[House Hearing, 118 Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
UNIDENTIFIED ANOMALOUS PHENOMENA:
IMPLICATIONS ON NATIONAL SECURITY,
PUBLIC SAFETY, AND GOVERNMENT TRANSPARENCY
=======================================================================
HEARING
BEFORE THE
SUBCOMMITTEE ON NATIONAL SECURITY,
THE BORDER, AND FOREIGN AFFAIRS
OF THE
COMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT
AND ACCOUNTABILITY
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
ONE HUNDRED EIGHTEENTH CONGRESS
FIRST SESSION
__________
JULY 26, 2023
__________
Serial No. 118-53
__________
Printed for the use of the Committee on Oversight and Accountability
[GRAPHIC NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]
Available on: govinfo.gov
oversight.house.gov or
docs.house.gov
__________
U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE
53-022 PDF WASHINGTON : 2023
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND ACCOUNTABILITY
JAMES COMER, Kentucky, Chairman
Jim Jordan, Ohio Jamie Raskin, Maryland, Ranking
Mike Turner, Ohio Minority Member
Paul Gosar, Arizona Eleanor Holmes Norton, District of
Virginia Foxx, North Carolina Columbia
Glenn Grothman, Wisconsin Stephen F. Lynch, Massachusetts
Gary Palmer, Alabama Gerald E. Connolly, Virginia
Clay Higgins, Louisiana Raja Krishnamoorthi, Illinois
Pete Sessions, Texas Ro Khanna, California
Andy Biggs, Arizona Kweisi Mfume, Maryland
Nancy Mace, South Carolina Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, New York
Jake LaTurner, Kansas Katie Porter, California
Pat Fallon, Texas Cori Bush, Missouri
Byron Donalds, Florida Jimmy Gomez, California
Kelly Armstrong, North Dakota Shontel Brown, Ohio
Scott Perry, Pennsylvania Melanie Stansbury, New Mexico
William Timmons, South Carolina Robert Garcia, California
Tim Burchett, Tennessee Maxwell Frost, Florida
Marjorie Taylor Greene, Georgia Summer Lee, Pennsylvania
Lisa McClain, Michigan Greg Casar, Texas
Lauren Boebert, Colorado Jasmine Crockett, Texas
Russell Fry, South Carolina Dan Goldman, New York
Anna Paulina Luna, Florida Jared Moskowitz, Florida
Chuck Edwards, North Carolina Vacancy
Nick Langworthy, New York
Eric Burlison, Missouri
Mark Marin, Staff Director
Jessica Donlon, Deputy Staff Director and General Counsel
Kaity Wolfe, Senior Professional Staff Member
Grayson Westmoreland, Senior Professional Staff Member
Mallory Cogar, Deputy Director of Operations and Chief Clerk
Contact Number: 202-225-5074
Julie Tagen, Minority Staff Director
Contact Number: 202-225-5051
------
Subcommittee on National Security, the Border, and Foreign Affairs
Glenn Grothman, Wisconsin, Chairman
Paul Gosar, Arizona Robert Garcia, California, Ranking
Virginia Foxx, North Carolina Minority Member
Clay Higgins, Louisiana Stephen F. Lynch, Massachusetts
Pete Sessions, Texas Dan Goldman, New York
Andy Biggs, Arizona Jared Moskowitz, Florida
Nancy Mace, South Carolina Katie Porter, California
Jake LaTurner, Kansas Cori Bush, Missouri
Pat Fallon, Texas Maxwell Frost, Florida
Kelly Armstrong, North Dakota Vacancy
Scott Perry, Pennsylvania Vacancy
C O N T E N T S
----------
Page
Hearing held on July 26, 2023.................................... 1
Witnesses
----------
Mr. Ryan Graves, Executive Director, Americans for Safe Aerospace
Oral Statement................................................... 10
Mr. David Grusch, Former National Reconnaissance Office
Representative, Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Task Force,
Department of Defense
Oral Statement................................................... 11
Commander David Fravor (Ret.), Former Commanding Officer, United
States Navy
Oral Statement................................................... 12
Written opening statements and statements for the witnesses are
available on the U.S. House of Representatives Document
Repository at: docs.house.gov.
Index of Documents
----------
* Report, Jeremy Corbell, ``The UAP Puzzle''; submitted by Rep.
Burchett.
* Statement for the Record, by George Knapp; submitted by Rep.
Burchett.
* Defense Intelligence Reference Document, ``Advanced Space
Propulsion Based on Vacuum (Spacetime Metric) Engineering'';
submitted by Rep. Burchett.
* Article, NewsNation, ``We are not alone: The UFO
whistleblower speaks''; submitted by Rep. Luna.
Documents are available at: docs.house.gov.
UNIDENTIFIED ANOMALOUS PHENOMENA:
IMPLICATIONS ON NATIONAL SECURITY,
PUBLIC SAFETY, AND GOVERNMENT TRANSPARENCY
----------
Wednesday, July 26, 2023
House of Representatives
Committee on Oversight and Accountability
Subcommittee on National Security,
the Border, and Foreign Affairs
Washington, D.C.
The Subcommittee met, pursuant to notice, at 10:06 a.m., in
room 2154, Rayburn Office Building, Hon. Glenn Grothman,
[Chairman of the Subcommittee] presiding.
Present: Representatives Grothman, Gosar, Foxx, Sessions,
Biggs, Mace, LaTurner, Armstrong, Perry, Garcia, Moskowitz, and
Frost.
Also present: Representatives Luna, Burlison, Gaetz,
Burchett, Comer, Ogles, Langworthy, Raskin, and Ocasio-Cortez.
Mr. Grothman. The Subcommittee on unidentified anomalous
phenomena, or UAPs, will come to order.
Welcome, everyone. Without objection, the Chair may declare
a recess at any time. Additionally, without objection, the
following Members are waived on to the Subcommittee for the
purpose of participating in today's hearing: Mr. Burchett of
Tennessee, Ms. Luna of Florida, Mr. Gaetz of Florida, Mr.
Burlison of Missouri, Ms. Ocasio-Cortez of New York, and Mr.
Ogles of Tennessee. Without objection so ordered.
For today's Subcommittee hearing both the Chair and Ranking
Member will have 10 minutes for opening remarks. We may both be
giving some of those minutes to other Members of our party.
I am now going to recognize myself for 10 minutes. I am
actually going to try to get out of here in about four and then
we will give it to some of my friends over here.
Good morning, and welcome to the most exciting Subcommittee
in Congress this week, the Subcommittee on National Security,
the Border, and Foreign Affairs for discussion of unidentified
anomalous phenomenon.
I would like to thank the brave military panelists and
personnel, such as the witnesses on the panel today, for
sharing their stories on how they have engaged UAPs, which has
brought attention to this matter.
Curiosity and speculation from all walks of life have
generated interest in studying what UAPs are and what threats
they may pose. I will say that when I was younger in school I
read a book--a 1966 book called ``Flying Saucers Serious
Business'' and for a while when I was a little bit younger, I
thought it was the most important issue out there.
The lack of transparency regarding UAPs, which was one of
the themes of that book--in any event, it has led to interest
in studying what UAPs are and what threats they pose.
The lack of transparency regarding UAPs has fueled wild
speculation and debate for decades, eroding public trust in the
very institutions that are meant to serve and protect them as
is evidenced by the large number of people we have here.
I also want to point out in 1966, President Gerald Ford
claimed to have seen a UFO, and in 1969 in Georgia, Jimmy
Carter claimed to have seen a UFO. So, this has led Congress to
establish entities to examine UAPs.
The National Defense Authorization Act of 2022 established
the all-domain anomaly resolution officer--AARO--to conduct or
to coordinate efforts across the Department of Defense and
other Federal agents to detect, identify, and investigate UAPs.
However, AARO's budget remains classified, prohibiting
meaningful oversight from Congress.
In addition to AARO's efforts, NASA is leading an
independent study on UAPs to identify how UAP data is gathered
from both civilian and government entities that can be analyzed
to shed light on the topic.
However, despite these offices being established there lies
a pressing demand for government transparency and
accountability that cannot be overlooked and that has been a
problem that has been around for 50 years.
The Biden Administration's handling of the Chinese spy
balloon that violated U.S. air space is one example how the
government is not prepared for these. The Biden
Administration's description of events has shown that the
government continues not to be forthright.
Between the Chinese balloon being shot down and two UAPs
subsequently shot down following the event earlier this year
the U.S. Government spent $1.5 million in taxpayer dollars on
missiles. Yet, we have seen little clarity from the Biden
Administration.
We must demand transparency from the Department of Defense,
our intelligence community, and our defense industry on the UAP
work. We are going to have some questions about that today.
Congress recognizes the subject of UAPs is multifaceted and
requires a careful data-driven approach. Today, we will seek
clarity from these witnesses' testimonies as to what can be
done to improve reporting for military and civilians and remain
committed to objective inquiry. Congress should work to ensure
that knowledge is not driven by fear.
Today, we are not just debating the existence of UAPs. We
are deliberating on the principles that define our republic,
which is a commitment to transparency and accountability.
I look forward to hearing from our witnesses today about
ways we can improve government efficiency and openness when it
comes to UAPs. I thank of you for your presence here today and
for your dedication to safeguarding the interests of the
American people. I look forward to your testimony.
Now I am going to turn it over for two and a half or 3
minutes to Representative Burchett from Tennessee.
Mr. Burchett. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Thank you all for
being here. I want to thank everybody for making this happen
today and I want to remind everybody this is a nonpartisan
issue. This has nothing to do with party politics. I think the
cover up goes a lot deeper than that.
I also want to thank my colleagues, Representative Anna
Paulina Luna, sitting beside me here; Jared Moskowitz, my
friend across the aisle, who has an incredible mind, and I am
anxious to hear his questions; my buddy, Eric Burlison. And it
is not in my notes here but Matt Gaetz--if it had not been for
Matt Gaetz, myself, him, and Luna would still be down at Eglin
Air Force Base trying to get some answers. He has got an
incredible legal mind.
Also, I know I saw out in the crowd there George Knapp, my
buddy, Jeremy Corbell. They are not witnesses, but they have
provided some statements on this subject, and I seek unanimous
consent to enter those statements into the record, Mr.
Chairman.
Mr. Grothman. Without objection.
Mr. Burchett. I also would like to enter in--I understand
now that this is unclassified, and it is public record but as
we all know that is sometimes difficult for the public to get a
hold of--a report, defense intelligence reference documents,
``Advanced Space Propulsion Based on Vacuum (spacetime metric)
Engineering,'' some light reading for some of our Members.
Mr. Grothman. Without objection.
Mr. Burchett. Thank you. You know, Mr. Knapp wrote since
1969, the position of our military has been that UFOs posed no
threat to national security and are not worthy of further
study. I would say that is the biggest understatement of the
decade.
He also goes on to talk about the dismissive attitude is at
odds with what was revealed in documents, reports, and internal
memos. And Mr. Corbell says as he writes these words, the UFO
is emerging as a major topic of global importance.
I can state that as a fact out there. I met a fellow who
came in here all the way from Denmark to be here for this
meeting. So, this is huge. This is worldwide. I think we
suspect what is going on.
But I would also like to thank the Members of Congress who
have supported our efforts to make this hearing happen. Some
have even confided in me that they have had UFO sightings of
their own.
Those Members, of course, some of them wish to remain
anonymous and I will keep it that way. But also, finally, I
would like to thank these three brave witnesses here. They took
an oath to uphold the Constitution of the United States and
daggum it they are doing it and we owe them a debt of
gratitude.
[Applause.]
Mr. Burchett. You all quit clapping. You are cutting in on
my time.
[Laughter.]
Mr. Burchett. Just kidding. These folks, they have got
nothing to gain from this and I think you are going to find out
that they have endured quite a few slings and arrows. We need
to remember them in our prayers and their families, and I am
thankful to them for their honest testimoneys.
They have done interviews and appeared in documentaries
like ``Accidental Truth'' to get their stories out there and
now they are all here to testify under oath for Congress. It
has been so difficult to get here today.
I have said, you know, in the Baptist Church we would say
that the devil is in our way and the devil has been in our way
through this thing. We have run into roadblocks from Members,
from the intelligence community, the Pentagon.
I proposed legislation to go in the FAA reauthorization
that just said if an airline pilot has a sighting that when he
makes that report to the FAA that it would come to Congress.
But I was told that the intelligence community did not like
that, and the bill was--the amendment was not even heard in
committee. I think it is time for this country to take back our
country.
We need to tell the folks at the Pentagon they work for us,
daggum it. We do not work for them and that is exactly the
point. This is an issue of government transparency.
We cannot trust a government that does not trust its
people. We are not bringing little green men or flying saucers
into the hearing. Sorry to disappoint about half of you all.
We are just going to get to the facts. We are going to
uncover the cover up and I hope this is just the beginning of
many more hearings and more people coming forward about this.
And I yield back the remainder of my time, I think--is it
to Representative Luna, Mr. Chairman, or is that----
Mr. Grothman. Yes, we will call Ms. Luna for her statement.
Ms. Luna. The circumstances surrounding UAPs has captivated
the attention of the American people for decades, ingrained in
even the minds of our Nation's leaders from Jimmy Carter to
Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton to Donald Trump, Marco Rubio to
Chuck Schumer, John Ratcliffe to National Security Council
officials.
Yet, from Roswell, New Mexico to the coast of Jacksonville,
Florida, the sightings of UAPs have rarely been explained by
the people who have firsthand accounts of these situations.
This is largely due to the lack of transparency by our own
government and the failure of our elected leaders to make good
on their promises to release explanations and footage and
mountains of over-classified documents that continue to be
hidden from the American people.
This is not just how I feel. In fact, the American people
largely believe that the government has actively covered up the
truth about UAPs.
One poll, in particular, found that 68 percent of Americans
believe that the government is hiding information about UAPs
and not being honest about what we know about them and from my
personal experience I believe the same thing. Another poll
found that nearly half of Americans believe that the Federal
Government is doing a very bad or somewhat bad job of dealing
with reports of UFO sightings.
As Representative Burchett just referenced on the FAA bills
that just went through, you can tell that that is exactly
happening.
Considering the thousands of testimoneys and videos taken
on people's phones and eyewitnesses' accounts made by credible
witnesses such as doctors, pilots, scientists, and active-duty
service members, it is unacceptable to continue to gaslight
Americans into thinking that this is not happening or that the
potential of intelligent life forms exist other than humans.
Even more alarming is the fact that these eyewitnesses are,
many times, service members and have no assurance that their
lives will not be negatively impacted or even harmed by their
experiences.
In being an active-duty service member working on an
airfield, I have had conversations with many pilots where they
were in fear of coming forward for retribution and/or being
taken off flight status.
How do we know this? Because the government has said
nothing to assure us otherwise. They have also done nothing to
calm the concerns of over 20 percent of Americans who have
reported to have seen UFOs or UAPs. We are simply told not to
question the government and that the government has it under
control.
Today is the first hearing of its kind where we will
attempt to get down to the bottom of what is actually happening
with UAPs. But we will hear from people who have had personal
sightings rather than Pentagon bureaucrats who have always been
sent to stonewall our investigations.
Just so that the press knows, and the people know, we were
even denied access to a classified briefing in a SCIF prior to
this hearing due to the amount of hoops that we had to jump
through to grant temporary clearance to witness Grusch, who has
knowledge of classified information.
