[Senate Hearing 116-28] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] S. Hrg. 116-28 NOMINATION OF JOSEPH V. CUFFARI ======================================================================= HEARING BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY AND GOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED SIXTEENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION __________ NOMINATION OF JOSEPH V. CUFFARI TO BE INSPECTOR GENERAL, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY __________ MARCH 5, 2019 Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.govinfo.gov Printed for the use of the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs [GRAPHIC NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT] __________ U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 35-771 PDF WASHINGTON : 2019 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Publishing Office, http://bookstore.gpo.gov. For more information, contact the GPO Customer Contact Center, U.S. Government Publishing Office. Phone 202-512-1800, or 866-512-1800 (toll-free). E-mail, [email protected]. COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY AND GOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS RON JOHNSON, Wisconsin, Chairman ROB PORTMAN, Ohio GARY C. PETERS, Michigan RAND PAUL, Kentucky THOMAS R. CARPER, Delaware JAMES LANKFORD, Oklahoma MAGGIE HASSAN, New Hampshire MITT ROMNEY, Utah KAMALA D. HARRIS, California RICK SCOTT, Florida KYRSTEN SINEMA, Arizona MICHAEL B. ENZI, Wyoming JACKY ROSEN, Nevada JOSH HAWLEY, Missouri Gabrielle D'Adamo Singer, Staff Director M. Scott Austin, U.S. Coast Guard Detailee David M. Weinberg, Minority Staff Director Zachary I. Schram, Minority Chief Counsel Alexa E. Noruk, Minority Director of Homeland Security Laura W. Kilbride, Chief Clerk Thomas J. Spino, Hearing Clerk C O N T E N T S ------ Opening statements: Page Senator Johnson.............................................. 1 Senator Peters............................................... 2 Senator Lankford............................................. 11 Senator Rosen................................................ 14 Senator Scott................................................ 15 Senator Carper............................................... 18 Prepared statements: Senator Johnson.............................................. 23 Senator Peters............................................... 24 Senator Sinema............................................... 26 WITNESSES Tuesday, March 5, 2019 Hon. Martha McSally, A United States Senator from the State of Arizona........................................................ 4 Joseph V. Cuffari to be Inspector General, U.S. Department of Homeland Security Testimony.................................................... 5 Prepared statement........................................... 27 Biographical and financial information....................... 30 Biographical Questionnaire-Supplement........................ 45 Letter from the Office of Government Ethics.................. 46 Responses to pre-hearing questions........................... 49 Responses to post-hearing questions.......................... 60 Letters of support........................................... 72 APPENDIX Minors and Families Chart........................................ 79 NOMINATION HEARING OF JOSEPH V. CUFFARI TO BE INSPECTOR GENERAL U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY ---------- TUESDAY, MARCH 5, 2019 U.S. Senate, Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, Washington, DC. The Committee met, pursuant to notice, at 2:32 p.m., in room SD-342, Dirksen Senate Office Building, Hon. Ron Johnson, Chairman of the Committee, presiding. Present: Senators Johnson, Lankford, Scott, Peters, Carper, Hassan, Harris, and Rosen. OPENING STATEMENT OF CHAIRMAN JOHNSON Chairman Johnson. Good afternoon. This hearing is called to order. We are meeting today to consider the nomination of Joseph Cuffari to be the Inspector General (IG) of the United States Department of Homeland Security (DHS), a pretty important position. I just want to start out, I will ask that my written statement be entered into the record.\1\ I see we have Senator McSally here to introduce Mr. Cuffari. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ The prepared statement of Senator Johnson appears in the Appendix on page 23. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Also, I just want to point out that Senator Sinema also would like to be here. She actually asked us to move the hearing, but it was very difficult to reschedule. But she was also highly supportive and disappointed she could not be here at the hearing. I will keep my comments pretty brief here. This Committee in particular really relies on Inspectors General. With the Government Accountability Office (GAO), we have the High-Risk List hearing tomorrow. We have seen issues and problems with Inspectors General where they have been captured by the agency--the DHS Inspector General from about 5 or 6 years ago, I would say the Veterans Affairs (VA) Inspector General, the investigation we did with the Tomah VA with mixed toxicity of overprescription of opioids resulting in the death of veterans because we did not have an independent Inspector General. And, truthfully, I understand how that dynamic works. I think in either your written questions or your testimony, you refer to the fact that your primary customer is the Secretary of the Department, and that is very appropriate. In general, what Inspectors General are doing is inspecting and doing investigations to create a better Department, which means that information is going to be available to the Secretary. So you become invested in that Department. You want to see that Department succeed, which is why you are doing all these investigations. So it can be very difficult at some point in time to air the dirty laundry, but it is crucial that we have an independent Inspector General to do just that. Mr. Cuffari, your public service is exemplary. I want to thank you for your past service. I want to thank you for your willingness to serve again. This is not an easy post. I particularly want to thank your family. I know you have some of them here, and I will let you introduce them later. As you know, government service is a family sacrifice, a family act of service. So, again, I just want to thank you for being here and for your willingness to serve. I want to thank your family, too, because you probably do not see them much anyway, and you will probably see them less with this new assignment. And I do not want to talk anybody out of anything. With that, I will quick turn it over to my Ranking Member, Senator Peters. OPENING STATEMENT OF SENATOR PETERS\1\ Senator Peters. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. And thank you, Dr. Cuffari, for being here today and for your willingness to take on what is going to be a very challenging role. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ The prepared statement of Senator Peters appears in the Appendix on page 24. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- For over 40 years, Inspectors General have acted as independent, nonpartisan watchdogs that are tasked with preventing and uncovering fraud, waste, and abuse in the Federal Government and promoting efficiency in agency operations. Simply put, the Inspector General makes sure that government is doing what it is supposed to do, and when there are problems, as mentioned by Mr. Chairman, the Inspector General makes sure that the agency and Congress and the American people know exactly what is happening. I want to also concur that I know that Senator Sinema wanted to be here today to help introduce you, and in a written statement, she describes you as an ``honorable public servant.'' And, Mr. Chair, I would like to enter into the record, without objection, her full statement.\2\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \2\ The prepared statement of Senator Sinema appears in the Appendix on page 26. