[Senate Report 111-228]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
Calendar No. 478
111th Congress Report
SENATE
2d Session 111-228
======================================================================
ENERGY AND WATER DEVELOPMENT APPROPRIATIONS BILL, 2011
_______
July 22, 2010.--Ordered to be printed
_______
Mr. Dorgan, from the Committee on Appropriations,
submitted the following
REPORT
[To accompany S. 3635]
The Committee on Appropriations reports the bill (S. 3635)
making appropriations for energy and water development and
related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2011,
and for other purposes, favorably thereon and recommends that
the bill do pass.
Amount in new budget (obligational) authority, fiscal year 2011
Total of bill as reported to the Senate................. $35,073,700,000
Amount of 2010 appropriations........................... 33,978,000,000
Amount of 2011 budget estimate.......................... 35,878,274,000
Bill as recommended to Senate compared to--
2010 appropriations................................. +1,095,700,000
2011 budget estimate................................ -804,574,000
CONTENTS
----------
Page
Purpose.......................................................... 4
Summary of Estimates and Recommendations......................... 4
Title I:
Department of Defense--Civil: Department of the Army:
Corps of Engineers--Civil:
General Investigations............................... 14
Construction, General................................ 29
Flood Control, Mississippi River, and Tributaries.... 41
Operation and Maintenance, General................... 44
Regulatory Program................................... 66
Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program...... 66
Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies................ 67
General Expenses..................................... 67
Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil
Works)............................................. 68
General Provisions--Corps of Engineers--Civil........ 68
Title II:
Department of the Interior:
Central Utah Project Completion Account.................. 70
Bureau of Reclamation:
Water and Related Resources.......................... 72
Central Valley Project Restoration Fund.............. 80
California Bay-Delta Restoration..................... 80
Policy and Administration............................ 80
General Provisions--Department of the Interior........... 80
Title III:
Department of Energy:
Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy................... 83
Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability.......... 90
Nuclear Energy....................................... 91
Fossil Energy Research and Development............... 93
Naval Petroleum and Oil Shale Reserves............... 95
Strategic Petroleum Reserve.......................... 95
Northeast Home Heating Oil Reserve................... 96
Energy Information Administration.................... 96
Non-Defense Environmental Cleanup........................ 96
Uranium Enrichment Decontamination and Decommissioning
Fund................................................... 97
Science.................................................. 98
Advanced Research Projects Agency--Energy................ 103
Innovative Technology Loan Guarantee Program............. 103
Advanced Technology Vehicles Manufacturing Loan Program.. 104
Departmental Administration.............................. 104
Office of the Inspector General.......................... 105
Atomic Energy Defense Activities:
National Nuclear Security Administration:
Weapons Activities............................... 105
Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation................. 112
Naval Reactors................................... 112
Office of the Administrator...................... 116
Environmental and Other Defense Activities:
Defense Environmental Cleanup........................ 116
Other Defense Activities............................. 119
Power Marketing Administrations:
Operation and Maintenance, Southeastern Power
Administration................................. 119
Operation and Maintenance, Southwestern Power
Administration................................. 120
Construction, Rehabilitation, Operation and
Maintenance, Western Area Power Administration. 120
Falcon and Amistad Operations and Maintenance
Fund........................................... 120
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission: Salaries and
Expenses........................................... 120
General Provisions--Department of Energy................. 143
Title IV:
Independent Agencies:
Appalachian Regional Commission.......................... 144
Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board.................. 144
Delta Regional Authority................................. 145
Denali Commission........................................ 145
Northern Border Regional Commission...................... 145
Southeast Crescent Regional Commission................... 145
Nuclear Regulatory Commission............................ 145
Office of Inspector General.......................... 146
Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board..................... 147
Office of the Federal Coordinator for Alaska Natural Gas
Transportation Projects................................ 147
Tennessee Valley Authority: Office of the Inspector
General................................................ 147
Title V: General Provisions...................................... 148
Compliance With Paragraph 7, Rule XVI, of the Standing Rules of
the
Senate......................................................... 149
Compliance With Paragraph 7(c), Rule XXVI, of the Standing Rules
of the
Senate......................................................... 149
Compliance With Paragraph 12, Rule XXVI, of the Standing Rules of
the
Senate......................................................... 150
Budgetary Impact of Bill......................................... 158
Disclosure of Congressionally Directed Spending Items............ 158
Comparative Statement of Budget Authority........................ 212
PURPOSE
The purpose of this bill is to provide appropriations for
the fiscal year 2011 beginning October 1, 2010, and ending
September 30, 2011, for energy and water development, and for
other related purposes. It supplies funds for water resources
development programs and related activities of the Department
of the Army, Civil Functions--U.S. Army Corps of Engineers'
Civil Works Program in title I; for the Department of the
Interior's Bureau of Reclamation in title II; for the
Department of Energy's energy research activities, including
environmental restoration and waste management, and atomic
energy defense activities of the National Nuclear Security
Administration in title III; and for related independent
agencies and commissions, including the Appalachian Regional
Commission, Delta Regional Authority, Denali Commission, and
the Nuclear Regulatory Commission in title IV.
SUMMARY OF ESTIMATES AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The fiscal year 2011 budget estimates for the bill total
$35,878,274,000 in new budget (obligational) authority. The
recommendation of the Committee totals $35,073,700,000. This is
$804,574,000 below the budget estimates and $1,095,700,000
above the enacted appropriation for the current fiscal year.
Subcommittee Hearings
The Appropriations Subcommittee on Energy and Water held
three sessions in connection with the fiscal year 2011
appropriation bill. Witnesses included officials and
representatives of the Federal agencies under the
subcommittee's jurisdiction.
The recommendations for fiscal year 2011 therefore, have
been developed after careful consideration of available data.
Votes in the Committee
By a vote of 17 to 12 the Committee on July 22, 2010,
recommended that the bill, as amended, be reported to the
Senate.
TITLE I
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE--CIVIL
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
Corps of Engineers--Civil
INTRODUCTION
The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is made up of
approximately 35,000 civilian and 650 military members that
perform both military and Civil Works functions. The military
and civilian engineers, scientists and other specialists work
hand in hand as leaders in engineering and environmental
matters. The diverse workforce of biologists, engineers,
geologists, hydrologists, natural resource managers, and other
professionals meets the demands of changing times and
requirements as a vital part of America's Army.
The Corps' mission is to provide quality, responsive
engineering services to the Nation including:
--Planning, designing, building, and operating water
resources and other Civil Works projects. (Navigation,
Flood Control, Environmental Protection, Disaster
Response, et cetera);
--Designing and managing the construction of military
facilities for the Army and Air Force. (Military
Construction); and
--Providing design and construction management support for
other Defense and Federal agencies. (Interagency and
International Services).
The Energy and Water bill only funds the Civil Works
missions of the Corps of Engineers. Approximately 23,000
civilians and about 290 military officers are responsible for
this nationwide mission.
It is important to realize that while the Corps Civil Works
programs impact all 50 States and virtually every citizen of
our Nation, they are a relatively minor part of the Federal
budget. It is instructive to understand the Federal budget and
the resources that go into the various programs in order to
determine the proper value that perhaps should be placed on
these programs.
For fiscal year 2010, the overall Federal budget amounted
to $3,540,000,000,000. Discretionary spending made up
$1,250,000,000,000 or just over 35 percent of the overall
budget. The remaining nearly 65 percent of the budget consists
of mandatory spending not subject to annual appropriations.
Of the $1,250,000,000,000 in discretionary spending,
$530,000,000,000 is referred to as non-defense discretionary
spending. This amounts to 15 percent of the Federal budget and
is what the administration has proposed to freeze for 3 years
to reduce the annual budget deficit.
The $530,000,000,000 in non-defense discretionary spending
in fiscal year 2010 was where 97.5 percent of the funds for the
Corps of Engineers was appropriated. In fiscal year 2010, the
Corps non-defense budget amounted to just more than
$5,300,000,000. That means that the Corps' budget makes up
about 1 percent of the non-defense discretionary spending or
about 0.15 percent of the overall budget.
A logical question to ask would be what does the Nation
receive for an investment of that magnitude? Through its Civil
Works program the Corps carries out a wide array of projects
that provide:
--Coastal storm damage reduction;
--Disaster preparedness and response;
--Environmental protection and restoration;
--Flood damage reduction;
--Hydropower;
--Navigable waters;
--Recreational opportunities;
--Regulatory oversight; and
--Water supply.
In fiscal year 2010, 1,167 projects were under
construction. These included 434 projects specifically
authorized by Congress and 733 projects, comprising 9
authorities, of the Continuing Authorities Program.
Of the specifically authorized projects, 191 were flood
risk management; 5 were for hydropower; 147 were for
navigation; 39 were for environmental restoration; and 52 were
for environmental infrastructure.
Forty-one States are served by Corps of Engineers ports and
waterways including all States east of the Mississippi River.
The Corps operates and maintains 12,000 miles of commercial
inland channels. Sixteen percent of U.S. domestic freight was
carried by water in 2007 (by ton-miles, excluding air and
pipeline). In 2007, 2,734 U.S. companies were operating on U.S.
waterways. The Corps operates and maintains 926 harbors on the
coasts, inland waterways, and the Great Lakes. Nearly 2.5
billion tons of cargo were handled by U.S. ports and waterways
in 2008 (998.7 million tons inbound from foreign sources, 522.1
million tons outbound and 956.3 million tons shipped
domestically. The value of the foreign commerce handled at U.S.
ports in 2008 was $1,624,000,000,000. More than 43 percent of
the tonnage consisted of shipments of crude oil and petroleum
products. The Corps also operates 238 lock chambers on the
inland waterway system. The average age of these facilities is
58 years.
To maintain these navigation channels, the Corps dredges
approximately 263 million cubic yards of material at a cost of
$1,344,000,000. More than 82 percent of this dredging is done
by 51 private firms (33 of which are small businesses). To
augment the private commercial dredge fleet, the Corps owns 11
dredges--4 hopper dredges and 7 others.
The Corps manages structures for flood risk management at
674 sites including 563 at Corps of Engineers-owned and -
operated dam projects. The Corps also oversees a network of
about 11,750 miles of levees either built or controlled by the
Corps. The average annual damages prevented by these flood risk
management projects for the 10 year period from 1999-2008 was
$22,300,000,000.
The Corps has 75 hydropower projects in operation with 350
generating units. The installed generating capacity of these
units is 21,747 megawatts. Seventy billion nine hundred million
kilowatt-hours of electricity are generated annually providing
$800,000,000 in revenue to the Treasury. The Corps owns and
operates 24 percent of the U.S. hydropower capacity and
provides 3 percent of the total U.S. electric capacity. There
are another 90 non-Federal power plants located at Corps
facilities providing an additional 2,300 megawatts of capacity.
The Corps owns more than 76 million acres and manages an
additional 4 million acres at various Corps projects. The total
surface area, at full pool level, of all Corps lakes totals
26,300,000 acres, or an area slightly larger than the State of
Kentucky.
The total capacity of Corps lakes is 329.2 million acre-
feet of storage. Of that amount, the Corps has a total of 9.76
million acre-feet of authorized municipal and industrial water
supply storage in 136 projects. These projects are located in
25 States as well as Puerto Rico. Forty-eight Corps project
also have authorized irrigation storage. The total investment
in municipal and industrial water supply storage is
$1,500,000,000.
The Corps is the top provider for recreation within the
Federal Government. Ten percent of the U.S. population visits a
Corps project at least once a year--that is more than 370
million visits per year. The Corps has 4,641 recreation sites
at 422 Corps projects (mostly lakes). Seventy percent of the
U.S. population live within 50 miles of a Corps lake. Twelve
million acres of land and water controlled by the Corps is used
for recreation. The Corps hosts 20 percent of the visits to
Federal recreation areas on 2 percent of Federal lands. Corps
projects provide 56,964 miles of shoreline (which is longer
than the coastline of the continental United States). The Corps
maintains 94,964 campsites, 6,487 miles of trails, and 3,522
boat launch ramps. The Corps has one-third of all U.S.
freshwater fishing and 20,000 fishing tournaments are held
annually at Corps projects. Visitors spend $18,000,000,000
annually at Corps projects. Visitation at Corps projects
supports more than 350,000 full- or part-time jobs. There are
more than 500 concessionaires on Corps projects with gross
fixed assets of $1,000,000,000.
In fiscal year 2009, the Corps acted on 71,260 permit
requests through the Corps regulatory program. There were 4,240
individual permits and letters of permission; 18,680 regional
general permits; and 26,540 nationwide permits. Two hundred and
sixty permits were denied and the applications were withdrawn
for 9,750 requests. The Corps also made some 80,000
jurisdictional wetland determinations in fiscal year 2009.
The Corps continues to provide support to local, State, and
Federal agencies before, during, and after major disasters.
Major disasters responded to in 2009: North Dakota/Minnesota
Floods; Continued support to Hurricane Katrina, Gustaf, and Ike
recovery operations.
The Corps also supports more than 70 other (non-defense)
Government agencies. In fiscal year 2009, the expenditures for
this effort topped $2,000,000,000 and were paid for by the
agencies requesting the assistance. The biggest customers for
the Corps' services are: Department of Homeland Security--
Customs and Border Protection; Department of Homeland
Security--FEMA; Department of State; Environmental Protection
Agency [EPA]; and U.S. Agency for International Development.
OVERVIEW AND ANALYSIS OF THE FISCAL YEAR 2011 BUDGET REQUEST
The fiscal year 2011 budget request for the Corps of
Engineers is composed of $4,939,000,000 in new budget
authority. This is a decrease of $186,000,000 from the fiscal
year 2010 request. The budget request is $506,000,000 less than
the fiscal year 2010 enacted amount.
The Committee is disappointed that the administration has
proposed to invest less in our Nation's water infrastructure in
fiscal year 2011 than they did in fiscal year 2010. The
Committee is very concerned about the continued large gap
between the administration's budget proposal and the annual
appropriations provided by this Committee. The Committee would
like to find a constructive way to work with the administration
to narrow this gap.
The Committee is concerned that the administration is not
placing the proper economic value on the Corps' Civil Works
program when budgetary resources are parceled out. At a time
when this existing infrastructure, the foundation of our
economic security and quality of life, is depreciating much
faster than it is being recapitalized, when our increasing
population is placing much greater stress on the Nation's vital
water resources, when shifts in population centers mean new and
different problems, and when a growing environmental awareness
requires new solutions to persistent problems, this
underfunding is unacceptable and threatens our continued well-
being. Infrastructure budgets have to be increased. If not, the
Nation will continue to face unscheduled outages, damaged and
incomplete infrastructure, and other emergency situations that
must be dealt with through ever-increasing emergency
appropriations. The situations in New Orleans and south
Louisiana in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina should have
been a wake-up call to the Nation as to how we should be making
investment decisions. A few billion dollars more of investment
in advance of Hurricane Katrina would have reduced the outlay
of the tens of billions of dollars that the Nation has had to
invest since the hurricane.
The Corps Civil Works program means jobs for our citizens
in the form of design and construction of the projects,
materials and supplies for construction and maintenance not to
mention the ancillary services that are provided for all
aspects of the Civil Works programs. Just as important to the
Nation as the jobs created and retained by these investments
are the taxes paid to local, State, and Federal coffers as a
result of these investments.
Over the last decade, the infrastructure provided by the
Civil Works program has provided more than $500,000,000,000 in
benefits to the Nation as well as revenues to the Treasury
through prevention of flood damages, transportation savings,
recreation benefits, hydropower revenues, water supply
benefits, and environmental benefits. This is a very
conservative estimate based on readily quantifiable data. These
benefits were achieved on an investment of less than
$70,000,000,000 (including the funds provided in the aftermath
of Hurricane Katrina and the American Recovery and Reinvestment
Act). Yet this return on investment seems not to be considered
when parceling out budgetary resources.
The Committee urges the administration to assess the value
of the Corps' programs to the national economy and derive a
level of investment from that impact that is commensurate with
the outputs of this critical infrastructure.
Unfortunately, this budget proposal, like many previous
budget proposals, is woefully inadequate in funding national
infrastructure needs. It ignores studies and projects that are
ongoing and funded in the fiscal year 2010 Energy and Water
Appropriations Act, that was agreed to by the Congress and
signed into law by the President, in favor of a select group of
studies and projects that comport to budgetary criteria devised
by the administration. While this is the prerogative of the
administration, it should be noted that the criteria utilized
is not based in law. It is simply the administration's choice
and as such has changed from year to year and from
administration to administration.
The Committee differs with the administration concerning
benefit-to-cost ratios being utilized to establish priority for
funding. The Flood Control Act of 1936 established that project
benefits should exceed projects costs. This has been the Corps'
longstanding water resource policy and legislative attempts to
change this requirement have been unsuccessful. However, the
administration has arbitrarily decided that benefits simply
exceeding the costs is not a sufficient measure of a project's
worth. For fiscal year 2011, the administration has chosen 2.5
to be the threshold for projects to be included in the budget.
Yet the administration has even chosen to ignore this
requirement.
Of the 95 projects recommended by the administration in the
construction account for fiscal year 2011, only 40 had a
benefit-to-cost ratio above the arbitrary 2.5 threshold chosen
for fiscal year 2011. An additional nine projects with benefit-
to-cost ratios of less than 2.5 were included based on
``substantial life saving benefits''. These 49 projects account
for only $570,000,000 or 34 percent of the requested
$1,690,000,000 for construction. That means that the other 46
projects funded at more than $1,100,000,000 were chosen by
other criteria established by the administration. Some of these
criteria, such as dam safety/seepage stability correction and
environmental compliance are criteria where the administration
and the Congress are in agreement. However, other criteria
utilized by the administration are more subjective.
The criteria for determining which studies to budget for
appears to be even murkier than the criteria for determining
which construction projects to fund. What is obvious is the
result. Fewer studies are funded every year than are enacted in
the previous appropriation act. These studies provide the
information needed to make vital investments in our water
resources infrastructure. However, they are de-emphasized in
the budget request.
The Regulatory Program is proposed at $193,000,000 for
fiscal year 2011. This is an increase of $3,000,000 to this
program that provides the funding for the Corps nationwide
regulatory roles primarily under section 404 of the Clean Water
Act and section 10 of the River and Harbor Act of 1899.
The Committee is disappointed that funding for the Formerly
Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program [FUSRAP] was cut by
$4,000,000 from the fiscal year 2010 enacted amount of
$134,000,000. This is a $10,000,000 cut to the program over the
last 2 years. This program was transferred to the Corps from
the Department of Energy, because the Committee was concerned
with management and cost issues of the program within the
Energy Department. This is a program that is being well-managed
by the Corps and should have stable, adequate budget resources
to continue these radiological clean-up activities.
The Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies account is
proposed at $25,000,000 for fiscal year 2011. These funds are
proposed for readiness and preparedness activities for the
Corps of Engineers.
The Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil
Works) is proposed as a separate account for $6,000,000. The
Committee continues to believe that the Assistant Secretary's
office should be funded in the Defense appropriations bill.
However, until such time as that can be reintegrated into that
bill, the Committee agrees that the office should be funded as
a separate account. The Assistant Secretary's duties encompass
much more than the Civil Works functions of the Corps of
Engineers and the budget needs of the office should be
addressed separately.
The General Expenses [GE] account is proposed at
$185,000,000 for fiscal year 2011. This is the same as the
fiscal year 2010 enacted amount. With inflation, this is a cut
to the management and oversight functions of the headquarters
of the Corps. The Committee notes that the Corps operates one
of the most efficient headquarters staffs in the National
Capital region. Only about 3.5 percent of their staffing is at
headquarters as opposed to 10 percent or more for comparable
agencies in the National Capital region.
PLANNING PROGRAM
The Committee is very concerned about the Corps planning
program. The Committee believes that the Corps should have a
robust planning program to not only address new water resource
needs but also to evaluate changes throughout the project
development process. Over the last 10 years, the Committee has
provided more than $1,500,000,000 to the Corps for planning
studies versus just over $1,000,000,000 as proposed by the
administration for the same period.
As this Committee has noted in the past, planning in the
Corps is a specialized skill set and once that ability is lost,
it is difficult to re-establish. Most of the criticisms of the
Corps' project development process in recent years have
centered on problems in the planning process. The Committee has
attempted to maintain consistent planning funding in order to
retain these skills. Even within the meager planning budgets
provided by the administration, some improvements to the
planning program such as the Planning Associates Program and
Planning Centers of Expertise have been initiated. However, the
Planning Centers of Expertise have not been funded to the
extent necessary to develop them into an effective planning
tool. The Committee has provided additional funding for these
centers in fiscal year 2011 and strongly urges the
administration to provide the necessary resources in future
budget submissions.
However, somewhere the planning process is breaking down.
Despite relatively stable planning budgets, the number of
reports by the Chief of Engineers has declined precipitously.
In the run-up to the Water Resources Development Act of 2007,
26 Chief of Engineers' reports were completed in 2005 and 2006.
However since 2007, only six Chief of Engineers' reports have
been completed. Complex planning studies seem to take
unbelievable amounts of time.
A General Reevaluation Report [GRR] of an approximately
$1,250,000,000 flood risk management/environmental restoration
project in the West has been ongoing since 1998 and has
received nearly $30,000,000 in Federal funds to date. According
to the latest schedule, a Chief of Engineers' report is not
expected until late 2012. At the other extreme, in the Upper
Great Plains, a roughly $1,250,000,000 flood risk management
feasibility study was initiated in 2009 and a draft Chief's
report is currently scheduled for December 2010 at a Federal
cost of about $7,000,000. At this rate, the preconstruction
engineering and design on the second study may be completed
before the GRR on the first.
These are just two of the extremes in the planning program
across the Corps Civil Works program. Another problem area is
deep draft navigation. These studies also seem to extend for
unusually long periods of time and suffer from dramatically
increased study costs. Two east coast DOEP draft studies have
been underway for more than 10 years with no end in sight to
the study process. Across the planning spectrum, studies with
shorter schedules are far outweighed by those with unusually
long schedules. While inconsistent funding is a reason for some
drawn out schedules, it is not the only reason. Some planning
efforts seem to go on forever, regardless of the amount of
funding provided.
The Committee understands that the planning process is the
most difficult phase of the project development process and
that a myriad of factors can lengthen or derail a planning
study. However, a planning study that lasts longer than 10
years seems excessive. One would think that studies of this
length would be limited to the largest, most complex projects
that the Corps expects to undertake. Proper planning is
critical to the success of every Corps project; however,
planning for planning's sake leads to frustration with the
planning process.
The Corps is directed to report to this Committee by
September 30, 2010, on ways to improve the planning program to
reduce these extended planning schedules. This report should
address funding needs, process changes, management changes and
other elements required to improve the timeliness of the
planning process.
THE AMERICAN RECOVERY AND REINVESTMENT ACT OF 2009
The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 [ARRA],
enacted on February 17, 2009, was an attempt to combat the
severe economic downturn by putting our citizens back to work
rebuilding our Nation's water resource infrastructure. The
Corps was provided $4,600,000,000 to stimulate job growth by
addressing needed water resource infrastructure needs. The
Corps project list was not approved by the administration until
May 2009. However, even with this delayed start, the Corps has
obligated more than 85 percent of the ARRA funding. More than
44 percent of the funding has gone to small businesses. The
Corps is on track to obligate all of this funding before it
expires on September 30, 2010.
BUDGET JUSTIFICATIONS
The Committee notes that the budget justifications arrived
nearly concurrently with the administration's budget rollout.
This is a considerable improvement over the past 2 years. The
Committee appreciates the traditional layout of the
justifications and notes that information was provided for all
accounts.
INLAND WATERWAY TRUST FUND
The Committee was first made aware of the precipitous
decline of revenues in the Inland Waterway Trust Fund [IWTF]
when the fiscal year 2008 budget was submitted to Congress. At
that time, the Committee was told a legislative proposal would
be forthcoming. It was developed as a part of the fiscal year
2009 budget request. As such, there was no stakeholder
involvement in the proposal. When it was finally presented to
Congress--some 12 months later--it was universally panned by
the navigation industry. The fiscal year 2009 budget request
was predicated on this proposal being enacted. Congress
demurred and indicated that a more equitable proposal was
needed.
The fiscal year 2011 budget repeats the proposal to phase
out the existing fuel tax that funds the IWTF and phase in a
lockage fee. Fortunately, the budget was not predicated on this
proposal being enacted. The administration proposal only
expends existing revenues available in the IWTF and deposits
assumed revenues from the lockage fee into the IWTF to be used
in subsequent years. This is a much more prudent way to budget
with these limited funds.
The Committee is aware of a Government-industry working
group that is working to find acceptable ways to enhance
revenues in the IWTF while providing an overhaul in the way
that IWTF projects are prioritized and budgeted. Much of this
group's work will require legislation to effect the changes
needed to enhance the funding for these projects. The Committee
looks forward to the final product from this working group and
the appropriate authorizing committees of the House of
Representatives and the Senate acting on this proposal.
Until new revenues are introduced into the IWTF, the
Committee will only provide funds for inland waterway projects
that can be accommodated within the approximately $90,000,000
annually that the current fuel tax generates. The Committee has
again included legislative text to prohibit the Corps from
entering into any new continuing contracts for any inland
waterway project until the revenue stream for the IWTF is
enhanced.
It should be noted that the Committee has waited through
four budget cycles for a viable proposal to more robustly fund
the investments that need to be made in the inland waterway
system. The Committee continues to support the current cost-
shared approach for these projects with half of the funds
derived from general revenues and half from the IWTF. However,
the Committee is only willing to wait so long for the
appropriate committees to fulfill their responsibilities and
provide the necessary legislation to resolve this issue.
Ultimately, this Committee may be forced to act in order to
address the serious needs of the inland waterway system.
CONTINUING CONTRACTS AND REPROGRAMMING
The Committee expects the Chief of Engineers to execute the
Civil Works program generally in accordance with congressional
direction. This includes moving individual projects forward in
accordance with the funds annually appropriated. However, the
Committee realizes that many factors outside the Corps' control
may dictate the progress of any given project or study.
The Committee is retaining the reprogramming legislation
provided in the fiscal year 2010 Energy and Water Development
Act.
5-YEAR COMPREHENSIVE BUDGET PLANNING
While the Committee appreciates the Corps' attempts to
provide a meaningful 5-year budget plan, it recognizes the
inherent difficulties between the legislative and executive
branches in preparing a useful plan. The executive branch is
unwilling to project a 5-year horizon for projects for which
they do not budget, leaving a sizeable percentage of the Corps
annual appropriations with a year-to-year event horizon for
planning purposes. The fact that a sizeable portion of the
annual appropriations are dedicated to congressional priorities
is not a new phenomenon. Many major public works projects over
the last two centuries have been funded on an annual basis
without a clear budget strategy. The Committee would welcome
the ideas and the opportunity to work with the executive branch
to determine a mutually agreeable way to develop an integrated
5-year comprehensive budget that displays true funding needs
for congressional as well as administration priorities.
Anything less will only give a partial view of the investments
needed in water resources infrastructure.
DISCLOSURE PROVISIONS
The budget for the Corps of Engineers consists of
individual line items of projects. As presented by the
President, the budget contains 975 specific line-item requests
for directed spending by the administration. Additional funding
is requested by the administration for nationwide line items.
All of these line items were specific requests by the
administration or the Congress to be funded in fiscal year
2011. They did not request these funds programmatically, they
requested them for a specific project in a specific location
for a specific purpose.
All of the projects funded in this report have gone through
the same rigorous public review and approval process as those
proposed for funding by the President. The difference in these
projects, of course, is that the congressionally directed
projects are not subject to the artificial budgetary
prioritization criteria that the administration utilizes to
decide what not to fund.
In the interest of providing full disclosure of funding
provided in the energy and water bill, all disclosures are made
in the report accompanying the bill.
Two tables are provided at the back of this report for
disclosure. The first table provides the congressionally
directed spending items requested by Members of Congress
requiring disclosure under the provisions of Rule 44 of the
Standing Rules of the Senate. If the Member requested the
budget request or if only the budget request was provided,
Member names are not listed next to these items because under
the provisions of Rule 44 this would not be considered
congressionally directed spending. The second table lists the
Presidentially directed spending items. While this table is not
required under the disclosure provisions of Rule 44, the
Committee believes that it is prudent to provide this
additional disclosure information.
The purposes for the funding provided in the various
accounts is described in the paragraphs associated with each
account. The location of the programs, projects, or studies are
denoted in the account tables.
GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS
Appropriations, 2010.................................... $160,000,000
Budget estimate, 2011................................... 104,000,000
Committee recommendation................................ 166,000,000
This appropriation funds studies to determine the need,
engineering feasibility, economic justification, and the
environmental and social suitability of solutions to water and
related land resource problems; and for preconstruction
engineering and design work, data collection, and interagency
coordination and research activities.
The planning program is the entry point for Federal
involvement in solutions to the Nation's water resource
problems and needs. Unfortunately, the General Investigations
[GI] account amount proposed in the budget is generally the
same as what has been proposed in previous budgets. Nationwide
studies and programs consume almost half of the
administration's GI request. This budget asserts that the
Nation should concentrate scarce resources on completing
studies but not carrying forward ongoing studies.
The Committee has provided for a robust and balanced
planning program for fiscal year 2011. However, no new starts
are included in this recommendation. To provide additional
transparency in the budget process, the Committee is pleased
that the administration has maintained the structure of this
account from how it was displayed in the fiscal year 2010
Energy and Water Act.
The first column represents the reconnaissance phase of the
planning process. These studies determine if there is a Federal
interest in a water resource problem or need and if there is a
cost sharing sponsor willing to move forward with the study.
The next column represents the feasibility phase of the study.
These detailed cost-shared studies determine the selected
alternative to be recommended to the Congress for construction.
The third column represents the preconstruction engineering and
design phase. These detailed cost-shared designs are prepared
while the project recommended to Congress is awaiting
authorization for construction.
The Committee believes that by segregating the table in
this manner, more attention will be focused on the various
study phases, and a more balanced planning program will be
developed by the administration. As the last two columns are
generally cost shared, they demonstrate the commitment by cost-
sharing sponsors to be a part of the Federal planning process.
By the same token, it also shows the level of commitment of the
Federal Government to these cost-sharing sponsors.
The budget request and the recommended Committee allowance
are shown on the following table:
CORPS OF ENGINEERS--GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS
[In thousands of dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Budget estimate Committee recommendation
Project title ------------------------------------------------------------------
RECON FEAS PED RECON FEAS PED
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ALASKA
HOMER HARBOR NAVIGATION IMPROVEMENTS, AK..... ......... ......... ......... ......... 300 .........
MATANUSKA RIVER WATERSHED, AK................ ......... 100 ......... ......... 100 .........
VALDEZ NAVIGATION IMPROVEMENTS, AK........... ......... ......... ......... ......... .......... 500
YAKUTAT HARBOR, AK........................... ......... 450 ......... ......... 450 .........
ARKANSAS
LOWER MISSISSIPPI RIVER RESOURCE ASSESSMENT, ......... ......... ......... ......... 150 .........
AR, IL, KY, LA, MS, MO, & TN................
MAY BRANCH, FORT SMITH, AR................... ......... ......... ......... ......... .......... 250
PINE MOUNTAIN DAM, AR........................ ......... ......... ......... ......... .......... 250
WHITE RIVER BASIN COMPREHENSIVE, AR & MO..... ......... ......... ......... ......... 250 .........
WHITE RIVER NAVIGATION TO BATESVILLE, AR..... ......... ......... ......... ......... 200 .........
CALIFORNIA
ALISO CREEK, CA.............................. ......... ......... ......... ......... 250 .........
ARROYO SECO WATERSHED, CA.................... ......... ......... ......... ......... 150 .........
CALIFORNIA COASTAL SEDIMENT MASTER PLAN, CA.. ......... 900 ......... ......... 900 .........
CENTRAL VALLEY INTEGRATED FLOOD MANAGEMENT ......... ......... ......... ......... 500 .........
STUDY, CA...................................
COYOTE AND BERRYESSA CREEKS, CA.............. ......... ......... 500 ......... .......... 500
COYOTE DAM, CA............................... ......... ......... ......... ......... 250 .........
LOS ANGELES COUNTY DRAINAGE AREA (LACDA) ......... ......... ......... ......... 200 .........
WATER CONSERVATION AND SUPPLY, WHITTIER
NARROWS DAM, CA.............................
LOS ANGELES RIVER ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, CA.. ......... ......... ......... ......... 200 .........
LOWER CACHE CREEK, YOLO COUNTY, WOODLAND AND ......... ......... ......... ......... 100 .........
VICINITY, CA................................
LOWER MISSION CREEK, CA...................... ......... ......... ......... ......... .......... 250
MALIBU CREEK WATERSHED, CA................... ......... 210 ......... ......... 210 .........
MATILIJA DAM, CA............................. ......... ......... ......... ......... .......... 100
MERCED COUNTY STREAMS, CA.................... ......... ......... ......... ......... 250 .........
MIDDLE CREEK, CA............................. ......... ......... ......... ......... .......... 400
PAJARO RIVER, CA............................. ......... ......... ......... ......... .......... 300
REDWOOD CITY HARBOR, CA...................... ......... ......... ......... ......... 200 .........
SACRAMENTO RIVER FLOOD CONTROL (GRR), CA ......... ......... ......... ......... 600 .........
(SYSTEM EVALUATION).........................
SAC-SAN JOAQUIN DELTA, DELTA ISLANDS AND ......... 468 ......... ......... 750 .........
LEVEES, CA..................................
SAN DIEGO COUNTY SHORELINE, CA (OCEANSIDE)... ......... ......... ......... ......... 200 .........
SAN FRANCISQUITO CREEK, CA................... ......... ......... ......... ......... 300 .........
SAN JOAQUIN RIVER BASIN, FRAZIER CREEK, CA... ......... ......... ......... ......... 150 .........
SAN JOAQUIN RIVER BASIN, LOWER SAN JOAQUIN ......... ......... ......... ......... 500 .........
RIVER, CA...................................
SAN JOAQUIN RIVER BASIN, WEST STANISLAUS ......... ......... ......... ......... 223 .........
COUNTY, ORESTIMBA CREEK, CA.................
SAN JOAQUIN RIVER BASIN, WHITE RIVER AND DRY ......... ......... ......... ......... 150 .........
CREEK, CA...................................
SANTA CLARA RIVER WATERSHED, CA.............. ......... ......... ......... ......... 250 .........
SOLANA-ENCINITAS SHORELINE, CA............... ......... 307 ......... ......... 307 .........
SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO SHORELINE, CA............ ......... ......... ......... ......... 500 .........
ST HELENA-NAPA RIVER, CA..................... ......... ......... ......... ......... 150 .........
SUN VALLEY WATERSHED, CA..................... ......... ......... ......... ......... 200 .........
SUTTER COUNTY, CA............................ ......... 339 ......... ......... 339 .........
TIJUANA RIVER ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, CA.. ......... ......... ......... 50 .......... .........
UPPER PENITENCIA CREEK, CA................... ......... 177 ......... ......... 177 .........
WESTMINSTER, EAST GARDEN GROVE, CA........... ......... ......... ......... ......... 279 .........
COLORADO
CACHE LA POUDRE RIVER BASIN, GREELEY, CO..... ......... ......... ......... ......... 150 .........
CHATFIELD REALLOCATION STUDY, CO............. ......... ......... ......... ......... 267 .........
ADAMS AND DENVER COUNTIES, CO................ ......... ......... ......... 50 .......... .........
CONNECTICUT
WESTCHESTER COUNTY STREAMS, BYRAM RIVER FLOOD ......... 200 ......... ......... 300 .........
REDUCTION, CT & NY..........................
CONNECTICUT RIVER ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, CT, ......... ......... ......... ......... 350 .........
MA, NH & VT.................................
DELAWARE
RED CLAY CREEK, CHRISTINA RIVER WATERSHED, DE ......... ......... ......... ......... 100 .........
FLORIDA
CANAVERAL HARBOR, FL......................... ......... ......... ......... ......... 500 .........
FLAGLER COUNTY, FL........................... ......... ......... ......... ......... 287 .........
LAKE WORTH INLET, PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL...... ......... 340 ......... ......... 340 .........
MILE POINT, FL............................... ......... ......... ......... ......... 375 100
SARASOTA, LIDO KEY BEACH, FL................. ......... ......... ......... ......... .......... 250
WALTON COUNTY, FL............................ ......... ......... ......... ......... .......... 250
GEORGIA
AUGUSTA, GA.................................. ......... 578 ......... ......... 578 .........
SAVANNAH HARBOR EXPANSION, GA................ ......... ......... 600 ......... .......... 600
TYBEE ISLAND, GA............................. ......... 200 ......... ......... 200 .........
HAWAII
ALA WAI CANAL, OAHU, HI...................... ......... 408 ......... ......... 408 .........
HILO HARBOR MODIFICATIONS, HI................ ......... ......... ......... ......... 300 .........
WEST MAUI WATERSHED, MAUI, HI................ ......... ......... ......... ......... 100 .........
ILLINOIS
DES PLAINES RIVER, IL (PHASE II)............. ......... 500 ......... ......... 500 .........
ILLINOIS RIVER BASIN RESTORATION, IL......... ......... 400 ......... ......... 750 .........
INTERBASIN CONTROL OF GREAT LAKES-MISSISSIPPI ......... 400 ......... ......... 750 .........
RIVER AQUATIC NUISANCE SPECIES, IL, IN, OH,
WI..........................................
PRAIRIE DUPONT LEVEE AND SANITARY DISTRICT ......... ......... ......... ......... 850 .........
AND FISH LAKE DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT,
IL..........................................
UPPER MISS RIVER COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IL, IA, ......... ......... ......... 750 .......... .........
MO, MN & WI.................................
UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER-ILLINOIS WW SYSTEM, ......... ......... ......... ......... .......... 4,000
IL, IA, MN, MO & WI.........................
INDIANA
INDIANA HARBOR, IN........................... ......... ......... 300 ......... .......... 300
IOWA
CEDAR RIVER, CEDAR RAPIDS, IA................ ......... ......... ......... ......... 700 3,000
HUMBOLDT, IA................................. ......... ......... ......... ......... 175 .........
KANSAS
BRUSH CREEK BASIN, KS & MO................... ......... ......... ......... ......... 200 .........
MANHATTAN, KS................................ ......... ......... ......... ......... 300 .........
TOPEKA, KS................................... ......... ......... 100 ......... .......... 500
UPPER TURKEY CREEK, KS....................... ......... ......... ......... ......... .......... 90
LOUISIANA
AMITE RIVER--ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, LA....... ......... ......... ......... ......... 250 .........
BAYOU SORREL LOCK, LA........................ ......... ......... 2,000 ......... .......... 2,000
BOSSIER PARISH, LA........................... ......... ......... ......... ......... 250 .........
CALCASIEU LOCK, LA........................... ......... 1,000 ......... ......... 1,000 .........
CALCASIEU RIVER BASIN, LA.................... ......... ......... ......... ......... .......... 250
CROSS LAKE, LA............................... ......... ......... ......... ......... 50 .........
LOUISIANA COASTAL AREA ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, ......... 16,595 ......... ......... 16,595 .........
LA..........................................
PORT OF IBERIA, LA........................... ......... ......... ......... ......... .......... 1,000
SOUTHWEST COASTAL LOUISIANA HURRICANE ......... ......... ......... ......... 1,000 .........
PROTECTION, LA..............................
ST CHARLES PARISH URBAN FLOOD CONTROL, LA.... ......... ......... ......... ......... 350 .........
WEST SHORE-LAKE PONTCHARTRAIN, LA............ ......... ......... ......... ......... 350 .........
MAINE
SEARSPORT HARBOR, ME......................... ......... ......... ......... ......... 300 .........
MARYLAND
ANACOSTIA RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, MD & DC ......... 183 ......... ......... 183 .........
(COMPREHENSIVE PLAN)........................
ANACOSTIA RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, PRINCE ......... ......... ......... ......... 250 .........
GEORGE'S COUNTY LEVEE, MD & DC..............
BALTIMORE METROPOLITAN WATER RESOURCES, MD... ......... ......... ......... 50 .......... .........
CHESAPEAKE BAY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, MD & VA... ......... ......... ......... ......... 150 .........
CHESAPEAKE BAY MARSHLANDS, MD................ ......... ......... ......... 50 .......... .........
CHESAPEAKE BAY SUSQUEHANNA RESERVOIR SEDIMENT ......... ......... ......... ......... 250 .........
MANAGEMENT, PA, MD & VA.....................
EASTERN SHORE, MID-CHESAPEAKE BAY ISLAND, MD. ......... ......... 483 ......... .......... 169
MIDDLE POTOMAC COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, MD, VA, ......... ......... ......... ......... 68 .........
PA, WV & DC.................................
SUSQUEHANNA RIVER BASIN ENVIRONMENTAL ......... ......... ......... ......... 250 .........
RESTORATION AND LOW FLOW MANAGEMENT, NY, PA
& MD........................................
MASSACHUSETTS
BOSTON HARBOR (45-FOOT CHANNEL), MA.......... ......... ......... ......... ......... 1,800 .........
PILGRIM LAKE, TRURO & PROVINCETOWN, MA....... ......... 100 ......... ......... 100 .........
MICHIGAN
CLINTON RIVER RIPARIAN CORRIDOR, MI.......... ......... ......... ......... ......... 100 .........
ECORSE CREEK, MI............................. ......... ......... ......... ......... .......... 200
GREAT LAKES NAVIGATION SYSTEM STUDY, MI, IL, 400 ......... ......... 400 .......... .........
IN, MN, NY, OH, PA & WI.....................
GREAT LAKES REMEDIAL ACTION PLANS & SEDIMENT ......... ......... ......... ......... 500 .........
REMEDIATION, MI, IL, IN, MN, NY, OH, PA & WI
LANSING GRAND RIVER WATERFRONT RESTORATION, ......... ......... ......... ......... 150 .........
MI..........................................
MINNESOTA
MINNESOTA RIVER WATERSHED STUDY, MN & SD..... ......... 350 ......... ......... 350 .........
MISSISSIPPI
PEARL RIVER WATERSHED, MS.................... ......... ......... ......... ......... 200 .........
MISSOURI
KANSAS CITYS, MO & KS........................ ......... 500 ......... ......... 500 .........
MISSOURI RIVER DEGRADATION, MO & KS.......... ......... 600 ......... ......... 600 .........
MISSOURI RIVER LEVEE SYSTEM, UNITS L-455 & R ......... ......... ......... ......... .......... 150
460-471, MO & KS............................
RIVER DES PERES, MO.......................... ......... ......... ......... ......... .......... 45
MONTANA
YELLOWSTONE RIVER CORRIDOR, MT............... ......... 200 ......... ......... 500 .........
NEVADA
TRUCKEE MEADOWS, NV.......................... ......... ......... ......... ......... .......... 4,500
NEW HAMPSHIRE
MERRIMACK RIVER WATERSHED STUDY, NH & MA..... ......... 200 ......... ......... 200 .........
PORTSMOUTH HARBOR AND PISCATAQUA RIVER ......... ......... ......... ......... .......... 150
TURNING BASIN, NH...........................
NEW JERSEY
DELAWARE RIVER BASIN COMPREHENSIVE, NJ....... ......... 290 ......... ......... 290 .........
HUDSON-RARITAN ESTUARY, HACKENSACK ......... 200 ......... ......... 200 .........
MEADOWLANDS, NJ.............................
HUDSON-RARITAN ESTUARY, LOWER PASSAIC RIVER, ......... 200 ......... ......... 200 .........
NJ..........................................
LOWER SADDLE RIVER, NJ....................... ......... ......... ......... ......... .......... 200
NEW JERSEY SHORE PROTECTION, HEREFORD INLET ......... ......... ......... ......... 250 .........
TO CAPE MAY INLET, NJ.......................
NEW JERSEY SHORELINE ALTERNATIVE LONG-TERM ......... ......... ......... ......... 200 .........
NOURISHMENT, NJ.............................
PASSAIC RIVER MAIN STEM, NJ & NY............. ......... ......... ......... ......... 125 .........
PASSAIC RIVER, HARRISON, NJ.................. ......... ......... ......... ......... .......... 160
PECKMAN RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, NJ............ ......... ......... ......... ......... 620 .........
RAHWAY RIVER BASIN, NJ....................... ......... ......... ......... ......... 250 .........
RARITAN BAY AND SANDY HOOK BAY, HIGHLANDS, NJ ......... ......... ......... ......... 207 .........
RARITAN BAY AND SANDY HOOK BAY, LEONARDO, NJ. ......... ......... ......... ......... 100 .........
RARITAN BAY AND SANDY HOOK BAY, UNION BEACH, ......... ......... ......... ......... .......... 125
NJ..........................................
SOUTH RIVER, RARITAN RIVER BASIN, NJ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... .......... 200
STONY BROOK, MILLSTONE RIVER BASIN, NJ....... ......... ......... ......... ......... 250 .........
NEW MEXICO
ESPANOLA VALLEY, RIO GRANDE AND TRIBUTARIES, ......... ......... ......... ......... 250 .........
NM..........................................
RIO GRANDE BASIN, NM, CO AND TX (SECTION 729) ......... 500 ......... ......... 500 .........
NEW YORK
DUTCHESS COUNTY WATERSHEDS, NY............... ......... ......... ......... ......... 100 .........
FORGE RIVER WATERSHED, NY.................... ......... ......... ......... ......... 400 .........
HUDSON-RARITAN ESTUARY, NY & NJ.............. ......... 200 ......... ......... 200 .........
JAMAICA BAY, MARINE PARK AND PLUMB BEACH, NY. ......... ......... 170 ......... .......... 170
LAKE MONTAUK HARBOR, NY...................... ......... 172 ......... ......... 172 .........
NORTH SHORE OF LONG ISLAND, ASHAROKEN, NY.... ......... ......... ......... ......... 100 .........
SOUTH SHORE OF STATEN ISLAND, NY............. ......... ......... ......... ......... 250 .........
TEN MILE RIVER, DUTCHESS COUNTY, NY AND ......... ......... ......... ......... 100 .........
LITCHFIELD COUNTY, CT.......................
NORTH CAROLINA
CURRITUCK SOUND, NC.......................... ......... 300 ......... ......... 300 .........
NEUSE RIVER BASIN, NC........................ ......... ......... 200 ......... .......... 200
NORTH CAROLINA INTERNATIONAL TERMINAL, NC.... 104 ......... ......... 11 393 .........
SURF CITY AND NORTH TOPSAIL BEACH, NC........ ......... 300 ......... ......... 300 .........
NORTH DAKOTA
FARGO-MOORHEAD METRO STUDY, ND & MN (RRN ......... 150 15,000 ......... 150 15,000
BASIN AUTHORITY)............................
FARGO-MOORHEAD UPSTREAM STUDY, ND & MN (RRN ......... ......... ......... ......... 200 .........
BASIN AUTHORITY)............................
JAMES RIVER, ND.............................. ......... ......... ......... ......... 150 .........
RED RIVER OF THE NORTH BASIN, ND, MN, SD & ......... 433 ......... ......... 1,896 .........
MANITOBA, CANADA............................
MISSOURI RIVER, ND, MT, SD, NE, IA, KS & MO.. ......... ......... ......... ......... 5,000 .........
SHEYENNE RIVER, ND........................... ......... ......... ......... ......... 150 .........
OHIO
WESTERN LAKE ERIE BASIN, OH, IN, & MI........ ......... ......... ......... ......... 2,000 .........
OKLAHOMA
ARKANSAS RIVER CORRIDOR, OK.................. ......... ......... ......... ......... 1,650 .........
GRAND (NEOSHO) RIVER BASIN WATERSHED, OK, KS, ......... ......... ......... ......... 190 .........
MO & AR.....................................
SOUTHEAST OKLAHOMA WATER RESOURCE STUDY, OK.. ......... ......... ......... ......... 325 .........
WASHITA RIVER BASIN, OK...................... ......... ......... ......... ......... 325 .........
OREGON
LOWER COLUMBIA RIVER ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, ......... 300 ......... ......... 300 .........
OR & WA.....................................
WALLA WALLA WATERSHED, OR & WA............... ......... ......... ......... ......... .......... 500
WILLAMETTE RIVER ENVIRONMENTAL DREDGING, OR.. ......... 220 ......... ......... 220 .........
WILLAMETTE RIVER FLOODPLAIN RESTORATION, OR.. ......... ......... 153 ......... .......... 153
PENNSYLVANIA
BLOOMSBURG, PA............................... ......... ......... ......... ......... .......... 500
DELAWARE RIVER DREDGED MATERIAL UTILIZATION, ......... ......... ......... ......... 200 .........
PA, DE & NJ.................................
SCHUYLKILL RIVER BASIN, WISSAHICKON ......... 214 ......... ......... 214 .........
WATERSHED, PA...............................
UPPER OHIO NAVIGATION SYSTEM STUDY, PA....... ......... 749 ......... ......... 1,200 .........
WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION, ......... ......... ......... 4 ..........
PA..........................................
SOUTH CAROLINA
EDISTO ISLAND, SC............................ ......... 114 ......... ......... 114 .........
TENNESSEE
MILL CREEK WATERSHED, DAVIDSON COUNTY, TN.... ......... 50 ......... ......... 50 .........
TEXAS
ABILENE, TX (BRAZOS RIVER BASIN-ELM CREEK)... ......... ......... ......... ......... 200 .........
BRAZOS ISLAND HARBOR, BROWNSVILLE CHANNEL, TX ......... 726 ......... ......... 726 .........
DALLAS FLOODWAY, UPPER TRINITY RIVER BASIN, ......... 700 ......... ......... 2,300 .........
TX..........................................
GIWW, HIGH ISLAND TO BRAZOS RIVER ......... 200 ......... ......... 200 .........
REALIGNMENTS, TX............................
GUADALUPE AND SAN ANTONIO RIVER BASINS, TX... ......... 600 ......... ......... 600 .........
LOWER COLORADO RIVER BASIN, TX............... ......... 425 ......... ......... 425 .........
NUECES RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, TX............. ......... 250 ......... ......... 250 .........
SABINE PASS TO GALVESTON BAY, TX............. ......... 200 ......... ......... 200 .........
SABINE-NECHES WATERWAY, TX................... ......... ......... ......... ......... .......... 400
SPARKS ARROYO COLONIA, EL PASO COUNTY, TX.... ......... ......... ......... ......... 200 .........
VIRGINIA
CHOWAN RIVER, VA & NC........................ ......... ......... ......... 124 .......... .........
CLINCH RIVER WATERSHED, VA................... ......... ......... ......... ......... 200 .........
DISMAL SWAMP & DISMAL SWAMP CANAL, VA........ ......... ......... ......... ......... 22 .........
FOUR MILE RUN, VA............................ ......... ......... ......... ......... 53 .........
GATHRIGHT DAM AND LAKE MOOMAW, VA............ ......... ......... ......... ......... 200 .........
JOHN H KERR DAM & RESERVOIR, VA & NC (SEC ......... 300 ......... ......... 300 .........
216)........................................
LYNNHAVEN RIVER BASIN, VIRGINIA BEACH, VA.... ......... ......... 50 ......... .......... 50
NEW RIVER, CLAYTOR LAKE, VA.................. ......... ......... ......... ......... 150 .........
UPPER RAPPAHANNOCK RIVER BASIN, VA........... ......... 200 ......... ......... 200 .........
WASHINGTON
CENTRALIA, CHEHALIS RIVER, LEWIS COUNTY, WA.. ......... ......... ......... ......... 500 .........
CHEHALIS RIVER BASIN, WA..................... ......... ......... ......... ......... 500 .........
ELLIOT BAY SEAWALL, WA....................... ......... ......... ......... ......... 500 .........
MT. ST. HELENS............................... ......... 225 ......... ......... 225 .........
PUGET SOUND NEARSHORE MARINE HABITAT ......... 400 ......... ......... 400 .........
RESTORATION, WA.............................
PUYALLUP RIVER, WA........................... ......... ......... ......... ......... 450 .........
SKAGIT RIVER, WA............................. ......... ......... ......... ......... 1,137 .........
SKOKOMISH RIVER BASIN, WA.................... ......... ......... ......... ......... 300 .........
WEST VIRGINIA
OHIO RIVER BASIN COMPREHENSIVE STUDY, WV, KY, ......... ......... ......... ......... 3,000 .........
OH, PA, IL, IN, VA, AL, TN, NY, MD, NC, MS &
GA..........................................
------------------------------------------------------------------
SUBTOTAL PROJECTS LISTED UNDER STATES.. 504 34,323 19,556 1,489 77,840 37,762
==================================================================
NATIONAL PROGRAMS
COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA:
AUTOMATED INFORMATION SYSTEM SUPPORT TRI- ......... 350 ......... ......... 350 .........
CADD....................................
COASTAL FIELD DATA COLLECTION............ ......... 1,400 ......... ......... 3,400 .........
ENVIRONMENTAL DATA STUDIES............... ......... 75 ......... ......... 75 .........
FLOOD DAMAGE DATA PROGRAM................ ......... 220 ......... ......... 220 .........
FLOOD PLAIN MANAGEMENT SERVICES.......... ......... 8,000 ......... ......... 11,000 .........
DELAWARE DAM SAFETY, DE.............. ......... ......... ......... ......... (250) .........
NUUANU (OAHU), HI.................... ......... ......... ......... ......... (200) .........
WAIOHULI GULCH (MAUI), HI............ ......... ......... ......... ......... (200) .........
WAIMEA (KAUAI), HI................... ......... ......... ......... ......... (200) .........
ANAHOLA (KAUAI), HI.................. ......... ......... ......... ......... (200) .........
HURRICANE EVACUATION STUDIES, HI..... ......... ......... ......... ......... (300) .........
DES MOINES RIVER REGULATED FREQUENCY ......... ......... ......... ......... (80) .........
CURVE AND SAYLORVILLE AND RED ROCK
RESERVOIRS POOL ELEVATION FREQUENCY
ESTIMATES, IA.......................
IOWA LIDAR, IA....................... ......... ......... ......... ......... (100) .........
URBAN LEVEE EVALUATIONS, MUSCATINE, ......... ......... ......... ......... (60) .........
IA..................................
WICHITA AREA DRAINAGE MASTER PLAN, KS ......... ......... ......... ......... (300) .........
CHITIMACHA TRIBE OF LOUISIANA, LA ......... ......... ......... ......... (400) .........
[GIS]...............................
CITY OF ALEXANDRIA, LA [GIS]......... ......... ......... ......... ......... (400) .........
EAST BATON ROUGE PARISH, LA [GIS].... ......... ......... ......... ......... (200) .........
LIVINGSTON PARISH, LA [GIS].......... ......... ......... ......... ......... (500) .........
AU TRAIN, MI......................... ......... ......... ......... ......... (75) .........
PAPILLION CREEK WATERSHED, NE........ ......... ......... ......... ......... (430) .........
OTERO COUNTY, NM..................... ......... ......... ......... ......... (100) .........
SOUTHEASTERN, PA..................... ......... ......... ......... ......... (250) .........
ABINGDON, VA......................... ......... ......... ......... ......... (55) .........
HYDROLOGIC STUDIES....................... ......... 250 ......... ......... 250 .........
INTERNATIONAL WATER STUDIES.............. ......... 200 ......... ......... 200 .........
PRECIPITATION STUDIES (NATIONAL WEATHER ......... 225 ......... ......... 225 .........
SERVICE)................................
REMOTE SENSING/GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION ......... 150 ......... ......... 150 .........
SYSTEM SUPPORT..........................
SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL INFORMATION ......... 50 ......... ......... 50 .........
CENTERS.................................
STREAM GAGING (U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY)... ......... 600 ......... ......... 600 .........
TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM.................... ......... 350 ......... ......... 350 .........
COORDINATION WITH OTHER AGENCIES:
ACCESS TO WATER DATA..................... ......... 750 ......... ......... 750 .........
COMMITTEE ON MARINE TRANSPORTATION ......... 100 ......... ......... 100 .........
SYSTEMS.................................
OTHER COORDINATION PROGRAMS:
CALFED............................... ......... 100 ......... ......... 100 .........
CHESAPEAKE BAY PROGRAM............... ......... 75 ......... ......... 75 .........
COORDINATION WITH OTHER AGENCIES..... ......... 200 ......... ......... 200 .........
GULF OF MEXICO....................... ......... 100 ......... ......... 100 .........
INTERAGENCY AND INTERNATIONAL SUPPORT ......... 700 ......... ......... 700 .........
INTERAGENCY WATER RESOURCE ......... 955 ......... ......... 955 .........
DEVELOPMENT.........................
INVENTORY OF DAMS.................... ......... 400 ......... ......... 400 .........
LAKE TAHOE........................... ......... 100 ......... ......... 1,000 .........
NATIONAL ESTUARY PROGRAM............. ......... 50 ......... ......... 50 .........
NORTH AMERICAN WATERFOWL MANAGEMENT.. ......... 50 ......... ......... 50 .........
PACIFIC NW FOREST CASE............... ......... 50 ......... ......... 50 .........
SPECIAL INVESTIGATIONS............... ......... 1,550 ......... ......... 1,550 .........
PLANNING ASSISTANCE TO STATES............ ......... 7,000 ......... ......... 9,000 .........
AUGUSTA RIVERFRONT DEVELOPMENT, AR... ......... ......... ......... ......... (50) .........
DELAWARE DAM SAFETY, DE.............. ......... ......... ......... ......... (250) .........
SUSUPE/CHALAN KANOA DRAINAGE PLAN ......... ......... ......... ......... (160) .........
(CNMI)..............................
PALA LAGOON (AMERICAN SAMOA)......... ......... ......... ......... ......... (200) .........
CLIMATE CHANGE VULNERABILITY AND RISK ......... ......... ......... ......... (250) .........
ASSESSMENT, HI......................
HE'EIA WATERSHED, HI................. ......... ......... ......... ......... (100) .........
PALMYRA ATOLL........................ ......... ......... ......... ......... (100) .........
STATE OF HAWAII GENERAL FLOOD CONTROL ......... ......... ......... ......... (190) .........
PLAN UPDATE.........................
GREENWAYS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, DES ......... ......... ......... ......... (100) .........
MOINES, IA..........................
LOWER NISHNABOTNA RIVER BASIN, IA.... ......... ......... ......... ......... (100) .........
MIDDLE AMANA, IA..................... ......... ......... ......... ......... (74) .........
SHUNGANUNGA CREEK, KS................ ......... ......... ......... ......... (100) .........
CHOCTAW COUNTY RESERVOIR, MS......... ......... ......... ......... ......... (50) .........
JONES COUNTY RESERVOIR, MS........... ......... ......... ......... ......... (450) .........
GENESEE RIVER SEDIMENT STUDY, NY..... ......... ......... ......... ......... (250) .........
OKLAHOMA COMPREHENSIVE WATER PLAN, OK ......... ......... ......... ......... (500) .........
DRIFT CREEK RESERVOIR PROJECT, OR.... ......... ......... ......... ......... (20) .........
OTHER:
FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT (FEMA/MAP MOD ......... 2,000 ......... ......... 2,000 .........
COORDINATION)...........................
INDEPENDENT PEER REVIEW.................. ......... 700 ......... ......... 700 .........
NATIONAL SHORELINE STUDY................. ......... 375 ......... ......... 375 .........
PLANNING SUPPORT PROGRAM................. ......... 2,100 ......... ......... 3,000 .........
TRIBAL PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM............... ......... 1,000 ......... ......... 1,600 .........
WATER RESOURCES PRINCIPLES AND GUIDELINES ......... 500 ......... ......... 500 .........
WATER RESOURCES PRIORITY STUDY........... ......... 2,000 ......... ......... .......... .........
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT..................... ......... ......... ......... ......... 5,000 .........
BASIC RESEARCH........................... ......... 1,689 ......... ......... 1,689 .........
ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT AND RESTORATION..... ......... 2,597 ......... ......... 2,597 .........
FLOOD AND COASTAL SYSTEMS................ ......... 2,714 ......... ......... 2,714 .........
NAVIGATION SYSTEMS RESEARCH.............. ......... 3,439 ......... ......... 3,439 .........
SUBMERGED AQUATIC VEGETATION, MD & VA.... ......... ......... ......... ......... 1,000 .........
SYSTEM-WIDE WATER RESOURCES.............. ......... 6,083 ......... ......... 6,083 .........
URBAN FLOOD DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM, DRI, ......... ......... ......... ......... 2,000 .........
NV......................................
WATER RESOURCE INFRASTRUCTURE (FLD & CSTL ......... 370 ......... ......... 370 .........
SYS)....................................
------------------------------------------------------------------
SUBTOTAL NATIONAL PROGRAMS............. ......... 49,617 ......... ......... 65,017 .........
==================================================================
TOTAL.................................. 504 83,940 19,556 1,489 142,857 37,762
SAVINGS AND SLIPPAGE......................... ......... ......... ......... ......... -16,108 .........
==================================================================
GRAND TOTAL............................ ......... 104,000 ......... ......... 166,000 .........
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Harbor Modification, Alaska.--The Committee
recommends $300,000 to continue feasibility studies of a new
harbor basin. The current harbor basin at the Port and Harbor
of Homer is utilized beyond its capacity, with boats rafting
three and four abreast at many locations in the harbor.
Additionally, Homer is experiencing more demand every year for
servicing larger fishing vessels, as a delivery port for these
vessels to sell their catch, acquire ice, effect repairs, and
for outfitting and provisioning as well as lay up between
seasons.
Valdez Harbor Expansion, Alaska.--The Committee
recommendation includes $500,000 to continue preconstruction
engineering and design studies. Rafting during the commercial
fishing season has been reported up to eight boats deep on a
regular basis. The problem is highly seasonal, requiring a
large need for transient space primarily during the summer
months.
May Branch, Arkansas.--Flooding causes an estimated
$1,800,000 in average annual damages. The proposed project
would remove 127 structures from the 100-year floodplain,
decrease expected annual flood damage by more than 96 percent,
reduce highway and railroad traffic interruptions, and decrease
the threat of loss of life attendant to flash flooding in urban
settings. The Committee recommends $250,000 is provided to
continue preconstruction engineering and design.
Middle Creek, California.--The Committee recommends
$400,000 for preconstruction engineering and design studies.
Clear Lake is the largest natural lake entirely within the
borders of California. The project would restore the natural
functions of the Middle Creek/Clear Lake ecosystem and
contribute to the goals of the North American Waterfowl
Management Plan.
Chatfield Lake Reallocation Study, Colorado.--The Committee
recommendation includes $267,000 to complete the feasibility
studies on reallocation a portion of the flood control storage
in the lake to water supply.
Connecticut River Ecosystem Restoration, Connecticut,
Massachusetts, New Hampshire, and Vermont.--The Committee
recommends $350,000 for feasibility studies to identify and
evaluate measures to reduce stream bank erosion, restore
anadramous fisheries migratory corridors and spawning habitat,
restore degraded wetlands and riverine habitat and improve the
overall fish and wildlife habitat of the Connecticut River. The
study will also identify opportunities to modify the management
of the dams and water systems to address ecological concerns
while maintaining their intended purposes.
Mile Point, Florida.--The Committee recommendation includes
$475,000 to complete feasibility studies and initiate
preconstruction engineering and design studies to determine the
source of erosion along the Mile Point shoreline and identify
solutions to which velocities in the area restrict deep draft
navigation to Jacksonville Harbor.
Walton County, Florida.--The Committee recommendation
includes $250,000 to initiate preconstruction engineering and
design activities. This project is a test bed for the Institute
of Water Resources Hurricane and Storm Damage Reduction model.
Interbasin Control of Great Lakes--Mississippi River
Aquatic Nuisance Species, Illinois, Indiana, Ohio, Wisconsin.--
The Committee has included $750,000 for these studies. Within
the funds provided, the Committee expects the Corps to include
interim studies providing the costs and benefits of hydrologic
separation of the Great Lakes watershed from the Mississippi
River watershed. Alternatives that would provide cost-effective
means to prohibit interbasin transfer of species should be
investigated while allowing current projects to continue to
provide the benefits of flood control, transportation savings,
and recreation uses of the current system.
Prairie Dupont Levee, Illinois.--The Committee recommends
$190,000 for the feasibility study to assess the potential for
reconstruction of deteriorated features such as gates and
culverts. The recommendation also includes $660,000 for the
deficiency correction preconstruction engineering and design
studies to investigate solutions such as rehabilitation/
replacement of existing relief wells and the construction of
additional relief wells.
Upper Mississippi River--Illinois Waterway Navigation
System, Illinois, Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, and Wisconsin.--
The Committee recommendation includes $4,000,000 for
continuation of preconstruction engineering and design studies.
The Committee recognizes the need to modernize this more than
60-year-old navigation system and has provided continued
funding for both structural design and environmental
restoration work.
Louisiana Coastal Area Ecosystem Restoration, Louisiana.--
The Committee recommends $16,595,000 for these important
studies. The Committee notes that the Science activities are
included within the overall line item rather than being
budgeted separately.
Chesapeake Bay, Susquehanna Reservoir Sediment Management,
Maryland, Pennsylvania and Virginia.--It has been estimated
that 280 million tons of sediment originating from the
Susquehanna River watershed are trapped behind the four
hydroelectric dams located on the Lower Susquehanna River
between Havre de Grace, Maryland, and Harrisburg, Pennsylvania.
Three of the four dams Holtwood, Safe Harbor, and York Haven
have reached steady state. It is estimated that the Conowingo
Dam will cease to have trapping capacity in 15 to 20 years.
Once this last reservoir reaches steady state, the sediment
input to the bay may increase dramatically. The Committee
recommendation includes $250,000 to initiate feasibility
studies to examine the impact of the Lower Susquehanna River
Dams on sediment transport into the Bay.
Boston Harbor (45-foot channel), Massachusetts.--The
Committee recommendation includes $1,800,000 to continue
studies for this harbor deepening project. The Committee notes
that the feasibility phase of this study was initiated in June
2002. Study costs have increased from $3,500,000 to the current
$6,500,000 while project construction still seems to be years
away. This is another example of the extended planning studies
that the Corps must resolve.
Great Lakes Remedial Action Plans and Sediment Remediation,
Michigan, Illinois, Indiana, Minnesota, New York, Ohio,
Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin.--The Committee recommendation
includes $500,000 for these remedial action plans to include
studies on the Black, Cuyahoga and Maumee Rivers, Ohio.
Peckman River and Tributaries, New Jersey.--The Committee
recommends $620,000 to complete the feasibility studies of this
flood risk management and environmental restoration of the
watershed.
Western Lake Erie Basin, Ohio, Indiana, and Michigan.--The
feasibility studies will provide a framework for sustainable
development in the watershed by examining ecosystem restoration
including habitat and wetland restoration, prevention of future
environmental losses, elimination of bacterial loadings and
pollutants of concern, improvements to navigation channels, and
analysis of flood control operations to ensure that they are
meeting evolving conditions. Within the funds recommended, work
should continue on the Blanchard River Multipurpose Feasibility
Study.
Upper Ohio Navigation Study, Pennsylvania.--The Committee
recommends $1,200,000 to continue feasibility studies to
evaluate alternatives to maintain safe, reliable, efficient,
and environmentally sustainable navigation on the Upper Ohio
River.
Sabine-Neches Waterway, Texas.--The Committee
recommendation includes $400,000 to initiate preconstruction
engineering and design efforts for navigation modifications up
to the Port of Beaumont to improve the efficiency and safety of
navigation on the waterway.
Skagit River, Washington.--The Committee recommendation
includes $1,137,000 to continue feasibility studies for flood
risk management in the cities of Mount Vernon, Burlington, and
La Conner in Skagit County, Washington.
Coastal Field Data Collection.--The Committee has
recommended $3,400,000 for this nationwide program. In addition
to budgeted funds of $1,400,000, $1,000,000 has been included
for Surge and Wave Island Modeling Studies, Hawaii and
$1,000,000 for the Pacific Island Land Ocean Typhoon Experiment
Program. The Wave Data Study should also be continued within
this overall funding amount. The Committee notes that the
Coastal Data Information Program has been moved to a new line
item in the Operation and Maintenance account under the
remaining items.
Flood Plain Management Services Program.--The Committee
recommendation includes $11,000,000. The Committee has provided
a listing in the table of projects that should be given
priority if cost sharing funds are available from the local
sponsors. However, the Corps should view these amounts as
guides and reprogram funds as appropriate to move these studies
forward as rapidly as possible.
Planning Assistance to States.--The Committee
recommendation includes $9,000,000 for this nationwide cost-
shared program. The Committee recognizes that there are
hundreds of these studies ongoing at any given time. The
Committee has provided a listing in the table of projects that
should be given priority if cost-sharing funds are available
from the local sponsors. However, the Corps should view these
amounts as guides and reprogram funds as appropriate to move
these studies forward as rapidly as possible.
Planning Support Program.--The Committee recommendation
includes $900,000 over the budget request. As the Committee has
noted in the introduction, the Corps has a number of Planning
Centers of Expertise, however, these Centers do not have the
resources necessary to make them truly effective. The
additional funds provided should be utilized to ensure the
effectiveness of these Centers and the Corps is urged to budget
necessary resources in future budgets to ensure that these
Centers of Expertise remain viable assets for the Corps'
planning program.
Tribal Partnership Program.--Within the funds provided
studies with tribes in New Mexico and with the Lower Brule
Sioux Tribe in South Dakota should be undertaken.
Water Resources Priorities Study.--No funds are provided
for this study as proposed by the administration.
Research and Development.--The Committee has recommended
$24,892,000 for the Corps nationwide research and development
programs. The Committee believes that this is an important area
of the Corps' program that should be supported and has
recommended $5,000,000 above the budget request. The Committee
believes that some of this additional funding should be applied
to global climate change research initiated in fiscal year 2010
particularly concentrating on the effects of sea level rise.
The Committee has also recommended $1,000,000 to continue
submerged aquatic vegetation research in the Chesapeake Bay and
$2,000,000 to continue the Urban Flood Demonstration Program in
cooperation with the Desert Research Institute.
National Shoreline Study.--The Committee recommends an
additional $375,000 for the national Planning Center of
Expertise for Coastal Storm Damage Reduction for continuing to
develop a process for managing shore protection projects as
part of a systems approach to coastal protection for the
purpose of achieving improved project performance, increased
cost effectiveness, and enhanced benefits.
CONSTRUCTION, GENERAL
Appropriations, 2010.................................... $2,031,000,000
Budget estimate, 2011................................... 1,690,000,000
Committee recommendation................................ 1,780,000,000
This appropriation includes funds for construction, major
rehabilitation and related activities for water resources
development projects having navigation, flood and storm damage
reduction, water supply, hydroelectric, environmental
restoration, and other attendant benefits to the Nation. The
construction and major rehabilitation for designated projects
for inland and costal waterways will derive one-half of the
funding from the Inland Waterway Trust Fund. Funds to be
derived from the Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund will be applied
to cover the Federal share of the Dredged Material Disposal
Facilities Program.
The administration request for the Construction, General
account is $1,690,000,000, a decrease of $341,000,000 from the
fiscal year 2010 enacted amount. By the Committee's estimate,
less than 60 percent of the needed funding is available in this
account. The administration request adequately funds only eight
projects; the rest are funded at much less than optimum levels.
Construction levels will slip due to constrained funding and
benefits to the national economy will be deferred. The
Committee is concerned that this lack of investment will
inevitably lead to another Katrina-style disaster somewhere in
the Nation, whether it is a catastrophic failure on the inland
waterway system or overwhelmed incomplete or damaged flood
control or shore protection infrastructure. The aftermath of
Hurricane Katrina should have taught us, if nothing else, that
more robust investment before the fact would have led to
considerably smaller payouts after the disaster. Yet, based on
the budget requests in the intervening 5 years, it is obvious
that no lesson has been learned.
