[Congressional Record Volume 170, Number 183 (Tuesday, December 10, 2024)]
[House]
[Pages H6582-H6586]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]




                             CHRISTMAS 1777

  The SPEAKER pro tempore (Mr. Wied). Under the Speaker's announced 
policy of January 9, 2023, the gentleman from Texas (Mr. Roy) is 
recognized for 60 minutes as the designee of the majority leader.
  Mr. ROY. Mr. Speaker, I appreciate the time to come here in December. 
I am not sure if we will get time next week here on the floor.
  As we look forward to Christmas, I think it is important to remember 
why we are here and why we are here in the House.
  Christmas 1777 was one of the lowest and most desperate points of 
American

[[Page H6583]]

history. General Washington, fresh off defeats at Brandywine and 
Germantown had marched the battered Continental Army to winter quarters 
at Valley Forge, Pennsylvania. Frozen rain, snow, and brutally cold 
temperatures tested not only the men's resolve to fight for freedom, 
but their bodies' ability to withstand the elements.
  They showed up low on provisions. It was so bad that in a letter on 
December 23, General Washington wrote to Henry Laurens of the 
Continental Congress: ``I am now convinced beyond a doubt, that unless 
some great and capital change suddenly takes place . . . this Army must 
inevitably be reduced to one or other of these three things: Starve, 
dissolve, or disperse. . . . [This] is not an exaggerated picture. . . 
. `'
  Historians estimate that as many as one-third of them didn't have 
boots or shoes. Washington ordered soldiers to build wooden huts for 
themselves to stave off the cold and search the surrounding countryside 
for straw to make bedding to keep them warm. They didn't have enough 
blankets to go around after all.
  In the same letter, Washington also noted that his Army was in danger 
from the enemy. General Howe was nearby, and Washington needed his men 
ready to rock and roll, but they couldn't do it.
  ``I ordered the troops to be in readiness,'' for an attack, 
Washington wrote. ``When behold to my great mortification . . . the men 
were unable to stir on account of provision. . . . `'
  ``All I could do under these circumstances was to send out a few 
light parties to watch and harass the enemy. . . . `'
  His officers were resigned to leaving the camp, and he fretted that 
without congressional action otherwise ``I much doubt the 
practicability of holding the Army together much longer.''
  Mr. Speaker, how did we get here?
  Twelve months earlier had been one of the high points of the 
Revolution and Washington's military career--victories at Trenton, 
victories at Princeton, the Crossing of the Delaware and the daring 
Christmas Day surprise attack on the Hessians.
  This year it was burnt mutton and watered-down grog for an Army that 
was cold, starving, and on the brink.
  Mr. Speaker, 2,100 out of 10,000 would die there from disease and 
exposure.
  We know that is not the end of the story. We know that because I am 
standing here on this floor in the United States House of 
Representatives as a citizen of the greatest country in the world.
  Baron Von Steuben got to camp in 1778 and started whipping the 
Continental Army into better shape, and Washington's men kept up the 
fight until Yorktown 3 long years later.
  However, now, Mr. Speaker, to my friends and colleagues who are here 
in the Chamber, the few remaining, it is now our turn to fight. We are 
at a relatively speaking low point in our country's history due to the 
unbelievable but yet completely observable negligence, nay, I say 
purposeful actions of the current administration to undermine the 
safety, security, prosperity, and well-being of our people and our 
Nation.

  We have millions of people who have been dumped into our country 
illegally, including criminals. We have $36 trillion in debt, another 
$2 trillion a year. It is really another $1 trillion every 100 days, a 
little over 3 months.
  Americans are in record levels of personal debt because of the record 
levels of inflation and a hamstrung economy by bureaucrats and 
progressive radical Democrats who want to micromanage your life and 
regulate your life to death, tell you what stoves you can use, what 
cars you can drive, drive up the price of cars, your houses, your 
schools, your healthcare, and then thank you for the privilege.
  The world around us is in chaos. We see what is happening in Syria. 
We saw what is happening in South Korea, and we see what is happening 
around the globe, Ukraine, and Russia, the empowerment of Iran, 
although, thankfully, the resolve of Israel is standing strong while 
our country has walked away from that fight.
  That is all due to the weakness of the Biden administration that it 
has shown for 4 years. Now it is our calling in this Congress to stand 
up alongside President Trump to stand up and fix it. However, the 
calling for our Congress is not to simply walk back some of the 
failures of this administration. It is not to ask for some quick fixes. 
It is to fundamentally change the trajectory of our country.

