[Congressional Record Volume 163, Number 149 (Thursday, September 14, 2017)]
[House]
[Pages H7417-H7420]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
ISSUES OF THE DAY
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under the Speaker's announced policy of
January 3, 2017, the Chair recognizes the gentleman from Texas (Mr.
Gohmert) for 30 minutes.
Mr. GOHMERT. Mr. Speaker, it is always an honor to be here on the
House floor.
We passed appropriations bills. It is a rare thing to hear it coming
from me, but the Appropriations Committee for the Republican majority
here in the House of Representatives has actually done an extraordinary
job this year. It hasn't been easy. They have spent a tremendous amount
of hours taking votes, during which it was made particularly partisan.
It is just a shame when people will take votes just along party lines
and not even reach out in the areas where there is mutual interest.
But, as with any bill, there are things that could have been better.
But our appropriators took some tough votes, and some of them tough
politically, but, overall, they did a remarkable job and they are to be
commended for the work they did.
We actually got our 12 appropriations bills passed in the House. I
look forward to the day--it may be years away, months away, weeks away,
days away--when the Senate is capable of passing 12 appropriations
bills.
It is very important, too, that we note the agreement that President
Trump reached. Widely reported, the President made a deal with Nancy
Pelosi and Chuck Schumer. But whether it is one of the worst votes I
have taken or not, I knew, number
[[Page H7418]]
one--Texas had been going through Hurricane Harvey, but Texas had
planned for the future. And God bless the Texas Legislature. Governor
Greg Abbott has been a dear friend since we started as district judges
together back in January of 1993. And I think the world of Governor
Greg Abbott. He is doing a superb job through the emergency situation
that Hurricane Harvey has created in Texas.
Also, Lieutenant Governor Dan Patrick is a very good friend. I think
the world of him. He has done a remarkable job leading there in Texas
from the standpoint of being the head of the Senate. He's a very
conservative man of principle. It is just a pleasure to have such able,
competent, not just conservatives, but very smart people who are people
of principle.
They created a rainy day fund. It has billions of dollars in it.
Obviously, Harvey was definitely a rainy day.
But when we took this vote on getting money into the emergency, the
FEMA, our emergency system, we were assured by people that I believed
to be very honest that they really were out of money for FEMA. That
vote had to be taken to get money into our emergency system so they
could help Florida prepare as Hurricane Irma approached.
Like I said, Texas had prepared for a rainy day as far beyond the
extent of their preparation. But I knew we could haggle over emergency
funding, we could haggle over the debt ceiling, we could haggle over a
CR coming up, and Texas would be okay while we were debating for 2, 3,
4 weeks, whatever it took until we got agreement. But Florida did not
have a rainy day fund. They needed help. Irma was approaching.
But the other thing that struck me about the need to get that vote
done, give the President 90 days, was that we still have not changed
the law to give Americans the help that so many tens or hundreds of
millions needed. We have got over 300 million here in the country and,
of course, there was bragging about the millions that got healthcare
under ObamaCare.
Well, that is a misnomer. It is a misstatement because the truth is
that some people got health insurance, but there were millions of
people that got--well, they lost the insurance. So all the statements
about, ``If you like your insurance, you can keep it,'' those were
lies. Those people making those statements have been now shown they
knew they were lies at the time they were being made. The architect of
ObamaCare knew that people would lose their insurance they liked; knew
that they would lose doctors they liked.
The way ObamaCare was designed, it even gave huge incentives,
financially, to the remaining big monopoly health insurance companies
not to bring into their network hospitals like MD Anderson or Cleveland
Clinic. There were actually incentives built in ObamaCare to have
health insurance companies not put chronic care facilities like cancer
and heart disease in their network because that meant people that had
those conditions would get that insurance because they had things like
MD Anderson or Cleveland Clinic or Mayo, whatever it was, in network,
and they didn't want them because that would be costly.
So it was a very subtle way ObamaCare was designed in order to
encourage insurance companies to actually avoid giving people the
doctors they had had before, the facilities they had had before and, in
many cases, lifesaving and life-lengthening facilities.
So there are just so many people hurting. In August, as I went all
over east Texas--from the very southeast end down in Sabine County to
the very north end, up in northwest end, up in Wood County, to the
northeast end, up in Harrison County, down to the southwest corner of
my district, down below Diboll in Angelina County--people are hurting,
and they are begging for Congress to keep its word.
We said: If you gave us the majority in the House and Senate, we
would repeal ObamaCare.
