Senate Report 107-68 - MILITARY CONSTRUCTION APPROPRIATION BILL, 2002

[Senate Report 107-68]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

Calendar No. 169
107th Congress Report
SENATE
1st Session 107-68

======================================================================

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION APPROPRIATION BILL, 2002
_______

September 25, 2001.--Ordered to be printed

_______

Mrs. Feinstein, from the Committee on Appropriations,
submitted the following

R E P O R T

[To accompany S. 1460]

The Committee on Appropriations reports the bill (S. 1460)
making appropriations for military construction, family
housing, and base realignment and closure for the Department of
Defense for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2002, and for
other purposes, reports favorably thereon and recommends that
the bill do pass.

Total of bill as reported to Senate..................... $10,500,000,000
Amount of 2002 budget estimate.......................... 9,971,312,000
Amount of 2001 appropriations........................... 8,936,498,000
The bill as reported to the Senate:
Over the budget estimate, 2002...................... 528,688,000
Over appropriations for fiscal year 2001............ 1,563,502,000

C O N T E N T S

----------
Page
Background:
Purpose of the bill.......................................... 3
Comparative statement........................................ 3
Compliance with section 308 of the Budget Control Act........ 9
Committee recommendation......................................... 9
Items of special interest........................................ 10
Military construction, Army...................................... 16
Military construction, Navy...................................... 17
Military construction, Air Force................................. 18
Military construction, Defense-wide.............................. 19
Military construction, Reserve components........................ 24
NATO Security Investment Program................................. 27
Family housing overview.......................................... 27
Family housing, Army............................................. 27
Family housing, Navy and Marine Corps............................ 28
Family housing, Air Force........................................ 30
Family housing, Defense-wide..................................... 31
Family housing improvement fund.................................. 31
Homeowners assistance fund, Defense.............................. 31
Base realignment and closure account, part IV.................... 32
General provisions............................................... 35
Compliance with paragraph 7, rule XVI of the Standing Rules of
the Senate..................................................... 36
Compliance with paragraph 12, rule XXVI of the Standing Rules of
the Senate..................................................... 36
Project listing by location...................................... 37

BACKGROUND

Purpose of the Bill

The Military Construction appropriation bill provides
necessary funding for the planning, design, construction,
alteration, and improvement of military facilities worldwide,
both for Active and Reserve Forces. It also finances the
construction, alteration, improvement, operation, and
maintenance of military family housing, including payments
against past housing mortgage indebtedness. Certain types of
community impact assistance may be provided, as well as
assistance to members of the military who face loss on the sale
of private residences due to installation realignments and
closures. The bill is also the source for the U.S. share of the
NATO Security Investment Program. In addition, the bill
provides funding to implement base closures and realignments
authorized by law.

Comparative Statement

The Committee recommends appropriations totaling
$10,500,000,000 for fiscal year 2002 military construction,
family housing, and base closure. The following table displays
the Committee recommendation in comparison with the current
fiscal year, and the President's fiscal year 2002 request.

COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF NEW BUDGET (OBLIGATIONAL) AUTHORITY
[In thousands of dollars]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Increase (+) or decrease (-) compared
Committee with--
Item 2001 enacted Budget estimate recommendation ---------------------------------------
2001 enacted Budget estimate
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Military construction, Army......................... 907,878 1,760,541 1,668,957 +761,079 -91,584
Foreign currency fluctuation adjustment......... -635 .................. .................. +635 ..................
Rescission...................................... .................. .................. -26,400 -26,400 -26,400
Miscellaneous appropriations (Public Law 106- 26,941 .................. .................. -26,941 ..................
554)...........................................
Supplemental appropriations (Public Law 107-20). 9,144 .................. .................. -9,144 ..................
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total......................................... 943,328 1,760,541 1,642,557 +699,229 -117,984

Military construction, Navy......................... 929,113 1,071,408 1,148,633 +219,520 +77,225
Foreign currency fluctuation adjustment......... -2,889 .................. -19,588 -16,699 -19,588
Rescission...................................... .................. .................. .................. .................. ..................
Supplemental appropriations (Public Law 107-20). 3,187 .................. .................. -3,187 ..................
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total......................................... 929,411 1,071,408 1,129,045 +199,634 +57,637

Military construction, Air Force.................... 868,294 1,068,250 1,148,269 +279,975 +80,019
Rescission...................................... .................. .................. -4,000 -4,000 -4,000
Miscellaneous appropriations (Public Law 106- 11,974 .................. .................. -11,974 ..................
554)...........................................
Supplemental appropriations (Public Law 107-20). 5,065 .................. .................. -5,065 ..................
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total......................................... 885,333 1,068,250 1,144,269 +258,936 +76,019

Military construction, Defense-wide................. 819,954 694,558 881,058 +61,104 +186,500
Foreign currency fluctuation adjustment......... -7,115 .................. .................. +7,115 ..................
Rescissions..................................... .................. .................. -69,280 -69,280 -69,280
Supplemental appropriations (Public Law 107-20). -14,376 .................. .................. +14,376 ..................
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total......................................... 798,463 694,558 811,778 +13,315 +117,220
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Active components...................... 3,556,535 4,594,757 4,727,649 +1,171,114 +132,892

Military construction, Army National Guard.......... 281,097 267,389 378,549 +97,452 +111,160
Miscellaneous appropriations (Public Law 106- 4,490 .................. .................. -4,490 ..................
554)...........................................
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total......................................... 285,587 267,389 378,549 +92,962 +111,160

Military construction, Air National Guard........... 203,381 149,072 222,767 +19,386 +73,695
Supplemental appropriations (Public Law 107-20). 6,700 .................. .................. -6,700 ..................
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total......................................... 210,081 149,072 222,767 +12,686 +73,695

Military construction, Army Reserve................. 108,499 111,404 111,404 +2,905 ..................
Military construction, Naval Reserve................ 64,331 33,641 33,641 -30,690 ..................
Rescission...................................... -2,400 .................. -925 +1,475 -925
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total......................................... 61,931 33,641 32,716 -29,215 -925

Military construction, Air Force Reserve............ 36,510 53,732 53,732 +17,222 ..................
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Reserve components..................... 702,608 615,238 799,168 +96,560 +183,930
===================================================================================================
Total, Military construction.................. 4,259,143 5,209,995 5,526,817 +1,267,674 +316,822
Appropriations............................ (4,261,543) (5,209,995) (5,627,422) (+1,365,879) (+417,427)
Rescissions............................... (-2,400) .................. (-100,605) (-98,205) (-100,605)
===================================================================================================
NATO Security Investment Program.................... 171,622 162,600 162,600 -9,022 ..................
===================================================================================================
Family housing, Army:
New construction................................ 165,459 59,200 80,400 -85,059 +21,200
Construction improvements....................... 63,450 220,750 220,750 +157,300 ..................
Planning and design............................. 6,528 11,592 11,592 +5,064 ..................
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, construction........................ 235,437 291,542 312,742 +77,305 +21,200

Operation and maintenance....................... 969,566 1,108,991 1,108,991 +139,425 ..................
Foreign currency fluctuation adjustment......... -19,911 .................. .................. +19,911 ..................
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, operation and maintenance........... 949,655 1,108,991 1,108,991 +159,336 ..................

Supplemental appropriations (Public Law 107-20). 26,480 .................. .................. -26,480 ..................
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Family housing, Army................... 1,211,572 1,400,533 1,421,733 +210,161 +21,200

Family housing, Navy and Marine Corps:
New construction................................ 204,669 114,847 123,047 -81,622 +8,200
Construction improvements....................... 192,652 183,054 183,054 -9,598 ..................
Planning and design............................. 19,914 6,499 6,499 -13,415 ..................
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, construction........................ 417,235 304,400 312,600 -104,635 +8,200

Operation and maintenance....................... 880,696 918,095 918,095 +37,399 ..................
Foreign currency fluctuation adjustment......... -1,071 .................. .................. +1,071 ..................
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, operation and maintenance........... 879,625 918,095 918,095 +38,470 ..................

Supplemental appropriations (Public Law 107-20). 20,300 .................. .................. -20,300 ..................
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Family housing, Navy and Marine Corps.. 1,317,160 1,222,495 1,230,695 -86,465 +8,200

Family housing, Air Force:
New construction................................ 71,857 140,800 150,800 +78,943 +10,000
Construction improvements....................... 173,663 352,879 375,345 +201,682 +22,466
Planning and design............................. 12,732 24,558 24,558 +11,826 ..................
Foreign currency fluctuation adjustment......... -6,839 .................. .................. +6,839 ..................
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, construction........................ 251,413 518,237 550,703 +299,290 +32,466

Operation and maintenance....................... 824,453 869,121 869,121 +44,668 ..................
Foreign currency fluctuation adjustment......... -5,392 .................. .................. +5,392 ..................
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, operation and maintenance........... 819,061 869,121 869,121 +50,060 ..................

Supplemental appropriations (Public Law 107-20). 13,625 .................. .................. -13,625 ..................
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Family housing, Air Force.............. 1,084,099 1,387,358 1,419,824 +335,725 +32,466

Family housing, Defense-wide:
Construction improvements....................... .................. 250 250 +250 ..................
Operation and maintenance....................... 44,787 43,762 43,762 -1,025 ..................
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Family housing, Defense-wide........... 44,787 44,012 44,012 -775 ..................

Department of Defense Family Housing Improvement .................. 2,000 2,000 +2,000 ..................
Fund...............................................
Homeowners assistance fund, Defense................. .................. 10,119 10,119 +10,119 ..................
(By transfer)................................... .................. .................. .................. .................. ..................
===================================================================================================
Total, Family housing......................... 3,657,618 4,066,517 4,128,383 +470,765 +61,866
New construction.......................... (441,985) (314,847) (354,247) (-87,738) (+39,400)
Construction improvements................. (429,765) (756,933) (779,399) (+349,634) (+22,466)
Foreign currency fluctuation adjustment... (-6,839) .................. .................. (+6,839) ..................
Planning and design....................... (39,174) (42,649) (42,649) (+3,475) ..................
General reduction......................... .................. .................. .................. .................. ..................
Operation and maintenance................. (2,779,907) (2,939,969) (2,939,969) (+160,062) ..................
Foreign currency fluctuation adjustment... (-26,374) .................. .................. (+26,374) ..................
Family Housing Improvement Fund........... .................. (2,000) (2,000) (+2,000) ..................
Homeowners Assistance Fund................ .................. (10,119) (10,119) (+10,119) ..................
(By transfer)............................. .................. .................. .................. .................. ..................
===================================================================================================
Base realignment and closure accounts:
Part IV......................................... 1,022,115 532,200 682,200 -339,915 +150,000
Supplemental appropriations (Public Law 107-20). 9,000 .................. .................. -9,000 ..................
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total......................................... 1,031,115 532,200 682,200 -348,915 +150,000

GENERAL PROVISIONS

General provision (sec. 129)........................ -100,000 .................. .................. +100,000 ..................
Foreign currency account (sec. 132)................. -83,000 .................. .................. +83,000 ..................
===================================================================================================
Grand total:
New budget (obligational) authority....... 8,936,498 9,971,312 10,500,000 +1,563,502 +528,688
Appropriations........................ (8,938,898) (9,971,312) (10,600,605) (+1,661,707) (+629,293)
Rescissions........................... (-2,400) .................. (-100,605) (-98,205) (-100,605)
(By transfer)......................... .................. .................. .................. .................. ..................
===================================================================================================
SUMMARY OF APPROPRIATIONS ACCOUNTS

Military Construction, Army......................... 943,328 1,760,541 1,642,557 +699,229 -117,984
Military Construction, Navy......................... 929,411 1,071,408 1,129,045 +199,634 +57,637
Military Construction, Air Force.................... 885,333 1,068,250 1,144,269 +258,936 +76,019
Military Construction, Defense-wide................. 798,463 694,558 811,778 +13,315 +117,220
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Active components...................... 3,556,535 4,594,757 4,727,649 +1,171,114 +132,892

Military Construction, Army National Guard.......... 285,587 267,389 378,549 +92,962 +111,160
Military Construction, Air National Guard........... 210,081 149,072 222,767 +12,686 +73,695
Military Construction, Army Reserve................. 108,499 111,404 111,404 +2,905 ..................
Military Construction, Naval Reserve................ 61,931 33,641 32,716 -29,215 -925
Military Construction, Air Force Reserve............ 36,510 53,732 53,732 +17,222 ..................
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Reserve components..................... 702,608 615,238 799,168 +96,560 +183,930
===================================================================================================
Total, Military Construction.................. 4,259,143 5,209,995 5,526,817 +1,267,674 +316,822
===================================================================================================
North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security 171,622 162,600 162,600 -9,022 ..................
Investment Program.................................
===================================================================================================
Family Housing, Army:
Construction.................................... 235,437 291,542 312,742 +77,305 +21,200
Operation and Maintenance....................... 976,135 1,108,991 1,108,991 +132,856 ..................
Family Housing, Navy and Marine Corps:
Construction.................................... 417,235 304,400 312,600 -104,635 +8,200
Operation and Maintenance....................... 899,925 918,095 918,095 +18,170 ..................
Family Housing, Air Force:
Construction.................................... 251,413 518,237 550,703 +299,290 +32,466
Operation and Maintenance....................... 832,686 869,121 869,121 +36,435 ..................
Family Housing, Defense-wide:
Construction.................................... .................. 250 250 +250 ..................
Operation and Maintenance....................... 44,787 43,762 43,762 -1,025 ..................
Department of Defense Family Housing Improvement .................. 2,000 2,000 +2,000 ..................
Fund...............................................
Homeowners Assistance Fund, Defense................. .................. 10,119 10,119 +10,119 ..................
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Family Housing......................... 3,657,618 4,066,517 4,128,383 +470,765 +61,866
===================================================================================================
Base Realignment and Closure Account................ 1,031,115 532,200 682,200 -348,915 +150,000
General Provisions.................................. -183,000 .................. .................. +183,000 ..................
===================================================================================================
Grand Total................................... 8,936,498 9,971,312 10,500,000 +1,563,502 +528,688
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Compliance With Section 308 of the Budget Control Act

Section 308(a) of the Budget and Impoundment Control Act of
1974 (Public Law 93-344) requires that the Committee include in
its report a comparison of its recommendations with levels
contained in the first concurrent resolution. Appropriate data
are reflected below:

BUDGETARY IMPACT OF BILL
PREPARED IN CONSULTATION WITH THE CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE PURSUANT TO SEC. 308(a), PUBLIC LAW 93-344, AS
AMENDED
[In millions of dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Budget authority Outlays
---------------------------------------------------
Committee Amount of Committee Amount of
allocation bill allocation bill
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comparison of amounts in the bill with Committee allocations
to its subcommittees of amounts in the First Concurrent
Resolution for 2002: Subcommittee on Military Construction:
General purpose, defense................................ 10,500 10,500 NA NA
General purpose, non-defense............................ ........... ........... NA NA
General purpose, total.................................. 10,500 10,500 9,284 \1\ 9,253
Projections of outlays associated with the recommendation:
2002.................................................... ........... ........... ........... \2\ 2,741
2003.................................................... ........... ........... ........... 4,026
2004.................................................... ........... ........... ........... 2,310
2005.................................................... ........... ........... ........... 794
2006 and future years................................... ........... ........... ........... 598
Financial assistance to State and local governments for 2002 NA ........... NA ...........
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Includes outlays from prior-year budget authority.
\2\ Excludes outlays from prior-year budget authority.

NA: Not applicable.

Committee Recommendation

The Committee recommends new fiscal year 2002
appropriations of $10,500,000,000. This is $528,688,000 over
the budget request, and $1,563,502,000 over the appropriations
for fiscal year 2001. The basis for this recommendation is
contained in the following ``Items of special interest,'' and
under the discussions pertaining to each individual
appropriation. Complete project detail is provided in the
tables at the end of the report.

ITEMS OF SPECIAL INTEREST

COMPLIANCE WITH 302(b) ALLOCATION

The Appropriations Committee conformed fully to the budget
resolution for defense spending in its 302(b) allocation. This
allocation divided the budget authority and outlays among the
subcommittees with jurisdiction over discretionary spending. In
this recommended bill, the Appropriations Committee has
remained within the tight constraints of its 302(b) allocation
for military construction.

hearings

The Subcommittee on Military Construction held hearings on
the fiscal year 2002 budget request during July and August
2001. The subcommittee heard testimony from representatives of
the military services and defense agencies concerning fiscal
year 2002 budget priorities and base realignment and closure
issues.

summary of committee recommendations

The budget request for fiscal year 2002 reflects an
increase of $1,034,814,000 from the amount enacted in fiscal
year 2001.
The Committee recommends an additional $528,688,000 above
the fiscal year 2002 budget request. The total recommended
appropriation for fiscal year 2002 is $10,500,000,000, an
increase of $1,563,502,000 from fiscal year 2001 funding.

general and flag officer quarters

The Committee is concerned about the escalating costs of
improving and maintaining general and flag officer quarters.
The Committee recognizes that many of these quarters are
historic and as such, require maintenance, preservation,
rehabilitation, and restoration beyond the normal Department of
Defense standards. These preservation activities contribute
significantly to the annual cost of maintaining these quarters.
The Committee urges the Department to look for innovative
ways to reduce these expenses while ensuring that projects are
consistent with DOD standards and not excessive. While the
Department of Defense should preserve these quarters as a
historical legacy, the military services should also explore
more cost effective ways of rehabilitating and restoring
historic family housing, such as the use of synthetic building
materials where appropriate.
The Committee has again included section 125 which requires
that the Military Construction Appropriations bill be the sole
source of all operation and maintenance for all flag and
general officer quarters. Based on the escalating costs of
routine repair and maintenance activities, the Committee
recommends that the annual limitation of expenditures for
repairs on these quarters be raised from $25,000 to $35,000 per
year.

overseas military construction

The Committee notes the significant increase in military
construction funding allocated for overseas bases in the fiscal
year 2002 budget request. In all, the proposed fiscal year 2002
overseas spending is 14.4 percent of overall specified project
spending versus only 9.9 percent of total spending in fiscal
year 2001. The Committee remains concerned about the adequacy
of facilities, particularly housing, community, and
environmental systems, at U.S. installations overseas. However,
the Committee is also concerned that some senior U.S.
commanders, in their efforts to improve inadequate facilities,
may be advocating major construction and environmental programs
that may lead to large funding commitments ahead of policy
decisions by the Secretary of Defense.
The Committee is aware that the Department of Defense is in
the midst of a comprehensive review of our overseas
installations to ensure that our presence is consistent with
the Quadrennial Defense Review (QDR) and our long-term basing
strategy. The Committee directs the Department to submit a
report on the Department's overseas basing master plan to the
congressional committees not later than April 1, 2002. The
master plan must identify those enduring installations required
to support our national military objectives as well as provide
a roadmap for future stationing decisions. This report must
take into account the issue of military training and the
potential for restrictions on proposed training areas,
including encroachment and environmental constraints and
concerns. The Committee's goal is to ensure that scarce
resources are appropriately allocated in support of our
national security objectives and consistent with the Department
of Defense's long range policies and plans.

CONFORMANCE WITH AUTHORIZATION BILL

The Committee strongly supports the authorization-
appropriation process. However, the Committee has reported the
appropriation bill prior to completion of the authorization
process. Therefore, the Committee has provided construction
funds for specific projects which were included in the Senate-
reported version of the National Defense Authorization Act for
fiscal year 2002 and projects subject to authorization.

Contingency funding

The Committee commends the Department and the military
services for including contingency funding in the fiscal year
2002 budget request for military construction and family
housing projects. Adequate contingency funding is essential for
the efficient and cost-effective execution of the overall
construction program throughout the Department of Defense. The
Committee strongly urges the Department to include responsible
contingency funding in the fiscal year 2003 budget submission.

