House Report 112-730 - REPORT ON LEGISLATIVE AND OVERSIGHT ACTIVITIES of the HOUSE COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY together with ADDITIONAL VIEWS ONE HUNDRED TWELFTH CONGRESS second session (Pursuant to House Rule XI, 1(d))

[House Report 112-730]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

Union Calendar No. 533
112th Congress Report
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
2nd Session 112-730
_______________________________________________________________________

REPORT ON LEGISLATIVE AND OVERSIGHT ACTIVITIES

of the

HOUSE COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND
SECURITY

together with

ADDITIONAL VIEWS

ONE HUNDRED TWELFTH CONGRESS

second session

(Pursuant to House Rule XI, 1(d))

December 27, 2012.--Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on
the State of the Union and ordered to be printed
REPORT ON LEGISLATIVE AND OVERSIGHT ACTIVITIES
OF THE COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY

Union Calendar No. 533
112th Congress Report
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
2nd Session 112-730
_______________________________________________________________________

REPORT ON LEGISLATIVE AND OVERSIGHT ACTIVITIES

of the

HOUSE COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND

SECURITY

together with

ADDITIONAL VIEWS

ONE HUNDRED TWELFTH CONGRESS

second session

(Pursuant to House Rule XI, 1(d))

December 27, 2012.--Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on
the State of the Union and ordered to be printed

LETTER OF SUBMITTAL

----------

House of Representatives,
Committee on Homeland Security,
Washington, DC, December 27, 2012.
Hon. Karen L. Haas,
Clerk of the House of Representatives,
The Capitol, Washington, DC.
Dear Ms. Haas: Pursuant to clause 1(d)(1) of Rule XI and
Rule X of the Rules of the House of Representatives, here is a
report of the legislative and oversight activities of the
Committee on Homeland Security during the 112th Congress.
Sincerely,
Peter T. King,
Chairman.

Union Calendar No. 533
112th Congress Report
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
2nd Session 112-730

======================================================================

LEGISLATIVE AND OVERSIGHT ACTIVITIES OF THE
COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY 112TH CONGRESS

_______

December 27, 2012.--Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on
the State of the Union and ordered to be printed

_______

Mr.King, from the Committee on Homeland Security, submitted the
following

R E P O R T

together with

ADDITIONAL VIEWS

Overview

The Committee on Homeland Security met on January 26, 2011,
for an organizational meeting for the 112th Congress under the
direction of Chairman Peter T. King of New York. The Committee
Membership was set at 33 Members: With 19 Republicans and 14
Democrats.
The Committee established six Subcommittees: The
Subcommittee on Cybersecurity, Infrastructure Protection, and
Security Technologies; the Subcommittee on Transportation
Security; the Subcommittee on Oversight, Investigations, and
Management; the Subcommittee on Emergency Preparedness,
Response, and Communications; the Subcommittee on Border and
Maritime Security; and the Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and
Intelligence.

CONTENTS

Page
Jurisdiction and Legislative History............................. 3
Membership and Organization...................................... 9
History of the Committee on Homeland Security.................... 13
Full Committee................................................... 20
Legislative Activities....................................... 21
Oversight Activities......................................... 62
Subcommittee on Cybersecurity, Infrastructure Protection, and
Security Technologies.......................................... 81
Legislative Activities....................................... 81
Oversight Activities......................................... 87
Subcommittee on Transportation Security.......................... 111
Legislative Activities....................................... 111
Oversight Activities......................................... 119
Subcommittee on Oversight, Investigations, and Management........ 133
Legislative Activities....................................... 133
Oversight Activities......................................... 137
Subcommittee on Emergency Preparedness, Response, and
Communications................................................. 155
Legislative Activities....................................... 155
Oversight Activities......................................... 162
Subcommittee on Border and Maritime Security..................... 189
Legislative Activities....................................... 189
Oversight Activities......................................... 202
Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and Intelligence................ 219
Legislative Activities....................................... 219
Oversight Activities......................................... 222
Committee Oversight Plan......................................... 235
Part A, Oversight Plan As Agreed to.......................... 235
Part B, Implementation of the Oversight Plan................. 249
Appendices
Appendix I--Committee Rules.................................. 277
Appendix II--Membership Changes to the Committee............. 291
Appendix III--List of Public Laws............................ 303
Appendix IV--Committee Legislative Reports................... 305
Appendix V--Status of Legislation Referred to the Committee.. 309
Appendix VI--Executive Communications, Memorials, Petitions,
and Presidential Messages.......................... 319
Appendix VII--Committee Staff................................ 323
Appendix VIII--Witnesses..................................... 327
Appendix IX--Printed Hearings................................ 363
Appendix X--Committee Prints................................. 373
Appendix XI--Summary of Committee Activities................. 375
Additional Views................................................. 376

Jurisdiction and Legislative History

A provision for the establishment of a Committee on
Homeland Security was included in H. Res. 5, the Rules of the
House of Representatives for the 112th Congress, agreed to on
January 5, 2011. The jurisdiction of the Committee is as
follows:

HOUSE RULE X

Committees and their legislative jurisdictions

1. There shall be in the House the following standing
committees, each of which shall have the jurisdiction and
related functions assigned by this clause and clauses 2, 3, and
4. All bills, resolutions, and other matters relating to
subjects within the jurisdiction of the standing committees
listed in this clause shall be referred to those committees, in
accordance with clause 2 of rule XII, as follows:
(I) Committee on Homeland Security
(1) Overall homeland security policy.
(2) Organization and administration of the Department
of Homeland Security.
(3) Functions of the Department of Homeland Security
relating to the following:
(A) Border and port security (except
immigration policy and non-border enforcement).
(B) Customs (except customs revenue).
(C) Integration, analysis, and dissemination
of homeland security information.
(D) Domestic preparedness for and collective
response to terrorism.
(E) Research and development.
(F) Transportation security.

* * * * *

General oversight responsibilities

2. (a) The various standing committees shall have general
oversight responsibilities as provided in paragraph (b) in
order to assist the House in
(1) its analysis, appraisal, and evaluation of--
(A) the application, administration,
execution, and effectiveness of Federal laws;
and
(B) conditions and circumstances that may
indicate the necessity or desirability of
enacting new or additional legislation; and
(2) its formulation, consideration, and enactment of
changes in Federal laws, and of such additional
legislation as may be necessary or appropriate.
(b)(1) In order to determine whether laws and programs
addressing subjects within the jurisdiction of a committee are
being implemented and carried out in accordance with the intent
of Congress and whether they should be continued, curtailed, or
eliminated, each standing committee (other than the Committee
on Appropriations) shall review and study on a continuing
basis--
(A) the application, administration, execution, and
effectiveness of laws and programs addressing subjects
within its jurisdiction;
(B) the organization and operation of Federal
agencies and entities having responsibilities for the
administration and execution of laws and programs
addressing subjects within its jurisdiction;
(C) any conditions or circumstances that may indicate
the necessity or desirability of enacting new or
additional legislation addressing subjects within its
jurisdiction (whether or not a bill or resolution has
been introduced with respect thereto); and
(D) future research and forecasting on subjects
within its jurisdiction.
(2) Each committee to which subparagraph (1) applies having
more than 20 members shall establish an oversight subcommittee,
or require its subcommittees to conduct oversight in their
respective jurisdictions, to assist in carrying out its
responsibilities under this clause. The establishment of an
oversight subcommittee does not limit the responsibility of a
subcommittee with legislative jurisdiction in carrying out its
oversight responsibilities.
(c) Each standing committee shall review and study on a
continuing basis the impact or probable impact of tax policies
affecting subjects within its jurisdiction as described in
clauses 1 and 3.
(d)(1) Not later than February 15 of the first session of a
Congress, each standing committee shall, in a meeting that is
open to the public and with a quorum present, adopt its
oversight plan for that Congress. Such plan shall be submitted
simultaneously to the Committee on Government Reform and to the
Committee on House Administration. In developing its plan each
committee shall, to the maximum extent feasible--
(A) consult with other committees that have
jurisdiction over the same or related laws, programs,
or agencies within its jurisdiction with the objective
of ensuring maximum coordination and cooperation among
committees when conducting reviews of such laws,
programs, or agencies and include in its plan an
explanation of steps that have been or will be taken to
ensure such coordination and cooperation;
(B) review specific problems with Federal rules,
regulations, statutes, and court decisions that are
ambiguous, arbitrary, or nonsensical, or that impose
severe financial burdens on individuals;
(C) give priority consideration to including in its
plan the review of those laws, programs, or agencies
operating under permanent budget authority or permanent
statutory authority;
(D) have a view toward ensuring that all significant
laws, programs, or agencies within its jurisdiction are
subject to review every 10 years; and
(E) have a view toward insuring against duplication
of Federal programs.
(2) Not later than March 31 in the first session of a
Congress, after consultation with the Speaker, the Majority
Leader, and the Minority Leader, the Committee on Government
Reform shall report to the House the oversight plans submitted
by committees together with any recommendations that it, or the
House leadership group described above, may make to ensure the
most effective coordination of oversight plans and otherwise to
achieve the objectives of this clause.
(e) The Speaker, with the approval of the House, may
appoint special ad hoc oversight committees for the purpose of
reviewing specific matters within the jurisdiction of two or
more standing committees.

Special oversight functions

3. (g)(1) The Committee on Homeland Security shall review
and study on a continuing basis all Government activities
relating to homeland security, (including the interaction of
all departments and agencies with the Department of Homeland
Security.
(2) In addition, the Committee shall review and study on
a primary and continuing basis all Government activities,
programs and organizations related to homeland security that
fall within its primary legislative jurisdiction

----------

Legislative History To Accompany Changes to Rule X

(Congressional Record, January 4, 2005, Page H25)

Rule X and the Committee on Homeland Security

Legislative History

Overall homeland security policy--The jurisdiction of the
Committee on Homeland Security over ``overall homeland security
policy'' is to be interpreted on a government-wide or multi-
agency basis similar to the Committee on Government Reform's
jurisdiction over ``overall economy, efficiency, and management
of government operations and activities. . . .'' Surgical
addresses of homeland security policy in sundry areas of
jurisdiction occupied by other committees would not be referred
to the Committee on Homeland Security on the basis of
``overall'' homeland security policy jurisdiction.
For example, the Committee on Homeland Security shall have
jurisdiction over a bill coordinating the Homeland security
efforts by all of the critical infrastructure protection
sectors. Jurisdiction over a bill addressing the protection of
a particular sector would lie with the committee otherwise
having jurisdiction over that sector.
Organization and administration of the Department of
Homeland Security--The jurisdiction of the Committee on
Homeland Security would apply only to organizational or
administrative aspects of the Department where another
committee's jurisdiction did not clearly apply. The Committee's
jurisdiction is to be confined to organizational and
administrative efforts and would not apply to programmatic
efforts within the Department of Homeland Security within the
jurisdiction of other committees.
Homeland Security Oversight--This would vest the Committee
on Homeland Security with oversight jurisdiction over the
Homeland security community of the United States. Nothing in
this clause shall be construed as prohibiting or otherwise
restricting the authority of any other committee to study and
review homeland security activities to the extent that such
activity directly affects a matter otherwise within the
jurisdiction of that committee.

Individual Committee Concerns

Agriculture--The jurisdiction of the Committee on Homeland
Security over ``border and port security'' shall be limited to
agricultural importation and entry inspection activities of the
Department of Homeland Security under section 421 of the
Homeland Security Act of 2002. The Committee on Agriculture
shall retain jurisdiction over animal and plant disease policy
including the authority reserved to the Department of
Agriculture to regulate policy under section 421 of the
Homeland Security Act of 2002, and the Animal Health Protection
Act, the Plant Protection Act, the Plant Quarantine Act, and
the Agriculture Quarantine Inspection User Fee Account. The
Committee on Agriculture shall retain jurisdiction over the
agricultural research and diagnosis mission at the Plum Island
Animal Disease Center.
Armed Services--The Committee on Armed Services shall
retain jurisdiction over warfighting, the military defense of
the United States, and other military activities, including any
military response to terrorism, pursuant to section 876 of the
Homeland Security Act of 2002.
Energy and Commerce--The Committee on Homeland Security
shall have jurisdiction over measures that address the
Department of Homeland Security's activities for domestic
preparedness and collective response to terrorism. The words
``to terrorism'' require a direct relation to terrorism. The
Committee on Homeland Security's jurisdiction over ``collective
response to terrorism'' means that it shall receive referrals
of bills addressing the Department of Homeland Security's
responsibilities for, and assistance to, first responders as a
whole. The Committee on Energy and Commerce (and other relevant
committees) shall retain their jurisdiction over bills
addressing the separate entities that comprise the first
responders. For example, the Committee on Energy and Commerce
shall retain its jurisdiction over a bill directing the
Department of Health and Human Services to train emergency
medical personnel.
Financial Services--The Committee on Financial Services
shall retain jurisdiction over the National Flood Insurance
Program and Emergency Food and Shelter Program of FEMA, and the
Defense Production Act. The Committee on Financial Services
shall retain its jurisdiction over the anti-money laundering,
terrorist financing, and anti-counterfeiting activities within
the Department of the Treasury and the financial regulators.
Government Reform--The Committee on Homeland Security shall
have jurisdiction over ``the organization and administration of
the Department of Homeland Security.'' The Committee on
Government Reform shall retain jurisdiction over federal civil
service, the overall economy, efficiency, and management of
government operations and activities, including Federal
procurement, and federal paperwork reduction. The Committee on
Government Reform shall retain jurisdiction over government-
wide information management efforts including the Federal
Information Security Management Act. The Committee on Homeland
Security shall have jurisdiction over integration, analysis,
and dissemination of homeland security information by the
Department of Homeland Security, and the Committee on
Government Reform shall retain jurisdiction over measures
addressing public information and records generally including
the Privacy Act and the Freedom of Information Act. The
Committee on Government Reform shall have jurisdiction over the
policy coordination responsibilities of the Office of
Counternarcotics Enforcement.
Intelligence--The Permanent Select Committee on
Intelligence shall retain jurisdiction over the intelligence
and intelligence-related activities of all departments and
agencies of the Federal Government, including the Office of the
Director of National Intelligence and the National
Counterterrorism Center as defined in the Intelligence Reform
and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004.
Judiciary--The Committee on the Judiciary shall retain
jurisdiction over immigration policy and non-border enforcement
of the immigration laws. Its jurisdiction over immigration
policy shall include matters such as the immigration and
naturalization process, numbers of aliens (including immigrants
and non-immigrants) allowed, classifications and lengths of
allowable stay, the adjudication of immigration petitions and
the requirements for the same, the domestic adjudication of
immigration petitions and applications submitted to the
Department of Labor or the Department of Homeland Security and
setting policy with regard to visa issuance and acceptance. Its
jurisdiction over non-border enforcement shall be limited to
those aspects of immigration enforcement not associated with
the immediate entry of individuals into the country, including
those aspects of the Bureau of Immigration and Customs
Enforcement. The Committee on Homeland Security shall have
jurisdiction over border and port security including the
immigration responsibilities of inspectors at ports of entry
and the border patrol. As used in the new Rule X(1)(l)(9) and
this legislative history, the word ``immigration'' shall be
construed to include ``naturalization'' and no substantive
change is intended by the new rule's not containing the word
``naturalization.''
Science--The Committee on Science shall retain some
jurisdiction over the research and development activities of
the Department of Homeland Security as such matters are
incidental to the Committee on Science's existing jurisdiction
(except where those activities are in the jurisdiction of
another committee).
Transportation and Infrastructure--The Committee on
Transportation and Infrastructure shall retain jurisdiction
over the Coast Guard. However, the Committee on Homeland
Security has jurisdiction over port security, and some Coast
Guard responsibilities in that area will fall within the
jurisdiction of both committees. Jurisdiction over emergency
preparedness will be split between the Committee on
Transportation and Infrastructure and the Committee on Homeland
Security. The Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure
shall retain its jurisdiction under clause 1(r)(2) over
``federal management of emergencies and natural disasters.''
This means that the committee retains its general jurisdiction
over the emergency preparedness and response operations of the
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Bills addressing
FEMA's general preparation for disaster from any cause shall be
referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.
The Committee on Homeland Security shall have jurisdiction over
the Department of Homeland Security's responsibilities with
regard to emergency preparedness only as they relate to acts of
terrorism. Thus, the Committee on Homeland Security shall have
jurisdiction over the responsibilities of the Office for
Domestic Preparedness, in accordance with section 430 of the
Homeland Security Act of 2002.
As indicated earlier, the Committee on Homeland Security's
jurisdiction over ``collective response to terrorism'' means
that it would receive referrals of bills addressing the
Department of Homeland Security's responsibilities for, and
assistance to, first responders as a whole and not over
measures addressing first responder communities individually.
The Committee on Homeland Security shall have jurisdiction
over the functions of the Department of Homeland Security
relating to transportation security, while the Committee on
Transportation and Infrastructure shall retain its jurisdiction
over transportation safety. In general, the Committee on
Homeland Security would have jurisdiction over bills addressing
the Transportation Security Administration and the Committee on
Transportation and Infrastructure would have jurisdiction over
bills addressing the various entities within the Department of
Transportation having responsibility for transportation safety,
such as the Federal Aviation Administration and the Federal
Motor Carrier Safety Administration. The jurisdiction of the
Committee on Homeland Security does not include expenditures
from trust funds under the jurisdiction of other committees,
including but not limited to the Highway Trust Fund, the
Airport and Airway Trust Fund, the Harbor Maintenance Trust
Fund, the Federal Buildings Fund, and the Inland Waterways
Trust Fund.
Ways and Means--The jurisdiction of the Committee on Ways
and Means over ``customs revenue'' is intended to include those
functions contemplated in section 412(b)(2) of the Homeland
Security Act of 2002 and includes those functions as carried
out in collection districts and ports of entry and delivery.
Membership and Organization of the Committee on Homeland Security

(19-14)

COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY

Peter T. King, New York, Chairman

Lamar Smith, Texas
Daniel E. Lungren, California
Mike Rogers, Alabama
Michael T. McCaul, Texas
Gus M. Bilirakis, Florida
Paul C. Broun, Georgia
Candice S.Miller, Michigan
Tim Walberg, Michigan
Chip Cravaack, Minnesota
Joe Walsh, Illinois
Patrick Meehan, Pennsylvania
Ben Quayle, Arizona
E. Scott Rigell, Virginia
Billy Long, Missouri
Jeff Duncan, South Carolina
Tom Marino, Pennsylvania
Blake Farenthold, Texas
Robert L. Turner, New York Bennie G. Thompson, Mississippi,
Loretta Sanchez, California
Sheila Jackson Lee, Texas
Henry Cuellar, Texas
Yvette D. Clarke, New York
Laura Richardson, California
Danny K. Davis, Illinois
Brian Higgins, New York
Cedric L. Richmond, Louisiana
Hansen Clarke, Michigan
William R. Keating, Massachusetts
Kathleen C. Hochul, New York
Janice Hahn, California
Ron Barber, Arizona
__________
Appointment of Mr.Peter T. King of New York as Chair, and Mr.Bennie
G. Thompson of Mississippi as Ranking Minority Member on January 5,
2011, pursuant to H. Res. 6 and H. Res. 7, respectively.
The Majority Members of the Committee were elected to the Committee
on January 18, 2011, pursuant to H. Res. 37; and the Minority Members
on January 19, 2011, pursuant to H. Res. 39.
Mr.Blake Farenthold of Texas was elected to the Committee pursuant
to H. Res. 42 on January 19, 2011.
Mr.Mo Brooks of Alabama was elected to the Committee pursuant to H.
Res. 53 on January 25, 2011.
Ms.Jane Harman of California resigned as a Member of the House of
Representatives on February 28, 2011.
Mrs.Donna M. Christensen resigned as a Member of the Committee on
Homeland effective March 7, 2011.
Ms.Kathleen C. Hochul of New York was elected to the Committee
pursuant to H. Res. 293 on June 2, 2011.
Ms.Janice Hahn of California was elected to the Committee pursuant
to H. Res. 377 on July 28, 2011.
Mr.Mo Brooks of Alabama resigned as a Member of the Committee on
Homeland Security on October 4, 2011, and Mr.Robert L. Turner of New
York was elected to the Committee pursuant to H. Res. 420.
Ms.Jackie Speier of California resigned as a Member of the
Committee on Homeland Security on February 16, 2012.
Mr.Ron Barber of Arizona was elected to the Committee pursuant to
H. Res. 707 on June 26, 2012.

__________

SUBCOMMITTEE ON CYBERSECURITY, INFRASTRUCTURE PROTECTION, AND SECURITY
TECHNOLOGIES

Daniel E. Lungren, California, Chairman

Michael T. McCaul, Texas
Tim Walberg, Michigan, Vice Chair
Patrick Meehan, Pennsylvania
Billy Long, Missouri
Tom Marino, Pennsylvania
Peter T. King, New York
(Ex Officio) Yvette D. Clarke, New York
Laura Richardson, California
Cedric L. Richmond, Louisiana
William R. Keating, Massachusetts
Bennie G. Thompson, Mississippi
(Ex Officio)
__________

SUBCOMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION SECURITY

Mike Rogers, Alabama, Chairman

Daniel E. Lungren, California
Tim Walberg, Michigan
Chip Cravaack, Minnesota
Joe Walsh, Illinois, Vice Chair
Robert L. Turner, New York
Peter T. King, New York
(Ex Officio) Sheila Jackson Lee, Texas
Danny K. Davis, Illinois
Cedric L. Richmond, Louisiana
Ron Barber, Arizona
Bennie G. Thompson, Mississippi
(Ex Officio)
__________

SUBCOMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT, INVESTIGATIONS, AND MANAGEMENT

Michael T. McCaul, Texas, Chairman

Gus M. Bilirakis, Florida
Billy Long, Missouri, Vice Chair
Jeff Duncan, South Carolina
Tom Marino, Pennsylvania
Peter T. King, New York
(Ex Officio) William R. Keating, Massachusetts
Yvette D. Clarke, New York
Danny K. Davis, Illinois
Bennie G. Thompson, Mississippi
(Ex Officio)
__________

SUBCOMMITTEE ON EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS, RESPONSE, AND COMMUNICATIONS

Gus M. Bilirakis, Florida, Chairman

E. Scott Rigell, Virginia
Tom Marino, Pennsylvania, Vice
Chair
Blake Farenthold, Texas
Robert L. Turner, New York
Peter T. King, New York
(Ex Officio) Laura Richardson, California
Hansen Clarke, Michigan
Kathleen C. Hochul, New York
Bennie G. Thompson, Mississippi
(Ex Officio)
__________

SUBCOMMITTEE ON BORDER AND MARITIME SECURITY

Candice S.Miller, Michigan, Chairman

Mike Rogers, Alabama
Michael T. McCaul, Texas
Paul C. Broun, Georgia
Ben Quayle, Arizona, Vice Chair
E. Scott Rigell, Virginia
Jeff Duncan, South Carolina
Peter T. King, New York
(Ex Officio) Henry Cuellar, Texas
Loretta Sanchez, California
Sheila Jackson Lee, Texas
Brian Higgins, New York
Hansen Clarke, Michigan
Bennie G. Thompson, Mississippi
(Ex Officio)
__________

SUBCOMMITTEE ON COUNTERTERRORISM AND INTELLIGENCE

Patrick Meehan, Pennsylvania, Chairman

Paul C. Broun, Georgia, Vice Chair
Chip Cravaack, Minnesota
Joe Walsh, Illinois
Ben Quayle, Arizona
E. Scott Rigell, Virginia
Billy Long, Missouri
Peter T. King, New York
(Ex Officio) Brian Higgins, New York
Loretta Sanchez, California
Henry Cuellar, Texas
Kathleen C. Hochul, New York
Janice Hahn, California
Ron Barber, Arizona
Bennie G. Thompson, Mississippi
(Ex Officio)
HISTORY OF THE COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY

Select Committees on Homeland Security

107th Congress
In the 107th Congress, the House Select Committee on
Homeland Security was established on June 19, 2002, pursuant to
H. Res. 449 (adopted by voice vote). The Committee was composed
of nine Members of the House: Mr. Richard ``Dick'' Armey of
Texas, Chairman; Mr. Thomas DeLay of Texas; Mr. Julius Caesar
``J.C.'' Watts of Oklahoma; Ms.Deborah Pryce of Ohio; Mr.
Robert Portman of Ohio; Ms.Nancy Pelosi of California; Mr.
Jonas Martin Frost of Texas; Mr. Robert Menendez of New Jersey;
and Ms.Rosa L. DeLauro of Connecticut.
The mandate of the Select Committee in the 107th Congress
was to ``develop recommendations and report to the House on
such matters that relate to the establishment of a department
of homeland security.'' The Select Committee accomplished its
mandate on November 22, 2002, when the House concurred in the
Senate amendment to H.R.5005, a bill establishing the
Department of Homeland Security, by unanimous consent, and
cleared H.R.5005 for the President. The bill was presented to
the President on November 22, 2002, and was signed on November
25, 2002, becoming Public Law 107-296.
The termination date of the House Select Committee on
Homeland Security was ``after final disposition of a bill [ . .
. ] including final disposition of any veto message on such
bill,'' which occurred on November 25, 2002.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Law Title Bill
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pub. L. 107-296................. The Homeland H.R.5005
Security Act of
2002..
------------------------------------------------------------------------

108th Congress
The second House Select Committee on Homeland Security was
established in the 108th Congress on January 7, 2003, pursuant
to provisions of H. Res. 5 (adopted by a recorded vote of 221
yeas and 203 nays). The Membership of the Select Committee was
established on February 12, 2003, as: Mr. Christopher Cox of
California, Chairman; Ms.Jennifer Dunn of Washington; Mr.
William ``Bill'' Young of Florida; Mr. Donald ``Don'' Young of
Alaska; Mr. F. James Sensenbrenner, Jr. of Wisconsin; Mr.
Wilbert Joseph ``Billy'' Tauzin of Louisiana; Mr. David Dreier
of California; Mr. Duncan Hunter of California; Mr.Harold
Rogers of Kentucky; Mr. Sherwood Boehlert of New York; Mr.
Lamar Smith of Texas; Mr.Wayne Curtis ``Curt'' Weldon of
Pennsylvania; Mr. Christopher Shays of Connecticut; Mr. Porter
J. Goss of Florida; Mr. David Camp of Michigan; Mr.Lincoln
Diaz-Balart of Florida; Mr. Robert W. Goodlatte of Virginia;
Mr. Ernest James Istook, Jr. of Oklahoma; Mr. Peter T. King of
New York; Mr. John E. Linder of Georgia; Mr. John B. Shadegg of
Arizona; Mr. Mark E. Souder of Indiana; Mr. William McClellan
``Mac'' Thornberry of Texas; Mr. James A. Gibbons of Nevada;
Ms.Kay Granger of Texas; Mr. Pete Sessions of Texas; Mr. John
E. Sweeney of New York; Mr. Jim Turner of Texas; Mr. Bennie G.
Thompson of Mississippi; Ms.Loretta Sanchez of California; Mr.
Edward J. Markey of Massachusetts; Mr. Norman D. Dicks of
Washington; Mr. Barney Frank of Massachusetts; Ms.Jane Harman
of California; Mr. Benjamin L. Cardin of Maryland; Ms.Louise M.
Slaughter of New York; Mr. Peter A. DeFazio of Oregon; Mrs.Nita
M. Lowey of New York; Mr. Robert E. Andrews of New Jersey;
Ms.Eleanor Holmes Norton, a Delegate from the District of
Columbia; Ms.Zoe Lofgren of California; Ms.Karen McCarthy of
Missouri; Ms.Sheila Jackson Lee of Texas; Mr.William ``Bill''
Pascrell, Jr. of New Jersey; Mrs.Donna M. Christensen, a
Delegate from the U.S. Virgin Islands; Mr. Bobby ``Bob''
Etheridge of North Carolina; Mr.Charles Gonzalez of Texas; Mr.
Ken Lucas of Kentucky; Mr. James R. Langevin of Rhode Island;
and Mr. Kendrick B. Meek of Florida.
The Select Committee was authorized to develop
recommendations and report to the House by bill or otherwise on
such matters that relate to the Homeland Security Act of 2002
(Public Law 107-296) as may be referred to it by the Speaker,
and was charged with reviewing and studying on a continuing
basis laws, programs, and Government activities relating to
homeland security. In addition, the Select Committee was
directed to conduct a thorough and complete study of the
operation and implementation of the Rules of the House,
including Rule X, with respect to the issue of homeland
security, and submit its recommendations regarding any changes
in the Rules of the House to the Committee on Rules not later
than September 30, 2004.
On September 30, 2004, the Select Committee on Homeland
Security submitted its recommendations on jurisdictional
changes to the Rules of the House of Representatives to the
Committee on Rules.
The Committee had six measures signed into law during the
108th Congress:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Law Title Bill
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pub. L. 108-136................. National Defense H.R.1588\1\
Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year
2004..

Pub. L. 108-268................. To provide for the H.R.4332
transfer of the
Nebraska Avenue
Naval Complex in
the District of
Columbia to
facilitate the
establishment of
the headquarters
for the
Department of
Homeland
Security, to
provide for the
acquisition by
the Department of
the Navy of
suitable
replacement
facilities..

Pub. L. 108-276................. Project BioShield S.15
Act of 2004.. (H.R.2122)

Pub. L. 108-293................. Coast Guard and H.R.2443
Maritime
Transportation
Act of 2004..

Pub. L. 108-330................. Department of H.R.4259
Homeland Security
Financial
Accountability
Act..

Pub. L. 108-458................. Intelligence S.2845
Reform and (H.R.5223)
Terrorism
Prevention Act of
2004..
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Indicates measures which were not referred directly to the Committee
on Homeland Security.

Pursuant to H.Res. 5, the Select Committee terminated on
January 2, 2005, with the expiration of the 108th Congress.

Committee on Homeland Security

109th Congress
The 109th Congress marked the first Congress for the
standing Committee on Homeland Security. During the two
previous Congresses, the House of Representatives established
separate Select Committees on Homeland Security: the first - to
establish the Department of Homeland Security, the second - to
monitor the initial activities of the Department and to examine
the need for a standing committee in the House with
jurisdictional authority over matters relating to the issue of
homeland security.
The Committee on Homeland Security was established as a
standing Committee of the House with the passage of H.Res. 5,
on January 4, 2005. The resolution was adopted by a recorded
vote of 220 yeas and 195 nays.
The Committee Membership was set at 34 Members with 19
Republicans and 15 Democrats. The following Members were
appointed to the Committee on Homeland Security for all or part
of the Congress: Mr.Christopher Cox of California; Mr.Peter T.
King of New York; Mr.Don Young of Alaska; Mr.Lamar S.Smith of
Texas; Mr.Curt Weldon of Pennsylvania; Mr.Christopher Shays of
Connecticut; Mr.John Linder of Georgia; Mr.Mark E. Souder of
Indiana; Mr.Tom Davis of Virginia; Mr.Daniel E. Lungren of
California; Mr.Jim Gibbons of Nevada; Mr.Rob Simmons of
Connecticut; Mr.Mike Rogers of Alabama; Mr.Stevan Pearce of New
Mexico; Ms.Katherine Harris of Florida; Mr.Bobby Jindal of
Louisiana; Mr.David G. Reichert of Washington; Mr.Michael T.
McCaul of Texas; Mr.Charles W. Dent of Pennsylvania; Ms.Ginny
Brown-Waite of Florida; Mr.Bennie G. Thompson of Mississippi;
Ms.Loretta Sanchez of California; Mr.Edward J. Markey of
Massachusetts; Mr.Norman D. Dicks of Washington; Ms.Jane Harman
of California; Mr.Peter A. DeFazio of Oregon; Ms.Nita M. Lowey
of New York; Ms.Eleanor Holmes Norton of District of Columbia;
Ms.Zoe Lofgren of California; Ms.Sheila Jackson Lee of Texas;
Mr.Bill Pascrell of Jr., New Jersey; Ms.Donna M. Christensen of
U.S. Virgin Islands; Mr.Bob Etheridge of North Carolina;
Mr.James R. Langevin of Rhode Island; and Mr.Kendrick B. Meek
of Florida.
On February 9, 2005, the Committee on Homeland Security
adopted its Rules, which provided for the establishment of five
Subcommittees. The Subcommittee on Prevention of Nuclear and
Biological Attack; the Subcommittee on Intelligence,
Information Sharing, and Terrorism Risk Assessment; the
Subcommittee on Economic Security, Infrastructure Protection,
and Cybersecurity; the Subcommittee on Management, Integration,
and Oversight; and the Subcommittee on Emergency Preparedness,
Science, and Technology.
On October 7, 2005, the Committee revised its Rules to
establish a Subcommittee on Investigations.
The Committee had eight measures signed into law during the
109th Congress:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Law Title Bill
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pub. L. 109-13.................. Emergency H.R.1268\2\
Supplemental (H.R.418)
Appropriations
Act for Defense,
the Global War on
Terror, and
Tsunami Relief,
2005..

Pub. L. 109-59.................. Safe, Accountable, H.R.3
Flexible,
Efficient
Transportation
Equity Act: A
Legacy for Users..

Pub. L. 109-163................. National Defense H.R.1815
Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year
2006..

Pub. L. 109-241................. Coast Guard and H.R.889
Maritime
Transportation
Act of 2006..

Pub. L. 109-295................. Department of H.R.5441
Homeland Security
Appropriations
Act, 2007..
(Title VI - Post
Katrina Emergency
Management Reform
Act).

Pub. L. 109-347................. ``Security and H.R.4954
Accountability
For Every Port
Act of 2006'' or
the ``SAFE Port
Act''..

Pub. L. 109-364................. John Warner H.R.5122
National Defense
Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year
2007..

Pub. L. 109-367................. Secure Fence Act H.R.6061
of 2006..
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ Indicates measures which were not referred directly to the Committee
on Homeland Security.

110th Congress
The Committee on Homeland Security continued as a standing
Committee pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 5, agreed to in
the House on January 4, 2007, by a record vote of 235 yeas and
195 nays.
The Committee on Homeland Security met on January 23, 2007,
for an organizational meeting for the 110th Congress under the
direction of Chairman Bennie G. Thompson of Mississippi. The
Committee Membership was set at 34 Members with 19 Democrats
and 15 Republicans. The following Members were appointed to the
Committee on Homeland Security for all or part of the Congress:
Mr.Bennie G. Thompson of Mississippi; Ms.Loretta Sanchez of
California; Mr.Edward J. Markey of Massachusetts; Mr.Norman D.
Dicks of Washington; Ms.Jane Harman of California; Mr.Peter A.
DeFazio of Oregon; Mrs.Nita M. Lowey of New York; Ms.Eleanor
Holmes Norton a Delegate from the District of Columbia; Ms.Zoe
Lofgren of California; Ms.Sheila Jackson-Lee of Texas;
Mrs.Donna M. Christensen a Delegate from the U.S. Virgin
Islands; Mr.Bob Etheridge of North Carolina; Mr.James R.
Langevin of Rhode Island; Mr.Henry Cuellar of Texas;
Mr.Christopher P. Carney of Pennsylvania; Ms.Yvette D. Clarke
of New York; Mr.Al Green of Texas; Mr.Ed Perlmutter of
Colorado; Mr.Bill Pascrell, Jr. of New Jersey; Mr.Peter T. King
of New York; Mr.Lamar Smith of Texas; Mr.Christopher Shays of
Connecticut; Mr.Mark E. Souder of Indiana; Mr.Tom Davis of
Virginia; Mr.Daniel E. Lungren of California; Mr.Mike Rogers of
Alabama; Mr.David G. Reichert of Washington; Mr.Michael T.
McCaul of Texas; Mr.Charles W. Dent of Pennsylvania; Ms.Ginny
Brown-Waite of Florida; Mr.Gus M. Bilirakis of Florida;
Mr.David Davis of Tennessee; Mr.Paul C. Broun of Georgia;
Mrs.Candice S.Miller of Michigan; Ms.Marsha Blackburn of
Tennessee; Mr.Kevin McCarthy of California; and Mr.Bobby Jindal
of Louisiana.
The Committee established six Subcommittees: the
Subcommittee on Border, Maritime, and Global Counterterrorism;
the Subcommittee on Intelligence, Information Sharing, and
Terrorism Risk Assessment; the Subcommittee on Transportation
Security and Infrastructure Protection; the Subcommittee on
Emerging Threats, Cybersecurity, and Science and Technology;
the Subcommittee on Emergency Communications, Preparedness, and
Response; and the Subcommittee on Management, Investigations,
and Oversight.
The Committee had four measures signed into law during the
110th Congress:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Law Title Bill
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pub. L. 110-53.................. Implementing H.R.1
Recommendations
of the 9/11
Commission Act of
2007..

Pub. L. 110-181................. National Defense H.R.4986\3\
Authorization Act (H.R.1585)
for Fiscal Year
2008..

Pub. L. 110-388................. A bill to provide S.2816
for the
appointment of
the Chief Human
Capital Officer
of the Department
of Homeland
Security by the
Secretary of
Homeland
Security..

Pub. L. 110-412................. Personnel H.R.6098
Reimbursement for
Intelligence
Cooperation and
Enhancement of
Homeland Security
Act of 2008..
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Indicates measures which were not referred directly to the Committee
on Homeland Security.

111th Congress

The Committee on Homeland Security continued as a standing
Committee pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 5, agreed to in
the House on January 6, 2009, by a record vote of 235 yeas and
195 nays.
The Committee on Homeland Security met on February 4, 2009,
for an organizational meeting for the 111th Congress under the
direction of Chairman Bennie G. Thompson of Mississippi. The
Committee Membership, was set at 34 Members with 21 Democrats
and 13 Republicans. The following Members were appointed to the
Committee on Homeland Security for all or part of the Congress:
Mr.Bennie G. Thompson of Mississippi; Ms.Loretta Sanchez, of
California; Ms.Jane Harman of California; Mr.Peter A. DeFazio
of Oregon; Ms.Eleanor Holmes Norton a Delegate from the
District of Columbia; Ms.Zoe Lofgren of California; Ms.Sheila
Jackson-Lee of Texas; Mr.Henry Cuellar of Texas; Mr.Christopher
P. Carney of Pennsylvania; Ms.Yvette D. Clarke of New York;
Ms.Laura Richardson of California; Mrs.Ann Kirkpatrick of
Arizona; Mr.Ben Ray Lujan of New Mexico; Mr.Bill Pascrell, Jr.
of New Jersey; Mr.Emanuel Cleaver of Missouri; Mr.Al Green of
Texas; Mr.James A. Himes of Connecticut; Ms.Mary Jo Kilroy of
Ohio; Mr.Eric J.J. Massa of New York; Ms.Dina Titus of Nevada;
Mr.William L. Owens of New York; Mr.Peter T. King of New York;
Mr.Lamar Smith of Texas; Mr.Mark E. Souder of Indiana;
Mr.Daniel E. Lungren of California; Mr.Mike Rogers of Alabama;
Mr.Michael T. McCaul of Texas; Mr.Charles W. Dent of
Pennsylvania; Mr.Gus M. Bilirakis of Florida; Mr.Paul C. Broun
of Georgia; Mrs.Candice S.Miller of Michigan; Mr.Pete Olson of
Texas; Mr.Anh ``Joseph'' Cao of Louisiana; Mr.Steve Austria of
Ohio; and Mr.Tom Graves of Georgia.
The Committee established six Subcommittees: the
Subcommittee on Border, Maritime, and Global Counterterrorism;
the Subcommittee on Intelligence, Information Sharing, and
Terrorism Risk Assessment; the Subcommittee on Transportation
Security and Infrastructure Protection; the Subcommittee on
Emerging Threats, Cybersecurity, and Science and Technology;
the Subcommittee on Emergency Communications, Preparedness, and
Response; and the Subcommittee on Management, Investigations,
and Oversight.
The Committee had 14 measures signed into law during the
111th Congress:

111th Congress

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Law Title Bill
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pub. L. 111--84................. National Defense H.R.2647\4\
Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year
2010..

Pub. L. 111--140................ Nuclear Forensics H.R.730
and Attribution
Act..

Pub. L. 111--145................ United States H.R.1299\5\
Capitol Police (H.R.2935)
Administrative
Technical
Correction Act of
2009..

Pub. L. 111--198................ Homebuyer H.R.5623
Assistance and
Improvement Act..

Pub. L. 111--207................ Cruise Vessel H.R.3360
Security and
Safety Act of
2009..

Pub. L. 111--245................ First Responder H.R.3978
Anti-Terrorism
Training
Resources Act..

Pub. L. 111--252................ To allow certain H.R.1517
U.S. Customs and
Border Protection
employees who
serve under an
overseas limited
appointment for
at least 2 years,
and whose service
is rated fully
successful or
higher throughout
that time, to be
converted to a
permanent
appointment in
the competitive
service..

Pub. L. 111--258................ Reducing Over- H.R.553
Classification
Act..

Pub. L. 111--259................ Intelligence H.R.2701
Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year
2011..

Pub. L. 111--271................ Redundancy H.R.3980
Elimination and
Enhanced
Performance for
Preparedness
Grants Act..

Pub. L. 111--281................ Coast Guard H.R.3619
Authorization Act
of 2010..

Pub. L. 111--356................ Northern Border H.R.4748
Counternarcotics
Strategy Act of
2010..

Pub. L. 111--376................ Anti-Border S 3243
Corruption Act of
2010..

Pub. L. 111--383................ Ike Skelton H.R.6523
National Defense
Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year
2011..
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ Indicates measures which were not referred directly to the Committee
on Homeland Security.
\5\ Indicates measures which were not referred to the Committee, but to
which measures were included during Congressional action.

112th Congress

The Committee on Homeland Security continued as a standing
Committee pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 5, agreed to in
the House on January 5, 2011, by a record vote of 238 yeas and
191 nays.
The Committee on Homeland Security met on January 26, 2011,
for an organizational meeting for the 111th Congress under the
direction of Chairman Peter T. King of New York. The Committee
Membership, was set at 33 Members with 19 Republicans and 14
Democrats. The following Members were appointed to the
Committee on Homeland Security for all or part of the Congress:
Mr.Peter T. King of New York; Mr.Lamar Smith of Texas;
Mr.Daniel E. Lungren of California; Mr.Mike Rogers of Alabama;
Mr.Michael T. McCaul of Texas; Mr.Gus M. Bilirakis of Florida;
Mr.Paul C. Broun of Georgia; Mrs.Candice S.Miller of Michigan;
Mr.Tim Walberg of Michigan; Mr.Chip Cravaack of Minnesota;
Mr.Joe Walsh of Illinois; Mr.Patrick Meehan of Pennsylvania;
Mr.Benjamin Quayle of Arizona; Mr.Scott Rigell of Virginia;
Mr.Billy Long of Missouri; Mr.Jeff Duncan of South Carolina;
Mr.Tom Marino of Pennsylvania; Mr.Blake Farenthold of Texas;
Mr.Mo Brooks of Alabama; and Mr.Robert L. Turner of New York;
Mr.Bennie G. Thompson of Mississippi; Ms.Loretta Sanchez of
California; Ms.Jane Harman of California; Ms.Sheila Jackson Lee
of Texas; Mr.Henry Cuellar of Texas; Ms.Yvette D. Clarke of New
York; Ms.Laura Richardson of California; Mrs.Donna M.
Christensen a Delegate from the U.S. Virgin Islands; Mr.Danny
K. Davis of Illinois; Mr.Brian Higgins of New York; Ms.Jackie
Speier of California; Mr.Cedric L. Richmond of Louisiana;
Mr.Hansen Clarke of Michigan; Mr.William R. Keating of
Massachusetts; Ms.Kathleen C. Hochul of New York; Ms.Janice
Hahn of California; and Mr.Ron Barber of Arizona.
The Committee established six Subcommittees: The
Subcommittee on Cybersecurity, Infrastructure Protection, and
Security Technologies; the Subcommittee on Transportation
Security; the Subcommittee on Oversight, Investigations, and
Management; the Subcommittee on Emergency Preparedness,
Response, and Communications; the Subcommittee on Border and
Maritime Security; and the Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and
Intelligence.
The Committee had 10 measures signed into law during the
112th Congress:

112th Congress

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Law Title Bill
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pub. L. 112--54................. Asia-Pacific S. 1487
Economic (H.R.2042)
Cooperation
Business Travel
Cards Act of
2011..

Pub. L. 112--81................. National Defense H.R.1540
Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year
2012..

Pub. L. 112--86................. Risk-Based H.R.1801
Security
Screening for
Members of the
Armed Forces Act.

Pub. L. 112--127................ Border Tunnel H.R.4119
Prevention Act of
2012.

Pub. L. 112--171................ To require the H.R.3670
Transportation
Security
Administration to
comply with the
Uniformed
Services
Employment and
Reemployment
Rights Act..

Pub. L. 112--199................ Whistleblower S.743
Protection (H.R. 3289)
Enhancement Act
of 2012..

Pub. L. 112--205................ Jaime Zapata H.R.915
Border
Enforcement
Security Task
Force Act..

Pub. L. 112--213................ Coast Guard and H.R. 2838
Maritime
Transportation
Act of 2012 ..

Pub. L. 112--217................ DHS Audit S. 1998
Requirement (H.R.5941)
Target Act of
2012..

Pub. L. 112--218................ No-Hassle Flying S. 3542
Act of 2012.. (H.R.6028)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ Indicates measures which were not referred directly to the Committee
on Homeland Security.
\7\ Indicates measures which were not referred to the Committee, but to
which Members were appointed as Conferees.

Full Committee

Peter T. King, New York, Chairman

----------

During the 112th Congress, the Committee on Homeland
Security held 15 hearings, receiving testimony from 48
witnesses, and considered 18 measures.

----------

Organizational Meeting of the Committee

The Committee on Homeland Security met on January 26, 2011,
for an organizational meeting for the 112th Congress under the
direction of Chairman Peter T. King of New York.
The Full Committee met pursuant to notice and adopted the
Committee Rules for the 112th Congress by unanimous consent.
The Committee also approved the Committee on Homeland
Security's Oversight Plan for the 112th Congress and Committee
Resolution No. 1, relating to staff hiring, and both were
adopted by unanimous consent.
The Committee established six Subcommittees: The
Subcommittee on Cybersecurity, Infrastructure Protection, and
Security Technologies; the Subcommittee on Transportation
Security; the Subcommittee on Oversight, Investigations, and
Management; the Subcommittee on Emergency Preparedness,
Response, and Communications; the Subcommittee on Border and
Maritime Security; and the Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and
Intelligence.

FIRST QUARTER ACTIVITY REPORT

On June 22, 2011, the Committee on Homeland Security met
pursuant to notice and adopted a report on the Oversight and
Legislative Activities of the Committee on Homeland Security
for the First Quarter of the 112th Congress. The Committee
ordered the report to be reported to the House, without
amendment, favorably, by voice vote.

THIRD QUARTER ACTIVITY REPORT

On June 6, 2012, the Committee on Homeland Security met
pursuant to notice and adopted a report on the Oversight and
Legislative Activities of the Committee on Homeland Security
for the Third Quarter of the 112th Congress. The Committee
ordered the report to be reported to the House, without
amendment, favorably, by voice vote.

----------

Legislative Activities of the Committee

ASIA-PACIFIC ECONOMIC COOPERATION BUSINESS TRAVEL CARDS
ACT OF 2011

Pub. L. 112-54 S.1487 (H.R.2042 | H.R.3312)

To require the Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation
with the Secretary of State, to establish a program to issue
Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation Business Travel Cards, and
for other purposes.
Summary
The Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation Business Travel Cards
Act of 2011 authorizes the Secretary of Homeland Security to
issue, in coordination with the Secretary of State, Asia-
Pacific Economic Cooperation business travel cards (ABT Cards)
to approved individuals. S.1487 requires the Secretary of
Homeland Security to integrate the ABT Cards with other
Department trusted traveler programs. Additionally, S.1487
permits the Secretary of Homeland Security to consult with
appropriate private sector entities and, if necessary,
prescribe regulations to issue the ABT Cards. The bill also
authorizes the Secretary to collect and adjust a user fee for
establishing and operating the ABT Card program. The Secretary
may terminate the program if it is in the interest of the
United States.
Legislative History
S.1487 was introduced in the Senate on August 2, 2011, by
Ms.Cantwell, Mr.Akaka, Mr.Inouye, and Mr.Johnson of Wisconsin,
and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and
Governmental Affairs.
On October 19, 2011, the Senate Committee on Homeland
Security and Governmental Affairs considered S.1487 and ordered
the measure to be favorably reported to the Senate with an
Amendment in the Nature of a Substitute.
The Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental
Affairs reported S.1487 to the Senate on November 3, 2011 with
no written report.
The Senate considered and passed S.1487 on November 3,
2011, by unanimous consent.
On November 4, 2011, the House considered and passed
S.1487, under Suspension of the Rules, clearing the measure for
the President.
The President signed S.1487 into law on November 12, 2011,
as Public Law 112-54.

H.R.2042, the House companion measure, was introduced in
the House on May 26, 2011, by Mr.Larsen of Washington,
Mr.Herger, Mr.Crowley, Mr.Brady of Texas, and Mr.Daniel E.
Lungren of California, and referred to the Committee on
Homeland Security. Within the Committee, H.R.2042 was referred
to the Subcommittee on Border and Maritime Security.
On October 25, 2011, the House considered H.R.2042 under
Suspension of the Rules and passed the measure by voice vote.
H.R.2042 was received in the Senate on October 31, 2011,
and on November 3, 2011, was read twice, and placed on the
Senate Legislative Calendar.

H.R.3312 was introduced in the House on November 2, 2011,
by Mr.Brady of Texas and Mr.Larsen of Washington, and referred
to the Committee on Homeland Security. Within the Committee,
H.R.3312 was referred to the Subcommittee on Border and
Maritime Security. H.R.3312 consisted of the text of S.1487, as
ordered to be reported by the Senate Committee on Homeland
Security and Governmental Affairs.

NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012

Pub. L. 112-81 H.R.1540 | S.1867

To authorize appropriations for Fiscal Year 2012 for military
activities of the Department of Defense, for military
construction, and for defense activities of the Department of
Energy, to prescribe military personnel strengths for such
fiscal year, and for other purposes.
Summary
The annual National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) is the
primary mechanism by which the United States Congress fulfills
its Constitutional obligation to provide for the common
defense.
The NDAA for Fiscal Year 2012 authorizes $554 billion for
the Defense base budget, and $115.5 billion for overseas
contingency operations. This represents a $19 billion reduction
from Fiscal Year 2011 and a $24.1 billion reduction from the
President's request.
Although this legislation authorizes programs within the
Department of Defense, the NDAA contains certain War on Terror
detainee provisions that are of great interest to the Committee
on Homeland Security. These include a prohibition on the
transfer or release of detainees housed at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba
into the United States, and a reaffirmation of the lawful
detention of individuals from al-Qaeda, the Taliban, and
associated forces engaged in an armed conflict with the United
States.
Also of interest to the Committee on Homeland Security are
the requirements for the detection of insider threats, in
response to the dissemination of classified information on the
WikiLeaks.org website, and the authorization of the Department
of Defense's counter-narcotics activities on the Southern
Border of the United States.
Legislative History
H.R.1540 was introduced in the House on April 14, 2011, by
Mr.McKeon and Mr.Smith of Washington, and referred to the
Committee on Armed Services.
The Committee on Armed Services considered H.R.1540 on May
11, 2011, and ordered the measure to be reported to the House,
amended by a recorded vote of 60 yeas and 1 nay.
The Chair of the Committee on Homeland Security sent a
letter on May 4, 2011, to the Chair of the Committee on Armed
Services agreeing, that, in order to expedite consideration of
H.R.1540 by the Full House, the Committee would not seek a
sequential referral of H.R.1540. The letter further requested
an appointment of Conferees should a House-Senate Conference be
called. The Chair of the Committee on Armed Services responded
on May 16, 2011, acknowledging the jurisdictional interests of
the Committee on Homeland Security and the agreement to not
seek a sequential referral.
The Committee on Armed Services reported H.R.1540 to the
House on May 17, 2011, as H. Rpt. 112-78. The Committee on
Armed Services filed the supplemental report to H.R.1540 on May
23, 2011 as H. Rpt. 112-78, Part II.
The House considered H.R.1540 on May 24 and 25, 2011. The
House continued consideration of H.R.1540 on June 26, 2011, and
passed H.R.1540 by a recorded vote of 322 yeas and 96 nays
(Recorded Vote No. 375).
H.R.1540 was received in the Senate, read twice, and
referred to the Senate Committee on Armed Services on June 6,
2011.
On November 15, 2011, the Senate Committee on Armed
Services reported S.1687, the Senate companion measure, to the
Senate, with no written report.
The Senate considered S.1687 on November 17, 18, 28, 29,
and 30, 2011. On November 30, 2011, the Senate invoked cloture
on S.1867 by a recorded vote of 88 yeas and 12 nays (Record
Vote No. 212). The Senate continued consideration on December
1, 2011, and passed S.1687 by a recorded vote of 93 yeas and 7
nays (Record Vote No. 218.).
On December 1, 2011, the Senate Committee on Armed Services
was discharged from further consideration of H.R.1540 by
unanimous consent. The Senate considered H.R.1540 by unanimous
consent, struck all after the enacting clause and substituted
the text of S.1867, as amended. The Senate then passed
H.R.1540, amended, by unanimous consent.
The Senate insisted upon its amendment to H.R.1540 on
December 1, 2011, requested a Conference with the House, and
appointed Conferees: Senators Levin; Lieberman; Reed; Akaka;
Nelson of Nebraska; Webb; McCaskill; Udall of Colorado; Hagan;
Begich; Manchin; Shaheen; Gillibrand; Blumenthal; McCain;
Inhofe; Sessions; Chambliss; Wicker; Brown of Massachusetts;
Portman; Ayotte; Collins; Graham; Cornyn; and Vitter.
On December 2, 2011, the Chair of the Committee on Homeland
Security sent a letter to the Speaker of the House requesting
to have Members of the Committee appointed as Conferees to the
Committee of Conference on H.R.1540.
The House, on December 7, 2011, by unanimous consent,
agreed to disagree to the Senate amendment, and agreed to a
Conference with the Senate thereon. The House agreed to
instruct House Conferees by a recorded vote of 421 yeas and 2
nays (Recorded Vote No. 892).
The Chair appointed Conferees on the part of the House on
December 7, 2011: From the Committee on Armed Services; the
Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence; the Committee on
Education and the Workforce; the Committee on Energy and
Commerce; the Committee on Financial Services; the Committee on
Foreign Affairs; the Committee on Homeland Security; the
Committee on the Judiciary; the Committee on Natural Resources;
the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform; the Committee
on Science, Space, and Technology; the Committee on Small
Business; the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure;
the Committee on Veterans Affairs; and the Committee on Ways
and Means.
Conferees from the Committee on Homeland Security, for
consideration of sec. 1099H of the House bill; and sec.
1092 of the Senate amendment, and modifications
committed to conference: Mr.Daniel E. Lungren of
California, Mrs.Miller of Michigan and Mr.Thompson of
Mississippi.
Conferees met on December 12, 2011, and agreed to file a
Conference Report to accompany H.R.1540. Conference Report to
accompany H.R.1540 filed in the House as H. Rpt. 112-329. As
reported, the Conference Report struck section 1099H; section
1092 was retained by the Committee of Conference.
The Committee on Rules met on December 13, 2011, and
reported a rule providing for the consideration of the
Conference Report to accompany H.R.1540. The Rule filed in the
House as H. Res. 493 (H. Rpt. 112-330).
The House considered the Conference Report to accompany
H.R.1540 on December 14, 2011, under the provisions of H. Res.
493, after agreeing to the Rule by a recorded vote of 245 yeas
and 169 nays, (Recorded Vote No. 926). During consideration, a
motion to recommit the conference report to the Committee of
Conference with instructions to the managers on the part of the
House, was not agreed to by a recorded vote of 183 yeas and 234
nays, (Recorded Vote No. 931).
The House agreed to the Conference Report to accompany
H.R.1540 on December 14, 2011, by a recorded vote of 283 yeas
to 136 nays (Recorded Vote No. 932). The House subsequently
agreed to H. Con. Res. 92, to direct the Clerk of the House of
Representatives to correct the enrollment of the bill H.R.1540.
The Senate considered the Conference Report to accompany
H.R.1540 on December 15, 2011, and agreed to the Conference
Report by a recorded vote of 86 yeas and 13 nays (Record Vote
No. 230.) The Senate subsequently agreed to H. Con. Res. 92 by
unanimous consent, clearing the measure for the President.
H.R.1540 was presented to the President on December 21,
2011. On December 31, 2011, the President signed H.R.1540 into
law as Public Law 112-81.

RISK-BASED SECURITY SCREENING FOR MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES ACT

Pub. L. 112-86 (H.R.1801)

To amend title 49, United States Code, to provide for expedited
security screenings for members of the Armed Forces.
Summary
This legislation directs the Transportation Security
Administration to develop and implement a plan to provide
expedited screening for any member of the U.S. Armed Forces--
and any accompanying family member--when that individual is
traveling on official orders through a primary airport.
Legislative History
H.R.1801 was introduced in the House on May 10, 2011, by
Mr.Cravaack, Mr.Bachus, and Mr.Rogers of Alabama, and referred
to the Committee on Homeland Security. Within the Committee,
H.R.1801 was referred to the Subcommittee on Transportation
Security.
The Subcommittee on Transportation Security considered
H.R.1801 on May 12, 2011, and ordered the measure reported,
favorably, to the Full Committee, without amendment, by voice
vote.
The Committee considered H.R.1801 on September 21, 2011,
and ordered the measure to be reported to the House, amended,
with a favorable recommendation, by voice vote.
The Committee reported H.R.1801 to the House on November 4,
2011, as H. Rpt. 112-271.
The House considered H.R.1801 under Suspension of the
Rules, and passed the measure by a two-thirds recorded vote of
404 yeas and none voting ``nay''.
H.R.1801 was received in the Senate on November 30, 2011,
read twice, and referred to the Senate Committee on Commerce,
Science, and Transportation.
The Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and
Transportation was discharged from further consideration by
unanimous consent on December 12, 2011. The Senate subsequently
passed H.R.1801, amended, by voice vote.
The House debated a motion to agree to concur in the Senate
amendment to H.R.1801 on December 19, 2011. On December 20,
2011, the House agreed to Suspend the Rules and concurred in
the Senate amendment to H.R.1801 by voice vote, clearing the
measure for the President.
H.R.1801 was presented to the President on December 23,
2011, and on January 3, 2012, was signed into law as Public Law
112-86.

BORDER TUNNEL PREVENTION ACT OF 2012

Pub. L. 112-127 (H.R.4119 (S. 1236))

To reduce the trafficking of drugs and to prevent human
smuggling across the Southwest Border by deterring the
construction and use of border tunnels.
Summary
H.R.4119 enhances the penalties for anyone who attempts or
assists in the construction of a tunnel or other passage that
crosses the international border between the United States and
another country with the intent of using the tunnel for
smuggling. The legislation also encourages the Department of
Homeland Security to continue outreach efforts to educate
landowners and residents in areas along the border between the
United Mexican States and the United States about cross-border
tunnels and requests their assistance in combating tunnel
construction.
The Secretary of Homeland Security is also required to
submit an annual report to Congress indicating the number of
tunnels located, and efforts to prevent these means of
smuggling.
Legislative History
H.R.4119 was introduced in the House on March 1, 2012, by
Mr.Reyes, Mr.Dreier, Mr.Quayle, and Mr.Thompson of Mississippi,
and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition
to the Committee on Ways and Means and the Committee on
Homeland Security. Within the Committee, H.R.4119 was referred
to the Subcommittee on Border and Maritime Security.
The Committee on the Judiciary considered H.R.4119 on March
6, 2012, and ordered the measure to be reported to the House,
without amendment, by voice vote.
The Chair of the Committee on Homeland Security sent a
letter to the Chair of the Committee on the Judiciary on March
15, 2012, agreeing that, in order to expedite consideration on
the House Floor, the Committee would discharge itself from
consideration of H.R.4119. On that same date, the Chair of the
Committee on the Judiciary sent a letter to the Chair of the
Committee on Homeland Security acknowledging the decision to
forego consideration of
H.R.4119.
The Committee on the Judiciary reported H.R.4119 to the
House on March 21, 2012, as H. Rpt. 112-418, Pt. I.
Subsequently, the Committee on Ways and Means and the Committee
on Homeland Security were discharged from further
consideration.
The House considered H.R.4119 under Suspension of the Rules
on May 15, 2012, and on May 16, 2012 passed the bill by a two-
thirds vote of 416 yeas and 4 nays (Recorded Vote No. 256).
The Senate considered and passed H.R.4119 on May 17, 2012,
by unanimous consent.
H.R.4119 was presented to the President on May 29, 2012.
The President signed H.R.4119 into law on June 5, 2012, as
Public Law 112-127.