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Chairman Johnson. No objection. Senator Peters. We certainly need an honorable public servant in this position, and as an effective Inspector General, you must be a partner to agency leadership, as was mentioned, working together to identify areas at risk and certainly to prevent problems before they occur. But they also must be a partner with Congress and keeping us apprised of emerging issues and responding to our concerns as we work to ensure that taxpayer money is spent efficiently. An effective Inspector General must be a leader. The Department of Homeland Security Inspector General supervises almost 800 investigators, auditors, and other employees, all of whom look to the Inspector General for guidance and for direction. And, most importantly, the Inspector General must be independent and impartial, relentlessly following the facts wherever they may lead. And if confirmed, there will undoubtedly be times when you will have to push back on the Department's top officials. The integrity and the effectiveness of the Department will depend in part on public trust. The Department of Homeland Security is the third largest agency in the Federal Government with over 245,000 employees and a total budget of $75 billion. And as one of the Nation's most critical law enforcement and national security agencies, the Department is charged with safeguarding our Nation from threats both foreign and domestic. The Department has faced significant challenges, including recruitment shortfalls, low morale, high acquisition costs, and insufficient financial controls. Robust and adaptable oversight is absolutely essential to ensure that the Department is effectively safeguarding our communities and our tax dollars. Last week, I met with Secretary Nielsen to discuss some of the most pressing issues at the Department, including security and commerce at our Northern Border, cybersecurity challenges in Michigan and across the Nation, the rise of domestic extremist violence, and ensuring the Department's actions reflect the very core values of our country. And I made it clear that the Department must not discriminate against our fellow Americans because of where they are from or where they worship. Secretary Nielsen committed to work on these issues. My colleagues and I are going to rely on the Inspector General to help evaluate the Department's performance on these critical commitments. The Office of Inspector General (OIG) has performed critical work in preventing and rooting out fraud, waste, and abuse at the Department of Homeland Security, and this has included investigations into reprisal against whistleblowers, including the brave men and women who serve in the United States Coast Guard (USCG). The Inspector General's office has conducted random checks at detention facilities, work you yourself conducted at the Department of Justice (DOJ). And in 2018, investigations by the Inspector General directly resulted in nearly $36 million in recoveries, fines, and restitution to the Federal Government. It is critical that the Inspector General achieves high performance standards, and this is important that this work continues. When this body created the Department of Homeland Security in 2002, we also established the agency of Inspector General to hold the Department accountable. As we consider your nomination, sir, I will be considering your commitment to independence, integrity, impartiality, and ensuring that the Department acts as a responsible steward of taxpayers' dollars, and I certainly look forward to your testimony. Chairman Johnson. Thank you, Senator Peters. And, again, I think we have just an extraordinary candidate or nominee before us here with that type of record of independence, and so I am very confident. Again, Dr. Cuffari, we are going to let you introduce your own family members. We have a couple other distinguished guests. We would like to recognize the Hon. Eric Thorson, the IG for the Treasury Department; the Hon. David Buckley, former IG for the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA); and the Hon. Thomas Gilman, the Chief Financial Officer (CFO) and Assistant Secretary for the Commerce Department. Again, the fact that these individuals are here, together with the letters of recommendation we got, which I will also ask to enter into the record,\1\ speak to your qualifications and your integrity. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ The letters referenced by Senator Johnson appears in the Appendix on page 72. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- So, with that, I would like to recognize Senator Martha McSally to introduce Dr. Cuffari. Senator McSally. OPENING STATEMENT OF HON. MARTHA MCSALLY, A UNITED STATES SENATOR FROM THE STATE OF ARIZONA Senator McSally. Thank you, Chairman Johnson, Ranking Member Peters, and Members of the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs (HSGAC). Thanks for allowing me the opportunity to speak to you about Dr. Joseph Cuffari, known as ``Joe'' to many of us, who has been nominated to be the Department of Homeland Security Inspector General. The Inspector General plays an important role in oversight of the Department of Homeland Security, and as the Inspector General, Dr. Cuffari will lead a team that has been without a confirmed head since the early days of this Administration. He will be expected to ensure the Department accomplishes its vital national security and public safety mission. Dr. Cuffari's distinguished career in public service makes him well suited to execute these crucial duties. He enlisted, after graduating from high school, in the U.S. Air Force (USAF). Go, Air Force. Dr. Cuffari spent more than 40 years in the Air Force, including on active duty and the reserves and in the Arizona Air National Guard. Throughout his career, Joe developed key oversight skills while serving our country with distinction. From 1986 to 1993, Dr. Cuffari served in a number of senior positions in the Air Force Office of Special Investigations (AFOSI) Inspector General component. After leaving active duty, he spent two decades in the U.S. Department of Justice Office of Inspector General, retiring in 2013 as Assistant Special Agent in Charge for the Office of Inspector General in Tucson, Arizona. Since then, Joe has been a senior policy adviser to Arizona Governors Jan Brewer and Doug Ducey for veterans and public safety issues, and this is where I have gotten to know him over these last several years. I want to thank you, Dr. Cuffari, for your commitment to public service over these years, and I can tell you personally, Mr. Chairman and Ranking Member Peters, Joe is a man of honor and integrity and has a heart of service for our country, and he will always do what is right. And he is going to really excel and do a great job in this position, and it is my honor to introduce him. Thank you. Chairman Johnson. Thank you, Senator McSally. It is the tradition of this Committee to swear in witnesses, so if you will stand and raise your right hand. Do you swear that the testimony you will give before this Committee will be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help you, God? Mr. Cuffari. I do. Chairman Johnson. Please be seated. Senator McSally did a nice job of introducing you, but I will read your introduction as well. Dr. Joseph Cuffari has more than 35 years of experience in investigations and oversight. Dr. Cuffari began his career in 1978 as an enlisted aircraft maintainer at the United States Air Force. In 1986, he joined the Air Force Office of Special Investigations as an Assistant Agent in Charge and later served at the Department of Justice Office of Inspector General, including as the Assistant Special Agent in Charge of the Tucson, Arizona, Field Office. He currently advises the Arizona Governor on military, veterans, and homeland security issues. Dr. Cuffari served in the Air Force Reserve and Air National Guard until retiring in 2017. Dr. Cuffari. TESTIMONY OF JOSEPH V. CUFFARI,\1\ NOMINEE TO BE INSPECTOR GENERAL, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Mr. Cuffari. Chairman Johnson, Ranking Member Peters, and distinguished members of the Committee, I am deeply honored to appear before you today to be considered by this Committee as President Trump's nominee to be the next Inspector General for the Department of Homeland Security. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ The prepared statement of Mr. Cuffari appears in the Appendix on page 27. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- I am very grateful to the President and to Secretary Nielsen for the confidence they have placed in me in this critical position. I thank Senator McSally for her very kind introduction, and many thanks to Senator Kyl, Senator Flake, and Senator Sinema and Governor Ducey and Governor Brewer and their staffs for their support. I also thank the Members of this Committee and their staff for meeting with me as part of my nomination process. If I am confirmed, I pledge to continue our discussions regarding matters of mutual interest and concern. I thank my wife, Lynn; son, Joey; and daughter-in-law, Grace, for supporting me. Lynn and I have been married for more than 35 years. I promised her that we would travel and that our life would be an adventure. Lynn, it has been a ride. Much as things have changed over the decades, one thing remains firm: the support, friendship, and guidance from my parents, Vincent and Connie; my brother, Tony; and my in-laws, Raymond and Rosemary Mazza. Equally as important are those same qualities that are given by my cousins, friends, and other associates who came from as far as Arizona, Philadelphia, and the other territories of the country. I also extend a special thanks to those who keep me looking trim: my barbers Tony and Mario. I owe all that I have to my family, in particular the determination, foresight, and fortitude of my grandparents. By coming to America, they ensured that the generations that followed them would live in the greatest country in the world and be afforded opportunities they did not have. In the early 1900s, my grandfathers took long sea voyages from Italy to the United States and settled in Philadelphia. As the United States entered World War I, they enlisted in the U.S. Army and served in combat engineering teams on the front lines. Miraculously, they survived and returned to Philadelphia to start families. Now, 100 years later, as I appear before you as a nominee, I thank them and all of our veterans for their service to our country. I have spent my entire adult life in public service. My calling began when I enlisted in the Air Force after graduating from high school in 1977. My service includes a career in the Air Force on active duty, in the reserves, and in the Air National Guard. That time has been coupled with 20 years of experience with the U.S. Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General and a combined 12 years with components of the Department of Defense (DOD) Office of the Inspector General. During that time, I worked with seven Inspectors General and am grateful to them for their mentorship, guidance, and support. I also thank the Council of IGs for their support and recommendation for this position. In creating the OIGs, I believe Congress recognized the shortfall permitting agencies to exclusively investigate themselves. If I am confirmed, I commit to being an honest broker of information and to seek the truth. I am mindful that the powers bestowed upon an IG are vast. Therefore, if confirmed, I will ensure that the DHS IG is judicious in exercising its powers and investigates an allegation and not an individual. It is in that spirit that I will be fair and objective in my undertakings, and if I am confirmed, I will work with Congress to augment its vital oversight responsibilities. I believe IGs fill another equally important role as well: the duty to highlight effective and efficient services that are discovered during the course of their work. If confirmed, I will highlight those best practices with an equal degree of transparency. To the dedicated men and women of the Department of Homeland Security IG, I commit to you that, if I am confirmed, I will be your advocate and champion the critical work you have done and continue to do for the American people. Thank you for your service. To the Committee, I sincerely appreciate your consideration of my nomination. I look forward to answering your questions. Chairman Johnson. Thank you, Dr. Cuffari. We have three questions I ask all nominees, and I will ask them to you. Is there anything you are aware of in your background that might present a conflict of interest with the duties of the office to which you have been nominated? Mr. Cuffari. No. Chairman Johnson. Do you know of anything, personal or otherwise, that would in any way prevent you from fully and honorably discharging the responsibilities of the office to which you have been nominated? Mr. Cuffari. No. Chairman Johnson. Do you agree without reservation to comply with any request or summons to appear and testify before any duly constituted committee of Congress if you are confirmed? Mr. Cuffari. Yes. Chairman Johnson. Thank you. Normally I defer questioning, but you said a couple of things in your opening comments, and I got some information right off the presses here, and I will actually hand it out to my colleagues. First, you brought up the point that obviously your family emigrated from a different country into the United States, I am sure seeking opportunity, as most of our ancestors did. So we are a Nation of immigrants. You also said, ``If confirmed, I commit to being an honest broker of information and to seek the truth.'' We have a huge problem in this Nation in terms of a broken immigration system. As I have been working with my staff, one of the things we are trying to do with the manufacturing background is going through the problem-solving process. You gather information, define the problem, root-cause analysis, then establish achievable goals, then design the solution. One of the things I have found most vexing in the whole issue of immigration and border security is just information is very difficult to come by. It changes over the years. We kind of define things differently. Quite honestly, in terms of illegal immigration, the problem has completely shifted from the highs, I think, the top number of individuals we ever apprehended coming across the border illegally is something like 1.6, 1.7 million people over a decade ago. But those were Mexican economic migrants, oftentimes apprehended multiple times the same day. Today we face a different issue, and that is what this chart\1\ is about. I am passing it out because we just got updated information. This, I believe, is our current problem. Because of our laws that treat, for example, unaccompanied children from Central America differently than we would from Mexican or Canadian unaccompanied children, because of the Flores Agreement that was challenged in court and there is now a reinterpretation of it, people that come in as family units also basically cannot be detained, so we are in full catch-and- release. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ The chart referenced by Senator Johnson appears in the Appendix on page 79. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- So what this chart shows is the red blocks are children, unaccompanied children coming in from Central America, illegally apprehended between the borders, up to 2011, about 4,000 per year. Then President Obama announced the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) memorandum, and although it does not apply to anybody that came in since, it was used as a catalyst by the coyotes, the drug traffickers who have become human traffickers. We just read a horrific story of individuals being abused because of women being put into the sex trade in the New York Times. I would ask everybody to read that if you want to see what the problem is. But the information we have gotten now, because we incentivize and we reward basically by allowing people to stay, if you come in as an unaccompanied child or as part of a family unit, we have gone from 2014, which was the big problem here--that is when President Obama declared a humanitarian crisis, and we all agreed, and the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) really did a yeoman's job of responding to that and setting up facilities to delouse and clean and provide medical attention. 