REPROGRAMMING RULES/CRITERIA

The following rules apply for all military construction and
family housing reprogrammings. A project or account (including
the sub-elements of an account) which has been specifically
reduced by the Congress in acting on the appropriation request
is considered to be a congressional interest item. A prior
approval reprogramming is required for any increase to an item
that has specifically reduced by the Congress. Accordingly, no
below threshold reprogrammings to an item specifically reduced
by the Congress are permitted.
The reprogramming criteria that apply to military
construction projects (25 percent of the funded amount or
$2,000,000, whichever is less) continue to apply to new housing
construction projects and to improvements over $2,000,000. To
provide the individual services the flexibility to proceed with
construction contracts without disruption or delay, the costs
associated with environmental hazard remediation such as
asbestos removal, radon abatement, lead-based paint removal or
abatement, and any other legislated environmental hazard
remediation may be excluded, provided that such remediation
requirements could not be reasonably anticipated at the time of
budget submission. This exclusion applies to projects
authorized in the budget year, and also projects authorized in
prior years for which construction contracts have not been
completed.
Furthermore, in instances where a prior approval
reprogramming request for a project or account has been
approved by the Committee, the amount approved becomes the new
base for any future increase or decrease via below threshold
reprogrammings (provided that the project or account is not a
congressional interest item).

transfer authority

The budget request proposed a general provision which would
allow the transfer of up to $67,000,000 between any accounts in
the bill, and this could be accomplished at the determination
of the Secretary of Defense and upon the approval of OMB.
Congress would be given an ``after the fact'' notification. The
Committee believes that the existing reprogramming procedures
are sufficient in solving urgent, high priority funding
problems within available resources and denies this request.

base realignment and closure

The Committee has included $682,200,000 for the ``Base
realignment and closure'' account, an increase of $150,000,000
over the budget request. This additional funding is needed to
address urgent, unfunded environmental remediation requirements
at bases that have been closed or realigned.

barracks construction

The fiscal year 2002 budget request includes $1,218,435,000
to construct or modernize 60 barracks projects.
The Committee recommends $1,246,373,000 for barracks
construction projects in fiscal year 2002, an increase of
$27,938,000 over the budget request. This additional funding is
provided to help reduce the unaccompanied housing deficit and
modernize existing barracks.

BARRACKS CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Location Request Recommended
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Army:
Alaska: Fort Richardson Barracks Complex $45,000,000 $45,000,000
(144 spaces).............................
Colorado: Fort Carson Barracks Complex 25,000,000 25,000,000
(336 spaces).............................
Hawaii:
Schofield Barracks Barracks Complex 23,000,000 23,000,000
(400 spaces).........................
Wheeler Trng Range Barracks Complex 50,000,000 50,000,000
(192 spaces).........................
Kentucky: Fort Campbell Barracks Complex 47,000,000 47,000,000
(104 spaces).............................
Michigan: Augusta/Battle Creek TASS ........... 13,318,000
Barracks (336 spaces)....................
Missouri: Fort Leonard Wood Basic Training 27,000,000 27,000,000
Complex (1,200 spaces)...................
New Jersey: Fort Monmouth Barracks Complex 20,000,000 20,000,000
(250 spaces).............................
North Carolina:
Fort Bragg Basic Training Complex (352 49,000,000 49,000,000
spaces)..............................
Fort Bragg Basic Training Complex (228 27,000,000 27,000,000
spaces)..............................
Fort Bragg Basic Training Complex (330 17,500,000 17,500,000
spaces)..............................
South Carolina: Fort Jackson Basic 26,000,000 26,000,000
Training Complex (1,200 spaces)..........
Texas: Fort Hood Barracks Complex (480 41,000,000 41,000,000
spaces)..................................
Washington: Fort Lewis Barracks Complex 48,000,000 48,000,000
(300 spaces).............................
Germany:
Bamberg Barracks Complex (282 spaces). 20,000,000 20,000,000
Darmstadt Barracks Complex (82 spaces) 6,800,000 6,800,000
Darmstadt Barracks Complex (82 spaces) 6,700,000 6,700,000
Heidelberg Barracks Complex (89 6,800,000 6,800,000
spaces)..............................
Heidelberg Barracks Complex (132 8,500,000 8,500,000
spaces)..............................
Hanau Barracks Complex (105 spaces)... 7,200,000 7,200,000
Korea:
Camp Hovey Barracks Complex (400 33,000,000 33,000,000
spaces)..............................
Camp Humphreys Barracks Complex (232 14,500,000 14,500,000
spaces)..............................
Camp Stanley Barracks Complex (464 28,000,000 28,000,000
spaces)..............................
-------------------------
Subtotal, Army...................... 577,000,000 590,318,000
=========================
Navy & Marine Corps:
California:
Camp Pendleton Bachelor Enlisted 21,200,000 21,200,000
Quarters (400 spaces)................
Camp Pendleton Bachelor Enlisted 21,600,000 21,600,000
Quarters (400 spaces)................
El Centro Bachelor Enlisted Quarters 23,520,000 23,520,000
(320 spaces).........................
NAS Lemoore Bachelor Enlisted Quarters 10,010,000 10,010,000
(104 spaces).........................
NC San Diego Bachelor Enlisted 47,240,000 47,240,000
Quarters (516 spaces)................
Twentynine Palms Bachelor Enlisted 29,675,000 29,675,000
Quarters (384 spaces)................
Washington, DC: Anacostia Bachelor 9,810,000 9,810,000
Enlisted Quarters (120 spaces)...........
Florida: Mayport Bachelor Enlisted 16,420,000 16,420,000
Quarters (260 spaces)....................
Hawaii:
Kaneohe Bay Bachelor Enlisted Quarters 24,920,000 24,920,000
(300 spaces).........................
NS Pearl Harbor Bachelor Enlisted 17,300,000 17,300,000
Quarters (112 spaces)................
NS Pearl Harbor Bachelor Enlisted 23,300,000 23,300,000
Quarters (312 spaces)................
Illinois:
Great Lakes Recruit Barracks (1,056 41,130,000 41,130,000
spaces)..............................
Great Lakes Recruit Barracks (1,056 41,130,000 41,130,000
spaces)..............................
Maine:
Kittery-Portsmouth Bachelor Enlisted ........... 14,620,000
Quarters (172 spaces)................
Brunswick Transient Student Quarters 22,630,000 22,630,000
(500 spaces).........................
Mississippi: Gulfport Bachelor Enlisted 14,300,000 14,300,000
Quarters (180 spaces)....................
Missouri: Kansas City Bachelor Enlisted 9,010,000 9,010,000
Quarters (196 spaces)....................
North Carolina:
Camp Lejeune Bachelor Enlisted 16,530,000 16,530,000
Quarters (400 spaces)................
Camp Lejeune Bachelor Enlisted 13,550,000 13,550,000
Quarters (320 spaces)................
Virginia:
NS Norfolk BEQ Modernization (380 14,730,000 14,730,000
spaces)..............................
Quantico Bachelor Enlisted Quarters 9,390,000 9,390,000
(200 spaces).........................
Greece: Larissa Bachelor Enlisted Quarters 12,240,000 12,240,000
(152 spaces).............................
Guam: Guam BEQ Modernization (64 spaces).. 9,300,000 9,300,000
-------------------------
Subtotal, Navy & Marine Corps........... 448,935,000 463,555,000
=========================
Air Force:
Alabama:
Maxwell AFB Officer Training School 11,800,000 11,800,000
Dormitory (120 spaces)...............
Maxwell AFB Squadron Officer School 13,600,000 13,600,000
Dormitory (162 spaces)...............
Alaska: Elmendorf AFB Domitory (180 20,000,000 20,000,000
spaces)..................................
Arizona: Davis-Monthan AFB Domitory (120 8,700,000 8,700,000
spaces)..................................
Colorado: Buckley AFB Domitory (144 11,200,000 11,200,000
spaces)..................................
Oklahoma: Tinker AFB Domitory (144 spaces) 10,200,000 10,200,000
Texas:
Lackland AFB Domitory (96 spaces)..... 8,600,000 8,600,000
Sheppard AFB Student Domitory (140 16,000,000 16,000,000
spaces)..............................
Sheppard AFB Student Domitory (160 21,000,000 21,000,000
spaces)..............................
Virginia: Langley AFB Domitory (96 spaces) 8,300,000 8,300,000
Germany: Ramstein AFB Domitory (120 11,000,000 11,000,000
spaces)..................................
Italy: Aviano AFB Domitory (102 spaces)... 8,200,000 8,200,000
Korea:
Osan AFB Domitory (156 spaces)........ 14,400,000 14,400,000
Osan AFB Domitory (156 spaces)........ 15,800,000 15,800,000
Osan AFB Officer Domitory (69 spaces). 9,700,000 9,700,000
Turkey: Eskisehir Domitory (32 spaces).... 4,000,000 4,000,000
-------------------------
Subtotal, Air Force..................... 192,500,000 192,500,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Real Property Maintenance Reporting Requirement

The Committee recommends a continuation of the following
general rules for repairing a facility under Operations and
Maintenance account funding:
Components of the facility may be repaired by replacement,
and such replacement can be up to current standards or code.
Interior arrangements and restorations may be included as
repair, but additions, new facilities, and functional
conversions must be performed as military construction
projects.
Such projects may be done concurrent with repair projects,
as long as the final conjunctively funded project is a complete
and usable facility.
The appropriate Service Secretary shall submit a 21-day
notification prior to carrying out any repair project with an
estimated cost in excess of $7,500,000.
The Department is directed to continue to provide the real
property maintenance backlog at all installations for which
there is a requested construction project in future budget
requests. This information is to be provided on Form 1390. In
addition, for all troop housing requests, the Form 1391 is to
continue to show all real property maintenance conducted in the
past 2 years and all future requirements for unaccompanied
housing at that installation.

Child Development Centers

The fiscal year 2002 budget request includes $25,460,000
for 4 child development center projects. The Committee
recommends $33,610,000 for a total of 6 projects.
The following child development center projects are
provided for fiscal year 2002:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Location Request Recommended
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Army:
Illinois: Rock Island Arsenal............. ........... $3,500,000
Kansas: Fort Riley........................ $6,800,000 6,800,000
Maryland: Fort Meade...................... 5,800,000 5,800,000
Germany: Wiesbaden Air Base............... 6,800,000 6,800,000
Navy:
South Carolina: Beaufort Naval Base....... 6,060,000 6,060,000
Air Force:
Montana: Malmstrom AFB.................... ........... 4,650,000
-------------------------
Total................................... 25,460,000 33,610,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Military Construction, Army

Appropriations, 2001.................................... $943,328,000
Budget estimate, 2002................................... 1,760,541,000
Committee recommendation (including rescission)......... 1,642,557,000

The Committee recommends $1,642,557,000 for the Army for
fiscal year 2002. This is a decrease of $117,984,000 from the
budget request for fiscal year 2002. This also reflects the
realignment of the Chemical Demilitarization Program
responsibility from the Army. (See State tables at the end of
the report for complete program recommendations.)
The Committee fully expects contracts for the following
projects to be awarded, as early in fiscal year 2002 as
practical:
Installation Desalinization System, Fort Bliss, TX.--Of the
$153,084,000 provided for planning and design within the
``Army'' account, the Committee directs that not less than
$1,800,000 be made available for the design of this water
treatment system.
Replace Instructional Facility, Bell Hall, Fort
Leavenworth, KS.--Of the $153,084,000 provided for planning and
design within the ``Army'' account, the Committee directs that
$2,500,000 be made available for the design of this
instructional facility.
Division Command and Control Facility, Fort Campbell, KY.--
Of the $153,084,000 provided for planning and design within the
``Army'' account, the Committee directs that $1,500,000 be made
available for the design of this command and control facility.
U.S. Army Heritage and Education Center, Carlisle Barracks,
PA.--Of the $153,084,000 provided for planning and design
within the ``Army'' account, the Committee directs that
$500,000 be made available for the planning and design of the
center for restoration and archival of Army documents and
audio/visual media.
U.S. Army Museum Support Center, Martinsburg, WV.--Of the
$153,084,000 provided for planning and design within the
``Army'' account, the Committee directs that $100,000 be made
available to conduct a study on the feasibility and cost to
renovate the Martinsburg Roundhouse Center, to accommodate the
U.S. Army indoor storage facility for macro military artifacts
project.
Physical Fitness Center Addition, Fort Wainwright, AK.--Of
the $21,130,000 provided for unspecified minor construction
within the ``Army'' account, the Committee directs that not
less than $600,000 be made available for the construction of
this physical fitness center addition.
Aircraft Armament Engineering Center, Yuma, AZ.--Of the
$21,130,000 provided for unspecified minor construction within
the ``Army'' account, the Committee directs that not less than
$1,480,000 be made available for the construction of this
engineering center.
Launch Complex Quality Assurance Facility, White Sands
Missile Range, NM.--Of the $21,130,000 provided for unspecified
minor construction within the ``Army'' account, the Committee
directs that not less than $1,050,000 be made available for the
construction of this quality assurance facility.
Anechoic Chamber, White Sands Missile Range, NM.--The
Committee recognizes the immediate requirement of the Army
Research Laboratory (Survivability, Lethality and Analysis
Division, SLAD) at White Sands Missile Range to replace the
anechoic chamber destroyed by fire in December 2000. The loss
of this facility will significantly impede critical research
and development in Army Information Operations. The Committee
strongly recommends that the Army expedite replacement of the
anechoic chamber at White Sands Missile Range.
Consolidated Logistics Maintenance Complex, Fort Sill,
OK.--Of the $153,084,000 provided for planning and design
within the ``Army'' account, the Committee directs that
$1,300,000 be made available for the design of this logistics
maintenance complex.

Military Construction, Navy

Appropriations, 2001.................................... $929,411,000
Budget estimate, 2002................................... 1,071,408,000
Committee recommendation (including rescission)......... 1,129,045,000

The Committee recommends $1,129,045,000 for Navy and Marine
Corps military construction for fiscal year 2002. This amount
is an increase of $57,637,000 from the fiscal year 2002 budget
request. (See State tables at the end of the report for
complete program recommendations.)
The Committee fully expects contracts for the following
projects to be awarded, as early in fiscal year 2002 as
practical:
Chapel, Kaneohe Bay Marine Corps Base, HI.--Of the
$37,332,000 provided for planning and design within the
``Navy'' account, the Committee directs that not less than
$510,000 be made available for the design of this chapel.
Renovate Joint Interoperability Test Command, Indian Head,
Naval Surface Warfare Center, MD.--Of the $37,332,000 provided
for planning and design within the ``Navy'' account, the
Committee directs that not less than $300,000 be made available
for the design of this facility.
Aircraft Prototype Facility, Patuxent River, MD.--Of the
$37,332,000 provided for planning and design within the
``Navy'' account, the Committee directs that not less than
$1,450,000 be made available for the design of this prototype
facility.
National Security Research Center, Newport Naval War
College, RI.--Of the $37,332,000 provided for planning and
design within the ``Navy'' account, the Committee directs that
not less than $1,790,000 be made available for the design of
this research center.
Electronic Integration and Support Facility, Charleston
Naval Weapons Station, SC.--Of the $37,332,000 provided for
planning and design within the ``Navy'' account, the Committee
directs that not less than $650,000 be made available for the
design of this support facility.
Turner Field House, U.S. Naval Academy, MD.--Of the
$37,332,000 provided for planning and design within the
``Navy'' account, the Committee directs that $2,700,000 be made
available for the design of this facility.
Fitness Center, Albany, Marine Corps Logistics Base, GA.--
Of the $13,321,000 provided for unspecified minor construction
within the ``Navy'' account, the Committee directs that not
less than $900,000 be made available for the construction of
this fitness center.
Infrastructure System Upgrade, Corpus Christi Naval Air
Station, TX.--Of the $13,321,000 provided for unspecified minor
construction within the ``Navy'' account, the Committee directs
that not less than $786,000 be made available for the
construction of these electrical, air conditioning and water
facilities upgrades.
Repair Taxiway, Field Waldron, TX.--Of the $13,321,000
provided for unspecified minor construction within the ``Navy''
account, the Committee directs that not less than $520,000 be
made available for the construction repair of this taxiway.
Repair Runway and Perimeter Fence, Cabaniss, TX.--Of the
$13,321,000 provided for unspecified minor construction within
the ``Navy'' account, the Committee directs that not less than
$369,000 be made available for the construction repair of this
runway and fence.
Compartmented Intelligence Facility, Joint Readiness Base,
Fort Worth, TX.--Of the $13,321,000 provided for unspecified
minor construction within the ``Navy'' account, the Committee
directs that not less than $200,000 be made available for the
construction of this facility.

Military Construction, Air Force

Appropriations, 2001.................................... $885,333,000
Budget estimate, 2002................................... 1,068,250,000
Committee recommendation (including rescission)......... 1,144,269,000

The Committee recommends $1,144,269,000 for the Air Force
in fiscal year 2002. This is an increase of $76,019,000 to the
fiscal year 2002 budget request. (See State tables at the end
of the report for complete program recommendations.)
The Committee fully expects contracts for the following
projects to be awarded, as early in fiscal year 2002 as
practical:
Convert Facilities to Avionics Shop, Elmendorf Air Force
Base, AK.--Of the $83,420,000 provided for planning and design
within the ``Air Force'' account, the Committee directs that
not less than $540,000 be made available for the design of this
conversion.
Blair Lake Vehicle Maintenance Facility, Eielson Air Force
Base, AK.--Of the $83,420,000 provided for planning and design
within the ``Air Force'' account, the Committee directs that
not less than $300,000 be made available for the design of this
vehicle maintenance facility.
Corrosion Paint/De-Paint Facility, Robins Air Force Base,
GA.--Of the $83,420,000 provided for planning and design within
the ``Air Force'' account, the Committee directs that not less
than $1,250,000 be made available for the design of this
corrosion facility.
Fire/Crash Rescue Station, Seymour Johnson Air Force Base,
NC.--Of the $83,420,000 provided for planning and design within
the ``Air Force'' account, the Committee directs that not less
than $490,000 be made available for the design of this fire/
crash rescue station.
Ramp Extension, Minot AFB, ND.--Of the $83,420,000 provided
for planning and design within the ``Air Force'' account, the
Committee directs that $1,710,000 be made available for the
planning and design of this ramp extension. The shortage of
parking space on the main parking apron at Minot AFB degrades
the readiness of the 5th Bomb Wing to meet mission requirements
and is a significant force protection deficiency. The Committee
urges the Air Force to complete all remaining design work as
quickly as possible and to fully fund this project in the
President's fiscal year 2003 budget.
Biomedical Training Facility--Brooks AFB, TX.--Of the
$12,250,000 provided for unspecified minor construction in the
``Air Force'' account, the Committee directs that $1,000,000 be
made available for the construction of this facility.
Masirah Island Airfield, Oman.--The Committee
recommendation includes $8,000,000 in the ``Air Force'' major
construction account to complete planning and design and
construction of the Masirah Island Airfield project in Oman.
The Committee recommendation rescinds $4,000,000 from
previously appropriated Air Force funds, and $4,000,000 from
previously appropriated Defense-Wide funds and reappropriates
those funds in this Act to complete the Masirah Island project,
which was originally authorized and funded in Public Law 107-
20.

Military Construction, Defense-wide

Appropriations, 2001.................................... $798,463,000
Budget estimate, 2002................................... 694,558,000
Committee recommendation (including rescissions)........ 811,778,000

The Committee recommends $811,778,000 for projects
considered within the ``Defense-wide'' account. The amount
recommended is an increase of $117,220,000 from the fiscal year
2002 budget request. This increase reflects the realignment of
the Chemical Demilitarization Program responsibility to this
appropriation. (See State tables at the end of the report for
complete program recommendations.)