S. 1236, the Senate companion measure, was introduced in
the Senate on June 20, 2011, by Mrs.Feinstein, Mr.Kyl,
Ms.Landrieu, and Ms.McCaskill, and referred to the Senate
Committee on the Judiciary.
The Senate Committee on the Judiciary considered S.1236 on
December 15, 2011, and ordered the measure to be reported to
the Senate, without amendment. The Senate Committee on the
Judiciary reported the measure on that same date, with no
written report.
The Senate passed S.1236, without amendment, by unanimous
consent on January 30, 2012.
S. 1236 was received in the House and held at the Desk on
January 31, 2012.

TO REQUIRE THE TRANSPORTATION SECURITY ADMINISTRATION TO COMPLY WITH
THE UNIFORMED SERVICES EMPLOYMENT AND REEMPLOYMENT RIGHTS ACT.

Pub. L. 112-171 (H.R.3670 (S. 1990))

To require the Transportation Security Administration to comply
with the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights
Act.
Summary
This legislation amends the Aviation and Transportation
Security Act (Pub. L. 107-71) to require the Transportation
Security Administration (TSA) to be fully compliant with the
Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (Pub.
L. 103-353). TSA has stated that current practice conforms to
the requirements of H.R.3670, however, the legislation would
mandate this practice.
Legislative History
H.R.3670 was introduced in the House on December 14, 2011,
by Mr.Walz of Minnesota, Mr.Bilirakis, and Mr.Owens, and
referred to the Committee on Homeland Security, and the
Committee on Veterans' Affairs. Within the Committee, H.R.3670
was referred to the Subcommittee on Transportation Security.
The Committee on Veterans' Affairs considered H.R.3670 on
April 27, 2012, and ordered the measure to be reported to the
House by voice vote. The Committee on Veterans' Affairs
reported H.R.3670 to the House on May 18, 2012 as H. Rpt. 112-
487, Pt. I.
The House considered H.R.3670 on May 30, 2012, under
Suspension of the Rules and passed the measure by voice vote.
H.R.3670 was received in the Senate, on June 4, 2012, read
twice, and referred to the Senate Committee on Commerce,
Science, and Transportation.
On August 2, 2012, the Senate Committee on Commerce,
Science, and Transportation was discharged from further
consideration of H.R.3670 by unanimous consent, and the Senate
passed the bill, clearing the measure for the President.
H.R.3670 was presented to the President on August 7, 2012,
and the President signed H.R.3670 into law on August 16, 2012,
as Public Law 112-171.

S. 1990, the Senate companion measure, was introduced in
the Senate on December 14, 2011, by Mr.Lieberman and six
original co-sponsors, and referred to the Senate Committee on
Commerce, Science, and Transportation.

WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTION ENHANCEMENT ACT OF 2011

Pub. L. 112-199 S. 743 (H.R.3289)

To amend chapter 23 of title 5, United States Code, to clarify
the disclosures of information protected from prohibited
personnel practices, require a statement in nondisclosure
policies, forms, and agreements that such policies, forms, and
agreements conform with certain disclosure protections, provide
certain authority for the Special Counsel, and for other
purposes.
Summary
S. 743 amends Federal personnel law so that protections
relating to whistleblowers apply to a disclosure of any
violation of law. Such protections are listed and expanded on
from the Whistleblower Protection Act of 1989. Section 109 of
this bill extends whistleblower and other anti-discrimination
protections to employees, and applicants for employment, of the
Transportation Security Administration. S. 743 adds the Office
of the Director of National Intelligence and the National
Reconnaissance Office to the list of intelligence community
entities excluded from coverage under the Whistleblower
Protection Act of 1989. Title II directs the intelligence
community, specifically the Director of National Intelligence,
to prescribe regulations to ensure personnel action would not
be taken against an employee of the intelligence community as a
reprisal for any whistleblower disclosure relating to
intelligence activities. The Director of National Intelligence
must also create an appellate review board to hear
whistleblower appeals and submit a report to Congress on the
status of the implementation of such regulations.
Legislative History
S. 743, the Senate companion measure, was introduced in the
Senate on April 6, 2011, by Mr.Akaka and 13 original co-
sponsors and referred to the Senate Committee on Homeland
Security and Governmental Affairs.
The Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental
Affairs considered S.743 on October 19, 2011, and ordered the
measure to be reported to the Senate with an amendment,
favorably.
The Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental
Affairs reported S.743 to the Senate on April 19, 2012 as
S.Rpt. 112-155.
The Senate considered and passed S.743 by unanimous consent
on May 8, 2012.
S. 743 was received in the House on May 9, 2012, and
referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform,
and in addition to the House Permanent Select Committee on
Intelligence and the Committee on Homeland Security, for a
period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker. Within the
Committee, S.743 was referred to the Subcommittee on Oversight,
Investigations, and Management, and in addition to the
Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and Intelligence.
The Chair of the Committee on Homeland Security sent a
letter to the Chair of the Committee on Oversight and
Government Reform on September 19, 2012, agreeing to waive
further consideration of S.734 in order to expedite
consideration on the House Floor. The letter further requested
the appointment of Conferees should a House-Senate Conference
be called. On that same date, the Chair of the Committee on
Oversight and Government Reform responded and agreed to the
jurisdictional interests of the Committee, the request for an
appointment of Conferees, and the agreement to waive further
consideration.
The House agreed, by unanimous consent, on September 28,
2012, to discharge the Committee on Oversight and Government
Reform, the Committee on Homeland Security, and the Permanent
Select Committee on Intelligence from further consideration of
S. 743 and passed the bill, as amended.
On November 13, 2012, the Senate concurred in the amendment
of the House to S. 743.
S. 743 was presented to the President on November 16, 2012.
Signed into law on November 27, 2012, as Public Law 112-199.

H.R.3289
H.R.3289, the House companion measure, was introduced in
the House on November 1, 2011, by Mr.Issa, Mr.Cummings,
Mr.Platts, and Mr.Van Hollen, and referred to the Committee on
Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to the
Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence and the Committee on
Homeland Security. Within the Committee, H.R.3289 was referred
to the Subcommittee on Oversight, Investigations, and
Management.
The Committee on Oversight and Government Reform considered
H.R.3289 on November 3, 2011, and ordered the measure to be
reported to the House, amended, by a recorded vote of 35 yeas
and 0nays.
The Committee on Oversight and Government Reform reported
H.R.3289 to the House on May 30, 2012 as H. Rpt. 112-508, Part
I. The referral of the bill to the House Permanent Select
Committee on Intelligence and the Committee on Homeland
Security extended for a period ending not later then October 1,
2012. On October 1, 2012, the Permanent Select Committee on
Intelligence and the Committee on Homeland Security were
discharged from further consideration of H.R.3289.

JAIME ZAPATA BORDER ENFORCEMENT SECURITY TASK FORCE ACT

Pub. L. 112-205 (H.R.915)

To establish a Border Enforcement Security Task Force program
to enhance border security by fostering coordinated efforts
among Federal, State, and local border and law enforcement
officials to protect United States border cities and
communities from trans-national crime, including violence
associated with drug trafficking, arms smuggling, illegal alien
trafficking and smuggling, violence, and kidnapping along and
across the international borders of the United States, and for
other purposes.
Summary
The Jaime Zapata Border Enforcement Security Task Force Act
establishes in United States Immigration and Customs
Enforcement (ICE) a Border Enforcement Security Task Force
(BEST) program to enhance border security by addressing and
reducing border security threats and violence by: (1)
Facilitating collaboration among Federal, State, local, Tribal,
and foreign law enforcement agencies to execute coordinated
activities in furtherance of border security and homeland
security; and (2) enhancing information-sharing among such
agencies.
H.R.915 authorizes the Secretary of Homeland Security,
acting through the Assistant Secretary for ICE, to establish
BEST units after considering: (1) Whether the area where the
unit would be established is significantly impacted by cross-
border threats; (2) the availability of Federal, State, local,
Tribal, and foreign law enforcement resources to participate in
the unit; and (3) the extent to which border security threats
are having a significant harmful impact in the area and in
other jurisdictions. The bill authorizes the Secretary, in
order to provide Federal assistance to the area so designated,
to: (1) Obligate such sums as are appropriated for the BEST
program; (2) direct the assignment of Federal personnel to that
program; and (3) take other actions to assist State, local,
Tribal, and foreign jurisdictions to participate.
The bill directs the Secretary to report on the
effectiveness of the program in enhancing border security and
reducing the drug trafficking, arms smuggling, illegal alien
trafficking and smuggling, violence, and kidnapping along and
across the borders of the United States.
Legislative History
111th Congress

H.R.1437, the ``Southern Border Security Task Force Act of
2009,'' was introduced in the House on March 11, 2009, by
Mr.Cuellar, and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security,
and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary. Within the
Committee, H.R.1437 was referred to the Subcommittee on Border,
Maritime, and Global Counterterrorism. No further action
occurred on H.R.1437 in the 111th Congress.
H.R.1437 contains provisions similar to those in H.R.915 in
the 112th Congress.

112th Congress

H.R.915 was introduced in the House on March 3, 2011, by
Mr.Cuellar and Mr.McCaul, and referred to the Committee on
Homeland Security. Within the Committee, H.R.915 was referred
to the Subcommittee on Border and Maritime Security.
On June 2, 2011, the Subcommittee on Border and Maritime
Security considered H.R.915 and favorably reported the measure
to the Full Committee for consideration, amended, by voice
vote.
On September 21, 2011, the Committee considered H.R.915,
and ordered the measure to be reported to the House with a
favorable recommendation, amended, by voice vote.
The Committee reported H.R.915 to the House on November 4,
2011, as H. Rpt. 112-268.
The House considered H.R.915 on May 30, 2012, under
Suspension of the Rules, and passed the measure by a \2/3\ roll
call vote of 391 yeas and 2 nays (Roll No. 296).
H.R.915 was received in the Senate, read twice and referred
to the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental
Affairs on June 4, 2012.
The Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental
Affairs considered H.R.915 on June 29, 2012, and ordered the
measure to be reported to the Senate, with an Amendment in the
Nature of a Substitute.
The Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental
Affairs reported H.R.915 to the Senate on August 28, 2012, as
S.Rpt. 112-206.
The Senate passed H.R.915 on September 22, 2012, by voice
vote, after agreeing to the Committee Amendment in the Nature
of a Substitute.
The House concurred in the Senate amendment to H.R. 915
under Suspension of the Rules on November 27, 2012, by a \2/3\
recorded vote of 397 yeas and 4 nays (Roll No. 610).
H.R. 915 was presented to the President on November 30,
2012; and signed into law on December 7, 2012, as Public Law
112-205.

COAST GUARD AND MARITIME TRANSPORTATION ACT OF 2012

Pub. Law 112-213 H.R. 2838 (H.R. 5887 | H.R. 4251)

An Act to authorize appropriations for the Coast Guard for
fiscal years 2012 through 2015, and for other purposes.
Summary
The Coast Guard and Maritime Security Act authorizes
appropriations for the U.S. Coast Guard for Fiscal Years 2013
through 2015 as applicable to operations and maintenance,
acquisitions, reserve program, environmental compliance, and
research and development. The bill further requires the
Commandant to submit to Congress a financial plan for capitol
assets listed in the President's budget and a list of the Coast
Guard's unfunded priorities and to continue the acquisition of
all 180 authorized Response Boat-Mediums until justification
for the acquisition of fewer boats is provided. The Secretary
is required to submit a report on the options for and cost of
extending the service life of the current ice breaking fleet
until a new icebreaker could be commissioned.
Additionally, two provisions from H.R. 4251 were included:
the first is the ``Transportation Worker Identification
Credential process reform'' and the second, the ``Integrated
cross-border maritime law enforcement operations between the
United States and Canada.'' Both of these provisions were
included in H.R. 2838 as passed by the Senate.
Legislative History
H.R. 2838 was introduced in the House on September 2, 2011,
by Mr. Lobiondo and Mr. Mica, and referred to the Committee on
Transportation and Infrastructure,
The Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure
considered H.R. 2838 on September 8, 2011, and ordered the
measure to be reported to the House, amended, by voice vote.
The Chair of the Committee on Homeland Security sent a
letter to the Chair of the Committee on Transportation and
Infrastructure on September 14, 2011, agreeing that, in order
to expedite consideration on the House Floor, the Committee on
Homeland Security would not seek a sequential referral of H.R.
2838. The letter further requested the appointment of Conferees
should a House-Senate Conference be convened. On September 27,
2011, the Chair of the Committee on Transportation and
Infrastructure sent a letter to the Chair of the Committee on
Homeland Security acknowledging the jurisdictional interests of
the Committee on Homeland Security and agreeing to request not
to seek a sequential referral of H.R. 2838.
The Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure reported
H.R. 2838 to the House on October 3, 2011, as H. Rpt. 112-229.
The House considered H.R. 2838 on November 4 and 15, 2011.
The House passed H.R. 2838 on November 15, 2011, amended, by
voice vote.
H.R. 2838 was received in the Senate on November 16, 2011,
read twice, and referred to the Senate Committee on Commerce,
Science, and Transportation.
The Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation was
discharged from further consideration of H.R. 2838 on September
22, 2012, the Senate then passed the measure, amended, by
unanimous consent. The title was amended so as to read ``An Act
to authorize appropriations for the Coast Guard for fiscal
years 2013 through 2014, and for other purposes.''
The House agreed to Suspend the Rules on December 5, 2012,
and pass H. Res. 825, providing for the concurrence by the
House in the Senate amendments to H.R. 2838, with an amendment.
On December 12, 2012, the Senate concurred in the amendment
of the House of Representatives to the amendment of the Senate
to H.R. 2838, to authorize appropriations for the Coast Guard
for fiscal years 2012 through 2015.
H.R. 2838 was presented to the President on December 14,
2012, and signed into law on December 20, 2012 as Public Law
112-213.

H.R. 5887
H.R.5887 was introduced in the House on June 1, 2012 and
referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.
The Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure
considered H.R.5887 on June 7, 2012, and ordered the measure to
be reported to the House, amended, by voice vote.
The Chair of the Committee on Homeland Security sent a
letter to the Speaker of the House on June 13, 2012, requesting
a sequential referral of H.R.5887.

DHS AUDIT REQUIREMENT TARGET ACT OF 2012

Pub. L. 112-217 S. 1998 (H.R. 5941)

To obtain an unqualified audit opinion, and improve financial
accountability and management at the Department of Homeland
Security.
Summary
S. 1998 would improve financial accountability and
management at the Department by requiring the Secretary to take
all the necessary steps to ensure all financial statements of
the Department are consolidated and ready in a timely manner in
preparation for an audit. S. 1998 would also ensure progress in
implementing the Department of Homeland Security Financial
Accountability Act by requiring the DHS Chief Financial Officer
to report to Congress until the Department is able to reach an
unqualified opinion. This report would include DHS' progress
and plans to meet its audit requirements. Specifically, this
report would: Discuss plans and resources needed to meet the
deadlines to obtain an unqualified opinion on the full set of
financial statements; address how the Department will eliminate
material weaknesses and significant deficiencies in internal
controls over financial reporting; provide deadlines for the
elimination of such weaknesses and deficiencies; and include
efforts to modernize the financial management systems of the
Department, including timelines, goals, alternatives, and costs
of the plan.
Legislative History
S. 1998 was introduced in the Senate on December 15, 2011,
by Mr. Brown of Massachusetts, Mr. Carper, and Mr. Johnson, and
referred to the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and
Governmental Affairs.
The Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental
Affairs considered S. 1998 on April 25, 2012, and ordered the
measure to be reported to the Senate, with an Amendment in the
Nature of a Substitute, favorably. The Senate Committee on
Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs reported S. 1998 on
November 20, 2012 as S. Rpt. 112-230. Placed on Senate
Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 535.
The Senate considered S. 1998 on November 28, 2012, and
passed the measure, amended, by unanimous consent.
S. 1998 was received in the House on November 29, 2012 and
referred to the Committee on Homeland Security, and in addition
to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. Within the
Committee, S. 1998 was referred to the Subcommittee on
Oversight, Investigations, and Management.
The Chair of the Committee on Oversight and Government
Reform sent a letter to the Chair of the Committee on Homeland
Security on December 7, 2012, agreeing to forego consideration
of S. 1998 in order to expedite consideration on the House
Floor. On that same date, the Chair of the Committee on
Homeland Security sent a letter to the Chair of the Committee
on Oversight and Government Reform agreeing to support to
expediting of consideration of S. 1998 on the House Floor.
The House agreed to Suspend the Rules and passed S. 1998 on
December 12, 2012, clearing the measure for the President.
S. 1998 was presented to the President on December 14,
2012. S. 1998 was signed into law on December 20, 2012, Public
Law 112-217.

H.R. 5941
H.R. 5941, the House companion measure, was introduced in
the House on June 8, 2012, by Mr. Platts, Mr. Connolly of
Virginia, and Mr. Towns; and referred to the Committee on
Homeland Security, and in addition to the Committee on
Oversight and Government Reform. Within the Committee, H.R.
5941 was referred to the Subcommittee on Oversight,
Investigations, and Management.

NO-HASSLE FLYING ACT OF 2012

Pub. L. 112-218 S. 3542 (H.R.6028)

To authorize the Assistant Secretary of Homeland Security
(Transportation Security Administration) to modify screening
requirements for checked baggage arriving from preclearance
airports, and for other purposes.
Summary
S. 3542 permits the Assistant Secretary of Homeland
Security (Transportation Security Administration) to use
discretion to determine, on a location-by-location basis, if
prescreening of checked baggage is necessary upon arrival in
the United States from a preclearance foreign airport and prior
to boarding a connecting domestic flight. Current practice
requires the baggage to be rescreened but does not require the
individual to be rescreened as well. S. 3542 allows the
Transportation Security Administration to streamline the
security process and allow employees to expend resources on
baggage that has not already been screened and cleared by
Transportation Security Administration screeners.
Legislative History
S. 3542 was introduced in the Senate on September 13, 2012,
by Ms. Klobuchar and Mr. Blunt, and referred to the Senate
Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
On November 29, 2012, the Senate, by unanimous consent,
discharged the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and
Transportation, considered S. 3542, and passed the measure,
with an amendment.
S. 3542 was received in the House on November 30, 2012, and
held at the Desk. The House considered S. 3542 under Suspension
of the Rules on December 12, 2012, and passed the bill,
clearing the measure for the President.
S. 3542 was presented to the President on December 14,
2012. S. 3542 was signed into law on December 20, 2012, as
Public Law 112-218.

H.R. 6028
H.R.6028 was introduced in the House on June 26, 2012, by
Mr.Walsh of Illinois and referred to the Committee on Homeland
Security. Within the Committee, H.R.6028 was referred to the
Subcommittee on Transportation Security.
The House considered H.R.6028 under Suspension of the Rules
on September 11, 2012, and passed the measure by voice vote.
H.R.6028 was received in the Senate on September 12, 2012,
read twice, and referred to the Senate Committee on Commerce,
Science, and Transportation.

CHEMICAL FACILITY ANTI-TERRORISM SECURITY AUTHORIZATION
ACT OF 2011

H.R.901

To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to codify the
requirement that the Secretary of Homeland Security maintain
chemical facility anti-terrorism security regulations.
Summary
The Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security
currently has authority to regulate chemical facilities under
the Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards (CFATS) issued
pursuant to section 550 of the Department of Homeland Security
Appropriations Act, 2007 (Pub.L. 109-295). H.R.901 codifies the
Secretary's authority to regulate chemical facility security
within the Homeland Security Act of 2002 and extend this
authority for seven years to allow the program to be fully
implemented and achieve its objectives of enhancing chemical
facility security and reducing risks of terrorism. The
provisions contained in H.R.901 largely reflect the original
statute, i.e. Section 550, and will enable the Department of
Homeland Security and chemical facilities to continue
implementing CFATS uninterrupted using the existing risk-based,
performance-based approach without imposing additional,
burdensome requirements that could slow or hinder progress
being made by both the Department and the chemical facilities.
H.R.901 is intended to provide long-term certainty to the
Department and chemical facilities regarding the requirement to
improve security at our Nation's chemical facilities while
preserving the ability of American companies to compete, remain
innovative, and create jobs.
Legislative History
H.R.901 was introduced in the House on March 3, 2011, by
Mr.Daniel E. Lungren of California and eight original
cosponsors, and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security,
and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce. Within
the Committee, H.R.901 was referred to the Subcommittee on
Cybersecurity, Infrastructure Protection, and Security
Technologies.
The Subcommittee on Cybersecurity, Infrastructure
Protection, and Security Technologies considered H.R.901 on
April 14, 2011, and ordered the measure to be favorably
reported to the Full Committee, without amendment, by a roll
call vote of 6 yeas and 4 nays.
On June 22, 2011, the Committee on Homeland Security met to
consider H.R.901 and ordered the measure to be reported to the
House, amended, by voice vote.
The Committee filed a report on H.R.901 in the House on
September 26, 2011, as H. Rpt. 112-224, Pt. 1. Referral of the
bill to the Committee on Energy and Commerce was extended on
September 26, 2011, for a period ending not later than November
11, 2011. Referral of the bill to the Committee on Energy and
Commerce was extended on November 11, 2011, for a period ending
not later than January 6, 2012. Referral of the bill to the
Committee on Energy and Commerce was extended on January 6,
2012, for a period ending not later than January 20, 2012.
Referral of the bill to the Committee on Energy and Commerce
was extended on January 20, 2012, for a period ending not later
than March 1, 2012. Referral of the bill to the Committee on
Energy and Commerce was extended on March 1, 2012, for a period
ending not later than March 9, 2012. Referral of the bill to
the Committee on Energy and Commerce was extended on March 9,
2012, for a period ending not later than June 8, 2012. On June
8, 2012, the Committee on Energy and Commerce was discharged
from further consideration of H.R.901. H.R.901 was placed on
the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 368.

TRANSPORTATION SECURITY ADMINISTRATION OMBUDSMAN
ACT OF 2011

H.R.1165

To amend title 49, United States Code, to establish an
Ombudsman Office within the Transportation Security
Administration for the purpose of enhancing transportation
security by providing confidential, informal, and neutral
assistance to address work-place related problems of
Transportation Security Administration employees, and for other
purposes.
Summary
H.R.1165 enhances transportation security by providing
confidential, informal, and neutral assistance to address work-
place related problems of Transportation Security
Administration (TSA) employees by strengthening and refining
the role of the TSA Office of Ombudsman.
Legislative History
H.R.1165 was introduced in the House on March 17, 2011, by
Ms.Jackson Lee of Texas, Ms.Speier, Mr.Thompson of Mississippi,
and Mr.Davis of Illinois, and referred to the Committee on
Homeland Security. Within the Committee, H.R.1165 was referred
to the Subcommittee on Transportation Security.
The Subcommittee on Transportation Security considered
H.R.1165 on May 12, 2011, and ordered the measure reported,
favorably, to the Full Committee, amended, by voice vote.
The Committee considered H.R.1165 on September 21, 2011,
and ordered the measure to be reported to the House, amended,
with a favorable recommendation, by voice vote.
The Committee reported H.R.1165 to the House on November 4,
2011, as H. Rpt. 112-270.

SECURE BORDER ACT OF 2011

H.R.1299

To achieve operational control of and improve security at the
international land borders of the United States, and for other
purposes.
Summary
In testimony before Congress, a Government Accountability
Office witness reported that the U.S. Border Patrol has less
than 44 percent of the Southwest Border under operational
control and less than 2 percent of the Northern Border under
operational control [GAO-11-374T and GAO-11-508T]. H.R.1299
requires the Department of Homeland Security to develop a plan
to gain operational control, as defined by the Secure Fence Act
of 2006 (Pub. L. 109-367), of the borders of the United States
within 5 years. In the event that the Secretary should try to
utilize another measure other than operational control, that
measure must be evaluated by a National Laboratory for
suitability in measuring control of the border. The Secretary
must also develop a comprehensive new measurement system which
captures the effectiveness of security at the ports of entry.
Finally, it requires the U.S. Customs and Border Protection to
provide the Committee with its resource allocation model for
the current future year staffing requirements and detailed port
of entry manpower data.
Legislative History
H.R.1299 was introduced in the House on March 31, 2011, by
Mrs.Miller of Michigan and 18 original cosponsors, and referred
to the Committee on Homeland Security. Within the Committee,
H.R.1299 was referred to the Subcommittee on Border and
Maritime Security.
On June 2, 2011, the Subcommittee on Border and Maritime
Security considered H.R.1299 and favorably reported the measure
to the Full Committee for consideration, amended, by voice
vote.
The Committee considered H.R.1299 on September 21, 2011,
and ordered the measure to be reported to the House, with a
favorable recommendation, amended, by voice vote.
The Committee reported H.R.1299 to the House on November
10, 2011, as H. Rpt. 112-274.
The House considered H.R.1299 on May 30, 2012, under
Suspension of the Rules and passed the measure by voice vote.
H.R.1299 was received in the Senate, read twice, and referred
to the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental
Affairs on June 4, 2012.
The Chair of the Committee on Ways and Means sent a letter
to the Chair of the Committee on Homeland Security on June 2,
2012, agreeing to waive consideration of H.R.1299. The letter
further requested the appointment of Conferees should a House-
Senate Conference be convened. On June 5, 2012, the Chair of
the Committee on Homeland Security sent a letter to the Chair
of the Committee on Ways and Means acknowledging the
jurisdictional concerns of the Committee on Ways and Means, and
agreeing to support the appointment of Conferees.

AVIATION SECURITY STAKEHOLDER PARTICIPATION ACT OF 2011

H.R.1447

To amend title 49, United States Code, to direct the Assistant
Secretary of Homeland Security (Transportation Security
Administration) to establish an Aviation Security Advisory
Committee, and for other purposes.
Summary
H.R.1447 directs the Assistant Secretary of the
Transportation Security Administration to establish an Aviation
Security Advisory Committee. The Assistant Secretary is
required to consult with the Advisory Committee on aviation
security matters and the development of recommendations to
improve aviation security.
Legislative History
H.R.1447 was introduced in the House on April 8, 2011, by
Mr.Thompson of Mississippi and Ms.Jackson Lee of Texas, and
referred to the Committee on Homeland Security. Within the
Committee, H.R.1447 was referred to the Subcommittee on
Transportation Security.
On September 21, 2011, the Chair discharged the
Subcommittee on Transportation Security from further
consideration of H.R.1447. The Committee proceeded to the
consideration of H.R.1447 and ordered the measure to be
reported to the House, without amendment, by voice vote.
The Committee reported H.R.1447 to the House on November 4,
2011, as H. Rpt. 112-269.
The House considered H.R.1447 under Suspension of the
Rules, on June 26, 2012, and passed the bill on June 28, 2012
by voice vote.
H.R.1447 was received in the Senate on June 29, 2012, read
twice, and referred to the Senate Committee on Commerce,
Science, and Transportation.

NATIONAL SECURITY AND FEDERAL LANDS PROTECTION ACT

H.R.1505 (H.R.2578)

To prohibit the Secretaries of the Interior and Agriculture
from taking action on public lands which impede border security
on such lands, and for other purposes.
Summary
H.R.1505 prohibits the Secretaries of the Interior and
Agriculture from taking action on public lands which impede the
Border Patrol from conducting security activities under the
direction of the Secretary of Homeland Security. In order to
effectively secure the border, the Department of Homeland
Security is provided to have immediate access to any public
land managed by the Federal Government; including access to
maintain and construct roads, construct a fence, use patrol
vehicles, and set up monitoring equipment.
Legislative History
H.R.1505 was introduced in the House on April 13, 2011, by
Mr. Bishop of Utah and 54 cosponsors, and referred to the
Committee on Natural Resources, and in addition the Committees
on Agriculture and Homeland Security. Within the Committee,
H.R. 1505 was referred to the Subcommittee on Border and
Maritime Security.
On October 5, 2011, the Natural Resources Subcommittee on
National Parks, Forests, and Public Lands discharged H.R.1505.
On October 5, 2011 the Committee on Natural Resources
considered H.R.1505, and ordered the measure to be reported to
the House with a favorable recommendation, amended, by a
recorded vote of 26 yeas and 17 nays.
The Chair of the Committee on Natural Resources sent a
letter on December 14, 2011, to the Chair of the Committee on
Homeland Security requesting that, in order to expedite
consideration of H.R. 1505 by the Full House, the Committee
would discharge H.R. 1505 from any further consideration. The
Chair of the Committee responded on December 14, 2011
acknowledging the request of the Committee on Natural Resources
by discharging H.R.1505 from further consideration by the
Committee. The response further requested an appointment of
Conferees should a House-Senate Conference be called.
The Committee on Natural Resources reported H.R.1505 to the
House as H. Rpt. 112-448, Pt. I on April 17, 2012. The
Committee on Agriculture and the Committee on Homeland Security
were subsequently discharged from further consideration of
H.R.1505.
The Committee on Rules met on June 18, 2012, and reported a
Rule providing for consideration of H.R.2578 to the House as H.
Res. 688. Among other things, the Rule provides for the
inclusion of the text of H.R.1505, as reported by the Committee
on Natural Resources, within section 1401 of H.R.2578.
Provisions of H.R.1505 were included within section 1401 of
H.R.2578 during House consideration on June 19, 2012.
As passed by the House, section 1401 of H.R.2578, the
Conservation and Economic Growth Act, contains the text of
H.R.1505.
H.R.2578 was introduced in the House on July 18, 2011, by
Mr.Denham, Mr.Nunes, Mr.Costa and Mr.McCarthy of California,
and referred to the Committee on Natural Resources.
The Committee on Natural Resources considered H.R.2578 on
October 15, 2011, and reported the measure to the House by
voice vote.
The Committee on Natural Resources reported H.R.2578 to the
House on December 1, 2011 as H. Rpt. 112-303.
The Committee on Rules met on June 18, 2012, and reported a
Rule providing for consideration of H.R.2578 to the House as H.
Res. 688. Among other things, the Rule provides for the
inclusion of the text of H.R.1505, as reported by the Committee
on Natural Resources, within section 1401 of H.R.2578.
The House passed H. Res.688 by a recorded vote of 240 yeas
and 175 nays.
The House considered H.R.2578 under the provisions of
H.Res.688 on June 19, 2012. A motion to recommit to the
Committee on Natural Resources, with instructions, failed by a
recorded vote of 188 yeas and 234 nays (Roll No. 386). The
House then passed H.R.2578 by a recorded vote of 232 yeas and
188 nays (Roll No. 387).
H.R.2578 was received in the Senate, read twice, and
referred to the Senate Committee on Energy and Natural
Resources.

SECURE VISAS ACT

H.R.1741

To authorize the Secretary of Homeland Security and the
Secretary of State to refuse or revoke visas to aliens if in
the security or foreign policy interests of the United States,
to require the Secretary of Homeland Security to review visa
applications before adjudication, to provide for the immediate
dissemination of visa revocation information, and for other
purposes.
Summary
H.R.1741, also known as the Secure Visas Act, provides the
Secretary of Homeland Security authority to refuse or revoke
any visa to an alien or class of aliens if deemed necessary or
advisable to protect the security interests of the United
States. The legislation mandates inspection of all visa
applications and supporting documentation before the
adjudication of the application at the 20 highest-risk visa
issuing diplomatic and consular posts, as determined by the
Secretary, and authorizes the Secretary to assign employees to
those diplomatic consular posts.
Legislative History
H.R.1741 was introduced in the House on May 5, 2011, by Mr.
Smith of Texas and eight original cosponsors, and referred to
the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the
Committee on Homeland Security. Within the Committee, H.R.1741
was referred to the Subcommittee on Border and Maritime
Security.
The Committee on the Judiciary considered H.R.1741 on June
23, 2011, and ordered the measure to be reported to the House,
amended, by a recorded vote of 17 yeas and 11 nays.
The Chair of the Committee on Homeland Security sent a
letter to the Chair of the Committee on the Judiciary on July
13, 2011, agreeing that, in order to expedite consideration on
the House Floor, the Committee on Homeland Security would waive
its right to consider H.R.1741. The letter further requested
the appointment of Conferees should a House-Senate Conference
be called. On that same date, the Chair of the Committee on the
Judiciary sent a letter to the Chair of the Committee on
Homeland Security agreeing to the waiving of consideration in
order to expedite consideration.
The Committee on the Judiciary reported H.R.1741 to the
House as H. Rpt. 112-441, Pt. I on March 8, 2012. Subsequently,
the Committee on Homeland Security was discharged from further
consideration of H.R.1741.

TO AMEND TITLE 49, UNITED STATES CODE, TO DIRECT THE ASSISTANT
SECRETARY OF HOMELAND SECURITY (TRANSPORTATION SECURITY ADMINISTRATION)
TO TRANSFER UNCLAIMED MONEY RECOVERED AT AIRPORT SECURITY CHECKPOINTS
TO UNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS, INCORPORATED, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES.

H.R.2179

To amend title 49, United States Code, to direct the Assistant
Secretary of Homeland Security (Transportation Security
Administration) to transfer unclaimed money recovered at
airport security checkpoints to United Service Organizations,
Incorporated, and for other purposes.
Summary
This legislation directs the Transportation Security
Administration (TSA) to transfer unclaimed money recovered at
airport security checkpoints to United Service Organizations,
Inc. for use in support of its airport centers. The legislation
will support the continued efforts of the United Service
Organizations, Inc. (USO) by providing funds to create a
welcoming and comfortable atmosphere at airports for our
dedicated military personnel and their families. Additionally,
this bill also directs TSA to provide clothing assistance to
homeless or needy veterans with unclaimed clothing recovered at
airport security checkpoints.
Legislative History
H.R.2179 was introduced in the House on June 14, 2011, by
Mr.Miller of Florida, and referred to the Committee on Homeland
Security. Within the Committee, H.R.2179 was referred to the
Subcommittee on Transportation Security.
On March 7, 2012, the Subcommittee on Transportation
Security considered H.R.2179 and reported the measure to the
Full Committee with a favorable recommendation, without
amendment, by voice vote.
The Full Committee considered H.R.2179 on March 28, 2012,
and ordered the measure to be favorably reported to the House,
amended, by voice vote.
The Committee reported H.R.2179 to the House on May 8,
2012, as H. Rpt. 112-468.

WMD PREVENTION AND PREPAREDNESS ACT OF 2011

H.R.2356

To enhance homeland security by improving efforts to prevent,
protect against, respond to, and recover from an attack with a
weapon of mass destruction, and for other purposes.
Summary
H.R.2356 enhances homeland security by improving efforts to
prevent, protect against, respond to, and recover from an
attack with a weapon of mass destruction (WMD), and for other
purposes. The bill addresses the range of actions necessary to
counter the WMD threat as identified through the Committee on
Homeland Security's oversight work and the recommendations of
the Commission on the Prevention of WMD Proliferation and
Terrorism in its report, ``World At Risk.'' The approach is to
include all aspects of the preparedness framework--prevention,
protection, response, and recovery--for chemical, biological,
radiological, and nuclear attacks and incidents.
Legislative History
111th Congress
H.R.5498 was introduced in the House on March 15, 2010, by
Mr.Pascrell, Mr.King of New York, Mr.Thompson of Mississippi,
Ms.Clarke, and Mr.Daniel E. Lungren of California and referred
to the Committee on Homeland Security, and in addition to the
Committee on Energy and Commerce, the Committee on Agriculture,
the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, the
Committee on Foreign Affairs, and the Permanent Select
Committee on Intelligence. Within the Committee, H.R.5498 was
referred to the Subcommittee on Emerging Threats,
Cybersecurity, and Science and Technology.
On June 15, 2010, the Subcommittee on Emerging Threats,
Cybersecurity, and Science and Technology held a hearing on
H.R.5498, the ``WMD Prevention and Preparedness Act of 2010.''
The Subcommittee received testimony from Sara (Sally) T.
Beatrice, PhD, Assistant Commissioner, Public Health
Laboratory, Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, City of
New York; Randall S.Murch, PhD, Associate Director, Research
Program Development, National Capital Region, Virginia
Polytechnic Institute and State University; Robert P. Kadlec,
MD, Vice President, Global Public Sector, PRTM Management
Consulting; and Julie E. Fischer, PhD, Senior Associate, Global
Health Security Program, Henry L. Stimson Center.
On June 23, 2010, the Full Committee considered H.R.5498
and ordered the measure to be reported to the House with a
favorable recommendation, amended, by a recorded vote of 26
yeas and 0nays (Roll Call Vote No. 24).
On November 17, 2010, the Chair of the House Permanent
Select Committee on Intelligence sent a letter to the Chair of
the Committee on Homeland Security indicating that, in order to
expedite consideration of the measure by the full House, the
Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence would agree to not
seek a sequential referral of H.R.5498. On that same date, the
Chair of the Committee on Homeland Security responded and
agreed to the waiving of the sequential referral and agreeing
to request to seek appointments of Conferees should a House-
Senate Conference be convened. On November 18, 2010, the Chair
of the Committee on Foreign Affairs sent a letter to the Chair
of the Committee on Homeland Security agreeing that, in order
to expedite consideration of the measure by the full House, the
Committee would waive consideration of H.R.5498. On that same
date, the Chair of the Committee on Homeland Security sent a
letter to the Chair of the Committee on Foreign Affairs
acknowledging the jurisdictional interests of the Committee on
Foreign Affairs.
The Committee on Homeland Security reported H.R.5498 to the
House on November 18, 2010, as H. Rept. 111-659, Pt. I.
Subsequently, the Committee on Agriculture, the Committee
on Transportation and Infrastructure, the Committee on Foreign
Affairs, and the House Permanent Select Committee on
Intelligence were discharged from further consideration of
H.R.5498.
The referral of H.R.5498 to the Committee on Energy and
Commerce was extended on November 18, 2010, for a period ending
not later than December 3, 2010. The referral of H.R.5498 to
the Committee on Energy and Commerce was extended on December
3, 2010, for a period ending not later than December 17, 2010.
The referral of H.R.5498 to the Committee on Energy and
Commerce was extended on December 17, 2010, for a period ending
not later than December 21, 2010.
112th Congress
H.R.2356 was introduced in the House on June 24, 2011, by
Mr.Pascrell, Mr.King of New York, Mr.Thompson of Mississippi,
and eight original cosponsors, and referred to the Committee on
Homeland Security, and in addition to the Committee on Energy
and Commerce, the Committee on Transportation and
Infrastructure, the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and the House
Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence. Within the
Committee, H.R.2356 was referred to the Subcommittee on
Cybersecurity, Infrastructure Protection, and Security
Technologies and the Subcommittee on Emergency Preparedness,
Response, and Communications.
The Chair discharged the Subcommittee on Cybersecurity,
Infrastructure Protection, and Security Technologies and the
Subcommittee on Emergency Preparedness, Response, and
Communications from further consideration of H.R.2356 on May 9,
2012.
The Full Committee considered H.R.2356 on May 9, 2012, and
ordered the measure to be reported to the House with a
favorable recommendation, amended, by voice vote.
On August 3, 2012, the Chair of the Committee on Science,
Space, and Technology sent a letter to the Speaker of the House
requesting a referral of H.R.2356.
The Committee on Homeland Security reported H.R.2356 to the
House on September 12, 2012, as H. Rpt. 112-665, Pt. I.
H.R.2356 was sequentially referred to the Committee on
Science, Space, and Technology on September 12, 2012, for a
period ending not later than November 30, 2012.
The referral of H.R.2356 to the Committee on Energy and
Commerce; the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure;
the Committee on Foreign Affairs; and the House Permanent
Select Committee on Intelligence was extended on September 12,
2012, for a period ending not later than November 30, 2012. The
Committee on Energy and Commerce; the Committee on
Transportation and Infrastructure; the Committee on Foreign
Affairs; the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence;
and the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology were
discharged from further consideration of H.R. 2356 on November
30, 2012. Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 510.

WMD INTELLIGENCE AND INFORMATION SHARING ACT OF 2011

H.R.2764

To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to establish weapons
of mass destruction intelligence and information sharing
functions of the Office of Intelligence and Analysis of the
Department of Homeland Security and to require dissemination of
information analyzed by the Department to entities with
responsibilities relating to homeland security, and for other
purposes.
Summary
This legislation requires the Department of Homeland
Security's Office of Intelligence and Analysis to support the
analysis and dissemination of information regarding threats
involving chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear
weapons throughout the Department and among other Federal,
State, local, and private sector partners.
Legislative History
H.R.2764 was introduced in the House on August 1, 2011, by
Mr.Meehan, Ms.Speier, Mr.Pascrell, Mr.Marino, Mr.King of New
York, and Mr.Rogers of Alabama, and referred to the Committee
on Homeland Security. Within the Committee, H.R.2764 was
referred to the Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and
Intelligence.
The Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and Intelligence
considered H.R.2764 on November 15, 2011, and ordered the
measure to be reported to the Full Committee with a favorable
recommendation, without amendment, by voice vote.
The Full Committee considered H.R.2764 on March 28, 2012,
and ordered the measure to be favorably reported to the House,
amended, by voice vote.
The Committee reported H.R.2764 to the House on May 8,
2012, as H. Rpt. 112-466.
The House considered H.R.2764 on May 30, 2012, under
Suspension of the Rules, and passed the measure by voice vote.
H.R.2764 was received in the Senate on June 4, 2012, read
twice, and referred to the Senate Committee on Homeland
Security and Governmental Affairs.

FEMA REAUTHORIZATION ACT OF 2011

H.R.2903

To reauthorize the programs and activities of the Federal
Emergency Management Agency.
Summary
H.R.2903 authorizes $1.031 billion for each of fiscal years
2012, 2013, and 2014 for the salaries and expenses of the
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Within that amount,
the bill authorizes $13.2 billion for the integrated public
alert and wireless system (IPAWS) in Section 102 of the bill.
Section 102 requires the President, acting through the FEMA
Administrator, to modernize and implement IPAWS, through the
establishment of common alerting and warning protocols. The
Administrator must ensure the system is capable of reaching
individuals in diverse geographic locations, targeted based on
risk to a particular area, and through a variety of
communications modes. In addition, the system must be capable
of providing alerts to individuals with disabilities and access
and functional needs. The section requires the creation of an
IPAWS Advisory Committee to ensure that the input of State,
local, Tribal, territorial, private sector, and non-profit
partners are incorporated into the system. Further, section 102
requires the Administrator to report to the Committees on
Transportation and Infrastructure and Homeland Security in the
House of Representatives and the Committee on Homeland Security
and Governmental Affairs in the Senate on implementation of the
system and findings of the Advisory Committee.
The provisions in section 102 are substantially similar to
legislation introduced by Mr. Bilirakis, the Integrated Public
Alert and Warning Modernization Act of 2012 (H.R.3563), which
was favorably reported by the Committee on Homeland Security on
September 20, 2012. Prior to consideration of H.R.2903 by the
House, provisions from H.R.3563 were included in section 102 at
Chairman Bilirakis' request.
In addition to authorizing IPAWS, H.R.2903 makes numerous
amendments to the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and
Emergency Assistance Act, which are of interest to the
Committee on Homeland Security.
Legislative History
H.R.2903 was introduced in the House on September 13, 2011,
by Mr.Denham, Mr.Hanna, and Ms.Norton, and referred to the
Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.
The Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure
considered H.R.2903 on March 8, 2012, and ordered the measure
to be reported to the House, amended, by voice vote.
The Chair of the Committee on Homeland Security sent a
letter to the Speaker of the House on March 8, 2012, requesting
a sequential referral of H.R.2903 to the Committee on Homeland
Security. The letter further indicated jurisdictional interests
over: Sec. 101, Reauthorization of Federal Emergency Management
Agency; Sec. 102, the Integrated Public Alert and Warning
System Modernization; Sec. 201, Reauthorization of urban search
and rescue response system; Sec. 202, Reauthorization of
emergency management assistance compact grants; and Sec. 217,
the National Dam Safety Program Act reauthorization.
The Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure reported
H.R.2903 to the House on September 14, 2012, as H. Rpt. 112-
674, Pt. I. H.R.2903 was sequentially referred to the Committee
on Homeland Security on September 14, 2012, for a period ending
not later than September 17, 2012.
The Chair of the Committee on Homeland Security sent a
letter to the Chair of the Committee on Transportation and
Infrastructure on September 17, 2012, agreeing to discharge
H.R.2903 in order to expedite consideration on the House Floor.
The letter further requested the appointment of Conferees
should a House-Senate Conference be called.
The Chair of the Committee on Transportation and
Infrastructure sent a letter to the Chair of the Committee on
Homeland Security on September 18, 2012, acknowledging the
jurisdictional interests of the Committee on Homeland Security
and the agreement to forego further consideration, and the
agreement to support conferees.
The House agreed to Suspend the Rules and pass H.R.2903 on
September 19, 2012, by voice vote.

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012

H.R.3116

To authorize certain programs of the Department of Homeland
Security, and for other purposes.
Summary
H.R.3116 authorizes several existing components and
positions of the Department and provides metrics for programs
operated by the Department of Homeland Security. In addition,
H.R.3116 clarifies authorities among various operating officers
and policy offices in order to promote greater coordination
among Departmental programs. H.R.3116 also proposes several
measures designed to bring about greater fiscal discipline
within the Department. For example, H.R.3116 requires
Department-wide cost and efficiency reviews for existing
expenditures, independent valuations for major acquisitions,
and intra-Department consultation for acquisitions.
H.R.3116 provides extensive direction and metrics carried
out in the fields of border security, information sharing,
preparedness, and response to terrorist attacks and natural
disasters and science and technology research and development.
Moreover, H.R.3116 authorizes pragmatic improvements for
security, including providing liability protections for
citizens who make good faith reports of suspected terrorist
activity and establishing a commission to reevaluate the causes
of the attacks of September 11, 2001, and the Federal
Government's ability to carry out the resulting
recommendations.
Legislative History
H.R.3116 was introduced in the House on October 6, 2011, by
Mr.King of New York and 12 original cosponsors, and referred to
the Committee on Homeland Security.
On October 12 and 13, 2011, the Committee considered
H.R.3116 and ordered the measure to be favorably reported to
the House, amended, by a recorded vote of 20 yeas and 12 nays.
On October 20, 2011 the Chair of the Committee on Science,
Space, and Technology sent a letter to the Speaker of the House
requesting a sequential referral of H.R.3116. On November 21,
2011, the Chair of the Committee on Transportation and
Infrastructure sent a letter to the Speaker of the House
requesting a sequential referral of H.R.3116. On December 14,
2011, the Chair of the Committee on Homeland Security sent a
letter to the Chair of the Committee on Natural Resources
requesting the waiving of a request to seek a referral of
H.R.3116. The Chair of the Committee on Natural Resources
agreed to not insist on a sequential referral of H.R.3116. On
December 15, 2011, the Chair of the Committee on Energy and
Commerce sent a letter to the Speaker of the House requesting a
referral of H.R.3116.
The Committee reported H.R. 3116 to the House on December
20, 2012, as H. Rpt. 112-717, Pt. I. H.R. 3116 was referred on
December 20, 2012, to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, the
Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, and the Committee
on Transportation and Infrastructure for a period ending not
later then December 21, 2012. On December 21, 2012, the
Committee on Energy and Commerce, the Committee on Science,
Space, and Technology, and the Committee on Transportation and
Infrastructure were discharged from further consideration of
H.R. 3116. Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 520.

MASS TRANSIT INTELLIGENCE PRIORITIZATION ACT

H.R.3140

To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to direct the
Secretary of Homeland Security to prioritize the assignment of
officers and analysts to certain State and urban area fusion
centers to enhance the security of mass transit systems.
Summary
This legislation requires the Secretary of Homeland
Security to prioritize the assignment of officers and analysts
to participate in State and local fusion centers in
jurisdictions with mass transit systems. These officers and
analysts will be responsible for the creation of mass transit
intelligence products to assist in the effective protection of
mass transit systems and promote consistent and timely
distribution of mass transit information, relevant to security,
among these jurisdictions.
Legislative History
H.R.3140 was introduced in the House on October 6, 2011, by
Ms.Speier and Mr.Meehan, and referred to the Committee on
Homeland Security. Within the Committee, H.R.3140 was referred
to the Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and Intelligence.
The Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and Intelligence
considered H.R.3140 on November 15, 2011, and ordered the
measure reported to the Full Committee with a favorable
recommendation, without amendment, by voice vote.
The Full Committee considered H.R.3140 on March 28, 2012,
and ordered the measure to be favorably reported to the House,
without amendment, by voice vote.
The Committee reported H.R.3140 to the House on May 8,
2012, as H. Rpt. 112-467.
The House considered H.R.3140 on May 30, 2012, under
Suspension of the Rules, and passed the measure by voice vote.
H.R.3140 was received in the Senate on June 4, 2012, read
twice, and referred to the Senate Committee on Homeland
Security and Governmental Affairs.

TO DIRECT THE SECRETARY OF HOMELAND SECURITY TO REFORM THE PROCESS FOR
THE ENROLLMENT, ACTIVATION, ISSUANCE, AND RENEWAL OF A TRANSPORTATION
WORKER IDENTIFICATION CREDENTIAL (TWIC) TO REQUIRE, IN TOTAL, NOT MORE
THAN ONE IN-PERSON VISIT TO A DESIGNATED ENROLLMENT CENTER.

H.R.3173

To direct the Secretary of Homeland Security to reform the
process for the enrollment, activation, issuance, and renewal
of a Transportation Worker Identification Credential (TWIC) to
require, in total, not more than one in-person visit to a
designated enrollment center.
Summary
The Transportation Worker Identification Credential (TWIC)
program was created to ensure all individuals who require
admittance into secure areas of regulated maritime facilities
and vessels are properly vetted and do not pose a threat to
maritime and supply chain security. Current TWIC requirements
compel applicants go to an enrollment center twice to complete
the application and confirm the biometric information embedded
into the card. The Committee believes that this is an onerous
burden for workers in the maritime industry, such as merchant
vessel operators and truck drivers, who rely on obtaining the
credential for employment.
H.R.3173 provides the Transportation Security
Administration with the ability to streamline the process for
TWIC application and require not more than one in-person visit.
Legislative History
H.R.3173 was introduced in the House on October 12, 2011,
by Mr.Scalise, Mr.Young of Alaska, Mr.King of New York,
Mr.Thompson of Mississippi, Mr.Cummings, and Mr.Richmond, and
referred to the Committee on Homeland Security. Within the
Committee, H.R.3173 was referred to the Subcommittee on Border
and Maritime Security.
The Subcommittee on Border and Maritime Security was
discharged from further consideration of H.R.3173 on May 9,
2012.
The Full Committee considered H.R.3173 on May 9, 2012, and
ordered the measure to be reported to the House with a
favorable recommendation, amended, by voice vote.
The Committee on Homeland Security reported H.R.3173 to the
House on June 15, 2012, as H. Rpt. 112-523.
The House considered H.R.3173 under Suspension of the Rules
on June 26, 2012, and passed the bill on June 28, 2012, by
voice vote.
H.R.3173 was received in the Senate on June 29, 2012, read
twice, and referred to the Senate Committee on Commerce,
Science, and Transportation.

INTEGRATED PUBLIC ALERT AND WARNING SYSTEM MODERNIZATION ACT OF 2012

H.R.3563

To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to direct the
Secretary of Homeland Security to modernize and implement the
national integrated public alert and warning system to
disseminate homeland security information and other
information, and for other purposes.
Summary
H.R.3563 requires the Secretary of Homeland Security to
modernize and implement the National integrated public alert
and warning system through the establishment of common alert
and warning protocols, standards, terminology, and an operating
system. Among other things, H.R.3563 requires the Secretary to
develop alerting capabilities for diverse modes of
communications, the ability to adapt to future technologies,
mechanisms to protect individual privacy, and the ability to
alert non-resident visitors to an affected area. The bill
further requires that the system be developed to ensure alerts
and warnings are provided to individuals with disabilities and
access and functional needs.
Within one year of the system becoming fully functional,
and every six months thereafter, the Secretary is required to
report to the Committee on Homeland Security and the Senate
Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee on the
functionality and performance of the system.
H.R.3563 authorizes $13.4 million for the system for each
of fiscal years 2012 through 2016. This amount is equal to the
Federal Emergency Management Agency's budget request for Fiscal
Year 2012, and approximately $5 million less than the
appropriated amount for Fiscal Year 2011.
Legislative History
H.R.3563 was introduced in the House on December 6, 2011,
by Mr.Bilirakis and Ms.Richardson, and referred to the
Committee on Homeland Security, and the Committee on
Transportation and Infrastructure. Within the Committee,
H.R.3563 was referred to the Subcommittee on Emergency
Preparedness, Response, and Communications.
The Subcommittee considered H.R.3563 on December 8, 2011,
and reported the measure to the Full Committee with a favorable
recommendation, amended, by voice vote.
The Full Committee considered H.R.3563 on March 28, 2012,
and ordered the measure to be favorably reported to the House,
amended, by voice vote.
The Committee on Homeland Security reported H.R.3563 to the
House on September 20, 2012, as H. Rpt. 112-685, Pt. I.
Subsequently, the Committee on Transportation and
Infrastructure was discharged from further consideration.
A provision similar to H.R.3563 was included in section 102
of the FEMA Reauthorization Act of 2012 (H.R.2903), which
passed the House of Representatives on September 19, 2012. For
additional information on H.R.2903, please see the Legislative
Activities of the Full Committee above.

PROMOTING AND ENHANCING CYBERSECURITY AND INFORMATION SHARING
EFFECTIVENESS ACT OF 2011

H.R.3674

To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to make certain
improvements in the laws relating to cybersecurity, and for
other purposes.
Summary
This measure provides authority for the Department of
Homeland Security to perform its current cybersecurity mission,
provides personnel authority, authorizes the National
Cybersecurity and Communications Integration Center at the
Department of Homeland Security and authorizes cybersecurity
research and development activities.
Legislative History
H.R.3674 was introduced in the House on December 15, 2011,
by Mr.Daniel E. Lungren of California and 11 original
cosponsors, and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security,
and in addition to the Committee on Oversight and Government
Reform, the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, the
Committee on the Judiciary, and the House Permanent Select
Committee on Intelligence. Within the Committee, H.R.3674 was
referred to the Subcommittee on Cybersecurity, Infrastructure
Protection, and Security Technologies.
On February 1, 2012, the Subcommittee considered H.R.3674
and ordered the measure reported to the Full Committee for
consideration, with a favorable recommendation, amended, by
voice vote.
The Committee on Homeland Security considered H.R.3674 on
April 18, 2012, and ordered the measure to be reported to the
House with a favorable recommendation, amended, by a recorded
vote of 16 yeas and 13 nays.
On April 20, 2012, the Chair of the Committee on Homeland
Security sent letters to the Chairs of the Committee on the
Judiciary, the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform,
and the Chair of the House Permanent Select Committee on
Intelligence requesting that, in order to expedite
consideration on the House Floor, the Committees be discharged
from further consideration of H.R.3674. On that same date, the
Chair of the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform sent
a letter to the Chair of the Committee on Homeland Security
agreeing to waive further consideration of H.R.3674. The Chairs
of the Committee on the Judiciary and the House Permanent
Select Committee on Intelligence sent letters to the Chair of
the Committee on Homeland Security on April 23, 2012, agreeing
to waive further consideration of
H.R.3674.
The Committee on Homeland Security reported H.R.3674 to the
House on July 11, 2012, as H. Rpt. 112-592, Pt. I.
Subsequently, the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform,
the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, the Committee
on the Judiciary, and the House Permanent Select Committee on
Intelligence were discharged from further consideration of
H.R.3674.
H.R.3674 was referred to the Committee on Energy and
Commerce on July 11, 2012, for a period ending not later than
September 21, 2012.
The Committee on Energy and Commerce was discharged from
further consideration of H.R.3674 on September 21, 2012.
Subsequently, H.R. 3674 was placed on the Union Calendar,
Calendar No. 501.

PUBLIC TRANSIT SECURITY AND LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT
SUPPORT ACT

H.R.3857

To amend the Implementing Recommendations of the 9/11
Commission Act of 2007 to require the Secretary of Homeland
Security to include as an eligible use the sustainment of
specialized operational teams used by local law enforcement
under the Transit Security Grant Program, and for other
purposes.
Summary
H.R. 3857 amends the Implementing Recommendations of the 9/
11 Commission Act of 2007 to allow public transportation
agencies who receive grant funding for security improvements to
use such funds for specialized patrol teams as long as the
recipient submits a sustainment plan for maintaining the
capability or capacity in future years. The bill also
authorizes $400 million for TSGP grants for each of fiscal
years 2012 and 2013, except that no more than 50 percent of
those funds in each of the fiscal years may be used for
operational costs.
Legislative History
H.R.3857 was introduced in the House on January 31, 2012,
by Mr.Turner of New York, Mr.King of New York, Mr.Rogers of
Alabama, and Mr.Grimm, and referred to the Committee on
Homeland Security. Within the Committee, H.R.3857 was referred
to the Subcommittee on Emergency Preparedness, Response, and
Communications and the Subcommittee on Transportation Security.
The Subcommittee on Emergency Preparedness, Response and
Communications and the Subcommittee on Transportation Security
were discharged from further consideration of H.R.3857 on May
9, 2012.
The Full Committee considered H.R.3857 on May 9, 2012, and
ordered the measure to be reported to the House with a
favorable recommendation, amended, by voice vote.
The Committee reported H.R.3857 to the House on May 30,
2012 as H. Rpt. 112-498.
The House considered H.R.3857 under Suspension of the Rules
on September 11, 2012, and passed the measure on September 12,
2012 by a \2/3\ recorded vote of 355 yeas and 62 nays.
H.R.3857 was received in the Senate on September 13, 2012,
read twice, and referred to the Senate Committee on Homeland
Security and Governmental Affairs.

GAUGING AMERICAN PORT SECURITY ACT

H.R.4005

To direct the Secretary of Homeland Security to conduct a study
and report to Congress on gaps in port security in the United
States and a plan to address them.
Summary
H.R.4005 provides for the Secretary of Homeland Security to
conduct a study on the remaining gaps in port security. Not
later than one year after the enactment of the bill, a
classified report must be submitted to the Congress. This
report should clearly prioritize the port security gaps and
provide a plan to address them.
Legislative History
H.R.4005 was introduced in the House on February 9, 2012,
by Ms.Hahn, and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security.
Within the Committee, H.R.4005 was referred to the Subcommittee
on Border and Maritime Security.
The Subcommittee on Border and Maritime Security was
discharged from further consideration of H.R.4005 on May 9,
2012.
The Full Committee considered H.R.4005 on May 9, 2012, and
ordered the measure to be reported to the House with a
favorable recommendation, amended, by voice vote.
The Committee reported H.R.4005 to the House on May 30,
2012, as H. Rpt. 112-499.
The House considered H.R.4005 under Suspension of the
Rules, on June 26, 2012, and passed the bill on June 28, 2012,
by a \2/3\ recorded vote of 411 yeas and 9 nays.
H.R.4005 was received in the Senate on June 29, 2012, read
twice, and referred to the Senate Committee on Homeland
Security and Governmental Affairs.