The Committee recommendation includes $1,780,000,000 in new
budget authority for this account. The Committee is aware that
execution problems in the Continuing Authorities Program have
resulted in considerable unobligated balances in this program
that are to be carried into fiscal year 2011 and 2012. The
Committee has utilized $120,000,000 of these unobligated
balances from this program toward the remainder of the account
for fiscal year 2011. Therefore the Construction, General
program for fiscal year 2011 is based on a total available
amount of $1,900,000,000. This is $210,000,000 above the budget
request but is still $131,000,000 below the enacted level. The
Committee recognizes that this is considerably less than the
needs in the program, but is the best that can be accomplished
in this constrained fiscal environment. The Committee will
continue to seek additional resources as the bill progresses
toward enactment.
The Committee deleted the new construction starts requested
by the administration as sufficient funding does not exist in
the current budget nor is there reasonable assurance that
sufficient funds will be available in the future to accommodate
these new items as well as ongoing work.
The appropriation provides funds for the Continuing
Authorities Program (projects which do not require specific
authorizing legislation), which includes projects for flood
control (section 205), emergency streambank and shoreline
protection (section 14), beach erosion control (section 103),
mitigation of shore damages (section 111), navigation projects
(section 107), snagging and clearing (section 208), aquatic
ecosystem restoration (section 206), beneficial uses of dredged
material (section 204), and project modifications for
improvement of the environment (section 1135).
The budget request and the approved Committee allowance are
shown on the following table:
CORPS OF ENGINEERS--CONSTRUCTION, GENERAL
[In thousands of dollars]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Committee
Project title Budget estimate recommendation
------------------------------------------------------------------------
ALABAMA
TUSCALOOSA, AL........................ ............... 8,240
ALASKA
AKUTAN HARBOR, AK..................... 7,000 7,000
ALASKA COASTAL EROSION, AK............ ............... 2,000
BETHEL RIVER BANK STABILIZATION, AK... ............... 3,000
HAINES HARBOR, AK..................... ............... 500
KENAI RIVER BLUFF EROSION, AK......... ............... 2,500
ARKANSAS
OZARK-JETA TAYLOR POWERHOUSE, AR...... ............... 12,900
RED RIVER BELOW DENISON DAM, AR, LA, & ............... 2,500
TX...................................
RED RIVER EMERGENCY BANK PROTECTION, ............... 2,000
AR, LA, OK, & TX.....................
CALIFORNIA
AMERICAN RIVER WATERSHED (COMMON 4,200 4,200
FEATURES), CA........................
AMERICAN RIVER WATERSHED (FOLSOM DAM 78,000 78,000
MODIFICATIONS), CA...................
AMERICAN RIVER WATERSHED (FOLSOM DAM 500 500
RAISE & BRIDGE), CA..................
CALFED LEVEE STABILITY PROGRAM, CA.... ............... 5,000
CORTE MADERA CREEK, CA................ ............... 500
FARMINGTON RECHARGE DEMONSTRATION ............... 500
PROGRAM, CA..........................
GUADALUPE RIVER, CA................... ............... 200
HAMILTON AIRFIELD WETLANDS 20,000 11,750
RESTORATION, CA......................
HARBOR/SOUTH BAY WATER RECYCLING ............... 2,000
PROJECT, LOS ANGELES, CA.............
LOS ANGELES RIVER DEMONSTRATION ............... 1,000
PROJECTS, CA.........................
MID-VALLEY AREA LEVEE RECONSTRUCTION, ............... 1,500
CA...................................
MURRIETA CREEK, CA.................... ............... 3,500
NAPA RIVER, CA........................ ............... 2,100
NAPA RIVER, SALT MARSH RESTORATION, CA 12,000 12,000
OAKLAND HARBOR (50 FOOT PROJECT), CA.. 4,330 4,330
PLACER COUNTY, CA..................... ............... 1,000
SAN FRANCISCO BAY TO STOCKTON, CA..... ............... 500
SACRAMENTO DEEPWATER SHIP CHANNEL, CA. 12,500 12,500
SACRAMENTO RIVER BANK PROTECTION 10,000 10,000
PROJECT, CA..........................
SACRAMENTO RIVER, GLENN-COLUSA ............... 700
IRRIGATION DISTRICT, CA..............
SAN LUIS REY RIVER, CA................ ............... 2,500
SAN RAMON VALLEY RECYCLED WATER, CA... ............... 459
SANTA ANA RIVER MAINSTEM, CA.......... 25,000 25,000
SOUTH SACRAMENTO COUNTY STREAMS, CA... 4,800 4,800
SUCCESS DAM AND RESERVOIR, CA (DAM 500 1,000
SAFETY)..............................
TAHOE BASIN RESTORATION, CA & NV...... ............... 4,000
UPPER GUADALUPE RIVER, CA............. ............... 2,500
WEST SACRAMENTO, CA................... 5,000 5,000
YUBA RIVER BASIN, CA.................. ............... 3,500
DELAWARE
DELAWARE BAY COASTLINE, BROADKILL ............... 250
BEACH, DE............................
DELAWARE BAY COASTLINE, ROOSEVELT 350 350
INLET TO LEWES BEACH, DE.............
DELAWARE COAST PROTECTION, DE......... ............... 390
DELAWARE COAST, CAPE HENLOPEN TO ............... 4,700
FENWICK ISLAND, BETHANY BEACH TO
SOUTH BETHANY, DE....................
DELAWARE COAST, CAPE HENLOPEN TO ............... 150
FENWICK ISLAND, FENWICK ISLAND, DE...
DELAWARE COAST, CAPE HENLOPEN TO ............... 150
FENWICK ISLAND, REHOBOTH BEACH AND
DEWEY BEACH, DE......................
DELAWARE RIVER MAINSTEM AND CHANNEL ............... 7,000
DEEPENING, DE, NJ & PA...............
FLORIDA
BREVARD COUNTY, FL.................... 350 350
DADE COUNTY, FL....................... 11,000 11,000
DUVAL COUNTY, FL...................... 7,500 7,500
FLORIDA KEYS WATER QUALITY ............... 2,800
IMPROVEMENTS, FL.....................
FORT PIERCE BEACH, FL................. 350 350
HERBERT HOOVER DIKE, FL (SEEPAGE 104,800 104,800
CONTROL).............................
JACKSONVILLE HARBOR, FL............... 6,000 6,000
MANATEE COUNTY, FL.................... 100 100
MANATEE HARBOR, FL.................... ............... 100
MARTIN COUNTY, FL..................... 8,000 8,000
NASSAU COUNTY, FL..................... 350 350
PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL (DELRAY BEACH ............... 680
REIMBURSEMENT).......................
PINELLAS COUNTY, FL................... ............... 2,500
SOUTH FLORIDA EVERGLADES ECOSYSTEM 180,000 155,000
RESTORATION, FL......................
CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA, FL.. (152,330) (127,330)
EVERGLADES AND SOUTH FLORIDA (5,170) (5,170)
ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, FL........
KISSIMMEE RIVER PROJECT, FL....... (22,500) (22,500)
ST. JOHNS COUNTY, FL.................. 350 350
TAMPA HARBOR, FL...................... 1,000 1,200
GEORGIA
ATLANTA ENVIRONMENTAL INFRASTRUCTURE, ............... 1,000
GA...................................
RICHARD B RUSSELL DAM & LAKE, GA & SC. 1,000 1,000
SAVANNAH HARBOR EXPANSION, GA......... 400 1,000
HAWAII
HAWAII WATER MANAGEMENT, HI........... ............... 2,000
KAHUKU, HI............................ ............... 4,590
IDAHO
LITTLE WOOD RIVER, GOODING, ID........ ............... 150
RURAL IDAHO, ID....................... ............... 2,000
ILLINOIS
ALTON TO GALE ORGANIZED LEVEE 150 150
DISTRICT, IL & MO (DEF CORR).........
CHAIN OF ROCKS CANAL, MISSISSIPPI 5,385 5,385
RIVER, IL (DEF CORR).................
CHICAGO SANITARY AND SHIP CANAL, 5,200 11,100
DISPERSAL BARRIER, IL................
DES PLAINES RIVER, IL................. 6,500 10,000
EAST ST. LOUIS, IL.................... 1,000 2,000
LOCK AND DAM 27, MISSISSIPPI RIVER, IL 350 350
(MAJOR REHAB)........................
MCCOOK AND THORNTON RESERVOIRS, IL.... 40,000 40,000
NUTWOOD DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, ............... 300
IL...................................
OLMSTED LOCKS AND DAM, OHIO RIVER, IL 136,000 136,000
& KY.................................
UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER RESTORATION, 21,150 19,000
IL, IA, MN, MO & WI..................
WOOD RIVER LEVEE, IL.................. 1,098 1,098
INDIANA
FORT WAYNE, ST. MARY'S AND MAUMEE ............... 165
RIVERS, IN (GREENWOOD AVENUE TOE
DRAIN)...............................
INDIANA HARBOR, CONFINED DISPOSAL 8,000 8,000
FACILITY, IN.........................
LITTLE CALUMET RIVER, IN.............. 10,000 10,000
IOWA
DES MOINES RECREATIONAL RIVER AND ............... 3,200
GREENBELT, IA........................
MISSOURI RIVER FISH MITIGATION, IA, 78,400 74,000
KS, MO, MT, NE, ND & SD..............
MISSOURI RIVER LEVEE SYSTEM (UNIT L- ............... 1,500
385), IA, NE, KS, MO.................
KANSAS
TURKEY CREEK BASIN, KANSAS CITY, KS & 8,000 8,000
MO...................................
KENTUCKY
KENTUCKY LOCK AND DAM, TENNESSEE 2,868 2,868
RIVER, KY............................
MARKLAND LOCKS AND DAM, KY (MAJOR 5,400 5,400
REHAB)...............................
WOLF CREEK DAM, LAKE CUMBERLAND, KY 134,000 134,000
(SEEPAGE CONTROL)....................
LOUISIANA
ASCENSION PARISH ENVIRONMENTAL ............... 160
INFRASTRUCTURE, LA...................
CALCASIEU RIVER AND PASS, DMMP, LA.... ............... 1,000
COMITE RIVER, LA...................... ............... 8,000
EAST BATON ROUGE PARISH ENVIRONMENTAL ............... 500
INFRASTRUCTURE, LA...................
EAST BATON ROUGE PARISH (FC), LA...... ............... 3,000
J. BENNETT JOHNSTON WATERWAY, LA...... 1,500 7,000
LAROSE TO GOLDEN MEADOW, LA (HURRICANE 5,500 5,500
PROTECTION)..........................
LOUISIANA COASTAL AREA ECOSYSTEM 19,000 19,000
RESTORATION, LA......................
OUACHITA RIVER LEVEES, LA............. ............... 1,000
WEST BANK AND VICINITY, NEW ORLEANS, 5,000 5,000
LA...................................
MARYLAND
ASSATEAGUE ISLAND, MD................. 1,000 1,000
ATLANTIC COAST OF MARYLAND, MD........ ............... 3,100
BALTIMORE METROPOLITAN WATER ............... 200
RESOURCES, GWYNNS FALLS, MD..........
CHESAPEAKE BAY ENVIRONMENTAL ............... 1,000
RESTORATION AND PROTECTION, MD, VA &
PA...................................
CHESAPEAKE BAY OYSTER RECOVERY, MD & 5,000 5,000
VA...................................
POPLAR ISLAND, MD..................... 1,530 1,530
MASSACHUSETTS
MUDDY RIVER, MA....................... 500 2,500
MICHIGAN
GREAT LAKES FISHERY AND ECOSYSTEM ............... 2,000
RESTORATION, MI......................
HAMILTON DAM, FLINT RIVER, FLINT, MI.. ............... 1,000
OAKLAND COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL ............... 500
INFRASTRUCTURE, MI...................
SAULT STE MARIE (REPLACEMENT LOCK), MI ............... 1,000
ST. CLAIR RIVER AND LAKE ST. CLAIR ............... 300
MANAGEMENT PLAN, MI..................
MINNESOTA
BRECKENRIDGE, MN...................... ............... 407
ROSEAU, MN (RED RIVER OF THE NORTH ............... 2,500
BASIN)...............................
MISSISSIPPI
DESOTO COUNTY, MS..................... ............... 12,000
MISSISSIPPI ENVIRONMENTAL ............... 18,000
INFRASTRUCTURE, MS...................
MISSOURI
BLUE RIVER BASIN, KANSAS CITY, MO..... ............... 550
BLUE RIVER CHANNEL, KANSAS CITY, MO... 4,500 4,500
CHESTERFIELD, MO...................... 3,439 3,939
CLEARWATER LAKE, MO (SEEPAGE CONTROL). 40,000 40,000
KANSAS CITYS, MO & KS................. 700 700
MERAMEC RIVER BASIN, VALLEY PARK ............... 2,000
LEVEE, MO............................
MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN THE OHIO AND 4,345 4,345
MISSOURI RIVERS (REG WORKS), MO & IL
MISSOURI AND MIDDLE MISSISSIPPI RIVERS ............... 1,200
ENHANCEMENT, MO......................
ST. LOUIS FLOOD PROTECTION, MO........ 100 200
SWOPE PARK INDUSTRIAL AREA, KANSAS ............... 5,330
CITY, MO.............................
MONTANA
FORT PECK CABIN CONVEYANCE, MT........ ............... 1,000
RURAL MONTANA, MT..................... ............... 5,000
NEBRASKA
ANTELOPE CREEK, LINCOLN, NE........... ............... 315
WESTERN SARPY COUNTY AND CLEAR CREEK, ............... 2,470
NE...................................
NEVADA
RURAL NEVADA, NV...................... ............... 20,000
NEW JERSEY
BARNEGAT INLET TO LITTLE EGG HARBOR ............... 7,600
INLET, NJ............................
BRIGANTINE INLET TO GREAT EGG HARBOR ............... 400
INLET, ABSECON ISLAND, NJ............
BRIGANTINE INLET TO GREAT EGG HARBOR ............... 80
INLET, BRIGANTINE ISLAND, NJ.........
CAPE MAY INLET TO LOWER TOWNSHIP, NJ.. 200 200
DELAWARE BAY COASTLINE, DE & NJ, ............... 250
OAKWOOD BEACH........................
GREAT EGG HARBOR INLET AND PECK BEACH, 500 500
NJ...................................
GREAT EGG HARBOR INLET TO TOWNSENDS ............... 2,000
INLET, NJ............................
HACKENSACK MEADOWLANDS, NJ............ ............... 300
JOSEPH G. MINISH PASSAIC RIVER ............... 3,000
WATERFRONT, NJ.......................
LOWER CAPE MAY MEADOWS, CAPE MAY 8,920 8,920
POINT, NJ............................
PASSAIC RIVER BASIN FLOOD MANAGEMENT, ............... 500
NJ...................................
RARITAN & SANDY HOOK BAY, PORT ............... 1,500
MONMOUTH, NJ.........................
RARITAN RIVER BASIN, GREEN BROOK SUB- 1,000 1,000
BASIN, NJ............................
SANDY HOOK TO BARNEGAT INLET, NJ...... ............... 2,000
TOWNSENDS INLET TO CAPE MAY INLET, NJ. ............... 2,000
NEW MEXICO
ACEQUIAS IRRIGATION SYSTEM, NM........ ............... 2,770
ALAMOGORDO, NM........................ ............... 4,200
CENTRAL NEW MEXICO, NM................ ............... 1,000
MIDDLE RIO GRANDE FLOOD PROTECTION, ............... 500
BERNALILLO TO BELEN, NM..............
RIO GRANDE FLOODWAY, SAN ACACIA TO 10,000 1,500
BOSQUE DEL APACHE, NM................
SOUTHWEST VALLEY, FLOOD DAMAGE ............... 5,809
REDUCTION, ALBUQUERQUE, NM...........
NEW YORK
ATLANTIC COAST OF LONG ISLAND, JONES ............... 300
INLET TO EAST ROCKAWAY INLET, LONG
BEACH ISLAND, NY.....................
ATLANTIC COAST OF NYC, ROCKAWAY INLET 300 300
TO NORTON POINT, NY..................
EAST ROCKAWAY INLET TO ROCKAWAY INLET ............... 1,000
AND JAMAICA BAY, NY..................
FIRE ISLAND INLET TO MONTAUK POINT, NY 1,100 4,600
LONG BEACH ISLAND, NY................. 300 300
NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY HARBOR, NY & 57,000 57,000
NJ...................................
NEW YORK CITY WATERSHED, NY........... ............... 1,000
ONONDAGA LAKE, NY..................... ............... 1,000
NORTH CAROLINA
BRUNSWICK COUNTY BEACHES, NC.......... ............... 350
WEST ONSLOW BEACH AND NEW RIVER INLET, ............... 722
TOPSAIL BEACH, NC....................
WILMINGTON HARBOR, NC................. 1,800 2,100
WRIGHTSVILLE BEACH, NC................ ............... 300
NORTH DAKOTA
FARGO, ND--MOORHEAD, MN............... ............... 20,000
GARRISON DAM AND POWER PLANT, ND 11,088 11,088
(REPLACEMENT)........................
GRAFTON, ND........................... ............... 3,000
MISSOURI RIVER RESTORATION, ND........ ............... 500
NORTH DAKOTA ENVIRONMENTAL ............... 14,300
INFRASTRUCTURE, ND...................
OHIO
DOVER DAM MUSKINGUM RIVER, OH......... 36,000 36,000
HOLES CREEK, WEST CARROLLTON, OH...... ............... 1,000
OHIO ENVIRONMENTAL INFRASTRUCTURE, OH. ............... 2,600
EUCLID, OH (EI)................... ............... (1,100)
PORTSMOUTH CSO MITIGATION, OH..... ............... (500)
TOLEDO WATERWAYS INITIATIVE PHASE ............... (1,000)
2, OH............................
OHIO RIVERFRONT, CINCINNATI, OH....... ............... 3,000
OKLAHOMA
CANTON LAKE, OK (DAM SAFETY).......... 24,334 24,334
YUKON, OK (EI)........................ ............... 500
OREGON
COLUMBIA RIVER TREATY FISHING ACCESS 500 500
SITES, OR & WA.......................
LOWER COLUMBIA RIVER ECOSYSTEM 4,700 4,700
RESTORATION, OR & WA.................
PENNSYLVANIA
EMSWORTH LOCKS & DAM, OHIO RIVER, PA 11,500 11,500
(STATIC INSTABILITY CORRECTION)......
LACKAWANNA RIVER, SCRANTON, PA........ ............... 500
LOCKS AND DAMS 2, 3, AND 4 MONONGAHELA 2,000 2,000
RIVER, PA............................
PRESQUE ISLE PENINSULA, PA (PERMANENT) 1,000 1,000
WYOMING VALLEY, PA (LEVEE RAISING).... ............... 1,500
PUERTO RICO
PORTUGUES AND BUCANA RIVERS, PR....... 39,539 39,539
RIO PUERTO NUEVO, PR.................. 12,000 12,000
SOUTH DAKOTA
BIG SIOUX RIVER, SIOUX FALLS, SD...... ............... 3,000
MISSOURI RIVER RESTORATION, SD........ ............... 300
TENNESSEE
CENTER HILL DAM, TN (SEEPAGE CONTROL). 77,800 77,800
CUMBERLAND COUNTY WATER SUPPLY, TN.... ............... 210
TEXAS
FORT BEND COUNTY (ARCOLA-FRESNO ............... ...............
REGIONAL WASTEWATER), TX (EI)........
BRAYS BAYOU, HOUSTON, TX.............. 7,740 3,740
CENTRAL CITY, FORT WORTH, UPPER ............... 4,815
TRINITY RIVER BASIN, TX..............
DALLAS FLOODWAY EXTENSION, TRINITY ............... 20,500
RIVER PROJECT, TX....................
JOHNSON CREEK, UPPER TRINITY BASIN, ............... 500
ARLINGTON, TX........................
LOWER COLORADO RIVER BASIN (WHARTON/ 10,000
ONION), TX...........................
RED RIVER BASIN CHLORIDE CONTROL, TX & ............... 2,800
OK...................................
UTAH
RURAL UTAH, UT........................ ............... 25,000
VERMONT
LAKE CHAMPLAIN WATERSHED INITIATIVE, ............... 500
VT...................................
VIRGINIA
ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BRIDGE 1,590 1,590
REPLACEMENT AT DEEP CREEK,
CHESAPEAKE, VA.......................
JOHN H. KERR DAM AND RESERVOIR, VA & 6,000 6,000
NC (REPLACEMENT).....................
NORFOLK HARBOR AND CHANNELS ............... 1,000
(DEEPENING), VA......................
NORFOLK HARBOR, CRANEY ISLAND, VA..... 1,000 1,000
ROANOKE RIVER UPPER BASIN, HEADWATERS 1,075 1,075
AREA, VA.............................
SANDBRIDGE, VA........................ ............... 300
VIRGINIA BEACH, VA (HURRICANE ............... 2,000
PROTECTION)..........................
WASHINGTON
CHIEF JOSEPH DAM GAS ABATEMENT, WA.... 200 200
COLUMBIA RIVER FISH MITIGATION, WA, 137,615 116,000
OR, & ID.............................
DUWAMISH AND GREEN RIVER BASIN, WA.... 5,500 5,500
HOWARD HANSON DAM, WA................. 500 500
LOWER SNAKE RIVER FISH AND WILDLIFE 1,500 1,500
COMPENSATION, WA, OR, & ID...........
MOUNT ST. HELENS SEDIMENT CONTROL, WA. 800 1,800
MUD MOUNTAIN DAM, WA (FISH PASSAGE)... 1,000 1,000
PUGET SOUND AND ADJACENT WATERS ............... 3,000
RESTORATION, WA......................
SHOALWATER BAY, WA.................... ............... 3,000
WEST VIRGINIA
BLUESTONE LAKE, WV (DAM SAFETY 15,000 15,000
ASSURANCE)...........................
GREENBRIER RIVER BASIN, WV............ ............... 1,500
ISLAND CREEK, LOGAN, WV............... ............... 5,000
LEVISA AND TUG FORKS AND UPPER 19,500 22,250
CUMBERLAND RIVER, WV, VA, & KY.......
LOWER MUD RIVER, MILTON, WV........... ............... 1,500
---------------------------------
SUBTOTAL........................ 1,571,596 1,867,693
NATIONAL PROGRAMS
AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL................. 4,000 5,000
CONTINUING AUTHORITIES PROGRAM:
AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION 7,273 7,273
(SECTION 206)....................
BENEFICIAL USE OF DREDGED MATERIAL 2,195 2,195
(SECTION 204, 207, 993)..........
EMERGENCY STREAMBANK AND SHORELINE 4,993 4,993
PROTECTION (SECTION 14)..........
FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (SECTION 6,635 6,635
205).............................
MITIGATION OF SHORE DAMAGES 8,300 8,300
(SECTION 111)....................
NAVIGATION PROGRAM (SECTION 107).. 1,227 1,227
PROJECT MODIFICATIONS FOR 7,046 7,046
IMPROVEMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT
(SECTION 1135)...................
SHORE PROTECTION (SECTION 103).... 3,100 3,100
SNAGGING AND CLEARING (SECTION 200 200
208).............................
DAM SAFETY AND SEEPAGE/STABILITY 49,100 49,100
CORRECTION PROGRAM...................
EMPLOYEES COMPENSATION FUND........... 19,000 19,000
ESTUARY RESTORATION PROGRAM (Public 5,000 2,500
Law 106-457).........................
INLAND WATERWAYS USER BOARD (BOARD 60 60
EXPENSES)............................
INLAND WATERWAYS USER BOARD (COE 275 275
EXPENSES)............................
SHORELINE EROSION CONTROL DEVELOPMENT ............... 2,500
AND DEMONSTRATION....................
RESTORATION OF ABANDONED MINES........ ............... 500
---------------------------------
SUBTOTAL........................ 118,404 119,904
SAVINGS AND SLIPPAGE.................. ............... -87,597
USE OF PRIOR-YEAR BALANCES............ ............... -120,000
---------------------------------
TOTAL........................... 1,690,000 1,780,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tuscaloosa, Alabama.--The Committee recommends $8,240,000
to complete the relocation project at Tuscaloosa, Alabama.
Ozark-Jeta Taylor, Arkansas.--This is another case where
Administration investments in our infrastructure seem to be
penny-wise and pound-foolish. The budget request provided no
funds for this on-going continuing contract. Termination costs
for this continuing contract are estimated to be $20,000,000.
Energy losses over the past 3 fiscal years exceed $25,000,000
due to forced outages of the hydropower units. The Committee
has recommended $12,900,000 to complete the rehabilitation work
on turbine unit 3. The Committee urges the administration to
budget for this contract in future budget submissions.
Red River Below Denison Dam, Arkansas, Louisiana, Oklahoma,
and Texas.--The Committee recommends $2,500,000 to continue
levee rehabilitation work in Arkansas and Louisiana to protect
the 1.7 million-acre flood plain from crop damage; loss of
livestock; damage to levees, railroads, highways, industries,
and other river and urban developments.
Red River Emergency Bank Protection, Arkansas, and
Louisiana.--The Committee recommends $2,000,000 for protection
of critical infrastructure and land along the Red River below
Index,
Arkansas.--The project plan provides for revetment, dikes,
or cutoffs that can be accomplished in advance of developing
the design for the entire project.
Hamilton Airfield Wetlands Restoration, California.--The
Committee recommendation includes $11,750,000 for this tidal
wetland restoration project. This reduction from the budget
request is based on updated information from the Corps.
Mid Valley Area Levee Reconstruction, California.--The
Committee recommendation includes $1,500,000 to complete the
design of areas two and four of the reconstruction of this
flood control project. The project includes levee
reconstruction through installing landside berms with toe
drains, ditch relocation, embankment modification, slurry cut-
off walls, and developing land for fish and wildlife
mitigation.
Oakland Harbor, California.--Within the Committee's
recommendation, $2,087,000 is recommended as a repayment to the
Port of Oakland to settle the port's payments in excess of the
local cost share on the 42-foot construction project DACW07-95-
003.
Tahoe Basin Restoration, California.--The Committee
recommends $4,000,000 for planning, design, and construction
assistance for environmental restoration, resource protection
and development projects in Lake Tahoe Basin. These projects
are part of the $2,500,000,000 local, State, Federal and
private watershed restoration effort referred to as the Lake
Tahoe Environmental Improvement Program [EIP]. Of the funds
provided, $2,700,000 are recommended for construction of the
Incline and Third Creek restoration project.
Delaware Coast, Cape Henlopen to Fenwick Island, Bethany
Beach to South Bethany Beach, Delaware.--The Committee has
recommended $4,700,000 for the second nourishment cycle on this
shore protection project.
Delaware Coast Protection, Delaware.--The Committee
recommendation includes $390,000 to reimburse the State for the
Federal share of the annual operation and maintenance of the
sand bypass facilities.
Everglades and South Florida Ecosystem Restoration,
Florida.--The Committee has chosen to display the various,
separately authorized components of the project in the table in
addition to a single line item as was proposed in the budget.
The Committee believes that it is prudent to maintain
visibility of the various project elements in the budget
process. It is the Committee's understanding that the Corps
cannot utilize all of the funding requested for the Site one
project in fiscal year 2011 due to the need to complete a post
authorization change report on the remaining features of this
project due to cost growth. Therefore, the Committee has
reduced The Central and Southern Florida element by $25,000,000
to account for this change. This lowers the overall committee
recommendation for the Everglades to $155,000,000.
Tampa Harbor, Florida.--$200,000 is provided above the
budget request to complete the General Reevaluation Report of
the Federal project.
Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal, Illinois.--The Committee
recommends $11,100,000 for the aquatic nuisance species
Barriers I and II and for interim measures for potential
barrier bypasses.
Olmsted Locks and Dam, Ohio River, Illinois and Kentucky.--
The Committee recommends $136,000,000 to continue construction
of this project. None of the funds provided for the Olmsted
Locks and Dam Project or any other construction funds are to be
used to reimburse the Claims and Judgment Fund.
Missouri Fish and Wildlife Recovery, Iowa, Kansas,
Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, and South Dakota.--
The Committee recommends $74,000,000 for this project. Within
the recommended funds, $12,000,000 is to be used for
modifications to the Intake Dam to provide additional habitat
for the pallid sturgeon.
Wolf Creek Dam, Lake Cumberland, Kentucky.--The Committee
recommends $134,000,000 for continuation of seepage control
measures at Wolf Creek Dam. It is the Committee's understanding
that this is the Corps' full funding capability for this
project in fiscal year 2011.
Larose to Golden Meadow, Louisiana.--The Committee has
recommended $5,500,000 to continue efforts to provide 100-year
flood protection for this project. Surveys show the levee grade
is deficient by 12-18 inches.
Chesapeake Bay Environmental Program, Maryland,
Pennsylvania, and Virginia.--The Committee has recommended
$1,000,000 for continuation of this project that is integral to
the clean-up of the Chesapeake Bay.
Chesapeake Bay Oyster Recovery, Maryland and Virginia.--The
Committee recommends $5,000,000 to continue oyster recovery
efforts in the Chesapeake Bay.
Muddy River, Massachusetts.--The Committee recommends
$2,500,000 for the Muddy River, Boston and Brookline,
Massachusetts project, $500,000 of which is to be used along
with fiscal year 2010 carryover funds to award a fully funded
contract to construct the flood risk management features of
Phase I of the project, and $2,000,000 of which is to be used
to complete design of Phase II, including the environmental
restoration elements of the project.
Oakland County, Michigan.--The Committee recommends
$500,000 for the George W. Kuhn drain project.
Meramec River Basin, Valley City, Missouri.--The Committee
recommendation includes $2,000,000 for additional flood risk
management features to address problems that became apparent
during the 2008 flood.
Fort Peck Dam and Lake, Montana.--The Committee
recommendation includes $1,000,000 for continuation of the
disposition of Fort Peck cabins.
Rural Nevada, Nevada.--The Committee recomendation includes
$20,000,000 for this project. Within the funds provided, the
Corps should give consideration to the Spanish Springs Valley
Sewering Project, Phase II; the Indian Springs Wastewater
Collection and Treatment System Project; the Moapa Valley
Wastewater Collection System Project; Searchlight Water System
Improvements Project; Minden Arsenic Compliance Project;
Tonopah Water Treatment Project; River Oaks Water and
Wastewater Collection System; Murray Creek Storm Drain; Incline
Village Wastewater Effluent Pipeline; and also to projects at:
Boulder City; Lyon County; Douglas County; Gerlach; Esmeralda
County; Fallon; Goldfield; Churchill County; West Wendover;
Yerington; Virgin Valley Water District; Lovelock; Truckee
Meadows Water Authority; Eldorado Valley; Ely; and Carson City.
Other communities that meet the program criteria should be
considered as funding allows.
Barnegat Inlet to Little Egg Harbor Inlet, New Jersey.--The
Committee recommends $7,600,000 for construction on this shore
protection project.
Acequias Irrigation System, New Mexico.--The Committee
recommends $2,770,000 to continue restoration of these historic
irrigation distribution systems.
Wilmington Harbor, North Carolina.--$300,000 is recommended
above the budget request to initiate a general reevaluation
study to investigate modification of the anchorage basin.
North Dakota [EI], North Dakota.--The Committee has
recommended $14,300,000 for this program. $1,600,000 is
recommended for the Mandan Raw Water Intake; $75,000 for the
Southeast Water Users District SEWUD; $1,700,000 for the
Grafton Water Treatment Plant Improvements; $1,375,000 for the
North Prairie Rural Water District; $1,575,000 for the Park
River Water Distribution System Improvements; $900,000 for the
Walsh Rural Water District Ground Storage Expansion; $1,500,000
for the Grand Forks Water Treatment Plant--Pilot Testing and
Design; $275,000 for the Fargo Water Treatment Plant Facility
Study Plan; $1,825,000 for the McKenzie County Regional Water
Service; $750,000 for the Williams Rural Water Phase I;
$1,500,000 for the Greater Ramsey Water District--expansion;
$100,000 for the Williston Waste Water Treatment System
Improvements; $425,000 for the LaMoure Sanitary Sewer Lining
Project; and $700,000 for the Traill Rural Water District Phase
III project.
Ohio [EI], Ohio.--The Committee recommendation includes
$2,600,000. $1,100,000 is recommended for the Euclid project;
$500,000 for the Portsmouth CSO project and $1,000,000 for the
Toledo Waterways Initiative Phase II.
Presque Isle, Pennsylvania.--The Committee recommends
$1,000,000 to continue this project to mitigate flood and
coastal storm damage.
Red River Basin Chloride Control, Texas, Oklahoma,
Arkansas, and Louisiana.--The Committee recommends $2,800,000
to continue construction of the project. Within the funds
recommended, $800,000 should be used for the Elm Fork, Area VI
element.
Rural Utah, [EI], Utah.--The Committee recommendation
includes $25,000,000 to continue construction of eligible
projects.
Within the funds provided, the Corps should give
consideration to Duchesne County Water Conservancy District;
Uintah County Whiterocks Projects; Emery Town water delivery
project; Cedarview Water Conservancy District; Bear River Water
Conservancy District; Eureka Town water and sewer project;
Monticello City water system project; Long Canal Project,
Garfield County; Cottonwood Irrigation Project, Emery County;
and Coalville Town water treatment project. Other communities
that meet the program criteria should be considered as funding
allows.
Lake Champlain Watershed Initiative, Vermont.--The
Committee recommendation includes $500,000 for continuation of
this project.
Columbia River Fish Mitigation, Washington, Oregon, and
Idaho.--The Committee recommendation includes $124,385,000 for
this project. The reduction made to this project should not be
viewed as any diminution of support for this project, rather an
attempt to balance out the Corps of Engineers nationwide
program among the various missions of the Corps.
Levisa and Tug Forks of the Big Sandy River and Cumberland
River, West Virginia, Kentucky, and Virginia.--The Committee
recommends $22,250,000 for the continuation of the project.
Within the funds recommended, the Committee includes
$19,500,000 for the Buchanan County, Dickenson County, and
Grundy, Virginia elements. Further, the recommendation includes
$2,750,000 for Kermit, Lower Mingo County, McDowell County,
Upper Mingo, and Wayne County, West Virginia.
Aquatic Plant Control Program.--The Committee
recommendation includes $5,000,000 for this program. Funds
above the budget request are included for cost-shared programs:
$150,000 for Black Rock Lake, Odensburg, New York and $500,000
for Lake Champlain, Vermont.
Estuary Restoration Program.--The Committee recommendation
includes $2,500,000 for this nationwide program. Within the
funds provided, $1,000,000 is for the Colorado Lagoon,
California, project.
Shore Line Erosion Control Development and Demonstration
Program.--The Committee has recommended $2,500,000 for
construction of a shoreline erosion abatement device at Oil
Piers in Ventura County, California, as well as monitoring
programs and other appropriate activities under this authority.
CONTINUING AUTHORITIES PROGRAM
The Committee will no longer list individual projects in
the CAP program in the table. The priority system that has been
established will guide the execution of the projects.
For each Continuing Authorities Program [CAP] section,
available funds shall be allocated utilizing this sequence of
steps until the funds are exhausted:
--capability-level funds for ongoing projects that have
executed cost-sharing agreements for the applicable
phase;
--capability-level funds for projects that are ready for
execution of new cost-sharing agreements for the
applicable phase and for which Corps Headquarters
authorizes execution of the agreements;
--funds, as permitted by Corps policies, for other projects
previously funded for the applicable phase but not
ready for execution of new cost-sharing agreements; and
--funds as permitted by Corps policies, for projects not
previously funded for the applicable phase.
Funds shall be allocated by headquarters to the appropriate
Field Operating Agency [FOA] for projects requested by that
FOA. If the FOA finds that the study/project for which funds
were requested cannot go forward, the funds are to be returned
to Corps headquarters to be reallocated based on the nationwide
priority listing. In no case should the FOA retain these funds
for use on a different project than the one for which the funds
were requested without the explicit approval of the Corps'
Headquarters.
Within the step at which available funds are exhausted for
each CAP section, funds shall be allocated to the projects in
that section that rank high according to the following factors:
high overall performance based on outputs; high percent
fiscally complete; and high unobligated carry-in. Section 14
funds shall be allocated to the projects that address the most
significant risks and adverse consequences, irrespective of
phase or previous funding history.
The Corps shall continue the ongoing process for suspending
and terminating inactive projects. Suspended projects shall not
be reactivated or funded unless the sponsor reaffirms in
writing its support for the project and establishes its
willingness and capability to execute its project
responsibilities.
In order to provide a mix of studies, design and
construction within each CAP section, the Corps is directed to
divide the funding generally 80/20 between the Design and
Implementation and the Feasibility phases within each
authority. The Chief of Engineers shall provide a report to the
Committees on Appropriations within 30 days of enactment of
this Act detailing how funds will be distributed to the
individual items in the various CAP sections for the fiscal
year. The Chief shall also provide an annual report at the end
of each fiscal year detailing the progress made on the backlog
of projects. The report should include the completions and
terminations as well as progress of ongoing work.
The Corps may initiate new continuing authorities projects
in all sections as funding allows. New projects may be
initiated after an assessment is made that such projects can be
funded over time based on historical averages of the
appropriation for that section and after prior approval by the
Committees on Appropriations.
FLOOD CONTROL, MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, ARKANSAS, ILLINOIS,
KENTUCKY, LOUISIANA, MISSISSIPPI, MISSOURI, AND TENNESSEE
Appropriations, 2010.................................... $340,000,000
Budget estimate, 2011................................... 240,000,000
Committee recommendation................................ 335,000,000
This appropriation funds planning, construction, and
operation and maintenance activities associated with water
resource projects located in the lower Mississippi River Valley
from Cape Girardeau, Missouri to the Gulf of Mexico.
The budget request and the approved Committee allowance are
shown on the following table:
MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES
[In thousands of dollars]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Committee
Project title Budget request recommendation
------------------------------------------------------------------------
INVESTIGATIONS
SOUTHEAST ARKANSAS, AR.................. .............. 300
DONALDSONVILLE TO THE GULF, LA.......... .............. 400
MORGANZA TO THE GULF, LA................ .............. 2,600
SPRING BAYOU, LA........................ .............. 81
COLDWATER RIVER BASIN BELOW ARKABUTLA 246 246
LAKE, MS...............................
QUIVER RIVER, MS........................ .............. 100
MEMPHIS METRO AREA, STORM WATER 100 100
MANAGEMENT STUDY, TN...................
COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA, AR, 500 1,400
IL, KY, LA, MS, MO & TN................
CONSTRUCTION
BAYOU METO BASIN, AR.................... .............. 4,000
CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, AR, IL, KY, LA, MS, 47,209 47,209
MO & TN................................
GRAND PRAIRIE REGION, AR................ .............. 16,000
MISSISSIPPI RIVER LEVEES, AR, IL, KY, 29,150 36,038
LA, MS, MO & TN........................
ST FRANCIS BASIN, AR & MO............... .............. 4,000
ATCHAFALAYA BASIN FLOODWAY SYSTEM, LA... 2,631 2,631
ATCHAFALAYA BASIN, LA................... 6,300 15,000
ST JOHNS BAYOU & NEW MADRID FLOODWAY, MO .............. 200
YAZOO BASIN, BIG SUNFLOWER RIVER, MS.... .............. 2,200
YAZOO BASIN, MAIN STEM, MS.............. .............. 25
YAZOO BASIN, MISSISSIPPI DELTA .............. 23,200
HEADWATERS PROJECT, MS.................
YAZOO BASIN, REFORMULATION, MS.......... .............. 1,600
YAZOO BASIN, UPPER YAZOO PROJECTS, MS... .............. 13,300
YAZOO BASIN, YAZOO BACKWATER LESS ROCKY .............. 575
BAYOU, MS..............................
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE
CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, AR, IL, KY, LA, MS, 66,008 66,008
MO & TN................................
HELENA HARBOR, PHILLIPS COUNTY, AR...... 198 600
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, AR....... 190 190
LOWER ARKANSAS RIVER, NORTH BANK, AR.... 223 223
LOWER ARKANSAS RIVER, SOUTH BANK, AR.... 200 200
MISSISSIPPI RIVER LEVEES, AR, IL, KY, 7,582 11,843
LA, MS, MO & TN........................
ST FRANCIS RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, AR & 6,293 10,000
MO.....................................
TENSAS BASIN, BOEUF AND TENSAS RIVERS, 2,374 2,374
AR & LA................................
WHITE RIVER BACKWATER, AR............... 1,276 1,276
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, IL....... 100 100
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, KY....... 20 20
ATCHAFALAYA BASIN FLOODWAY SYSTEM, LA... 1,878 1,878
ATCHAFALAYA BASIN, LA................... 12,398 12,398
BATON ROUGE HARBOR, DEVIL SWAMP, LA..... 42 42
BAYOU COCODRIE AND TRIBUTARIES, LA...... 47 47
BONNET CARRE, LA........................ 2,300 3,500
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, LA....... 586 586
LOWER RED RIVER, SOUTH BANK LEVEES, LA.. 377 377
MISSISSIPPI DELTA REGION--CAERNARVON, LA 921 921
OLD RIVER, LA........................... 9,255 9,255
TENSAS BASIN, RED RIVER BACKWATER, LA... 3,286 3,286
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MO....... 185 185
WAPPAPELLO LAKE, MO..................... 4,966 4,966
GREENVILLE HARBOR, MS................... 18 1,000
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MS....... 109 109
VICKSBURG HARBOR, MS.................... 32 750
YAZOO BASIN, ARKABUTLA LAKE, MS......... 5,961 7,961
YAZOO BASIN, BIG SUNFLOWER RIVER, MS.... 184 1,684
YAZOO BASIN, ENID LAKE, MS.............. 5,784 7,784
YAZOO BASIN, GREENWOOD, MS.............. 790 790
YAZOO BASIN, GRENADA LAKE, MS........... 6,301 8,301
YAZOO BASIN, MAIN STEM, MS.............. 1,469 1,469
YAZOO BASIN, SARDIS LAKE, MS............ 7,113 9,113
YAZOO BASIN, TRIBUTARIES, MS............ 967 1,017
YAZOO BASIN, WILL M WHITTINGTON AUX 377 400
CHAN, MS...............................
YAZOO BASIN, YAZOO BACKWATER AREA, MS... 583 733
YAZOO BASIN, YAZOO CITY, MS............. 731 831
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, TN....... 70 70
MEMPHIS HARBOR, MCKELLAR LAKE, TN....... 1,433 1,433
REMAINING ITEMS
MAPPING................................. 1,237 1,237
SAVINGS AND SLIPPAGE.................... .............. -11,162
-------------------------------
TOTAL............................. 240,000 335,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------
GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS
Morganza to the Gulf, Louisiana.--The Committee has
recommended $2,600,000 to continue development of the Post
Authorization Change report and Revised Programmatic
Environmental Impact Statement [RPEIS]. Fiscal year 2011
efforts will focus on selecting a recommended plan, completing
feasibility-level designs and costs for the recommended plan,
and developing a RPEIS that reflects the recommended plan.
Collection and Study of Basic Data, Arkansas, Illinois,
Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, and Tennessee.--The
Committee recommendation includes $900,000 above the budget
request for LIDAR mapping in the Yazoo Basin, Mississippi.
CONSTRUCTION
Grand Prairie, Arkansas.--The Committee has recommended
$16,000,000 for continued construction of the project. This
project will provide for agricultural water supply, ground
water protection, and fish and wildlife restoration and
enhancement.
Mississippi River Levees, Arkansas, Illinois, Kentucky,
Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, and Tennessee.--Additional
funds above the budget request could be used to continue the
preparation of additional NEPA documentation in association
with the MRL features of the St. Johns New Madrid, Missouri
project; fully fund relief wells at Tunica, Mississippi, Parcel
2; Rena Lara, Mississippi; Magna Vista-Brunswick, Mississippi,
Item 463-L; Item 465-L; Reid Bedford-King, Item 422-R; continue
ongoing construction contracts; Duncan Point Seepage; and
Avondale Ramps.
Yazoo Basin, Big Sunflower Basin, Mississippi.--The
Committee recognizes the need to control bank erosion and
reduce sedimentation and headcutting in watersheds of the Yazoo
Basin for purposes of improving water quality, fisheries, and
reducing maintenance. The Committee recommends $2,200,000 for
continued construction of the Yazoo Basin, Big Sunflower River
Project. Not more than $2,200,000 should be used for the
continued construction of these water quality and sedimentation
reduction measures. The Committee expects the water quality
funds to be used for the monitoring and establishment of water
quality reference indicators and the development of total
maximum daily loads target loads on Yazoo Basin projects.
Yazoo Basin, Delta Headwaters Project, Mississippi.--The
Committee has recommended $23,200,000 for continuation of a
joint effort by the Corps of Engineers and the Natural
Resources Conservation Service in the Yazoo Basin of
Mississippi. Funds are provided for the Corps to undertake
construction work in the following watersheds: Abiaca Creek,
Batupan Bogue, Black Creek, Coldwater River, Cane-Mussacana
Creek, Hurricane-Wolfe Creek, Hickahala-Senatobia Creek,
Hotophia Creek, Long Creek, Pelucia Creek, Otoucalofa Creek,
Toby-Tubby Creek, Yalobusha River, and Skuna River. The
Committee expects the Corps to design and construct future
work, acquire real estate, and monitor results for all
watersheds in fiscal year 2011 and for future work as required
for completion of the total program. The Committee expects the
administration to request funds for this vital project.
MAINTENANCE
Mississippi River Levees, Arkansas, Illinois, Kentucky,
Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, and Tennessee.--Funds above
the budget request could be used to resurface the mainline
levee below West Memphis, Arkansas; periodic inspections at
locations in Arkansas, Kentucky, Mississippi, Missouri, and
Tennessee; installation of levee mile posts at various
locations; critical slide repairs; placement of crushed stone
surfacing on levees; mitigation; bank stabilization; levee
surfacing material and operation and maintenance of the motor
vessel Mississippi.
Mississippi Lakes.--The Committee has recommended
additional funding to address the maintenance backlog at
Arkabutla, Sardis, Enid, and Grenada Lakes in Mississippi.
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, GENERAL
Appropriations, 2010.................................... $2,400,000,000
Budget estimate, 2011................................... 2,361,000,000
Committee recommendation................................ 2,495,000,000
This appropriation funds operation, maintenance, and
related activities at the water resources projects that the
Corps operates and maintains. Work to be accomplished consists
of dredging, repair, and operation of structures and other
facilities, as authorized in the various river and harbor,
flood control, and water resources development acts. Related
activities include aquatic plant control, monitoring of
completed projects where appropriate, removal of sunken
vessels, and the collection of domestic waterborne commerce
statistics.
Maintenance of our aging water infrastructure inventory
gets more expensive every year, however, it is consistently
underfunded. If this trend continues, the Corps will not be
able to maintain expected levels of service at all of its
projects. The Committee has maintained its tradition of
supporting what the budget request terms as ``low use harbors
and waterways''. The Committee recognizes the importance of
these facilities and will continue to provide funding for them.
The Committee is concerned about the administration's O&M
request. In fiscal year 2010, the administration proposed a
budget of $2,504,000,000 for operation and maintenance. For
fiscal year 2011, the request is $143,000,000 less. The
Committee understands that the O&M budget fluctuates from year
to year due to periodic maintenance dredging requirements,
however, the general trend should be for this budget to
increase. Nearly 75 percent of the O&M budget consists of labor
and dredging costs in most years. Labor costs rarely decrease
for the Corps as it takes roughly the same amount of manpower
to operate Corps projects on a yearly basis. That means that
when the budget request is reduced as it is for fiscal year
2011, the only areas available to reduce are dredging and real
maintenance items.
This is the wrong trend for this program. The Corps is to
be commended for managing to keep as much of their
infrastructure operable as they have with the O&M budgets that
have been put forward and enacted. The American Recovery and
Reinvestment Act of 2009 was a tremendous boost to clear out
some of the worst of the backlogged maintenance items and
dredging, however, more needs to be done. The Committee
recommendation of $2,495,000,000, $134,000,000 above the budget
request, is a step in the right direction. The Committee urges
the administration to commit to a more realistic budget for O&M
in fiscal year 2012 and beyond to avoid problems such as
occurred on the Ohio River in fiscal year 2010.
In late 2009 and early 2010, transportation was disrupted
on the Ohio River twice due to unexpected lock closures. First
a miter gate fell off its mounts and into the river at the
Markland Lock, closing the main lock chamber for about 6
months. Shippers' costs increased dramatically as tows had to
be broken down to move through the much smaller auxiliary lock.
Fortunately, there was a smaller redundant lock at the site. If
not the river would have been closed above Markland for 6
months. That would mean no shipping by water of any commodities
in or out of the Ohio River Valley from Cincinnati, Ohio, to
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
To add insult to injury, in January 2010, the mount for the
miter gate at the Greenup Lock failed. That lock was out of
service for a number of weeks as well. With more than half of
the Corps locks more than 50 years old, unscheduled lock
closures may be the norm, if more funding is not invested in
the infrastructure. With more than 600 million tons of cargo
moved on the inland waterway system, these closures would have
significant impacts on the national economy. Maintenance of
this infrastructure is too important to our national economy to
allow it to fail due to short term budget goals.
The budget request and the Committee recommendation are
shown on the following table:
CORPS OF ENGINEERS--OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE
[In thousands of dollars]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Committee
Project title Budget estimate recommendation
------------------------------------------------------------------------
ALABAMA
ALABAMA-COOSA COMPREHENSIVE WATER 253 253
STUDY, AL............................
ALABAMA RIVER LAKES, AL............... 15,745 18,745
BLACK WARRIOR AND TOMBIGBEE RIVERS, AL 20,751 20,751
GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, AL........ 5,230 5,230
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORK, AL...... 30 30
MOBILE HARBOR, AL..................... 23,560 23,560
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, AL......... 100 100
TENNESSEE-TOMBIGBEE WATERWAY WILDLIFE 1,900 2,344
MITIGATION, AL & MS..................
TENNESSEE-TOMBIGBEE WATERWAY, AL & MS. 23,767 28,000
WALTER F. GEORGE LOCK AND DAM, AL & GA 8,394 8,394
ALASKA
ANCHORAGE HARBOR, AK.................. 14,013 14,013
BETHEL HARBOR, AK..................... 234 1,000
CHENA RIVER LAKES, AK................. 2,999 2,999
DILLINGHAM HARBOR, AK................. 955 955
DOUGLAS HARBOR, AK.................... 241 241
HAINES HARBOR, AK..................... 241 241
HOMER HARBOR, AK...................... 513 513
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, AK..... 180 180
KODIAK HARBORS, AK.................... ............... 750
NINILCHIK HARBOR, AK.................. 420 420
NOME HARBOR, AK....................... 973 973
PETERSBURG HARBOR, AK................. 500 1,000
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, AK......... 1,360 1,360
ARIZONA
ALAMO LAKE, AZ........................ 3,019 3,019
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, AZ..... 90 90
PAINTED ROCK DAM, AZ.................. 1,522 1,522
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, AZ... 33 33
WHITLOW RANCH DAM, AZ................. 607 607
ARKANSAS
BEAVER LAKE, AR....................... 10,570 10,570
BLAKELY MT DAM, LAKE OUACHITA, AR..... 8,452 9,000
BLUE MOUNTAIN LAKE, AR................ 1,612 1,612
BULL SHOALS LAKE, AR.................. 7,292 7,292
DARDANELLE LOCK & DAM, AR............. 7,632 7,632
DEGRAY LAKE, AR....................... 6,979 7,500
DEQUEEN LAKE, AR...................... 1,467 1,467
DIERKS LAKE, AR....................... 1,570 1,570
GILLHAM LAKE, AR...................... 1,340 1,340
GREERS FERRY LAKE, AR................. 10,230 10,230
HELENA HARBOR, AR..................... 15 500
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, AR..... 311 311
MCCLELLAN-KERR ARKANSAS RIVER 33,553 33,553
NAVIGATION SYSTEM, AR................
MILLWOOD LAKE, AR..................... 4,802 4,802
NARROWS DAM, LAKE GREESON, AR......... 4,874 5,250
NIMROD LAKE, AR....................... 1,957 1,957
NORFORK LAKE, AR...................... 6,224 6,224
OSCEOLA HARBOR, AR.................... 15 1,000
OUACHITA AND BLACK RIVERS, AR & LA.... 7,505 10,505
OZARK-JETA TAYLOR LOCK & DAM, AR...... 5,485 5,485
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, AR......... 3 3
WHITE RIVER, AR....................... 30 30
YELLOW BEND PORT, AR.................. 3 115
CALIFORNIA
BLACK BUTTE LAKE, CA.................. 2,367 2,367
BUCHANAN DAM, HV EASTMAN LAKE, CA..... 2,119 2,119
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR, CA............ 4,600 4,600
COYOTE VALLEY DAM, LAKE MENDOCINO, CA. 3,652 6,190
DRY CREEK (WARM SPRINGS) LAKE & 5,831 9,471
CHANNEL, CA..........................
FARMINGTON DAM, CA.................... 450 450
HIDDEN DAM, HENSLEY LAKE, CA.......... 2,163 2,163
HUMBOLDT HARBOR AND BAY, CA........... 5,848 5,848
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, CA..... 4,604 4,604
ISABELLA LAKE, CA..................... 1,956 1,956
LOS ANGELES COUNTY DRAINAGE AREA, CA.. 7,035 7,035
MARINA DEL REY, CA.................... 2,050 5,050
MERCED COUNTY STREAMS, CA............. 401 401
MOJAVE RIVER DAM, CA.................. 522 522
MORRO BAY HARBOR, CA.................. 1,590 1,590
NEW HOGAN LAKE, CA.................... 2,476 2,476
NEW MELONES LAKE, DOWNSTREAM CHANNEL, 1,929 1,929
CA...................................
NEWPORT BAY HARBOR, CA................ 1,280 1,280
OAKLAND HARBOR, CA.................... 7,500 7,500
OCEANSIDE HARBOR, CA.................. 1,520 1,520
PINE FLAT LAKE, CA.................... 3,378 3,378
PINOLE SHOAL MANAGEMENT STUDY, CA..... ............... 2,500
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, CA......... 2,132 2,132
RICHMOND HARBOR, CA................... 8,375 8,375
SACRAMENTO RIVER (30 FOOT PROJECT), CA 3,585 3,585
SACRAMENTO RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES 1,475 1,475
(DEBRIS CONTROL), CA.................
SACRAMENTO RIVER SHALLOW DRAFT 161 161
CHANNEL, CA..........................
SAN FRANCISCO BAY, DELTA MODEL 1,087 1,087
STRUCTURE, CA........................
SAN FRANCISCO HARBOR AND BAY, CA 3,090 3,090
(DRIFT REMOVAL)......................
SAN FRANCISCO HARBOR, CA.............. 2,776 2,776
SAN JOAQUIN RIVER, PORT OF STOCKTON, 3,603 6,500
CA...................................
SAN PABLO BAY AND MARE ISLAND STRAIT, 2,750 2,750
CA...................................
SANTA ANA RIVER BASIN, CA............. 4,883 4,883
SANTA BARBARA HARBOR, CA.............. 2,040 2,040
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, CA... 1,751 1,751
SUCCESS LAKE, CA...................... 2,529 2,529
SUISUN BAY CHANNEL, CA................ 2,980 2,980
TERMINUS DAM, LAKE KAWEAH, CA......... 2,133 2,133
VENTURA HARBOR, CA.................... 2,840 2,840
YUBA RIVER, CA........................ 121 121
COLORADO
BEAR CREEK LAKE, CO................... 647 647
CHATFIELD LAKE, CO.................... 1,375 1,375
CHERRY CREEK LAKE, CO................. 1,057 1,057
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, CO..... 572 572
JOHN MARTIN RESERVOIR, CO............. 2,941 2,941
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, CO... 765 765
TRINIDAD LAKE, CO..................... 1,243 1,243
CONNECTICUT
BLACK ROCK LAKE, CT................... 537 537
COLEBROOK RIVER LAKE, CT.............. 689 689
HANCOCK BROOK LAKE, CT................ 478 478
HOP BROOK LAKE, CT.................... 1,092 1,092
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, CT..... 292 292
LONG ISLAND SOUND, DMMP, CT........... 2,000 2,000
MANSFIELD HOLLOW LAKE, CT............. 699 699
MYSTIC RIVER, CT...................... 160 160
NEW HAVEN HARBOR, CT.................. 400 400
NORTHFIELD BROOK LAKE, CT............. 559 559
NORWALK HARBOR, CT.................... ............... 582
PATCHOGUE RIVER, CT................... ............... 918
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, CT......... 1,050 1,050
STAMFORD HURRICANE BARRIER, CT........ 467 467
THOMASTON DAM, CT..................... 994 994
WEST THOMPSON LAKE, CT................ 849 849
DELAWARE
CEDAR CREEK, DE....................... 50 50
HARBOR OF REFUGE, LEWES, DE........... ............... 200
INDIAN RIVER INLET AND BAY, DE........ 100 100
INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, DELAWARE RIVER 16,075 16,075
TO CHESAPEAKE BAY, DE & MD...........
INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, REHOBOTH BAY TO 100 100
DELAWARE BAY, DE.....................
MISPILLION RIVER, DE.................. 50 50
MURDERKILL RIVER, DE.................. 50 50
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, DE......... 40 40
WILMINGTON HARBOR, DE................. 4,270 7,020
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, DC..... 100 100
POTOMAC AND ANACOSTIA RIVER, DC (DRIFT 845 845
REMOVAL).............................
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, DC......... 30 30
WASHINGTON HARBOR, DC................. 25 25
FLORIDA
ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, FL.... ............... 2,820
CANAVERAL HARBOR, FL.................. 4,715 4,715
CENTRAL & SOUTHERN FLORIDA, FL........ 19,520 19,520
ESCAMBIA AND CONECUH RIVERS, FL....... 68 68
FERNANDINA HARBOR, FL................. 1,294 1,294
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, FL..... 900 900
INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY CALOOSAHATCHEE ............... 2,000
RIVER TO ANCLOTE RIVER, FL...........
INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, JACKSONVILLE TO 350 4,000
MIAMI, FL............................
JACKSONVILLE HARBOR, FL............... 5,708 5,708
JIM WOODRUFF LOCK AND DAM, LAKE 9,449 9,449
SEMINOLE, FL, AL & GA................
MIAMI HARBOR, FL...................... ............... 200
OKEECHOBEE WATERWAY, FL............... 2,444 2,444
PALM BEACH HARBOR, FL................. 2,510 2,510
PANAMA CITY HARBOR, FL................ 55 55
PENSACOLA HARBOR, FL.................. 67 67
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, FL......... 1,450 1,450
REMOVAL OF AQUATIC GROWTH, FL......... 3,500 3,500
ST. LUCIE INLET, FL................... 250 250
TAMPA HARBOR, FL...................... 5,200 5,200
WATER/ENVIRONMENTAL CERTIFICATION, FL. 400 400
GEORGIA
ALLATOONA LAKE, GA.................... 7,008 7,008
APALACHICOLA, CHATTAHOOCHEE AND FLINT 2,603 2,603
RIVERS, GA, AL & FL..................
ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, GA.... 265 1,500
BRUNSWICK HARBOR, GA.................. 6,719 6,719
BUFORD DAM AND LAKE SIDNEY LANIER, GA. 8,840 8,840
CARTERS DAM AND LAKE, GA.............. 8,136 8,136
HARTWELL LAKE, GA & SC................ 11,501 11,501
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED ENVIRONMENTAL 85 85
PROJECTS, GA.........................
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, GA..... 141 141
J. STROM THURMOND LAKE, GA & SC....... 10,918 10,918
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, GA......... 122 122
RICHARD B RUSSELL DAM & LAKE, GA & SC. 9,387 9,387
SAVANNAH HARBOR, GA................... 18,462 18,462
SAVANNAH RIVER BELOW AUGUSTA, GA...... 230 230
WEST POINT DAM AND LAKE, GA & AL...... 8,845 8,845
HAWAII
BARBERS POINT HARBOR, HI.............. 245 330
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, HI..... 642 961
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, HI......... 604 604
IDAHO
ALBENI FALLS DAM, ID.................. 1,521 1,521
DWORKSHAK DAM AND RESERVOIR, ID....... 2,965 2,965
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, ID..... 288 288
LUCKY PEAK LAKE, ID................... 2,689 2,689
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, ID... 499 499
ILLINOIS
CALUMET HARBOR AND RIVER, IL & IN..... 4,238 4,238
CARLYLE LAKE, IL...................... 5,643 5,643
CHICAGO HARBOR, IL.................... 2,064 2,064
CHICAGO RIVER, IL..................... 510 510
CHICAGO SANITARY AND SHIP CANAL 7,450 7,450
DISPERSAL BARRIER, IL................
FARM CREEK RESERVOIRS, IL............. 398 398
ILLINOIS WATERWAY, IL & IN (MVR 32,238 32,238
PORTION).............................
ILLINOIS WATERWAY, IL & IN (MVS 1,802 1,802
PORTION).............................
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED ENVIRONMENTAL 65 65
PROJECTS, IL.........................
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, IL..... 1,707 1,707
KASKASKIA RIVER NAVIGATION, IL........ 2,176 2,176
LAKE MICHIGAN DIVERSION, IL........... 710 710
LAKE SHELBYVILLE, IL.................. 5,512 5,512
MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI 53,692 53,692
RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS (MVR PORTION),
IL...................................
MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI 21,581 21,581
RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS (MVS PORTION),
IL...................................
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, IL......... 106 106
REND LAKE, IL......................... 5,702 5,702
SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY 689 689
WATERS, IL...........................
WAUKEGAN HARBOR, IL................... 590 590
INDIANA
BROOKVILLE LAKE, IN................... 1,141 1,141
BURNS WATERWAY HARBOR, IN............. 171 171
CAGLES MILL LAKE, IN.................. 1,030 1,030
CECIL M. HARDEN LAKE, IN.............. 1,013 1,013
INDIANA HARBOR, IN.................... 5,700 5,700
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, IN..... 800 800
J. EDWARD ROUSH LAKE, IN.............. 1,793 1,793
MISSISSINEWA LAKE, IN................. 1,147 1,147
MONROE LAKE, IN....................... 1,899 1,899
PATOKA LAKE, IN....................... 980 980
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, IN......... 185 185
SALAMONIE LAKE, IN.................... 1,012 1,012
SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY 125 125
WATERS, IN...........................
IOWA
CORALVILLE LAKE, IA................... 4,559 5,000
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, IA..... 393 393
MISSOURI RIVER--KENSLERS BEND, NE TO 137 137
SOIUX CITY, IA.......................
MISSOURI RIVER--RULO TO MOUTH, IA, NE, ............... 7,000
KS & MO..............................
MISSOURI RIVER--SIOUX CITY TO THE 9,021 9,021
MOUTH, IA, KS, MO, & NE..............
RATHBUN LAKE, IA...................... 2,501 2,501
RED ROCK DAM AND LAKE, RED ROCK, IA... 8,135 9,000
SAYLORVILLE LAKE, IA.................. 5,003 5,500
KANSAS
CLINTON LAKE, KS...................... 2,080 2,080
COUNCIL GROVE LAKE, KS................ 1,649 1,649
EL DORADO LAKE, KS.................... 609 609
ELK CITY LAKE, KS..................... 1,040 1,040
FALL RIVER LAKE, KS................... 1,200 1,200
HILLSDALE LAKE, KS.................... 791 791
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, KS..... 318 318
JOHN REDMOND DAM AND RESERVOIR, KS.... 1,760 1,760
KANOPOLIS, KS......................... 1,561 1,561
MARION LAKE, KS....................... 1,613 1,613
MELVERN LAKE, KS...................... 1,981 1,981
MILFORD LAKE, KS...................... 2,391 2,391
PEARSON-SKUBITZ BIG HILL LAKE, KS..... 1,332 1,332
PERRY LAKE, KS........................ 2,254 2,254
POMONA LAKE, KS....................... 1,965 1,965
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, KS... 100 100
TORONTO LAKE, KS...................... 652 652
TUTTLE CREEK LAKE, KS................. 2,644 2,644
WILSON LAKE, KS....................... 1,415 1,715
KENTUCKY
BARKLEY DAM AND LAKE, BARKLEY, KY & TN 10,025 10,025
BARREN RIVER LAKE, KY................. 3,454 3,454
BIG SANDY HARBOR, KY.................. 1,600 1,600
BUCKHORN LAKE, KY..................... 1,655 1,655
CARR CREEK LAKE, KY................... 1,882 1,882
CAVE RUN LAKE, KY..................... 965 965
DEWEY LAKE, KY........................ 1,762 1,762
ELVIS STAHR (HICKMAN) HARBOR, KY...... 16 780
FISHTRAP LAKE, KY..................... 1,942 1,942
GRAYSON LAKE, KY...................... 1,434 1,434
GREEN AND BARREN RIVERS, KY........... 2,100 2,100
GREEN RIVER LAKE, KY.................. 2,242 2,242
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, KY..... 839 839
KENTUCKY RIVER, KY.................... 10 10
LAUREL RIVER LAKE, KY................. 1,646 1,646
MARTINS FORK LAKE, KY................. 1,088 1,088
MIDDLESBORO CUMBERLAND RIVER BASIN, KY 113 113
NOLIN LAKE, KY........................ 2,821 2,821
OHIO RIVER LOCKS AND DAMS, KY, IL, IN 31,433 31,433
& OH.................................
OHIO RIVER OPEN CHANNEL WORK, KY, IL, 5,682 5,682
IN & OH..............................
PAINTSVILLE LAKE, KY.................. 1,361 1,361
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, KY......... 2 2
ROUGH RIVER LAKE, KY.................. 2,606 2,606
TAYLORSVILLE LAKE, KY................. 1,232 1,232
WOLF CREEK DAM, LAKE CUMBERLAND, KY... 8,089 8,089
YATESVILLE LAKE, KY................... 1,154 1,154
LOUISIANA
ATCHAFALAYA RIVER AND BAYOUS CHENE, 8,230 12,230
BOEUF & BLACK, LA....................
BARATARIA BAY WATERWAY, LA............ 135 135
BAYOU BODCAU RESERVOIR, LA............ 1,072 1,072
BAYOU LAFOURCHE AND LAFOURCHE-JUMP 1,050 1,050
WATERWAY, LA.........................
BAYOU PIERRE, LA...................... 24 24
BAYOU SEGNETTE WATERWAY, LA........... 37 37
BAYOU TECHE & VERMILION RIVER, LA..... 11 11
BAYOU TECHE, LA....................... 150 150
CADDO LAKE, LA........................ 222 222
CALCASIEU RIVER AND PASS, LA.......... 14,495 20,081
FRESHWATER BAYOU, LA.................. 1,625 1,625
GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, LA........ 19,031 19,031
HOUMA NAVIGATION CANAL, LA............ 2,352 4,352
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, LA..... 758 758
J.BENNETT JOHNSTON WATERWAY, LA....... 7,745 12,000
LAKE PROVIDENCE HARBOR, LA............ 17 600
MADISON PARISH PORT, LA............... 5 150
MERMENTAU RIVER, LA................... 2,008 2,008
MISSISSIPPI RIVER OUTLETS AT VENICE, 2,215 4,215
LA...................................
MISSISSIPPI RIVER, BATON ROUGE TO THE 62,969 62,969
GULF OF MEXICO, LA...................
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, LA......... 60 60
REMOVAL OF AQUATIC GROWTH, LA......... 1,410 1,410
WALLACE LAKE, LA...................... 241 241
WATERWAY FROM EMPIRE TO THE GULF, LA.. 5 5
WATERWAY FROM INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY TO 30 30
BAYOU DULAC, LA......................
MAINE
BASS HARBOR, TREMONT, ME.............. 65 65
BEALS HARBOR, ME...................... 100 1,250
DISPOSAL AREA MONITORING, ME.......... 1,050 1,050
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, ME..... 148 148
PIG ISLAND GUT, ME.................... 100 100
PORTLAND HARBOR, ME................... ............... 8,000
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, ME......... 750 750
SACO RIVER, ME........................ 140 140
SCARBOROUGH RIVER, ME................. 160 160
SOUTHERN MAINE AND NEW HAMPSHIRE OCEAN ............... 200
DISPOSAL SITE DESIGNATION, ME & NH..
SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY 20 20
WATERS, ME...........................
MARYLAND
BALTIMORE HARBOR AND CHANNELS (50 17,215 17,215
FOOT), MD............................
BALTIMORE HARBOR, MD (DRIFT REMOVAL).. 375 375
CRISFIELD HARBOR, MD.................. ............... 160
CUMBERLAND, MD AND RIDGELEY, WV....... 188 188
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MD..... 124 124
JENNINGS RANDOLPH LAKE, MD & WV....... 1,756 2,856
LOWER THOROFARE, DEAL ISLAND, MD...... ............... 1,440
NANTICOKE RIVER, MD................... 160 160
OCEAN CITY HARBOR AND INLET AND 1,400 1,400
SINEPUXENT BAY, MD...................
POCOMOKE RIVER, MD.................... ............... 1,800
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, MD......... 475 475
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, MD... 60 60
WICOMICO RIVER, MD.................... 1,500 1,500
MASSACHUSETTS
BARRE FALLS DAM, MA................... 700 700
BIRCH HILL DAM, MA.................... 792 792
BOSTON HARBOR, MA..................... 2,700 2,700
BUFFUMVILLE LAKE, MA.................. 657 657
CAPE COD CANAL, MA.................... 14,174 14,174
CHARLES RIVER NATURAL VALLEY STORAGE 329 329
AREA, MA.............................
CONANT BROOK LAKE, MA................. 403 403
DUXBURY HARBOR, MA.................... 100 100
EAST BRIMFIELD LAKE, MA............... 557 557
HODGES VILLAGE DAM, MA................ 629 629
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MA..... 349 349
KNIGHTVILLE DAM, MA................... 688 688
LITTLEVILLE LAKE, MA.................. 682 682
NEW BEDFORD, FAIRHAVEN AND ACUSHNET 1,250 1,250
HURRICANE BARRIER, MA................
NEWBURYPORT HARBOR, MA................ ............... 3,000
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, MA......... 1,200 1,200
TULLY LAKE, MA........................ 726 726
WEST HILL DAM, MA..................... 842 842
WESTVILLE LAKE, MA.................... 661 661
MICHIGAN
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MI..... 125 125
MICHIGAN NAVIGATION O&M, MI........... ............... 8,000
ALPENA HARBOR, MI................. ............... ...............
ARCADIA HARBOR, MI................ ............... ...............
BIG BAY HARBOR, MI................ ............... ...............
BLACK RIVER HARBOR, GOGEBIC CO-OP, ............... ...............
MI...............................
BOLLES HARBOR, MI................. ............... ...............
CEDAR RIVER HARBOR, MI (NAVIGATION ............... ...............
STRUCTURES)......................
CHANNELS IN LAKE ST CLAIR, MI..... 1,117 1,117
CHARLEVOIX HARBOR, MI............. 208 208
CHEBOYGAN HARBOR, MI.............. ............... ...............
CLINTON RIVER, MI................. ............... ...............
DETOUR HARBOR, MI................. ............... ...............
DETROIT RIVER, MI................. 5,218 5,218
EAGLE HARBOR, MI.................. ............... ...............
FRANKFORT HARBOR, MI.............. ............... ...............
GRAND HAVEN HARBOR, MI............ 722 722
GRAND HAVEN HARBOR, MI (NAVIGATION ............... ...............
STRUCTURES)......................
GRAND MARAIS HARBOR, MI ............... ...............