It is time to have an open-minded discussion on this topic,
to hear the evidence and understand the magnitude of what this
means not just for our Nation but for humanity.
Thank you, Chairman. I yield back the rest of my time.
Mr. Grothman. Thank you very much. And I would like to
thank you and Mr. Burchett for bringing this topic to my
attention.
Now we will recognize National Security Subcommittee
Ranking Member Garcia for 10 minutes.
Mr. Garcia. Well, thank you, Mr. Chairman, and I want to
thank first our witnesses for joining us today. I want to begin
by thanking you all for your service to our country and for
sharing your voices today and your courage to be here as well.
To Mr. Graves, I am particularly grateful to you to spend
some time that we had for you to share with candor some of your
experiences. So, I appreciate that as well.
I do want to thank all the Members of our Subcommittee
today and also those that are here and have waived on for their
incredible interest in this issue, particularly to Congressman
Burchett. I know that your leadership has brought us to this
place today and I want to thank you for that as well as
everyone else that has been engaged in this work.
I also want to thank the Oversight staff who I know has
been working very hard to ensure that today's hearing is
serious, that it is transparent, and that it also provides
appropriate answers as our Oversight body always demands.
Now, it is really important that we are here in a
bipartisan way to have this conversation which really to the
heart of it is about national security and key to the
Subcommittee's core purpose.
This is the Subcommittee on National Security of the
Oversight Committee.
Now, our witnesses will testify today that UAPs have posed
a serious safety threat and we must understand this. More
broadly, we are dealing with real questions that get to the
heart of our faith in government.
Faith in our institutions, as we all know, is at an all-
time low. Partisanship and alternative facts make it too easy
to doubt narrative or our institutions. But this hearing will
offer the public unique perspectives, building on years of
reporting by both Federal agencies and the independent media.
Now, some of the earliest reporting on this issue was a
groundbreaking 2017 New York Times report which revealed
research as we know now on unidentified anomalous phenomena or
as many call UFOs by the Defense Intelligence Agency.
Mr. Graves and Commander Fravor's experiences with UAPs
have also been documented by the public, not just by the New
York Times but CNN and many other national news outlets.
Now, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence
has published public reports documenting UAPs and on June 9,
2022, NASA announced that the agency is commissioning a study
to, of course, examine unidentified anomalous phenomena.
Now, the sheer number of reports, whistleblowers, and
stories of unidentified anomalous phenomena should raise real
questions and warrant investigation and oversight and that is
why we are here today.
Now, pilots have reported encounters for years and because
of the stigma around reporting these incidents we still do not
have a complete picture of actually what is going on,
particularly, as your witnesses will testify, on the civilian
side and that is a real problem that we have today in the
country.
Now, it is very important that we show that Democrats and
Republicans in Congress can come together in a bipartisan way
to cut through misinformation and to look at the facts in a
serious and thoughtful manner.
If we are to advance oversight and public disclosure, we
must also gain the broad support of the public. We will succeed
getting facts out to the public faster if there is a broad
public support as part of the process.
Now, I understand fully the Department of Defense is
hesitant to share information that could also undermine our
national security by revealing information on the capabilities
of our own aircraft, our sensors, and other sensitive material.
At the same time, many people believe that we are
withholding information from them and that is dangerous also. I
believe in openness and transparency. That is also the role of
Congress, and I want to trust that the American people will be
able to weigh the evidence and make up their own minds.
Now, we have incidents when sensors, sometimes even
multiple types of sensors, detect things that we cannot
explain. UAPs, whatever they may be, may pose a serious threat
to our military or civilian aircraft and that must be
understood.
Now, my career and training as a longtime and career
educator and teacher and researcher tell me that we should
never rule anything out. We know that our space, of course, is
vast and undiscovered.
I also want to note that Mr. Sean Kirkpatrick, Director of
the All-Domain Anomaly Resolution Office, the component of the
DoD office that investigates UAP data, has testified before the
Senate this year that his unit has found no evidence of
extraterrestrial activity.
NASA has also stated they do not have evidence of
extraterrestrial life either and we have heard this, of course,
from some of our government agencies. And we should remind
viewers and witnesses, which I think is really important, that
we also cannot share classified information in public settings.
But questions, of course, remain that people want to see
data and information for themselves. The enormous interest in
the hearing today underscores the importance of a fair and open
look at the evidence from witnesses who can share their unique
perspectives.
Now, I know I certainly have a lot of questions. I know
that all the Members of our Committee do as well. We should
come to this hearing with an open mind, and we should not let
our existing ideas restrict us on either side.
I hear over and over from many agencies the stigma around
reporting and investigating UAPs prevents us from getting real
answers. We know that whistleblowers have reported harassment,
intimidation, or stigma as well and this is not acceptable.
If people cannot report incidents which would have national
security or safety implications, then that also has serious
consequences for us.
As Ranking Member of this Subcommittee, I know my job would
be completely impossible if whistleblowers or others feel
intimidated to come before this Committee. We cannot be afraid
of asking questions and we cannot be afraid of the truth.
I am proud to say that this hearing builds upon bipartisan
work by Members of the House and Senate dating many years back
which is sought to increase awareness within the Department of
Defense and more--and to mandate more of Congress of UAPs.
We know the Senate is taking up an amendment to their
defense authorization bill which will create a commission with
broad declassification authority, and we should all agree that
that is an important step.
Members of both parties and senior officials in multiple
administrations have taken an interest in this issue and we are
proud to carry and build that confidence in the American
people.
This hearing will also not be the end of the discussion but
a new chapter and start to years and years of work that many
folks both in the public and within government have been
working on. We should encourage more reporting, not less, on
UAPs. The more that we understand, the safer we will be.
We will hear testimony from witnesses today with a long
record of service to the American people and with subject
matter expertise.
Our witnesses have a unique opportunity to share their
perspective, insights, and their experiences with the American
people and I encourage all of my colleagues to engage with
these difficult questions with an open mind and to follow the
facts on behalf of our country.
I also just want to say, more broadly, that we should look
at this hearing and believe that everything is on the table as
it relates to UAPs. I think an open mind is absolutely the
best.
I want to yield the two and a half minutes, the remainder
of my time, to the representative from Florida, Representative
Moskowitz, for an opening statement. He also has been very much
engaged in this issue and I want to thank him for his
leadership.
Congressman?
Mr. Moskowitz. Thank you, Ranking Member Garcia. Thank you,
Mr. Chairman. I want to thank Tim Burchett and Anna Paulina
Luna for their leadership in pushing this hearing forward.
I want to thank, obviously, committee staff and their staff
working on this on a bipartisan basis because many Americans
are deeply interested in this issue, and it should not take the
potential of nonhuman origin to bring us together.
Additionally, I want to thank the witnesses for coming
forward to share your perspectives, your thoughts, and the
sightings of UAPs. Unlike other hearings many times in Congress
you are not here to help a political party, but you are here to
share information with the American people, and it is not
something that is just going on in this Administration.
It is something that has spanned many administrations. For
decades many Americans have been fascinated by objects
mysterious and unexplained and it is long past time that they
got some answers.
The American public has a right to learn about technologies
of unknown origins, nonhuman intelligence, and unexplainable
phenomena. Those are not the words of a UFO Twitter account.
That is a direct quote from Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, that
the American public has a right to learn about technologies of
unknown origins, nonhuman intelligence, and unexplainable
phenomena.
In an interview with Fox News, recent former Director of
National Intelligence John Ratcliffe confirmed the U.S.
Government is aware a lot more sightings of UAPs and that they
have not made that information public. I quote, ``There are a
lot more sightings that have not been made public,'' Ratcliffe
said to Fox News.
For me, this hearing is about transparency. We,
unfortunately, live in a time in which many people distrust
government and our institutions and over classification of
information away from the American public or even Congress
contributes to today's politics.
The American people have regular questions. What are UAPs?
How come the media does not report more on them? Are they
foreign adversaries? Are they U.S. technology? Are they
something else?
They ask themselves how come when a Russian jet shoots
flares at one of our drones--we have perfect pictures and
videos to show the American people and the world--but when it
comes to UAPs nothing.
Of course, we must always protect our national security to
maintain our superiority like when stealth helicopters were
only rumored to exist but were used in the Osama bin Laden raid
in 2011.
But we cannot allow that to be used as a shield to keep the
American people completely in the dark from basic truths. The
American people deserve to hear more about special access
programs.
Congress has a right to know if there is any unsanctioned
weapons development satellite imagery that has not been
provided to Congress. Congress created the All-Domain
Resolution Office in the NDAA of 2022.
In its initial analysis there are 171 uncharacterized UAP
reports--and this is the words from the report--that appear to
have demonstrated unusual flight characteristics or performance
capabilities.
I believe more information is known about the 171
instances. It is time for Congress to reinsert ourselves. I
call on our military leaders and intelligence officials to
release more information to the American people about UAPs. And
to our military leaders, if there is nothing to conceal let
Congress go to Wright Patterson Air Force Base, the Doug Wright
Proving Ground, or even Groom Lake in Nevada. We should have
disclosure today. We should have disclosure tomorrow. The time
has come.
Thank you, Ranking Member.
Mr. Garcia. Thank you, Mr. Moskowitz, and I will yield back
now to our Chairman. Thank you.
Mr. Grothman. Alright. Now I would like to introduce our
witnesses. Our first witness is Lieutenant Ryan Graves. He is
the Executive Director of Americans for Safe Aerospace.
Lieutenant Graves is also a former U.S. Navy F-18 pilot with
his own UAP experience.
The next witness, David Grusch, is a former senior
intelligence officer with the National Geospatial Intelligence
Agency and was a senior technical advisor for UAP issues.
And, finally, retired Navy Commander David Fravor, squadron
leader who worked as a naval aviator for 18 years. Mr. Fravor
has his own UAP experience known as the Tic Tac event.
I look forward to hearing from all three of you today.
Pursuant to Committee Rule 9(g), the witnesses will please
stand and raise their right hands.
Do you solemnly swear to tell the truth, the whole truth,
and nothing but the truth, so help you God?
[Witnesses are sworn.]
Mr. Grothman. Let the record show that all the witnesses
answered in the affirmative. You may be seated. We appreciate
you all being here today and look forward to your testimony.
I will remind the witnesses that we have read your written
statements and they will appear in full in the hearing record.
Please try to limit your oral statements to 5 minutes.
As a reminder, please press the button on the microphone in
front of you so that it is on, and the Members can hear you.
When you begin to speak the light in front of you will turn
green. After 4 minutes it will turn yellow and the red light
when that comes it tells you your 5 minutes have expired.
I will now recognize Mr. Graves for 5 minutes for your
opening statement.
STATEMENT OF RYAN GRAVES
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
AMERICANS FOR SAFE AEROSPACE
Mr. Graves. Thank you, Chairman Grothman, Ranking Member
Garcia, distinguished Members of the House Oversight
Subcommittee on National Security, Representatives Burchett and
Luna.
My name is Ryan ``FOBS'' Graves and I am a former F-18
pilot with a decade of service in the U.S. Navy including two
deployments in Operation Enduring Freedom and Operation
Inherent Resolve.
I have experienced advanced UAP firsthand and I am here to
voice the concerns of more than 30 commercial aircrew and
military veterans who have confided their similar encounters
with me.
Today I would like to highlight three critical issues that
demand our action. As we convene here, UAP are in our airspace
but they are grossly under reported. These sightings are not
rare or isolated. They are routine. Military aircrew and
commercial pilots, trained observers whose lives depend on
accurate identification, are frequently witnessing these
phenomena.
The stigma attached to UAP is real and powerful and
challenges national security. It silences commercial pilots who
fear professional repercussions, discourages witnesses, and is
only compounded by recent government claims questioning the
credibility of eyewitness testimony.
Parts of our government are aware more about UAP than they
let on, but excessive classification practices keep crucial
information hidden. Since 2021 all UAP videos are classified as
secret or above. This level of secrecy not only impedes our
understanding but fuels speculation and mistrust.
In 2014, I was an F-18 Foxtrot pilot in the Navy Fighter
Attack Squadron 11, the Red Rippers, and I was stationed at NAS
Oceana in Virginia Beach. After upgrades were made to our jet's
radar systems, we began detecting unknown objects operating in
our airspace.
At first, we assumed they were radar errors but soon we
began to correlate the radar tracks with multiple onboard
sensors, including infrared systems, eventually through visual
ID.
During a training mission in Warning Area W-72, 10 miles
off the coast of Virginia Beach, two F-18 Super Hornets were
split by a UAP. The object, described as a dark gray or a black
cube inside of a clear sphere, came within 50 feet of the lead
aircraft and was estimated to be five to 15 feet in diameter.
The mission commander terminated the flight immediately and
returned to base. Our squadron submitted a safety report but
there was no official acknowledgement of the incident and no
further mechanism to report the sightings.
Soon these encounters became so frequent that aircrew would
discuss the risk of UAP as part of their regular preflight
briefs. Recognizing the need for action and answers, I founded
Americans for Safe Aerospace.
The organization has since become a haven for UAP witnesses
who were previously unspoken due to the absence of a safe
intake process. More than thirty witnesses have come forward
and almost 5,000 Americans have joined us in the fight for
transparency at safeaerospace.org.
The majority of witnesses are commercial pilots at major
airlines. Often, they are veterans with decades of flying
experience. Pilots are reporting UAP at altitudes that appear
above them at 40,000 feet, potentially in low Earth orbit or in
the gray zone below the common line, making unexplainable
maneuvers like right hand turns and retrograde orbits, or J
hooks.
Sometimes these reports are reoccurring with numerous
recent sightings north of Hawaii and in the North Atlantic.
Other veterans are also coming forward to us regarding UAP
encounters in our airspace and oceans. The most compelling
involve observations of UAP by multiple witnesses and sensor
systems. I believe these accounts are only scratching the
surface and more will share their experiences once it is safe
to do so.
In closing, I recognize the skepticism surrounding this
topic. If everyone could see the sensor and video data I
witnessed, our national conversation would change. I urge us to
put aside stigma and address the security and safety issue this
topic represents.
If UAP are foreign drones, is an urgent national security
problem. If it is something else, it is an issue for science.
In either case, unidentified objects are a concern for flight
safety. The American people deserve to know what is happening
in our skies. It is long overdue.
Thank you.
Mr. Grothman. Mr. Grusch?
STATEMENT OF DAVID GRUSCH
FORMER NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICER REPRESENTATIVE
UNIDENTIFIED ANOMALOUS PHENOMENA TASK FORCE
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Mr. Grusch. Mr. Chairman, Ranking Members and Congressmen,
thank you. I am happy to be here. This is an important issue,
and I am grateful for your time.
My name is David Charles Grusch. I was an intelligence
officer for 14 years both in the U.S. Air Force, both active-
duty Air National Guard and Reserve at the rank of Major and
most recently from 2021 to 2025--excuse me, 2023--at the
National Geospatial Intelligence Agency, NGA, at the GS-15
civilian level, which is the military equivalent of a full bird
colonel.
I was my agency's co-lead in unidentified anomalous
phenomena and trans medium object analysis as well as reporting
to the UAP Task Force--UAPTF--and eventually, once it was
established, the All-Domain Anomaly Resolution Office--AARO.