SECURING MARITIME ACTIVITIES THROUGH RISK-BASED TARGETING FOR PORT
SECURITY ACT

H.R.4251

To authorize, enhance, and reform certain port security
programs through increased efficiency and risk-based
coordination within the Department of Homeland Security, and
for other purposes.
Summary
The purpose of H.R.4251 is to expand and update the
Security and Accountability For Every Port Act of 2006 (SAFE
Port Act, Pub. L. 109-347) by enhancing security measures
overseas before threats reach U.S. shores, to foster a
collaborative environment between Customs and Border Protection
and the U.S. Coast Guard in sharing port security duties, and
to leverage the maritime security work of trusted allies of the
U.S. such as the United Kingdom, Canada, and New Zealand.
H.R.4251 is based upon three fundamental themes: (1)
Encouraging Department of Homeland Security (DHS) components
with shared jurisdiction to cooperate in maritime operations
and partner with State and local law enforcement agencies to
enhance the Nation's maritime security; (2) securing the supply
chain through the use of risk-based methodology; and (3)
finding cost savings through increased collaboration with
international, Federal, State, and local partners.
Key provisions in the bill include: (1) A Port Security
Grant Program management provision that sets timelines for
responses that DHS and the Federal Emergency Management Agency
(FEMA) must provide in regards to Port Security Grant
Applications; (2) authorizing the Coast Guard and Royal
Canadian Mounted Police maritime Shiprider program, including
funding of $2 million per year, which is the current level of
funding for the program; (3) port security training program
with accreditation from the Federal Law Enforcement Training
Center; and (4) requiring DHS to publish its spending
regulations regarding Transportation Worker Identification
Credential readers and including a firm deadline of December
31, 2014, for full deployment of readers.
Legislative History
H.R.4251 was introduced in the House on March 22, 2012, by
Mrs.Miller of Michigan, Mr.King of New York, Mr.Cuellar,
Mr.McCaul, and Mr.Clarke of Michigan, and referred to the
Committee on Homeland Security. Within the Committee, H.R.4251
was referred to the Subcommittee on Border and Maritime
Security.
The Subcommittee considered H.R.4251 on March 26, 2012, and
favorably reported the measure to the Full Committee, amended,
by voice vote.
The Committee considered H.R.4251 on June 6, 2012, and
ordered the measure to the favorably reported to the House,
amended, by voice vote.
The Committee reported H.R.4251 to the House on June 12,
2012, as H. Rpt. 112-521.
The House considered H.R.4251 under Suspension of the Rules
on June 26, 2012.
The Chair of the Committee on Ways and Means sent a letter
to the Chair of the Committee on Homeland Security agreeing to
forego action on the bill. On June 28, 2012, the Chair of the
Committee on Homeland Security sent a letter to the Chair of
the Committee on Ways and Means acknowledging the
jurisdictional interests of the Committee on Ways and Means and
the agreement to forego action.
The House passed H.R.4251 on June 28, 2012, by a \2/3\
recorded vote of 402 yeas and 21 nays.
H.R.4251 was received in the Senate on June 29, 2012, read
twice, and referred to the Senate Committee on Commerce,
Science, and Transportation.

OUTREACH TO PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES DURING EMERGENCIES ACT

H.R.5806

To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to require the
Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency to
provide guidance and coordination for outreach to people with
disabilities during emergencies, and for other purposes.
Summary
In order to enhance coordination with, and outreach to,
individuals with disabilities during emergencies, H.R. 5806
would require the Administrator of the Federal Emergency
Management Agency to develop and provide guidance regarding
engagement with these individuals.
Legislative History
H.R. 5806 was introduced in the House on May 17, 2012, by
Ms. Richardson and referred to the Committee on Transportation
and Infrastructure, and in addition to the Committee on
Homeland Security. Within the Committee, H.R. 5806 was referred
to the Subcommittee on Emergency Preparedness, Response, and
Communications.
The Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure
considered H.R. 5806 on August 1, 2012, and ordered the measure
to be reported to the House, amended, by voice vote.
The Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure reported
H.R. 5806 on December 21, 2012, as H. Rpt. 112-719, Part I. The
Committee on Homeland Security was discharged from further
consideration of H.R. 5806. Placed on the Union Calendar,
Calendar No. 522.

TO AMEND THE HOMELAND SECURITY ACT OF 2002 TO PERMIT USE OF CERTAIN
GRANT FUNDS FOR TRAINING CONDUCTED IN CONJUNCTION WITH A NATIONAL
LABORATORY OR RESEARCH FACILITY

H.R.5843

To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to permit use of
certain grant funds for training conducted in conjunction with
a national laboratory or research facility.
Summary
This bill amends Section 2008 of the Homeland Security Act
of 2002 to define training in conjunction with a national
laboratory or research facility as an allowable use of certain
homeland security grant funds. Current interpretation of the
statute by the Federal Emergency Management Agency prohibits
the use of such funds in this manner. This bill allows grant
funds to be better utilized by programs at Federal facilities
that benefit civilian public safety efforts.
Legislative History
H.R.5843 was introduced in the House on May 18, 2012, by
Mr.Daniel E. Lungren of California, and referred to the
Committee on Homeland Security. Within the Committee, H.R.5843
was referred to the Subcommittee on Cybersecurity,
Infrastructure Protection, and Security Technologies.
The House considered H.R.5843 under Suspension of the Rules
on June 26, 2012, and passed the bill on June 28, 2012, by
voice vote.
H.R.5843 was received in the Senate on June 29, 2012, read
twice, and referred to the Senate Committee on Homeland
Security and Governmental Affairs.

NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2013

H.R. 4310 (S. 3254)

An Act to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2013 for
military activities of the Department of Defense, for military
construction, and for defense activities of the Department of
Energy, to prescribe military personnel strengths for such
fiscal year, and for other purposes.
Summary
The National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013
(NDAA) authorizes a total of $648.7 billion in discretionary
and mandatory spending on defense programs in Fiscal Year 2013.
This authorization includes $85.5 billion to support military
operations in Afghanistan. This represents a $1.7 billion
increase from the President's request.
While this measure authorizes programs and missions within
the Department of Defense, the Committee on Homeland Security
remains interested in provisions that affect the Global War on
Terror. The NDAA prohibits the transfer of detainees from the
naval base located at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba to the United
States, and imposes new sanctions against entities who have
dealings with Iran.
Additionally, the Committee on Homeland Security is
interested in two provisions that Members of the Committee were
appointed as Conferees to the Committee of Conference on H.R.
4310. Section 1111 of H.R. 4310 establishes a Committee on
National Security Personnel within the Executive Office of the
President to issue a National Security Human Capital Strategy.
The strategy focuses on developing national security and
homeland security personnel to complete objectives that require
an integration of personnel and activities from multiple
executive branch agencies. Section 1803 of S. 3254 was an
amendment offered by Senator Lieberman during consideration of
the measure. This section continues funding for the Assistance
to Firefighters Grant (AFG), Staffing for Adequate Fire and
Emergency Response Grant (SAFER), and the United States Fire
Academy. The AFG and SAFER grants programs are reauthorized for
five years at $750 million each and includes a number of
accountability measures, including performance assessments and
a competitive awards process. Section 1803 also requires the
Government Accountability Office to report to Congress the
effect that changes to the grant programs have had on
mitigating fire and fire-related hazards.
Legislative History
H.R. 4310 was introduced in the House on March 29, 2012, by
Mr. McKeon and Mr. Smith of Washington and referred to the
Committee on Armed Services.
The Committee on Armed Services considered May 9, 2012, and
ordered the measure to be reported to the House, amended, by a
recorded vote of 56 yeas and 5 nays,
The Chair of the Committee on Homeland Security sent a
letter to the Chair of the Committee on Armed Services on May
11, 2012, agreeing to not seek a sequential referral of H.R.
4310 in order to expedite consideration on the House Floor.
The Committee on Armed Services reported H.R. 4310 to the
House on May 11, 2012, as H. Rpt. 112-479. On May 15, 2012, the
Committe on Armed Services filed a supplemental report as H.
Rpt. 112-479, Part II.
The House considered H.R. 4310 on May 16, 17, 18, 2012. The
House then passed H.R. 4310 on May 18, 2012, by a recorded vote
of 299 yeas and 120 nays (Roll No. 291). The title of the
measure was amended so as to read ``To authorize appropriations
for fiscal year 2013 for military activities of the Department
of Defense, for military construction, and for defense
activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military
personnel strengths for such fiscal year, and for other
purposes.''
H.R. 4310 was received in the Senate on June 19, 2012, read
twice, and referred to the Senate Committee on Armed Services.
The Chair of the Committee on Homeland Security sent a
letter to the Speaker of the House on December 4, 2012,
requesting the appointment of Conferees should a House-Senate
Conference be called on H.R. 4310 or S. 3254, the Senate
companion measure. The letter further requested the appointment
of Conferees to the following sections of H.R. 4310, as passed
by the House: Sec. 362. Assistance for homeland defense mission
training; Sec. 952. Expansion of persons eligible for expedited
Federal hiring following completion of National Security
Education Program scholarship; Sec. 1014. Extension of
authority for joint task forces to provide support to law
enforcement agencies conducting counter-terrorism activities.
Sec. 1062, Interagency Council on the Strategic Capability of
the National Laboratories; and Sec. 1111. Interagency personnel
rotations; and the following section of S. 3254 (S. Amdt.
3090): S. 1803, amendment offered by Senator Lieberman. Federal
Assistance to Fire Departments.
On December 4, 2012, the Senate Committee on Armed Services
was discharged from further consideration of H.R. 4310, the
bill was then passed, after striking all after the enacting
clause and inserting in lieu thereof the text of S. 3254, as
amended. The Senate insisted on its amendment, requested a
conference with the House on the disagreeing votes of the two
Houses; and the Chair was authorized to appoint the following
conferees on the part of the Senate: Senators Levin, Lieberman,
Reed, Akaka, Nelson (NE), Webb, McCaskill, Udall (CO), Hagan,
Begich, Manchin, Shaheen, Gillibrand, Blumenthal, McCain,
Inhofe, Sessions, Chambliss, Wicker, Brown (MA), Portman,
Ayotte, Collins, Graham, Cornyn, and Vitter.
On December 12, 2012, the Senate vitiated the December 4,
2012 passage of H.R. 4310. The Senate passed H.R. 4310, after
striking all after the enacting clause and inserting in lieu
thereof, the text of S. 3254, the Senate
The House agreed on December 13, 2012, to disagree to the
Senate amendment and agreed to a Conference with the Senate
thereon.
The Speaker appointed Conferees on the part of the House on
December 13, 2012: From the Committee on Armed Services; the
House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence; the Committee
on Education and the Workforce; the Committee on Energy and
Commerce; the Committee on Financial Services; the Committee on
Foreign Affairs; the Committee on Homeland Security; the
Committee on the Judiciary; the Committee on Natural Resources;
the Committtee on Oversight and Government Reform; the
Committee on Science, Space, and Technology; the Committee on
Small Business; the Committee on Transportation and
Infrastructure; and the Committee on Veterans' Affairs.
Conferees from the Committee on Homeland Security were as
follows: For consideration of sec. 1111 of the House bill and
sec. 1803 of the Senate amendment, and modifications committed
to conference: Representatives King of New York, Turner of New
York, and Thompson of Mississippi.
The Committee of Conference met and agreed to file a
Conference Report to accompany H.R. 4310 on December 18, 2012.
The Committee of Conference filed the report to accompany H.R.
4310 on December 18, 2012 as H. Rpt. 112-705.
The Committee on Rules met and granted a Rule providing for
the consideration of the Conference Report to accompany H.R.
4310 on December 19, 2012. Rule filed in the House as H. Res.
840, H. Rpt. 112-707.
The House considered the Conference Report to accompany
H.R. 4310 on December 20, 2012, under the provisions of H. Res.
840. The House agreed to the Conference Report to accompany
H.R. 4310 by a recorded vote of 315 yeas and 107 nays (Roll No.
645).
The Conference papers were held at the Desk in the Senate
on December 20, 2012. The Senate considered the Conference
Report to accompany H.R. 4310 on December 21, 2012, and agreed
to the Conference Report by a record vote of 81 yeas and 14
nays (Record Vote No. 229). Clearing the measure for the
President.

S. 3254
On June 4, 2012, the Senate Committee on Armed Services
reported an original measure to the Senate as S. 3254 (S. Rpt.
112-173).
A motion to proceed to the consideration of S. 3254 was
made in the Senate on November 13, 14, 15, 26, 27, and 28,
2012. On November 28, 2012, the Senate agreed to the motion to
proceed to the consideration of S. 3254 by voice vote. The
Senate considered S. 3254 on November 29, and 30; and December
3 and 4, 2012. The Senate passed S. 3254 on December 4, 2012,
by a record vote of 98 yeas and 0 nays (Record Vote No. 221).
The Senate incorporated S. 3254 into H.R. 4310, as an
amendment, on December 4, 2012. See action taken on H.R. 4310,
listed above.

DHS ACCOUNTABILITY ACT OF 2012

H.R.5913

To create an independent advisory panel to comprehensively
assess the management structure and capabilities related to the
Department of Homeland Security and make recommendations to
improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the management of
the Department.
Summary
After 10 years since the Department of Homeland Security's
(DHS) creation, significant work remains for DHS to efficiently
and effectively manage its mission functions and programs. The
DHS Accountability Act of 2012 creates an independent advisory
panel to comprehensively assess the management structure and
capabilities related to the Department of Homeland Security.
H.R.5913 requires the panel to make recommendations to improve
the management of the Department, including an examination of
the policies, practices, and procedures used to carry out its
management functions. Furthermore, the panel is tasked to asses
to what extent duplication exists and how this duplication may
negatively affect the mission of DHS, and to what extent
management of key homeland security missions is centralized in
the Department. Finally, the panel is to measure and evaluate
the Department's progress in making the management structure
and capabilities more efficient and effective.
Legislative History
H.R.5913 was introduced in the House on June 7, 2012, by
Mr.McCaul, Mr.Keating, and Mr.Long, and referred to the
Committee on Homeland Security. Within the Committee, H.R.5913
was referred to the Subcommittee on Oversight, Investigations,
and Management.
The Subcommittee on Oversight, Investigations, and
Management considered H.R.5913 on August 1, 2012, and ordered
the measure reported to the Full Committee for consideration
with a favorable recommendation, amended, by voice vote.
The House considered H.R. 5913 under Suspension of the
Rules on November 27, 2012, and passed the bill, amended, by
voice vote.

MEDICAL PREPAREDNESS ALLOWABLE USE ACT

H.R.5997

To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to codify authority
under existing grant guidance authorizing use of Urban Area
Security Initiative and State Homeland Security Grant Program
funding for enhancing medical preparedness, medical surge
capacity, and mass prophylaxis capabilities.
Summary
As a result of findings from hearings held in the
Subcommittee on Emergency Preparedness, Response, and
Communications on medical countermeasures, H.R. 5997 was
introduced to ensure that medical preparedness activities,
including mass prophylaxis and medical surge capacity, remain
allowable uses under the State Homeland Security Grant Program
and the Urban Area Security Initiative. Specifically, H.R. 5997
codifies the medical preparedness activities currently
permitted in the grant guidance for those programs.
Legislative History
H.R. 5997 was introduced in the House on June 21, 2012, by
Mr. Bilirakis, Mr. Clarke of Michigan, Mr. Turner of New York,
and Mr. Rogers of Alabama; and referred to the Committee on
Homeland Security. Within the Committee, H.R. 5997 was referred
to the Subcommittee on Emergency Preparedness, Response, and
Communications.
The House considered H.R. 5997 under Suspension of the
Rules on November 27, 2012, and passed the bill, amended, by a
\2/3\ recorded vote of 397 yeas and 1 nay (Roll No. 609).

MANDATORY OPERATIONAL CONTROL REPORTING AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACT
OF 2012

H.R.6025

To provide for annual reports on the status of operational
control of the international land and maritime borders of the
United States and unlawful entries, and for other purposes.
Summary
In testimony before Congress, a Government Accountability
Office (GAO) witness reported that the U.S. Border Patrol has
less than 44 percent of the Southwest border under operational
control and less than 2 percent of the Northern Border under
operational control [GAO-11-374T and GAO-11-508T].
In 2010, the Department of Homeland Security stopped
reporting the number of miles of border under operational
control with the promise of a new, more holistic measure of
border security called the Border Condition Index.
Nearly three years later, no new measure for border
security has been released.
H.R 6025 requires that the Department of Homeland Security
resume reporting miles of the border under operational control
and provide an estimate of the number of unlawful entries
between ports of entry.
Additionally, this bill requires the Department to give the
GAO access to the operational control numbers--for third party
verification and the use of a standard other than operational
control to describe security along the border must be vetted by
a Department of Energy National Laboratory with prior expertise
in border security.
Legislative History
H.R. 6025 was introduced in the House on June 26, 2012 by
Mrs. Miller of Michigan and Mr. Flake, and referred to the
Committee on Homeland Security and the Committee on the
Judiciary. Within the Committee, H.R. 6025 was referred to the
Subcommittee on Border and Maritime Security.
The House considered H.R. 6025 under Suspension of the
Rules on November 27, 2012, and passed the bill by voice vote.

CLOTHE A HOMELESS HERO ACT

H.R.6328

To amend title 49, United States Code, to direct the Assistant
Secretary of Homeland Security (Transportation Security
Administration) to transfer unclaimed clothing recovered at
airport security checkpoints to local veterans organizations
and other local charitable organizations, and for other
purposes.
Summary
This legislation directs the Transportation Security
Administration (TSA), in consultation with the Secretary of
Veterans Affairs, to transfer unclaimed clothing recovered at
any airport security checkpoint to local veteran organizations
or other local charitable organizations for distribution to
homeless or needy veterans and veteran families. This
legislation however does not prevent an airport or TSA from
donating unclaimed clothing to a charitable organization of
their choosing.
Legislative History
H.R. 6328 was introduced in the House on August 2, 2012, by
Ms. Hochul and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security.
Within the Committee, H.R. 6328 was referred to the
Subcommittee on Transportation Security.
The House considered H.R. 6328 under Suspension of the
Rules on November 27, 2012, and passed the bill by voice vote.
The Senate passed H.R. 6328, amended, on December 11, 2012,
by unanimous consent, clearing the measure for the President.

BORDER SECURITY INFORMATION IMPROVEMENT ACT OF 2012

H.R.6368

To require the Department of Justice, in consultation with the
Department of Homeland Security, to provide a report to
Congress on the Departments' ability to track, investigate and
quantify cross-border violence along the Southwest Border and
provide recommendations to Congress on how to accurately track,
investigate, and quantify cross-border violence.
Summary
H.R.6368 requires a joint report to Congress, no later than
180 days after the enactment of the Act, from the Department of
Justice (DOJ) and Department of Homeland Security (DHS),
concerning cross-border violence on the Southwest Border. The
study shall include: The definition of cross-border violence;
the ability to track, investigate, quantify, and report the
level of violence; steps being taken to address the effects of
the violence; information and data collected and made available
on the violence; and additional resources needed.
Legislative History
H.R.6368 was introduced in the House on September 10, 2012,
and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary and the
Committee on Homeland Security. Within the Committee, H.R.6368
was referred to the Subcommittee on Border and Maritime
Security.
The Chair of the Committee on Homeland Security sent a
letter to the Chair of the Committee on the Judiciary on
September 12, 2012, agreeing that, in order to expedite
consideration on the House Floor, the Committee on Homeland
Security would discharge H.R.6368 from further consideration.
The letter further requested the appointment of Conferees
should a House-Senate Conference be called. The Chair of the
Committee on the Judiciary sent a letter to the Chair of the
Committee on Homeland Security on September 13, 2012,
acknowledging the jurisdictional interests of the Committee on
Homeland Security and the agreement to forego consideration.
The letter further agreed to the appointment of Conferees
should a House-Senate Conference be called.
The House considered H.R.6368 on September 19, 2012, under
Suspension of the Rules and passed the measure by voice vote.
H.R.6368 was received in the Senate on September 20, 2012,
read twice, and referred to the Senate Committee on the
Judiciary.

SENSE OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES REGARDING THE 2007 PASSENGER NAME
RECORD AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES AND THE EUROPEAN UNION

H. Res. 255

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that
effective sharing of passenger information from inbound
international flight manifests is a crucial component of our
national security and that the Department of Homeland Security
must maintain the information sharing standards required under
the 2007 Passenger Name Record Agreement between the United
States and the European Union.
Summary
H. Res. 255 expresses the sense of the House of
Representatives that effective sharing of passenger information
from inbound international flight manifests is a crucial
component of our National security and that the Department of
Homeland Security must maintain the information sharing
standards required under the 2007 Passenger Name Record
Agreement (PNR) between the United States and the European
Union. H. Res. 255 calls for the Department to refute any
attempt to modify the current PNR regime if the modifications
imposed new limitations that materially reduced access by the
United States to PNR data. In May 2011, the Senate passed a
companion resolution, S.Res. 174.
Legislative History
H. Res. 255 was introduced in the House on May 10, 2011, by
Mr.King of New York, and nine original cosponsors, and referred
to the Committee on Homeland Security. Within the Committee,
H. Res. 255 was retained at the Full Committee.
On September 21, 2011, the Committee considered H. Res.255
and ordered the measure to be favorably reported to the House,
without amendment, by voice vote.
The Committee reported H. Res. 255 to the House on November
4, 2011, as H. Rpt. 112-272.

SENSE OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES REGARDING THE SEPTEMBER 11, 2001,
10TH ANNIVERSARY

H. Res. 391

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives regarding
the terrorist attacks launched against the United States on
September 11, 2001, on the 10th anniversary of that date.
Summary
Through H. Res. 391, the House of Representatives
recognizes September 11th as a day of solemn commemoration and
extends its deepest sympathies to the innocent victims of the
September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks and their families,
friends, and loved ones.
The resolution further commends the military and
intelligence personnel involved in the removal of Osama bin
Laden and reasserts the commitment to opposing violent
extremism against American interests and to providing the U.S.
military, intelligence, and law enforcement communities with
the resources and support to achieve this.
Legislative History
H. Res. 391 was introduced in the House on September 7,
2011, by Mr.Cantor and Ms.Pelosi, and referred to the Committee
on Oversight and Government Reform, the Committee on Foreign
Affairs, the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on
Transportation and Infrastructure, the Committee on the
Judiciary, the Committee on Homeland Security, and the
Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence.
On September 9, 2011, the House agreed to discharge the
Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, the Committee on
Foreign Affairs, the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee
on Transportation and Infrastructure, the Committee on the
Judiciary, the Committee on Homeland Security, and the
Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence from further
consideration of H. Res. 391, and agreed to the measure by
voice vote.

----------

Oversight Activities of the Committee

CURRENT TERRORIST THREATS

Since September 11, 2001, there have been over 50 plots and
terrorist attacks against the Homeland; two of them successful
in killing innocent Americans. Additionally, law enforcement
officers have arrested dozens of individuals plotting attacks
against the Homeland and our allies. On December 21, 2010, the
Attorney General stated that in the last 2 years there have
been 126 people indicted on terrorism charges, including 50
citizens of the United States. The threat from al-Qaeda and its
affiliates continues to remain extremely high.
On January 24, 2011, the Committee conducted a Member site
visit to the National Counterterrorism Center (NCTC) to educate
Members on the NCTC and receive a threat briefing from the NCTC
Director. The NCTC was established in August 2004 by Executive
Order 13354, and codified by the Intelligence Reform and
Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 (Pub.L. 108-458). The NCTC
serves as the primary organization within the United States
Government for integrating and analyzing all terrorism-related
intelligence that has a foreign nexus.
On February 9, 2011, the Committee held a hearing entitled
``Understanding the Homeland Threat Landscape Considerations
for the 112th Congress.'' The Committee received testimony from
Hon. Janet Napolitano, Secretary, Department of Homeland
Security; and Hon. Michael E. Leiter, Director, National
Counterterrorism Center.
Throughout the 112th Congress Members of the Committee
received regular monthly classified briefings from NCTC, the
Department of Homeland Security, and the Federal Bureau of
Investigation to stay current on the latest intelligence and
threats to the Homeland.
On February 18, March 18, June 17, July 22, September 16,
October 22, and November 18, 2011; February 17, March 30, May
18, June 22, August 3, and November 30, 2012, Committee staff
received classified intelligence briefings from the Department
on threats to the Nation's borders.
On May 25, 2011, the Full Committee held a hearing entitled
``Threats to the American Homeland After Killing Bin Laden: An
Assessment.'' The Committee received testimony from Hon. Lee
Hamilton, Bipartisan Policy Center; Ms.Frances F. Townsend,
Senior Vice President, Worldwide Government, Legal, and
Business Affairs, MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings, Inc; Mr.Peter
Bergen, Director, National Security Studies Program, New
America Foundation; and Mr.Evan F. Kohlmann, Flashpoint Global
Partners.
On September 8, 2011, the Committee held a hearing entitled
``The Attacks of September 11th: Where are We Today.'' The
Committee received testimony from Hon. Lee Hamilton, Former
Vice-Chairman, The National Commission on Terrorist Attacks
Upon the United States; Hon. Tom J. Ridge, Former Secretary of
Homeland Security; and Hon. Eugene L. Dodaro, Comptroller
General of the United States.
On October 11, 2011, Members of the Committee conducted a
site visit of the NCTC and the Office of the Director of
National Intelligence.
The Chair of the Full Committee and the Chair of the
Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and Intelligence sent a letter
to the Secretary of State on March 30, 2012, requesting that
the Nigerian Islamist group Boko Haram be designated as a
Foreign Terrorist Organization. On May 18, 2012, the Chair of
the Full Committee and the Chair of the Subcommittee on
Counterterrorism and Intelligence sent a follow-up letter to
the Secretary of State regarding the Department of State's
inaction on the designation of Boko Haram as a Foreign
Terrorist Organization.
On July 25, 2012, the Committee on Homeland Security held a
hearing entitled ``Understanding the Homeland Threat
Landscape.'' The Committee received testimony from Hon. Janet
Napolitano, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security; and
Hon. Matthew G. Olsen, Director, National Counterterrorism
Center.
The Chair of the Full Committee co-signed a letter to the
Attorney General of the United States and the Secretary of
State on September 19, 2012, objecting to the release of Omar
Abdel Rahman, also known as the ``Blind Sheikh.''
The Chair of the Full Committee sent a letter on October 4,
2012, to the President of the United States regarding
opposition to the purchase of the Thomson Correctional Center.
Previously, Congress passed a number of bills to block the
Administration from purchasing this facility and transferring
Guantanamo detainees to the United States. The Chair of the
Full Committee identified a number of homeland security needs
that funding could be recommitted to including: The purchase of
new U.S. Coast Guard cutters, updates to critical
infrastructure vulnerable to cyber attacks, and vital funding
to design, build, and implement the National inter-operable
public safety wireless broadband network.

PRESIDENTIAL BUDGET REQUESTS FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Fiscal Year 2012 Budget Request

As part of the Committee's oversight responsibilities,
Committee staff reviewed the President's budget request for the
Department of Homeland Security for Fiscal Year 2012, and on
March 3, 2011, the Committee held a hearing entitled ``The
President's Fiscal Year 2012 Budget Request for the Department
of Homeland Security.'' The Committee received testimony from
Hon. Janet Napolitano, Secretary, Department of Homeland
Security. Based on a Committee staff review of the President's
budget request for Fiscal Year 2012 and testimony received, the
Committee completed its Views and Estimates of the President's
budget request and submitted them to the House Budget Committee
for its consideration.

FY 2013 Budget Request

On February 15, 2012, the Committee held a hearing entitled
``An Examination of the President's FY 2013 Budget Request for
the Department of Homeland Security.'' The Committee received
testimony from Hon. Janet Napolitano, Secretary, Department of
Homeland Security. The Committee completed its Views and
Estimates of the President's budget request and submitted them
to the House Budget Committee for its consideration.

RADICALIZATION

One of the greatest threats facing the Homeland is that of
homegrown violent Islamist terrorists who depart from
mainstream Islam and are radicalized to al-Qaeda's violent
ideology. These individuals often have no contact with known
terrorist networks overseas, making it exponentially difficult
for law enforcement to detect these individuals who may be
actively plotting attacks. Interception often requires
cooperation and a partnership from members of the Muslim
community, who may be witnesses to an individual's path toward
radicalization. As part of the Committee's oversight of
domestic radicalization, Committee staff held a series of
meetings with representatives of Federal, State, and local law
enforcement, academia, religious organizations, private sector
entities, and non-profit organizations. The meetings focused on
discussing the current threat of homegrown terrorism and
violent extremism within the United States and what measures
can be taken to address this problem. Briefers included
representatives of the Ahmaddiyya Group, the World Organization
for Resource Development and Education, the Anti-Defamation
League, a former United States attorney with expertise in this
area, representatives from Johns Hopkins University,
representatives from the New York Department of Corrections,
and representatives from the U.S. Bureau of Prisons, among
others.
On March 10, 2011, the Committee held a hearing entitled
``The Extent of Radicalization in the American Muslim Community
and That Community's Response.'' The Committee received
testimony from Hon. John D. Dingell, a Representative in
Congress from the 15th District of Michigan; Hon. Keith
Ellison, a Representative in Congress from the 5th District of
Minnesota; Hon. Frank Wolf, a Representative in Congress from
the 10th District of Virginia; Dr. M. Zuhdi Jasser, President
and Founder, American Islamic Forum for Democracy; Mr.Abdirizak
Bihi, Director, Somali Education and Social Advocacy Center;
Mr.Melvin Bledsoe, Private Citizen; and Sheriff Leroy Baca, Los
Angeles County Sheriff's Department.
One platform for Islamist radicalization is within the U.S.
prison system. In advance of a hearing on radicalization within
the U.S. prison system, Committee staff visited the
Administrative Maximum (ADX) prison in Florence, Colorado in
May 2011. Staff toured the facility and received a briefing on
the on-going security threats at the prison, which houses a
number of former al-Qaeda members and affiliates.
On June 15, 2011, the Committee held the second in the
series of hearings entitled ``The Threat of Muslim-American
Radicalization in U.S. Prisons.'' The Committee received
testimony from Mr.Patrick T. Dunleavy, Ret. Deputy Inspector
General, Criminal Intelligence Unit, New York State Department
of Correctional Services; Mr.Kevin Smith, Former Assistant
United States Attorney, Central District of California;
Mr.Michael P. Downing, Commanding Officer, Counter-Terrorism
and Special Operations Bureau, Los Angeles Police Department;
and Dr. Bert Useem, Department Head and Professor, Sociology
Department, Purdue University.
The Committee held the third in the series of
radicalization hearings on July 27, 2011, entitled ``Al
Shabaab: Recruitment and Radicalization within the Muslim
American Community and the Threat to the Homeland.'' The
Committee received testimony from Mr.Ahmed Hussen, Canadian
Somali Congress National President; Mr.Thomas Joscelyn, Senior
Fellow, Foundation for Defense of Democracies; Mr.William
Anders Folk, Former Assistant United States Attorney, District
of Minnesota; and Mr.Thomas E. Smith, Chief of Police, Saint
Paul, Minnesota. In addition to the hearing, the Committee
released a Majority investigative report entitled ``Al--
Shabaab: Recruitment and Radicalization within the Muslim
American Community and the Threat to the Homeland.''
On September 13, 2011, the Full Committee Chair testified
in the United Kingdom before the Home Affairs Committee of the
House of Commons. The Chair responded to an invitation from the
Home Affairs Committee to appear as the first witness to
testify on the Committee's inquiry into the ``Roots of Violent
Radicalization.'' The Chair presented evidence based upon
findings from the series of hearings held this Congress.
On December 7, 2011, the Committee held a joint hearing
with the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental
Affairs entitled ``Homegrown Terrorism: The Threat to Military
Communities Inside the United States.'' This hearing was the
fourth in the Committee's series of hearings on radicalization,
and marked the first-ever joint hearing between the House and
Senate Homeland Security Committees since the inception of the
House Committee on Homeland Security in 2005. The Committees
received testimony from Hon. Paul N. Stockton, Assistant
Secretary of Defense for Homeland Defense and Americas'
Security Affairs, Office of Undersecretary of Defense for
Policy, Department of Defense, accompanied by: Mr.Jim
Stuteville, United States Army Senior Advisor,
Counterintelligence Operations and Liaison to the Federal
Bureau of Investigation; LTC Reid L. Sawyer, Director,
Combating Terrorism Center at West Point; and Mr.Daris Long,
Private Citizen.
In advance of the hearing, joint House and Senate Committee
staffs held a number of briefings with Government officials and
experts from this field, including: A counterterror expert and
advisor to the Army Counterintelligence Operations; a
prosecutor in the case against Farooque Ahmed; a U.S. Navy
Medical Service Corps Commander, Middle East Foreign Area
Officer; the Deputy Executive Director of the American Muslim
Armed Forces and Veteran Affairs Council; and representatives
from think tanks.
Committee staff also received a number of official
Government briefings on the terrorist threat to military
communities in the United States. Briefers included: the
Defense Intelligence Agency's Joint Intelligence Task Force-
Combating Terrorism (JITF-CT); the Naval Criminal Investigative
Service (NCIS); the Joint Chiefs of Staff (JCS); the Department
of Homeland Security's Office of Intelligence and Analysis
(I&A); and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI).
In addition to the hearing, the Committee also released a
majority investigative report entitled ``Homegrown Terrorism:
The Threat To Military Communities Inside The United States.''
Additionally, in light of the testimony received, Mr.King of
New York and 12 original cosponsors introduced H.R.5144 on
April 27, 2012. This legislation allows members of the Armed
Forces who were killed or wounded as a result of a terrorist
attack on U.S. soil to be eligible for the Award of the Purple
Heart. Similar legislation,
S. 2885, was introduced by Senator Lieberman on May 8, 2012.
Provisions of H.R. 5144 and S. 2885 were included in the
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013, H.R.
4310.
In addition to the Committee's investigative hearings,
Committee staff have been engaged in oversight of the Federal
Government's efforts to counter radicalization. Committee staff
were briefed by officials from the Department of Homeland
Security, including the Principal Deputy Counterterrorism
Coordinator and Senior Advisor to the Secretary, who has been
directed to serve as the Department's lead on countering
violent extremism (CVE). The Committee's oversight has focused
specifically on the administration's recently released
strategies, entitled ``Empowering Local Partners to Prevent
Violent Extremism in the United States'' and ``Strategic
Implementation Plan for Empowering Local Partners to Prevent
Violent Extremism in the United States.'' In addition,
Committee staff attended the Department's National Countering
Violent Extremism Workshop in August 2011.
The Committee also included two provisions within H.R.3116,
the ``Department of Homeland Security Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2012'', to address the administration's efforts to
counter violent extremism. The first provision requires the
Secretary of Homeland Security to designate an official of the
Department to coordinate efforts to counter homegrown violent
Islamist extremism. The second requires the Director of the
Federal Law Enforcement Training Center to report to the House
and Senate Committees on its counter-violent extremism
training.
On December 14, 2011, Committee staff met with
representatives from the Department of Homeland Security and
the White House for a briefing on the administration's
Strategic Implementation Plan (SIP) as part of its countering
violent extremism strategy. On April 13, 2012, Committee staff
met with individuals from DHS and the Federal Law Enforcement
Training Center (FLETC) for a briefing on the CVE curriculum
being developed and implemented at FLETC. Committee staff will
continue to monitor this issue closely.
On April 26, 2012, the Chair of the Full Committee sent a
letter to the Deputy Attorney General expressing concerns over
the FBI's revisions of its counterterror training curriculum.
No reply has yet been received.
On June 20, 2012, the Committee held a hearing entitled
``The American Muslim Response to Hearings on Radicalization
within their Community.'' The Committee received testimony from
M. Zuhdi Jasser, MD, President and Founder, American Islamic
Forum for Democracy; Ms.Asra Nomani, Private Citizen; Qanta A.
A. Ahmed, MD, FACP, FCCP, FAASM, Private Citizen; and Ms.Faiza
Patel, Co-Director, Liberty and National Security Program,
Brennan Center for Justice.

OVERSIGHT OF WASTE, FRAUD, AND ABUSE

One of the Committee's primary oversight responsibilities
is to ensure that American taxpayer dollars are spent wisely by
eliminating waste, fraud, and abuse. As a result, the Committee
has made it a priority to identify high-risk programs and
ensure transparency within the Department of Homeland Security.
Committee staff held multiple meetings on the Department's
Transformation and Systems Consolidation (TASC) solicitation.
On May 20, 2011, Committee staff met with the Department's
Chief Financial Officer on the Department's decision to cancel
TASC following the Government Accountability Office's
recommendation to reevaluate the requirements. According to the
Department, the Federal Information Technology (IT) policy
changes, as well as advances in IT, altered the requirements
with regard to the scope of work and the need for an already-
integrated finance, acquisition, and asset management solution.
On March 15, 2011, the Subcommittee on Border and Maritime
Security held a hearing entitled, ``Strengthening the Border--
Finding the Right Mix of Personnel, Infrastructure, and
Technology.'' The purpose of this hearing was to review
Department of Homeland Security actions related to the purchase
and deployment of border technology along with personnel and
infrastructure resources.
On May 4, 2011, the Subcommittee on Transportation Security
held a legislative hearing on ``H.R.1690, the MODERN Security
Credentials Act.'' The purpose of the legislation and the
hearing is to address redundant and burdensome security
background checks conducted by the Transportation Security
Administration (TSA) for transportation workers. The bill
eliminates a specific redundancy whereby commercial motor
vehicle operators must undergo two security threat assessments
to gain a Hazardous Materials Endorsement and a Transportation
Worker Identification Credential. During the hearing, witnesses
testified about the burden duplicative processes place on
workers, as well as the cost implications.
On June 16, 2011, the Chair and Ranking Member of the Full
Committee sent a letter to the Administrator of TSA requesting
more information regarding a recent report of racial profiling
by Behavior Detection Officers (BDOs) at Newark Liberty
International Airport.
In response to these management difficulties, the Committee
engaged in other oversight activities aimed at identifying and
addressing waste, fraud, and abuse within the Department. The
Chairs of the Subcommittee on Emergency Preparedness, Response,
and Communications and the Subcommittee on Cybersecurity,
Infrastructure Protection, and Security Technologies sent a
letter, on April 5, 2011, to the Secretary of Homeland Security
requesting information on the procurement of detection systems
for biological agents. On May 4, 2011, the Chair of the
Emergency Preparedness, Response, and Communications
Subcommittee and the Chair of the Oversight, Investigations,
and Management Subcommittee sent a letter to the Administrator
of the Federal Emergency Management Agency regarding processes
for vetting employees with access systems in response to a case
of employee embezzlement.
On May 27, 2011, the Chair of the Oversight,
Investigations, and Management Subcommittee and Ranking Member
sent two letters to the Government Accountability Office to
conduct audits of the Department of Homeland Security related
to information technology governance and high-risk information
technology investments. Through this work, the Committee
intends to identify process improvements and potential cost
savings.
Committee Members and staff held a series of meetings with
Federal officials and private sector stakeholders regarding the
Department of Homeland Security's Science and Technology
Directorate. The oversight included a review of the how the
Department could improve technology transfer with other Federal
agencies to enhance capability and reduce costs. In-depth staff
briefings continued on a bi-weekly basis to ensure that the S&T
Directorate activities are addressing critical priorities. The
Under Secretary has also appeared before the Subcommittee on
Cybersecurity, Infrastructure Protection, and Security
Technologies to address budget prioritizations going forward.
The Subcommittee on Oversight, Investigations, and
Management held a hearing on March 8, 2012, entitled
``Eliminating Waste, Fraud, Abuse, and Duplication in the
Department of Homeland Security.'' The Subcommittee received
testimony from Hon. James Gilmore III, Former Governor of
Virginia and Chairman of the Congressional Advisory Panel to
Assess Domestic Response Capabilities for Terrorism Involving
Weapons of Mass Destruction; Ms.Cathleen Berrick, Managing
Director, Homeland Security and Justice Issues, Government
Accountability Office; Mr.Charles K. Edwards, Acting Inspector
General, Department of Homeland Security; and Mr.Scott Lilly,
Senior Fellow, Center for American Progress.
The Chair of the Full Committee and the Chair of the
Subcommittee on Cybersecurity, Infrastructure Protection, and
Security Technologies sent a letter on April 26, 2012, to the
Comptroller General of the United States regarding the
Department of Homeland Security's Protective Security Advisors.
The letter requested that the Comptroller General address
concerns over the general responsibilities of the Protective
Security Advisors, the vulnerability assessments conducted, or
the possibility of duplication with other Departmental
components conducting separate vulnerability assessments.
On September 20, 2012, the Committee held a hearing
entitled ``The Department of Homeland Security: An Assessment
of the Department and a Roadmap for its Future.'' The Committee
received testimony from Hon. Richard L. Skinner, Former
Inspector General, Department of Homeland Security; Hon.
Stewart A. Baker, Former Assistant Secretary for Policy,
Department of Homeland Security; Mr. Frank J. Cilluffo, Former
Principal Advisor to Governor Tom Ridge, White House Office of
Homeland Security; Mr.David C. Maurer, Director, Homeland
Security and Justice, Government Accountability Office.

PUBLIC SAFETY COMMUNICATIONS

The terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, highlighted
the fact that our Nation's first responders lack true
interoperable communications. In the 10 years since the
attacks, billions of dollars have been spent, yet public safety
officers are still unable to effectively communicate with one
another.
On February 1, 2011, Committee staff met with
representatives from the Department of Homeland Security's
Office of Emergency Communications (OEC) to receive an update
on OEC's current activities. Staff held a follow-up meeting
with OEC on March 23, 2011 to receive an update on the
completion of Goal 1 of the National Emergency Communications
Plan. Throughout the 112th Congress, Committee staff met with
representatives from various stakeholder organizations and the
private sector, including the Amateur Radio Relay League, to
inform the development and continued discussion of the
Broadband for First Responders Act of 2011 (H.R.607), which was
introduced by the Chair and Ranking Member of the Full
Committee on February 10, 2011.
On March 4, 2011, Committee staff met with representatives
from the Department of Homeland Security to receive a briefing
on the National Communication System. On May 13, 2011,
Committee staff attended a briefing provided by various State
and local stakeholder groups on the need for the allocation of
the D Block to public safety.
The Committee held a hearing on March 30, 2011, entitled
``Public Safety Communications: Are the Needs of Our First
Responders Being Met?'' The Committee received testimony from
Mr.William ``Bill'' D. Carrow, President, The Association of
Public-Safety Communications Officials (APCO) International;
Sheriff Paul H. Fitzgerald, First Vice President, National
Sheriffs' Association; Chief John E. ``Jack'' Parow (Ret.),
President and Chairman of the Board, International Association
of Fire Chiefs; and Mr.Gregory L. Simay, At-Large Director, Los
Angeles Regional Interoperable Communication System. This
hearing reviewed the state of public safety communications, and
evaluated the progress that has been made since the attacks of
September 11, 2001. Issues, such as the need for a National
interoperable public safety wireless broadband network, the
need to reallocate the D Block to public safety uses, and the
coordination between Federal, State, and local partners were
discussed. This hearing provided Committee Members with an
opportunity to hear from State, local, and non-Governmental
officials on their successes and challenges as they work to
prepare for and respond to natural disasters and terrorist
attacks.
On February 8, 2012, the Chair of the Full Committee sent a
letter to the Chair of the Senate Committee on Finance, the
Chair of the House Committee on Ways and Means, and Members of
the Committee of Conference on H.R.3630, the Middle Class Tax
Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012 urging the inclusion of
provisions allocating the D Block to public safety. H.R.3630
was signed into law on February 22, 2012 (Pub. L. 112-96).
Title VI of the Act, Public Safety Communications and
Electromagnetic Spectrum Action, reallocated the D Block
spectrum to public safety, one of the Committee's primary goals
in the 112th Congress.

MASS TRANSIT SECURITY

An attack on our Nation's mass transit systems could have
devastating consequences for innocent passengers, National
infrastructure, and our economy. Each year, the American public
takes over 10 billion trips on public transit systems,
traveling more than 55 billion miles annually.\1\ An attack on
one system could impact not only the immediately affected
system, but disrupt public transit systems throughout the
United States, thereby affecting the way tens of millions of
citizens get to work every day.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\http://www.apta.com/resources/statistics/Documents/FactBook/
APTA_2010_Fact_Book.
pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unlike aviation, mass transit relies on an open
infrastructure with multiple access points and a significantly
higher passenger volume. The tactics and techniques used for
passenger screening in aviation are generally not feasible in
the open environment of a mass transit system. Consequently,
these systems can be an attractive terrorist target. On
February 28, 2011, the Chair of the Full Committee met with
representatives from Amtrak to discuss their rail security
initiatives and security problems.
The Full Committee held a hearing on May 4, 2011, entitled
``Securing Our Nation's Mass Transit Systems Against a
Terrorist Attack.'' The Committee received testimony from Hon.
John S.Pistole, Administrator, Transportation Security
Administration, Department of Homeland Security; Hon. W. Craig
Fugate, Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency,
Department of Homeland Security; Mr.Richard Daddario, Deputy
Commissioner for Counterterrorism, New York City Police
Department; Mr.Richard L. Rodriguez, President, Chicago Transit
Authority; and Mr.Daniel O. Hartwig, Deputy Chief-Operations,
BART Police Department, San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit
(BART).
As a result of testimony received during the hearing, the
Chair of the Full Committee and Ms.Clarke of New York sent a
joint letter to the Appropriations Committee Homeland Security
Subcommittee on May 6, 2011, requesting $300 million in funding
for the Transit Security Grant Program in Fiscal Year 2012.

SECURING SENSITIVE INFORMATION

In July 2010, WikiLeaks.org posted thousands of sensitive
and classified military documents on a website. This
intentional release of classified information significantly
jeopardized the lives of U.S. military and intelligence
personnel, as well as jeopardizing National security. The
threat was compounded when WikiLeaks.org, in November 2010,
released another trove of documents which included thousands of
confidential diplomatic cables. As a continuation of the
Committee's oversight from the 111th Congress, the Chair of the
Full Committee sent a letter to the Secretary of the Department
of the Treasury requesting that the U.S. Government have
WikiLeaks and its founder designated on the Specially
Designated Nationals List on January 12, 2011.
On May 11, 2011, the Chair of the Full Committee sent a
letter to the Secretary of Defense and the Chairman of the
Joint Chiefs of Staff requesting an explanation of news reports
that the Defense Department may allow terrorist detainees held
at Guantanamo Bay to receive visits from wives and other family
members. The Chair of the Full Committee expressed grave
concern with the potential damage to our National security
posed by the prospect of such visits. The Committee received a
response on June 23, 2011, updating the Committee on the
procedures at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba relating to detainees and
their interactions with family members.
On February 7, 2012, Chair sent a letter to the General
Counsel of the Department of Defense (DoD) regarding concerns
about the disclosure of classified information to al-Qaeda
detainees at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. The Committee received a
response and the information requested was made available to
the Committee through open source outlets.
The Chair of the Full Committee sent a letter to the
Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation on May 21,
2012, requesting a full investigation of reported leaks of
highly classified information regarding penetration of al-Qaeda
in the Arabian Peninsula. The requested investigation was to
include the Intelligence Community, the Department of Defense,
the Department of Homeland Security, Federal law enforcement
and the White House, including the National Security staff. The
Chair of the Full Committee expressed concern with implications
of the leaks including the lives of unique intelligence sources
and other being jeopardized, the aborting of operations, and
damage to critical intelligence relationships.

PROSECUTION OF UNINDICTED CO-CONSPIRATORS

On May 27, 2009, the United Stated District Court in
Northern Texas handed down a decision to sentence the Holy Land
Foundation and its leaders on charges of providing material
support to Hamas, a designated Foreign Terrorist Organization.
On April 15, 2011, the Chair of the Full Committee sent a
letter to the Attorney General of the United States to inquire
about the decision to not prosecute the 246 individuals and
organizations named as unindicted co-conspirators in the U.S.
v. Holy Land Foundation. On April 29, 2011, the Committee
received a response.

SEE SOMETHING, SAY SOMETHING

The ``If You See Something, Say Something,'' program
originally implemented by New York City's Metropolitan
Transportation Authority, aims to engage the public and key
frontline employees to identify and report indicators of
terrorism, crime, and other threats to the appropriate
transportation and law enforcement authorities. The Committee
has worked with the Department of Homeland Security, as well as
other Federal, State, local, and private sector entities to
expand the ``If You See Something, Say Something'' campaign. On
January 26, 2011, the Chair of the Full Committee introduced,
H.R.495, the ``See Something Say Something Act of 2011''.
Provisions of H.R.495 were included in H.R.3116, the
Department of Homeland Security Authorization Act of 2011. For
further discussion, see H.R.3116 listed above.

ASSISTANCE TO STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS AND
FIRST RESPONDERS

On April 12, 2011, the Chair of the Full Committee sent a
letter to the Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security
expressing concern over the risk-based and effective allocation
of grant funds for the Urban Area Security Initiative. On April
29, 2011, the Committee received a response.
The Chair of the Full Committee sent two letters to the
Director of National Intelligence and the Director of the
Central Intelligence Agency on April 24, 2012 requesting more
intelligence access and dissemination for first responders. The
Committee received a classified response.
Committee staff received, and has requested further,
briefings on the domestic threat of remote-controlled bombs,
pursuant to a request by State and local police bomb squads for
jammer technology.
On June 27, 2012, the Chair of the Full Committee, along
with the Chair of the Subcommittee on Emergency Preparedness,
Response, and Communications and Representative Turner of New
York, sent a letter to the Secretary of the Department of
Homeland Security expressing concern that the intelligence and
information sharing core capability was not included in all of
the Frameworks required by Presidential Policy Directive 8, but
instead limited to the Prevention and Protection Frameworks.
The Committee received a response on November 7, 2012.

AVIATION SECURITY

On June 16, 2011, the Chair and Ranking Member of the Full
Committee sent a letter to the Administrator of the
Transportation Security Administration requesting more
information regarding a recent report of racial profiling by
Behavior Detection Officers at Newark Liberty International
Airport.
The Chair of the Full Committee and the Chair of the
Subcommittee on Transportation Security sent a classified
letter on November 15, 2011, to the Assistant Secretary of
Homeland Security for the Transportation Security
Administration.
On August 6, 2012, the Chair of the Full Committee sent a
letter to the Administrator of the Transportation Security
Administration regarding the security breaches on August 5,
2012, at the Newark Liberty International Airport.

TERROR THREAT FROM IRAN

The Committee began an investigation into the exposure of
Iran's plot to assassinate the ambassador of the Kingdom of
Saudi Arabia to the United States in Washington, DC. Committee
staff met with a number of experts on this issue, including
representatives from the Foundation for Defense of Democracies
and the American Enterprise Institute. On November 22, 2011,
the Chair of the Full Committee and the Chairs of the
Subcommittee on Oversight, Investigations, and Management, and
the Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and Intelligence sent a
letter to the President requesting a strong and effective
response to Iran's dangerous provocations.
On March 21, 2012, the Committee held a hearing entitled
``Iran, Hezbollah, and the Threat to the Homeland.'' The
Committee received testimony from Mr.Mitchell Silber, Director,
Intelligence Analysis, NYPD Intelligence Division, New York
City Police Department; Mr.Michael A. Braun, Managing Partner,
Spectre Group International, LLC.; Dr. Matthew Levitt,
Director, Stein Program on Counterterrorism and Intelligence,
The Washington Institute for Near East Policy; Mr.Christopher
E. Swecker, Private Citizen, and Dr. Colin Kahl, Associate
Professor, Georgetown University, Senior Fellow, Center for a
New American Security.
In advance of the hearing, Committee staff met with a
number of experts on this issue, including representatives
from, or formerly with, the following organizations: The
Federal Bureau of Investigation's Office of International
Operations; the Center for Law and Counterterrorism at the
Foundation for Defense of Democracies; the Office of the
Secretary of Defense and an Assistant Director for Terrorism
and Financial Intelligence at the U.S. Department of the
Treasury; Georgetown University; the Council on Foreign
Relations; the RAND Corporation; the Bipartisan Policy Center;
and the Director of Central Intelligence.

DOD/CIA INVOLVEMENT IN BIN LADEN MISSION FILM

On August 9, 2011, the Chair of the Full Committee sent a
letter to the Inspectors General of the Department of Defense
(DoD) and the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) expressing
concern regarding on-going leaks of classified information
concerning sensitive military operations, specifically
allegations that administration officials may have provided
filmmakers with details of the raid that successfully killed
Osama bin Laden. The Chair further requested an investigation
and classified briefing into this matter from the DoD and the
CIA's Inspectors General. On November 17, 2011, Committee staff
met with the Deputy Inspector General, Office of the Inspector
General for Intelligence and Special Program Assessments,
Department of Defense, to discuss further actions the office
plans to take with regard to this issue.
On February 2, 2012, staff requested an update from the
Department of Defense's Inspector General on the investigation
into leaks about the Osama bin Laden raid. The Committee
received a classified briefing and is awaiting the release of a
report from the Administration.
On May 22, 2012, in response to a Freedom of Information
Act request made by Judicial Watch, a Federal judge ordered the
release of electronic communications regarding the cooperation
of the Department of Defense and the Central Intelligence
Agency with the filmmakers of the bin Laden movie. The Chair of
the Full Committee sent letters on May 23, 2012, to the Under
Secretary of Defense for Intelligence and the Deputy Director
of the CIA expressing concern over the central role
Administration officials, including them, played in granting
individuals without appropriate security clearances
unprecedented access to classified and sensitive information.
The Chair further expressed concern that leaks pertaining to
the raid would jeopardize the capabilities of the Special
Operations Forces to eliminate terrorist leaders who pose a
threat to the U.S. Homeland and risk the safety of special
operators and their families.

THE NATIONAL NETWORK OF FUSION CENTERS

In the aftermath of the information-sharing failures of
September 11, 2001, State and local governments, working with
the Department of Homeland Security, established a National
Network of Fusion Centers to facilitate two-way threat
information sharing and enhance counterterrorism partnerships
and analysis. As part of the Committee's oversight, Committee
staff visited 32 of the 77 fusion centers within the National
Network, meeting with State and local law enforcement,
intelligence analysts and other fusion center personnel,
emergency managers, State homeland security advisors,
Department of Homeland Security intelligence officers, reports
officers, intelligence analysts, and regional directors, and
Federal Bureau of Investigation personnel. Additionally,
Committee staff attended the National Fusion Center Training
Event held in Phoenix, Arizona in April 2012. Furthermore,
Committee staff held extensive DC-based briefings with the
Department of Homeland Security and the Federal Bureau of
Investigation to discuss their roles of support to the fusion
centers.

DETENTION OF AMERICAN CONTRACTORS

The Chair of the Full Committee sent a letter to the Prime
Minister of Iraq and the Secretary of State on December 21,
2011, regarding three American contractors detained in Iraq.
Their release was secured on December 27, 2011.
On January 4, 2012, the Chair sent a letter to the
Secretary of State regarding concerns over the Department's
inadequate response to the detention of American contractors in
Iraq. The Department of State replied on January 24, and
subsequently a follow-up letter was sent on February 21, 2012,
and a response was received on March 15, 2012.

ANWAR AL-AWLAKI

On May 26, 2011, the Chair of the Full Committee sent a
letter to the Attorney General of the United States requesting
documents and case files related to al-Qaeda in the Arabian
Peninsula (AQAP) terrorist Anwar al-Awlaki and his possible
involvement in the planning and execution of the September 11,
2001 terrorist attacks.
On October 25, 2011, the Chair of the Full Committee sent
letters to the Director of the Defense Intelligence Agency, the
Secretary of Homeland Security, the Secretary of State, and the
Attorney General of the United States seeking an investigation
into the roles of Anwar al-Awlaki, Eyad al-Rababah, and Daoud
Chehazeh in facilitating the attacks of September 11, 2011.
The Chair of the Full Committee and Committee staff
received classified briefings in February and March 2012 from
the Federal Bureau of Investigation on Anwar al-Awlaki's
possible role in the attacks of September 11, 2001.
On February 16, and March 15, 2012, the Chair of the Full
Committee and the Committee Staff received classified briefings
from the Federal Bureau of Investigation on Anwar al-Awlaki's
possible role in the attacks of September 11.
Committee staff met with lawyers from law firms
representing clients on April 11, 2012, to discuss an on-going
lawsuit against the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia over compensation
for families of the 9/11 victims. In addition, Committee staff
spoke with former Senator Bob Graham (who co-Chaired the Joint
Intelligence Committee Inquiry into the 9/11 attacks) and
former Senator Bob Kerry concerning unresolved aspects of the
9/11 investigation.

UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE (USSS)

On April 19, 2012, the Chair of the Full Committee
initiated an investigation into an alleged incident involving
United States Secret Service's personnel and foreign nationals
in Cartagena, Colombia.
The Chair of the Full Committee sent a letter to the
Director of the Secret Service on April 20, 2012, with
questions relating to the alleged incident in Cartagena,
Colombia. On May 1, 2012, the Committee received a response
letter from the USSS.
On May 4, 2012, Committee staff received a briefing from
multiple representatives from the USSS and the Department of
Homeland Security to provide additional information in response
to the April 20 letter.
The Chair of the Full Committee sent a letter to the
Secretary of State on May 15, 2012, requesting that three State
Department personnel on the ground in Colombia would be made
available to the Committee for its investigation.
On October 9, 2012, Committee staff received a briefing
from the Department of Homeland Security Office of the
Inspector General (OIG) on the status of the OIG's ongoing
investigations into the Cartagena incident. Committee staff
will continue to work with the OIG's office as the
investigation concludes.

WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION

On June 1, 2012, the Committee on Homeland Security held a
Member-only briefing on the threat from weapons of mass
destruction, including baseline assessments and any recent
threat information on chemical, biological, radiological, and
nuclear weapons. Representatives from the Central Intelligence
Agency, the Defense Intelligence Agency, the Federal Bureau of
Investigation Weapons of Mass Destruction Directorate, the
National Counterterrorism Center, the National Guard Bureau of
the Department of Defense, and the New York City Police
Department were present to respond to Member questions.
The Chair of the Full Committee and the Subcommittee on
Cybersecurity, Infrastructure Protection, and Security
Technologies sent a letter to the Secretary of Homeland
Security requesting assistance to State and local police bomb
squads combating remote-controlled improvised explosive
devices. The Committee received a response on November 7, 2012.

NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION

In its annual report, the Inspector General of the National
Archives and Records Administration (NARA) reported that NARA
was unable to locate over 1,700 boxes of historical records.
Among these missing items were classified and sensitive
materials.
The Chair of the Committee on Homeland Security sent a
letter to the Archivist of the United States on May 4, 2012,
requesting a report on the status of the missing documents,
including if any of the Committee's personal holdings were
among the missing, and the potential National Security risk of
the potential loss of these records.
The Committee received a response and will continue to
examine the potential loss of secure and sensitive information
from the National Archives.

PROTECTING MILITARY COMMUNITIES

As noted above, the Committee held a joint hearing with the
Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs
on December 7, 2011 entitled, ``Homegrown Terrorism: The Threat
to Military Communities Inside the United States.'' This
hearing was the fourth in the Committee's series of hearings on
radicalization, and marked the first-ever joint hearing between
the House and Senate Homeland Security Committees. Prior to the
hearing joint House and Senate Committee staff held numerous
briefings with Government officials from the Defense
Intelligence Agency, the Naval Criminal Investigative Service,
and the Federal Bureau of Investigation, as well as experts in
the field.
In preparing for the December 7, 2011 hearing, it was
discovered that the Department of Defense does not have an
official account of ``green on blue'' casualties to Coalition
Forces in Afghanistan. On August 21, 2012, the Chair of the
Full Committee sent a letter to the Secretary of Defense
requesting an account of ``green on blue'' casualties suffered
by Coalition Forces in Afghanistan. On that same date, the
Chair of the Full Committee sent a letter to the Director of
National Intelligence requesting an interagency intelligence
survey of the Afghan security forces to address ``green on
blue'' shootings. The Committee has not received a response to
date.