                              {time}  1730

  It is to take bold action. It is to pass serious legislation. It is 
to fundamentally change our reliance on debt and profligate spending 
that is indebting our children and driving up inflation because we are 
spending money we don't have.
  We have an obligation to fight for the American people. That is our 
calling as we wrap up this year. We have several really important 
fights and debates to continue to finish, such as the National Defense 
Authorization Act, which, unbelievably, our Democratic colleagues are 
resisting and saying they aren't going to support. Why? Because 
Republicans have taken the position that we shouldn't have taxpayer 
funding at the Pentagon for transgender surgeries for children.
  Our Democratic colleagues are so committed to the mutilation of 
children that they would choose not to authorize the defense of the 
United States. That is the world in which we are currently operating, 
and it is Republicans who are standing here in defense of our children 
while trying to make sure our defense is strong.
  The NDAA is not where it should be. Let me be clear, because of 
radical progressive Democrats in the Senate and the House, we have 
miles to go.
  We have an obligation to do our job. We have an obligation to not 
spend money that we don't have. We have an obligation to pay for the 
disaster aid that so many of my colleagues understandably want and seek 
for their constituents in the wake of hurricane damage, drought, or 
issues that are facing our people. We have an obligation to pay for 
these things, or else we are no better than the people we criticize.
  Come January, after we do whatever we are going to do here in 
December with respect to the funding of government, such as the 
disaster funding, the national defense bill, the farm bill, all issues 
that are still ripe before us--we have a new President, a new Congress 
coming in, a new Senate, all Republican--what will we do? I am here to 
suggest to you that, through the reconciliation tools, we can make 
serious change.
  Now, here, I pause for a second. I have colleagues of mine who, 
rightly, on both sides of the aisle, will point out that reconciliation 
is supposed to be a budget tool for reconciling the budget and ensuring 
that we are, frankly, working to achieve balance and not spending more 
money than we should. That very much should be the priority of budget 
reconciliation, and I will endeavor to ensure that we follow that path.
  I remind the American people that the reason they cannot afford 
healthcare, the reason they cannot go to the doctor of their choice, 
the reason they are frustrated with the American healthcare system 
today, and the reason insurance companies are making billions of 
dollars while they suffer is their Federal Government.
  It is a Federal Government that has overpromised, overregulated, and 
is now telling you precisely what kind of healthcare you can have while 
then enriching insurance companies to administer it for you. You can't 
go to the doctor of your choice. You can't get the healthcare of your 
choice. We don't have robust health savings accounts. We haven't 
empowered you.
  We have empowered bureaucrats in Washington at HHS and bureaucrats at 
CMS who are managing Medicare and managing Medicaid. We have empowered 
insurance bureaucrats. We have empowered corporate cronies. What we 
have not done is empowered you. What we have not done is empowered 
doctors.
  We must do that if we are going to claim the mantle of not just 
healthcare freedom and making America healthy again, but if we are 
going to actually say that we are going to be fiscally responsible, we 
can't solve our $36 trillion of debt if we don't solve the burden of 
healthcare.
  When we get to January, when we are sworn in, when we have counted 
the electors for President Trump, when the Senate is in session, we 
should act with dispatch to pass a reconciliation package right out of 
the gate that secures the border of the United States.

[[Page H6584]]

  It was the fundamental promise of the Trump campaign but, more 
importantly, what President Trump has campaigned on all the way back 
since 2016, what President Trump did while he was in office from 2017 
to 2021.
  It was the fundamental failure of the Biden administration to 
purposefully flood our country with some 10-odd million human beings, 
including criminals, weakening our border, fentanyl, all the dangers 
that have been posed to the American people, including the murders of 
Americans, deaths from fentanyl poisoning, putting the burden on our 
social welfare state and our schools, jails, and hospitals.
  Obligation number one for this Republican Congress is to ensure that 
we secure the border, or at least take step one to secure the border. 
What will that mean?
  Well, we need to build the wall. President Trump ran on building the 
wall in 2016, so let's provide the funding through reconciliation to 
ensure that the wall is built.
  Number two, the wall does no good if you have policies in place that 
allow people to be released into the United States. That is what the 
Biden administration has done, so we must fund and empower ICE to carry 
out the repatriation of millions of individuals who are illegally 
placed into the United States in violation of law, in violation of the 
statute, in violation of parole, in the name of parole, and in the name 
of asylum. These individuals must be removed and repatriated through 
funding to ICE and Border Patrol.
  We need to fund the Migrant Protection Protocols that President Trump 
was using to ensure that Mexico was upholding its end of the bargain 
and not dumping people into our country. We need to pay back the States 
that have had to be on the front lines when our government failed us, 
like Texas, which has spent $12 billion over the last 4 years to stand 
in the breach. Other States also have a claim to having stood up to try 
to secure the border.
  We should impose monthly and annual fees on those who have been 
paroled into the United States and those who have been given notices to 
appear in court. We have to pay for all that. Impose fees. Impose fees 
on applications for work permits. Ensure that welfare benefits only go 
to United States citizens and legal permanent residents and not 
parolees, not asylees, and not people who are illegally present.

