[House Report 105-618]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
105th Congress Report
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
2d Session 105-618
_______________________________________________________________________
TERRY SANFORD FEDERAL BUILDING
_______
July 14, 1998.--Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be
printed
_______________________________________________________________________
Mr. Shuster, from the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure,
submitted the following
R E P O R T
[To accompany H.R. 3982]
[Including cost estimate of the Congressional Budget Office]
The Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, to whom
was referred the bill (H.R. 3982) to designate the Federal
building located at 310 New Bern Avenue in Raleigh, North
Carolina, as the ``Terry Sanford Federal Building'', having
considered the same, report favorably thereon with an amendment
and recommend that the bill as amended do pass.
The amendment is as follows:
Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert in lieu
thereof the following:
SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.
The Federal building located at 310 New Bern Avenue in Raleigh, North
Carolina, shall be known and designated as the ``Terry Sanford Federal
Building''.
SEC. 2. REFERENCES.
Any reference in law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other
record of the United States to the Federal building referred to in
section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Terry Sanford
Federal Building''.
BACKGROUND
Terry Sanford was born in Laurinburg, North Carolina, in
1917. He attended the University of North Carolina at Chapel
Hill for his undergraduate studies as well as his law degree,
graduating in 1946. Senator Sanford also served in World War
II, initially as a special agent for the Federal Bureau of
Investigation, and then later as a volunteer recruit in the
United States Army. He began his service in the Army as a
private. However, he later served as a paratrooper in five
European campaigns, including Normandy, and was discharged as a
First Lieutenant.
In addition to founding three law firms, two in Raleigh and
one in Fayetteville, Senator Sanford held a number of public
offices. He was a member and Secretary-Treasurer of the North
Carolina State Ports Authority from 1950 until 1953. In 1953,
Senator Sanford was elected to the North Carolina State Senate
and served until 1955. Later, after founding one of three law
firms, Senator Sanford was elected Governor of North Carolina,
in 1961. Following his term as governor, he returned to private
practice until 1986, when he made a successful bid to represent
North Carolina in the United States Senate, serving until 1993.
Senator Sanford was also dedicated to academia. He was the
President of Duke University from 1969 to 1984, and continued
as President Emeritus from 1995 until 1998. Senator Sanford
also was the recipient of numerous honorary degrees, and served
on the boards of universities, colleges and educational
associations, as well as on the boards of a number of
corporations in the technology industry.
This is a fitting tribute to a man whose life exemplified
the essence of public service.
HEARINGS
The Committee did not hold hearings on H.R. 3982.
COMMITTEE CONSIDERATION
On June 25, 1998, the Committee met in open session and
ordered reported H.R. 3982, as amended, to designate the
Federal Building located at 310 New Bern Avenue, Raleigh, North
Carolina, as the ``Terry Sanford Federal Building,''
unanimously by voice vote, a quorum being present.
ROLLCALL VOTES
Clause 2(l)(2)(B) of rule XI requires each committee report
to include the total number of votes cast for and against on
each rollcall vote on a motion to report and on any amendment
offered to the measure or matter, and the names of those
members voting for and against. There were no recorded votes
taken in connection with ordering H.R. 3982 reported, as
amended. A motion by Mr. Kim to order H.R. 3982 reported to the
House, as amended, was agreed to by voice vote, a quorum being
present.
COMMITTEE OVERSIGHT FINDINGS
Pursuant to clause 2(l)(3)(A) of rule XI of the Rules of
the House of Representatives, oversight findings and
recommendations have been made by the Committee as reflected in
this report.
COST OF THE LEGISLATION
Clause 7 of rule XIII of the Rules of the House of
Representatives does not apply where a cost estimate and
comparison prepared by the Director of the Congressional Budget
Office under section 402 of the Congressional Budget Act of
1974 has been timely submitted prior to the filing of the
report and is included in the report. Such a cost estimate is
included in this report.
COMPLIANCE WITH HOUSE RULE XI
1. With respect to the requirement of clause 2(l)(3)(B) of
rule XI of the Rules of the House of Representatives, and
308(a) of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974, the Committee
references the report of the Congressional Budget Office
included below.
2. With respect to the requirement of clause 2(l)(3)(D) of
rule XI of the Rules of the House of Representatives, the
Committee has received no report of oversight findings and
recommendations from the Committee on Government Reform and
Oversight on the subject of H.R. 3982, as amended.
3. With respect to the requirement of clause 2(l)(3)(C) of
rule XI of the Rules of the House of Representatives and
Section 402 of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974, the
Committee has received the following cost estimate for H.R.
3982, as amended, from the Director of the Congressional Budget
Office.
U.S. Congress,
Congressional Budget Office,
Washington, DC, June 25, 1998.
Hon. Bud Shuster,
Chairman, Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, House of
Representatives, Washington, DC.
Dear Mr. Chairman: The Congressional Budget Office has
reviewed the following bills, which were ordered reported by
the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure on
June 25, 1998. CBO estimates that their enactment would have no
significant impact on the federal budget and would not affect
direct spending or receipts; therefore, pay-as-you-go
procedures would not apply. The bills contain no
intergovernmental or private-sector mandates as defined in the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act and would impose no costs on
state, local, or tribal governments. The bills reviewed are:
H.R. 2379, a bill to designate the federal building
and United States courthouse located at 251 North Main
Street in Winston-Salem, North Carolina, as the ``Hiram
H. Ward Federal Building and United States
Courthouse;''
H.R. 2787, a bill to designate the United States
courthouse located at 141 Church Street in New Haven,
Connecticut, as the ``Richard C. Lee United States
Courthouse;''
H.R. 3223, a bill to designate the federal building
located at 300 East 8th Street in Austin, Texas, as the
``J.J. `Jake' Pickle Federal Building;''
H.R. 3696, a bill to designate the federal building
located at 316 North 26th Street in Billings, Montana,
as the ``James F. Battin United States Courthouse;''
H.R. 3982, a bill to designate the federal building
located at 310 New Bern Avenue in Raleigh, North
Carolina, as the ``Terry Sanford Federal Building;''
and
S. 1800, an act to designate the federal building and
United States courthouse located at 85 Marconi
Boulevard in Columbus, Ohio, as the ``Joseph P.
Kinneary United States Courthouse.''
If you wish further details on this estimate, we will be
pleased to provide them. The CBO staff contact is John R.
Righter. This estimate was approved by Robert A. Sunshine,
Deputy Assistant Director for Budget Analysis.
Sincerely,
June E. O'Neill, Director.
CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY STATEMENT
Pursuant to clause (2)(l)(4) of rule XI of the Rules of the
House of Representatives, committee reports on a bill or joint
resolution of a public character shall include a statement
citing the specific powers granted to the Congress in the
Constitution to enact the measure. The Committee on
Transportation and Infrastructure finds that Congress has the
authority to enact this measure pursuant to its powers granted
under article I, section 8 of the Constitution.
FEDERAL MANDATES STATEMENT
The Committee adopts as its own the estimate of federal
mandates prepared by the Director of the Congressional Budget
Office pursuant to section 423 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform
Act.
ADVISORY COMMITTEE STATEMENT
No advisory committees within the meaning of section 5(b)
of the Federal Advisory Committee Act were created by this
legislation.
APPLICABILITY TO THE LEGISLATIVE BRANCH
The Committee finds that the legislation does not relate to
the terms and conditions of employment or access to public
services or accommodations within the meaning of section
102(b)(3) of the Congressional Accountability Act.
CHANGES IN EXISTING LAW MADE BY THE BILL, AS REPORTED
H.R. 3982, as amended, makes no changes in existing law.