TERRORIST ATTACK ON THE U.S. CONSULATE IN BEGHAZI, LIBYA

On September 11, 2012, heavily armed Islamist militants
stormed and burned the American Consulate in Benghazi, Libya,
killing the United States Ambassador to Libya, J. Christopher
Stevens, and three others: Sean Smith, a Foreign Service
officer, as well as Tyrone S. Woods and Glen A. Doherty who
were tasked with protecting diplomatic personnel. Following the
attack, the Administration described the event as a
``spontaneous reaction'' to a film trailer posted on the
Internet. The Ambassador to the United Nations stated this
position on National television despite an investigation that
was ongoing and had many unanswered questions. Later accounts
provided by the U.S. State Department and American intelligence
analysts contradicted that position.
The Chair of the Full Committee sent a letter on October 8,
2012 to the Director of National Intelligence and the Director
of the Central Intelligence Agency regarding concern over the
possible disclosure of sensitive intelligence to the media
pertaining to the terrorist attack on the U.S. Consulate in
Benghazi, Libya. No responses have been received at this time.
On October 11, 2012 the Chair of the Full Committee sent a
letter to the Secretary of State requesting that the group or
groups that conducted the terrorist attack on the U.S.
Consulate in Benghazi, Libya be held responsible and classified
as a Foreign Terrorist Organization. The Committee received a
response on November 7, 2012.
The Chair of the Full Committee sent a letter October 19,
2012, to the President of the United States requesting that the
Administration release intelligence community reporting that
led the Administration to characterize the assault on the U.S.
Consulate in Benghazi, the assassination of U.S. Ambassador to
Libya, J. Christopher Stevens, and the murders of three other
American officials as a ``spontaneous reaction'' to a film
trailer posted on the Internet. The letter further requested
that the Administration release subsequent intelligence
community analyses which led the Administration to determine
that the events of September 11, 2012 represented a terrorist
attack. The Committee has not received a response to date.

DISASTER RESPONSE AND RECOVERY

Hurricane Sandy made landfall in the Northeast United
States on October 29, 2012, leaving 8 million people without
power and billions in damage. As of early December, the Federal
Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) had deployed more than 7,000
personnel to the impacted areas and approved more than $1
billion in assistance.
Members and Committee staff began monitoring the storm
prior to landfall, participating in meetings and conference
calls with FEMA representatives. On November 1, 2012, Committee
staff visited FEMA headquarters to participate in a video
conference call with senior FEMA leadership, FEMA Regional
Administrators, Federal partners, and State and local emergency
management officials impacted by Hurricane Sandy.
Throughout the response and now into the recovery phase,
the Chair of the Full Committee remained in contact with
Federal, State, and local officials to assess the response and
identify gaps, including calls with the Secretary of Homeland
Security, the Administrator of FEMA, the Federal Coordinating
Officer, and visits to area emergency operations centers.
On November 3, 2012, the Chair of the Full Committee met
with the Secretary of Homeland Security and escorted her on a
tour of impacted areas of Nassau and Suffolk Counties,
including Long Beach, Island Park, South Massapequa, and
Lindenhurst, these being some of the hardest hit areas of New
York.
The Chair of the Full Committee again met with the
Secretary on November 6, 2012 and escorted her on a tour of
damaged areas in South Seaford and the Nassau County Office of
Emergency Management emergency operations center in Bethpage,
New York.
In light of persistent power outages and fuel shortages in
New York, on November 9, 2012, the Chair of the Full Committee
sent a letter to the President requesting that he leverage all
available Federal resources to assist in restoring power and
getting residents back into their homes. While the Committee
has not received a formal response to this letter, on November
14, 2012, FEMA representatives announced the creation of the
Sheltering and Temporary Essential Power (STEP) pilot program,
which will utilize Public Assistance funding to assist
residents by making repairs to their homes to restore power and
provide shelter.
The Committee continues to monitor efforts to respond to,
and recover from, Hurricane Sandy, which will continue for
years to come.

CONGRESSIONAL DELEGATIONS

CODEL Rogers (March 20-27, 2011)

From March 20 through March 27, 2011, the Subcommittee on
Transportation Security Chair led a Congressional Delegation to
the State of Israel to examine critical homeland security
issues including aviation security, counterterrorism,
intelligence and information sharing, and border security.
Members had the opportunity to meet with U.S. State Department
officials stationed in Israel and Israeli government officials,
including the Prime Minister and Deputy Prime Minister of
Israel. Members examined various topics including, but not
limited to: U.S. relations with Israel; Israel's nuclear
program; Israeli security; counterterrorism; information
sharing; border security; and on-going threats to the region.
Members also visited Ben Gurion International Airport, the
largest and busiest airport in Israel, to observe aviation
security measures and discuss cooperation on security.

CODEL McCaul (November 4-11, 2011)

From November 4 through 11, 2011, the Subcommittee on
Oversight, Investigations, and Management Chair led a
Congressional Delegation to the Islamic Republic of
Afghanistan, the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, the Republic of
Turkey, and the Republic of Iraq. Members on the trip examined
counterterrorism efforts including general threats to the U.S.
Homeland; reviewed the Department of Homeland Security overseas
presence, including port security; examined local and regional
threats; and met with foreign officials.
As a result of information garnered during the CODEL, the
Subcommittee on Oversight, Investigations, and Management Chair
sent a letter to the National Security Advisor to the
President, requesting the administration consider several
observations and recommendations from the trip, which would
enhance National security.

CODEL King (February 19-22, 2012)

From February 19 through 22, 2012, the Chair of the Full
Committee visited the United Kingdom as part of an effort to
examine security and counterterror issues related to the 2012
Summer Olympics. During the trip, the Full Committee Chair met
with various intelligence and counterterrorism officials,
including: The U.S. Ambassador to the Court of Saint James; a
British Security Service official responsible for counterterror
investigations (which included a tour of the Olympic site); the
Director General of the British Security Service; the British
Secret Intelligence Service; the Commissioner of the
Metropolitan Police; officials from the U.S. Embassy in London;
and member of the British Special Forces.

CODEL Rogers (March 31-April 6, 2012)

From March 31 through April 6, 2012, the Chair of the
Subcommittee on Transportation Security led a Congressional
Delegation to the People's Republic of China, South Korea, and
Japan, to examine critical transportation infrastructure and
security in these countries, and gain an in-depth first-hand
perspective on commercial and passenger transportation security
issues that impact U.S. National security and the economy.

CODEL McCaul (August 4-9, 2012)

From August 4 through 9, 2012, the Chair of the
Subcommittee on Oversight, Investigations, and Management led a
Congressional Delegation to the United Mexican States, the
Republic of Colombia, the Republic of Paraguay, the Federative
Republic of Brazil, and the Argentine Republic. The delegation
examined the presence of Iran and Hezbollah in South America,
the threat to the Southwest border from terrorists and drug
cartels and acquired information about the terrorist pipeline
from the Middle East into South America.

----------

Full Committee Hearings Held

``Understanding the Homeland Threat Landscape--Considerations
for the 112th Congress.'' February 9, 2011. (Serial No.
112-1)
``The President's FY 2012 Budget Request for the Department of
Homeland Security.'' March 3, 2011. (Serial No. 112-6)
``The Extent of Radicalization in the American Muslim Community
and That Community's Response.'' March 10, 2011.
(Serial No. 112-9)
``Public Safety Communications: Are the Needs of Our First
Responders Being Met?'' March 30, 2011. (Serial No.
112-13)
``Securing Our Nation's Mass Transit Systems Against a
Terrorist Attack.'' May 4, 2011. (Serial No. 112-22)
``Threats to the American Homeland After Killing Bin Laden: An
Assessment.'' May 25, 2011. (Serial No. 112-25)
``The Threat of Muslim-American Radicalization in U.S.
Prisons.'' June 15, 2011. (Serial No. 112-9)
``Al Shabaab: Recruitment and Radicalization within the Muslim
American Community and the Threat to the Homeland.''
July 27, 2011. (Serial No. 112-9)
``The Attacks of September 11th: Where are We Today?''
September 8, 2011. (Serial No. 112-42)
``Homegrown Terrorism: The Threat to Military Communities
Inside the United States.'' December 7, 2011. Joint
hearing with the Senate Committee on Homeland Security
and Governmental Affairs. (Serial No. 112-63)
``An Examination of the President's FY 2013 Budget Request for
the Department of Homeland Security.'' February 15,
2012. (Serial No. 112-67)
``Iran, Hezbollah, and the Threat to the Homeland.'' March 21,
2012. (Serial No. 112-78)
``Understanding the Homeland Threat Landscape.'' July 25, 2012.
(Serial No. 112-108)
``The Department of Homeland Security: An Assessment of the
Department and a Roadmap for its Future.'' September
20, 2012. (Serial No. 112-119)
Subcommittee on Cybersecurity, Infrastructure Protection, and Security
Technologies

Daniel E. Lungren, California, Chairman

Tim Walberg, Michigan
Patrick Meehan,
Pennsylvania
Billy Long, Missouri
Tom Marino, Pennsylvania
Peter T. King, New York
(Ex
Officio) Yvette D. Clarke, New York
Laura Richardson, California
Cedric L. Richmond, Louisiana
William R. Keating, Massachusetts
Bennie G. Thompson, Mississippi
(Ex Officio)

----------

During the 112th Congress, the Subcommittee on
Cybersecurity, Infrastructure Protection, and Security
Technologies held 20 hearings, receiving testimony from 77
witnesses, and considered three measures.

----------

Legislative Activities of the Subcommittee

CHEMICAL FACILITY ANTI-TERRORISM SECURITY AUTHORIZATION
ACT OF 2011

H.R.901

To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to codify the
requirement that the Secretary of Homeland Security maintain
chemical facility anti-terrorism security regulations.

Summary

The Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security
currently has authority to regulate chemical facilities under
the Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards (CFATS) issued
pursuant to section 550 of the Department of Homeland Security
Appropriations Act, 2007 (Pub.L. 109-295). H.R.901 codifies the
Secretary's authority to regulate chemical facility security
within the Homeland Security Act of 2002 and extend this
authority for seven years to allow the program to be fully
implemented and achieve its objectives of enhancing chemical
facility security and reducing risks of terrorism. The
provisions contained in H.R.901 largely reflect the original
statute, i.e. Section 550, and will enable the Department of
Homeland Security and chemical facilities to continue
implementing CFATS uninterrupted using the existing risk-based,
performance-based approach without imposing additional,
burdensome requirements that could slow or hinder progress
being made by both the Department and the chemical facilities.
H.R.901 is intended to provide long-term certainty to the
Department and chemical facilities regarding the requirement to
improve security at our Nation's chemical facilities while
preserving the ability of American companies to compete, remain
innovative, and create jobs.

Legislative History

H.R.901 was introduced in the House on March 3, 2011, by
Mr.Daniel E. Lungren of California and eight original
cosponsors, and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security,
and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce. Within
the Committee, H.R.901 was referred to the Subcommittee on
Cybersecurity, Infrastructure Protection, and Security
Technologies.
The Subcommittee on Cybersecurity, Infrastructure
Protection, and Security Technologies considered H.R.901 on
April 14, 2011, and ordered the measure to be favorably
reported to the Full Committee, without amendment, by a roll
call vote of 6 yeas and 4 nays.
On June 22, 2011, the Committee on Homeland Security met to
consider H.R.901 and ordered the measure to be reported to the
House, amended, by voice vote.
The Committee filed a report on H.R.901 in the House on
September 26, 2011, as H. Rpt. 112-224, Pt. 1. Referral of the
bill to the Committee on Energy and Commerce was extended on
September 26, 2011, for a period ending not later than November
11, 2011. Referral of the bill to the Committee on Energy and
Commerce was extended on November 11, 2011, for a period ending
not later than January 6, 2012. Referral of the bill to the
Committee on Energy and Commerce was extended on January 6,
2012, for a period ending not later than January 20, 2012.
Referral of the bill to the Committee on Energy and Commerce
was extended on January 20, 2012, for a period ending not later
than March 1, 2012. Referral of the bill to the Committee on
Energy and Commerce was extended on March 1, 2012, for a period
ending not later than March 9, 2012. Referral of the bill to
the Committee on Energy and Commerce was extended on March 9,
2012, for a period ending not later than June 8, 2012. On June
8, 2012, the Committee on Energy and Commerce was discharged
from further consideration of H.R.901. H.R.901 was placed on
the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 368.

WMD PREVENTION AND PREPAREDNESS ACT OF 2011

H.R.2356

To enhance homeland security by improving efforts to prevent,
protect against, respond to, and recover from an attack with a
weapon of mass destruction, and for other purposes.

Summary

H.R.2356 enhances homeland security by improving efforts to
prevent, protect against, respond to, and recover from an
attack with a weapon of mass destruction (WMD), and for other
purposes. The bill addresses the range of actions necessary to
counter the WMD threat as identified through the Committee on
Homeland Security's oversight work and the recommendations of
the Commission on the Prevention of WMD Proliferation and
Terrorism in its report, ``World At Risk.'' The approach is to
include all aspects of the preparedness framework--prevention,
protection, response, and recovery--for chemical, biological,
radiological, and nuclear attacks and incidents.

Legislative History

111th Congress
H.R.5498 was introduced in the House on March 15, 2010, by
Mr.Pascrell, Mr.King of New York, Mr.Thompson of Mississippi,
Ms.Clarke, and Mr.Daniel E. Lungren of California and referred
to the Committee on Homeland Security, and in addition to the
Committee on Energy and Commerce, the Committee on Agriculture,
the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, the
Committee on Foreign Affairs, and the Permanent Select
Committee on Intelligence. Within the Committee, H.R.5498 was
referred to the Subcommittee on Emerging Threats,
Cybersecurity, and Science and Technology.
On June 15, 2010, the Subcommittee on Emerging Threats,
Cybersecurity, and Science and Technology held a hearing on
H.R. 5498, the ``WMD Prevention and Preparedness Act of 2010.''
The Subcommittee received testimony from Sara (Sally) T.
Beatrice, PhD, Assistant Commissioner, Public Health
Laboratory, Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, City of
New York; Randall S.Murch, PhD, Associate Director, Research
Program Development, National Capital Region, Virginia
Polytechnic Institute and State University; Robert P. Kadlec,
MD, Vice President, Global Public Sector, PRTM Management
Consulting; and Julie E. Fischer, PhD, Senior Associate, Global
Health Security Program, Henry L. Stimson Center.
On June 23, 2010, the Full Committee considered H.R.5498
and ordered the measure to be reported to the House with a
favorable recommendation, amended, by a recorded vote of 26
yeas and 0nays (Roll Call Vote No. 24).
On November 17, 2010, the Chair of the House Permanent
Select Committee on Intelligence sent a letter to the Chair of
the Committee on Homeland Security indicating that, in order to
expedite consideration of the measure by the full House, the
Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence would agree to not
seek a sequential referral of H.R.5498. On that same date, the
Chair of the Committee on Homeland Security responded and
agreed to the waiving of the sequential referral and agreeing
to request to seek appointments of Conferees should a House-
Senate Conference be convened. On November 18, 2010, the Chair
of the Committee on Foreign Affairs sent a letter to the Chair
of the Committee on Homeland Security agreeing that, in order
to expedite consideration of the measure by the full House, the
Committee would waive consideration of H.R.5498. On that same
date, the Chair of the Committee on Homeland Security sent a
letter to the Chair of the Committee on Foreign Affairs
acknowledging the jurisdictional interests of the Committee on
Foreign Affairs.
The Committee on Homeland Security reported H.R.5498 to the
House on November 18, 2010, as H. Rept. 111-659, Pt. I.
Subsequently, the Committee on Agriculture, the Committee
on Transportation and Infrastructure, the Committee on Foreign
Affairs, and the House Permanent Select Committee on
Intelligence were discharged from further consideration of
H.R.5498.
The referral of H.R.5498 to the Committee on Energy and
Commerce was extended on November 18, 2010, for a period ending
not later than December 3, 2010. The referral of H.R.5498 to
the Committee on Energy and Commerce was extended on December
3, 2010, for a period ending not later than December 17, 2010.
The referral of H.R.5498 to the Committee on Energy and
Commerce was extended on December 17, 2010, for a period ending
not later than December 21, 2010.
112th Congress
H.R.2356 was introduced in the House on June 24, 2011, by
Mr.Pascrell, Mr.King of New York, Mr.Thompson of Mississippi,
and eight original cosponsors, and referred to the Committee on
Homeland Security, and in addition to the Committee on Energy
and Commerce, the Committee on Transportation and
Infrastructure, the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and the House
Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence. Within the
Committee, H.R.2356 was referred to the Subcommittee on
Cybersecurity, Infrastructure Protection, and Security
Technologies and the Subcommittee on Emergency Preparedness,
Response, and Communications.
The Chair discharged the Subcommittee on Cybersecurity,
Infrastructure Protection, and Security Technologies and the
Subcommittee on Emergency Preparedness, Response, and
Communications from further consideration of H.R.2356 on May 9,
2012.
The Full Committee considered H.R.2356 on May 9, 2012, and
ordered the measure to be reported to the House with a
favorable recommendation, amended, by voice vote.
On August 3, 2012, the Chair of the Committee on Science,
Space, and Technology sent a letter to the Speaker of the House
requesting a referral of H.R.2356.
The Committee on Homeland Security reported H.R.2356 to the
House on September 12, 2012, as H. Rpt. 112-665, Pt. I.
H.R.2356 was referred to the Committee on Science, Space,
and Technology on September 12, 2012, for a period ending not
later than November 30, 2012.
The referral of H.R.2356 to the Committee on Energy and
Commerce; the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure;
the Committee on Foreign Affairs; and the House Permanent
Select Committee on Intelligence was extended on September 12,
2012, for a period ending not later than November 30, 2012. The
Committee on Energy and Commerce; the Committee on
Transportation and Infrastructure; the Committee on Foreign
Affairs; the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence;
and the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology were
discharged from further consideration of H.R. 2356 on November
30, 2012. Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 510.

FEDERAL PROTECTIVE SERVICE REFORM AND ENHANCEMENT ACT

H.R.2658

To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to enhance the
ability of the Federal Protective Service to provide adequate
security for the prevention of terrorist activities and for the
promotion of homeland security, and for other purposes.

Summary

The Government Accountability Office (GAO) issued a series
of scathing reports highlighting deficiencies in the ability of
the Federal Protective Service (FPS) to protect Federal
facilities, specifically with regard to the ability of FPS to
provide proper oversight over contract guards and provide
sufficient training [GAO-11-705R, GAO-11-554, GAO-11-492, and
GAO-11-813T]. H.R.2658 will improve security at Federal
facilities by directing the Secretary of Homeland Security to
establish minimum training standards, improve systems for
verifying guard certifications, and standardize training. The
legislation requires the FPS to provide at least 16 hours of X-
ray and magnetometer training before a guard may stand post. It
also requires the Secretary to submit to Congress a 5-year
staffing needs plan designed to address GAO's concerns that FPS
is unable to focus on its long-range needs. Further, the bill
authorizes FPS to conduct a covert testing program to test
guard competency and training. The legislation also establishes
baseline standards for contracts for security services,
establishes a toll-free hotline to report security violations,
and requires the Secretary to establish a standardized list of
items to be prohibited from entering a Federal facility.

Legislative History

H.R.2658 was introduced in the House on July 26, 2011, by
Mr.Daniel E. Lungren of California, and referred to the
Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and in addition
to the Committee on Homeland Security. Within the Committee,
H.R.2658 was referred to the Subcommittee on Cybersecurity,
Infrastructure Protection, and Security Technologies.
On July 28, 2011, the Subcommittee considered H.R.2658 and
ordered the measure reported to the Full Committee for
consideration, with a favorable recommendation, amended, by
voice vote.

PROMOTING AND ENHANCING CYBERSECURITY AND INFORMATION SHARING
EFFECTIVENESS ACT OF 2011

H.R.3674

To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to make certain
improvements in the laws relating to cybersecurity, and for
other purposes.

Summary

This measure provides authority for the Department of
Homeland Security to perform its current cybersecurity mission,
provides personnel authority, authorizes the National
Cybersecurity and Communications Integration Center at the
Department of Homeland Security and authorizes cybersecurity
research and development activities.

Legislative History

H.R.3674 was introduced in the House on December 15, 2011,
by Mr.Daniel E. Lungren of California and 11 original
cosponsors, and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security,
and in addition to the Committee on Oversight and Government
Reform, the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, the
Committee on the Judiciary, and the House Permanent Select
Committee on Intelligence. Within the Committee, H.R.3674 was
referred to the Subcommittee on Cybersecurity, Infrastructure
Protection, and Security Technologies.
On February 1, 2012, the Subcommittee considered H.R.3674
and ordered the measure reported to the Full Committee for
consideration, with a favorable recommendation, amended, by
voice vote.
The Committee on Homeland Security considered H.R.3674 on
April 18, 2012, and ordered the measure to be reported to the
House with a favorable recommendation, amended, by a recorded
vote of 16 yeas and 13 nays.
On April 20, 2012, the Chair of the Committee on Homeland
Security sent letters to the Chairs of the Committee on the
Judiciary, the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform,
and the Chair of the House Permanent Select Committee on
Intelligence requesting that, in order to expedite
consideration on the House Floor, the Committees be discharged
from further consideration of H.R.3674. On that same date, the
Chair of the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform sent
a letter to the Chair of the Committee on Homeland Security
agreeing to waive further consideration of H.R.3674. The Chairs
of the Committee on the Judiciary and the House Permanent
Select Committee on Intelligence sent letters to the Chair of
the Committee on Homeland Security on April 23, 2012, agreeing
to waive further consideration of
H.R.3674.
The Committee on Homeland Security reported H.R.3674 to the
House on July 11, 2012, as H. Rpt. 112-592, Pt. I.
Subsequently, the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform,
the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, the Committee
on the Judiciary, and the House Permanent Select Committee on
Intelligence were discharged from further consideration of
H.R.3674.
H.R.3674 was referred to the Committee on Energy and
Commerce on July 11, 2012, for a period ending not later than
September 21, 2012.
The Committee on Energy and Commerce was discharged from
further consideration of H.R.3674 on September 21, 2012.
Subsequently, H.R.3674 was placed on the Union Calendar,
Calendar No. 501.

TO AMEND THE HOMELAND SECURITY ACT OF 2002 TO PERMIT USE OF CERTAIN
GRANT FUNDS FOR TRAINING CONDUCTED IN CONJUNCTION WITH A NATIONAL
LABORATORY OR RESEARCH FACILITY

H.R.5843

To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to permit use of
certain grant funds for training conducted in conjunction with
a national laboratory or research facility.

Summary

This bill amends Section 2008 of the Homeland Security Act
of 2002 to define training in conjunction with a national
laboratory or research facility as an allowable use of certain
homeland security grant funds. Current interpretation of the
statute by the Federal Emergency Management Agency prohibits
the use of such funds in this manner. This bill allows grant
funds to be better utilized by programs at Federal facilities
that benefit civilian public safety efforts.

Legislative History

H.R.5843 was introduced in the House on May 18, 2012, by
Mr.Daniel E. Lungren of California, and referred to the
Committee on Homeland Security. Within the Committee, H.R.5843
was referred to the Subcommittee on Cybersecurity,
Infrastructure Protection, and Security Technologies.
The House considered H.R.5843 under Suspension of the Rules
on June 26, 2012, and passed the bill on June 28, 2012, by
voice vote.
H.R.5843 was received in the Senate on June 29, 2012, read
twice, and referred to the Senate Committee on Homeland
Security and Governmental Affairs.

----------

Oversight Activities of the Subcommittee

CHEMICAL SECURITY

On February 11, 2011, the Subcommittee held a hearing
entitled ``Preventing Chemical Terrorism: Building a Foundation
of Security at Our Nation's Chemical Facilities.'' This hearing
reviewed the Department of Homeland Security's (DHS) risk-based
efforts to strengthen the security of hundreds of chemical
facilities around the Nation; assessed progress of the Chemical
Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards (CFATS) implementation;
examined actions that DHS and chemical facilities have taken to
date under the CFATS regulations and discussed near-term steps
to strengthen the program going forward in order to reach
longer-term goals; and examined whether the Department's
approach is striking an appropriate balance between
strengthening security and enabling growth in this vital sector
of our economy. The Subcommittee received testimony from Hon.
Rand Beers, Under Secretary, National Protection and Programs
Directorate, Department of Homeland Security; Mr.Timothy J.
Scott, Chief Security Officer, The Dow Chemical Company,
testifying on behalf of the American Chemistry Council; Dr. M.
Sam Mannan, PhD, PE, CSP, Regents Professor and Director, Mary
Kay O'Connor Process Safety Center, Texas A&M University
System; and Mr.George S.Hawkins, General Manager, District of
Columbia Water and Sewer Authority.
Committee staff participated in numerous meetings,
including conferences, with CFATS stakeholders. Committee staff
met with various representatives from the private sector in
addition to Federal Government entities impacted, or
prospectively impacted, by CFATS including the DHS National
Protection and Programs Directorate, the U.S. Coast Guard, the
Environmental Protection Agency, and the Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
These oversight activities led to the introduction of
H.R.901, discussed above, and will continue to inform the
Committee's legislative and oversight priorities related to
CFATS implementation. In addition, Committee staff will
continue to monitor the development of ammonium nitrate
regulations as required by the Secure Handling of Ammonium
Nitrate Act, Section 563 of the Fiscal Year 2008 Department of
Homeland Security Appropriations Act (Pub.L. 110-161).
On May 11, 2011, the Chair of the Full Committee sent a
letter to the Speaker of the House requesting a referral of
H.R.908, the Full Implementation of the Chemical Facility Anti-
Terrorism Standards Act, which was referred to the Committee on
Energy and Commerce, based on the jurisdiction of the Committee
on Homeland Security on CFATS matters.
In response to the contents of a leaked internal memo which
revealed management and implementation problems within the
CFATS program, on January 11, 2012, the Subcommittee held a
bipartisan, bicameral staff briefing with program leadership on
the contents of the memo and the Department's plan to address
the issues contained therein.
On February 8, 2012, the Subcommittee held a Member
briefing on Chemical Facilities Anti-Terrorism Standards
(CFATS). Members were briefed on the challenges CFATS faces to
its complete implementation, including those identified in a
leaked internal memo by representatives from the National
Protection and Programs Directorate (NPPD) of the U.S.
Department of Homeland Security.
In February 2012, the Chair of the Subcommittee sent two
requests for study of the CFATS program to the Government
Accountability Office (GAO). The first, sent on February 17,
2012 requested an analysis of the chemical facility tiering
process. The second was sent on February 28, 2012 and asked for
analysis of the roles of unions and contractors in the employ
of the CFATS program. Similar letters were sent from the Chair
of the Subcommittee to the Undersecretary of the National
Protection and Programs Directorate (NPPD).
In response to concerns about an Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) decision to post the locations and inventory of
chemical facilities, the Chair of the Subcommittee sent a
letter to the EPA Administrator questioning the decision. The
potential rulemaking was subsequently abandoned.
The Subcommittee held a hearing on March 6, 2012, entitled
``The Chemical Facilities Anti-Terrorism Standards Program:
Addressing Its Challenges and Finding a Way Forward.'' The
Subcommittee received testimony from Hon. Rand Beers, Under
Secretary, National Protection and Programs Directorate,
Department of Homeland Security; Ms.Penny J. Anderson,
Director, Infrastructure Security Compliance Division, Office
of Infrastructure Protection, Department of Homeland Security;
Mr.David Wulf, Deputy Director, Infrastructure Security
Compliance Division, Office of Infrastructure Protection,
Department of Homeland Security; Mr.Bill Allmond, Vice
President, Government and Public Relations, Society of Chemical
Manufacturers and Affiliates; Mr.Timothy J. Scott, Chief
Security Officer and Corporate Director, Emergency Services and
Security, Dow Chemical; and Mr.David L. Wright, President,
American Federation of Government Employees Local 918. This
hearing provided Members with information concerning the
management and administration problems in the program. The
Subcommittee further requested that the Department provide
Members with a quarterly update on the progress of the program.
During the month of April 2012 Committee staff had numerous
meetings with private industry interests on the status and
progress of the CFATS program. This included briefings and
updates on industry's interactions with the Department and
whether those interactions were within the spirit of the CFATS
public-private partnership model. Other meetings were subject
matter specific. Those included discussions on the status of
the personnel surety component of CFATS and the disputed fuel
mixtures rule.
On May 31, 2012, the Subcommittee Members received an
update on the status of the CFATS program. Representatives from
the National Protection and Programs Directorate (NPPD) of the
U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) responded to Member
concerns and provided an update on the progress CFATS'
management has taken to correct management and personnel
problems identified during the March 6, 2012, Subcommittee
hearing.

NUCLEAR REACTOR FACILITY SECURITY

On March 11, 2011, an earthquake and tsunami struck Japan
causing a nuclear emergency at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear
Power Station and a global impact on the nuclear sector.
Committee staff examined the integrated effort of numerous U.S.
Government agencies to support Japan's effort to respond to
this event. The lessons learned were applied to nuclear
security activities in the United States as well as the
appropriate role of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
of better preparing the nuclear sector for extreme events,
including terrorist attacks.
On March 25, 2011, Committee staff conducted a site visit
to the Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant on the Chesapeake Bay
in Lusby, Maryland. This facility is owned by Constellation
Energy and located approximately 50 miles southeast of
Washington, DC. The trip provided staff with an opportunity to
observe nuclear power plant security measures (physical
security, cybersecurity, and personnel security) to determine
how the facility interacts with the Department of Homeland
Security and State and local first responders to address
vulnerabilities and respond to a potential attack or accident
at the facility. The Committee will continue to examine what
steps the Nation's nuclear energy industry is taking to ensure
the safe and secure operation of facilities in light of the
events in Japan.
Committee staff toured the Nuclear Regulatory Commission
(NRC) Emergency Operations Center on May 6, 2011, and received
briefings on the mission, goals, and functions of the NRC and,
specifically, on the NRC Emergency Preparedness and Response
Program and the NRC's security policy and operations to ensure
NRC-regulated nuclear facilities remain among the Nation's most
secure critical infrastructures. Partnerships between the NRC
and the DHS Federal Emergency Management Agency, the Domestic
Nuclear Detection Office, the National Protection and Programs
Directorate, and State and local entities were explored.
On May 12, 2011, Committee staff met with representatives
from the Indian Point Energy Center, a nuclear energy plant in
Buchanan, New York, situated along the Hudson River,
approximately 25 miles north of Manhattan. These
representatives provided their perspective on the implications
of the events at Fukushima for the U.S. nuclear energy
industry, as well as a detailed overview of the multiple
barriers and redundant systems in place to prevent and prepare
for such an event whether due to natural causes or potential
terrorist attacks.
On June 21, 2012, Committee staff participated in the
Defense Energy Security Caucus briefing on Small Modular
Nuclear Reactors. Representatives from the Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) provided their perspectives on the safety,
security, and proliferation attributes of emerging small
reactor technology.
Committee Staff received a briefing on July 17, 2012
facilitated by the American Association for the Advancement of
Science on ``Recent Developments in Laser Isotope Separation
for Uranium Enrichment.'' The NRC is considering a license
application to build a facility that uses this technology, and
facility security will be an important consideration.
On October 16, 2012, Committee Staff received a briefing on
the findings from the Independent Investigation Commission
regarding the Lessons Learned from the Fukushima Nuclear
Accident. Some of the nuclear safety lessons learned may have
applicability towards improving nuclear facility security.

WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION

Weapons of mass destruction (WMD) pose a daunting challenge
to homeland security because of their great potential to cause
catastrophic consequences. Terrorists actively seek to acquire,
build, and use such weapons and technologies. Dangerous
chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear (CBRN) and
explosive materials, technology, and knowledge, often dual-use,
circulate with ease in our global economy and are controlled
unevenly around the world, making it difficult to limit their
access and movement and ultimately prevent terrorist acts. The
Commission on the Intelligence Capabilities of the United
States Regarding Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD Commission)
has released several reports in recent years detailing that
these agents remain a threat, and that biological and nuclear
weapons in particular are most concerning. In the 111th
Congress, Mr.King of New York introduced vital legislation
focused on achieving success in countering the WMD threat
(H.R.5057).
During the 112th Congress, the Committee has continued to
examine efforts across the Federal Government aimed at
expanding and strengthening capabilities to prevent, detect,
protect against, mitigate, respond to, and recover from such
attacks. Committee staff met with stakeholders involved in
activities across the spectrum of WMD defense to keep Members
informed of advances being made, as well as gaps that persist.
Mr.Pascrell, in addition to the Chair of the Full Committee,
and nine current Members of the Committee on Homeland Security
introduced H.R.2356 on June 24, 2011.
On March 31, 2011, the Chair of the Subcommittee sent a
letter to the Committee on Appropriations' Subcommittee on
Homeland Security urging continued support for appropriations
for radiological and nuclear transformational research and
development within the Domestic Nuclear Detection Office's
(DNDO) budget, instead of transferring this portfolio to the
Science and Technology Directorate per the President's budget
request, to enable DNDO to continue carrying out its activities
as authorized under the SAFE Port Act of 2006 (Pub.L. 109-347).
On April 5, 2011, the Chair of the Subcommittee on
Cybersecurity, Infrastructure Protection, and Security
Technologies and the Chair and Ranking Member of the
Subcommittee on Emergency Preparedness, Response, and
Communications sent a letter to the Secretary of Homeland
Security requesting responses related to the procurement of
Generation-3 BioWatch detection systems. The response, dated
May 23, 2011, was deemed inadequate to assure the Committee
that the Department's decisions to-date on the Gen-3
procurement are the product of a sound acquisition process and
based on valid science, and whether, going forward, the
Department has in place the tools, technical expertise, and
acquisition policies and procedures to effectively support the
successful delivery of the needed rapid biodetection
capability. As such, the Subcommittee Chairmen requested on
November 17, 2011, that the Government Accountability Office
investigate further.
Committee staff observed the Securing the Cities (STC)
full-scale exercise in New York City, New York (NYC) on April
7, 2011. STC is a successful initiative by DNDO to reduce the
risk of a radiological or nuclear attack on the NYC region by
enhancing regional capabilities to detect, identify, and
interdict illicit radioactive materials. STC involves 13
principal partners coordinated through the New York City Police
Department (NYPD). The exercise served as a milestone to assess
the effectiveness of the program to-date. Ultimately, DHS
envisions utilizing the detection and interdiction architecture
implemented in NYC as a template for radiological and nuclear
protection of other cities in the United States. During the
exercise, Committee staff toured the Lower Manhattan Security
Coordination Center and learned of the NYC infrastructure being
protected by STC; visited the NYPD Emergency Operations Center
to observe regional cooperation and real-time information
sharing among Federal, State, county, and city agencies in the
tri-State area; and observed the exercise at multiple choke
points including land and sea to view fixed, mobile, maritime,
and human-portable radiation detection systems in use.
In addition to the STC exercise, DNDO conducted an external
assessment of the STC program. On May 5, 2011, Committee staff
received a briefing from the STC Strategic Assessment Team led
by experts from Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Lawrence
Livermore National Laboratory, and the University of Tennessee.
The assessment concluded that the STC initiative is a valuable,
worthwhile program that should be completed in the New York
City region and, in parallel, expanded to other cities in a
phased approach.
Since the beginning of the 112th Congress, Committee staff
participated in numerous meetings with DNDO and radiological/
nuclear defense stakeholders to ensure that Members were
informed and in a position to conduct appropriate oversight. In
particular, Committee staff received a briefing from senior
officials on the Global Nuclear Detection Architecture
Strategic Plan delivered in December 2010 and discussed next
steps in developing Implementation Plans.
In addition, representatives from the National Academy of
Sciences (NAS) briefed staff on the Academy's 2011 report,
``Evaluating Testing, Costs, and Benefits of Advanced
Spectroscopic Portals (ASPs).'' The DNDO subsequently provided
the Committee with information on how it is addressing the
recommendations from NAS on the ASP program. On July 25, 2011,
the DNDO Director notified the Committee of the termination of
the ASP program and on August 9, 2011, the DNDO briefed
Committee staff on the plan going forward.
The Subcommittee on Cybersecurity, Infrastructure
Protection, and Security Technologies, Subcommittee on
Counterterrorism and Intelligence, and Subcommittee on
Emergency Preparedness, Response, and Communications held a
joint classified Member briefing on the present and evolving
threat of WMD terrorism on May 13, 2011. Representatives from
the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, National
Counterterrorism Center (NCTC), and the National Counter
Proliferation Center (NCPC) briefed Members on terrorist
intent, capability, and plans to develop, acquire, and use CBRN
weapons. This information will provide the foundational
underpinning for the Committee's future legislative and
oversight activities to address shortfalls in National WMD
preparedness.
On June 23, 2011, the Subcommittee on Cybersecurity,
Infrastructure Protection, and Security Technologies and the
Subcommittee on Emergency Preparedness, Response, and
Communications held a joint hearing, prior to introduction, on
H.R.2356, the ``WMD Prevention and Preparedness Act of 2011.''
The Subcommittees received testimony from Hon. William J.
Pascrell, Jr., a Representative in Congress from the 8th
District of New Jersey; Senator Jim Talent, Vice Chairman, The
Bipartisan WMD Center; Dr. Robert P. Kadlec, Former Special
Assistant to the President for Biodefense; and Mr.Richard H.
Berdnik, Sheriff, Passaic County, New Jersey. Following the
hearing, Mr.Pascrell in addition to the Chair of the Full
Committee, and nine current Members of the Committee on
Homeland Security introduced
H.R.2356 on June 24, 2011. H.R.2356 was referred to the
Committee on Homeland Security, the Committee on Energy and
Commerce, the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure,
the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and the Permanent Select
Committee on Intelligence.
Between June and December 2011, Committee staff met with
stakeholders, including Federal officials and the private
sector, to examine progress in the development of alternatives
to Helium-3 for radiation detection equipment. On September 23,
2011, DHS officials provided an update to Committee staff on
the recent outcome of tests on alternative neutron detection
technology and plans going into FY 2012. Throughout the 112th
session, Committee staff continued to assess progress toward
replacement technologies that address the Helium-3 shortage.
Throughout the month of July 2011, Committee staff attended
a seminar series entitled ``Nuclear Weapons and Nuclear
Security: History, Policy, and Outlook'' organized by the
Center for Science, Technology, and Security Policy at the
American Association for the Advancement of Science. Through
December 2011, Committee staff also attended seminars offered
to Congressional staff by the Center for Biosecurity at the
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center on U.S. preparedness
for biological and nuclear attacks. The insight offered by
nuclear and biological experts improved the Committee awareness
of current gaps in preparedness and continued to inform the
Committee's oversight of WMD activities.
On July 26, 2011, the Subcommittee held a hearing entitled
``The Last Line of Defense: Federal, State, and Local Efforts
to Prevent Nuclear and Radiological Terrorism Within the United
States.'' The hearing examined Federal, State, and local
efforts to implement the domestic portion of the Global Nuclear
Detection Architecture (GNDA), with a focus on efforts to build
capability in the interior of the U.S. including through the
Securing the Cities program. The Subcommittee received
testimony from Mr.Warren M. Stern, Director, Domestic Nuclear
Detection Office, Department of Homeland Security; Mr.Carl
Pavetto, Deputy Associate Administrator, Office of Emergency
Operations, National Nuclear Security Administration,
Department of Energy; Mr.Richard Daddario, Deputy Commissioner
for Counterterrorism, New York City Police Department; Mr.Mark
Perez, Homeland Security Advisor, Florida Department of Law
Enforcement; and Mr.David C. Maurer, Director, Homeland
Security and Justice Issues, Government Accountability Office.
This hearing examined Federal, State, and local efforts to
implement the domestic portion of GNDA, with a focus on efforts
to build capability within the interior of the United States.
The hearing addressed issues including how the Federal
Government works with State and local stakeholders to build
basic detection architectures and enhance awareness of
radiological and nuclear threats; whether a clear delineation
of roles and responsibilities exists; the extent of integration
of efforts and technology across all levels of government; and
cost-effective approaches to meet the needs of the GNDA.
From August 10 through 17, 2011, Committee staff traveled
to the United Kingdom and Austria to engage government and
international officials on nuclear security issues of mutual
interest. Staff visited the Ministry of Defence and Aldermaston
Weapons Establishment while in the United Kingdom, and the
Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty Organization and the
International Atomic Energy Agency in Vienna, Austria.
On December 13, 2011, Committee staff received a briefing
from representatives from the Central Intelligence Agency to
discuss possible chemical weapons in Syria.
On February 21, 2012, Committee staff received a briefing
from the Domestic Nuclear Detection Office on that agency's
Fiscal Year 2013 budget request.
Committee staff received a briefing from the Science and
Technology Directorate on March 6, 2012, on the 2012 Site-
Specific Biosafety and Biosecurity Mitigation Risk Assessment
for the National Bio and Agro-defense Facility.
On March 19, 2012, the Chair of the Full Committee sent a
letter to the DNDO requesting detailed information on plans to
distribute and deploy Radiation Portal Monitors. The DNDO and
CBP jointly responded on April 20, 2012.
Committee staff were briefed by the Domestic Nuclear
Detection Office on March 29, 2012, about its activities with
respect to Department of Homeland Security and Department of
Energy National laboratories. As a follow-up, staff were
briefed on April 4, 2012 by the Department of Energy on the
breadth of its laboratories, its funding processes for them,
and its partnerships with the Department of Homeland Security
in utilizing the labs.
On April 24, 2012, Committee staff participated in the 1st
Annual Global Nuclear Detection Architecture (GNDA) symposium.
This symposium brought together all cooperating agencies and
the first responder community to establish an integrated inter-
and intra-agency plan for the GNDA.
Committee staff visited DNDO headquarters on April 26,
2012, and met with the Director to discuss the strategy, plans,
and issues of the Office. Staff also received a tour of the
DNDO Joint Analysis Center.
On May 2, 2012, Committee staff attended the Domestic
Preparedness meeting in New York City. The focus of this
meeting was on nuclear preparedness of major urban areas and
associated inter-agency coordination. The Securing the Cities
program was highlighted as a successful model for equipping
first responders for WMD prevention and preparedness.
Committee staff received a briefing on the GNDA program,
its accomplishments, and plans on May 15, 2012. On May 16,
Committee staff received a briefing from the Director of the
GNDA on the Implementation Plan. This Plan, which was requested
by the Committee, provides the programmatic details that
support the implementation of the GNDA Strategic Plan.
The Members of the Subcommittee received a classified
threats briefing on June 1, 2012, and examined the current
status of the potential threats to the Homeland from weapons of
mass destruction.
On July 24, 2012, the Subcommittee held a classified
Member-only briefing on the nuclear terrorism threat.
Representatives from the Intelligence Community, Department of
Energy, and Department of Homeland Security responded to Member
concerns.
On July 26, 2012, the Subcommittee held a hearing entitled
``Preventing Nuclear Terrorism: Does DHS have an Effective and
Efficient Nuclear Detection Strategy?'' The Subcommittee
received testimony from Dr. Huban Gowadia, Acting Director,
Domestic Nuclear Detection Office, Department of Homeland
Security; Mr.David Maurer, Director, Homeland Security and
Justice Issues, Government Accountability Office; and Mr.Vayl
Oxford, National Security Executive Policy Advisor, Pacific
Northwest National Laboratory. This hearing provided Members an
opportunity to examine Federal efforts to acquire the next
generation of radiation detection technology and the underlying
Global Nuclear Detection Architecture.
Committee staff held a roundtable discussion on August 1,
2012 with representatives from the Congressional Research
Service, the Government Accountability Office, former
Department of Homeland Security Officials, and others on the
topic of optimizing the Department's weapons of mass
destruction activities and capabilities. The discussion
addressed pros and cons of consolidation of the Office of
Health Affairs and the Domestic Nuclear Detection Office, and
other considerations for shifting activities and authorities.
On August 23, 2012, Committee staff received a briefing
from the Science and Technology Directorate to learn of ongoing
work regarding toxic chemical releases.
The Subcommittee, together with the Subcommittee on
Emergency Preparedness, Response, and Communications, convened
a hearing on September 13, 2012 entitled, ``BioWatch Present
and Future: Meeting Mission Needs for Effective
Biosurveillance?'' The Subcommittees received testimony from
Dr. Alexander Garza, MD, MPH, Assistant Secretary for Health
Affairs, Chief Medical Officer, Department of Homeland
Security; Hon. Raphael Borras, Under Secretary for Management,
Department of Homeland Security; Mr.William Jenkins, Director,
Homeland Security and Justice Issues, Government Accountability
Office; and Ms. Frances Phillips, RN, MHA, Deputy Secretary for
Public Health Services, Department of Health and Mental
Hygiene, State of Maryland. This hearing provided Members an
opportunity to examine the state of the biosurveillance efforts
of the Department of Homeland Security, with a special focus on
BioWatch, and with particular attention to the findings of a
GAO report [GAO-12-810], released on management challenges with
the BioWatch Generation 3 acquisition.
During the period of August through October 2012, Committee
staff received detailed briefings and demonstrations on
capabilities and emerging technologies for addressing chemical,
biological, radiological, nuclear, and explosive (CBRNE)
threats. The briefings and demonstrations were provided by the
following Department of Energy National Laboratories: Lawrence
Livermore, Los Alamos, Oakridge, Pacific Northwest, and Sandia.
Committee staff received a briefing on October 3, 2012 from
the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). The IAEA
provided an update on its efforts to secure nuclear materials
world-wide and also discussed its database for tracking the
illicit nuclear materials.
On November 16, 2012, representatives from the DHS National
Program Protection Directorate (NPPD) provided a briefing on
the nuclear security sector plan to Committee staff. This
briefing focused on Departmental efforts to coordinate the
security of nuclear materials and facilities throughout the
United States. The briefing also provided an opportunity for
Committee staff to examine the effectiveness of interagency
collaboration in the nuclear sector.
Committee staff received a briefing on December 5, 2012,
from DNDO on their recently-released 2012 report on the Global
Nuclear Detection Architecture Joint Interagency Review. The
acting Director of DNDO provided details on the progress that
the interagency community has made in addressing nuclear
detection gaps in the Architecture.
On December 14, 2012, Committee staff received a briefing
from the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) on
their Global Threat Reduction Initiative. This NNSA initiative
includes efforts to improve the security of domestic nuclear
materials at facilities such as hospitals and universities.

AMMONIUM NITRATE

Between June and December 2011, Committee staff met with
stakeholders from the private sector and the Federal Government
to discuss the development of ammonium nitrate regulations as
required by the Secure Handling of Ammonium Nitrate Act
(Section 563 of the Fiscal Year 2008 Department of Homeland
Security Appropriations Act (Pub.L. 110-161)). Following the
release of the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM), Department
of Homeland Security officials briefed Committee staff on
August 3, 2011, on the path forward for the Ammonium Nitrate
NPRM; however, Department policy restrictions prevented further
discussions with the Committee until after the comment period
closed on December 1, 2011.
Through H.R.3116, the ``Department of Homeland Security
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012,'' the Committee
addressed initial concerns that the Department is overreaching
beyond the Congressional intent established within the Ammonium
Nitrate Act. The Committee does not intend for the Department
to regulate the entire chain of custody of ammonium nitrate,
just the point of sale. Thus, H.R.3116 includes a provision to
clarify that transportation providers who are already subject
to a sufficient security program will be exempt from the
ammonium nitrate regulations.
During March 2012, Committee staff met with stakeholders
regarding concerns with the Ammonium Nitrate program. Staff
heard concerns about the administration of the program and how
efforts to begin the regulatory process would be impacted by
the issues with the CFATS program. On April 13, 2012, DHS
leadership briefed staff from the Committee on Homeland
Security and the Committee on Appropriations. See additional
discussion of H.R.3116, listed above.
On July 12, 2012, the Subcommittee held a hearing entitled
``Securing Ammonium Nitrate: Using Lessons Learned in
Afghanistan to Protect the Homeland from IED's.'' The
Subcommittee received testimony from LTG Michael D. Barbero,
Director, Joint IED Defeat Organization, United States Army,
Department of Defense; Mr.John P. Woods, Assistant Director,
Homeland Security Investigations, Immigration and Customs
Enforcement, Department of Homeland Security; and Mr.Charles
Michael Johnson, Jr., Director, International Counterterrorism
& Security Assistance Issues, Government Accountability Office.
Bipartisan Committee staff traveled to the Austin Powder
Company in Fork Union, Virginia on September 25, 2012. The
purpose of the visit was to view and be briefed on perimeter
security measures and credentialing at a facility which
produces and transports ammonium nitrate.

SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY

During the 112th Congress, Committee staff conducted
meetings with Federal officials, academic experts, the private
sector, and other stakeholders on the mission and operations of
the Department of Homeland Security's (DHS) Science and
Technology (S&T) Directorate. The S&T Directorate is the
component responsible for research, development, testing, and
evaluation of homeland security technologies. The Directorate
was established upon the creation of the Department and has
experienced considerable growing pains and Congressional
scrutiny during its eight years of existence.
In 2009, the S&T Directorate underwent a structural
realignment, developed a strategic plan, and conducted an
expansive portfolio analysis that informed resource allocation
and FY 2012 budget planning. The Subcommittee's oversight has
focused on examining: (1) The linkage between the S&T's
strategic plan and its programs; (2) inadequate transparency
and detail in its budget justifications; (3) the persistent
lack of responsiveness to the needs of its customers and end-
users; (4) S&T's ability to provide scientific and technical
support to components throughout a technology's acquisition
lifecycle; (5) leveraging of the scientific capital of the
Department of Energy National Laboratories, other Federal
Departments and agencies, academia, and the private sector; and
(6) the failure to more rapidly develop and transition homeland
security technologies. The Subcommittee continued to monitor
the Directorate as it evolves and assess whether it is
achieving the goals and objectives stated in its strategic
plan.
On March 31, 2011, Committee staff met with representatives
from the Department's Centers of Excellence (COEs) to learn
about the tools, technologies, and other capabilities being
developed by this network of universities and partners. The
Subcommittee's continued oversight will focus on examining the
linkages between the COEs, the Department, and other customers,
as well as the ability of the COEs to provide enduring, cross-
cutting technology and basic research needs for the Department
and the Nation.
Committee staff attended the DHS S&T Expo on April 28,
2011, in Washington, DC. At the expo, S&T demonstrated and
displayed homeland security technologies that support our
Nation, including first responders, when protecting,
responding, and recovering from hazards and terrorist attacks.
Staff interacted with subject matter experts from the
Department, as well as Department-funded laboratories and other
technology developers.
On June 6, 2011, Committee staff held a roundtable
discussion with the Under Secretary for Science and Technology
at the Department. The Under Secretary addressed the shifting
strategy of the Directorate toward rapid fielding of technology
and acquisition support, interagency collaboration on research
priorities, and the implications of proposed research and
development budget cuts on homeland security.
Additionally, on June 15, August 3, and August 9, 2011,
Committee staff attended briefings with the S&T Directorate
regarding issues including international collaborative research
and development efforts; agriculture security activities; and
approaches to protect against and mitigate damage to New York
City's network of tunnels.
Committee staff met with representatives from the
Commonwealth of Australia on October 5, 2011, to discuss
mechanisms for coordinating research and development
internationally and cost-sharing in order to advance National
security and innovation.
Begining on October 18, 2011, Committee staff initiated a
series of Committee staff briefings at which the DHS S&T
provided in-depth discussions of the activities of each of its
divisions on a bi-weekly basis. Representatives from DHS
briefed staff on the Explosives Division, the Borders and
Maritime Division, the Human Factors Division, the Chemical and
Biological Defense Division, and the Cybersecurity Division,
throughout the remainder of 2011.
The series continued in 2012 with representatives from DHS
briefing staff on their work with the strategic investor In-Q-
Tel, the Office of University Programs, the First Responder
Group, the Office of National Laboratories, research to support
the United States Secret Service, efforts to develop
technologies to secure the commercial supply chain,
international partnerships, and infrastructure protection and
disaster management.
On November 17, 2011 the Subcommittee held a hearing
entitled ``S&T on a Budget: Finding Smarter Approaches to Spur
Innovation, Impose Discipline, Drive Job Creation, and
Strengthen Homeland Security.'' Given the new reality facing
S&T of significant budgetary pressures going forward, the
hearing examined S&T's evolving mission, organization, assets,
and activities. Particular emphasis was placed on: (1) The
balance of the directorate's programs (e.g., long-term vs.
near-term R&D, S&T, acquisition support); (2) its priorities
and how they are set; (3) its relationships with other R&D
organizations and the allocation of resources between
Government, industry, and academia; (4) its strategic planning
process; (5) stakeholder involvement in setting research
priorities; and other concerns. The Subcommittee received
testimony from Hon. Tara O'Toole, Under Secretary, Science and
Technology Directorate, Department of Homeland Security; and
Mr.David C. Maurer, Director, Homeland Security and Justice
Issues, Government Accountability Office.
On February 14, 2012, Committee staff received a briefing
from the Science and Technology Directorate on its Fiscal Year
2013 budget request.
Committee staff received a briefing on March 1, 2012, from
Pacific Northwest National Laboratories on the lab's biological
and chemical defense work for the Department of Homeland
Security.
On March 16, 2012, Committee staff attended an open session
of the National Academy of Science Committee on the Evaluation
of the Updated Site-Specific Risk Assessment for the National
Bio and Agro-defense Facility.
Committee staff received a briefing on April 4, 2012, from
the directors of the DHS Centers of Excellence. This provided
an opportunity to better understand the role that universities
play in the DHS S&T strategy, and the relationships with
industry and National laboratories.
Committee staff were briefed on April 17, 2012, about the
overall S&T Directorate strategy by the Deputy Under Secretary
for Science and Technology.
Committee staff received numerous briefings from the
Department of Energy National Laboratories that work with the
Department of Homeland Security in preparation for the hearing
and for general oversight purposes.
On April 19, 2012, the Subcommittee held a hearing entitled
``The DHS and DOE National Labs: Finding Efficiencies and
Optimizing Outputs in Homeland Security Research and
Development.'' The Subcommittee received testimony from Dr.
Daniel M. Gerstein, Deputy Under Secretary for Science and
Technology, Department of Homeland Security; Dr. Huban Gowadia,
Deputy Director, Domestic Nuclear Detection Office, Department
of Homeland Security; Dr. Daniel Morgan, Specialist in Science
and Technology Policy, Resources, Sciences, and Industry
Division, Congressional Research Service; Ms.Jill Hruby, Vice
President, International, Homeland and Nuclear Security, Sandia
National Laboratories; and Dr. Michael Robert Carter, Senior
Scientist, National Ignition Facility and Photon Science
Directorate, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.
On April 25, 2012, Committee staff received a briefing from
the National Institute of Standards and Technology of the
Department of Commerce in preparation for the joint
subcommittee hearing on first responder technologies.
The Subcommittee on Emergency Preparedness, Response, and
Communications and the Subcommittee on Cybersecurity,
Infrastructure Protection, and Security Technologies held a
joint hearing on May 9, 2012, entitled, ``First Responder
Technologies: Ensuring a Prioritized Approach for Homeland
Security Research and Development.'' The Subcommittees received
testimony from Dr. Robert Griffin, Director of First Responder
Programs, Science and Technology Directorate, Department of
Homeland Security; Ms.Mary H. Saunders, Director, Standards
Coordination Office, National Institute of Standards and
Technology; Chief Edward Kilduff, Chief of Department, New York
City Fire Department, New York City, New York; Ms.Annette
Doying, Director, Office of Emergency Management, Pasco County,
Florida; and Ms.Kiersten Todt Coon, President and CEO, Liberty
Group Ventures.
On June 13, 2012, Committee staff met with representatives
from the S&T Directorate to discuss its Updated Site-Specific
Biosafety and Biosecurity Mitigation Risk Assessment for the
National Bio and Agro-Defense Facility. On June 14, staff met
with the National Academies of Science to be briefed on that
organization's review of the assessment.
Committee staff received a briefing on July 12, 2012 from
the National Academy of Sciences on its forthcoming report,
``Meeting Critical Laboratory Needs for Animal Agriculture:
Examination of Three Options.'' The report was requested by the
Department of Homeland Security to assess capability needs
related to the development of the National Bio and Agro-defense
Facility.
Committee staff and Members attended a demonstration hosted
by the Congressional Fire Caucus on August 1, 2012, of
Department of Homeland Security first responder technologies in
the Rayburn House Office Building.
On September 24, 2012, Committee staff held a site visit to
the CREATE Center of Excellence at the University of Maryland.
The visit provided Committee staff the opportunity to observe
the Center's open-source terrorism database.

SAFETY ACT IMPLEMENTATION

The Support Anti-Terrorism by Fostering Effective
Technologies Act of 2002 (SAFETY Act), (6 USC. 441 et seq.;
Title VIII, Subtitle G of the Homeland Security Act of 2002
Pub.L. 107-296) was intended to encourage the development and
deployment of anti-terrorism technologies by limiting the
liability of sellers of the technology and others in the
distribution and supply chain for third-party claims arising
out of acts of terrorism where the technology has been deployed
to prevent, respond to, or recover from such events. Despite
Congressional intent for broad application and use of the
SAFETY Act protections and efforts by the Department to
streamline the SAFETY Act application process, the Department
of Homeland Security continues to experience difficulty
generating interest in the program and developing efficient
internal review processes.
Committee staff met with Department officials to monitor
the program's progress and consulted with various stakeholders
concerned with the pace and requirements of the SAFETY Act
review process. Other aspects of Subcommittee oversight
included the application burden, general program awareness,
options for expedited review, renewal process and rate, and the
SAFETY Act's coordination with procurement.
On March 9, 2011, the Chair of the Full Committee and the
Chair of the Subcommittee sent a letter to the Department's
Under Secretary for the Science and Technology Directorate
requesting an update on the implementation of the SAFETY Act,
including: Annual data on quantity of applications,
designations, and certifications; corresponding data on renewal
applications; processing times; review process and criteria;
use of the pre-qualification process; program metrics; and
program costs. The Committee received a response on May 13,
2011.
The Subcommittee held a hearing on May 26, 2011, entitled
``Unlocking the SAFETY Act's Potential to Promote Technology
and Combat Terrorism.'' The Subcommittee received testimony
from Mr.Paul Benda, Acting Deputy Under Secretary, Science and
Technology Directorate, Department of Homeland Security;
Mr.Marc Pearl, President and Chief Executive Officer, Homeland
Security and Defense Business Counsel; Mr.Brian Finch, Partner,
Dickstein Shapiro LLP; Mr.Scott Boylan, Vice President and
General Counsel, Morpho Detection, Inc.; and Mr.Craig Harvey,
Chief Operations Officer and Executive Vice President, NVision
Solutions, Inc.
On September 14, 2011, Committee staff received their first
quarterly briefing from the Department on the status of SAFETY
Act implementation after the May 26, 2011, hearing. Topics
discussed included: Progress of the SAFETY Act in terms of
numbers of certifications and designations; the addition of new
block designations and certifications; and other
accomplishments to-date as well as challenges. Throughout the
112th Congress, Committee staff continued to receive quarterly
briefings from the S&T Directorate on its implementation of the
SAFETY Act.

CYBERSECURITY THREAT

The threat posed by hackers, nation states, terrorists, and
common thieves to the critical infrastructure of the Nation has
only increased in recent years. It is important that the
Subcommittee understand the threat environment and the
implications to the security of the country. Committee staff
participated in multiple briefings and meetings with
stakeholders including officials from the Intelligence
Community and the Department of Homeland Security.
On February 11, 2011, Members of the Subcommittee received
a classified Member-only briefing on an assessment of the
current cybersecurity threat. Representatives from the
Department of Homeland Security and the National Security
Agency were present. The Subcommittee has continued these
briefings every three months throughout the 112th Congress.
The Subcommittee held a hearing on March 16, 2011, entitled
``Examining the Cyber Threat to Critical Infrastructure and the
American Economy.'' The Subcommittee received testimony from
Hon. Phillip Reitinger, Deputy Under Secretary, National
Protection and Programs Directorate, Department of Homeland
Security; Mr.Gregory C. Wilshusen, Director, Information
Security Issues, Government Accountability Office; Dr. Phyllis
Schneck, Vice President and Chief Technical Officer, McAfee
Inc.; Mr.James A. Lewis, Director and Senior Fellow, Technology
and Public Policy Program, Center for Strategic and
International Studies; and Ms.Mischel Kwon, President, Mischel
Kwon Associates.
On September 17, 2012, Committee staff received a
classified briefing from US-CERT on cybersecurity threats to
critical infrastructure sectors.