  Currently, that is costing us upwards of $160 billion over 10 years. 
Your tax dollars are going to fund welfare benefits for people who have 
been illegally placed into the United States or who illegally came 
here.
  Additionally, let's make Mexico and other bad-actor states pay for 
the wall by imposing a tax on remittances sent by noncitizens here 
abroad.
  Impose taxes or fees on nongovernmental organizations that have been 
taking taxpayer money just to use it against us and move people here 
illegally into the United States.
  Require illegal aliens to cover the cost of background checks.
  Impose fees on aliens who fail to provide approved, unexpired 
identification documents at ports of entry.
  Increase financial penalties for visa overstays.
  Increase fees on student visas to stop the foreign takeover of U.S. 
colleges.
  Beef up 287(g) to allow local law enforcement to collaborate with 
Federal law enforcement to enforce our border security and immigration 
laws.
  These are just some of the things, a pretty exhaustive list, that we 
can do, should do, and must do right out of the gate in January when we 
have the pen. We can do it--and by the way, we can pay for it--and we 
must.
  Let me be clear: For all manners of our choices on reconciliation, we 
will pay for them. We will achieve deficit reduction, not deficit 
increase. That is our calling, and we must achieve it. Failure to do so 
will not succeed.
  We can repeal the expanded Internal Revenue Service funding. I would 
rather pay for Border Patrol agents than to pay for Internal Revenue 
Service agents. There is some $50 billion sitting there. Let's use that 
to secure the border of the United States.
  Let's repeal the student loan policy of the Biden administration in 
which Americans who never went to college or have paid off their 
student loans or don't qualify are paying off the student loans of 
other Americans. Why is that happening?
  My wife's student loan hasn't been paid off. She has now been working 
on it for 20 years, the product of a single mom. She worked her butt 
off to go to school, had debt sitting there. She has been paying it 
down and working hard to pay it down.
  There are thousands, millions of those people in this country who 
have followed the law, done their responsibility, worked hard to pay 
off their student loans. Joe Biden came in and said: Don't worry about 
that. I am going to take from you, and I am going to give to these 
other people.
  End that. That could get us between $100 billion and $270 billion. 
Take that and fund the things we need to do and that the Constitution 
calls for us to do.
  Repeal the SNAP Thrifty Food Plan. Do you know what that was? It was 
a massive expansion done by the stroke of the pen, just like the same 
stroke of the pen that Joe Biden used to expand the student loan 
bailouts, to expand food stamps, effectively, and to walk into just 
continuing to fund the worst form.
  Huge percentages of the food stamps go to sugar drinks and all the 
things that are making us unhealthy, making us obese, and making us 
overweight so that we can then go to pharma, Big Insurance, and big 
hospitals and say: Please save us from ourselves.
  The government subsidizes both. The Federal Government subsidizes the 
poison. The Federal Government subsidizes the overmedication. The 
Federal Government subsidizes the bureaucracy. Guess what? We are all 
worse off because of it, and we are $36 trillion in debt. How about we 
stop doing that?
  Every Member of Congress is going to have some constituency telling 
them why they can't do that. They are going to have somebody saying: If 
you do that, my rural hospital might have a problem. If you do that, my 
local business, my local sugar growers, my local manufacturers--who 
cares? That is not our job.
  Forgive me for channeling ``Mr. Smith Goes to Washington,'' but we 
are not supposed to be here to funnel printed money to our local 
districts. We are not. That is not why we are elected. Unfortunately, 
that is why too many of my colleagues on both sides of the aisle are 
here. Don't do that.
  We could repeal the EPA EV mandate rule. We could save $113 billion 
by stopping the ridiculous rule to mandate that two-thirds of our fleet 
be changed to electric vehicles by 2032. That is absurd.
  If you even converted the entire American fleet today to electric 
vehicles, you would diminish CO2 production by less than, I 
think, 2 percent, a fraction. I don't even think it is that high. It 
would be a minimal impact, and you can't even do that. Even if we 
wanted to, we couldn't do that.