Pentagon Reconstruction

The Committee fully supports the Department of Defense
efforts to rebuild the Pentagon from the recent terrorist
attacks on September 11, 2001. The Committee is committed to
working with the Department to ensure the necessary resources
are available for reconstructing the Pentagon and improving the
anti-terrorism and force protection measures of the facility.
The Congress recently provided $40,000,000,000 of emergency
spending authority to the administration, of which a portion
will be directed towards the Pentagon reconstruction. The
Committee believes that the funding to rebuild the destroyed
wedge of the Pentagon should be funded through traditional
military construction appropriations, specifically ``Military
Construction, Defense-wide''. The Committee directs the
Department to report to the congressional defense committees on
the overall status of the reconstruction plan, acquisition
strategy, project time line, and cost estimates no later than
November 1, 2001.

chemical demilitarization

The budget request identified a requirement of $172,500,000
for the construction of the following chemical weapon
demilitarization facilities in fiscal year 2002. The Committee
recommends a total of $172,500,000 for this program as
requested by the President.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
State/installation/project Request Recommended
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Arkansas: Pine Bluff Arsenal, Ammunition $26,000,000 $26,000,000
Demilitarization Facility, Ph 6..............
Colorado: Pueblo Depot, Ammunition 11,000,000 11,000,000
Demilitarization Facility, Ph 3..............
Indiana: Newport Army Ammunition Plant, 66,000,000 66,000,000
Ammunition Demilitarization Facility, Ph 4...
Kentucky: Bluegrass Army Depot, Ammunition 3,000,000 3,000,000
Demilitarization Facility, Ph 2..............
Maryland: Aberdeen Proving Ground, Ammunition 66,500,000 66,500,000
Demilitarization Facility, Ph 4.............
-------------------------
Total................................... 172,500,000 172,500,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

The budget request proposes that these amounts should be
appropriated under the ``Military Construction, Army'' account.
As in prior years, the Committee recommends that these amounts
be appropriated under the ``Military Construction, Defense-
wide'' account, in order to facilitate the tracking of expenses
for the Chemical Demilitarization Program, and to avoid
distorting the size of the Army's military construction
program.
The Committee believes that the focus on this program must
remain at the Office of the Secretary of the Defense rather
than at the service level and directs the Department to submit
the fiscal year 2003 budget accordingly.
The following chart displays the scope of the military
construction investment in the overall chemical
demilitarization program:

CHEMICAL DEMILITARIZATION PROGRAM MILITARY CONSTRUCTION COSTS
[In millions of dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2000 Fiscal year--
and ------------------------------------------------------ Total
prior 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tooele................................. 198.0 ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... 198.0
Anniston............................... 181.2 ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... 181.2
Umatilla Depot......................... 11.2 ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... 11.2
Umatilla Facility...................... 182.2 9.4 ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... 191.6
Pine Fixed Facility.................... ....... ....... ....... 2.0 7.7 0.8 ....... 10.5
Pine Bluff Depot....................... 10.0 ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... 10.0
Pine Bluff Facility.................... 107.8 43.6 25.0 ....... ....... ....... ....... 176.4
Pueblo Depot........................... 6.3 ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... 6.3
Pueblo Facility........................ ....... 10.7 13.0 35.3 71.0 28.8 ....... 158.8
Blue Grass Depot....................... 2.0 8.5 ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... 10.5
Blue Grass Facility.................... ....... ....... 3.0 10.0 ....... 36.0 62.0 111.0
Aberdeen CTDF.......................... 16.1 ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... 16.1
Aberdeen Depot......................... 1.9 ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... 1.9
Aberdeen Facility...................... 80.0 45.7 66.5 30.4 ....... ....... ....... 221.7
Newport Depot.......................... 2.0 ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... 2.0
Newport Facility....................... 47.4 34.4 65.0 13.2 ....... ....... ....... 160.0
MAPS Facility.......................... ....... 3.1 ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... 3.1
Planning and Design.................... 114.5 ....... 1.0 ....... ....... ....... ....... 115.5
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total............................ 960.6 155.4 172.5 90.9 78.7 65.6 62.0 1,585.8
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Medical construction program

The fiscal year 2002 budget request included $225,126,000
for 22 projects plus planning and design and unspecified minor
construction to provide hospital and medical facilities,
including treatment, training, and medical research and
development facilities. The Committee recommends a total of
$229,126,000 for Department of Defense medical projects.
The following hospital and medical projects are recommended
for fiscal year 2002:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Location/project title Request Recommended
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alaska: Ft. Wainwright, Hospital $18,500,000 $18,500,000
Replacement............................
California:
Camp Pendleton, Fleet Hospital 3,150,000 3,150,000
Support Facilities.................
Camp Pendleton, Medical/Dental 4,300,000 4,300,000
Clinic Replacement, Horno,.........
Camp Pendleton, Medical/Dental 3,800,000 3,800,000
Clinic Replacement, Las Flores.....
Camp Pendleton, Medical/Dental 4,050,000 4,050,000
Clinic Replacement, Las Pulgas.....
Twentynine Palms, LDRP Conversion... 1,600,000 1,600,000
Colorado: Shriever Air Force Base, 4,000,000 4,000,000
Medical/Dental Clinic..................
Florida:
Hurlburt Field, Clinic Addition/ 8,800,000 8,800,000
Alteration.........................
Mayport Naval Station, Medical/ 24,000,000 24,000,000
Dental Clinic Replacement..........
Georgia:
Albany Marine Corps Logistics Base, 5,800,000 5,800,000
Medical/Dental Clinic Replacement..
Fort Stewart, Consolidated Troop 11,000,000 11,000,000
Medical Clinic.....................
Maryland:
Andrews Air Force Base, Medical 7,300,000 7,300,000
Clinic Addition/Alteration.........
Andrews Air Force Base, Branch 2,950,000 2,950,000
Medical/Dental Clinic Replace-
ment...............................
New Mexico: Holloman Air Force Base, 5,700,000 5,700,000
Medical Clinic Alteration..............
Texas:
Dyess Air Force Base, Medical 3,300,000 3,300,000
Treatment Facility Alteration......
Fort Hood, Hospital Addition/ 12,200,000 12,200,000
Alteration.........................
Virginia: Norfolk, Branch Medical Clinic 21,000,000 21,000,000
Addition/Alteration....................
Washington: Whidbey Island Naval Air 6,600,000 6,600,000
Station, Water Survival Facility.......
Wyoming: F.E. Warren Air Force Base, 2,700,000 2,700,000
Medical Clinic Alteration..............
Portugal: Lajes Field, Dental Clinic 3,750,000 3,750,000
Replacement............................
Germany: Thule Air Force Base, Composite 28,000,000 28,000,000
Medical Facility Replacement...........
Greenland: Heidelberg, Hospital Addition/ 10,800,000 10,800,000
Clinic Alteration......................
-------------------------------
Total............................. 193,300,000 193,300,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ambulatory Clinic, Goose Creek, SC.--Of the $30,300,000
provided for planning and design within the ``Defense-wide
Tricare Management Activity'' account, the Committee directs
that not less than $4,000,000 be made available for the design
of this clinic.
Armed Forces Institute of Pathology (AFIP).--The Committee
is aware of the long standing need for expanded and improved
facilities for the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology (AFIP)
as reported to Congress in the AFIP Facility Improvement Plan
in accordance with direction in the fiscal year 2000 National
Defense Authorization Act. However, the Committee is concerned
over the projected cost estimates to renovate and expand the
existing facility at Walter Reed Army Medical Center.
Therefore, the Committee directs the Department of Defense to
undertake an assessment of alternate locations in lower cost
regions within the Mid-Atlantic area. In conducting its
assessment, the Department is instructed to take into account
regional facilities that could provide research, medical, DNA
analysis, forensic, and biometric support to the Institute.

defense agencies

Measurement and Signature Intelligence (MASINT) Test,
Evaluation, and Acquisition Support Center (MASINT/TEA),
Huntsville, AL.--Of the $16,516,000 provided for planning and
design within the ``Defense-wide Defense Intelligence Agency''
account, the Committee directs that not less than $4,000,000 be
made available for the completion of concept development, cost
estimation, and design of this support center.
Measurement and Signature Intelligence (MASINT) Tasking,
Processing, Exploitation, and Dissemination (MASINT/TPED)
Center, Martinsburg, WV.--Of the $16,516,000 provided for
planning and design within the ``Defense-wide Defense
Intelligence Agency'' account, the Committee directs that not
less than $6,000,000 be made available for the completion of
concept development, cost estimation, and design of this
tasking, processing, exploitation, and dissemination center.

contingency construction

The Committee has provided $10,000,000 for the Secretary of
Defense ``Contingency construction'' account in accordance with
the budget request. This account provides funds which may be
used by the Secretary of Defense for unforeseen facility
requirements. The Committee believes that the funding provided
to the account is adequate to meet the needs of the Department.

rescissions

National Missile Defense.--Division A of Public Law 106-246
provided funding for ``National Missile Defense, Initial
Deployment Facilities, Phase 1.'' The administration has
determined that currently planned National Missile Defense
construction programs should be funded through the Defense
Appropriations research, test, development, and evaluation
account instead of through the Military Construction
Appropriations bill. Consequently, the $55,030,000 balance
remaining in the National Missile Defense Military Construction
account is no longer required for the project for which it was
appropriated. The Committee therefore rescinds $55,030,000 from
the ``Military Construction, Defense-wide'' account.
Aruba-Forward Operating Locations.--Division B of Public
Law 106-246 provided funding for a Forward Operating Location
at Aruba. This project is no longer required. Therefore, the
Committee rescinds $10,250,000 from the ``Military
Construction, Defense-wide'' account.

energy conservation and improvement project

The Committee recommends the full budget request of
$35,600,000 for the Energy Conservation and Improvement Project
(ECIP). Last winter's energy shortages, coupled with heightened
national security concerns over the vulnerability of the
existing power delivery system, transmission lines, and fuel
supply sources, have underscored the need for the Department to
increase its reliance on renewable energy resources,
particularly solar, wind, and geothermal, at military
installations and Department of Defense family housing
complexes. It is the opinion of the Committee that renewable
energy resources can help to improve energy reliability,
independence, and security through diversification and
distributed development, and in so doing, complement
conventional energy resources.
To accomplish this goal, the Committee directs the
Department to designate an executive agent among the services
with field-level renewable energy purchasing experience, to
assess the regional potential of renewal energy generation,
transmission, and distribution by industry on or near
Department of Defense installations in the United States.
Because of the Air Force's scope and level of experience, the
Committee recommends that the Air Force be designated the
executive agent.
The assessment is expected to encompass installations in
each of the services and should include an analysis of the
overall cost, benefit, and risk of various renewable energy
proposals. The Department is also directed to provide a plan
for encouraging the participation of private industry in the
development and provision of renewable energy, and address the
Department's market, regulatory, legal, cost and other possible
impediments to an increased reliance on renewable resources. A
thorough assessment is expected to take a minimum of 12 to 15
months to complete, at an estimated cost of $10,000,000. Given
the critical importance of this assessment, the Committee
directs that of the $35,600,000 in the Energy Conservation
Improvement Project fund, $10,000,000 be allocated to this
assessment. The Department is directed to provide the
congressional defense committees with an interim report on the
scope and method of the assessment no later than April 30,
2002, and a final report no later than April 30, 2003.

Joint Use Facilities

Joint Use Facilities--Joint Future Years' Defense Plan
(FYDP).--The Committee recognizes the efficiencies gained by
the construction of joint use--multi-service facilities.
However, past initiatives to begin development of such projects
have produced limited results. It is the belief of the
Committee that the military services, including the reserve
components, should be encouraged to develop joint use
facilities without the penalty of having the cost of the entire
facility added to the FYDP of only one component.
Given that it is within the authority of the Secretary of
Defense, through the Office of the Comptroller, to develop a
separate future year defense plans account for the application
of such joint use projects, the Committee directs the Secretary
of Defense, through the Office of the Comptroller, to develop
such an account, within the existing funding constraints, that
would encourage the application for, and construction of,
joint-use, multi-service projects throughout the services
including the reserve components. The Committee further
encourages the Department to submit a budget in fiscal year
2003 with the inclusion of a Joint Future Years' Defense Plan
(FYDP).
The Committee directs the Secretary of Defense to report to
the congressional defense committees on the Department's plan
to develop a Joint Future Years' Defense Plan no later than
February 15, 2002.

Military Construction, Reserve Components

Appropriations, 2001.................................... $702,608,000
Budget estimate, 2002................................... 615,238,000
Committee recommendation................................ 799,168,000

The Committee recommends $799,168,000 for military
construction projects for the Guard and Reserve components.
This amount is $183,930,000 above the fiscal year 2002 budget
request. This increase reflects the Committee's continued
strong support for the Guard and Reserve.
The Committee's recommended action on each Reserve
component project is reflected in the State list at the end of
this report.
The Committee recommends approval of military construction,
Reserve component as outlined in the following table:

RESERVE COMPONENT
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Component Request Recommended
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Army National Guard..................... $267,389,000 $378,549,000
Air National Guard...................... 149,072,000 222,767,000
Army Reserve............................ 111,404,000 111,404,000
Naval Reserve (including rescission).... 33,641,000 32,716,000
Air Force Reserve....................... 53,732,000 53,732,000
-------------------------------
Total............................. 615,238,000 799,168,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Weapons of Mass Destruction--Civil Support Teams.--The
Committee notes the continued progress by the Department in
establishing the Weapons of Mass Destruction--Civil Support
Teams (WMD/CST), and in the administrative and organizational
restructuring.
However, the National Guard has continued requirements for
additional, adequate facilities from which to train, and to
coordinate with other Federal and State agencies, and to store
decontamination and reconnaissance equipment. Any outstanding
requirements in this area must be fully integrated into the
overall resourcing strategy for responding to events addressing
weapons of mass destruction and civil support. The Committee
has provided the Army National Guard an additional $9,000,000,
in unspecified minor construction funding to directly support
the completion of facilities for the next seven WMD/CST
locations. The Committee directs the Chief of the National
Guard Bureau to report to the congressional defense committees
on the distribution of these funds no later than 60 days
following the designation of the remaining locations of the 27
initial sites.
The Committee has added funding for specific Reserve
component planning and design initiatives. The Committee
recommendation also provides additional funding over the budget
request for minor construction activities for the Reserve
components.
The Committee fully expects contracts for the following
projects to be awarded, as early in fiscal year 2002 as
practical:
Readiness Center, Warren, AR.--Of the $34,378,000 provided
for planning and design within the ``Army National Guard''
account, the Committee directs that $30,000 be made available
for the planning and design of this readiness center.
Reconstruct Leadership Academy, Camp Rowland, CT.--Of the
$34,378,000 provided for planning and design within the ``Army
National Guard'' account, the Committee directs that not less
than $520,000 be made available for the design to reconstruct
this leadership academy.
Maintenance Shop, Camp Blanding, FL.--Of the $34,378,000
provided for planning and design within the ``Army National
Guard'' account, the Committee directs that not less than
$1,400,000 be made available for the design of this maintenance
shop.
Consolidated Maintenance Facility, Esler/Pineville, LA.--Of
the $34,378,000 provided for planning and design with the
``Army National Guard'' account, the Committee directs that not
less than $1,700,000 be made available for the design of this
maintenance facility.
Readiness Center, Kosciusko, MS.--Of the $34,378,000
provided for planning and design within the ``Army National
Guard'' account, the Committee directs that $300,000 be made
available for the design of this readiness center.
Integrated Special Operations Training Facility, Camp
Dawson, WV.--Of the $34,378,000 provided for planning and
design within the ``Army National Guard'' account, the
Committee directs that $2,000,000 be made available for the
planning and design of this operations and training facility.
Aviation Classification Repair (AVCRAD), Springfield, MO.--
Of the $34,378,000 provided for planning and design within the
``Army National Guard'' account, the Committee directs that not
less than $1,620,000 be made available for the design of this
aviation repair facility.
Unit Training Equipment Site (UTES), Fort Indiantown Gap,
PA.--Of the $34,378,000 provided for planning and design within
the ``Army National Guard'' account, the Committee directs that
not less than $1,500,000 be made available for the design of
this equipment site.
Readiness Center, Watertown, SD.--Of the $34,378,000
provided for planning and design within the ``Army National
Guard'' account, the Committee directs that not less than
$514,000 be made available for the design of this readiness
center.
Joint Army National Guard/Air National Guard Readiness
Center, Martinsburg, WV.--Of the $34,378,000 provided for
planning and design within the ``Army National Guard'' account,
the Committee directs that not less than $1,000,000 be made
available for the design of this readiness center.
Security Forces Facility, Eielson Air Force Base, AK.--Of
the $7,342,000 provided for planning and design within the
``Air National Guard'' account, the Committee directs that not
less than $1,000,000 be made available for the design of this
security forces facility.
Airfield Facilities Upgrade, Des Moines, IA.--Of the
$7,342,000 provided for planning and design within the ``Air
National Guard'' account, the Committee directs that not less
than $370,000 be made available for the design of this airfield
upgrade.
Airfield Facilities Upgrade, Martinsburg Air National Guard
Base, WV.--Of the $7,342,000 provided for planning and design
within the ``Air National Guard'' account, the Committee
directs that not less than $2,000,000 be made available for the
design of this airfield upgrade.
Scout Armories, AK.--Of the $22,381,000 provided for
unspecified minor construction within the ``Army National
Guard'' account, the Committee directs that not less than
$1,487,000 be made available for the construction of these
scout armories in Kipnuk, Newtok, and Kake, Alaska.
Entry Way/Guard Facility, Fort Harrison, MT.--Of the
$22,381,000 provided for unspecified minor construction within
the ``Army National Guard'' account, the Committee directs that
$727,000 be made available for the construction of this entry
way/guard facility.
Storage Building, Camp Grafton, ND.--Of the $22,381,000
provided for unspecified minor construction within the ``Army
National Guard'' account, the Committee directs that not less
than $1,499,000 be made available for the construction of a
storage building.
Joint Use Training Facility, Rickenbacker Army National
Guard Base, OH.--Of the $22,381,000 provided for unspecified
minor construction within the ``Army National Guard'' account,
the Committee directs that not less than $1,274,000 be made
available for the construction of this training facility.
C-26 Hangar, Rickenbacker Army National Guard Base, OH.--Of
the $22,381,000 provided for unspecified minor construction
within the ``Army National Guard'' account, the Committee
directs that not less than $1,365,000 be made available for the
construction of this hangar.
Courseware Development Support Facility, Camp Murray, WA.--
Of the $22,381,000 provided for unspecified minor construction
within the ``Army National Guard'' account, the Committee
directs that not less than $1,375,000 be made available for the
construction of this support facility.
Airfield Facilities Upgrade, Camp Dawson, WV.--Of the
$22,381,000 provided for unspecified minor construction within
the ``Army National Guard'' account, the Committee directs that
not less than $1,000,000 be made available for the construction
of these airfield upgrades.
Munitions Storage Facility, McConnell Air Force Base, KS.--
Of the $8,425,000 provided for unspecified minor construction
within the ``Air National Guard'' account, the Committee
directs that not less than $1,500,000 be made available for the
construction of this munitions storage facility.
Alter Command Post/Logistics Base, Selfridge Air National
Guard Base, MI.--Of the $8,425,000 provided for unspecified
minor construction within the ``Air National Guard'' account,
the Committee directs that not less than $425,000 be made
available for this command post addition.
Engineering Storage Facility, Malmstrom Air Force Base,
MT.--Of the $8,425,000 provided for unspecified minor
construction within the ``Air National Guard'' account, the
Committee directs that not less than $1,500,000 be made
available for this storage facility.