I became a whistleblower through a PPD-19 urgent concern
filing in May 2022 with the intelligence community inspector
general following concerning reports from multiple esteemed and
credentialed current and former military and intelligence
community individuals that the U.S. Government is operating
with secrecy above congressional oversight with regards to
UAPs.
My testimony is based on information I have been given by
individuals with a long-standing track record of legitimacy and
service to this country, many of whom also have shared
compelling evidence in the form of photography, official
documentation, and classified oral testimony to myself and many
of my various colleagues.
I have taken every step I can to corroborate this evidence
over a period of 4 years while I was with the UAP Task Force
and do my due diligence on the individuals sharing it. It is
because of these steps, I believe strongly in the importance of
bringing this information before you.
I am driven by a commitment of both to truth and
transparency, rooted in our inherent duty to uphold the United
States Constitution and protect the American people. I am
asking Congress to hold our government to this standard and
thoroughly investigate these claims.
But as I stand here under oath now, I am speaking to the
facts as I have been told them. In the U.S. Air Force in my
National Reconnaissance Office--NRO--reservist capacity, I was
a member of the UAP Task Force from 2019 to 2021.
I served at the NRO operations center on the Director's
briefing staff, which included the coordination of the
Presidential daily brief and supporting a variety of
contingency operations, which I was the reserve intelligence
division chief backup.
In 2019, the UAP Task Force Director asked me to identify
all special access programs and controlled access programs,
also known as SAPs and CAPs, we needed to satisfy our
congressionally mandated mission and we would direct report at
the time to the DEP/SecDef.
At the time, due to my extensive executive level
intelligence support duties I was cleared to literally all
relevant compartments and in a position of extreme trust both
in my military and civilian capacities.
I was informed in the course of my official duties of a
multi-decade UAP crash retrieval and reverse engineering
program to which I was denied access to those additional read-
ons when I requested it.
I made the decision based on the data I collected to report
this information to my superiors and multiple inspectors
general and, in effect, becoming a whistleblower. As you know,
I have suffered retaliation for my decision, but I am hopeful
that my actions will ultimately lead to a positive outcome of
increased transparency.
Thank you, and I am happy to answer your questions.
Mr. Grothman. Thank you.
Commander Fravor?
STATEMENT OF DAVID FRAVOR (RET.)
FORMER COMMANDING OFFICER
UNITED STATES NAVY
Commander Fravor. Thank you. Thank you, Mr. Chairman,
Congressmen and Congresswomen.
I want to first thank you for the invitation to speak to
the Committee on the UAP topic. This has been in the news for
the past 6 years and seems to be continuing to gain momentum.
As you know, my name is David Fravor. I am a retired
Commander in the United States Navy. In 2004, I was a
commanding officer of Strike Fighter Squadron 41, the world-
famous Black Aces. We were tasked to Carrier Airwing 11
stationed on board the USS Nimitz and had begun a 2-month
workup cycle off the coast of California.
On this day we were scheduled for a 2 V 2 air to air
training with the USS Princeton as our control. When we
launched off, Nimitz, my wingman, was joining up. We were told
that the training was going to be suspended and we are going to
proceed with real-world tasking.
As we proceeded to the west, the air controller was
counting down the range to an object that we were going to, and
we were unaware of what we were going to see when we arrived.
There the controller told us that these objects had been
observed for over 2 weeks coming down from over 80,000 feet,
rapidly descending to 20,000 feet, hanging out for hours and
then going straight back up. For those that do not realize,
above 80,000 feet is space.
We arrived at the location at approximately 20,000 feet and
the controller called merge plot, which means that our radar
blip was now in the same resolution cell as the contact. As we
looked around, we noticed that we saw some whitewater off our
right side.
It is important to note that the weather on this day was as
close to perfect as you could ask for off the coast of San
Diego. Clear skies, light winds, calm seas, no whitecaps from
waves. So, the whitewater stood out in a large blue ocean.
All four of us, because we were an F-18F so we had pilots
and WSO in the backseat, looked down and saw a white Tic Tac
object with a longitudinal axis pointing north south and moving
very abruptly over the water like a ping pong ball.
There were no rotors, no rotor wash, or any sign of visible
control surfaces like wings. As we started clockwise toward the
object my WSO and I decided to go down and take a closer look
with the other aircraft staying in high cover to observe both
us and the Tic Tac.
We proceeded around the circle about 90 degrees from the
start of our descent and the object suddenly shifted its
longitudinal axis, aligned it with my aircraft, and began to
climb. We continued down another 270 degrees, nose low, where
the Tic Tac would have been.
Our altitude at this point was about 15,000 feet and a Tic
Tac was about 12,000. As we pulled nose onto the object within
about a half mile of it, it rapidly accelerated in front of us
and disappeared. Our wingman, roughly 8,000 feet above us, lost
contact also.
We immediately turned back to see where the whitewater was
at, and it was gone also. So, as we started to turn back toward
the east, the controller came up and said, ``sir, you are not
going to believe this, but that thing is at your CAP point
roughly 60 miles away in less than a minute.'' You can
calculate the speed.
We returned to Nimitz. We were taking off our gear. We were
talking to one of my crews, who was getting ready to launch. We
mentioned it to him, and they went out and luckily got the
video that you see, that 90-second video.
What you do not see is the radar tape that was never
released, and we do not know where it is at, of the act of
jamming that the object put on an APG-73 radar, and I can get
into modes later if you are interested.
What is shocking to us is that the incident was never
investigated. None of my crew were ever questioned. The tapes
were never taken and after a couple days it turned into a great
story with friends. It was not until 2009, until Jay Stratton
had contacted me to investigate. Unbeknownst to all, he was
part of the ATIP program in the Pentagon led by Lue Elizondo.
There was an unofficial official report that came out that
is now on the internet. Years later, I was contacted by the
other pilot, Alex Dietrich, and asked if I would been contacted
and I said no, but I am willing to talk. I was contacted by Mr.
Elizondo, and we talked for a short period of time. He said we
would be in contact.
A few weeks after that I was made aware that Lue had left
the Pentagon in protest and joined forces with Tom DeLonge,
Chris Mellon, Steve Justice and others to form To the Stars
Academy, an organization that pressed the issue with leading
industry experts and U.S. Government officials.
They work with Leslie Keane, who is present today, Ralph
Blumenthal and Helene Cooper to publish the articles in the
2017 New York Times and it removed the stigma on the topic of
UFOs, which is why we are here today.
Those articles opened the door for the government and
public that cannot be closed. It has led to an interest from
our elected officials who are not focused on little green men
but figuring out where these craft are, where are they from,
the technology they possess, how do they operate.
It also led to the Whistleblower Protection Act in the
NDAA. There are multiple witnesses coming forward to say--that
have firsthand knowledge, and Mr. Grusch just covered that.
What concerns me is that there is no oversight from our
elected officials on anything associated with our government
processing or working on craft believed not from this world.
This issue is not a full public disclosure that can undermine
national security, but it is about ensuring that our system of
checks and balances works across all work done in the
government using taxpayer funds.
Relative to government programs, even unacknowledged waived
programs have some level of oversight by the appropriate
committee members in the House and Senate and this work that is
said to be occurring from whistleblower testimoneys should not
be exempt.
In closing, I would like to say that the Tic Tac object we
engaged in 2004 was far superior to anything that we had on
time, have today, or looking to develop in the next 10 years.
If we in fact have programs that possess this technology,
it needs to have oversight from those people that the citizens
of this great country elected in office to represent what is
best for the United States and best for the citizens.
I thank you for your time. Thank you very much.
Mr. Grothman. Thank you very much. I know it was very
difficult for all of you, all you have done in the past to try
to illuminate this issue.
I call on myself first for some questions. I am going to
start with Mr. Graves.
Are your pilots, or pilots that you interact with as part
of your organization, do you feel are adequately trained and
briefed on how to handle encounters with UAPs?
Mr. Graves. No. Right now, military witnesses to UAP have
limited options for reporting UAP. But more concerning is that
the commercial aviation sector has not adapted to the lessons
that military has implemented.
The military and Department of Defense has stated that UAP
represent a critical aviation safety risk. We have not seen
that same language being used in the commercial markets. They
are not acknowledging this risk.
Mr. Grothman. OK. What steps do you think have to be taken
to improve a pilot's UAP reporting, be it military or
commercial?
Mr. Graves. Right now, we need a system where pilots can
report without fear of losing their jobs. There is a fear that
the stigma associated with this topic is going to lead to
professional repercussions either through management or perhaps
through their yearly physical check.
So, having a secure system, reducing the stigma, and making
this information available through the public is going to
reduce the concerns that aircrew have.
Mr. Grothman. Could you just give me a little idea of the
degree to which reports in the past are not made public right
now?
Mr. Graves. Well, I do not think there has been a proper
reporting system to gather those reports and thus not report
them. So, to answer your question, I think there is a dearth of
data due to the fact that the reporting has been limited up to
this time.
Mr. Grothman. Could you tell me why you believe it is
--kind of to play the devil's advocate, a reason why some
of this stuff should not be available to the public?
Mr. Graves. There is certainly some national security
concerns when we use our advanced sensors in our tactical jets
to be able to identify these objects.
However, there is no reason that the objects themselves
would be classified. I would be curious to see how the security
classification guideline actually spells out the different
nuances of how this topic is classified from the perspective of
UAP, not national security.
Mr. Grothman. I will give you a followup on that. Assuming
that there are reasons why not all it should be made public,
this has been around for a long period of time. Can you think
of--can any of the three of you think of any reason why
anything related to UAPs, say, 15 years and back should not be
immediately made public?
Mr. Grusch. I think one of it is acknowledging a
vulnerability both from a collection and I will just say, you
know, a countermeasure perspective. So, it is a nut we have not
cracked for many years.
Mr. Grothman. Even, say, 20 years back. Is there any reason
why when you go back that far things should not be made public?
Mr. Grusch. Unless it shows a specific national security
vulnerability as it relates to a weakness in a particular
defense system.
Mr. Grothman. OK. Mr. Fravor, the Tic Tac incident that you
were engaged occurred in 2004. What kind of reporting took
place after that incident?
Commander Fravor. None. We had a standard debrief where the
backseaters went down to our carrier intel center and briefed
would have happened and that was it. No one else talked to us
and I was in the top 20 in the battle group. No one came. That
captain was aware. The admiral was aware. Nothing was done.
Mr. Grothman. Did your commanding officers provide any sort
of justification?
Commander Fravor. No, because I was the commanding officer
of the squadron. So, no.
Mr. Grothman. Was this incident the only UAP event that you
encountered while you were a pilot?
Commander Fravor. Yes, it was.
Mr. Grothman. OK. This is for any one of you. Based on--
based off of each of your experiences and observations do you
believe UAPs pose a potential threat to our national security?
Commander Fravor. Yes, and here is why. The technology that
we faced was far superior than anything that we had, and you
could put that anywhere.
If you had one, you captured one, you reverse engineered
it, you got it to work, you are talking something that can go
into space, go someplace, drop down in a matter of seconds, do
whatever it wants, and leave and there is nothing we can do
about it. Nothing.
Mr. Grothman. OK. Each of you?
Mr. Graves. I would also like to add from a commercial
aviation and military aviation perspective, we deal with
uncertainty in our operating space as a matter of our
professional actions.
Identifying friend from foe is very important to us, and so
when we have unidentified targets, and we continue to ignore
those due to a stigma or fear of what it could be that is an
opening that our adversaries can take advantage of.
Mr. Grothman. What steps should be taken to better
understand and respond to UAP encounters in the interest of
national security?
Mr. Graves. There needs to be a location where this
information is centralized for processing and there needs to be
a two-way communication loop so the operators on the front end
have a feedback and can get best practices on how to process
information, what to do, and to ensure that their reporting is
being listened to. Right now, there is not a lot of back and
forth.
Mr. Grothman. Mr. Grusch, in your complaint to the
intelligence community Inspector General, you claim that you
believe information is being hidden. What kind of information
do you think was hidden and do you think it should remain
hidden?
Mr. Grusch. Yes, I can speak to that very briefly in an
unclassified manner. As you know, the preponderance of my
complaint was classified to the intelligence communities. Both
material acquisition and exploitation activity, also baselining
the UAPs but not sharing it with, you know, intelligence
professionals that are actually doing step briefs to pilots,
that kind of information.
Mr. Grothman. OK. Thank you very much. Now we will go to
Mr. Garcia.
Mr. Garcia. Thank you. Again, thank you all for your
service and for testifying today. I want to just talk about
UAPs as it relates to what we are seeing and pilots'
interaction with UAPs.
Particularly, Mr. Graves, one of the, I think, concerns
from Members of this Committee is this idea that pilots--there
is no system to actually report UAPs and the stigma around
pilots.
And so can you just briefly--you mentioned that you are
working with 30 pilots right now that have had encounters with
UAPs. But you have also, I believe, discussed and know of many
more pilots. This is just those that you are currently working
with.
Is that correct? Can you expand on that?
Mr. Graves. Certainly. I will break that down in two ways.
First, when we were first experiencing these objects off the
Eastern Seaboard in the 2014 to 2015 time period, anyone that
had upgraded their radar systems were seeing these objects.
So, there was a large number of my colleagues that were
detecting these objects off the Eastern Seaboard. They were
further correlating that information with their other onboard
sensors and many of them also had their own eye sightings as
well of these objects.
Now, that was our personal firsthand experience at the
time. Since then, as I have engaged this topic, others have
reached out to me to share their experiences both on the
military side as well as a commercial aviation side.
On the military aviation side, veterans that have recently
got out have shared their stories and have expressed how the
objects we were seeing in 2014 and 2015 continued all the way
to 2019, 2020, and beyond. And so, it became a generational
issue for naval aviators on the Eastern Seaboard.
This was something we are briefing to new students. This is
something that was included in the notice to airmen to ensure
that there was no accidents, and now with commercial aviators,
they are reaching out because they are having somewhat similar
experiences as our military brothers and sisters, but they do
not have any reporting system that they can send this to.
Mr. Garcia. And let me just add to--and both to Mr. Fravor
as well as Mr. Graves, not having the system for reporting
would you both agree that is harmful to not just our national
security interest, but to understand this phenomena of what is
happening with UAPs?
Commander Fravor. I think it is actually--it is a travesty
that we do not have a system to correlate this and actually
investigate. You know, so if you took the East Coast, you know,
there is coastal radars out there that monitor our air defense
identification zone so out there 200 miles.
They can track these, you know, so when you see them they
could actually go and pull that data and get maneuvering. And
instead of just having the airplanes, there is other data
sources out there, and I have talked to other government
officials on this.
So, you need a centrally located repository that these
reports go to. So, if you just stuck it in DoD, you would not
get anything out of the Intelligence Committee because they
have a tendency not to talk.
But if you have got a central location where these reports
are coming in, not just military but also commercial aviation
because there is a lot of that going on, especially if you talk
to anyone that flies from here to Hawaii over the Pacific, they
see odd lights.
So, I think you need to develop something that allows you a
central point to collect the data in order to investigate.
Mr. Garcia. Mr. Graves?
Mr. Graves. I will concur with everything Mr. Fravor said.
I will continue to say that the commercial pilots that have
reached out to me through Americans for Safe Aerospace are
doing so because they do not feel there is another way for them
to report this safety issue.