  Why would we drive up the cost of automobiles, make them less 
reliable, harm the economy, spend money subsidizing something that is 
not going to produce the result that it said it is going to produce, 
all so some people can run around, flying to Davos in their private 
jets, patting themselves on the back, which is precisely what my 
colleagues on the other side of the aisle and gasbags like John Kerry 
do.
  I will probably get admonished for that one.
  The fact of the matter is that we have an obligation here in Congress 
to do the job we said we would do. I give this speech, and I give it 
pretty regularly, but I am going to keep giving it because I have to be 
honest with you. This job has its pros and cons. The cons list tends to 
stack up. You are away from your family, and you are traveling and all 
of that, but it is a great honor and a great blessing.
  One of the great blessings is when you are around the country and see 
somebody--or like the woman who I ran into on the street who was 
walking up the street and coming up to the Capitol, who just said: 
Thank you. Thank you for fighting for us. Thank you for giving us a 
voice for sanity.
  The American people just want their country back. Do you want to know 
what the election was about in November? They just want their country 
back. They just want common sense back. They just want sanity.
  Here we are again, sitting here on the eve of passing a National 
Defense Authorization Act, which many of my

[[Page H6585]]

Democratic colleagues are saying they don't want to support because, 
again, we are limiting the use of taxpayer dollars to go to transgender 
surgeries for children.

                              {time}  1745

  We have a defense authorization bill that is something like, I don't 
know, $900 billion to authorize the national defense of the United 
States.
  Now, imagine George Washington and all of those men freezing to 
death. They didn't have socks. They didn't have shoes. They were 
suffering. General Washington thought he was going to lose the Army.
  Fast-forward to Christmas of 1944 and our grandfathers, our great-
grandfathers, some of our fathers were sitting in a foxhole in Bastogne 
freezing to death, and for what?
  For a country that would take taxpayer dollars to fund, through the 
national defense of the United States, the mutilation of children. Now, 
my Democrat colleagues want to hold up the National Defense 
Authorization Act because we dare say that children shouldn't be 
mutilated.
  That is the current Democratic Party. If you want to know why they 
were thrown out on their ear in November, that is why.
  Now we should lead. We should lead farther.
  I heard some rumbling on this side of the aisle that the Speaker 
shouldn't have included that language in the bill. The Speaker was 
exactly right to include that language in the bill. We have an 
obligation in the House of Representatives, the people's House, not to 
punt. I hear my colleagues saying, well, President Trump will come in 
and take care of it.
  I understand that we believe that the policies adopted by the 
President will be much more to our liking.
  But what about your constitutional obligation?
  What about our job?
  What about our use of the power of the purse?
  The United States House of Representatives is supposed to be the 
closest to the people. The people didn't sign up for this. The people 
just want a military that is lethal again. They just want a military 
that is not woke, that isn't going through all sorts of nonsense 
trainings at the academies or at the Pentagon itself. They sure as hell 
don't want their taxpayer dollars going to the mutilation of children.
  Let's not forget that this same National Defense Authorization Act 
will continue to allow and promote the use of taxpayer dollars for 
adult transgender surgeries.
  Mr. Speaker, if we pass this bill, this horrible bill, according to 
our Democratic colleagues that shouldn't have this provision to protect 
children, our great win is to pull back the goalpost from full 
transgender surgeries being funded through our tax dollars through the 
Pentagon to, well, we will just do adults, but not children, we think.
  We will still fund the chief diversity officer, whatever that is and 
whatever value that is providing for the Pentagon. We will still 
continue to authorize all manners of programs. We still have a bill 
that is larded up with conservation programs and all sorts of things, 
it is not just a specific defense bill.
  There are a variety of reasons to oppose this legislation because we 
can do better. It could be more focused on lethality. It can be with 
fewer dollars.
  Our job is to represent the people. It is not to represent the latest 
focus group at Yale University that sit around talking about what woke 
nonsense they want out of our Pentagon, but yet that is what our 
Democrat colleagues are doing.
  We will see what happens tomorrow when we vote on this defense bill. 
I think it is useful for the American people to see precisely the 
values of our radical, progressive Democrat colleagues on this 
particular issue.
  It is incumbent upon Republicans for us to advance the ball, to 
actually shrink the size of government. Don't hide behind DOGE. Don't 
hide behind Elon or Vivek. Don't say: Oh, isn't it great? They are 
going to do all this stuff. They are going to take this stuff in. They 
are going to use AI. They are going to crowdsource. Then what? What?
  They are going to present recommendations to Secretaries. The 
Secretaries will implement some of that stuff. Meanwhile, Congress will 
continue to appropriate. Congress will continue to authorize.
  What will we authorize? What will we appropriate?
  Will it be responsible? Will we shrink the size of the bureaucracy? 
Will we make government more efficient and effective and focus on its 
actual constitutional provisions? Will we address the massive problem 
with the automatic spending that is Medicare, Medicaid, Social 
Security, now increasingly, the Veterans Administration, which is on 
autopilot?
  Mr. Speaker, 70 percent of the budget, 70 percent of what we spend 
every year, is on autopilot, and we don't touch it. My Democrat 
colleagues will say, you are going to push granny off the cliff. My 
Republican colleagues will say, we can't cut discretionary spending 
because we must focus on so-called mandatory, automatic spending. Yet 
then we never have a proposal. We never come to the floor.
  One of my Democratic colleagues was walking by me earlier. I won't 
name this individual lest I get that individual in trouble. I was 
giving an interview and they asked me about whether ObamaCare subsidies 
should be on the chopping block for this round of debates on 
reconciliation later this year in tax policy.
  Now my answer, as someone who opposed the implementation of 
ObamaCare, was to not focus on ObamaCare. My answer was simple: The 
American people deserve robust health savings accounts in which they 
can choose their healthcare, where they are empowered, their doctor is 
empowered, and insurance companies, bureaucrats, hospitals, and pharma 
are not in power.
  This Democratic colleague was walking by and said, hey, I can support 
that. Those are the kinds of conversations, if we want to be serious 
about driving down the cost of healthcare, so we can actually balance 
our budget, that we must have in the context of reconciliation.
  My message to my Republican colleagues is, if you think you are going 
to come in this Chamber and waltz in here and say that we are going to 
pass tax reform, extend the tax cuts without dealing with spending, you 
are mistaken. You are mistaken.