120,000 thousand people came to this country in 2014 as either an unaccompanied minor or as part of a family unit. Last year, 145,000 people came in those two categories. The latest information, in the first 5 months now of this year, 159,000 people have come into this country illegally between the ports of entry (POEs), taking a very dangerous journey, as either an unaccompanied child, but more and more as a family unit because it is very advantageous for them to do that. This is a problem. But the only reason I can display this problem is we are starting to get some more accurate information. And so I wanted to make this point, but I also wanted to hopefully engage you, as hopefully the confirmed Inspector General, to work with this Committee, to take a look at how we gather information, how consistent it is, and how that can be delivered on a very regular basis to Congress and, even more importantly, to the American public. Now, I know you are adviser to Governor Ducey on homeland security issues. Do you have any comments in terms of what we are seeing here? I mean, you are right down there in Arizona on the border. Can you just comment on the current situation and what as Inspector General you want to take a look at to help improve the Department's performance along those areas? Mr. Cuffari. Senator, I would just like to clarify. I am Governor Ducey's military and veterans affairs policy adviser. I do not advise the Governor on homeland security matters. Chairman Johnson. Oh, OK. Do you have any comments on this at all, though? You are going to be, obviously, Inspector General. This is going to be a big issue. You will be asked to take a look at, are we following policies in detention facilities, are we following the law? I mean, there are so many issues wrapped up with Customs and Border Protection and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). This is a very controversial, very contentious issue, and certainly this Committee and the American public want to make sure that we treat people with real humanity and that we are following the rules. Mr. Cuffari. Senator, I will comment, and I commit to you 100 percent, to you and the Members of this Committee, that I will be responsive, if I am confirmed as the Inspector General. Chairman Johnson. In my opening comments, I talked about the independence and what I have seen time and time again, quite honestly, is Inspectors General being captured by the agencies and how that is--we are all human beings. We like people. We develop loyalties to people. You are working for an organization, and you want to see that organization succeed. You obviously have a great deal of experience of independence in this role. Talk about your attitude, how you combat that very human tendency to, in the end being somewhat of a cheerleader for the Department that you are asked to be an independent Inspector General for. Mr. Cuffari. Senator, I go back to taking an oath of office as an Air Force officer and as a member of the Arizona Air National Guard. My ultimate responsibility is to follow the Constitution and determine that the laws of the land are being followed. Chairman Johnson. OK. Senator Peters. Senator Peters. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Mr. Cuffari, as you have heard over and over again from both of us, we are expecting strong, independent oversight, which is absolutely essential, if confirmed in this position. So I just want you to be very clear on the record for me, please. If you are confirmed, will you commit to responding to requests from Members of Congress and particularly Members of this Committee in a consistent manner and regardless of the party of someone from this Committee asking for your response? Mr. Cuffari. Senator, you have my absolute commitment to doing such a thing. Senator Peters. Do you believe that DHS management should comply with requests for documents and information from Members of this Committee as well, regardless of party? Mr. Cuffari. I believe the Department should follow the law in their application of the law and provide those documents that are applicable and can be provided. Senator Peters. So if I get your answer, in principle, if you are saying you are going to follow policy, but is it a core principle, do you believe, that this Committee gets information that we have constitutional duties in terms of oversight and that we should get those documents if we ask for them? Mr. Cuffari. Yes, Senator. Senator Peters. I also appreciate your answers to the Chairman regarding your independence and your desire to be objective. But I have to say, unfortunately, under this Administration we have seen some very troubling attempts to undermine the statutory independence of IGs across the Federal Government. Last October, we learned of plans to abruptly replace the Department of Interior's (DOI) Acting IG with a political appointee with no governmental oversight experience whatsoever. More recently, I was deeply concerned by recent efforts by the Department of Education officials to interfere with the work of that Department's Inspector General. On January 3, 2019, the Deputy Secretary of the Department of Education sent a letter to the Acting Inspector General urging her to ``reconsider its planned review'' of a departmental action or redirect the inquiry into actions taken by a previous Administration instead of the current Administration. Further, the letter went on to demand a clear, written explanation in the event that the Inspector General did not adhere to the Deputy Secretary's request. So given these instances, Mr. Cuffari, do you think that it is ever appropriate for an agency official to direct an Inspector General to drop or change a planned or ongoing inquiry? Mr. Cuffari. I think it is appropriate for the Inspector General to follow the Inspector General Act. It provides, as you know, the relief if such an instance were to occur. And I do not have the facts because obviously I am not in the Education Department or in the Interior Department. But if that were to occur, there is a relief valve built into the IG Act that permits the IG to go directly to Congress and express their concerns. Senator Peters. So in the IG Act, there are only three scenarios where the DHS Secretary may prohibit the IG from carrying out or completing an audit or investigation, if the Secretary determines that such prohibition is necessary in order to: one, prevent the disclosure of specific categories of sensitive information; two, preserve the national security; or, three, prevent a significant impairment to the interests of the United States. However, the IG Act clearly places the burden on the Secretary, if the Secretary chooses to invoke this authority to restrict the IG's work. So, in fact, the IG Act states that the Secretary shall notify the DHS IG in writing within 7 days stating the reasons. So you were saying you would follow this act? There would have to be these fairly pretty big reasons for interfering with your investigation and you would vigorously push back on a Secretary that was trying to limit your independence? Mr. Cuffari. Yes, Senator, that is exactly what I am saying. Senator Peters. Great. So in the event that an Inspector General and Department head disagree about what the objectives or scope of the review or investigation should be, who do you think makes the final decision? Mr. Cuffari. I think that the final decision, Senator, would come from this body, from the Chairman and from you as the Ranking Member. Senator Peters. Well, this is the objectives or scope of a particular review or investigation that you are conducting. Do you think you would come back to us for that? Or would you let the Secretary know that unless you have this act invoked, it is up to you to make those decisions? Mr. Cuffari. It is. But if the Secretary were to invoke those, this decision would have to then be made by this body. Senator Peters. If confirmed, what specific steps will you take to ensure that the work of the DHS Inspector General's office remains objective and independent? I am pleased with your commitment to do that, but I would certainly like to get a better sense