Mr. Garcia. And I think one of the clear outcomes of this
hearing already is that there has to be a safe and transparent
reporting process for pilots, both on the commercial side and
the military side, to be able to report UAPs in a way that is
also transparent but also understands the scope of our national
security interests and what may be classified or not.
But I think there has to be some sort of system and so that
is something that I hope can be an outcome that this Committee
can work on.
Is there anything else just for the two of you briefly
beyond this reporting system that you think that we can do as a
government to encourage and facilitate more civilian reporting
on this?
Mr. Graves. I think we are doing it right now.
Mr. Garcia. OK. Great.
Mr. Graves. I think this hearing is going to show the
American people that their government takes this topic
seriously.
Mr. Garcia. And how about civilians that may not be pilots?
What kind of process could be in place for civilians who are
not pilots who may have UAP encounters? Do either of you have
any suggestions that could facilitate that?
Mr. Graves. My recommendations would be to make that a
sensor centric operation in order to make it as objective as
possible.
Mr. Garcia. OK. Sir? Mr. Fravor?
Commander Fravor. I agree with Mr. Graves on that.
Mr. Garcia. OK. Just briefly, I also just want to note
for--particularly for the two pilots and then a question for
Mr. Grusch.
One of the things that I found fascinating in our
discussion, Mr. Graves, last night as well is that you both
described UAPs and formations and the way they are observed in
space or in our air and the way that they move, essentially,
ways in which current technology of our aircraft that we know
of are unable to actually function or move.
And so will you just for the public record again, once
again, just briefly just either describe or note that aircraft
that we witnessed, particularly by the 30 folks that you are
working with, are essentially outside the scope of anything
that we know of today and the technology we have today.
Mr. Graves? Mr. Fravor?
Mr. Graves. Yes. The objects that are being seen by
commercial pilots are performing maneuvers that are
unexplainable due to our current understanding of our
technology and our capabilities as a country, and that applies
for the military as well.
Mr. Garcia. Mr. Fravor?
Commander Fravor. Yes, I concur with that. We have nothing
that can stop in midair and go the other direction nor do we
have anything that can, like in our situation, come down from
space, hang out for 3 hours and go back up.
Mr. Garcia. Thank you. My last question--and sometimes--I
know that you have also said some of these answers in the past,
but we are trying to get them on the public record as well,
which is really important.
Mr. Grusch, finally, do you believe that our government is
in possession of UAPs?
Mr. Grusch. Absolutely, based on interviewing over 40
witnesses over 4 years.
Mr. Garcia. And where?
Mr. Grusch. I know the exact locations and those locations
were provided to the Inspector General and some of which to the
intelligence committees. I actually had the people with the
firsthand knowledge provide a protected disclosure to the
Inspector General.
Mr. Garcia. Thank you.
And, Mr. Chairman, I would just say that I think that these
questions are important questions and I look forward to being
involved in the process to get those answered. I know there
will be a lot of questions from other Committee Members.
So, I yield back.
Mr. Grothman. Thank you. We will go to Mr. Burchett
himself.
Mr. Burchett. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Thank you, Mr.
Garcia. I would like to have you on the--my legislation to do
just that on the reporting and we will get together on that.
Maybe you can be my co-sponsor on that. That would be really
cool. Thank you for those great questions.
Mr. Graves, again, I would like to know how do you know
that these were not our aircraft?
Mr. Graves. Some of the behaviors that we saw in our
working area, we would see these objects being at 0.0 Mach
--that is zero airspeed--over certain pieces of the ground.
So, what that means just like a river if you throw a bobber in
it is going to float downstream.
These objects were staying completely stationary in
category four hurricane winds. These same objects would then
accelerate to supersonic speeds--1.1, 1.2 Mach--and they would
do so in very erratic and quick behaviors that we do not--I do
not have an explanation for.
Mr. Burchett. OK. Have you spoken to commercial and
military pilots that have seen these off of our East Coast?
Mr. Graves. I have.
Mr. Burchett. OK. Mr. Fravor, I noticed that in the Tic Tac
video--it is Tic Tac like the candy, not TikTok like the
Chinese Communist app.
Commander Fravor. That is correct.
Mr. Burchett. Yes, sir. I just want to make that--because
my daughter corrected me on that and called me a Boomer and
said, hey, Boomer, and I said, no, baby, it is Tic Tac like the
candy. You are going to have to just look it up.
And but I would also like to say today is a day of many
firsts. It is a miracle that we are having this meeting and it
is also a miracle that my wife has put up with me for 9 years
today. Today is my anniversary. So, I want to tell my wife
happy anniversary and that I love her very much.
As she likes to say, this 9 years have been the best 2
years of her life.
[Laughter.]
Mr. Burchett. So, thank you.
Mr. Fravor, what astonished you the most about the flight
capabilities of these Tic Tac, very briefly?
Commander Fravor. The performance. Absolute performance. It
was----
Mr. Burchett. And you are not aware of any other objects
that anybody in the world has in this world that has those
capabilities?
Commander Fravor. No. I think it is far beyond, actually,
our material science that we currently possess.
Mr. Burchett. Are you aware of any other reconnaissance
platforms have tracked or recorded the Tic Tac's maneuvers,
maybe the NORAD system or any of the others?
Commander Fravor. I am not.
Mr. Burchett. OK.
Mr. Grusch, thank you for being here, brother, and thank
you all very much.
Have you faced any retaliation or reprisals for any of your
testimony or anything on these lines?
Mr. Grusch. Yes. I have to be careful what I say in detail
because there is an open whistleblower reprisal investigation
on my behalf, and I do not want to compromise that
investigation by providing anything that may help provide
somebody information.
But it was very brutal and very unfortunate. Some of the
tactics they used to hurt me both professionally and
personally, to be quite frank. Yes.
Mr. Burchett. It is very unfortunate. As they say, when you
are over the target that is when they do the most firing at
you. Do you have any personal knowledge of people who have been
harmed or injured in efforts to cover up or conceal these
extraterrestrial technology?
Mr. Grusch. Yes, personally.
Mr. Burchett. Have you heard--have anyone been murdered
that you would--that you know of or have heard of, I guess?
Mr. Grusch. I have to be careful asking that question. I
directed people with that knowledge to the appropriate
authorities.
Mr. Burchett. Maybe in a--if we could get in a confidential
area, a SCIF, we could talk about that. But unfortunately, we
were denied access to the SCIF and that is very unfortunate in
this scenario.
Mr. Fravor, do you believe that you witnessed an additional
object under the water in relation to your encounter?
Commander Fravor. I will say we did not see an object.
There was something there to cause the whitewater and when we
turned around it was gone. So, there was something there that
obviously moved.
Mr. Burchett. OK. It was not the same object, though, that
you were looking at, correct?
Commander Fravor. No. We actually joked that the Tic Tac
was communicating with something when we came back and--because
the whitewater disappeared.
Mr. Burchett. We were--in another instance--were told about
the capabilities of a jamming during viewing of some--when
there were some people chasing some of these objects. Did you
experience any of that jamming or interrupting your radar or
weapons system?
Commander Fravor. My crew that launched after we landed
experienced significant jamming to the APG-73 radar, which was
what we had on board, which is a mechanically scan very high-
end system prior to the APG-79 and, yes, it did pretty much
everything you could do--range, velocity, aspect--and then it
split the lock, then the targeting pod is passive. That is what
we were able to get the video on.
Mr. Burchett. I am about to run out of time. But are you
aware of any of our enemies that have that capability?
Commander Fravor. No.
Mr. Burchett. OK. I would also like to note for the record
that, like George Knapp, Breaking Area 51, he is the reason I
knew about that, and the reason I know about the Tic Tacs is
because Leslie Keane from a New York Times article and I would
encourage everybody to read that.
Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I yield back to you no time.
Mr. Grothman. Very good. Mr. Raskin?
Mr. Raskin. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Mr. Graves, you reported UAP encounters during training
flights, I think, and have since come forward to warn the
Pentagon that these encounters may be putting pilots at risk.
My first question is, you have identified these as taking place
on the East Coast--is it just on the East Coast where these
encounters have been reported?
Mr. Graves. No. Since the events initially occurred, I have
learned that the objects have been detected, essentially, where
all operations--our Navy operations are being conducted across
the world and that is from the All-Domain Anomaly Resolutions
Office reporting.
Mr. Raskin. Can you describe your experience after you
decided to come forward and go public with your experience?
Mr. Graves. Certainly. Like many others in 2017, I saw the
New York Times article come out as well and for me it was
special because I recognized the voices on the video. I
recognize the video itself. I had seen it when it was taken. I
had seen it when it was debriefed.
And so that was--kind of shook me because I realized that
this problem was still ongoing and so I reached out to
colleagues back on the East Coast and realized that this was
still a safety risk that they were dealing with, that they had
essentially hit a wall with how they could move forward on this
conversation. It was at that point when I decided to try to
move the conversation forward myself.
Mr. Raskin. Are there common characteristics to the UAPs
that have been cited by different pilots and can you describe
what the convergence of descriptions is?
Mr. Graves. Certainly. We were primarily seeing dark gray
or black cubes inside of a clear sphere.
Mr. Raskin. I am sorry. Dark gray or black cubes?
Mr. Graves. Yes, inside of a clear sphere where the apex or
tips of the cube were touching the inside of that sphere, and
that was primarily what was being reported when we were able to
gain a visual tally of these objects. That occurred over almost
8 years and as far as I know is still occurring.
Mr. Raskin. So, I take it that you are arguing what we need
is real transparency and a reporting system so we can get some
clarity on what is going on out there because there are many
pilots in your situation. But we should have a way of
developing a systematic inventory of all of such encounters. Is
that right?
Mr. Graves. Yes, and I think we need both transparency and
the reporting. We have the reporting, but we need to make sure
that information can be promulgated to commercial aviation as
well as the rest of the populace.
Mr. Raskin. Mr. Grusch, what about you? What was your
experience after you came forward?
Mr. Grusch. Well, it has only been about 2 months or so.
So, I guess my experience has been overwhelming support from
former colleagues of mine that have, you know, privately
messaged me and I do appreciate that.
But I do have knowledge of active planned reprisal activity
against myself, and other colleagues and it is very, very
upsetting to me.
Mr. Raskin. Coming from where?
Mr. Grusch. Certain senior leadership at previous agencies
I was associated with and that is all I will say publicly. But
I can provide more details in a closed environment.
Mr. Raskin. OK. Well, I hope you understand that there
would be bipartisan rejection of any attempt to vilify,
demonize, or engage in other reprisals against our witnesses
and people who are telling the truth from their perspective.
Mr. Grusch. Yes. There were certain colleagues of mine that
were brutally administratively attacked, and it actually makes
me very upset as a leader to see that happen to other co-
workers and actually superiors of mine over the last 3 years.
Mr. Raskin. How do you account for that response? That
seems like a bizarre response.
Mr. Grusch. I call it administrative terrorism. That is
their quiver--their tool in the toolbox to silence people,
especially, you know, career government service cares about
their career, cares about their clearance, their reputation to
climb the ladder, and when you threaten that flow--career
path--a lot of people back off. But I am here to represent
those people. So----
Mr. Raskin. Mr. Fravor, what about you? What has your
experience been since you have come forward with your
perspective on this?
Commander Fravor. Actually, I have been treated very well
and the six people that were involved, myself included, all of
them have or will be retiring from the military as 05s, 06s,
and all my friends that are very senior, three and four stars,
I have talked to them. They believe. They understand there is a
problem. But no, I was actually treated really well.
Mr. Raskin. And what is your general interpretation of
these phenomena or what is your current thinking of trying to
make sense of them?
Commander Fravor. Well, I will say, you know, I am not like
a UFO fanatic. It is not me. But I will tell you that what we
saw with four sets of eyes over a 5-minute period still--there
is nothing--we have nothing close to it. It was amazing to see.
I told my buddy, I wanted to fly it. But that is--just an
incredible technology.
Mr. Raskin. All right. Mr. Chairman, thank you very much. I
yield back to you.
Mr. Grothman. Thanks. On to Ms. Luna.
Ms. Luna. Mr. Grusch, in speaking to you yesterday, I just
wanted to followup on Representative Raskin's questions. In the
last couple of years, have you had incidences that have caused
you to be in fear for your life for addressing these issues?
Mr. Grusch. Yes, personally. Yes.
Ms. Luna. I just want everyone to note that he is coming
forward in fear of his life to put in perspective if they were
really not scared about this information coming out why would
someone be intimidated like that.
To your knowledge, are NHIs working with adversarial
foreign governments in either technology exchange programs or
back engineering programs?
Mr. Grusch. I do not have data on that. I am not sure.
Ms. Luna. Have you heard or you had people come forward to
present that evidence?
Mr. Grusch. Not that particular evidence that you just
espoused.
Ms. Luna. OK. On the 19th of April, Dr. Kirkpatrick, head
of AARO, had said that he did not find any evidence of UAPs.
You also stated that you had--in your interview that you
briefed him on information that you were uncovering but that he
did not followup with you. Were the items that you divulged to
him pertinent to national security?
Mr. Grusch. Yes. Him and I had a classified conversation in
April 2022 before he took over AARO in July 2022 and I provided
him some concerns I had.
Ms. Luna. Do you know why he might not have followed up
with you?
Mr. Grusch. Unfortunately, I cannot read his mind. I wish
he did. I was happy to give sage counsel to him on where to
look when he took the helm of AARO.
Ms. Luna. OK. And then my last question for you before I
move to Mr. Graves is you received prior approval from the
Defense Department to speak on certain issues, correct?
Mr. Grusch. Correct, through DODSR--DoD Prepublication and
Security Review--and I just want to remind the public they are
just looking from a security perspective. These are my own
personal views and opinions, not the Department's.
Ms. Luna. OK. I am asking that, though, mainly because I
think that there are many people that would like to discredit
you. So, it does bring a certain amount of credibility to your
testimony.
Mr. Grusch. I am required by law to do that as a former
intelligence officer, or I go to jail for revealing classified
information.
Ms. Luna. Yes, we do not want you to go to jail.
My next question would actually be for Mr. Graves. Can you
please explain to me in detail the event that occurred at
Vandenberg Air Force Base?
Mr. Graves. Certainly. In the 2003 timeframe, a large group
of Boeing contractors were operating near one of the launch
facilities at Vandenberg Air Force Base when they observed a
very large 100-yard sighted red square approach the base from
the ocean and hover at low altitude over one of the launch
facilities. This object remained for about 45 seconds or so
before darting off over the mountains.
There was a similar event within 24 hours, later in the
evening. This was a morning event, I believe 8:45 in the
morning. Later in the evening, post sunset, there were reports
of other sightings on base including some aggressive behaviors.
These objects were approaching some of the security guards
at rapid speeds before darting off, and this is information
that was received through one of the witnesses that have
approached me at Americans for Safe Aerospace.
Ms. Luna. Was this documented in any official form whether
it was a police blotter?
Mr. Graves. Yes. They had official documentation and
records from the event that the witness held over the years.
Ms. Luna. And I am not going to ask you to do it right now
for time reasons, but you would be able to sketch what was
witnessed, correct? And you have--have you seen that before on
any other equipment and/or during your flight time?
Mr. Graves. I have not seen what they have described. This
object was estimated to be almost the size of a football field
and I have not seen anything personally that large.
Ms. Luna. OK. And then another question on followup
referencing the Gimbal video Go Fast incident. Can you just
clarify? Because to our understanding the footage was actually
cutoff at a certain point.