  If K Street wants to come down here and make their case for all of 
the tax provisions they want--and look, there are a lot of small 
businesses and people across America who care strongly about getting 
the tax policies that I agree with that we ought to put in place: 
expensing, research and development, pass-through tax policy. To be 
very clear, tax policy is not going to move off of the House floor 
until we deal with spending.
  We are going to cut spending. We are going to put us on a path to 
balance. We are going to reduce deficits, or I will be an opponent of 
tax policy and many of my colleagues will also because the time is now. 
No more games, no more gimmicks, no more short-term extensions to get a 
political win. This has to end on both sides of the aisle.
  We need to get busy this Congress figuring out how to be fiscally 
responsible, dramatically cutting the bureaucracy, shrinking 
Washington, and empowering Americans.
  Mr. Speaker, I am reminded as I wrap up here that Valley Forge was 
not the end of the story for this country when I opened up my remarks 
about General Washington and the suffering of those soldiers under his 
care and watch.
  Those men freezing, starving, and uncertain of the future, not 
knowing what laid in front of them, they didn't give up.
  General Washington wrote in that pre-Christmas letter, ``We have not 
more than 3 months to prepare a great deal of business in--if we let 
these slip or waste, we shall be laboring under the same difficulties 
all next campaign. . . .''
  Washington knew that every low point was a time to prepare, to keep 
moving, to get things in place for the next fight, because those low 
points are where opportunity lives. That is what we can learn from and 
what we have to imitate here.
  We have 4 years to make transformative change or we will squander 
everything that those men at Valley Forge fought for and gave us, all 
those men who fought in the Civil War in the 1860s, all of those men 
who stormed the

[[Page H6586]]

beaches of Normandy and ended up at Bastogne.
  What are we going to have written on our headstone when this fight is 
over? Did we keep and preserve this republic for our kids and our 
grandkids?
  That should be the question that guides everything we do as 
Republicans in charge of this House Chamber going forward.
  Mr. Speaker, I yield back the balance of my time.

                          ____________________