of how you would do that in the face of what could be some agency pressure? Mr. Cuffari. Senator, if confirmed, I intend to have a professional relationship with the Secretary and ensure that the concerns that she has about the function of the Department are addressed by the IG. I also equally would want to ensure that, if confirmed as the IG, I would have an equally professional relationship with you and your staff members to address those same concerns. Senator Peters. Will you commit to releasing Inspector General reports to the public, even in the face of agency objections, to the maximum extent possible under the law? Mr. Cuffari. To the maximum extent possible under the law, yes. Senator Peters. Since 2016, the DHS OIG has conducted unannounced inspections of ICE detention facilities as part of an ongoing review to identify violations of the agency's detention standards. Recently, representatives from nonprofit advocacy groups visited a facility housing at least nine infants under one year of age and have raised concerns over the lack of specialized medical care available for these young children. So my question to you, sir, is: Will you commit to continuing the OIG's DHS detention oversight program, including examining the ability of--or the availability, I should say, of medical care for infants, young children, and pregnant women? Mr. Cuffari. Yes, Senator. Senator Peters. And how do you propose to do that? Mr. Cuffari. I propose to lay out a game plan once I understand what the work requirements are and perhaps use other subject matter experts like medical doctors, physicians, psychologists, social workers to assist the IG's office in conducting its oversight role. Senator Peters. Thank you. Chairman Johnson. Dr. Cuffari, just to quickly clarify your answers to Senator Peters, if the Secretary were to come to you and try to close down an investigation that is not of those No. 3, you would notify this Committee of that attempt. Correct? Mr. Cuffari. Absolutely, Senator. Chairman Johnson. And if she under legal authority shut down an investigation for those three reasons, you would also come to this Committee and make sure that we were made aware of that? Mr. Cuffari. That is correct. Chairman Johnson. OK. Senator Lankford. OPENING STATEMENT OF SENATOR LANKFORD Senator Lankford. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. May I call you ``Joe''? Mr. Cuffari. Absolutely, Senator. Senator Lankford. Thanks for bringing your family here, Joe. This is a big day, and it has been a long process to be able to get to this day. There is not a short route to be able to get to that table. We are grateful for Inspectors General. This Committee is very passionate about it. That is why you will hear questions over and over again about your independence. You work for the American people and for Congress, uniquely not for the agency that you are housed in. You work down the hall, but you work from a separate entity, for the American people, and for Congress, not the Executive Branch. And so we are grateful for the work that is there and for what you are taking on, because it is a tough role. I have a whole litany of questions I want to be able to bounce through you, though. Let me start with election security. DHS has made some significant strides toward protecting our national election system. Our elections are not Federal. They are local, and they are State. But we have a great partnership with that, and that partnership seems to be growing stronger. There was a lot of distance. The previous DHS started calling States to say there is a problem with a foreign actor trying to get into our system, and there was very little relationship that was there. This DHS has worked very hard to establish relationships. What I need to hear is you are going to stay engaged on things like making sure there are security clearances in States, so that if there is a problem, there is somebody in the State to be able to do rapid conversation with, that DHS maintains those relationships. Relationships are easy to start. They are hard to maintain. And so just doing the work of maintaining the State relationships with election individuals and the vigilance on our systems for our national elections that, again, are State-run. Any issues or questions about that for you? Mr. Cuffari. Absolutely none, Senator. Senator Lankford. Any background for you in working on election security issues or any of the relationships with DHS? Have you touched on any of those issues before? Mr. Cuffari. I have not, not on election security. Senator Lankford. Well, you will get baptized into the system, because it is its own unique dynamic as you go through it, because there are a lot of nuances with it. But just help us stay on track on those things as well. The morale in DHS and among DHS employees has been historically low. In fact, as you look at the morale of employees over the years, DHS has been year after year very low. I think part of the reason for that is many of those employees have been perpetually beat up by Congress and by other folks. They are second-guessed a lot, and they make exceptionally difficult decisions on the fly. Some of the border areas of the United States have had more than 100 percent increases in individuals coming at them, and you have a small group trying to be able to make hard decisions, and they get second-guessed a lot. We are going to need your help and your insight. I do not want there to be an entity within the Federal Government, especially one as important at the work of DHS, to have low morale. Have you seen some of the previous reads before on low morale in DHS? And do you have any initial ideas about doing an investigation to be able to find out why? Mr. Cuffari. Senator, let me start off by first saying that I am committed to working with you and the Members of the Committee to identify those issues that may be challenges within the Department. I would first like, again, if I am confirmed as the IG, to ensure that challenges within the Office of the IG are addressed and the morale is increased there, if it is at some other lower point, and then assist the Secretary with identifying areas that can be increased to help the Secretary with increasing morale within the Department. Senator Lankford. We have DHS employees scattered certainly around the country but also around the world, and they work in very remote locations often, and they have exceptionally difficult tasks. We are incredibly grateful for the law enforcement tasks that they do, but at times they feel undersupported, and we want to help fix that. But we are going to need your insight to be able to know exactly how to be able to do that, and I would expect you to be able to interact with the Secretary to say, ``We have low morale, and this seems to be a reason.'' The Secret Service has been one of those entities that has been really tough. They have been underequipped for a while. There are issues around career path and having an unstable career path, overtime pay, multiple differences with other law enforcement within DHS have had some differences. I will have an expectation that in a year forward or so we can come back and talk about this and to see what needs to be done to be able to improve the situation for the Secret Service. There has also been a longstanding issue at DHS over hiring authority in their human resource (HR) department. That has been a struggle. That still goes back to the birth of DHS and trying to combine all those entities into one, and they are still struggling with computer systems and HR systems as well. We will have an expectation that you will be able to help look over somebody's shoulder and help solve a problem that has not been solved in almost two decades. Are you up to that? Mr. Cuffari. Absolutely, Senator. Senator Lankford. The law enforcement capabilities are also something that we do not have enough time to be able to go through all of it, but there is a great need for somebody looking over their shoulder, giving counsel to the Secretary, and noticing some of the things that are different. For instance, law enforcement authorities are different whether it is a Customs and Border Patrol marine