North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program

Appropriations, 2001.................................... $171,622,000
Budget estimate, 2002................................... 162,600,000
Committee recommendation................................ 162,600,000

The Committee has provided $162,600,000 for the North
Atlantic Treaty Organization [NATO] Security Investment Program
for fiscal year 2002, fully funding the budget request.
The Committee continues the requirement that no funds will
be used for projects (including planning and design) related to
the enlargement of NATO and the Partnership for Peace program,
unless Congress is notified 21 days in advance of the
obligation of funds. In addition, the Committee's intent is
that section 122 of the General Provisions shall apply to this
program.
The Department of Defense is directed to identify
separately the level of effort anticipated for NATO enlargement
and for Partnership for Peace for that fiscal year in future
budget justifications.

Family Housing Overview

The Committee has provided $4,128,383,000 for family
housing construction, operations and maintenance, and the
Department's family housing improvement fund. This amount is
$61,866,000 above the fiscal year 2002 budget request and
$470,765,000 above the amount appropriated in fiscal year 2001.

Family Housing, Army

Appropriations, 2001.................................... $1,211,572,000
Budget estimate, 2002................................... 1,400,533,000
Committee recommendation................................ 1,421,733,000

The Committee recommends a total of $1,421,733,000 for
family housing, Army, in fiscal year 2002. This is $21,200,000
over the fiscal year 2002 budget request.

construction

The Committee recommends $80,400,000 for new construction
instead of $59,200,000 as requested, as shown below:

Construction Improvements

The following projects are to be accomplished within the
amounts provided for construction improvements:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Location/project Requested Recommended
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alabama: Ft. Rucker (28 units).......... $2,400,000 $2,400,000
Washington, DC: Walter Reed Army Medical 100,000 100,000
Center (221 units).....................
Georgia: Ft. Stewart/Hunter AAF (2,927 37,800,000 37,800,000
units) Privatization...................
Kentucky: Ft. Campbell (4,540 units) 52,800,000 52,800,000
Privatization..........................
Maryland:
Aberdeen Proving Ground (10 units).. 1,050,000 1,050,000
Ft. Detrick (155 units) 1,200,000 1,200,000
Privatization......................
New Jersey: Picatinny Arsenal (116 500,000 500,000
units) Privatization...................
New York:
Ft. Hamilton (436 units) 2,200,000 2,200,000
Privatization......................
West Point (51 units) New Brick..... 9,400,000 9,400,000
North Carolina: Ft. Bragg (4,744 units) 50,000,000 50,000,000
Privatization..........................
Germany:
Ansbach (128 units) Bleidorn........ 14,400,000 14,400,000
Baumholder (188 units).............. 5,300,000 5,300,000
Darmstadt (180 units)............... 6,600,000 6,600,000
Stuttgart (30 units) Boeblingen..... 3,600,000 3,600,000
Stuttgart (45 units) Steuben & 5,200,000 5,200,000
Weicht Village.....................
Wiesbaden (432 units)............... 12,600,000 12,600,000
Italy: Vicenza (156 units).............. 11,600,000 11,600,000
Korea: Yongsan (17 units)............... 4,000,000 4,000,000
-------------------------------
Total............................. 220,750,000 220,750,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Family Housing, Navy and Marine Corps

Appropriations, 2001.................................... $1,317,160,000
Budget estimate, 2002................................... 1,222,495,000
Committee recommendation................................ 1,230,695,000

The Committee recommends $1,230,695,000 for family housing,
Navy and Marine Corps, in fiscal year 2002. This amount is
$8,200,000 over the fiscal year 2002 budget request.

construction

The Committee recommends $123,047,000 for new construction
instead of $114,847,000 as requested, as shown below:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Location/project Requested Recommended
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Arizona: MCAS Yuma (51 Units)........... $9,017,000 $9,017,000
California: Twentynine Palms (74 Units) 16,250,000 16,250,000
Marine Palms Housing area..............
Hawaii:
MCB Kaneohe Bay (172 Units) Housing 46,996,000 55,196,000
areas 63 & 64......................
CNB Pearl Harbor (70 Units) Hale 16,827,000 16,827,000
Moku...............................
Mississippi: NAS Pascagoula (160 Units). 23,354,000 23,354,000
Italy: NAS Sigonella (10 Units)......... 2,403,000 2,403,000
-------------------------------
Total............................. 114,847,000 123,047,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS

The following projects are to be accomplished within the
amounts provided for construction improvements:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Location/project Requested Recommended
------------------------------------------------------------------------
California:
COMNAVBASE San Diego (160 units).... $16,055,000 $16,055,000
Camp Pendleton (40 units) San Onofre 3,700,000 3,700,000
Camp Pendleton (3,200 units MCB 14,737,000 14,737,000
Pendleton, 111 units MWTC
Brideport, 284 MCB Pendleton)
Privatized.........................
Washington, DC:
Marine Barracks 8th & I (Quarters 2) 945,000 945,000
Marine Barracks 8th & I (Quarters 4) 949,000 949,000
Marine Barracks 8th & I (Quarters 6) 1,788,000 1,788,000
Florida:
NAS Pensacola (36 units) Cabannis 2,557,000 2,557,000
Crescent...........................
NAS Pensacola (14 units) Light House 1,267,000 1,267,000
Terrace............................
NAS Whiting Field (115 units) 9,873,000 9,873,000
Whiting Pines......................
Maryland:
USNA Anapolis (42 units) North 3,955,000 3,955,000
Severn Village.....................
NAS Patuxent River (28 units) 1,609,000 1,609,000
Chaffee Court......................
Mississippi: NAS Meridian (118 units)... 8,696,000 8,696,000
North Carolina:
Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune (80 4,569,000 4,569,000
units) Watkins Village.............
Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune (30 3,172,000 3,172,000
units) Paradise Point..............
Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune (1 70,000 70,000
unit) Quarters 2000................
Tennessee: NSA Mid South, Memphis (773 12,370,000 12,370,000
units Privatized)......................
Virginia:
COMNAVREG Norfolk (12 units) Pecan 582,000 582,000
Crescent...........................
COMNAVREG Norfolk (25 units) Fairway 1,600,000 1,600,000
Crescent...........................
ACSC Wallops Island (28 units) 2,917,000 2,917,000
Blades Circle......................
Iceland:
NAS Keflavik (95 units) SP housing 26,074,000 26,074,000
area...............................
NAS Keflavik (65 units) Lower 12,681,000 12,681,000
Commissary housing area............
Japan:
CFA Sasebo: Hario Village (44 units) 608,000 608,000
Dragon Vale (8 Units)..............
CNFJ Yokosuka (96 units)............ 9,475,000 9,475,000
CNFJ Yokosuka (96 units)............ 10,398,000 10,398,000
CNFJ Yokosuka (78 units)............ 7,029,000 7,029,000
MCAS Iwakuni (44 units) Midrise 656. 1,293,000 1,293,000
Marianas Island: CNFM Guam (44 units) 7,620,000 7,620,000
New Apra Heights.......................
United Kingdom:
NAVACTS London (70 units) Daws Hill. 7,530,000 7,530,000
NAVACTS London (80 units) West 8,935,000 8,935,000
Ruislip............................
-------------------------------
Total............................. 183,054,000 183,054,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Family Housing, Air Force

Appropriations, 2001.................................... $1,084,099,000
Budget estimate, 2002................................... 1,387,358,000
Committee recommendation................................ 1,419,824,000

The Committee recommends $1,419,824,000 for family housing,
Air Force, in fiscal year 2002, which is $32,466,000 over the
budget request.

construction

The Committee recommends $150,800,000 for new construction,
instead of $140,800,000 as requested, as shown below:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Location/project Requested Recommended
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Arizona: Luke AFB (120 Units)........... $15,712,000 $15,712,000
California: Travis AFB (118 Units)...... 18,150,000 18,150,000
Colorado: Buckley AFB (55 Units)........ 11,400,000 11,400,000
Delaware: Dover AFB (120 Units)......... 18,145,000 18,145,000
Washington, DC: Bolling AFB (136 Units) 16,926,000 16,926,000
Ph 7...................................
Hawaii: Hickam AFB (102 Units) Ph 1..... 25,037,000 25,037,000
Idaho: Mountain Home AFB (56 Units) Ph 4 .............. 10,000,000
Louisiana: Barksdale AFB (56 Units) Ph 1 7,300,000 7,300,000
South Dakota: Ellsworth AFB (78 Units) 13,700,000 13,700,000
Ph 1...................................
Virginia: Langley AFB (4 Units)......... 1,200,000 1,200,000
Portugal: Lajes AFB Azores (64 Units) Ph 13,230,000 13,230,000
2......................................
-------------------------------
Total............................. 140,800,000 150,800,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

construction improvements

The following projects are to be accomplished within the
amounts provided for construction improvements:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Location/project Requested Recommended
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alaska: Elmendorf AFB (624 units) $12,300,000 $12,300,000
Privatization..........................
Arizona: Luke AFB--Improve Electrical 1,084,000 1,084,000
System.................................
California:
Beale AFB (1,444 units) 14,500,000 14,500,000
Privatization......................
Travis AFB (49 units)............... 3,276,000 3,276,000
Colorado: USAF Academy--Improve Gas 297,000 297,000
Valve Facility.........................
Delaware: Dover AFB--Improve Family 400,000 400,000
Housing Management Office..............
Washington, DC: Bolling AFB (2 units)... 690,000 690,000
Florida: Eglin Aux Field 9 (330 Units) .............. ..............
Privatization..........................
Hawaii:
Hickam AFB (1,356 units) 15,420,000 15,420,000
Privatization......................
Hickam AFB--Improve Infrastructure.. 2,167,000 2,167,000
Illinois: Scott AFB--Improve Housing 550,000 550,000
Office.................................
Louisiana: Barksdale AFB--Improve Water 1,500,000 1,500,000
Distribution System....................
Maryland:
Andrews AFB (202 units)............. 16,789,000 16,789,000
Andrews AFB (115 units) 7,779,000 7,779,000
Privatization......................
Andrews AFB--Improve Housing Office. 600,000 600,000
Massachusetts: Hanscom AFB--Improve 1,100,000 1,100,000
Utilities Systems......................
Missouri:
Whiteman AFB (176 units)............ .............. 17,966,000
Whiteman AFB--Improve Sewer System.. 500,000 500,000
Nevada: Nellis AFB (1,313 units) 1,466,000 1,466,000
Privatization..........................
New Jersey: McGuire AFB (1,882 units) 27,127,000 27,127,000
Privatization..........................
North Dakota: Grand Forks AFB (181 17,810,000 17,810,000
units).................................
South Carolina:
Charleston AFB (178 units).......... 13,495,000 13,495,000
Charleston AFB (50 units) Hunley .............. 4,500,000
Park, Ph 2.........................
Texas: Lackland AFB (564 units) 20,733,000 20,733,000
Privatization..........................
Virginia:
Langley AFB (66 units) Improve 15,746,000 15,746,000
Historic Family Housing............
Langley AFB (1,268 units) 16,700,000 16,700,000
Privatization......................
Wyoming: F.E. Warren AFB--Improve 470,000 470,000
Sanitary Sewer Mains...................
Germany:
Ramstein AB (407 units)............. 46,668,000 46,668,000
Ramstein AB--Improve Common 1,012,000 1,012,000
Neighborhood Areas.................
Spangdahlem AFB (138 units)......... 15,632,000 15,632,000
Guam: Andersen AFB (112 units) Ph 10.... 17,534,000 17,534,000
Japan:
Kadena AB (108 units) Ph 2.......... 13,582,000 13,582,000
Yokota AFB (281 units) Ph 1......... 16,240,000 16,240,000
United Kingdom:.........................
RAF Croughton (158 units)........... 16,100,000 16,100,000
RAF Lackenheath (156 units)......... 15,208,000 15,208,000
RAF Mildenhall (31 units)........... 5,808,000 5,808,000
RAF Molesworth (119 units).......... 12,596,000 12,596,000
-------------------------------
Total............................. 352,879,000 375,345,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Family Housing, Defense-wide

Appropriations, 2001.................................... $44,787,000
Budget estimate, 2002................................... 44,012,000
Committee recommendation................................ 44,012,000

The Committee recommends $44,012,000 for family housing,
Defense-wide, in fiscal year 2002. This amount is equal to the
budget request. Specific details are included in the tables at
the end of the report.

Family Housing Improvement Fund

Appropriations, 2001....................................................
Budget estimate, 2002................................... $2,000,000
Committee recommendation................................ 2,000,000

The Committee recommends $2,000,000 for the Family Housing
Improvement Fund. This amount is equal to the budget request.

Homeowners Assistance Fund, Defense

Appropriations, 2001....................................................
Budget estimate, 2002................................... $10,119,000
Committee recommendation................................ 10,119,000

The Committee recommends $10,119,000 for the Homeowners
Assistance Fund, which is equal to the amount of the budget
request.
The Homeowners Assistance Fund is a non-expiring revolving
fund which finances a program for providing assistance to
homeowners by reducing their losses incident to the disposal of
their homes when military installations at or near where they
are serving or employed are ordered to be closed or the scope
of operations is reduced. The Fund was established in
recognition of the fact that base closure and reduction actions
can have serious economic effects on local communities. The
Fund receives funding from several sources: appropriations,
borrowing authority, reimbursable authority, prior fiscal year
unobligated balances, revenue from sale of acquired properties,
and recovery of prior year obligations.

Base Realignment and Closure

Overview

The Congress has appropriated, to date, a net total of
$21,393,333,000 for the Base Realignment and Closure program
for fiscal years 1990 through 2001. In the bill for fiscal year
2002, the Committee is recommending total funding of
$682,200,000 under one account.
The Committee, in appropriating such funds, has provided
the Department with the flexibility to allocate funds by
Service, by function and by base. The Committee, in recognizing
the complexities of realigning and closing bases and providing
for environmental restoration, has provided such flexibility to
allow the Office of the Secretary of Defense to monitor the
program execution of the Services and to redistribute
unobligated balances as appropriate to avoid delays and to
effect timely execution of realignment and closures along with
environmental restoration.
The following table displays the total amount appropriated
for each round of base closure including amounts recommended
for fiscal year 2002:

BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE
[Total funding, fiscal year 1990 through fiscal year 2002]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fiscal year 1990 Fiscal year 2002
through fiscal Fiscal year 2001 Committee Total
year 2000 enacted recommended
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Part I.............................. $2,684,577,000 ( \1\ ) ( \1\ ) $2,684,577,000
Part II............................. 4,915,636,000 ( \1\ ) ( \1\ ) 4,915,636,000
Part III............................ 7,269,267,000 ( \1\ ) ( \1\ ) 7,269,267,000
Part IV............................. 5,492,738,000 $1,031,115,000 $682,200,000 7,206,053,000
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total......................... 20,362,218,000 1,031,115,000 682,200,000 22,075,533,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Not applicable.

Since the start of the current process for Base Realignment
and Closure, Military Construction Appropriations Acts have
appropriated a net total of $21,393,333,000 for the entire
program for fiscal years 1990 through 2001. The total amount
appropriated combined with the budget requested for fiscal year
2002 Base Realignment and Closure is a total of
$22,075,533,000.

Base Realignment and Closure Account, Part IV

Appropriations, 2001.................................... $1,031,115,000
Budget estimate, 2002................................... 532,200,000
Committee recommendation................................ 682,200,000

The Committee recommends $682,200,000 for the base
realignment and closure account, part IV. This is an increase
of $150,000,000 over the amount requested for fiscal year 2002,
and $348,915,000 under the amount appropriated in fiscal year
2001.
The Committee is deeply concerned about the adequacy of
funding for, and pace of, environmental cleanup at BRAC
installations. Of particular concern are the substantial
shortfalls in the Navy and Air Force fiscal 2002 budget
submissions for ``must pay'' BRAC environmental cleanup costs.
Both services identified to this Committee environmental
requirements that must be funded in fiscal year 2002 that were
not included in the revised budget submission. The Navy has
reported a shortfall of $167,627,000 for urgent environmental
remediation projects, including health and safety threats and
legal commitments, at 16 installations. The Air Force shortfall
is $55,000,000 for clean up projects at 7 installations.
The administration's fiscal year 2002 budget request is
$532,200,000. The request is $498,915,000 below the amount
appropriated for fiscal year 2001, and $150,000,000 below the
Committee recommendation of $682,200,000. The Committee
believes that the budget request is wholly inadequate to meet
the current environmental cleanup requirements at BRAC
installations. To help make up the services' urgent shortfall
in funding, the Committee recommends that the unobligated
balance of $55,030,000 remaining in the fiscal year 2001
Defense-wide account, ``National Missile Defense Initial
Deployment Facilities Phase 1,'' be rescinded and that the
funds be reallocated to the base realignment and closure
account, part IV, specifically to offset the Navy and Air Force
BRAC environmental shortfalls. The Committee recommends this
offset as a result of the Department's decision to shift the
proposed national missile defense construction program from
military construction into research, test, development, and
evaluation.
The Committee also recommends that $19,588,000 be rescinded
from previously appropriated Navy planning and design funds,
and that $925,000 be rescinded from previously appropriated
Naval Reserve planning and design funds and reallocated to the
BRAC account so that the Navy will have an additional source of
funds to meet its BRAC oblications.
In all, to help the communities affected by the services'
environmental remediation shortfalls, the Committee recommends
an increase of $150,000,000 over the budget request for the
base realignment and closure account, part IV, and strongly
urges the Department to accelerate to the maximum extent
possible the environmental cleanup of BRAC installations.
Consistent with the requirements identified by the Navy and the
Air Force, the Committee also expects the Department to
properly fund this account to fully meet its requirements and
honor its commitments in future budget requests. The Committee
expects the Department to give priority consideration to the
projects that the Navy and Air Force have identified as urgent
unfunded requirements, and to execute these projects as
expeditiously as possible in fiscal year 2002.
The Committee also directs the Department to provide a
report by March 1, 2002, detailing the ongoing BRAC
environmental remediation projects of each of the services and
relevant Defense Agencies. The report should include the
following elements: (1) the total funds allocated to each
project through fiscal year 2002, (2) the budget request for
fiscal year 2003, (3) details of the mandatory spending
requirements for fiscal year 2003 based on legal and regulatory
commitments, (4) the projected cost to complete each project,
and (5) the projected completion date.

Hunters Point Naval Shipyard

Of particular concern to the Committee is the level of
progress being made on BRAC environmental remediation at the
former Hunters Point Naval Shipyard in California.
The Committee directs the Secretary of Defense to provide
the congressional defense committees, within 90 days of the
enactment of this Act, with a master plan for the cleanup of
Hunters Point Naval Shipyard. This plan should include a
detailed cleanup schedule plus cost estimates for each parcel
as well as for the entire project. Following submission of the
initial report, the Secretary is directed to provide semi-
annual progress reports to the defense congressional
committees.
The Committee expects the Navy to fully fund the cleanup of
the shipyard in a timely manner, and to execute as
expeditiously as possible the total fiscal year 2002 program,
at no less than the budgeted level of $50,608,000. This
includes allocating sufficient resources to complete the
cleanup of Parcel B, to continue the cleanup of Parcels C and
D, and to initiate site characterization of Parcels E and F in
fiscal year 2002. The Committee also expects the Navy to
adequately fund the cleanup of Parcels C and D and the site
characterization of Parcels E and F as expeditiously as
possible in accordance with the master plan.

Environmental Remediation, Mc Clellan Air Force Base, CA

The closure of McClellan Air Force Base was completed on
July 13, 2001. Productive re-use of the base is now underway,
and nearly 2,000 of the 25,000 jobs lost to the Sacramento
Region with the base closure have been recreated. An estimated
$490,000,000 in BRAC environmental remediation funds will be
required to complete the base clean up program. Of particular
concern to the Committee is the urgent requirement to clean up
the plutonium contamination at the installation. In addition to
the $35,754,000 included in the President's fiscal year 2002
budget for environmental clean up at McClellan AFB, the Air
Force has identified to the Committee a shortfall of
$22,600,000 for fiscal year 2002 clean up activities at
McClellan. The Committee expects the Air Force to fully fund
the environmental remediation program at McClellan in 2002 and
beyond.