(NAVIGATION STRUCTURES)..........
HARBOR BEACH HARBOR, MI........... ............... ...............
HARRISVILLE HARBOR, MI............ ............... ...............
HOLLAND HARBOR, MI................ 655 655
KEWEENAW WATERWAY, MI............. 12 12
KEWEENAW WATERWAY, MI (NAVIGATION ............... ...............
STRUCTURES)......................
LAC LA BELLE HARBOR, MI........... ............... ...............
LELAND HARBOR, MI................. ............... ...............
LES CHENEAUX ISLANDS CHANNELS, MI. ............... ...............
LEXINGTON HARBOR, MI.............. ............... ...............
LITTLE LAKE HARBOR, MI............ ............... ...............
LUDINGTON HARBOR, MI.............. 1,419 1,419
LUDINGTON HARBOR, MI (NAVIGATION ............... ...............
STRUCTURES)......................
MANISTEE HARBOR AND RIVER CHANNEL, 252 252
MI...............................
MARQUETTE HARBOR, MI.............. 230 230
MENOMINEE HARBOR, MI & WI......... ............... ...............
MONROE HARBOR, MI................. 1,340 1,340
MUSKEGON HARBOR, MI............... 872 872
ONTONAGON HARBOR, MI.............. 1,172 1,172
PENTWATER HARBOR, MI.............. ............... ...............
PORT SANILAC HARBOR, MI........... ............... ...............
PORTAGE LAKE HARBOR, MI ............... ...............
(NAVIGATION STRUCTURES)..........
PRESQUE ISLE HARBOR, MI........... ............... ...............
ROUGE RIVER, MI................... ............... ...............
SAGINAW RIVER, MI................. 3,190 3,190
SAUGATUCK HARBOR, KALAMAZOO RIVER, ............... ...............
MI...............................
SEBEWAING RIVER, MI............... 75 75
SOUTH HAVEN HARBOR, MI............ ............... ...............
ST. CLAIR RIVER, MI............... 1,233 1,233
ST. JOSEPH HARBOR, MI............. 755 755
ST. MARYS RIVER, MI (NAVIGATION 22,074 22,074
STRUCTURES)......................
WHITE LAKE HARBOR, MI............. ............... ...............
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, MI......... 430 430
SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY 2,501 2,501
WATERS, MI...........................
MINNESOTA
BIGSTONE LAKE AND WHETSTONE RIVER, MN 251 251
& SD.................................
DULUTH-SUPERIOR HARBOR, MN & WI....... 7,237 7,237
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MN..... 463 463
LAC QUI PARLE LAKES, MINNESOTA RIVER, 677 677
MN...................................
MINNESOTA RIVER, MN................... 262 262
MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI 48,426 48,426
RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS (MVP PORTION),
MN...................................
ORWELL LAKE, MN....................... 462 462
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, MN......... 84 84
RED LAKE RESERVOIR, MN................ 233 233
RESERVOIRS AT HEADWATERS OF 4,381 4,381
MISSISSIPPI RIVER, MN................
ST. PAUL HARBOR DREDGING, MN.......... ............... 200
SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY 446 446
WATERS, MN...........................
MISSISSIPPI
BILOXI HARBOR, MS..................... 1,400 1,400
CLAIBORNE COUNTY PORT, MS............. 1 74
EAST FORK, TOMBIGBEE RIVER, MS........ 220 220
GULFPORT HARBOR, MS................... 3,882 10,537
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MS..... 34 34
MOUTH OF YAZOO RIVER, MS.............. 30 175
OKATIBBEE LAKE, MS.................... 1,655 2,505
PASCAGOULA HARBOR, MS................. 5,520 10,910
PEARL RIVER, MS & LA.................. 145 145
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, MS......... 77 77
ROSEDALE HARBOR, MS................... 11 1,200
YAZOO RIVER, MS....................... 26 154
MISSOURI
CARUTHERSVILLE HARBOR, MO............. 13 900
CLARENCE CANNON DAM AND MARK TWAIN 7,841 7,841
LAKE, MO.............................
CLEARWATER LAKE, MO................... 3,021 3,021
HARRY S TRUMAN DAM AND RESERVOIR, MO.. 8,842 8,842
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MO..... 1,713 1,713
LITTLE BLUE RIVER LAKES, MO........... 741 741
LONG BRANCH LAKE, MO.................. 941 941
MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN THE OHIO AND 28,731 28,731
MISSOURI RIVERS (REG WORKS), MO & IL
NEW MADRID HARBOR, MILE 889, MO....... ............... 420
NEW MADRID HARBOR, MO................. 210 240
POMME DE TERRE LAKE, MO............... 2,156 2,156
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, MO......... 4 4
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, MO... 327 327
SMITHVILLE LAKE, MO................... 1,160 1,160
SOUTHEAST MISSOURI PORT, MO........... ............... 360
STOCKTON LAKE, MO..................... 4,153 4,153
TABLE ROCK LAKE, MO & AR.............. 8,293 8,293
UNION LAKE, MO........................ 5 5
MONTANA
FT. PECK DAM AND LAKE, MT............. 5,411 5,411
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MT..... 120 120
LIBBY DAM, MT......................... 1,846 1,846
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, MT... 270 270
NEBRASKA
GAVINS POINT DAM, NE & SD............. 7,706 7,706
HARLAN COUNTY LAKE, NE................ 2,222 2,222
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, NE..... 343 343
PAPILLION CREEK, NE................... 738 738
SALT CREEK AND TRIBUTARIES, NE........ 1,067 1,067
NEVADA
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, NV..... 66 66
MARTIS CREEK LAKE, NV & CA............ 1,170 1,170
PINE AND MATHEWS CANYONS LAKES, NV.... 557 557
NEW HAMPSHIRE
BLACKWATER DAM, NH.................... 716 716
EDWARD MACDOWELL LAKE, NH............. 635 635
FRANKLIN FALLS DAM, NH................ 724 724
HOPKINTON-EVERETT LAKES, NH........... 1,440 1,440
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, NH..... 105 105
OTTER BROOK LAKE, NH.................. 730 730
PORTSMOUTH HARBOR AND PISCATAQUA ............... 500
RIVER, NH............................
PORTSMOUTH HARBOR, (SAGAMORE CREEK ............... 150
CHANNELS), NH........................
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, NH......... 275 275
SURRY MOUNTAIN LAKE, NH............... 746 746
NEW JERSEY
ABSECON INLET, NJ..................... ............... 200
BARNEGAT INLET, NJ.................... 325 325
COLD SPRING INLET, NJ................. 350 350
DELAWARE RIVER AT CAMDEN, NJ.......... 15 15
DELAWARE RIVER, PHILADELPHIA TO THE 20,020 20,020
SEA, NJ, PA & DE.....................
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, NJ..... 145 145
MANASQUAN RIVER, NJ................... ............... 250
NEW JERSEY INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, NJ.. 250 250
NEWARK BAY, HACKENSACK AND PASSAIC 100 100
RIVERS, NJ...........................
PASSAIC RIVER FLOOD WARNING SYSTEM, NJ 570 570
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, NJ......... 1,506 1,506
RARITAN RIVER TO ARTHUR KILL CUT-OFF, 100 400
NJ...................................
RARITAN RIVER, NJ..................... 80 225
SANDY HOOK BAY AT LEONARD, NJ......... 100 100
SHARK RIVER, NJ....................... 500 500
SHOAL HARBOR AND COMPTON CREEK, NJ.... 80 80
SHREWSBURY RIVER MAIN CHANNEL, NJ..... 80 80
NEW MEXICO
ABIQUIU DAM, NM....................... 2,891 2,891
COCHITI LAKE, NM...................... 3,546 3,546
CONCHAS LAKE, NM...................... 2,067 2,972
GALISTEO DAM, NM...................... 927 927
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, NM..... 740 740
JEMEZ CANYON DAM, NM.................. 1,398 1,398
MIDDLE RIO GRANDE ENDANGERED SPECIES 2,500 2,500
COLLABORATIVE PROGRAM, NM [MRGESCP]..
SANTA ROSA DAM AND LAKE, NM........... 1,220 1,220
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, NM... 532 532
TWO RIVERS DAM, NM.................... 601 601
UPPER RIO GRANDE WATER OPERATIONS 1,000 1,000
MODEL STUDY, CO, NM, TX..............
NEW YORK
ALMOND LAKE, NY....................... 490 490
ARKPORT DAM, NY....................... 223 223
BROWNS CREEK, NY...................... 100 100
BUTTERMILK CHANNEL, NY................ 8,600 8,600
EAST RIVER, NY........................ 2,800 2,800
EAST ROCKAWAY INLET, NY............... 200 200
EAST SIDNEY LAKE, NY.................. 573 573
EASTCHESTER CREEK, NY................. 150 150
FIRE ISLAND INLET TO JONES INLET, NY.. 100 5,100
FLUSHING BAY AND CREEK, NY............ 100 100
GREAT KILLS HARBOR, STATEN ISLAND, NY. 60 60
GREAT SOUTH BAY, NY................... 100 100
HUDSON RIVER CHANNEL, NY.............. 100 100
HUDSON RIVER, NY (MAINT).............. 3,700 3,700
HUDSON RIVER, NY (O & C).............. 1,650 1,650
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, NY..... 858 858
JAMAICA BAY, NY....................... 120 120
JONES INLET, NY....................... 150 150
LAKE MONTAUK HARBOR, NY............... 60 60
LONG ISLAND INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, NY. 100 100
MATTITUCK HARBOR, NY.................. 60 60
MORICHES INLET, NY.................... 100 100
MOUNT MORRIS DAM, NY.................. 3,661 3,661
NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY CHANNELS, NY.. 6,150 6,150
NEW YORK HARBOR, NY................... 3,796 3,796
NEW YORK HARBOR, NY & NJ (DRIFT 7,200 7,200
REMOVAL).............................
NEW YORK HARBOR, NY & NJ (PREVENTION 1,045 1,045
OF OBSTRUCTIVE DEPOSITS).............
NEW YORK GREAT LAKES NAVIGATION O&M, ............... 1,700
NY...................................
BARCELONA HARBOR, NY.............. ............... ...............
BLACK ROCK CHANNEL AND TONAWANDA 1,552 1,552
HARBOR, NY.......................
BUFFALO HARBOR, NY................ 1,165 1,165
CAPE HARBOR, NY................... ............... ...............
GREAT SODUS BAY HARBOR, NY........ ............... ...............
IRONDEQUOIT HARBOR, NY............ ............... ...............
LITTLE RIVER HARBOR, NY........... ............... ...............
LITTLE SODUS BAY HARBOR, NY....... 6 6
MORRISTOWN HARBOR, NY............. ............... ...............
OAK ORCHARD HARBOR, NY............ ............... ...............
OGDENSBURG HARBOR, NY............. ............... ...............
OLCOTT HARBOR, NY................. ............... ...............
OSWEGO HARBOR, NY................. 34 34
PORT ONTARIO HARBOR, NY........... ............... ...............
ROCHESTER HARBOR, NY.............. 56 56
VINCENT HARBOR, NY................ ............... ...............
WILSON HARBOR, NY................. ............... ...............
NEWTOWN CREEK, NY..................... 60 60
PORTCHESTER HARBOR, NY................ 60 60
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, NY......... 1,928 1,928
SHINNECOCK INLET, NY.................. 100 100
SOUTHERN NEW YORK FLOOD CONTROL 925 925
PROJECTS, NY.........................
SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY 635 635
WATERS, NY...........................
WESTCHESTER CREEK, NY................. 100 100
WHITNEY POINT LAKE, NY................ 642 642
NORTH CAROLINA
ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, NC.... 4,750 4,750
B. EVERETT JORDAN DAM AND LAKE, NC.... 1,918 1,918
BOGUE INLET AND CHANNEL, NC........... ............... 500
CAPE FEAR RIVER ABOVE WILMINGTON, NC.. 2,243 2,243
CAROLINA BEACH INLET, NC.............. ............... 500
FALLS LAKE, NC........................ 2,042 2,042
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, NC..... 255 255
LOCKWOODS FOLLY RIVER, NC............. ............... 500
MANTEO (SHALLOWBAG) BAY, NC........... 4,095 8,095
MASONBORO INLET AND CONNECTING 50 50
CHANNELS, NC.........................
MOREHEAD CITY HARBOR, NC.............. 3,800 4,100
NEW RIVER INLET, NC................... 600 600
NEW TOPSAIL INLET AND CONNECTING ............... 500
CHANNELS, NC.........................
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, NC......... 655 655
ROLLINSON CHANNEL, NC................. 50 50
SILVER LAKE HARBOR, NC................ 150 150
W. KERR SCOTT DAM AND RESERVOIR, NC... 3,591 3,591
WILMINGTON HARBOR, NC................. 12,247 12,847
NORTH DAKOTA
BOWMAN HALEY, ND...................... 246 246
GARRISON DAM, LAKE SAKAKAWEA, ND...... 12,564 12,764
HOMME LAKE, ND........................ 276 276
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, ND..... 303 303
LAKE ASHTABULA AND BALDHILL DAM, ND... 1,424 1,424
MISSOURI RIVER BETWEEN FORT PECK DAM, ............... 560
MT, AND GAVIN'S POINT DAM, SD & NE
(SEC. 33), (MANDAN DIKE RESTORATION,
ND)..................................
PIPESTEM LAKE, ND..................... 550 550
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, ND... 253 253
SOURIS RIVER, ND...................... 509 509
SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY 35 35
WATERS, ND...........................
OHIO
ALUM CREEK LAKE, OH................... 1,435 1,435
ASHTABULA HARBOR, OH.................. 1,995 1,995
BERLIN LAKE, OH....................... 2,347 2,347
CAESAR CREEK LAKE, OH................. 1,559 1,559
CLARENCE J. BROWN DAM, OH............. 1,190 1,190
CLEVELAND HARBOR, OH.................. 10,680 14,480
CONNEAUT HARBOR, OH................... 940 940
DEER CREEK LAKE, OH................... 1,323 1,323
DELAWARE LAKE, OH..................... 1,362 1,362
DILLON LAKE, OH....................... 1,260 1,260
FAIRPORT HARBOR, OH................... 1,572 1,572
HURON HARBOR, OH...................... ............... 500
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, OH..... 624 624
LORAIN HARBOR, OH..................... 443 443
MASSILLON LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECT, OH 21 21
MICHAEL J. KIRWAN DAM AND RESERVOIR, 1,403 1,403
OH...................................
MISSISSIPPI FLOOD CONTROL, OH......... 1,722 1,722
MOSQUITO CREEK LAKE, OH............... 1,413 1,413
MUSKINGUM RIVER LAKES, OH............. 8,244 8,244
NORTH BRANCH KOKOSING RIVER LAKE, OH.. 296 296
PAINT CREEK LAKE, OH.................. 1,297 1,297
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, OH......... 295 295
ROSEVILLE LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECT, OH 35 35
SANDUSKY HARBOR, OH................... 1,102 1,102
SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY 257 257
WATERS, OH...........................
TOLEDO HARBOR, OH..................... 5,049 7,849
TOM JENKINS DAM, OH................... 603 603
WEST FORK OF MILL CREEK LAKE, OH...... 750 750
WILLIAM H. HARSHA LAKE, OH............ 1,611 1,611
OKLAHOMA
ARCADIA LAKE, OK...................... 596 596
BIRCH LAKE, OK........................ 646 646
BROKEN BOW LAKE, OK................... 2,458 2,458
CANTON LAKE, OK....................... 1,949 1,949
COPAN LAKE, OK........................ 1,104 1,104
EUFAULA LAKE, OK...................... 7,232 7,232
FORT GIBSON LAKE, OK.................. 6,216 6,216
FORT SUPPLY LAKE, OK.................. 1,058 1,058
GREAT SALT PLAINS LAKE, OK............ 406 406
HEYBURN LAKE, OK...................... 603 603
HUGO LAKE, OK......................... 1,748 1,748
HULAH LAKE, OK........................ 901 901
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, OK..... 261 261
KAW LAKE, OK.......................... 2,121 2,121
KEYSTONE LAKE, OK..................... 5,006 5,006
MCCLELLAN-KERR ARKANSAS RIVER 5,794 5,794
NAVIGATION SYSTEM, OK................
OOLOGAH LAKE, OK...................... 2,089 2,089
OPTIMA LAKE, OK....................... 197 197
PENSACOLA RESERVOIR, LAKE OF THE 167 167
CHEROKEES, OK........................
PINE CREEK LAKE, OK................... 1,032 1,032
ROBERT S. KERR LOCK AND DAM AND 7,604 7,604
RESERVOIR, OK........................
SARDIS LAKE, OK....................... 1,130 1,130
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, OK... 900 900
SKIATOOK LAKE, OK..................... 1,465 1,465
TENKILLER FERRY LAKE, OK.............. 4,459 4,459
WAURIKA LAKE, OK...................... 2,568 2,568
WEBBERS FALLS LOCK & DAM, OK.......... 5,617 5,617
WISTER LAKE, OK....................... 922 922
OREGON
APPLEGATE LAKE, OR.................... 1,298 1,298
BLUE RIVER LAKE, OR................... 573 573
BONNEVILLE LOCK & DAM, OR & WA........ 7,487 7,487
CHETCO RIVER, OR...................... 586 586
COLUMBIA & LWR WILLAMETTE R BLW 24,868 24,868
VANCOUVER, WA AND PORTLAND, OR.......
COLUMBIA RIVER AT THE MOUTH, OR & WA.. 12,850 18,350
COLUMBIA RIVER BETWEEN VANCOUVER, WA & 645 645
THE DALLES, OR.......................
COOS BAY, OR.......................... 4,697 5,791
COQUILLE RIVER, OR.................... 433 433
COTTAGE GROVE LAKE, OR................ 1,319 1,319
COUGAR LAKE, OR....................... 1,733 1,733
DEPOE BAY, OR......................... ............... 166
DETROIT LAKE, OR...................... 1,127 1,127
DORENA LAKE, OR....................... 1,055 1,055
ELK CREEK LAKE, OR.................... 87 87
FALL CREEK LAKE, OR................... 1,149 1,149
FERN RIDGE LAKE, OR................... 1,800 1,800
GREEN PETER-FOSTER LAKES, OR.......... 2,139 2,139
HILLS CREEK LAKE, OR.................. 863 863
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED ENVIRONMENTAL 30 30
PROJECTS, OR.........................
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, OR..... 559 559
JOHN DAY LOCK AND DAM, OR & WA........ 5,217 5,217
LOOKOUT POINT LAKE, OR................ 2,080 2,080
LOST CREEK LAKE, OR................... 3,897 3,897
MCNARY LOCK & DAM, OR & WA............ 6,277 6,277
PORT ORFORD, OR....................... ............... 400
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, OR......... 200 200
ROGUE RIVER AT GOLD BEACH, OR......... 579 579
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, OR... 92 92
SIUSLAW RIVER , OR.................... 708 1,083
SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY 4,100 4,100
WATERS, OR...........................
TILLAMOOK BAY AND BAR, OR............. ............... 600
UMPQUA RIVER, OR...................... 800 800
WILLAMETTE RIVER AT WILLAMETTE FALLS, 92 258
OR...................................
WILLAMETTE RIVER BANK PROTECTION, OR.. 85 85
WILLOW CREEK LAKE, OR................. 657 657
YAQUINA BAY AND HARBOR, OR............ 1,786 1,986
YAQUINA RIVER (DEPOT SLOUGH), OR...... ............... 12
PENNSYLVANIA
ALLEGHENY RIVER, PA................... 8,456 8,456
ALVIN R. RUSH DAM, PA................. 600 600
AYLESWORTH CREEK LAKE, PA............. 230 230
BELTZVILLE LAKE, PA................... 1,425 1,425
BLUE MARSH LAKE, PA................... 2,817 2,817
CONEMAUGH RIVER LAKE, PA.............. 1,351 1,351
COWANESQUE LAKE, PA................... 1,772 1,772
CROOKED CREEK LAKE, PA................ 2,039 2,039
CURWENSVILLE LAKE, PA................. 687 687
DELAWARE RIVER, PHILADELPHIA, PA TO 820 820
TRENTON, NJ..........................
EAST BRANCH CLARION RIVER LAKE, PA.... 1,671 1,671
ERIE HARBOR, PA....................... 1,389 1,389
FOSTER JOSEPH SAYERS DAM, PA.......... 672 672
FRANCIS E. WALTER DAM, PA............. 880 880
GENERAL EDGAR JADWIN DAM AND 250 250
RESERVOIR, PA........................
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, PA..... 744 744
JOHNSTOWN, PA......................... 36 36
KINZUA DAM AND ALLEGHANY RESERVOIR, PA 1,469 1,469
LOYALHANNA LAKE, PA................... 1,460 1,460
MAHONING CREEK LAKE, PA............... 1,326 1,326
MONONGAHELA RIVER, PA................. 15,861 15,861
OHIO RIVER LOCKS AND DAMS, PA, OH & WV 28,023 28,023
OHIO RIVER OPEN CHANNEL WORK, PA, OH & 633 633
WV...................................
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, PA......... 170 170
PROMPTON LAKE, PA..................... 506 506
PUNXSUTAWNEY, PA...................... 22 22
RAYSTOWN LAKE, PA..................... 3,752 3,752
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, PA... 46 46
SCHUYLKILL RIVER, PA.................. 250 250
SHENANGO RIVER LAKE, PA............... 2,496 2,496
STILLWATER LAKE, PA................... 363 363
SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY 107 107
WATERS, PA...........................
TIOGA HAMMOND LAKES, PA............... 2,384 2,384
TIONESTA LAKE, PA..................... 2,200 2,200
UNION CITY LAKE, PA................... 425 425
WOODCOCK CREEK LAKE, PA............... 1,078 1,078
YORK INDIAN ROCK DAM, PA.............. 480 480
YOUGHIOGHENY RIVER LAKE, PA & MD...... 2,358 2,358
PUERTO RICO
SAN JUAN HARBOR, PR................... 3,700 3,700
RHODE ISLAND
BLOCK ISLAND HARBOR OF REFUGE, RI..... 1,250 1,250
FOX POINT HURRICANE BARRIER, 500 500
PROVIDENCE, RI.......................
GREAT SALT POND, BLOCK ISLAND, RI..... ............... 250
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, RI..... 24 24
PAWCATUCK RIVER, LITTLE NARRAGANSETT ............... 2,500
BAY & WATCH HILL COVE, CT & RI.......
POINT JUDITH HARBOR OF REFUGE, RI..... ............... 500
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, RI......... 500 500
PROVIDENCE HARBOR SHIPPING CHANNEL, RI ............... 3,800
WOONSOCKET, RI........................ 300 300
SOUTH CAROLINA
ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, SC.... 900 2,500
CHARLESTON HARBOR, SC................. 9,925 9,925
COOPER RIVER, CHARLESTON HARBOR, SC... 6,140 6,140
GEORGETOWN HARBOR, SC................. 320 1,500
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, SC..... 64 64
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, SC......... 625 625
TOWN CREEK, SC........................ 380 380
SOUTH DAKOTA
BIG BEND DAM, LAKE SHARPE, SD......... 9,768 9,768
COLD BROOK LAKE, SD................... 1,080 1,080
COTTONWOOD SPRINGS LAKE, SD........... 285 285
FORT RANDALL DAM, LAKE FRANCIS CASE, 8,970 8,970
SD...................................
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, SD..... 100 100
LAKE TRAVERSE, SD & MN................ 656 656
OAHE DAM, LAKE OAHE, SD & ND.......... 10,477 10,477
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, SD... 144 144
TENNESSEE
CENTER HILL LAKE, TN.................. 5,067 5,067
CHEATHAM LOCK AND DAM, TN............. 6,358 6,358
CHICKAMAUGA LOCK, TENNESSEE RIVER, TN. 3,500 3,500
CORDELL HULL DAM AND RESERVOIR, TN.... 6,429 6,429
DALE HOLLOW LAKE, TN.................. 6,219 6,219
J. PERCY PRIEST DAM AND RESERVOIR, TN. 4,608 4,608
OLD HICKORY LOCK AND DAM, TN.......... 8,237 8,237
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, TN......... 3 3
TENNESSEE RIVER, TN................... 16,540 16,540
WOLF RIVER HARBOR, TN................. 180 180
TEXAS
AQUILLA LAKE, TX...................... 1,120 1,120
ARKANSAS-RED RIVER BASINS CHLORIDE 1,439 1,439
CONTROL--AREA VIII, TX...............
BARDWELL LAKE, TX..................... 1,879 1,879
BELTON LAKE, TX....................... 3,682 3,682
BENBROOK LAKE, TX..................... 2,578 2,578
BRAZOS ISLAND HARBOR, TX.............. 3,468 3,468
BUFFALO BAYOU & TRIBUTARIES, TX....... 3,518 3,518
CANYON LAKE, TX....................... 3,429 3,429
CEDAR BAYOU, TX....................... 1,695 1,695
CHANNEL TO PORT BOLIVAR, TX........... 329 329
CORPUS CHRISTI SHIP CHANNEL, TX....... 4,608 4,608
DENISON DAM, LAKE TEXOMA, TX & OK..... 10,057 10,057
ESTELLINE SPRINGS EXPERIMENTAL 43 43
PROJECT, TX..........................
FERRELLS BRIDGE DAM, LAKE O' THE 3,709 3,709
PINES, TX............................
FREEPORT HARBOR, TX................... 3,538 3,538
GALVESTON HARBOR AND CHANNEL, TX...... 8,441 8,441
GIWW, CHANNEL TO VICTORIA, TX......... 1,825 1,825
GRANGER DAM AND LAKE, TX.............. 2,360 2,360
GRAPEVINE LAKE, TX.................... 3,014 3,014
GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, TX........ 27,792 27,792
HORDS CREEK LAKE, TX.................. 1,708 1,708
HOUSTON SHIP CHANNEL, TX.............. 23,817 29,040
BARBOUR TERMINAL CHANNEL, TX...... (1,811) ...............
BAYPORT SHIP CHANNEL, TX.......... (4,028) ...............
GREENS BAYOU, TX.................. ............... ...............
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, TX..... 1,364 1,364
JIM CHAPMAN LAKE, TX.................. 1,939 1,939
JOE POOL LAKE, TX..................... 1,094 1,094
LAKE KEMP, TX......................... 467 467
LAVON LAKE, TX........................ 3,135 3,135
LEWISVILLE DAM, TX.................... 3,542 3,542
MATAGORDA SHIP CHANNEL, TX............ 3,024 5,000
NAVARRO MILLS LAKE, TX................ 2,767 2,767
NORTH SAN GABRIEL DAM AND LAKE 2,536 2,536
GEORGETOWN, TX.......................
O C FISHER DAM AND LAKE, TX........... 1,373 1,373
PAT MAYSE LAKE, TX.................... 992 992
PROCTOR DAM AND LAKE, TX.............. 2,336 2,336
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, TX......... 451 451
RAY ROBERTS LAKE, TX.................. 1,525 1,525
SABINE-NECHES WATERWAY, TX............ 14,330 15,000
SAM RAYBURN DAM AND RESERVOIR, TX..... 6,396 6,396
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, TX... 194 194
SOMERVILLE LAKE, TX................... 3,292 3,292
STILLHOUSE HOLLOW DAM, TX............. 2,150 2,150
TEXAS CITY SHIP CHANNEL, TX........... 1,436 1,436
TEXAS WATER ALLOCATION ASSESSMENT, TX. 100 1,000
TOWN BLUFF DAM, B A STEINHAGEN LAKE, 2,666 2,666
TX...................................
WACO LAKE, TX......................... 3,131 3,131
WALLISVILLE LAKE, TX.................. 2,175 2,175
WHITNEY LAKE, TX...................... 7,221 7,221
WRIGHT PATMAN DAM AND LAKE, TX........ 3,804 3,804
UTAH
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, UT..... 31 31
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, UT... 653 653
VERMONT
BALL MOUNTAIN, VT..................... 896 896
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, VT..... 79 79
NARROWS OF LAKE CHAMPLAIN, VT & NY.... 85 85
NORTH HARTLAND LAKE, VT............... 719 719
NORTH SPRINGFIELD LAKE, VT............ 838 838
TOWNSHEND LAKE, VT.................... 797 797
UNION VILLAGE DAM, VT................. 683 683
VIRGINIA
ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY--ACC, 2,150 2,150
VA...................................
ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY--DSC, 895 1,825
NC & VA..............................
CHINCOTEAGUE INLET, VA................ 500 500
GATHRIGHT DAM AND LAKE MOOMAW, VA..... 2,268 2,268
HAMPTON ROADS, NORFOLK & NEWPORT NEWS 1,225 1,225
HARBOR, VA (DRIFT REMOVAL)...........
HAMPTON ROADS, VA (PREVENTION OF 50 50
OBSTRUCTIVE DEPOSITS)................
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, VA..... 367 367
JAMES RIVER CHANNEL, VA............... 4,180 5,000
JOHN H. KERR LAKE, VA & NC............ 11,423 11,423
JOHN W. FLANNAGAN DAM AND RESERVOIR, 2,230 2,230
VA...................................
LYNNHAVEN INLET, VA................... 300 500
NORFOLK HARBOR, VA.................... 9,766 11,000
NORTH FORK OF POUND RIVER LAKE, VA.... 668 668
PHILPOTT LAKE, VA & NC................ 6,396 6,396
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, VA......... 870 870
RUDEE INLET, VA....................... 520 520
TANGIER CHANNEL, VA................... 1,135 1,135
WATER/ENVIRONMENTAL CERTIFICATION, VA. 104 104
WATERWAY ON THE COAST OF VIRGINIA, VA. 143 600
WASHINGTON
CHIEF JOSEPH DAM, WA.................. 772 772
COLUMBIA RIVER AT BAKER BAY, WA & OR.. ............... 800
COLUMBIA RIVER BETWEEN CHINOOK AND ............... 900
SAND ISLAND, WA......................
EDIZ HOOK, WA......................... 30 30
EVERETT HARBOR AND SNOHOMISH RIVER, WA 1,006 1,006
GRAYS HARBOR AND CHEHALIS RIVER, WA... 10,550 10,550
HOWARD HANSON DAM, WA................. 3,276 3,276
ICE HARBOR LOCK & DAM, WA............. 4,147 4,147
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED ENVIRONMENTAL 32 32
PROJECTS, WA.........................
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, WA..... 750 750
LAKE CROCKETT (Keystone Harbor), WA... 550 550
LAKE WASHINGTON SHIP CANAL, WA........ 8,276 13,376
LITTLE GOOSE LOCK & DAM, WA........... 2,314 2,314
LOWER GRANITE LOCK & DAM, WA.......... 5,872 5,872
LOWER MONUMENTAL LOCK & DAM, WA....... 4,734 4,734
MILL CREEK LAKE, WA................... 3,817 3,817
MOUNT ST. HELENS SEDIMENT CONTROL, WA. 265 265
MUD MOUNTAIN DAM, WA.................. 3,441 3,441
NEAH BAY, WA.......................... 50 50
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, WA......... 459 459
PUGET SOUND AND TRIBUTARY WATERS, WA.. 905 905
QUILLAYUTE RIVER, WA.................. 1,590 1,590
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, WA... 447 447
SEATTLE HARBOR, WA.................... 951 951
STILLAGUAMISH RIVER, WA............... 265 265
SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY 74 74
WATERS, WA...........................
SWINOMISH CHANNEL, WA................. 62 600
TACOMA, PUYALLUP RIVER, WA............ 142 142
THE DALLES LOCK & DAM, WA & OR........ 8,702 8,702
WILLAPA RIVER AND HARBOR, WA.......... 30 75
WEST VIRGINIA
BEECH FORK LAKE, WV................... 1,377 1,377
BLUESTONE LAKE, WV.................... 1,700 1,700
BURNSVILLE LAKE, WV................... 3,049 3,049
EAST LYNN LAKE, WV.................... 2,215 2,215
ELKINS, WV............................ 15 15
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, WV..... 279 279
KANAWHA RIVER LOCKS & DAM, WV......... 9,791 9,791
OHIO RIVER LOCKS AND DAMS, WV, KY & OH 34,802 34,802
OHIO RIVER OPEN CHANNEL WORK, WV, KY & 3,088 3,088
OH...................................
R D BAILEY LAKE, WV................... 2,237 2,237
STONEWALL JACKSON LAKE, WV............ 1,173 1,273
SUMMERSVILLE LAKE, WV................. 2,376 2,636
SUTTON LAKE, WV....................... 3,075 3,075
TYGART LAKE, WV....................... 1,434 1,434
WISCONSIN
EAU GALLE RIVER LAKE, WI.............. 729 729
FOX RIVER, WI......................... 2,402 2,402
GREEN BAY HARBOR, WI.................. 2,698 7,698
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, WI..... 64 64
KEWAUNEE HARBOR, WI................... 8 8
MILWAUKEE HARBOR, WI.................. 1,672 1,672
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, WI......... 239 239
STURGEON BAY HARBOR AND LAKE MICHIGAN 19 19
SHIP CANAL, WI.......................
SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY 509 509
WATERS, WI...........................
TWO RIVERS HARBOR, WI................. ............... 1,020
WYOMING
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED ENVIRONMENTAL 10 10
PROJECTS, WY.........................
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, WY..... 37 37
JACKSON HOLE LEVEES, WY............... 1,001 1,001
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, WY... 213 213
---------------------------------
SUBTOTAL........................ 2,198,519 2,381,612
REMAINING ITEMS
AQUATIC NUISANCE CONTROL RESEARCH..... 690 690
ASSET MANAGEMENT/FACILITIES AND 4,750 5,250
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE................
BUDGET/MANAGEMENT SUPPORT FOR O&M
BUSINESS LINES:
OPTIMIZATION TOOLS FOR NAVIGATION. 750 750
PERFORMANCE BASED BUDGETING 4,000 4,000
SUPPORT PROGRAM..................
RECREATION MANAGEMENT SUPPORT 1,650 1,650
PROGRAM..........................
STEWARDSHIP SUPPORT PROGRAM....... 392 392
COASTAL DATA INFORMATION PROGRAM...... 3,000 5,000
COASTAL INLET RESEARCH PROGRAM........ 3,000 3,000
CULTURAL RESOURCES (NAGPRA/CURATION).. 5,500 5,500
DREDGE MCFARLAND READY RESERVE........ 10,000 10,000
DREDGE WHEELER READY RESERVE.......... 11,000 11,000
DREDGING DATA AND LOCK PERFORMANCE 1,150 1,150
MONITORING SYSTEM....................
DREDGING OPERATIONS AND ENVIRONMENTAL 7,000 7,000
RESTORATION [DOER]...................
DREDGING OPERATIONS TECHNICAL SUPPORT 2,000 2,000
PROGRAM [DOTS].......................
EARTHQUAKE HAZARDS REDUCTION PROGRAM.. 270 270
FACILITY PROTECTION................... 6,500 6,500
FERC HYRDOPOWER COORDINATION.......... 3,000 3,000
FISH & WILDLIFE OPERATING FISH 3,800 3,800
HATCHERY REIMBURSEMENT...............
GLOBAL CHANGE SUSTAINABILITY.......... 10,000 10,000
GREAT LAKES TRIBUTARY MODEL........... 1,200 1,200
INLAND WATERWAY NAVIGATION CHARTS..... 3,800 3,800
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL 1,780 1,780
PROJECTS.............................
INTERAGENCY PERFORMANCE EVALUATION 8,000 8,000
TASK FORCE/HURRICANEPROTECTION
DECISION CHRONOLOGY LESSONS LEARNED
IMPLEMENTATION.......................
LONG-TERM OPTION ASSESSMENT FOR LOW 1,500 1,500
USE NAVIGATION.......................
MONITORING OF COMPLETED NAVIGATION 1,800 1,800
PROJECTS.............................
NATIONAL (LEVEE) FLOOD INVENTORY...... 15,000 15,000
NATIONAL COASTAL MAPPING PROGRAM...... 7,000 9,500
NATIONAL DAM SAFETY PROGRAM........... 17,450 17,450
NATIONAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS 6,750 6,750
PROGRAM [NEPP].......................
NATIONAL NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT 4,230 4,230
ACTIVITIES...........................
NATIONAL PORTFOLIO ASSESSMENT FOR 571 571
REALLOCATION.........................
PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT TECHNICAL SUPPORT 300 300
[ABS-P2, WINABS].....................
PROTECTION OF NAVIGATION: HARBOR 825 825
MAINTENANCE FEE DATA COLLECTION......
PROTECTION OF NAVIGATION: PROTECT, 50 50
CLEAR AND STRAIGHTEN CHANNELS (SEC 3)
PROTECTION OF NAVIGATION: REMOVAL OF 500 500
SUNKEN VESSELS.......................
PROTECTION OF NAVIGATION: WATERBORNE 4,771 4,771
COMMERCE STATISTICS..................
RECREATION ON STOP [R1S] NATIONAL 65 65
RECREATION RESERVATION...............
REGIONAL SEDIMENT MANAGEMENT 2,000 5,000
DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM................
HAWAII RSM, HI.................... ............... (1,000)
NORTH CAROLINA RSM, NC............ ............... (600)
DELAWARE ESTUARY RSM, NJ.......... ............... (200)
SOUTH COASTAL RHODE ISLAND RSM, RI ............... (750)
CHESAPEAKE BAY, NEWPOINT COMFORT, ............... (59)
MATHEWS COUNTY, VA...............
RELIABILITY MODELS PROGRAM FOR MAJOR 608 608
REHAB................................
RESPONSES TO CLIMATE CHANGE AT CORPS 5,000 5,000
PROJECTS.............................
SHORELINE USE PERMIT STUDY............ 250 250
WATER OPERATIONS TECHNICAL SUPPORT 653 653
[WOTS]...............................
---------------------------------
SUBTOTAL........................ 162,555 170,555
SAVINGS AND SLIPPAGE.................. ............... -57,167
=================================
ROUNDING.............................. -74 ...............
TOTAL........................... 2,361,000 2,495,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway, Alabama and Mississippi.--The
Committee recommendation includes additional funds above the
budget request for additional dredging, environmental
stewardship activities and backlog maintenance.
Bethel Harbor, Alaska.--$1,000,000 is recommended to for
plans and specifications and dredging of this small harbor that
serves as a regional transportation center for 50 villages.
Arkansas Lakes, Arkansas.--The Committee recommendation
includes funds above the budget request for each of these
projects: DeGray Lake, Lake Greeson, and Lake Ouachita, to
provide adequate levels of service and for backlog maintenance
items.
Ouachita and Black Rivers, Arkansas and Louisiana.--The
Committee recommends $3,000,000 for maintenance dredging of
this inland navigation project.
Marina Del Rey, California.--The Committee recommends an
additional $3,000,000 for dredging this project, the largest
man-made harbor in the United States with nearly 6,000 boat
slips and home to a U.S. Coast Guard cutter. The harbor also
serves as the key rescue support for the Los Angeles
International Airport.
San Francisco Harbor, California.--The Committee is
concerned that significant coastal erosion is occurring in the
vicinity of the San Francisco Main Ship Channel, jeopardizing
municipal wastewater infrastructure. The Committee expects that
the Corps should complete its planning studies and the
environmental requirements for a potential project to prevent
further deterioration in fiscal year 2011 and directs the Corps
to take all steps necessary to proceed to construction no later
than fiscal year 2012.
Norwalk Harbor, Connecticut.--The Committee recommends
$1,500,000 for the phase III maintenance dredging of the
harbor.
Harbor of Refuge, Lewes, Delaware.--The Committee
recommends $200,000 to update existing preliminary design and
condition survey.
Wilmington Harbor, Delaware.--The Committee recommendation
includes $7,020,000 for this project. Additional funds
recommended above the budget request are for maintenance of
disposal areas and additional dredging.
Intracoastal Waterway, Caloosahatchee to Anclote,
Florida.--The Committee recommends $2,000,000 for maintenance
dredging.
Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway, Georgia.--$1,500,000 is
recommended for dredging critical areas of this waterway as
well as for work related to new upland disposal sites.
Wilson Lake, Kansas.--The Committee recommendation includes
$300,000 above the budget request for the reallocation study.
Indiana Harbor Confined Disposal Facility, Indiana.--Funds
for this project have been included in the CG account.
Calcasieu River and Pass, Louisiana.--The Committee has
included additional funds for dredging needs on this project.
J. Bennett Johnston Waterway, Louisiana.--The Committee has
included $4,255,000 above the budget request for backlog
maintenance and dredging needs.
Lower Thorofare, Maryland.--The Committee recommendation
includes $1,440,000 for dredging needs on this channel that
service watermen and the Maryland seafood industry.
Michigan Great lakes Harbor Maintenance and Dredging,
Michigan.--The Committee notes that there are some 80 federally
maintained harbors and waterways in Michigan. However, the
Committee also notes that fewer than 20 are budgeted. With the
limited funding available to the Committee, the Committee has
recommended $8,000,000 under this line item to provide for some
of the dredging and maintenance needs of the State rather than
trying to fund small amounts for each project. The Committee
has listed all of the harbors and waterways in the table that
are eligible for this funding. However, recognizing that
conditions on these waterways is constantly changing, the
Committee is directing the Corps to propose a maintenance
program for fiscal year 2011 that would most effectively
utilize both the budgeted funds along with the funds provided
in this line item for these harbor and waterway projects.
Mouth of the Yazoo River, Mississippi.--The Committee
includes additional funds for the maintenance dredging of the
entrance to the Vicksburg Harbor.
Rosedale Harbor, Mississippi.--The Committee recommendation
includes $1,200,000 for maintenance dredging of the harbor. The
port serves many small communities and the farmers in the area.
Caruthersville Harbor, Missouri.--The Committee
recommendation includes $900,000 to dredge the harbor and
turning basin.
Portsmouth Harbor, New Hampshire.--The Committee
recommendation includes $650,000 for the project. This includes
$500,000 for dredging the Simplex Shoals and $150,000 for
environmental documentation and plans and specifications for
dredging Sagamore Creek and the other harbor back channels.
Absecon Inlet, New Jersey.--The Committee recommends
$200,000 for dredging of the inlet.
Cape May Inlet to Lower Township, New Jersey.--The
Committee has included funding for this project in the
construction account.
New York Great Lakes Harbor Maintenance and Dredging, New
York.--The Committee notes that there are more than 20
federally maintained harbors and waterways along the Great
Lakes in New York. However, the Committee also notes that only
five are budgeted. With the limited funding available to the
Committee, the Committee has recommended $1,700,000 under this
line item to provide for some of the dredging and maintenance
needs of the State rather than trying to fund small amounts for
each project. The Committee has listed all of the harbors and
waterways in the table that are eligible for this funding.
However, recognizing that conditions on these waterways is
constantly changing, the Committee is directing the Corps to
propose a maintenance program for fiscal year 2011 that would
most effectively utilize both the budgeted funds along with the
funds provided in this line item for these harbor and waterway
projects.
Coastal Inlets, North Carolina.--The Committee has included
additional funds for the coastal inlets on the North Carolina
coast that were not funded in the administration's budget
request. With the limited funding available to the Committee,
the Committee has attempted to provide for some of the dredging
needs of the State.
Wilmington Harbor, North Carolina.--The Committee
recommendation includes $600,000 over the budget request for a
sand management study for Bald Hill Island.
Garrison Dam and Lake Sakakawea, North Dakota.--The
Committee recommends $100,000 for mosquito control in the
Williston area due to the shallow-water mosquito breeding areas
created by the impoundment of Lake Sakakawea.
Ohio Great Lakes Harbors.--The Committee has included
additional funds for Cleveland, Huron and Toledo Harbors that
were underfunded in the administration's budget request. With
the limited funding available to the Committee, the Committee
has attempted to provide for some of the dredging need of the
State. The Committee notes that Cleveland Harbor has got to
determine interim and long-term disposal alternatives to avoid
closure of the harbor after 2014.
Columbia River at the Mouth, Oregon and Washington.--The
Committee recommends $5,500,000 above the budget request for
South Jetty beach material placement.
Providence Harbor, Rhode Island.--The Committee has
recommended $3,800,000 to dredge this project.
Houston Ship Channel, Texas.--The Committee has combined
the line items for the Houston Ship Channel, the Bayport
Channel, Greens Bayou and the Barbers Point Channel under this
single line item for fiscal year 2011 to allow for more
efficient utilization of funds on these interconnected
navigation channels. The Corps is urged to budget these
channels as a single line item in future budget submissions.
However, for transparency, the justification sheet should still
show the individual amounts for each of the channels. The
Committee has also recommended additional funds above the
budget request for additional maintenance dredging and other
related activities.
Texas Water Allocation Assessment, Texas.--$1,000,000 is
recommended to continue these studies to determine if existing
water can be better allocated to support more balanced water
use in light of future needs.
Appomattox River, Virginia.--The Committee recommends
$500,000 to complete environmental testing and analysis and
obtain environmental permits.
Chinook, Head of Sand Island, and Baker Bay, Washington.--
The Committee notes the proximity of Corps navigation
facilities on the Columbia River between Chinook and the Head
of Sand Island, Washington, and at Baker Bay, Washington, and
encourage the Corps of Engineers to seek ways to achieve cost
savings and efficiency, such as by utilizing appropriate
contracting methods while having these two projects be
considered together when seeking bids and awarding contracts.
$1,700,000 is recommended for dredging at these harbors.
Lake Washington Ship Canal, Washington.--The Committee
recommendation includes $5,100,000 over the budget request for
additional maintenance needs at the project.
Mud Mountain Dam, Washington.--Within the funds
recommended, the Corps is directed to continue to satisfy
Federal fish passage obligations for the term of the
cooperative agreement with Puget Sound Energy.
Green Bay Harbor, Wisconsin.--The Committee recommendation
includes $5,000,000 above the budget request for backlog
maintenance and dredging needs.
Asset Management/Facilities and Equipment Maintenance.--The
Committee recognizes the critical importance of protecting the
large Federal investment in the Nation's aging inventory of
water infrastructure and the key objectives of the Corps' asset
management program in this regard. Improving system reliability
and efficiency, extending useful life, minimizing risk, and
identifying critical maintenance needs (on a risk basis) will
achieve cost savings to better meet service needs across the
Nation. The Committee has therefore provided $500,000 to
initiate an automated risk based asset management system
including, but not limited to, condition assessments,
geospatial mapping, data base integration/interoperability and
photogrammetric visualization of the inventory. The Corps shall
also evaluate technologies for real time dam monitoring for
emergency events and the subsurface piping and seepage problems
associated with aging dams and levees. The Corps is urged to
budget for this automated system in future budget submissions.
Coastal Data Information Program.--The Committee believes
that this is a better account for this work to be funded than
the GI account where it has been previously funded. The
Committee recognizes the importance of accurate directional
wave measurements to the success of coastal Corps projects and
notes that nationwide, coastal Corps districts have called for
sustained and enhanced wave information as a top data priority.
The additional funding recommended above the budget request
along with the budget request is directed toward the
maintenance of wave observations and the expansion of the
national wave monitoring network. The Corps is requested to
report back to the Committee on its plan to address critical
data gaps in this system.
National Coastal Mapping.--A total of $9,500,000 is
recommended for this program. Additional funds recommended
above the budget request are for LIDAR bathymetry for use in
regional sediment management and for Coastal Zone Mapping and
Imaging LIDAR/LASER to be conducted with the University of
Southern Mississippi.
Regional Sediment Management Demonstration Program.--The
Committee has recommended $5,000,000 for this program,
$3,000,000 above the budget request. Within the funds
recommended, the Corps is directed to undertake studies for the
State of Hawaii; the State of North Carolina; South Coastal
Rhode Island; Delaware Estuary, New Jersey; and for Chesapeake
Bay, New Point Comfort, Mathews County, Virginia.
REGULATORY PROGRAM
Appropriations, 2010.................................... $190,000,000
Budget estimate, 2011................................... 193,000,000
Committee recommendation................................ 193,000,000
An appropriation of $193,000,000 is recommended for the
regulatory program of the Corps of Engineers.
This appropriation provides for salaries and costs incurred
administering regulation of activities affecting U.S. waters,
including wetlands, in accordance with the Rivers and Harbors
Act of 1899 33 U.S.C. section 401, the Clean Water Act of 1977
Public Law 95-217, and the Marine Protection, Research and
Sanctuaries Act of 1972 Public Law 92-532.
The appropriation helps maintain program performance,
protects important aquatic resources, and supports partnerships
with States and local communities through watershed planning
efforts.
FORMERLY UTILIZED SITES REMEDIAL ACTION PROGRAM
Appropriations, 2010.................................... $134,000,000
Budget estimate, 2011................................... 130,000,000
Committee recommendation................................ 130,000,000
The Committee recommends an appropriation of $130,000,000
to continue activities related to the FUSRAP in fiscal year
2005.
The responsibility for the cleanup of contaminated sites
under the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program was
transferred to the Army Corps of Engineers in the fiscal year
1998 Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act, Public
Law 105-62.
FUSRAP is not specifically defined by statute. The program
was established in 1974 under the broad authority of the Atomic
Energy Act and, until fiscal year 1998, funds for the cleanup
of contaminated defense sites had been appropriated to the
Department of Energy through existing appropriation accounts.
In appropriating FUSRAP funds to the Corps of Engineers, the
Committee intended to transfer only the responsibility for
administration and execution of cleanup activities at eligible
sites where remediation had not been completed. It did not
intend to transfer ownership of and accountability for real
property interests that remain with the Department of Energy.
The Corps of Engineers has extensive experience in the
cleanup of hazardous, toxic, and radioactive wastes through its
work for the Department of Defense and other Federal agencies.
The Committee always intended for the Corps' expertise be used
in the same manner for the cleanup of contaminated sites under
FUSRAP. The Committee expects the Corps to continue programming
and budgeting for FUSRAP as part of the Corps of Engineers--
Civil program. The Committee directs the Corps to prioritize
sites that are nearing completion during fiscal year 2008.
The Corps is directed to prioritize sites that are nearing
completion. The Committee directs the Corps of Engineers during
fiscal year 2011 to complete the Remedial Investigation/
Feasibility Study of the former Sylvania nuclear fuel site at
Hicksville, New York and to proceed expeditiously to a Record
of Decision and, if appropriate, initiate any necessary
remediation in accordance with CERCLA. The Secretary of the
Army shall submit a report to the Committees on Appropriations
of the House of Representatives and the Senate detailing the
progress not later than 120 days after enactment of this act.
FLOOD CONTROL AND COASTAL EMERGENCIES
Appropriations, 2010....................................................
Budget estimate, 2011................................... $30,000,000
Committee recommendation................................ 30,000,000
The Committee has recommended $30,000,000 for the Flood
Control and Coastal Emergencies account. This account provides
funds for preparedness activities for natural and other
disasters, response, and emergency flood fighting and rescue
operations, hurricane response, and emergency shore protection
work. It also provides for emergency supplies of clean water
where the source has been contaminated or where adequate
supplies of water are needed for consumption.
GENERAL EXPENSES
Appropriations, 2010.................................... $185,000,000
Budget estimate, 2011................................... 185,000,000
Committee recommendation................................ 185,000,000
This appropriation finances the expenses of the Office,
Chief of Engineers, the Division Offices, and certain research
and statistical functions of the Corps of Engineers. The
Committee recommendation is $185,000,000.
Executive Direction and Management.--The Office of the
Chief of Engineers and 8 division offices supervise work in 38
district offices.
Humphreys Engineer Center Support Activity.--This support
center provides administrative services (such as personnel,
logistics, information management, and finance and accounting)
for the Office of the Chief of Engineers and other separate
field operating activities.
Institute for Water Resources.--This institute performs
studies and analyses, and develops planning techniques for the
management and development of the Nation's water resources.
United States Army Corps of Engineers Finance Center.--This
center provides centralized support for all Corps finance and
accounting.
Office of Congressional Affairs.--The Committee believes
that an Office of Congressional Affairs for the Civil Works
Program would hamper the efficient and effective coordination
of issues with the Committee staff and Members of Congress. The
Committee believes that the technical knowledge and managerial
expertise needed for the Corps headquarters to effectively
address Civil Works authorization, appropriation, and
headquarters policy matters resides in the Civil Works
organization. Therefore, the Committee strongly recommends that
the Office of Congressional Affairs not be a part of the
process by which information on Civil Works projects, programs,
and activities is provided to Congress.
The Corps is reminded that General Expense funds are
appropriated solely for the executive management and oversight
of the Civil Works Program under the direction of the Director
of Civil Works.
OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF THE ARMY (CIVIL WORKS)
Appropriations, 2010.................................... $5,000,000
Budget estimate, 2011................................... 6,000,000
Committee recommendation................................ 6,000,000
The Committee has recommended $6,000,000 for the Office of
the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works) [OASA(CW)].
As has been previously stated, the Committee believes that this
office should be funded through the Defense appropriations bill
and directs the administration to budget for this office under
the Department of Defense, Operation and Maintenance--Army
account in future budget submissions. It is the Committee's
opinion that the traditional role of the ASA(CW) is to provide
the Chief of Engineers advice about policy matters and
generally be the political spokesperson for the
administration's policies; however, the Chief of Engineers is
responsible for carrying out the program. This is underscored
by the administration's budget documents that state that the
OASA(CW) provides policy direction and oversight for the civil
works program and the Headquarters of the Corps provides
executive direction and management of the civil works program.
The Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works advises
the Secretary of the Army on a variety of matters, including
the Civil Works program of the Corps of Engineers. The
Assistant Secretary is a member of the Army Secretariat with
responsibilities, such as participating in continuity of
Government exercises that extend well beyond Civil Works. The
Assistant Secretary also oversees the administration, operation
and maintenance, and capital development of Arlington National
Cemetery and the Soldiers' and Airmen's Home National Cemetery.
Congressional oversight of the Army Cemetery program lies not
with the Energy and Water Appropriations Subcommittee, but
rather with the Appropriations Subcommittee on Military
Construction and Veterans Affairs and with the Committee on
Veterans Affairs.
The Army's accounting system does not track OMA funding of
overhead or Army-wide support offices on the basis of which
office receives support, nor would it be efficient or effective
to do so for a 20-person office. Instead, expenses such as
legal support, personnel services, finance and accounting
services, the executive motor pool, travel on military
aircraft, and other support services are centrally funded and
managed on a department-wide basis. Transferring the funding
for the expenses of the Assistant Secretary for Civil Works to
a separate account has greatly complicated the Army's
accounting for such indirect and overhead expenses with no
commensurate benefit to justify the change. The Committee does
not agree that these costs should be funded in this bill and
therefore has only provided funding for salaries and expenses
as in previous years.
GENERAL PROVISIONS--CORPS OF ENGINEERS--CIVIL
Section 101. The bill includes language concerning
reprogramming guidelines.
Section 102. The bill includes language prohibiting
implementation of competitive sourcing or HPO.
Section 103. The bill includes language concerning
continuing contracts and the Inland Waterway Trust Fund.
Section 104. The bill includes language concerning report
notifications.
Section 105. The bill includes a provision providing the
Corps of Engineers authorization for emergency measures to
exclude Asian carp from the Great Lakes. It should be noted
that when considering this language for inclusion in this bill
that the Committee did not consider hydrologic separation of
the Great Lakes Basin from the Mississippi River Basin to be an
emergency measure. The Committee believes that the issue of
hydrologic separation should be fully studied by the Corps of
Engineers and vetted by the appropriate congressional
authorizing committees and specifically enacted into law rather
than have implementation be attempted through this limited
provision.
Section 106. The bill includes language deauthorizing a
portion of a project.
Section 107. The bill includes language modifying the scope
of a project.
Section 108. The bill includes language concerning a
project cost limit change.
Section 109. The bill includes language concerning the
utilization of the Revolving Fund for the acquisition of a
building.
Section 110. The bill includes language concerning the
utilization of the Revolving Fund for the construction of three
buildings.
Section 111. The bill includes language concerning a
project cost limit change.
Section 112. The bill includes language modifying the
boundaries of a project.
Section 113. The bill includes language deauthorizing a
portion of a project.
Section 114. The bill includes language concerning
operation and maintenance of a project.
Section 115. The bill includes language concerning leasing
of property.
Section 116. The bill includes language concerning
acquisition of property.
Section 117. The bill includes language modifying the cost
sharing for certain projects.
Section 118. The bill includes language concerning a
property transfer.
TITLE II
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Central Utah Project Completion Account
Appropriations, 2010.................................... $42,004,000
Budget estimate, 2011................................... 43,004,000
Committee recommendation................................ 43,004,000
The Committee recommendation for fiscal year 2011 to carry
out the provisions of the Central Utah Project Completion Act
totals $43,004,000. An appropriation of $38,810,000 has been
provided for Central Utah project construction; $2,500,000 for
fish, wildlife, and recreation, mitigation and conservation.
The Committee recommendation provides $1,694,000 for program
administration and oversight.
Legislative language is included which allows up to
$1,500,000 of the funds provided to be used for administrative
costs.
The Central Utah Project Completion Act (titles II-VI of
Public Law 102-575) provides for the completion of the central
Utah project by the Central Utah Water Conservancy District.
The Act also authorizes the appropriation of funds for fish,
wildlife, recreation, mitigation, and conservation; establishes
an account in the Treasury for the deposit of these funds and
of other contributions for mitigation and conservation
activities; and establishes a Utah Reclamation Mitigation and
Conservation Commission to administer funds in that account.
The act further assigns responsibilities for carrying out the
act to the Secretary of the Interior and prohibits delegation
of those responsibilities to the Bureau of Reclamation.
AMERICAN RECOVERY AND REINVESTMENT ACT
The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 [ARRA]
enacted on February 17, 2009, was an attempt to combat the
severe economic downturn by putting our citizens back to work
rebuilding our Nation's water resource infrastructure. Through
the Bureau of Reclamation's Water and Related Resources
Account, $50,000,000 was provided to stimulate job growth by
addressing water resource infrastructure needs in the Central
Utah Project area. All of this ARRA funding has been obligated.
Bureau of Reclamation
INTRODUCTION
The Bureau of Reclamation was established in 1902 with the
primary mission of harnessing the western rivers that led to
homesteading and the economic development in the west. Today,
Reclamation has evolved into a contemporary water management
agency. In addition to the traditional missions of bringing
water and power to the west, Reclamation has developed and
continues to develop, programs, initiatives, and activities
that will help the Western States, Native American tribes, and
others meet new water needs and balance the multitude of
competing uses of water in the West.
While Reclamation only has projects in the 17 Western
States, their programs impact the entire Nation. Reclamation is
the largest wholesaler of water in the country operating 348
reservoirs with a total storage capacity of 245 million acre-
feet. Reclamation projects deliver 10 trillion gallons of water
to more than 31 million people each year, and provide 1 out of
5 Western farmers (140,000) with irrigation water for 10
million acres of farmland that produce 60 percent of the
Nation's vegetables and 25 percent of its fruits and nuts.
Reclamation manages, with partners, 289 recreation sites that
have 90 million visits annually.
Reclamation is also the second largest producer of
hydroelectric power in the Western United States. Fifty-eight
powerplants annually provide more than 41 billion kilowatt
hours generating nearly $1,000,000,000 in power revenues and
produce enough electricity to serve 3.5 million homes.
Reclamation's power revenues to the Treasury alone justify the
investments proposed in the budget request. When water supply,
recreation, environmental, and other ancillary benefits are
considered, the return on this investment is greatly increased.
As with the Corps of Engineers budget, the Committee does
not believe that the administration properly values the
economic input of the Bureau of Reclamation's programs to the
national economy. Reclamation's budget amounted to a meager
0.21 percent of the $530,000,000,000 in nondefense
discretionary spending in fiscal year 2010. Or more broadly,
Reclamation's budget amounted to 0.03 percent of the entire
$3,540,000,000,000 fiscal year 2010 Federal budget.
The Committee urges the administration to assess the value
of Reclamation's programs to the national economy and derive a
level of investment from that impact that is commensurate with
the outputs of this critical infrastructure.
OVERVIEW AND ANALYSIS OF THE FISCAL YEAR 2011 BUDGET REQUEST
The fiscal year 2011 budget request for the Bureau of
Reclamation is composed of $1,064,697,000 in new budget
authority. The budget request is $23,019,000 less than the
fiscal year 2010 enacted amount but is an increase of
$44,014,000 from the fiscal year 2010 request.
The Committee is pleased that the administration has chosen
to invest marginally more in Western water infrastructure in
fiscal year 2011, but the needs far outweigh the amount
proposed. Many Reclamation projects are 100 years old. A
majority are more than 50 years old. This aging infrastructure
desperately needs to be recapitalized if the Nation intends to
continue to reap the benefits that this infrastructure
provides. Besides the jobs created by the construction and
maintenance of the existing infrastructure, this infrastructure
has greatly contributed to the population boom in the Western
States over the last 50 years. This population boom and the
jobs and taxes to Federal, State, and local coffers that
accompanied it would not have been possible without the
infrastructure provided by the Bureau of Reclamation.
Unfortunately this budget proposal is woefully inadequate
in funding the infrastructure needs. The Committee is
particularly disappointed to see that rural water projects are
greatly underfunded in this budget. In many cases the budget
proposals for these projects are less than the inflation rate
for the project. In other words, at this level of investment,
these projects will never be completed because project costs
are increasing faster than the amount recommended by the
administration.
The largest account in Reclamation's budget is the Water
and Related Resources account. The administration budget
proposal includes $913,582,000 for this account. This is a
decrease of $37, 576,000 from the fiscal year 2010 enacted
amount, but it is an increase of $20,457,000 more than the
administration's fiscal year 2010 budget request.
The Central Valley Project Restoration Fund is proposed at
$49,915,000 for fiscal year 2011. This is an increase of
$14,557,000 over the fiscal year 2010 enacted amount. This
account is primarily funded from revenues collected from water
and power customers. Levels of funding in this account are
based on a 3-year rolling average of revenues collected.
The California Bay-Delta Restoration account is proposed at
$40,000,000 for fiscal year 2011. This is the same as the
fiscal year 2010 enacted amount. The Committee notes that this
is a $9,000,000 increase over the administration's fiscal year
2010 budget request.
The Policy and Administration account is requested at
$61,200,000, the same as the fiscal year 2010 enacted amount.
This is also the same as the fiscal year 2010 budget request.
AMERICAN RECOVERY AND REINVESTMENT ACT
The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 [ARRA]
enacted on February 17, 2009, was an attempt to combat the
severe economic downturn by putting our citizens back to work
rebuilding our Nation's water resource infrastructure. The
Bureau of Reclamation was provided $950,000,000 to stimulate
job growth by addressing water resource infrastructure needs.
Reclamation has obligated more than 85 percent of their ARRA
funding. Reclamation is on track to obligate all of this
funding before it expires on September 30, 2010.
WATER AND RELATED RESOURCES
Appropriations, 2010.................................... $951,158,000
Budget estimate, 2011................................... 913,582,000
Committee recommendation................................ 938,600,000
An appropriation of $938,600,000 is recommended by the
Committee for general investigations of the Bureau of
Reclamation. The water and related resources account supports
the development, management, and restoration of water and
related natural resources in the 17 Western States. The account
includes funds for operating and maintaining existing
facilities to obtain the greatest overall level of benefits, to
protect public safety, and to conduct studies on ways to
improve the use of water and related natural resources. Work
will be done in partnership and cooperation with non-Federal
entities and other Federal agencies.
The Committee has divided underfinancing between the
Resources Management subaccount and the Facilities Operation
and Maintenance subaccount. The Committee directs that the
underfinancing amount in each subaccount initially be applied
uniformly across all projects within the subaccounts. Upon
applying the underfinanced amounts, normal reprogramming
procedures should be undertaken to account for schedule
slippages, accelerations, or other unforeseen conditions.
DISCLOSURE PROVISIONS
The budget for the Bureau of Reclamation consists of
individual line items of projects. As presented by the
President, the budget contains 211 specific line-item requests
for directed spending by the administration. An additional 43
line-item requests for funding by the administration is for
nationwide line items. All of these line items were specific
requests by the administration of the Congress to be funded in
fiscal year 2011. They did not request these funds
programmatically, they requested them for a specific project in
a specific location for a specific purpose.
All of the projects funded in this report have gone through
the same rigorous public review and approval process as those
proposed for funding by the President. The difference in these
projects, of course, is that the congressionally directed
projects are not subject to the artificial budgetary
prioritization criteria that the administration utilizes to
decide what not to fund.
In the interest of providing full disclosure of funding
provided in the energy and water bill, all disclosures are made
in the report accompanying the bill.
Two tables are provided at the back of this report for
disclosure. The first table provides the congressionally
directed spending items requested by Members of Congress
requiring disclosure under the provisions of Rule 44 of the
Standing Rules of the Senate. If the Member requested the
budget request or if only the budget request was provided,
Member names are not listed next to these items because under
the provisions of Rule 44 this would not be considered
congressionally directed spending. The second table lists the
Presidentially directed spending items. While this table is not
required under the disclosure provisions of Rule 44, the
Committee believes that it is prudent to provide this
additional disclosure information.
The purposes for the funding provided in the various
accounts is described in the paragraphs associated with each
account. The location of the programs, projects, or studies are
denoted in the account tables
BUREAU OF RECLAMATION--WATER AND RELATED RESOURCES
[In thousands of dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Budget estimate Committee recommendation
-------------------------------------------------
Project title Resources Facilities Resources Facilities
management OM&R management OM&R
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ARIZONA
Ak Chin Indian Water Rights Settlement Act Project............ .......... 10,960 ........... 10,960
Colorado River Basin Project--Central Arizona Project......... 9,055 361 9,055 361
Colorado River Front Work and Levee System.................... 2,255 .......... 2,255 ...........
Northern Arizona Investigations Program....................... 182 .......... 182 ...........
Phoenix Metropolitan Water Reclamation and Reuse Project...... 200 .......... 200 ...........
Salt River Project............................................ 581 219 581 219
San Carlos Apache Tribe Water Settlement Act Project.......... 325 .......... 325 ...........
South/Central Arizona Investigations Program.................. 608 .......... 608 ...........
Yuma Area Projects............................................ 1,362 20,058 1,362 20,058
CALIFORNIA
All American Canal-Imperial Dam Electrification rehabilitation .......... .......... 1,000 ...........
Cachuma Project............................................... 787 614 787 614
California Investigations Program............................. 233 .......... 233 ...........
Calleguas Municipal Water District Recycling Project.......... 1,400 .......... 1,400 ...........
Central Valley Projects:
American River Division, Folsom Dam Unit/Mormon Island.... 1,631 7,833 2,551 7,833
Auburn-Folsom South Unit.................................. 1,400 .......... 1,400 ...........
Delta Division............................................ 14,004 6,004 14,004 6,004
East Side Division........................................ 1,458 2,943 1,458 2,943
Friant Division........................................... 1,733 3,342 9,733 3,342
Miscellaneous Project Programs............................ 10,949 910 12,949 910
Replacements, Additions, and Extraordinary Maintenance .......... 21,656 ........... 21,656
Program..................................................
Sacramento River Division................................. 41,642 1,722 41,642 1,722
San Felipe Division....................................... 1,173 6 1,173 6
San Joaquin Division...................................... 400 .......... 400 ...........
Shasta Division........................................... 925 9,566 925 9,566
Trinity River Division.................................... 12,331 4,330 12,331 4,330
Water and Power Operations................................ 1,483 8,408 1,483 8,408
West San Joaquin Division, San Luis Unit.................. 8,367 7,033 8,367 7,033
Yield Feasibility Investigation........................... 448 .......... 448 ...........
Lake Tahoe Regional Wetlands.................................. 94 .......... 94 ...........
Long Beach Area Water Reclamation Project..................... 1,000 .......... 1,000 ...........
Long Beach Desalination Project............................... 1,000 .......... 1,000 ...........
Mokelumne River Regional Water Storage & Conjunctive.......... .......... .......... 500 ...........
Orland Project................................................ .......... 767 ........... 767
Rancho California Water District.............................. .......... .......... 250 ...........
Salton Sea Research Project................................... 400 .......... 400 ...........
San Diego Area Water Reclamation Program...................... 4,969 .......... 4,969 ...........
San Diego Four Reservoir Intertie............................. .......... .......... 500 ...........
San Jose Area Water Reclamation and Reuse Program............. 242 .......... 242 ...........
Soboba........................................................ 4,000 .......... 4,000 ...........
Solano Project................................................ 1,498 2,337 1,498 2,337
Southern California Investigations Program.................... 262 .......... 762 ...........
Ventura River Project......................................... 203 9 203 9
COLORADO
Animas-La Plata Project, Colorado River Storage Participating 12,134 328 12,134 328
Project......................................................
Collbran Project.............................................. 249 2,265 249 2,265
Colorado-Big Thompson Project................................. 221 12,557 221 12,557
Colorado Investigations Program............................... 183 .......... 183 ...........
Fruitgrowers Dam Project...................................... 154 165 154 165
Fryingpan-Arkansas Project.................................... 103 8,721 103 8,721
Fryingpan-Arkansas Project--Arkansas Valley Conduit........... 3,000 .......... 3,000 ...........
Grand Valley Unit, CRBSCP, Title II........................... 195 1,345 195 1,345
Leadville/Arkansas River Recovery Project..................... .......... 6,659 ........... 6,659
Mancos Project................................................ 113 163 1,500 163
Paradox Valley Unit, CRBSCP, Title II......................... 93 2,850 93 2,850
Pine River Project............................................ 326 237 326 237
San Luis Valley Project....................................... 319 4,743 319 4,743
Uncompahgre Project........................................... 252 145 252 145
HAWAII
Hawaii Water Resources Study.................................. .......... .......... 300 ...........
IDAHO
Boise Area Projects........................................... 3,031 2,515 3,031 2,515
Columbia and Snake River Salmon Recovery Project.............. 18,000 .......... 18,000 ...........
Idaho Investigations Program.................................. 390 .......... 390 ...........
Lewiston Orchards Project..................................... 721 105 721 105
Minidoka Area Projects........................................ 2,901 2,310 2,901 2,310
KANSAS
Kansas Investigations Program................................. 5 .......... 5 ...........
Wichita Project............................................... 10 404 10 404
Wichita Project (Equus Beds Division)......................... 50 .......... 50 ...........
MONTANA
Fort Peck Reservation/Dry Prairie Rural Water System.......... 2,000 .......... 6,000 ...........
Hungry Horse Project.......................................... .......... 702 ........... 702
Huntley Project............................................... 31 84 31 84
Lower Yellowstone Project..................................... 34 15 34 15
Milk River Project............................................ 327 2,456 1,327 2,456
Montana Investigations Program................................ 20 .......... 20 ...........
Rocky Boys/North Central MT Rural Water System................ 1,000 .......... 5,000 ...........
Sun River Project............................................. 52 272 52 272
NEBRASKA
Mirage Flats Project.......................................... 13 131 13 131
NEVADA
Halfway Wash Project/Study.................................... 75 .......... 75 ...........
Lahontan Basin Project (Humbolt, Newlands, and Washoe 4,056 2,667 4,056 2,667
Projects)....................................................
Lake Mead/Las Vegas Wash Program.............................. 700 .......... 1,850 ...........
North Las Vegas Water Reuse................................... .......... .......... 3,000 ...........
NEW MEXICO
Albuquerque Metro Area Reuse.................................. .......... .......... 500 ...........
Carlsbad Project.............................................. 3,032 1,748 3,032 1,748
Eastern New Mexico Investigations Program..................... 23 .......... 23 ...........
Eastern New Mexico Water Supply--Ute Reservoir................ .......... .......... 2,000 ...........
Jicarilla Apache Rural Water System........................... 500 .......... 500 ...........