But what happens at the end of that video, just for those
Americans specifically that are wanting to know about the rest
of that footage?
Mr. Graves. Certainly. There was some uncertainty or, you
know, instability with the object. It seemed to rock a bit, and
that is the last I had seen of the video. Much of the data that
I would recommend be analyzed would consist of radar data that
would provide precise kinematics on the object as well as the
fleet of objects that were operating nearby.
Ms. Luna. OK. And the followup, in regard to the recording
procedures that Mr. Garcia had addressed on as well as
Representative Burchett, with the FAA, to your understanding,
pilots that are seeing this--commercial airline pilots--are
they receiving cease and desist letters from corporations for
coming forward with information in regard to safety for
potential airline passengers?
Mr. Graves. I have been made privy to conversations with
commercial aviators who have received cease and desist orders.
Ms. Luna. So, the American public should know that
corporations are putting their own reputations on the--not the
line but ahead of the safety of the American people, and I
think would you agree with that statement?
Mr. Graves. It appears so.
Ms. Luna. OK. I guess this would be my last--oh, I am out
of time. I yield. I will be back.
Mr. Grothman. Good. Mr. Moskowitz?
Mr. Moskowitz. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Gentlemen, let us talk about the laws of physics for a
second.
Mr. Graves and Commander Fravor, I heard you talk about
speed. When those objects broke the sound barrier, did they
make a sonic boom?
Commander Fravor. I was in a jet. You cannot hear anything.
It is kind of loud in there.
Mr. Graves. Yes. You are not able to actually personally
tell within the vehicle. I will say the objects that we were
seeing they were spherical, and they were observed up to Mach
2, which is a very nonaerodynamic shape.
Mr. Moskowitz. What about G forces? Let us talk about G
forces of those vehicles. Could a human survive those G forces
with known technology today?
Mr. Graves. No.
Commander Fravor. No, not for the acceleration rates that
we observed.
Mr. Moskowitz. OK. What about what they looked like? How
close did you get? Did you see a seam or a rivet or a section?
And what I mean is, obviously, the jets you are flying have all
those things. Did these objects have those?
Mr. Graves. I did not have the detail to be able to tell
that.
Commander Fravor. So, we got within a half mile of the Tic
Tac, which people say that is pretty far, but in airplanes that
is actually relatively close. No, it was perfectly white,
smooth, no windows, although when we did take the original FLIR
video that is out there when you put it on a big screen it
actually had two little objects that came out of the bottom of
it. But other than that, no windows, no seams, no nothing.
Mr. Moskowitz. Mr. Grusch, as a result of your previous
government work, have you met with people with direct knowledge
or have direct knowledge yourself of nonhuman origin craft?
Mr. Grusch. Yes. I personally interviewed those
individuals.
Mr. Moskowitz. Mr. Grusch, as a result of your previous
government work have you met with people with direct knowledge
or have direct knowledge yourself about ATs--advanced
technologies--that the U.S. Government has?
Mr. Grusch. Based on conventional advanced tech I was
briefed to the preponderance of the Defense Department's both
space and aerospace compartmented programs. Yes.
Mr. Moskowitz. Do you have knowledge, or do you have reason
to believe, that there are programs in the advanced tech space
that are unsanctioned?
Mr. Grusch. Yes, I do.
Mr. Moskowitz. OK. And when you say that they are above
congressional oversight what do you mean?
Mr. Grusch. A complicated question. So, there is, you know,
some--I would call it abuse here. So, congressional oversight
of conventional Special Access Programs--and I will use Title
10, DoD as an example, right.
So, 10 U.S. Code Section 119 discusses congressional
oversight of SAPs, discusses the DEP/SecDef's ability to waive
congressional reporting. However, the Gang of 8 is at least
supposed to be notified if a--you know, a waived or a waive
bigoted unacknowledged SAP is created and that is public law.
Mr. Moskowitz. Well, so then how does--I mean, I do not
want to cut you off, but how does a program like that get
funded?
Mr. Grusch. I will give you generalities. I can get very
specific in a closed session. But misappropriation of funds and
self-fund.
Mr. Moskowitz. Does that mean that there is money in the
budget that is set to go to a program, but it does not, and it
goes to something else?
Mr. Grusch. Yes. I have specific knowledge of that. Yes.
Mr. Moskowitz. Do you think U.S. corporations are
overcharging for certain tech they are selling to the U.S.
Government and that additional money is going to programs?
Mr. Grusch. Correct, through something called IR&D.
Mr. Moskowitz. OK. Satellite imagery--let us talk about
satellite imagery. We have satellites all over the place, some
that we are aware of and many that we are not aware of, right.
We are taking pictures of everything at every point and second.
Mr. Grusch, are you aware--do you have direct knowledge, or
have you talked to people with direct knowledge, that there are
satellite imagery of these events?
Mr. Grusch. That was one of my primary tasks at NGA since
we process, exploit, and disseminate that kind of information.
I have seen multiple cases, some of which to my understanding--
and, of course, I left NGA in April so that is my information
cutoff date.
But I personally review both what we call overhead
collection and from other strategic and tactical platforms that
were--I could not even explain prosaically, and I have a degree
in physics, by the way, as well. And I had--I am aware that you
guys have not seen these reports, unfortunately and I do not
know why.
Mr. Moskowitz. Do you have direct knowledge, or have you
spoken to people with direct knowledge, that this imagery
applies to crash sites--crash imagery?
Mr. Grusch. I cannot discuss that in an open session.
Mr. Moskowitz. OK. Do you have any information that the
U.S. Government is involved in a disinformation campaign to
deny the existence of certain UAPs?
Mr. Grusch. I cannot go beyond what I have already stated
publicly in my News Nation interview because it touches other
sensitivities.
Mr. Moskowitz. OK. I will yield the balance of my time
back. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Mr. Grothman. Ms. Foxx?
Ms. Foxx. Thank you, Mr. Chairman, and I thank our
witnesses for being here today.
Mr. Grusch, in your sworn testimony you state that the U.S.
Government has retrieved supposedly extraterrestrial spacecraft
and other UAP-related artifacts. You go so far as to state that
the U.S. is in possession of, quote, ``nonhuman spacecraft,''
end quote, and that some of these artifacts have circulated
with defense contractors. Several other former military and
intelligence officials have come forward with similar
allegations albeit in nonpublic settings.
However, Dr. Sean Kirkpatrick, the Director of AARO,
previously testified before Congress that there has been, and I
quote, ``no credible evidence thus far of extraterrestrial
activity'' or of, quote, ``off-world technology brought to the
attention of the office.''
To your knowledge, is that statement correct?
Mr. Grusch. It is not accurate. I believe Dr. Kirkpatrick
mentioned he had about 30 individuals that have come to AARO
thus far. A few of those individuals have also come to AARO
that I also interviewed.
Ms. Foxx. OK.
Mr. Grusch. And I know what they provided Dr. Kirkpatrick
and their team.
Ms. Foxx. OK.
Mr. Grusch. I was able to evaluate that information.
Ms. Foxx. OK. I need to go on.
Mr. Grusch. Sure.
Ms. Foxx. But my understanding--this--his statement is
accurate. Came from a direct quote, and this contradiction is a
perfect example of why we need to inject transparency into our
government.
And for another example, look no further than the pitiful
response to the Chinese spy balloon debacle earlier this year.
You may remember the mass confusion that ensued when the
balloon was first spotted over Montana 4 days after it first
entered U.S. airspace over Alaska.
The Biden Administration's initial inability to address the
object grew into a continuous series of embarrassments. After
news of the balloon reached the mainstream media, we were
assured that the balloon posed no threat to our security.
However, after the balloon was allowed to transit the
entire continental United States, fighter jets were scrambled
off the coast of South Carolina to shoot it down. This flip
flopping and obfuscation caused needless confusion, fear, and
panic across the country.
It is my hope, Mr. Chairman, that this sort of confusion
will not be repeated. We should investigate the extent to which
elements of our government possess or do not possess
information that is of critical value to the American people.
We owe it to the citizens of this Nation to make sure that
our government is transparent and accountable. We must make
sure that our government provides answers and Congress must do
its duty to solicit those answers.
With that, Mr. Chairman, I yield back.
Mr. Grothman. Yes. Mr. Frost?
Mr. Frost. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
In 2022, NASA announced that it was commissioning an
independent study team to examine UAPs. The NASA team is
comprised of scientists across different fields as well as
former astronauts and pilots.
In May, the independent study team held its first public
meeting, which included the perspectives from NASA senior
leaders as well as perspectives from the Department of Defense
and intelligence agencies. The NASA study team is also expected
to release its first report pretty soon and I think it is safe
to say that we all eagerly await its results.
Mr. Graves, how might NASA's research influence the
commercial industry regarding safety and UAP?
Mr. Graves. I think NASA has a big role to play as far as
commercial aviation safety and it is one of their original
charges as an organization.
One of the recommendations that have been put forward is to
utilize their existing Aviation Safety Reporting System to
serve as a short-term fill and trusted platform for pilots that
want to report on UAP. It also has built-in analytics
capability and is funded by Congress.
Mr. Frost. Gotcha. And also, Mr. Graves, are there any
other industries that may be influenced by the NASA research on
UAPs and, if so, how so?
Mr. Graves. Well, I think there is a large swath of
commercial capabilities that could be brought to bear on this
topic from space-based or ground-based sensor systems that are
available open source or through commercial marketplaces, and I
think NASA's work, as they work to identify and highlight
specific parameters that can be found, we can take that
information and promulgate this through the public sector so
that we can have more open conversation about what we are
seeing.
Mr. Frost. You know, in 2020 the Department of Defense
released several videos of UAPs including Mr. Fravor's
experience, U.S. Navy pilots that recorded footage. In 2021,
the Office of the Director of National Intelligence released a
preliminary report on UAP events.
NASA Administrator Bill Nelson stated that NASA would begin
to investigate these events. In fact, I sit on the Science,
Space and Technology Committee and when we were doing a hearing
with the NASA Administrator, Bill Nelson, I asked, you know,
why NASA needed to be fully funded.
And there were many great reasons, but one of them was
actually--had to do with UAPs. He actually mentioned, you know,
is there life out there? I do not know. And so, either way
these actions ultimately led NASA to assemble the independent
study team that I mentioned earlier.
Also, in 2021 Harvard University stood up the Galileo
Project to research and examine the origins of UAP. So, it
seems like both, you know, from NASA and in the higher
education community because of the work that you all have done
and people standing up, you know, I think we are seeing some of
that stigma slowly going away.
Mr. Fravor, do you believe that military pilots feeling
empowered to share their UAP experiences has directly impacted
the scientific community's research goals on this topic?
Commander Fravor. I would say yes. I would say that, you
know, starting in 2017 when it actually came out, it took that
stigma away. I mean, I have talked to multiple Senators who
said prior to that if you would have mentioned UAP, you would
have been laughed off the Hill and now we are sitting here
today for a public testimony on what is actually going on. You
know, I am hoping that this curve will be more of an
exponential and we will get more and more transparent to the
level that we can.
Mr. Frost. I mean, it is important. I could not imagine--
you know, I am not a pilot, but I used to fly gliders in Civil
Air Patrol.
Commander Fravor. A pilot?
Mr. Frost. And so, either way, I mean, I could not imagine,
you know, being in the glider and seeing something and then not
feeling like I had the agency to talk about it.
Mr. Graves, can you discuss the importance of seeking
scientists to sit on your advisory board?
Mr. Graves. Absolutely. I think, ultimately, this is going
to be a scientific problem, and not only that, it is also an
engineering problem. I have been working with the American
Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics to help them stand up
a UAP integration committee to help integrate their engineering
prowess into this problem.
And so, yes, very much I think this is an engineering and
scientific problem as much as a national security problem.
Mr. Frost. And how might Congress help to facilitate
partnerships between the scientific community and the UAP focus
groups within government?
Mr. Graves. Well, I think one of the things they can do is
to have these types of hearings to communicate to the public
that this is a topic of interest.
I think that there is a pseudo market, if you will, of
interested capabilities and talent that want to approach this
topic and we are seeing that start to grow now. So, I think
continued conversation and reduction of stigma is going to
allow that to flourish and allow answers to help generate
themselves.
Mr. Frost. A hundred percent. Well, thank you all for being
here. Thank you for your work. I think it is important that we
keep our top scientific minds focused on this issue and look
for ways to increase collaboration. Thank you so much. I yield
back.
Mr. Grothman. Mr. Comer?
Mr. Comer. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Let me say I want to
thank you for having this hearing and I want to thank Mr.
Burchett and Ms. Luna for leading this hearing. And with that,
I yield my 5 minutes to Mr. Burchett.
Mr. Burchett. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I am going to direct
this, I believe, to Mr. Grusch. But if any of you all feel like
you need to jump in just jump right in. We are good.
Has the U.S. Government become aware of actual evidence of
extraterrestrial or otherwise unexplained forms of intelligence
and, if so, when do you think this first occurred?
Mr. Grusch. I like to use the term nonhuman. I do not like
to denote origin. Keeps the aperture open both scientifically.
Certainly, like I have discussed publicly, previously 1930's.
Mr. Burchett. OK. Can you give me the names and titles of
the people with direct firsthand knowledge and access to some
of this crash retrieval--some of these crash retrieval programs
and maybe which facilities, military bases, that would--the
recovered material would be in?
And I know a lot of Congress talked about we are going to
go to Area 51 and, you know, there is nothing there anymore
anyway. It is just--you know, and we move like a glacier, as
soon as we announce it, I am sure the moving vans have pulled
up. But please?
Mr. Grusch. I cannot discuss that publicly, but I did
provide that information both to the intel committees and the
Inspector General.
Mr. Burchett. And we could get that in the SCIF if we were
allowed to get in a SCIF with you? Would that be probably what
you would think?
Mr. Grusch. Sure, if you had the appropriate accesses. Yes.
Mr. Burchett. What Special Access Programs cover this
information and how is it possible that they have evaded
oversight for so long?
Mr. Grusch. I do know the names. Once again, I cannot
discuss that publicly in how they have evaded oversight. In a
closed setting, I can tell you the specific tradecraft used.
Mr. Burchett. All right. When do you think those programs
began and who authorized them?
Mr. Grusch. I do know a lot of that information, but that
is something I can discuss publicly because of sensitivities.
Mr. Burchett. All right. If any of you all want to jump in
on any of this, you are more than welcome to.
What level of security clearance is required to fully
access these programs?
Mr. Grusch. Well, anybody who has----
Mr. Burchett. And I say that because myself, Representative
Gaetz and Representative Luna were basically turned away at one
point at Eglin. So, please go right ahead.
Mr. Grusch. Certainly, a difference between Member access
and, say, somebody like me, but anybody who has a, you know,
TS/SCI clearance and meets the eligibility criteria. The access
adjudicative authority should be able to grant you access.
Mr. Gaetz. Mr. Burchett, if you will yield.
So, just to be--put a fine point on that there is nothing
that you are aware of that is above Special Access Program
classification?
Mr. Grusch. It is a misnomer that there is anything
actually above top secret. Executive Order 13526 delineates the
classification levels.
Mr. Gaetz. Right. But I draw upon that because we can have
access to those programs and so the notion that we are not
being given that access sort of defies our typical muscle
memory here in Congress.