CYBERSECURITY

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is the primary
point of contact and coordination for all civilian, non-
intelligence U.S. Government networks as well as privately held
critical infrastructure. Understanding how the Department
currently fulfills that role and how it can improve its
relationship with other Federal agencies as well as with the
private sector is an important function of the Subcommittee.
Committee staff participated in numerous meetings with private
stakeholders as well as the Department to support the Members
of the Subcommittee in their conduct of oversight.
The Subcommittee held a hearing on April 15, 2011, entitled
``The DHS Cybersecurity Mission: Promoting Innovation and
Securing Critical Infrastructure.'' The Subcommittee received
testimony from Mr.Sean McGurk, Director, National Cybersecurity
and Communications Integration Center, Department of Homeland
Security; Mr.Gerry Cauley, President and CEO, North American
Electric Reliability Corporation; Ms.Jane Carlin, Chair,
Financial Services Sector Coordinating Council; and Mr.Edward
Amoroso, Senior Vice President and Chief Security Officer,
AT&T. The Department is the primary agency in coordinating the
protection of privately owned critical infrastructure and it is
important for the Committee to understand how the Department
performs this mission. This hearing focused on how the
Department interacts with those owners and operators of
critical infrastructure.
On June 24, 2011, the Subcommittee held a hearing entitled
``Examining the Homeland Security Impact of the Obama
Administration's Cybersecurity Proposal.'' The Subcommittee
received testimony from Ms.Melissa Hathaway, President,
Hathaway Global Strategies, LLC; Dr. Greg Shannon, Chief
Scientist for Computer Emergency Readiness Team, Software
Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University; Mr.Leigh
Williams, BITS President, The Financial Services Roundtable;
and Mr.Larry Clinton, President, Internet Security Alliance.
This hearing examined an Administration proposal for
cybersecurity and that proposal's impact on the Department of
Homeland Security and the owners and operations of critical
infrastructure.
The Subcommittee Chair received a classified cybersecurity
operations briefing on July 14, 2011, from the Department of
Homeland Security's Under Secretary for National Protection and
Programs Directorate.
On August 25, 2011, Committee staff received a classified
briefing on the status of the Einstein 3 program by DHS
National Cyber Security Division.
Committee staff received a briefing on September 9, 2011,
from the Department's Acting Assistant Secretary for
Cybersecurity and Communications on cybersecurity training and
educational outreach efforts.
On September 22, 2011, the Subcommittee Chair received a
classified cybersecurity operations briefing from the Acting
Deputy Under Secretary for National Protection and Programs
Directorate.
The Subcommittee held a hearing on October 6, 2011,
entitled ``Cloud Computing: What are the Security
Implications?'' The Subcommittee received testimony from Hon.
Richard Spires, Chief Information Officer, Department of
Homeland Security; Dr. David McClure, Associate Administrator,
Office of Citizen Services and Innovative Technologies, General
Services Administration; Mr.Greg Wilshusen, Director of
Information Security Issues, Government Accountability Office;
Mr.James W. Sheaffer, President, North American Public Sector,
Computer Sciences Corporation; Mr.Timothy Brown, Senior Vice
President, and Chief Architect for Security, CA Technologies;
Mr.James R. Bottum, Vice Provost for Computing and Information
Technology, and Chief Information Officer, Clemson University;
and Mr.John Curran, Chief Executive Officer, American Registry
of Internet Numbers.
Committee staff received a series of briefings on October
14, November 8, and November 10, 2011, on issues including: The
National Critical Infrastructure Protection Program; the United
States Computer Emergency Readiness Team (US-CERT); and the
Office of Federal Network Security.
On November 16, 2011, the Subcommittee Chair and Ranking
Member received a classified cybersecurity operations briefing
by Acting Deputy Under Secretary National Protection and
Programs Directorate.
The Subcommittee held a hearing on December 6, 2011,
entitled ``Hearing on Draft Legislative Proposal on
Cybersecurity.'' The Subcommittee received testimony from
Ms.Cheri McGuire, Vice President of Global Government Affairs
and Cybersecurity Policy, Symantec Corporation; Dr. Greg
Shannon, Chief Scientist for Computer Emergency Readiness Team,
Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University;
Mr.Gregory T. Nojeim, Senior Counsel and Director, Project on
Freedom, Security and Technology, Center for Democracy and
Technology; and Mr.Kevin R. Kosar, Analyst in American
Government, Congressional Research Service.
This hearing examined the Directorate's evolving mission,
organization, assets, and activities. Particular emphasis was
placed on prioritization of the Directorate's programs, its
relationships with other organizations and the allocation of
resources between government, industry, and academia, its
strategic planning process, and stakeholder involvement in
setting research priorities.
Bipartisan Committee staff received a briefing on July 31,
2012, on cybersecurity information sharing programs with
critical infrastructure sectors, the Cyber Information Sharing
and Collaboration Program (CISCP). Focus was on the financial
services sector and the expansion of the pilot with the Defense
Industrial Base.
On August 1, 2012, the Chair of the Subcommittee received a
classified cybersecurity operations brief from the Department.
Committee staff received a briefing, on August 8, 2012, on
the Joint Cybersecurity Services Program (JCSP) and the
Enhanced Cybersecurity Service (ECS) which will replace the
standard installation of the EINSTEIN system for civilian dot
Gov networks.
The Chair of the Subcommittee received a classified
cybersecurity operations brief from the Department on September
21, 2012.
On October 5, 2012 bipartisan Committee staff received a
briefing on the DHS contribution to the National Initiative on
Cybersecurity Education (NICE) and the DHS cyber education
office.

CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE PROTECTION MISSION OF THE DEPARTMENT OF
HOMELAND SECURITY

Committee staff received multiple briefings from the
Department of Homeland Security's National Protection and
Programs Directorate (NPPD), specifically with the Office of
Infrastructure Protection, on activities conducted by the Risk
Management Analysis, Enhanced Critical Infrastructure Program
(ECIP), Protected Critical Infrastructure Information Program
(PCII), as well as meetings with the Government Accountability
Office (GAO) and the Congressional Research Service regarding
the current state of critical infrastructure protection.
On February 24, 2011, Committee staff visited the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). The briefing provided an
overview of FERC's jurisdiction and authorities, a look at the
electricity and natural gas markets, major rulemakings
currently under way, and it provided an opportunity to share
information on electric transmission, smart grid security, and
cybersecurity. The visit also included tours of FERC's market
monitoring and reliability monitoring centers.
Committee staff visited the House of Representatives mail
facility in Capitol Heights, Maryland on April 26, 2011. The
briefing and facility tour focused on security measures and
screening protocols in place for detecting dangerous materials
in the mail system. Staff also received an overview of the
facility's coordination with the United State's Postal Service
and private partners FedEx and UPS.
On May 24, 2011, the Subcommittee Chair requested a GAO
study of the Department of Homeland Security's decision to
change its process for assessing Level 1 and Level 2 status to
critical infrastructure. The GAO initiated the investigation
and is expected to issue a report later in 2012.
The Subcommittee Chair requested the GAO study of the
Department of Homeland Security's ability to identify and
resolve cross-sector dependencies on May 24, 2011. These
dependencies are created by statute or regulation and could
force the outage of two or more sectors (i.e. electric and gas)
simultaneously.
The Chairs of the Full Committee and the Subcommittee sent
a letter to the Under Secretary for NPPD indicating that the
reorganization of the National Programs and Protection
Directorate without notice to Congress would be in violation of
the Homeland Security Act of 2002. The letter, sent on June 1,
2011 requested an immediate and complete briefing on the matter
before the Full Committee. Committee staff met with the NPPD
Chief of Staff on June 3, 2011 to discuss this matter.
From June 7 through 11, 2011, Committee staff joined Senate
and Department representatives on the United States-European
Union Expert Meeting on Critical Infrastructure Protection. The
meeting covered the following topics: Information sharing,
international cooperation, interdependencies, the economics of
critical infrastructure protection, and the threat of solar
weather on critical infrastructure.
On June 3, 2011, Committee staff received a briefing from
the Director of the National Space Weather Prediction Center on
the science of space weather predictions. This included an
overview of potential impacts of a heightened solar storm
season on critical infrastructure.
Committee staff received a briefing on June 7, 2011, on
IBM's Global Critical Infrastructure Project from the company's
Vice President. Staff received an overview of IBM's work to
improve government efficiency and information sharing,
particularly in the arenas of cyber security and supply chain
security.
Committee staff received a briefing on June 15, 2011, from
the Department on special events risk assessment and
prioritization process. Department experts explained the intra-
agency coordination process and the system for ranking various
events based on risk factors.
On June 16, 2011, Committee staff received a briefing on
underwater cable reliability from TE Connectivity. Underwater
cable and cable landings are critical infrastructure within the
spirit of the National Infrastructure Protection Plan. Staff
learned of the specific benefits and vulnerabilities of
underwater cable.
Committee staff received a briefing on June 16, 2011, from
the Office for Bombing Prevention on the status of the
Department's efforts to establish explosives detection canine
standards.
On July 20, 2011, Committee staff received a classified
briefing on DHS Critical Foreign Dependencies Initiative
(CFDI). The CFDI focuses on identifying infrastructure risks
and vulnerabilities across borders. DHS Office of
Infrastructure Protection and Risk Management Analysis staff
provided an overview of the methodology and criteria used in
determining dependencies.
Committee staff visited The University of Maryland Center
for Critical Infrastructure Sensor Networks on July 29, 2011.
The campus in College Park, Maryland is a Department of
Homeland Security Center of Excellence focusing on applied
science related to understanding and combating terrorism.
Applications for the sensor network include: Disaster response,
critical infrastructure protection, intelligence sharing. The
Center also houses START, the National Consortium for the Study
of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism.
On August 3, 2011, Committee staff met with staff from the
Government Accountability Office (GAO) requesting a review and
survey design for statutory dependency research project
initiated in May 2011.
Committee staff conducted a site visit to the Port of
Baltimore on August 30, 2011, and toured a cable landing ship
and held a meeting with a private company security director on
critical infrastructure protection and resiliency.
On October 6, 2011, Committee staff attended the
Congressional Solar Weather and Electro Magnetic Pulse
Briefing, hosted by DHS and the National Defense University.
Staff attended subsequent forums where Subcommittee Members
addressed the conference.
Committee staff received a briefing on November 3, 2011, on
the Department's Operation Global Shield, a border security and
counter-proliferation initiative.
On November 9, 2011, Committee staff visited the Department
of Defense (DoD) Cyber Command for an overview of activities,
legal authorities, and to visit the DoD-National Security
Agency Joint Operations Center.
The Subcommittee held a Member briefing on the present and
evolving threat to dam security on December 13, 2011.
Representatives from the Dams Sector Branch of the Office of
Infrastructure Protection, National Protection and Programs
Directorate (NPPD) of the Department of Homeland Security
responded to Member concerns.
Committee staff conducted a site visit with the DHS Science
and Technology Directorate to examine a tunnel plug project
demonstration on January 25, 2012. The demonstration was an
opportunity to learn about a new approach to halting flood
waters in the event of a natural or technological disaster to
preserve lives and infrastructure.
Committee staff received briefings on solar weather and
electromagnetic pulse impacts from DHS/FEMA, the private
sector, and the National Center for Atmospheric Research. The
National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) and the
University Consortium for Atmospheric Research provided staff
with an overview of its work on solar weather and a view of
current threats on March 22, 2012.
In cooperation with NCAR, the Federal Emergency Management
Agency, and the National Defense University, the Members of the
Subcommittee received a briefing on June 7, 2012, on the
tabletop exercise on solar weather impacts and public response.
On April 10, 2012, the Chair of the Full Committee and the
Subcommittee Chair sent a letter to the GAO requesting a study
of the Department of Homeland Security's Protective Security
Advisor (PSA) Program. The request asks that GAO identify
redundancies between the efforts of PSAs and other similar
representatives of the Department. It also requires a look at
consistency and continuity of communications and information
sharing within the Department and with critical infrastructure
owners and operators. The Protective Security Advisor program
is designed to provide owners and operators of critical
infrastructure with subject matter expertise on vulnerability
mitigation and infrastructure protection.
On June 7, 2012, the Subcommittee held a Member briefing
and tabletop exercise on the effects increased solar activity
or an electromagnetic pulse (EMP) could have on our Nation's
critical infrastructure. Representatives from the National
Defense University (NDU), the National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration (NOAA), and the Department of Homeland Security
(DHS) provided Members potential scenarios regarding how these
events could impact critical infrastructure in their districts.
The panel included segments on the following topics: Severe
Geomagnetic Storms, Severe Geomagnetic Storms vs. EMP and the
National Grid, Efforts Focused on the Cascade Effects on
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Protection, and Scenario One
and Impact Analysis.
On September 12, 2012, the Subcommittee held a hearing
entitled ``The EMP Threat: Examining the Consequences.'' The
Subcommittee received testimony from Hon. Trent Franks, a
Representative in Congress from the 2nd District of Arizona;
Mr.Joseph McClelland, Director, Office of Electric Reliability,
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission; Mr.Brandon Wales,
Director, Homeland Infrastructure Threat and Risk Analysis
Center, Department of Homeland Security; Mr.Michael A. Aimone,
Director, Business Enterprise Integration, Office of the Deputy
Undersecretary of Defense for Installations and Environment,
Office of Undersecretary of Defense for Acquisition,
Technology, and Logistics, Department of Defense; and Dr. Chris
Beck, President, Electric Infrastructure Security Council.
On October 11, 2012 bipartisan Committee staff traveled to
Ft. Meyer, Virginia for the Military District of Washington
interagency exercise, ``Capitol Shield.'' The exercise featured
DC, Maryland and Virginia homeland security and emergency
management agencies working with the Department of Defense,
Federal Protective Service, the Federal Emergency Management
Agency, the Department of Transportation, the Department of
Health and Human Services, and the DHS Office of Infrastructure
Protection. Sited in multiple locations, the exercise simulated
mass casualty events. Some examples include a coordinated IED
attack, Metro tunnel collapse, and a nuclear or WMD attack.
In preparation for the 2013 Presidential Inauguration,
Committee staff from the Subcommittees on Cybersecurity,
Infrastructure Protection and Security Technologies; Border and
Maritime Security; Emergency Preparedness, Response, and
Communications; and Counterterrorism and Intelligence attended
a Joint Command advance briefing on inauguration security. Held
at Ft. McNair, Virginia, the briefing covered crowd control,
threat analysis and event response planning.

FEDERAL PROTECTIVE SERVICE

The Federal Protective Service (FPS) is a vital component
within the Department of Homeland Security. The mission of the
FPS in securing Government buildings and its occupants is
critical to protecting thousands of Governmental employees
working in Federal buildings across the Nation.
On February 25, 2011, Committee staff visited an FPS
facility in Alexandria, Virginia. Staff received an overview of
the FPS mission to secure Federal buildings. The visit included
a briefing on the agency's legal authorities, as well as its
budget, recruiting, and training challenges.
The Subcommittee Chair sent a letter to the Government
Accountability Office (GAO) on March 8, 2011, requesting a
review of the management of the FPS concerning its contract
guard program. The Subcommittee Chair sent an additional letter
on March 14, 2011, requesting a comprehensive review of changes
in physical security in Federal facilities since September 11,
2001.
On May 23, 2011, the Deputy Director of FPS provided a
briefing for Committee staff on the corrective actions taken at
the Detroit Federal Building after a bombing attempt.
The Subcommittee Chair sent a letter to GAO on May 23,
2011, requesting a comprehensive review on FPS future plans
following the decision to move away from the Risk Assessment
Management Program.
On July 13, 2011, the Subcommittee held a hearing entitled
``Securing Federal Facilities: Challenges of the Federal
Protective Service and the Need for Reform.'' The Subcommittee
received testimony from Mr.L. Eric Patterson, Director, Federal
Protective Service; Mr.Mark L. Goldstein, Director Physical
Infrastructure, Government Accountability Office; Mr.Steve
Amitay, Legislative Counsel, National Association of Security
Companies; and Mr.David Wright, President, National Federal
Protective Service Union, American Federation of Government
Employees. This hearing allowed Members to examine several
perennial and reoccurring issues impacting the ability of the
FPS to complete its mission of securing and safeguarding
Federal facilities and their occupants. The hearing also
provided the recently appointed FPS Director an opportunity to
explain his vision for the organization, and provide the
Subcommittee an opportunity to identify areas of concern that
may need to be addressed through further Congressional
oversight and legislative reform.
On September 27, 2011, Committee staff met with
representatives from the Federal Protective Service Union to
discuss on-going concerns.
Committee staff met with representatives from GAO on
November 10, 2011, to discuss on-going work done at the request
of the Committee as well as preliminary findings.
On November 16, 2011, the Subcommittee Chair sent letters
to the GAO requesting an assessment of the adequacy of the
evacuation plans of Federal facilities; and an assessment of
how facility security risk assessments are conducted across the
Government.
Committee staff met with the Deputy Director of FPS on
February 14, 2012, to receive a briefing on the President's FY
2013 budget request.
Committee staff met with representatives from GAO on
February 27, 2012, to discuss on-going work done at the request
of the Committee as well as preliminary findings.
Committee staff received a briefing from the FPS Director
on February 29, 2012, regarding efforts by the FPS to develop
an interim risk management tool, training and certifications
for contract guards, and progress made toward implementing GAO
recommendations.
On May 15, 2012, Committee staff received a briefing from
the Deputy Director of FPS regarding the agency's role in
providing perimeter security for Federal buildings, and role
FPS played during the 2012 NATO Summit in Chicago.
On July 24, 2012, the Subcommittee convened a hearing
entitled, ``Securing Federal Facilities: An Examination of FPS
Progress in Improving Oversight and Assessing Risk.'' The
Subcommittee received testimony from Mr.L. Eric Patterson,
Director, Federal Protective Service, Department of Homeland
Security; Mr.Mark Goldstein, Director of Physical
Infrastructure Issues, Government Accountability Office; and
Dr. James Peerenboom, Director, Infrastructure Assurance
Center, Argonne National Laboratory. This hearing provided
Members an opportunity to examine FPS's progress toward
addressing several perennial challenges impacting the agency's
ability to complete its mission of securing Federal facilities
and their occupants. Specifically, this hearing focused on
FPS's development of an interim facility assessment tool, known
as the Modified Infrastructure Survey Tool (MIST), which was
developed in partnership with Argonne National Laboratory. The
hearing included discussion of GAO's preliminary findings of a
GAO review of FPS's efforts to assess facility risks and
oversee contract guards.
The Subcommittee received a report on August 10, 2012 from
the Government Accountability Office, entitled, ``Federal
Protective Service: Actions Needed to Assess Risk and Better
Manage Contract Guards at Federal Facilities'' [GAO-12-739].
The report found the FPS is not assessing risks at Federal
facilities in a manner consistent with standards of the
National Infrastructure Protection Plan's (NIPP) risk
management framework.
On August 24, 2012, Committee staff received a briefing
from representatives from the Argonne National Laboratory
regarding the National Laboratory's Homeland and National
Security Programs, including critical infrastructure
capabilities being leveraged by the Federal Protective Service.

IRANIAN CYBER THREATS

On April 26, 2012, the Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and
Intelligence and the Subcommittee on Cybersecurity,
Infrastructure Protection, and Security Technologies held a
joint hearing entitled ``Iranian Cyber Threat to the U.S.
Homeland.'' The Subcommittees received testimony from Mr.Frank
J. Cilluffo, Associate Vice President and Director, Homeland
Security Policy Institute, The George Washington University;
Mr.Ilan Berman, Vice President, American Foreign Policy
Council; and Mr.Roger Caslow, Executive Cyberconsultant, Suss
Consulting.

NORAD AND NORTHCOM

From November 27 through 30, 2012 the Majority Committee
staff traveled to NORAD/NORTHCOM/MDA (North American Aerospace
Defense Command / U.S. Northern Command / Missile Defense
Agency) in Colorado Springs, Colorado. The purpose of the trip
was to receive classified briefings on the nature of Department
of Defense and Homeland Security Intelligence and Information
Sharing, the Southwest Border Threat, Defense support to civil
authorities, an after-action report on Hurricane Sandy
response, and an executive briefing on military-civilian
coordination. Included in the discussions were NORAD/NORTHCOM's
joint cyber efforts, missile defense capabilities, and the
threat to the homeland from the perspective of the Defense
Intelligence Agency.

----------

Subcommittee Hearings Held

``Preventing Chemical Terrorism: Building a Foundation of
Security at Our Nation's Chemical Facilities.''
February 11, 2011. (Serial No. 112-3)
``Examining the Cyber Threat to Critical Infrastructure and the
American Economy.'' March 16, 2011. (Serial No. 112-11)
``The DHS Cybersecurity Mission: Promoting Innovation and
Securing Critical Infrastructure.'' Apr. 15, 2011.
(Serial No. 112-19)
``Unlocking the SAFETY Act's Potential to Promote Technology
and Combat Terrorism.'' May 26, 2011. (Serial No. 112-
26)
``H.R.2356, the `WMD Prevention and Preparedness Act of
2011.''' June 23, 2011. Joint hearing with the
Subcommittee on Emergency Preparedness, Response, and
Communications. (Serial No. 112-32)
``Examining the Homeland Security Impact of the Obama
Administration's Cybersecurity Proposal.'' June 24,
2011. (Serial No. 112-33)
``Securing Federal Facilities: Challenges of the Federal
Protective Service and the Need For Reform.'' July 13,
2011. (Serial No. 112-38)
``The Last Line of Defense: Federal, State, and Local Efforts
to Prevent Nuclear and Radiological Terrorism Within
the United States.'' July 26, 2011. (Serial No. 112-40)
``Cloud Computing: What are the Security Implications?''
October 6, 2011. (Serial No. 112-50)
``S&T on a Budget: Finding Smarter Approaches to Spur
Innovation, Impose Discipline, Drive Job Creation and
Strengthen Homeland Security.'' November 17, 2011.
(Serial No. 112-57)
``Hearing on Draft Legislative Proposal on Cybersecurity.''
December 6, 2011. (Serial No. 112-61)
``The Chemical Facilities Anti-Terrorism Standards Program:
Addressing Its Challenges and Finding a Way Forward.''
March 6, 2012. (Serial No. 112-74)
``The DHS and DOE National Labs: Finding Efficiencies and
Optimizing Outputs in Homeland Security Research and
Development.'' April 19, 2012. (Serial No. 112-84)
``Iranian Cyber Threat to the U.S. Homeland.'' Joint with the
Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and Intelligence.
April 26, 2012. (Serial No. 112-86)
``First Responder Technologies: Ensuring a Prioritized Approach
for Homeland Security Research and Development.'' May
9, 2012. Joint with the Subcommittee on Emergency
Preparedness, Response, and Communications. (Serial No.
112-90)
``Securing Ammonium Nitrate: Using Lessons Learned in
Afghanistan to Protect the Homeland from IED's.'' July
12, 2012. (Serial No. 112-105)
``Securing Federal Facilities: An Examination of FPS Progress
in Improving Oversight and Assessing Risk.'' July 24,
2012. (Serial No. 112-109)
``Preventing Nuclear Terrorism: Does DHS have an Effective and
Efficient Nuclear Detection Strategy?'' July 26, 2012.
(Serial No. 112-110)
``The EMP Threat: Examining the Consequences.'' September 12,
2012. (Serial No. 112-115)
``BioWatch Present and Future: Meeting Mission Needs for
Effective Biosurveillance?'' Joint with the
Subcommittee on Emergency Preparedness, Response, and
Communications. September 13, 2012. (Serial No. 112-
117)
Subcommittee on Transportation Security

Mike Rogers, Alabama, Chairman

Daniel E. Lungren,
California
Tim Walberg, Michigan
Chip Cravaack, Minnesota
Joe Walsh, Illinois, Vice
Chair
Robert L. Turner, New York
Peter T. King, New York
(Ex
Officio) Sheila Jackson Lee, Texas
Danny K. Davis, Illinois
Cedric L. Richmond, Louisiana
Ron Barber, Arizona
Bennie G. Thompson, Mississippi
(Ex Officio)

----------

During the 112th Congress, the Subcommittee on
Transportation Security held 23 hearings, receiving testimony
from 132 witnesses, and considered five measures.

----------

Legislative Activities of the Subcommittee

RISK-BASED SECURITY SCREENING FOR MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES ACT

Pub. L. 112-86 (H.R.1801)

To amend title 49, United States Code, to provide for expedited
security screenings for members of the Armed Forces.

Summary

This legislation directs the Transportation Security
Administration to develop and implement a plan to provide
expedited screening for any member of the U.S. Armed Forces--
and any accompanying family member--when that individual is
traveling on official orders through a primary airport.

Legislative History

H.R.1801 was introduced in the House on May 10, 2011, by
Mr.Cravaack, Mr.Bachus, and Mr.Rogers of Alabama, and referred
to the Committee on Homeland Security. Within the Committee,
H.R.1801 was referred to the Subcommittee on Transportation
Security.
The Subcommittee on Transportation Security considered
H.R.1801 on May 12, 2011, and ordered the measure reported,
favorably, to the Full Committee, without amendment, by voice
vote.
The Committee considered H.R.1801 on September 21, 2011,
and ordered the measure to be reported to the House, amended,
with a favorable recommendation, by voice vote.
The Committee reported H.R.1801 to the House on November 4,
2011, as H. Rpt. 112-271.
The House considered H.R.1801 under Suspension of the
Rules, and passed the measure by a two-thirds recorded vote of
404 yeas and none voting ``nay''.
H.R.1801 was received in the Senate on November 30, 2011,
read twice, and referred to the Senate Committee on Commerce,
Science, and Transportation.
The Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and
Transportation was discharged from further consideration by
unanimous consent on December 12, 2011. The Senate subsequently
passed H.R.1801, amended, by voice vote.
The House debated a motion to agree to concur in the Senate
amendment to H.R.1801 on December 19, 2011. On December 20,
2011, the House agreed to Suspend the Rules and concurred in
the Senate amendment to H.R.1801 by voice vote, clearing the
measure for the President.
H.R.1801 was presented to the President on December 23,
2011, and on January 3, 2012, was signed into law as Public Law
112-86.

TO REQUIRE THE TRANSPORTATION SECURITY ADMINISTRATION TO COMPLY WITH
THE UNIFORMED SERVICES EMPLOYMENT AND REEMPLOYMENT RIGHTS ACT.

Pub. L. 112-171 (H.R.3670 (S. 1990))

To require the Transportation Security Administration to comply
with the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights
Act.

Summary

This legislation amends the Aviation and Transportation
Security Act (Pub. L. 107-71) to require the Transportation
Security Administration (TSA) to be fully compliant with the
Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (Pub.
L. 103-353). TSA has stated that current practice conforms to
the requirements of H.R.3670, however, the legislation would
mandate this practice.

Legislative History

H.R.3670 was introduced in the House on December 14, 2011,
by Mr.Walz of Minnesota, Mr.Bilirakis, and Mr.Owens, and
referred to the Committee on Homeland Security, and the
Committee on Veterans' Affairs. Within the Committee, H.R.3670
was referred to the Subcommittee on Transportation Security.
The Committee on Veterans' Affairs considered H.R.3670 on
April 27, 2012, and ordered the measure to be reported to the
House by voice vote. The Committee on Veterans' Affairs
reported H.R.3670 to the House on May 18, 2012 as H. Rpt. 112-
487, Pt. I.
The House considered H.R.3670 on May 30, 2012, under
Suspension of the Rules and passed the measure by voice vote.
H.R.3670 was received in the Senate, on June 4, 2012, read
twice, and referred to the Senate Committee on Commerce,
Science, and Transportation.
On August 2, 2012, the Senate Committee on Commerce,
Science, and Transportation was discharged from further
consideration of H.R.3670 by unanimous consent, and the Senate
passed the bill, clearing the measure for the President.
H.R.3670 was presented to the President on August 7, 2012,
and the President signed H.R.3670 into law on August 16, 2012,
as Public Law 112-171.

NO-HASSLE FLYING ACT OF 2012

Pub. L. 112-218 S. 3542 (H.R.6028)

Summary

S. 3542 permits the Assistant Secretary of Homeland
Security (Transportation Security Administration) to use
discretion to determine, on a location-by-location basis, if
prescreening of checked baggage is necessary upon arrival in
the United States from a preclearance foreign airport and prior
to boarding a connecting domestic flight. Current practice
requires the baggage to be rescreened but does not require the
individual to be rescreened as well. S. 3542 allows the
Transportation Security Administration to streamline the
security process and allow employees to expend resources on
baggage that has not already been screened and cleared by
Transportation Security Administration screeners.

Legislative History

S. 3542 was introduced in the Senate on September 13, 2012,
by Ms. Klobuchar and Mr. Blunt, and referred to the Senate
Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
On November 29, 2012, the Senate, by unanimous consent,
discharged the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and
Transportation, considered S. 3542, and passed the measure,
with an amendment.
S. 3542 was received in the House on November 30, 2012, and
held at the Desk. The House considered S. 3542 under Suspension
of the Rules on December 12, 2012, and passed the bill,
clearing the measure for the President.
S. 3542 was presented to the President on December 14,
2012. S. 3542 was signed into law on December 20, 2012, as
Public Law 112-218.

TRANSPORTATION SECURITY ADMINISTRATION OMBUDSMAN
ACT OF 2011

H.R.1165

Summary

H.R.1165 enhances transportation security by providing
confidential, informal, and neutral assistance to address work-
place related problems of Transportation Security
Administration (TSA) employees by strengthening and refining
the role of the TSA Office of Ombudsman.

Legislative History

H.R.1165 was introduced in the House on March 17, 2011, by
Ms.Jackson Lee of Texas, Ms.Speier, Mr.Thompson of Mississippi,
and Mr.Davis of Illinois, and referred to the Committee on
Homeland Security. Within the Committee, H.R.1165 was referred
to the Subcommittee on Transportation Security.
The Subcommittee on Transportation Security considered
H.R.1165 on May 12, 2011, and ordered the measure reported,
favorably, to the Full Committee, amended, by voice vote.
The Committee considered H.R.1165 on September 21, 2011,
and ordered the measure to be reported to the House, amended,
with a favorable recommendation, by voice vote.
The Committee reported H.R.1165 to the House on November 4,
2011, as H. Rpt. 112-270.

AVIATION SECURITY STAKEHOLDER PARTICIPATION ACT OF 2011

H.R.1447

Summary

H.R.1447 directs the Assistant Secretary of the
Transportation Security Administration to establish an Aviation
Security Advisory Committee. The Assistant Secretary is
required to consult with the Advisory Committee on aviation
security matters and the development of recommendations to
improve aviation security.

Legislative History

H.R.1447 was introduced in the House on April 8, 2011, by
Mr.Thompson of Mississippi and Ms.Jackson Lee of Texas, and
referred to the Committee on Homeland Security. Within the
Committee, H.R.1447 was referred to the Subcommittee on
Transportation Security.
On September 21, 2011, the Subcommittee on Transportation
Security was discharged from further consideration of H.R.1447.
The Committee proceeded to the consideration of H.R.1447 and
ordered the measure to be reported to the House, without
amendment, by voice vote.
The Committee reported H.R.1447 to the House on November 4,
2011, as H. Rpt. 112-269.
The House considered H.R.1447 under Suspension of the
Rules, on June 26, 2012, and passed the bill on June 28, 2012,
by voice vote.
H.R.1447 was received in the Senate on June 29, 2012, read
twice, and referred to the Senate Committee on Commerce,
Science, and Transportation.

MODERNIZING OF DOCUMENTATION AND ELIMINATION OF REDUNDANT
IDENTIFICATION AND SECURITY CREDENTIALS ACT

H.R.1690

To amend titles 49 and 46, United States Code, and the Homeland
Security Act of 2002 to provide for certain improvements in
surface transportation security, and for other purposes.

Summary

H.R.1690 requires the Department of Homeland Security to
establish a comprehensive task force with representatives from
industry, labor, and Federal Government agencies to evaluate
the effects of harmonizing the disqualifying offenses and
waiver processes for transportation workers, evaluate potential
fee reductions for transportation workers, and provide its
recommendations to the Secretary of Homeland Security. The bill
ensures that airport operators continue to manage their own
security credentialing programs. This will give local airports
the flexibility they need to enhance their own security,
provided they meet minimum Federal standards.
This legislation eliminates a redundancy whereby commercial
motor vehicle operators must undergo a Federal security threat
assessment in order to obtain a Hazardous Materials Endorsement
(HME), which is needed to transport hazardous materials, and a
similar assessment to obtain a Transportation Worker
Identification Credential (TWIC), which is needed to enter onto
a port facility. Instead, this bill repeals the requirements
for a threat assessment as part of an HME, and requires all
commercial truck drivers who carry security-sensitive cargo to
simply obtain a TWIC. The Secretary of Homeland Security is
required to identify a list of all security-sensitive
materials--materials that have a security nexus and have
potential links to terrorism.

Legislative History

H.R.1690 was introduced in the House on May 3, 2011, by
Mr.Rogers of Alabama, Mr.McCaul, Mr.Walsh of Illinois, and
Mr.Brooks, and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security.
Within the Committee, H.R.1690 was referred to the Subcommittee
on Transportation Security.
On May 4, 2011 the Subcommittee on Transportation Security
held a hearing on ``H.R.1690, the MODERN Security Credentials
Act.'' The Subcommittee received testimony from Mr.Stephen
Sadler, Deputy Assistant Administrator, Transportation Threat
Assessment and Credentialing, Transportation Security
Administration, Department of Homeland Security; Mr.Darrell
S.Bowman, Group Leader, Advanced Systems and Applications,
Virginia Tech Transportation Institute; Ms.Jeanne M. Olivier,
A.A.E., Assistant Director, Aviation Security and Technology,
Aviation Department, The Port Authority of New York & New
Jersey, testifying on behalf of the American Association of
Airport Executives; Mr.Martin Rojas, Vice President, Security
and Operations, American Trucking Association; and Mr.Randall
H. Walker, Director of Aviation, Las Vegas McCarran
International Airport, Clark County Department of Aviation,
testifying on behalf of the Airports Council International--
North America.
The Subcommittee on Transportation Security considered
H.R.1690 on May 12, 2011, and ordered the measure favorably
reported to the Full Committee, amended, by voice vote.

H.R.2179

Summary

This legislation directs the Transportation Security
Administration (TSA) to transfer unclaimed money recovered at
airport security checkpoints to United Service Organizations,
Inc. for use in support of its airport centers. The legislation
will support the continued efforts of the United Service
Organizations, Inc. (USO) by providing funds to create a
welcoming and comfortable atmosphere at airports for our
dedicated military personnel and their families. Additionally,
this bill also directs TSA to provide clothing assistance to
homeless or needy veterans with unclaimed clothing recovered at
airport security checkpoints.

Legislative History

H.R.2179 was introduced in the House on June 14, 2011, by
Mr.Miller of Florida, and referred to the Committee on Homeland
Security. Within the Committee, H.R.2179 was referred to the
Subcommittee on Transportation Security.
On March 7, 2012, the Subcommittee on Transportation
Security considered H.R.2179 and reported the measure to the
Full Committee with a favorable recommendation, without
amendment, by voice vote.
The Full Committee considered H.R.2179 on March 28, 2012,
and ordered the measure to be favorably reported to the House,
amended, by voice vote.
The Committee reported H.R.2179 to the House on May 8,
2012, as H. Rpt. 112-468.

TRANSPORTATION SECURITY ADMINISTRATION AUTHORIZATION
ACT OF 2011

H.R. 3011

To authorize the programs of the Transportation Security
Administration relating to the provision of transportation
security, and for other purposes.

Summary

This legislation authorizes funding for fiscal years 2012
and 2013 for the Transportation Security Administration (TSA)
to carry out its mission of securing the Nation's
transportation systems. The bill specifically aims to
streamline and improve programs and address key issues at TSA
by increasing accountability, transparency, and reducing waste
and inefficiencies.

Legislative History

Prior to introduction of H.R.3011, the Subcommittee on
Transportation Security considered a Subcommittee print on
September 14, 2011, and ordered the measure to be reported to
the Full Committee, amended, by voice vote.
H.R.3011 was subsequently introduced in the House on
September 22, 2011, by Mr.Rogers of Alabama, Mr.King of New
York, Mr.Daniel E. Lungren of California, Mr.Walberg,
Mr.Cravaack, and Mr.Brooks, and referred the Committee on
Homeland Security and the Committee on the Judiciary.

PUBLIC TRANSIT SECURITY AND LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT
SUPPORT ACT

H.R.3857

Summary

H.R. 3857 amends the Implementing Recommendations of the 9/
11 Commission Act of 2007 to allow public transportation
agencies who receive grant funding for security improvements to
use such funds for specialized patrol teams as long as the
recipient submits a sustainment plan for maintaining the
capability or capacity in future years. The bill also
authorizes $400 million for TSGP grants for each of fiscal
years 2012 and 2013, except that no more than 50 percent of
those funds in each of the fiscal years may be used for
operational costs.

Legislative History

H.R.3857 was introduced in the House on January 31, 2012,
by Mr.Turner of New York, Mr.King of New York, Mr.Rogers of
Alabama, and Mr.Grimm, and referred to the Committee on
Homeland Security. Within the Committee, H.R.3857 was referred
to the Subcommittee on Emergency Preparedness, Response, and
Communications and the Subcommittee on Transportation Security.
The Subcommittee on Emergency Preparedness, Response and
Communications and the Subcommittee on Transportation Security
were discharged from further consideration of H.R.3857 on May
9, 2012.
The Full Committee considered H.R.3857 on May 9, 2012, and
ordered the measure to be reported to the House with a
favorable recommendation, amended, by voice vote.
The Committee reported H.R.3857 to the House on May 30,
2012 as H. Rpt. 112-498.
The House considered H.R.3857 under Suspension of the Rules
on September 11, 2012, and passed the measure on September 12,
2012 by a \2/3\ recorded vote of 355 yeas and 62 nays.
H.R.3857 was received in the Senate on September 13, 2012,
read twice, and referred to the Senate Committee on Homeland
Security and Governmental Affairs.

CLOTHE A HOMELESS HERO ACT

H.R.6328

Summary

This legislation directs the Transportation Security
Administration (TSA), in consultation with the Secretary of
Veterans Affairs, to transfer unclaimed clothing recovered at
any airport security checkpoint to local veteran organizations
or other local charitable organizations for distribution to
homeless or needy veterans and veteran families. This
legislation however does not prevent an airport or TSA from
donating unclaimed clothing to a charitable organization of
their choosing.

Legislative History

H.R. 6328 was introduced in the House on August 2, 2012, by
Ms. Hochul and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security.
Within the Committee, H.R. 6328 was referred to the
Subcommittee on Transportation Security.
The House considered H.R. 6328 under Suspension of the
Rules on November 27, 2012, and passed the bill by voice vote.
The Senate passed H.R. 6328, amended, on December 11, 2012,
by unanimous consent.

----------

Oversight Activities of the Subcommittee

THREATS TO AVIATION AND SURFACE TRANSPORTATION SECURITY

The Subcommittee conducted oversight activities to assess
the threats to aviation and surface transportation. Committee
staff met with a wide range of representatives from the
Transportation Security Administration (TSA), the
transportation industry, and other stakeholders to examine
information sharing, coordination among Federal, State, and
local partners, and other security matters. Intelligence
collected from Osama bin Laden's compound following his death
further emphasizes the threat to both our aviation and surface
transportation systems.
On February 10, 2011, the Subcommittee held a hearing
entitled ``Terrorism and Transportation Security.'' The
Subcommittee received testimony from Hon. John S.Pistole,
Administrator, Transportation Security Administration,
Department of Homeland Security. The purpose of this hearing
was to examine the TSA's progress in further developing
meaningful security measures, discuss the future of the agency
as a nimble counterterrorism organization, and identify areas
for operational improvements and cost savings in order to
strengthen TSA's effectiveness and efficiency at preventing
terrorism and protecting the traveling public.
On February 16, 2011, the Subcommittee held a classified
Member briefing on current threats to the Nation's aviation and
surface transportation security. Representatives from the
Transportation Security Administration were present to respond
to Member questions.
The Subcommittee Chair sent a letter to the Assistant
Administrator of the Transportation Security Administration on
February 17, 2011, requesting more detailed information on
TSA's aviation, pipeline, and surface transportation efforts.
On March 18, 2011, the Subcommittee received a reply.
On September 8, 2011, the Members of the Subcommittee
received a classified briefing from representatives from the
Transportation Security Administration on current threats to
the Nation's aviation and surface transportation security.
The Chair of the Full Committee and the Chair of the
Subcommittee sent a classified letter on November 15, 2011, to
the Assistant Secretary of Homeland Security for the
Transportation Security Administration. On December 8, 2011,
TSA provided the Committee with a classified response.
On November 16, 2011, the Subcommittee Chair received a
classified briefing on a vital transportation security matter.
On November 18, 2011, the Members of the Subcommittee received
a classified Member-only briefing on this issue.
Representatives from the Transportation Security Administration
and the Department of Homeland Security's Office of Inspector
General responded to Member concerns.
On June 4, 2012, the Members of the Subcommittee conducted
a site visit to Chicago, Illinois, to receive a briefing and
examine security operations at the Chicago O'Hare International
Airport.
On June 27, 2012, the Subcommittee held a classified Member
briefing on threats to transportation.
The Subcommittee on Transportation Security released a
majority staff report on September 10, 2012 entitled,
``Rebuilding TSA into a Smarter, Leaner Organization.'' The
report outlined the Subcommittee's findings and recommendations
to help TSA evolve to meet the next terrorist threat.
On September 11, 2012 the Subcommittee held a hearing
entitled, ``Eleven Years After 9/11 Can TSA Evolve To Meet the
Next Terrorist Threat?'' The Subcommittee received testimony
from Mr.Geoff Freeman, Chief Operating Officer, U.S. Travel
Association; Dr. James Jay Carafano, Ph.D., Deputy Director,
The Kathryn and Shelby Cullom Davis Institute for International
Studies and Director, Douglas and Sarah Allison Center for
Foreign Policy Studies, The Heritage Foundation; Mr.Sam
Gilliland, Chief Executive Officer, Sabre Holdings; Mr.John
Halinski, Deputy Administrator, Transportation Security
Administration; and Mr.Stephen Lord, Director, Homeland
Security and Justice Issues, Government Accountability Office.
The purpose of this hearing was to ask policy experts,
stakeholders and TSA leadership what steps TSA can take to
become a leaner, smarter organization and meet the needs of the
traveling public.
Members of the Subcommittee received a briefing on
September 19, 2012 from representatives from the Transportation
Security Administration and the Federal Aviation Administration
on efforts to address ongoing weaknesses in the flight school
student vetting process that could allow individuals on the No
Fly List to obtain flight training in the United States.

AIR CARGO SECURITY

On August 1, 2010, the Department of Homeland Security met
the mandate in the Implementing Recommendations of the 9/11
Commission Act (Pub.L. 110-53) to screen 100 percent of air
cargo transported on domestic passenger aircraft flights and
flights departing the United States. The Transportation
Security Administration (TSA) is still collecting data from air
carriers regarding their ability to screen 100 percent of all
in-bound cargo on international passenger flights. However, the
agency is confident it will soon have carrier data to verify
that this Congressional mandate has been met. The TSA has met
the Implementing Recommendation of the 9/11 Commission Act
(Pub. L. 110-53) mandate to screen 100 percent of domestic air
cargo. The TSA is still collecting data from air carriers
regarding their ability to screen 100 percent of all in-bound
cargo on international passenger flights. The Subcommittee
continues to discuss with private sector stakeholders and the
TSA methods to improve security in a risk based manner, while
promoting the free flow of commerce.
On March 9, 2011, the Subcommittee held a hearing entitled
``Securing Air Commerce From the Threat of Terrorism.'' The
Subcommittee received testimony from Mr.John Sammon, Assistant
Administrator, Transportation Sector Network Management,
Transportation Security Administration, Department of Homeland
Security; and Mr.Stephen Lord, Director, Homeland Security and
Justice Issues, Government Accountability Office. The purpose
of this hearing was to examine air cargo security including:
On-going challenges for securing inbound cargo on international
passenger flights; TSA's efforts to develop screening measures
in collaboration with industry and foreign partners; and the
technology available to conduct those screening measures.
On February 28, 2012, the Subcommittee held a Member
briefing on the progress of securing inbound air cargo. Members
received an update from the Transportation Security
Administration and industry representatives.

TRANSPORTATION WORKER IDENTIFICATION CREDENTIAL

The Subcommittee conducted oversight of the Transportation
Security Administration (TSA) on transportation security
credentialing programs, including the Transportation Worker
Identification Credential (TWIC) in order to eliminate
inefficiencies and redundancies within the threat assessment
process and reduce costs for card applicants. Committee staff
also met with private sector stakeholders representing
different modes of transportation to examine impacts of the
TWIC on their sectors.
On March 17, 2011, the Subcommittee Chair sent a letter to
the Government Accountability Office (GAO) requesting to be a
co-requestor of a report entitled ``Transportation Worker
Identification Credential: Internal Control Weaknesses Need to
Be Corrected to Help Achieve Security Objectives.'' The GAO
provided this report on May 10, 2011 [GAO-11-657].
On April 6, 2011, the Subcommittee held a Member briefing
on the TWIC Program. Representatives from the Transportation
Security Administration and the U.S. Coast Guard were present
to respond to Member questions.
Committee staff have continued to meet with representatives
from TSA and other relevant Government stakeholders, including
GAO, to learn about challenges facing the TWIC program, and
updates on the impending universal rule.

AVIATION SECURITY

The Subcommittee continued to examine passenger and baggage
screening technology and procedures, international cooperation
issues, and Transportation Security Administration's (TSA)
security programs in order to identify where progress has been
made, and where shortfalls remain in strengthening aviation
security.
In the 112th Congress, the Subcommittee Chair and Committee
Majority staff met with representatives from TSA and the
Federal Air Marshal Service to discuss the use of canines for
explosives detection. Similarly, the Subcommittee Chair met
with the State of Israel's Deputy Chief of Mission to discuss
international cooperation and aviation security and
counterterrorism efforts.
On March 11, 2011, the Subcommittee Chair sent a letter to
the Administrator of the TSA expressing concern with inaccurate
contractor reporting concerning test results for X-ray
technologies deployed by TSA in the Nation's airports.
On May 25, 2011 the Subcommittee received a Member briefing
on the Transportation Security Administration's authorization
for fiscal years 2012 and 2013. Members were briefed by
representatives from the Transportation Security
Administration.
The Subcommittee held a hearing on June 2, 2011, entitled
``Authorizing the Transportation Security Administration for
Fiscal Years 2012 and 2013.'' The Subcommittee received
testimony from Hon. John S.Pistole, Administrator,
Transportation Security Administration, Department of Homeland
Security.
Members of the Subcommittee received a briefing on June 14,
2011, on the TSA's Behavior Detection Officer Screening of
Passengers by Observation Techniques, or the SPOT program.
Committee staff met with various stakeholders from the
surface and aviation transportation industries to solicit their
input for the Transportation Security Administration
Authorization bill for Fiscal Years 2012 and 2013.
The Subcommittee held a hearing on July 12, 2011, entitled
``Industry Perspectives: Authorizing the Transportation
Security Administration for FY 2012 and 2013.'' The
Subcommittee received testimony from Mr.Tom Farmer, Assistant
Vice President, Security Safety and Operations, American
Association of Railroads; Mr.Martin Rojas, Vice President,
Security and Operations, American Trucking Association;
Ms.Wanda Dunham, Chief of Police and Emergency Management,
Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority, MARTA Police
Headquarters; Mr.Raymond Reese, Corporate Health, Safety and
Security Leader, Colonial Pipeline Company; Mr.John Risch,
Alternate National Legislative Director, United Transportation
Union; Mr.Peter J. Bunce, President and Chief Executive
Officer, General Aviation Manufacturers Association;
Mr.Nicholas E. Calio, President and Chief Executive Officer,
Air Transport Association; Mr.Steve Alterman, President, Cargo
Airline Association; and Mr.Christopher Witkowski, Director,
Air Safety, Health and Security, Association of Flight
Attendants--CWA. The purpose of this hearing was to examine the
perspectives of industry representatives on the need for
comprehensive authorization act for the Transportation Security
Administration.
The Subcommittee held a classified Member-only briefing on
July 20, 2011, to examine covert testing results at
Transportation Security Administration passenger screening
checkpoints. Representatives from the Government Accountability
Office were present to respond to Member concerns.
On October 14, 2011, the Chair of the Subcommittee sent a
letter to the Administrator of the TSA expressing concern with
a recent court finding of a potentially flawed bidding process
for private security screeners at one of the Nation's airports.
The TSA provided a response to the Subcommittee on November 10,
and December 12, 2011.
The Chair of the Subcommittee sent a letter to the
Inspector General of the Department of Homeland Security on
November 2, 2011, regarding the recent allegations of perimeter
security breaches at one of the Nation's largest airports. The
Inspector General provided the Committee with a classified
report in February 2012 on this issue.
On November 30, 2011, the Subcommittee Chair and
Mr.Farenthold sent a letter to the Administrator of the TSA
requesting more information about TSA's use of storage
facilities nation-wide. In response, representatives from TSA
met with the Subcommittee Chair and Mr.Farenthold to discuss
the use of storage facilities.
On December 8, 2011, the Subcommittee held a hearing
entitled ``A Review of Passenger Screening Technology at U.S.
Airports.'' The Subcommittee received testimony from Hon. John
S.Pistole, Administrator, Transportation Security
Administration, Department of Homeland Security; Ms.Gale D.
Rossides, Deputy Administrator, Transportation Security
Administration, Department of Homeland Security; Mr.Robin E.
Kane, Assistant Administrator for Security Technology,
Transportation Security Administration, Department of Homeland
Security; Hon. Caryn Wagner, Under Secretary, Office of
Intelligence and Analysis, Department of Homeland Security; Dr.
Tara O'Toole, Under Secretary, Science and Technology
Directorate, Department of Homeland Security; Dr. Cedric Sims,
Executive Director, Office of Program Accountability and Risk
Management, Management Directorate, Department of Homeland
Security; Mr.Charles K. Edwards, Acting Inspector General,
Office of Inspector General, Department of Homeland Security;
Ms.Anne Richards, Assistant Inspector General for Audits,
Office of Inspector General, Department of Homeland Security;
and Mr.Stephen M. Lord, Director, Homeland Security and Justice
Issues, Government Accountability Office.
The Subcommittee Members received a classified briefing on
March 21, 2012, updating them on the concerns raised at the
December 8, 2011, hearing. Members were provided an update by
representatives from the Government Accountability Office.
Members of the Subcommittee conducted a site visit on
February 6, 2012, to Washington Dulles International Airport.
Members had the opportunity to observe the cargo and baggage
screening facilities, the Transportation Security Operations
Center (TSOC), and the Transportation Security Administration's
pilot program to test Credential Authentication Technology
Boarding Pass Scanning System (CAT/BPSS). On May 30, 2012,
Members of the Subcommittee conducted a site visit to TSA's
systems integration integrity facility to receive a
demonstration and additional details of CAT/BPSS.
On February 7 and 16, 2012, the Subcommittee held a hearing
entitled ``Screening Partnership Program: Why is a Job-
Creating, Public-Private Partnership Meeting Resistance at
TSA?'' The Subcommittee received testimony from Hon. John
S.Pistole, Administrator, Transportation Security
Administration, Department of Homeland Security; Mr.Mark
VanLoh, A.A.E., Director, Aviation Department, Kansas City
International Airport; Stephen D. Amitay, Esq., Federal
Legislative Counsel, National Association of Security
Companies; and Mr.John Gage, National President, American
Federation of Government Employees. The purpose of this hearing
was to examine the TSA Screening Partnership Program (SPP) and
discuss TSA's ability to make responsible contracting
decisions, while ensuring that taxpayer dollars are not wasted.
On March 1, 2012, the Chair of the Subcommittee sent a letter
to TSA following up on questions raised at this hearing. The
Subcommittee received a response on March 28, 2012.
The Subcommittee held a hearing on February 16, 2012,
entitled ``Last Line of Defense: The Federal Air Marshal
Service 10 Years After 9/11.'' The Subcommittee received
testimony from Mr.Robert S.Bray, Assistant Administrator for
Law Enforcement, Director, Federal Air Marshal Service,
Transportation Security Administration, Department of Homeland
Security; Mr.Michael Novak, Assistant Administrator, Training
and Workforce Engagement, Transportation Security
Administration, Department of Homeland Security; Mr.Roderick J.
Allison, Deputy Assistant Administrator for Law Enforcement,
Deputy Director, Federal Air Marshal Service, Transportation
Security Administration, Department of Homeland Security; and
Mr.Charles K. Edwards, Acting Inspector General, Office of the
Inspector General, Department of Homeland Security. The purpose
of this hearing was to assess the continued value and impact of
the Federal Air Marshal Service (FAMS) on aviation security;
learn about changes to FAMS as a result of the Transportation
Security Administration's recent internal reorganization; and
discuss the impact of the President's FY 2013 budget request.
On March 28, 2012, the Subcommittee held a hearing entitled
``Rightsizing TSA Bureaucracy and Workforce Without
Compromising Security.'' The Subcommittee received testimony
from Mr.David Nicholson, Assistant Administrator, Finance and
Administration and Chief Financial Officer, Transportation
Security Administration, Department of Homeland Security;
Mr.Christopher L. McLaughlin, Assistant Administrator, Security
Operations, Transportation Security Administration, Department
of Homeland Security; Mr.Sean J. Byrne, Assistant
Administrator, Human Capital, Transportation Security
Administration; Department of Homeland Security; and Mr.James
G. Duncan, Assistant Administrator, Professional
Responsibility, Transportation Security Administration,
Department of Homeland Security. The purpose of this hearing
was to examine the large number of Full Time Equivalent
employees at the Transportation Security Administration,
despite a net decrease in the number of passengers traveling
each year in the United States.
Members of the Subcommittee received a classified briefing
on April 25, 2012, on passenger screening technology at the
Nation's airports.
The Subcommittee held a hearing on May 16, 2012, entitled
``Access Control Point Breaches at Our Nation's Airports:
Anomalies or Systemic Failures?'' The Subcommittee received
testimony from Mr.John P. Sammon, Assistant Administrator,
Office of Security Policy and Industry Engagement,
Transportation Security Administration, Department of Homeland
Security; Mr.Charles K. Edwards, Acting Inspector General,
Department of Homeland Security; Mr.Mark Crosby, Chief of
Public Safety and Security, Portland International Airport,
testifying on behalf of the American Association of Airport
Executives; Captain Sean P. Cassidy, First Vice President, Air
Line Pilots Association, International; and Mr.William Swift,
Chairman, Airport Minority Advisory Council. The purpose of
this hearing was to discuss with TSA and its partners recent
breaches of security at airports across the country.
Additionally, this hearing examined coordination across all
entities with respect to the background checks that airports
and airline workers are subject to, and assessed whether those
background checks are sufficient.
On May 17, 2012, the Chair and Ranking Member of the
Subcommittee sent a letter to the Administrator of the
Transportation Security Administration regarding testimony
received at the May 16, 2012 hearing and a recent Department of
Homeland Security Inspector General report entitled
``Transportation Security Administration's Efforts to Identify
and Track Breaches at Our Nation's Airports'' [OIG-12-80].
On June 7, 2012 the Subcommittee held a hearing entitled,
``TSA's Efforts to Fix Its Poor Customer Service Reputation and
Become a Leaner, Smarter Agency.'' The Subcommittee received
testimony from the Honorable John S.Pistole, Administrator,
Transportation Security Administration. The purpose of the
hearing was to provide an opportunity for the TSA Administrator
to describe efforts to develop TSA to become a more efficient
and effective agency in order to improve its overall
relationship with the flying public while continuing to perform
its mission.
The Subcommittee received a briefing on June 7, 2012 from
representatives from the Government Accountability Office on
the Transportation Security Administration's Alien Flight
Student Program.
On June 20, 2012 the Chair of the Subcommittee sent a
letter to the Administrator of the Transportation Security
Administration regarding a recent Government Accountability
Office report [GAO-12-875] on General Aviation Security and the
Transportation Security Administration's Alien Flight Student
Program. The Committee received a response on August 31, 2012.
On July 10, 2012, the Subcommittee held a hearing entitled,
``Challenging the Status Quo at TSA: Perspectives on the Future
of Transportation Security.'' The Subcommittee received
testimony from Dr. Richard Bloom, Associate Vice President for
Academics and Director for Terrorism, Espionage, and Security
Studies, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University; Mr.Robert Poole,
Searle Freedom Trust Transportation Fellow and Director of
Transportation Policy, Reason Foundation; Mr.Rick ``Ozzie''
Nelson, Senior Fellow and Director, Homeland Security and
Counterterrorism Program, Center for Strategic and
International Studies; Mr.Tom Blank, Executive Vice President,
Gephardt Government Affairs, Gephardt Group; and Ms.Colby
Alonso, Flight Attendant for US Airways, testifying on behalf
of the Association of Flight Attendants. The purpose of this
hearing was to identify innovative ideas to secure critical
transportation infrastructure.
The Subcommittee held a hearing on July 11, 2012 entitled,
``Has TSA Met the Deadline to Provide Expedited Screening to
Military Service Members?'' The Subcommittee received testimony
from Mr.Chris McLaughlin, Assistant Administrator for Security
Operations, Transportation Security Administration; and Mr.Todd
Rosenblum, Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for
Homeland Defense and Americas' Security Affairs, U.S.
Department of Defense. The purpose of this hearing was to
examine how the Transportation Security Administration and the
Department of Defense are implementing the requirements
outlined in Pub. L. 112-86, the Risk-Based Security Screening
for Members of the Armed Forces Act.
The Chair of the Subcommittee sent a letter on July 13,
2012 to the Administrator of the Transportation Security
Administration to solicit feedback regarding recommendations
raised to improve TSA's efficiency and effectiveness at the
July 10, 2012 hearing held by the Subcommittee. The
Subcommittee received a response on August 28, 2012.
On July 18, 2012, the Subcommittee held a hearing entitled,
"A Decade After 9/11 Could American Flight Schools Still
Unknowingly Be Training Terrorists?" The Subcommittee received
testimony from Mr.Stephen Lord, Director, Homeland Security and
Justice Issues, Government Accountability Office; Mr.Kerwin
Wilson, General Manager for General Aviation, Office of
Security Policy and Industry Engagement, Transportation
Security Administration; Mr.John Woods, Assistant Director,
National Security Investigations, U.S. Immigration and Customs
Enforcement; Mr.Jens C. Hennig, Vice President of Operations,
General Aviation Manufacturers Association; and Mr.Douglas
Carr, Vice President of Safety, Security, Operations &
Regulation, National Business Aviation Association. On that
same day, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) released a
report [GAO-12-875] entitled, ``General Aviation Security:
Weaknesses Exist in TSA's Process for Ensuring Foreign Flight
Students Do Not Pose a Security Threat.'' The purpose of this
hearing was for the agencies and industry stakeholders involved
with the Alien Flight Student Program to discuss how they are
ensuring that foreign nationals enrolling in U.S. flight
schools are being properly vetted before they receive flight
training and apply for an FAA airman's certificate.
On July 19, 2012 the Chair and Members of the Subcommittee
sent a letter to the Administrator of the Transportation
Security Administration regarding the issue of whether TSA vets
people against the No Fly list who apply for flight lessons.
The Committee received a response on August 31, 2012.
The Chairman of the Subcommittee sent a letter on July 27,
2012 to the Secretary of Homeland Security regarding the
findings of a recent GAO report entitled, ``General Aviation
Security: Weaknesses Exist in TSA's Process for Ensuring
Foreign Flight Students Do Not Pose a Security Threat'' [GAO-
12-875]. The Committee received a response on August 31, 2012.
On August, 1, 2012, the Subcommittee held a hearing
entitled, ``Breach of Trust: Addressing Misconduct Among TSA
Screeners.'' The Subcommittee received testimony from Mr.John
Halinski, Deputy Administrator, Transportation Security
Administration. The purpose of this hearing was to establish on
the record TSA's efforts to weed out employees prone to
criminal or negligent behavior before they become another bad
news story for TSA, and to examine how TSA adjudicates cases
where employee misconduct has occurred.
The Chair of the Subcommittee sent a letter on August 14,
2012 to the Administrator of the Transportation Security
Administration regarding the explosives detection canine
breeding and training program at Lackland Air Force Base. The
Subcommittee received a response on September 11, 2012.
On September 20, 2012 the Chair of the Subcommittee on
Transportation Security and the Chair of the Subcommittee on
Oversight, Investigations, and Management sent a letter to the
Government Accountability Office requesting a comprehensive
review of TSA's Pre-Check trusted traveler program. GAO has
indicated that they will begin this review in 2013.