Middle Rio Grande Project..................................... 14,772 10,323 15,422 10,323
Navajo Gallup Water Supply.................................... 10,000 .......... 10,000 ...........
Navajo Nation Investigations Program.......................... 114 .......... 114 ...........
Pecos River Basin Water Salvage Project....................... .......... 485 ........... 485
Rio Grande Project............................................ 1,141 5,222 2,141 5,222
San Juan River Basin Investigations Program................... 91 .......... 91 ...........
Southern New Mexico/West Texas Investigations Program......... 91 .......... 91 ...........
Tucumcari Project............................................. 25 16 25 16
Upper Rio Grande Basin Investigations Program................. 35 .......... 35 ...........
NORTH DAKOTA
P-SMBP--Garrison Diversion Unit............................... 30,672 5,879 44,121 5,879
OKLAHOMA
Arbuckle Project.............................................. 48 182 48 182
McGee Creek Project........................................... 20 660 20 660
Mountain Park Project......................................... 7 472 7 472
Norman Feasibility Study...................................... .......... .......... 755 ...........
Norman Project................................................ 9 467 9 467
Oklahoma Investigations Program............................... 47 .......... 47 ...........
Washita Basin Project......................................... 7 1,425 7 1,425
W.C. Austin Project........................................... 18 481 18 481
OREGON
Crooked River Project......................................... 458 486 458 486
Deschutes Ecosystem Restoration Project....................... .......... .......... 500 ...........
Deschutes Project............................................. 434 392 934 392
Eastern Oregon Projects....................................... 555 297 555 297
Klamath Dam Removal Study..................................... 5,000 .......... 5,000 ...........
Klamath Project............................................... 18,813 3,687 18,813 3,687
Oregon Investigations Program................................. 157 .......... 457 ...........
Rogue River Basin Project, Talent Division.................... 1,222 354 1,222 354
Tualatin Project.............................................. 315 238 315 238
Umatilla Project.............................................. 1,370 2,767 1,370 2,767
Wallowa Lake Dam Rehabilitation and Water Management.......... .......... .......... 1,000 ...........
Water for Irrigation Streams and Economy Feasibility Study .......... .......... 400 ...........
[WISE].......................................................
SOUTH DAKOTA
Lewis and Clark Rural Water System............................ 2,000 .......... 10,000 ...........
Mid-Dakota Rural Water Project................................ .......... 15 ........... 15
Mni Wiconi Project............................................ 17,280 10,200 20,280 10,200
Perkins County Rural Water District........................... 1,000 .......... 1,000 ...........
Rapid Valley Project.......................................... .......... 84 ........... 84
TEXAS
Balmorhea Project............................................. 41 10 41 10
Canadian River Project........................................ 54 111 54 111
Lower Rio Grande Water Conservation Project................... 50 .......... 50 ...........
Nueces River Project.......................................... 20 543 20 543
Round Rock Reclaimed Water Project, TX........................ .......... .......... 2,000 ...........
San Angelo Project............................................ 35 383 35 383
Texas Investigations Program.................................. 47 .......... 47 ...........
UTAH
Hyrum Project................................................. 167 157 167 157
Moon Lake Project............................................. 13 38 13 38
Newton Project................................................ 69 26 69 26
Northern Utah Investigations Program.......................... 102 .......... 602 ...........
Ogden River Project........................................... 280 166 280 166
Provo River Project........................................... 1,076 520 1,076 520
Scofield Project.............................................. 346 77 346 77
Southern Nevada/Utah Investigations Program................... 26 .......... 26 ...........
Southern Utah Investigations Program.......................... 128 .......... 128 ...........
Strawberry Valley Project..................................... 289 22 289 22
Summit County Water Supply (Weber Basin)...................... .......... .......... 500 ...........
Weber Basin Project........................................... 914 756 914 756
Weber River Project........................................... 71 134 71 134
WASHINGTON
Columbia Basin Project........................................ 4,575 6,500 5,575 6,500
Odessa Subarea Special Study.................................. .......... .......... 1,250 ...........
Washington Area Projects...................................... 407 52 407 52
Washington Investigations Program............................. 75 .......... 75 ...........
Yakima Project................................................ 1,493 6,992 1,493 6,992
Yakima River Basin Water Enhancement Project.................. 12,395 .......... 16,395 ...........
WYOMING
Kendrick Project.............................................. 119 4,191 119 4,191
North Platte Project.......................................... 266 1,569 266 1,569
Shoshone Project.............................................. 76 1,122 76 1,122
-------------------------------------------------
Subtotal................................................ 311,885 230,166 381,696 230,166
VARIOUS
Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Project--Title I........ .......... 10,536 ........... 11,536
Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Project--Title II....... 7,000 .......... 7,000 ...........
Colorado River Storage Project (CRSP), Section 5.............. 3,955 4,947 3,955 4,947
Colorado River Storage Project (CRSP), Section 8.............. 3,752 .......... 3,752 ...........
Colorado River Water Quality Improvement Program.............. 635 .......... 635 ...........
Dam Safety Program:
Department of the Interior Dam Safety Program............. .......... 1,900 ........... 1,900
Initiate Safety of Dams Corrective Action................. .......... 74,274 ........... 74,274
Safety Evaluation of Existing Dams........................ .......... 19,000 ........... 19,000
Drought Emergency Assistance Program.......................... 380 .......... 380 ...........
Emergency Planning and Disaster Response Program.............. .......... 1,157 ........... 1,157
Endangered Species Recovery Implementation Program............ 23,721 .......... 23,721 ...........
Environmental and Interagency Coordination Activities......... 1,883 .......... 1,883 ...........
Environmental Program Administration.......................... 1,140 .......... 1,140 ...........
Examination of Existing Structures............................ .......... 9,037 ........... 9,037
Federal Building Seismic Safety Program....................... .......... 1,140 ........... 1,140
General Planning Activities................................... 2,347 .......... 2,347 ...........
Land Resources Management Program............................. 10,665 .......... 10,665 ...........
Lower Colorado River Investigations Program................... 137 .......... 137 ...........
Lower Colorado River Operations Program....................... 25,300 .......... 25,300 ...........
Miscellaneous Flood Control Operations........................ .......... 803 ........... 803
Native American Affairs Program............................... 7,465 .......... 7,465 ...........
Negotiation and Administration of Water Marketing............. 1,924 .......... 1,924 ...........
Operation and Program Management.............................. 936 1,044 936 1,044
Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program (other Pick Sloan).......... 3,018 37,339 3,018 37,339
Power Program Services........................................ 1,269 307 1,269 307
Public Access and Safety Program.............................. 616 155 616 155
Reclamation Law Administration................................ 2,265 .......... 2,265 ...........
Recreation and Fish and Wildlife Program Administration....... 2,137 .......... 2,137 ...........
Research and Development:
Desalination and Water Purification Program............... 2,066 1,600 2,066 1,600
Science and Technology Program............................ 11,488 .......... 12,488 ...........
Rural Water Program, Title I.................................. 2,677 .......... 2,677 ...........
Site Security Activities...................................... .......... 30,268 ........... 30,268
United States/Mexico Border Issues--Technical Support......... 90 .......... 90 ...........
Upper Colorado River Operations Program....................... 252 .......... 252 ...........
Water Conservation Field Services Program..................... 7,854 .......... 7,854 ...........
WaterSMART Program:
WaterSMART Grants (Challenge Grant in 2010)............... 27,000 .......... 20,000 ...........
Title XVI Water Reclamation/Reuse Projects................ 20,189 .......... 7,689 ...........
Basin Studies............................................. 6,000 .......... 4,000 ...........
-------------------------------------------------
Subtotal................................................ 178,024 193,507 157,524 194,507
Underfinancing................................................ .......... .......... (16,800) (8,493)
=================================================
TOTAL................................................... 489,909 423,673 522,420 416,180
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All American Canal, California.--The Committee has
recommended $1,000,000 to initiate the Imperial Dam
Electrification Rehabilitation project. The Committee
understands that a repayment contract will have to be
negotiated with the Imperial Irrigation District under the
provisions of Public Law 111-11, Title IX, Subtitle G--Aging
Infrastructure before any funding can be provided for the
project.
Central Valley Project--American River Division.--$920,000
has been recommended above the budget request for the El Dorado
Irrigation District Temperature Control Device.
Central Valley Project--Miscellaneous Project Programs.--
The Committee recommendation includes $2,000,000 for anadramous
fish screens.
Central Valley Project--Friant Division.--The Committee
recommendation includes $8,000,000 for the San Joaquin River
Restoration. These funds should be utilized in conjunction with
and in advance of those funds available from the San Joaquin
River Restoration Fund. The Committee encourages the timely
completion of all environmental review, feasibility, and design
documents to allow for construction to begin in fiscal year
2011 on the Friant-Kern and Madera Canals Capacity Correction
projects, and further encourages the expeditious completion of
studies to inform the hatchery and genetics management plan and
other actions necessary for reintroduction of salmon in 2012.
Hawaii Water Resources Study, Hawaii.--The Committee
recommends $300,000 to update the Hawaii Water Resources Study.
This study is especially critical in view of the significant
changes to plantation agriculture and the related water systems
that have prevailed for more than 100 years in the State of
Hawaii.
Milk River Project.--$1,000,000 has been recommended for
the St. Mary Diversion Rehabilitation Project. These funds
should be utilized using applicable Reclamation Law and as
directed in this act.
Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin, Garrison Diversion Unit, North
Dakota.--Within the Committee recommendation, $32,000,000 is
recommended for rural water projects. Of this amount,
$16,000,000 shall be expended for the following projects:
$2,000,000 for the Northwest Area Water Supply; $7,000,000 for
the South Central Regional Water District; and $7,000,000 for
the Southwest Pipeline. Additionally the Committee recommends
$3,120,000 for the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe Irrigation
Project.
Oregon Investigations Program, Oregon.--$300,000 above the
budget request is recommended for developing appraisal-level
designs and cost estimates for Umatilla on-reservation
distribution systems.
Water for Irrigation Streams and Economy Feasibility
Study.--The Committee recommendation includes $400,000 for the
Water for Irrigation Streams and Economy Feasibility study.
Tualatin Valley Water Supply Feasibility Study, Oregon.--
The Committee understands that Reclamation has sufficient funds
available for the feasibility study and recognizes that the
completion of the Bureau of Reclamation's Scoggins Dam
Corrective Action Alternative Study is integral to determining
how the State, local and Federal partners will proceed to
address dam safety and long-term water needs of the region.
Therefore, the Committee urges Reclamation to maintain its
schedule for completion of the Scoggins Dam CAAS in Federal
fiscal year 2011 in order to address these needs in a timely
and efficient manner.
Northern Utah Investigations Program, Utah.--The Committee
has recommended an additional $500,000 for the Rural Water
Technology Alliance.
Yakima River Basin Water Enhancement Project, Washington.--
The Committee recommends an additional $4,000,000 above the
budget request for the Diversion Reduction Agreement with the
Sunnyside Irrigation District to address water shortages in the
basin.
Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Project--Title I.--
The Committee recommends $1,000,000 above the budget request
for plant replacements that would contribute to the successful
pilot run of the Yuma Desalting Plant.
Drought Emergency Assistance.--The Committee has provided
the budget request for this program. Within the funds provided,
the Committee urges the Bureau of Reclamation to recognize the
unique conditions in Hawaii and provide full and fair
consideration of the request for drought assistance from the
State of Hawaii and fund if meritorious.
Research and Development, Science and Technology Program.--
The Committee recommends $1,000,000 above the budget request
for Quagga and Zebra Mussel research activities. The Committee
is concerned about the impacts to western waters of these two
invasive species. Reclamation efforts to date have necessarily
focused on addressing the problems caused by the mussels at
Reclamation facilities. The Committee believes that Reclamation
should establish a research program geared toward eradicating
or controlling these invasive species.
Water Conservation Field Services Program.--Within the
amounts provided, Reclamation is urged to continue urban water
conservation projects identified through the Metropolitan Water
District of Southern California Innovative Conservation
Program; industrial water efficiency surveys to assess
opportunities to conserve water in industrial water use; and
for weather based irrigation controller activities to pilot
ways to speed distribution and acceptance of these landscape
water efficiency devices.
WaterSMART Program.--Within the amounts provided for the
challenge grants, funds are included for the Desert Research
Institute to create a systems framework to identify solutions
for addressing water supply, flood control, natural resources
and climate change challenges. The Committee also recommends
that the Education Center at the Conservation Garden Park, Utah
and the Gravel Pit Aquifer Storage and Recovery Project, Utah
should be considered for challenge grants. Within the amounts
provided for title XVI, Water Reclamation, and Reuse under this
item, the Committee has recommended $2,500,000 for the
WateReuse Foundation. These funds are available to support the
Foundation's research priorities.
CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT RESTORATION FUND
Appropriations, 2010.................................... $35,358,000
Budget estimate, 2011................................... 49,915,000
Committee recommendation................................ 49,915,000
The Committee recommends an appropriation of $49,915,000
for the Central Valley Project Restoration Fund.
The Central Valley Project Restoration Fund was authorized
in the Central Valley Project Improvement Act, title 34 of
Public Law 102-575. This fund was established to provide
funding from project beneficiaries for habitat restoration,
improvement and acquisition, and other fish and wildlife
restoration activities in the Central Valley project area of
California. Revenues are derived from payments by project
beneficiaries and from donations. Payments from project
beneficiaries include several required by the act (Friant
Division surcharges, higher charges on water transferred to
non-CVP users, and tiered water prices) and, to the extent
required in appropriations acts, additional annual mitigation
and restoration payments.
CALIFORNIA BAY-DELTA RESTORATION
(INCLUDING TRANSFER OF FUNDS)
Appropriations, 2010.................................... $40,000,000
Budget estimate, 2011................................... 40,000,000
Committee recommendation................................ 40,000,000
The Committee recommendation includes an appropriation of
$40,000,000 for the CALFED Bay-Delta Program.
This account funds activities that are consistent with the
CALFED Bay-Delta Program, a collaborative effort involving 18
State and Federal agencies and representatives of California's
urban, agricultural, and environmental communities. The goals
of the program are to improve fish and wildlife habitat, water
supply reliability, and water quality in the San Francisco Bay-
San Joaquin River Delta, the principle hub of California's
water distribution system.
POLICY AND ADMINISTRATION
Appropriations, 2010.................................... $61,200,000
Budget estimate, 2011................................... 61,200,000
Committee recommendation................................ 61,200,000
The Committee recommendation for general administrative
expenses is $61,200,000.
The policy and administrative expenses program provides for
the executive direction and management of all reclamation
activities, as performed by the Commissioner's offices in
Washington, DC, Denver, Colorado, and five regional offices.
The Denver office and regional offices charge individual
projects or activities for direct beneficial services and
related administrative and technical costs. These charges are
covered under other appropriations.
General Provisions--Department of the Interior
Section 201. The bill includes language regarding Bureau of
Reclamation Reprogramming.
Section 202. The bill includes language regarding the San
Luis Unit and the Kesterson Reservoir in California.
Section 203. The bill includes language that states
requirements for purchase or lease of water from the Middle Rio
Grande or Carlsbad Projects in New Mexico.
Section 204. The bill includes language regarding Drought
Emergency Assistance.
Section 205. The bill includes language concerning a
project cost ceiling increase.
Section 206. The bill includes language regarding the
Desert Terminal Lakes Program.
Section 207. The bill includes language extending a water
service contract.
Section 208. The bill includes language concerning certain
recreational use permits.
TITLE III
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Transparency
The Committee recognizes the Department's efforts to
achieve greater transparency in financial and programmatic
performance. This has particularly been demonstrated in the
execution of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. In
other more focused efforts, the Committee has seen that greater
transparency has exposed significant financial risks and
liabilities facing the Department, such as those liabilities
arising from contractor managed defined benefit pension
liabilities and other contractor benefits. The Committee
expects the Department to apply the same degree of transparency
to its base programs and mission support activities by the end
of fiscal year 2011.
Cyber Security
Pervasive and sustained cyber attacks against the United
States are on the rise and continue to pose a threat to Federal
operations. DOE is particularly vulnerable because web-based
systems and data support critical mission activities related to
energy security, nuclear security, scientific discovery and
innovation, and environmental programs. The Committee supports
DOE's efforts to implement cyber security measures to protect
classified systems and networks. Moreover, the Committee is
encouraged that a November 2009 Office of Independent Oversight
report found that DOE's classified systems are adequately
protected against cyber security threats, including the threat
of compromise from external sources and the threat from
malicious insiders. However, the Office also found remaining
weaknesses that, if addressed, could further strengthen DOE's
cyber security. The major weaknesses include (1) a lack of
clear policies and guidance to ensure the appropriate level of
protection for information that is shared between networks that
operate at different classification categories, (2) operational
and system-specific risks are not being fully evaluated and
documented, and (3) site-specific cyber security plans are not
sufficiently detailed to address the full range of threats. The
Committee directs DOE to submit a report by April 1, 2011, on
how the Department resolved the program weaknesses identified
in the November 2009 Office of Independent Oversight report.
Reprogramming Guidelines
The Department of Energy is directed to operate in a manner
fully consistent with the following reprogramming guidelines. A
reprogramming request must be submitted to the Committees on
Appropriations for consideration before any implementation of a
reorganization proposal which includes moving previous
appropriations between appropriation accounts. The Department
is directed to inform the Committees promptly and fully when a
change in program execution and funding is required during the
fiscal year. To assist the Department in this effort, the
following guidance is provided for programs and activities
funded in the Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies
Appropriations Act. The Department is directed to follow this
guidance for all programs and activities unless specific
reprogramming guidance is provided for a program or activity.
Definition.--A reprogramming includes the reallocation of
funds from one activity to another within an appropriation, or
any significant departure from a program, project, activity, or
organization described in the agency's budget justification as
presented to and approved by Congress. For construction
projects, a reprogramming constitutes the reallocation of funds
from one construction project identified in the justifications
to another project or a significant change in the scope of an
approved project.
Any reallocation of new or prior year budget authority or
prior year deobligations must be submitted to the Committees in
writing and may not be implemented prior to approval by the
Committees on Appropriations.
Energy Programs
ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND RENEWABLE ENERGY
Appropriations, 2010.................................... $2,242,500,000
Budget estimate, 2011................................... 2,355,473,000
Committee recommendation................................ 2,287,800,000
The Committee recommendation is $2,287,800,000 for Energy
Efficiency and Renewable Energy.
Hydrogen Technology.--The Committee recommends $174,000,000
for hydrogen technology. Within the available funds,
$20,000,000 is for Technology Validation, at least half of
which is focused on vehicle and hydrogen infrastructure
applications; $47,000,000 is for hydrogen fuels R&D, with a
particular focus on the synergies between hydrogen and
renewable energy and deriving hydrogen from renewable
resources; $20,000,000 is for Market Transformation in early
markets, particularly for stationary sources (not safety codes
and standards); and $1,000,000 is for education.
Biomass and Biorefinery Systems R&D.--The Committee
recommends $220,000,000 for biomass and biorefinery systems
R&D. Within the available funds a total of $30,000,000 is for
algae biofuels. The Committee recognizes that improvements and
innovations to feedstock production will contribute to meeting
overall cost goals. Significant potential exists for
discoveries in this area, particularly with algae strains that
possess unique metabolic and enzymatic adaptations to tolerate
high salinity. The Committee directs the Department to make
$5,000,000 available for research and development activities
for halophilic algae applications in partnership with a
university-led consortia having expertise in this area and
ready access to a wide variety of high-salinity algae strains.
Also within available funds, $15,000,000 is for the
cellulosic reverse auction. The Committee is aware the
Department is considering a reverse auction in fiscal year 2010
using $4,500,000 made available in fiscal year 2008. The
Committee urges the Department to consider delaying such action
and combining the 2008 funding with fiscal year 2011 funds to
make the reverse auction more compelling. Further, within
available funds, $4,000,000 is provided for coordination with
the Fuels Technology subprogram under Vehicles Technologies to
continue testing the effects of intermediate fuel blends (15-20
percent ethanol mixed with 80-85 percent gasoline) on Tier 1
vehicles and small engines. The testing will provide data on
how these blends may affect materials, durability, performance
and emissions of legacy engines. Work should be done in
coordination with the Vehicles Technology Program.
The Committee continues to be concerned about the Nation's
capability to meet the 2022 requirement of 21 billion gallons
of advanced biofuels required under the Renewable Fuel Standard
[RFS]. The Committee is not aware of a coordinated strategy
among Federal agencies to achieve this requirement. The lack of
a Federal strategy creates opportunities for duplication of
efforts and the waste of taxpayer dollars. To address this, the
Committee directs the Department to coordinate with the
appropriate Federal agencies, with input from industry
partners, to develop a strategy to meet the advanced biofuel
requirements of the RFS. The strategy should seek to avoid
duplication among the Federal agencies while drawing on their
research strengths and capabilities. The Committee directs the
Department to complete this strategy by September 30, 2011. The
Committee recommends $5,000,000 for a demonstration of a
catalytic process to convert liquid ethanol into gaseous
ethylene. The Committee notes that thermochemical conversion of
biomass to fuels involves the production of synthetic natural
gas [SNG], a valuable and important energy feedstock in its own
right. The Committee encourages the Department to study the
economic and ecological sustainability of integrating SNG
production with existing forest, crop or other biomass source
operations. The Department should place particular emphasis on
instances where production of SNG can result in near-term job
creation and prevention of job loss. The Department shall
report back to the Committee no later than 8 months from
enactment.
Solar Energy.--The Committee recommends $272,000,000 for
solar energy. From within the available funds, the Committee
directs the Department to provide $50,000,000 for concentrating
solar power demonstration projects as proposed in the budget
request. The Committee is aware of recent developments in the
field of concentrated photovoltaics where ultra-high-efficiency
concentrator solar cells are being designed at less than the
cost of current technology now used in concentrating
photovoltaic applications. This technology has the advantages
of lower land use and increased power. The Committee encourages
DOE to continue its efforts to invest in promising high
efficiency, low cost concentrated photovoltaic solar technology
that will accelerate the achievement of grid parity. The
Committee also encourages the Department of Energy to designate
and fund, in fiscal year 2011, a center for solar energy
innovation to be located in close proximity to high-quality
solar resources and the site chosen by the Department of Energy
for its Solar Demonstration Zone Project. The center should
support the research, development, and deployment of the
essential components of the solar energy supply chain to
promote the integration of solar technologies and products into
utility, building and commercial systems, and to improve their
reliability, affordability and rapid deployment across the
Southwest region and the United States.
Wind Energy.--The recommendation is $123,000,000 for wind
energy. The Department is encouraged to undertake at least two
offshore wind demonstration projects off the Atlantic Coast,
with at least one project in transitional depths and one in
deepwater. To the greatest extent possible, the Department
shall coordinate with the Department of Interior (Bureau of
Offshore Energy, Management, Regulation, and Enforcement) and
the Atlantic Offshore Wind Energy Consortium in order to select
projects that are likely to foster the deployment of commercial
offshore wind generation in the short term.
Geothermal Technology.--The recommendation for geothermal
technology is $55,000,000, the same as the administration's
request. The Committee directs the Department to make not less
than $5,000,000 available to continue development and
deployment of low-temperature geothermal systems.
Together, the funding provided through the American
Recovery and Reinvestment Act [ARRA] and the fiscal year 2010
and fiscal year 2011 appropriations bills reflect the
Committee's intent to fund the full range of activities
authorized by Congress in 2007 in subtitle B of Public Law 110-
140. The Committee expects that in future years the Department
will request funding for a broad based program, and not just
Enhanced Geothermal System activities. The Committee also
requests that the Department provide the Committee with a copy
of its report required by section 621 of Public Law 110-140
evaluating the Department's progress implementing the
geothermal provisions of Public Law 110-140 and evaluating
additional advanced concepts and technologies to maximize the
geothermal resource potential of the United States.
Water Power Energy R&D.--The Committee recommends
$60,000,000 for water power. Of the funds made available,
$15,000,000 is directed for conventional hydropower activities
and $45,000,000 is for marine and hydrokinetic activities.
Within available funds, the Committee directs the Department to
provide not less than $6,000,000 for the construction of
necessary testing infrastructure for marine and hydrokinetic
systems. Further, the Committee includes $1,000,000 for
research and development activities of tidal barrage
technology.
Vehicle Technologies.--The Committee recommends
$325,000,000 for vehicle technologies. The Committee recognizes
the Department's efforts to increase the number of hybrids and
plug-in electric vehicles in its fleet and is also cognizant
that significant research, development, and deployment [RD&D]
challenges exist to the adoption of this technology on a large
scale. To address these challenges, the Department should
investigate technologies that will advance electrification of
all classes of passenger vehicles. The Committee also directs
the Department to make $3,000,000 available to continue efforts
on both stationary and in-motion inductive power transfer
technology to a national laboratory-university consortia. The
Committee includes $5,000,000 for natural gas vehicle research
and development.
The Committee recognizes that batteries that reach the end
of their useful lives in electric vehicles will have remaining
capacity for other uses and directs the program to use
$2,000,000 in conjunction with the Office of Electricity to
commence work on the secondary use program authorized in
section 915 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005.
The Committee further directs $5,000,000 for the Department
to establish a program to collect and synthesize data on the
use of plug-in electric drive vehicles and provide technical
assistance to communities that want to prepare for plug-in
electric drive vehicle deployment.
Building Technologies.--The Committee recommends
$222,000,000 for building technologies. The Committee includes
$5,000,000 for the solar decathlon, which the Department had
proposed to fund under the RE-ENERGYSE program. The Committee
includes $1,500,000 for research and development activities for
advanced sensing and control technologies for task-intuitive
lighting systems, and directs the Department to identify a
university-led partnership with experience in this field. The
Committee includes $16,000,000 for the Energy Efficient
Building Systems Design Hub.
The Committee is concerned about the memorandum of
understanding [MOU] the Department signed with the
Environmental Protection Agency [EPA] in September 2009 that
reassigns new duties and responsibilities for implementing the
ENERGY STAR program within the two agencies. The Committee does
not understand why the Department used its limited resources to
pursue this MOU without congressional input, particularly when
an energy bill with significant statutory changes to the ENERGY
STAR program has been favorably reported from the authorizing
committee and was pending before the Senate. The Committee
encourages the Department to consult with Congress in the
future before it attempts to implement such sweeping changes to
its programs.
The Committee is also concerned about deficiencies in the
ENERGY STAR program as noted in the October 2009 Audit Report
from the Department's Office of Inspector General, and the
March 5, 2010 GAO report. The Committee also questions the
Department's claim that Americans saved $17,000,000,000 last
year using these products, since that data was reported by the
same entities who had abused the program in the past. The
Committee recognizes that the Department and EPA have issued
new guidelines to address these deficiencies, but that
insufficient time has passed to determine their effectiveness.
The Committee believes the Department should require
independent verification from accredited or third party
laboratories for all products. The Committee directs the
Government Accountability Office [GAO] to assess (1) whether
the Department has taken sufficient steps to implement the
recommendations of the Office of Inspector General, and (2)
whether the new guidelines and other changes to the program
adequately address the issues raised both by the Office of
Inspector General and GAO.
The Committee notes that the Energy Policy Conservation Act
of 1975 authorized the Department to issue efficiency standards
for a list of products, and to date televisions are the only
item for which DOE has failed to issue a standard. The
Committee encourages the Secretary to complete a rulemaking
process to establish effective efficiency standards for
televisions, as expeditiously as possible.
Industrial Technologies.--The Committee recommends
$100,000,000 for industrial technologies. Within available
funds, the Committee recommends $14,000,000 for the Industries
of the Future (Specific), and $1,500,000 for the Department to
contract with the National Academy of Sciences to conduct an
analysis of cooperative mechanisms, beyond research and
development support, to advance the development of a robust,
domestic clean energy technology sector. Such mechanisms may
include, but are not limited to, grants, loan guarantees,
demonstration projects, tax incentives, procurement, and other
forms of public-private partnerships.
Federal Energy Management Program.--The Committee
recommends $42,000,000 for the Federal Energy Management
Program [FEMP]. Of the funds made available, the Committee
recommends that Federal Fleets receive $5,000,000 to conduct an
assessment of the most appropriate places to deploy electric
vehicles in the Federal fleet and to begin a pilot program to
deploy electric vehicles based on the assessment.
The FEMP is intended to assist Federal agencies--which
together spend roughly $10,000,000,000 annually on energy
procurements--in achieving energy savings. The Committee is
troubled with recent findings of the DOE Inspector General
[OIG] in its audit report on the FEMP. The OIG found that FEMP
``had not always maintained up-to-date energy efficiency
specifications; could not demonstrate that it had adequately
pursued the development of new energy efficiency
specifications; and had not effectively managed relevant
contractor efforts essential to the program.'' The Committee
directs the Department to deliver by March 15, 2011 an action
plan to address the problems identified by the OIG.
RE-ENERGYSE.--The Committee recommends no funds for RE-
ENERGYSE.
Facilities and Infrastructure.--The Committee recommends
$57,500,000 for facilities and infrastructure consistent with
the budget request.
Program Direction.--The Committee recommends $170,000,000
for program direction.
Program Support.--The Committee recommends $59,700,000 for
program support. Within the international subprogram,
$2,000,000 is to continue the United States-Israel energy
cooperative agreement.
Weatherization Assistance Program.--The Committee provides
$200,000,000. Of that amount, $7,500,000 is for training and
technical assistance and $30,000,000 is for innovations in
weatherization as requested in the budget. The Committee notes
that this program received $5,000,000,000 in the Recovery Act
in addition to current year appropriations, and that prior
appropriated balances are more than sufficient to carry the
existing program into fiscal year 2012 without further
appropriation.
Intergovernmental Activities.--The Committee provides
$50,000,000 for State Energy Programs and $10,000,000 for
Tribal Energy Activities.
Congressionally Directed Spending Items.--The Committee
includes $147,600,000 for the following list of projects that
provide for research, development, and demonstration of energy
efficiency or renewable energy technologies or programs. The
Committee reminds recipients that statutory cost sharing
requirements may apply to these projects.
CONGRESSIONALLY DIRECTED ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND RENEWABLE ENERGY PROJECTS
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Project title Amount Requestor
------------------------------------------------------------------------
21st Century Renewable Fuels, $400,000 Senators Levin, Stabenow
Energy, and Materials
Initiative.
Adams State College Solar $400,000 Senator Mark Udall
Project.
Advanced Closed-Cycle Turbine $1,000,000 Senator Murray
Generator.
Advanced Energy Studies........ $2,750,000 Senator Dorgan
Advanced Solid State Lithium $300,000 Senators Levin, Stabenow
Ion Battery Domestic
Manufacturing Initiative.
Algae Biofuels Research........ $2,000,000 Senators Murray, Cantwell
Alternative and Unconventional $10,000,000 Senators Bennett, Hatch
Energy Research and
Development.
Alternative Energy Medical $500,000 Senator Reid
Complex.
Bio-Energy Research Center..... $800,000 Senator Tester
Biofuel from Nevada's Municipal $500,000 Senator Reid
Wastes.
Biofuels, Biopower, and $1,250,000 Senators Chambliss,
Biomaterials Initiative. Isakson
Biomass Boiler and Steam $650,000 Senator Johnson
Absorption Chiller Plant.
Biomass Boiler at Ferrum $300,000 Senators Webb, Warner
College.
Bucknell University Marcellus $200,000 Senators Specter, Casey
Shale Research Initiative.
Center for Biomass Utilization. $1,500,000 Senators Dorgan, Conrad
Center for Ocean Renewable $500,000 Senator Shaheen
Energy.
Center for Ozark Community $1,500,000 Senator Bond
Biomass Energy Development.
Chittenden County Natural Gas $1,000,000 Senator Leahy
Refueling Project.
CHRISTUS Center for Healthy $300,000 Senators Landrieu, Vitter
Living and Energy Efficient
LEED Technology.
City of Grand Rapids City $400,000 Senators Levin, Stabenow
Building Solar and Wind
Renewable Energy Demonstration
Project.
City of Lansing Bioengergy $400,000 Senators Levin, Stabenow
Generation Demonstration
Project.
City of San Jose Smart LEED $600,000 Senator Feinstein
Streetlights, CA.
City of Yreka Biomass Facility, $500,000 Senator Feinstein
CA.
Clean Energy Infrastructure $200,000 Senator Sherrod Brown
Educational Initiative.
Co-Gen Electrostatic $700,000 Senator Gillibrand
Precipitator.
Collaboration on Renewable $300,000 Senator Reid
Energy Job Creation Strategies.
Delaware Energy Efficiency..... $55,000 Senators Carper, Kaufman
Development of High Yield $6,000,000 Senators Inouye, Akaka
Tropical Feedstocks and
Biomass Conversion Technology
for Renewable Energy
Production.
Energy Conservation, Solar $300,000 Senator Landrieu
Energy Education and Research.
Energy Recovery at the Water $750,000 Senators Tester, Baucus
Reclamation Facility.
Ethanol From Agriculture for $1,000,000 Senators Pryor, Lincoln
Arkansas and America.
Farm Solar Share............... $645,000 Senators Carper, Kaufman
Farm-Based Renewable Energy.... $400,000 Senator Murray
Fuel Cell Durability Research.. $400,000 Senator Dodd
Genetic Improvement of $500,000 Senators Reed, Whitehouse
Switchgrass for Biofuels.
Geothermal Conversion Project.. $1,000,000 Senator Lugar
Great Basin College--Direct Use $1,000,000 Senator Reid
Geothermal Demonstration
Project.
Green Building................. $250,000 Senators Schumer,
Gillibrand
Green Energy Sustainable Loan $700,000 Senator Gillibrand
Program.
Hawaii Energy Sustainability $6,000,000 Senators Inouye, Akaka
Program.
Hawaii Renewable Energy $6,000,000 Senator Inouye
Development Venture.
High Performance Computing $700,000 Senator Hagan
Infrastructure for Modeling
Solar Energy.
High Speed Wind Turbine Noise $1,000,000 Senators Cochran, Wicker
Model with Suppression.
Home Energy Efficiency Research $500,000 Senator Specter, Casey
and Development Initiative.
Hoonah IPEC Hydroelectric $1,500,000 Senator Murkowski
Project.
Industrial Technologies Program $1,000,000 Senator Reid
Language.
Institute for Environmental $450,000 Senator Rockefeller
Studies.
Iowa Central Community College $500,000 Senators Harkin, Grassley
Renewable Fuels Laboratory.
Kaukauna Utilities $1,000,000 Senator Kohl
Hydroelectric Generator
Replacement.
Large-Scale Wind Training...... $400,000 Senators Schumer,
Gillibrand
Las Vegas Residential Energy $500,000 Senator Reid
Efficiency Program.
Livingston Campus Geothermal $750,000 Senators Lautenberg,
Energy System. Menendez
Long Island Sustainable Schools $450,000 Senator Schumer
Network.
Maine Tidal Power Initiative... $1,000,000 Senators Collins, Snowe
Martin County Microfiber Fuel $500,000 Senators Burr, Hagan
Cell Technology Development.
Mega-Turbine Research for $750,000 Senator Ben Nelson
Enhanced Wind Power.
Mendocino County for the $450,000 Senators Feinstein, Boxer
Strategic Woody-Biomass
Initiative.
MidSouth/Southeast BioEnergy $1,000,000 Senators Pryor, Lincoln
Consortium.
Montana Algal BioDiesel $750,000 Senators Tester, Baucus
Initiative.
Nanostructured Materials for $1,000,000 Senators Cochran, Wicker
Improved Photovoltaics.
National Center for Deepwater $10,000,000 Senators Collins, Snowe
Offshore Wind.
National Open-Ocean Energy $1,200,000 Senator Bill Nelson
Laboratory.
National Wind Energy Center, $3,000,000 Senator Hutchison
University of Houston,
Houston, TX.
National Wind Resource Center $1,000,000 Senator Cornyn
at Pantex.
Natural Resource Research $750,000 Senators Pryor, Lincoln
Center (NRCC).
Nevada Inter-Tribal Energy $150,000 Senator Reid
Consortium.
Nevada Renewable Energy $3,000,000 Senator Reid
Consortium.
Nevada Renewable Energy $3,000,000 Senator Reid
Innovation and Deployment
Cluster--Technology
Commercialization and Site
Development.
North Country Community Wood $200,000 Senator Shaheen
Energy Systems.
Nushagak Area Hydropower $500,000 Senator Murkowski
Project.
Ocean-Based Energy Generation.. $600,000 Senator Murray
Ohio Advanced Energy $500,000 Senator Sherrod Brown
Manufacturing Center (OAEMC).
Ohio Low Cost Carbon Fiber $1,500,000 Senators Voinovich,
Initiative. Sherrod Brown
OIT Geothermal Power Generation $400,000 Senators Wyden, Merkley
Plant.
Old Dominion University, $750,000 Senators Webb, Warner
Construction and Operation of
a Demonstration Scale Algal
Research Center.
Optimized Concentrated Solar $750,000 Senator Specter
Power Trough Development
Project.
Photovoltaic System at Closed, $650,000 Senator Schumer
Capped Landfill.
Producing Renewable, Value- $1,000,000 Senator Landrieu
Added Products from Waste
Feedstocks.
Rapid Battery Charging Device $500,000 Senator Reid
for Electric Vehicles.
Red Wing Regional Biosolids $700,000 Senator Klobuchar
Processing Facility.
Reedsport Wave Power Project $400,000 Senators Wyden, Merkley
(Phase I).
Renerwable Energy Technical $500,000 Senator Schumer
Training Center.
Renewable Energy Demonstration. $750,000 Senator Durbin
Renewable Energy Demonstration $300,000 Senator Mark Udall
Projects at Old FLC.
Renewable Energy Feasibility $500,000 Senator Reid
Study and Resources Assessment
for Lincoln County, NV.
Renewable Energy Initiative.... $500,000 Senator Durbin
Renewable Energy Solar Farm.... $650,000 Senators Lautenberg,
Menendez
Reno Hydrogen Fuel............. $1,000,000 Senator Reid
Research and Develop Geothermal $700,000 Senator Begich
Energy.
Research, Development and $1,000,000 Senator Kohl
Demonstration of Plug-In
Hybrid Electric Drive Kits.
Rowan University Algae-Based $750,000 Senators Lautenberg,
Renewable Fuel Initiative. Menendez
Salem City Solar Energy Project $300,000 Senators Bennett, Hatch
San Francisco Bay Area $500,000 Senator Feinstein
Biosolids to Energy Project,
CA.
San Francisco Electric Vehicle $300,000 Senator Boxer
Initiative.
Shenandoah Valley as a National $350,000 Senator Warner
Demonstration Project
Achieving 25 Percent Renewable
Energy by the Year 2025.
Sitka Blue Lake Hydroelectric $1,000,000 Senators Murkowski, Begich
Expansion Project.
Solar Cell Connectivity $1,000,000 Senators Reed, Whitehouse
Research and Development.
Solar Electric System.......... $200,000 Senator Gillibrand
Solar Energy Infrastructure $500,000 Senator Reid
Enhancement.
Solar Energy Research and $500,000 Senator Lugar
Laboratory.
Solar Power Module Development. $500,000 Senator Leahy
Solar Testing and Training..... $400,000 Senators Dodd, Lieberman
South Jordan NGV Fleet $300,000 Senator Bennett
Implementation Program.
South Utah Electric District $1,000,000 Senator Bennett
Crab Creek Small Hydropower
Facility.
Southern Regional Center for $3,500,000 Senators Cochran, Wicker
Lightweight Innovative Designs.
Southwest Washington Tidal $1,000,000 Senators Murray, Cantwell
Energy Project.
Springfield Fast-Fill CNG $500,000 Senator Bond
Facility.
Strategic Biomass Initiative... $500,000 Senators Cochran, Wicker
Sun Grant Initiative, South $2,000,000 Senators Johnson, Thune
Dakota State University
Regional Biomass Feedstock
Research and Development.
Sustainable Biofuel Production-- $400,000 Senator Kerry
Consolidated Bioprocessing
Strategy for Biomass
Conversion.
Sustainable Campus Initiative $400,000 Senator Reid
of Sierra Nevada College at
Lake Tahoe.
Sustainable Energy Homeowner $200,000 Senator Sanders
Outreach Program.
Sustainable Energy in Schools.. $500,000 Senator Sanders
Sustainable Energy Institute... $500,000 Senators Harkin, Grassley
Sustainable Energy Research $9,000,000 Senators Cochran, Wicker
Center.
Tri-County Biomass Energy Pilot $800,000 Senators Tester, Baucus
Project.
Truckee Meadows Water $1,000,000 Senator Reid
Reclamation Facility
Environmental and Energy
Enhancement.
Uintah Natural Gas Fueling $300,000 Senators Bennett, Hatch
Station.
University of Louisville $2,000,000 Senator McConnell
Research and Energy
Independence Program.
UNLV--Intermountain West $500,000 Senator Reid
Sustainable Development
Project.
UNR--Great Basin Center for $250,000 Senator Reid
Geothermal Energy.
University of Rhode Island-- $750,000 Senators Reed, Whitehouse
Offshore Wind Energy Research
Initiative.
Utah Center for Energy $3,400,000 Senators Bennett, Hatch
Innovation and
Commercialization.
Vermont Biofuels and Carbon $750,000 Senator Leahy
Harvest Initiative.
Vermont Biomass Energy Resource $1,000,000 Senator Leahy
Center.
Vernonia Sustainable Schools... $300,000 Senators Wyden, Merkley
White Earth Tribal BioMass Bio $700,000 Senators Klobuchar,
Fuel Project. Franken
Wind Energy Infrastructure..... $550,000 Senator Dorgan
Wind Energy Materials $1,500,000 Senator Dorgan
Development.
Wind Energy Technology Training $500,000 Senator Murray
Program.
Wind Energy Training and $750,000 Senator Dorgan
Infrastructure.
Wind Power Exploration......... $100,000 Senators Tester, Baucus
Wind Resource Monitoring and $1,000,000 Senator Reid
Training Program.
Wireless Turbine Blade Sensor $750,000 Senator Schumer
System Research.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability
Appropriations, 2010.................................... $171,982,000
Budget estimate, 2011................................... 185,930,000
Committee recommendation................................ 190,180,000
The Committee provides $190,180,000 for Electricity
Delivery and Energy Reliability. The Committee recommends
continued development and use of the Electricity Infrastructure
Operations Centers for researching, developing and deploying
technologies to better manage and control the electrical grid.
Congressionally Directed Spending Items.--The Committee
includes $4,250,000 for the following list of projects that
provide for research, development, and demonstration of
electricity delivery and energy reliability technologies or
programs. The Committee reminds recipients that statutory cost-
sharing requirements may apply to these projects.
CONGRESSIONALLY DIRECTED ELECTRICITY DELIVERY AND ENERGY RELIABILITY
PROJECTS
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Project title Amount Requestor
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dubuque Smarter Energy Project. $500,000 Senator Harkin
Energy Development and $300,000 Senator Dorgan
Reliability.
Navajo Nation Electrification $900,000 Senators Bingaman, Tom
Program. Udall
Smart Grid Simulation $800,000 Senator Dorgan
Technology.
Technology Development......... $750,000 Senator Dorgan
UNR--Energy Storage for $1,000,000 Senator Reid
Intermittent Renewable Energy
Sources.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nuclear Energy
Appropriations, 2010.................................... $786,637,000
Budget estimate, 2011................................... 824,052,000
Committee recommendation................................ 783,170,000
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
The Committee recommendation for nuclear energy research,
development, and facilities totals $783,170,000.
Nuclear Energy Enabling Technologies.--The Committee
recommends $62,000,000 for Nuclear Energy Enabling
Technologies. The Committee recommends no funding for the new
Transformative Nuclear Concepts R&D program for which the
Committee finds no compelling argument. This line appears to be
redundant to work scope already undertaken in Advanced Reactor
Concepts and potentially in the Small Modular Reactors and
Modified Open Cycle lines. Further, the Committee recommends
$16,000,000 for the Energy Innovation Hub for Modeling &
Simulation.
Integrated University Program.--The Committee provides
$5,000,000 to restore funding to current year levels and
sustain the ongoing collaboration between the Office of Nuclear
Energy, NNSA's Office of Nuclear Nonproliferation, and the
Nuclear Regulatory Commission to support the training of
engineers and scientists in nuclear engineering, as well as
nonproliferation, nuclear forensics, and nuclear safeguards
missions. This funding is to be used consistent with the
authorization provided in section 313 of Public Law 111-8. This
funding is not intended to supplant university research funding
provided within the nuclear energy research and development
activities. Studies by the American Physical Society, American
Association for the Advancement of Science and the American
Nuclear Society recommended Federal investment in university
research and training in nuclear engineering and forensics.
RE-ENERGYSE.--The Committee recommends no funding for this
line. Alternately, the Committee continues to support the on-
going Integrated University Program.
Reactor Concepts R&D.--The Committee recommends
$188,500,000 for Reactor Concepts Research and Development.
The Committee recommends $85,000,000 for the Next
Generation Nuclear Plant program. This program has already
spent over $500,000,000 with none of the funds requiring a
match by industry. Furthermore, of the two entities selected by
the Department to proceed with conceptual design, one has
failed to reach agreement with the Department on the issue of
cost-sharing and the other is proceeding with minimal cost-
share. The issue of cost-sharing is plaguing this program and
will do so into the future without a realistic approach by
industry. Additionally, the one conceptual design team
progressing today is not expected to finish its design until
late this year or early the following year. The design will
then be reviewed by advisory entities and the Department and is
subject to a formal determination by the Secretary as to
whether to proceed further. Hence, any funding provided in
fiscal year 2011 may be for a program that is no longer
supported by a demonstration element.
The Committee fully supports the other budget request lines
under Reactors Concepts R&D and provides $50,000,000 for the
small modular reactor [SMR] program. The Committee understands
the arguments that SMRs, if successful, may have unique
attributes in meeting base-load power supply needs of the
future. However, the Committee notes that light-water SMRs are
unlikely to lessen the nuclear waste issues facing the country.
Regarding the Light Water Reactor Sustainability program, the
Committee expects a high cost share from industry.
Fuel Cycle Research and Development.--The Committee
recommends $191,000,000 for Fuel Cycle Research and
Development. The Committee recommends $40,000,000 for the
Advanced Fuels program, including $7,000,000 for the Department
to issue a competitive solicitation requesting industry teams
(fuel suppliers, utilities and advanced ceramic developers) for
cost shared proposals to develop and test advanced LWR fuel
with ceramic cladding, with the capability of very high burn up
and with the objective of achieving readiness for Lead Test Rod
operation in commercial reactors within 5 years. This should be
awarded on a 50-50 cost-share basis. The Committee recommends
$30,000,000 for the Modified Open Cycle program. The Committee
notes the Department's request is putting significant funding
into three different approaches to the fuel cycle--once
through, closed, and modified open. It is not clear to the
Committee how long the Department envisions exploring these
three pathways and this raises questions about out-year costs.
Significant waste reductions in a closed fuel cycle will be
costly. It is less clear what potential exists with a modified
open cycle. The Committee urges the Department to develop
research plans that include decision dates in order to avoid
costly and long-term research and development in these areas.
International Nuclear Energy Cooperation.--The Committee
recommends the budget request level of $3,000,000 for
International Nuclear Energy Cooperation.
RADIOLOGICAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT
Space and Defense Infrastructure.--The Committee recommends
$57,000,000 for Space and Defense Infrastructure. Of the funds
provided, $15,160,000 is for Oak Ridge National Laboratory. The
Committee urges the Department to request sufficient funds for
nuclear infrastructure in future budgets in order that nuclear
materials and engineering facilities are maintained compliant
with DOE orders and directives.
Research Reactor Infrastructure.--The Committee recommends
the budget request for this activity at $4,818,000.
Pu-238 Production Restart Project.--The Committee provides
no funding for Pu-238 production capabilities. The Committee
understands that the United States no longer has the capability
to produce plutonium-238, which is a critical source of power
for NASA space missions, and that a shortage of this
radioisotope may affect future NASA missions. However, Pu-238
is not needed for any DOE or NNSA missions, including national
security applications. As NASA will be the only user of Pu-238,
the Committee believes NASA should pay for the entire service
through a similar work for others arrangement that DOE has with
the Department of Homeland Security and other government
agencies.
IDAHO FACILITIES MANAGEMENT
The Committee recommends $173,000,000 for Idaho Facilities
Management.
PROGRAM DIRECTION
The Committee recommends $91,452,000 for Program Direction,
consistent with the budget request.
Congressionally Directed Spending Items.--The Committee
includes $7,400,000 for the following list of projects. The
Committee reminds recipients that statutory cost sharing
requirements may apply to these projects.
CONGRESSIONALLY DIRECTED NUCLEAR ENERGY PROJECTS
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Project title Amount Requestor
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nuclear Engineering Research $500,000 Senators Bennett, Hatch
Center.
Nuclear Fabrication Consortium. $2,000,000 Senator Voinovich, Sherrod
Brown
Nuclear Power Operator $400,000 Senator Kerry
Simulator.
Ohio State Nuclear Reactor $2,000,000 Senator Voinovich
Laboratory Facility Research
and Education Expansion.
Oversight of Yucca Mountain $2,500,000 Senator Reid
Shut Down and Reclamation.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fossil Energy Research and Development
Appropriations, 2010.................................... $672,383,000
Budget estimate, 2011................................... 586,583,000
Committee recommendation................................ 725,950,000
The Committee recommendation for Fossil Energy Research and
Development is $725,950,000. The Committee urges the Department
to develop a plan and request funding in the next budget
request for a Clean Coal Power Initiative Round IV to build on
previous efforts. The Committee also supports the Department's
efforts to develop a new budget structure that reflects the
future direction of the coal research programs in Advanced
Power Systems, Carbon Capture, Geologic Storage, and Cross-
Cutting Research.
Fuels and Power Systems.--The Committee recommends
$452,000,000 for fuels and power systems which is $48,150,000
above the request. From within existing funds, the Committee
recommends $10,000,000, in addition to sums allocated for
university research, to initiate the NETL-Regional University
Alliance for Energy Innovation and encourages the Department's
future support for this initiative. The recommendation includes
$68,000,000 for innovations for existing plants. Within
available funds, the Committee also supports $5,000,000 to
continue the mercury research program. The Committee recommends
$64,000,000 for the Advanced Integrated Gasification Combined
Cycle activities and $32,000,000 for the Advanced Turbines
program. The Committee recommends $170,000,000 for Carbon
Sequestration activities, including support for integrated
emission reduction initiatives. Of these funds, $20,000,000 is
provided for the creation of a center focused on innovative
concepts for the beneficial use of carbon dioxide for non-
geologic activities. The Committee has also provided an
additional $4,000,000 for the Focus Area for Carbon
Sequestration Science. The Committee recommends $20,000,000 for
Fuels, including for coal/biomass activities. The Committee
supports additional research and development projects that
would produce substantially higher quality fuels which would
include greater carbon lifecycle requirements than conventional
fuels and technologies. Such fuels would be derived from coal/
biomass feed stocks and seek to meet fuel specifications for
military and civilian use without additional petroleum
components. The Committee recommends $50,000,000 for Fuel Cell
research. The Committee recommends $48,000,000 for Advanced
Research, including $20,000,000 for computational energy
sciences and system dynamics.
Natural Gas Technologies.--The Committee recommendation
includes $22,000,000. Of this amount, $15,000,000 is provided
for methane hydrates activities. The Committee has restored the
hydrates technology program to this account and does not
support funding a gas hydrates research program within the
Office of Science. The Committee recommends $3,000,000 to
continue research being conducted that targets small,
independent producers in the areas of exploration production,
and safety, including completion and well control technology,
and to continue to develop solutions to minimize the
environmental impacts of natural gas development, including
advancement of water resources treatment technologies. The
Committee further recommends support for one or more
demonstration-scale projects to treat water resources
associated with domestic natural gas development. The Committee
understands that, with the projected increases in demand for
natural gas, the amount of produced water affected will pose an
even greater challenge unless cost-effective methods are
developed to treat the water, including treatment for
beneficial reuse. The Committee encourages the Office of Fossil
Energy to consult with other offices, including the Office of
Environmental Management, and conduct the project, or projects,
jointly with industry to integrate existing, validated, low-
cost technology. The Committee recommends continued support for
unconventional natural gas production from basins that contain
tight gas sands, shale gas, and coal bed methane resources.
Unconventional Fossil Energy Technologies.--The Committee
recommends $26,000,000 to continue the implementation of the
comprehensive research, development, and demonstration [RD&D]
strategy the Committee directed the Department to develop in
Public Law 111-85. The Committee recommends that the Department
concentrate its RD&D activities on developing the significant
unconventional energy resource within the United States,
including the Western Energy Corridor. The Department should
look to demonstrate technology applications for these resources
on state and Federal lands, as appropriate, including oil shale
and tar sands. The Committee urges the Department to partner
with research universities, national laboratories, and
industry. Within available funds, the Committee recommends
$1,200,000 to continue the Risk Based Data Management System.
Within available funds, the Committee also recommends
continuation of the stripper well program and ongoing research
being conducted that targets small, independent producers in
the areas of enhanced oil recovery, exploration and production,
safety, and environmental solutions.
Program Direction.--The Committee recommends $170,300,000
for Program Direction, of which $138,700,000 is for the
National Energy Technology Laboratory.
Other Programs.--The Committee recommends $20,000,000 for
Plant and Capital Equipment. The Committee recommends
$10,000,000 for Fossil Energy Environmental Restoration. The
Committee recommends $700,000 for the special recruitment
programs. The Committee recommends $5,000,000 to restore
funding for Cooperative research and development. The Committee
urges the Department to continue NETL's efforts within the
Project Management Center [PMC]. The Committee continues to
encourage the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy
to carry on this collaboration and funding of the PMC with the
NETL.
Congressionally Directed Projects.--The Committee
recommends $19,950,000 for the following congressionally
directed projects.
CONGRESSIONALLY DIRECTED FOSSIL ENERGY PROJECTS
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Project title Amount Requestor
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Clean Energy Technology........ $2,000,000 Senator Dorgan
CO2 Sequestration Projects..... $700,000 Senators Mark Udall,
Bennet
Fossil Fuel Research and $3,000,000 Senators Dorgan, Conrad
Development.
Gulf of Mexico Hydrates $1,000,000 Senators Cochran, Wicker
Research Consortium.
Hydrogen Fuel Dispensing $750,000 Senator Rockefeller
Station.
Long Term Environmental and $750,000 Senator Rockefeller
Economic Impacts of the
Development of a Coal
Liquefaction Sector in China.
National Center for Hydrogen $3,000,000 Senators Dorgan, Conrad
Technology.
Sunbury Generation/Calera $750,000 Senator Specter
Carbon Capture Project.
University of Kentucky Coal- $1,000,000 Senator McConnell
Derived Low Energy Materials
for Sustainable Construction
Project.
Utah Center for Ultra-Clean $7,000,000 Senators Bennett, Hatch
Coal Utilization and Heavy Oil
Research.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Naval Petroleum and Oil Shale Reserves
Appropriations, 2010.................................... $23,627,000
Budget estimate, 2011................................... 23,614,000
Committee recommendation................................ 23,614,000
The Committee recommends $23,614,000 for fiscal year 2011,
the same as the budget request for the operation of the naval
petroleum and oil shale reserves.
Strategic Petroleum Reserve
Appropriations, 2010.................................... $243,823,000
Budget estimate, 2011................................... 138,861,000
Committee recommendation................................ 209,861,000
The Committee recommends $209,861,000 for the Strategic
Petroleum Reserve. The Committee does not support the budget
proposal to cancel $71,000,000 of prior appropriated funds for
the proposed expansion site in Richton, Mississippi. The
Committee notes that although the Department was directed by
statute in Public Law 111-8 to submit a report to Congress
regarding the effects of expanding the Reserve on the domestic
petroleum market within 45 days of enactment of the conference
report, the Department has failed to submit this report. The
Committee included these reporting requirements to inform
decision making for both the Department and Congress, and is
troubled that the Department has chosen to ignore this
requirement for more than a year. The Committee expects the
Department to be more responsive to congressional direction in
future budget requests.
Northeast Home Heating Oil Reserve
Appropriations, 2010.................................... $11,300,000
Budget estimate, 2011................................... 11,300,000
Committee recommendation................................ 11,300,000
The Committee recommends $11,300,000, the same as the
budget request.
Energy Information Administration
Appropriations, 2010.................................... $110,595,000
Budget estimate, 2011................................... 128,833,000
Committee recommendation................................ 119,000,000
The Committee recommends $119,000,000 for the Energy
Information Administration. The Committee strongly encourages
the Energy Information Administration to continue its work on
the Energy and Financial Markets Initiative.
Non-Defense Environmental Cleanup
Appropriations, 2010.................................... $244,673,000
Budget estimate, 2011................................... 225,163,000
Committee recommendation................................ 244,163,000
The Committee's recommendation for Non-Defense
Environmental Cleanup is $244,163,000.
Reprogramming Control Levels.--In fiscal year 2011, the
Environmental Management program may transfer funding between
operating expense funded projects within the controls listed
below using guidance contained in the Department's budget
execution manual (DOE M 135.1-1A, chapter IV). All capital
construction line item projects remain separate controls from
the operating projects. The Committees on Appropriations in the
House and Senate must be formally notified in advance of all
reprogrammings, except internal reprogrammings, and the
Department is to take no financial action in anticipation of
congressional response. The Committee recommends the following
reprogramming control points for fiscal year 2011:
--Fast Flux Test Reactor Facility Decontamination and
Decommissioning;
--Gaseous Diffusion Plants;
--Small Sites; and
--West Valley Demonstration Project.
Internal Reprogramming Authority.--Headquarters
Environmental Management may transfer up to $2,000,000, one
time, between accounts listed above to reduce health and safety
risks, gain cost savings, or complete projects, as long as a
program or project is not increased or decreased by more than
$2,000,000 in total during the fiscal year.
The reprogramming authority--either formal or internal--may
not be used to initiate new programs or to change funding
levels for programs specifically denied, limited, or increased
by Congress in the act or report. The Committee on
Appropriations in the House and Senate must be notified within
30 days after the use of the internal reprogramming authority.
Fast Flux Test Reactor Facility Decontamination and
Decommissioning.--The Committee recommends $3,659,000, the same
as the request.
Gaseous Diffusion Plants.--The Committee recommends
$99,464,000, the same as the request.
Small Sites.--The Committee recommends $82,966,000. A total
of $50,000,000 is provided to Moab.
West Valley Demonstration Project.--The Committee
recommends $58,074,000.
Uranium Enrichment Decontamination and Decommissioning Fund
Appropriations, 2010.................................... $573,850,000
Budget estimate, 2011................................... 530,498,000
Committee recommendation................................ 550,000,000
The Committee's recommendation is $550,000,000 to sustain
clean-up activities at uranium enrichment facilities. Of the
funds provided, $85,000,000 is recommended for the Paducah
Gaseous Diffusion Plant, $200,000,000 is recommended for the
East Tennessee Technology Park, and $265,000,000 is recommended
for the Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant. With these funds
and any additional funds generated though the barter of uranium
in the Department's inventory, the Department is encouraged to
maintain its current accelerated cleanup schedule at the
Portsmouth site. Accelerated cleanup of the site is consistent
with the Department's mission for responsible resolution to the
environmental legacy of nuclear weapons production, and is
anticipated to reduce life cycle costs and more quickly resolve
associated risks. The funding for Portsmouth is substantially
less than the budget request due to the administration's
reliance on a legislative proposal to reinstate a $200,000,000
fee on uranium fuel to pay for the Portsmouth increase. This is
the second year the Committee has rejected this proposal. The
Committee is aware of the fact that more than $5,000,000,000 in
available funding remains in the UED&D fund. The administration
is urged to propose real increased budget authority for these
activities rather than legislative proposals that have not been
proposed to the authorizing committees of jurisdiction.
SCIENCE
Appropriations, 2010.................................... $4,903,710,000
Budget estimate, 2011................................... 5,121,437,000
Committee recommendation................................ 5,012,000,000
The Committee recommends $5,012,000,000 for the Office of
Science. The Committee understands that changing the Nation's
decades-long dependence on imported oil and unfettered emission
of carbon dioxide requires fundamental changes in the ways we
produce, store, and use energy. To meet these strategic
challenges, the United States will have to develop new
technologies that require scientific breakthroughs that come
only with fundamental understanding of new materials and
chemical processes. The Committee believes the funding increase
in fiscal year 2011 will support initiatives to advance
scientific understanding for new energy technologies.
HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS
The Committee recommends $820,085,000 for High Energy
Physics. The Committee is encouraged that the Large Hadron
Collider [LHC] started operations again in March 2010 and it
reached energy levels of 3.5 trillion electron volts, which is
three times higher than any other machine in the world has been
able to achieve. However, the Committee is concerned about the
LHC's planned shutdown at the end of 2011 to address design
problems and the impact the shutdown may have on the U.S. High
Energy Physics Program. For example, a decision to operate the
Tevatron at the Fermi National Accelerator beyond fiscal year
2011 might reduce funding available for other high-priority
projects. The Committee urges the Office of Science to keep the
Committee informed about the status of operations at LHC and
how the planned shutdown will impact the U.S. program. The
Committee also recognizes the recommendation made in the 2008
report of the Particle Physics Project Prioritization Panel to
develop a world-leading program of neutrino science to
understand the role neutrinos play in the evolution of the
universe. The United States has unique capabilities and
infrastructure at Fermilab to advance this area of science. The
Committee supports design work for two new potential
construction projects--the Long Baseline Neutrino Experiment
and the Muon to Electron Conversion Experiment. However, the
Committee directs the Office of Science to submit a report not
later than 180 days after enactment of this act that lays out
(1) the expected benefits of intensity frontier science, (2) a
strategy for maintaining the U.S. lead, and (3) the funding
needs over the next 10 years, including construction
activities, of implementing the proposed strategy. The
Committee also is concerned about the status of the Deep
Underground Science and Engineering Laboratory [DUSEL] funded
by the National Science Foundation [NSF]. The neutrino program
relies on the construction of DUSEL and any delays in the DUSEL
program would impact advances in this area of science. The
Committee urges the Office of Science to coordinate its
neutrino program research efforts with NSF to avoid unnecessary
delays. The Committee is very encouraged by DOE and NASA's
collaborative effort and success on the Joint Dark Energy
Mission Interim Science Working Group and expects the
Department to continue to fully support this process and to
work closely with NASA in the planning and execution of this
mission.
NUCLEAR PHYSICS
The Committee recommends $554,000,000 for Nuclear Physics.
A recent National Academy of Sciences report, Advancing Nuclear
Medicine through Innovation, recommended increasing the Federal
commitment to nuclear medicine research. Nuclear medicine could
substantially accelerate, simplify, and reduce the cost of
delivering and improving healthcare. However, the Committee is
concerned that the Department is not using funds to directly
support nuclear medicine research with human application. To
this end, within the funds provided, $15,400,000 is for nuclear
medicine research with human application. All of the added
funds must be awarded competitively in one or more
solicitations that include all sources--universities, the
private sector, and Government laboratories--on an equal basis.
Funding for nuclear medicine application research was
previously within the Biological and Environmental Research
program.
BIOLOGICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH
The Committee recommends $614,500,000 for Biological and
Environmental Research. Of these funds, $11,000,000 is provided
for artificial retina research. An artificial retina has the
potential to restore vision to millions of people suffering
from eye diseases. In November 2009, the Lawrence Livermore
National Laboratory team developing artificial retinas received
a Research and Development 100 Award, known as the ``Oscars of
Invention.'' The Committee encourages the Department to
continue this research and meet its goal of producing a
prosthesis with more than 1,000 electrodes, which would allow
facial recognition, as quickly as possible. The funding request
of $15,400,000 for nuclear medicine research efforts has been
moved to Nuclear Physics to better address mission
requirements.
BASIC ENERGY SCIENCES
The Committee recommends $1,739,115,000 for Basic Energy
Sciences. Of these funds, $151,600,000 is provided for
construction activities as requested in the budget. The
remaining $1,587,515,000 is for research. Within available
funds, up to $100,000,000 shall be used to support the 46
Energy Frontier Research Centers. The Committee does not
support the creation of new Energy Frontier Research Centers at
this time. The Department must first demonstrate the benefits
and results of this new research and development approach
designed to address fundamental scientific energy challenges
before the program is expanded further. A significant increase
in funding for the core research program in materials and
chemical sciences should be sufficient to advance scientific
and engineering knowledge in areas of study where the
Department feels there are gaps in addressing energy
challenges.
Within the research funds provided, $16,000,000 shall be
available for the Fuels from Sunlight energy innovation hub and
$22,000,000 for a new Batteries and Energy Storage energy
innovation hub.
The Committee recommends no funding for a research program
in gas hydrates. A gas hydrates research program should
continue in the Office of Fossil Energy, not the Office of
Science. A recently issued, congressionally mandated report by
the National Research Council [NRC] concluded that the Office
of Fossil Energy's methane hydrate program had been
``consistent and effective'' in leading a broad-based science
and technology development program to investigate naturally
occurring gas hydrates. In addition, the NRC found the methane
hydrate program had made advances in identification, drilling,
and production of methane from hydrate for use as a possible
energy source. The Office of Science is not the appropriate
office to continue this work. The Committee also provides no
funding for modeling of engine design at this time. Within the
research funds provided, $35,000,000 is for the Experimental
Program to Stimulate Competitive Research [EPSCoR]. The EPSCoR
program is currently funding energy research that will help
reduce our dependence on foreign oil.
ADVANCED SCIENTIFIC COMPUTING RESEARCH
The Committee recommends $418,000,000 for Advanced
Scientific Computing Research.
FUSION ENERGY SCIENCES
The Committee recommends $384,000,000 for Fusion Energy
Sciences. The Committee is concerned by cost increases and
schedule delays related to the ITER project. In the last year,
the projected start date for ITER has slipped another 10 months
to November 2019, or 3 years later than first projected. These
schedule changes put U.S. cost estimates at risk as costs
escalate for the total project. The Committee encourages the
Office of Science to keep the Committee informed about
significant decisions and developments related to the ITER
project.
The Committee is encouraged that the Office of Science
tasked the National Academy of Sciences with reviewing options
to advance inertial fusion energy. The Committee understands
that an independent National Academy of Sciences committee will
(1) assess the prospects of generating power using inertial
confinement fusion, (2) identify scientific and engineering
challenges, the costs for manufacturing targets, and research
and development objectives to develop an inertial fusion energy
demonstration plant, and (3) advise DOE on a roadmap for
developing a demonstration plant.
The Committee believes that this is a practical way of
identifying the steps that are needed to develop an inertial
fusion energy program and plans to work with DOE to assess the
budget needs for this alternative approach to fusion energy.
Within available funds, the Committee provides $4,000,000 to
advance inertial fusion energy, which may include experiments
using solid state or krypton fluoride lasers, ion beams, or
pulsed power, and to help laboratories and universities
participate in the National Academy of Sciences review.
The Committee is encouraged by DOE's progress in advancing
fusion energy sciences. However, the Committee is concerned by
the Fusion Advisory Committee finding that the United States
risks losing leadership and competitiveness in material
science. To successfully harness fusion energy, scientists and
engineers must design and build reactor components that can
withstand extreme radiation environments and temperature. Since
these extreme environments and material needs are common to
both magnetic and inertial fusion energy, the Committee
encourages DOE to reassess its materials science program and
establish a program that would explore science, engineering,
and materials issues for both magnetic and inertial fusion
energy and build U.S. expertise.
SCIENCE LABORATORIES INFRASTRUCTURE
The Committee recommends $126,000,000 to support
infrastructure activities.
SAFEGUARDS AND SECURITY
The Committee recommends $86,500,000 for Safeguards and
Security activities.
SCIENCE PROGRAM DIRECTION
The Committee recommends $208,000,000 for the Office of
Science Program Direction. Of these funds, $8,963,000 shall be
used for the Office of Scientific and Technical Information. No
funds shall be used to hire new site office personnel, except
for field staff at the Integrated Support Centers in Chicago
and Oak Ridge.
SCIENCE WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT
The Committee recommends $21,000,000 for Workforce
Development for Teachers and Scientists program. Of these
funds, up to $5,000,000 shall be available for the graduate
fellowship program. The Committee encourages the Office of
Science to monitor the impact of this program and demonstrate
whether students continue to pursue careers in scientific and
technical fields. The Committee also provides $5,800,000 for
educator programs that provides professional development for
middle school, high school, community college, and
undergraduate educators. Furthermore, $2,500,000 shall be
available for program administration and evaluation to ensure
the efficiency and effectiveness of science workforce
development activities.
Congressionally Directed Spending Items.--The Committee
includes $40,800,000 for the following list of projects that
provide for research, development, and demonstration of science
technologies or programs. The Committee reminds recipients that
statutory cost sharing requirements may apply to these
projects.
CONGRESSIONALLY DIRECTED SCIENCE PROJECTS
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Project title Amount Requestor
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Advanced Computer Simulation $1,000,000 Senator Reid
Initiative.
Alaska Climate Center.......... $500,000 Senators Murkowski, Begich
Antibodies Research............ $4,000,000 Senators Dorgan, Conrad
Center for Diagnostic $2,000,000 Senator Rockefeller
Nanosystems.
Center for Nanoscale Energy.... $7,000,000 Senators Dorgan, Conrad
Characteristics and Cleanup of $3,500,000 Senators Cochran, Wicker
the U.S. Nuclear Legacy.
Climate Model Evaluation $2,000,000 Senators Shelby, Sessions
Program.
Computing Capability........... $2,000,000 Senators Dorgan, Conrad
Development of Nontechnology- $500,000 Senator Reid
enhanced Solar Cells with Low
Cost and High Conversion
Efficiency.
Energy Research................ $250,000 Senator Cochran
Environmental Radioactivity $750,000 Senators Cochran, Wicker
Monitoring Laboratory:
Monitoring/Assessment of the
Radioactive Pollutants in the
South-West Mississippi.
Functional Nanoparticles for $1,000,000 Senators Cochran, Wicker
Improved Ultra Capacitor
Devices.
Idaho National Laboratory $1,000,000 Senators Crapo, Risch
Center for Advanced Energy
Studies.
KU Cancer Research Equipment... $4,000,000 Senators Brownback,
Roberts
Lincoln Memorial University/ $2,000,000 Senator Alexander
ORNL Partnership on Geothermal
Energy.
Material Science Smart Coatings $500,000 Senator Ben Nelson
Metal-enhanced Fluorescence $750,000 Senators Mikulski, Cardin
Research and Development.
Missouri University Research $1,000,000 Senator Bond
Reactor Reflector Shield.
Nanotechnology Initiative...... $600,000 Senators Dodd, Lieberman
Nevada Water Resources Data, $750,000 Senator Reid
Modeling, and Vizualization
(DMV) Center.
Oregon Sustainability Center... $300,000 Senators Wyden, Merkley
RNAi Research.................. $300,000 Senator Kerry
Solid State Preparation and $500,000 Senator Reid
Characterization Lab.
Southern Illinois University $750,000 Senator Durbin
Research.
Technology Transfer & $500,000 Senators Bingaman, Tom
Commercialization of Udall
Technologies at DOE.
TU Algae to Green Fuels Energy $750,000 Senator Inhofe
Project.
University of California, San $1,500,000 Senator Feinstein
Diego Seismic Research.
University of South Dakota $350,000 Senator Johnson
Project on Renewable Energy
and the Economy.
URI Regional Earth System $750,000 Senators Reed, Whitehouse
Center.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
ADVANCED RESEARCH PROJECTS AGENCY--ENERGY [ARPA-E]
Appropriations, 2010....................................................