Thank you, Mr. Burchett. I will yield back to you.
Mr. Burchett. Thank you, Mr. Gaetz.
Along those lines, Title 10--you may not know this or not,
but Title 10 and Title 50 authorization they seem to say they
are inefficient. So, who gets to decide this, in your opinion,
in the past?
Mr. Grusch. It is a group of career senior executive
officials.
Mr. Burchett. OK. Are they government officials?
Mr. Grusch. Both in and out.
Mr. Burchett. Be what?
Mr. Grusch. Both in and out of government and that is about
as far as I can go there.
Mr. Burchett. I got you. All right. Well, that leads to my
next question. Which private corporations are directly involved
in this program? How much taxpayer money has been invested in
these programs, to your knowledge?
I mean, we know--we audit the Pentagon every year and I
have been here 5 years and they fail the daggum thing every
year. Lose over a billion dollars a year, we think, and I was
told the Department of Defense maybe 60 percent of their assets
are unaccounted for, whatever the heck that means. In the
public sector, you go to jail for that kind of crap. So, tell
me.
Mr. Grusch. Yes. I know when I am a dollar off on my DTS
travel voucher I get hammered, but seems like it does not work
the other way, right.
Mr. Burchett. If you sell over--if you sell over $600 worth
of stuff on Ebay now you get a call from the IRS. So, please,
what corporations?
Mr. Grusch. Yes. I do not know the specific metrics toward
the end of your question. The specific corporations I did
provide to the committees in specific divisions and I spent 11=
hours with both intel committees.
Mr. Burchett. OK. Has there been any--has there been an
active U.S. Government disinformation campaign to deny the
existence of unidentified aerial phenomena and, if so, why?
Mr. Grusch. I cannot go beyond what I have already espoused
publicly about that.
Mr. Burchett. OK. I have been told to ask you what that is
and how to get it in the record.
Mr. Grusch. Which----
Ms. Luna. What you stated publicly in your interviews for
the congressional Record.
Mr. Grusch. If you reference my News Nation interview and I
talked about a multi-decade, you know, campaign to
disenfranchise public interest, basically.
Ms. Luna. Thank you.
Mr. Burchett. I apologize, Mr. Chairman. I yield back
negative 21 seconds.
Mr. Grothman. Thank you.
Ms. Ocasio-Cortez?
Ms. Ocasio-Cortez. Thank you, Mr. Chairman, and thank you
to our witnesses for coming here today. I do concur with the
Ranking Member as well as several other Members here on this
Committee that this is a committee for whistleblowers and for
the protection of whistleblowers as well. So, we understand
what you are putting on the table here and what you are putting
on the line here. We thank you for that.
Mr. Grusch, you sat on the unidentified anomalous
phenomenon task force created in the 2020 NDAA, correct?
Mr. Grusch. Yes.
Ms. Ocasio-Cortez. There have been some things that have
been mentioned here during this hearing that I wanted to pick
up on.
Mr. Graves, you mentioned specifically during the answer to
one of your questions, you named Boeing contractors being
engaged in an incident regarding this red cube about a football
field wide.
I was wondering if you could speak a little bit about the
interaction--or Mr. Grusch, either of you--the interactions
between defense contractor companies and any UAP-related
programs or activities.
Mr. Graves. So, I will just say that the information about
the contractors themselves were provided by a witness and I
have no particular detail in that relationship.
Ms. Ocasio-Cortez. Understood.
Mr. Grusch?
Mr. Grusch. The kind of general unclassed wave tops.
Certainly, the contractors, you know, or the metal benders, so
to speak, the ones actually doing specific performance on
government contracts.
Ms. Ocasio-Cortez. Are they required to issue any
disclosure regarding UAP sightings or do they engage in any
reporting around this?
Mr. Grusch. In terms of the contractors? Not that I am
aware of.
Ms. Ocasio-Cortez. They do not. OK. Now, when it comes to
notification that you had mentioned about IR&D programs, we
have seen defense contractors abuse their contracts before
through this Committee.
I have seen it personally, and I have also seen the
notification requirements to Congress abused. I am wondering,
one of the loopholes that we see in the law is that there is--
at least from my vantage point, is that depending on what we
are seeing is that there are no actual definitions or
requirements for notification.
Are there--what methods of notification did you observe?
Like, when they say they notified Congress, how did they do
that? Do you have insight into that?
Mr. Grusch. For certain IR&D activities, I can only think
of ones conventional in nature. Sometimes they flow through
certain, I will just say SAP programs, that have cognizant
authority over the Air Force or something and those are
congressionally reported compartments.
But IR&D is literally internal to the contractors. So, as
long as it is money, either profits, private investment, et
cetera, they do whatever they want.
Ms. Ocasio-Cortez. And to put a finer point on it, when
there is a requirement for any agency or company to--or any
agency to notify Congress, do they contact the chairman of a
committee? Do they get them on the phone specifically? Is this
through an email to, hypothetically, a dead email box?
Mr. Grusch. A lot of it comes through what they call the
PPR--Periodic Program Review process--if it is, you know, a SAP
or controlled access program equity, and then those go to the
specific committees, whether it be the SASC, HASC----
Ms. Ocasio-Cortez. OK. Thank you. I apologize. I just--my
time is limited.
Mr. Graves, one of your main concerns that the FAA
currently does not have an official process to receive reports
of UAP from pilots or others, correct?
Mr. Graves. Correct.
Ms. Ocasio-Cortez. And in your experience what data should
the AARO program prioritize for potential collection? We have,
you know, location, date, time, but are there other specific
characteristics that should be included in these reports?
Mr. Graves. Certainly. I think that there is two categories
that would be important. One would be kinematics and
understanding the specifics of how the vehicle or objects are
moving, and the second would be a more zoomed out approach of
being able to look at origin and destination after or before
the incident as well as getting a better contextual
understanding of how these objects are interacting with each
other.
Ms. Ocasio-Cortez. Thank you. Now, because I only have a
minute left--I apologize we only have 5 minutes today. But for
the record, if you were me where would you look? Titles,
programs, departments, regions--if you could just name
anything. And I put that as an open question to the three of
you.
Mr. Grusch. I would be happy to give you that in a closed
environment. I can tell you specifically.
Ms. Ocasio-Cortez. Thank you. Commander Fravor?
Commander Fravor. I would say and I have told people that
you have to know where to look. They are not going to divulge
it to you because of the classification levels. But if you know
where to look and who to talk to, which is exactly where Mr.
Grusch can point you then you have them.
Ms. Ocasio-Cortez. OK. Mr. Graves?
Mr. Graves. I was an operator, so I was depending on folks
like Mr. Grusch to do that homework.
Ms. Ocasio-Cortez. OK. Thank you very much. I yield back to
the Chair.
Mr. Grothman. Mr. Biggs?
Mr. Biggs. Thanks. Thanks, Mr. Chairman. I thank the
witnesses for being here today. I am over here.
Thank you so much for being here. I want to get into the
specifics here and the reason I am going to go this way is
because you have talked a bit about what I would call
misdirection by official U.S. Government with regard to UAPs,
right, and so I am going to get to that in a second.
But last week White House NSC spokesman, John Kirby, stated
that UAPs are having an impact on our training ranges and needs
to be treated as a legitimate issue. Do you concur with his
statements? And that is for each of you.
Mr. Grusch. Yes.
Mr. Graves. Yes.
Commander Fravor. Yes.
Mr. Biggs. OK. Now, having said that, I am going to take
you to specific instances around the Phoenix Valley because
that is where I live.
In 1997, we had the famous Phoenix Lights case. I do not
know if any of you are familiar with that. There were two
things that went along with that and the explanation was
military training range off Luke and the Barry Goldwater range.
Do you know anything different other than the official
explanation of those lights?
Mr. Grusch. Only what is in the public vernacular about it.
That was outside the scope of my duties.
Mr. Biggs. And if we wanted to--just my question along with
my colleague from New York, Ms. Ocasio-Cortez, if we wanted to
find out more about that where would we go to find the files
and where--and who would we address? I know you are going to
tell me we need to go to a SCIF so you can tell us in a SCIF.
Commander Fravor. I could potentially give you a vector on
that. That specific case I am not--I mean, I am familiar with
it in terms of public, but I can give you a vector in a closed
environment. Yes.
Mr. Biggs. That would be good. Thank you. So, if it is true
that UAPs are having an impact on training ranges and this
Administration considers it to be a legitimate issue what steps
can Congress take to address training range impacts? And I say
that having two very large training rages in my state.
And so, we will start with Mr. Graves and go on down the
panel.
Mr. Graves. Some of the initial procedures have been
implemented such as within the United States Navy that have a
Range Fouler Report that gathers information from pilots. I
understand that a service-wide reporting mechanism is still
pending.
However, that would be a great next step not only for
gathering information but for showing the troops that is an
acceptable topic and reducing the stigma.
Mr. Biggs. OK. Please all of you continue.
Mr. Grusch. Yes. As a recipient of a lot of those training
range reports sometimes we only get contextual, kind of oral
reporting. It would be nice if they attached all sensor data
and there is a system in place that can handle multiple
classifications of data, and that is an issue with the F-35,
right. That jet was never built to be an ISR platform, and it
is a pain in the butt to get that data off. So----
Mr. Biggs. Great. Thank you.
Commander Fravor. Yes, I would agree with the previous two,
being a user of those training ranges, that the data has to be
out there. You have to acknowledge that you are seeing them and
then you have to collect the data.
Right now, you get the report. Someone says, I saw
something, but no one collects the radar data to back it up and
do research.
Mr. Biggs. OK. Do you believe that the 2019 classification
guidelines for UAPs interferes with the Federal Government's
ability to be transparent with the American people and do you
think we need to be more transparent with the American people?
All of you, yes.
Mr. Graves. I will say yes to that.
Mr. Grusch. Yes, I am familiar with the UAP Task Force 2019
Security Classification guide. I think it is fair. I did
actually help author that with the Director.
Mr. Biggs. Uh-oh. You got a bias then.
Mr. Grusch. Yes. I will say--I will call it a lazy attitude
about declassifying videos. I mean, I have seen some of the
videos of, you know, the recent shoot down and I saw no reason
that could not have been released as long as they mask, you
know, some data. The American people deserve to see that
imagery and full motion video.
Commander Fravor. I would think--well, in my opinion, I
will say things are over-classified. I know for a fact the
video or the pictures that came out in the--I think it was the
2020 report, that had the stuff off the East Coast that were
taken with an iPhone off the East Coast.
A buddy of mine was one of the senior people there and he
said they originally classified it TS/SCI, and my question then
was what is TS/SCI about these? They are an iPhone literally
off the vacapes. That is not TS/SCI.
So, they are over classified, and as soon as they do that
they go in a vault and then you all have to look for them.
Mr. Biggs. So, with the over-classification that may be one
way. Are there other ways that the DoD or intelligence agencies
are keeping this information from the American people or even
from Congress?
Mr. Graves. I think part of that has been not encouraging
reporting, if the problem is not something that can be
measured, if it is not something that is going to be fixed.
Mr. Biggs. OK. Very good. Well, I am out of time and I
thank you, Mr. Chairman, and I yield back.
Mr. Grothman. First of all, without objection,
Representative Nick Langworthy of New York is waived on the
Subcommittee for purpose of questioning witnesses at today's
Subcommittee hearing. And then we go to Mr. Burlison.
Mr. Burlison. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Appreciate you guys
coming out today testifying.
Look, I have been here for 6 months and I am pretty
skeptical. I do not trust anything in this town and so--and I
think that is because I am from Missouri. You have got to show
me, right.
With that being said, there has been a lot of things that
have been said in the public, Mr. Grusch, and so I want to get
down, if we can, to some specifics, right.
So, at one point you had said that there has been harmful
activity or aggressive activity. Has any of the activity been
aggressive, been hostile, in your reports?
Mr. Grusch. I know of multiple colleagues of mine that got
physically injured and the activity----
Mr. Burlison. By UAPs or by people within the Federal
Government?
Mr. Grusch. Both.
Mr. Burlison. OK. So, there has been activity by alien or
nonhuman technology and/or beings that has caused harm to
humans?
Mr. Grusch. I cannot get into the specifics in an open
environment, but at least the activity that I personally
witnessed--and I have to be very careful here because you do
not--you know, they tell you never to acknowledge tradecraft,
right.
So, what I personally witnessed, myself and my wife, was
very disturbing.
Mr. Burlison. OK. One of my constituents actually sent this
next question and I figured I would ask it since I have the
same thought. You have said that U.S. has intact spacecraft.
You said that the government has alien bodies or alien species.
Have you seen--have you seen the spacecraft?
Mr. Grusch. I have to be careful to describe what I have
seen firsthand and not in this environment. But I could answer
that question behind closed doors.
Mr. Burlison. Have you seen any of the bodies?
Mr. Grusch. That is something I have not witnessed myself.
Mr. Burlison. OK. And so with that being said, you know,
the other statement that has been made that was intriguing to
me because--and it is intriguing because my view has been that
we are billions of light years away from any other system and
the concept that an alien species that is technologically
advanced enough to travel billions of light years gets here and
somehow is incompetent enough to not survive Earth or crashes
is something that I find a little bit farfetched.
And that with that being said, you have mentioned that
there is interdimensional potential. Could you expound on that?
Mr. Grusch. To answer your first question and, you know, I
am here as a fact witness and not an expert, but I will give
you a theoretical framework at least to work off to kind of
espouse crashes.
Regardless of, you know, your level of sentience, right--
you know, planes crash, cars crash, and a number of sorties,
however high, a small percentage are going to end in, you know,
mission failure, if you will, as we say in the Air Force.
And then in terms of multidimensionality, that kind of
thing, the framework that I am familiar with, for example, is
something called the holographic principle both--it derives
itself from general relativity and quantum mechanics and that
is if you want to imagine a 3D object such as yourself casting
a shadow onto a 2D surface that is the holographic principle.
So, you can be projected--quasi projected from higher
dimensional space to lower dimensional. It is a scientific
trope that you can actually cross, literally, as far as I
understand, but there is probably guys with Ph.Ds. that we
could probably argue about that.
Mr. Burlison. But you have not seen any documentation that
that is what is occurring? It is a theory?
Mr. Grusch. Only theoretical framework discussion.
Mr. Burlison. OK. OK. Occam's Razor is that this--these
aircrafts have they been identified that they are being
produced by domestic, you know, military contractors? Is there
any evidence that that is what is being recovered?
Mr. Grusch. Not to my knowledge. Plus, the recoveries
predate a lot of our advanced programs that I previously am
waiving off. So----
Mr. Burlison. So, would it be safe to say that there could
be a scenario today where you have an aircraft that crashes
because it has been involved in one program from one Federal
agency and the--but the agency that retrieves it is not aware
of that program and to them it appears alien in origin?
Mr. Grusch. I mean, that is a hypothetical situation. I am
not aware of any historical situation that would match that
that you described.
Mr. Burlison. You are not aware--it has not happened that
you are aware of?
Mr. Grusch. That I am aware of.
Mr. Burlison. Thank you. Mr. Chairman, I yield back.
Mr. Grothman. Mr. Gaetz?
Mr. Gaetz. Several months ago my office received a
protected disclosure from Eglin Air Force Base indicating that
there was a UAP incident that required my attention. I sought a
briefing regarding that episode and brought with me Congressman
Burchett and Congresswoman Luna.