vessel off the coast or a Coast Guard vessel. Now, they are both under DHS authority, but their paths to actually do an interdiction are exceptionally different. The Coast Guard vessel, it may take an hour or more to be able to do an interdiction what Customs and Border Patrol could do immediately, because the Coast Guard is having to play ``Mother, May I?'' all the time back to base to be able to radio in and ask, ``Can I take the next step?'' The boat then may be 100 miles away from it. Customs and Border Patrol can do that quickly. I cannot figure out why those two have such different systems and why one is more hamstrung than the other. This would be an area where you can help us untie. Again, this is a two-decade process of trying to be able to pull stuff together, but it is an area that they notice on the ground that does not often bubble up to other places. What we are counting on you for is to be able to step into some of those locations with your teams and to be able to say, ``All these are DHS family members. What can we do to be able to make sure it is more streamlined?'' Part of the morale issue, my guess is because we have never been able to get back to where it is, one area seems more hamstrung than the other when they all think we have a common Secretary, and we do not have common procedures and practices within it. So it would be very helpful to be able to step in and to be able to see some of that stuff, at least make recommendations to the Secretary. My perception is many of those things will not need congressional action. They just need repair internally. Are you up to that kind of task as well? Mr. Cuffari. Absolutely, Senator. Senator Lankford. We look forward to your leadership in it, and we look forward to getting a chance to be able to chat with you. You are looking over everybody else's shoulder. We will look over yours. And I look forward to you coming back to this place so we can get a chance to be able to pick your brain on this. Again, thanks to you for going through the process, and thanks to your family as well. You have definitely taken them on an adventure through your marriage, it sounds like, so thank you. Mr. Cuffari. Thank you, sir. Chairman Johnson. Senator Rosen. OPENING STATEMENT OF SENATOR ROSEN Senator Rosen. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. And thank you. We had a chance to speak privately earlier. Thank you to your family and for your willingness to step up to this very important position. So I have a couple of questions based on some of the things we were able to speak about earlier. My first one is about Temporary Protected Status (TPS), and, there have been serious allegations of improper political interference in the decisionmaking process surrounding the termination of Temporary Protected Status for people from El Salvador, Nicaragua, and, of course, several other countries. We have thousands of TPS folks right in Nevada. So during a private meeting in my office, we discussed the need for you and your office to be responsive to all Members of this Committee who exercise an important oversight function. I want to thank you for agreeing when we met to investigate DHS' role in the termination of TPS for these individuals should I or other Members of the Committee request that of you in writing, which I plan to do. So will you confirm for me today that you will investigate the termination of TPS after your confirmation when I request that you do so on behalf of my constituents in Nevada? Mr. Cuffari. Senator, if I am confirmed as the IG, I will take your request and give it due consideration. I did commit to you to investigate matters of concern to you and other Members of this Committee. Senator Rosen. Thank you. In the same vein, I want to talk a little bit about family separation, and the IG Act requires that the DHS Inspector General immediately report to the Secretary any particularly serious or flagrant problems, abuses, or deficiencies relating to the Administration of programs or operations. We know there have been serious issues so far. So based on the information that is publicly available to you at this time, would you consider the policy of separating children from their parents a particularly serious or flagrant problem or abuse? Mr. Cuffari. Senator, as you know, I am not in the Department. I am not in the management chain currently---- Senator Rosen. What you know from public information. Mr. Cuffari. I would like to take and obtain all the facts that the Secretary and others within the Administration arrived at making that policy. Senator Rosen. So you will take a look at separating families, infants, and children from their parents? Mr. Cuffari. Senator, I will take a look, again, if I am confirmed as the IG, at any matters that concern this body. Senator Rosen. So you have a little bit of past work, of course, as a policy adviser to the Governor of Arizona since 2013. So for about a year and a half, from July 2013 to February 2015, you served as Arizona Governor's office liaison contact to the Arizona Joint Border Security Advisory Committee. Can you tell us a little bit about that committee and what your role as liaison contact entailed? Mr. Cuffari. I believe, Senator, that was a committee that was formed by the Arizona State Legislature in statute. It required a member of the Governor's staff to be a member of that council, but---- Senator Rosen. And what was your role on the committee? Mr. Cuffari. To my knowledge, I never attended any meeting that they had. Senator Rosen. And so did you have any role in the implementation of the then-Governor of Arizona's immigration policies on that committee? Mr. Cuffari. I did not. Senator Rosen. So the last question I have, I would like to talk a little bit about whistleblowers. We talked about this in my office, too. And so how do you plan to address allegations by some ICE agents that agency whistleblowers have faced improper workplace retaliation? Mr. Cuffari. Again, if I am confirmed as the IG, I want to ensure that the IG's Office of Whistleblower is robustly staffed, that they screen incoming complaints and report them to me for evaluation. I think it is intolerable for someone to be retaliated against. Senator Rosen. And what courses of remedy might you seek if you thought that whistleblowers were being retaliated against? Mr. Cuffari. To conduct or ask to have an investigation conducted and evaluate all the facts and make a final decision and recommendation. Senator Rosen. So I guess I was wrong. I guess I do have one last question, and the question is this: How do you really view the role of the agency of Inspector General in the broadest sense? And so how will you determine what you are going to need to investigate? You have a lot of areas to work with, and so how are you going to prioritize and take care of the job, this very big job of Inspector General? Mr. Cuffari. I view the role of the Inspector General as a nonpartisan fact finder to lay out the truth as the facts are presented. I will screen requests for investigations, audits, and inspections based--and the priority would be those that are immediately affecting or degrading public safety or national security, and then work down through the list from there. Senator Rosen. And do you think you will be able to do this with your own autonomy that the Inspector General's office requires? Mr. Cuffari. I think it is critical that I be able to do that with my own autonomy. Senator Rosen. And if you felt there was a threat to that autonomy, how would you respond? Mr. Cuffari. Senator, I would come to this body and explain it to the Chairman, the Ranking Member, and the other Members of the Committee. Senator Rosen. Thank you. Thank you for your time. Mr. Cuffari. Thank you. Chairman Johnson. Senator Scott. OPENING STATEMENT OF SENATOR SCOTT Senator Scott. First, thank you for your service. Mr. Cuffari. Thank you, sir. Senator Scott. I guess you could not get in the Navy at the time. Is that why you did the Air Force? [Laughter.] Mr. Cuffari. Could not get in. Senator Scott. I gave my Dad trouble because he did the Army. First off, thank you for all you have done, and thank you for all your public service. You