Budget estimate, 2011................................... $299,966,000
Committee recommendation................................ 200,000,000
The Committee recommends $200,000,000 for the Advanced
Research Projects Agency--Energy [ARPA-E]. ARPA-E is
responsible for funding high-risk research and development
projects to meet long-term energy challenges. The primary goal
is to invest in energy projects that can overcome technological
barriers and eventually reduce energy imports, improve energy
efficiency, and reduce energy-related emissions, including
greenhouse gases. ARPA-E will also help the United States
maintain a technological lead in developing and deploying
advanced energy technologies. The Committee supports ARPA-E's
efforts to fund creative ``out-of-the-box'' transformational
energy research that industry by itself cannot or will not
support due to its high risk, but where success would provide
significant benefits for the United States. The Committee
encourages ARPA-E to work closely with the Office of Science,
including scientists and engineers working at Energy Frontier
Research Centers and Hubs, to identify promising projects that
are potential game changers for energy systems.
Innovative Technology Loan Guarantee Program
(INCLUDING RESCISSION OF FUNDS)
ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
GROSS APPROPRIATION
Appropriations, 2010.................................... $43,000,000
Budget estimate, 2011................................... 558,000,000
Committee recommendation................................ 438,000,000
OFFSETTING RECEIPTS
Appropriations, 2010.................................... -$43,000,000
Budget estimate, 2011................................... -58,000,000
Committee recommendation................................ -58,000,000
NET APPROPRIATION
Appropriations, 2010....................................................
Budget estimate, 2011................................... $500,000,000
Committee recommendation................................ 380,000,000
The Committee recommends new loan authority of
$10,000,000,000 for nuclear power facilities, and
$7,000,000,000 for coal and petroleum coke-based power
generation and industrial gasification projects that
incorporate carbon capture and sequestration [CCS], pipelines
and transportation of CO2. Eligible CCS projects may
include stand-alone pipeline projects that transport carbon
dioxide to storage sites for the purpose of storage and any
such project shall be considered by the Secretary to have
satisfied the requirements of section 1703(a) of Public Law
109-58. The Secretary may also direct a portion of such
authority for projects focused on the beneficial use of carbon
dioxide.
The Committee also recommends $380,000,000 for subsidy
costs of renewable energy projects. The Committee derives
$140,000,000 of this amount from the rescission of
$14,000,000,000 in unsubsidized loan authority for renewable
projects provided in fiscal year 2009. This leaves over
$3,800,000,000 in renewable unsubsidized loan authority
remaining. The Committee notes that since fiscal year 2008,
when renewable unsubsidized loan authority was first granted,
only two conditional commitments collectively valued at
$317,000,000 have been made. There are only two additional
projects in the near term pipeline valued collectively at
$300,000,000. Hence, in over 2 years the program is prepared to
use only $617,000,000 of the $18,500,000,000 in renewable
unsubsidized loan authority. Nearly all original applicants for
the 1703 unsubsidized renewable program have moved their
applications to the subsidized 1705 program appropriated
through the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009.
These factors demonstrate that renewable projects will advance
much more quickly through a 1703 credit subsidy program than
through an unsubsidized program. The failure to convert the
majority of the $18,500,000,000 in renewable loan authority to
credit subsidy will result in that authority being untapped for
over a decade.
The Committee remains concerned with the Department's
implementation of the Loan Guarantee Program. While some
program improvements have been made in the last year, DOE's
program implementation has been ad hoc. A recent Government
Accountability Office [GAO] review of the Loan Guarantee
Program found that the Department treats applicants
inconsistently, and lacks mechanisms to identify and address
applicants' concerns. The program lacks transparency and has
been slow to come to closure on applications. Since the
program's inception, only one loan guarantee has been closed,
along with conditional commitments for just eight projects.
With more than $80,000,000,000 in available loan guarantee
authority, less than $14,000,000,000 has been committed. The
Committee expects the Department to address the problems raised
by GAO expeditiously, and report within 90 days of its
progress.
The Committee is also concerned that the Loan Guarantee
Program does not support a diverse set of clean fuel technology
and more importantly, the Committee is concerned about the
impact that operation is having on the commercialization of
those technologies. The Department of Energy is directed to
encourage the production of advanced biofuels by comparing the
risk profiles against similar risk profiles.
The Committee is concerned that the Loan Guarantee Program,
expanded by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act to help
finance renewable energy projects that commence construction by
September 30, 2011, will be unable to finance certain solar
projects on private land due to environmental permitting
timelines established by the Department. While the Committee is
aware that the Department of the Interior has ``fast tracked''
the permitting of a subset of proposed solar energy projects on
Federal land, the Committee is concerned that DOE has not
established goals to complete environmental impact statements
for projects on private land seeking loan guarantees by the
September 2011 deadline. The Department has advised solar
developers that if NEPA requires an EIS on a solar development
proposal, DOE will likely not complete the EIS by the September
2011 deadline. The Committee instructs the Department to
identify a set of proposed solar development projects on
private lands with the goal of completing all necessary
environmental reviews by September 2011. The Committee also
strongly recommends that the Department initiate the
environmental review process earlier in the loan guarantee
selection process, in order to assure that environmental
impacts of renewable energy projects are considered during loan
guarantee selection.
ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY VEHICLES MANUFACTURING LOAN PROGRAM
Appropriations, 2010.................................... $20,000,000
Budget estimate, 2011................................... 9,998,000
Committee recommendation................................ 9,998,000
The Committee recommends the $9,998,000 as requested.
Departmental Administration
(GROSS)
Appropriations, 2010.................................... $288,684,000
Budget estimate, 2011................................... 288,872,000
Committee recommendation................................ 288,872,000
(MISCELLANEOUS REVENUES)
Appropriations, 2010.................................... -$119,740,000
Budget estimate, 2011................................... -119,740,000
Committee recommendation................................ -119,740,000
NET APPROPRIATION
Appropriations, 2010.................................... $168,944,000
Budget estimate, 2011................................... 169,132,000
Committee recommendation................................ 169,132,000
The Committee recommends $288,872,000 for Departmental
Administration, which provides a net appropriation of
$169,132,000 in fiscal year 2011.
Office of the Inspector General
Appropriations, 2010.................................... $51,927,000
Budget estimate, 2011................................... 42,850,000
Committee recommendation................................ 42,850,000
The Committee recommends $42,850,000, the same as the
request. In fiscal year 2011, the budget request moves funding
for financial statement audits from the Office of the Inspector
General to the Working Capital Fund. This accounts for the
reduction in the Office of Inspector General funding from
fiscal year 2010 to fiscal year 2011.
ATOMIC ENERGY DEFENSE ACTIVITIES
National Nuclear Security Administration
WEAPONS ACTIVITIES
Appropriations, 2010.................................... $6,384,431,000
Budget estimate, 2011................................... 7,008,835,000
Committee recommendation................................ 7,018,835,000
The Committee recommends $7,018,835,000 for National
Nuclear Security Administration [NNSA] Weapons Activities, an
increase of $10,000,000 above the budget request. This level of
funding will allow NNSA to modernize aging infrastructure and
maintain the scientific, technological, and engineering
capabilities needed to assess the safety, security, and
reliability of nuclear weapons.
DIRECTED STOCKPILE WORK
The Committee recommends $1,874,279,000 for directed
stockpile work, a decrease of $24,100,000 below the request.
Within these funds, at least $197,700,000 shall be for directed
stockpile work activities at Pantex. This increase in funding
will help restore activities at Pantex related to weapons
dismantlement and disposition and stockpile services support
for scheduled weapons assembly, disassembly, and dismantlement.
Life Extension Program.--The Committee recommends
$249,463,000 for the Life Extension Program, the same as the
budget request.
Stockpile Systems.--The Committee recommends $649,366,000,
the same as the request. Of these funds, at least $165,000,000
shall be used for surveillance activities. Over the last
several years, the laboratory directors of Los Alamos, Lawrence
Livermore, and Sandia National Laboratories, who are
responsible for assessing the safety, security, and reliability
of the nuclear weapons stockpile every year, have expressed
concern that funding shortfalls in the surveillance program may
begin to jeopardize the annual assessment process. Furthermore,
in September 2009, the JASON study group found NNSA's
surveillance program was becoming inadequate and the continued
success of stockpile stewardship required a revised
surveillance program. A robust surveillance program is required
to maintain confidence in the performance of nuclear weapons in
the absence of underground nuclear testing. Thus, the Committee
is encouraged by NNSA's decision to increase funding for
surveillance activities and make changes to the surveillance
program to better address aging issues. When NNSA completes its
Phase 6.2/6.2A study for the B61 life extension program, the
Committee directs NNSA to submit to the Committee both a
classified and unclassified report 90 days after the completion
of the study with (1) a description of the safety and security
features NNSA would add to a refurbished B61 and (2) a cost and
benefit analysis of installing the proposed features in the
warhead. The cost and benefit analysis should include (1) the
costs of science, technology, and engineering to install new
safety and security features, (2) the costs of assessing the
impact the new features may have on the performance of the
nuclear explosive package at the national laboratories, (3) the
extent to which the proposed safety and security features
address specific safety and security concerns, and (4) why
current safety and security features would not be sufficient.
When NNSA completes its Phase 6.2/6.2A study, the Committee
also directs NNSA to submit to the Committee a revised B61 LEP
Alternative Analysis study on whether the benefits of a
combined nuclear and nonnuclear refurbishment option for the
B61 outweighs the costs or whether it would be more cost
effective to delay the nuclear scope. The Committee understands
that the preliminary analysis shows that NNSA would save
approximately $2,000,000,000 by combining the nuclear and
nonnuclear scope. A combined nuclear and nonnuclear scope would
also reduce NNSA and Air Force security risks and costs by a
factor of 2 because they would not have to handle the weapon
and transport it overseas twice. In addition, a combined
nuclear and nonnuclear scope would allow NNSA to consolidate
the different variants of the B61 bomb into one variant that
has the least special nuclear material, add modern safety
features, and extend the life of the weapon for both strategic
and tactical missions for 30 years. However, the costs
portrayed in this study are a rough order of magnitude and
detailed program costs will not be available until NNSA
completes the B61 study. The Committee will need the most
accurate information possible on these cost savings before it
can make an informed decision about moving forward with the
life extension program.
Weapons Dismantlement.--The Committee recommends
$64,425,000, an increase of $6,400,000 above the budget
request. Within these funds, $27,500,000 shall be used to help
restore activities at Pantex for weapons dismantlement
activities. The Committee encourages NNSA to keep the Committee
informed about changes to dismantlement rates as a result of
the new START treaty.
Stockpile Services.--The Committee recommends $911,025,000,
a decrease of $30,500,000 below the budget request. Within
these funds, at least $74,000,000 shall be used to support
surveillance activities. Also, within these funds, no more than
$160,000,000 shall be used for plutonium sustainment. The
Committee understands that NNSA will complete building W88 war
reserve pits in fiscal year 2011 and continue to exercise its
pit manufacturing capability. Furthermore, within these funds,
$84,100,000 shall be used for scheduled weapons assembly,
disassembly, and dismantlement work at Pantex.
CAMPAIGNS
The campaigns support scientific research, experimental
activities and advanced computation, which make up the core of
the science-based stockpile stewardship program. This program
has enabled the U.S. Government to ensure the safety,
reliability, and security of our nuclear weapons stockpile
without underground nuclear testing for the past 16 years. The
Committee recommends $1,693,630,000 for NNSA Campaigns, which
is $22,900,000 below the request.
Science Campaign.--The Committee recommends $354,300,000, a
decrease of $10,924,000 below the budget request. Within these
funds, $56,050,000 shall be used for advanced certification to
advance scientific understanding of safety and security systems
for nuclear weapons and to improve the annual weapons
certification process. The Committee continues to strongly
support the weapons physics activities at Sandia's Z facility
that are critical to sustaining a safe, secure, and effective
nuclear stockpile. The Committee provides $53,296,000 to
Sandia's Z facility. An additional $10,000,000 in funding will
help the Z facility conduct plutonium experiments in
environments of extreme conditions found in nuclear weapons
explosions.
Engineering Campaign.--The Committee recommends
$149,900,000, an increase of $7,980,000 above the budget
request. Within these funds, the Committee provides $21,510,000
for weapons systems engineering assessment technology
activities. Nuclear weapons may have to operate in a nuclear
environment and electronic and other nonnuclear weapons
components, which are critical to the proper functioning of a
nuclear weapon, must survive thermal, blast and shock effects
as well as exposure to neutron and gamma radiation. The
Committee is providing funding to support testing and
experimental capabilities that create or simulate radiation
environments similar to those found in a nuclear explosion. The
funding will also maintain the highly technical set of
specialized skills needed to develop the tests and simulations,
interpret the results, and design radiation hardened components
for life extension programs, such as the upcoming W78.
Inertial Confinement Fusion Ignition and High-yield
Campaign.--The Committee recommends $481,548,000 as requested.
Within these funds, at least $62,477,000 and $48,000,000 shall
be used for inertial confinement fusion activities at the
University of Rochester's Omega facility and Sandia National
Laboratory's Z facility, respectively.
The Committee is concerned that NNSA has been slow to
solicit help and ideas from outside experts with knowledge in
inertial confinement fusion to make the first ignition
experiments a success. The Committee questions Lawrence
Livermore National Laboratory's decision, as the laboratory
with lead responsibility for managing ignition experiments, to
wait 4 years--and only months before the first ignition
experiment is expected to take place--to implement the JASON
study group's 2005 recommendation to form a standing external
review committee of experts that could provide expert advice on
the scientific and technical challenges. Even with the creation
of this external review committee, a Government Accountability
Office [GAO] study found that the committee currently in place
falls short of meeting the intent of the JASON study group
recommendation. For example, GAO found that the committee may
not be able to give fully objective, candid advice because the
committee will take direction from, and report to, Livermore's
Director, rather than to NNSA. The Committee strongly supports
the creation of an independent advisory board that can evaluate
experiments planned at the National Ignition Facility, identify
potential weaknesses with the experimental plan, and recommend,
if necessary, alternative approaches to address scientific and
technical challenges. The Committee also strongly supports the
advisory committee's role in setting a strategic direction for
inertial confinement fusion and high-energy density physics
research and determining how best to use current facilities to
advance this scientific field.
Advanced Simulation and Computing.--The Committee
recommends $615,748,000 for the Advanced Simulation and
Computing [ASC] Campaign as requested. The Committee supports
NNSA's efforts to establish a dual validation approach in the
annual assessment process. Independent peer review by Los
Alamos and Lawrence Livermore National Laboratories, with
assistance from Sandia National Laboratory, will increase
confidence in the annual assessment of the current stockpile
and weapons that are refurbished under life extension programs.
Readiness Campaign.--The Committee recommends $92,134,000
for the Readiness Campaign, $19,958,000 less than the budget
request. Within these funds, no more than $30,199,000 shall be
used for tritium production efforts. The Committee is concerned
about the technical challenges NNSA is facing with tritium
production at the Watts Bar reactor and the slow progress in
increasing production capacity.
READINESS IN TECHNICAL BASE AND FACILITIES
The Committee recommends $1,919,970,000, an increase of
$71,000,000 above the request. While the committee supports the
increase in funding for science, technology, and engineering to
better assess the safety, security, and reliability of the
nation's nuclear stockpile, the committee is concerned that the
budget request does not contain sufficient funds for two major
production plants--Y-12 in Oak Ridge, Tennessee, and Pantex in
Amarillo, Texas. These production plants are responsible for,
among other things, dismantlement of retired nuclear weapons,
surveillance to detect aging issues, and disassembly and
assembly of life-extended W76 warheads. The increase in funding
will fill significant gaps at these facilities that would avoid
layoffs and disruption to dismantlement and life extension
schedules.
The Committee has also restored funding for the Los Alamos
Neutron Science Center [LANSCE] Refurbishment project. This
facility is the cornerstone of scientific research at Los
Alamos serving between 500-600 users per year. LANSCE is
currently being used to support stockpile stewardship
experiments, produce medical isotopes to treat cancer and
calibrate medical imaging equipment, and conduct Office of
Science research to study matter and materials that may be used
in new energy technologies. Specifically, NNSA's stockpile
stewardship plans through 2020 show LANSCE being used by the
three nuclear weapons laboratories to address issues of
immediate concern to the stockpile and only LANSCE will be able
to provide needed data in a timely and cost-effective manner.
Congressional funding over the last 2 years has helped Los
Alamos purchase spare parts for a critical component that is
reaching the end of its life and will allow LANSCE to return to
full operation. Fiscal year 2011 funds will allow Los Alamos to
purchase parts for one of its main power sources that are
expected to fail within the next 3 years and develop and
purchase new computers, instruments, controls, and diagnostics
systems that have components that are no longer commercially
available because they were manufactured in the 1960s.
The Committee is concerned about NNSA's use of funds for
the Kansas City Responsive Infrastructure Manufacturing and
Sourcing [KCRIMS] project. The purpose of the project is to
build a new, smaller, and more modern facility at the Kansas
City Plant to manufacture nonnuclear components for nuclear
warheads and bombs. The costs of this project range from
$500,000,000 to $673,000,000 with an estimated life-cycle cost
of $4,700,000,000. Rather than financing this construction
project using a budget line item in the President's annual
request for appropriations, NNSA has decided to acquire the
facility using the General Services Administration [GSA]
leasing authority, which allows GSA to lease space from a
private developer on behalf of NNSA. NNSA chose the GSA leasing
option as the best financing approach because it would lead to
the lowest overall total cost over a 20-year period, eliminate
the need for large up-front capital outlays, and it would meet
NNSA's commitment to Congress to operate the facility by 2012.
However, ground breaking for the new building has been delayed
until at least August 2011 and the Committee is concerned that
some level of funding may be being used to supplement
construction costs. The Committee directs NNSA to identify
funds for the KCRIMS project as a separate line item under the
Readiness in Technical Base and Facilities [RTBF] account with
an explanation of how the funds will be used to support the
project.
The Committee recommends $1,479,954,000, an increase of
$30,000,000 above the request, for the RTBF Operations and
Maintenance account. This funding supports the operations and
maintenance of the NNSA laboratories and production facilities,
equipment purchases, and personnel. Of these funds:
Operations of Facilities.--The Committee recommends
$1,277,991,000, an increase of $20,000,000 above the budget
request. Within these funds, at least $230,927,000 and
$131,254,000 shall be used for operations of facilities support
for Y-12 and Pantex, respectively. This funding increase will
help Y-12 and Pantex sustain facilities and other critical
infrastructure needed for life extension programs,
dismantlement work, and other national security needs.
Program Readiness.--The Committee recommends the requested
amount of $69,309,000.
Material Recycle and Recovery.--The Committee recommends
$80,429,000, an increase of $10,000,000. Within these funds,
$50,905,000 shall be for material recycle and recovery
activities at Y-12. This increase in funding will help restore
activities at Y-12 related to the recovery and reuse of
enriched uranium and lithium from dismantled nuclear weapons
for stockpile stewardship, naval reactors, and nuclear
nonproliferation missions.
Containers.--The Committee recommends the requested amount
of $27,992,000.
Storage.--The Committee recommends the requested amount of
$24,233,000.
Construction.--The Committee recommends $440,016,000.
Project 11-D-801, TA-55 Reinvestment Project, Los Alamos,
New Mexico.--The Committee provides $20,000,000 as requested to
begin the second phase of this effort to mitigate safety risks
to workers identified by the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety
Board.
Project 09-D-007, LANSCE Refurbishment Project, Los Alamos,
New Mexico.--The Committee recommends $30,000,000 to refurbish
the LANSCE facility. These funds shall be made available for
capital equipment acquisition, installation, and associated
design funds.
Project 09-D-404, Test Capabilities Revitalization Phase
II, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, New Mexico.--The
committee recommends $11,000,000 to build mechanical shock
facilities and rocket sled tracks that will be needed for the
B61 life extension program.
Project 08-D-802, High Explosive Pressing Facility, Pantex
Plant, Amarillo, Texas.--The Committee recommends $30,000,000
as requested.
Project 07-D-140, Project Engineering and Design [PED],
Various Locations.--The Committee recommends $5,000,000 as
requested to continue design work on the Transuranic Waste
Facility Project at Los Alamos National Laboratory.
Project 06-D-140, PED, Various Locations.--The Committee
recommends $4,000,000 as requested. The project account
supports ongoing design efforts for the Radioactive Liquid
Waste Treatment Facility.
Project 06-D-141, PED, Uranium Processing Facility, Y-12,
Oak Ridge, Tennessee.--The Committee recommends $115,016,000,
as requested.
Project 04-D-125 Chemistry and Metallurgy Facility
Replacement Project, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los
Alamos, New Mexico.--The Committee recommends $225,000,000 as
requested.
SECURE TRANSPORTATION ASSET
The Committee recommendation for the Secure Transportation
Asset program is $248,045,000, the same as the budget request.
NUCLEAR COUNTERTERRORISM INCIDENT RESPONSE
The Committee recommends full funding of the nuclear
counterterrorism incident response program. The Committee
provides $233,134,000 as requested. The Committee supports
NNSA's efforts in developing equipment, procedures, and human
expertise to identify and render safe improvised nuclear
devices.
FACILITIES AND INFRASTRUCTURE RECAPITALIZATION
The Committee provides $94,000,000 for Facilities and
Infrastructure Recapitalization activities, consistent with the
budget request. This program was developed to reduce the
backlog in deferred maintenance of aging infrastructure
facilities throughout the complex.
SITE STEWARDSHIP
The Committee recommends $100,478,000, a decrease of
$5,000,000 below the budget request. The Committee supports
NNSA's efforts to consolidate and dispose of NNSA special
nuclear material that is no longer required for the nuclear
weapons mission. Within available funds, up to $4,000,000 may
be used for energy-saving projects. The Committee directs NNSA
to submit with the fiscal year 2012 budget request the list of
projects under the energy modernization and investment program.
The list of projects should include the total cost of each
project, the expected cost savings and other benefits of each
project and when those cost savings will be realized, and the
extent to which they contribute to NNSA's energy conservation
goals.
Operations and Maintenance.--The Committee recommends
$85,478,000.
Construction.--The Committee recommends the requested level
of $15,000,000.
Project 11-D-601 Sanitary Effluent Reclamation Facility,
Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico.--The
Committee recommends full funding of $15,000,000 for this
project.
SAFEGUARDS AND SECURITY
The Committee recommendation for the Safeguards and
Security Program is $835,299,000.
Defense Nuclear Security Operations and Maintenance.--The
Committee recommends the requested level of $667,954,000. The
Committee support NNSA's efforts to reduce costs related to
securing national laboratories and production sites while still
maintaining effective physical security measures at each site.
The Committee encourages NNSA to continue eliminating
unnecessary costs while still protecting facilities' assets and
resources against theft, sabotage, and other criminal acts.
Construction.--The Committee recommends $43,000,000, a
decrease of $9,000,000.
Project 08-D-701 Nuclear Materials Safeguards and Security
Upgrades Project Phase II, Los Alamos, New Mexico.--The
Committee recommends $43,000,000 for this project, a decrease
of $9,000,000 from the budget request. NNSA will not be able to
complete design activities and begin construction work until
design plans for the Chemistry and Metallurgy Research
Replacement--Nuclear Facility [CMR-NF] project is more
developed. The size of CMR-NF will determine the amount of
security fencing needed.
Cybersecurity.--The Committee recommends the full request
of $124,345,000.
SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, AND ENGINEERING CAPABILITY
The Committee recommends $20,000,000 as requested for
Science, Technology, and Engineering Capability activities. The
Committee supports NNSA's efforts to leverage its science,
engineering, and technological expertise to work with the
Defense Threat Reduction Agency to improve the nation's
counterterrorism capabilities. The Committee encourages NNSA to
continue working with DTRA to improve nuclear forensics
capabilities and develop the tools needed to probe materials
and objects and identify hidden or concealed nuclear threats.
Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation
Appropriations, 2010.................................... $2,136,709,000
Budget estimate, 2011................................... 2,687,167,000
Committee recommendation................................ 2,612,167,000
The Committee recommends $2,612,167,000 for Defense Nuclear
Nonproliferation. The Committee supports NNSA's goal of
securing all vulnerable nuclear material within 4 years.
Securing nuclear materials at the sites and facilities where
they are located is the best defense against nuclear terrorism.
Since April 2009, when President Obama announced the 4-year
goal, NNSA, with the assistance of other Government agencies,
has made significant progress. For example, in the last year,
four countries have eliminated all weapons-usable nuclear
material on their soil--bringing the total to 17 countries in
the last 10 years. Despite this progress, NNSA lacks a clear
set of metrics to assess and report on the progress of the 4-
year nuclear security effort. The Committee directs NNSA to
provide a report to the Committee by April 1, 2011, with (1)
the measures and indicators it will use to assess the progress
in meeting the 4-year goal, (2) the progress it has made toward
meeting the goals 2 years into the effort, and (3) additional
measures it must take and funding requirements for the last 2
years. Such measures should include the fraction of the total
number of sites in the world with nuclear weapons or weapons-
usable materials where all of those stocks have been eliminated
and the fraction that have demonstrated that their security
systems are performing effectively and could protect against a
broad range of outsider and insider threats.
NONPROLIFERATION AND VERIFICATION RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
The Committee recommends $362,068,000, an increase of
$10,500,000 above the budget request, to support expanded
investment in developing advanced nuclear detection
technologies. Within the available funds, the Committee
provides $10,000,000 for NNSA laboratories to use their
expertise and advanced computational, modeling, and simulation
capabilities to meet the United States' space situational
awareness requirements. The Committee expects NNSA to include
this initiative in the regular budget request. Also, within
available funds, at least $500,000 should be used for the
Global Seismographic Network [GSN] Equipment Renewal project.
The GSN, among other things, has 46 sites--the single largest
contribution--that monitor compliance with the Comprehensive
Nuclear Test Ban Treaty and could detect foreign nuclear tests.
However, GSN equipment, such as sensors, is more than 15 years
old, obsolete, and increasingly difficult to effectively
maintain.
NONPROLIFERATION AND INTERNATIONAL SECURITY
The Committee recommends $155,930,000 as requested.
INTERNATIONAL NUCLEAR MATERIALS PROTECTION AND COOPERATION
The Committee recommends $590,118,000 as requested. The
Committee is encouraged by NNSA's efforts in completing
security upgrades at 210 out of 229 buildings that store
weapons usable nuclear material and warheads in Russia. NNSA is
also on track to complete security upgrades at the remaining 19
buildings by the end of fiscal year 2012. In addition to
completing security upgrades, NNSA is working on gradually
decreasing U.S. funding and relying more heavily on Russian
resources for upgrades and maintenance. The August 2009 Joint
Transition Plan between the United States and Russia laid out
the necessary steps at each site to maintain robust material,
protection, control, and accounting [MPC&A] systems in place.
However, the Committee remains concerned about sustaining
security upgrades after the program expires at the end of
fiscal year 2012. The Committee wants assurances that the U.S.
investment of $2,700,000,000 since fiscal year 1996 will not be
squandered. The Committee directs NNSA to submit a report to
the Committee not later than 90 days of enactment on (1)
whether Russia has taken steps to implement the Joint
Transition Plan, (2) the remaining challenges in sustaining
security upgrades and how NNSA plans to address those
challenges, and (3) U.S. resources, whether direct or indirect,
needed after fiscal year 2012 to support U.S.-funded MPC&A
activities.
FISSILE MATERIALS DISPOSITION
The Committee recommends $935,213,000, a reduction of
$95,500,000, to support the plutonium disposition program and
construction projects.
U.S. Surplus Fissile Materials Disposition.--The Committee
provides for the full request of $304,925,000, including
$278,940,000 as requested for the U.S. plutonium disposition
and $25,985,000 as requested for the U.S. uranium disposition
program.
Construction.--The Committee recommends $582,788,000 to
support construction, a reduction of $30,000,000. The Committee
supports construction of three critical facilities at Savannah
River in South Carolina--the MOX Fuel Fabrication
Facility [MFFF], the Waste Solidification Building, and the Pit
Disassembly and Conversion Facility [PDCF]--that will dispose
of at least 34 metric tons of plutonium by fabricating it into
mixed oxide fuel for domestic nuclear reactors. However, a
March 2010 GAO report found that NNSA (1) may not be able to
supply MFFF with sufficient quantities of plutonium oxide
feedstock to meet its planned production schedule of
MOX fuel and (2) there may not be demand from
domestic utilities that own nuclear reactors to buy
MOX fuel. NNSA plans to complete construction of
MFFF at least 6 years before PDCF is completed even though PDCF
will provide the majority of the plutonium feedstock to MFFF.
In addition, NNSA only has a limited quantity of feedstock on
hand to supply the MFFF prior to the start of pit disassembly
operations at PDCF. However, NNSA has not established a clear
strategy on how it will supply feedstock to MFFF to meet its
goals. Furthermore, while NNSA has one potential customer for
most of its MOX fuel, it has not done sufficient
outreach to find MOX fuel customers. Without this
outreach, NNSA will not be able to sell MOX fuel and
return more than $1,000,000,000 to the U.S. Treasury. The
Committee directs the NNSA to submit a plan not later than 90
days of enactment to mitigate the likely shortfall in plutonium
oxide feedstock for the MFFF prior to the start of pit
disassembly operations. This plan should include, at a minimum,
the following five items: (1) the actions needed to ensure that
the Advanced Recovery and Integrated Extraction System project
at Los Alamos will meet its existing production goals, and the
cost and schedule associated with any needed expansion of the
project; (2) an assessment of how much additional plutonium
material, including fuel-grade plutonium, is available within
the DOE complex for use as feedstock for the MFFF; (3) an
assessment of the effect on the design and safety of the MFFF
from the use of fuel-grade plutonium as feedstock; (4) an
assessment of potential changes to the MOX fuel
production schedule and the effect of these changes on the cost
and schedule for operating the MFFF; and (5) an assessment of
the cost and schedule associated with obtaining a limited but
sufficient pit disassembly process to produce feedstock for the
MFFF. The Committee also directs NNSA to submit a report not
later than 90 days after enactment of this act on what actions
it has taken to inform utilities about the MOX fuel
program and related incentives and how it plans to increase the
number of customers for MOX fuel.
Project 99-D-143, Mixed Oxide Fuel Fabrication Facility,
Savannah River, South Carolina.--The Committee recommends
$475,788,000 as requested.
Project 99-D-141-02, Waste Solidification Building,
Savannah River, South Carolina.--The Committee recommends full
funding of $57,000,000 for this project.
Project 99-D-141-01, Pit Disassembly and Conversion
Facility, Savannah River, South Carolina.--The Committee
recommends $50,000,000, a reduction of $30,000,000, for
construction of this facility. The Committee supports NNSA's
efforts to design and develop gloveboxes and other critical
equipment and technologies to handle plutonium and establish a
pit disassembly and conversion capability. However, no funding
should be used for construction activities until (1) NNSA
completes its assessment of the impact on cost and schedule of
combining NNSA's Pit Disassembly and Conversion Facility
project with the Office of Environmental Management's Plutonium
Preparation Project at Savannah River, (2) determines whether
the projects should be combined and the pit disassembly and
conversion capability will be located at the K-area Facility
rather than a new, stand-alone facility, and (3) completes its
conceptual design report with a new cost and schedule range
consistent with DOE guidance.
Russian Surplus Materials Disposition.--The Committee
recommends $47,500,000, a reduction of $65,500,000. No funding
shall be used to support research and development of the Gas
Turbine-Modular Helium Reactor in Russia. The Committee
understands that on April 13, 2010, the United States and
Russia signed the Plutonium Management and Disposition
Agreement. The agreement represents an important step in
advancing nuclear disarmament. Under the agreement, the United
States and Russia will each dispose of 34 metric tons of
weapon-grade plutonium--enough material for approximately
17,000 nuclear weapons--by using it as fuel in civil power
reactors to produce electricity. The Committee also understands
that the United States committed $400,000,000, subject to
future appropriations, to help Russia dispose of the excess
plutonium and that NNSA requested the first $100,000,000 in the
fiscal year 2011 budget. The Committee cannot provide the full
$100,000,000 requested because of tight budget constraints,
spending on other nonproliferation priorities, and the fact
that NNSA does not plan to spend any of the $100,000,000
requested in fiscal year 2011. According to NNSA planning
documents, NNSA will spend the $100,000,000 over 3 years
beginning in fiscal year 2012. In addition, NNSA has
$17,000,000 in uncosted funds appropriated in fiscal year 2010
at its disposal to implement the agreement in fiscal year 2011.
However, as a confidence-building measure and in support of the
agreement, the Committee will provide $47,500,000.
The Committee directs NNSA to submit to the Committee a
report on how the United States will spend the $400,000,000 and
the milestones that Russia must meet before the United States
releases any of these funds.
GLOBAL THREAT REDUCTION INITIATIVE
The Committee recommends $568,838,000, an increase of
$10,000,000. The Global Threat Reduction Initiative's Domestic
Material Protection program works to install security upgrades
at buildings containing high-priority nuclear and radiological
materials located at civilian sites in the United States. The
Committee is concerned by the decrease in funding and level of
effort for these activities. As a result, of the total funds
requested for the Global Threat Reduction Initiative, at least
$35,147,000 should be used for the Domestic Material Protection
program to secure vulnerable nuclear materials in the United
States. If by the end of the second quarter of fiscal year 2011
NNSA has not entered into an agreement with South Africa to
remove South African highly enriched uranium, the Committee
directs NNSA to use $27,000,000 of the $108,000,000
appropriated for gap nuclear material remove activities for
domestic material protection activities.
Naval Reactors
Appropriations, 2010.................................... $945,133,000
Budget estimate, 2011................................... 1,070,486,000
Committee recommendation................................ 1,040,486,000
The Committee provides $1,040,486,000 for Naval Reactors.
In fiscal year 2010, NNSA began work on three significant
projects: design of a reactor plant for new Ohio-class
ballistic missile submarines, refueling of a land-based reactor
prototype, and construction of a new spent fuel facility. Based
on current projections, funding for these three projects will
grow from $200,000,000 in fiscal year 2011 to more than
$600,000,000 in fiscal year 2015. The Committee is concerned
that the cost for these projects and management requirements
will peak at the same time. The Committee urges the program to
keep Congress informed on the progress of each project.
Office of the Administrator
Appropriations, 2010.................................... $420,754,000
Budget estimate, 2011................................... 448,267,000
Committee recommendation................................ 438,267,000
The Committee recommends $438,267,000 for the Office of the
Administrator, a decrease of $10,000,000 below the budget
request.
ENVIRONMENTAL AND OTHER DEFENSE ACTIVITIES
Defense Environmental Cleanup
Appropriations, 2010.................................... $5,642,331,000
Budget estimate, 2011................................... 5,588,039,000
Committee recommendation................................ 5,262,838,000
The Committee recommendation for Defense Environmental
Cleanup is $5,262,838,000. Within the total provided, the
Department is directed to fund the Hazardous Waste Worker
Training Program at $10,000,000. The Committee is supportive of
the Office of Environmental Management's efforts to improve the
management of its portfolio of projects by creating operational
activities and capital cleanup projects funded under the
existing PBS structure. The capital cleanup projects are aimed
at environmental remediation efforts like soil and groundwater
cleanup, including monitoring well installation and
construction of treatment systems, as well as decontamination
and decommissioning of excess facilities. The Environmental
Management program plans to apply the rigor of the Department's
Project Management Order, DOE 413.3A, to these relatively small
cleanup projects. The Committee directs Environmental
Management to include a summary of these capital cleanup
projects, including scope, cost and schedule, as supplementary
information to accompany the submission of the fiscal year 2012
request. Environmental Management should budget for these
capital cleanup projects as operating expense funded projects
within the PBSs, apply the principles of DOE 413 for all these
projects, and apply all pertinent, generally accepted
government accounting principles and DOE Orders for
capitalization of these projects upon completion.
Reprogramming Control Levels.--In fiscal year 2011, the
Environmental Management program may transfer funding between
operating expense funded projects within the controls listed
below using guidance contained in the Department's budget
execution manual (DOE M 135.1-1A, chapter IV). All capital
construction line item projects remain separate controls from
the operating projects. The Committees on Appropriations in the
House and Senate must be formally notified in advance of all
reprogrammings, except internal reprogrammings, and the
Department is to take no financial action in anticipation of
Congressional response. The Committee recommends the following
reprogramming control points for fiscal year 2011:
--Closure sites;
--Hanford Site;
--Idaho National Laboratory;
--NNSA Sites;
--Oak Ridge Reservation;
--Office of River Protection;
--Savannah River Site;
--Waste Isolation Pilot Plant;
--Program Direction;
--Program Support;
--Technology Development and Deployment;
--Safeguards and Security;
--All Capital Construction Line Items, regardless of site.
Internal Reprogramming Authority.--The new reprogramming
control points above obviates, in most cases, the need for
internal reprogramming authority. However, at the few sites to
which the internal reprogramming statute still applies,
Environmental Management site managers may transfer up to
$5,000,000, one time, between accounts listed above to reduce
health and safety risks, gain cost savings, or complete
projects, as long as a program or project is not increased or
decreased by more than $5,000,000 in total during the fiscal
year.
The reprogramming authority--either formal or internal--may
not be used to initiate new programs or to change funding
levels for programs specifically denied, limited, or increased
by Congress in the act or report. The Committee on
Appropriations in the House and Senate must be notified within
30 days after the use of the internal reprogramming authority.
Closure Sites.--The Committee recommends $6,375,000, the
same as the request, for closure sites.
Hanford Site.--The Committee recommends $1,018,929,000 for
Richland Operations. The Department is directed to carry out
maintenance and public safety efforts at the B Reactor. Funding
for the Hazardous Materials Management and Emergency Response
[HAMMER] facilities are provided for within available funds.
Idaho National Laboratory.--The Committee recommends
$407,100,000 for Idaho National Laboratory.
NNSA Sites.--The Committee recommends $279,373,000 for NNSA
sites.
Oak Ridge Reservation.--The Committee recommends
$232,700,000 for Oak Ridge Reservation, including $152,278,000
for ORNL and Y12 D&D activities under the Integrated Facilities
Disposition Program. The amount provided for cleanup activities
at ORNL shall include the 2000 Area slabs and soils remediation
and the Isotope Area decommissioning and demolition.
Office of River Protection.--The Committee recommends
$1,158,178,000 for the Office of River Protection.
Savannah River Site.--The Committee recommends
$1,217,799,000 for the Savannah River site. The Committee
provides $910,533,000 for Radioactive Liquid Tank Waste at the
Savannah River Site, an increase of $104,300,000 over the
request, funded by offsets from Nuclear Materials and Spent
Nuclear Fuel Activities at Savannah River. These funds should
be combined with other fiscal year 2010 and 2011 savings to
accelerate tank retrievals at the site through the deployment
of innovative technologies, such as small column ion exchange,
advanced solvent extractants and steam reforming. Successful
demonstration of these technologies has the potential to save
tens of millions of dollars in life cycle costs at Savannah
River and will expand the range of treatment options for
similar wastes at other sites.
Waste Isolation Pilot Plant.--The Committee recommends
$230,245,000 for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant.
Program Direction.--The Committee recommends $355,000,000
for program direction. The Committee notes that in fiscal year
2010 the administration requested $355,000,000 for program
direction and then oddly reduced the fiscal year 2011 request
to $323,825,000. The Environmental Management program has
suffered due to management issues with construction projects
and completing projects on time and within budget. While not
the only answer to this problem, sufficient workforce is
certainly required to address management issues. The Committee
was pleased with the fiscal year 2010 request level even if it
could not match it. The dramatic reduction of the fiscal year
2011 request is disconcerting and inexplicable. The Committee
recognizes the need to improve project management in the
Environmental Management organization, and supports efforts to
make such improvements. The Committee supports the efforts of
the Assistant Secretary to create a more effective
Environmental Management project management team with the
assistance of the Army Corps of Engineers.
Program Support.--The Committee recommends $34,000,000 for
program support.
Safeguards and Security.--The Committee recommends
$249,754,000 for safeguards and security.
Technology Development and Deployment.--The Committee
recommends $39,685,000 for technology development and
deployment. Additional funds above the budget request are
provided to continue successful efforts with industry to
transfer and demonstrate international technologies and
approaches to the cleanup program. The Committee also
encourages the Department to work with industry on initiatives
which better support the transition of ideas and technology
into practice.
Federal Contribution to Uranium Enrichment Decontamination
and Decommissioning Fund.--The Committee recommends
$33,700,000, the remaining balance for the Federal contribution
for the UED&D Fund.
Other Defense Activities
Appropriations, 2010.................................... $847,468,000
Budget estimate, 2011................................... 878,209,000
Committee recommendation................................ 866,317,000
The Committee recommendation is $866,317,000, a decrease of
$11,892,000 below the budget request. The Committee does not
provide the funding requested under the general provisions to
increase the Department's acquisition workforce capacity and
capabilities.
Health, Safety and Security.--The Committee recommends
$462,211,000.
Office of Legacy Management.--The Committee recommends
$188,626,000.
Nuclear Energy.--The Committee recommends $88,200,000 for
Idaho infrastructure for sitewide safeguards and security.
Defense-related Administrative Support.--The Committee
provides $118,836,000.
Office of Hearings and Appeals.--The Committee provides
$6,444,000.
Congressionally Directed Spending Items.--The Committee
includes $2,000,000 for the following list of projects of Other
Defense Activities. The Committee reminds recipients that
statutory cost-sharing requirements may apply to these
projects.
CONGRESSIONALLY DIRECTED OTHER DEFENSE ACTIVITIES PROJECTS
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Project title Amount Requestor
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Burlington Atomic Energy $1,000,000 Senators Harkin, Grassley
Commission Plant and Ames
Laboratory Former Workers
Medical Surveillance Programs.
Medical Monitoring at Paducah, $1,000,000 Senator McConnell
KY, Portsmouth, OH, and Oak
Ridge, TN.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Power Marketing Administrations
BONNEVILLE POWER ADMINISTRATION
The Bonneville Power Administration is the Department of
Energy's marketing agency for electric power in the Pacific
Northwest. Bonneville provides electricity to a 300,000 square
mile service area in the Columbia River drainage basin.
Bonneville markets the power from Federal hydropower projects
in the Northwest, as well as power from non-Federal generating
facilities in the region. Bonneville also exchanges and markets
surplus power with Canada and California. The Committee
recommends no new borrowing authority for BPA during fiscal
year 2011.
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, SOUTHEASTERN POWER ADMINISTRATION
Appropriations, 2010.................................... $7,638,000
Budget estimate, 2011...................................................
Committee recommendation................................................
For the Southeastern Power Administration, the Committee
recommends no funding, the same as the budget request.
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, SOUTHWESTERN POWER ADMINISTRATION
Appropriations, 2010.................................... $44,944,000
Budget estimate, 2011................................... 12,699,000
Committee recommendation................................ 12,699,000
For the Southwestern Power Administration, the Committee
recommends $12,699,000, the same as the budget request.
CONSTRUCTION, REHABILITATION, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, WESTERN AREA
POWER ADMINISTRATION
Appropriations, 2010.................................... $256,711,000
Budget estimate, 2011................................... 105,558,000
Committee recommendation................................ 105,558,000
For the Western Area Power Administration, the Committee
recommends $105,558,000, the same as the budget request.
FALCON AND AMISTAD OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE FUND
Appropriations, 2010.................................... $2,568,000
Budget estimate, 2011................................... 220,000
Committee recommendation................................ 220,000
For the Falcon and Amistad Operating and Maintenance Fund,
the Committee recommends $220,000 the same as the request.
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
SALARIES AND EXPENSES
Appropriations, 2010.................................... $298,000,000
Budget estimate, 2011................................... 315,600,000
Committee recommendation................................ 315,600,000
REVENUES APPLIED
Appropriations, 2010.................................... -$298,000,000
Budget estimate, 2011................................... -315,600,000
Committee recommendation................................ -315,600,000
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[In thousands of dollars]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Committee recommendation
Committee compared to--
Enacted Budget estimate recommendation ---------------------------------
Enacted Budget estimate
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND RENEWABLE ENERGY
Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy RDD&D:
Hydrogen Technology............................................ 174,000 ............... 174,000 ............... +174,000
Hydrogen and fuel cell technologies............................ ............... 137,000 ............... ............... -137,000
Biomass and Biorefinery Systems R&D............................ 220,000 220,000 220,000 ............... ...............
Solar energy................................................... 225,000 302,398 272,000 +47,000 -30,398
Wind energy.................................................... 80,000 122,500 123,000 +43,000 +500
Geothermal technology.......................................... 44,000 55,000 55,000 +11,000 ...............
Water Power.................................................... 50,000 40,488 60,000 +10,000 +19,512
Vehicle technologies........................................... 311,365 325,302 325,000 +13,635 -302
Building technologies.......................................... 200,000 230,698 222,000 +22,000 -8,698
Industrial technologies........................................ 96,000 100,000 100,000 +4,000 ...............
Federal energy management program.............................. 32,000 42,272 42,000 +10,000 -272
RE-ENERGYSE (Regaining our energy science and engineering edge) ............... 50,000 ............... ............... -50,000
Facilities and infrastructure:
National Renewable Energy Laboratory [NREL]................ 19,000 18,000 18,000 -1,000 ...............
Construction:
10-EE-01 South table mountain ingress/egress and 44,000 ............... ............... -44,000 ...............
traffic capacity upgrades, National Renewable Energy
Laboratory, Golden, CO................................
08-EE-01 Energy systems integration facility, National ............... 39,500 39,500 +39,500 ...............
Renewal Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO.................
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Construction............................... 44,000 39,500 39,500 -4,500 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Facilities and infrastructure.............. 63,000 57,500 57,500 -5,500 ...............
Program direction.............................................. 140,000 200,008 170,000 +30,000 -30,008
Program support................................................ 45,000 87,307 59,700 +14,700 -27,607
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy RDD&D....... 1,680,365 1,970,473 1,880,200 +199,835 -90,273
Weatherization and intragovernmental:
Weatherization:
Weatherization assistance.................................. 210,000 262,500 162,500 -47,500 -100,000
Training and technical assistance.......................... ............... 7,500 7,500 +7,500 ...............
Innovations in weatherization.............................. ............... 30,000 30,000 +30,000 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Weatherization................................. 210,000 300,000 200,000 -10,000 -100,000
Other:
State energy program grants................................ 50,000 75,000 50,000 ............... -25,000
Tribal energy activities................................... 10,000 10,000 10,000 ............... ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Other.......................................... 60,000 85,000 60,000 ............... -25,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Weatherization and intragovernmental........... 270,000 385,000 260,000 -10,000 -125,000
Congressionally directed projects.................................. 292,135 ............... 147,600 -144,535 +147,600
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, ENERGY EFFICENCY AND RENEWABLE ENERGY................. 2,242,500 2,355,473 2,287,800 +45,300 -67,673
ELECTRICITY DELIVERY AND ENERGY RELIABILITY
Research and development:
Clean energy transmission and reliability...................... 38,450 35,000 35,000 -3,450 ...............
Smart grid research and development............................ 32,450 39,293 39,293 +6,843 ...............
Energy storage................................................. 14,000 40,000 40,000 +26,000 ...............
Cyber security for energy delivery systems..................... 40,000 30,000 30,000 -10,000 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Research and development........................... 124,900 144,293 144,293 +19,393 ...............
Permitting, siting, and analysis................................... 6,400 6,400 6,400 ............... ...............
Infrastructure security and energy restoration..................... 6,187 6,188 6,188 +1 ...............
Program direction.................................................. 21,420 29,049 29,049 +7,629 ...............
Congressionally directed projects.................................. 13,075 ............... 4,250 -8,825 +4,250
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, ELECTRICITY DELIVERY AND ENERGY RELIABILITY........... 171,982 185,930 190,180 +18,198 +4,250
NUCLEAR ENERGY
Research and development:
Nuclear energy enabling technologies........................... ............... 99,300 62,000 +62,000 -37,300
Integrated university program.................................. 5,000 ............... 5,000 ............... +5,000
RE-ENERGYSE.................................................... ............... 5,000 ............... ............... -5,000
Reactor concepts RD&D.......................................... ............... 195,000 188,500 +188,500 -6,500
Generation IV nuclear energy systems........................... 220,137 ............... ............... -220,137 ...............
Nuclear power 2010............................................. 105,000 ............... ............... -105,000 ...............
Fuel cycle research and development............................ 136,000 201,000 191,000 +55,000 -10,000
International nuclear energy cooperation....................... ............... 3,000 3,000 +3,000 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Research and development........................... 466,137 503,300 449,500 -16,637 -53,800
Infrastructure:
Radiological facilities management:
Space and defense infrastructure........................... 42,000 47,000 57,000 +15,000 +10,000
Research reactor infrastructure............................ 10,000 4,818 4,818 -5,182 ...............
Oak Ridge nuclear infrastructure........................... 10,000 ............... ............... -10,000 ...............
Los Alamos nuclear infrastructure.......................... 10,000 ............... ............... -10,000 ...............
PU-238 production restart project.......................... ............... 15,000 ............... ............... -15,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Radiological facilities management............. 72,000 66,818 61,818 -10,182 -5,000
INL facilities management:
INL Operations and infrastructure.......................... 173,000 162,482 173,000 ............... +10,518
Program direction.................................................. 73,000 91,452 91,452 +18,452 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Nuclear Energy..................................... 784,137 824,052 775,770 -8,367 -48,282
====================================================================================
Congressionally directed projects.................................. 2,500 ............... 7,400 +4,900 +7,400
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, NUCLEAR ENERGY........................................ 786,637 824,052 783,170 -3,467 -40,882
====================================================================================
FOSSIL ENERGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
Fuels and Power Systems:
Innovations for existing plants................................ 52,000 65,000 68,000 +16,000 +3,000
Advanced integrated gasification combined cycle................ 63,000 55,000 64,000 +1,000 +9,000
Advanced turbines.............................................. 32,000 31,000 32,000 ............... +1,000
Carbon sequestration........................................... 154,000 143,000 170,000 +16,000 +27,000
Fuels.......................................................... 25,000 12,000 20,000 -5,000 +8,000
Fuel cells..................................................... 50,000 50,000 50,000 ............... ...............
Advanced research.............................................. 28,000 47,850 48,000 +20,000 +150
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Fuels and power systems............................ 404,000 403,850 452,000 +48,000 +48,150
Natural Gas Technologies........................................... 17,833 ............... 22,000 +4,167 +22,000
Unconventional fossil energy technologies from Petroleum--Oil 20,000 ............... 26,000 +6,000 +26,000
Technologies......................................................
Program direction.................................................. 158,000 152,033 170,300 +12,300 +18,267
Plant and Capital Equipment........................................ 20,000 20,000 20,000 ............... ...............
Fossil energy environmental restoration............................ 10,000 10,000 10,000 ............... ...............
Special recruitment programs....................................... 700 700 700 ............... ...............
Cooperative research and development............................... 5,000 ............... 5,000 ............... +5,000
Congressionally directed projects.................................. 36,850 ............... 19,950 -16,900 +19,950
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, FOSSIL ENERGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT................ 672,383 586,583 725,950 +53,567 +139,367
NAVAL PETROLEUM AND OIL SHALE RESERVES............................. 23,627 23,614 23,614 -13 ...............
STRATEGIC PETROLEUM RESERVES
Storage facilities development..................................... 224,732 188,906 188,906 -35,826 ...............
Management for SPR operations...................................... 19,091 20,955 20,955 +1,864 ...............
Use of prior-year balances......................................... ............... -71,000 ............... ............... +71,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, STRATEGIC PETROLEUM RESERVES.......................... 243,823 138,861 209,861 -33,962 +71,000
NORTHEAST HOME HEATING OIL RESERVE................................. 11,300 11,300 11,300 ............... ...............
ENERGY INFORMATION ADMINISTRATION.................................. 110,595 128,833 119,000 +8,405 -9,833
NON-DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP
Fast Flux Test Reactor Facility (WA)............................... 7,652 3,659 3,659 -3,993 ...............
Gaseous Diffusion Plants........................................... 100,885 99,464 99,464 -1,421 ...............
Small Sites:
Brookhaven National Lab........................................ 15,000 13,861 13,861 -1,139 ...............
SNF stabilization and disposition--2012 Idaho National Lab..... 5,000 4,900 4,900 -100 ...............
Consolidated Business Center:
California Site support.................................... 262 ............... ............... -262 ...............
Soil and water remediation:
Stanford Linear Accelerator Center..................... 4,600 3,526 3,526 -1,074 ...............
Nuclear facility D&D:
Energy Technology Engineering Center................... 13,000 10,679 10,679 -2,321 ...............
Soil and water remediation--Moab........................... 39,000 31,000 50,000 +11,000 +19,000
Completed sites administration and support................. 1,200 ............... ............... -1,200 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Consolidated Business Center................... 58,062 45,205 64,205 +6,143 +19,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Small Sites.................................... 78,062 63,966 82,966 +4,904 +19,000
West Valley Demonstration Project.................................. 58,074 58,074 58,074 ............... ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, NON-DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP..................... 244,673 225,163 244,163 -510 +19,000
URANIUM ENRICHMENT DECONTAMINATION AND DECOMMISSIONING FUND
Decontamination and decommissioning................................ 573,850 730,498 550,000 -23,850 -180,498
Offsetting collections............................................. ............... -200,000 ............... ............... +200,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, URANIUM ENRICHMENT DECONTAMINATION AND DECOMMISSIONING 573,850 530,498 550,000 -23,850 +19,502
FUND/URANIUM INVENTORY CLEANUP..............................
====================================================================================
SCIENCE
Advanced scientific computing research............................. 394,000 426,000 418,000 +24,000 -8,000
Basic energy sciences:
Research....................................................... 1,482,260 1,683,400 1,587,515 +105,255 -95,885
Construction:
07-SC-06 Project Engineering and Design [PED] National 139,000 151,600 151,600 +12,600 ...............
Synchrotron Light Source II [NSLS-II].....................
05-R-320 LINAC Coherent Light Source [LCLS]................ 15,240 ............... ............... -15,240 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Construction................................... 154,240 151,600 151,600 -2,640 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Basic energy sciences............................. 1,636,500 1,835,000 1,739,115 +102,615 -95,885
Biological and environmental research:
Biological systems science..................................... 318,476 321,947 317,547 -929 -4,400
Climate and environmental sciences............................. 285,706 304,953 296,953 +11,247 -8,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Biological and environmental research................. 604,182 626,900 614,500 +10,318 -12,400
Fusion energy sciences program..................................... 426,000 380,000 384,000 -42,000 +4,000
High-energy physics:
Proton accelerator-based physics............................... 434,471 439,262 ............... -434,471 -439,262
Electron accelerator-based physics............................. 26,420 24,707 ............... -26,420 -24,707
Non-accelerator physics........................................ 99,321 88,539 ............... -99,321 -88,539
Theoretical physics............................................ 67,240 69,524 ............... -67,240 -69,524
Advanced technology R&D........................................ 183,031 189,968 ............... -183,031 -189,968
Research....................................................... ............... ............... 803,085 +803,085 +803,085
Construction:
11-SC-40 Project Engineering and Design [PED] long baseline ............... 12,000 12,000 +12,000 ...............
neutrino experiment, FNAL.................................
11-SC-41 Project Engineering and Design [PED] muon to ............... 5,000 5,000 +5,000 ...............
electron conversion experiment, FNAL......................
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Construction................................... ............... 17,000 17,000 +17,000 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, High-energy physics............................... 810,483 829,000 820,085 +9,602 -8,915
Operations and maintenance..................................... 515,000 526,000 518,000 +3,000 -8,000
Construction:
06-SC-01 Project Engineering and Design [PED] 12 GeV 20,000 36,000 36,000 +16,000 ...............
continuous electron beam accelerator facility upgrade,
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator facility (was
project 07-SC-001), Newport News, VA......................
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Nuclear physics................................. 535,000 562,000 554,000 +19,000 -8,000
Workforce development for teachers and scientists.................. 20,678 35,600 21,000 +322 -14,600
Science laboratories infrastructure:
Laboratories facilities support:
Infrastructure support:
Payment in lieu of taxes............................... 1,385 1,385 1,385 ............... ...............
Oak Ridge landlord..................................... 5,214 5,260 5,260 +46 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Infrastructure support..................... 6,599 6,645 6,645 +46 ...............
Construction:
11-SC-70 Utilities upgrade, FNAL....................... ............... 7,524 7,524 +7,524 ...............
11-SC-71 Utility infrastructure modernization at TJNAF. ............... 7,828 7,828 +7,828 ...............
10-SC-70 Research support building and infrastructure 6,900 33,100 33,100 +26,200 ...............
modernization, SLAC...................................
10-SC-71 Energy sciences building, ANL................. 8,000 15,000 15,000 +7,000 ...............
10-SC-72 Renovate science laboratory, Phase II, BNL.... 5,000 15,000 15,000 +10,000 ...............
09-SC-72 Seismic life-safety, modernization and 34,027 20,103 20,103 -13,924 ...............
replacement of general purpose buildings Phase 2, PED/
Construction, LBNL....................................
09-SC-73, Interdisciplinary science building Phase 1, 39,387 ............... ............... -39,387 ...............
PED, BNL..............................................
09-SC-74, Technology and engineering development 27,687 20,800 20,800 -6,887 ...............
facilities PED, TJNAF.................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Construction............................... 121,001 119,355 119,355 -1,646 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Science laboratories infrastructure........... 127,600 126,000 126,000 -1,600 ...............
Safeguards and security............................................ 83,000 86,500 86,500 +3,500 ...............
Science program direction:
Headquarters................................................... 75,261 87,236 85,000 +9,739 -2,236
Office of Science and Technical Information.................... 8,916 8,963 8,963 +47 ...............
Field offices.................................................. 105,200 118,238 114,037 +8,837 -4,201
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Science program direction............................. 189,377 214,437 208,000 +18,623 -6,437
Congressionally directed projects.................................. 76,890 ............... 40,800 -36,090 +40,800
====================================================================================
TOTAL, SCIENCE............................................... 4,903,710 5,121,437 5,012,000 +108,290 -109,437
NUCLEAR WASTE DISPOSAL
Repository program................................................. 28,400 ............... ............... -28,400 ...............
Program direction.................................................. 70,000 ............... ............... -70,000 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, NUCLEAR WASTE DISPOSAL................................ 98,400 ............... ............... -98,400 ...............
====================================================================================
ADVANCED RESEARCH PROJECTS AGENCY--ENERGY
Advanced research projects agency--Energy ARPA-E projects.......... ............... 273,400 173,434 +173,434 -99,966
Program direction.................................................. ............... 26,566 26,566 +26,566 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, ENERGY TRANSFORMATION ACCELERATION FUND............... ............... 299,966 200,000 +200,000 -99,966
====================================================================================
TITLE 17--INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY GUARANTEE PROGRAM
Administrative operations.......................................... 43,000 58,000 58,000 +15,000 ...............
Offsetting collection.............................................. -43,000 -58,000 -58,000 -15,000 ...............
Cost of loan guarantees............................................ ............... 500,000 380,000 +380,000 -120,000
Additional loan volume............................................. ............... 360,000 170,000 +170,000 -190,000
Additional subsidy cost............................................ ............... 300,000 ............... ............... -300,000
Loan volume (rescission)........................................... ............... ............... -140,000 -140,000 -140,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, TITLE 17--INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY GUARANTEE PROGRAM..... ............... 1,160,000 410,000 +410,000 -750,000
====================================================================================
ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY VEHICLES MANUFACTURING LOAN PROGRAM
Administrative expenses............................................ 20,000 9,998 9,998 -10,002 ...............
====================================================================================
DEPARTMENTAL ADMINISTRATION
Administrative operations:
Salaries and expenses:
Office of the Secretary:
Program direction...................................... 5,864 5,864 5,864 ............... ...............
Management reform...................................... ............... 2,000 ............... ............... -2,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Office of the Secretary....................... 5,864 7,864 5,864 ............... -2,000
Chief Financial Officer.................................... 62,981 62,731 62,731 -250 ...............
Management................................................. 78,456 74,783 74,783 -3,673 ...............
Human capital management................................... 29,537 27,560 27,560 -1,977 ...............
Chief Information Officer.................................. 38,146 36,238 36,238 -1,908 ...............
Congressional and intergovernmental affairs:
Program direction...................................... 4,826 4,826 4,826 ............... ...............
Office of Indian Energy Policy and Programs............ ............... 1,500 5,500 +5,500 +4,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Congressional and intergovernmental affairs... 4,826 6,326 10,326 +5,500 +4,000
Economic impact and diversity.............................. 3,896 4,033 4,033 +137 ...............
General Counsel............................................ 32,478 36,654 34,654 +2,176 -2,000
Policy and international affairs........................... 19,296 19,296 19,296 ............... ...............
Public affairs............................................. 4,500 4,500 4,500 ............... ...............
Office of Indian Energy Policy and Programs................ 5,500 ............... ............... -5,500 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Salaries and expenses.......................... 285,480 279,985 279,985 -5,495 ...............
Program support:
Minority economic impact................................... 2,775 2,304 2,304 -471 ...............
Policy analysis and system studies......................... 1,159 1,159 1,159 ............... ...............
Environmental policy studies............................... 528 528 528 ............... ...............
Climate change technology program (program support)........ 9,270 9,270 9,270 ............... ...............
Cybersecurity and secure communications.................... 33,365 35,872 35,872 +2,507 ...............
Corporate management information program................... 9,403 8,933 8,933 -470 ...............
Energy information technology services..................... 22,149 21,120 21,120 -1,029 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Program support................................ 78,649 79,186 79,186 +537 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Administrative operations......................... 364,129 359,171 359,171 -4,958 ...............
Cost of work for others........................................ 47,537 48,537 48,537 +1,000 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, DEPARTMENTAL ADMINISTRATION........................ 411,666 407,708 407,708 -3,958 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Funding from other defense activities.............................. -122,982 -118,836 -118,836 +4,146 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Departmental administration (gross)................... 288,684 288,872 288,872 +188 ...............
====================================================================================
Miscellaneous revenues............................................. -119,740 -119,740 -119,740 ............... ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, DEPARTMENTAL ADMINISTRATION (net)..................... 168,944 169,132 169,132 +188 ...............
====================================================================================
OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL........................................ 51,927 42,850 42,850 -9,077 ...............
ATOMIC ENERGY DEFENSE ACTIVITIES
NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
WEAPONS ACTIVITIES:
Directed stockpile work:
Life extension program:
W76 Life extension program............................. 223,196 249,463 249,463 +26,267 ...............
Stockpile systems:
B61 Stockpile systems.................................. 91,956 317,136 317,136 +225,180 ...............
W76 Stockpile systems.................................. 65,497 64,521 64,521 -976 ...............
W78 Stockpile systems.................................. 50,741 85,898 85,898 +35,157 ...............
W80 Stockpile systems.................................. 19,064 34,193 34,193 +15,129 ...............
B83 Stockpile systems.................................. 35,682 39,349 39,349 +3,667 ...............
W87 Stockpile systems.................................. 51,817 62,603 62,603 +10,786 ...............
W88 Stockpile systems.................................. 43,043 45,666 45,666 +2,623 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Stockpile systems............................. 357,800 649,366 649,366 +291,566 ...............
Weapons dismantlement and disposition:
Operations and maintenance................................. 96,100 58,025 64,425 -31,675 +6,400
Stockpile services:
Production support......................................... 301,484 309,761 309,761 +8,277 ...............
Research and development support........................... 37,071 38,582 38,582 +1,511 ...............
Research and development certification and safety.......... 165,076 209,053 209,053 +43,977 ...............
Management, technology, and production..................... 183,223 193,811 193,811 +10,588 ...............
Plutonium sustainment...................................... 141,909 190,318 159,818 +17,909 -30,500
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Stockpile services............................. 828,763 941,525 911,025 +82,262 -30,500
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Directed stockpile work........................... 1,505,859 1,898,379 1,874,279 +368,420 -24,100
Campaigns:
Science campaign:
Advanced certification................................. 19,400 76,972 56,050 +36,650 -20,922
Primary assessment technologies........................ 83,181 85,723 85,723 +2,542 ...............
Dynamic materials properties........................... 86,617 96,984 106,984 +20,367 +10,000
Advanced radiography................................... 28,535 23,594 23,594 -4,941 ...............
Secondary assessment technologies...................... 77,913 81,949 81,949 +4,036 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Science campaign........................... 295,646 365,222 354,300 +58,654 -10,922
Engineering campaign:
Enhanced surety........................................ 42,000 42,429 42,429 +429 ...............
Weapons system engineering assessment technology....... 18,000 13,530 21,510 +3,510 +7,980
Nuclear survivability.................................. 21,000 19,786 19,786 -1,214 ...............
Enhanced surveillance.................................. 69,000 66,175 66,175 -2,825 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Engineering campaign....................... 150,000 141,920 149,900 -100 +7,980
Inertial confinement fusion ignition and high-yield
campaign:
Ignition............................................... 106,734 109,506 109,506 +2,772 ...............
NIF diagnostics, cryogenics, and experimental support.. 72,252 102,649 102,649 +30,397 ...............
Pulsed power inertial confinement fusion............... 5,000 5,000 5,000 ............... ...............
Joint program in high-energy density laboratory plasmas 4,000 4,000 4,000 ............... ...............
Facility operations and target production.............. 269,929 260,393 260,393 -9,536 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Inertial confinement fusion................ 457,915 481,548 481,548 +23,633 ...............
Advanced simulation and computing.......................... 567,625 615,748 615,748 +48,123 ...............
Readiness campaign:
Stockpile readiness.................................... 5,746 18,941 18,941 +13,195 ...............
High-explosives and weapon operations.................. 4,608 3,000 3,000 -1,608 ...............
Nonnuclear readiness................................... 12,701 21,864 21,864 +9,163 ...............
Tritium readiness...................................... 68,246 50,187 30,229 -38,017 -19,958
Advanced design and production technologies............ 8,699 18,100 18,100 +9,401 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Readiness campaign......................... 100,000 112,092 92,134 -7,866 -19,958
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Campaigns..................................... 1,571,186 1,716,530 1,693,630 +122,444 -22,900
Readiness in technical base and facilities [RTBF]:
Operations of facilities:
Operations of facilities............................... ............... 1,257,991 ............... ............... -1,257,991
Kansas City Plant...................................... 156,056 ............... 186,102 +30,046 +186,102
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory................. 86,670 ............... 80,106 -6,564 +80,106
Los Alamos National Laboratory......................... 311,776 ............... 318,464 +6,688 +318,464
Nevada Test Site....................................... 79,583 ............... 80,077 +494 +80,077
Pantex................................................. 131,602 ............... 131,254 -348 +131,254
Sandia National Laboratory............................. 104,133 ............... 117,369 +13,236 +117,369
Savannah River Site.................................... 128,580 ............... 92,722 -35,858 +92,722
Y-12 Productions Plant................................. 229,774 ............... 230,927 +1,153 +230,927
Institutional Site Support............................. 120,129 ............... 40,970 -79,159 +40,970
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Operations of facilities................... 1,348,303 1,257,991 1,277,991 -70,312 +20,000
Program readiness.......................................... 73,021 69,309 69,309 -3,712 ...............
Material recycle and recovery.............................. 69,542 70,429 80,429 +10,887 +10,000
Containers................................................. 23,392 27,992 27,992 +4,600 ...............
Storage.................................................... 24,708 24,233 24,233 -475 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, RTBF........................................... 1,538,966 1,449,954 1,479,954 -59,012 +30,000
Construction:
11-D-801 TA-55 Reinvestment project, LANL.............. ............... 20,000 20,000 +20,000 ...............
10-D-501 Nuclear facilities risk reduction Y-12 12,500 ............... ............... -12,500 ...............
National security complex, Oakridge, TN...............
09-D-007, LANSCE Reinvestment Los Alamos National Lab, 20,000 ............... 30,000 +10,000 +30,000
Los Alamos, NM........................................
09-D-404, Test capabilities revitalization II, Sandia 3,200 ............... 11,000 +7,800 +11,000
National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM................
08-D-801 High-pressure fire loop [HPFL] Pantex Plant, 31,910 ............... ............... -31,910 ...............
Amarillo, TX..........................................
08-D-802 High-explosive pressing facility Pantex Plant, ............... 30,000 30,000 +30,000 ...............
Amarillo, TX..........................................
07-D-140 Project Engineering and Design [PED], various ............... 5,000 5,000 +5,000 ...............
locations.............................................
06-D-140 Project Engineering and Design [PED], various 12,000 4,000 4,000 -8,000 ...............
locations.............................................
06-D-141 Project Engineering and Design [PED], Y-12 94,000 115,016 115,016 +21,016 ...............
National Security Complex, Oak Ridge, TN..............
06-D-402 NTS replace fire stations 1 & 2 Nevada Test 1,473 ............... ............... -1,473 ...............
Site, NV..............................................
04-D-125 Chemistry and metallurgy facility replacement 97,000 225,000 225,000 +128,000 ...............
project, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos,
NM....................................................
04-D-128 TA-18 mission relocation project, Los Alamos 1,500 ............... ............... -1,500 ...............
Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM............................
99-D-141 Pit disassembly and conversion facility, SRS.. 30,321 ............... ............... -30,321 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Construction............................... 303,904 399,016 440,016 +136,112 +41,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, RTBF.......................................... 1,842,870 1,848,970 1,919,970 +77,100 +71,000
Secure transportation asset:
Operations and equipment............................... 138,772 149,018 149,018 +10,246 ...............
Program direction...................................... 96,143 99,027 99,027 +2,884 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Secure transportation asset................ 234,915 248,045 248,045 +13,130 ...............
Nuclear counterterrorism incident response..................... 221,936 233,134 233,134 +11,198 ...............
Facilities and infrastructure recapitalization program......... 83,959 94,000 94,000 +10,041 ...............
Construction:
07-D-253 TA 1 Heating Systems Modernization [HSM] 9,963 ............... ............... -9,963 ...............
Sandia National Laboratory............................
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Construction............................... 9,963 ............... ............... -9,963 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Facilities and infrastructure recapitalization 93,922 94,000 94,000 +78 ...............
program.............................................
Site stewardship:
Site stewardship........................................... 61,288 90,478 85,478 +24,190 -5,000
Construction:
11-D-601 Sanitary effluent reclamation facility LANL... ............... 15,000 15,000 +15,000 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Site stewardship.............................. 61,288 105,478 100,478 +39,190 -5,000
Safeguards and security:
Defense nuclear security................................... 720,044 667,954 667,954 -52,090 ...............
Construction:
10-D-701 Security improvements project Y-12 Plant, 49,000 ............... ............... -49,000 ...............
Oak Ridge, TN.....................................
08-D-701 Nuclear materials S&S upgrade project Los ............... 52,000 43,000 +43,000 -9,000
Alamos National Laboratory........................
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Construction........................... 49,000 52,000 43,000 -6,000 -9,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Defense nuclear security............... 769,044 719,954 710,954 -58,090 -9,000
Cybersecurity.............................................. 122,511 124,345 124,345 +1,834 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Safeguards and security........................... 891,555 844,299 835,299 -56,256 -9,000
Science, technology, and engineering capability................ ............... 20,000 20,000 +20,000 ...............
Congressionally directed projects.............................. 3,000 ............... ............... -3,000 ...............
Use of prior-year balances..................................... -42,100 ............... ............... +42,100 ...............
====================================================================================
TOTAL, WEAPONS ACTIVITIES.................................... 6,384,431 7,008,835 7,018,835 +634,404 +10,000
====================================================================================
DEFENSE NUCLEAR NONPROLIFERATION
Nonproliferation and verification, R&D............................. 317,300 351,568 362,068 +44,768 +10,500
Nonproliferation and international security........................ 187,202 155,930 155,930 -31,272 ...............