We asked to see any of the evidence that had been taken by
flight crew in this endeavor and to observe any radar signature
as long as--as well as to meet with the flight crew. We were
not afforded access to all of the flight crew and initially we
were not afforded access to images and to radar.
Thereafter, we had a bit of a discussion about how
authorities flow in the United States of America and we did see
the image and we did meet with one member of the flight crew
who took the image.
The image was of something that I am not able to attach to
any human capability either from the United States or from any
of our adversaries and I am somewhat informed on the matter
having served on the Armed Services Committee for 7 years,
having served on the committee that oversees DARPA and advanced
technologies for several years.
When we spoke with the flight crew and when he showed us
the photo that he had taken I asked why the video was not
engaged--why we did not have a FLIR system that worked. Here is
what he said.
They were out on a test mission that day over the Gulf of
Mexico and when you are on a test mission you are supposed to
have clear airspace. Not supposed to be anything that shows up.
And they saw a sequence of four craft in a clear diamond
formation for which there is a radar sequence that I and I
alone have observed in the U.S. Congress.
One of the pilots goes to check out that diamond formation
and sees a large floating, what I can only describe as an orb,
again, like I said, not of any human capability that I am--that
I am aware of.
And when he approached he said that his radar went down. He
said that his FLIR system malfunctioned and that he had to
manually take this image from one of the lenses and it was not
automated in collection as you would typically see in a test
mission.
So, I guess I will start with Commander Fravor. How should
we think about the fact that this craft that was approached by
our pilot had the capability of disarming a number of the
sensor and collection systems on that craft?
Commander Fravor. I think this goes to that national
security side. You can go back through history of things
showing up in certain areas and disabling our capabilities,
which is disheartening, and for us, I mean, like I said, it
completely disabled the radar on the aircraft when they tried
to do it and the only way we could see it is passively, which
is how he got that image.
So, I think that is a concern on what are these doing, not
only how do they operate but their capabilities inside to do
things like this.
Mr. Gaetz. And how should we think about four craft moving
in a very clear formation equidistant from one another in a
diamond? In all of the phenomenon, perhaps, Mr. Graves, that
you have analyzed have we ever seen multiple craft in a single
formation?
Mr. Graves. I have one particular case and that was during
the Gimbal incident. The recording on the AT FLIR system shows
a single object that rotates.
You hear the pilots refer to a fleet of objects that is not
visible on the FLIR system and that was something that I
witnessed during the debrief as part of the radar data on the
situational awareness page.
I would like to add, however, Congressman, there is a small
bit of anger, I would say, I would feel if those pilots are
still facing that difficulty in reporting this topic and they
do not have the tools to be able to mitigate this issue. It
just goes to show how serious this is and why this is such an
important issue for our pilots and for our Nation.
Mr. Gaetz. It was stated explicitly to me by these test
pilots that if you have a UAP experience the best thing you can
do for your career is forget it and not tell anyone because any
type of reporting, either above the surface or below the
surface, does have a perceived consequence to these people and
that is a culture we must change if we want to get to the
truth.
Mr. Chairman, I would observe that perhaps as we move
forward from this hearing there are some obvious next steps.
Every person watching this knows that we need to meet with Mr.
Grusch in a secure compartmentalized facility so that we can
get fulsome answers that do not put him in jeopardy and that
give us the information we need.
Second, I would suggest that the radar images that were
collected of this formation of craft out of Eglin Air Force
Base and specifically the actual image taken by the actual
flight crew that we can actually validate be provided to the
Committee, subpoenaed if necessary, so that we are able to
track how to get this type of reporting and analysis done in a
more fulsome way. That would be my recommendation humbly as a
guest here of the fine Oversight Committee.
I yield back.
Mr. Grothman. Ms. Mace?
Ms. Mace. Thank you, Mr. Chairman, and good morning to our
witnesses who are testifying today. I want to thank each of you
for being here to discuss a topic of grave importance to our
national security.
Earlier this year a Chinese spy balloon was shot down off
the coast of my home state of South Carolina. Since the Roswell
incident in 1947, many American have wondered about the dangers
of unknown objects crisscrossing our skies. Whether these are
UAPs or weather phenomena, advanced technology from American
allied or enemy forces, or something more out of this world.
So, my first question--I have several questions and I
will--if we can just be quick on these first two. I am going to
ask each of you the same question and then I will get to each
of you individually.
The first one, when you reported your experiences with a
UAP did any of you face any repercussions with your superiors?
Yes or no.
Mr. Graves. No.
Commander Fravor. No.
Mr. Grusch. I have actually never seen anything personally,
believe it or not.
Ms. Mace. All right. And then do you believe there is an
active disinformation campaign within our government to deny
the existence of UAPs? Yes or no.
Mr. Graves. I do not have an answer to that.
Mr. Grusch. As previously stated publicly, yes.
Commander Fravor. Previously with, like, Project Bluebook,
yes, but currently I do not speak for the U.S. Government.
Ms. Mace. OK. Thank you.
I have a few questions for Mr. Graves. What percentage of
UAP sightings, in your belief, go unreported by our pilots?
Mr. Graves. This is an approximation based off of my
personal experience speaking with a number of pilots, but I
would estimate we are somewhere near 5 percent reporting,
perhaps.
Ms. Mace. So, like, 95 percent basically do not report
seeing UAPs?
Mr. Graves. That is just my personal estimate.
Ms. Mace. In the incident off Virginia Beach, do you
believe the Navy took the danger to your aircraft seriously
after it was reported?
Mr. Graves. Absolutely.
Ms. Mace. A few questions for Mr. Fravor.
As an expert naval aviator have you ever seen an object
that looked and moved like the Tic Tac UAP?
Commander Fravor. No.
Ms. Mace. Did the Tic Tac UAP move in such a way that
defied the laws of physics?
Commander Fravor. The way we understand them, yes.
Ms. Mace. Many dismiss UAP reports as classified weapons
testing by our own government. But in your experience as a
pilot does our government typically test advanced weapons
systems right next to multimillion-dollar jets without
informing our pilots?
Commander Fravor. No. We have test ranges for that.
Ms. Mace. It took over 15 years for your encounter with the
Tic Tac to be declassified. Do you feel there was a good reason
to prevent lawmakers from having access to this footage?
Commander Fravor. No. I just think it was ignored when it
happened, and it just sat somewhere in a file. Never got
reported.
Ms. Mace. In a drawer. It happens a lot up here. Shocker.
Mr. Grusch, a couple of questions for you too, sir, this
morning. What percentage of UAPs do you feel are adequately
investigated by the U.S. Government, of the 5 percent that are
reported?
Mr. Grusch. I can only speak for my personal leadership
over at NGA. I tried to look at every report that came through
that I could triage.
Ms. Mace. Do you believe that officials at the highest
levels of our national security apparatus have unlawfully
withheld information from Congress and subverted our oversight
authority?
Mr. Grusch. There are certain elected leaders that had more
information that--I am not sure what they have shared with
certain Gang of 8 members or et cetera. But, certainly, I would
not be surprised.
Ms. Mace. OK. You say that the government is in possession
of potentially nonhuman spacecraft. Based on your experience
and extensive conversations with experts do you believe our
government has made contact with intelligent extraterrestrials?
Mr. Grusch. It is something I cannot discuss in a public
setting.
Ms. Mace. OK. And I cannot ask when you think this
occurred. If you believe we have crashed craft, as stated
earlier, do we have the bodies of the pilots who piloted this
craft?
Mr. Grusch. As I have stated publicly already in my News
Nation interview, biologics came with some of these recoveries.
Yes.
Ms. Mace. Were they, I guess, human or nonhuman biologics?
Mr. Grusch. Nonhuman, and that was the assessment of people
with direct knowledge on the program I talked to that are
currently still on the program.
Ms. Mace. And was this documentary evidence, this video,
photos, eyewitness? Like, how would that be determined?
Mr. Grusch. The specific documentation I would have to talk
to you in a SCIF about.
Ms. Mace. Got you. OK.
So--and you may or may not be able to answer my last
question, and maybe we get into a SCIF at the next hearing that
we have. But who in the government, either what agency, sub
agency, what contractors, who should be called into the next
hearing about UAPs either in a public setting or even in a
private setting?
And you probably cannot name names, but what agencies or
organizations, contractors, et cetera, do we need to call in to
get these questions answered whether it is about funding, what
programs are happening, and what is out there?
Mr. Grusch. I can give you a specific cooperative and
hostile witness list of specific individuals that were in
those.
Ms. Mace. And how soon can we get that list?
Mr. Grusch. I am happy to provide that to you after the
hearing.
Ms. Mace. Super. Thank you. And I yield back.
Mr. Grothman. OK. Now we have Mr. Langworthy. OK.
Mr. Langworthy. Thank you very much. I would like to thank
all of the witnesses for being here today to discuss this very
unique topic and I would like to jump right into my questions,
if you do not mind.
Commander Fravor, can you briefly describe your background?
Commander Fravor. Yes. I was an enlisted Marine, Naval
Academy graduate, Navy, flew for 18 years. Got a Master's from
University of Houston and I have worked in the private sector
for the last what now, 19--16 years, 17 years. I do a lot of
defense work.
Mr. Langworthy. Really gold-plated credentials. Commander
Fravor, we have all seen this floating Tic Tac video that you
engaged with on November 14th, 2004. Can you briefly talk about
why you were off the coast of San Diego that day?
Commander Fravor. Yes. We were at a work up with all the
battle groups. So, we integrate the ships with the carrier, the
airwing with the carrier, and we start working.
So, we were doing an air to air defense to hone not only
our skills but those of the USS Princeton when they had been
tracking them for 2 weeks. The problem was that there was never
manned aircraft airborne when they were tracking them and this
was the first day and, unfortunately, we were the ones airborne
and went and saw it.
Mr. Langworthy. Do you remember the weather that day? Was
it cloudy or windy or anything out of the ordinary on the
Pacific coast?
Commander Fravor. It was actually--if you are familiar San
Diego, it was a perfect day, light winds, no whitecaps, clear
skies. Not a cloud. It was--for flying it was the best.
Mr. Langworthy. Now, is it true that you saw, in your
words, a 40-foot flying Tic Tac shaped object?
Commander Fravor. That is correct. For some people that
cannot--know what a Tic Tac is it is a giant flying propane
tank.
Mr. Langworthy. Did this object come up on radar or
interfere with your radar or the USS Princeton?
Commander Fravor. The Princeton tracked it. The Nimitz
tracked it. The E2 tracked it. We never saw it on our radars.
Our fire control radars never picked it up.
The other airplane that took the video did get it on a
radar. As soon as it tried to lock it, it jammed the radar,
spit the lock and he rapidly switched over to the targeting
pod, which you can do in the F-18.
Mr. Langworthy. From what you saw that day and what you
have seen on video did you see any source of propulsion from
the flying object including on any potential thermal scans from
your aircraft?
Commander Fravor. No, there is none. There is no IR plume
coming out and Chad, who took the video, went through all the
EO, which is black and white TV and the I&R modes and there is
no visual signs of propulsion. It is just sitting in space at
20,000 feet.
Mr. Langworthy. In your career have you ever seen a
propulsion system that creates no thermal exhaust?
Commander Fravor. No.
Mr. Langworthy. Can you describe how the aircraft
maneuvered?
Commander Fravor. Abruptly, very determinant. It knew
exactly what it was doing. It was aware of our presence and it
had acceleration rates--I mean, it went from zero to matching
our speed in no time at all.
Mr. Langworthy. Now, if the fastest plane on Earth was
trained to do these maneuvers that you saw, would it be capable
of doing that?
Commander Fravor. No, not even close.
Mr. Langworthy. And just to confirm, this object had no
wings, correct?
Commander Fravor. No wings.
Mr. Langworthy. Now, was the aircraft that you were flying
was it armed?
Commander Fravor. No, and never felt threatened at all.
Mr. Langworthy. If the aircraft was armed do you believe
that your aircraft or any aircraft in possession of the United
States could have shot the Tic Tac down?
Commander Fravor. I would say no, just on the performance.
It would have just left in a split second.
Mr. Langworthy. It looks like we have a problem here that
needs further investigation.
Commander Fravor. Yes.
Mr. Langworthy. In your belief is this flying Tic Tac--I
mean, is this--is it capable of being the product of any other
nation on the Earth?
Commander Fravor. No. I actually said--like I said earlier,
I think it defies current material science and the ability to
develop that much propulsion and I know there has been some
physicists that have done calculations, which is beyond
anything that we have.
Mr. Langworthy. Well, either the United States has an
adversary here in this world that we do not know or we really
have some serious investigations to do. I really appreciate you
being here. Is there anything else about the November 14th,
2004, incident that you think is important for this Committee
to know that you have not been asked here today?
Commander Fravor. No. You know, it has been said it is
probably the most credible UFO sighting in history, based on
all the sensors that were tracking it and then for us to get
visual. And to go against the naysayers that it is something on
the screen or whatever, I mean, there is four sets of human
eyeballs.
We are all very credible. Of the six of us that were
involved in the thing, including the video, every one of us is
going to do 20-plus years in the military in very responsible
positions. I would say the world needs to know that. It is not
a joke.
Mr. Langworthy. Thank you very much for your testimony here
today, for all of you. And I yield back, Mr. Chairman.
Mr. Grothman. Mr. Ogles?
Mr. Ogles. Thank you, Mr. Chairman, and thank you all for
being here and the courage it took to come forward and, again,
the sacrifice that each of you have made.
I serve on the National Security Subcommittee for the
Financial Services Committee so I really want to stay in the
national security lane, if I may.
So, when we think about traditional adversaries and both us
toward them and them toward us, you know, we probe their
capabilities. We look for weaknesses and we collect that data,
that reconnaissance, for--in the event we need it in the
future.
For each of you, yes or no question. Based off of your own
experience or the data that you have been privy to is there any
indication that these UAPs could be essentially collecting
reconnaissance information?
Mr. Graves?
Mr. Graves. Yes.
Mr. Ogles. Mr. Grusch?
Mr. Grusch. Fair assessment.
Mr. Ogles. Mr. Fravor?
Commander Fravor. It is very possible.
Mr. Ogles. Again, in the national security vein, is it
possible that these UAPs would be probing our capabilities, yes
or no?
Mr. Graves?
Mr. Graves. Yes.
Mr. Ogles. Mr. Grusch?
Mr. Grusch. Yes.
Mr. Ogles. Mr. Fravor?
Commander Fravor. Definitely.
Mr. Ogles. Is it possible that these UAPs are testing for
vulnerabilities in our current systems?
Mr. Graves. Yes.
Mr. Grusch. Yes.
Commander Fravor. Possible.
Mr. Ogles. Do you feel, based off of your experience and
information that you have been privy to, that these UAPs
provide an existential threat to the national security of the
United States?
Mr. Graves?
Mr. Graves. Potentially.
Mr. Grusch. Yes, sir, potentially.
Commander Fravor. Same answer, potentially. I would say
definitely potentially.
Mr. Ogles. Mr. Graves and Fravor, in the event that your
encounters had become hostile would you have--would you have
had the capability to defend yourself, your crew, your
aircraft?
Mr. Graves. Absolutely not.
Mr. Ogles. Sir?
Mr. Grusch. No.