have done a lot of different things. What is the closest of things you have done in the past to this job? Is there a similar job that you have had in the past that you can bring--you say, ``I am going to bring that experience to the table, and that is why I can do a good job with this?'' Mr. Cuffari. Senator, I would say that the 20-plus years in the U.S. Department of Justice as a criminal investigator, coupled, again, with about 12 years with the Air Force Office of Special Investigations, and with the Department of Defense IG collectively provides me with the skill set that I believe an IG needs to conduct impartial investigations. Senator Scott. In those experiences, did you ever have any concern that people above you were trying to stifle your ability to investigate something and make the right thing happen? Mr. Cuffari. No, sir. Senator Scott. OK. So you feel confident that you should be able to do this job without that, I guess? You do not believe somebody is going to try to compromise your ability to do your job? Mr. Cuffari. I cannot speak for future events, although my commitment is if I felt that that was going to happen or was happening, I would come to this Committee with my concerns. Senator Scott. I just finished 8 years as Governor of Florida, and we have had a lot of hurricanes, and there are a lot of Federal resources that come after a hurricane or any sort of disaster. One of the concerns I have had is: Is that money going to be spent well? We are sitting here, we are running deficits. We have $22 trillion worth of debt and all these things. And one thing I tried to do at the State level is just try to make sure--I do not care whether it is Federal or State resources--that it was spent well. Do you think that is something that as an IG you will be able to have an impact on? Mr. Cuffari. Absolutely. I think one of the roles of the IG is to determine the efficiency and be a good fiduciary responsibility of the taxpayers' money. Senator Scott. Have you had experience in your prior jobs to have concerns about spending, whether it is just wasteful spending or inefficient spending? Mr. Cuffari. Yes, sir. Senator Scott. And were you able to make anything happen to try to stop it? Mr. Cuffari. We wrote a recommendation. It concerned the Immigration and Naturalization Service's (INS) contract for services, a multi-million-dollar contract, that we made some recommendations. This was when the Immigration Service was in the Justice Department, and those recommendations were followed. Senator Scott. OK. So if somebody came to you with a story that a Federal agency would buy the same services from the same company at a significant multiple of what a State could buy, would that give you concern? Mr. Cuffari. It would give me concern, but not knowing all the facts, I would need to take a look at that, certainly. Senator Scott. OK. And that is something, if somebody came to you, you would be interested in looking at? Mr. Cuffari. Most certainly. Senator Scott. OK. Thank you. Mr. Cuffari. Yes, sir. Chairman Johnson. Thank you, Senator Scott. And I am going to publicly prod you to take on that mission of some of that oversight as well. You have time if you want to kind of lay out that one example. Senator Scott. OK. I will give you the story. So I have gone through all these hurricanes, and people came to me after--I had two bad ones my seventh and eighth year, which is probably good because I learned a lot the first 6 years. But on debris pickup, I did not realize how much money is spent. It is just unbelievable amounts of money is spent after these hurricanes. The Corps of Engineers could do it or the State could do it. The Feds pay for a portion in either case. It appears that in one case the Feds pay more. But the contract was dramatically different in price. Same company. The Federal contract was multiples more expensive than our contracts we had in the State. As far as I can tell, there is no accountability. Nothing has happened. I assume the next hurricane--and I felt like I was, first a fiduciary for the State and then a fiduciary also for the Federal Government, so I did not waste the money. But somebody could. It would have been easier. It actually would probably be easier if I had waited and picked the Federal contract for me. If that is an example, you always assume if you find one big one like that, there is probably another one. Chairman Johnson. So I have to keep prodding you because I think you have given me some numbers. What did the State pay? What was the contract? Senator Scott. My understanding of the numbers--and, Chairman, I am going to get all these numbers public and try to---- Chairman Johnson. So, again, I am prodding you off the top of your head, so Politifact, do not hold---- Senator Scott. This is not exact numbers. So we would have--the counties--the way it worked is after the hurricane, the Feds would pay 75 percent, the county would pay 12.5 percent, and the State paid 12.5 percent, until we hit a certain threshold, then the Feds paid 90 percent, we paid 5 percent, and the county paid 5 percent. The contracts that the county had pre-landfall, which is what they are supposed to do, it was somewhere between seven and eight-fifty a cubic yard. Do you know what the Corps' contract was? Over seventy. I got more people calling me to say, ``You really ought to turn that over to the Corps.'' And so, one, it is an unbelievable extra amount. It is not a little bit of money. I do not know if people realize how much money is spent on this debris pickup. It could be $1 billion per hurricane, right? And then you look at why are we paying the multiples. It does not matter what party you are in. We do not want to waste money, and we know we have a deficit problem, and we know we have a debt problem. And so I do not want to waste anybody's money. So, Chairman, the way I was thinking about it is try to take all because apples to apples would be all the States that have hurricane risk, because that is where I think most of the debris pickup would be. I am going to find out. I am going to find out what exactly the contract is, and then I am also going to look at what each of the States--because I assume they are in the same position as Florida. What we did is we had contracts before, but in Michael, which is the one we had last year, we did post-hurricane contracts, and it was not much difference in pricing. Chairman Johnson. This is exactly what I am trying to get Committee members---- Senator Scott. It is a lot of money. Chairman Johnson [continuing]. Is really champion a particular cause where you have knowledge, but that is 10 times--in business, we call that an ``order of magnitude difference,'' which is amazing. Senator Scott. Yes. Chairman Johnson. So, anyway---- Senator Scott. I want to get the exact numbers. Chairman Johnson. Right. I got you. You are in charge of the project. Senator Scott. Yes. Chairman Johnson. Senator Carper. OPENING STATEMENT OF SENATOR CARPER Senator Carper. To my right are two new Senators. Before they became Senators, one was a U.S. Representative and one was Governor. And when I was elected to the U.S. House many years ago, before I was Governor, we had orientation for new Members of the House, and we spent literally a week together learning the ropes and getting to know each other. It was hugely helpful. It is one of my favorite memories of being in the House of Representatives. As Governor, I remember going to my first New Governors School as a newly elected Governor with my wife and the person who was going to be my chief of staff. I loved New Governors School. It was about 3 days. We went off to Roy Romer's State, Colorado. He was the Chair of the National Governors Association (NGA). We had about 20 Governors that cycled in and out, just to come in and tell us all the mistakes they had made and saying, ``Learn from my mistakes.'' And we did. I remember to this day, I can just go almost down the line telling you the things that I learned from them in these private meetings, small-group meetings. And here in the Senate we did not have anything like an orientation for new Senators, and Lamar Alexander and I and a couple of others