International nuclear materials protection and cooperation......... 572,050 590,118 590,118 +18,068 ...............
Elimination of weapons-grade plutonium production program.......... 24,507 ............... ............... -24,507 ...............
Fissile materials disposition:
U.S. plutonium disposition..................................... 90,896 278,940 278,940 +188,044 ...............
U.S. uranium disposition....................................... 34,691 25,985 25,985 -8,706 ...............
Supporting activities.......................................... 1,075 ............... ............... -1,075 ...............
Construction:
MOX fuel fabrication facilities:
99-D-143 Mixed oxide fuel fabrication facility, 504,238 475,788 475,788 -28,450 ...............
Savannah River, SC....................................
99-D-141-01 Pit disassembly and conversion facility, ............... 80,000 50,000 +50,000 -30,000
Savannah River, SC....................................
99-D-141-02 Waste solidification building, Savannah 70,000 57,000 57,000 -13,000 ...............
River, SC.............................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Construction............................... 574,238 612,788 582,788 +8,550 -30,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, U.S. surplus fissile materials disposal.... 700,900 917,713 887,713 +186,813 -30,000
Russian surplus materials disposition...................... 1,000 113,000 47,500 +46,500 -65,500
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Fissile materials disposition..................... 701,900 1,030,713 935,213 +233,313 -95,500
Global threat reduction initiative................................. 333,500 558,838 568,838 +235,338 +10,000
Congressionally directed projects.................................. 250 ............... ............... -250 ...............
====================================================================================
TOTAL, DEFENSE NUCLEAR NONPROLIFERATION...................... 2,136,709 2,687,167 2,612,167 +475,458 -75,000
====================================================================================
NAVAL REACTORS
Naval reactors development......................................... 877,533 997,886 967,886 +90,353 -30,000
Construction:
10-D-093, Security upgrades, KAPL.............................. 1,500 400 400 -1,100 ...............
10-D-904, NRF infrastructure upgrades, Idaho................... 700 500 500 -200 ...............
09-D-190, PED, Infrastructure upgrades, KAPL................... 1,000 ............... ............... -1,000 ...............
09-D-902, NRF Office Building #2, ECC upgrade, Idaho........... 6,400 4,000 4,000 -2,400 ...............
08-D-190 Project engineering and design, Expended Core Facility 9,500 25,000 25,000 +15,500 ...............
M-290 recovering discharge station, Naval Reactor Facility, ID
07-D-190 Materials research technology complex [MRTC].......... 11,700 2,700 2,700 -9,000 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Construction....................................... 30,800 32,600 32,600 +1,800 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Naval reactors development............................ 908,333 1,030,486 1,000,486 +92,153 -30,000
Program direction.................................................. 36,800 40,000 40,000 +3,200 ...............
====================================================================================
TOTAL, NAVAL REACTORS........................................ 945,133 1,070,486 1,040,486 +95,353 -30,000
====================================================================================
OFFICE OF THE ADMINISTRATOR
Office of the Administrator........................................ 418,074 448,267 438,267 +20,193 -10,000
Congressionally directed projects.................................. 13,000 ............... ............... -13,000 ...............
Use of prior-year balances......................................... -10,320 ............... ............... +10,320 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, OFFICE OF THE ADMINISTRATOR........................... 420,754 448,267 438,267 +17,513 -10,000
====================================================================================
TOTAL, NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION.............. 9,887,027 11,214,755 11,109,755 +1,222,728 -105,000
====================================================================================
DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP
Closure Sites:
Closure sites administration................................... 8,225 6,375 6,375 -1,850 ...............
Miamisburg..................................................... 33,243 ............... ............... -33,243 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Closure sites......................................... 41,468 6,375 6,375 -35,093 ...............
Hanford Site:
Nuclear facility D&D, river corridor closure project........... 327,955 ............... ............... -327,955 ...............
Nuclear material stabilization & disposition PFP............... 118,087 ............... ............... -118,087 ...............
SNF stabilization and disposition.............................. 95,325 ............... ............... -95,325 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, 2012 accelerated completions....................... 541,367 ............... ............... -541,367 ...............
Nuclear facility D&D--remainder of Hanford..................... 70,250 ............... ............... -70,250 ...............
Richland community and regulatory support...................... 21,940 ............... ............... -21,940 ...............
Soil & water remediation--groundwater/vadose zone.............. 223,766 ............... ............... -223,766 ...............
Solid waste stabilization & disposition--200 area.............. 132,757 ............... ............... -132,757 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, 2035 accelerated completions....................... 448,713 ............... ............... -448,713 ...............
Central plateau remediation:
Nuclear material stabilization and disposition PFP......... ............... 64,969 79,969 +79,969 +15,000
SNF stabilization and disposition.......................... ............... 94,016 ............... ............... -94,016
Solid waste stabilization and disposition 2035............. ............... 135,026 135,026 +135,026 ...............
Soil and water remediation--groundwater vadose zone 2035... ............... 129,629 204,629 +204,629 +75,000
Nuclear Facility, D&D--remainder of Hanford 2035........... ............... ............... 99,641 +99,641 +99,641
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Central plateau remediation.................... ............... 423,640 519,265 +519,265 +95,625
River corridor and other clean-up operations:
Nuclear facility D&D--remainder of Hanford 2035........ ............... 139,641 ............... ............... -139,641
Nuclear facility D&D river corridor closure project.... ............... 386,028 380,228 +380,228 -5,800
Richland community and regulatory support.............. ............... 19,620 25,420 +25,420 +5,800
SNF Stabilization and disposition...................... ............... ............... 94,016 +94,016 +94,016
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, River corridor and other clean-up ............... 545,289 499,664 +499,664 -45,625
operations..........................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Hanford Site.................................. 990,080 968,929 1,018,929 +28,849 +50,000
Idaho National Laboratory:
SNF stabilization and disposition--2012........................ 34,268 43,337 23,337 -10,931 -20,000
Solid waste stabilization and disposition...................... 143,500 172,631 165,631 +22,131 -7,000
Radioactive liquid tank waste stabilization and disposition.... 91,850 111,773 97,773 +5,923 -14,000
06-D-401, Sodium bearing waste treatment project, ID........... 93,700 6,500 12,500 -81,200 +6,000
11-D-402, PE&D Calcine Disposition Project, Idaho.............. ............... ............... 15,000 +15,000 +15,000
Soil and water remediation--2012............................... 91,500 68,959 88,959 -2,541 +20,000
Nuclear facility D&D........................................... 5,450 ............... ............... -5,450 ...............
Idaho community and regulatory support......................... 3,900 3,900 3,900 ............... ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Idaho National Laboratory............................. 464,168 407,100 407,100 -57,068 ...............
NNSA:
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory......................... 910 635 635 -275 ...............
NNSA Service Center/SPRU....................................... 17,938 15,547 15,547 -2,391 ...............
Nevada......................................................... 65,674 66,000 66,000 +326 ...............
California site support........................................ 238 238 238 ............... ...............
Sandia National Laboratories................................... 2,864 ............... ............... -2,864 ...............
Los Alamos National Laboratory................................. 196,500 196,953 196,953 +453 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, NNSA sites and Nevada off-sites....................... 284,124 279,373 279,373 -4,751 ...............
Oak Ridge Reservation:
Building 3019.................................................. 38,900 50,001 50,001 +11,101 ...............
Nuclear facility D&D ORNL...................................... 44,400 58,101 88,503 +44,103 +30,402
Nuclear facility D&D Y-12...................................... 53,500 63,775 63,775 +10,275 ...............
Nuclear facility D&D, E. Tenn. Technology Park................. 100 87 87 -13 ...............
OR reservation community & regulatory support.................. 6,253 6,409 6,409 +156 ...............
Solid waste stabilization and disposition--2012................ 35,615 23,925 23,925 -11,690 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Oak Ridge Reservation................................. 178,768 202,298 232,700 +53,932 +30,402
Office of River Protection:
Waste treatment and immobilization plant:
01-D-16 A-D................................................ 365,000 370,178 370,178 +5,178 ...............
01-D-16E Pretreatment facility............................. 325,000 370,000 370,000 +45,000 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Waste treatment and immobilization plant....... 690,000 740,178 740,178 +50,178 ...............
Tank Farm activities:
Rad liquid tank waste stabilization and disposition........ 408,000 418,000 418,000 +10,000 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Tank Farm activities........................... 408,000 418,000 418,000 +10,000 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Office of River Protection........................ 1,098,000 1,158,178 1,158,178 +60,178 ...............
Savannah River site:
Nuclear material stabilization and disposition:
Nuclear material stabilization and disposition............. 385,310 ............... ............... -385,310 ...............
Construction:
08-D-414 Project engineering and design plutonium 6,315 ............... ............... -6,315 ...............
preparation facility, VL..............................
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, 2012 accelerated completions............... 391,625 ............... ............... -391,625 ...............
SR community and regulatory support............................ 18,300 ............... ............... -18,300 ...............
Spent nuclear fuel stabilization and disposition............... 38,768 ............... ............... -38,768 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, 2035 accelerated completions....................... 57,068 ............... ............... -57,068 ...............
Clean-up and waste disposition:
Savannah River community and regulatory support............ ............... 18,330 18,330 +18,330 ...............
Site risk management operations:
NM stabilization and disposition........................... ............... 370,042 275,542 +275,542 -94,500
SNF stabilization and disposition.......................... ............... 23,194 13,394 +13,394 -9,800
Radioactive liquid tank waste stabilization:
Radioactive liquid tank waste stabilization and ............... 549,282 653,582 +653,582 +104,300
disposition...........................................
Construction:
05-D-405 Salt waste processing facility, Savannah ............... 256,951 256,951 +256,951 ...............
River.............................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Radioactive liquid tank waste............. ............... 806,233 910,533 +910,533 +104,300
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Site risk management operations........... ............... 1,199,469 1,199,469 +1,199,469 ...............
Tank Farm activities:
Rad liquid tank waste stabilization and disposition........ 527,138 ............... ............... -527,138 ...............
05-D-405, Salt waste processing facility................... 234,118 ............... ............... -234,118 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Tank farm activities........................... 761,256 ............... ............... -761,256 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Savannah River site............................... 1,209,949 1,217,799 1,217,799 +7,850 ...............
Waste Isolation Pilot Plant:
Operate WIPP................................................... 154,902 134,999 134,999 -19,903 ...............
Central Characterization Project............................... 13,730 25,797 30,797 +17,067 +5,000
Transportation................................................. 33,851 30,678 35,678 +1,827 +5,000
Community and regulatory support............................... 27,854 28,771 28,771 +917 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Waste Isolation Pilot Plant........................... 230,337 220,245 230,245 -92 +10,000
Program direction.................................................. 345,000 323,825 355,000 +10,000 +31,175
Program support.................................................... 34,000 25,143 34,000 ............... +8,857
Safeguards and Security:
Oak Ridge Reservation.......................................... 32,400 17,300 17,300 -15,100 ...............
Paducah........................................................ 8,190 8,496 8,496 +306 ...............
Portsmouth..................................................... 17,509 15,979 15,979 -1,530 ...............
Richland/Hanford Site.......................................... 82,771 69,234 69,234 -13,537 ...............
Savannah River Site............................................ 132,064 132,064 132,064 ............... ...............
Waste Isolation Pilot Project.................................. 4,644 4,755 4,755 +111 ...............
West Valley.................................................... 1,859 1,926 1,926 +67 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Safeguards and Security............................... 279,437 249,754 249,754 -29,683 ...............
Technology development............................................. 20,000 32,320 39,685 +19,685 +7,365
Uranium enrichment D&D fund contribution........................... 463,000 496,700 33,700 -429,300 -463,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUBTOTAL, DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP...................... 5,638,331 5,588,039 5,262,838 -375,493 -325,201
====================================================================================
Congressionally directed projects.................................. 4,000 ............... ............... -4,000 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP......................... 5,642,331 5,588,039 5,262,838 -379,493 -325,201
====================================================================================
OTHER DEFENSE ACTIVITIES
Health, safety, and security:
Health, safety and security.................................... 337,757 356,471 354,471 +16,714 -2,000
Program direction.............................................. 104,125 107,740 107,740 +3,615 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Health, safety and security........................... 441,882 464,211 462,211 +20,329 -2,000
Office of Legacy Management:
Legacy management.............................................. 177,618 176,122 176,122 -1,496 ...............
Program direction.............................................. 12,184 12,504 12,504 +320 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Office of Legacy Management........................... 189,802 188,626 188,626 -1,176 ...............
Defense-related activities:
Infrastructure:
Idaho sitewide safeguards and security..................... 83,358 88,200 88,200 +4,842 ...............
Defense-related administrative support............................. 122,982 118,836 118,836 -4,146 ...............
Office of hearings and appeals..................................... 6,444 6,444 6,444 ............... ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Other Defense Activities........................... 844,468 866,317 864,317 +19,849 -2,000
====================================================================================
Acquisitions workforce improvement................................. ............... 11,892 ............... ............... -11,892
Congressionally directed projects.................................. 3,000 ............... 2,000 -1,000 +2,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, OTHER DEFENSE ACTIVITIES.............................. 847,468 878,209 866,317 +18,849 -11,892
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DEFENSE NUCLEAR WASTE DISPOSAL..................................... 98,400 ............... ............... -98,400 ...............
====================================================================================
TOTAL, ATOMIC ENERGY DEFENSE ACTIVITIES...................... 16,475,226 17,681,003 17,238,910 +763,684 -442,093
====================================================================================
POWER MARKETING ADMINISTRATIONS
SOUTHEASTERN POWER ADMINISTRATION:
Operation and maintenance:
Purchase power and wheeling................................ 85,228 88,615 88,615 +3,387 ...............
Program direction.......................................... 7,638 8,034 8,034 +396 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Operation and maintenance...................... 92,866 96,649 96,649 +3,783 ...............
Less alternative financing [PPW]............................... -14,422 -14,458 -14,458 -36 ...............
Offsetting collections......................................... -78,444 -82,191 -82,191 -3,747 ...............
Cost of implementing reclassification of receipts.............. 7,638 ............... ............... -7,638 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, SOUTHEASTERN POWER ADMINISTRATION..................... 7,638 ............... ............... -7,638 ...............
====================================================================================
SOUTHWESTERN POWER ADMINISTRATION:
Operation and maintenance:
Operating expenses......................................... 13,775 13,676 13,676 -99 ...............
Purchase power and wheeling................................ 48,000 49,000 49,000 +1,000 ...............
Program direction.......................................... 27,153 28,381 28,381 +1,228 ...............
Construction............................................... 6,016 8,073 8,073 +2,057 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Operation and maintenance...................... 94,944 99,130 99,130 +4,186 ...............
Less alternative financing..................................... -12,000 -13,818 -13,818 -1,818 ...............
Offsetting collections......................................... -69,868 -72,613 -72,613 -2,745 ...............
Cost of implementing reclassification of receipts.............. 31,868 ............... ............... -31,868 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, SOUTHWESTERN POWER ADMINISTRATION..................... 44,944 12,699 12,699 -32,245 ...............
====================================================================================
WESTERN AREA POWER ADMINISTRATION:
Operation and maintenance:
Construction and rehabilitation............................ 104,971 109,887 109,887 +4,916 ...............
Operation and maintenance.................................. 57,159 57,793 57,793 +634 ...............
Purchase power and wheeling................................ 548,847 543,622 543,622 -5,225 ...............
Program direction.......................................... 180,756 193,961 193,961 +13,205 ...............
Utah mitigation and conservation........................... 7,584 7,627 7,627 +43 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Operation and maintenance...................... 899,317 912,890 912,890 +13,573 ...............
Less alternative financing..................................... -288,920 -271,895 -271,895 +17,025 ...............
Offsetting collections (Public Law 108-477, Public Law 109-103) -349,807 -350,919 -350,919 -1,112 ...............
Offsetting collections (Public Law 98-381)..................... -3,879 -4,212 -4,212 -333 ...............
Offsetting collections (for program direction)................. -110,492 -149,036 -149,036 -38,544 ...............
Offsetting collections (for O&M)............................... -37,038 -31,270 -31,270 +5,768 ...............
Cost of implementing reclassification of receipts.............. 147,530 ............... ............... -147,530 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, WESTERN AREA POWER ADMINISTRATION..................... 256,711 105,558 105,558 -151,153 ...............
FALCON AND AMISTAD OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE FUND:
Operation and maintenance...................................... 2,568 3,715 3,715 +1,147 ...............
Offsetting collections......................................... -2,348 -3,495 -3,495 -1,147 ...............
Cost of implementing reclassification of receipts.............. 2,348 ............... ............... -2,348 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, FALCON AND AMISTAD OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE FUND..... 2,568 220 220 -2,348 ...............
====================================================================================
TOTAL, POWER MARKETING ADMINISTRATIONS....................... 311,861 118,477 118,477 -193,384 ...............
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission........................... 298,000 315,600 315,600 +17,600 ...............
FERC revenues.................................................. -298,000 -315,600 -315,600 -17,600 ...............
====================================================================================
GRAND TOTAL, DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY............................ 27,111,438 29,613,170 28,346,405 +1,234,967 -1,266,765
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GENERAL PROVISIONS--DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
The following list of general provisions is recommended by
the Committee. The recommendation includes several provisions
which have been included in previous Energy and Water
Appropriations Acts and new provisions as follows:
Section 301. Language is included on reprogramming
authority.
Section 302. Language is included that prohibits the use of
funds in this act to initiate a request for proposal or
expression of interest or other similar arrangements for new
programs which have not yet been presented to Congress in the
annual budget submission and which have not yet been approved
and funded by Congress.
Section 303. Language is included to address issues under
section 3161 of Public Law 102-484.
Section 304. Language is included which permits the
transfer and merger of unexpended balances of prior
appropriations with appropriation accounts established in this
bill.
Section 305. Language is included specifically authorizing
intelligence activities pending enactment of the fiscal year
2011 Intelligence Authorization Act.
Section 306. The Committee has included a provision related
to pensions.
Section 307. Language is included related to the minor
construction threshold.
Section 308. The Committee has included a provision related
to notification of funding awards.
Section 309. Language is included related to the barter of
uranium.
Section 310. Language is included related to notification
of loan guarantee awards.
TITLE IV
INDEPENDENT AGENCIES
Appalachian Regional Commission
Appropriations, 2010.................................... $76,000,000
Budget estimate, 2011................................... 76,000,000
Committee recommendation................................ 76,000,000
Established in 1965, the Appalachian Regional Commission is
an economic development agency composed of 13 Appalachian
States and a Federal co-chair appointed by the President. For
fiscal year 2011, the Committee recommends $76,000,000 for the
ARC.
The Committee recognizes the Commission's efforts to
cooperate with appropriate Federal, regional, State, and local
entities to help diversify and strengthen the Appalachian
regional economy. The Committee encourages the Commission to
explore environmental remediation projects related to
brownfield sites and abandoned mine lands. The Committee
encourages the Commission to examine the Appalachian Regional
Reforestation Initiative, and other initiatives that will
foster economic development related to forest products,
ecosystem services, and tourism, by restoring healthy forests
on a landscape scale. The Committee encourages the Commission
to coordinate with the Appalachian Coal Country Watershed Team
within the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and
Enforcement, Department of the Interior, and the State and
Private Forestry programs of the U.S. Forest Service.
The Committee recognizes the importance of trade and
investment opportunities to the Appalachian Region and is
encouraged by the findings in a report that Appalachian firms
could find significant trade and investment opportunities,
particularly in the energy, high technology, and transportation
sectors in the Republic of Turkey and the surrounding region.
In this regard, the Committee supports the Appalachian-Turkish
Trade Project [ATTP], a project to promote opportunities to
expand trade, encourage business interests, stimulate foreign
studies, and to build a lasting and mutually meaningful
relationship between Appalachian States and the Republic of
Turkey, as well as the neighboring regions, such as Greece. The
Committee commends the ARC for its leadership role in helping
to implement the mission of the ATTP. The Committee expects the
ARC to continue to be a prominent ATTP sponsor.
Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board
SALARIES AND EXPENSES
Appropriations, 2010.................................... $26,086,000
Budget estimate, 2011................................... 28,640,000
Committee recommendation................................ 26,086,000
For fiscal year 2011, the Committee recommends $26,086,000,
for the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board.
Delta Regional Authority
Appropriations, 2010.................................... $13,000,000
Budget estimate, 2011................................... 13,000,000
Committee recommendation................................ 13,000,000
For the Delta Regional Authority, the Committee recommends
$13,000,000. The Delta Regional Authority was established to
assist the eight State Mississippi Delta Region in obtaining
basic infrastructure, transportation, skills training, and
opportunities for economic development.
Denali Commission
Appropriations, 2010.................................... $11,965,000
Budget estimate, 2011................................... 11,965,000
Committee recommendation................................ 11,965,000
The Denali Commission is a Federal-State partnership
responsible for promoting infrastructure development, job
training, and other economic development services in rural
areas throughout Alaska. For fiscal year 2011, the Committee
recommends $11,965,000.
Northern Border Regional Commission
Appropriations, 2010.................................... $1,500,000
Budget estimate, 2011................................... 1,500,000
Committee recommendation................................................
The Committee recommends no funding for the Northern Border
Regional Commission.
Southeast Crescent Regional Commission
Appropriations, 2010.................................... $250,000
Budget estimate, 2011................................... 250,000
Committee recommendation................................................
The Committee recommends no funding for the Southeast
Crescent Regional Commission.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission
SALARIES AND EXPENSES
Appropriations, 2010.................................... $1,056,000,000
Budget estimate, 2011................................... 1,043,483,000
Committee recommendation................................ 1,053,483,000
REVENUES
Appropriations, 2010.................................... -$902,402,000
Budget estimate, 2011................................... -906,220,000
Committee recommendation................................ -915,220,000
NET APPROPRIATION
Appropriations, 2010.................................... $153,598,000
Budget estimate, 2011................................... 137,263,000
Committee recommendation................................ 138,263,000
The Committee recommendation for the Nuclear Regulatory
Commission for fiscal year 2011 is $1,053,483,000, an increase
of $10,000,000 above the budget request. This amount is offset
by estimated revenues of $915,220,000 resulting in a net
appropriation of $138,263,000. The additional $10,000,000 of
funding supplements the $5,000,000 included in the budget
request for Nuclear Regulatory Commission participation in an
Integrated University Program as directed by section 313 of
Public Law 111-8. The total of $15,000,000 for this program is
subject to fee recovery consistent with that authorized by the
Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990, as amended. The
Committee recommends $10,000,000 of this amount to be used to
support university education programs relevant to the NRC
mission. In addition, not less than $5,000,000 of this amount
will be used for grants to support research projects that do
not align with programmatic missions but are critical to
maintaining the discipline of nuclear science and engineering.
Fee Recovery.--The Committee recommendation assumes that
the NRC will recover 90 percent of its budget authority from
user fees and annual charges, as authorized in the Omnibus
Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990, as amended, less the
appropriation derived from the Nuclear Waste Fund, the amount
necessary to implement section 3116 of the Ronald W. Reagan
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005 (Public
Law 108-375), and the amount necessary for generic homeland
security activities of the Commission. Of the $1,053,483,000
gross appropriation for fiscal year 2012, $10,000,000 is drawn
from the Nuclear Waste Fund, $524,000 is drawn from the General
Fund of the Treasury to execute NRC's responsibilities to
provide oversight of certain Department of Energy activities
under section 3116 of Ronald W. Reagan National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005 (Public Law 108-375),
and $26,048,000 is drawn from the General Fund of the Treasury
to execute NRC's homeland security responsibilities. Ninety
percent of the balance of $1,016,911,000 (i.e., $915,220,000)
is funded by fees collected from NRC licensees, and the
remaining 10 percent (i.e., $101,691,000) is funded from the
General Fund of the Treasury.
OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL
GROSS APPROPRIATION
Appropriations, 2010.................................... $10,860,000
Budget estimate, 2011................................... 10,102,000
Committee recommendation................................ 10,860,000
REVENUES
Appropriations, 2010.................................... $9,774,000
Budget estimate, 2011................................... 9,092,000
Committee recommendation................................ 9,774,000
NET APPROPRIATION
Appropriations, 2010.................................... $1,086,000
Budget estimate, 2011................................... 1,010,000
Committee recommendation................................ 1,086,000
The Committee recommends a net appropriation of $1,086,000,
an increase of $76,000 over the budget request. The Committee
directs that the current no year funding authority of the
Office of Inspector General be retained.
Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board
Appropriations, 2010.................................... $3,891,000
Budget estimate, 2011................................... 2,490,000
Committee recommendation................................ 3,891,000
The Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board was established to
evaluate the scientific and technical validity of the
Department of Energy's nuclear waste disposal program. The
Board reports its findings no fewer than two times a year to
Congress and to the Secretary of Energy. For fiscal year 2011,
the Committee recommends $3,891,000.
Office of the Federal Coordinator for Alaska Natural Gas Transportation
Projects
Appropriation, 2009..................................... $4,466,000
Budget estimate, 2011................................... 4,285,000
Committee recommendation................................ 4,285,000
The Office of the Federal Coordinator for Alaska Natural
Gas Transportation Projects was established as an independent
agency in the executive branch on December 13, 2006, pursuant
to the Alaska Natural Gas Pipeline Act of 2004. The Committee
recommends $4,285,000, the same as the budget request.
Tennessee Valley Authority
OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL
GROSS APPROPRIATION
Appropriations, 2010....................................................
Budget estimate, 2011...................................................
Committee recommendation................................................
OFFSET FROM TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY FUND
Appropriations, 2010....................................................
Budget estimate, 2011...................................................
Committee recommendation................................................
TITLE V
GENERAL PROVISIONS
The following list of general provisions are recommended by
the Committee.
Section 501. The provision prohibits the use of any funds
provided in this bill from being used to influence
congressional action.
Section 502. The provision addresses transfer authority
under this act.
COMPLIANCE WITH PARAGRAPH 7, RULE XVI, OF THE STANDING RULES OF THE
SENATE
Paragraph 7 of rule XVI requires that Committee reports on
general appropriations bills identify each Committee amendment
to the House bill ``which proposes an item of appropriation
which is not made to carry out the provisions of an existing
law, a treaty stipulation, or an act or resolution previously
passed by the Senate during that session.''
The Committee recommends funding for the following programs
or activities which currently lack authorization for fiscal
year 2011:
The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers: General Investigations;
Construction, General; Mississippi River and Tributaries;
Operations and Maintenance; Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial
Action Program;
Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation;
Water and Related Resources;
Department of Energy: Energy Conservation and Supply
Activities:
Office of Fossil Energy: Fossil Energy R&D, Clean Coal,
Naval Petroleum and Oil Shale Research;
Health, Safety and Security;
Non-Defense Environmental Management;
Office of Science;
Department of Administration;
National Nuclear Security Administration: Weapons
Activities; Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation; Naval Reactors;
Office of the Administrator;
Defense Environmental Management, Defense Site Acceleration
Completion;
Other Defense Activities;
Defense Nuclear Waste Fund;
Office of Security and Performance Assurance;
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission;
Power Marketing Administrations: Southeastern,
Southwestern, Western Area; and
Energy Information Administration.
COMPLIANCE WITH PARAGRAPH 7(c), RULE XXVI, OF THE STANDING RULES OF THE
SENATE
Pursuant to paragraph 7(c) of rule XXVI, on July 22, 2010,
theCommittee ordered reported en bloc an original bill (S.
3636) making appropriations for the Departments of Commerce and
Justice, and Science, and related agencies for the fiscal year
ending September 30, 2011, and for other purposes; an original
bill (S. 3635) making appropriations for energy and water
development and related agencies for the fiscal year ending
September 30, 2011, and for other purposes; and an original
bill making appropriations for the Departments of
Transportation, and Housing and Urban Development, and related
agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2011, and for
other purposes; with each subject to amendment and subject to
the Committee spending guidance, and authorized the chairman of
the committee or the chairman of the subcommittee to offer the
text of the Senate-reported bill as a committee amendment in
the nature of a substitute to the House companion measure, by a
recorded vote of 17-12, a quorum being present. The vote was as
follows:
Yeas Nays
Chairman Inouye Mr. Cochran
Mr. Leahy Mr. Bond
Mr. Harkin Mr. McConnell
Ms. Mikulski Mr. Shelby
Mr. Kohl Mr. Gregg
Mrs. Murray Mr. Bennett
Mr. Dorgan Mrs. Hutchison
Mrs. Feinstein Mr. Brownback
Mr. Durbin Mr. Alexander
Mr. Johnson Ms. Collins
Ms. Landrieu Mr. Voinovich
Mr. Reed Ms. Murkowski
Mr. Lautenberg
Mr. Nelson
Mr. Pryor
Mr. Tester
Mr. Specter
COMPLIANCE WITH PARAGRAPH 12, RULE XXVI, OF THE STANDING RULES OF THE
SENATE
Paragraph 12 of rule XXVI requires that Committee reports
on a bill or joint resolution repealing or amending any statute
or part of any statute include ``(a) the text of the statute or
part thereof which is proposed to be repealed; and (b) a
comparative print of that part of the bill or joint resolution
making the amendment and of the statute or part thereof
proposed to be amended, showing by stricken-through type and
italics, parallel columns, or other appropriate typographical
devices the omissions and insertions which would be made by the
bill or joint resolution if enacted in the form recommended by
the Committee.''
In compliance with this rule, changes in existing law
proposed to be made by the bill are shown as follows: existing
law to be omitted is enclosed in black brackets; new matter is
printed in italic; and existing law in which no change is
proposed is shown in roman.
WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT ACT, 1996, PUBLIC LAW 104-303
TITLE III--PROJECT-RELATED PROVISIONS
SEC. 333. PASSAIC RIVER, NEW JERSEY.
Section 1148 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986
(100 Stat. 4254) is amended to read as follows:
``SEC. 1148. PASSAIC RIVER BASIN.
``(a) Acquisition of Lands.--The Secretary may acquire from
willing sellers lands on which residential structures are
located and that are subject to frequent and recurring flood
damage, as identified in the supplemental floodway report of
the Corps of Engineers, Passaic River Buyout Study, September
1995, at an estimated total cost of $194,000,000.
``[(b) Retention of Lands for Flood Protection.--Lands
acquired by the Secretary under this section shall be retained
by the Secretary for future use in conjunction with flood
protection and flood management in the Passaic River Basin.]
(b) Lands individually acquired by the Secretary under this
section for flood protection and flood management in the
Passaic River Basin are to held by the Secretary and the non-
Federal sponsor as tenants in common with, thereafter, any
interest held by the Secretary in such lands to be transferred
by Quitclaim Deed to the Non-Federal sponsor for consideration
as is necessary to render the project cost sharing percentages
to be in compliance with section 903(c) of the Water Resources
Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213) and such other law as
may be applicable.
``(c) Cost Sharing.--The non-Federal share of the cost of
carrying out this section shall be 25 percent plus any amount
that might result from application of subsection (d).
``(d) Applicability of Benefit-Cost Ratio Waiver
Authority.--In evaluating and implementing the project under
this section, the Secretary shall allow the non-Federal
interest to participate in the financing of the project in
accordance with section 903(c), to the extent that the
Secretary's evaluation indicates that applying such section is
necessary to implement the project.''.
(e) Funds for Land Acquisition.--Funds for acquiring such
lands as are necessary in carrying out the requirements of this
section and requirements as further recommended by the
Secretary shall include funds as provided in subsection (c) and
(d) of this section herein and also funds as previously
appropriated with any and all such funds to be held by the
Secretary for use in acquiring the requisite lands in
proportion to the project cost sharing percentages.
------
WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT ACT, 2000, PUBLIC LAW 106-541
TITLE V--MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS
SEC. 529. LAS VEGAS, NEVADA.
(a) Definitions.-- * * *
* * * * * * *
(b) Participation in Project.-- * * *
(1) In general.-- * * *
* * * * * * *
(3) Authorization of appropriations.--There is
authorized to be appropriated [$20,000,000] $30,000,00
to carry out this section.
------
ENERGY AND WATER DEVELOPMENT APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 2004, PUBLIC LAW 108-
137
TITLE I
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE--CIVIL
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
Corps of Engineers--Civil
GENERAL PROVISIONS
CORPS OF ENGINEERS--CIVIL
Sec. 117. Section 595 of the Water Resources Development
Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 383; 117 Stat. 142) is amended--
(1) by striking the section heading and inserting
the following:
``SEC. 595. IDAHO, MONTANA, RURAL NEVADA, NEW MEXICO, AND RURAL
UTAH.'';
(2) in subsection (a)--
(A) by redesignating paragraphs (1) through
(3) as subparagraphs (A) through (C),
respectively;
(B) by striking (a) and all that follows
through ``means--'' and inserting the
following:
``(a) Definitions.--In this section:
``(1) Rural nevada.--The term `rural Nevada'
means''; and
(C) by adding at the end the following:
``(2) Rural utah.--The term `rural Utah' means--
``(A) the counties of Box Elder, Cache,
Rich, Tooele, Morgan, Summit, Dagett, Wasatch,
Duchesne, Uintah, Juab, Sanpete, Carbon,
Millard, Sevier, Emery, Grand, Beaver, Piute,
Wayne, Iron, Garfield, San Juan, and Kane,
Utah[; and];
``(B) the portions of Washington County,
Utah, that are located outside the city of St.
George, Utah[.]; and'';
(C) the portions of Utah County and Weber
Counties that are located outside of a
political subdivision, the population of which
is greater than 10,000 residents.
------
WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT ACT OF 2007, PUBLIC LAW 110-114
TITLE III--PROJECT-RELATED PROVISIONS
SEC. 3001. BLACK WARRIOR-TOMBIGBEE RIVERS, ALABAMA.
Section 111 of title I of division C of the Consolidated
Appropriations Act, 2005 (118 Stat. 2944) is amended to read as
follows:
``SEC. 111. BLACK WARRIOR-TOMBIGBEE RIVERS, ALABAMA.
``(a) * * *
``(1) * * *
* * * * * * *
(3) may grant to the City of Tuscaloosa a long term
lease or license agreement for any portion of the
Parcel not required for construction of the new
administrative facility under subsection (a)
(2)(c)until such time as the City of Tuscaloosa is
prepared to take fee simple title per the provisions of
subsection(b)(2).
``(c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized
to be appropriated to carry out this section $32,000,000.''.
* * * * * * *
SEC. 3113. WESTERN SARPY AND CLEAR CREEK, NEBRASKA.
The project for ecosystem restoration and flood damage
reduction, Western Sarpy and Clear Creek, Nebraska, authorized
by section 101(b)(21) of the Water Resources Development Act of
2000 (114 Stat. 2578), is modified to authorize the Secretary
to construct the project at a total cost of [$21,664,000, with
an estimated Federal cost of $14,082,000 and an estimated non-
Federal cost of $7,582,000.] $38,800,000, with an estimated
Federal cost of $25,220,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost
of $13,580,000.
* * * * * * *
SEC. 3182. LAND CONVEYANCES.
(a)* * *
* * * * * * *
(j) Denison, Texas.--
(1) In general.--Not later than 90 days after the
date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall
offer to convey at fair market value to the city of
Denison, Texas, all right, title, and interest of the
United States in and to the approximately 900 acres of
land located in Grayson County, Texas, which is
currently subject to an application for lease for
public park and recreational purposes made by the city
of Denison, dated August 17, 2005.
(2) Survey to obtain legal description.--The exact
acreage and description of the real property referred
to in paragraph (1) shall be determined by a survey
paid for by the city of Denison, Texas, that is
satisfactory to the Secretary.
(3) Conveyance.--Not later than 90 days after the
date of acceptance by the city of Denison, Texas, of an
offer under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall convey
the land surveyed under paragraph (2) by quitclaim deed
to the city of Denison, Texas.
(k) St. Charles County, Missouri.--
(1) Definitions.--In this subsection, the following
definitions apply:
(A) Federal land.--The term `Federal land'
means the 1 parcel of Corps of Engineers land
totaling approximately 84 acres, located U.S.
Survey No. 1838, Township 48 North, Range 6
East.
(B) Non-federal land.--The term `non-
Federal land' means the approximately 70 acres
of land, subject to any existing easements
situated in Jersey County, Illinois, adjacent
to existing Corps fee title land.
(2) Land exchange.--Subject to paragraph (3), on
conveyance by Ameren U.E. to the United States of all
right, title, and interest in and to the non-Federal
land, the Secretary shall convey to Ameren U.E., all
right, title, and interest of the United States in and
to the Federal land.
(3) Conditions.--
(A) Deeds.--
(i) Non-federal land.--The
conveyance of the non-Federal land to
the Secretary shall be by a warranty
deed acceptable to the Secretary.
(ii) Federal land.--The conveyance
of the Federal land to Ameren U.E.,
shall be--
(I) by quitclaim deed; and
(II) subject to any
reservations, terms, and
conditions that the Secretary
determines to be necessary to
allow the United States to
operate and maintain the
Mississippi River 9-Foot
Navigation Project.
(iii) Legal descriptions.--The
Secretary shall provide a legal
description of the Federal land, and
Ameren U.E., shall provide a legal
description of the non-Federal land,
for inclusion in the deeds referred to
in clauses (i) and (ii).
(B) Removal of improvements.--
(i) In general.--The Secretary may
require the removal of, or Ameren U.E.,
may voluntarily remove, any
improvements to the non-Federal land
before the completion of the exchange
or as a condition of the exchange.
``(ii) No liability.--If Ameren
U.E., removes any improvements to the
non-Federal land under clause (i)--
(I) Ameren U.E., shall have
no claim against the United
States relating to the removal;
and
(II) the United States
shall not incur or be liable
for any cost associated with
the removal or relocation of
the improvements.
(C) Administrative costs.--The Secretary
shall require Ameren U.E. to pay reasonable
administrative costs associated with the
exchange.
(D) Cash equalization payment.--If the
appraised fair market value, as determined by
the Secretary, of the Federal land exceeds the
appraised fair market value, as determined by
the Secretary, of the non-Federal land, Ameren
U.E. shall make a cash equalization payment to
the United States.
(E) Deadline.--The land exchange under
subparagraph (B) shall be completed not later
than 2 years after the date of enactment of
this Act.
[(k)] (l) Generally Applicable Provisions.--
(1) Survey to obtain legal description.--The exact
acreage and the legal description of any real property
to be conveyed under this section shall be determined
by a survey that is satisfactory to the Secretary.
(2) Applicability of property screening
provisions.--Section 2696 of title 10, United States
Code, shall not apply to any conveyance under this
section.
(3) Additional terms and conditions.--The Secretary
may require that any conveyance under this section be
subject to such additional terms and conditions as the
Secretary considers appropriate and necessary to
protect the interests of the United States.
(4) Costs of conveyance.--An entity to which a
conveyance is made under this section shall be
responsible for all reasonable and necessary costs,
including real estate transaction and environmental
documentation costs, associated with the conveyance.
(5) Liability.--An entity to which a conveyance is
made under this section shall hold the United States
harmless from any liability with respect to activities
carried out, on or after the date of the conveyance, on
the real property conveyed. The United States shall
remain responsible for any liability with respect to
activities carried out, before such date, on the real
property conveyed.
* * * * * * *
TITLE V--MISCELLANEOUS
SEC. 5067. IDAHO, MONTANA, RURAL NEVADA, NEW MEXICO, RURAL UTAH, AND
WYOMING.
(a) * * *
* * * * * * *
``(h) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized
to be appropriated to carry out this section for the period
beginning with fiscal year 2001 [$150,000,000 for rural Nevada]
$200,000,000 for rural Nevada, $75,000,000 for Montana,
$25,000,000 for New Mexico, $55,000,000 for Idaho, $100,000,000
for rural Utah, and $30,000,000 for Wyoming. Such sums shall
remain available until expended.''.
* * * * * * *
------
CONSOLIDATED APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 2008, PUBLIC LAW 110-161
TITLE II
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
General Provisions, Department of the Interior
Sec. 208. (a) Notwithstanding any other provision of law,
of amounts made available under section 2507 of the Farm
Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002 (43 U.S.C. 2211 note;
Public Law 107-171), the Secretary of the Interior--
(1) acting through the Commissioner of Reclamation,
shall use--
(A) subject to subsection (b), $3,000,000
for activities necessary to convey to the State
of Nevada the land known as the ``Carson Lake
and Pasture'', as authorized by section 206(e)
of the Truckee-Carson-Pyramid Lake Water Rights
Settlement Act (Public Law 101-618: 104 Stat.
3311);
* * * * * * *
(C) in consultation with the Corps of
Engineers, as applicable, $5,000,000 to study
and prepare plans for the development and
construction of a pipeline to convey water from
Dixie Valley to Churchill County, Nevada; and
[(D) $10,000,000 for--
[(i) design and construction of the
Derby Dam fish screen to allow passage
of fish, including the cui-ui and
Lahontan cutthroat trout; and
[(ii) any improvements to Derby Dam
necessary to make the fish screen
operable;
[(E) $6,000,000 for the acquisition of not
more than 4 small hydroelectric power plants
from the Sierra Pacific Power Company to
improve water allocation and fish passage in
the Truckee River; and]
[(F)] (D) $6,000,000 for Lower Truckee
River restoration projects identified by the
cities of Reno and Sparks, Nevada, and Washoe
County, Nevada;
* * * * * * *
(3) shall allocate $1,000,000 to the Summit Lake
Paiute Tribe to plan and complete [restoration efforts
at the Summit Lake in Northern Washoe County]
restoration and environmental protection efforts at the
Summit Lake in Humboldt County, Nevada, for the benefit
of the Tribe because of their status as Indians;
------
ENERGY AND WATER DEVELOPMENT AND RELATED AGENCIES APPROPRIATIONS, 2010,
PUBLIC LAW 111-85
TITLE II
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
General Provisions--Department of the Interior
Sec. 208. (a) Of the amounts made available under section
2507 of the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002 (43
U.S.C. 2211 note; Public Law 107-171), the Secretary of the
Interior, acting through the Commissioner of Reclamation,
shall--
(1) provide, subject to subsection (b),
[$66,200,000] $81,200,000 to establish the Walker Basin
Restoration Program for the primary purpose of
restoring and maintaining Walker Lake, a natural desert
terminal lake in the State of Nevada, consistent with
protection of the ecological health of the Walker River
and the riparian and watershed resources of the West,
East, and Main Walker Rivers, and including associated
activities that enhance recovery of the federally
threatened Lahontan cutthroat trout; and
* * * * * * *
(b)(1) The amount made available under subsection (a)(1)
shall be--
(A) * * *
(B) * * *
(i) * * *
(I) to administer and manage a 3-
year or longer water leasing
demonstration program in the Walker
Lake inflows; and
* * * * * * *
(vi) $200,000 to support alternative crops
and alternative agricultural cooperatives
programs in Lyon and Mineral Counties, Nevada,
that promote water conservation in the Walker
River Basin.
(vii) $15,000,000 to be used as described
in subparagraph (A), as determined by the
National Fish and Wildlife Foundation.
BUDGETARY IMPACT OF BILL
PREPARED IN CONSULTATION WITH THE CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE PURSUANT TO SEC. 308(a), PUBLIC LAW 93-344, AS
AMENDED
[In millions of dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Budget authority Outlays
-----------------------------------------------------
Committee Amount of Committee Amount of
guidance\1\ bill guidance\1\ bill
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comparison of amounts in the bill with Committee spending
guidance to its subcommittees for 2011: Subcommittee on
Energy and Water Development:
Mandatory............................................. ............ ........... ............ ...........
Discretionary......................................... 34,968 34,968 NA \2\45,782
Projections of outlays associated with the recommendation:
2011.................................................. ............ ........... ............ \3\20,301
2012.................................................. ............ ........... ............ 9,675
2013.................................................. ............ ........... ............ 3,238
2014.................................................. ............ ........... ............ 630
2015 and future years................................. ............ ........... ............ 874
Financial assistance to State and local governments for NA 93 NA 19
2011.....................................................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\There is no section 302(a) allocation to the Committee on Appropriations for fiscal year 2011.
\2\Includes outlays from prior-year budget authority.
\3\Excludes outlays from prior-year budget authority.
NA: Not applicable.
DISCLOSURE OF CONGRESSIONALLY DIRECTED SPENDING ITEMS
The Constitution vests in the Congress the power of the
purse. The Committee believes strongly that Congress should
make the decisions on how to allocate the people's money.
As defined in Rule XLIV of the Standing Rules of the
Senate, the term ``congressional directed spending item'' means
a provision or report language included primarily at the
request of a Senator, providing, authorizing, or recommending a
specific amount of discretionary budget authority, credit
authority, or other spending authority for a contract, loan,
loan guarantee, grant, loan authority, or other expenditure
with or to an entity, or targeted to a specific State, locality
or congressional district, other than through a statutory or
administrative, formula-driven, or competitive award process.
For each item, a Member is required to provide a
certification that neither the Member nor the Senator's
immediate family has a pecuniary interest in such
congressionally directed spending item. Such certifications are
available to the public on the Web site of the Senate Committee
on Appropriations (www.appropriations.senate.gov/senators.cfm).
Following is a list of congressionally directed spending
items included in the Senate recommendation discussed in this
report, along with the name of each Senator who submitted a
request to the Committee of jurisdiction for each item so
identified. Neither the Committee recommendation nor this
report contains any limited tax benefits or limited tariff
benefits as defined in rule XLIV.
CONGRESSIONALLY DIRECTED SPENDING ITEMS
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Agency Account Project title Funding Member
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. ABILENE, TX (BRAZOS RIVER BASIN--ELM CREEK)......................... $200,000 Cornyn
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. ALISO CREEK, CA..................................................... $250,000 Feinstein
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. AMITE RIVER--ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, LA.............................. $250,000 Landrieu
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. ANACOSTIA RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY LEVEE, MD & $250,000 Mikulski, Cardin
DC.
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. ARKANSAS RIVER CORRIDOR, OK......................................... $1,650,000 Inhofe
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. ARROYO SECO WATERSHED, CA........................................... $150,000 Feinstein
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. BALTIMORE METROPOLITAN WATER RESOURCES, MD.......................... $50,000 Cardin
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. BLOOMSBURG, PA...................................................... $500,000 Specter, Casey
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. BOSSIER PARISH, LA.................................................. $250,000 Landrieu, Vitter
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. BOSTON HARBOR (45-FOOT CHANNEL), MA................................. $1,800,000 Kerry
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. BRUSH CREEK BASIN, KS & MO.......................................... $200,000 Bond, Roberts
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. CACHE LA POUDRE RIVER BASIN, GREELEY, CO............................ $150,000 M. Udall
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. CALCASIEU RIVER BASIN, LA........................................... $250,000 Landrieu
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. CANAVERAL HARBOR, FL................................................ $500,000 Bill Nelson
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. CEDAR RIVER, CEDAR RAPIDS, IA....................................... $3,000,000 Harkin, Grassley
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. CENTRAL VALLEY INTEGRATED FLOOD MANAGEMENT STUDY, CA................ $500,000 Feinstein, Boxer
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. CENTRALIA, CHEHALIS RIVER, LEWIS COUNTY, WA......................... $500,000 Murray, Cantwell
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. CHATFIELD REALLOCATION STUDY, CO.................................... $267,000 Bennet, M. Udall
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. CHEHALIS RIVER BASIN, WA............................................ $500,000 Murray, Cantwell
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. CHESAPEAKE BAY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, MD & VA.......................... $150,000 Mikulski
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. CHESAPEAKE BAY MARSHLANDS, MD....................................... $50,000 Cardin
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. CHESAPEAKE BAY SUSQUEHANNA RESERVOIR SEDIMENT MANAGEMENT, PA, MD, & $250,000 Mikulski, Cardin
VA.
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. CHOWAN RIVER, VA & NC............................................... $124,000 Webb, Warner
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. CLINCH RIVER WATERSHED, VA.......................................... $200,000 Webb, Warner
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. CLINTON RIVER RIPARIAN CORRIDOR, MI................................. $100,000 Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. CONNECTICUT RIVER ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, CT, MA, NH, & VT........... $350,000 Leahy, Dodd, Lieberman, Kerry
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. COYOTE DAM, CA...................................................... $250,000 Feinstein
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. CROSS LAKE, LA...................................................... $50,000 Landrieu
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. DALLAS FLOODWAY, UPPER TRINITY RIVER BASIN, TX...................... $1,600,000 Hutchison, Cornyn
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. DELAWARE RIVER DREDGED MATERIAL UTILIZATION, PA, DE & NJ............ $200,000 Kaufman, Specter
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. DISMAL SWAMP & DISMAL SWAMP CANAL, VA............................... $22,000 Webb, Warner
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. DUTCHESS COUNTY WATERSHEDS, NY...................................... $100,000 Schumer, Gillibrand
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. ECORSE CREEK, MI.................................................... $200,000 Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. ELLIOT BAY SEAWALL, WA.............................................. $500,000 Murray, Cantwell
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. ESPANOLA VALLEY, RIO GRANDE AND TRIBUTARIES, NM..................... $250,000 Bingaman, Tom Udall
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. FARGO-MOORHEAD UPSTREAM STUDY, ND & MN (RRN BASIN AUTHORITY)........ $200,000 Dorgan, Conrad
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. FLAGLER COUNTY, FL.................................................. $287,000 Bill Nelson
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. FORGE RIVER WATERSHED, NY........................................... $400,000 Schumer, Gillibrand
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. FOUR MILE RUN, VA................................................... $53,000 Webb, Warner
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. GATHRIGHT DAM AND LAKE MOOMAW, VA................................... $200,000 Webb, Warner
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. GRAND (NEOSHO) RIVER BASIN WATERSHED, OK, KS, MO & AR............... $190,000 Roberts
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. GREAT LAKES REMEDIAL ACTION PLANS & SEDIMENT REMEDIATION, MI, IL, $500,000 Voinovich, Levin, Stabenow,
IN, MN, NY, OH, PA, & WI. Sherrod Brown
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. HILO HARBOR MODIFICATIONS, HI....................................... $300,000 Inouye
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. HOMER HARBOR NAVIGATION IMPROVEMENTS, AK............................ $300,000 Murkowski
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. HUMBOLDT, IA........................................................ $175,000 Harkin, Grassley
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. ILLINOIS RIVER BASIN RESTORATION, IL................................ $350,000 Durbin, Burris
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. INTERBASIN CONTROL OF GREAT LAKES--MISSISSIPPI RIVER AQUATIC $350,000 Voinovich, Durbin, Levin,
NUISANCE SPECIES, IL, IN, OH, WI. Stabenow
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. JAMES RIVER, ND..................................................... $150,000 Dorgan, Conrad
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. LANSING GRAND RIVER WATERFRONT RESTORATION, MI...................... $150,000 Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. LOS ANGELES COUNTY DRAINAGE AREA [LACDA] WATER CONSERVATION AND $200,000 Feinstein
SUPPLY, WHITTIER NARROWS DAM, CA.
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. LOS ANGELES RIVER ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, CA......................... $200,000 Boxer
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. LOWER CACHE CREEK, YOLO COUNTY, WOODLAND AND VICINITY, CA........... $100,000 Feinstein, Boxer
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. LOWER MISSION CREEK, CA............................................. $250,000 Feinstein, Boxer
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. LOWER MISSISSIPPI RIVER RESOURCE ASSESSMENT, AR, IL, KY, LA, MS, MO, $150,000 Pryor, Lincoln, Wicker
& TN.
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. LOWER SADDLE RIVER, NJ.............................................. $200,000 Lautenberg, Menendez
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. MANHATTAN, KS....................................................... $300,000 Brownback, Roberts
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. MATILIJA DAM, CA.................................................... $100,000 Feinstein, Boxer
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. MAY BRANCH, FORT SMITH, AR.......................................... $250,000 Pryor, Lincoln
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. MERCED COUNTY STREAMS, CA........................................... $250,000 Feinstein, Boxer
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. MIDDLE CREEK, CA.................................................... $400,000 Feinstein
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. MIDDLE POTOMAC COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, MD, VA, PA, WV, & DC............. $68,000 Cardin
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. MILE POINT, FL...................................................... $475,000 Bill Nelson
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. MISSOURI RIVER LEVEE SYSTEM, UNITS L-455 & R-460-471, MO & KS....... $150,000 Bond, Roberts
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. MISSOURI RIVER, ND, MT, SD, NE, IA, KS, & MO........................ $5,000,000 Dorgan, Harkin, Conrad
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. NEW JERSEY SHORE PROTECTION, HEREFORD INLET TO CAPE MAY INLET, NJ... $250,000 Lautenberg, Menendez
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. NEW JERSEY SHORELINE ALTERNATIVE LONG-TERM NOURISHMENT, NJ.......... $200,000 Lautenberg, Menendez
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. NEW RIVER, CLAYTOR LAKE, VA......................................... $150,000 Webb, Warner
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. NORTH CAROLINA INTERNATIONAL TERMINAL, NC........................... $300,000 Hagan
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. NORTH SHORE OF LONG ISLAND, ASHAROKEN, NY........................... $100,000 Schumer
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. OHIO RIVER BASIN COMPREHENSIVE STUDY, WV, KY, OH, PA, IL, IN, VA, $3,000,000 Voinovich, Bunning, Rockefeller
AL, TN, NY, MD, NC, MS, & GA.
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. PAJARO RIVER, CA.................................................... $300,000 Feinstein, Boxer
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. PASSAIC RIVER MAIN STEM, NJ & NY.................................... $125,000 Lautenberg, Menendez
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. PASSAIC RIVER, HARRISON, NJ......................................... $160,000 Lautenberg, Menendez
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. PEARL RIVER WATERSHED, MS........................................... $200,000 Cochran, Wicker
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. PECKMAN RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, NJ................................... $620,000 Lautenberg, Menendez
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. PINE MOUNTAIN DAM, AR............................................... $250,000 Pryor, Lincoln
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. PORT OF IBERIA, LA.................................................. $1,000,000 Landrieu, Vitter
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. PORTSMOUTH HARBOR AND PISCATAQUA RIVER TURNING BASIN, NH............ $150,000 Shaheen
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. PRAIRIE DUPONT LEVEE AND SANITARY DISTRICT AND FISH LAKE DRAINAGE $850,000 Durbin, Burris
AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL.
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. PUYALLUP RIVER, WA.................................................. $450,000 Murray, Cantwell
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. RAHWAY RIVER BASIN, NJ.............................................. $250,000 Lautenberg, Menendez
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. RARITAN BAY AND SANDY HOOK BAY, HIGHLANDS, NJ....................... $207,000 Lautenberg, Menendez
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. RARITAN BAY AND SANDY HOOK BAY, LEONARDO, NJ........................ $100,000 Lautenberg, Menendez
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. RARITAN BAY AND SANDY HOOK BAY, UNION BEACH, NJ..................... $125,000 Lautenberg, Menendez
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. RED CLAY CREEK, CHRISTINA RIVER WATERSHED, DE....................... $100,000 Carper, Kaufman
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. RED RIVER OF THE NORTH BASIN, ND, MN, SD & MANITOBA, CANADA......... $1,463,000 Dorgan, Klobuchar, Conrad
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. REDWOOD CITY HARBOR, CA............................................. $200,000 Feinstein
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. RIVER DES PERES, MO................................................. $45,000 Bond
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. SABINE-NECHES WATERWAY, TX.......................................... $400,000 Cornyn
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. SACRAMENTO RIVER FLOOD CONTROL [GRR], CA (SYSTEM EVALUATION)........ $600,000 Feinstein
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. SAC-SAN JOAQUIN DELTA, DELTA ISLANDS AND LEVEES, CA................. $282,000 Feinstein, Boxer
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. SAN DIEGO COUNTY SHORELINE, CA (OCEANSIDE).......................... $200,000 Feinstein
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. SAN FRANCISQUITO CREEK, CA.......................................... $300,000 Feinstein, Boxer
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. SAN JOAQUIN RIVER BASIN, FRAZIER CREEK, CA.......................... $150,000 Feinstein
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. SAN JOAQUIN RIVER BASIN, LOWER SAN JOAQUIN RIVER, CA................ $500,000 Feinstein, Boxer
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. SAN JOAQUIN RIVER BASIN, WEST STANISLAUS COUNTY, ORESTIMBA CREEK, $223,000 Feinstein
CA.
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. SAN JOAQUIN RIVER BASIN, WHITE RIVER AND DRY CREEK, CA.............. $150,000 Feinstein
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. SANTA CLARA RIVER WATERSHED, CA..................................... $250,000 Feinstein
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. SARASOTA, LIDO KEY BEACH, FL........................................ $250,000 Bill Nelson
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. SEARSPORT HARBOR, ME................................................ $300,000 Collins
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. SHEYENNE RIVER, ND.................................................. $150,000 Dorgan, Conrad
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. SKAGIT RIVER, WA.................................................... $1,137,000 Murray, Cantwell
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. SKOKOMISH RIVER BASIN, WA........................................... $300,000 Cantwell
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. SOUTH RIVER, RARITAN RIVER BASIN, NJ................................ $200,000 Lautenberg, Menendez
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO SHORELINE, CA................................... $500,000 Feinstein
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. SOUTH SHORE OF STATEN ISLAND, NY.................................... $250,000 Schumer, Gillibrand
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. SOUTHEAST OKLAHOMA WATER RESOURCE STUDY, OK......................... $325,000 Inhofe
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. SOUTHWEST COASTAL LOUISIANA HURRICANE PROTECTION, LA................ $1,000,000 Landrieu
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. SPARKS ARROYO COLONIA, EL PASO COUNTY, TX........................... $200,000 Cornyn
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. ST. CHARLES PARISH URBAN FLOOD CONTROL, LA.......................... $350,000 Landrieu, Vitter
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. ST. HELENA--NAPA RIVER, CA.......................................... $150,000 Boxer
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. STONY BROOK, MILLSTONE RIVER BASIN, NJ.............................. $250,000 Lautenberg, Menendez
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. SUN VALLEY WATERSHED, CA............................................ $200,000 Feinstein
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. SUSQUEHANNA RIVER BASIN ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION AND LOW FLOW $250,000 Mikulski
MANAGEMENT, NY, PA, & MD.
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. TEN MILE RIVER, DUTCHESS COUNTY, NY AND LITCHFIELD COUNTY, CT....... $100,000 Schumer, Gillibrand
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. TIJUANA RIVER ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, CA......................... $50,000 Boxer
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. TOPEKA, KS.......................................................... $400,000 Brownback, Roberts
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. TRUCKEE MEADOWS, NV................................................. $4,500,000 Reid, Ensign
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. UPPER MISS RIVER COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IL, IA, MO, MN, & WI............ $750,000 Harkin, Durbin, Grassley
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER--ILLINOIS WW SYSTEM, IL, IA, MN, MO, & WI... $4,000,000 Durbin, Harkin, Burris, Grassley
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. UPPER OHIO NAVIGATION SYSTEM STUDY, PA.............................. $451,000 Specter, Casey
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. UPPER TURKEY CREEK, KS.............................................. $90,000 Roberts
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. VALDEZ NAVIGATION IMPROVEMENTS, AK.................................. $500,000 Murkowski, Begich
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. WALLA WALLA WATERSHED, OR & WA...................................... $500,000 Murray, Wyden, Merkley, Cantwell
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. WALTON COUNTY, FL................................................... $250,000 Bill Nelson
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. WASHITA RIVER BASIN, OK............................................. $325,000 Inhofe
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. WEST MAUI WATERSHED, MAUI, HI....................................... $100,000 Inouye, Akaka
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. WEST SHORE--LAKE PONTCHARTRAIN, LA.................................. $350,000 Landrieu
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. WESTCHESTER COUNTY STREAMS, BYRAM RIVER FLOOD REDUCTION, CT & NY... $100,000 Dodd, Lieberman, Schumer
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. WESTERN LAKE ERIE BASIN, OH, IN, & MI............................... $2,000,000 Voinovich, Sherrod Brown
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION, PA..................... $4,000 Casey
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. WESTMINSTER, EAST GARDEN GROVE, CA.................................. $279,000 Feinstein
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. WHITE RIVER BASIN COMPREHENSIVE, AR & MO............................ $250,000 Pryor, Lincoln
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. WHITE RIVER NAVIGATION TO BATESVILLE, AR............................ $200,000 Pryor, Lincoln
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. YELLOWSTONE RIVER CORRIDOR, MT...................................... $300,000 Tester, Baucus
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. General Investigation Items not listed under states................. .............. ................................
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. COASTAL FIELD DATA COLLECTION:
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. PACIFIC ISLANDS LAND OCEAN TYPHOON EXPERIMENT................... $1,000,000 Inouye
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. SURGE AND WAVE ISLAND MOORING STUDIES........................... $1,000,000 Inouye
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. FLOOD PLAIN MANAGEMENT SERVICES:
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. DELAWARE DAM SAFETY, DE..................................... $250,000 Carper, Kaufman
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. NUUANU (OAHU), HI........................................... $200,000 Inouye
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. WAIOHULI GULCH (MAUI), HI.................................. $200,000 Inouye
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. WAIMEA (KAUAI), HI.......................................... $200,000 Inouye
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. ANAHOLA (KAUAI), HI......................................... $200,000 Inouye
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. HURRICANE EVACUATION STUDIES, HI............................ $300,000 Inouye
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. DES MOINES RIVER REGULATED FREQUENCY CURVE AND SAYLORVILLE AND $80,000 Grassley
RED ROCK RESERVOIRS POOL ELEVATION FREQUENCY ESTIMATES, IA.
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. IOWA LIDAR, IA.............................................. $100,000 Grassley
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. URBAN LEVEE EVALUATIONS, MUSCATINE, IA...................... $60,000 Grassley
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. WICHITA AREA DRAINAGE MASTER PLAN, KS....................... $300,000 Brownback, Roberts
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. CHITIMACHA TRIBE OF LOUISIANA, LA [GIS]..................... $400,000 Landrieu
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. CITY OF ALEXANDRIA, LA [GIS]................................ $400,000 Landrieu
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. EAST BATON ROUGE PARISH, LA [GIS]........................... $200,000 Landrieu
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. LIVINGSTON PARISH, LA [GIS]................................. $500,000 Landrieu
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. AU TRAIN, MI................................................ $75,000 Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. PAPILLION CREEK WATERSHED, NE............................... $430,000 Ben Nelson
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. OTERO COUNTY, NM............................................ $100,000 Bingaman, Tom Udall
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. SOUTHEASTERN, PA............................................ $250,000 Specter, Casey
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. ABINGDON, VA................................................ $55,000 Webb, Warner
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. COORDINATION WITH OTHER AGENCIES:
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. OTHER COORDINATION PROGRAMS:
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. LAKE TAHOE.................................................. $900,000 Reid, Feinstein
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. PLANNING ASSISTANCE TO STATES:
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. AUGUSTA RIVERFRONT DEVELOPMENT, AR.......................... $50,000 Pryor, Lincoln
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. DELAWARE DAM SAFETY, DE..................................... $250,000 Carper, Kaufman
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. SUSUPE/CHALAN KANOA DRAINAGE PLAN [CNMI].................... $160,000 Inouye, Akaka
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. PALA LAGOON (AMERICAN SAMOA)................................ $200,000 Inouye, Akaka
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. CLIMATE CHANGE VULNERABILITY AND RISK ASSESSMENT, HI........ $250,000 Inouye, Akaka
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. HE'EIA WATERSHED, HI........................................ $100,000 Inouye, Akaka
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. PALMYRA ATOLL............................................... $100,000 Inouye, Akaka
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. STATE OF HAWAII GENERAL FLOOD CONTROL PLAN UPDATE........... $190,000 Inouye, Akaka
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. GREENWAYS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, DES MOINES, IA................ $100,000 Grassley
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. LOWER NISHNABOTNA RIVER BASIN, IA........................... $100,000 Harkin, Grassley
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. MIDDLE AMANA, IA............................................ $74,000 Grassley
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. SHUNGANUNGA CREEK, KS....................................... $100,000 Roberts
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. CHOCTAW COUNTY RESERVOIR, MS................................ $50,000 Wicker
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. GENESEE RIVER SEDIMENT STUDY, NY............................ $250,000 Schumer
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. OKLAHOMA COMPREHENSIVE WATER PLAN, OK....................... $500,000 Inhofe
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. DRIFT CREEK RESERVOIR PROJECT, OR........................... $20,000 Wyden, Merkley
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. TRIBAL PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM.......................................... $1,600,000 Johnson, Bingaman, Tom Udall
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT............................................ $5,000,000 Cochran
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. SUBMERGED AQUATIC VEGETATION, MD & VA........................... $1,000,000 Cardin
Corps of Engineers............. General Investigations................. URBAN FLOOD DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM, DRI, NV...................... $2,000,000 Reid
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. ACEQUIAS IRRIGATION SYSTEM, NM...................................... $2,770,000 Bingaman, Tom Udall
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. ALAMOGORDO, NM...................................................... $4,200,000 Tom Udall
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. ALASKA COASTAL EROSION, AK.......................................... $2,000,000 Murkowski
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. ANTELOPE CREEK, LINCOLN, NE......................................... $315,000 Ben Nelson
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. ASCENSION PARISH ENVIRONMENTAL INFRASTRUCTURE, LA................... $160,000 Landrieu
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. ATLANTA ENVIRONMENTAL INFRASTRUCTURE, GA............................ $1,000,000 Chambliss, Isakson
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. ATLANTIC COAST OF LONG ISLAND, JONES INLET TO EAST ROCKAWAY INLET, $300,000 Schumer
LONG BEACH ISLAND, NY.
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. ATLANTIC COAST OF MARYLAND, MD...................................... $3,100,000 Mikulski, Cardin
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. BALTIMORE METROPOLITAN WATER RESOURCES, GWYNNS FALLS, MD............ $200,000 Cardin
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. BARNEGAT INLET TO LITTLE EGG HARBOR INLET, NJ....................... $7,600,000 Lautenberg, Menendez
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. BETHEL RIVER BANK STABILIZATION, AK................................. $3,000,000 Murkowski, Begich
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. BIG SIOUX RIVER, SIOUX FALLS, SD.................................... $3,000,000 Johnson, Thune
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. BLUE RIVER BASIN, KANSAS CITY, MO................................... $550,000 Bond
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. BRECKENRIDGE, MN.................................................... $407,000 Klobuchar
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. BRIGANTINE INLET TO GREAT EGG HARBOR INLET, ABSECON ISLAND, NJ...... $400,000 Lautenberg, Menendez
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. BRIGANTINE INLET TO GREAT EGG HARBOR INLET, BRIGANTINE ISLAND, NJ... $80,000 Lautenberg, Menendez
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. BRUNSWICK COUNTY BEACHES, NC........................................ $350,000 Burr, Hagan
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. CALCASIEU RIVER AND PASS, DMMP, LA.................................. $1,000,000 Landrieu
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. CALFED LEVEE STABILITY PROGRAM, CA.................................. $5,000,000 Feinstein
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. CENTRAL CITY, FORT WORTH, UPPER TRINITY RIVER BASIN, TX............. $4,815,000 Hutchison, Cornyn
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. CENTRAL NEW MEXICO, NM.............................................. $1,000,000 Bingaman, Tom Udall
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. CHESAPEAKE BAY ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION AND PROTECTION, MD, VA, & $1,000,000 Mikulski, Cardin, Webb, Warner
PA.
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. CHESTERFIELD, MO.................................................... $500,000 Bond
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. CHICAGO SANITARY AND SHIP CANAL, DISPERSAL BARRIER, IL.............. $5,900,000 Voinovich, Durbin, Levin,
Stabenow, Sherrod Brown
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. COMITE RIVER, LA.................................................... $8,000,000 Landrieu, Vitter
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. CORTE MADERA CREEK, CA.............................................. $500,000 Feinstein
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. CUMBERLAND COUNTY WATER SUPPLY, TN.................................. $210,000 Alexander
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. DALLAS FLOODWAY EXTENSION, TRINITY RIVER PROJECT, TX................ $20,500,000 Hutchison, Cornyn
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. DELAWARE BAY COASTLINE, BROADKILL BEACH, DE......................... $250,000 Carper, Kaufman
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. DELAWARE BAY COASTLINE, DE & NJ, OAKWOOD BEACH...................... $250,000 Lautenberg, Menendez
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. DELAWARE COAST PROTECTION, DE....................................... $390,000 Carper, Kaufman
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. DELAWARE COAST, CAPE HENLOPEN TO FENWICK ISLAND, BETHANY BEACH TO $4,700,000 Carper, Kaufman
SOUTH BETHANY, DE.
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. DELAWARE COAST, CAPE HENLOPEN TO FENWICK ISLAND, FENWICK ISLAND, DE $150,000 Carper, Kaufman
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. DELAWARE COAST, CAPE HENLOPEN TO FENWICK ISLAND, REHOBOTH BEACH AND $150,000 Carper, Kaufman
DEWEY BEACH, DE.
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. DELAWARE RIVER MAINSTEM AND CHANNEL DEEPENING, DE, NJ, & PA......... $7,000,000 Specter, Casey
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. DES MOINES RECREATIONAL RIVER AND GREENBELT, IA..................... $3,200,000 Harkin, Grassley
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. DES PLAINES RIVER, IL............................................... $3,500,000 Durbin
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. DESOTO COUNTY, MS................................................... $12,000,000 Cochran, Wicker
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. EAST BATON ROUGE PARISH [FC], LA.................................... $3,000,000 Landrieu, Vitter
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. EAST BATON ROUGE PARISH ENVIRONMENTAL INFRASTRUCTURE, LA............ $500,000 Landrieu
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. EAST ROCKAWAY INLET TO ROCKAWAY INLET AND JAMAICA BAY, NY........... $1,000,000 Schumer, Gillibrand
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. EAST ST. LOUIS, IL.................................................. $1,000,000 Durbin
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. FARGO, ND--MOORHEAD, MN............................................. $20,000,000 Dorgan
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. FARMINGTON RECHARGE DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM, CA....................... $500,000 Feinstein
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. FIRE ISLAND INLET TO MONTAUK POINT, NY.............................. $3,500,000 Schumer, Gillibrand
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. FLORIDA KEYS WATER QUALITY IMPROVEMENTS, FL......................... $2,800,000 Bill Nelson
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. FORT PECK CABIN CONVEYANCE, MT...................................... $1,000,000 Tester, Baucus
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. FORT WAYNE, ST. MARY'S, AND MAUMEE RIVERS, IN (GREENWOOD AVENUE TOE $165,000 Lugar
DRAIN).