TECHNOLOGY PROCUREMENT

On September 22, 2011, the Subcommittee held a hearing
entitled ``TSA Reform: Exploring Innovations in Technology
Procurement to Stimulate Job Growth.'' The Subcommittee
received testimony from Ms.Elaine C. Duke, President, Elaine
Duke & Associates, LLC; Mr.Michael P. Jackson, President,
Firebreak Partners, LLC; and Mr.Stephen M. Lord, Director,
Homeland Security and Justice Issues, Government Accountability
Office.
On October 13, 2011, the Subcommittee continued its hearing
from September, receiving testimony from Mr.Marc A. Pearl,
President and CEO, Homeland Security and Defense Business
Council; Mr.Scott Boylan, Vice President and General Counsel,
Safran Morpho Detection; and Mr.Guy Ben-Ari, Deputy Director,
Defense-Industrial Initiatives Group, Fellow, International
Security Program, Center for Strategic and International
Studies.
The Subcommittee continued its examination on November 3,
2011, with a hearing entitled ``TSA Reform: Exploring
Innovations in Technology Procurement to Stimulate Job Growth,
Part III.'' The Subcommittee received testimony from Dr. Nick
Nayak, Chief Procurement Officer, Department of Homeland
Security; Mr.Robin E. Kane, Assistant Administrator, Security
Technology, Transportation Security Administration, Department
of Homeland Security; Mr.Paul Benda, Chief of Staff, Director,
Homeland Security Advanced Research Projects Agency, Department
of Homeland Security, accompanied by Dr. Susan Hallowell,
Director, Transportation Security Laboratory; and Mr.Charles K.
Edwards, Acting Inspector General, Department of Homeland
Security. This series of hearings provided Members an
opportunity to examine innovative solutions to technology
procurement challenges at TSA, an agency that expends
significant funds each year on developing, purchasing, and
maintaining screening technology. The TSA is by far the largest
purchaser of detection equipment for the Department, with over
$2 billion in inventories in 2012, representing 66 percent of
the Department's assets according to a recent DHS Inspector
General report.
The Subcommittee Chair sent a letter to the Government
Accountability Office on February 22, 2012, requesting to be a
co-requestor of a report on the Transportation Security
Administration's National Explosives Detection Canine Program.
The GAO undertook a review, and released its report on December
13, 2012 , entitled ``TSA Explosives Detection Canine Program:
Actions Needed to Analyze Data and Ensure Canine Teams Are
Effectively Utilized'' [GAO-13-54SU].
On June 19, 2012 the Subcommittee held a hearing entitled,
``Is TSA's Planned Purchase of CAT/BPSS a Wise Use of Taxpayer
Dollars?'' The Subcommittee received testimony from Mr.Kelly
Hoggan, Assistant Administrator, Office of Security
Capabilities, Transportation Security Administration and
Mr.Steven M. Lord, Director, Homeland Security and Justice
Issues, Government Accountability Office. The purpose of this
hearing was to determine, before TSA got further along in the
procurement process, to what extent the agency has developed
meaningful requirements, cost-benefit analyses, and identified
operational challenges for the Credential Authentication
Technology Boarding Pass Scanning System (CAT/BPSS).
On November 15, 2012, the Subcommittee held a hearing
entitled ``TSA's Recent Scanner Shuffle: Real Strategy or
Wasteful Smokescreen?'' The Subcommittee received testimony
from Mr. Jonathan Cantor, Acting Chief Privacy, Department of
Homeland Security; and Mr. John Sanders, Assistant
Administrator, Office of Security Capabilities, Transportation
Security Administration, Department of Homeland Security. The
purpose of this hearing was to investigate TSA's decision to
move 91 backscatter machines totaling $13.7 million into TSA
warehouse storage facilities and not utilize these machines at
airports across the country.

TRANSPORTATION SECURITY ADMINISTRATION REORGANIZATION

On December 1, 2011, the Subcommittee Members received a
briefing on the Transportation Security Administration's
internal reorganization from representatives from the
Transportation Security Administration.

AVIATION SECURITY EFFORTS IN FOREIGN NATIONS

On March 22, 2012, the Subcommittee held a Member briefing
on the delayed Rule for Aircraft Repair Station Security.
Representatives from the Transportation Security Administration
(TSA) and industry representatives were present to respond to
Member questions.
On March 27, 2012, the Chair of the Subcommittee and
Mr.Walberg sent a letter to the Secretary of Homeland Security
regarding the delayed rulemaking for Aircraft Repair Station
Security. On May 4, 2012, the Subcommittee received a response.
The Subcommittee held a hearing on April 7, 2011, entitled
``Strengthening International Cooperation on Aviation
Security.'' The Subcommittee received testimony from Mr.John W.
Halinski, Assistant Administrator, Office of Global Strategies,
Transportation Security Administration; Mr.Filip Cornelis, Head
of Unit for Aviation Security, Directorate General for Mobility
and Transport, European Commission; Mr.Rafi Ron, President, New
Age Security Solutions; and Mr.Jim Marriott, Chief, Aviation
Security Branch, International Civil Aviation Organization.
This hearing examined international standards that are designed
to ensure the security of both passenger and all-cargo
aircraft; how the United States works with its foreign partners
to ensure screening equipment is up-to-date and adequate for
the volume and type of passengers, baggage, and cargo it needs
to screen; the success of the foreign airport assessments
program; and how TSA shares information on security technology,
passenger name record data, and other vital security protocols
with foreign partners. On May 4, 2012, the Subcommittee
received a response.
On May 8, 2012, the Subcommittee held a hearing entitled
``Building Secure Partnerships in Travel, Commerce, and Trade
with the Asia-Pacific Region.'' The Subcommittee received
testimony from Mr.John Halinski, Assistant Administrator,
Office of Global Strategies, Transportation Security
Administration, Department of Homeland Security; Mr.Mark
Koumans, Deputy Assistant Secretary, Office of International
Affairs, Department of Homeland Security; Hon. Hans G. Klemm,
Economic Coordinator, U.S. Senior Official for Asia-Pacific
Economic Cooperation, Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs,
U.S. Department of State; Mr.Gary E. Wade, Vice President
Security, Atlas Air Worldwide Holdings, Inc., testifying on
behalf of the Cargo Airline Association; Ms.Dorothy Reimold,
Assistant Director, Security and Travel Facilitation,
International Air Transport Association; Mr.Roger Dow,
President and Chief Executive Officer, U.S. Travel Association;
and Mr.Michael C. Mullen, Executive Director, Express
Association of America. The purpose of this hearing was to
discuss the economic and security ties between the United
States and Asia; the Department of Homeland Security's work in
Asia, including air cargo security; and information sharing
both amongst the Department and its private sector partners,
and amongst the Nation's public and private sector entities and
their Asia-Pacific counterparts. The hearing followed a
delegation of bipartisan Committee Members and Staff to the
People's Republic of China, the Republic of Korea, and Japan to
gain first-hand knowledge of aviation security, rail security,
rail and mass transit security, counterterrorism measures,
intelligence and information sharing, and global supply chain
security in the countries visited.
On May 31, 2012, the Subcommittee on Oversight,
Investigations, and Management, and the Subcommittee on
Transportation Security held a joint Member briefing on the
Transportation Security Administration's (TSA) coordination on
aviation security with foreign countries. Representatives from
TSA were present to respond to Member questions.

SURFACE TRANSPORTATION SECURITY

From May 14 through 15, 2012, the Subcommittee conducted a
Member site visit to New York City, New York. Members examined
security issues including tours of the Jamaica Station Transit
Hub, Red Hook Container Terminal, Brooklyn-Battery Tunnel, New
York Police Department Lower Manhattan Security Initiative, 9/
11 Memorial, Ground Zero and Port Authority Trans-Hudson
Station. The Members also received a rail security briefing on-
board Amtrak.
On May 31, 2012, the Subcommittee held a hearing entitled
``TSA's Surface Inspection Program: Strengthening Security or
Squandering Scant Resources?'' The Subcommittee received
testimony from Chief John O'Connor, Amtrak Police Department;
Mr.Skip Elliott, Vice President, Public Safety and Environment,
CSX; Mr.Philip L. Byrd Sr., President, Bulldog Hiway Express,
testifying on behalf of the American Trucking Associations;
Mr.William C. Blankenship, Chief Operating Officer, Greyhound
Lines, Inc.; and Mr.Doug Morris, Director, Safety and Security
Operations, Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association.
This hearing provided Members an opportunity to examine the
Surface Transportation Security Inspection Program and its
budget. Stakeholder perspectives of the program were discussed,
as well as other surface transportation-related issues.
On June 20, 2012, Members of the Subcommittee received a
briefing from representatives from the Association of American
Railroads on railroad security.

----------

Subcommittee Hearings Held

``Terrorism and Transportation Security.'' February 10, 2011.
(Serial No. 112-2)
``Securing Air Commerce From the Threat of Terrorism.'' March
9, 2011. (Serial No. 112-8)
``Strengthening International Cooperation on Aviation
Security.'' April 7, 2011. (Serial No. 112-17)
``H.R.1690, the `MODERN Security Credentials Act.''' May 4,
2011. (Serial No. 112-23)
``Authorizing the Transportation Security Administration for
Fiscal Years 2012 and 2013.'' June 2, 2011. (Serial No.
112-28)
``Industry Perspectives: Authorizing the Transportation
Security Administration for FY 2012 and 2013.'' July
12, 2011. (Serial No. 112-28)
``TSA Reform: Exploring Innovations in Technology Procurement
to Stimulate Job Growth.'' September 22, 2011. (Serial
No. 112-46)
``TSA Reform: Exploring Innovations in Technology Procurement
to Stimulate Job Growth, Part II.'' October 13, 2011.
(Serial No. 112-46)
``TSA Reform: Exploring Innovations in Technology Procurement
to Stimulate Job Growth, Part III.'' November 3, 2011.
(Serial No. 112-46)
``A Review of Passenger Screening Technology at U.S.
Airports.'' December 8, 2011. (Classified Hearing)
``Screening Partnership Program: Why is a Job-Creating, Public-
Private Partnership Meeting Resistance at TSA?''
February 7, 16, 2012. (Serial No. 112-66)
``Last Line of Defense: the Federal Air Marshal Service 10
Years After 9/11.'' February 16, 2012. (Serial No.
112-69)
``Rightsizing TSA Bureaucracy and Workforce Without
Compromising Security.'' March 28, 2012. (Serial No.
112-80)
``Building Secure Partnerships in Travel, Commerce, and Trade
with the Asia-Pacific Region.'' May 8, 2012. (Serial
No. 112-89)
``Access Control Point Breaches at Our Nation's Airports:
Anomalies or Systematic Failures.'' May 16, 2012.
(Serial No. 112-91)
``TSA's Surface Inspection Program: Strengthening Security or
Squandering Scant Resources?'' May 31, 2012. (Serial
No. 112-95)
``TSA's Efforts to Fix Its Poor Customer Service Reputation and
Become a Leaner, Smarter Agency.'' June 7, 2012.
(Serial No. 112-97)
``Is TSA's Planned Purchase of CAT/BPSS a Wise Use of Taxpayer
Dollars?'' June 19, 2012. (Serial No. 112-99)
``Challenging the Status Quo at TSA: Perspectives on the Future
of Transportation Security'' July 10, 2012. (Serial No.
112-103)
``Has TSA Met the Deadline to Provide Expedited Screening to
Military Service Members?'' July 11, 2012. (Serial No.
112-104)
``A Decade After 9/11 Could American Flight Schools Still
Unknowingly Be Training Terrorists?'' July 18, 2012.
(Serial No. 112-106)
``Breach of Trust: Addressing Misconduct Among TSA Screeners.''
August 1, 2012. (Serial No. 112-112)
``Eleven Years After 9/11 Can TSA Evolve To Meet the Next
Terrorist Threat?'' September 11, 2012. (Serial No.
112-114)
``TSA's Recent Scanner Shuffle: Real Strategy or Wasteful
Smokescreen?'' November 15, 2012. (Serial No. 112-121)
Subcommittee on Oversight, Investigations, and Management

Michael T. McCaul, Texas, Chairman

Gus M. Bilirakis, Florida
Billy Long, Texas
Jeff Duncan, South Carolina
Tom Marino, Pennsylvania
Peter T. King, New York
(Ex
Officio) William R. Keating, Massachusetts
Yvette D. Clarke, New York
Danny K. Davis, Illinois
Bennie G. Thompson, Mississippi
(Ex Officio)

----------

During the 112th Congress, the Subcommittee on Oversight,
Investigations, and Management held 22 hearings, receiving
testimony from 94 witnesses, and considered one measure.

----------

Legislative Activities of the Subcommittee

WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTION ENHANCEMENT ACT OF 2011

Pub. Law 112-199 S. 743 (H.R.3289)

Summary

S. 743 amends Federal personnel law so that protections
relating to whistleblowers apply to a disclosure of any
violation of law. Such protections are listed and expanded on
from the Whistleblower Protection Act of 1989. Section 109 of
this bill extends whistleblower and other anti-discrimination
protections to employees, and applicants for employment, of the
Transportation Security Administration. S. 743 adds the Office
of the Director of National Intelligence and the National
Reconnaissance Office to the list of intelligence community
entities excluded from coverage under the Whistleblower
Protection Act of 1989. Title II directs the intelligence
community, specifically the Director of National Intelligence,
to prescribe regulations to ensure personnel action would not
be taken against an employee of the intelligence community as a
reprisal for any whistleblower disclosure relating to
intelligence activities. The Director of National Intelligence
must also create an appellate review board to hear
whistleblower appeals and submit a report to Congress on the
status of the implementation of such regulations.

Legislative History

S. 743, the Senate companion measure, was introduced in the
Senate on April 6, 2011, by Mr.Akaka and 13 original co-
sponsors and referred to the Senate Committee on Homeland
Security and Governmental Affairs.
The Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental
Affairs considered S.743 on October 19, 2011, and ordered the
measure to be reported to the Senate with an amendment,
favorably.
The Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental
Affairs reported S.743 to the Senate on April 19, 2012 as
S.Rpt. 112-155.
The Senate considered and passed S.743 by unanimous consent
on May 8, 2012.
S. 743 was received in the House on May 9, 2012, and
referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform,
and in addition to the House Permanent Select Committee on
Intelligence and the Committee on Homeland Security, for a
period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker. Within the
Committee, S.743 was referred to the Subcommittee on Oversight,
Investigations, and Management, and in addition to the
Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and Intelligence.
The Chair of the Committee on Homeland Security sent a
letter to the Chair of the Committee on Oversight and
Government Reform on September 19, 2012, agreeing to waive
further consideration of S.743 in order to expedite
consideration on the House Floor. The letter further requested
the appointment of Conferees should a House-Senate Conference
be called. On that same date, the Chair of the Committee on
Oversight and Government Reform responded and agreed to the
jurisdictional interests of the Committee, the request for an
appointment of Conferees, and the agreement to waive further
consideration.
The House agreed, by unanimous consent, on September 28,
2012, to discharge the Committee on Oversight and Government
Reform, the Committee on Homeland Security, and the Permanent
Select Committee on Intelligence from further consideration of
S. 743 and passed the bill, as amended.
On November 13, 2012, the Senate concurred in the amendment
of the House to S. 743.
S. 743 was presented to the President on November 16, 2012.
Signed into law on November 27, 2012, as Public Law 112-199.

DHS AUDIT REQUIREMENT TARGET ACT OF 2012

Pub. L. 112-217 S. 1998 (H.R. 5941)

To obtain an unqualified audit opinion, and improve financial
accountability and management at the Department of Homeland
Security.

Summary

S. 1998 would improve financial accountability and
management at the Department by requiring the Secretary to take
all the necessary steps to ensure all financial statements of
the Department are consolidated and ready in a timely manner in
preparation for an audit. S. 1998 would also ensure progress in
implementing the Department of Homeland Security Financial
Accountability Act by requiring the DHS Chief Financial Officer
to report to Congress until the Department is able to reach an
unqualified opinion. This report would include DHS' progress
and plans to meet its audit requirements. Specifically, this
report would: Discuss plans and resources needed to meet the
deadlines to obtain an unqualified opinion on the full set of
financial statements; address how the Department will eliminate
material weaknesses and significant deficiencies in internal
controls over financial reporting; provide deadlines for the
elimination of such weaknesses and deficiencies; and include
efforts to modernize the financial management systems of the
Department, including timelines, goals, alternatives, and costs
of the plan.

Legislative History

S. 1998 was introduced in the Senate on December 15, 2011,
by Mr. Brown of Massachusetts, Mr. Carper, and Mr. Johnson, and
referred to the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and
Governmental Affairs.
The Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental
Affairs considered S. 1998 on April 25, 2012, and ordered the
measure to be reported to the Senate, with an Amendment in the
Nature of a Substitute, favorably. The Senate Committee on
Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs reported S. 1998 on
November 20, 2012 as S. Rpt. 112-230. Placed on Senate
Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 535.
The Senate considered S. 1998 on November 28, 2012, and
passed the measure, amended, by unanimous consent.
S. 1998 was received in the House on November 29, 2012 and
referred to the Committee on Homeland Security, and in addition
to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. Within the
Committee, S. 1998 was referred to the Subcommittee on
Oversight, Investigations, and Management.
The Chair of the Committee on Oversight and Government
Reform sent a letter to the Chair of the Committee on Homeland
Security on December 7, 2012, agreeing to forego consideration
of S. 1998 in order to expedite consideration on the House
Floor. On that same date, the Chair of the Committee on
Homeland Security sent a letter to the Chair of the Committee
on Oversight and Government Reform agreeing to support to
expediting of consideration of S. 1998 on the House Floor.
The House agreed to Suspend the Rules and passed S. 1998 on
December 12, 2012, clearing the measure for the President.
S. 1998 was presented to the President on December 14,
2012. S. 1998 was signed into law on December 20, 2012 as
Public Law 112-217.

DHS ACCOUNTABILITY ACT OF 2012

H.R.5913

Summary

After 10 years since the Department of Homeland Security's
(DHS) creation, significant work remains for DHS to efficiently
and effectively manage its mission functions and programs. The
DHS Accountability Act of 2012 creates an independent advisory
panel to comprehensively assess the management structure and
capabilities related to the Department of Homeland Security.
H.R.5913 requires the panel to make recommendations to improve
the management of the Department, including an examination of
the policies, practices, and procedures used to carry out its
management functions. Furthermore, the panel is tasked to asses
to what extent duplication exists and how this duplication may
negatively affect the mission of DHS, and to what extent
management of key homeland security missions is centralized in
the Department. Finally, the panel is to measure and evaluate
the Department's progress in making the management structure
and capabilities more efficient and effective.

Legislative History

H.R.5913 was introduced in the House on June 7, 2012, by
Mr.McCaul, Mr.Keating, and Mr.Long, and referred to the
Committee on Homeland Security. Within the Committee, H.R.5913
was referred to the Subcommittee on Oversight, investigations,
and Management.
The Subcommittee on Oversight, Investigations, and
Management considered H.R.5913 on August 1, 2012, and ordered
the measure reported to the Full Committee for consideration
with a favorable recommendation, amended, by voice vote.
The House considered H.R. 5913 under Suspension of the
Rules on November 27, 2012, and passed the bill, amended, by
voice vote.

----------

Oversight Activities of the Subcommittee

WAR AGAINST MEXICAN DRUG CARTELS

Violence in the United Mexican States' war against drug
trafficking organizations has escalated in recent years. As a
result, the drug-related violence along the Mexican side of the
United States-Mexican border has become more brutal and
widespread. Given the increase in violent crime, the
Subcommittee examined the role the Department of Homeland
Security is playing to address Mexican drug-related violence at
and near the border.
On March 31, 2011, the Subcommittee held a hearing entitled
``The U.S. Homeland Security Role in the Mexican War Against
Drug Cartels.'' The Subcommittee received testimony from
Mr.Luis Alvarez, Assistant Director, Immigration and Customs
Enforcement, Department of Homeland Security; Mr.Brian Nichols,
Deputy Assistant Secretary, International Narcotics and Law
Enforcement Affairs, U.S. Department of State; Mr.Frank Mora,
Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense, Western Hemisphere
Affairs, Department of Defense; Dr. Kristin Finklea, Analyst,
Domestic Social Policy Division, Congressional Research
Service; Mr.Jon Adler, President, Federal Law Enforcement
Officers Association; Dr. David Shirk, Director, Trans-Border
Institute, University of San Diego; Mr.John Bailey, Professor,
Government and Foreign Service, Georgetown University; and Dr.
Ricardo C. Ainslie, Department of Educational Psychology,
College of Education, The University of Texas at Austin. The
purpose of the hearing was to examine the Nation's efforts to
assist Mexico in the establishment of the rule of law and to
combat drug cartels.
On April 27, 2011, the Chairs of the Full Committee and the
Subcommittee sent a letter to the Secretary of State urging
support for H.R.1270 and requesting the State Department
``develop a comprehensive strategy with the overall goal of
assisting the Mexican Government in their effort to win the war
against the drug cartels.''
During a speech given March 24, 2011, the Secretary of
Homeland Security stated, ``the border is better now than it
ever has been.'' On May 11, 2011, the Subcommittee held a
follow-up hearing entitled ``On the Border and in the Line of
Fire: U.S. Law Enforcement, Homeland Security, and Drug Cartel
Violence,'' to examine current border security efforts and
reports of spill-over violence. The Subcommittee received
testimony from Mr.Grayling Williams, Director, Office of
Counternarcotics Enforcement, Department of Homeland Security;
Ms.Amy Pope, Deputy Chief of Staff and Counselor, Criminal
Division, Office of Assistant Attorney General, U.S. Department
of Justice; Mr.Steven C. McCraw, Director, Texas Department of
Public Safety; Hon. Thomas C. Horne, Attorney General, State of
Arizona; Sheriff Sigifredo Gonzalez, Zapata County, State of
Texas; and Chief Victor Rodriguez, McAllen Police Department,
State of Texas.
Following the May 11, 2011, hearing, the Subcommittee Chair
sent a letter to the Government Accountability Office
requesting, among other things, an audit of the Merida
Initiative. The GAO has issued a classified report to the
Committee.
On October 4, 2011, the Subcommittee on Oversight,
Investigations, and Management and the Committee on Foreign
Affairs' Subcommittee on the Western Hemisphere held a joint
hearing entitled ``Merida Part Two: Insurgency and Terrorism in
Mexico.'' The Subcommittees received testimony from Hon.
William R. Brownfield, Assistant Secretary, Bureau of
International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs, U.S.
Department of State; Mr.Rodney G. Benson, Assistant
Administrator, Chief of Intelligence, Drug Enforcement
Administration, U.S. Department of Justice; and Ms.Mariko
Silver, Acting Assistant Secretary, Office of International
Affairs, U.S. Department of Homeland Security. The purpose of
the hearing was to examine the Nation's efforts to assist the
Mexican Government and win the war against the Mexican drug
cartels.
On September 14, 2012, the Subcommittee Chair asked to
become a co-requester of a report that the Government
Accountability Office is preparing on border surveillance
technologies at the request of the Chair and Ranking Member of
the Subcommittee on Border and Maritime Security. In addition,
on September 21, 2012, the Subcommittee Chair sent a letter to
the Comptroller General asking GAO to review coordination
efforts in securing the U.S.-Mexican border to include how DHS
is leveraging resources along the Southwest border for
achieving an integrated law enforcement response. GAO
acknowledged receipt of this request.

DHS MANAGEMENT

On March 11, 2011, the Subcommittee Chair met with the
newly confirmed Department of Homeland Security Under Secretary
for Management to discuss his vision and goals as the Under
Secretary.
The Subcommittee Chair met with representatives of the
Government Accountability Office (GAO) on March 11, 2011,
regarding issues facing the Department. Among the topics
discussed were duplication of Government homeland security
programs, border security, transportation security,
cybersecurity, fusion centers, and DHS contracting.
The Subcommittee Chair met with the Acting Inspector
General of the Department of Homeland Security on April 13,
2011, to receive a briefing on what the Office of Inspector
General had in plan for future investigations.
On February 9, 2012, the Subcommittee hosted a Member
briefing on the Department's management goals and priorities
for 2012. Topics covered during the briefing, led by the Under
Secretary for Management, included strengthening the
Department's acquisition process, contracting duplication, a
simplified budget structure, improper payments, and progress
made on the Department's ``qualified'' audit opinion.
The Subcommittee Chair sent a letter to the Comptroller
General of the United States on April 24, 2012, requesting to
be a co-requester of two reports GAO is preparing on the
Department of Homeland Security's Office of Policy and
intelligence analysis capabilities at the request of the Senate
Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. GAO is
currently investigating this issue.
Committee staff received briefings from the Department's
Chief Human Capital Officer, the Chief Procurement Officer, the
Chief Financial Officer, the Chief Administrative Officer,
Chief Learning Officer, and the Chief Information Officer.
On May 30, 2012, the Chair and Ranking Members of the
Subcommittee on Oversight, Investigations, and Management and
the Subcommittee on Border and Maritime Security sent a letter
to the GAO requesting a review of the Department's Trusted
Traveler programs to include the extent to which these programs
have improved the facilitation of commerce and trade across
U.S. borders, their impact on security, the effectiveness of
the application process, and how the Department measures the
programs' performance.

DHS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is the largest
procurer of information technology (IT) systems in the Federal
civilian Government with a Fiscal Year 2011 IT budget of
roughly $6 billion. The Department plans to use these funds to
manage 90 ``major'' IT investments intended to assist the
Department in carrying out its mission of leading the National
effort to secure the Nation against terrorist attacks and other
threats and hazards. Recently the Department reported that over
half of these ``major'' investments encountered or are at risk
of encountering significant cost and schedule shortfalls.
In light of this, on May 27, 2011, the Subcommittee Chair
and Ranking Member sent letters to the Government
Accountability Office (GAO): The first, requested GAO to review
how well the Department is managing at-risk investments, and
the second, asked GAO to assess the extent to which the
Department has established IT governance and oversight
structures, and how these are being used to manage and oversee
IT investments. The GAO issued a report [GAO-12-904] on these
matters in September 2012, with two recommendations for the
Department.

DENYING TERRORIST SAFE HAVENS

The Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of
2004 (Pub. L. 108-458) and the National Defense Authorization
Act of 2010 (Pub. L. 111-84) require the Administration to
report on efforts to deny terrorists safe havens. A June 2011
Government Accountability Office (GAO) report titled,
``Combating Terrorism: U.S. Government Should Improve Its
Reporting on Terrorist Safe Havens,'' [GAO-11-561] reviewed the
extent to which the Department of State (DOS) identified and
assessed terrorist safe havens and interagency efforts to deny
terrorists safe havens. GAO found that although the DOS does
identify existing terrorist safe havens in its Country Reports
on Terrorism, that report lacks the level of detail required by
Congress. Specifically, the GAO stated that ``the DOS report is
incomplete without including the contributions of its various
interagency partners to address terrorist safe havens.''
Additionally, the GAO notes that the Government has not
developed a list of all efforts to deny safe haven to
terrorists. The DOS has identified only a few efforts that it
funds, but does not include other Federal Government funding
efforts, including funding by the Department of Defense (DoD).
The Department of Homeland Security currently receives its
funding for programs and activities that deny safe havens from
both the Departments of State and Defense.
Following the release of the GAO report, the Subcommittee
held a hearing to examine the threat of safe havens to the
United States and what the Department of Homeland Security--
working in conjunction with other Federal Government agencies--
is doing to combat this threat. On June 3, 2011, the
Subcommittee held the hearing entitled ``Denying Safe Havens:
Homeland Security's Efforts to Counter Threats from Pakistan,
Yemen, and Somalia.'' The Subcommittee received testimony from
Ms.Jacquie Williams-Bridgers, Managing Director, International
Affairs and Trade, Government Accountability Office; Mr.Mark
Koumans, Deputy Assistant Secretary, International Affairs,
Department of Homeland Security; Ms.Shari Villarosa, Deputy
Coordinator for Regional Affairs, Department of State; Mr.James
Q. Roberts, Principal Director for Special Operations and
Combating Terrorism, Office of Special Operations/Low-Intensity
Conflict and Interdependent Capabilities, Department of
Defense; Mr.Steve Coll, President and CEO, New America
Foundation; Prof. Bruce Hoffman, Director, Center for Peace and
Security Studies and Director, Security Studies Program,
Georgetown University; and Prof. Daniel L. Byman, Security
Studies Program, School of Foreign Service at Georgetown
University and Senior Fellow, Saban Center for Middle East
Policy, The Brookings Institution. The purpose of the hearing
was to determine the Department of Homeland Security's presence
in surrounding safe haven countries and the United States'
efforts to contain terrorists in those safe havens.
On June 7, 2012, the Subcommittee Chair sent a letter to
the Comptroller General asking GAO to review DHS's
international counterterrorism activities including how U.S.
embassies leverage DHS staff posted overseas and how the
Department allocates resources to counterterrorism efforts
abroad. GAO's review is ongoing.
Committee staff received a briefing on October 23, 2012
from the Assistant Secretary for the Office of International
Affairs.

DHS ACQUISITION MANAGEMENT

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has been
criticized in the past for, among other things, failing to
supervise projects and allowing the costs of certain contracts
to exceed initial estimates. As a result of this lapse, on May
27, 2011, the Subcommittee Chair and Ranking Member sent a
letter to the Government Accountability Office (GAO) requesting
a review of the contracting mechanisms at the Department. As a
result, the GAO issued a report [GAO-12-947] in September 2012
that made one recommendation to the Department.
Additionally, on March, 21, 2012, the Subcommittee Chair
sent a letter to the Comptroller General asking to be a co-
requester of a report that the Government Accountability Office
is preparing on the Department of Homeland Security's
acquisition policy at the request of the Senate Committee on
Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. The GAO issued a
report [GAO-12-833] that made five recommendations to the
Department.
In an effort to explore the findings of GAO's acquisition
report, the Subcommittee held a hearing entitled ``DHS
Acquisition Management Challenges: Solution for Saving Taxpayer
Dollars.'' The Subcommittee received testimony from Mr.John
Hutton, Director, Acquisition and Sourcing Management,
Government Accountability Office; Dr. Nick Nayak, Chief
Procurement Officer, Department of Homeland Security; Mr.Mark
Borkowski, Assistant Commissioner, Office of Technology
Innovation and Acquisition, Customs and Border Protection,
Department of Homeland Security; and Ms. Karen
Shelton Waters, Assistant Administrator, Office of Acquisition,
Transportation Security Administration, Department of Homeland
Security.
Furthermore, on August 1, 2012 the Subcommittee issued a
Majority investigative report titled, ``Initiatives Needed to
Correct Weaknesses in the Department of Homeland Security's
Acquisition and Contracting Policies.'' The report, which
highlighted shortcomings in DHS's acquisition and contracting
practices, identified poorly managed programs resulting in
homeland security capabilities being delivered late, costing
more, and doing less than expected. The report included five
solutions to help improve future acquisition and contracting
outcomes in the Department.

DHS WORKFORCE MORALE

In recent years, the Department of Homeland Security has
ranked as one of the Departments with the lowest morale among
employees within the Federal Government. Understanding why the
Department is considered such a difficult place to work is
imperative. The ``Best Places to Work in the Federal
Government'' rankings--compiled by the Partnership for Public
Service and American University's Institute for the Study of
Public Policy Implementation--showed the Department in 28th
place out of 32 agencies in 2010. This is the same ranking as
in 2009. Additionally, in 2010, the Department administered an
internal survey, which returned more than 10,000 completed
responses. The findings of this survey show leading indications
of dissatisfaction ranging from: The Department not dealing
with poor work performers to the way promotions are decided. As
a result, on May 27, 2011, the Subcommittee Chair and Ranking
Member sent a letter to the Government Accountability Office
requesting an investigation into the causes of this,
specifically, to what extent the Department has identified the
root causes that have contributed to low employee morale, and
what progress has made in addressing these issues within the
Department. The GAO issued a report on September 28, 2012,
entitled ``Department of Homeland Security: Taking Further
Action to Better Determine Causes of Morale Problems Would
Assist in Targeting Action Plans'' [GAO-12-940].
In a continued effort to examine the problem of low morale
within the Department, on March 22, 2012, the Subcommittee held
a hearing entitled ``Building One DHS: Why is Employee Morale
Low?'' The Subcommittee received testimony from Admiral Thad
Allen (Ret.), Senior Vice President, Booz Allen Hamilton;
Ms.Catherine Emerson, Chief Human Capital Officer, Department
of Homeland Security; Mr.David Maurer, Director, Homeland
Security and Justice Team, Government Accountability Office;
Mr.Max Stier, President and CEO, The Partnership for Public
Service; and Dr. Jeff T. H. Pon, Chief Human Resources Officer,
Society for Human Resource Management.
Following the hearing, the Subcommittee chair sent a letter
to the Secretary of Homeland Security on May 17, 2012,
encouraging the Department to work with stakeholders,
leadership, and DHS employees to adopt a robust plan to improve
morale within the agency.

FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT AT FEMA

In light of a March 31, 2011 criminal complaint filed
against a Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) employee
for embezzlement, on May 4, 2011, the Chairs of the
Subcommittee on Oversight, Investigations, and Management and
the Subcommittee on Emergency Preparedness, Response, and
Communications Subcommittee, sent a letter to the Administrator
of FEMA requesting information regarding the processes that
exist to vet employees, particularly those with access to
financial systems, and what internal controls are in place
within FEMA's various payroll systems to help identify possible
fraudulent activity. The Committee received a response on June
2, 2011.

OVERSIGHT OF ST. ELIZABETHS CONSTRUCTION

The construction of the Department of Homeland Security
Headquarters at the St. Elizabeths facility is the largest
Federal construction project to occur in the Washington, DC
area since the construction of The Pentagon. The project will
bring many Department components together under one roof and
house roughly 14,000 employees on the campus. Over $1 billion
has been appropriated for its construction to-date.
On May 31, 2011, Members conducted a site visit to the St.
Elizabeths campus to examine the progress of construction and
plans moving forward.
On March 29, 2012, officials from DHS and the General
Services Administration briefed Committee staff on construction
at the St. Elizabeths facility and discussed upcoming budget
requests. The Subcommittee continued to closely monitor this
major project.
In a continued effort to evaluate progress made at the St.
Elizabeths facility, on July 27, 2012, Committee staff
conducted a second site visit of the campus.

DHS EFFORTS TO PROTECT AMERICAN JOBS AND
SECURE THE HOMELAND

Two Department of Homeland Security components, U.S.
Immigration and Customs Enforcement and the U.S. Customs and
Border Protection (CBP), have broad responsibilities to enforce
laws and regulations that have a significant impact on the
American economy. It is imperative these components work hand-
in-hand with the private sector to effectively enforce the law
and protect the Nation's intellectual property. Given these
challenges, the Subcommittee examined the effectiveness of the
Department's efforts.
On July 7, 2011, the Subcommittee held a hearing entitled
``Homeland Security Investigations: Examining DHS's Efforts to
Protect American Jobs and Secure the Homeland.'' The
Subcommittee received testimony from Mr.Brian Toohey,
President, Semiconductor Industry Association; Mr.Michael
Russo, Director of Global Security and Product Protection, Eli
Lilly and Company; Mr.Mario Mancuso, Partner, Fried, Frank,
Harris, Shriver & Jacobson, LLP; and Ms.Jena Baker-McNeill,
Private Citizen.
The Subcommittee Chair, along with Mr.Duncan of South
Carolina and Mr.Marino, sent a letter to the Secretary of
Homeland Security and the Secretary of the Treasury on July 13,
2011, requesting an explanation of a CBP policy that appears to
deter collaborative efforts and information sharing between CBP
and the private sector as it relates to counterfeit computer
chips entering the United States. The Commissioner of the U.S.
Customs and Border Protection responded on July 28, 2011. The
response did address most of the concerns of the Subcommittee
and on September 22, 2011, the Chair and Ranking Member of the
Subcommittee sent a follow-up letter requesting further
clarification.

HOMELAND SECURITY CONTRACTING

The Department of Homeland Security continues to face
challenges managing and overseeing its acquisition programs, as
well as effectively leveraging existing and emerging
technologies to accomplish its mission. Additionally, instances
have arisen where the Department spends millions of dollars
developing new technologies only to discover adequate off-the-
shelf technologies exist that can accomplish the same
objectives. Therefore, the Subcommittee examined the
Department's process for seeking out technologies across
components, the Federal Government, and the private sector in
order to reduce costs.
On July 15, 2011, the Subcommittee held a hearing entitled
``Homeland Security Contracting: Does the Department
Effectively Leverage Emerging Technologies?'' The Subcommittee
received testimony from Mr.Charles K. Edwards, Acting Inspector
General, Department of Homeland Security; Mr.David Maurer,
Director, Homeland Security and Justice Team, Government
Accountability Office; Mr.Rafael Borras, Under Secretary for
Management and Chief Acquisition Officer, Department of
Homeland Security; Dr. Tara O'Toole, Under Secretary, Science
and Technology Directorate, Department of Homeland Security;
Mr.Jim Williams, Vice Chair, Homeland Security Committee,
TechAmerica; Mr.Marc Pearl, President and CEO, Homeland
Security and Defense Business Council; and Mr.Scott Amey,
General Counsel, Project On Government Oversight.

ASSESSING SECURITY AT THE PORT OF HOUSTON

In testimony before the Subcommittee, a Government
Accountability Office witness testified: ``[Al-Qaeda] and other
groups with malevolent intent continue to target energy tankers
and offshore energy infrastructure because of their importance
to the Nation's economy and National Security.'' It is because
of this on-going threat and the Port of Houston's importance to
the Nation's energy, economy, and National security, the
Subcommittee examined security measures implemented at the
Port, possible improvements, and best practices that could
potentially be implemented at other ports.
On August 24, 2011, the Subcommittee held a field hearing
in Houston, Texas, entitled ``Preventing an Economic Shock
Wave: Securing the Port of Houston from a Terrorist Attack.''
The Subcommittee received testimony from Mr.Stephen Caldwell,
Director of Maritime and Coast Guard Issues, Homeland Security
and Justice Team, Government Accountability Office; Capt. James
H. Whitehead, Sector Commander, Sector Houston-Galveston,
United States Coast Guard, Department of Homeland Security;
Sheriff Adrian Garcia, Harris County Sheriff's Office, Texas;
Mr.James T. Edmonds, Chairman, The Port of Houston Authority;
and Capt. William Diehl (Ret.), President, Greater Houston Port
Bureau.
The Subcommittee Chair sent a letter to the Commandant of
the U.S. Coast Guard, on September 8, 2011, urging the U.S.
Coast Guard to examine the unique public-private partnership
established at the Port of Houston and its possible
applicability at other ports in the United States.

TEN YEARS AFTER 9/11:
ASSESSING AIRPORT SECURITY AT BOSTON LOGAN

Over the last decade, the Department of Homeland Security
(DHS) has developed systems to secure aviation transportation
to prevent terrorist attacks such as the tragic events of
September 11, 2001. Two main areas of focus were perimeter
security and the new behavior screening system known as
Screening Passengers by Observation Techniques (SPOT). The
Subcommittee examined how the perimeter and behavior detection
systems developed over the last 10 years, and observed the
perimeter system at Boston Logan International Airport, one of
the launch sites for the attacks of September 11.
On September 16, 2011, the Subcommittee held a field
hearing in Boston, Massachusetts entitled ``Ten Years After 9/
11: Assessing Airport Security and Preventing a Future
Terrorist Attack.'' The Subcommittee received testimony from
Mr.Stephen M. Lord, Director, Homeland Security and Justice
Issues, Government Accountability Office; Mr.Chris McLaughlin,
Assistant Administrator, Office of Security Operations,
Transportation Security Administration, Department of Homeland
Security; Admiral (Ret.) George Naccara, Federal Security
Director, Transportation Security Administration, Department of
Homeland Security; Mr.Edward C. Freni, Director of Aviation,
Massachusetts Port Authority; and Major Michael Concannon,
Massachusetts State Police Troop F Headquarters.
The Subcommittee Chair sent a letter to the Secretary of
Homeland Security on December 5, 2011, urging the Department to
consider implementation of the SPOT behavioral screening system
Nation-wide and to continue close examination of perimeter
security at all aviation sites throughout the United States.
On May 16, 2012, the Subcommittee Chair sent a letter to
the Administrator of the Transportation Security Administration
expressing concerns over the inefficient deployment of certain
screening equipment and the need for the agency to work with
foreign partners to deploy advanced screening technologies and
procedures abroad.
In light of recent allegations of racial profiling by
behavior detection officers at Boston Logan International
Airport, the Subcommittee Chair and Ranking Member asked to
become a co-requester of a report that the Government
Accountability Office (GAO) is preparing on the Transportation
Security Administration's behavior detection program at the
request of the Chair of the House Transportation and
Infrastructure Committee. GAO's evaluation is ongoing.
Additionally, the Subcommittee Chair asked to become a co-
requester of a report the GAO is preparing on the
Transportation Security Administration's Advanced Imaging
Technology at the request of the Chairman of the Transportation
Security Subcommittee. GAO's review is underway.
On September 20, 2012, the Subcommittee Chair, along with
the Chair of the Transportation Security Subcommittee sent a
letter to the Comptroller General requesting GAO review TSA's
Pre-Check trusted traveler program including how the program is
being implemented and the extent to which TSA is engaging with
its industry partners. GAO acknowledged receipt of this
request.

NARCO-TERRORISM'S THREAT ALONG THE SOUTHERN U.S. BORDER

In 2011, the Southwest Border of the United States,
specifically the State of Texas, reported they had experienced
more than 22 murders, 24 assaults, 15 shootings, and 5
kidnappings stemming from cartel activity during a one-year
period. The cartels are exploiting holes in U.S. border
security to infiltrate America's cities as bases for narco-
trafficking and terrorist activities. Retired U.S. Army
Generals Scales and McCaffrey produced a report entitled ``A
Call to Action: Narco-Terrorism's Threat to the Southern U.S.
Border,'' which outlined these threats and sparked the
Subcommittee to further investigate their findings as related
to the potential gaps in homeland security.
On October 14, 2011, the Subcommittee held a hearing
entitled ``A Call to Action: Narco-Terrorism's Threat to the
Southern U.S. Border.'' The Subcommittee received testimony
from General Barry R. McCaffrey (Ret.), President, BR McCaffrey
Associates, LLC; Major General Robert H. Scales (Ret.),
President, COLGEN, LP; Mr.Todd Staples, Commissioner, Texas
Department of Agriculture; and Dr. Michael Vickers, Las Palmas
Veterinary Hospital; and Ms.Sylvia Aguilar, Chief Deputy, El
Paso County Sheriff's Office Head Quarters. The purpose of the
hearing was to determine the Nation's effort to counter the
growing violence along the Southern Border.
As a result of the hearing, the Chair of the Subcommittee
sent a letter to the Secretary of Homeland Security on December
5, 2011, requesting the Department review the McCaffrey-Scales
report and, furthermore, develop a comprehensive strategy with
State authorities to make border security more effective.

BUREAUCRACY, FEMA, AND THE TEXAS WILDFIRES

The Summer of 2011 brought the State of Texas record-high
temperatures and the worst drought in 100 years. This set the
conditions for fires to spark and spread to engulf more than
1,400 homes and thousands of acres. The Federal Emergency
Management Agency's (FEMA) response was delayed and the Federal
Government failed to pre-position assisting aircraft despite
all of the warning signs and potential damage to the region. In
an effort to determine lessons learned from the disaster, the
Subcommittee examined the Federal response to the wildfires,
and the processes by which local and State government had to
initiate in order to receive necessary support from the Federal
Government.
On October 17, 2011, the Subcommittee held a field hearing
in Austin, Texas entitled ``Texas Wildfire Review: Did
Bureaucracy Prevent a Timely Response?'' The Subcommittee
received testimony from Mr.W. Nim Kidd, Assistant Director,
Emergency Management, Texas Department of Public Safety; Major
General John F. Nichols, Adjutant General, Texas Military
Forces Texas; Mr.Kevin Starbuck, CEM, Emergency Management
Coordinator, Amarillo/Potter/Randall Office of Emergency
Management; Mr.Tony Russell, Region VI Regional Administrator,
Federal Emergency Management Agency, Department of Homeland
Security; and Mr.Tom Harbour, Director, Fire and Aviation
Management, Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture.

COUNTER POTENTIAL ATTACKS FROM IRAN

On October 11, 2011 United States officials revealed that
two men were charged in New York State for allegedly plotting
to assassinate the Saudi Arabian Ambassador in Washington, DC,
on behalf of the Government of Iran. One man was a citizen of
the United States, the other a member of Iran's Qods Force--a
special operations unit within the Iranian Islamic
Revolutionary Guard Corps. Allegedly the men collaborated with
a Drug Enforcement Administration informant who was identified
as a member of the Los Zetas drug cartel. The implications of
foreign governments utilizing cartels to gain access to the
United States in an attempt to assassinate political officials
are a threat to National security and a breach of international
law. The Subcommittee investigated the matter in order to fully
assess the likelihood and capabilities of Foreign Terrorist
Organizations to breach the country's border and terrorize the
Homeland.
On October 26, 2011, the Subcommittee on Counterterrorism
and Intelligence and the Subcommittee on Oversight,
Investigations, and Management held a joint hearing entitled
``Iranian Terror Operations on American Soil.'' The
Subcommittees received testimony from General Jack Keane
(Ret.), United States Army; Mr.Reuel Marc Gerecht, Senior
Fellow, Foundation for Defense of Democracies; Dr. Matt Levitt,
Director, Stein Program on Counterterrorism and Intelligence,
The Washington Institute for Near East Policy; Dr. Lawrence
Korb, Senior Fellow, Center For American Progress Action Fund;
and Colonel Timothy J. Geraghty (Ret.), United States Marine
Corps. The purpose of the hearing was to examine the plot by
Iran to assassinate the Saudi Arabian ambassador to the United
States.
As a result of the hearing, the Chairs of the Full
Committee and the Subcommittee on Oversight, Investigations,
and Management and the Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and
Intelligence sent a letter on November 22, 2011, to the
President urging the administration to enforce sanctions on
Iran's Central Bank, designate the Iranian Revolutionary Guard
Corps as a Foreign Terrorist Organization, and conduct all
efforts appropriate to ensure protection of the Homeland.
On June 7, 2012, the Subcommittee Chair sent a letter to
the Comptroller General requesting the Government
Accountability Office (GAO) review the threat posed by Iranian
activities in Latin America and how prepared DHS is to respond
if a conflict emerges. GAO's review is underway.
On July 25, 2012, the Subcommittee on Oversight,
Investigations, and Management and the Subcommittee on
Counterterrorism and Intelligence held a joint Member briefing
on the Department of Homeland Security's contingency plans in
the event of an increased threat to the U.S. Homeland from
Iranian terrorism following a potential military action against
the illicit Iranian nuclear program. Representatives from the
Department responded to Member questions.

FORFEITED ASSETS MANAGEMENT

According to the Department of the Treasury, the Department
of Homeland Security received $345.72 million in Treasury
Forfeiture Funds in FY 2010. The Department of the Treasury
states that the U.S. Customs and Border Protection received
$65.343 million, the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement
received $154.14 million, the Secret Service received $121.724
million, the United States Coast Guard received $4.18 million,
and the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center received $0.345
million in FY 2010.
Given the magnitude of the aforementioned funds, the
Subcommittee Chair sent a letter to the Secretary of Homeland
Secretary on December 9, 2011, requesting the Department
clarify how the money was used by the Department and its
components. The Committee has not received a response at this
time.

OVERSIGHT OF MANAGEMENT EFFICIENCY

The Department of Homeland Security established an
Efficiency Review Board for the purposes of measuring and
developing cost-savings, effectiveness, and efficiencies within
Departmental components. The Secretary of Homeland Security,
Janet Napolitano, stated the efficiency review, ``is designed
to make sure we get the highest and best use out of precious
taxpayer dollars.'' Government Accountability Office reports
indicate that oversight of the progress of efficiency review
boards is critical to make sure the review is being properly
conducted.
To assess the progress of the board, the Subcommittee Chair
sent a letter on December 9, 2011, to the Secretary of Homeland
Security requesting information about the board's composition,
methodologies of assessment, and findings thus far. The
Committee has not received a response at this time.
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) continues to face
challenges integrating and consolidating its basic management
functions. Inadequate business information integration has
caused mismanagement, redundancies and duplication, and
inefficient use of resources that has increased costs within
the Department. DHS still lacks effective program management,
clear roles and processes for program governance, sharing of
best practices, and access to timely, reliable and analyzed
data on more than $18 billion in acquisitions and investments.
As a result, management integration remains on the Government
Accountability's Office (GAO) High Risk List (High-Risk Series:
An Update, [GAO-11-278]).
In response to these management difficulties, on March 1,
2012, the Subcommittee held a hearing entitled ``Building One
DHS: Why Can't Management Information be Integrated?'' The
Subcommittee received testimony from Hon. Rafael Borras, Under
Secretary for Management, Department of Homeland Security;
Mr.David Maurer, Director, Homeland Security and Justice Team,
Government Accountability Office; and Mr.Charles K. Edwards,
Acting Inspector General, Department of Homeland Security.
In light of the April 2, 2012, ``Management Deficiency
Report,'' published by the Office of Inspector General at the
U.S. General Services Administration (GSA), the public became
aware of egregious waste and abuse of resources within Federal
agencies. The report highlighted excessive and improper
spending on conference planning, food, and mementos within the
GSA. On April 27, 2012, the Subcommittee Chair sent a letter to
the Under Secretary for Management of the Department of
Homeland Security requesting information regarding National and
international conferences attended by DHS personnel and how
resources are spent. Due to a lack of response, the
Subcommittee Chair sent a letter to the Secretary of Homeland
Security on September 19, 2012 requesting this information
immediately. The Subcommittee has yet to receive a response.

DUPLICATIVE TASKING REQUIREMENTS

Given the constrained fiscal environment, the Department of
Homeland Security is under increased pressure to find cost
savings and optimize funding. However, Government
Accountability Office (GAO) reports [GAO-11-318SP, GAO-12-
342SP, and GAO-12-453SP] indicate the agency has a number of
duplicative tasking requirements. These duplicative taskings
spike costs and drain vital revenues. In many instances the
Department is repeating efforts of State and local governments,
other agencies, and in some cases within its own agency.
Given these concerns, the Subcommittee Chair sent a letter
to the Comptroller General of the United States on December 9,
2011, requesting that GAO investigate and report on the
specific instances of duplicative taskings within Departmental
components.
In February 2012, the GAO reported on duplication and cost
savings opportunities across the Federal Government in a report
entitled ``2012 Annual Report: Opportunities to Reduce
Potential Duplication, Overlap, and Fragmentation, Achieve
Savings, and Enhance Revenue'' [GAO-12-342SP]. The GAO
identified two new duplicative homeland security areas
including homeland security grants and Federal facility risk
assessments in its February 2012 report on duplication. GAO's
report also identified four opportunities to save costs
including border security, passenger aviation security fees,
immigration inspection fees, and domestic disaster assistance.
To continue its examination of duplication and
opportunities for cost savings within the Department, on March
8, 2012, the Subcommittee held a hearing entitled ``Eliminating
Waste, Fraud, Abuse, and Duplication in the Department of
Homeland Security.'' The Subcommittee received testimony from
Hon. James Gilmore III, Former Governor of Virginia and
Chairman of the Congressional Advisory Panel to Assess Domestic
Response Capabilities for Terrorism Involving Weapons of Mass
Destruction; Ms.Cathleen Berrick, Managing Director, Homeland
Security and Justice Issues, Government Accountability Office;
Mr.Charles K. Edwards, Acting Inspector General, Department of
Homeland Security; and Mr.Scott Lilly, Senior Fellow, Center
for American Progress.
Immediately following the March 8, 2012, hearing, the
Subcommittee Chair sent a letter to the Secretary of Homeland
Security to inform the Secretary of the findings of the
hearing.

HOMELAND SECURITY STRATEGY

In the Implementing Recommendations of the 9/11 Commission
Act of 2007 (Pub. L. 110-53), Congress mandated that the
Department of Homeland Security (DHS) carry out a Quadrennial
Homeland Security Review (QHSR), as a way to develop and update
strategies for homeland security and align the strategy to the
Department's programs and activities. DHS defines the primary
purpose of the QHSR as a strategic framework to guide the
activities of participants in homeland security toward a common
end. In an effort to examine the current strategy documents
produced by the Department and their effective implementation,
on February 3, 2012, the Subcommittee held a hearing entitled
``Is DHS Effectively Implementing a Strategy to Counter
Emerging Threats?'' The Subcommittee received testimony from
Hon. Paul Schneider, Principal, The Chertoff Group; Ms.Sharon
L. Caudle, PhD, The Bush School of Government and Public
Service, Texas A&M University; Mr.Shawn Reese, Analyst,
Emergency Management and Homeland Security Policy,
Congressional Research Service; Mr.David Maurer, Director,
Homeland Security and Justice Team, Government Accountability
Office; and Mr.Alan Cohn, Deputy Assistant Secretary, Office of
Policy, Department of Homeland Security.
Following the hearing, the Subcommittee Chair sent a letter
to the Secretary of Homeland Security encouraging the
Department to conduct an in-depth risk assessment prior to
developing a strategy and to work more closely with
stakeholders.

ETHICAL STANDARDS

Public service is a public trust. Each Federal employee has
a responsibility to the United States Government and its
citizens to place loyalty to the Constitution, laws, and
ethical principles above private gain. However, over the past
two years several reports of employees of the Department of
Homeland Security acting unethically and in some cases
criminally have eroded the faith entrusted to them by the
American people. In response, on May 17, 2012, the Subcommittee
held a hearing entitled ``Department of Homeland Security: An
Examination of Ethical Standards.'' The Subcommittee received
testimony from Mr.Charles K. Edwards, Acting Inspector General,
Department of Homeland Security; Mr.Thomas S.Winkowski, Acting
Deputy Commissioner, Customs and Border Protection, Department
of Homeland Security; Mr.James G. Duncan, Assistant
Administrator, Office of Professional Responsibility,
Transportation Security Administration, Department of Homeland
Security; and Mr.Timothy Moynihan, Assistant Director, Office
of Professional Responsibility, Immigration and Customs
Enforcement, Department of Homeland Security.
Furthermore, on April 24, 2012, the Subcommittee Chair
asked to become a co-requester of a report that the Government
Accountability Office (GAO) is preparing on personnel
misconduct in the Transportation Security Administration at the
request of the Chairman of the House Transportation and
Infrastructure Committee. Additionally the Subcommittee Chair
sent a letter providing the findings from the hearing to the
Secretary. The GAO has initiated an investigation and intends
to issue a report on the findings.

CYBER THREATS

Americans are currently under attack by nation states and
computer hackers seeking to target our Nation's critical
infrastructure, steal our intellectual property, and compromise
sensitive information such as personal credit cards, bank
accounts, and social security numbers. The Director of the
Federal Bureau of Investigation, Robert S.Mueller, III stated
the dangers from cyber attacks will equal or surpass the
dangers of terrorism ``in the foreseeable future, and will pose
the number one threat to our country.'' In response to this
rapidly growing threat, on April 24, 2012, the Subcommittee
held a hearing entitled ``America is Under Cyber Attack: Why
Urgent Action is Needed.'' The Subcommittee received testimony
from Mr.Shawn Henry, Former Executive Assistant Director,
Criminal, Cyber, Response, and Services Branch, Federal Bureau
of Investigation, Department of Justice; Mr.James Lewis,
Director and Senior Fellow, Technology and Public Policy
Program, Center for Strategic and International Studies;
Mr.Gregory C. Wilshusen, Director, Information Security Issues,
Government Accountability Office; Mr.Stuart McClure, Chief
Technology Officer, McAfee; and Dr. Stephen E. Flynn, Founding
Co-Director, George J. Kostas Research Institute for Homeland
Security, Northeastern University.

AVIATION SECURITY WITH FOREIGN COUNTRIES

In response to a May 16, 2012 letter the Subcommittee Chair
sent to the Administrator of the Transportation Security
Administration, on May 31, 2012, the Subcommittee on Oversight,
Investigations, and Management, and the Subcommittee on
Transportation Security held a joint Member briefing on the
Transportation Security Administration's (TSA) coordination on
aviation security with foreign countries. Representatives from
TSA were present to respond to Member questions.

THIRD BORDER

Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands are two United
States Territories which are suffering intensified violence and
escalating homicide rates. These Caribbean territories, because
of their geographic configuration and close proximity to the
continental United States, are particularly susceptible to
threats posed by illicit trafficking in persons, drugs, and
firearms, as well as money laundering and other criminal
activity.
In an attempt to better understand the broader security
concerns this emerging situation creates for the United States
mainland, including potential cooperation between drug cartels
operating in the Caribbean region and international terrorist
organizations, on July 21, 2012, the Subcommittee held a
hearing entitled ``The U.S. Caribbean Border: An Open Road for
Drug Traffickers and Terrorists.'' The Subcommittee received
testimony from the Honorable Luis Fortuno, Governor of the
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico; Rear Admiral William Lee, Deputy
for Operations, Policy, and Capabilities, United States Coast
Guard; Ms.Janice Ayala, Assistant Director for Operations,
United States Immigrations and Customs Enforcement; Mr.Kevin
McAleenan, Assistant Commissioner, Office of Field Operations,
United States Customs and Border Protection; Mr.Michael
Kostelnik, Assistant Commissioner, Office of Air and Marine,
United States Customs and Border Protection.

UNMANNED AERIAL SYSTEMS

The military use of unmanned aerial systems (UAS) has
increased exponentially within the last few years, especially
due to their high demand in both the Iraq and Afghanistan wars.
With the projected growth and concerns related to the domestic
use of UASs, the Subcommittee on Oversight, Investigations, and
Management examined information from experts in the field to
better understand DHS's role in overseeing the use of UASs
within the Homeland. On July 19, 2012, the Subcommittee held a
hearing entitled ``Using Unmanned Aerial Systems Within the
Homeland: Security Game Changer?'' The Subcommittee received
testimony from Mr.Todd E. Humphreys, Ph.D, Assistant Professor,
Cockrell School of Engineering, The University of Texas at
Austin; Mr.Gerald Dillingham, Ph.D., Director, Physical
Infrastructure Issues, Government Accountability Office; Chief
Deputy William McDaniel, Montgomery County Sheriff's Office,
Conroe, Texas; and Ms.Amie Stepanovich, Litigation Counsel,
Electronic Privacy Information Center.
Prior to the hearing, on June 27, 2012 the Subcommittee
Chair sent a letter to the Government Accountability Office
(GAO) requesting a review of unmanned aerial systems. As a
result, the GAO issued its final report in September 2012 (GAO-
12-981), which included a recommendation to the Secretary of
Homeland Security. In addition, on September 14, 2012, the
Subcommittee Chair and Ranking Member sent a letter to the
Secretary of Homeland Security to urge the Department's support
for a study by the National Research Council of the National
Academy of Sciences to assess vulnerabilities to the Nation's
GPS navigation system since UASs are dependent on this system
to operate. The Subcommittee has not yet received a response.