And, by golly, the American public gave us the majority in the House
and Senate. Yes, President Obama was in the White House, but we got the
majority in the House and Senate. And, holy smoke, we were able to
get--it wasn't a total repeal, but, under reconciliation procedures, we
were able to repeal most of ObamaCare in the House and in the Senate,
and send it to the President's desk, where he vetoed it. Well, that
wasn't a big surprise.
So Republicans were saying: Okay. You give us the House, the Senate
majority, and the White House, then it is a no-brainer because then we
have a President who will sign the bill that we passed when Obama was
President, and this time the Republican President will surely sign it.
Well, not only do we know we have a Republican in the White House,
but President Trump--God bless him--made clear: If you just send me
that bill that you passed in the last Congress that Obama vetoed, I
will sign it, and then we can work on a healthcare system where people
can get the care they need.
Now, what has not been talked about in the alt-left media--some
people call them the mainstream media. But the alt-left, mainstream
media, whatever you want to call them, they have talked about all the
millions of people that now have health insurance.
No. Most of those--it may be a few, but most of them have got
Medicaid. That is not the most desirable insurance you can have.
And another thing that needs to be made clear: health insurance is
not healthcare. Anyone in America here legally, illegally, criminal,
non criminal, it doesn't matter, if you are in the United States and
you have a problem, you can go to the emergency room.
I have been in emergency rooms with my immediate family members,
including kids, in-laws. I mean, I have been there. And we wait in line
behind people that may have a cold or a cut or a minor this or that.
They have got healthcare.
{time} 1315
And most of those people aren't going to pay anything, and they got
the healthcare they needed. Now, they don't have health insurance,
apparently, most of them that I have been in line behind, because you
could hear the discussion as they go through filling out the forms with
the hospital people. It would be far better if we had a better system
of clinics for people like that so they didn't have to go tie up the
most expensive healthcare there is in the emergency room. They could go
to a clinic and get the things they need.
I was yanking a hook out of a catfish that my youngest daughter had
caught some years back, and it is kind of embarrassing, a Member of
Congress, and the hook had not set until it was well down in the
catfish, so I was having a lot of trouble getting it out. And I got a
long needle-nose pliers and I was pulling it out, and I just strained
as hard as I could and, lo and behold, pulled the hook out and embedded
it very deeply in my hand down at the base of the thumb.
People started freaking out. It was no big deal. I mean, I just had a
hook buried about three-quarters of an inch or so in my thumb.
I went down for an emergency. I didn't want to. Somebody said: Look,
we will take care of your daughter. You need to get a tetanus shot.
When I found out the line was going to be about 2 hours before they
could get around to messing with the hook that was embedded in my
thumb, well, I went home and ended up using ice, and I eventually got
it out myself.
But I know, even without one of my kids or relatives, just by myself,
I have been there. I have sat there. I have listened to conversations.
There is no question, health insurance is not healthcare.
People are still hurting, and they relied on our promise; and if we
don't get the big part of ObamaCare repealed, at least at a minimum,
and get a system in place that gets people back toward the kind of
healthcare they once knew and loved--if we weren't part of the
government, as an old judge, I know those lawsuits would be brought.
The allegation in the pleadings would be that a promise was made
which lured someone in to act to their detriment based on those
promises. The doctrine, legally, is called promissory estoppel. The
judge could issue an order, if you win the case, and prevent someone
from going back on their word after they made a promise on which
another party relied to their detriment.
Unfortunately for the American public, when it is Congress, or, in
particular, the Senate, and in particular a Republican Senator, or
more, who makes an absolute repeated promise
[[Page H7419]]
over and over that they are going to do something if you elect them or
reelect them and people rely on that, they vote them in and it turns
out it is to their detriment because that Senator was not being honest
in running for office, well, it is kind of a shame that you can't get a
judge to come in and say: ``I am issuing an order under the doctrine of
promissory estoppel. You will not be allowed to back down off of your
promise. You will make good on your promise.''
When it is the government, you can't sue them and force that, because
promissory estoppel does not apply in a government situation, not
normally.
So what are we left with? Well, people can say, well, you know, wait
until the next election. We will have to replace people. No. This is
it. This is the chance. This is a generational chance. We promised
people certain things we would do, and I was fully supportive of the
promises that President Donald J. Trump made that helped him get
elected. Particularly, he promised to repeal and replace ObamaCare. For
heaven's sake, we ought to be helping him in that.