GENERAL PROVISIONS

The following lists general provisions proposed by the
Committee. The Committee recommends inclusion of several
proposals which have been incorporated in previous
appropriations acts, provisions requested by the Defense
Department, and new provisions. The Committee recommendations
are as follows:
Sec. 101. Restricts payments under a cost-plus-a-fixed-fee
contract for work, except in cases of contracts for
environmental restoration at base closure sites.
Sec. 102. Permits use of funds for hire of passenger motor
vehicles.
Sec. 103. Permits use of funds for defense access roads.
Sec. 104. Prohibits construction of new bases inside the
continental United States for which specific appropriations
have not been made.
Sec. 105. Limits the use of funds for purchase of land or
land easements.
Sec. 106. Prohibits the use of funds to acquire land,
prepare a site, or install utilities for any family housing
except housing for which funds have been made available.
Sec. 107. Limits the use of minor construction funds to
transfer or relocate activities among installations.
Sec. 108. Prohibits the procurement of steel unless
American producers, fabricators, and manufacturers have been
allowed to compete.
Sec. 109. Prohibits payments of real property taxes in
foreign nations.
Sec. 110. Prohibits construction of new bases overseas
without prior notification.
Sec. 111. Establishes a threshold for American preference
of $500,000 relating to architect and engineering services.
Sec. 112. Establishes preference for American contractors
for military construction in the United States territories and
possessions in the Pacific, and on Kwajalein Atoll, or in the
Arabian Gulf.
Sec. 113. Requires notification of military exercises
involving construction in excess of $100,000.
Sec. 114. Limits obligations during the last 2 months of
the year.
Sec. 115. Permits funds appropriated in prior years to be
available for construction authorized during the current
session of Congress.
Sec. 116. Permits the use of expired or lapsed funds to pay
the cost of supervision for any project being completed with
lapsed funds.
Sec. 117. Permits obligation of funds from more than 1
fiscal year to execute a construction project, provided that
the total obligation for such project is consistent with the
total amount appropriated for the project.
Sec. 118. Allows expired funds to be transferred to the
``Foreign currency fluctuations, construction, defense''
account.
Sec. 119. Directs the Department to report annually on
actions taken to encourage other nations to assume a greater
share of the common defense budget.
Sec. 120. Allows transfer of proceeds from earlier base
realignment and closure accounts to the continuing base
realignment and closure accounts.
Sec. 121. Permits the transfer of funds from Family Housing
Construction accounts to the DOD Family Housing Improvement
Fund.
Sec. 122. Restricts the use of funds for the Partnership
for Peace Program.
Sec. 123. Requires the Secretary of Defense to notify the
congressional defense committees of all family housing
privatization solicitations and agreements which contain any
clause providing consideration for base realignment and
closure, force reductions and extended deployments.
Sec. 124. Provides transfer authority to the Homeowners
Assistance Program.
Sec. 125. Requires that all Military Construction
Appropriations Acts be the sole funding source of all operation
and maintenance for family housing, including flag and general
officer quarters, and limits the repair on flag and general
officer quarters to $35,000 per year without prior notification
to the defense committees.
Sec. 126. Provides for completion of the Masirah Island
Airfield project in Oman.
Sec. 127. Directs the Secretary of Defense to submit to the
congressional defense committees a Master Plan for the
environmental remediation of Hunters Point Naval Shipyard,
California.

COMPLIANCE WITH PARAGRAPH 7, RULE XVI, OF THE STANDING RULES OF THE
SENATE

Paragraph 7 of rule XVI requires that Committee reports on
general appropriations bills identify each Committee amendment
to the House bill ``which proposes an item of appropriation
which is not made to carry out the provisions of an existing
law, a treaty stipulation, or an act or resolution previously
passed by the Senate during that session.''

COMPLIANCE WITH PARAGRAPH 12, RULE XXVI OF THE STANDING RULES OF THE
SENATE

Paragraph 12 of rule XXVI requires that Committee reports
on a bill or joint resolution repealing or amending any statute
or part of any statute include ``(a) the text of the statute or
part thereof which is proposed to be repealed; and (b) a
comparative print of that part of the bill or joint resolution
making the amendment and of the statute or part thereof
proposed to be amended, showing by stricken-through type and
italics, parallel columns, or other appropriate typographical
devices the omissions and insertions which would be made by the
bill or joint resolution if enacted in the form recommended by
the committee.''
The Committee bill as recommended contains no such
provisions.

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT LISTING BY LOCATION
[In thousands of dollars]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Committee Change from
Installation and project Budget recommen- budget
request dation estimate
------------------------------------------------------------------------

ALABAMA

ARMY:
ANNISTON ARMY DEPOT:
COMPONENT MAINTENANCE 2,300 2,300 ............
FACILITY.............
REBUILD SHOP AND 2,850 2,850 ............
FACILITY.............
FORT RUCKER: COMMANCHE 11,400 11,400 ............
SIMULATOR TRAINING
FACILITY.................
REDSTONE ARSENAL: DINING 7,200 7,200 ............
FACILITY.................
AIR FORCE:
MAXWELL AFB:
SQUADRON OFFICER 9,000 9,000 ............
SCHOOL ACADEMIC
FACILITY.............
OFFICER TRAINING 11,800 11,800 ............
SCHOOL DORMITORY.....
SQUADRON OFFICER 13,600 13,600 ............
SCHOOL DORMITORY.....
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD:
HUNTSVILLE: UNIT TRAINING 7,498 7,498 ............
EQUIPMENT SITE...........
MOBILE: ADD/ALTER 5,333 5,333 ............
READINESS CENTER.........
AIR NATIONAL GUARD: DOTHAN: ............ 11,000 +11,000
COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS
SQUADRON.....................
AIR FORCE RESERVE:
MAXWELL AFB:
FUEL CELL MAINTENANCE 7,300 7,300 ............
HANGAR...............
AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE 9,900 9,900 ............
HANGAR...............
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, ALABAMA...... 88,181 99,181 +11,000

ALASKA

ARMY:
FORT RICHARDSON: BARRACKS 45,000 45,000 ............
COMPLEX (PHASE I)........
FORT WAINWRIGHT:
ASSEMBLY BUILDING..... 4,200 4,200 ............
POWER PLANT COOLING 23,000 23,000 ............
TOWER................
FORT RICHARDSON: MOUT ............ 18,000 +18,000
TRAINING FACILITY........
AIR FORCE:
EARECKSON AFB: UPGRADE 4,600 4,600 ............
WASTEWATER SYSTEM........
ELMENDORF AFB:
ADD/ALTER AIRCRAFT 12,200 12,200 ............
FUEL SYSTEM
MAINTENANCE HANGAR...
DORMITORY............. 20,000 20,000 ............
DEFENSE-WIDE:
EIELSON AFB: REPLACE BULK 8,800 8,800 ............
FUEL STORAGE TANKS.......
FORT WAINWRIGHT: HOSPITAL 18,500 18,500 ............
REPLACEMENT (PHASE III)..
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: JUNEAU: ............ 7,568 +7,568
READINESS CENTER.............
AIR NATIONAL GUARD: ELMENDORF 5,000 5,000 ............
AFB: UPGRADE COMBAT
COMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES....
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, ALASKA........... 141,300 166,868 +25,568

ARIZONA

ARMY: FORT HUACHUCA: EFFLUENT 6,100 6,100 ............
REUSE SYSTEM.................
NAVY:
YUMA MARINE CORPS AIR
STATION:
AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL 6,750 6,750 ............
TOWER................
LAND ACQUISITION 8,660 8,660 ............
(PHASE II)...........
STATION ORDNANCE AREA. 7,160 7,160 ............
AIR FORCE:
DAVIS-MONTHAN AFB:
DORMITORY............. 8,700 8,700 ............
REPLACE AIRCRAFT 8,600 8,600 ............
RECLAMATION/PARTS
PROCESS COMPLEX......
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: MARANA: 14,358 14,358 ............
AVIATION MAINTENANCE HANGAR..
ARMY RESERVE: MESA: RESERVE 10,900 10,900 ............
CENTER/ORGANIZATIONAL
MAINTENANCE SHOP.............
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, ARIZONA.......... 71,228 71,228 ............

ARKANSAS

ARMY: PINE BLUFF ARSENAL: 26,000 ............ -26,000
AMMUNITION DEMILITARIZATION
FACILITY (PHASE VI)..........
AIR FORCE:
LITTLE ROCK AFB:
C-130J FLIGHT 10,600 10,600 ............
SIMULATOR FACILITY...
FIRE STATION.......... ............ 7,500 +7,500
DEFENSE-WIDE: PINE BLUFF ............ 26,000 +26,000
ARSENAL: AMMUNITION
DEMILITARIZATION FACILITY
(PHASE VI)...................
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, ARKANSAS......... 36,600 44,100 +7,500

CALIFORNIA

NAVY:
CAMP PENDLETON MARINE
CORPS BASE:
AIRCRAFT HANGAR 4,470 4,470 ............
IMPROVEMENTS.........
BACHELOR ENLISTED 21,200 21,200 ............
QUARTERS.............
BACHELOR ENLISTED 21,600 21,600 ............
QUARTERS.............
BOAT MAINTENANCE 11,980 11,980 ............
FACILITY.............
HELO OUTLYING LANDING 3,910 3,910 ............
FIELD (PHASE II).....
INDOOR PHYSICAL 13,460 13,460 ............
FITNESS FACILITY.....
IRON/MANGANESE PLANT.. 11,180 11,180 ............
REGIMENTAL ARTILLERY 13,160 13,160 ............
MAINTENANCE COMPLEX..
CORONADO NAVAL AMPHIBIOUS 8,610 8,610 ............
BASE: EXPEDITIONARY
WARFARE TRAINING FACILITY
EL CENTRO NAVAL AIR 23,520 23,520 ............
FACILITY: TRANSIENT
BACHELOR ENLISTED
QUARTERS.................
LEMOORE NAVAL AIR STATION: 10,010 10,010 ............
BACHELOR ENLISTED
QUARTERS.................
PORT HUENEME NAVAL
CONSTRUCTION BATTALION
CENTER:
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 3,780 3,780 ............
SCHOOL...............
PORT IMPROVEMENTS..... 12,400 12,400 ............
SAN DIEGO NAVAL STATION:
BACHELOR ENLISTED 47,240 47,240 ............
QUARTERS.............
REPLACE PIERS 10/11 17,500 17,500 ............
(PHASE II)...........
SAN NICHOLAS ISLAND: 13,730 13,730 ............
SUPPLY PIER..............
TWENTYNINE PALMS:
ACADEMIC INSTRUCTION 9,860 9,860 ............
BUILDING.............
AMMUNITION STORAGE 9,540 9,540 ............
FACILITIES...........
BACHELOR ENLISTED 29,675 29,675 ............
QUARTERS.............
ENLISTED DINING 11,930 11,930 ............
FACILITY.............
RESERVE SUPPORT 8,760 8,760 ............
FACILITIES...........
VEHICLE WASH STATION.. 5,360 5,360 ............
AIR FORCE:
EDWARDS AFB:
ADD/ALTER TERMINAL 4,600 4,600 ............
AREA CONTROL FACILITY
CONSOLIDATED SUPPORT 11,700 11,700 ............
FACILITY.............
LOS ANGELES AFB: 23,000 23,000 ............
CONSOLIDATED BASE SUPPORT
COMPLEX..................
TRAVIS AFB:
REPLACE SUPPORT 6,800 6,800 ............
FACILITY.............
C-5 SQUADRON ............ 9,600 +9,600
OPERATIONS FACILITY..
VANDENBERG AFB: MISSILE 11,800 11,800 ............
TRANSPORT BRIDGE.........
DEFENSE-WIDE:
CAMP PENDLETON MARINE
CORPS BASE:
FLEET HOSPITAL SUPPORT 3,150 3,150 ............
FACILITIES...........
REPLACE MEDICAL/DENTAL 4,300 4,300 ............
CLINIC (HORNO).......
REPLACE MEDICAL/DENTAL 3,800 3,800 ............
CLINIC (LAS FLORES)..
REPLACE MEDICAL/DENTAL 4,050 4,050 ............
CLINIC (LAS PULGAS)..
TRACY DEFENSE DISTRIBUTION 30,000 30,000 ............
DEPOT: REPLACE GENERAL
PURPOSE WAREHOUSE........
CORONADO NAVAL AMPHIBIOUS 13,650 13,650 ............
BASE: SEAL TEAM FIVE
OPERATIONS FACILITY......
TWENTYNINE PALMS: HOSPITAL 1,600 1,600 ............
LDRP CONVERSION..........
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD:
FORT IRWIN: MANEUVER AREA 21,953 21,953 ............
TRAINING EQUIPMENT SITE
(PHASE I)................
LANCASTER: READINESS 4,530 4,530 ............
CENTER...................
AZUSA: READINESS CENTER... ............ 14,011 +14,011
NAVY RESERVE: PORT HUENEME 1,000 1,000 ............
NAVAL RESERVE CENTER: VEHICLE
MAINTENANCE FACILITY.........
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, CALIFORNIA....... 458,808 482,419 +23,611

COLORADO

ARMY:
FORT CARSON: BARRACKS 25,000 25,000 ............
COMPLEX (NELSON BLVD)
(PHASE I)................
PUEBLO DEPOT: AMMUNITION 11,000 ............ -11,000
DEMILITARIZATION FACILITY
(PHASE III).............
AIR FORCE:
BUCKLEY AFB:
DORMITORY............. 11,200 11,200 ............
FITNESS CENTER........ 12,000 12,000 ............
CONTROL TOWER......... ............ 5,800 +5,800
SCHRIEVER AFB: SBIRS 19,000 19,000 ............
MISSION CONTROL STATION
BACKUP...................
U.S. AIR FORCE ACADEMY:
ADD/ALTER ATHLETIC 11,400 11,400 ............
FACILITIES (PHASE II)
INSTALL AIR 1,300 1,300 ............
CONDITIONING
(ENLISTED DORMITORY).
REPLACE CONTROL TOWER. 6,400 6,400 ............
UPGRADE POTABLE WATER 6,400 6,400 ............
SYSTEM (CADET AREA)..
DEFENSE-WIDE:
PUEBLO DEPOT: AMMUNITION ............ 11,000 +11,000
DEMILITARIZATION FACILITY
(PHASE III).............
SCHRIEVER AFB: MEDICAL/ 4,000 4,000 ............
DENTAL CLINIC............
ARMY RESERVE: FORT CARSON: 9,394 9,394 ............
ARMED FORCES RESERVE CENTER/
NEW RESERVE CENTER...........
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, COLORADO......... 117,094 122,894 +5,800

CONNECTICUT

AIR NATIONAL GUARD: ORANGE 12,000 12,000 ............
ANGS: REPLACE AIR CONTROL
SQUADRON COMPLEX.............

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

ARMY: FORT MCNAIR: PHYSICAL 11,600 11,600 ............
FITNESS TRAINING CENTER......
NAVY: ANACOSTIA: BACHELOR 9,810 9,810 ............
ENLISTED QUARTERS REPLACEMENT
AIR FORCE: BOLLING AFB: ADD/ 2,900 2,900 ............
ALTER CHAPEL CENTER..........
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, DISTRICT OF 24,310 24,310 ............
COLUMBIA...............

DELAWARE

AIR FORCE: DOVER AFB: FIRE ............ 7,300 +7,300
STAION.......................

FLORIDA

NAVY:
KEY WEST NAVAL AIR 11,400 11,400 ............
STATION: AIR TRAFFIC
CONTROL TOWER/OPERATIONS
BUILDING.................
MAYPORT NAVAL STATION: 16,420 16,420 ............
BACHELOR ENLISTED
QUARTERS.................
PENSACOLA NAVAL AIR ............ 3,700 +3,700
STATION: CONSOLIDATED
FIRE STATION.............
WHITING FIELD NAVAL AIR 2,140 2,140 ............
STATION: AIRFIELD
APPROACH LIGHTING........
AIR FORCE:
CAPE CANAVERAL AIR 7,800 7,800 ............
STATION: REPLACE
FIRECRASH RESCUE STATION.
EGLIN AFB: COMMAND AND 11,400 11,400 ............
CONTROL TEST OPERATIONS
CENTER...................
HURLBURT FIELD:
CONSOLIDATED 4,000 4,000 ............
COMMUNICATION
FACILITY.............
DINING FACILITY/ 6,400 6,400 ............
FITNESS CENTER.......
MACDILL AFB: MISSION 10,000 ............ -10,000
PLANNING CENTER (PHASE I)
TYNDALL AFB:
F-22 FUELS SYSTEM 3,050 3,050 ............
MAINTANENCE HANGAR...
F-22 SQUAD OPERATIONS/ 12,000 12,000 ............
AIRCRAFT MAINT UNIT
HANGAR...............
DEFENSE-WIDE:
HURLBURT FIELD:
ADD/ALTER MEDICAL/ 8,800 8,800 ............
DENTAL CLINIC........
CV-22 TRAINING DEVICE 10,200 10,200 ............
SUPPORT FACILITY.....
READINESS SUPPLY 3,200 3,200 ............
PACKAGE FACILITY.....
MACDILL AFB:
PUBLIC ACCESS BUILDING 2,500 2,500 ............
RENOVATE COMMAND AND 9,500 9,500 ............
CONTROL FACILITY.....
MAYPORT NAVAL STATION: 24,000 24,000 ............
REPLACE MEDICAL/DENTAL
CLINIC...................
AIR NATIONAL GUARD: CAMP 6,900 6,900 ............
BLANDING: REPLACE WEATHER
TRAINING COMPLEX.............
NAVY RESERVE:
JACKSONVILLE NAVAL AIR
STATION:
HANGAR RENOVATIONS.... 3,744 3,744 ............
MARINE CORPS RESERVE ............ ............ ............
TRAINING CENTER......
READINESS SUPPORT SITE 2,500 2,500 ............
FACILITIES...........
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, FLORIDA...... 155,954 149,654 -6,300

GEORGIA

ARMY:
FORT BENNING:
PASSENGER PROCESSING 17,000 17,000 ............
FACILITY.............
RUNWAY EXTENSION...... 6,900 6,900 ............
FORT GILLEM:
CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION 29,000 29,000 ............
FORENSIC LABORATORY..
EXPLOSIVE ORDANCE 5,600 5,600 ............
DETACHMENT OPERATIONS
BUILDING.............
FORT GORDON:
INFORMATION SYSTEMS 11,000 11,000 ............
FACILITY.............
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 23,000 23,000 ............
FACILITY.............
FORT STEWART:
EDUCATION CENTER...... 16,000 16,000 ............
SOLDIER SERVICE CENTER 10,200 10,200 ............
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 13,600 13,600 ............
FACILITY.............
AIR FORCE:
MOODY AFB: FITNESS CENTER. ............ 8,600 +8,600
ROBINS AFB:
FIRE TRAINING FACILITY 3,800 3,800 ............
LARGE ITEM AIRCRAFT 3,050 3,050 ............
SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
PAINT FAC............
REPLACE KC-135 7,800 7,800 ............
SQUADRON OPERATIONS..
DEFENSE-WIDE:
ALBANY MARINE CORPS 5,800 5,800 ............
LOGISTICS BASE: REPLACE
MEDICAL/DENTAL CLINIC....
FORT BENNING: TACTICAL 5,100 5,100 ............
EQUIPMENT COMPLEX........
FORT STEWART: CONSOLIDATED 11,000 11,000 ............
TROOP MEDICAL CLINIC.....
AIR NATIONAL GUARD: ROBINS 6,100 6,100 ............
AFB: REPLACE OPERATIONS AND
TRAINING COMPLEX.............
AIR FORCE RESERVE: ROBINS AFB: 2,000 2,000 ............
AIR FORCE RESERVE
HEADQUARTERS (PHASE II)......
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, GEORGIA.......... 176,950 185,550 +8,600

HAWAII

ARMY:
PEARL HARBOR: SHIPPING 11,800 11,800 ............
OPERATIONS BUILDING......
POHAKULOA TRAINING AREA:
COMMAND AND RANGE 5,100 5,100 ............
CONTROL BUILDING.....
LAND ACQUISITION ............ 1,500 +1,500
PARKER RANCH.........
KAHUKU WINDMILL SITE: LAND ............ 900 +900
ACQUISITION..............
SCHOFIELD BARRACKS: 23,000 23,000 ............
BARRACKS COMPLEX (WILSON
STREET) (PHASE I-C)......
WHEELER ARMY AIRFIELD: 50,000 50,000 ............
BARRACKS COMPLEX
(AVIATION) (PHASE VI-A)..
NAVY:
CAMP SMITH: CINCPAC 37,580 37,580 ............
HEADQUARTERS (PHASE III).
KANEOHE BAY MARINE CORPS 24,920 24,920 ............
BASE: BACHELOR ENLISTED
QUAR- TERS..............
LUALUALEI NAVAL MAGAZINE: 6,000 6,000 ............
SHORE POWER AT WHARVES...
PEARL HARBOR NAVAL
COMPLEX:
BACHELOR ENLISTED 17,300 17,300 ............
QUARTERS.............
BACHELOR ENLISTED 23,300 23,300 ............
QUARTERS.............
DRYDOCK SUPPORT 7,900 7,900 ............
FACILITY.............
ELECTRICAL 12,100 12,100 ............
DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM
IMPROVEMENTS.........
SEWER FORCE MAIN...... 16,900 16,900 ............
FORD ISLAND WATER LINE ............ 14,100 +14,100
REPLACEMENT..........
DEFENSE-WIDE: HICKAM AFB: 29,200 29,200 ............
REPLACE HYDRANT FUEL SYSTEM..
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, HAWAII........... 265,100 281,600 +16,500

IDAHO

AIR FORCE: MOUNTAIN HOME AFB: 14,600 14,600 ............
REPLACE AIRCRAFT PARKING
APRON........................
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: GOWEN 8,117 8,117 ............
FIELD: READINESS CENTER......
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, IDAHO............ 22,717 22,717 ............