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. GRAFTON, ND......................................................... $3,000,000 Dorgan, Conrad
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. GREAT EGG HARBOR INLET TO TOWNSENDS INLET, NJ....................... $2,000,000 Lautenberg, Menendez
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. GREAT LAKES FISHERY AND ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, MI................... $2,000,000 Voinovich, Levin, Stabenow,
Sherrod Brown
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. GREENBRIER RIVER BASIN, WV.......................................... $1,500,000 Rockefeller
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. GUADALUPE RIVER, CA................................................. $200,000 Feinstein
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. HACKENSACK MEADOWLANDS, NJ.......................................... $300,000 Lautenberg, Menendez
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. HAINES HARBOR, AK................................................... $500,000 Murkowski
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. HAMILTON DAM, FLINT RIVER, FLINT, MI................................ $1,000,000 Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. HARBOR/SOUTH BAY WATER RECYCLING PROJECT, LOS ANGELES, CA........... $2,000,000 Feinstein
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. HAWAII WATER MANAGEMENT, HI......................................... $2,000,000 Inouye
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. HOLES CREEK, WEST CARROLLTON, OH.................................... $1,000,000 Voinovich
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. ISLAND CREEK, LOGAN, WV............................................. $5,000,000 Rockefeller
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. J. BENNETT JOHNSTON WATERWAY, LA.................................... $5,500,000 Landrieu, Vitter
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. JOHNSON CREEK, UPPER TRINITY BASIN, ARLINGTON, TX................... $500,000 Hutchison, Cornyn
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. JOSEPH G. MINISH PASSAIC RIVER WATERFRONT, NJ....................... $3,000,000 Lautenberg, Menendez
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. KAHUKU, HI.......................................................... $4,590,000 Inouye
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. KENAI RIVER BLUFF EROSION, AK....................................... $2,500,000 Murkowski
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. LACKAWANNA RIVER, SCRANTON, PA...................................... $500,000 Specter, Casey
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. LAKE CHAMPLAIN WATERSHED INITIATIVE, VT............................. $500,000 Leahy, Schumer, Gillibrand
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. LEVISA AND TUG FORKS AND UPPER CUMBERLAND RIVER, WV, VA, & KY....... $2,750,000 Rockefeller
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. LITTLE WOOD RIVER, GOODING, ID...................................... $150,000 Crapo, Risch
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. LOS ANGELES RIVER DEMONSTRATION PROJECTS, CA........................ $1,000,000 Boxer
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. LOWER MUD RIVER, MILTON, WV......................................... $1,500,000 Rockefeller
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. MANATEE HARBOR, FL.................................................. $100,000 Bill Nelson
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. MERAMEC RIVER BASIN, VALLEY PARK LEVEE, MO.......................... $2,000,000 Bond
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. MIDDLE RIO GRANDE FLOOD PROTECTION, BERNALILLO TO BELEN, NM......... $500,000 Bingaman, Tom Udall
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. MID-VALLEY AREA LEVEE RECONSTRUCTION, CA............................ $1,500,000 Feinstein
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. MISSISSIPPI ENVIRONMENTAL INFRASTRUCTURE, MS........................ $18,000,000 Cochran, Wicker
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. MISSOURI AND MIDDLE MISSISSIPPI RIVERS ENHANCEMENT, MO.............. $1,200,000 Harkin
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. MISSOURI RIVER LEVEE SYSTEM (UNIT L-385), IA, NE, KS, MO............ $1,500,000 Bond
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. MISSOURI RIVER RESTORATION, ND...................................... $500,000 Conrad
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. MISSOURI RIVER RESTORATION, SD...................................... $300,000 Johnson
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. MT. ST. HELENS SEDIMENT CONTROL, WA................................. $1,000,000 Murray
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. MUDDY RIVER, MA..................................................... $2,000,000 Kerry
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. MURRIETA CREEK, CA.................................................. $3,500,000 Feinstein
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. NAPA RIVER, CA...................................................... $2,100,000 Feinstein, Boxer
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. NEW YORK CITY WATERSHED, NY......................................... $1,000,000 Schumer, Gillibrand
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. NORFOLK HARBOR AND CHANNELS (DEEPENING), VA......................... $1,000,000 Webb, Warner
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. NORTH DAKOTA ENVIRONMENTAL INFRASTRUCTURE, ND....................... $14,300,000 Dorgan
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. NUTWOOD DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL............................. $300,000 Durbin
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. OAKLAND COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL INFRASTRUCTURE, MI..................... $500,000 Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. OHIO ENVIRONMENTAL INFRASTRUCTURE, OH:
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. EUCLID, OH...................................................... $1,100,000 Voinovich
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. PORTSMOUTH CSO MITIGATION, OH................................... $500,000 Voinovich, Sherrod Brown
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. TOLEDO WATERWAYS INITIATIVE PHASE 2, OH......................... $1,000,000 Voinovich, Sherrod Brown
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. OHIO RIVERFRONT, CINCINNATI, OH..................................... $3,000,000 Voinovich, Sherrod Brown
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. ONONDAGA LAKE, NY................................................... $1,000,000 Schumer
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. OUACHITA RIVER LEVEES, LA........................................... $1,000,000 Landrieu
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. OZARK-JETA TAYLOR POWERHOUSE, AR.................................... $12,900,000 Pryor
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL (DELRAY BEACH REIMBURSEMENT).................. $680,000 Bill Nelson
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. PASSAIC RIVER BASIN FLOOD MANAGEMENT, NJ............................ $500,000 Lautenberg, Menendez
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. PINELLAS COUNTY, FL................................................. $2,500,000 Bill Nelson
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. PLACER COUNTY, CA................................................... $1,000,000 Feinstein, Boxer
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. PUGET SOUND AND ADJACENT WATERS RESTORATION, WA..................... $3,000,000 Murray, Cantwell
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. RARITAN & SANDY HOOK BAY, PORT MONMOUTH, NJ......................... $1,500,000 Lautenberg, Menendez
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. RED RIVER BASIN CHLORIDE CONTROL, TX & OK........................... $2,800,000 Cornyn
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. RED RIVER BELOW DENISON DAM, AR, LA, & TX........................... $2,500,000 Landrieu, Pryor, Lincoln, Vitter
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. RED RIVER EMERGENCY BANK PROTECTION, AR, LA, OK, & TX............... $2,000,000 Landrieu, Pryor, Lincoln
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. ROSEAU, MN (RED RIVER OF THE NORTH BASIN)........................... $2,500,000 Klobuchar, Franken
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. RURAL IDAHO, ID..................................................... $2,000,000 Crapo, Risch
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. RURAL MONTANA, MT................................................... $5,000,000 Tester, Baucus
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. RURAL NEVADA, NV.................................................... $20,000,000 Reid, Ensign
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. RURAL UTAH, UT...................................................... $25,000,000 Bennett
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. SACRAMENTO RIVER, GLENN-COLUSA IRRIGATION DISTRICT, CA.............. $700,000 Feinstein
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. SAN FRANCISCO BAY TO STOCKTON, CA................................... $500,000 Feinstein, Boxer
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. SAN LUIS REY RIVER, CA.............................................. $2,500,000 Feinstein, Boxer
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. SAN RAMON VALLEY RECYCLED WATER, CA................................. $459,000 Feinstein
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. SANDBRIDGE, VA...................................................... $300,000 Webb, Warner
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. SANDY HOOK TO BARNEGAT INLET, NJ.................................... $2,000,000 Lautenberg, Menendez
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. SAULT STE. MARIE (REPLACEMENT LOCK), MI............................. $1,000,000 Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. SAVANNAH HARBOR EXPANSION, GA....................................... $600,000 Chambliss, Isakson
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. SHOALWATER BAY, WA.................................................. $3,000,000 Murray
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. SOUTHWEST VALLEY, FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION, ALBUQUERQUE, NM........... $5,809,000 Bingaman, Tom Udall
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. ST. CLAIR RIVER AND LAKE ST. CLAIR MANAGEMENT PLAN, MI.............. $300,000 Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. ST. LOUIS FLOOD PROTECTION, MO...................................... $100,000 Bond
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. SUCCESS DAM AND RESERVOIR, CA (DAM SAFETY).......................... $500,000 Feinstein, Boxer
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. SWOPE PARK INDUSTRIAL AREA, KANSAS CITY, MO......................... $5,330,000 Bond
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. TAHOE BASIN RESTORATION, CA & NV.................................... $4,000,000 Reid, Feinstein
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. TAMPA HARBOR, FL.................................................... $200,000 Bill Nelson
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. TOWNSENDS INLET TO CAPE MAY INLET, NJ............................... $2,000,000 Lautenberg, Menendez
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. TUSCALOOSA, AL...................................................... $8,240,000 Shelby
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. UPPER GUADALUPE RIVER, CA........................................... $2,500,000 Feinstein
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. VIRGINIA BEACH, VA (HURRICANE PROTECTION)........................... $2,000,000 Webb, Warner
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. WEST ONSLOW BEACH AND NEW RIVER INLET, TOPSAIL BEACH, NC............ $722,000 Burr, Hagan
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. WESTERN SARPY COUNTY AND CLEAR CREEK, NE............................ $2,470,000 Ben Nelson
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. WILMINGTON HARBOR, NC............................................... $300,000 Burr
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. WRIGHTSVILLE BEACH, NC.............................................. $300,000 Burr, Hagan
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. WYOMING VALLEY, PA (LEVEE RAISING).................................. $1,500,000 Specter, Casey
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. YUBA RIVER BASIN, CA................................................ $3,500,000 Feinstein
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. YUKON, OK [EI]...................................................... $500,000 Inhofe
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. Construction, General Items not listed under states................. .............. ................................
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL:
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. BLACK LAKE, OGDENSBURG, NY...................................... $150,000 Schumer
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. LAKE CHAMPLAIN, VT.............................................. $500,000 Leahy
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. ESTUARY RESTORATION PROGRAM (PUBLIC LAW 106-457):
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. COLORADO LAGOON, CA............................................. $1,000,000 Feinstein
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. SHORELINE EROSION CONTROL DEVELOPMENT AND DEMONSTRATION:
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. OIL PIERS....................................................... $2,500,000 Feinstein
Corps of Engineers............. Construction, General.................. RESTORATION OF ABANDONED MINES...................................... $500,000 Feinstein
Corps of Engineers............. MR&T--GI............................... COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA, AR, IL, KY, LA, MS, MO, & TN.... $900,000 Cochran, Wicker
Corps of Engineers............. MR&T--GI............................... DONALDSONVILLE TO THE GULF, LA...................................... $400,000 Landrieu
Corps of Engineers............. MR&T--GI............................... MORGANZA TO THE GULF, LA............................................ $2,600,000 Landrieu, Vitter
Corps of Engineers............. MR&T--GI............................... QUIVER RIVER, MS.................................................... $100,000 Cochran, Wicker
Corps of Engineers............. MR&T--GI............................... SOUTHEAST ARKANSAS, AR.............................................. $300,000 Pryor, Lincoln
Corps of Engineers............. MR&T--GI............................... SPRING BAYOU, LA.................................................... $81,000 Landrieu
Corps of Engineers............. MR&T--CG............................... ATCHAFALAYA BASIN, LA............................................... $8,700,000 Landrieu, Vitter
Corps of Engineers............. MR&T--CG............................... BAYOU METO BASIN, AR................................................ $4,000,000 Pryor, Lincoln
Corps of Engineers............. MR&T--CG............................... GRAND PRAIRIE REGION, AR............................................ $16,000,000 Pryor, Lincoln
Corps of Engineers............. MR&T--CG............................... MISSISSIPPI RIVER LEVEES, AR, IL, KY, LA, MS, MO, & TN.............. $6,888,000 Cochran, Landrieu, Bond, Pryor,
Lincoln, Vitter, Wicker
Corps of Engineers............. MR&T--CG............................... ST. FRANCIS BASIN, AR & MO.......................................... $4,000,000 Bond, Pryor, Lincoln
Corps of Engineers............. MR&T--CG............................... ST. JOHNS BAYOU & NEW MADRID FLOODWAY, MO........................... $200,000 Bond
Corps of Engineers............. MR&T--CG............................... YAZOO BASIN, BIG SUNFLOWER RIVER, MS................................ $2,200,000 Cochran, Wicker
Corps of Engineers............. MR&T--CG............................... YAZOO BASIN, MAIN STEM, MS.......................................... $25,000 Cochran, Wicker
Corps of Engineers............. MR&T--CG............................... YAZOO BASIN, MISSISSIPPI DELTA HEADWATERS PROJECT, MS............... $23,200,000 Cochran, Wicker
Corps of Engineers............. MR&T--CG............................... YAZOO BASIN, REFORMULATION, MS...................................... $1,600,000 Cochran, Wicker
Corps of Engineers............. MR&T--CG............................... YAZOO BASIN, UPPER YAZOO PROJECTS, MS............................... $13,300,000 Cochran, Wicker
Corps of Engineers............. MR&T--CG............................... YAZOO BASIN, YAZOO BACKWATER LESS ROCKY BAYOU, MS................... $575,000 Cochran, Wicker
Corps of Engineers............. MR&T--O&M.............................. BONNET CARRE, LA.................................................... $1,200,000 Landrieu
Corps of Engineers............. MR&T--O&M.............................. GREENVILLE HARBOR, MS............................................... $982,000 Cochran, Wicker
Corps of Engineers............. MR&T--O&M.............................. HELENA HARBOR, PHILLIPS COUNTY, AR.................................. $402,000 Pryor, Lincoln
Corps of Engineers............. MR&T--O&M.............................. MISSISSIPPI RIVER LEVEES, AR, IL, KY, LA, MS, MO, & TN.............. $4,261,000 Cochran, Landrieu, Pryor,
Lincoln, Vitter, Wicker
Corps of Engineers............. MR&T--O&M.............................. ST. FRANCIS RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, AR & MO.......................... $3,707,000 Bond, Pryor, Lincoln
Corps of Engineers............. MR&T--O&M.............................. VICKSBURG HARBOR, MS................................................ $718,000 Cochran, Wicker
Corps of Engineers............. MR&T--O&M.............................. YAZOO BASIN, ARKABUTLA LAKE, MS..................................... $2,000,000 Cochran, Wicker
Corps of Engineers............. MR&T--O&M.............................. YAZOO BASIN, BIG SUNFLOWER RIVER, MS................................ $1,500,000 Cochran, Wicker
Corps of Engineers............. MR&T--O&M.............................. YAZOO BASIN, ENID LAKE, MS.......................................... $2,000,000 Cochran, Wicker
Corps of Engineers............. MR&T--O&M.............................. YAZOO BASIN, GRENADA LAKE, MS....................................... $2,000,000 Cochran, Wicker
Corps of Engineers............. MR&T--O&M.............................. YAZOO BASIN, SARDIS LAKE, MS........................................ $2,000,000 Cochran, Wicker
Corps of Engineers............. MR&T--O&M.............................. YAZOO BASIN, TRIBUTARIES, MS........................................ $50,000 Cochran, Wicker
Corps of Engineers............. MR&T--O&M.............................. YAZOO BASIN, WILL M. WHITTINGTON AUX CHAN, MS....................... $23,000 Cochran, Wicker
Corps of Engineers............. MR&T--O&M.............................. YAZOO BASIN, YAZOO BACKWATER AREA, MS............................... $150,000 Cochran
Corps of Engineers............. MR&T--O&M.............................. YAZOO BASIN, YAZOO CITY, MS......................................... $100,000 Cochran, Wicker
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. ABSECON INLET, NJ................................................... $200,000 Lautenberg, Menendez
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. ALABAMA RIVER LAKES, AL............................................. $3,000,000 Sessions
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. ATCHAFALAYA RIVER AND BAYOUS CHENE, BOEUF & BLACK, LA............... $4,000,000 Landrieu, Vitter
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY--DSC, NC & VA........................ $930,000 Webb, Warner
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, FL.................................. $2,820,000 Bill Nelson
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, GA.................................. $1,235,000 Chambliss, Isakson
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, SC.................................. $1,600,000 Graham
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. BARBERS POINT HARBOR, HI............................................ $85,000 Inouye
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. BEALS HARBOR, ME.................................................... $1,150,000 Collins
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. BETHEL HARBOR, AK................................................... $766,000 Murkowski
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. BLAKELY MT DAM, LAKE OUACHITA, AR................................... $548,000 Pryor, Lincoln
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. BOGUE INLET AND CHANNEL, NC......................................... $500,000 Hagan
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. CALCASIEU RIVER AND PASS, LA........................................ $5,586,000 Landrieu, Vitter
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. CAROLINA BEACH INLET, NC............................................ $500,000 Burr
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. CARUTHERSVILLE HARBOR, MO........................................... $887,000 Bond
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. CRISFIELD HARBOR, MD................................................ $160,000 Mikulski
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. CLAIBORNE COUNTY PORT, MS........................................... $73,000 Cochran, Wicker
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. CLEVELAND HARBOR, OH................................................ $3,800,000 Voinovich, Sherrod Brown
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. COLUMBIA RIVER AT BAKER BAY, WA & OR................................ $800,000 Murray
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. COLUMBIA RIVER AT THE MOUTH, OR & WA................................ $5,500,000 Murray, Crapo, Risch, Wyden,
Merkley, Cantwell
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. COLUMBIA RIVER BETWEEN CHINOOK AND SAND ISLAND, WA.................. $900,000 Murray
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. CONCHAS LAKE, NM.................................................... $905,000 Bingaman, Tom Udall
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. COOS BAY, OR........................................................ $1,094,000 Wyden, Merkley
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. CORALVILLE LAKE, IA................................................. $441,000 Harkin, Grassley
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. COYOTE VALLEY DAM, LAKE MENDOCINO, CA............................... $2,538,000 Feinstein
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. DEGRAY LAKE, AR..................................................... $521,000 Pryor, Lincoln
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. DEPOE BAY, OR....................................................... $166,000 Wyden, Merkley
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. DRY CREEK (WARM SPRINGS) LAKE & CHANNEL, CA......................... $3,640,000 Feinstein, Boxer
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. ELVIS STAHR (HICKMAN) HARBOR, KY.................................... $764,000 Bunning
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. FIRE ISLAND INLET TO JONES INLET, NY................................ $5,000,000 Schumer, Gillibrand
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. GARRISON DAM, LAKE SAKAKAWEA, ND.................................... $200,000 Dorgan
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. GEORGETOWN HARBOR, SC............................................... $1,180,000 Graham
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. GREAT SALT POND, BLOCK ISLAND, RI................................... $250,000 Reed, Whitehouse
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. GREEN BAY HARBOR, WI................................................ $5,000,000 Kohl
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. GULFPORT HARBOR, MS................................................. $6,655,000 Cochran, Wicker
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. HARBOR OF REFUGE, LEWES, DE......................................... $200,000 Carper, Kaufman
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. HELENA HARBOR, AR................................................... $485,000 Pryor, Lincoln
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. HOUMA NAVIGATION CANAL, LA.......................................... $2,000,000 Landrieu, Vitter
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. HOUSTON SHIP CHANNEL, TX............................................ $5,223,000 Hutchison, Cornyn
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. BARBOUR TERMINAL CHANNEL, TX.................................... .............. ................................
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. BAYPORT SHIP CHANNEL, TX........................................ .............. ................................
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. GREENS BAYOU.................................................... .............. ................................
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. HURON HARBOR, OH.................................................... $500,000 Voinovich
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, HI................................... $319,000 Inouye
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY CALOOSAHATCHEE RIVER TO ANCLOTE RIVER, FL..... $2,000,000 Bill Nelson
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, JACKSONVILLE TO MIAMI, FL.................... $3,650,000 Bill Nelson
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. J. BENNETT JOHNSTON WATERWAY, LA.................................... $4,255,000 Landrieu, Vitter
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. JAMES RIVER CHANNEL, VA............................................. $820,000 Webb, Warner
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. JENNINGS RANDOLPH LAKE, MD & WV..................................... $1,100,000 Mikulski, Cardin, Rockefeller
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. KODIAK HARBORS, AK.................................................. $750,000 Begich
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. LAKE PROVIDENCE HARBOR, LA.......................................... $583,000 Landrieu, Vitter
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. LAKE WASHINGTON SHIP CANAL, WA...................................... $5,100,000 Murray
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. LOCKWOODS FOLLY RIVER, NC........................................... $500,000 Hagan
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. LOWER THOROFARE, DEAL ISLAND, MD.................................... $1,440,000 Mikulski
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. LYNNHAVEN INLET, VA................................................. $200,000 Webb, Warner
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. MADISON PARISH PORT, LA............................................. $145,000 Landrieu, Vitter
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. MANASQUAN RIVER, NJ................................................. $250,000 Lautenberg, Menendez
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. MANTEO (SHALLOWBAG) BAY, NC......................................... $4,000,000 Burr, Hagan
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. MARINA DEL REY, CA.................................................. $3,000,000 Feinstein
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. MATAGORDA SHIP CHANNEL, TX.......................................... $1,976,000 Cornyn
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. MIAMI HARBOR, FL.................................................... $200,000 Bill Nelson
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. MICHIGAN NAVIGATION O&M, MI......................................... $8,000,000 Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. ALPENA HARBOR, MI............................................... .............. Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. ARCADIA HARBOR, MI.............................................. .............. Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. BIG BAY HARBOR, MI.............................................. .............. Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. BLACK RIVER HARBOR, GOGEBIC CO-UP, MI........................... .............. Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. BOLLES HARBOR, MI............................................... .............. Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. CEDAR RIVER HARBOR, MI (NAVIGATION STRUCTURES).................. .............. Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. CHANNELS IN LAKE ST. CLAIR, MI.................................. .............. Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. CHARLEVOIX HARBOR, MI........................................... .............. Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. CHEBOYGAN HARBOR, MI............................................ .............. Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. CLINTON RIVER, MI............................................... .............. Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. DETOUR HARBOR, MI............................................... .............. Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. DETROIT RIVER, MI............................................... .............. Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. EAGLE HARBOR, MI................................................ .............. Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. FRANKFORT HARBOR, MI............................................ .............. Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. GRAND HAVEN HARBOR, MI.......................................... .............. Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. GRAND HAVEN HARBOR, MI (NAVIGATION STRUCTURES).................. .............. Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. GRAND MARAIS HARBOR, MI (NAVIGATION STRUCTURES)................. .............. Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. HARBOR BEACH HARBOR, MI......................................... .............. Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. HARRISVILLE HARBOR, MI.......................................... .............. Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. HOLLAND HARBOR, MI.............................................. .............. Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. KEWEENAW WATERWAY, MI........................................... .............. Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. KEWEENAW WATERWAY, MI (NAVIGATION STRUCTURES)................... .............. Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. LAC LA BELLE HARBOR, MI......................................... .............. Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. LELAND HARBOR, MI............................................... .............. Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. LES CHENEAUX ISLANDS CHANNELS, MI............................... .............. Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. LEXINGTON HARBOR, MI............................................ .............. Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. LITTLE LAKE HARBOR, MI.......................................... .............. Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. LUDINGTON HARBOR, MI............................................ .............. Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. LUDINGTON HARBOR, MI (NAVIGATION STRUCTURES).................... .............. Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. MANISTEE HARBOR AND RIVER CHANNEL, MI........................... .............. Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. MARQUETTE HARBOR, MI............................................ .............. Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. MENOMINEE HARBOR, MI & WI....................................... .............. Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. MONROE HARBOR, MI............................................... .............. Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. MUSKEGON HARBOR, MI............................................. .............. Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. ONTONAGON HARBOR, MI............................................ .............. Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. PENTWATER HARBOR, MI............................................ .............. Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. PORT SANILAC HARBOR, MI......................................... .............. Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. PORTAGE LAKE HARBOR, MI (NAVIGATION STRUCTURES)................. .............. Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. PRESQUE ISLE HARBOR, MI......................................... .............. Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. ROUGE RIVER, MI................................................. .............. Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. SAGINAW RIVER, MI............................................... .............. Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. SAUGATUCK HARBOR, KALAMAZOO RIVER, MI........................... .............. Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. SEBEWAING RIVER, MI............................................. .............. Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. SOUTH HAVEN HARBOR, MI.......................................... .............. Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. ST. CLAIR RIVER, MI............................................. .............. Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. ST. JOSEPH HARBOR, MI........................................... .............. Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. ST. MARYS RIVER, MI (NAVIGATION STRUCTURES)..................... .............. Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. WHITE LAKE HARBOR, MI........................................... .............. Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. MISSISSIPPI RIVER OUTLETS AT VENICE, LA............................. $2,000,000 Landrieu, Vitter
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. MISSOURI RIVER--RULO TO MOUTH, IA, NE, KS, & MO..................... $7,000,000 Harkin, Bond
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. MISSOURI RIVER BETWEEN FORT PECK DAM, MT, AND GAVIN'S POINT DAM, SD $560,000 Dorgan
& NE (SEC. 33), (MANDAN DIKE RESTORATION, ND).
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. MOREHEAD CITY HARBOR, NC............................................ $300,000 Hagan
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. MOUTH OF YAZOO RIVER, MS............................................ $145,000 Cochran, Wicker
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. NARROWS DAM, LAKE GREESON, AR....................................... $376,000 Pryor, Lincoln
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. NEW MADRID HARBOR, MILE 889, MO..................................... $420,000 Bond
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. NEW MADRID HARBOR, MO............................................... $30,000 Bond
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. NEW TOPSAIL INLET AND CONNECTING CHANNELS, NC....................... $500,000 Hagan
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. NEW YORK GREAT LAKES NAVIGATION O&M, NY............................. $1,700,000 Schumer, Gillibrand
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. BARCELONA HARBOR, NY............................................ .............. Schumer, Gillibrand
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. BLACK ROCK CHANNEL AND TONAWANDA HARBOR, NY..................... .............. Schumer, Gillibrand
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. BUFFALO HARBOR, NY.............................................. .............. Schumer, Gillibrand
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. CAPE HARBOR, NY................................................. .............. Schumer, Gillibrand
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. GREAT SODUS BAY HARBOR, NY...................................... .............. Schumer, Gillibrand
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. IRONDEQUOIT HARBOR, NY.......................................... .............. Schumer, Gillibrand
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. LITTLE RIVER HARBOR, NY......................................... .............. Schumer, Gillibrand
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. LITTLE SODUS BAY HARBOR, NY..................................... .............. Schumer, Gillibrand
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. MORRISTOWN HARBOR, NY........................................... .............. Schumer, Gillibrand
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. OAK ORCHARD HARBOR, NY.......................................... .............. Schumer, Gillibrand
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. OGDENSBURG HARBOR, NY........................................... .............. Schumer, Gillibrand
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. OLCOTT HARBOR, NY............................................... .............. Schumer, Gillibrand
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. OSWEGO HARBOR, NY............................................... .............. Schumer, Gillibrand
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. PORT ONTARIO HARBOR, NY......................................... .............. Schumer, Gillibrand
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. ROCHESTER HARBOR, NY............................................ .............. Schumer, Gillibrand
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. VINCENT HARBOR, NY.............................................. .............. Schumer, Gillibrand
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. WILSON HARBOR, NY............................................... .............. Schumer, Gillibrand
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. NEWBURYPORT HARBOR, MA.............................................. $3,000,000 Kerry
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. NORFOLK HARBOR, VA.................................................. $1,234,000 Webb, Warner
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. NORWALK HARBOR, CT.................................................. $582,000 Dodd, Lieberman
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. OKATIBBEE LAKE, MS.................................................. $850,000 Cochran, Wicker
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. OSCEOLA HARBOR, AR.................................................. $985,000 Pryor, Lincoln
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. OUACHITA AND BLACK RIVERS, AR & LA.................................. $3,000,000 Landrieu, Pryor, Lincoln, Vitter
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. PASCAGOULA HARBOR, MS............................................... $5,390,000 Cochran, Wicker
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. PATCHOGUE RIVER, CT................................................. $918,000 Lieberman
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. PAWCATUCK RIVER, LITTLE NARRAGANSETT BAY & WATCH HILL COVE, CT & RI $2,500,000 Reed, Whitehouse
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. PETERSBURG HARBOR, AK............................................... $500,000 Murkowski, Begich
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. PINOLE SHOAL MANAGEMENT STUDY, CA................................... $2,500,000 Feinstein, Boxer
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. POCOMOKE RIVER, MD.................................................. $1,800,000 Mikulski
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. POINT JUDITH HARBOR OF REFUGE, RI................................... $500,000 Reed, Whitehouse
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. PORT ORFORD, OR..................................................... $400,000 Wyden, Merkley
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. PORTLAND HARBOR, ME................................................. $8,000,000 Collins
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. PORTSMOUTH HARBOR AND PISCATAQUA RIVER, NH.......................... $500,000 Gregg, Shaheen
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. PORTSMOUTH HARBOR, (SAGAMORE CREEK CHANNELS), NH.................... $150,000 Shaheen
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. PROVIDENCE HARBOR SHIPPING CHANNEL, RI.............................. $3,800,000 Reed, Whitehouse
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. RARITAN RIVER TO ARTHUR KILL CUT-OFF, NJ............................ $300,000 Lautenberg, Menendez
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. RARITAN RIVER, NJ................................................... $145,000 Lautenberg, Menendez
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. RED ROCK DAM AND LAKE, RED ROCK, IA................................. $865,000 Harkin, Grassley
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. ROSEDALE HARBOR, MS................................................. $1,189,000 Cochran, Wicker
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. SABINE-NECHES WATERWAY, TX.......................................... $670,000 Hutchison
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. SAN JOAQUIN RIVER, PORT OF STOCKTON, CA............................. $2,897,000 Feinstein, Boxer
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. SAYLORVILLE LAKE, IA................................................ $497,000 Harkin, Grassley
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. SIUSLAW RIVER, OR................................................... $375,000 Wyden, Merkley
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. SOUTHEAST MISSOURI PORT, MO......................................... $360,000 Bond
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. SOUTHERN MAINE AND NEW HAMPSHIRE OCEAN DISPOSAL SITE DESIGNATION, ME $200,000 Collins
& NH.
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. ST. PAUL HARBOR DREDGING, MN........................................ $200,000 Franken
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. STONEWALL JACKSON LAKE, WV.......................................... $100,000 Rockefeller
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. SUMMERSVILLE LAKE, WV............................................... $260,000 Rockefeller
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. SWINOMISH CHANNEL, WA............................................... $538,000 Murray, Cantwell
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. TENNESSEE-TOMBIGBEE WATERWAY WILDLIFE MITIGATION, AL & MS........... $444,000 Cochran, Wicker
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. TENNESSEE-TOMBIGBEE WATERWAY, AL & MS............................... $4,233,000 Cochran, Wicker
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. TEXAS WATER ALLOCATION ASSESSMENT, TX............................... $900,000 Cornyn
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. TILLAMOOK BAY AND BAR, OR........................................... $600,000 Wyden, Merkley
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. TOLEDO HARBOR, OH................................................... $2,800,000 Voinovich, Sherrod Brown
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. TWO RIVERS HARBOR, WI............................................... $1,020,000 Kohl
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. WATERWAY ON THE COAST OF VIRGINIA, VA............................... $457,000 Webb, Warner
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. WILLAMETTE RIVER AT WILLAMETTE FALLS, OR............................ $166,000 Wyden, Merkley
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. WILLAPA RIVER AND HARBOR, WA........................................ $45,000 Murray
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. WILMINGTON HARBOR, DE............................................... $2,750,000 Carper, Kaufman
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. WILMINGTON HARBOR, NC............................................... $600,000 Hagan
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. WILSON LAKE, KS..................................................... $300,000 Roberts
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. YAQUINA BAY AND HARBOR, OR.......................................... $200,000 Wyden, Merkley
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. YAQUINA RIVER (DEPOT SLOUGH), OR.................................... $12,000 Wyden, Merkley
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. YAZOO RIVER, MS..................................................... $128,000 Cochran, Wicker
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. YELLOW BEND PORT, AR................................................ $112,000 Pryor, Lincoln
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. Operation and Maintenance items not listed under states............. --- ................................
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. COASTAL DATA INFORMATION PROGRAM.................................... $2,000,000 Shaheen, Hagan, Wyden, Merkley
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. NATIONAL COASTAL MAPPING PROGRAM:
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. COASTAL ZONE MAPPING AND IMAGING LIDAR, MS...................... $2,500,000 Cochran, Wicker
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. REGIONAL SEDIMENT MANAGEMENT DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM:
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. HAWAII RSM, HI.................................................. $1,000,000 Inouye
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. NORTH CAROLINA RSM, NC.......................................... $600,000 Burr, Hagan
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. DELAWARE ESTUARY RSM, NJ........................................ $200,000 Kaufman, Lautenberg, Menendez,
Specter
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. SOUTH COASTAL RHODE ISLAND RSM, RI.............................. $750,000 Reed
Corps of Engineers............. Operation and Maintenance.............. CHESAPEAKE BAY, NEWPOINT COMFORT, MATHEWS COUNTY, VA............ $59,000 Webb, Warner
Corps of Engineers............. General Provision...................... Section 108..................................................... .............. Reid
Corps of Engineers............. General Provision...................... Section 109..................................................... .............. Cochran, Shaheen
Corps of Engineers............. General Provision...................... Section 110..................................................... .............. Cochran
Corps of Engineers............. General Provision...................... Section 111..................................................... .............. Ben Nelson
Corps of Engineers............. General Provision...................... Section 114..................................................... .............. Dorgan, Conrad
Corps of Engineers............. General Provision...................... Section 115..................................................... .............. Shelby
Corps of Engineers............. General Provision...................... Section 116..................................................... .............. Lautenberg
Corps of Engineers............. General Provision...................... Section 117..................................................... .............. Lautenberg
Bureau of Reclamation.......... Water and Related Resources............ Albuquerque Metro Area Reuse........................................ $500,000 Bingaman, Tom Udall
Bureau of Reclamation.......... Water and Related Resources............ All American Canal-Imperial Dam Electrification rehabilitation...... $1,000,000 Feinstein
Bureau of Reclamation.......... Water and Related Resources............ Central Valley Projects:
Bureau of Reclamation.......... Water and Related Resources............ American River Division, Folsom Dam Unit/Mormon Island.......... $920,000 Feinstein
Bureau of Reclamation.......... Water and Related Resources............ Miscellaneous Project Programs.................................. $2,000,000 Feinstein, Boxer
Bureau of Reclamation.......... Water and Related Resources............ Friant Division................................................. $8,000,000 Feinstein, Boxer
Bureau of Reclamation.......... Water and Related Resources............ Columbia Basin Project.............................................. $1,000,000 Murray, Cantwell
Bureau of Reclamation.......... Water and Related Resources............ Deschutes Ecosystem Restoration Project............................. $500,000 Wyden, Merkley
Bureau of Reclamation.......... Water and Related Resources............ Deschutes Project................................................... $500,000 Wyden, Merkley
Bureau of Reclamation.......... Water and Related Resources............ Eastern New Mexico Water Supply--Ute Reservoir...................... $2,000,000 Bingaman, Tom Udall
Bureau of Reclamation.......... Water and Related Resources............ Fort Peck Reservation/Dry Prairie Rural Water System................ $4,000,000 Tester, Baucus
Bureau of Reclamation.......... Water and Related Resources............ Hawaii Water Resources Study, HI.................................... $300,000 Inouye
Bureau of Reclamation.......... Water and Related Resources............ Lake Mead/Las Vegas Wash Program.................................... $1,150,000 Reid, Ensign
Bureau of Reclamation.......... Water and Related Resources............ Lewis and Clark Rural Water System.................................. $8,000,000 Johnson, Harkin, Grassley,
Klobuchar, Franken, Thune
Bureau of Reclamation.......... Water and Related Resources............ Mancos Project...................................................... $1,387,000 Bennet, M. Udall
Bureau of Reclamation.......... Water and Related Resources............ Middle Rio Grande Project........................................... $650,000 Bingaman
Bureau of Reclamation.......... Water and Related Resources............ Milk River Project.................................................. $1,000,000 Tester, Baucus
Bureau of Reclamation.......... Water and Related Resources............ Mni Wiconi Project.................................................. $3,000,000 Johnson, Thune
Bureau of Reclamation.......... Water and Related Resources............ Mokelumne River Regional Water Storage & Conjunctive................ $500,000 Feinstein
Bureau of Reclamation.......... Water and Related Resources............ Norman Feasibility Study............................................ $755,000 Inhofe
Bureau of Reclamation.......... Water and Related Resources............ North Las Vegas Water Reuse......................................... $3,000,000 Reid
Bureau of Reclamation.......... Water and Related Resources............ Northern Utah Investigations Program................................ $500,000 Bennett
Bureau of Reclamation.......... Water and Related Resources............ Odessa Subarea Special Study........................................ $1,250,000 Murray, Cantwell
Bureau of Reclamation.......... Water and Related Resources............ Oregon Investigations Program....................................... $300,000 Wyden, Merkley
Bureau of Reclamation.......... Water and Related Resources............ P-SMBP--Garrison Diversion Unit..................................... $13,449,000 Dorgan, Conrad
Bureau of Reclamation.......... Water and Related Resources............ Rancho California Water District.................................... $250,000 Feinstein
Bureau of Reclamation.......... Water and Related Resources............ Rio Grande Project.................................................. $1,000,000 Bingaman, Tom Udall
Bureau of Reclamation.......... Water and Related Resources............ Rocky Boys/North Central MT Rural Water System...................... $4,000,000 Tester, Baucus
Bureau of Reclamation.......... Water and Related Resources............ Round Rock Reclaimed Water Project, TX.............................. $2,000,000 Cornyn
Bureau of Reclamation.......... Water and Related Resources............ San Diego Four Reservoir Intertie................................... $500,000 Feinstein
Bureau of Reclamation.......... Water and Related Resources............ Southern California Investigations Program.......................... $500,000 Feinstein, Boxer
Bureau of Reclamation.......... Water and Related Resources............ Summit County Water Supply, UT (Weber Basin)........................ $500,000 Bennett, Hatch
Bureau of Reclamation.......... Water and Related Resources............ Wallowa Lake Dam Rehab, OR.......................................... $1,000,000 Wyden, Merkley
Bureau of Reclamation.......... Water and Related Resources............ Water for Irrigation Streams and Economy Feasibility Study (WISE)... $400,000 Wyden, Merkley
Bureau of Reclamation.......... Water and Related Resources............ Yakima River Basin Water Enhancement Project........................ $4,000,000 Murray
Bureau of Reclamation.......... Water and Related Resources............ Items not listed under states....................................... .............. ................................
Bureau of Reclamation.......... Water and Related Resources............ Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Project--Title I.............. $1,000,000 Feinstein
Bureau of Reclamation.......... Water and Related Resources............ Research and Development:
Bureau of Reclamation.......... Water and Related Resources............ Science and Technology Program.................................. $1,000,000 Feinstein
Bureau of Reclamation.......... Water and Related Resources............ WaterSMART Program.............................................. .............. ................................
Bureau of Reclamation.......... Water and Related Resources............ Title XVI Water Reclamation/Reuse Projects...................... $2,500,000 Reid
Bureau of Reclamation.......... Water and Related Resources............ Section 205..................................................... .............. Reid
Bureau of Reclamation.......... Water and Related Resources............ Section 206..................................................... .............. Reid
Bureau of Reclamation.......... Water and Related Resources............ Section 207..................................................... .............. Tester
Bureau of Reclamation.......... Water and Related Resources............ Section 208..................................................... .............. Dorgan, Conrad
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. 21st Century Renewable Fuels, Energy, and Materials Initiative...... $400,000 Senators Levin, Stabenow
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Adams State College Solar Project................................... $400,000 Senator Mark Udall
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Advanced Closed-Cycle Turbine Generator............................. $1,000,000 Senator Murray
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Advanced Energy Studies............................................. $2,750,000 Senator Dorgan
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Advanced Solid State Lithium Ion Battery Domestic Manufacturing $300,000 Senators Levin, Stabenow
Initiative.
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Algae Biofuels Research............................................. $2,000,000 Senators Murray, Cantwell
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Alternative and Unconventional Energy Research and Development...... $10,000,000 Senators Bennett, Hatch
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Alternative Energy Medical Complex.................................. $500,000 Senator Reid
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Bio-Energy Research Center.......................................... $800,000 Senator Tester
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Biofuel from Nevada's Municipal Wastes.............................. $500,000 Senator Reid
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Biofuels, Biopower, and Biomaterials Initiative..................... $1,250,000 Senators Chambliss, Isakson
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Biomass Boiler and Steam Absorption Chiller Plant................... $650,000 Senator Johnson
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Biomass Boiler at Ferrum College.................................... $300,000 Senators Webb, Warner
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Bucknell University Marcellus Shale Research Initiative............. $200,000 Senators Specter, Casey
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Center for Biomass Utilization...................................... $1,500,000 Senators Dorgan, Conrad
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Center for Ocean Renewable Energy................................... $500,000 Senator Shaheen
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Center for Ozark Community Biomass Energy Development............... $1,500,000 Senator Bond
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Chittenden County Natural Gas Refueling Project..................... $1,000,000 Senator Leahy
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. CHRISTUS Center for Healthy Living and Energy Efficient LEED $300,000 Senators Landrieu, Vitter
Technology.
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. City of Grand Rapids City Building Solar and Wind Renewable Energy $400,000 Senators Levin, Stabenow
Demonstration Project.
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. City of Lansing Bioenergy Generation Demonstration Project.......... $400,000 Senators Levin, Stabenow
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. City of San Jose Smart LEED Streetlights, CA........................ $600,000 Senator Feinstein
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. City of Yreka Biomass Facility, CA.................................. $500,000 Senator Feinstein
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Clean Energy Infrastructure Educational Initiative.................. $200,000 Senator Sherrod Brown
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Co-Gen Electrostatic Precipitator................................... $700,000 Senator Gillibrand
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Collaboration on Renewable Energy Job Creation Strategies........... $300,000 Senator Reid
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Delaware Energy Efficiency.......................................... $55,000 Senators Carper, Kaufman
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Development of High Yield Tropical Feedstocks and Biomass Conversion $6,000,000 Senators Inouye, Akaka
Technology for Renewable Energy Production.
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Energy Conservation, Solar Energy Education and Research............ $300,000 Senator Landrieu
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Energy Recovery at the Water Reclamation Facility................... $750,000 Senators Tester, Baucus
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Ethanol From Agriculture for Arkansas and America................... $1,000,000 Senators Pryor, Lincoln
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Farm Solar Share.................................................... $645,000 Senators Carper, Kaufman
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Farm-Based Renewable Energy......................................... $400,000 Senator Murray
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Fuel Cell Durability Research....................................... $400,000 Senator Dodd
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Genetic Improvement of Switchgrass for Biofuels..................... $500,000 Senators Reed, Whitehouse
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Geothermal Conversion Project....................................... $1,000,000 Senator Lugar
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Great Basin College--Direct Use Geothermal Demonstration Project.... $1,000,000 Senator Reid
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Green Building, NY.................................................. $250,000 Senators Schumer, Gillibrand
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Green Energy Sustainable Loan Program............................... $700,000 Senator Gillibrand
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Hawaii Energy Sustainability Program................................ $6,000,000 Senators Inouye, Akaka
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Hawaii Renewable Energy Development Venture......................... $6,000,000 Senator Inouye
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. High Performance Computing Infrastructure for Modeling Solar Energy. $700,000 Senator Hagan
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. High Speed Wind Turbine Noise Model with Suppression................ $1,000,000 Senators Cochran, Wicker
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Home Energy Efficiency Research and Development Initiative.......... $500,000 Senators Specter, Casey
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Hoonah IPEC Hydroelectric Project................................... $1,500,000 Senator Murkowski
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Industrial Technologies Program Language............................ $1,000,000 Senator Reid
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Institute for Environmental Studies................................. $450,000 Senator Rockefeller
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Iowa Central Community College Renewable Fuels Laboratory........... $500,000 Senators Harkin, Grassley
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Kaukauna Utilities Hydroelectric Generator Replacement.............. $1,000,000 Senator Kohl
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Large-Scale Wind Training........................................... $400,000 Senators Schumer, Gillibrand
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Las Vegas Residential Energy Efficiency Program..................... $500,000 Senator Reid
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Livingston Campus Geothermal Energy System.......................... $750,000 Senators Lautenberg, Menendez
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Long Island Sustainable Schools Network............................. $450,000 Senator Schumer
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Maine Tidal Power Initiative........................................ $1,000,000 Senators Collins, Snowe
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Martin County Microfiber Fuel Cell Technology Development........... $500,000 Senators Burr, Hagan
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Mega-Turbine Research for Enhanced Wind Power....................... $750,000 Senator Ben Nelson
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Mendocino County for the Strategic Woody-Biomass Initiative......... $450,000 Senators Feinstein, Boxer
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. MidSouth/Southeast BioEnergy Consortium............................. $1,000,000 Senators Pryor, Lincoln
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Montana Algal BioDiesel Initiative.................................. $750,000 Senators Tester, Baucus
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Nanostructured Materials for Improved Photovoltaics................. $1,000,000 Senators Cochran, Wicker
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. National Center for Deepwater Offshore Wind......................... $10,000,000 Senators Collins, Snowe
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. National Open-Ocean Energy Laboratory............................... $1,200,000 Senator Bill Nelson
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. National Wind Energy Center, University of Houston, Houston, TX..... $3,000,000 Senator Hutchison
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. National Wind Resource Center at Pantex............................. $1,000,000 Senator Cornyn
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Natural Resource Research Center [NRCC]............................. $750,000 Senators Pryor, Lincoln
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Nevada Inter-Tribal Energy Consortium............................... $150,000 Senator Reid
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Nevada Renewable Energy Consortium.................................. $3,000,000 Senator Reid
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Nevada Renewable Energy Innovation and Deployment Cluster-- $3,000,000 Senator Reid
Technology Commercialization and Site Development.
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. North Country Community Wood Energy Systems......................... $200,000 Senator Shaheen
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Nushagak Area Hydropower Project.................................... $500,000 Senator Murkowski
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Ocean-Based Energy Generation....................................... $600,000 Senator Murray
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Ohio Advanced Energy Manufacturing Center [OAEMC]................... $500,000 Senator Sherrod Brown
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Ohio Low Cost Carbon Fiber Initiative............................... $1,500,000 Senators Voinovich, Sherrod
Brown
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. OIT Geothermal Power Generation Plant............................... $400,000 Senators Wyden, Merkley
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Old Dominion University, Construction and Operation of a $750,000 Senators Webb, Warner
Demonstration Scale Algal Research Center.
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Optimized Concentrated Solar Power Trough Development Project....... $750,000 Senator Specter
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Photovoltaic System at Closed, Capped Landfill...................... $650,000 Senator Schumer
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Producing Renewable, Value-Added Products from Waste Feedstocks..... $1,000,000 Senator Landrieu
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Rapid Battery Charging Device for Electric Vehicles................. $500,000 Senator Reid
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Red Wing Regional Biosolids Processing Facility..................... $700,000 Senator Klobuchar
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Reedsport Wave Power Project (Phase I).............................. $400,000 Senators Wyden, Merkley
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Renewable Energy Technical Training Center.......................... $500,000 Senator Schumer
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Renewable Energy Demonstration...................................... $750,000 Senator Durbin
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Renewable Energy Demonstration Projects at Old FLC.................. $300,000 Senator Mark Udall
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Renewable Energy Feasibility Study and Resources Assessment for $500,000 Senator Reid
Lincoln County, NV.
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Renewable Energy Initiative......................................... $500,000 Senator Durbin
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Renewable Energy Solar Farm......................................... $650,000 Senators Lautenberg, Menendez
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Reno Hydrogen Fuel.................................................. $1,000,000 Senator Reid
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Research and Develop Geothermal Energy.............................. $700,000 Senator Begich
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Research, Development and Demonstration of Plug-In Hybrid Electric $1,000,000 Senator Kohl
Drive Kits.
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Rowan University Algae-Based Renewable Fuel Initiative.............. $750,000 Senators Lautenberg, Menendez
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Salem City Solar Energy Project..................................... $300,000 Senators Bennett, Hatch
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. San Francisco Bay Area Biosolids to Energy Project, CA.............. $500,000 Senator Feinstein
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. San Francisco Electric Vehicle Initiative........................... $300,000 Senator Boxer
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Shenandoah Valley as a National Demonstration Project Achieving 25 $350,000 Senator Warner
Percent Renewable Energy by the Year 2025.
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Sitka Blue Lake Hydroelectric Expansion Project..................... $1,000,000 Senators Murkowski, Begich
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Solar Cell Connectivity Research and Development.................... $1,000,000 Senators Reed, Whitehouse
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Solar Electric System............................................... $200,000 Senator Gillibrand
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Solar Energy Infrastructure Enhancement............................. $500,000 Senator Reid
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Solar Energy Research and Laboratory................................ $500,000 Senator Lugar
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Solar Power Module Development...................................... $500,000 Senator Leahy
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Solar Testing and Training.......................................... $400,000 Senators Dodd, Lieberman
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. South Jordan NGV Fleet Implementation Program....................... $300,000 Senator Bennett
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. South Utah Electric District Crab Creek Small Hydropower Facility... $1,000,000 Senator Bennett
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Southern Regional Center for Lightweight Innovative Designs......... $3,500,000 Senators Cochran, Wicker
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Southwest Washington Tidal Energy Project........................... $1,000,000 Senators Murray, Cantwell
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Springfield Fast-Fill CNG Facility.................................. $500,000 Senator Bond
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Strategic Biomass Initiative........................................ $500,000 Senators Cochran, Wicker
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Sun Grant Initiative, South Dakota State University Regional Biomass $2,000,000 Senators Johnson, Thune
Feedstock Research and Development.
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Sustainable Biofuel Production--Consolidated Bioprocessing Strategy $400,000 Senator Kerry
for Biomass Conversion.
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Sustainable Campus Initiative of Sierra Nevada College at Lake Tahoe $400,000 Senator Reid
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Sustainable Energy Homeowner Outreach Program....................... $200,000 Senator Sanders
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Sustainable Energy in Schools....................................... $500,000 Senator Sanders
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Sustainable Energy Institute........................................ $500,000 Senators Harkin, Grassley
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Sustainable Energy Research Center.................................. $9,000,000 Senators Cochran, Wicker
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Tri-County Biomass Energy Pilot Project............................. $800,000 Senators Tester, Baucus
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Truckee Meadows Water Reclamation Facility Environmental and Energy $1,000,000 Senator Reid
Enhancement.
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Uintah Natural Gas Fueling Station.................................. $300,000 Senators Bennett, Hatch
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. University of Louisville Research and Energy Independence Program... $2,000,000 Senator McConnell
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. UNLV--Intermountain West Sustainable Development Project............ $500,000 Senator Reid
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. UNR--Great Basin Center for Geothermal Energy....................... $250,000 Senator Reid
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. University of Rhode Island-Offshore Wind Energy Research Initiative. $750,000 Senators Reed, Whitehouse
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Utah Center for Energy Innovation and Commercialization............. $3,400,000 Senators Bennett, Hatch
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Vermont Biofuels and Carbon Harvest Initiative...................... $750,000 Senator Leahy
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Vermont Biomass Energy Resource Center.............................. $1,000,000 Senator Leahy
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Vernonia Sustainable Schools........................................ $300,000 Senators Wyden, Merkley
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. White Earth Tribal BioMass Bio Fuel Project......................... $700,000 Senators Klobuchar, Franken
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Wind Energy Infrastructure.......................................... $550,000 Senator Dorgan
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Wind Energy Materials Development................................... $1,500,000 Senator Dorgan
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Wind Energy Technology Training Program............................. $500,000 Senator Murray
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Wind Energy Training and Infrastructure............................. $750,000 Senator Dorgan
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Wind Power Exploration.............................................. $100,000 Senators Tester, Baucus
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Wind Resource Monitoring and Training Program....................... $1,000,000 Senator Reid
Department of Energy........... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Wireless Turbine Blade Sensor System Research....................... $750,000 Senator Schumer
Department of Energy........... Elecricity Deliverability and Energy Dubuque Smarter Energy Project...................................... $500,000 Senator Harkin
Reliability.
Department of Energy........... Elecricity Deliverability and Energy Energy Development and Reliability.................................. $300,000 Senator Dorgan
Reliability.
Department of Energy........... Elecricity Deliverability and Energy Navajo Nation Electrification Program............................... $900,000 Senators Bingaman, Tom Udall
Reliability.
Department of Energy........... Elecricity Deliverability and Energy Smart Grid Simulation Technology.................................... $800,000 Senator Dorgan
Reliability.
Department of Energy........... Elecricity Deliverability and Energy Technology Development.............................................. $750,000 Senator Dorgan
Reliability.
Department of Energy........... Elecricity Deliverability and Energy UNR--Energy Storage for Intermittent Renewable Energy Sources....... $1,000,000 Senator Reid
Reliability.
Department of Energy........... Nuclear Energy......................... Nuclear Engineering Research Center................................. $500,000 Senators Bennett, Hatch
Department of Energy........... Nuclear Energy......................... Nuclear Fabrication Consortium...................................... $2,000,000 Senator Voinovich, Sherrod Brown
Department of Energy........... Nuclear Energy......................... Nuclear Power Operator Simulator.................................... $400,000 Senator Kerry
Department of Energy........... Nuclear Energy......................... Ohio State Nuclear Reactor Laboratory Facility Research and $2,000,000 Senator Voinovich
Education Expansion.
Department of Energy........... Nuclear Energy......................... Oversight of Yucca Mountain Shut Down and Reclamation............... $2,500,000 Senator Reid
Department of Energy........... Fossil Energy.......................... Clean Energy Technology............................................. $2,000,000 Senator Dorgan
Department of Energy........... Fossil Energy.......................... CO2 Sequestration Projects.......................................... $700,000 Senators Mark Udall, Bennet
Department of Energy........... Fossil Energy.......................... Fossil Fuel Research and Development................................ $3,000,000 Senators Dorgan, Conrad
Department of Energy........... Fossil Energy.......................... Gulf of Mexico Hydrates Research Consortium......................... $1,000,000 Senators Cochran, Wicker
Department of Energy........... Fossil Energy.......................... Hydrogen Fuel Dispensing Station.................................... $750,000 Senator Rockefeller
Department of Energy........... Fossil Energy.......................... Long Term Environmental and Economic Impacts of the Development of a $750,000 Senator Rockefeller
Coal Liquefaction Sector in China.
Department of Energy........... Fossil Energy.......................... National Center for Hydrogen Technology............................. $3,000,000 Senators Dorgan, Conrad
Department of Energy........... Fossil Energy.......................... Sunbury Generation/Calera Carbon Capture Project.................... $750,000 Senator Specter
Department of Energy........... Fossil Energy.......................... University of Kentucky Coal-Derived Low Energy Materials for $1,000,000 Senator McConnell
Sustainable Construction Project.
Department of Energy........... Fossil Energy.......................... Utah Center for Ultra-Clean Coal Utilization and Heavy Oil Research. $7,000,000 Senators Bennett, Hatch
Department of Energy........... Office of Science...................... Advanced Computer Simulation Initiative............................. $1,000,000 Senator Reid
Department of Energy........... Office of Science...................... Alaska Climate Center............................................... $500,000 Senators Murkowski, Begich
Department of Energy........... Office of Science...................... Antibodies Research................................................. $4,000,000 Senators Dorgan, Conrad
Department of Energy........... Office of Science...................... Center for Diagnostic Nanosystems................................... $2,000,000 Senator Rockefeller
Department of Energy........... Office of Science...................... Center for Nanoscale Energy......................................... $7,000,000 Senators Dorgan, Conrad
Department of Energy........... Office of Science...................... Characteristics and Cleanup of the U.S. Nuclear Legacy.............. $3,500,000 Senators Cochran, Wicker
Department of Energy........... Office of Science...................... Climate Model Evaluation Program.................................... $2,000,000 Senators Shelby, Sessions
Department of Energy........... Office of Science...................... Computing Capability................................................ $2,000,000 Senators Dorgan, Conrad
Department of Energy........... Office of Science...................... Development of Nontechnology-enhanced Solar Cells with Low Cost and $500,000 Senator Reid
High Conversion Efficiency.
Department of Energy........... Office of Science...................... Energy Research..................................................... $250,000 Senator Cochran
Department of Energy........... Office of Science...................... Environmental Radioactivity Monitoring Laboratory: Monitoring/ $750,000 Senators Cochran, Wicker
Assessment of the Radioactive Pollutants in the South-West
Mississippi.
Department of Energy........... Office of Science...................... Functional Nanoparticles for Improved Ultra Capacitor Devices....... $1,000,000 Senators Cochran, Wicker
Department of Energy........... Office of Science...................... Idaho National Laboratory Center for Advanced Energy Studies........ $1,000,000 Senators Crapo, Risch
Department of Energy........... Office of Science...................... KU Cancer Research Equipment........................................ $4,000,000 Senators Brownback, Roberts
Department of Energy........... Office of Science...................... Lincoln Memorial University/ORNL Partnership on Geothermal Energy... $2,000,000 Senator Alexander
Department of Energy........... Office of Science...................... Material Science Smart Coatings..................................... $500,000 Senator Ben Nelson
Department of Energy........... Office of Science...................... Metal-enhanced Fluorescence Research and Development................ $750,000 Senators Mikulski, Cardin
Department of Energy........... Office of Science...................... Missouri University Research Reactor Reflector Shield............... $1,000,000 Senator Bond
Department of Energy........... Office of Science...................... Nanotechnology Initiative........................................... $600,000 Senators Dodd, Lieberman
Department of Energy........... Office of Science...................... Nevada Water Resources Data, Modeling, and Visualization [DMV] $750,000 Senator Reid
Center.
Department of Energy........... Office of Science...................... Oregon Sustainability Center........................................ $300,000 Senators Wyden, Merkley
Department of Energy........... Office of Science...................... RNAi Research....................................................... $300,000 Senator Kerry
Department of Energy........... Office of Science...................... Solid State Preparation and Characterization Lab.................... $500,000 Senator Reid
Department of Energy........... Office of Science...................... Southern Illinois University Research............................... $750,000 Senator Durbin
Department of Energy........... Office of Science...................... Technology Transfer & Commercialization of Technologies at DOE...... $500,000 Senators Bingaman, Tom Udall
Department of Energy........... Office of Science...................... TU Algae to Green Fuels Energy Project.............................. $750,000 Senator Inhofe
Department of Energy........... Office of Science...................... University of California, San Diego Seismic Research................ $1,500,000 Senator Feinstein
Department of Energy........... Office of Science...................... University of South Dakota Project on Renewable Energy and the $350,000 Senator Johnson
Economy.
Department of Energy........... Office of Science...................... URI Regional Earth System Center.................................... $750,000 Senators Reed, Whitehouse
Department of Energy........... Other Defense Activities............... Burlington Atomic Energy Commission Plant and Ames Laboratory Former $1,000,000 Senators Harkin, Grassley
Workers Medical Surveillance Programs.