established it, about 12 years ago, and I think it is better than nothing, maybe not as good as it could or should be. But when you get confirmed--and I think you will--who do you have to reach out to, to say, ``Now what do I do?'' Although what I did in the Senate when I got here, I knew a bunch of people who had served in the other House, and I knew a bunch of folks we had been Governors together. Some people I did not know at all, and relationships are really important in everything, including the work we do. I remember just going and having a cup of coffee with the Senators I did not know, and when you come out and say, ``I sure would like to learn from you. I would like to have your help,'' people will do that. But have you thought at all about those relationships and how you might come up to speed to do this job well? Mr. Cuffari. Yes, Senator, and as I mentioned---- Senator Carper. Maybe you will have a New IG School or something. Mr. Cuffari. I look to my mentors, current IGs, Glenn Fine, Michael Horowitz, the Council of Inspector Generals for Integrity and Efficiency (CIGIE), and to, quite frankly, this Committee for its knowledge, and hopefully you will share your insights and concerns with me, and we could do a better job together. Senator Carper. OK. Thanks for visiting with me yesterday. One of the things we talked about was force multipliers, and we think of force multipliers along the border with Mexico, and we have the Border Patrol. But we also have avionics and we have surveillance systems. We have boats, we have horses, we have all those force multipliers. I mentioned to you, I think, the IG offices along with GAO, along with us, the oversight Committee in the Senate, the oversight Committee in the House, that we can all be force multipliers. As Governor Scott, also known as Senator Scott, has just said, we do have a huge and growing deficit. The deficit last year I just learned was $757 billion. This year we are looking at $850 billion. Next year we are looking at $1 trillion. That is just unsustainable and unimaginable. And we need to do everything we can in order to address it. I mentioned to you the GAO High-Risk List, and I mentioned to you specifically the work that Jane Holl Lute did as Deputy Secretary in Homeland Security when Janet Napolitano was the Secretary. And she literally went and met with Gene Dodaro every month and said, ``How do we get off of your High-Risk List?'' And ultimately they did in many respects. I have one question that is personal and one back to business. I understand that you have some members of your family here. I got here too late to actually hear you introduce them. But are they sitting to your left? Mr. Cuffari. My wife, Lynn, is behind me, and my brother is sitting right next to her--Tony--and then the other---- Senator Carper. Your brother, what is his name? Mr. Cuffari. Tony. Senator Carper. Is he the one who has been rolling his eyes when you spoke? [Laughter.] I used to have a brother like that. Mr. Cuffari. I suspect he is not the only one doing that. [Laughter.] Senator Carper. Anybody else? Mr. Cuffari. I have cousins, family members, families and friends. The whole back of the gallery here is to support me. Senator Carper. Well, that is great. We welcome all of you. I think Senator Rosen mentioned that you served as Governor Brewer's liaison to the Arizona Border Security Advisory Committee, and if confirmed, do you pledge to assess, inspect, and investigate the Department's border security operations impartially and without regard to any political views that you may hold? Mr. Cuffari. Absolutely, Senator. Senator Carper. OK. Thank you. As we have discussed, DHS has made progress in recent years in improving its management--there is still more to do; there is always more to do--but still faces a number of significant challenges. And we talked a little bit about this when we met, but I just want to come back to it again. What do you think are some of the biggest management challenges at the Department? And how can you, if confirmed as IG, help the agency address those challenges? Mr. Cuffari. Senator, from what is available on the IG's public site, challenges relate to management of the Department's stovepiping, cybersecurity concerns, and border security, from what I recall. Senator Carper. Talk about the relationship that you would hope to have with the leadership of the Department, including the Secretary. Mr. Cuffari. I believe, again, if I am confirmed, I will strive to have a very professional relationship with the Secretary, the senior leaders in the Department, as well as with this Committee and other Members of Congress. Senator Carper. When we were down in Central America, the Secretary and I--and the Chairman and I have been down to Central America a time or two to visit Honduras, Guatemala, and El Salvador, and I was back down there in a codel that I was privileged to lead a few weeks ago during our recess. I said to the countries down there--we talked about something called ``the Alliance for Prosperity,'' which is like a Central American version of Plan Colombia, which has actually been quite successful. I described both Plan Colombia and the Alliance for Prosperity as ``You can do it. We can help.'' And I think that is not a bad way to approach your job and with the Department. I think it is important when people screw up, you blow the whistle on them, but also you can be really effective by trying to help folks. And just like Jane Holl Lute was looking for help at the Deputy Secretary--and she got a lot of help from GAO. They just did not say, ``We are going to just rip you apart.'' They said, ``We are going to help and help the Department,'' and amazing things happened. Hopefully, that will be of some help to you. Mr. Cuffari. Absolutely. I look forward to meeting her, Senator. Senator Carper. Good. I just want to say to your wife--I can barely see your wife back there--thank you for your willingness to share this man with our country. Thank you. Chairman Johnson. Thank you, Senator Carper. You mentioned our trip down to Guatemala and Honduras, and we just had Secretary Nielsen at our lunch, and she just made a trip, and the Presidents were saying the exact same things they told us. Remember when they said, ``Change the ambiguity in your laws. All these children are our future.'' They basically told her the same thing, ``Send our kids back.'' Pretty powerful testimony. I was also reminded that when you were talking about the deficit. The namesake of this building was incorrectly quoted, apparently. He never said, ``A billion there, a billion there, you are talking real money.'' He said, ``A billion here, a billion there,'' so I was kind of thinking the same thing: ``A trillion here, a trillion there. We are talking about real money.'' But, anyway, Dr. Cuffari, we are, again, I think, really impressed with your background. We truly appreciate your service, your past service to this country. I think the letters of recommendation were incredibly strong. The people that showed up today for your hearing I think also speak to your integrity, which is exactly what we are looking for. I do not think there are any further questions, so I do have to read the fact that the nominee has made financial disclosures and provided responses to biographical and prehearing questions submitted by the Committee. Without objection, this information will be made part of the hearing record,\1\ with the exception of the financial data, which are on file and available for public inspection in the Committee's offices. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ The information referenced by Senator Johnson appears in the Appendix on page 45. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The hearing record will remain open until 5 p.m. tomorrow, March 6, for the submission of statements and questions for the record. Again, thank you for your service. I want to thank your wife, your family, and God bless all of you. This hearing is adjourned. Mr. Cuffari. Thank you, Senator. [Whereupon, at 3:32 p.m., the Committee was adjourned.] A P P E N D I X ---------- [GRAPHICS NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT] [all]