ILLINOIS

ARMY: ROCK ISLAND ARSENAL: ............ 3,500 +3,500
CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER.....
NAVY:
GREAT LAKES NAVAL TRAINING
CENTER:
RECRUIT BARRACKS...... 41,130 41,130 ............
RECRUIT BARRACKS...... 41,130 41,130 ............
NAVY RESERVE: GREAT LAKES: 4,426 4,426 ............
RESERVE CENTER RENOVATION....
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, ILLINOIS......... 86,686 90,186 +3,500

INDIANA

ARMY: NEWPORT ARMY AMMUNITION 66,000 ............ -66,000
PLANT: AMMUNITION
DEMILITARIZATION FACILITY
(PHASE IV)...................
NAVY: CRANE NAVAL SURFACE 5,820 5,820 ............
WARFARE CENTER: SPECIAL
WARFARE MUNITIONS ENGINEERING
FACILITY.....................
DEFENSE-WIDE: NEWPORT ARMY ............ 66,000 +66,000
AMMUNITION PLANT: AMMUNITION
DEMILITARIZATION FACILITY
(PHASE IV)...................
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: CAMP ............ 4,947 +4,947
ATTERBURY: BATTLE SIMULATION
CENTER.......................
AIR FORCE RESERVE: GRISSOM 13,200 13,200 ............
ARB: SERVICES COMPLEX (PHASE
III).........................
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, INDIANA.......... 85,020 89,967 +4,947

IOWA

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: 2,713 2,713 ............
ESTHERVILLE: READINESS CENTER
AIR NATIONAL GUARD:
SIOUX GATEWAY AIRPORT:
KC-135 PARKING APRON/ 14,400 14,400 ............
HYDRANT REFUELING
SYSTEM...............
KC-135 FUEL CELL/ 8,300 8,300 ............
CORROSION CONTROL
HANGAR...............
KC-135 EXTEND AND 4,300 4,300 ............
UPGRADE TAXIWAY......
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, IOWA............. 29,713 29,713 ............

KANSAS

ARMY:
FORT RILEY:
CHILD DEVELOPMENT 6,800 6,800 ............
CENTER...............
MODIFIED RECORD FIRE 4,100 4,100 ............
RANGE................
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: FORT 645 645 ............
RILEY: ORGANIZATIONAL
MAINTENANCE SHOP............
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, KANSAS........... 11,545 11,545 ............

KENTUCKY

ARMY:
BLUE GRASS ARMY DEPOT: 3,000 ............ -3,000
AMMUNITION
DEMILITARIZATION FACILITY
(PHASE II)...............
FORT CAMPBELL:
BARRACKS COMPLEX 47,000 47,000 ............
(MARKET GARDEN ROAD)
(PHASE III)..........
DEPLOYMENT STAGING 3,300 3,300 ............
COMPLEX..............
DEPLOYMENT STAGING 3,300 3,300 ............
COMPLEX/AIR..........
DEPLOYMENT STAGING 3,300 3,300 ............
COMPLEX/RAIL.........
ELECTRICAL SUBSTATION. 10,000 10,000 ............
EXPAND KEYHOLE 10,600 10,600 ............
HARDSTAND AREA.......
PASSENGER PROCESSING 11,400 11,400 ............
FACILITY.............
FORT KNOX: RANGE MULTI- ............ 12,000 +12,000
PURPOSE DIGITAL TANK
(PHASE IV) WILCOX RANGE..
DEFENSE-WIDE: BLUEGRASS ARMY ............ 3,000 +3,000
DEPOT: AMMUNITION
DEMILITARIZATION FACILITY
(PHASE II)...................
ARMY RESERVE: FORT KNOX: 14,846 14,846 ............
RESERVE CENTER...............
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, KENTUCKY......... 106,746 118,746 +12,000

LOUISIANA

ARMY:
FORT POLK:
EDUCATION CENTER...... 10,800 10,800 ............
READINESS AND 10,400 10,400 ............
OPERATIONS FACILITY..
AIR FORCE: BARKSDALE AFB: ............ 5,000 +5,000
CONTROL TOWER................
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD:
CAMP BEAUREGARD: READINESS 5,392 5,392 ............
CENTER...................
CARVILLE: READINESS CENTER 5,677 5,677 ............
AIR NATIONAL GUARD: NEW ............ 5,500 +5,500
ORLEANS: VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
SUPPORT EQUIPMENT FACILITY...
NAVY RESERVE: LAFAYETTE: 5,200 5,200 ............
MARINE RESERVE TRAINING
CENTER.......................
NEW ORLEANS NAVAL AIR
STATION:
EQUIPMENT SHOP AND 2,270 2,270 ............
HOLDING SHELTER......
JOINT RESERVE CENTER ............ ............ ............
(PHASE II)...........
REFUELER MAINTENANCE 650 650 ............
FACILITY.............
REPLACE BRIDGES....... 1,300 1,300 ............
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, LOUISIANA.... 41,689 52,189 +10,500

MAINE

NAVY:
BRUNSWICK NAVAL AIR
STATION:
AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE 41,665 41,665 ............
HANGAR...............
BACHELOR ENLISTED 22,630 22,630 ............
QUARTERS.............
P-3 SUPPORT FACILITY.. 3,100 3,100 ............
KITTTERY-PORTSMOUTH NAVAL ............ 14,620 +14,620
STATION: BACHELOR HOUSING
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: BANGOR: 11,618 11,618 ............
ARMY AVIATION SUPPORT
FACILITY (PHASE I)...........
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, MAINE............ 79,013 93,633 +14,620

MARYLAND

ARMY:
ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND:
AMMUNITION 66,500 ............ -66,500
DEMILITARIZATION
FACILITY (PHASE IV)..
AMMUNITION 5,300 5,300 ............
SURVEILLANCE FACILITY
CLIMATIC TEST FACILITY 9,000 9,000 ............
EDGEWOOD: CHEMISTRY 44,000 44,000 ............
LABORATORY...............
FORT MEADE:
CHILD DEVELOPMENT 5,800 5,800 ............
CENTER...............
OPERATIONS FACILITY ............ 5,400 +5,400
(55TH SIGNAL COMPANY)
NAVY:
INDIAN HEAD NAVAL 1,250 1,250 ............
EXPLOSIVE ORDANCE CENTER:
JOINT EOD EQUIPMENT
MAGNETIC EVALUATION
FACILITY.................
PATUXENT RIVER NAVAL AIR
WARFARE CENTER:
ADVANCED SYSTEMS 10,770 10,770 ............
INTEGRATION FACILITY
(PHASE VI)...........
RANGES OPERATIONS 2,260 2,260 ............
SUPPORT FACILITY.....
AIR FORCE:
ANDREWS AFB:
CONSOLIDATE SQUADRON 10,070 10,070 ............
OPERATIONS FACILITY..
REPAIR EAST RUNWAY.... 7,600 7,600 ............
UPGRADE FIRE TRAINING 1,750 1,750 ............
FACILITY.............
DEFENSE-WIDE:
ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND:
AMMUNITION ............ 66,500 +66,500
DEMILITARIZATION
FACILITY (PHASE IV)..
OPERATIONAL TRAINING 3,200 3,200 ............
FACILITY.............
ANDREWS AFB:
ADD/ALTER MEDICAL 7,300 7,300 ............
CLINIC...............
BRANCH MEDICAL/DENTAL 2,950 2,950 ............
CLINIC RELOCATION....
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: 2,314 2,314 ............
SALISBURY: ORGANIZATIONAL
MAINTENANCE SHOP............
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, MARYLAND......... 180,064 185,464 +5,400

MASSACHUSETTS

AIR FORCE: HANSCOM AFB: 9,400 9,400 ............
RENOVATE ACQUISITION MGMT
FACILITY (PHASE III).........
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: 8,347 8,347 ............
FRAMINGHAM: ORGANIZATIONAL
MAINTENANCE SHOP.............
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, MASSACHUSETTS.... 17,747 17,747 ............

MICHIGAN

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD:
LANSING: COMBINED SUPPORT 5,809 5,809 ............
MAINTENANCE SHOP (PHASE
II)......................
AUGUSTA/BATTLE CREEK: TASS ............ 13,318 +13,318
BARRACKS.................
AIR NATIONAL GUARD:
SELFRIDGE ANGB: RUNWAY 2,000 2,000 ............
CLEAR ZONE LAND
ACQUISITION..............
BATTLE CREEK: MUNITIONS ............ 9,500 +9,500
AND MAINTENANCE STORAGE
COMPLEX..................
NAVY RESERVE: SELFRIDGE ANGB: 1,490 1,490 ............
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE FACILITY.
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, MICHIGAN......... 9,299 32,117 +22,818

MINNESOTA

AIR NATIONAL GUARD: DULUTH ............ 10,000 +10,000
INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT:
COMPOSITE AIRCRAFT
MAINTENANCE COMPLEX (PHASE I)
NAVY RESERVE: DULUTH: RESERVE 2,980 2,980 ............
CENTER ADDITION..............
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, MINNESOTA........ 2,980 12,980 +10,000

MISSISSIPPI

NAVY:
GULFPORT NAVAL
CONSTRUCTION BATTALION
CENTER:
BACHELOR ENLISTED 14,300 14,300 ............
QUARTERS.............
MOBILIZATION 7,360 7,360 ............
OPERATIONS FACILITY..
PASCAGOULA: FLEET ............ 4,680 +4,680
OPERATIONS BUILDING......
MERDIAN NAVAL AIR STATION: ............ 3,370 +3,370
T-45 SUPPORT FACILITY....
AIR FORCE:
REPLACE TECHNICAL TRAINING 28,600 28,600 ............
FACILITY (PHASE II-A)....
COLUMBUS AFB: RADAR ............ 5,000 +5,000
APPROACH CONTROL CENTER..
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD:
CAMP SHELBY: MILITARY 11,444 11,444 ............
EDUCATION CENTER (PHASE
II)......................
GULFPORT: READINESS CENTER 9,145 9,145 ............
AIR NATIONAL GUARD:
JACKSON IAP:
C-17 FACILITY 16,500 16,500 ............
CONVERSION...........
UPGRADE CORROSION 5,700 5,700 ............
CONTROL FACILITY.....
AIR FORCE RESERVE: KEESLER 12,000 12,000 ............
AFB: C-130J MAINTENANCE
HANGAR.......................
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, MISSISSIPPI...... 105,049 118,099 +13,050

MISSOURI

ARMY:
FORT LEONARD WOOD:
BASIC COMBAT TRAINING 27,000 27,000 ............
COMPLEX (PHASE II)...
NIGHT FIRE RANGE...... 4,300 4,300 ............
RECORD FIRE RANGE..... 3,550 3,550 ............
NAVY: KANSAS CITY MARINE CORPS 9,010 9,010 ............
SUPPORT ACTIVITY: BACHELOR
ENLISTED QUARTERS............
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, MISSOURI......... 43,860 43,860 ............

MONTANA

AIR FORCE: MALMSTROM AFB: ............ 4,650 +4,650
CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER.....
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: 822 822 ............
KALISPELL: READINESS CENTER..
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, MONTANA.......... 822 5,472 +4,650

NEBRASKA

AIR FORCE: OFFUTT AFB: FIRE/ ............ 10,400 +10,400
CRASH RESCUE STATION.........
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, NEBRASKA......... ............ 10,400 +10,400

NEVADA

NAVY: FALLON NAS: WATER ............ 6,150 +6,150
TREATMENT FACILITY...........
AIR FORCE:
NELLIS AFB:
DYNAMIC BATTLE CONTROL 12,600 12,600 ............
CENTER...............
LAND ACQUISITION...... ............ 19,000 +19,000
AIR NATIONAL GUARD: RENO-TAHOE 8,500 8,500 ............
IAP: REPLACE BASE SUPPLY
WAREHOUSE COMPLEX............
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, NEVADA........... 21,100 46,250 +25,150

NEW HAMPSHIRE

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD:
CONCORD:
ARMY AVIATION SUPPORT 27,185 27,185 ............
FACILITY.............
READINESS CENTER...... 1,868 1,868 ............
AIR NATIONAL GUARD: PEASE AFB: 2,200 2,200 ............
KC-135R SIMULATOR TRAINING
FACIL- ITY..................
ARMY RESERVE: ROCHESTER: 9,122 9,122 ............
RESERVE CENTER/ORGANIZATIONAL
MAINTENANCE SHOP.............
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, NEW HAMPSHIRE.... 40,375 40,375 ............

NEW JERSEY

ARMY: FORT MONMOUTH: BARRACKS. 20,000 20,000 ............
NAVY: EARLE NAS: EXPLOSIVE ............ 4,370 +4,370
TRUCK HOLDING YARDS (3)......
AIR FORCE:
C-17 ADD/ALTER FUEL CELL.. 1,050 1,050 ............
C-17 COMMUNICATIONS 1,400 1,400 ............
SUPPORT..................
C-17 FLIGHT SIMULATOR 4,900 4,900 ............
FACILITY.................
C-17 MAINTENANCE HANGAR... 27,700 27,700 ............
C-17 THREE BAY HANGAR..... 1,500 1,500 ............
DEFENSE-WIDE: MCGUIRE AFB: 4,400 4,400 ............
BULK FUEL STORAGE TANK.......
AIR NATIONAL GUARD:
ATLANTIC CITY IAP: 6,300 6,300 ............
COMMUNICATIONS/SECURITY
FORCES COMPLEX...........
MCGUIRE AFB: REPLACE JOINT 4,900 4,900 ............
MEDICAL TRAINING FACILITY
ARMY RESERVE: FORT DIX: 12,000 12,000 ............
BARRACKS MODERNIZATION.......
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, NEW JERSEY....... 84,150 88,520 +4,370

NEW MEXICO

ARMY: WHITE SANDS MISSILE ............ 7,600 +7,600
RANGE: PROFESSIONAL
DEVELOPMENT CENTER...........
AIR FORCE:
CANNON AFB: REPLACE FIRE/ 9,400 9,400 ............
CRASH RESCUE STATION.....
KIRTLAND AFB: TELESCOPE/ 15,500 15,500 ............
ATMOSPHERE COMPENSATION
LABORATORY...............
DEFENSE-WIDE: HOLLOMAN AFB: 5,700 5,700 ............
MEDICAL CLINIC ALTERATION....
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, NEW MEXICO....... 30,600 38,200 +7,600

NEW YORK

ARMY:
FORT DRUM:
BATTLE SIMULATION 9,000 9,000 ............
CENTER (PHASE II)....
FIELD OPERATIONS 2,150 2,150 ............
FACILITY.............
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS 4,700 4,700 ............
STORAGE FACILITY.....
TACTICAL EQUIPMENT 31,000 31,000 ............
SHOPS................
U.S. MILITARY ACADEMY: 37,900 37,900 ............
CADET PHYSICAL
DEVELOPMENT CENTER (PHASE
II)......................
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: FORT 17,000 17,000 ............
DRUM: MANEUVER AREA TRAINING
EQUIPMENT SITE (PHASE I).....
AIR NATIONAL GUARD:
FRANCIS S. GABRESKI 19,000 19,000 ............
AIRPORT: COMPOSITE
SUPPORT COMPLEX..........
NIAGARA FALLS ............ 2,800 +2,800
INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT:
FUEL CELL/CORROSION
HANGAR ADDITION..........
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, NEW YORK....... 120,750 123,550 +2,800

NORTH CAROLINA

ARMY:
FORT BRAGG:
BARRACKS COMPLEX 49,000 49,000 ............
(BUTNER ROAD) (PHASE
II)..................
BARRACKS COMPLEX 27,000 27,000 ............
(LONGSTREET ROAD)
(PHASE II)...........
BARRACKS COMPLEX 17,500 17,500 ............
(TAGAYTAY ROAD)
(PHASE II-C).........
PARACHUTE TEAM GENERAL 7,700 7,700 ............
PURPOSE BUILDING.....
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 13,600 13,600 ............
FACILITY.............
SUNNY POINT MILITARY OCEAN
TERMINAL:
DEPLOYMENT STAGING 2,000 2,000 ............
AREA.................
FIRE STATION.......... 2,750 2,750 ............
OPEN STORAGE AREA..... 2,050 2,050 ............
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND 4,600 4,600 ............
TRUCK PAD............
NAVY:
CAMP LEJEUNE MARINE CORPS
BASE:
ACADEMIC BUILDING..... 15,860 15,860 ............
AMMUNITION STORAGE 5,880 5,880 ............
MAGAZINE UPGRADE
(PHASE I)............
BACHELOR ENLISTED 16,530 16,530 ............
QUARTERS.............
BACHELOR ENLISTED 13,550 13,550 ............
QUARTERS.............
ENGINEERING EQUIPMENT 6,960 6,960 ............
MAINTENANCE SHOP.....
LANDFILL CELL......... 8,290 8,290 ............
NEW RIVER MARINE CORPS AIR
STATION:
PROPERTY CONTROL 1,560 1,560 ............
FACILITY.............
PROPERTY CONTROL 2,490 2,490 ............
FACILITY.............
AIR FORCE: POPE AFB: 17,800 17,800 ............
CONSOLIDATE C-130 CORROSION
CONTROL FACILITY.............
DEFENSE-WIDE:
CAMP LEJEUNE MARINE CORPS 8,857 8,857 ............
BASE: ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
ADDITION AND RENOVATION..
FORT BRAGG:
IMAGERY AND ANALYSIS 3,150 3,150 ............
FACILITY.............
LANGUAGE SUSTAINMENT 2,100 2,100 ............
TRAINING FACILITY....
REPAIR TRAINING 1,812 1,812 ............
FACILITY.............
TEAM OPERATIONS/ 5,800 5,800 ............
INFORMATION
AUTOMATION FACILITY..
TRAINING FACILITY..... 5,000 5,000 ............
TRAINING RANGE........ 2,600 2,600 ............
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 3,600 3,600 ............
COMPLEX..............
WEATHER OPERATIONS 1,000 1,000 ............
FACILITY.............
BATTALION OPERATIONS/ 8,500 8,500 ............
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
FACILITY.............
POPE AFB: BULK FUEL 3,400 3,400 ............
STORAGE TANK.............
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, NORTH CAROLINA... 260,939 260,939 ............