Department of Energy........... Other Defense Activities............... Medical Monitoring at Paducah, KY, Portsmouth, OH, and Oak Ridge, TN $1,000,000 Senator McConnell
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PRESIDENTIALLY DIRECTED SPENDING ITEMS
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Agency Account Project title Funding Member
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ ALA WAI CANAL, OAHU, HI......................................................... $408,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ ANACOSTIA RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, MD & DC (COMPREHENSIVE PLAN)................... $183,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ AUGUSTA, GA..................................................................... $578,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ BAYOU SORREL LOCK, LA........................................................... $2,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ BRAZOS ISLAND HARBOR, BROWNSVILLE CHANNEL, TX................................... $726,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ CALCASIEU LOCK, LA.............................................................. $1,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ CALIFORNIA COASTAL SEDIMENT MASTER PLAN, CA..................................... $900,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ COYOTE AND BERRYESSA CREEKS, CA................................................. $500,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ CURRITUCK SOUND, NC............................................................. $300,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ DELAWARE RIVER BASIN COMPREHENSIVE, NJ.......................................... $290,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ DES PLAINES RIVER, IL (PHASE II)................................................ $500,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ EASTERN SHORE, MID-CHESAPEAKE BAY ISLAND, MD.................................... $169,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ EDISTO ISLAND, SC............................................................... $114,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ FARGO-MOORHEAD METRO STUDY, ND & MN (RRN BASIN AUTHORITY)....................... $15,150,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ GIWW, HIGH ISLAND TO BRAZOS RIVER REALIGNMENTS, TX.............................. $200,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ GREAT LAKES NAVIGATION SYSTEM STUDY, MI, IL, IN, MN, NY, OH, PA & WI............ $400,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ GUADALUPE AND SAN ANTONIO RIVER BASINS, TX...................................... $600,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ HUDSON-RARITAN ESTUARY, HACKENSACK MEADOWLANDS, NJ.............................. $200,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ HUDSON-RARITAN ESTUARY, LOWER PASSAIC RIVER, NJ................................. $200,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ HUDSON-RARITAN ESTUARY, NY & NJ................................................. $200,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ INDIANA HARBOR, IN.............................................................. $300,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ JAMAICA BAY, MARINE PARK AND PLUMB BEACH, NY.................................... $170,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ JOHN H. KERR DAM & RESERVOIR, VA & NC (SEC 216)................................. $300,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ KANSAS CITYS, MO & KS........................................................... $500,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ LAKE MONTAUK HARBOR, NY......................................................... $172,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ LAKE WORTH INLET, PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL......................................... $340,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ LOUISIANA COASTAL AREA ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, LA................................ $16,595,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ LOWER COLORADO RIVER BASIN, TX.................................................. $425,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ LOWER COLUMBIA RIVER ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, OR & WA............................. $300,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ LYNNHAVEN RIVER BASIN, VIRGINIA BEACH, VA....................................... $50,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ MALIBU CREEK WATERSHED, CA...................................................... $210,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ MATANUSKA RIVER WATERSHED, AK................................................... $100,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ MERRIMACK RIVER WATERSHED STUDY, NH & MA........................................ $200,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ MILL CREEK WATERSHED, DAVIDSON COUNTY, TN....................................... $50,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ MINNESOTA RIVER WATERSHED STUDY, MN & SD........................................ $350,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ MISSOURI RIVER DEGRADATION, MO & KS............................................. $600,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ MT ST HELENS.................................................................... $225,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ NEUSE RIVER BASIN, NC........................................................... $200,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ NUECES RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, TX................................................ $250,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ OCMULGEE RIVER BASIN WATERSHED MANAGEMENT, GA................................... $600,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ PILGRIM LAKE, TRURO & PROVINCETOWN, MA.......................................... $100,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ PUGET SOUND NEARSHORE MARINE HABITAT RESTORATION, WA............................ $400,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ RIO GRANDE BASIN, NM, CO AND TX (SECTION 729)................................... $500,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ SABINE PASS TO GALVESTON BAY, TX................................................ $200,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ SCHUYLKILL RIVER BASIN, WISSAHICKON WATERSHED, PA............................... $214,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ SOLANA-ENCINITAS SHORELINE, CA.................................................. $307,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ SURF CITY AND NORTH TOPSAIL BEACH, NC........................................... $300,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ SUTTER COUNTY, CA............................................................... $339,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ TYBEE ISLAND, GA................................................................ $200,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ UPPER PENITENCIA CREEK, CA...................................................... $177,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ UPPER RAPPAHANNOCK RIVER BASIN, VA.............................................. $200,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ WILLAMETTE RIVER ENVIRONMENTAL DREDGING, OR..................................... $220,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ WILLAMETTE RIVER FLOODPLAIN RESTORATION, OR..................................... $153,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. General Investigations............ YAKUTAT HARBOR, AK.............................................................. $450,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. AKUTAN HARBOR, AK............................................................... $7,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. ALTON TO GALE ORGANIZED LEVEE DISTRICT, IL & MO (DEF CORR)...................... $150,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. AMERICAN RIVER WATERSHED (COMMON FEATURES), CA.................................. $4,200,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. AMERICAN RIVER WATERSHED (FOLSOM DAM MODIFICATIONS), CA......................... $78,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. AMERICAN RIVER WATERSHED (FOLSOM DAM RAISE & BRIDGE), CA........................ $500,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. ASSATEAGUE ISLAND, MD........................................................... $1,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. ATLANTIC COAST OF NYC, ROCKAWAY INLET TO NORTON POINT, NY....................... $300,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BRIDGE REPLACEMENT AT DEEP CREEK, CHESAPEAKE, VA. $1,590,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. BLUE RIVER CHANNEL, KANSAS CITY, MO............................................. $4,500,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. BLUESTONE LAKE, WV (DAM SAFETY ASSURANCE)....................................... $15,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. BRAYS BAYOU, HOUSTON, TX........................................................ $3,740,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. BREVARD COUNTY, FL.............................................................. $350,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. CANTON LAKE, OK (DAM SAFETY).................................................... $24,334,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. CAPE MAY INLET TO LOWER TOWNSHIP, NJ............................................ $200,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. CENTER HILL DAM, TN (SEEPAGE CONTROL)........................................... $77,800,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. CHAIN OF ROCKS CANAL, MISSISSIPPI RIVER, IL (DEF CORR).......................... $5,385,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. CHESAPEAKE BAY OYSTER RECOVERY, MD & VA......................................... $5,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. CHESTERFIELD, MO................................................................ $3,939,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. CHICAGO SANITARY AND SHIP CANAL, DISPERSAL BARRIER, IL.......................... $11,100,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. CHIEF JOSEPH DAM GAS ABATEMENT, WA.............................................. $200,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. CLEARWATER LAKE, MO (SEEPAGE CONTROL)........................................... $40,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. COLUMBIA RIVER FISH MITIGATION, WA, OR & ID..................................... $116,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. COLUMBIA RIVER TREATY FISHING ACCESS SITES, OR & WA............................. $500,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. DADE COUNTY, FL................................................................. $11,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. DELAWARE BAY COASTLINE, ROOSEVELT INLET TO LEWES BEACH, DE...................... $350,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. DES PLAINES RIVER, IL........................................................... $10,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. DOVER DAM MUSKINGUM RIVER, OH................................................... $36,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. DUVAL COUNTY, FL................................................................ $7,500,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. DUWAMISH AND GREEN RIVER BASIN, WA.............................................. $5,500,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. EAST ST. LOUIS, IL.............................................................. $2,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. EMSWORTH LOCKS & DAM, OHIO RIVER, PA (STATIC INSTABILITY CORRECTION)............ $11,500,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. FIRE ISLAND INLET TO MONTAUK POINT, NY.......................................... $4,600,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. FORT PIERCE BEACH, FL........................................................... $350,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. GARRISON DAM AND POWER PLANT, ND (REPLACEMENT).................................. $11,088,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. GREAT EGG HARBOR INLET AND PECK BEACH, NJ....................................... $500,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. HAMILTON AIRFIELD WETLANDS RESTORATION, CA...................................... $11,750,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. HERBERT HOOVER DIKE, FL (SEEPAGE CONTROL)....................................... $104,800,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. HOWARD HANSON DAM, WA........................................................... $500,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. INDIANA HARBOR, CONFINED DISPOSAL FACILITY, IN.................................. $8,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. J. BENNETT JOHNSTON WATERWAY, LA................................................ $7,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. JACKSONVILLE HARBOR, FL......................................................... $6,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. JOHN H. KERR DAM AND RESERVOIR, VA & NC (REPLACEMENT)........................... $6,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. KANSAS CITYS, MO & KS........................................................... $700,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. KENTUCKY LOCK AND DAM, TENNESSEE RIVER, KY...................................... $2,868,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. LAROSE TO GOLDEN MEADOW, LA (HURRICANE PROTECTION).............................. $5,500,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. LEVISA AND TUG FORKS AND UPPER CUMBERLAND RIVER, WV, VA & KY.................... $22,250,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. LITTLE CALUMET RIVER, IN........................................................ $10,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. LOCK AND DAM 27, MISSISSIPPI RIVER, IL (MAJOR REHAB)............................ $350,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. LOCKS AND DAMS 2, 3 AND 4 MONONGAHELA RIVER, PA................................. $2,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. LONG BEACH ISLAND, NY........................................................... $300,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. LOUISIANA COASTAL AREA ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, LA................................ $19,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. LOWER CAPE MAY MEADOWS, CAPE MAY POINT, NJ...................................... $8,920,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. LOWER COLUMBIA RIVER ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, OR & WA............................. $4,700,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. LOWER SNAKE RIVER FISH AND WILDLIFE COMPENSATION, WA, OR & ID................... $1,500,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. MANATEE COUNTY, FL.............................................................. $100,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. MARKLAND LOCKS AND DAM, KY (MAJOR REHAB)........................................ $5,400,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. MARTIN COUNTY, FL............................................................... $8,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. MCCOOK AND THORNTON RESERVOIRS, IL.............................................. $40,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN THE OHIO AND MISSOURI RIVERS (REG WORKS), MO & IL..... $4,345,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. MISSOURI RIVER FISH MITIGATION, IA, KS, MO, MT, NE, ND & SD..................... $74,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. MT. ST. HELENS SEDIMENT CONTROL, WA............................................. $1,800,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. MUD MOUNTAIN DAM, WA (FISH PASSAGE)............................................. $1,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. MUDDY RIVER, MA................................................................. $2,500,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. NAPA RIVER, SALT MARSH RESTORATION, CA.......................................... $12,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. NASSAU COUNTY, FL............................................................... $350,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY HARBOR, NY & NJ......................................... $57,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. NORFOLK HARBOR, CRANEY ISLAND, VA............................................... $1,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. OAKLAND HARBOR (50 FOOT PROJECT), CA............................................ $4,330,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. OLMSTED LOCKS AND DAM, OHIO RIVER, IL & KY...................................... $136,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. POPLAR ISLAND, MD............................................................... $1,530,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. PORTUGUES AND BUCANA RIVERS, PR................................................. $39,539,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. PRESQUE ISLE PENINSULA, PA (PERMANENT).......................................... $1,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. RARITAN RIVER BASIN, GREEN BROOK SUB-BASIN, NJ.................................. $1,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. RICHARD B. RUSSEL DAM & LAKE, GA & SC........................................... $1,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. RIO GRANDE FLOODWAY, SAN ACACIA TO BOSQUE DEL APACHE, NM........................ $1,500,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. RIO PUERTO NUEVO, PR............................................................ $12,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. ROANOKE RIVER UPPER BASIN, HEADWATERS AREA, VA.................................. $1,075,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. SACRAMENTO DEEPWATER SHIP CHANNEL, CA........................................... $12,500,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. SACRAMENTO RIVER BANK PROTECTION PROJECT, CA.................................... $10,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. SANTA ANA RIVER MAINSTEM, CA.................................................... $25,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. SAVANNAH HARBOR EXPANSION, GA................................................... $1,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. SOUTH FLORIDA EVERGLADES ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, FL.............................. $155,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. SOUTH SACRAMENTO COUNTY STREAMS, CA............................................. $4,800,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. ST. JOHNS COUNTY, FL............................................................ $350,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. ST. LOUIS FLOOD PROTECTION, MO.................................................. $200,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. SUCCESS DAM AND RESERVOIR, CA (DAM SAFETY)...................................... $1,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. TAMPA HARBOR, FL................................................................ $1,200,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. TURKEY CREEK BASIN, KANSAS CITY, KS & MO........................................ $8,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER RESTORATION, IL, IA, MN, MO & WI........................ $19,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. WEST BANK AND VICINITY, NEW ORLEANS, LA......................................... $5,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. WEST SACRAMENTO, CA............................................................. $5,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. WILMINGTON HARBOR, NC........................................................... $2,100,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. WOLF CREEK DAM, LAKE CUMBERLAND, KY (SEEPAGE CONTROL)........................... $134,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Construction, General............. WOOD RIVER LEVEE, IL............................................................ $1,098,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. MR&T-GI........................... COLDWATER RIVER BASIN BELOW ARKABUTLA LAKE, MS.................................. $246,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. MR&T-GI........................... COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA, AR, IL, KY, LA, MS, MO & TN................. $1,400,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. MR&T-GI........................... MEMPHIS METRO AREA, STORM WATER MANAGEMENT STUDY, TN............................ $100,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. MR&T-CG........................... ATCHAFALAYA BASIN FLOODWAY SYSTEM, LA........................................... $2,631,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. MR&T-CG........................... ATCHAFALAYA BASIN, LA........................................................... $15,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. MR&T-CG........................... CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, AR, IL, KY, LA, MS, MO & TN................................ $47,209,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. MR&T-CG........................... MISSISSIPPI RIVER LEVEES, AR, IL, KY, LA, MS, MO & TN........................... $36,038,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. MR&T-O&M.......................... ATCHAFALAYA BASIN FLOODWAY SYSTEM, LA........................................... $1,878,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. MR&T-O&M.......................... ATCHAFALAYA BASIN, LA........................................................... $12,398,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. MR&T-O&M.......................... BATON ROUGE HARBOR, DEVIL SWAMP, LA............................................. $42,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. MR&T-O&M.......................... BAYOU COCODRIE AND TRIBUTARIES, LA.............................................. $47,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. MR&T-O&M.......................... CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, AR, IL, KY, LA, MS, MO & TN................................ $66,008,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. MR&T-O&M.......................... INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, AR............................................... $190,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. MR&T-O&M.......................... INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, IL............................................... $100,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. MR&T-O&M.......................... INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, KY............................................... $20,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. MR&T-O&M.......................... INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, LA............................................... $586,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. MR&T-O&M.......................... INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MO............................................... $185,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. MR&T-O&M.......................... INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MS............................................... $109,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. MR&T-O&M.......................... INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, TN............................................... $70,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. MR&T-O&M.......................... LOWER ARKANSAS RIVER, NORTH BANK, AR............................................ $223,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. MR&T-O&M.......................... LOWER ARKANSAS RIVER, SOUTH BANK, AR............................................ $200,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. MR&T-O&M.......................... LOWER RED RIVER, SOUTH BANK LEVEES, LA.......................................... $377,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. MR&T-O&M.......................... MEMPHIS HARBOR, MCKELLAR LAKE, TN............................................... $1,433,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. MR&T-O&M.......................... MISSISSIPPI DELTA REGION--CAERNARVON, LA........................................ $921,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. MR&T-O&M.......................... OLD RIVER, LA................................................................... $9,255,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. MR&T-O&M.......................... TENSAS BASIN, BOEUF AND TENSAS RIVERS, AR & LA.................................. $2,374,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. MR&T-O&M.......................... TENSAS BASIN, RED RIVER BACKWATER, LA........................................... $3,286,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. MR&T-O&M.......................... WAPPAPELLO LAKE, MO............................................................. $4,966,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. MR&T-O&M.......................... WHITE RIVER BACKWATER, AR....................................................... $1,276,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. MR&T-O&M.......................... YAZOO BASIN, GREENWOOD, MS...................................................... $790,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. MR&T-O&M.......................... YAZOO BASIN, MAIN STEM, MS...................................................... $1,469,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... ABIQUIU DAM, NM................................................................. $2,891,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... ALABAMA--COOSA COMPREHENSIVE WATER STUDY, AL.................................... $253,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... ALABAMA RIVER LAKES, AL......................................................... $18,745,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... ALAMO LAKE, AZ.................................................................. $3,019,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... ALBENI FALLS DAM, ID............................................................ $1,521,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... ALLATOONA LAKE, GA.............................................................. $7,008,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... ALLEGHENY RIVER, PA............................................................. $8,456,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... ALMOND LAKE, NY................................................................. $490,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... ALUM CREEK LAKE, OH............................................................. $1,435,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... ALVIN R. RUSH DAM, PA........................................................... $600,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... ANCHORAGE HARBOR, AK............................................................ $14,013,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... APALACHICOLA, CHATTAHOOCHEE AND FLINT RIVERS, GA, AL & FL....................... $2,603,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... APPLEGATE LAKE, OR.............................................................. $1,298,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... AQUILLA LAKE, TX................................................................ $1,120,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... ARCADIA LAKE, OK................................................................ $596,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... ARKANSAS--RED RIVER BASINS CHLORIDE CONTROL--AREA VIII, TX...................... $1,439,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... ARKPORT DAM, NY................................................................. $223,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... ASHTABULA HARBOR, OH............................................................ $1,995,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... ATCHAFALAYA RIVER AND BAYOUS CHENE, BOEUF & BLACK, LA........................... $12,230,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY--ACC, VA......................................... $2,150,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY--DSC, NC & VA.................................... $1,825,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, GA.............................................. $1,500,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, NC.............................................. $4,750,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, SC.............................................. $2,500,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... AYLESWORTH CREEK LAKE, PA....................................................... $230,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... B. EVERETT JORDAN DAM AND LAKE, NC.............................................. $1,918,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... BALL MOUNTAIN, VT............................................................... $896,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... BALTIMORE HARBOR AND CHANNELS (50 FOOT), MD..................................... $17,215,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... BALTIMORE HARBOR, MD (DRIFT REMOVAL)............................................ $375,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... BARATARIA BAY WATERWAY, LA...................................................... $135,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... BARBERS POINT HARBOR, HI........................................................ $330,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... BARDWELL LAKE, TX............................................................... $1,879,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... BARKLEY DAM AND LAKE, BARKLEY, KY & TN.......................................... $10,025,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... BARNEGAT INLET, NJ.............................................................. $325,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... BARRE FALLS DAM, MA............................................................. $700,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... BARREN RIVER LAKE, KY........................................................... $3,454,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... BASS HARBOR, TREMONT, ME........................................................ $65,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... BAYOU BODCAU RESERVOIR, LA...................................................... $1,072,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... BAYOU LAFOURCHE AND LAFOURCHE-JUMP WATERWAY, LA................................. $1,050,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... BAYOU PIERRE, LA................................................................ $24,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... BAYOU SEGNETTE WATERWAY, LA..................................................... $37,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... BAYOU TECHE & VERMILION RIVER, LA............................................... $11,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... BAYOU TECHE, LA................................................................. $150,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... BEALS HARBOR, ME................................................................ $1,250,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... BEAR CREEK LAKE, CO............................................................. $647,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... BEAVER LAKE, AR................................................................. $10,570,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... BEECH FORK LAKE, WV............................................................. $1,377,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... BELTON LAKE, TX................................................................. $3,682,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... BELTZVILLE LAKE, PA............................................................. $1,425,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... BENBROOK LAKE, TX............................................................... $2,578,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... BERLIN LAKE, OH................................................................. $2,347,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... BETHEL HARBOR, AK............................................................... $1,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... BIG BEND DAM, LAKE SHARPE, SD................................................... $9,768,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... BIG SANDY HARBOR, KY............................................................ $1,600,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... BIGSTONE LAKE AND WHETSTONE RIVER, MN & SD...................................... $251,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... BILOXI HARBOR, MS............................................................... $1,400,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... BIRCH HILL DAM, MA.............................................................. $792,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... BIRCH LAKE, OK.................................................................. $646,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... BLACK BUTTE LAKE, CA............................................................ $2,367,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... BLACK ROCK CHANNEL AND TONAWANDA HARBOR, NY..................................... $1,552,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... BLACK ROCK LAKE, CT............................................................. $537,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... BLACK WARRIOR AND TOMBIGBEE RIVERS, AL.......................................... $20,751,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... BLACKWATER DAM, NH.............................................................. $716,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... BLAKELY MT DAM, LAKE OUACHITA, AR............................................... $9,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... BLOCK ISLAND HARBOR OF REFUGE, RI............................................... $1,250,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... BLUE MARSH LAKE, PA............................................................. $2,817,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... BLUE MOUNTAIN LAKE, AR.......................................................... $1,612,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... BLUE RIVER LAKE, OR............................................................. $573,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... BLUESTONE LAKE, WV.............................................................. $1,700,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... BONNEVILLE LOCK & DAM, OR & WA.................................................. $7,487,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... BOSTON HARBOR, MA............................................................... $2,700,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... BOWMAN HALEY, ND................................................................ $246,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... BRAZOS ISLAND HARBOR, TX........................................................ $3,468,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... BROKEN BOW LAKE, OK............................................................. $2,458,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... BROOKVILLE LAKE, IN............................................................. $1,141,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... BROWNS CREEK, NY................................................................ $100,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... BRUNSWICK HARBOR, GA............................................................ $6,719,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... BUCHANAN DAM, HV EASTMAN LAKE, CA............................................... $2,119,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... BUCKHORN LAKE, KY............................................................... $1,655,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... BUFFALO BAYOU & TRIBUTARIES, TX................................................. $3,518,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... BUFFALO HARBOR, NY.............................................................. $1,165,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... BUFFUMVILLE LAKE, MA............................................................ $657,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... BUFORD DAM AND LAKE SIDNEY LANIER, GA........................................... $8,840,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... BULL SHOALS LAKE, AR............................................................ $7,292,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... BURNS WATERWAY HARBOR, IN....................................................... $171,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... BURNSVILLE LAKE, WV............................................................. $3,049,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... BUTTERMILK CHANNEL, NY.......................................................... $8,600,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... CADDO LAKE, LA.................................................................. $222,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... CAESAR CREEK LAKE, OH........................................................... $1,559,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... CAGLES MILL LAKE, IN............................................................ $1,030,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... CALCASIEU RIVER AND PASS, LA.................................................... $20,081,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... CALUMET HARBOR AND RIVER, IL & IN............................................... $4,238,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... CANAVERAL HARBOR, FL............................................................ $4,715,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... CANTON LAKE, OK................................................................. $1,949,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... CANYON LAKE, TX................................................................. $3,429,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... CAPE COD CANAL, MA.............................................................. $14,174,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... CAPE FEAR RIVER ABOVE WILMINGTON, NC............................................ $2,243,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... CARLYLE LAKE, IL................................................................ $5,643,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... CARR CREEK LAKE, KY............................................................. $1,882,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... CARTERS DAM AND LAKE, GA........................................................ $8,136,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... CARUTHERSVILLE HARBOR, MO....................................................... $900,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... CAVE RUN LAKE, KY............................................................... $965,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... CECIL M. HARDEN LAKE, IN........................................................ $1,013,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... CEDAR BAYOU, TX................................................................. $1,695,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... CEDAR CREEK, DE................................................................. $50,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... CENTER HILL LAKE, TN............................................................ $5,067,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... CENTRAL & SOUTHERN FLORIDA, FL.................................................. $19,520,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR, CA...................................................... $4,600,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... CHANNEL TO PORT BOLIVAR, TX..................................................... $329,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... CHANNELS IN LAKE ST. CLAIR, MI.................................................. $1,117,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... CHARLES RIVER NATURAL VALLEY STORAGE AREA, MA................................... $329,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... CHARLESTON HARBOR, SC........................................................... $9,925,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... CHARLEVOIX HARBOR, MI........................................................... $208,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... CHATFIELD LAKE, CO.............................................................. $1,375,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... CHEATHAM LOCK AND DAM, TN....................................................... $6,358,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... CHENA RIVER LAKES, AK........................................................... $2,999,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... CHERRY CREEK LAKE, CO........................................................... $1,057,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... CHETCO RIVER, OR................................................................ $586,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... CHICAGO HARBOR, IL.............................................................. $2,064,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... CHICAGO RIVER, IL............................................................... $510,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... CHICAGO SANITARY AND SHIP CANAL DISPERSAL BARRIER, IL........................... $7,450,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... CHICKAMAUGA LOCK, TENNESSEE RIVER, TN........................................... $3,500,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... CHIEF JOSEPH DAM, WA............................................................ $772,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... CHINCOTEAGUE INLET, VA.......................................................... $500,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... CLAIBORNE COUNTY PORT, MS....................................................... $74,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... CLARENCE CANNON DAM AND MARK TWAIN LAKE, MO..................................... $7,841,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... CLARENCE J BROWN DAM, OH........................................................ $1,190,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... CLEARWATER LAKE, MO............................................................. $3,021,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... CLEVELAND HARBOR, OH............................................................ $14,480,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... CLINTON LAKE, KS................................................................ $2,080,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... COCHITI LAKE, NM................................................................ $3,546,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... COLD BROOK LAKE, SD............................................................. $1,080,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... COLD SPRING INLET, NJ........................................................... $350,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... COLEBROOK RIVER LAKE, CT........................................................ $689,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... COLUMBIA & LWR WILLAMETTE R BLW VANCOUVER, WA AND PORTLAND, OR.................. $24,868,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... COLUMBIA RIVER AT THE MOUTH, OR & WA............................................ $18,350,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... COLUMBIA RIVER BETWEEN VANCOUVER, WA & THE DALLES, OR........................... $645,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... CONANT BROOK LAKE, MA........................................................... $403,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... CONCHAS LAKE, NM................................................................ $2,972,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... CONEMAUGH RIVER LAKE, PA........................................................ $1,351,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... CONNEAUT HARBOR, OH............................................................. $940,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... COOPER RIVER, CHARLESTON HARBOR, SC............................................. $6,140,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... COOS BAY, OR.................................................................... $5,791,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... COPAN LAKE, OK.................................................................. $1,104,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... COQUILLE RIVER, OR.............................................................. $433,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... CORALVILLE LAKE, IA............................................................. $5,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... CORDELL HULL DAM AND RESERVOIR, TN.............................................. $6,429,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... CORPUS CHRISTI SHIP CHANNEL, TX................................................. $4,608,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... COTTAGE GROVE LAKE, OR.......................................................... $1,319,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... COTTONWOOD SPRINGS LAKE, SD..................................................... $285,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... COUGAR LAKE, OR................................................................. $1,733,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... COUNCIL GROVE LAKE, KS.......................................................... $1,649,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... COWANESQUE LAKE, PA............................................................. $1,772,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... COYOTE VALLEY DAM, LAKE MENDOCINO, CA........................................... $6,190,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... CROOKED CREEK LAKE, PA.......................................................... $2,039,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... CUMBERLAND, MD AND RIDGELEY, WV................................................. $188,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... CURWENSVILLE LAKE, PA........................................................... $687,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... DALE HOLLOW LAKE, TN............................................................ $6,219,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... DARDANELLE LOCK & DAM, AR....................................................... $7,632,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... DEER CREEK LAKE, OH............................................................. $1,323,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... DEGRAY LAKE, AR................................................................. $7,500,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... DELAWARE LAKE, OH............................................................... $1,362,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... DELAWARE RIVER AT CAMDEN, NJ.................................................... $15,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... DELAWARE RIVER, PHILADELPHIA TO THE SEA, NJ, PA & DE............................ $20,020,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... DELAWARE RIVER, PHILADELPHIA, PA TO TRENTON, NJ................................. $820,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... DENISON DAM, LAKE TEXOMA, TX & OK............................................... $10,057,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... DEQUEEN LAKE, AR................................................................ $1,467,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... DETROIT LAKE, OR................................................................ $1,127,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... DETROIT RIVER, MI............................................................... $5,218,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... DEWEY LAKE, KY.................................................................. $1,762,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... DIERKS LAKE, AR................................................................. $1,570,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... DILLINGHAM HARBOR, AK........................................................... $955,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... DILLON LAKE, OH................................................................. $1,260,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... DISPOSAL AREA MONITORING, ME.................................................... $1,050,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... DORENA LAKE, OR................................................................. $1,055,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... DOUGLAS HARBOR, AK.............................................................. $241,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... DRY CREEK (WARM SPRINGS) LAKE & CHANNEL, CA..................................... $9,471,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... DULUTH-SUPERIOR HARBOR, MN & WI................................................. $7,237,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... DUXBURY HARBOR, MA.............................................................. $100,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... DWORKSHAK DAM AND RESERVOIR, ID................................................. $2,965,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... EAST BRANCH CLARION RIVER LAKE, PA.............................................. $1,671,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... EAST BRIMFIELD LAKE, MA......................................................... $557,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... EAST FORK, TOMBIGBEE RIVER, MS.................................................. $220,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... EAST LYNN LAKE, WV.............................................................. $2,215,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... EAST RIVER, NY.................................................................. $2,800,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... EAST ROCKAWAY INLET, NY......................................................... $200,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... EAST SIDNEY LAKE, NY............................................................ $573,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... EASTCHESTER CREEK, NY........................................................... $150,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... EAU GALLE RIVER LAKE, WI........................................................ $729,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... EDIZ HOOK, WA................................................................... $30,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... EDWARD MACDOWELL LAKE, NH....................................................... $635,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... EL DORADO LAKE, KS.............................................................. $609,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... ELK CITY LAKE, KS............................................................... $1,040,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... ELK CREEK LAKE, OR.............................................................. $87,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... ELKINS, WV...................................................................... $15,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... ELVIS STAHR (HICKMAN) HARBOR, KY................................................ $780,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... ERIE HARBOR, PA................................................................. $1,389,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... ESCAMBIA AND CONECUH RIVERS, FL................................................. $68,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... ESTELLINE SPRINGS EXPERIMENTAL PROJECT, TX...................................... $43,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... EUFAULA LAKE, OK................................................................ $7,232,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... EVERETT HARBOR AND SNOHOMISH RIVER, WA.......................................... $1,006,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... FAIRPORT HARBOR, OH............................................................. $1,572,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... FALL CREEK LAKE, OR............................................................. $1,149,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... FALL RIVER LAKE, KS............................................................. $1,200,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... FALLS LAKE, NC.................................................................. $2,042,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... FARM CREEK RESERVOIRS, IL....................................................... $398,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... FARMINGTON DAM, CA.............................................................. $450,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... FERN RIDGE LAKE, OR............................................................. $1,800,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... FERNANDINA HARBOR, FL........................................................... $1,294,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... FERRELLS BRIDGE DAM, LAKE O' THE PINES, TX...................................... $3,709,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... FIRE ISLAND INLET TO JONES INLET, NY............................................ $5,100,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... FISHTRAP LAKE, KY............................................................... $1,942,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... FLUSHING BAY AND CREEK, NY...................................................... $100,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... FORT GIBSON LAKE, OK............................................................ $6,216,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... FORT RANDALL DAM, LAKE FRANCIS CASE, SD......................................... $8,970,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... FORT SUPPLY LAKE, OK............................................................ $1,058,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... FOSTER JOSEPH SAYERS DAM, PA.................................................... $672,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... FOX POINT HURRICANE BARRIER, PROVIDENCE, RI..................................... $500,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... FOX RIVER, WI................................................................... $2,402,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... FRANCIS E WALTER DAM, PA........................................................ $880,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... FRANKLIN FALLS DAM, NH.......................................................... $724,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... FREEPORT HARBOR, TX............................................................. $3,538,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... FRESHWATER BAYOU, LA............................................................ $1,625,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... FT. PECK DAM AND LAKE, MT....................................................... $5,411,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... GALISTEO DAM, NM................................................................ $927,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... GALVESTON HARBOR AND CHANNEL, TX................................................ $8,441,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... GARRISON DAM, LAKE SAKAKAWEA, ND................................................ $12,764,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... GATHRIGHT DAM AND LAKE MOOMAW, VA............................................... $2,268,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... GAVINS POINT DAM, NE & SD....................................................... $7,706,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... GENERAL EDGAR JADWIN DAM AND RESERVOIR, PA...................................... $250,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... GEORGETOWN HARBOR, SC........................................................... $1,500,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... GILLHAM LAKE, AR................................................................ $1,340,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... GIWW, CHANNEL TO VICTORIA, TX................................................... $1,825,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... GRAND HAVEN HARBOR, MI.......................................................... $722,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... GRANGER DAM AND LAKE, TX........................................................ $2,360,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... GRAPEVINE LAKE, TX.............................................................. $3,014,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... GRAYS HARBOR AND CHEHALIS RIVER, WA............................................. $10,550,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... GRAYSON LAKE, KY................................................................ $1,434,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... GREAT KILLS HARBOR, STATEN ISLAND, NY........................................... $60,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... GREAT SALT PLAINS LAKE, OK...................................................... $406,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... GREAT SOUTH BAY, NY............................................................. $100,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... GREEN AND BARREN RIVERS, KY..................................................... $2,100,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... GREEN BAY HARBOR, WI............................................................ $7,698,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... GREEN PETER--FOSTER LAKES, OR................................................... $2,139,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... GREEN RIVER LAKE, KY............................................................ $2,242,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... GREERS FERRY LAKE, AR........................................................... $10,230,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, AL.................................................. $5,230,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, LA.................................................. $19,031,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, TX.................................................. $27,792,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... GULFPORT HARBOR, MS............................................................. $10,537,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... HAINES HARBOR, AK............................................................... $241,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... HAMPTON ROADS, NORFOLK & NEWPORT NEWS HARBOR, VA (DRIFT REMOVAL)................ $1,225,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... HAMPTON ROADS, VA (PREVENTION OF OBSTRUCTIVE DEPOSITS).......................... $50,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... HANCOCK BROOK LAKE, CT.......................................................... $478,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... HARLAN COUNTY LAKE, NE.......................................................... $2,222,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... HARRY S. TRUMAN DAM AND RESERVOIR, MO........................................... $8,842,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... HARTWELL LAKE, GA & SC.......................................................... $11,501,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... HELENA HARBOR, AR............................................................... $500,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... HEYBURN LAKE, OK................................................................ $603,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... HIDDEN DAM, HENSLEY LAKE, CA.................................................... $2,163,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... HILLS CREEK LAKE, OR............................................................ $863,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... HILLSDALE LAKE, KS.............................................................. $791,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... HODGES VILLAGE DAM, MA.......................................................... $629,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... HOLLAND HARBOR, MI.............................................................. $655,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... HOMER HARBOR, AK................................................................ $513,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... HOMME LAKE, ND.................................................................. $276,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... HOP BROOK LAKE, CT.............................................................. $1,092,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... HOPKINTON-EVERETT LAKES, NH..................................................... $1,440,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... HORDS CREEK LAKE, TX............................................................ $1,708,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... HOUMA NAVIGATION CANAL, LA...................................................... $4,352,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... HOUSTON SHIP CHANNEL, TX........................................................ $23,817,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... BARBOUR TERMINAL CHANNEL, TX................................................ -$1,811,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... BAYPORT SHIP CHANNEL, TX.................................................... -$4,028,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... HOWARD HANSON DAM, WA........................................................... $3,276,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... HUDSON RIVER CHANNEL, NY........................................................ $100,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... HUDSON RIVER, NY (MAINT)........................................................ $3,700,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... HUDSON RIVER, NY (O & C)........................................................ $1,650,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... HUGO LAKE, OK................................................................... $1,748,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... HULAH LAKE, OK.................................................................. $901,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... HUMBOLDT HARBOR AND BAY, CA..................................................... $5,848,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... ICE HARBOR LOCK & DAM, WA....................................................... $4,147,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... ILLINOIS WATERWAY, IL & IN (MVR PORTION)........................................ $32,238,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... ILLINOIS WATERWAY, IL & IN (MVS PORTION)........................................ $1,802,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... INDIAN RIVER INLET AND BAY, DE.................................................. $100,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... INDIANA HARBOR, IN.............................................................. $5,700,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... INSPECTION OF COMPLETED ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECTS, GA.............................. $85,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... INSPECTION OF COMPLETED ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECTS, IL.............................. $65,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... INSPECTION OF COMPLETED ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECTS, OR.............................. $30,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... INSPECTION OF COMPLETED ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECTS, WA.............................. $32,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... INSPECTION OF COMPLETED ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECTS, WY.............................. $10,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORK, AL................................................ $30,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, AK............................................... $180,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, AR............................................... $311,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, AZ............................................... $90,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, CA............................................... $4,604,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, CO............................................... $572,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, CT............................................... $292,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, DC............................................... $100,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, FL............................................... $900,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, GA............................................... $141,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, HI............................................... $961,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, IA............................................... $393,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, ID............................................... $288,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, IL............................................... $1,707,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, IN............................................... $800,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, KS............................................... $318,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, KY............................................... $839,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, LA............................................... $758,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MA............................................... $349,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MD............................................... $124,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, ME............................................... $148,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MI............................................... $125,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MN............................................... $463,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MO............................................... $1,713,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MS............................................... $34,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MT............................................... $120,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, NC............................................... $255,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, ND............................................... $303,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, NE............................................... $343,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, NH............................................... $105,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, NJ............................................... $145,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, NM............................................... $740,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, NV............................................... $66,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, NY............................................... $858,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, OH............................................... $624,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, OK............................................... $261,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, OR............................................... $559,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, PA............................................... $744,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, RI............................................... $24,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, SC............................................... $64,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, SD............................................... $100,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, TX............................................... $1,364,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, UT............................................... $31,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, VA............................................... $367,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, VT............................................... $79,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, WA............................................... $750,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, WI............................................... $64,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, WV............................................... $279,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, WY............................................... $37,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, DELAWARE RIVER TO CHESAPEAKE BAY, DE & MD................ $16,075,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, JACKSONVILLE TO MIAMI, FL................................ $4,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, REHOBOTH BAY TO DELAWARE BAY, DE......................... $100,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... ISABELLA LAKE, CA............................................................... $1,956,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... J. BENNETT JOHNSTON WATERWAY, LA................................................ $12,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... J. EDWARD ROUSH LAKE, IN........................................................ $1,793,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... J. PERCY PRIEST DAM AND RESERVOIR, TN........................................... $4,608,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... J. STORM THURMOND LAKE, GA & SC................................................. $10,918,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... JACKSON HOLE LEVEES, WY......................................................... $1,001,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... JACKSONVILLE HARBOR, FL......................................................... $5,708,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... JAMAICA BAY, NY................................................................. $120,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... JAMES RIVER CHANNEL, VA......................................................... $5,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... JEMEZ CANYON DAM, NM............................................................ $1,398,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... JENNINGS RANDOLPH LAKE, MD & WV................................................. $2,856,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... JIM CHAPMAN LAKE, TX............................................................ $1,939,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... JIM WOODRUFF LOCK AND DAM, LAKE SEMINOLE, FL, AL & GA........................... $9,449,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... JOE POOL LAKE, TX............................................................... $1,094,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... JOHN DAY LOCK AND DAM, OR & WA.................................................. $5,217,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... JOHN H. KERR LAKE, VA & NC...................................................... $11,423,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... JOHN MARTIN RESERVOIR, CO....................................................... $2,941,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... JOHN REDMOND DAM AND RESERVOIR, KS.............................................. $1,760,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... JOHN W. FLANNAGAN DAM AND RESERVOIR, VA......................................... $2,230,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... JOHNSTOWN, PA................................................................... $36,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... JONES INLET, NY................................................................. $150,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... KANAWHA RIVER LOCKS & DAM, WV................................................... $9,791,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... KANOPOLIS, KS................................................................... $1,561,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... KASKASKIA RIVER NAVIGATION, IL.................................................. $2,176,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... KAW LAKE, OK.................................................................... $2,121,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... KENTUCKY RIVER, KY.............................................................. $10,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... KEWAUNEE HARBOR, WI............................................................. $8,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... KEWEENAW WATERWAY, MI........................................................... $12,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... KEYSTONE LAKE, OK............................................................... $5,006,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... KINZUA DAM AND ALLEGHANY RESERVOIR, PA.......................................... $1,469,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... KNIGHTVILLE DAM, MA............................................................. $688,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... LAC QUI PARLE LAKES, MINNESOTA RIVER, MN........................................ $677,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... LAKE ASHTABULA AND BALDHILL DAM, ND............................................. $1,424,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... LAKE CROCKETT (Keystone Harbor), WA............................................. $550,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... LAKE KEMP, TX................................................................... $467,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... LAKE MICHIGAN DIVERSION, IL..................................................... $710,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... LAKE MONTAUK HARBOR, NY......................................................... $60,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... LAKE PROVIDENCE HARBOR, LA...................................................... $600,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... LAKE SHELBYVILLE, IL............................................................ $5,512,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... LAKE TRAVERSE, SD & MN.......................................................... $656,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... LAKE WASHINGTON SHIP CANAL, WA.................................................. $13,376,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... LAUREL RIVER LAKE, KY........................................................... $1,646,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... LAVON LAKE, TX.................................................................. $3,135,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... LEWISVILLE DAM, TX.............................................................. $3,542,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... LIBBY DAM, MT................................................................... $1,846,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... LITTLE BLUE RIVER LAKES, MO..................................................... $741,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... LITTLE GOOSE LOCK & DAM, WA..................................................... $2,314,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... LITTLE SODUS BAY HARBOR, NY..................................................... $6,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... LITTLEVILLE LAKE, MA............................................................ $682,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... LONG BRANCH LAKE, MO............................................................ $941,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... LONG ISLAND INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, NY........................................... $100,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... LONG ISLAND SOUND, DMMP, CT..................................................... $2,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... LOOKOUT POINT LAKE, OR.......................................................... $2,080,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... LORAIN HARBOR, OH............................................................... $443,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... LOS ANGELES COUNTY DRAINAGE AREA, CA............................................ $7,035,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... LOST CREEK LAKE, OR............................................................. $3,897,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... LOWER GRANITE LOCK & DAM, WA.................................................... $5,872,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... LOWER MONUMENTAL LOCK & DAM, WA................................................. $4,734,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... LOYALHANNA LAKE, PA............................................................. $1,460,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... LUCKY PEAK LAKE, ID............................................................. $2,689,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... LUDINGTON HARBOR, MI............................................................ $1,419,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... LYNNHAVEN INLET, VA............................................................. $500,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... MADISON PARISH PORT, LA......................................................... $150,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... MAHONING CREEK LAKE, PA......................................................... $1,326,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... MANISTEE HARBOR AND RIVER CHANNEL, MI........................................... $252,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... MANSFIELD HOLLOW LAKE, CT....................................................... $699,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... MANTEO (SHALLOWBAG) BAY, NC..................................................... $8,095,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... MARINA DEL REY, CA.............................................................. $5,050,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... MARION LAKE, KS................................................................. $1,613,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... MARQUETTE HARBOR, MI............................................................ $230,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... MARTINS FORK LAKE, KY........................................................... $1,088,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... MARTIS CREEK LAKE, NV & CA...................................................... $1,170,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... MASONBORO INLET AND CONNECTING CHANNELS, NC..................................... $50,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... MASSILLON LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECT, OH.......................................... $21,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... MATAGORDA SHIP CHANNEL, TX...................................................... $5,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... MATTITUCK HARBOR, NY............................................................ $60,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... MCCLELLAN-KERR ARKANSAS RIVER NAVIGATION SYSTEM, AR............................. $33,553,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... MCCLELLAN-KERR ARKANSAS RIVER NAVIGATION SYSTEM, OK............................. $5,794,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... MCNARY LOCK & DAM, OR & WA...................................................... $6,277,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... MELVERN LAKE, KS................................................................ $1,981,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... MERCED COUNTY STREAMS, CA....................................................... $401,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... MERMENTAU RIVER, LA............................................................. $2,008,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... MICHAEL J KIRWAN DAM AND RESERVOIR, OH.......................................... $1,403,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... MIDDLE RIO GRANDE ENDANGERED SPECIES COLLABORATIVE PROGRAM, NM (MRGESCP)........ $2,500,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... MIDDLESBORO CUMBERLAND RIVER BASIN, KY.......................................... $113,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... MILFORD LAKE, KS................................................................ $2,391,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... MILL CREEK LAKE, WA............................................................. $3,817,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... MILLWOOD LAKE, AR............................................................... $4,802,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... MILWAUKEE HARBOR, WI............................................................ $1,672,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... MINNESOTA RIVER, MN............................................................. $262,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... MISPILLION RIVER, DE............................................................ $50,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... MISSISSINEWA LAKE, IN........................................................... $1,147,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... MISSISSIPPI FLOOD CONTROL, OH................................................... $1,722,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS (MVP PORTION), MN...... $48,426,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS (MVR PORTION), IL...... $53,692,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS (MVS PORTION), IL...... $21,581,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN THE OHIO AND MISSOURI RIVERS (REG WORKS), MO & IL..... $28,731,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... MISSISSIPPI RIVER OUTLETS AT VENICE, LA......................................... $4,215,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... MISSISSIPPI RIVER, BATON ROUGE TO THE GULF OF MEXICO, LA........................ $62,969,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... MISSOURI RIVER--KENSLERS BEND, NE TO SOIUX CITY, IA............................. $137,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... MISSOURI RIVER--SIOUX CITY TO THE MOUTH, IA, KS, MO, & NE....................... $9,021,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... MOBILE HARBOR, AL............................................................... $23,560,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... MOJAVE RIVER DAM, CA............................................................ $522,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... MONONGAHELA RIVER, PA........................................................... $15,861,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... MONROE HARBOR, MI............................................................... $1,340,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... MONROE LAKE, IN................................................................. $1,899,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... MOREHEAD CITY HARBOR, NC........................................................ $4,100,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... MORICHES INLET, NY.............................................................. $100,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... MORRO BAY HARBOR, CA............................................................ $1,590,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... MOSQUITO CREEK LAKE, OH......................................................... $1,413,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... MOUNT MORRIS DAM, NY............................................................ $3,661,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... MOUTH OF YAZOO RIVER, MS........................................................ $175,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... MT. ST. HELENS SEDIMENT CONTROL, WA............................................. $265,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... MUD MOUNTAIN DAM, WA............................................................ $3,441,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... MURDERKILL RIVER, DE............................................................ $50,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... MUSKEGON HARBOR, MI............................................................. $872,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... MUSKINGUM RIVER LAKES, OH....................................................... $8,244,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... MYSTIC RIVER, CT................................................................ $160,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... NANTICOKE RIVER, MD............................................................. $160,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... NARROWS DAM, LAKE GREESON, AR................................................... $5,250,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... NARROWS OF LAKE CHAMPLAIN, VT & NY.............................................. $85,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... NAVARRO MILLS LAKE, TX.......................................................... $2,767,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... NEAH BAY, WA.................................................................... $50,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... NEW BEDFORD, FAIRHAVEN AND ACUSHNET HURRICANE BARRIER, MA....................... $1,250,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... NEW HAVEN HARBOR, CT............................................................ $400,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... NEW HOGAN LAKE, CA.............................................................. $2,476,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... NEW JERSEY INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, NJ............................................ $250,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... NEW MADRID HARBOR, MO........................................................... $420,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... NEW MELONES LAKE, DOWNSTREAM CHANNEL, CA........................................ $1,929,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... NEW RIVER INLET, NC............................................................. $600,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY CHANNELS, NY............................................ $6,150,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... NEW YORK HARBOR, NY............................................................. $3,796,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... NEW YORK HARBOR, NY & NJ (DRIFT REMOVAL)........................................ $7,200,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... NEW YORK HARBOR, NY & NJ (PREVENTION OF OBSTRUCTIVE DEPOSITS)................... $1,045,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... NEWARK BAY, HACKENSACK AND PASSAIC RIVERS, NJ................................... $100,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... NEWPORT BAY HARBOR, CA.......................................................... $1,280,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... NEWTOWN CREEK, NY............................................................... $60,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... NIMROD LAKE, AR................................................................. $1,957,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... NINILCHIK HARBOR, AK............................................................ $420,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... NOLIN LAKE, KY.................................................................. $2,821,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... NOME HARBOR, AK................................................................. $973,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... NORFOLK HARBOR, VA.............................................................. $11,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... NORFORK LAKE, AR................................................................ $6,224,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... NORTH BRANCH KOKOSING RIVER LAKE, OH............................................ $296,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... NORTH FORK OF POUND RIVER LAKE, VA.............................................. $668,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... NORTH HARTLAND LAKE, VT......................................................... $719,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... NORTH SAN GABRIEL DAM AND LAKE GEORGETOWN, TX................................... $2,536,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... NORTH SPRINGFIELD LAKE, VT...................................................... $838,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... NORTHFIELD BROOK LAKE, CT....................................................... $559,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... O.C. FISHER DAM AND LAKE, TX.................................................... $1,373,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... OAHE DAM, LAKE OAHE, SD & ND.................................................... $10,477,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... OAKLAND HARBOR, CA.............................................................. $7,500,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... OCEAN CITY HARBOR AND INLET AND SINEPUXENT BAY, MD.............................. $1,400,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... OCEANSIDE HARBOR, CA............................................................ $1,520,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... OHIO RIVER LOCKS AND DAMS, KY, IL, IN & OH...................................... $31,433,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... OHIO RIVER LOCKS AND DAMS, PA, OH & WV.......................................... $28,023,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... OHIO RIVER LOCKS AND DAMS, WV, KY & OH.......................................... $34,802,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... OHIO RIVER OPEN CHANNEL WORK, KY, IL, IN & OH................................... $5,682,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... OHIO RIVER OPEN CHANNEL WORK, PA, OH & WV....................................... $633,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... OHIO RIVER OPEN CHANNEL WORK, WV, KY & OH....................................... $3,088,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... OKATIBBEE LAKE, MS.............................................................. $2,505,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... OKEECHOBEE WATERWAY, FL......................................................... $2,444,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... OLD HICKORY LOCK AND DAM, TN.................................................... $8,237,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... ONTONAGON HARBOR, MI............................................................ $1,172,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... OOLOGAH LAKE, OK................................................................ $2,089,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... OPTIMA LAKE, OK................................................................. $197,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... ORWELL LAKE, MN................................................................. $462,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... OSCEOLA HARBOR, AR.............................................................. $1,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... OSWEGO HARBOR, NY............................................................... $34,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... OTTER BROOK LAKE, NH............................................................ $730,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... OUACHITA AND BLACK RIVERS, AR & LA.............................................. $10,505,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... OZARK-JETA TAYLOR LOCK & DAM, AR................................................ $5,485,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... PAINT CREEK LAKE, OH............................................................ $1,297,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... PAINTED ROCK DAM, AZ............................................................ $1,522,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... PAINTSVILLE LAKE, KY............................................................ $1,361,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... PALM BEACH HARBOR, FL........................................................... $2,510,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... PANAMA CITY HARBOR, FL.......................................................... $55,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... PAPILLION CREEK, NE............................................................. $738,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... PASCAGOULA HARBOR, MS........................................................... $10,910,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... PASSAIC RIVER FLOOD WARNING SYSTEM, NJ.......................................... $570,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... PAT MAYSE LAKE, TX.............................................................. $992,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... PATOKA LAKE, IN................................................................. $980,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... PEARL RIVER, MS & LA............................................................ $145,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... PEARSON-SKUBITZ BIG HILL LAKE, KS............................................... $1,332,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... PENSACOLA HARBOR, FL............................................................ $67,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... PENSACOLA RESERVOIR, LAKE OF THE CHEROKEES, OK.................................. $167,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... PERRY LAKE, KS.................................................................. $2,254,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... PETERSBURG HARBOR, AK........................................................... $1,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... PHILPOTT LAKE, VA & NC.......................................................... $6,396,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... PIG ISLAND GUT, ME.............................................................. $100,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... PINE AND MATHEWS CANYONS LAKES, NV.............................................. $557,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... PINE CREEK LAKE, OK............................................................. $1,032,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... PINE FLAT LAKE, CA.............................................................. $3,378,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... PIPESTEM LAKE, ND............................................................... $550,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... POMME DE TERRE LAKE, MO......................................................... $2,156,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... POMONA LAKE, KS................................................................. $1,965,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... PORTCHESTER HARBOR, NY.......................................................... $60,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... POTOMAC AND ANACOSTIA RIVER, DC (DRIFT REMOVAL)................................. $845,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... PROCTOR DAM AND LAKE, TX........................................................ $2,336,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, AK................................................... $1,360,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, AL................................................... $100,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, AR................................................... $3,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, CA................................................... $2,132,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, CT................................................... $1,050,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, DC................................................... $30,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, DE................................................... $40,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, FL................................................... $1,450,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, GA................................................... $122,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, HI................................................... $604,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, IL................................................... $106,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, IN................................................... $185,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, KY................................................... $2,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, LA................................................... $60,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, MA................................................... $1,200,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, MD................................................... $475,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, ME................................................... $750,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, MI................................................... $430,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, MN................................................... $84,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, MO................................................... $4,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, MS................................................... $77,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, NC................................................... $655,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, NH................................................... $275,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, NJ................................................... $1,506,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, NY................................................... $1,928,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, OH................................................... $295,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, OR................................................... $200,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, PA................................................... $170,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, RI................................................... $500,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, SC................................................... $625,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, TN................................................... $3,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, TX................................................... $451,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, VA................................................... $870,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, WA................................................... $459,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, WI................................................... $239,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... PROMPTON LAKE, PA............................................................... $506,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... PUGET SOUND AND TRIBUTARY WATERS, WA............................................ $905,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... PUNXSUTAWNEY, PA................................................................ $22,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... QUILLAYUTE RIVER, WA............................................................ $1,590,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... R. D. BAILEY LAKE, WV........................................................... $2,237,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... RARITAN RIVER TO ARTHUR KILL CUT-OFF, NJ........................................ $400,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... RARITAN RIVER, NJ............................................................... $225,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... RATHBUN LAKE, IA................................................................ $2,501,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... RAY ROBERTS LAKE, TX............................................................ $1,525,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... RAYSTOWN LAKE, PA............................................................... $3,752,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... RED LAKE RESERVOIR, MN.......................................................... $233,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... RED ROCK DAM AND LAKE, RED ROCK, IA............................................. $9,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... REMOVAL OF AQUATIC GROWTH, FL................................................... $3,500,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... REMOVAL OF AQUATIC GROWTH, LA................................................... $1,410,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... REND LAKE, IL................................................................... $5,702,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... RESERVOIRS AT HEADWATERS OF MISSISSIPPI RIVER, MN............................... $4,381,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... RICHARD B. RUSSEL DAM & LAKE, GA & SC........................................... $9,387,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... RICHMOND HARBOR, CA............................................................. $8,375,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... ROBERT S. KERR LOCK AND DAM AND RESERVOIR, OK................................... $7,604,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... ROCHESTER HARBOR, NY............................................................ $56,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... ROGUE RIVER AT GOLD BEACH, OR................................................... $579,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... ROLLINSON CHANNEL, NC........................................................... $50,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... ROSEDALE HARBOR, MS............................................................. $1,200,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... ROSEVILLE LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECT, OH.......................................... $35,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... ROUGH RIVER LAKE, KY............................................................ $2,606,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... RUDEE INLET, VA................................................................. $520,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... SABINE-NECHES WATERWAY, TX...................................................... $15,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... SACO RIVER, ME.................................................................. $140,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... SACRAMENTO RIVER (30 FOOT PROJECT), CA.......................................... $3,585,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... SACRAMENTO RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES (DEBRIS CONTROL), CA........................... $1,475,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... SACRAMENTO RIVER SHALLOW DRAFT CHANNEL, CA...................................... $161,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... SAGINAW RIVER, MI............................................................... $3,190,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... SALAMONIE LAKE, IN.............................................................. $1,012,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... SALT CREEK AND TRIBUTARIES, NE.................................................. $1,067,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... SAM RAYBURN DAM AND RESERVOIR, TX............................................... $6,396,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... SAN FRANCISCO BAY, DELTA MODEL STRUCTURE, CA.................................... $1,087,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... SAN FRANCISCO HARBOR AND BAY, CA (DRIFT REMOVAL)................................ $3,090,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... SAN FRANCISCO HARBOR, CA........................................................ $2,776,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... SAN JOAQUIN RIVER, PORT OF STOCKTON, CA......................................... $6,500,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... SAN JUAN HARBOR, PR............................................................. $3,700,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... SAN PABLO BAY AND MARE ISLAND STRAIT, CA........................................ $2,750,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... SANDUSKY HARBOR, OH............................................................. $1,102,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... SANDY HOOK BAY AT LEONARD, NJ................................................... $100,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... SANTA ANA RIVER BASIN, CA....................................................... $4,883,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... SANTA BARBARA HARBOR, CA........................................................ $2,040,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... SANTA ROSA DAM AND LAKE, NM..................................................... $1,220,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... SARDIS LAKE, OK................................................................. $1,130,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... SAVANNAH HARBOR, GA............................................................. $18,462,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... SAVANNAH RIVER BELOW AUGUSTA, GA................................................ $230,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... SAYLORVILLE LAKE, IA............................................................ $5,500,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... SCARBOROUGH RIVER, ME........................................................... $160,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, AZ............................................. $33,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, CA............................................. $1,751,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, CO............................................. $765,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, ID............................................. $499,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, KS............................................. $100,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, MD............................................. $60,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, MO............................................. $327,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, MT............................................. $270,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, ND............................................. $253,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, NM............................................. $532,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, OK............................................. $900,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, OR............................................. $92,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, PA............................................. $46,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, SD............................................. $144,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, TX............................................. $194,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, UT............................................. $653,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, WA............................................. $447,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, WY............................................. $213,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... SCHUYLKILL RIVER, PA............................................................ $250,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... SEATTLE HARBOR, WA.............................................................. $951,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... SEBEWAING RIVER, MI............................................................. $75,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... SHARK RIVER, NJ................................................................. $500,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... SHENANGO RIVER LAKE, PA......................................................... $2,496,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... SHINNECOCK INLET, NY............................................................ $100,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... SHOAL HARBOR AND COMPTON CREEK, NJ.............................................. $80,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... SHREWSBURY RIVER MAIN CHANNEL, NJ............................................... $80,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... SILVER LAKE HARBOR, NC.......................................................... $150,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... SIUSLAW RIVER, OR............................................................... $1,083,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... SKIATOOK LAKE, OK............................................................... $1,465,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... SMITHVILLE LAKE, MO............................................................. $1,160,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... SOMERVILLE LAKE, TX............................................................. $3,292,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... SOURIS RIVER, ND................................................................ $509,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... SOUTHERN NEW YORK FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS, NY.................................... $925,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... ST. CLAIR RIVER, MI............................................................. $1,233,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... ST. JOSEPH HARBOR, MI........................................................... $755,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... ST. LUCIE INLET, FL............................................................. $250,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... ST. MARYS RIVER, MI (NAVIGATION STRUCTURES)..................................... $22,074,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... STAMFORD HURRICANE BARRIER, CT.................................................. $467,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... STILLAGUAMISH RIVER, WA......................................................... $265,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... STILLHOUSE HOLLOW DAM, TX....................................................... $2,150,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... STILLWATER LAKE, PA............................................................. $363,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... STOCKTON LAKE, MO............................................................... $4,153,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... STONEWALL JACKSON LAKE, WV...................................................... $1,273,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... STURGEON BAY HARBOR AND LAKE MICHIGAN SHIP CANAL, WI............................ $19,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... SUCCESS LAKE, CA................................................................ $2,529,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... SUISUN BAY CHANNEL, CA.......................................................... $2,980,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... SUMMERSVILLE LAKE, WV........................................................... $2,636,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... SURRY MOUNTAIN LAKE, NH......................................................... $746,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY WATERS, IL.................................... $689,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY WATERS, IN.................................... $125,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY WATERS, ME.................................... $20,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY WATERS, MI.................................... $2,501,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY WATERS, MN.................................... $446,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY WATERS, ND.................................... $35,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY WATERS, NY.................................... $635,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY WATERS, OH.................................... $257,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY WATERS, OR.................................... $4,100,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY WATERS, PA.................................... $107,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY WATERS, WA.................................... $74,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY WATERS, WI.................................... $509,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... SUTTON LAKE, WV................................................................. $3,075,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... SWINOMISH CHANNEL, WA........................................................... $600,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... TABLE ROCK LAKE, MO & AR........................................................ $8,293,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... TACOMA, PUYALLUP RIVER, WA...................................................... $142,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... TAMPA HARBOR, FL................................................................ $5,200,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... TANGIER CHANNEL, VA............................................................. $1,135,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... TAYLORSVILLE LAKE, KY........................................................... $1,232,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... TENKILLER FERRY LAKE, OK........................................................ $4,459,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... TENNESSEE RIVER, TN............................................................. $16,540,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... TENNESSEE-TOMBIGBEE WATERWAY WILDLIFE MITIGATION, AL & MS....................... $2,344,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... TENNESSEE-TOMBIGBEE WATERWAY, AL & MS........................................... $28,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... TERMINUS DAM, LAKE KAWEAH, CA................................................... $2,133,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... TEXAS CITY SHIP CHANNEL, TX..................................................... $1,436,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... TEXAS WATER ALLOCATION ASSESSMENT, TX........................................... $1,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... THE DALLES LOCK & DAM, WA & OR.................................................. $8,702,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... THOMASTON DAM, CT............................................................... $994,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... TIOGA HAMMOND LAKES, PA......................................................... $2,384,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... TIONESTA LAKE, PA............................................................... $2,200,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... TOLEDO HARBOR, OH............................................................... $7,849,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... TOM JENKINS DAM, OH............................................................. $603,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... TORONTO LAKE, KS................................................................ $652,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... TOWN BLUFF DAM, B. A. STEINHAGEN LAKE, TX....................................... $2,666,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... TOWN CREEK, SC.................................................................. $380,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... TOWNSHEND LAKE, VT.............................................................. $797,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... TRINIDAD LAKE, CO............................................................... $1,243,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... TULLY LAKE, MA.................................................................. $726,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... TUTTLE CREEK LAKE, KS........................................................... $2,644,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... TWO RIVERS DAM, NM.............................................................. $601,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... TYGART LAKE, WV................................................................. $1,434,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... UMPQUA RIVER, OR................................................................ $800,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... UNION CITY LAKE, PA............................................................. $425,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... UNION LAKE, MO.................................................................. $5,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... UNION VILLAGE DAM, VT........................................................... $683,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... UPPER RIO GRANDE WATER OPERATIONS MODEL STUDY, CO, NM, TX....................... $1,000,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... VENTURA HARBOR, CA.............................................................. $2,840,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... W. KERR SCOTT DAM AND RESERVOIR, NC............................................. $3,591,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... WACO LAKE, TX................................................................... $3,131,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... WALLACE LAKE, LA................................................................ $241,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... WALLISVILLE LAKE, TX............................................................ $2,175,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... WALTER F. GEORGE LOCK AND DAM, AL & GA.......................................... $8,394,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... WASHINGTON HARBOR, DC........................................................... $25,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... WATER/ENVIRONMENTAL CERTIFICATION, FL........................................... $400,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... WATER/ENVIRONMENTAL CERTIFICATION, VA........................................... $104,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... WATERWAY FROM EMPIRE TO THE GULF, LA............................................ $5,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... WATERWAY FROM INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY TO BAYOU DULAC, LA.......................... $30,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... WATERWAY ON THE COAST OF VIRGINIA, VA........................................... $600,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... WAUKEGAN HARBOR, IL............................................................. $590,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... WAURIKA LAKE, OK................................................................ $2,568,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... WEBBERS FALLS LOCK & DAM, OK.................................................... $5,617,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... WEST FORK OF MILL CREEK LAKE, OH................................................ $750,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... WEST HILL DAM, MA............................................................... $842,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... WEST POINT DAM AND LAKE, GA & AL................................................ $8,845,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... WEST THOMPSON LAKE, CT.......................................................... $849,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... WESTCHESTER CREEK, NY........................................................... $100,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... WESTVILLE LAKE, MA.............................................................. $661,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... WHITE RIVER, AR................................................................. $30,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... WHITLOW RANCH DAM, AZ........................................................... $607,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... WHITNEY LAKE, TX................................................................ $7,221,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... WHITNEY POINT LAKE, NY.......................................................... $642,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... WICOMICO RIVER, MD.............................................................. $1,500,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... WILLAMETTE RIVER AT WILLAMETTE FALLS, OR........................................ $258,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... WILLAMETTE RIVER BANK PROTECTION, OR............................................ $85,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... WILLAPA RIVER AND HARBOR, WA.................................................... $75,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... WILLIAM H. HARSHA LAKE, OH...................................................... $1,611,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... WILLOW CREEK LAKE, OR........................................................... $657,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... WILMINGTON HARBOR, DE........................................................... $7,020,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... WILMINGTON HARBOR, NC........................................................... $12,846,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... WILSON LAKE, KS................................................................. $1,715,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... WISTER LAKE, OK................................................................. $922,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... WOLF CREEK DAM, LAKE CUMBERLAND, KY............................................. $8,089,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... WOLF RIVER HARBOR, TN........................................................... $180,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... WOODCOCK CREEK LAKE, PA......................................................... $1,078,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... WOONSOCKET, RI.................................................................. $300,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... WRIGHT PATMAN DAM AND LAKE, TX.................................................. $3,804,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... YAQUINA BAY AND HARBOR, OR...................................................... $1,986,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... YATESVILLE LAKE, KY............................................................. $1,154,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... YAZOO RIVER, MS................................................................. $154,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... YELLOW BEND PORT, AR............................................................ $115,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... YORK INDIAN ROCK DAM, PA........................................................ $480,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... YOUGHIOGHENY RIVER LAKE, PA & MD................................................ $2,358,000 The President
Corps of Engineers.............. Operation and Maintenance......... YUBA RIVER, CA.................................................................. $121,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Ak Chin Indian Water Rights Settlement Act Project, AZ.......................... $10,960,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Animas-La Plata Project, Colorado River Storage Participating Project, CO....... $12,462,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Arbuckle Project, OK............................................................ $230,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Balmorhea Project, TX........................................................... $51,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Boise Area Projects, ID......................................................... $5,546,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Cachuma Project, CA............................................................. $1,401,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... California Investigations Program, CA........................................... $233,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Calleguas Municipal Water District Recycling Project, CA........................ $1,400,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Canadian River Project, TX...................................................... $165,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Carlsbad Project, NM............................................................ $4,780,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Central Valley Projects, CA:
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... American River Division, Folsom Dam Unit/Mormon Island, CA.................. $10,384,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Auburn-Folsom South Unit, CA................................................ $1,400,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Delta Division, CA.......................................................... $20,008,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... East Side Division, CA...................................................... $4,401,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Friant Division, CA......................................................... $13,075,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Miscellaneous Project Programs, CA.......................................... $13,859,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Replacements, Additions, and Extraordinary Maint. Program, CA............... $21,656,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Sacramento River Division, CA............................................... $43,364,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... San Felipe Division, CA..................................................... $1,179,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... San Joaquin Division, CA.................................................... $400,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Shasta Division, CA......................................................... $10,491,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Trinity River Division, CA.................................................. $16,661,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Water and Power Operations, CA.............................................. $9,891,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... West San Joaquin Division, San Luis Unit, CA................................ $15,400,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Yield Feasibility Investigation, CA......................................... $448,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Collbran Project, CO............................................................ $2,514,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Colorado Investigations Program, CO............................................. $183,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Colorado River Basin Project--Central Arizona Project, AZ....................... $9,416,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Colorado River Front Work and Levee System, AZ.................................. $2,255,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Colorado-Big Thompson Project, CO............................................... $12,778,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Columbia and Snake River Salmon Recovery Project, ID............................ $18,000,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Columbia Basin Project, WA...................................................... $12,075,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Crooked River Project, OR....................................................... $944,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Deschutes Project, OR........................................................... $1,326,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Eastern New Mexico Investigations Program, NM................................... $23,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Eastern Oregon Projects, OR..................................................... $852,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Fort Peck Reservation/Dry Prairie Rural Water System, MT........................ $6,000,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Fruitgrowers Dam Project, CO.................................................... $319,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Fryingpan-Arkansas Project--Arkansas Valley Conduit, CO......................... $3,000,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Fryingpan-Arkansas Project, CO.................................................. $8,824,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Grand Valley Unit, CRBSCP, Title II, CO......................................... $1,540,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Halfway Wash Project/Study, NV.................................................. $75,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Hungry Horse Project, MT........................................................ $702,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Huntley Project, MT............................................................. $115,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Hyrum Project, UT............................................................... $324,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Idaho Investigations Program, ID................................................ $390,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Jicarilla Apache Rural Water System, NM......................................... $500,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Kansas Investigations Program, KS............................................... $5,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Kendrick Project, WY............................................................ $4,310,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Klamath Dam Removal Study, OR................................................... $5,000,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Klamath Project, OR............................................................. $22,500,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Lahontan Basin Project, NV...................................................... $6,723,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Lake Mead/Las Vegas Wash Program, NV............................................ $1,850,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Lake Tahoe Regional Wetlands, CA................................................ $94,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Leadville/Arkansas River Recovery Project, CO................................... $6,659,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Lewis and Clark Rural Water System, SD, IA, MN.................................. $10,000,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Lewiston Orchards Project, ID................................................... $826,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Long Beach Area Water Reclamation Project, CA................................... $1,000,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Long Beach Desalination Project, CA............................................. $1,000,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Lower Colorado River Investigations Program, CO................................. $137,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Lower Rio Grande Water Conservation Project, TX................................. $50,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Lower Yellowstone Project, MT................................................... $49,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Mancos Project, CO.............................................................. $1,663,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... McGee Creek Project, OK......................................................... $680,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Mid-Dakota Rural Water Project, SD.............................................. $15,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Middle Rio Grande Project, NM................................................... $25,745,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Milk River Project, MT.......................................................... $3,783,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Minidoka Area Projects, ID...................................................... $5,211,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Mirage Flats Project, NE........................................................ $144,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Mni Wiconi Project, SD.......................................................... $30,480,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Montana Investigations Program, MT.............................................. $20,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Moon Lake Project, UT........................................................... $51,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Mountain Park Project, OK....................................................... $479,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Navajo Gallup Water Supply, NM.................................................. $10,000,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Navajo Nation Investigations Program, NM........................................ $114,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Newton Project, UT.............................................................. $95,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Norman Project, OK.............................................................. $476,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... North Platte Project, WY........................................................ $1,835,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Northern Arizona Investigations Program, AZ..................................... $182,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Northern Utah Investigations Program, UT........................................ $602,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Nueces River Project, TX........................................................ $563,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Ogden River Project, UT......................................................... $446,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Oklahoma Investigations Program, OK............................................. $47,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Oregon Investigations Program,OR................................................ $457,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Orland Project, CA.............................................................. $767,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Paradox Valley Unit, CRBSCP, Title II, CO....................................... $2,943,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Pecos River Basin Water Salvage Project, NM..................................... $485,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Perkins County Rural Water District, SD......................................... $1,000,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Phoenix Metropolitan Water Reclamation and Reuse Project, AZ.................... $200,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Pine River Project, CO.......................................................... $563,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Provo River Project, UT......................................................... $1,596,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... P-SMBP--Garrison Diversion Unit, ND............................................. $50,000,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Rapid Valley Project, SD........................................................ $84,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Rio Grande Project, NM.......................................................... $7,363,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Rocky Boys/North Central MT Rural Water System, MT.............................. $5,000,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Rogue River Basin Project, Talent Division, OR.................................. $1,576,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Salt River Project, AZ.......................................................... $800,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Salton Sea Research Project, CA................................................. $400,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... San Angelo Project, TX.......................................................... $418,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... San Carlos Apache Tribe Water Settlement Act Project, AZ........................ $325,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... San Diego Area Water Reclamation Program, CA.................................... $4,969,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... San Jose Area Water Reclamation and Reuse Program, CA........................... $242,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... San Juan River Basin Investigations Program, NM................................. $91,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... San Luis Valley Project, CO..................................................... $5,062,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Scofield Project, UT............................................................ $423,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Shoshone Project, WY............................................................ $1,198,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Soboba, CA...................................................................... $4,000,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Solano Project, CA.............................................................. $3,835,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... South/Central Arizona Investigations Program, AZ................................ $608,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Southern California Investigations Program, CA.................................. $762,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Southern Nevada/Utah Investigations Program, UT................................. $26,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Southern New Mexico/West Texas Investigations Program, NM, TX................... $91,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Southern Utah Investigations Program, UT........................................ $128,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Strawberry Valley Project, UT................................................... $311,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Sun River Project, MT........................................................... $324,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Texas Investigations Program, TX................................................ $47,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Tualatin Project, OR............................................................ $553,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Tucumcari Project, NM........................................................... $41,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Umatilla Project, OR............................................................ $4,137,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Uncompahgre Project, CO......................................................... $397,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Upper Rio Grande Basin Investigations Program, NM............................... $35,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Ventura River Project, CA....................................................... $212,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... W.C. Austin Project, OK......................................................... $499,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Washington Area Projects, WA.................................................... $459,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Washington Investigations Program, WA........................................... $75,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Washita Basin Project, OK....................................................... $1,432,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Weber Basin Project, UT......................................................... $1,670,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Weber River Project, UT......................................................... $205,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Wichita Project (Equus Beds Division), KS....................................... $50,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Wichita Project, KS............................................................. $414,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Yakima Project, WA.............................................................. $8,485,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Yakima River Basin Water Enhancement Project, WA................................ $16,395,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Yuma Area Projects, AZ.......................................................... $21,420,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Items not listed under states................................................... .............. The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Project--Title I.......................... $11,536,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Project--Title II......................... $7,000,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Colorado River Storage Project (CRSP), Section 5................................ $8,902,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Colorado River Storage Project (CRSP), Section 8................................ $3,752,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Colorado River Water Quality Improvement Program................................ $635,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Dam Safety Program:
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Department of the Interior Dam Safety Program............................... $1,900,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Initiate Safety of Dams Corrective Action................................... $74,274,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Safety Evaluation of Existing Dams.......................................... $19,000,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Drought Emergency Assistance Program............................................ $380,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Emergency Planning and Disaster Response Program................................ $1,157,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Endangered Species Recovery Implementation Program.............................. $23,721,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Environmental and Interagency Coordination Activities........................... $1,883,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Environmental Program Administration............................................ $1,140,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Examination of Existing Structures.............................................. $9,037,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Federal Building Seismic Safety Program......................................... $1,140,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... General Planning Activities..................................................... $2,347,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Land Resources Management Program............................................... $10,665,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Lower Colorado River Operations Program......................................... $25,300,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Miscellaneous Flood Control Operations.......................................... $803,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Native American Affairs Program................................................. $7,465,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Negotiation and Administration of Water Marketing............................... $1,924,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Operation and Program Management................................................ $1,980,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program (other Pick Sloan)............................ $40,357,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Power Program Services.......................................................... $1,576,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Public Access and Safety Program................................................ $771,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Reclamation Law Administration.................................................. $2,265,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Recreation and Fish and Wildlife Program Administration......................... $2,137,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Research and Development:
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Desalination and Water Purification Program................................. $3,666,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Science and Technology Program.............................................. $12,488,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Rural Water Program, Title I.................................................... $2,677,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Site Security Activities........................................................ $30,268,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... United States/Mexico Border Issues--Technical Support........................... $90,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Upper Colorado River Operations Program......................................... $252,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Water Conservation Field Services Program....................................... $7,854,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... WaterSMART Program:
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... WaterSMART Grants (Challenge Grant in 2010)................................. $20,000,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Title XVI Water Reclamation/Reuse Projects.................................. $7,689,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... Water and Related Resources....... Basin Studies............................................................... $4,000,000 The President
Bureau of Reclamation........... CALFED............................ California Bay-Delta Restoration................................................ $40,000,000 The President
Department of the Interior...... CUPCA............................. Central Utah Project Completion Act............................................. $43,004,000 The President
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF NEW BUDGET (OBLIGATIONAL) AUTHORITY FOR FISCAL YEAR 2010 AND BUDGET ESTIMATES AND AMOUNTS RECOMMENDED IN THE BILL FOR FISCAL
YEAR 2011
[In thousands of dollars]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Senate Committee recommendation
compared with (+ or -)
Item 2010 Budget estimate Committee ---------------------------------
appropriation recommendation 2010
appropriation Budget estimate
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TITLE I--DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE--CIVIL
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
Corps of Engineers--Civil
Investigations..................................................... 160,000 104,000 166,000 +6,000 +62,000
Construction....................................................... 2,031,000 1,690,000 1,780,000 -251,000 +90,000
Mississippi River and tributaries.................................. 340,000 240,000 335,000 -5,000 +95,000
Recission...................................................... ............... -23,000 ............... ............... +23,000
Recission of emergency funding................................. ............... -35,000 ............... ............... +35,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Mississippi River and tributaries.................. 340,000 182,000 335,000 -5,000 +153,000
Operations and maintenance......................................... 2,400,000 2,361,000 2,495,000 +95,000 +134,000
Regulatory program................................................. 190,000 193,000 193,000 +3,000 ...............
FUSRAP............................................................. 134,000 130,000 130,000 -4,000 ...............
Flood control and coastal emergencies.............................. ............... 30,000 30,000 +30,000 ...............
Expenses........................................................... 185,000 185,000 185,000 ............... ...............
Office of Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works)............ 5,000 6,000 6,000 +1,000 ...............
====================================================================================
Total, title I, Department of Defense--Civil................. 5,445,000 4,881,000 5,320,000 -125,000 +439,000
Appropriations........................................... (5,445,000) (4,939,000) (5,320,000) (-125,000) (+381,000)
Rescissions.............................................. ............... (-23,000) ............... ............... (+23,000)
Recission of emergency funding........................... ............... (-35,000) ............... ............... (+35,000)
TITLE II--DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Central Utah Project Completion Account
Central Utah project construction.................................. 38,800 38,810 38,810 +10 ...............
Fish, wildlife, and recreation mitigation and conservation......... 1,500 2,500 2,500 +1,000 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal..................................................... 40,300 41,310 41,310 +1,010 ...............
Program oversight and administration............................... 1,704 1,694 1,694 -10 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Central Utah project completion account............... 42,004 43,004 43,004 +1,000 ...............
Bureau of Reclamation
Water and related resources........................................ 951,158 913,582 938,600 -12,558 +25,018
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Water and related resources...................... 951,158 913,582 938,600 -12,558 +25,018
Central Valley project restoration fund............................ 35,358 49,915 49,915 +14,557 ...............
California Bay-Delta restoration................................... 40,000 40,000 40,000 ............... ...............
Policy and administration.......................................... 61,200 61,200 61,200 ............... ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Bureau of Reclamation................................. 1,087,716 1,064,697 1,089,715 +1,999 +25,018
====================================================================================
Total, title II, Department of the Interior.................. 1,129,720 1,107,701 1,132,719 +2,999 +25,018
TITLE III--DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Energy Programs
Energy efficiency and renewable energy............................. 2,242,500 2,355,473 2,287,800 +45,300 -67,673
Electricity delivery and energy reliability........................ 171,982 185,930 190,180 +18,198 +4,250
Nuclear energy..................................................... 786,637 824,052 783,170 -3,467 -40,882
Fossil energy research and development............................. 672,383 586,583 725,950 +53,567 +139,367
Naval Petroleum and Oil Shale Reserves............................. 23,627 23,614 23,614 -13 ...............
Strategic petroleum reserve........................................ 243,823 138,861 209,861 -33,962 +71,000
Northeast home heating oil reserve................................. 11,300 11,300 11,300 ............... ...............
Energy Information Administration.................................. 110,595 128,833 119,000 +8,405 -9,833
Non-defense environmental clean up................................. 244,673 225,163 244,163 -510 +19,000
Uranium enrichment decontamination and decommissioning fund........ 573,850 730,498 550,000 -23,850 -180,498
Offsetting collections......................................... ............... -200,000 ............... ............... +200,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, UEDDF.............................................. 573,850 530,498 550,000 -23,850 +19,502
Science............................................................ 4,903,710 5,121,437 5,012,000 +108,290 -109,437
Nuclear Waste Disposal............................................. 98,400 ............... ............... -98,400 ...............
Advanced research projects agency--Energy ARPA-E................... ............... 299,966 200,000 +200,000 -99,966
Innovative Technology Loan Guarantee Program....................... 43,000 58,000 58,000 +15,000 ...............
Offsetting collection.......................................... -43,000 -58,000 -58,000 -15,000 ...............
Proposed change in subsidy cost................................ ............... 500,000 380,000 +380,000 -120,000
Additional loan volume......................................... ............... 360,000 170,000 +170,000 -190,000
Additional subsidy cost........................................ ............... 300,000 ............... ............... -300,000
Loan volume (rescission)....................................... ............... ............... -140,000 -140,000 -140,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Innovative Technology Guarantee Pgm................ ............... 1,160,000 410,000 +410,000 -750,000
Advanced technology vehicles manufacturing loans program........... 20,000 9,998 9,998 -10,002 ...............
Departmental administration........................................ 288,684 288,872 288,872 +188 ...............
Miscellaneous revenues......................................... -119,740 -119,740 -119,740 ............... ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net appropriation............................................ 168,944 169,132 169,132 +188 ...............
Office of the Inspector General.................................... 51,927 42,850 42,850 -9,077 ...............
Atomic Energy Defense Activities
National Nuclear Security Administration:
Weapons activities............................................. 6,384,431 7,008,835 7,018,835 +634,404 +10,000
Defense nuclear nonproliferation............................... 2,136,709 2,687,167 2,612,167 +475,458 -75,000
Naval reactors................................................. 945,133 1,070,486 1,040,486 +95,353 -30,000
Office of the Administrator.................................... 420,754 448,267 438,267 +17,513 -10,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, National Nuclear Security Administration........... 9,887,027 11,214,755 11,109,755 +1,222,728 -105,000
Defense environmental cleanup...................................... 5,642,331 5,588,039 5,262,838 -379,493 -325,201
Other defense activities........................................... 847,468 866,317 866,317 +18,849 ...............
Acquisition workforce capacity and capabilities................ ............... 11,892 ............... ............... -11,892
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Other defense activities........................... 847,468 878,209 866,317 +18,849 -11,892
Defense nuclear waste disposal..................................... 98,400 ............... ............... -98,400 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Atomic Energy Defense Activities...................... 16,475,226 17,681,003 17,238,910 +763,684 -442,093
Power Marketing Administrations
Operation and maintenance, Southeastern Power Administration....... 78,444 8,034 8,034 -70,410 ...............
Offsetting collection.......................................... -70,806 -8,034 -8,034 +62,772 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, O&M, Southeastern Power Administration............. 7,638 ............... ............... -7,638 ...............
Operation and maintenance, Southwestern Power Administration....... 82,944 46,312 46,312 -36,632 ...............
Offsetting collection.......................................... -38,000 -33,613 -33,613 +4,387 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, O&M, Southwestern Power Administration............. 44,944 12,699 12,699 -32,245 ...............
Construction, rehabilitation, operation and maintenance, Western 610,397 285,864 285,864 -324,533 ...............
Area Power Administration.........................................
Offsetting collection.......................................... -349,807 -180,306 -180,306 +169,501 ...............
Offsetting collection Colorado River Dam Fund.................. -3,879 ............... ............... +3,879 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, O&M, Western Area Power Administration............. 256,711 105,558 105,558 -151,153 ...............
Falcon and Amistad operating and maintenance fund.................. 2,568 3,715 3,715 +1,147 ...............
Offsetting collections......................................... ............... -3,495 -3,495 -3,495 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Falcon and Amistad O&M fund........................ 2,568 220 220 -2,348 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Power Marketing Administrations....................... 311,861 118,477 118,477 -193,384 ...............
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Salaries and expenses.............................................. 298,000 315,600 315,600 +17,600 ...............
Revenues applied................................................... -298,000 -315,600 -315,600 -17,600 ...............
====================================================================================
Total, title III, Department of Energy....................... 27,111,438 29,613,170 28,346,405 +1,234,967 -1,266,765
TITLE IV--INDEPENDENT AGENCIES
Appalachian Regional Commission.................................... 76,000 76,000 76,000 ............... ...............
Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board............................ 26,086 28,640 26,086 ............... -2,554
Delta Regional Authority........................................... 13,000 13,000 13,000 ............... ...............
Denali Commission.................................................. 11,965 11,965 11,965 ............... ...............
Northern Border Regional Commission................................ 1,500 1,500 ............... -1,500 -1,500
Southeast Crescent Regional Commission............................. 250 250 ............... -250 -250
Nuclear Regulatory Commission:
Salaries and expenses.......................................... 1,056,000 1,043,483 1,053,483 -2,517 +10,000
Revenues....................................................... -902,402 -906,220 -915,220 -12,818 -9,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal..................................................... 153,598 137,263 138,263 -15,335 +1,000
Office of Inspector General.................................... 10,860 10,102 10,860 ............... +758
Revenues....................................................... -9,774 -9,092 -9,774 ............... -682
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal..................................................... 1,086 1,010 1,086 ............... +76
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Nuclear Regulatory Commission......................... 154,684 138,273 139,349 -15,335 +1,076
Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board............................... 3,891 2,490 3,891 ............... +1,401
Office of the Federal Coordinator for Alaska Natural Gas 4,466 4,285 4,285 -181 ...............
Transportation Projects...........................................
====================================================================================
Total, title IV, Independent agencies........................ 291,842 276,403 274,576 -17,266 -1,827
====================================================================================
Grand total.................................................. 33,978,000 35,878,274 35,073,700 +1,095,700 -804,574
Appropriations........................................... (33,978,000) (35,936,274) (35,213,700) (+1,235,700) (-722,574)
Rescissions.............................................. ............... (-23,000) (-140,000) (-140,000) (-117,000)
Rescission of emergency funding.......................... ............... (-35,000) ............... ............... (+35,000)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------