FORT HOOD ATTACK

On November 5, 2009, Nidal Hasan, a commissioned officer in
the U.S. Army, entered the Fort Hood deployment center with two
pistols. He jumped on a desk and shouted ``Allahu Akbar!'' --
Arabic for ``God is great!'' He then opened fire, killing
twelve U.S. soldiers and one Department of Defense employee,
and injuring forty-two others. In July 2012, the William H.
Webster Commission issued its final report, almost three years
after the incident. The report is an in-depth review of the
Federal Bureau of Investigation's (FBI) actions in the Nidal
Hasan case and the events leading up to the terrorist attack at
Fort Hood.
On September 14, 2012, the Subcommittee held a hearing
entitled ``Lessons From Fort Hood: Improving our Ability to
Connect the Dots.'' In addition to the Webster Commission's
Report, the Subcommittee examined information sharing across
the relevant intelligence and law enforcement agencies and if
there were other factors involved in preventing agencies to
share information which could have prevented this tragedy. The
Subcommittee received testimony from Mr.Douglas Winter, Deputy
Chair, The William H. Webster Commission; Ms.Ishrad Manji,
Director, Moral Courage Project, New York University;
Mr.Michael Leiter, Former Director of the National
Counterterrorism Center; and Mr.Kshemendra Paul, Program
Manager, Information Sharing Environment, Office of the
Director of National Intelligence.

BORDER SECURITY

On November 16, 2012, the Subcommittee held a hearing
entitled ``A Line in the Sand: Assessing Dangerous Threats to
Our Nation's Borders.'' The Subcommittee received testimony
from Ambassador Robert F. Noriega, Visiting Fellow, American
Enterprise Institute; Mr. Frank Cilluffo, Director, Homeland
Security Policy Institute, The George Washington University;
Mr. Douglas Farah, Senior Fellow, International Assessment and
Strategy Center; and Marc Rosenblum, Ph.D., Specialist in
Immigration Policy, Congressional Research Service.

----------

Subcommittee Hearings Held

``The U.S. Homeland Security Role in the Mexican War Against
Drug Cartels.'' March 31, 2011. (Serial No. 112-14)
``On the Border and in the Line of Fire: U.S. Law Enforcement,
Homeland Security and Drug Cartel Violence.'' May 11,
2011. (Serial No. 112-24)
``Denying Terrorist Safe Havens: Homeland Security's Efforts to
Counter Threats from Pakistan, Yemen and Somalia.''
June 3, 2011. (Serial No. 112-28)
``Homeland Security Investigations: Examining DHS's Efforts to
Protect American Jobs and Secure the Homeland.'' July
7, 2011. (Serial No. 112-34)
``Homeland Security Contracting: Does the Department
Effectively Leverage Emerging Technologies?'' July 15,
2011. (Serial No. 112-39)
``Preventing an Economic Shock Wave: Securing the Port of
Houston from a Terrorist Attack.'' August 24, 2011.
(Houston, Texas) (Serial No. 112-41)
``Ten Years After 9/11: Assessing Airport Security and
Preventing a Future Terrorist Attack.'' September 16,
2011. (Boston, Massachusetts) (Serial No. 112-45)
``Merida Part Two: Insurgency and Terrorism in Mexico.''
October 4, 2011. Joint with the Committee on Foreign
Affairs' Subcommittee on the Western Hemisphere.
(Serial No. 112-48)
``A Call to Action: Narco-Terrorism's Threat to the Southern
U.S. Border.'' October 14, 2011. (Serial No. 112-51)
``Texas Wildfire Review: Did Bureaucracy Prevent a Timely
Response?'' October 17, 2011. (Austin, Texas) (Serial
No. 112-52)
``Iranian Terror Operations on American Soil.'' October 26,
2011. Joint hearing with the Subcommittee on
Counterterrorism and Intelligence. (Serial No. 112-54)
``Is DHS Effectively Implementing a Strategy to Counter
Emerging Threats?'' February 3, 2012. (Serial No. 112-
64)
``Building One DHS: Why Can't Management Information be
Integrated?'' March 1, 2012. (Serial No. 112-72)
``Eliminating Waste, Fraud, Abuse, and Duplication in the
Department of Homeland Security.'' March 8, 2012.
(Serial No. 112-75)
``Building One DHS: Why is Employee Morale Low?'' March 22,
2012. (Serial No. 112-79)
``America is Under Cyber Attack: Why Urgent Action is Needed.''
April 24, 2012. (Serial No. 112-85)
``Department of Homeland Security: An Examination of Ethical
Standards.'' May 17, 2012. (Serial No. 112-92)
``U.S.-Caribbean Border: Open Road for Drug Traffickers and
Terrorists.'' June 21, 2012. (Serial No. 112-100)
``Using Unmanned Aerial Systems Within the Homeland: Security
Game Changer?'' July 19, 2012. (Serial No. 112-107)
``Lessons From Fort Hood: Improving our Ability to Connect the
Dots.'' September 14, 2012. (Serial No. 112-118)
``DHS Acquisition Management Challenges: Solutions for Saving
Taxpayer Dollars.'' September 21, 2012. (Serial No.
112-120)
``A Line in the Sand: Assessing Dangerous Threats to Our
Nation's Borders.'' November 16, 2012. (Serial No. 112-
123)
Subcommittee on Emergency Preparedness, Response, and Communications

Gus M. Bilirakis, Florida, Chairman

Scott Rigell, Virginia
Tom Marino, Pennsylvania,
Vice
Chair
Blake Farenthold, Texas
Robert L. Turner, New York
Peter T. King, New York
(Ex
Officio) Laura Richardson, California
Hansen Clarke, Michigan
Kathleen C. Hochul, New York
Bennie G. Thompson, Mississippi
(Ex Officio)

----------

During the 112th Congress, the Subcommittee on Emergency
Preparedness, Response, and Communications held 20 hearings,
receiving testimony from 90 witnesses, and considered three
measures.

----------

Legislative Activities of the Subcommittee

HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT MANAGEMENT IMPROVEMENT ACT

H.R.1129

To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to prohibit
requiring the use of a specified percentage of a grant under
the Urban Area Security Initiative and State Homeland Security
Grant Program for specific purposes, and for other purposes.

Summary

H.R.1129 prohibits the Administrator of the Federal
Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) from requiring recipients of
funds under the State Homeland Security Grant Program (SHSGP)
or the Urban Area Security Initiative (UASI) to use a specific
percentage of those funds for a particular allowable use,
unless otherwise directed by statute.
The bill further requires the Administrator of FEMA to
study the use of SHSGP and UASI funds for managing and
administering the grants to determine whether the current
statutory percentage is sufficient to ensure proper oversight,
management, and administration of grant awards. H.R.1129 also
directs the Administrator to study the feasibility, advantages,
and disadvantages of issuing multi-year grant guidance for
SHSGP and UASI. The Administrator is required to report to the
Committee on Homeland Security and Senate Homeland Security and
Governmental Affairs Committee on the findings of both studies
within 180 days of enactment of the bill.

Legislative History

H.R.1129 was introduced in the House on March 16, 2011, by
Ms.Richardson, Ms.Bass of California, and Ms.Hirono, and
referred solely to the Committee on Homeland Security. Within
the Committee, H.R.1129 was referred to the Subcommittee on
Emergency Preparedness, Response and Communications.
The Subcommittee considered H.R.1129 on December 8, 2011,
and reported the measure to the Full Committee with a favorable
recommendation, amended, by voice vote.

METROPOLITAN MEDICAL RESPONSE SYSTEM PROGRAM ACT OF 2011

H.R.1411

To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to ensure
continuation of the Metropolitan Medical Response System
Program, and for other purposes.

Summary

H.R.1411 authorizes the Metropolitan Medical Response
System Program (MMRS) and directs the Secretary of Homeland
Security to provide grants through the Administrator of the
Federal Emergency Management Agency to State and local
governments to strengthen medical surge capacity and mass
prophylaxis capabilities, enhance detection capabilities,
develop mass triage plans, support information sharing and
collaboration, conduct training and exercises, and strengthen
decontamination capabilities. Jurisdictions that received
funding in Fiscal Year 2010 are eligible for continued funding.
After Fiscal Year 2012, a jurisdiction shall not be eligible
unless the Secretary determines that the jurisdiction maintains
a sufficient measured degree of capability in accordance with
outlined performance measures. The provision also requires a
review of the program to provide recommendations going forward.
For each fiscal year, 2012 through 2016, $41 million is
authorized.

Legislative History

H.R.1411 was introduced in the House on April 7, 2011, by
Mr.Bilirakis, and referred to the Committee on Energy and
Commerce and the Committee on Homeland Security. Within the
Committee, H.R.1411 was referred to the Subcommittee on
Emergency Preparedness, Response, and Communications.
The Subcommittee considered H.R.1129 on December 8, 2011,
and reported the measure to the Full Committee with a favorable
recommendation, amended, by voice vote.

WMD PREVENTION AND PREPAREDNESS ACT OF 2011

H.R.2356

To enhance homeland security by improving efforts to prevent,
protect against, respond to, and recover from an attack with a
weapon of mass destruction, and for other purposes.

Summary

Legislative

112th Congress History
H.R.2356 was introduced in the House on June 24, 2011, by
Mr.Pascrell, Mr.King of New York, Mr.Thompson of Mississippi,
and eight original cosponsors, and referred to the Committee on
Homeland Security, and in addition to the Committee on Energy
and Commerce, the Committee on Transportation and
Infrastructure, the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and the House
Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence. Within the
Committee, H.R.2356 was referred to the Subcommittee on
Cybersecurity, Infrastructure Protection, and Security
Technologies and the Subcommittee on Emergency Preparedness,
Response, and Communications.
The Subcommittee on Cybersecurity, Infrastructure
Protection, and Security Technologies and the Subcommittee on
Emergency Preparedness, Response, and Communications were
discharged from further consideration of H.R.2356 on May 9,
2012.
The Full Committee considered H.R.2356 on May 9, 2012, and
ordered the measure to be reported to the House with a
favorable recommendation, amended, by voice vote.
The Committee on Homeland Security reported H.R.2356 to the
House on September 12, 2012, as H. Rpt. 112-665, Pt. I.
H.R.2356 was referred to the Committee on Science, Space,
and Technology on September 12, 2012, for a period ending not
later than November 30, 2012.
The referral of H.R.2356 to the Committee on Energy and
Commerce; the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure;
the Committee on Foreign Affairs; and the House Permanent
Select Committee on Intelligence was extended on September 12,
2012, for a period ending not later than November 30, 2012. The
Committee on Energy and Commerce; the Committee on
Transportation and Infrastructure; the Committee on Foreign
Affairs; the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence;
and the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology were
discharged from further consideration of H.R. 2356 on November
30, 2012. Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 510.

INTEGRATED PUBLIC ALERT AND WARNING SYSTEM MODERNIZATION ACT OF 2012

H.R.3563

Summary

H.R.3563 requires the Secretary of Homeland Security to
modernize and implement the National integrated public alert
and warning system through the establishment of common alert
and warning protocols, standards, terminology, and an operating
system. Among other things, H.R.3563 requires the Secretary to
develop alerting capabilities for diverse modes of
communications, the ability to adapt to future technologies,
mechanisms to protect individual privacy, and the ability to
alert non-resident visitors to an affected area. The bill
further requires that the system be developed to ensure alerts
and warnings are provided to individuals with disabilities and
access and functional needs.
Within one year of the system becoming fully functional,
and every six months thereafter, the Secretary is required to
report to the Committee on Homeland Security and the Senate
Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee on the
functionality and performance of the system.
H.R.3563 authorizes $13.4 million for the system for each
of fiscal years 2013 through 2017. This amount is equal to the
Federal Emergency Management Agency's budget request for Fiscal
Year 2013, and approximately $5 million less than the
appropriated amount for Fiscal Year 2011.

Legislative History

H.R.3563 was introduced in the House on December 6, 2011,
by Mr.Bilirakis and Ms.Richardson, and referred to the
Committee on Homeland Security, and the Committee on
Transportation and Infrastructure. Within the Committee,
H.R.3563 was referred to the Subcommittee on Emergency
Preparedness, Response, and Communications.
The Subcommittee considered H.R.3563 on December 8, 2011,
and reported the measure to the Full Committee with a favorable
recommendation, amended, by voice vote.
The Full Committee considered H.R.3563 on March 28, 2012,
and ordered the measure to be favorably reported to the House,
amended, by voice vote.
The Committee on Homeland Security reported H.R.3563 to the
House on September 20, 2012, as H. Rpt. 112-685, Pt. I.
Subsequently, the Committee on Transportation and
Infrastructure was discharged from further consideration.
A provision similar to H.R.3563 was included in section 102
of the FEMA Reauthorization Act of 2012 (H.R.2903), which
passed the House of Representatives on September 19, 2012. For
additional information on H.R.2903, please see the Legislative
Activities of the Full Committee above.

PUBLIC TRANSIT SECURITY AND LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT
SUPPORT ACT

H.R.3857

Summary

H.R. 3857 amends the Implementing Recommendations of the
9/11 Commission Act of 2007 to allow public transportation
agencies who receive grant funding for security improvements to
use such funds for specialized patrol teams as long as the
recipient submits a sustainment plan for maintaining the
capability or capacity in future years. The bill also
authorizes $400 million for TSGP grants for each of fiscal
years 2012 and 2013, except that no more than 50 percent of
those funds in each of the fiscal years may be used for
operational costs.

Legislative History

OUTREACH TO PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES DURING EMERGENCIES ACT

H.R.5806

Summary

In order to enhance coordination with, and outreach to,
individuals with disabilities during emergencies, H.R. 5806
would require the Administrator of the Federal Emergency
Management Agency to develop and provide guidance regarding
engagement with these individuals.

Legislative History

H.R. 5806 was introduced in the House on May 17, 2012, by
Ms. Richardson and referred to the Committee on Transportation
and Infrastructure, and in addition to the Committee on
Homeland Security. Within the Committee, H.R. 5806 was referred
to the Subcommittee on Emergency Preparedness, Response, and
Communications.
The Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure
considered H.R. 5806 on August 1, 2012, and ordered the measure
to be reported to the House, amended, by voice vote.
The Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure reported
H.R. 5806 on December 21, 2012, as H. Rpt. 112-719, Part I. The
Committee on Homeland Security was discharged from further
consideration of H.R. 5806. Placed on the Union Calendar,
Calendar No. 522.

MEDICAL PREPAREDNESS ALLOWABLE USE ACT

H.R.5997

Summary

As a result of findings from hearings held in the
Subcommittee on Emergency Preparedness, Response, and
Communications on medical countermeasures, H.R. 5997 was
introduced to ensure that medical preparedness activities,
including mass prophylaxis and medical surge capacity, remain
allowable uses under the State Homeland Security Grant Program
and the Urban Area Security Initiative. Specifically, H.R. 5997
codifies the medical preparedness activities currently
permitted in the grant guidance for those programs.

Legislative History

H.R. 5997 was introduced in the House on June 21, 2012, by
Mr. Bilirakis, Mr. Clarke of Michigan, Mr. Turner of New York,
and Mr. Rogers of Alabama; and referred to the Committee on
Homeland Security. Within the Committee, H.R. 5997 was referred
to the Subcommittee on Emergency Preparedness, Response, and
Communications.
The House considered H.R. 5997 under Suspension of the
Rules on November 27, 2012, and passed the bill, amended, by a
\2/3\ recorded vote of 397 yeas and 1 nay (Roll No. 609).

----------

Oversight Activities of the Subcommittee

DISASTER PREPAREDNESS, RESPONSE, AND RECOVERY

Since the beginning of the 112th Congress, States and
localities have experienced thwarted terror plots, severe
winter storms, tornadoes, hurricanes, earthquakes, a tsunami,
and widespread flooding. It is imperative that the Federal
Government, along with its partners at the State and local
levels and the private sector, work to prepare for and respond
to terrorist attacks, natural disasters, and other emergencies.
On February 4, 2011, Committee staff conducted a site visit
of the Mount Weather Emergency Operations Center in Virginia to
receive a tour and briefing on the Federal Government's
emergency operations center.
On February 8, 2011, the Subcommittee held a Member site
visit to the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA)
National Response Coordination Center in Washington, DC. This
visit provided Subcommittee Members with an overview of FEMA's
mission and operations and efforts to work with its State,
local, and private sector partners. Members met with officials
from throughout the agency including the Administrator and
Deputy Administrator of FEMA. Following the briefing, Members
toured the National Response Coordination Center.
On February 24 and March 22, 2011, Committee staff met with
representatives from FEMA and the U.S. Marine Corps to receive
a briefing on the Prepositioned Equipment Program.
On March 16, 2011, the Subcommittee Chair met with the
Director of FEMA's Office of Disability Integration and
Coordination to discuss efforts to integrate individuals with
disabilities and access functional needs into emergency
preparedness and response efforts.
Committee staff met with representatives from the Homeland
Security Policy Institute on April 5, 2011, to discuss
resiliency.
Committee staff participated in a tour of the Department of
Health and Human Services' Operations Center on April 21, 2011.
On May 5, 2011, Committee staff attended a briefing on
FEMA's direct housing program. This included a preview of the
agency's hurricane season preparedness and queries on its
housing contracts oversight.
Committee staff attended FEMA's quarterly response and
recovery briefing at FEMA Headquarters on May 6, 2011, and
received an update on operations in response to tornadoes and
flooding in FEMA Regions IV and VI.
On May 31, 2011, the Subcommittee held a Member site visit
to the American Red Cross' disaster operations center. The
visit provided information on the Red Cross' role in disaster
response and services it provides through its local chapters.
The Subcommittee held a field hearing in Clearwater,
Florida, on June 10, 2011, entitled ``Weathering the Storm: A
State and Local Perspective on Emergency Management.'' The
Subcommittee received testimony from Mr.Bryan Koon, Director,
Florida Division of Emergency Management; Ms.Nancy Dragani,
Director, Ohio Emergency Management Agency, testifying on
behalf of the National Emergency Management Association;
Mr.Gerald Smith, Director, Lake County Division of Emergency
Management, testifying on behalf of the Florida Emergency
Preparedness Association; Mr.John ``Rusty'' Russell, Director,
Huntsville--Madison County (AL) Emergency Management Agency,
testifying on behalf of the International Association of
Emergency Managers; Ms.Chauncia Willis, Emergency Coordinator,
City of Tampa, Florida; and Ms.Linda Carbone, Chief Executive
Officer, Tampa Bay Chapter, American Red Cross. This hearing
provided the Members with an opportunity to hear from State,
local and non-Governmental officials on their successes and
challenges as they work to prepare for and respond to natural
disasters and terrorist attacks.
Committee staff attended a briefing with representatives
from Joplin, Missouri, on June 14, 2011, to learn about the
impact of the tornadoes and receive an update on recovery
efforts.
Committee staff visited the National Operations Center
(NOC) on July 18, 2011 to receive a briefing on the NOC's
operations, intelligence, and response missions.
On July 21, 2011, the Subcommittee hosted a Member briefing
for the Members of the Committee on FEMA's recovery assistance
available after a disaster. Representatives from FEMA responded
to Member questions.
Committee staff conducted a site visit to the University of
Maryland College Park Campus, on July 29, 2011, to receive
briefings from representatives of the Center for Networking of
Infrastructure Sensors and the National Consortium on Terrorism
and Responses to Terrorism.
On September 3, 2011, Committee staff visited the Tampa Bay
Chapter of the American Red Cross.
On September 13, 2011, the Subcommittee Chair addressed the
FEMA Office of Disability Integration and Coordination's
``Getting Real'' Conference regarding the importance of
integrating individuals with disabilities and access and
functional needs in preparedness and response efforts.
The Subcommittee hosted a National Preparedness Month
briefing on September 19, 2011. Representatives from FEMA and
the Ready Program attended to provide information and respond
to staff questions.
Committee staff conducted a site visit to Virginia Urban
Search and Rescue (USAR) Team 1 in Fairfax, Virginia, on
September 27, 2011. Staff received a briefing from
representatives of FEMA and Fairfax County Fire and Rescue on
the capabilities of USAR teams. Representatives demonstrated
the various equipment and capabilities of USAR Team 1.
Committee staff visited the Nassau County (New York) Office
of Emergency Management's Emergency Operations Center for a
briefing and tour on October 20, 2011.
On October 25, 2011, the Subcommittee held a hearing
entitled ``Five Years Later: An Assessment of the Post Katrina
Emergency Management Reform Act.'' The Subcommittee received
testimony from Hon. W. Craig Fugate, Administrator, Federal
Emergency Management Agency, Department of Homeland Security.
This hearing provided Subcommittee Members with an opportunity
to assess FEMA's progress since the passage of the Post Katrina
Emergency Management Reform Act and consider areas in which
FEMA's capabilities could be further enhanced.
The Subcommittee held a field hearing in Detroit, Michigan,
on October 28, 2011, entitled ``The State of Northern Border
Preparedness: A Review of Federal, State, and Local
Coordination.'' The Subcommittee received testimony from
Mr.Andrew Velasquez, Regional Administrator--Region V, Federal
Emergency Management Agency, Department of Homeland Security;
RADM Michael Parks, Ninth District Commander, U.S. Coast Guard,
Department of Homeland Security; Mr.John Beutlich, Director of
the Northern Region, Office of Air and Marine, U.S. Customs and
Border Protection, Department of Homeland Security; Captain
Thomas Sands, Deputy State Director, Emergency Management and
Homeland Security, State of Michigan; Commissioner Donald
Austin, Detroit Fire Department; Mr.R. Daryl Lundy, Director,
Homeland Security and Emergency Management, City of Detroit;
and Mr.James P. Buford P.E.M., Director, Department of Homeland
Security and Emergency Management, Wayne County, Michigan. This
hearing considered the various preparedness and response
coordination efforts in areas along our Nation's Northern
border.
On November 17, 2011, Committee staff received a briefing
from representatives of the Federal Emergency Management Agency
(FEMA) on the Agency's disaster housing missions.
Committee staff attended a briefing conducted by the
Washington Metropolitan Council of Governments on its report,
``Improving Regional Incident Response,'' on November 28, 2011.
Staff were briefed by representatives from Montgomery County,
Maryland; Fairfax County, Virginia; and Washington, DC.
The Subcommittee held a field hearing in La Plume,
Pennsylvania, on November 29, 2011, entitled ``Ensuring
Effective Preparedness and Response: Lessons Learned from
Hurricane Irene and Tropical Storm Lee.'' The Subcommittee
received testimony from Ms.MaryAnn Tierney, Administrator,
Region III, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Department of
Homeland Security; Colonel David Anderson, Commander, Baltimore
District, United States Army Corps of Engineers; Mr.Glenn
Cannon, Director, Pennsylvania Emergency Management Agency;
Ms.Marita Wenner, Volunteer Chair, Pennsylvania State Disaster
Committee, American Red Cross; Mr.James Brozena, Executive
Director, Luzerne County Flood Protection Authority; Mr.James
Good, Owner, Arey Building Supply. This hearing assessed the
impact of Hurricane Irene and Tropical Storm Lee, particularly
on hard hit areas in Northeastern Pennsylvania, and considered
the lessons learned from those storms to ensure the continued
enhancement of preparedness, response, and recovery
capabilities.
In furtherance of the Subcommittee's oversight of FEMA's
progress in implementing the Post Katrina Emergency Management
Reform Act of 2006, Committee staff attended the International
Disaster Conference in New Orleans, Louisiana during the week
of January 16, 2012. Staff attended seminars regarding public
and private sector partnerships during disaster response, and
best practices for the development of mitigation, response, and
recovery plans.
On January 18, 2012, the Subcommittee Chair met with the
2011 winners of FEMA's Individual and Community Preparedness
Awards.
Committee staff received a briefing on hazard mitigation
from representatives of FEMA on January 25, 2012.
On January 26, 2012, Committee staff participated in the
inaugural FEMA Think Tank conference call led by FEMA Deputy
Administrator Richard Serino.
On March 16, 2012, Committee staff met with FEMA Region II
Regional Administrator Lynn Canton to discuss operations within
FEMA Region II.
Committee staff attended the 2012 Interagency Spring Flood
Briefing on March 16, 2012; and on March 23, 2012, received a
briefing from representatives of FEMA on the National Flood
Insurance Program.
Committee staff met with the FEMA Federal Insurance and
Mitigation Associate Administrator on April 20, 2012 to discuss
efforts to reauthorize the National Flood Insurance Program.
On June 5, 2012, Committee staff attended a briefing
conducted by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, National
Weather Service, and American Red Cross on preparedness for the
2012 hurricane season.
Committee staff received a briefing from representatives of
the American Red Cross on June 25, 2012 regarding disaster
trends and response operations.
On July 17, 2012, the Subcommittee held a Member site visit
to the American Red Cross' Digital Disaster Operations Center
to receive a tour of the Center and briefing about the use of
social media to aid in disaster preparedness and response.
Committee staff received a briefing from representatives of
the National Academies of Science on July 31, 2012 on the
release of its report, ``Disaster Resilience: A National
Imperative.''
On August 29, 2012, Committee staff attended a video
conference call at FEMA's National Response Coordination Center
on the impact of Hurricane Isaac in each of the FEMA Regions.
On September 14, 2012, Committee staff received a briefing
from the Department of Justice on the specifics of Americans
with Disabilities Act compliance as they pertain to emergency
shelters.
Committee staff attended the FEMA Office of Response and
Recovery's quarterly briefing on October 19, 2012 and received
an update on the implementation of the Disaster Assistance
Recoupment Fairness Act and the Flood Insurance Reform Act.

PRESIDENTIAL POLICY DIRECTIVE-8

On May 5, 2011, the Subcommittee Members received a
briefing on Presidential Policy Directive-8-National
Preparedness (PPD-8), which outlines the Administration's
vision for strengthening preparedness and resilience. PPD-8
repeals and replaces Homeland Security Presidential Directive
(HSPD) 8-National Preparedness, signed by President George W.
Bush in December 2003. Members were briefed by the Deputy
Administrator for National Preparedness, Federal Emergency
Management Agency, and the Senior Director for Preparedness
Policy, National Security Staff, The White House.
Committee staff met with representatives of the Federal
Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) on August 1, 2011, to
receive a briefing on the implementation of PPD-8.
On September 23, 2011, Committee staff attended a briefing
on the National Disaster Recovery Framework provided by FEMA,
the Department of Commerce, the Department of Housing and Urban
Development, and the Department of the Interior.
On November 3, 2011, Committee staff attended FEMA's Office
of Response and Recovery's quarterly briefing and received an
update on Presidential Policy Directive-8.
Committee staff met with representatives of FEMA's Federal
Insurance and Mitigation Administration, on December 20, 2011,
to discuss mitigation activities and programs and the
development of the mitigation framework pursuant to PPD-8.
Committee staff attended FEMA's quarterly response and
recovery briefing at FEMA headquarters on January 13, 2012, at
which an update on PPD-8 implementation was provided.
On March 15, 2012, Committee staff attended the FEMA Region
II National Disaster Recovery Framework Forum in New York City,
New York.
Committee staff received a briefing from representatives of
FEMA on the release of the National Preparedness Report,
pursuant to PPD-8 and section 652(a) of the Post Katrina
Emergency Management Reform Act, on May 3, 2012.
On June 6, 2012, the Subcommittee held a hearing entitled
``The National Preparedness Report: Assessing the State of
Preparedness.'' The Subcommittee received testimony from Hon.
Timothy Manning, Deputy Administrator, Protection and National
Preparedness, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Department
of Homeland Security; Mr.Stanley J. Czerwinski, Director,
Intergovernmental Relations, U.S. Governmental Accountability
Office; Mr.John Madden, Director, Homeland Security & Emergency
Management, State of Alaska, testifying on behalf of the
National Emergency Management Association; Mr.Mike Sena, Deputy
Director, Northern California Regional Intelligence Center,
testifying on behalf of the National Fusion Center Association;
and Georges C. Benjamin, M.D., Executive Director, American
Public Health Association. This hearing examined the National
Preparedness Report, required by PPD-8 and Section 652 of the
Post Katrina Emergency Management Reform Act, and provided
Subcommittee Members with an assessment of the current state of
preparedness nationwide.
On June 8, 2012, Committee staff attended the FEMA Office
of Response and Recovery's quarterly briefing and received an
update on the various frameworks required by PPD-8, along with
FEMA's workforce transformation initiatives.
Committee staff met with representatives from the National
Emergency Management Association on December 3, 2012, to
discuss the Disaster Relief Fund and possible reforms to
enhance the efficiency of disaster response and recovery.

BUDGET REQUESTS FOR THE
FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY

FY 2012 Budget Request

The President's Fiscal Year 2012 budget request included
$10.06 billion for the Federal Emergency Management Agency
(FEMA), a $283 million reduction from the level in the Fiscal
Year 2011 Continuing Resolution. The request included
reductions in the Management and Administration account, which
were largely attributed to efficiencies and streamlined
business processes. The request also proposed to restructure
homeland security grant programs through the elimination and
consolidation of a number of smaller grant programs into the
larger State Homeland Security Grant Program and Urban Area
Security Initiative funding accounts.
On March 9, 2011, the Subcommittee held a hearing entitled
``Ensuring Effective Preparedness and Response--An Assessment
of the Fiscal Year 2012 Budget Request for the Federal
Emergency Management Agency.'' The Subcommittee received
testimony from Hon. W. Craig Fugate, Administrator, Federal
Emergency Management Agency, Department of Homeland Security.
This hearing provided Subcommittee Members with an opportunity
to question Administrator Fugate about President Obama's Fiscal
Year 2012 budget request for the Federal Emergency Management
Agency (FEMA) and ongoing operations at FEMA.
In preparation for the hearing, Committee staff met with
representatives from FEMA on February 16, 2011 to receive a
briefing on the President's Fiscal Year 2012 budget request.

FY 2013 Budget Request

The President's Fiscal Year 2013 budget request included
$10.17 billion for the Federal Emergency Management Agency, a
$217 million reduction from the Fiscal Year 2012 enacted level
of funding. Much of this reduction is attributed to streamlined
business processes within the Salaries and Expenses account.
On February 29, 2012, the Subcommittee held a hearing
entitled ``The President's Fiscal Year 2013 Budget Request for
the Federal Emergency Management Agency.'' The Subcommittee
received testimony from Hon. Richard Serino, Deputy
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Department
of Homeland Security. This hearing continued the Subcommittee's
oversight of the Federal Emergency Management Agency and
provided Members with an opportunity to examine the President's
Fiscal Year 2013 budget request and explore ways to continue to
enhance emergency preparedness and response capabilities
through the efficient and effective use of taxpayer dollars.
In preparation for the hearing, Committee staff met with
representatives from FEMA on February 14, 2012 to receive a
briefing on the President's Fiscal Year 2013 budget request for
FEMA.

MEDICAL PREPAREDNESS

The mission of the Office of Health Affairs (OHA) is to
provide health and medical expertise in support of the
Department of Homeland Security's mission to prepare for,
respond to, and recover from all hazards impacting the Nation's
health security.
As part of the Subcommittee's oversight, Committee staff
attended a number of conferences and met with stakeholders.
From January 10 through 11, 2011, Committee staff attended the
annual Public Health Emergency Medical Countermeasures
Enterprise conference in Washington, DC.
From March 15 though 16, 2011, Committee staff traveled to
New York City, New York, for ``Tales of Our Cities,'' a
conference focused on medical preparedness for a catastrophic
incident.
On March 17, 2011, the Subcommittee held a hearing entitled
``Ensuring Effective Preparedness, Response, and Recovery for
Events Impacting Health Security.'' The Subcommittee received
testimony from Dr. Alexander G. Garza, MD, MPH, Assistant
Secretary for Health Affairs and Chief Medical Officer,
Department of Homeland Security. This hearing provided
Subcommittee Members with an opportunity to examine the
President's Fiscal Year 2012 budget request for OHA and OHA's
progress in developing its mission to provide for health
security, to discuss the future of the agency as a nimble and
effective provider in this regard, and to identify areas for
improvements and cost savings.
In preparation for the hearing, Committee staff met with
representatives of the Office of Health Affairs on February 3,
2011 to receive a briefing on its mission and activities. On
February 15, 2011, Committee staff met with OHA representatives
to receive a briefing on the President's Fiscal Year 2012
budget request for OHA. Committee staff once again met with
representatives from OHA on March 14, 2011 to receive a
briefing on medical operations and challenges in medical
credentialing for their first responder workforce.
During the hearing, Subcommittee Members expressed concern
about Project BioWatch. Subsequent to the hearing on April 5,
2011, the Chairs and Ranking Members of the Subcommittee on
Emergency Preparedness, Response, and Communications, and the
Subcommittee Cybersecurity, Infrastructure Protection, and
Security Technologies sent a letter to the Secretary of
Homeland Security expressing concern about the Department's
acquisition processes as they relate to Project BioWatch. The
response, dated May 23, 2011, was deemed inadequate to allay
Member concerns. As a result, the Subcommittee Chair, along
with the Chair of the Subcommittee on Cybersecurity,
Infrastructure Protection, and Security Technologies, sent a
letter to the Comptroller General on November 17, 2011,
requesting an examination of the BioWatch Generation 3
acquisition. This report was released on September 12, 2012
(GAO-12-810) and projected serious concerns over the management
of the acquisition. For additional information on this report,
see the September 13, 2012 hearing detailed in the
Biosurveillance section below.
On March 29, 2011, Committee staff received an update
briefing from the Director of the Office of Public Health
Preparedness and Response of the Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention on that office's activities.
The Chair and Ranking Member of the Subcommittee introduced
H.R.1411, the ``Metropolitan Medical Response System Program
Act,'' on April 7, 2011. H.R.1411 authorizes the activities of
the Metropolitan Medical Response System, including medical
surge capacity and countermeasures distribution. For further
action on H.R.1411, see the legislative section listed above.
On June 9, 2011, Committee staff visited Tampa General
Hospital in Tampa, Florida to meet with officials about
emergency preparedness efforts and medical surge capacity and
tour the facility.
Committee staff received a briefing from representatives
from the Department of Health and Human Services on its Federal
Experts Security Advisory Panel report on reforming laboratory
biosecurity, on June 17, 2011.
On June 23, 2011, the Subcommittee Chair met with the
Assistant Secretary of the Office of Health Affairs, to discuss
health security matters.
Committee staff received a briefing from representatives of
the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, on September
28, 2011, on its 2011 State-by-State public health preparedness
report and other matters.
On October 24, 2011, Committee staff received a briefing
from representatives of the Department of Health and Human
Services on its work to develop and refine protocols for use of
the smallpox vaccine.
On January 12, 2012, Committee staff met with
representatives from the Trust for America's Health (TFAH) to
receive a briefing on TFAH's report, Ready or Not: Protecting
the Public From Diseases, Disasters, and Bioterrorism 2011.
The Subcommittee held a hearing on March 29, 2012, entitled
``The Fiscal Year 2013 Budget Request for the Department of
Homeland Security's Office of Health Affairs.'' The
Subcommittee received testimony from Dr. Alexander Garza,
Assistant Secretary for Health Affairs, Chief Medical Officer,
Department of Homeland Security. This hearing continued the
Subcommittee's oversight of OHA, and particularly the BioWatch
Program and National Biosurveillance Integration Center,
providing Subcommittee Members with an opportunity to more
closely examine these, and other, OHA programs to ensure
resources are leveraged to best enhance security. In
preparation of the hearing, on February 16, 2012, Committee
staff received a briefing from the Office of Health Affairs on
the office's Fiscal Year 2013 budget request.
On September 27, 2012, Committee staff attended the 2012
New York City meeting of the Concordia Summit: Promoting
Public-Private Partnerships. Panels included discussions on
optimizing Federal and industry roles in health security and
development of medical countermeasures for biodefense.
Committee staff attended a meeting of the Committee on
Department of Homeland Security Workforce Resilience at the
Institute of Medicine of the National Academies of Science on
December 13, 2012. The Committee convened at the request of the
Department to study how to improve the physical and mental
resilience of the DHS workforce and identify the elements of a
strategic plan for the DHSTogether program. The Assistant
Secretary of the Office of Health Affairs, which is leading the
effort in partnership with the Management Directorate, provided
opening remarks.

BIOSURVEILLANCE

On February 4, 2011, Committee staff visited the Multi-
Agency Collaborative Environment of the Department of Defense
in Virginia to receive a briefing on their work with the
National Biosurveillance and Integration Center.
Committee staff participated in a panel discussion at the
Institute of Medicine on ``Discussions on Future Directions for
National Biosurveillance,'' on May 9, 2011. Additionally,
Committee staff attended Biowatch Gen-3 visitor day in Chicago,
Illinois to learn about and observe field testing of the
Generation 3 technology.
On August 3, 2011, Committee staff received a briefing from
representatives of the Office of Health Affairs and the Office
of the Chief Procurement Officer on plans for re-competing the
support contract for the BioWatch Program.
From August 29 through September 4, 2011, Committee staff
attended the 2011 National BioWatch Workshop in Tampa, Florida.
The Subcommittee Chair addressed a portion of the workshop.
Committee staff received a classified briefing from
representatives of the Office of Health Affairs on the
development of the BioWatch Gen-3 program on October 6, 2011.
On November 17, 2011, the Chairs of the Subcommittee on
Emergency Preparedness, Response, and Communications and the
Subcommittee on Cybersecurity, Infrastructure Protection, and
Security Technology sent a letter to the Comptroller General of
the United States requesting an examination of the development
of the Office of Health Affairs' BioWatch Generation-3 system.
The GAO released their report on September 12, 2012 [GAO-12-
810].
Committee staff met with the Institute of Medicine of the
National Academies of Science on February 1, 2012, to discuss
the findings of its report, ``Information Sharing and
Collaboration: Applications in Integrated Biosurveillance.''
On April 9, 2012, Committee staff received a briefing from
the new Director of the National Biosurveillance and
Integration Center (NBIC) concerning on-going activities and
the expected new strategic plan for the NBIC.
On July 23, 2012, the Subcommittee held a Member briefing
and demonstration of the BioWatch Generation 1/2 technology.
Representatives from the Office of Health Affairs were present
to respond to Member questions.
On September 13, 2012, the Subcommittee on Emergency
Preparedness, Response, and Communications and the Subcommittee
on Cybersecurity, Infrastructure Protection, and Security
Technologies held a joint hearing entitled ``BioWatch Present
and Future: Meeting Mission Needs for Effective
Biosurveillance?'' The Subcommittees received testimony from
Dr. Alexander Garza, MD, MPH, Assistant Secretary for Health
Affairs, Chief Medical Officer, Department of Homeland
Security; Hon. Raphael Borras, Under Secretary for Management,
Department of Homeland Security; Mr.William Jenkins, Director,
Homeland Security and Justice Issues, Government Accountability
Office; and Ms.Frances Phillips, RN, MHA, Deputy Secretary for
Public Health Services, Department of Health and Mental
Hygiene, State of Maryland. This hearing examined the state of
the Department of Homeland Security's biosurveillance efforts,
with a special focus on BioWatch, and with particular attention
to the findings of a GAO report [GAO-12-810] released on
management challenges with the BioWatch Generation 3
acquisition.
On September 21, 2012, Committee staff met with
representatives from the Office of Health Affairs to receive a
briefing on the National Biosurveillance Integration Center
Strategic Plan.

OUTREACH TO STATE, LOCAL, AND TRIBAL GOVERNMENTS, AND
THE PRIVATE SECTOR

Throughout the 112th Congress, Committee staff met with
various Federal agencies and stakeholder groups representing
the first responder and emergency management communities to
discuss issues of concern to their membership. This includes
representatives from the Department of Homeland Security's
Office of Policy to discuss the new Tribal Liaison Officer
position; the National Association of Counties; the National
Emergency Managers Association; the Big City Emergency
Managers, and the International Association of Fire Chiefs'
Terrorism and Homeland Security Subcommittee.
On May 12, 2011, the Subcommittee Chair met with the
Director of the Federal Emergency Management Agency's Private
Sector Division to receive a briefing on the Division's
operations and efforts to incorporate the private sector into
emergency preparedness, response, and recovery efforts.
Committee staff met with representatives from FEMA's
Private Sector Division on July 25, 2011, to receive an update
on current activities.
On August 3, 2011, the Subcommittee Chair and Ranking
Member addressed FEMA's National conference, ``Building
Resilience Through Public Private Partnerships,'' held in
Washington, DC.
On October 26, 2011, the Subcommittee Chair addressed the
Congressional Fire Services Institute's National Advisory
Committee.
On June 20, 2012, Committee staff met with representatives
from Joplin, Missouri to receive an update on recovery efforts
following the May 2011 tornadoes.
Committee staff conducted a site visit to the Washington
Regional Threat and Analysis Center in Washington, D.C. on June
22, 2012 to receive a briefing on the Center's operations.
During this site visit, staff also toured the co-located
emergency operations center.

EXERCISES

The Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) National
Exercise Program works to coordinate preparedness exercises at
the Federal, State, and local level. Each year, FEMA conducts a
National Level Exercise (NLE), which includes participation
from senior leadership in the Federal interagency along with
State and local partners. National Level Exercise 2011 (NLE
2011), a functional exercise held from May 16 through 19, 2011,
simulated a catastrophic earthquake in the New Madrid Seismic
Zone.
On April 1, 2011, the Subcommittee held a Member briefing
on preparations for the NLE 2011, including efforts to use
lessons learned from recent catastrophic earthquakes in New
Zealand and Japan to inform the scenario. Members were briefed
by FEMA's Deputy Administrator for National Preparedness and
the Director of the National Exercise Program.
In preparation for this Member briefing, Committee staff
received several briefings on FEMA's National Exercise Program
and National Level Exercise 2011. On March 2, 2011, Committee
staff received a briefing from FEMA officials on the National
Exercise Program. Committee staff received a briefing on
preparations for NLE 2011 on March 23, 2011. In addition, on
May 16, 2011, Committee staff observed the NLE 2011 functional
exercise. Staff traveled to the Master Control Cell located in
Herndon, Virginia, and the American Red Cross Disaster
Operations Center and received briefings from representatives
of FEMA, the U.S. Geological Survey, the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers, the American Red Cross, and Voluntary Organizations
Active in Disasters.
On August 18, 2011 Committee staff traveled to Ft. McNair
to receive a briefing on the capabilities and jurisdiction of
the National Capitol Area Command. Subsequent to the briefing,
staff traveled to the Center for National Response in West
Virginia to observe and participate in a joint weapons of mass
destruction rescue and recovery exercise with the 911th
Battalion and the Fairfax and Arlington County, Virginia Fire
Departments.
From September 28 through 29, 2011, Committee staff
participated in a tabletop exercise on recovery and mitigation.
Hosted by FEMA, this exercise was a follow on to NLE 2011 and
focused on the necessary recovery and mitigation efforts
subsequent to a catastrophic earthquake.
Committee staff observed the 2011 Capital Shield Exercise,
a National Capital Area multi-hazard exercise, on October 19,
2011. Exercise participants included representatives from FEMA,
the Department of Homeland Security, the Department of Defense,
and District of Columbia Emergency Management.
Representatives of FEMA's National Exercise Division
briefed Committee staff on February 2, 2012 on changes to the
National Exercise Program and lessons learned from NLE 2011.
Committee staff observed the NLE 2012 Capstone event on
June 4, 2012. Staff traveled to the DHS Office of Cybersecurity
and Communications in Arlington, Virginia to receive a briefing
from NLE 2012 exercise leaders, tour the National Cybersecurity
and Communications Integration Center, view DHS' Cybersecurity
Operations Demonstration, and participate in a video conference
call with the exercise's Master Control Center.
On July 18, 2012, the Subcommittee held a Member briefing
on the National Exercise Program. Representatives from the
Federal Emergency Management Agency National Protection and
Program Directorate responded to Member questions. In
preparation for this Member Briefing, Committee staff received
a briefing from private sector partners on June 27, 2012
regarding National Level Exercises 2011 and 2012, and the
future of FEMA's National Exercise Program.

PREPAREDNESS AND RESPONSE TO CHEMICAL, BIOLOGICAL, RADIOLOGICAL, AND
NUCLEAR THREATS

Terrorists actively plot and have attempted to use weapons
of mass destruction (WMD) to attack the United States. At a
2010 Committee on Homeland Security hearing with the
Commissioners of the Commission on the Prevention of Weapons of
Mass Destruction Proliferation and Terrorism (WMD Commission),
the Commissioners noted that ``it is more likely than not that
there will be a weapon of mass destruction used someplace on
earth by a terrorist group before the end of the year 2013 and
that it is more likely that the weapons will be biological
rather than nuclear.'' In the WMD Commission's report card on
the Nation's efforts to protect the Nation from WMD terrorism,
the Government received a grade of ``F'' on its efforts to
enhance the Nation's capabilities for rapid response to prevent
biological attacks from inflicting mass casualties.
Committee staff participated in a site visit to the Calvert
Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant, in Calvert County, Maryland on
March 25, 2011. Staff toured the facility and received a
briefing on the plant's security and disaster preparedness.
Committee staff met with representatives from the Nuclear
Energy Institute on March 29, 2011, to discuss the response to
the disaster at the Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant in Japan and
disaster preparedness efforts at nuclear power plants in the
United States.
On April 13, 2011, the Subcommittee began a series of
hearings entitled ``Taking Measure of Countermeasures.'' The
first day of hearings was subtitled ``A Review of Government
and Industry Efforts to Protect the Homeland Through
Accelerated Research, Development, and Acquisition of Chemical,
Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear Medical
Countermeasures.'' The Subcommittee received testimony from
Ms.Cynthia Bascetta, Managing Director, Health Care, Government
Accountability Office; Dr. Segaran P. Pillai, Chief Medical and
Science Advisor, Chemical and Biological Division, Science and
Technology Directorate, Department of Homeland Security; Dr.
Richard J. Hatchett, Chief Medical Officer and Deputy Director,
Strategic Sciences and Management, Department of Health and
Human Services; Dr. Gerald W. Parker, Deputy Assistant to the
Secretary of Defense, Chemical and Biological Defense,
Department of Defense; Ms.Phyllis Arthur, Senior Director,
Vaccines, Immunotherapeutics, and Diagnostics Policy,
Biotechnology Industry Organization; Mr.John M. Clerici,
Principal, Tiber Creek Partners LLC; and Dr. Daniel Fagbuyi,
Medical Director, Disaster Preparedness and Emergency
Management, Children's National Medical Center. This hearing
provided Members with the opportunity to question Federal and
private sector witnesses about the substantial challenges that
remain in the research, development, and acquisition of medical
countermeasures.
Committee staff participated in a site visit to the Nuclear
Regulatory Commission's Emergency Operations Center on May 6,
2011, and received a briefing on its activities.
On May 12, 2011, the Subcommittee convened the second day
of hearings, subtitled ``A Review of Efforts to Protect the
Homeland Through Distribution and Dispensing of CBRN Medical
Countermeasures.'' The Subcommittee received testimony from Dr.
Alexander Garza, Assistant Secretary for Health Affairs and
Chief Medical Officer, Office of Health Affairs, Department of
Homeland Security; Rear Admiral Ali Khan, Director, Office of
Public Health Preparedness and Response, Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention, Department of Health and Human
Services; Mr.Mike McHargue, Director of Emergency Operations,
Division of Emergency Medical Operations; Florida Department of
Health; Mr.David Starr, Director, Countermeasures Response
Unit, New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene;
Chief Lawrence E. Tan, Emergency Medical Services Division, New
Castle County, Delaware, testifying on behalf of the Emergency
Services Sector Coalition on Medical Countermeasures; and Dr.
Jeffrey Levi, Executive Director, Trust for America's Health.
This hearing provided Subcommittee Members with the opportunity
to examine various distribution and dispensing plans and
efforts at the Federal, State, local, and private sector
levels, including an assessment of the challenges faced in
distributing and dispensing countermeasures to large segments
of the population.
In preparation for these hearings, Committee staff held
numerous meetings with representatives from the Department of
Homeland Security, the Department of Health and Human Services,
the Government Accountability Office, the WMD Commission, State
and local governments, and the private sector.
On May 13, 2011, the Subcommittee along with the
Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and Intelligence, and the
Subcommittee on Cybersecurity, Infrastructure Protection, and
Security Technologies, held a classified Member briefing on the
threat posed by WMD terrorism. Members were briefed by
representatives of the National Counterterrorism Center and the
National Counter-proliferation Center.
On June 23, 2011, the Subcommittee on Cybersecurity,
Infrastructure Protection, and Security Technologies and the
Subcommittee on Emergency Preparedness, Response, and
Communications held a joint hearing, prior to introduction, on
H.R.2356, the ``WMD Prevention and Preparedness Act of 2011.''
The Subcommittees received testimony from Hon. William J.
Pascrell, Jr. a Representative in Congress from the 8th
District of New Jersey; Senator Jim Talent, Vice Chairman, The
Bipartisan WMD Center; Dr. Robert P. Kadlec, Former Special
Assistant to the President for Biodefense; and Mr.Richard H.
Berdnik, Sheriff, Passaic County, New Jersey. This legislative
hearing examined provisions in H.R.2356, to prevent, protect
against, respond to, and recover from a WMD attack. For further
activity on H.R.2356, see the Legislative Activities of the
Full Committee discussed above.
Committee staff met with representatives of the Office of
Health Affairs on August 3, 2011, to discuss agricultural
security. Subsequent to that meeting, on August 10, 2011, the
Subcommittee Chair sent a letter to the Comptroller General,
Government Accountability Office (GAO), requesting an
examination of the Nation's agricultural defense initiatives
with regard to surveillance and response. The GAO is expected
to release a report on this in early 2013.
On September 8, 2011, Committee staff met with
representatives of the Environmental Protection Agency's Aspect
Program to receive a briefing on radiation detection
capabilities and program operations.
Committee staff participated in a panel discussion at the
Institute of Medicine's Preparedness Forum in Washington, DC,
on October 19, 2011, regarding H.R.2356, the ``WMD Prevention
and Preparedness Act of 2011.''
On March 20, 2012, Committee staff visited John F. Kennedy
International Airport to observe the agricultural inspection
operations of the U.S. Customs and Border Protection. These
operations are critical for preventing the importation of
illegal commodities that can introduce agents harmful to human
health and animal and agricultural health, particularly
biological threats.
On April 17, 2012, the Subcommittee held a third day of
hearings on ``Taking Measure of Countermeasures.'' The hearing
was subtitled ``Protecting the Protectors,'' and the
Subcommittee received testimony from Dr. James D. Polk,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Office of Health Affairs,
Department of Homeland Security; Mr.Edward J. Gabriel,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Preparedness and
Response, Department of Health and Human Services; Chief Al H.
Gillespie, President and Chairman of the Board, International
Association of Fire Chiefs; Mr.Bruce Lockwood, Second Vice
President, USA Council, International Association of Emergency
Managers; Sheriff Chris Nocco, Pasco County Sheriff's Office,
Pasco County, Florida; and Mr.Manuel Peralta, Director of
Safety and Health, National Association of Letter Carriers.
This hearing, the third in the series on medical
countermeasures, provided Subcommittee Members with the
opportunity to explore plans and strategies to ensure that
emergency response personnel are protected in the event of such
an attack, including through voluntary pre-event vaccination.
In preparation for the hearing, on March 27, 2012,
Committee staff received a briefing from the Biomedical
Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA) of the
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) on BARDA's
activities and priorities for Fiscal Year 2012 development and
procurement of medical countermeasures. Staff also received a
briefing that day from HHS' Office of the Assistant Secretary
for Preparedness and Response, jointly with the United States
Postal Service, on a National plan to utilize mail carriers to
dispense home medical kits to the public in a health emergency.
On April 10, 2012, Committee staff were briefed by
representatives of BARDA on plans to develop an antibiotic
medkit for first responders.
As a result of findings from the series of hearings on
medical preparedness and medical countermeasures, on June 21,
2012, the Subcommittee Chair introduced H.R. 5997, the Medical
Preparedness Allowable Use Act, to ensure that Urban Area
Security Iniative and State Homeland Security Grant Program
funds may be used for medical preparedness and mass prophylaxis
activities. H.R. 5997 passed the House on November 29, 2012, by
a vote of 397 yeas and 1 nay. For additional information on
H.R. 5997, see Legislative Activities of the Subcommittee
above.
On August 1, 2012, Committee staff held a roundtable
discussion with representatives from the Congressional Research
Service, Government Accountability Office, former Department of
Homeland Security officials, and other relevant subject matter
experts on the topic of optimizing the Department's weapons of
mass destruction activities and capabilities. The discussion
addressed the pros and cons of consolidation of the Office of
Health Affairs and the Domestic Nuclear Detection Office, and
other considerations for shifting activities and authorities.
On October 26, 2012, the Subcommittee Chair addressed the
annual meeting of the Emergency Services Coalition on Medical
Preparedness, ``Countermeasures 2.0: Protecting the
Protectors,'' in Orlando, Florida.

EFFICIENCY AND EFFECTIVENESS OF ASSISTANCE TO STATE AND LOCAL
GOVERNMENTS AND INDIVIDUALS

On January 5, 2011 and January 31, 2011, Committee staff
attended briefings by Federal Emergency Management (FEMA)
officials on their plans to recoup up to $643 million in
potentially improper Individual Assistance payments from
Hurricanes Katrina and Rita and other subsequent disasters.
Committee staff received a further briefing on FEMA's
recoupment efforts on March 15, 2011.
On January 12, 2011, Committee staff received a briefing
from representatives of the Department of Homeland Security's
Office of Inspector General (OIG) to learn about the OIG's
audit of grant programs to ensure efficiency and that funding
is used in compliance with relevant statutory requirements.
Committee staff met with representatives from the OIG on
January 24, 2011, to discuss the results of an audit of New
York's management of State Homeland Security Grant Program and
Urban Area Security Initiative grant funds.
On February 9, 2011, Committee staff met with
representatives from the National Academy of Public
Administration to receive a briefing on their work with the
Federal Emergency Management Agency to develop performance
measures and metrics, pursuant to Pub.L. 111-271, for grants
administered by the Department of Homeland Security. Committee
staff received a further update of this work on May 3, 2011.
Committee staff met with the Assistant Administrator of the
Federal Emergency Management Agency's Grant Programs
Directorate on February 11, 2011, to discuss various issues
related to homeland security grants.
Committee staff met with representatives of the Government
Accountability Office on March 1, 2011, to discuss their
oversight of grants administered by the Department of Homeland
Security under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act.
On April 7, 2011, Committee staff received a briefing from
representatives of the Federal Emergency Management Agency and
the DHS Office of Intelligence and Analysis on the use of
grants to support State and local fusion centers.
Committee staff met with representatives from the Federal
Emergency Management Agency, the Coast Guard, the
Transportation Security Administration, and the Office of
Intelligence and Analysis on May 18, 2011, to receive a
briefing on the Department's guidance for the Fiscal Year 2011
grant programs.
Committee staff met with representatives from FEMA's
National Preparedness Assessment Division on May 24, 2011, to
receive a briefing on FEMA's efforts to develop performance
measures and metrics for the various grant programs.
On June 8, 2011, Committee staff attended the National
Academy of Public Administration's second panel meeting with
representatives of the Federal Emergency Management Agency,
``Developing Performance Measures and Assessing the
Effectiveness of FEMA's Homeland Security Grant Programs.''
Committee staff met with representatives from the City of
Tampa Bay, Florida on June 8, 2011, to discuss the Urban Area
Security Initiative (UASI).
On July 15, 2011, Committee staff received a classified
briefing from representatives of FEMA, the Office of
Intelligence and Analysis, and the Office of Infrastructure
Protection on the changes to the risk formula used to determine
Homeland Security Grant Program awards.
From June 19 through 22, 2011, Committee staff attended the
National UASI and Homeland Security Conference in San
Francisco, California to participate in workshops on the uses
and effectiveness of the major homeland security grant
programs.
Committee staff met with representatives from FEMA and the
United States Coast Guard on August 1, 2011, to receive a
briefing on the Port Security Grant Program.
On August 22, 2011, Committee staff met with
representatives from FEMA, Customs and Border Protection, the
Coast Guard, and the Transportation Security Administration to
receive a briefing on the Fiscal Year 2011 Homeland Security
Grant Program awards.
Committee staff visited FEMA's Grant Programs Directorate
on November 30, 2011, to receive a demonstration and briefing
on the Non-Disaster Grants System and investment justification
application and review process.
On January 6, 2012, the Subcommittee Chair sent a letter to
the Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency
regarding reports that funding under the Homeland Security
Grant Program was used by the State of Michigan to purchase
sno-cone machines. FEMA provided a response to this letter on
January 17, 2012.
In furtherance of the Subcommittee's work to ensure that
grant expenditures are appropriately measured and monitored, on
January 9, 2012 and January 30, 2012, Committee staff met with
representatives of the National Emergency Management
Association (NEMA) to discuss NEMA's Proposal for a
Comprehensive Preparedness Grants Structure.
Committee staff met with representatives of the National
Fusion Center Association's Executive Board on January 25, 2012
regarding Federal financial support of State and urban area
fusion centers. Subsequently, on February 1, 2012, Committee
staff received an update from representatives of the Federal
Emergency Management Agency and Office of Intelligence and
Analysis on the use of grants to support State and urban area
fusion centers.
Committee staff met with representatives of FEMA's Grant
Programs Directorate on January 26, 2012 regarding guidance
development and program changes to the Fiscal Year 2012
homeland security grant programs.
On January 30, 2012, Committee staff met with
representatives of the Department's Office of Inspector General
regarding management audits of the State Homeland Security
Grant Program and Urban Area Security Initiative.
On February 2, 2012, Committee staff met with
representatives of FEMA's National Preparedness Division to
receive an update on FEMA's efforts to develop performance
measures and metrics for grant programs.
Committee staff met with representatives of the Government
Accountability Office on February 6, 2012, regarding a review
of homeland security grant programs requested by the Chair of
the Full Committee, the Subcommittee Chair, and other Members
of the Committee.
In furtherance of the Subcommittee's oversight of FEMA's
efforts to recoup improperly provided Individual Assistance
subsequent to disasters, Committee staff participated in a
conference call with representatives of FEMA regarding the
implementation of the Disaster Assistance Recoupment Fairness
Act of 2011 on February 8, 2012.
Committee staff were briefed by representatives of FEMA,
the U.S. Coast Guard, the Transportation Security
Administration, and the Office of Intelligence and Analysis on
February 16, 2012, regarding the Fiscal Year 2012 grant
guidance for various homeland security grant programs.
On February 29, 2012, the Subcommittee Chair met with the
Assistant Administrator for Grant Programs Directorate, Federal
Emergency Management Agency.
In preparation for the series of hearings on grants, over
the course of February, March, and April 2012, Committee staff
met with representatives of numerous stakeholder organizations
including the International Association of Fire Fighters,
National League of Cities, National Association of Counties,
National Emergency Management Association, International
Association of Emergency Managers, U.S. Council of Mayors,
National Fusion Center Association, National Governors
Association, National Volunteer Fire Council, American
Association of Port Authorities, and Washington Metropolitan
Area Transit Authority.
On March 20, 2012, the Subcommittee held a hearing entitled
``Ensuring the Transparency, Efficiency, and Effectiveness of
Homeland Security Grants.'' The Subcommittee received testimony
from Ms.Elizabeth Harman, Assistant Administrator, Grant
Programs Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency,
Department of Homeland Security; Mr.Corey Gruber, Assistant
Administrator, National Preparedness Directorate, Federal
Emergency Management Agency, Department of Homeland Security;
Ms.Anne L. Richards, Assistant Inspector General for Audits,
Office of Inspector General, Department of Homeland Security;
Mr.William O. Jenkins, Jr., Director, Homeland Security and
Justice Issues, U.S. Government Accountability Office; and Hon.
Michael A. Nutter, Mayor, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. This
hearing examined FEMA's management and administration of
homeland security grant programs and gave Subcommittee Members
an opportunity to receive greater detail on the
Administration's Fiscal Year 2013 budget proposal to
consolidate a number of grant programs into the National
Preparedness Grant Program.
On April 16, 2012, Committee staff participated in FEMA's
National Preparedness Grant Program Forum.
Committee staff met with representatives of FEMA's National
Preparedness Directorate on April 24, 2012 to receive a
briefing on the implementation of the Threat and Hazard
Identification and Risk Assessment (THIRA) guidance.
On April 26, 2012, the Subcommittee continued its hearings
``Ensuring the Efficiency, Effectiveness, and Transparency of
Homeland Security Grants (Part II): Stakeholder Perspectives.''
The Subcommittee received testimony from Mr.James H. Davis,
Executive Director, Colorado Department of Public Safety,
testifying on behalf of the National Governors Association;
Mr.Bryan Koon, Director, Florida Division of Emergency
Management, testifying on behalf of the National Emergency
Management Association; Ms.Hui-Shan Walker, Emergency
Management Coordinator, City of Hampton, Virginia, testifying
on behalf of the International Association of Emergency
Managers; Mr.Judson Freed, Director of Emergency Management and
Homeland Security, Ramsey County, Minnesota, testifying on
behalf of the National Association of Counties; Mr.Richard
Daddario, Deputy Commissioner, Counterterrorism Bureau, New
York City Police Department; Mr.Robert M. Maloney, Director,
Office of Emergency Management, Baltimore, Maryland; Chief Hank
Clemmensen, Palatine Rural Fire Protection District, testifying
on behalf of the International Association of Fire Chiefs;
Mr.Richard A. Wainio, President and CEO, Tampa Port Authority,
testifying on behalf of the American Association of Port
Authorities; and Mr.Michael DePallo, Director and General
Manager, The Port Authority Trans Hudson (PATH) Corporation,
testifying on behalf of the American Public Transportation
Association. This hearing continued the Subcommittee's review
of the Administration's proposal to create a ``National
Preparedness Grant Program'' and provided Members with valuable
input from stakeholders who receive and rely on homeland
security grant funding to enhance their security operations.
Committee staff received a briefing from representatives of
the National Academy of Public Administration on the results of
its study, Improving the National Preparedness System:
Developing More Meaningful Grant Performance Measures,
conducted pursuant to the Redundancy Elimination and Enhanced
Performance for Preparedness Grants Act (Pub. L. 111-271).
On June 28, 2012, Committee staff met with representatives
of the Federal Emergency Management Agency, Coast Guard,
Customs and Border Protection, and Transportation Security
Administration to receive a briefing on the Fiscal Year 2012
State Homeland Security Grant Program, Urban Area Security
Initiative, Port Security Grant Program, and Transit Security
Grant Program awards.
On July 24, 2012, the Subcommittee held a classified Member
briefing on grants. Representatives from the Federal Emergency
Management Agency, the Office of Intelligence and Analysis, the
Transportation Security Administration, the United Stated Coast
Guard, and the Office of Infrastructure Protection responded to
Member concerns.
On August 7 and 8, 2012, Committee staff attended FEMA's
National Preparedness Symposium in Crystal City, Virginia and
participated on a panel with staff from the United States
Senate regarding grant funding.
Committee staff met with representatives from the Office of
Intelligence and Analysis' State and Local Program Office and
FEMA's Grant Programs Directorate to receive a briefing on the
use of grants to support State and urban area fusion centers on
August 23, 2012.
On October 9, 2012, the Subcommittee Chair joined the Full
Committee Chair in sending a letter to the Secretary of
Homeland Security, urging compliance with congressional intent
and refraining from implementing the National Preparedness
Grant Program, proposed in the Fiscal Year 2013 budget request,
through grant guidance or other administrative means. A
response to this letter from the Assistant Secretary for
Legislative Affairs, Department of Homeland Security, was
received on November 29, 2012.