Mr. Ogles. Based off of the information that you have been
privy to is there any indication that these UAPs are interested
in our nuclear technology and capabilities?
Mr. Graves. Yes.
Mr. Grusch. By external observation, sure, that could be a
fair assessment. Yes.
Commander Fravor. Yes.
Mr. Ogles. Is there any indication the Department of Energy
is involved in UAP data collection and housing?
Mr. Graves. I do not have an answer.
Mr. Grusch. I cannot confirm or deny that in a public
setting.
Mr. Ogles. Could you do it in a secure setting?
Mr. Grusch. Yes.
Mr. Ogles. Mr. Fravor?
Commander Fravor. No, I do not know.
Mr. Ogles. Mr. Chairman, you know, I think I am the last
Member to go. But there clearly is a threat to the national
security of the United States of America. As Members of
Congress, we have a responsibility to maintain oversight and be
aware of these activities so that, if appropriate, we take
action.
I would encourage the Chairman to demand that we have any
and all, but in particular Mr. Grusch, talk to us in a SCIF and
if that access is denied I will personally volunteer to
initiate the Holman Rule against any personnel or any program
or any agency that denies access to Congress.
Mr. Chairman, with that, I will yield the remainder of my
time to my fellow colleague from Tennessee, Mr. Burchett.
Mr. Burchett. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Thank you, Mr.
Ogles, for the great questions, brother.
Mr. Grusch, I might have asked this before but I want to
make sure. Do you have any personal knowledge of someone who
has possibly been injured working on legacy UAP reverse
engineering?
Mr. Grusch. Yes.
Mr. Burchett. OK. How were they injured? Was it
--is it something like a radioactive type situation or
something we did not understand? I have heard people talk about
Havana syndrome type incidences. What was your recollection of
that?
Mr. Grusch. I cannot get into specifics, but you can
imagine assessing an unknown unknown there is a lot of
potentialities you cannot fully prepare for.
Mr. Burchett. How do you think we ought to handle UAP
whistleblower complaints like yours in the future?
Mr. Grusch. Yes. There was some issue with mine. So, you
know, PPD-19 process it goes to the intel committees either
through PPD-19 or ICD 120.
There is not a good way for the intelligence community
Inspector General to provide that to other committees, and I
asked my information to be sent to the House and Senate Armed
Services Committee because there are Title 10 equities at play.
But there was no smooth process to do so.
Mr. Burchett. It is a trashcan. Are you aware of any
individuals that are participating in reverse engineering
programs for nonterrestrial craft?
Mr. Grusch. Personally, yes.
Mr. Burchett. Do you know any that would be willing to
testify if there were protections for them?
Mr. Grusch. Certainly, closed door and assurances that
breaking their NDA they are not going to get administratively
punished for so.
Mr. Burchett. I yield, Mr. Chairman.
Mr. Grothman. Thank you. We are going to do something a
little bit out of the ordinary here. We are going to give three
people a chance at additional 3 minutes.
So, Mr. Burchett, do you want to keep going?
Mr. Burchett. Why don't you come back to me, Mr. Chairman?
Ms. Luna, if she is on--is she on that list?
Ms. Luna. I am on the special list.
Mr. Grothman. Sure.
Ms. Luna. Chairman, I would like to submit for the record
an article by News Nation and it follows Mr. Grusch's full
interview, for the record.
Mr. Grothman. Without objection.
Ms. Luna. Thank you. Mr. Grusch, why is it that you refer
to the phenomenon as nonhuman intelligence? Why deviate from
the basis of extraterrestrial life?
Mr. Grusch. I think the phenomenon is a very complex and I
like to leave an open mind analytically to specific origin.
Ms. Luna. When you say specific origin are you referring--
can you elaborate on that for those that might not----
Mr. Grusch. If it is a traditional extraterrestrial origin
or something else that we do not quite understand from an
either biological or astrophysics perspective. I just like to
keep an open mind on what it could be.
Ms. Luna. OK. And referring to your News Nation interview
you had referenced specific treaties between governments.
Article Three of the nuclear arms treaty with Russia identifies
UAPs.
It specifically mentions them. To your knowledge, are their
safety measures in place with foreign governments or other
superpowers to avoid an escalatory situation in the event that
a UAP malevolent event occurs?
Mr. Grusch. You are referring to actual--a public treaty in
the U.N. register--it is funny you mentioned that--the
agreement on measures to reduce the risk of outbreak of nuclear
war signed in 1971. Unclassified treaty publicly available, and
if you cite the George Washington University National Security
Archives you will find the declassified, in 2013, specific
provisions and the specific red line flash message traffic with
the specific codes pursuant to Article Three and Article--also
situation two, which is in the previously classified NSA
archive.
What I would recommend--and I tried to get access but I got
a wall of silence at the White House--was those specific
incidents when those--message traffic was used. I think some
scholarship on that would open the door to a further
investigation using those publicly available information.
Ms. Luna. Thank you. And then my last question with 51
seconds remaining, you mentioned white collar crimes
potentially being--taking place in regards to a cover up. Can
you please elaborate?
Mr. Grusch. I have concerns based on the interviews I
conducted under my official duties of potential violations of
the Federal Acquisition Regulations--the FAR.
Ms. Luna. Thank you very much. Chairman, I yield the
remainder of my time.
Mr. Grothman. OK. We will go to Mr. Raskin for 3 minutes.
Mr. Raskin. Thanks, Mr. Chair, and I thank the witnesses
for their endurance and service today.
Mr. Fravor, you have described your episode in detail now
and you call it the most credible UFO sighting in history. I
wonder was this the first time that you encountered a UFO or a
UAP in 2004?
Commander Fravor. Yes.
Mr. Raskin. And what was your general attitude or
perspective on the UFO discussion before that happened?
Commander Fravor. I never felt that we were alone with all
the planets out there. But I was not a UFO person. I was not
watching History Channel and Mufon and all that.
Mr. Raskin. And have you had experiences or encounters
since that happened?
Commander Fravor. No.
Mr. Raskin. And so, have you formed any general conclusions
about what you think you experienced then?
Commander Fravor. Yes. I think what we experienced was,
like I said, well beyond the material science and the
capabilities that we had at the time, that we have currently,
or that we are going to have in the next 10 to 20 years.
Mr. Raskin. Very good.
Mr. Grusch, you have been able to answer in great detail on
certain questions and then other things you say you are not
able to respond to. Can you just explain where you are drawing
the line and what is the basis for that?
Mr. Grusch. Based on my DODSR security review and what they
have determined that is unclassified.
Mr. Raskin. I see. So, you are answering any questions that
just call upon your knowledge of unclassified questions but
anything that relates to classified matters you are not
commenting on in this context?
Mr. Grusch. In an open session. But happy to participate in
a closed session at the right level.
Mr. Raskin. OK. And, Mr. Graves, you said that there are
dozens of fellow pilots, military pilots. Are there also
commercial pilots who have encountered the same kind of
sightings that you described before?
Mr. Graves. They are similar. Pilots--commercial pilots
have less range and less sensors to be able to reach out and
look for objects over wide swaths of airspace. And so pilots
are seeing them. Commercial pilots are seeing them and they are
typically closer and the range of what they are seeing is
pretty large.
Mr. Raskin. What is the most vivid concrete sighting with
the naked eye of the objects that you described before, the
cube-like objects?
Mr. Graves. Certainly. I think the most vivid sighting of
that would have been a near mid-air that we had at the entrance
to our working area. One of these objects was completely
stationary at the exact entrance to our working areas, not only
geographically but also altitude.
So, it was right where all the jets are going, essentially,
on the Eastern Seaboard. The two aircraft flew within about 50
feet of the object and that was a very close visual sighting.
Mr. Raskin. And you were in one of the aircraft?
Mr. Graves. I was not. I was there when the pilot landed.
He canceled the mission after. I was there. He was in the ready
room with all his gear on with his mouth open and I asked him
what the problem was and he said he almost hit one of those
darn things.
Mr. Raskin. He said he was 50 feet away from it?
Mr. Graves. Yes, sir.
Mr. Raskin. And his description of the object was
consistent with the description you gave us before?
Mr. Graves. A dark gray or a black cube inside of a clear
sphere.
Mr. Raskin. Inside of a clear sphere?
Mr. Graves. Yes.
Mr. Raskin. And with no self-evident propulsion system?
Mr. Graves. No wings. No IR energy coming off of the
vehicle. Nothing tethering it to the ground, and that was
primarily what we were experiencing out there.
Mr. Raskin. I am over time. Thank you very much for your
service and I yield back, Mr. Chairman.
Mr. Grothman. Very good. Mr. Burchett?
Mr. Burchett. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. This is for all
three of you all--starting with Mr. Graves. Why did you come
forward on this issue?
Mr. Graves. I came forward because I felt that my
colleagues did not have a way to mitigate the safety threat and
I wanted to help them. I was trained as an aviation safety
officer by the Navy and this seemed--it just felt right. I felt
like I had to help the folks that were still flying and dealing
with this.
Mr. Burchett. Mr. Grusch?
Mr. Grusch. Purely a sense of duty. My first swore an oath
when I was a cadet 18 years ago and I still uphold that even
out of uniform.
Mr. Burchett. Commander?
Commander Fravor. I was pestered by a friend, and I asked
why and he said, you are the one person that they cannot
discredit, and you will add credibility to the New York Times
article. And so after about six times I said OK.
[Laughter.]
Mr. Burchett. This town is not made, unfortunately, by
people like you all. We thank you. I do want to also thank the
people in the audience and the people that are watching this
that cannot be--people all over the world that have kept this
issue alive.
You have endured criticism and derogatory remarks, and we
are trying to get to the bottom of it. So, God bless you all.
Thank you all so much. We really appreciate you guys and gals.
[Applause.]
Mr. Burchett. That is why we need term limits. You all keep
clapping. Us politicians just keep talking.
[Laughter.]
Mr. Burchett. Let me ask you all, how can the public
contribute to UAP reporting and what avenues you think are
available to the public to report these sightings?
Mr. Graves. Right now I do not think there is a lot of
public options for the everyman to be able to report on this. I
think even for professionals that have sensor data that are
seeing these on a regular basis they are still hesitant to come
forward.
And so, for the general public I think encouraging the
conversations that we are having today, looking for technology
solutions that can be distributed so that objective data can be
gathered is the first place to go.
Mr. Burchett. Mr. Grusch?
Mr. Grusch. I will just touch on the whistleblower side of
it. I do encourage, you know, current and former military,
intelligence community, and industry contractors to come
forward in a legal way, either through the IC or DoD or
whatever the cognizant IGs are to join me in this discussion.
Mr. Burchett. Commander? And I guess I should say this for
the record. My daddy was United States Marine Corps First
Marine Division. So----
Commander Fravor. Oorah.
Mr. Burchett. Yes, sir. He was old school. Him and Chesty
Puller on Peleliu. So thank you, brother.
Commander Fravor. Wow.
Mr. Burchett. I am not--I am not anything like my daddy. He
was incredible. I am very mediocre, to say the least. But go
ahead.
Commander Fravor. You seem to be doing fine.
Mr. Burchett. Yes.
Commander Fravor. For me, you know, I was an accident
investigator. So, the biggest thing that you learn, and I think
that witnesses need to do is, one, do not try and make the fish
bigger than it was. Stick to the facts.
Write it down and do not speculate what you think it is
because it will sway your decision. Just write the facts down.
We can get all the facts together and we can start to
investigate and get a real honest story instead of it was this
big.
Mr. Burchett. Thank you, and I want to thank everybody. We
made history today. Mr. Chairman, I yield.
Mr. Grothman. Thank you much. Mr. Garcia?
Mr. Garcia. I think--I know now we are going to be making
some closing remarks and so I just want to just say a few
things.
First, to our witnesses, I want to thank all of you for
being here with us today. I know that it takes a lot--a lot of
courage. You are telling really important information to this
Committee, and I just want to thank you also for your--all
three of you, your service to our country.
I also want to just note that today's hearing was both
important but also serious and I want to thank our Subcommittee
Chairman, Mr. Grothman, I think for running a very fair and
substantive hearing. I do want to thank the Committee staff on
both sides for the amount of work that it took to put this
hearing in place and certainly to all the Members that have
been involved in this issue prior to--prior to the hearing.
I also want to note for our witnesses and for the public
that I am a freshman Member of Congress and I have only been
here for 7 months. But this is by far the most bipartisan
conversation and discussion that I have seen happen in the
Congress and I think that a topic of this significance as it
relates to our national security, as it relates to information
that we are trying to gather for the American public does bring
people together and I think that has been really great to see.
I think it is also important to note for the public, we--
today in our hearing we had on our side also both our full
Ranking Member, which is Mr. Raskin, and our Vice Ranking
Member, which is Ms. Ocasio-Cortez, both here at our hearing.
I think it shows the importance and seriousness that our
side of the aisle is taking to this important hearing but also
the broader issue as it relates to working with our Republican
counterparts on this Committee.
I want to additionally add that I think--and I encourage--I
think it is really important that we have and continue these
discussions and these hearings. Clearly, there is a lot of
information that we do not know.
But it is also very clear that we have to continue our
investigation and accountability on asking the right questions
and ensuring that they are part of the public record.
One thing that was important today is some folks might
wonder, you know, why are we asking questions that might
already be out there or that have been asked before. It is
important that they are asked and put into the public record as
it relates to this Committee.
And so I want to thank you for, you know, answering some
questions multiple times. I know not just in maybe meetings you
had with some Members but also here in the public.
Let me also just add an additional note that it is
important also that our friends in the media and those that are
not just reporting on this hearing but that have reported on
this topic and that may in the future, the media has an
important role in this process and it is very important that
the media engages, does independent investigation, and reports
on not just what happened today but what they see independently
as what has happened around UAPs in the broader community.
That is also an important public benefit that we have in
trying to get the information and the facts as it relates to
this.
Let me also just say, finally, that as a teacher and an
educator and a longtime teacher and researcher that I also
really believe in following facts and doing your homework and
making sure that you follow science as we try to get as much
information as possible.
So, I want to thank you all for agreeing to do that today.
Transparency is a cornerstone of government. We live in a vast
galaxy. A lot of unanswered questions, and thank you all for
being here today.
Mr. Chairman?
Mr. Grothman. Thank you. I would like to one more time
thank Mr. Burchett and Ms. Luna for bringing this to our
attention. It is a topic that has interested me since I was in
school. It was a very illuminating hearing.
Obviously, I think several of us are going to look forward
to getting some answers in a more confidential setting. I
assume some legislation will come out of this.
Mr. Burchett. I apologize, Mr. Chairman. I need to
compliment the folks in my office that did a lot of the work on
this. Rachel and Noah sitting behind me here, they are very
quiet and humble. But without them this thing would not have
come off like it did. So, I apologize.
Mr. Grothman. Thank you. I think we are going to want to
look into what we can do to make more of this information
public. I think there is certainly a time period after which it
should always be made public and people have been concerned
about these issues, like I said, since I was in high school.
But in any event, I would like to thank everybody who was
here sticking through the entire hearing.
Without objection, the Members will have five legislative
days to submit materials and to submit additional written
questions for the witnesses, which will be forwarded to the
witnesses for their response.
If there is no further business, without objection, the
Subcommittee stands adjourned.
[Whereupon, at 12:22 p.m., the Subcommittee was adjourned.]
[all]