I am very grateful. We had some difficult times there between some of
us, particularly the House Freedom Caucus and the House leadership, but
Paul Ryan, Kevin McCarthy, Steve Scalise, they came through. We worked
together and we got an agreement that repealed most of ObamaCare, and
we got it down to the Senate.
I have my friend from West Virginia, and I would be glad to yield to
him.
Expressing First Amendment Rights
Mr. MOONEY of West Virginia. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to commend the
football players of Clay and Braxton County High Schools, both in my
congressional district, the Second District of beautiful West Virginia.
I commend them for exercising their right to pray before a football
game on September 1.
After one person complained about prayer at football games, Clay
County High School decided to institute a moment of silence instead.
Much to everyone's surprise, during that moment of silence, both teams
ran onto the field, knelt, and prayed together. In a spontaneous action
throughout the stands, individuals stood and joined the prayer.
In this time of great divisiveness in our Nation, gestures like these
remind us about what is great in America. Our First Amendment protects
all Americans from laws that hinder our religious freedom, our right to
free speech, and our right to worship God as we see fit.
Even though Braxton and Clay County are bitter rivals in football,
they came together to share this moment to worship the Almighty God. I
commend them for this gesture.
For the record, Braxton County won the game 23-13.
To the gentleman from Texas, thank you. I appreciate your good work
here and your words for the American people.
Mr. GOHMERT. I have been to my friend's home, beautiful as it is in a
beautiful part of the country, and I appreciate the gentleman's
recognition. It sounds like it is well deserved.
Regarding what has to be done about healthcare, clearly, the Senate
is not going to get to 60 votes on anything to do with repealing,
replacing ObamaCare. We have this reconciliation procedure that we went
through all the hoops, dotted the I's, crossed the T's, and we passed
the budget, got the rule set for reconciliation so the Senate can pass
a bill in reconciliation with 51 votes instead of 60.
Of course, the majority leader could say: You know what? This is such
a critical promise we made about healthcare that, just like the Reid
rule, when it is really, really important, we will set aside the 60-
vote cloture rule so that we can get something done, whether it is a
confirmation, whatever it is, that saves lives, helps Americans.
Well, if there was ever a bill that fit that situation, it would be
one that helped save lives through repealing at least the biggest,
worst parts of ObamaCare.
Nonetheless, under that reconciliation procedure, we have until
September 30 to get it done with 51 votes. I have got to say, earlier
this summer--I have been here 12\1/2\ years. I have never seen a
situation where the majority party in the Senate was calling those in
the majority party in the House, including the Speaker and the
leadership team, and calling those of us in the House Freedom Caucus,
calling those in the Tuesday Group, and their one big question--I have
never heard of this happening in American history--their big question
was: Would you please promise us that, if we pass this bill in the
Senate, you promise us you will not take up our bill and pass it as it
is, because the only chance we have, we are told, of passing this bill
in the Senate is if we know for sure it won't become law.
I have never heard of that happening before, but that is what
happened this summer. From our Speaker on down, our different groups:
Yes, we promise you we won't let that bad bill you're voting on become
law. We will make sure it goes to conference, and we will get something
a lot better than that that we send to the House and Senate to vote on.
It didn't get passed, and we have until September 30 to keep from
being about as big a bunch of liars as has ever been in Congress. That
is it.
I am very grateful--again, here, I appreciate the Appropriations
Committee, and I will express appreciation here, now, for Speaker Paul
Ryan, because he has agreed with me and some others about the kind of
pressure we are going to put on when we get back the last week of
September if the Senate has not passed their ObamaCare repeal bill.
They have got to pass something or we can't get it to conference. We
can't get the American public what they need.
Now, some of you have said: Well, if you had just passed that first
bill the Republican leaders had put together. Well, I am not sure who
put it together. It may have been the remaining health insurance
companies and Big Pharma, from what I could tell, but it was not going
to do anybody any good except the insurance companies and Big Pharma.
It was not going to help rank-and-file Americans the way we promised
them we would help them.
There are some that say: Yeah, but, Louie, if you guys had just voted
``yes'' immediately on that bill, it would have gotten wind in the
sails of the President and we would already have tax reform.
Well, I am here to tell you, Mr. Speaker, if we had passed that first
bill, and when people saw their premiums continuing to shoot up and
their deductibles continuing to shoot up and just these overwhelming
prices, it would not have been wind in the sails of President Trump. It
would have meant that people would have been so angry, a lot of
Republicans would have stayed home and a lot of Democrats who voted for
Donald Trump and Members of the Republican House and Senate, they would
stay home or they would go out and vote for someone else, and the first
order of business in January 2019 would probably have been, when we
lost the majority, the impeachment of President Trump. It shouldn't be.