NORTH DAKOTA

AIR FORCE: GRAND FORKS AFB: KC- 7,800 7,800 ............
135 SQUADRON OPERATIONS/
AIRCRAFT MAINT UNIT..........
DEFENSE-WIDE:
GRAND FORKS AFB: HYDRANT 9,110 9,110 ............
FUEL SYSTEM..............
MINOT AFB: HYDRANT FUEL 14,000 14,000 ............
SYSTEM...................
AIR NATIONAL GUARD: FARGO/ ............ 5,000 +5,000
HECTOR: WEAPONS RELEASE
SYSTEMS SHOP................
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, NORTH DAKOTA..... 30,910 35,910 +5,000

OHIO

AIR FORCE:
WRIGHT-PATTERSON AFB:
ADD/ALTER SPECIAL 3,450 3,450 ............
OPERATIONS
INTELLIGENCE FACILITY
CONSOLIDATE ACQ 21,400 21,400 ............
MANAGEMENT COMPLEX
(PHASE IV-B).........
SECURITY GATE,BASE ............ 3,400 +3,400
ENTRANCE.............
CINCINNATI: READINESS 9,780 9,780 ............
CENTER...................
ARMY RESERVE: CLEVELAND: LAND 1,200 1,200 ............
ACQUISITION..................
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, OHIO............. 35,830 39,230 +3,400

OKLAHOMA

ARMY: FORT SILL: DEPLOYMENT 5,100 5,100 ............
STAGING COMPLEX..............
AIR FORCE:
ALTUS AFB:
REPAIR AIRFIELD 20,200 20,200 ............
PAVEMENTS (PHASE I)..
DORMITORY............. 10,200 10,200 ............
DEPOT PLATING SHOP.... ............ 11,200 +11,200
VANCE AFB: ROAD REPAIR ............ 4,809 +4,809
(ELAM ROAD)..............
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, OKLAHOMA......... 35,500 51,509 +16,009

OREGON

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: EUGENE: ............ 8,300 +8,300
JOINT ARMED FORCES RESERVE
CENTER (PH I)................

PENNSYLVANIA

DEFENSE-WIDE:
NEW CUMBERLAND DEFENSE 19,900 19,900 ............
DISTRIBUTION DEPOT:
SPECIAL PURPOSE WAREHOUSE
PHILADELPHIA DEFENSE 2,429 2,429 ............
SUPPLY CENTER:
CONSOLIDATE INDOOR
FITNESS FACILITIES.......
AIR NATIONAL GUARD:
PITTSBURGH IAP:
REPLACE VEHICLE 3,200 3,200 ............
MAINTENANCE COMPLEX..
SQUADRON OPERATIONS ............ 7,700 +7,700
AND SUPPORT FACILITY
(171ST AIR REFUELING
SQDN)................
NAVY RESERVE: WILLOW GROVE: 3,715 3,715 ............
HANGAR FIRE PROTECTION
UPGRADES.....................
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, PENNSYLVANIA..... 29,244 36,944 +7,700

RHODE ISLAND

NAVY:
NEWPORT NAVAL STATION:
SPECIAL WARFARE 15,290 15,290 ............
OFFICERS INSTRUCTION
BUILDING.............
LAB-UNMANNED UNDERSEA ............ 9,370 +9,370
COMBAT VEHICLE.......
AIR NATIONAL GUARD: QUONSET 9,600 9,600 ............
STATE AIRPORT: C-130J REPLACE
COMPOSITE MAINTENANCE SHOPS..
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, RHODE ISLAND..... 24,890 34,260 +9,370

SOUTH CAROLINA

ARMY: FORT JACKSON: BASIC 26,000 26,000 ............
COMBAT TRAINEE COMPLEX (PHASE
I)...........................
NAVY:
BEAUFORT MARINE CORPS AIR
STATION:
AIRBORNE WEAPONS 1,960 1,960 ............
SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
WAREHOUSE............
CHILD DEVELOPMENT 6,060 6,060 ............
CENTER...............
PARRIS ISLAND MARINE CORPS 5,430 5,430 ............
RECRUIT DEPOT: MILITARY
POLICE AND EMERGENCY
SERVICES FACILITY........
AIR FORCE: SHAW AFB: EDUCATION ............ 5,800 +5,800
CENTER.......................
DEFENSE-WIDE: BEAUFORT MARINE 12,850 12,850 ............
CORPS AIR STATION: REPLACE
LAUREL BAY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL.
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, SOUTH CAROLINA... 52,300 58,100 +5,800

SOUTH DAKOTA

AIR FORCE: ELLSWORTH AFB: LIVE ............ 12,200 +12,200
ORDNANCE LOADING AREA........
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD:
MITCHELL: COMBINED SUPPORT 14,228 14,228 ............
MAINTENANCE SHOP.........
JOE FOSS FIELD/SOUIX CITY: ............ 6,500 +6,500
RUNWAY/TAXIWAY
IMPROVEMENT..............
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, SOUTH DAKOTA..... 14,228 32,928 +18,700

TENNESSEE

NAVY: MILLINGTON NAVAL SUPPORT 3,900 3,900 ............
ACTIVITY: ELEVATED WATER TANK
AIR FORCE:
ARNOLD AFB:
CONVERT TO HYPERSONIC 10,400 10,400 ............
PLANT................
UPGRADE JET ENGINE AIR 14,000 14,000 ............
INDUCTION SYSTEM
(PHASE IV)...........
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD:
ALCOA: READINESS CENTER... 8,203 8,203 ............
HENDERSON: OPERATIONAL 2,012 2,012 ............
MAINTENANCE SHOP.........
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, TENNESSEE........ 38,515 38,515 ............

TEXAS

ARMY:
FORT HOOD:
BARRACKS COMPLEX...... 41,000 41,000 ............
COMMAND AND CONTROL 10,000 10,000 ............
FACILITY (PHASE II)..
MULTI-PURPOSE DIGITAL 13,000 13,000 ............
TRAINING RANGE (PHASE
II)..................
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 12,200 12,200 ............
FACILITY.............
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 23,000 23,000 ............
FACILITY.............
FORT SAM HOUSTON: GENERAL 2,250 2,250 ............
INSTRUCTION BUILDING.....
NAVY: KINGSVILLE NAS: AIRFIELD ............ 6,160 +6,160
LIGHTING.....................
AIR FORCE:
LACKLAND AFB:
JOINT ADVANCED 4,200 4,200 ............
LANGUAGE TRAINING
CENTER...............
DORMITORY............. 8,600 8,600 ............
LAUGHLIN AFB: ADD/ALTER 12,000 12,000 ............
FITNESS CENTER...........
SHEPPARD AFB:
REPLACE STUDENT 16,000 16,000 ............
DORMITORY/DINING
FACILITY.............
STUDENT DORMITORY/ 21,000 21,000 ............
DINING FACILITY......
DYESS AFB: C-130 SQUADRON ............ 16,800 +16,800
OPERATIONS FACILITY......
DEFENSE-WIDE:
DYESS AFB: MEDICAL 3,300 3,300 ............
TREATMENT FACILITY
ALTERATION...............
FORT HOOD: ADD/ALTER 12,200 12,200 ............
HOSPITAL.................
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: AUSTIN: 25,659 25,659 ............
ARMY AVIATION SUPPORT
FACILITY.....................
AIR NATIONAL GUARD: CAMP 900 900 ............
MABRY: REPLACE WEATHER FLIGHT
COM- PLEX...................
ARMY RESERVE: RED RIVER ARMY 1,862 1,862 ............
DEPOT: RESERVE CENTER/
ORGANIZATIONAL MAINTENANCE
SHOP.........................
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, TEXAS............ 207,171 230,131 +22,960

UTAH

AIR FORCE:
HILL AFB:
CONSOLIDATE HYDRAULIC/ 14,000 14,000 ............
PNEUDRAULIC REPAIR
FACILITY.............
DEPOT MAINTENANCE ............ 8,000 +8,000
HANGAR (PHASE I).....
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, UTAH......... 14,000 22,000 +8,000

VIRGINIA

ARMY:
FORT BELVOIR:
CHAPEL................ 4,950 4,950 ............
OPERATIONS BUILDING... 31,000 31,000 ............
FORT EUSTIS:
FIELD OPERATIONS 1,750 1,750 ............
FACILITY.............
MAIN PIER............. 23,000 23,000 ............
ACCESS ROAD........... ............ 9,900 +9,900
FORT LEE:
AIRBORNE TRAINING 17,500 17,500 ............
FACILITY.............
MILITARY ENTRANCE 6,400 6,400 ............
PROCESSING STATION...
NAVY:
NORFOLK NAVAL STATION:
AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE 11,300 11,300 ............
HANGAR REPLACEMENT...
AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE 14,100 14,100 ............
HANGAR REPLACEMENT...
AIRFIELD PAVEMENT 6,360 6,360 ............
UPGRADE..............
BACHELOR ENLISTED 14,730 14,730 ............
QUARTERS
MODERNIZATION........
DEPERMING PIER 2,810 2,810 ............
REPLACEMENT..........
PIER REPLACEMENT 28,210 28,210 ............
(PHASE I)............
WATERFRONT ELECTRICAL 15,620 15,620 ............
UPGRADE..............
WATERFRONT ELECTRICAL 12,900 12,900 ............
UPGRADE..............
QUANTICO MARINE CORPS
COMBAT DEVELOPMENT
COMMAND:
AIRCRAFT FIRE AND 3,790 3,790 ............
RESCUE STATION.......
BACHELOR ENLISTED 9,390 9,390 ............
QUARTERS.............
AIR FORCE:
LANGLEY AFB:
DORMITORY............. 8,300 8,300 ............
F-22 LOW OBSERVABLE/ 16,000 16,000 ............
COMPOSITE REPAIR
FACILITY.............
F-22 OPERATIONS AND 19,000 19,000 ............
MAINTENANCE FACILITY.
F-22 UPGRADE 4,000 4,000 ............
FLIGHTLINE
INFRASTRUCTURE.......
DEFENSE-WIDE:
FORT BELVOIR: ADDITIONAL 900 900 ............
CHILLER UNIT.............
NORFOLK: ADD/ALTER BRANCH 21,000 21,000 ............
MEDICAL CLINIC...........
PENTAGON: PHYSICAL FITNESS 25,000 25,000 ............
AND READINESS FACILITY...
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: FORT ............ 10,700 +10,700
PICKETT: MANEUVER AND
EQUIPMENT TRAINING SITE......
NAVY RESERVE: WILLIAMSBURG: 2,130 2,130 ............
HEADQUARTERS BUILDING........
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, VIRGINIA......... 300,140 320,740 +20,600

VERMONT

AIR NATIONAL GUARD: ............ 5,600 +5,600
BURLINGTON: VEHICLE
MAINTENANCE COMPLEX..........

WASHINGTON

ARMY:
FORT LEWIS:
AMMUNITION SUPPLY 17,000 17,000 ............
POINT EXPANSION......
BARRACKS COMPLEX (17TH 48,000 48,000 ............
AND B STREET) (PHASE
I)...................
COMBAT VEHICLE TRAIL.. 7,300 7,300 ............
DEPLOYMENT STAGING 15,500 15,500 ............
COMPLEX..............
DEPLOYMENT STAGING 16,500 16,500 ............
COMPLEX/RAIL.........
PALLET HANDING 13,200 13,200 ............
FACILITY.............
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 9,100 9,100 ............
FACILITY.............
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 9,600 9,600 ............
FACILITY.............
NAVY:
BANGOR STRATEGIC WEAPONS 3,900 3,900 ............
FACILITY: UTILITIES AND
SITE IMPROVEMENTS........
BREMERTON NAVAL STATION: 24,460 24,460 ............
REPLACE PIER DELTA (PHASE
II)......................
EVERETT NAVAL STATION: 6,820 6,820 ............
SHORE INTERMEDIATE
MAINTENANCE FACILITY.....
WHIDBEY ISLAND NAVAL AIR
STATION:
P-3 SUPPORT FACILITY.. 3,470 3,470 ............
CONTROL TOWER......... ............ 3,900 +3,900
AIR FORCE:
FAIRCHILD AFB: REPLACE 2,800 2,800 ............
MUNITIONS MAINTENANCE
ADMIN FACIL- ITY........
MCCHORD AFB:
ADD/ALTER MISSION 15,800 15,800 ............
SUPPORT CENTER (PHASE
I)...................
C-17 EXTEND NOSE DOCKS 4,900 4,900 ............
DEFENSE-WIDE:
FORT LEWIS:
LANGUAGE SUSTAINMENT 1,100 1,100 ............
TRAINING FACILITY....
TACTICAL EQUIPMENT 5,800 5,800 ............
COMPLEX..............
WHIDBEY ISLAND NAVAL AIR 6,600 6,600 ............
STATION: AIRCREW WATER
SURVIVAL TRAINING
FACILITY.................
ARMY RESERVE: FORT LEWIS: 21,978 21,978 ............
RESERVE CENTER/ORGANIZATIONAL
MAINTENANCE SHOP.............
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, WASHINGTON....... 233,828 237,728 +3,900

WEST VIRGINIA

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: ............ 6,433 +6,433
WILLIAMSTOWN: READINESS
CENTER.......................
GLEN JEAN:
ARMED FORCES RESERVE ............ 21,389 +21,389
CENTER/ORGANIZATION
MAINTENANCE SHOP........
AIR NATIONAL GUARD: YEAGER AIR ............ 4,100 +4,100
BASE: CIVIL ENGINEER/WEAPONS
COMPLEX......................
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, WEST VIRGINIA.... ............ 31,922 +31,922

WISCONSIN

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: OSHKOSH: 5,274 5,274 ............
ORGANIZATIONAL MAINTENANCE
SHOP.........................
AIR NATIONAL GUARD: CAMP ............ 5,700 +5,700
DOUGLAS/VOLK FIELD: CONTROL
TOWER........................
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, WISCONSIN........ 5,274 10,974 +5,700

WYOMING

AIR FORCE: F.E. WARREN AFB: 10,200 10,200 ............
FITNESS CENTER...............
DEFENSE-WIDE: F. E. WARREN 2,700 2,700 ............
AFB: MEDICAL CLINIC
ALTERATION...................
NAVY RESERVE: CHEYENNE: 1,060 1,060 ............
RESERVE CENTER ADDITION......
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, WYOMING.......... 13,960 13,960 ............

EL SALVADOR

DEFENSE-WIDE: COMALAPA AB: 12,577 12,577 ............
FORWARD OPERATING LOCATION...

GERMANY

ARMY:
BAMBERG:
BARRACKS COMPLEX 20,000 20,000 ............
(WARNER'S 3).........
PHYSICAL FITNESS 16,000 16,000 ............
TRAINING CENTER......
BAUMHOLDER: VEHICLE 9,000 9,000 ............
MAINTENANCE FACILITY.....
DARMSTADT:
BARRACKS COMPLEX 6,700 6,700 ............
(CAMBRAI FRITSCH
4028)................
BARRACKS COMPLEX 6,800 6,800 ............
(KELLEY 4163)........
HANAU: BARRACKS COMPLEX 7,200 7,200 ............
(PIONEER 8)..............
HEIDELBERG:
BARRACKS COMPLEX 6,800 6,800 ............
(PATTON 114).........
BARRACKS COMPLEX 8,500 8,500 ............
(TOMPKINS 4253)......
MANNHEIM: VEHICLE 16,000 16,000 ............
MAINTENANCE FACILITY.....
WEISBADEN:
CHILD DEVELOPMENT 6,800 6,800 ............
CENTER...............
PHYSICAL FITNESS 19,500 19,500 ............
TRAINING CENTER......
AIR FORCE:
RAMSTEIN AB:
COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS 15,000 15,000 ............
SQUADRON COMPLEX
(PHASE I)............
DORMITORY............. 11,000 11,000 ............
FREIGHT TERMINAL AND 9,400 9,400 ............
DEFENSE COURIER
SERVICE..............
STRATEGIC LIFT AREA 4,600 4,600 ............
EXPANSION............
UPGRADE UTILITY 2,900 2,900 ............
INFRASTRUCTURE.......
SPANGDAHLEM AB:
NORTHWEST 6,200 6,200 ............
INFRASTRUCTURE
EXPANSION............
REFUELER VEHICLE 2,500 2,500 ............
MAINTENANCE FACILITY.
DEFENSE-WIDE:
GEILENKIRCHEN: ELEMENTARY 1,733 1,733 ............
SCHOOL MULTI PURPOSE ROOM
HEIDELBERG:
HOSPITAL ADDITION/ 28,000 28,000 ............
CLINIC ALTERATION....
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 3,312 3,312 ............
CLASSROOM ADDITION/
RENOVATION...........
KAISERLAUTERN: ELEMENTARY 1,439 1,439 ............
SCHOOL CLASSROOM ADDITION
KITZINGEN: ELEMENTARY 1,394 1,394 ............
SCHOOL CLASSROOM ADDITION
LANDSTUHL: ELEMENTARY 1,444 1,444 ............
SCHOOL/MIDDLE SCHOOL
CLASSROOM ADDITION.......
RAMSTEIN: HIGH SCHOOL 2,814 2,814 ............
CLASSROOM ADDITION.......
VOGELWEH: ELEMENTARY 1,558 1,558 ............
SCHOOL CLASSROOM ADDITION/
RENOVA- TION............
WEISBADEN: ELEMENTARY 1,378 1,378 ............
SCHOOL CLASSROOM ADDITION
WUERZBURG: ELEMENTARY 2,684 2,684 ............
SCHOOL CLASSROOM/
GYMNASIUM ADDITION.......
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, GERMANY........ 220,656 220,656 ............

GREECE

NAVY:
LARISSA NAVAL SUPPORT 12,240 12,240 ............
ACTIVITY: BACHELOR
ENLISTED QUARTERS........
SOUDA BAY NAVAL SUPPORT 3,210 3,210 ............
ACTIVITY: SEWAGE
TREATMENT PLANT ADDITION.
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, GREECE......... 15,450 15,450 ............

GREENLAND

AIR FORCE: THULE AB: REPLACE 19,000 ............ -19,000
TAXIWAYS/APRONS..............
DEFENSE-WIDE: THULE AB: 10,800 10,800 ............
COMPOSITE MEDICAL FACILITY
REPLACEMENT..................
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, GREENLAND........ 29,800 10,800 -19,000

GUAM

NAVY:
GUAM NAVAL SUPPORT
ACTIVITY:
BACHELOR ENLISTED 9,300 9,300 ............
QUARTERS
MODERNIZATION........
WATERFRONT UTILITIES 14,800 14,800 ............
UPGRADE..............
AIR FORCE:
ANDERSEN AFB:
WAR RESERVE MATERIAL 4,550 4,550 ............
STORAGE FACILITY.....
REPLACE SECURITY 5,600 5,600 ............
FORCES OPERATIONS
FACILITY.............
DEFENSE-WIDE: ANDERSEN AFB: 20,000 20,000 ............
REPLACE HYDRANT FUEL SYSTEM..
AIR NATIONAL GUARD: ANDERSON 4,300 4,300 ............
AFB: OPERATIONS AND TRAINING
FACILITY.....................
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, GUAM............. 58,550 58,550 ............

ICELAND

NAVY: KEFLAVIK NAVAL AIR 2,820 2,820 ............
STATION: SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL
CONNECTION CHARGE............

ITALY

NAVY: SIGONELLA NAVAL AIR 3,060 3,060 ............
STATION: P-3 SUPPORT FACILITY
AIR FORCE:
AVIANO AB:
DORMITORY............. 8,200 8,200 ............
INDOOR FIRING RANGE... 3,600 3,600 ............
DEFENSE-WIDE: AVIANO AB: 3,647 3,647 ............
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASSROOM
ADDITION.....................
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, ITALY............ 18,507 18,507 ............

JAPAN

DEFENSE-WIDE: YOKOTA AB: BULK 13,000 13,000 ............
FUEL STORAGE TANK............

KOREA
ARMY:
CAMP CARROLL:
ELECTRICAL 8,000 8,000 ............
DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM..
PHYSICAL FITNESS 8,593 8,593 ............
TRAINING CENTER......
CAMP CASEY: VEHICLE 8,500 8,500 ............
MAINTENANCE FACILITY.....
CAMP HOVEY:
BARRACKS COMPLEX...... 33,000 33,000 ............
SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM. 2,750 2,750 ............
CAMP HUMPHREYS: BARRACKS 14,500 14,500 ............
COMPLEX..................
CAMP JACKSON: GENERAL 6,100 6,100 ............
INSTRUCTION BUILDING.....
CAMP STANLEY: BARRACKS 28,000 28,000 ............
COMPLEX..................
AIR FORCE:
KUNSAN AB: ADD/ALTER 12,000 12,000 ............
FITNESS CENTER...........
OSAN AB:
DORMITORY............. 14,400 14,400 ............
DORMITORY............. 15,800 15,800 ............
OFFICER DORMITORY..... 9,700 9,700 ............
REPLACE BASE CIVIL 36,000 ............ -36,000
ENGINEER COMPLEX.....
REPLACE TRAFFIC 5,925 5,925 ............
MANAGEMENT FACILITY..
REPLACE VEHICLE 2,000 2,000 ............
OPERATIONS/
ADMINISTRATION
FACILITY.............
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 17,317 17,317 ............
FACILITY.............
DEFENSE-WIDE: CAMP CASEY: 5,500 5,500 ............
REPLACE FUEL STORAGE FACILITY
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, KOREA............ 228,085 192,085 -36,000

KWAJALEIN

ARMY: KWAJALEIN ATOLL: COLD 11,000 11,000 ............
STORAGE WAREHOUSE............

OMAN

AIR FORCE: MASIRAH ISLAND: ............ 8,000 +8,000
AIRFIELD REPAIRS (PHASE II)..

PORTUGAL

DEFENSE-WIDE: LAJES FIELD: 3,750 3,750 ............
DENTAL CLINIC REPLACEMENT....

AMERICAN SAMOA

ARMY RESERVE: AMERICAN SAMOA: 19,703 19,703 ............
RESERVE CENTER/ORGANIZATIONAL
MAINTENANCE SHOP.............

SPAIN

NAVY: ROTA NAVAL STATION: 2,240 2,240 ............
AIRCRAFT FIRE AND RESCUE
ADDITION.....................
DEFENSE-WIDE: ROTA NAVAL 3,000 3,000 ............
STATION: MARINE LOADING ARMS.
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, SPAIN............ 5,240 5,240 ............

TURKEY

AIR FORCE: ESKISEHIR: 4,000 4,000 ............
DORMITORY/MISSION SUPPORT
FACILITY.....................

UNITED KINGDOM

AIR FORCE:
RAF MILDENHALL:
AVIONICS MAINTENANCE 10,800 10,800 ............
COMPLEX (PHASE II)...
FITNESS CENTER........ 11,600 11,600 ............
RAF LAKENHEATH: REPLACE 11,300 11,300 ............
SUPPLY MATERIAL CONTROL
FACILITY.................
DEFENSE-WIDE: RAF FELTWELL: 22,132 22,132 ............
CONSTRUCT NEW MIDDLE SCHOOL..
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, UNITED KINGDOM... 55,832 55,832 ............

WAKE ISLAND

AIR FORCE: WAKE ISLAND: REPAIR 25,000 ............ -25,000
AIRFIELD PAVEMENT (PHASE I)..

NATO

NATO SECURITY INVESTMENT 162,600 162,600 ............
PROGRAM......................

WORLDWIDE CLASSIFIED

ARMY:
CLASSIFIED LOCATIONS:
CLASSIFIED PROJECT.... 4,000 4,000 ............
RESCISSION CLASSIFIED ............ -26,400 -26,400
PROJECT..............
AIR FORCE: CLASSIFIED 4,458 4,458 ............
LOCATION: TACTICAL UNIT
DETACHMENT FACILITY..........
DEFENSE-WIDE: CLASSIFIED 2,400 2,400 ............
LOCATION: AVIATION AND
MAINTENANCE FACILITY.........
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, WORLDWIDE 10,858 -15,542 -26,400
CLASSIFIED.............

WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED

ARMY:
UNSPECIFIED WORLDWIDE
LOCATIONS:
HOST NATION SUPPORT... 23,100 23,100 ............
PLANNING AND DESIGN... 134,098 153,084 +18,986
UNSPECIFIED MINOR 18,000 21,130 +3,130
CONSTRUCTION.........
NAVY:
UNSPECIFIED WORLDWIDE
LOCATIONS:
PLANNING AND DESIGN... 29,932 37,332 +7,400
UPSPECIFIED MINOR 10,546 13,321 +2,775
CONSTRUCTION.........
RESCISSION............ ............ -19,588 -19,588
AIR FORCE:
UNSPECIFIED WORLDWIDE
LOCATIONS:
PLANNING AND DESIGN... 79,130 83,420 +4,290
UPSPECIFIED MINOR 11,250 12,250 +1,000
CONSTRUCTION.........
RESCISSION............ ............ -4,000 -4,000
DEFENSE-WIDE:
UNSPECIFIED WORLDWIDE
LOCATIONS:
ENERGY CONSERVATION 35,600 35,600 ............
IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM..
CONTINGENCY 10,000 10,000 ............
CONSTRUCTION.........
RESCISSION............ ............ -65,280 -65,280
RESCISSION............ ............ -4,000 -4,000
PLANNING AND DESIGN;
TRICARE MANAGEMENT 26,300 30,300 +4,000
ACTIVITY.........
SPECIAL OPERATIONS 6,861 6,861 ............
COMMAND..........
CHEMICAL AND 700 700 ............
BIOLOGICAL
DEFENSE PROGRAM..
DEFENSE THREAT 2,400 2,400 ............
REDUCTION AGENCY.
DEPARTMENT OF 1,929 1,929 ............
DEFENSE DEPENDENT
EDUCATION........
BALLISTIC MISSILE 6,290 6,290 ............
DEFENSE
ORGANIZATION.....
DEFENSE 6,516 16,516 +10,000
INTELLIGENCE
AGENCY...........
DEFENSE LOGISTICS 3,500 3,500 ............
AGENCY...........
UNDISTRIBUTED..... 20,000 20,000 ............
-----------------------------------------
SUBTOTAL, 74,496 88,496 +14,000
PLANNING AND
DESIGN.........
UNSPECIFIED MINOR
CONSTRUCTION:
TRICARE MANAGEMENT 5,526 5,526 ............
ACTIVITY.........
SPECIAL OPERATIONS 1,903 1,903 ............
COMMAND..........
DEFENSE FINANCE 1,500 1,500 ............
AND ACCOUNTING
SERVICE..........
DEPARTMENT OF 4,249 4,249 ............
DEFENSE DEPENDENT
EDUCATION........
BALLISTIC MISSILE 2,009 2,009 ............
DEFENSE
ORGANIZATION.....
JOINT CHIEFS OF 6,305 6,305 ............
STAFF............
UNDISTRIBUTED..... 3,000 3,000 ............
-----------------------------------------
SUBTOTAL, 24,492 24,492 ............
UNSPECIFIED
MINOR
CONSTRUCTION...
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD:
UNSPECIFIED WORLDWIDE
LOCATIONS:
PLANNING AND DESIGN... 25,794 34,378 +8,584
UNSPECIFIED MINOR 4,671 22,381 +17,710
CONSTRUCTION.........
AIR NATIONAL GUARD:
UNSPECIFIED WORLDWIDE
LOCATIONS:
PLANNING AND DESIGN... 3,972 7,342 +3,370
UNSPECIFIED MINOR 5,000 8,425 +3,425
CONSTRUCTION.........
ARMY RESERVE:
UNSPECIFIED WORLDWIDE
LOCATIONS:
PLANNING AND DESIGN... 8,024 8,024 ............
UNSPECIFIED MINOR 2,375 2,375 ............
CONSTRUCTION.........
NAVY RESERVE:
UNSPECIFIED WORLDWIDE
LOCATIONS:
PLANNING AND DESIGN... 1,176 1,176 ............
RESCISSION............ ............ -925 -925
AIR FORCE RESERVE:
UNSPECIFIED WORLDWIDE
LOCATIONS:
PLANNING AND DESIGN... 4,336 4,336 ............
UNSPECIFIED MINOR 4,996 4,996 ............
CONSTRUCTION.........
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, WORLDWIDE 510,988 501,865 -9,123
UNSPECIFIED........

FAMILY HOUSING, ARMY

ALASKA: FORT WAINWRIGHT (32 12,000 12,000 ............
UNITS).......................
ARIZONA: FORT HUACHUCA (72 10,800 10,800 ............
UNITS).......................
KANSAS: FORT LEAVENWORTH (80 10,000 20,000 +10,000
UNITS).......................
TEXAS:
FORT BLISS (76 UNITS)..... 13,600 13,600 ............
FORT SAM HOUSTON (80)..... ............ 11,200 +11,200
KOREA: CAMP HUMPHREYS (54 12,800 12,800 ............
UNITS).......................
CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS..... 220,750 220,750 ............
PLANNING AND DESIGN........... 11,592 11,592 ............
-----------------------------------------
SUBTOTAL, CONSTRUCTION.. 291,542 312,742 +21,200
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE:
FURNISHING ACCOUNT........ 45,546 45,546 ............
MANAGEMENT ACCOUNT........ 82,177 82,177 ............
MISCELLANEOUS ACCOUNT..... 1,277 1,277 ............
SERVICES ACCOUNT.......... 49,520 49,520 ............
UTILITIES ACCOUNT......... 258,790 258,790 ............
LEASING................... 196,956 196,956 ............
MAINTENANCE OF REAL 446,806 446,806 ............
PROPERTY.................
INTEREST PAYMENT.......... 1 1 ............
HOUSING PRIVATIZATION 27,918 27,918 ............
SUPPORT COST.............
FOREIGN CURRENCY ............ ............ ............
FLUCTUATION ADJUSTMENT...
-----------------------------------------
SUBTOTAL, OPERATION AND 1,108,991 1,108,991 ............
MAINTENANCE............
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, FAMILY HOUSING, 1,400,533 1,421,733 +21,200
ARMY...................

FAMILY HOUSING, NAVY AND
MARINE CORPS

ARIZONA: YUMA (51 UNITS)...... 9,017 9,017 ............
CALIFORNIA: TWENTYNINE PALMS 16,250 16,250 ............
(74 UNITS)...................
HAWAII:
KANEOHE BAY (212 UNITS)... 46,996 55,196 +8,200
PEARL HARBOR (70 UNITS)... 16,827 16,827 ............
MISSISSIPPI: PASCAGOULA (160 23,354 23,354 ............
UNITS).......................
ITALY: SIGONELLA (10 UNITS)... 2,403 2,403 ............
CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS..... 183,054 183,054 ............
PLANNING AND DESIGN........... 6,499 6,499 ............
-----------------------------------------
SUBTOTAL, CONSTRUCTION.. 304,400 312,600 +8,200
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE:
FURNISHINGS ACCOUNT....... 32,701 32,701 ............
MANAGEMENT ACCOUNT........ 85,535 85,535 ............
MISCELLANEOUS ACCOUNT..... 1,200 1,200 ............
SERVICES ACCOUNT.......... 65,787 65,787 ............
UTILITIES ACCOUNT......... 195,172 195,172 ............
LEASING ACCOUNT........... 123,965 123,965 ............
MAINTENANCE ACCOUNT....... 409,567 409,567 ............
SVCM'S MORTGAGE INSURANCE 68 ............
PREMIUM ACCOUNT..........
HOUSING PRIVATIZATION 4,100 4,100 ............
SUPPORT COST.............
FOREIGN CURRENCY ............ ............ ............
FLUCTUATION ADJUSTMENT...
-----------------------------------------
SUBTOTAL, OPERATION AND 918,095 918,095 ............
MAINTENANCE............
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, FAMILY HOUSING, 1,222,495 1,230,695 +8,200
NAVY AND MARINE CORPS..

FAMILY HOUSING, AIR FORCE

ARIZONA: LUKE AFB (120 UNITS). 15,712 15,712 ............
CALIFORNIA: TRAVIS AFB (118 18,150 18,150 ............
UNITS).......................
COLORADO: BUCKLEY AFB (55 11,400 11,400 ............
UNITS).......................
DELAWARE: DOVER AFB (120 18,145 18,145 ............
UNITS).......................
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA: BOLLING 16,926 16,926 ............
AFB (136 UNITS)..............
HAWAII: HICKAM AFB (102 UNITS) 25,037 25,037 ............
IDAHO: MOUNTAIN HOME AFB (56 ............ 10,000 +10,000
UNITS).......................
LOUISIANA: BARKSDALE AFB (56 7,300 7,300 ............
UNITS).......................
SOUTH DAKOTA: ELLSWORTH AFB 13,700 13,700 ............
(78 UNITS)...................
VIRGINIA: LANGLEY AFB (4 1,200 1,200 ............
UNITS).......................
PORTUGAL: LAJES FIELD (64 13,230 13,230 ............
UNITS).......................
CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS..... 352,879 375,345 +22,466
PLANNING AND DESIGN........... 24,558 24,558 ............
-----------------------------------------
SUBTOTAL, CONSTRUCTION.. 518,237 550,703 +32,466
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE:
FURNISHINGS ACCOUNT....... 36,619 36,619 ............
MANAGEMENT ACCOUNT........ 58,224 58,224 ............
SERVICES ACCOUNT.......... 28,356 28,356 ............
UTILITIES ACCOUNT......... 168,652 168,652 ............
MISCELLANEOUS............. 2,384 2,384 ............
LEASING................... 102,919 102,919 ............
MAINTENANCE............... 436,526 436,526 ............
MORTGAGE INSURANCE 35 35 ............
PREMIUMS.................
HOUSING PRIVATIZATION SUPPORT 35,406 35,406 ............
COST.........................
FOREIGN CURRENCY ............ ............ ............
FLUCTUATION ADJUSTMENT...
-----------------------------------------
SUBTOTAL, OPERATION AND 869,121 869,121 ............
MAINTENANCE............
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, FAMILY HOUSING, 1,387,358 1,419,824 +32,466
AIR FORCE..............

FAMILY HOUSING, DEFENSE-WIDE

CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS..... 250 250 ............
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE:
FURNISHINGS ACCOUNT (NSA). 129 129 ............
FURNISHINGS ACCOUNT (DIA). 3,630 3,630 ............
FURNISHINGS ACCOUNT (DLA). 30 30 ............
MANAGEMENT ACCOUNT (NSA).. 15 15 ............
MANAGEMENT ACCOUNT (DLA).. 292 292 ............
MISCELLANEOUS ACCOUNT 57 57 ............
(NSA)....................
SERVICES ACCOUNT (NSA).... 374 374 ............
SERVICES ACCOUNT (DLA).... 78 78 ............
UTILITIES ACCOUNT (NSA)... 414 414 ............
UTILITIES ACCOUNT (DLA)... 428 428 ............
LEASING (NSA)............. 11,698 11,698 ............
LEASING (DLA)............. 25,600 25,600 ............
MAINTENANCE OF REAL 658 658 ............
PROPERTY (NSA)...........
MAINTENANCE OF REAL 359 359 ............
PROPERTY (DLA)...........
-----------------------------------------
SUBTOTAL, OPERATION AND 43,762 43,762 ............
MAINTENANCE............
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, FAMILY HOUSING, 44,012 44,012 ............
DEFENSE-WIDE...........

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE FAMILY
HOUSING IMPROVEMENT FUND

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE FAMILY 2,000 2,000 ............
HOUSING IMPROVEMENT FUND.....

HOMEOWNERS ASSISTANCE FUND,
DEFENSE

HOMEOWNERS ASSISTANCE FUND, 10,119 10,119 ............
DEFENSE......................

BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE
ACCOUNT, PART IV

BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE 532,200 682,200 +150,000
ACCOUNT, PART IV.............
=========================================
GRAND TOTAL............. 9,971,312 10,500,000 +528,688

RECAPITULATION

ARMY.......................... 1,760,541 1,668,957 -91,584
RESCISSION................ ............ -26,400 -26,400
NAVY.......................... 1,071,408 1,148,633 +77,225
RESCISSION................ ............ -19,588 -19,588
AIR FORCE..................... 1,068,250 1,148,269 +80,019
RESCISSION (GENERAL ............ -4,000 -4,000
PROVISION 126)...........
DEFENSE AGENCIES.............. 694,558 881,058 +186,500
RESCISSION................ ............ -65,280 -65,280
RESCISSION (GENERAL ............ -4,000 -4,000
PROVISION 126)...........
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD........... 267,389 378,549 +111,160
AIR NATIONAL GUARD............ 149,072 222,767 +73,695
ARMY RESERVE.................. 111,404 111,404 ............
NAVAL RESERVE................. 33,641 33,641 ............
RESCISSION................ ............ -925 -925
AIR FORCE RESERVE............. 53,732 53,732 ............
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL MILITARY 5,209,995 5,526,817 +316,822
CONSTRUCTION...........

NATO INFRASTRUCTURE........... 162,600 162,600 ............
FAMILY HOUSING, ARMY.......... 1,400,533 1,421,733 +21,200
(NEW CONSTRUCTION)........ (59,200) (80,400) (+21,200)
(CONSTRUCTION (220,750) (220,750) ............
IMPROVEMENTS)............
(PLANNING AND DESIGN)..... (11,592) (11,592) ............
(OPERATION AND (1,108,991) (1,108,991) ............
MAINTENANCE).............
FAMILY HOUSING, NAVY AND 1,222,495 1,230,695 +8,200
MARINE CORPS.................
(NEW CONSTRUCTION)........ (114,847) (123,047) (+8,200)
(CONSTRUCTION (183,054) (183,054) ............
IMPROVEMENTS)............
(PLANNING AND DESIGN)..... (6,499) (6,499) ............
(OPERATION AND (918,095) (918,095) ............
MAINTENANCE).............
FAMILY HOUSING, AIR FORCE..... 1,387,358 1,419,824 +32,466
(NEW CONSTRUCTION)........ (140,800) (150,800) (+10,000)
(CONSTRUCTION (352,879) (375,345) (+22,466)
IMPROVEMENTS)............
(PLANNING AND DESIGN)..... (24,558) (24,558) ............
(OPERATION AND (869,121) (869,121) ............
MAINTENANCE).............
FAMILY HOUSING, DEFENSE 44,012 44,012 ............
AGENCIES.....................
(CONSTRUCTION (250) (250) ............
IMPROVEMENTS)............
(OPERATION AND (43,762) (43,762) ............
MAINTENANCE).............
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE FAMILY 2,000 2,000 ............
HOUSING IMPROVEMENT FUND.....
HOMEOWNERS ASSISTANCE FUND.... 10,119 10,119 ............
BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE 532,200 682,200 +150,000
ACCOUNT......................
=========================================
GRAND TOTAL............. 9,971,312 10,500,000 +528,688
------------------------------------------------------------------------