It is not appropriate, but that is probably what would have happened if
we had just jumped on that first bad bill.
We have got a good bill. We have still got a chance. We have got to
get this done for the good of America. If we can't get this done, we
have no business being in the majority. It just brings you to just
throw up your hands: My goodness, what good is this?
I will also say, Mr. Speaker, the old adage is true: democracy
ensures a people are governed no better than they deserve.
We have got too many Americans across this country that are not
paying attention. They are like some friends I had in high school that
said: Well, Louie, I don't care what the government does as long as
they stay out of my business. Well, they have come to find out, if you
don't care what the government does, they are not going to stay out of
your business; they are going to take it over--your life, your
business, everything.
People have got to get reengaged, pay attention, get out and vote,
and we have got a chance to get it fixed. It is absolutely essential
before September 30, at midnight, that we get something done to help
the American people.
I am looking forward, if the Senate doesn't get a decent bill done, I
want us to pass a sense of the House bill right here in the House that
says it is the sense of the House that the Senate absolutely must pass
a bill to give the American public the help they need with healthcare
by repealing the worst parts of ObamaCare, at a minimum.
[[Page H7420]]
{time} 1330
And then follow the Speaker out here on the steps, and every one of
us point to the Senate, and keep putting the pressure on. Keep on
putting the pressure on until, hopefully, they do something.
But it may be that they get it done. We don't have to get into a
battle of words and wits like that. The American public is expecting
it. We promised it. We have got to get that done. In the meantime, I
know there is a lot of discussion, a lot of calls today about, oh, gee,
the President is talking about DACA this, and DACA that.
I have spent so many hours, so many nights, down on the border all
night long, and I always heard the same things from my friends in the
Border Patrol. Every time anybody in Congress, or in the
administration, starts talking about, well, we are working out a deal
for amnesty for this, or to legalize that, then we get a huge surge in
people coming across our southern border.
So I will continue to refuse to make statements about what I think
about--should we agree to this; should we compromise on this
legalization, this amnesty? Because every time we do, people get lured
into the United States.
When that happens, there are always some that get drawn into sex
slavery. Some get drawn into being mules and drug dealers for the drug
cartels; and some--we have seen the video, we have seen the evidence--
they die trying to get in.
We should not be luring people in. We need to secure the border. That
includes building a wall where we need it. We don't need one in Big
Bend National Park, in my opinion. If you can get across Big Bend
National Park carrying all of the water you are going to need to get
clear across there, then I want you in America, and I want you in our
military. You are an extraordinary person. We don't need a wall through
Big Bend National Park, most of it, anyway, but there are places we do.
We have got to secure the border. If you go down there, south of
McAllen, the river is wide, flowing fast. If you just have people along
the river--I have been there, I know. The coyotes will not bring people
across if they see there is law enforcement that will stop them. The
trouble was, during the Obama administration, they didn't stop them.
They didn't even process them when they got across. I have seen it.
Why wouldn't you stop them? Why wouldn't you say: No, you are not
coming on to U.S. land. Go back. Come in legally. We want you, but you
have got to come in legally.
It is time to secure the border. President Trump is making great
strides in that area. General Kelly--God bless him--he was making great
strides when he was head of Homeland Security. I was so thrilled he was
there. I knew about the things he was doing, and I sure hope it
continues, whoever replaces him. But we have got to secure our border,
build a wall where it is needed.
We have got to repeal ObamaCare--the worst parts of it, anyway--and
get people the help they need.
We have also got to give them the tax reform they need. As Art Laffer
told me--he was asking me: Louie, you know, once we got that 30 percent
tax cut in 1983, the third year of the President Reagan administration,
do you know what the rate of growth was? Here we have been talking
about 1.92 percent. It was 8 percent or over when they had the big tax
cut.
People got jobs. They made more money than ever. It was incredible.
It is time to get back to that kind of growth. It is time to get back
to a healthcare system where we are not slaves to a health insurance
company, and we are not slaves to the U.S. Government, where we have
control of our doctor-patient relationship, and America can heal; it
can grow; it can prosper.
We can bring back manufacturing jobs, which are so critical to this
Nation, but we have got to get it done, and it has got to start this
month.
Mr. Speaker, I yield back the balance of my time.
____________________