TRAINING

On February 16, 2011, Committee staff met with
representatives of the National Domestic Preparedness
Consortium to receive an update on current operations.
Committee staff conducted a site visit to the Center for
Domestic Preparedness in Anniston, Alabama on May 18, 2011, to
observe current operations and chemical agent training
capabilities and participate in training.
From May 18 through 19, 2011, Committee staff conducted a
site visit to the National Emergency Response and Rescue
Training Center in College Station, Texas to observe and
participate in first responder training programs.
On June 8, 2011, Committee staff visited the Hillsborough
County Sheriff Department's Practical Training Center to view
the training facility that is used by Federal, State, and local
law enforcement.
Committee staff received a briefing from representatives of
the Federal Emergency Management Agency and the National
Counterterrorism Center on November 9, 2011, on the Joint
Counterterrorism Awareness Workshop Series.
On January 31, 2012, Committee staff attended the Joint
Counterterrorism Awareness workshop series held in Bethpage,
New York.
On July 19, 2012, Committee staff met with representatives
from the National Preparedness Consortium to receive an update
on current operations.

EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS

On February 1, 2011, Committee staff met with
representatives from the Department of Homeland Security's
Office of Emergency Communications (OEC) to receive an update
on OEC's current activities.
Committee staff met with representatives from the
Department of Homeland Security on March 4, 2011, to receive a
briefing on the National Communication System.
On March 23, 2011, Committee staff received a briefing from
representatives of the Office of Emergency Communications to
receive an update on the completion of Goal 1 of the National
Emergency Communications Plan.
Committee staff participated in the New York State
Association of Chiefs of Police seminar on emergency
communications on March 28, 2011.
On April 13 and 26, 2011, Committee staff met with
representatives from stakeholder organizations on the
cancellation of the Department of Justice's Integrated Wireless
Network program.
On May 11, 2011, Committee staff met with representatives
from the Interagency Communications Interoperability System
based in Los Angeles to discuss the system and various
communications issues.
Committee staff attended a briefing provided by various
State and local stakeholder groups on May 13, 2011, on the need
for the allocation of the D Block to public safety.
On June 3, 2011, Committee staff met with representatives
from the Department of Homeland Security's National Protection
and Programs Directorate to discuss the possible future
reorganization of the Directorate and assess the potential
impact on the Office of Emergency Communications.
In furtherance of the Subcommittee's work to ensure the
construction of a National public safety wireless broadband
network, on June 16, 2011, Committee staff attended a forum at
the Eisenhower Executive Office Building.
On October 7, 2011, Committee staff met with
representatives from the Department of Homeland Security's
Office of Interoperability and Compatibility to receive a
demonstration of the Virtual USA project.
Committee staff met with representatives from the
Department of Transportation on November 4, 2011, to receive a
briefing on Emergency 911 issues.
On November 9, 2011, Committee staff met with
representatives from the Office of Emergency Communications to
discuss planning and technology updates.
On November 14, 2011, Committee staff met with
representatives of the Federal Emergency Management Agency to
receive a briefing on the activities of the Disaster Emergency
Communications Division.
Committee staff participated in a conference call on
November 15, 2011, to receive an update on the National
Communications System.
On November 17, 2011, the Subcommittee held a hearing
entitled ``Ensuring Coordination and Cooperation: A Review of
the Emergency Communications Offices Within the Department of
Homeland Security.'' The Subcommittee received testimony from
Mr.Chris Essid, Director, Office of Emergency Communications,
Department of Homeland Security; Mr.John O'Connor, Manager,
National Coordinating Center for Communications, National
Protection and Programs Directorate, Department of Homeland
Security; Mr.Damon Penn, Assistant Administrator, National
Continuity Programs, Federal Emergency Management Agency,
Department of Homeland Security; Mr.Eric Edwards, Director,
Disaster Emergency Communications Division, Response
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Department of
Homeland Security; and Ms.Linda K. Moore, Specialist in
Telecommunications and Spectrum Policy, Congressional Research
Service. This hearing provided Subcommittee Members with an
opportunity to review the various offices within the Department
of Homeland Security with emergency communications
responsibilities and determine whether these offices
effectively coordinate, whether there is any duplication of
efforts or efficiencies that could be gained, and whether these
offices provide consistent guidance and requirements to States
and localities.
Committee staff met with representatives from the
Department of Homeland Security's Office of Emergency
Communications on February 9, 2012, to receive an update on the
Office's programs and operations.
On February 14, 2012, Committee staff met with
representatives from the Department of Homeland Security to
discuss the Fiscal Year 2012 budget and its impact on
communications offices in the Department.
Committee staff met with representatives from the
Interagency Communications Interoperability System on April 18,
2012, to discuss spectrum and other communications topics.
On June 11, 2012, the Subcommittee Chair sent a letter to
the Under Secretary for the National Protection and Programs
Directorate, expressing concern about proposals to merge the
Office of Emergency Communications and National Communications
System within the Office of Cybersecurity and Communications. A
response to this letter was received by the Committee on July
11, 2012.
On July 16, 2012, Committee staff met with representatives
from the Office of Emergency Communications to receive a
briefing on National Emergency Communications Plan Goal 2.
Committee staff met with representatives from the National
Protection and Programs Directorate on August 16, 2012 to
receive a briefing on the implementation of Executive Order
13618 and its impact on the communications offices within NPPD.
On September 12, 2012, the Subcommittee on Emergency
Preparedness, Response, and Communications held a hearing
entitled ``Resilient Communications: Current Challenges and
Future Advancements.'' The Subcommittee received testimony from
Ms.Bobbie Stempfley, Deputy Assistant Secretary, Office of
Cybersecurity and Communications, Department of Homeland
Security; Mr.David Turetsky, Chief, Public Safety and Homeland
Security Bureau, Federal Communications Commission; Mr.Trey
Forgety, Director of Government Relations, National Emergency
Number Association; Mr.Kyle Malady, Senior Vice President,
Global Network Engineering and Operations, Verizon; Mr.Terry
Hall, President, APCO International; and Mr.Chris McIntosh,
Interoperability Coordinator, Office of Veterans Affairs and
Homeland Security, Commonwealth of Virginia. This hearing
provided Subcommittee Members with an opportunity to examine
efforts to enhance the resiliency of communications
capabilities, including the implementation of Executive Order
13618, the allocation of the D Block to public safety, and
efforts to implement Next Generation 911.
In preparation for the hearing Committee staff met, and
conducted conference calls with, members of local government
and the private sector.

ALERTS AND WARNINGS

Terrorist attacks and natural disasters can occur at any
time, often with little-to-no notice. Alerts and warnings
provided in advance of potential threats and hazards can help
to direct the public to get out of harm's way, which will save
lives.
On February 10, 2011, Committee staff met with
representatives from the Federal Emergency Management Agency to
receive a briefing on the integrated public alerts and warnings
system (IPAWS).
Committee staff met with representatives from the
Department of Homeland Security on March 3, 2011, on the
Emergency Alert System.
On March 29, 2011, the Subcommittee Chair met with
representatives of the Federal Emergency Management Agency to
receive a briefing on IPAWS.
Committee staff met with stakeholders on March 31, 2011, to
discuss the Emergency Alert System.
On March 11 and 31, 2011, Committee staff participated in
conference calls to receive information on the new National
Terrorism Advisory System.
On May 17, 2011, Committee staff met with stakeholders
regarding the implementation of the Commercial Mobile Alert
System (CMAS)/Personal Localized Alerting Network (PLAN)
system.
On June 22, 2011, Committee staff received a briefing from
representatives of the Federal Emergency Management Agency to
receive an update on IPAWS.
The Subcommittee held a hearing on July 8, 2011, entitled
``Communicating With the Public During Emergencies: An Update
on Federal Alert and Warning Efforts.'' The Subcommittee
received testimony from Mr.Damon Penn, Assistant Administrator,
National Continuity Programs, Federal Emergency Management
Agency, Department of Homeland Security; RADM James A. Barnett,
Chief, Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau, Federal
Communications Commission; Mr.Christopher Guttman-McCabe, Vice
President, Regulatory Affairs, CTIA--The Wireless Association;
Ms.Suzanne D. Goucher, President and CEO, Maine Association of
Broadcasters, testifying on behalf of the National Alliance of
State Broadcasting Associations; and Mr.Allen W. Kniphfer,
Emergency Coordinator, Jefferson County, Alabama. This hearing
provided Subcommittee Members with an opportunity to hear from
representatives from FEMA, the FCC, and their private sector
partners about efforts to provide timely alerts and warnings to
the public.
On November 3, 2011, Committee staff attended a briefing
conducted by representatives of the Federal Emergency
Management Agency and Federal Communications Commission on the
planned November 9, 2011 National test of the Emergency Alert
System.
Committee staff visited FEMA's National Response
Coordination Center on November 9, 2011, to observe the
National test of the Emergency Alert System and receive a
briefing from FEMA leadership.
As a result of the Subcommittee's oversight of the IPAWS
program, on December 6, 2011, the Subcommittee Chair and
Ranking Member introduced the Integrated Public Alert and
Warning System Modernization Act (H.R.3563). (For further
action on H.R.3563 see the legislation section above).
On March 23, 2012, Committee staff met with representatives
from the Federal Emergency Management Agency and the Federal
Communications Commission to discuss the results of the
National test of the Emergency Alert System, which took place
in November 2011.
The Subcommittee held a Member briefing on April 24, 2012,
at which representatives of the private sector provided Members
a perspective on their involvement in the Integrated Public
Alert and Warning System, including feedback on the National
test of the Emergency Alert System and an update on efforts to
deploy the Commercial Mobile Alert System (CMAS).
The Chair of the Subcommittee sent a letter to the
Honorable Craig Fugate, Administrator of the Federal Emergency
Management Agency, on May 22, 2012 regarding the authorization
of IPAWS message originators and the execution of memoranda of
understanding.
Committee staff met with representatives of the National
Council on Disability to discuss inclusive alert and warning
capabilities on June 25, 2012.
On July 17, 2012, Members of the Subcommittee conducted a
site visit to the American Red Cross' Digital Operations
Center. The visit provided Members with an opportunity to
examine how the Red Cross uses social media to aid in their
disaster response operations.

MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONS OF THE FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY

On April 15, 2011, the Chair and Ranking Member of the
Subcommittee, the Ranking Member of the Full Committee, and
Senators Lieberman, Collins, and Akaka sent a letter to the
Comptroller General requesting that the Government
Accountability Office (GAO) conduct a review of the Federal
Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) workforce planning and
management efforts. GAO issued the results of its review,
Workforce Planning and Training Could Be Enhanced by
Incorporating Strategic Management Principles [GAO-12-487], on
April 26, 2012 .
The Chair of the Subcommittee sent a letter to the
Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency on
July 26, 2011 regarding the protection of privacy of FEMA
disaster assistance applicants and inventory control. A
response was received on May 24, 2011.
The Chairs of the Subcommittee on Emergency Preparedness,
Response, and Communications, and the Subcommittee on
Oversight, Investigations, and Management sent a letter to FEMA
Administrator on May 4, 2011, regarding the recent criminal
complaint filed against a FEMA employee for embezzlement and
fraud. The letter requested information on FEMA's efforts to
vet its employees and internal controls in place for various
payment systems to monitor waste, fraud, and abuse. A response
was received in September 14, 2011.
On July 28, 2011, the Chair of the Subcommittee met with
the Director of International Affairs, Federal Emergency
Management Agency, to receive a briefing on FEMA's
international mission. Prior to this briefing, on July 6, 2011,
Committee staff also met with the Director.
Committee staff met with representatives from FEMA on
December 19, 2011, to receive a briefing on the FEMA
Qualifications System.
On January 27, 2012, Committee Staff met with the FEMA's
Chief Component Human Capital Officer to discuss the results of
the Partnership for Public Service's ``Best Places to Work in
the Federal Government'' survey and FEMA's efforts to improve
employee morale.
On July 13, 2012, Committee staff met with representatives
from the Federal Emergency Management Agency to discuss the
overall vision for and status of FEMA's Workforce
Transformation, including implementation of recommendations
made by the Government Accountability Office in its April 2012
report, ``Federal Emergency Management Agency Workforce
Planning and Training Could be Enhanced by Incorporating
Strategic Management Principles,'' [GAO-12-487].
Committee staff continued its discussions with FEMA
representatives on August 10 and August 24, 2012 to receive
briefings on changes within the Reservist Program and Workforce
Transformation respectively.

NATIONAL SPECIAL SECURITY EVENTS

The Subcommittee held a Member briefing on November 2,
2011, to examine National Special Security Events and security
for the 2012 Republican and Democratic National Conventions.
Representatives from the U.S. Secret Service and the Federal
Emergency Management Agency responded to Member concerns.

DEFENSE SUPPORT TO CIVIL AUTHORITIES

Committee staff received a briefing from representatives
from the U.S. Northern Command (NORTHCOM) on May 5, 2011, on
the Department of Defense's disaster response posture.
On March 29, 2012, Committee staff received a briefing by
the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Homeland
Defense on the Department of Defense's role in response to a
chemical, biological, radiological, or nuclear event. This
included a discussion of National Guard and Federal support
teams, how they would integrate with other personnel, and how
they might protect themselves through the use of medical
countermeasures.
On March 30, 2012, Committee staff participated in a video
conference call with representatives from NORTHCOM to discuss
defense support to civil authorities, including Department of
Defense participation in National Level Exercise 2011.
On October 12, 2012, Committee staff met with
representatives from the Office of the Assistant Secretary of
Defense for Homeland Defense regarding actions to improve
Defense support in complex catastrophes.
Committee staff conducted a site visit to Fort McNair on
October 16, 2012 to receive a briefing on security preparations
for the 2013 Presidential Inauguration.

FIRST RESPONDER TECHNOLOGIES

On January 24, 2012, Committee staff received a briefing
from representatives of the DHS Science and Technology
Directorate's First Responder Group on efforts to research,
develop, and deploy technologies to aid first responders.
On May 7, 2012, Committee staff received a briefing from
representatives of FEMA's National Integration Center and Grant
Programs Directorate regarding FEMA's activities related to
first responder technologies.
The Subcommittee on Emergency Preparedness, Response, and
Communications and the Subcommittee on Cybersecurity,
Infrastructure Protection, and Security Technologies held a
joint hearing on May 9, 2012, entitled, ``First Responder
Technologies: Ensuring a Prioritized Approach for Homeland
Security Research and Development.'' The Subcommittees received
testimony from Dr. Robert Griffin, Director of First Responder
Programs, Science and Technology Directorate, Department of
Homeland Security; Ms.Mary H. Saunders, Director, Standards
Coordination Office, National Institute of Standards and
Technology; Chief Edward Kilduff, Chief of Department, New York
City Fire Department, New York City, New York; Ms.Annette
Doying, Director, Office of Emergency Management, Pasco County,
Florida; and Ms.Kiersten Todt Coon, President and CEO, Liberty
Group Ventures. This hearing provided Members with an
opportunity to assess efforts at the Federal level to work with
the first responder community to research, develop, and deploy
vital technologies that will enhance the ability of first
responders to achieve their missions.
Committee staff participated in a site visit and tour of
the National Institute of Standards and Technology on June 8,
2012.
On July 19, 2012, Committee staff received a briefing from
representatives of the Federal Emergency Management Agency on
its activities with respect to the development and funding of
first responder technologies.

----------

Subcommittee Hearings Held

``Ensuring Effective Preparedness and Response--An Assessment
of the Fiscal Year 2012 Budget Request for the Federal
Emergency Management Agency.'' March 9, 2011. (Serial
No. 112-7)
``Ensuring Effective Preparedness, Response, and Recovery for
Events Impacting Health Security.'' March 17, 2011.
(Serial No. 112-12)
``Taking Measure of Countermeasures: A Review of Government and
Industry Efforts to Protect the Homeland Through
Accelerated Research, Development, and Acquisition of
Chemical, Biological, Radiological and Nuclear Medical
Countermeasures.'' April 13, 2011. (Serial No. 112-18)
``Taking Measure of Countermeasures: A Review of Efforts to
Protect the Homeland Through Distribution and
Dispensing of CBRN Medical Countermeasures.'' May 12,
2011. (Serial No. 112-18)
``Weathering the Storm: A State and Local Perspective on
Emergency Management.'' June 10, 2011 (Clearwater,
Florida). (Serial No. 112-30)
``H.R.2356, the `WMD Prevention and Preparedness Act of
2011.''' June 23, 2011. Joint hearing with the
Subcommittee on Cybersecurity, Infrastructure
Protection, and Security Technologies. (Serial No. 112-
32)
``Communicating With the Public During Emergencies: An Update
on Federal Alert and Warning Efforts.'' July 8, 2011.
(Serial No. 112-36)
``Five Years Later: An Assessment of the Post Katrina Emergency
Management Reform Act.'' October 25, 2011. (Serial No.
112-53)
``The State of Northern Border Preparedness: A Review of
Federal, State, and Local Coordination.'' October 28,
2011 (Detroit, Michigan). (Serial No. 112-55)
``Ensuring Coordination and Cooperation: A Review of the
Emergency Communications Offices Within the Department
of Homeland Security.'' November 17, 2011. (Serial No.
112-58)
``Ensuring Effective Preparedness and Response: Lessons Learned
from Hurricane Irene and Tropical Storm Lee.'' November
29, 2011. (La Plume, Pennsylvania) (Serial No. 112-59)
``The President's Fiscal Year 2013 Budget Request for the
Federal Emergency Management Agency.'' February 29,
2012. (Serial No. 112-71)
``Ensuring the Transparency, Efficiency, and Effectiveness of
Homeland Security Grants.'' March 20, 2012. (Serial
No. 112-77)
``The Fiscal Year 2013 Budget Request for the Department of
Homeland Security's Office of Health Affairs.'' March
29, 2012. (Serial No. 112-81)
``Taking Measure of Countermeasures (Part III): Protecting the
Protectors.'' April 17, 2012. (Serial No. 112-82)
``Ensuring the Efficiency, Effectiveness, and Transparency of
Homeland Security Grants (Part II): Stakeholder
Perspectives.'' April 26, 2012. (Serial No. 112-77)
``First Responder Technologies: Ensuring a Prioritized Approach
for Homeland Security Research and Development.'' May
9, 2012. Joint with the Subcommittee on Cybersecurity,
Infrastructure Protection, and Security Technologies.
(Serial No. 112-90)
``The National Preparedness Report: Assessing the State of
Preparedness.'' June 6, 2012. (Serial No. 112-96)
``Resilient Communications: Current Challenges and Future
Advancements.'' September 12, 2012. (Serial No. 112-
116)
``BioWatch Present and Future: Meeting Mission Needs for
Effective Biosurveillance?'' Joint with the
Subcommittee on Cybersecurity, Infrastructure
Protection, and Security Technologies. September 13,
2012. (Serial No. 112-117)
Subcommittee on Border and Maritime Security

Candice S.Miller, Michigan, Chairman

Mike Rogers, Alabama
Michael T. McCaul, Texas
Paul C. Broun, Georgia
Ben Quayle, Arizona, Vice
Chair
E. Scott Rigell, Virginia
Jeff Duncan, South Carolina
Peter T. King, New York
(Ex
Officio) Henry Cuellar, Texas
Loretta Sanchez, California
Sheila Jackson Lee, Texas
Brian Higgins, New York
Hansen Clarke, Michigan
Bennie G. Thompson, Mississippi
(Ex Officio)

----------

During the 112th Congress, the Subcommittee on Border and
Maritime Security held 19 hearings, receiving testimony from 74
witnesses, and considered four measures.

----------

Legislative Activities of the Subcommittee

ASIA-PACIFIC ECONOMIC COOPERATION BUSINESS TRAVEL CARDS
ACT OF 2011

Pub. L. 112-54 S.1487 (H.R.2042 | H.R.3312)

Summary

The Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation Business Travel Cards
Act of 2011 authorizes the Secretary of Homeland Security to
issue, in coordination with the Secretary of State, Asia-
Pacific Economic Cooperation business travel cards (ABT Cards)
to approved individuals. S.1487 requires the Secretary of
Homeland Security to integrate the ABT Cards with other
Department trusted traveler programs. Additionally, S.1487
permits the Secretary of Homeland Security to consult with
appropriate private sector entities and, if necessary,
prescribe regulations to issue the ABT Cards. The bill also
authorizes the Secretary to collect and adjust a user fee for
establishing and operating the ABT Card program. The Secretary
may terminate the program if it is in the interest of the
United States.

Legislative History

S.1487 was introduced in the Senate on August 2, 2011, by
Ms.Cantwell, Mr.Akaka, Mr.Inouye, and Mr.Johnson of Wisconsin,
and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and
Governmental Affairs.
On October 19, 2011, the Senate Committee on Homeland
Security and Governmental Affairs considered S.1487 and ordered
the measure to be favorably reported to the Senate with an
Amendment in the Nature of a Substitute.
The Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental
Affairs reported S.1487 to the Senate on November 3, 2011 with
no written report.
The Senate considered and passed S.1487 on November 3,
2011, by unanimous consent.
On November 4, 2011, the House considered and passed
S.1487, under Suspension of the Rules, clearing the measure for
the President.
The President signed S.1487 into law on November 12, 2011,
as Public Law 112-54.

BORDER TUNNEL PREVENTION ACT OF 2012

Pub. L. 112-127 (H.R.4119 (S. 1236))

To reduce the trafficking of drugs and to prevent human
smuggling across the Southwest Border by deterring the
construction and use of border tunnels.

Summary

H.R.4119 enhances the penalties for anyone who attempts or
assists in the construction of a tunnel or other passage that
crosses the international border between the United States and
another country with the intent of using the tunnel for
smuggling. The legislation also encourages the Department of
Homeland Security to continue outreach efforts to educate
landowners and residents in areas along the border between the
United Mexican States and the United States about cross-border
tunnels and requests their assistance in combating tunnel
construction.
The Secretary of Homeland Security is also required to
submit an annual report to Congress indicating the number of
tunnels located, and efforts to prevent these means of
smuggling.

Legislative History

H.R.4119 was introduced in the House on March 1, 2012, by
Mr.Reyes, Mr.Dreier, Mr.Quayle, and Mr.Thompson of Mississippi,
and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition
to the Committee on Ways and Means and the Committee on
Homeland Security. Within the Committee, H.R.4119 was referred
to the Subcommittee on Border and Maritime Security.
The Committee on the Judiciary considered H.R.4119 on March
6, 2012, and ordered the measure to be reported to the House,
without amendment, by voice vote.
The Chair of the Committee on Homeland Security sent a
letter to the Chair of the Committee on the Judiciary on March
15, 2012, agreeing that, in order to expedite consideration on
the House Floor, the Committee would discharge itself from
consideration of H.R.4119. On that same date, the Chair of the
Committee on the Judiciary sent a letter to the Chair of the
Committee on Homeland Security acknowledging the decision to
forego consideration of
H.R.4119.
The Committee on the Judiciary reported H.R.4119 to the
House on March 21, 2012, as H. Rpt. 112-418, Pt. I.
Subsequently, the Committee on Ways and Means and the Committee
on Homeland Security were discharged from further
consideration.
The House considered H.R.4119 under Suspension of the Rules
on May 15, 2012, and on May 16, 2012 passed the bill by a two-
thirds vote of 416 yeas and 4 nays (Recorded Vote No. 256).
The Senate considered and passed H.R.4119 on May 17, 2012,
by unanimous consent.
H.R.4119 was presented to the President on May 29, 2012.
The President signed H.R.4119 into law on June 5, 2012, as
Public Law 112-127.

JAIME ZAPATA BORDER ENFORCEMENT SECURITY TASK FORCE ACT

Pub. Law 112-205 (H.R.915)

Summary

The Jaime Zapata Border Enforcement Security Task Force Act
establishes in United States Immigration and Customs
Enforcement (ICE) a Border Enforcement Security Task Force
(BEST) program to enhance border security by addressing and
reducing border security threats and violence by: (1)
Facilitating collaboration among Federal, State, local, Tribal,
and foreign law enforcement agencies to execute coordinated
activities in furtherance of border security and homeland
security; and (2) enhancing information-sharing among such
agencies.
H.R.915 authorizes the Secretary of Homeland Security,
acting through the Assistant Secretary for ICE, to establish
BEST units after considering: (1) Whether the area where the
unit would be established is significantly impacted by cross-
border threats; (2) the availability of Federal, State, local,
Tribal, and foreign law enforcement resources to participate in
the unit; and (3) the extent to which border security threats
are having a significant harmful impact in the area and in
other jurisdictions. The bill authorizes the Secretary, in
order to provide Federal assistance to the area so designated,
to: (1) Obligate such sums as are appropriated for the BEST
program; (2) direct the assignment of Federal personnel to that
program; and (3) take other actions to assist State, local,
Tribal, and foreign jurisdictions to participate.
The bill directs the Secretary to report on the
effectiveness of the program in enhancing border security and
reducing the drug trafficking, arms smuggling, illegal alien
trafficking and smuggling, violence, and kidnapping along and
across the borders of the United States.

Legislative History

111th Congress

112th Congress

SECURE BORDER ACT OF 2011

H.R.1299

To achieve operational control of and improve security at the
international land borders of the United States, and for other
purposes.

Summary

In testimony before Congress, a Government Accountability
Office witness reported that the U.S. Border Patrol has less
than 44 percent of the Southwest border under operational
control and less than 2 percent of the Northern Border under
operational control [GAO-11-374T and GAO-11-508T]. H.R.1299
requires the Department of Homeland Security to develop a plan
to gain operational control, as defined by the Secure Fence Act
of 2006 (Pub. L. 109-367), of the Nation's borders within 5
years. In the event that the Secretary should try to utilize
another measure other than operational control, that measure
must be evaluated by a National Laboratory for suitability in
measuring control of the border. The Secretary must also
develop a comprehensive new measurement system which captures
the effectiveness of security at the ports of entry. Finally,
it requires the U.S. Customs and Border Protection to provide
the Committee with its resource allocation model for the
current future year staffing requirements and detailed port of
entry manpower data.

Legislative History

H.R.1299 was introduced in the House on March 31, 2011, by
Mrs.Miller of Michigan and 18 original cosponsors, and referred
to the Committee on Homeland Security. Within the Committee,
H.R.1299 was referred to the Subcommittee on Border and
Maritime Security.
On June 2, 2011, the Subcommittee on Border and Maritime
Security considered H.R.1299 and favorably reported the measure
to the Full Committee for consideration, amended, by voice
vote.
On September 21, 2011, the Subcommittee was discharged from
further consideration of H.R.1299. The Committee then
considered H.R.1299, and ordered the measure to be reported to
the House, with a favorable recommendation, amended, by voice
vote.
The Committee reported H.R.1299 to the House on November
10, 2011, as H. Rpt. 112-274.
The House considered H.R.1299 on May 30, 2012, under
Suspension of the Rules and passed the measure by voice vote.
H.R.1299 was received in the Senate, read twice, and referred
to the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental
Affairs on June 4, 2012.
The Chair of the Committee on Ways and Means sent a letter
to the Chair of the Committee on Homeland Security on June 2,
2012, agreeing to waive consideration of H.R.1299. The letter
further requested the appointment of Conferees should a House-
Senate Conference be convened. On June 5, 2012, the Chair of
the Committee on Homeland Security sent a letter to the Chair
of the Committee on Ways and Means acknowledging the
jurisdictional concerns of the Committee on Ways and Means, and
agreeing to support the appointment of Conferees.

NATIONAL SECURITY AND FEDERAL LANDS PROTECTION ACT

H.R.1505 (H.R.2578)

To prohibit the Secretaries of the Interior and Agriculture
from taking action on public lands which impede border security
on such lands, and for other purposes.

Summary

H.R.1505 prohibits the Secretaries of the Interior and
Agriculture from taking action on public lands which impede the
Border Patrol from conducting security activities under the
direction of the Secretary of Homeland Security. In order to
effectively secure the border, the Department of Homeland
Security is provided to have immediate access to any public
land managed by the Federal Government; including access to
maintain and construct roads, construct a fence, use patrol
vehicles, and set up monitoring equipment.

Legislative History

H.R. 1505
H.R.1505 was introduced in the House on April 13, 2011, by
Mr. Bishop of Utah and 54 cosponsors, and referred to the
Committee on Natural Resources, and in addition the Committees
on Agriculture and Homeland Security. Within the Committee,
H.R. 1505 was referred to the Subcommittee on Border and
Maritime Security.
On October 5, 2011, the Natural Resources Subcommittee on
National Parks, Forests, and Public Lands discharged H.R.1505.
On October 5, 2011 the Committee on Natural Resources
considered H.R.1505, and ordered the measure to be reported to
the House with a favorable recommendation, amended, by a
recorded vote of 26 yeas and 17 nays.
The Chair of the Committee on Natural Resources sent a
letter on December 14, 2011, to the Chair of the Committee on
Homeland Security requesting that, in order to expedite
consideration of H.R. 1505 by the Full House, the Committee
would discharge H.R. 1505 from any further consideration. The
Chair of the Committee responded on December 14, 2011
acknowledging the request of the Committee on Natural Resources
by discharging H.R.1505 from further consideration by the
Committee. The response further requested an appointment of
Conferees should a House-Senate Conference be called.
The Committee on Natural Resources reported H.R.1505 to the
House as H. Rpt. 112-448, Pt. I on April 17, 2012. The
Committee on Agriculture and the Committee on Homeland Security
were subsequently discharged from further consideration of
H.R.1505.
The Committee on Rules met on June 18, 2012, and reported a
Rule providing for consideration of H.R.2578 to the House as H.
Res. 688. Among other things, the Rule provides for the
inclusion of the text of H.R.1505, as reported by the Committee
on Natural Resources, within section 1401 of H.R.2578.
Provisions of H.R.1505 were included within section 1401 of
H.R.2578 during House consideration on June 19, 2012.

H.R.2578
Section 1401 of H.R.2578, the Conservation and Economic
Growth Act, as passed by the House contains the text of
H.R.1505.
H.R.2578 was introduced in the House on July 18, 2011, by
Mr.Denham, Mr.Nunes, Mr.Costa and Mr.McCarthy of California,
and referred to the Committee on Natural Resources.
The Committee on Natural Resources considered H.R.2578 on
October 15, 2011, and reported the measure to the House by
voice vote.
The Committee on Natural Resources reported H.R.2578 to the
House on December 1, 2011 as H. Rpt. 112-303.
The Committee on Rules met on June 18, 2012, and reported a
Rule providing for consideration of H.R.2578 to the House as H.
Res. 688. Among other things, the Rule provides for the
inclusion of the text of H.R.1505, as reported by the Committee
on Natural Resources, within section 1401 of H.R.2578.
The House passed H. Res.688 by a recorded vote of 240 yeas
and 175 nays.
The House considered H.R.2578 under the provisions of H.
Res.688 on June 19, 2012. A motion to recommit to the Committee
on Natural Resources, with instructions, failed by a recorded
vote of 188 yeas and 234 nays (Roll No. 386). The House then
passed H.R.2578 by a recorded vote of 232 yeas and 188 nays
(Roll No. 387).
H.R.2578 was received in the Senate, read twice, and
referred to the Senate Committee on Energy and Natural
Resources.

SECURE VISAS ACT

H.R.1741

Summary

H.R.1741, also known as the Secure Visas Act, provides the
Secretary of Homeland Security authority to refuse or revoke
any visa to an alien or class of aliens if deemed necessary or
advisable to protect the security interests of the United
States. The legislation mandates inspection of all visa
applications and supporting documentation before the
adjudication of the application at the 20 highest-risk visa
issuing diplomatic and consular posts, as determined by the
Secretary, and authorizes the Secretary to assign employees to
those diplomatic consular posts.

Legislative History

H.R.1741 was introduced in the House on May 5, 2011, by Mr.
Smith of Texas and eight original cosponsors, and referred to
the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the
Committee on Homeland Security. Within the Committee, H.R.1741
was referred to the Subcommittee on Border and Maritime
Security.
The Committee on the Judiciary considered H.R.1741 on June
23, 2011, and ordered the measure to be reported to the House,
amended, by a recorded vote of 17 yeas and 11 nays.
The Chair of the Committee on Homeland Security sent a
letter to the Chair of the Committee on the Judiciary on July
13, 2011, agreeing that, in order to expedite consideration on
the House Floor, the Committee on Homeland Security would waive
its right to consider H.R.1741. The letter further requested
the appointment of Conferees should a House-Senate Conference
be called. On that same date, the Chair of the Committee on the
Judiciary sent a letter to the Chair of the Committee on
Homeland Security agreeing to the waiving of consideration in
order to expedite consideration.
The Committee on the Judiciary reported H.R.1741 to the
House as H. Rpt. 112-441, Pt. I on March 8, 2012. Subsequently,
the Committee on Homeland Security was discharged from further
consideration of H.R.1741.

TO PROVIDE U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION WITH ACCESS TO FEDERAL
LANDS TO CARRY OUT CERTAIN SECURITY ACTIVITIES IN THE SOUTHWEST BORDER
REGION

H.R.1922

To provide U.S. Customs and Border Protection with access to
Federal lands to carry out certain security activities in the
Southwest border region, and for other purposes.

Summary

Over 20.7 million acres along the U.S. Southern Border are
Federal lands managed by the Department of the Interior and the
Department of Agriculture. Federal land managers are using
environmental regulations to impede the U.S. Border Patrol from
accessing these lands and effectively securing the border. The
purpose of this bill is to give U.S. Customs and Border
Protection unfettered access to Federal Lands for the purposes
of conducting motorized patrols.

Legislative History

H.R.1922 was introduced in the House on May 13, 2011, by
Mr.Quayle and six original cosponsors, and referred to the
Committee on Natural Resources, in addition to the Committee on
Homeland Security. Within the Committee, H.R.1922 was referred
to the Subcommittee on Border and Maritime Security.
On June 2, 2011, the Subcommittee on Border and Maritime
Security considered H.R.1922 and favorably reported the measure
to the Full Committee for consideration by voice vote.
Provisions of H.R.1922 were included in Title VI of
H.R.3116 as reported to the House. See also action on H.R.3116
discussed above.

H.R.3173

Summary

The Transportation Worker Identification Credential (TWIC)
program was created to ensure all individuals who require
admittance into secure areas of regulated maritime facilities
and vessels are properly vetted and do not pose a threat to
maritime and supply chain security. Current TWIC requirements
compel applicants go to an enrollment center twice to complete
the application and confirm the biometric information embedded
into the card. The Committee believes that this is an onerous
burden for workers in the maritime industry, such as merchant
vessel operators and truck drivers, who rely on obtaining the
credential for employment.
H.R.3173 provides the Transportation Security
Administration with the ability to streamline the process for
TWIC application and require not more than one in-person visit.

Legislative History

H.R.3173 was introduced in the House on October 12, 2011,
by Mr.Scalise, Mr.Young of Alaska, Mr.King of New York,
Mr.Thompson of Mississippi, Mr.Cummings, and Mr.Richmond, and
referred to the Committee on Homeland Security. Within the
Committee, H.R.3173 was referred to the Subcommittee on Border
and Maritime Security.
The Subcommittee on Border and Maritime Security was
discharged from further consideration of H.R.3173 on May 9,
2012.
The Full Committee considered H.R.3173 on May 9, 2012, and
ordered the measure to be reported to the House with a
favorable recommendation, amended, by voice vote.
The Committee on Homeland Security reported H.R.3173 to the
House on June 15, 2012, as H. Rpt. 112-523.
The House considered H.R.3173 under Suspension of the Rules
on June 26, 2012, and passed the bill on June 28, 2012, by
voice vote.
H.R.3173 was received in the Senate on June 29, 2012, read
twice, and referred to the Senate Committee on Commerce,
Science, and Transportation.

GAUGING AMERICAN PORT SECURITY ACT

H.R.4005

To direct the Secretary of Homeland Security to conduct a study
and report to Congress on gaps in port security in the United
States and a plan to address them.

Summary

H.R.4005 requires the Secretary of Homeland Security to
conduct a study on the remaining gaps in port security. Not
later than one year after the enactment of the bill, a
classified report must be submitted to the Congress. This
report should clearly prioritize the port security gaps and
provide a plan to address them.

Legislative History

H.R.4005 was introduced in the House on February 9, 2012,
by Ms.Hahn, and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security.
Within the Committee, H.R.4005 was referred to the Subcommittee
on Border and Maritime Security.
The Subcommittee on Border and Maritime Security was
discharged from further consideration of H.R.4005 on May 9,
2012.
The Full Committee considered H.R.4005 on May 9, 2012, and
ordered the measure to be reported to the House with a
favorable recommendation, amended, by voice vote.
The Committee reported H.R.4005 to the House on May 30,
2012, as H. Rpt. 112-499.
The House considered H.R.4005 under Suspension of the
Rules, on June 26, 2012, and passed the bill on June 28, 2012,
by a recorded vote of 411 yeas and 9 nays.
H.R.4005 was received in the Senate on June 29, 2012, read
twice, and referred to the Senate Committee on Homeland
Security and Governmental Affairs.

SECURING MARITIME ACTIVITIES THROUGH RISK-BASED TARGETING FOR PORT
SECURITY ACT

H.R.4251

To authorize, enhance, and reform certain port security
programs through increased efficiency and risk-based
coordination within the Department of Homeland Security, and
for other purposes.

Summary

The purpose of H.R.4251 is to expand and update the
Security and Accountability For Every Port Act of 2006 (SAFE
Port Act, Pub. L. 109-347) by enhancing security measures
overseas before threats reach U.S. shores, to foster a
collaborative environment between Customs and Border Protection
and the U.S. Coast Guard in sharing port security duties, and
to leverage the maritime security work of trusted allies of the
U.S. such as the United Kingdom, Canada, and New Zealand.
H.R.4251 is based upon three fundamental themes: (1)
Encouraging Department of Homeland Security (DHS) components
with shared jurisdiction to cooperate in maritime operations
and partner with State and local law enforcement agencies to
enhance the Nation's maritime security; (2) securing the supply
chain through the use of risk-based methodology; and (3)
finding cost savings through increased collaboration with
international, Federal, State, and local partners.
Key provisions in the bill include: (1) A Port Security
Grant Program management provision that sets timelines for
responses that DHS and the Federal Emergency Management Agency
(FEMA) must provide in regards to Port Security Grant
Applications; (2) authorizing the Coast Guard and Royal
Canadian Mounted Police maritime Shiprider program, including
funding of $2 million per year, which is the current level of
funding for the program; (3) port security training program
with accreditation from the Federal Law Enforcement Training
Center; and (4) requiring DHS to publish its spending
regulations regarding Transportation Worker Identification
Credential readers and including a firm deadline of December
31, 2014, for full deployment of readers.

Legislative History

H.R.4251 was introduced in the House on March 22, 2012, by
Mrs.Miller of Michigan, Mr.King of New York, Mr.Cuellar,
Mr.McCaul, and Mr.Clarke of Michigan, and referred to the
Committee on Homeland Security. Within the Committee, H.R.4251
was referred to the Subcommittee on Border and Maritime
Security.
The Subcommittee considered H.R.4251 on March 26, 2012, and
favorably reported the measure to the Full Committee, amended,
by voice vote.
The Committee considered H.R.4251 on June 6, 2012, and
ordered the measure favorably reported to the House, amended,
by voice vote.
The Committee reported H.R.4251 to the House on June 12,
2012, as H. Rpt. 112-521.
The House considered H.R.4251 under Suspension of the
Rules, on June 26, 2012.
The Chair of the Committee on Ways and Means sent a letter
to the Chair of the Committee on Homeland Security agreeing to
forego action on the bill. On June 28, 2012, the Chair of the
Committee on Homeland Security sent a letter to the Chair of
the Committee on Ways and Means acknowledging the
jurisdictional interests of the Committee on Ways and Means and
the agreement to forego action.
The House passed H.R.4251 on June 28, 2012, by a \2/3\
recorded vote of 402 yeas and 21 nays.
H.R.4251 was received in the Senate on June 29, 2012, read
twice, and referred to the Senate Committee on Commerce,
Science, and Transportation.

MANDATORY OPERATIONAL CONTROL REPORTING AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACT
OF 2012

H.R.6025

To provide for annual reports on the status of operational
control of the international land and maritime borders of the
United States and unlawful entries, and for other purposes.

Summary

In testimony before Congress, a Government Accountability
Office (GAO) witness reported that the U.S. Border Patrol has
less than 44 percent of the Southwest border under operational
control and less than 2 percent of the Northern Border under
operational control [GAO-11-374T and GAO-11-508T].
In 2010, the Department of Homeland Security stopped
reporting the number of miles of border under operational
control with the promise of a new, more holistic measure of
border security called the Border Condition Index.
Nearly three years later, no new measure for border
security has been released.
H.R. 6025 requires that the Department of Homeland Security
resume reporting miles of the border under operational control
and provide an estimate of the number of unlawful entries
between ports of entry.
Additionally, this bill requires the Department to give the
GAO access to the operational control numbers--for third party
verification and the use of a standard other than operational
control to describe security along the border must be vetted by
a Department of Energy National Laboratory with prior expertise
in border security.

Legislative History

H.R. 6025 was introduced in the House on June 26, 2012 by
Mrs. Miller of Michigan and Mr. Flake, and referred to the
Committee on Homeland Security and the Committee on the
Judiciary. Within the Committee, H.R. 6025 was referred to the
Subcommittee on Border and Maritime Security.
The House considered H.R. 6025 under Suspension of the
Rules on November 27, 2012, and passed the bill by voice vote.

BORDER SECURITY INFORMATION IMPROVEMENT ACT OF 2012

H.R.6368

Summary

H.R.6368 requires a joint report to Congress, no later than
180 days after the enactment of the Act, from the Department of
Justice (DOJ) and Department of Homeland Security (DHS),
concerning cross-border violence on the Southwest Border. The
study shall include: The definition of cross-border violence;
the ability to track, investigate, quantify, and report the
level of violence; steps being taken to address the effects of
the violence; information and data collected and made available
on the violence; and additional resources needed.

Legislative History

H.R.6368 was introduced in the House on September 10, 2012,
and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary and the
Committee on Homeland Security. Within the Committee, H.R.6368
was referred to the Subcommittee on Border and Maritime
Security.
The Chair of the Committee on Homeland Security sent a
letter to the Chair of the Committee on the Judiciary on
September 12, 2012, agreeing that, in order to expedite
consideration on the House Floor, the Committee on Homeland
Security will discharge H.R.6368 from further consideration.
The letter further requested the appointment of Conferees
should a House-Senate Conference be called. The Chair of the
Committee on the Judiciary sent a letter to the Chair of the
Committee on Homeland Security on September 13, 2012,
acknowledging the jurisdictional interests of the Committee on
Homeland Security and the agreement to forego consideration.
The letter further agreed to the appointment of Conferees
should a House-Senate Conference be called.
The House considered H.R.6368 on September 19, 2012, under
Suspension of the Rules and passed the measure by voice vote.
H.R.6368 was received in the Senate on September 20, 2012,
read twice, and referred to the Senate Committee on the
Judiciary.

----------

Oversight Activities of the Subcommittee

BORDER SECURITY BETWEEN THE PORTS OF ENTRY

The concept of operational control of the border as used in
the U.S. Border Patrol's National Strategy has become the
standard measure to describe how much or how little of the
border is secure. According to the Border Patrol, approximately
1,107 miles are under effective operational control, but U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP) has no current plans to
gain additional miles under control for the rest of Fiscal Year
2012 or in Fiscal Year 2013.
In order for the Border Patrol to be effective, agents must
have the right combination of personnel, infrastructure, and
technology. Since the cancellation of SBInet, the question
remains: ``What is next?'' The addition of increased Border
Patrol agents and infrastructure improvements alone cannot
secure the border--suitable technology must be used to support
the agents in the field as a force multiplier.
State and local law enforcement, first responders, and
other Government officials can, and should, be leveraged to
accomplish the shared goal of a secure border and safe
communities. State and local officials in many cases are the
first to encounter criminal elements associated with the influx
of illegal crossings. The Subcommittee is examining how the
current programs in place that delegate customs authority to
State and local law enforcement can inform the future use of
such authorities in securing the border against illegal
immigration and the smuggling of contraband.
Subcommittee Members were briefed on January 19, 2011, by
officials from CBP's Office of Technology Innovation and
Acquisitions. The briefing examined the Department of Homeland
Security's plan to move forward in the aftermath of the
Secretary's decision to cancel the Secure Border Initiative.
On January 27, 2011, Committee staff received a briefing
from members of the Association of Unmanned Vehicle Systems
International on the issue of unmanned aerial vehicles as a
tool to help secure the border.
On January 27, 2011, Committee staff met with officials
from the U.S. Border Patrol to discuss Fiscal Year 2010
statistics and how they relate to operational control of the
border. The brief reviewed what metrics the Border Patrol uses
to define levels of control on the border.
Committee staff met with representatives from the
Government Accountability Office (GAO) on February 4, 2011, to
discuss two reports: the first titled ``Enhanced DHS Oversight
and Assessment of Interagency Coordination Is Needed for the
Northern Border'' [GAO-11-97] and the second, ``Preliminary
Observations on Border Control Measures for the Southwest
Border'' [GAO-11-374T].
On February 15, 2011, the Subcommittee held a hearing
entitled ``Securing Our Borders--Operational Control and the
Path Forward.'' The Subcommittee received testimony from
Mr.Michael J. Fisher, Chief, Border Patrol, U.S. Customs and
Border Protection, Department of Homeland Security; Mr.Richard
M. Stana, Director, Homeland Security and Justice, Government
Accountability Office; and Hon. Raul G. Salinas, Mayor, City of
Laredo, Texas. The hearing focused on the Department's efforts
to gain and maintain operational control of the border. It
examined the effectiveness of the U.S. Border Patrol's measures
for obtaining operational control including statistics on
apprehensions, contraband seized, and number of Border Patrol
Agents assigned to the Southwest Border. Additionally, the
hearing provided Members an opportunity to explore whether a
Department-wide strategy to secure the border exists.
Committee staff met with officials from CBP on March 8,
2011, to receive an update on technology and personnel on the
border.
On March 15, 2011, the Subcommittee held a hearing entitled
``Strengthening the Border--Finding the Right Mix of Personnel,
Infrastructure, and Technology.'' The Subcommittee received
testimony from Mr.Michael J. Fisher, Chief of the Border
Patrol, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of
Homeland Security; Mr.Mark Borkowski, Assistant Commissioner,
Office of Technology Innovation and Acquisition, U.S. Customs
and Border Protection, Department of Homeland Security;
Mr.Michael C. Kostelnik, (Maj. Gen. Ret.) Assistant
Commissioner, Office of CBP Air and Marine, U.S. Customs and
Border Protection, Department of Homeland Security; Major
General Hugo E. Salazar, Adjutant General, Arizona National
Guard; and Mr.Richard M. Stana, Director, Homeland Security and
Justice, Government Accountability Office. The focus of this
hearing was to examine the Department of Homeland Security's
efforts to secure the border using a combination of personnel,
infrastructure, and technology.
Majority Members of the Subcommittee sent a letter to the
President on April 1, 2011, requesting an extension of the
current National Guard deployment along the Southwest Border,
past the current June 30, 2011 deadline. The National Guard has
been a valuable force multiplier in the border mission--known
as Operation Phalanx--and has proven to be well-equipped to
provide the necessary support to civilian law enforcement
personnel. The National Guard has expertise in a variety of
border security skills such as ground surveillance, criminal
investigative analysis, and command-and-control capabilities.
The letter further requested that the National Guard not be
limited to assisting civilian law enforcement, but to function
to the full extent allowed under Title 32, Section 502(f) duty
status.
Committee staff held a briefing, on April 12, 2011, with
representatives from Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE)
regarding cooperation between their organization and State and
local law enforcement officials. The briefing covered areas of
effectiveness and areas that needed improvement.
Committee staff met with representatives from the
Government Accountability Office (GAO) on April 25, 2011, to
discuss and examine SBInet and GAO's recommendations for the
future of this program.
On April 26, 2011, the Subcommittee received a briefing
from representatives from ICE on the Border Enforcement
Security Task Force (BEST) teams. The briefing focused on their
work with State and local law enforcement in the areas
surrounding the BEST teams.
Committee staff met with the Deputy Chief of the U.S.
Border Patrol on April 27, 2011 to discuss the effectiveness of
the Operation Stonegarden grant program and other programs the
U.S. Border Patrol uses to leverage State and local resources
to secure the border.
State and local law enforcement, first responders, and
other Government officials can, and should be, leveraged to
accomplish the shared goal of a secure border and safe
communities. The Subcommittee examined this issue in a May 3,
2011 hearing entitled ``Border Security and Enforcement--
Department of Homeland Security's Cooperation with State and
Local Law Enforcement Stakeholders.'' The Subcommittee received
testimony from Mr.Kumar Kibble, Deputy Director, U.S.
Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Department of Homeland
Security; Mr.Ronald Vitiello, Deputy Chief, U.S. Customs and
Border Protection, Department of Homeland Security; Sheriff
Larry Dever, Cochise County Sheriff's Office, Arizona; Sheriff
Todd Entrekin, Etowah County Sheriff's Office, Alabama; and
Mr.Gomecindo Lopez, Commander, Special Operations Bureau, El
Paso County Sheriff's Office, Texas.
Committee staff met with representatives from DHS and the
Department of Defense (DOD) on April 10, 2012, to discuss the
upcoming hearing on the issue of the National Guard on the
Southern Border. The meeting covered potential information that
would be raised in the hearing and helped to respond to various
Committee staff questions on a variety of topics.
On April 17, 2012, the Subcommittee held a hearing entitled
``Boots on the Ground or Eyes in the Sky: How Best to Utilize
the National Guard to Achieve Operational Control.'' The
Subcommittee received testimony from Hon. Paul N. Stockton,
Assistant Secretary of Defense for Homeland Defense and
Americas' Security Affairs, Office of Undersecretary of Defense
for Policy, Department of Defense; Mr.Ronald D. Vitiello,
Deputy Chief of Border Patrol, U.S. Customs and Border
Protection, Department of Homeland Security; Mr.Martin Vaughan,
Executive Director, Southwest Region, Office of Air and Marine,
U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland
Security; Maj. Gen. John Nichols, Adjutant General, Texas
National Guard; and Mr.Brian J. Lepore, Director, Defense
Capabilities and Management, Government Accountability Office.
The purpose of this hearing was to focus on the National Guard
and CBPs future strategy to achieve operational control of the
border, whether additional ad hoc deployments may be necessary,
and how best to utilize the National Guard to support the
Border Patrol.
On May 8, 2012, the Subcommittee held a hearing entitled
``Measuring Border Security: U.S. Border Patrol's New Strategic
Plan and the Path Forward.'' The Subcommittee received
testimony from Chief Michael J. Fisher, Border Patrol,
Department of Homeland Security; Ms.Rebecca Gambler, Acting
Director, Homeland Security and Justice, Government
Accountability Office; and Mr.Marc Rosenblum, PhD, Specialist
in Immigration Policy, Congressional Research Service. This
hearing examined the U.S. Border Patrol's new strategic plan
and its implications for future border security efforts.
On July 23, 2012, the Subcommittee received an update from
representatives from Customs and Border Protection regarding a
border technology development timeline.

SECURITY AT THE PORTS OF ENTRY

Examining how the U.S. Customs and Border Protection Office
of Field Operations uses the resources appropriated by Congress
to stop the illicit flow of money, guns, and drugs across the
Nation's borders is crucial in determining control of the
border. The Department of Justice reported in the National Drug
Threat Assessment (February 2010) that nearly 90 percent of all
drugs smuggled into the United States flow through official
ports of entry. However, statistics provided by the U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP)--in their CBP Strategic
Context Congressional Justification, Fiscal Year 2010--show
that CBP personnel are apprehending fewer than half of all
major violators, such as drug smugglers, at the border.
Committee staff received a briefing from representatives
from Immigration and Custom Enforcement (ICE) on March 7, 2011,
on the current situation with drug cartels within the United
Mexican States. The briefing covered techniques on smuggling
drugs into the United States and money and weapons out of the
United States.
On March 11 and 23, 2011, Committee staff met with
representatives from both the Department of Treasury's
Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) and ICE to
discuss the current financial issues of the Mexican drug
cartels, specifically, their use of stored value cards.
In evaluating the allocation of resources at the ports of
entry in terms of manpower, canine units, and infrastructure,
the Subcommittee looked to determine whether or not those
resources were being properly deployed to stem the tide of
illicit guns, money, and drugs that cross through the ports of
entry. On April 5, 2011, the Subcommittee held a hearing
entitled ``Using Resources Effectively to Secure Our Border at
Ports of Entry--Stopping the Illicit Flow of Money, Guns, and
Drugs.'' The Subcommittee received testimony from Mr.Thomas
Winkowski, Assistant Commissioner, U.S. Customs and Border
Protection, Department of Homeland Security; Mr.Stan Korosec,
Vice President, Operations, Blue Water Bridge Canada;
Mr.Timothy J. Koerner, Vice President and Chief Security
Officer, Canadian National Railway Company; and Hon. Richard F.
Cortez, Mayor, City of McAllen, Texas.
Committee staff met with the Deputy Chief of the U.S.
Border Patrol on April 27, 2011, to discuss the effectiveness
of Operation Stonegarden and other programs Border Patrol uses
to secure the border.
The Chairs of the Full Committee and the Subcommittee sent
a letter to the President on April 1, 2011, requesting an
extension of the National Guard troop along the Southern
Border.
The Chair and Ranking Member of the Full Committee and the
Chair and Ranking Member of the Subcommittee sent a letter on
June 1, 2011, to the CBP Commissioner regarding personnel at
the borders and ports of entry.
On July 8, 2011, the Subcommittee hosted a Member-only
classified briefing. The briefing provided an assessment of
current border security threats to the Nation. Members were
briefed by representatives from the Department of Homeland
Security, including the Office of Intelligence and Analysis and
Customs and Border Protection.
Committee staff met with representatives from CBP on
September 26, 2011, regarding the Border Condition Index. CBP
was able to provide an overview of the Index and respond to
staff concerns.
On April 20, 2012, representatives from CBP met with
Committee staff on Section 543 of the President's Fiscal Year
2013 Budget Request, the Alternative Sources of Funding
Provision.
On May 1, 2012 the Subcommittee held a field hearing in
Laredo, Texas, entitled ``Using Technology to Facilitate Trade
and Enhance Security at Our Ports of Entry.'' The Subcommittee
received testimony from Mr.Gene Garza, Director of Field
Operations, Laredo Field Office, Office of Field Operations,
U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland
Security; Mr.Steve C. McCraw, Director, Texas Department of
Homeland Security; Mr.Jesse Hereford, Vice Chairman, Border
Trade Alliance; Mr.Wilfredo Martinez, Chairman, Laredo Chamber
of Commerce, Laredo, Texas; and Mr.Jose D. Gonzalez, Jose David
Gonzalez Customs Brokerage. The purpose of the hearing was to
examine the use of CBP technology at the ports of entry, its
limitations, and how the Department can ensure the technology
needs of CBP are being met through the effective research,
acquisition, and procurement.
The Subcommittee conducted a site visit on May 1, 2012, to
view the World Trade International Bridge in Laredo, Texas.
That same day, the Subcommittee also conducted a site visit
and participated in a survey along the Rio Grande to examine
methods of illegal entry into the United States. The survey was
conducted by the U.S. Border Patrol, and included personnel
from the Texas Department of Public Safety and U.S. Coast Guard
boat units.

PORT AND MARITIME SECURITY

The U.S. Coast Guard (USCG) plays a vital role within the
Department of Homeland Security (DHS). The USCG safeguards the
Nation's ports, waterways, and coastal waters, interdicts
illegal drug smuggling, performs search and rescue operations,
inspects and ensures safety for all maritime vessels entering
the United States and aids in law enforcement on the water; all
while maintaining a state of defensive readiness.
Committee staff conducted a site visit to the Maritime
Security Response Team (MSRT) in Chesapeake, Virginia on
January 13, 2011. The visit allowed staff to conduct oversight
and gain greater knowledge of the missions and capabilities of
the MSRTs.
On February 8, 2011, Committee staff met with
representatives from the USCG to discuss the International Port
Security Program (ISPS). The meeting specifically focused on
the inspection process and program effectiveness.
The Chairs of the Full Committee and the Subcommittee sent
a letter on March 2, 2011, to the Commandant of the U.S. Coast
Guard regarding the proposed budget request for the USCG and
its post-9/11 mission.
Committee staff met with representatives from the USCG on
March 17, 2011, for a briefing on the current status and
effectiveness of Interagency Operational Centers (IOCs) and
their plans for future development.
On April 13, 2011, the Subcommittee conducted a site visit
to the U.S. Coast Guard Headquarters in Washington, DC. Members
of the Committee and Committee staff met with the Commandant of
the Coast Guard and examined security-related issues.
On April 14, 20, and 27, 2011, Committee staff met with
representatives from the USCG, the Government Accountability
Office, and relevant stakeholders to understand their concerns
of the Transportation Worker Identification Credential (TWIC)
program. Committee staff received a briefing on April 19, 2011,
from representatives from the USCG on the Shiprider program and
discussed relevant legislation.
Committee staff met with representatives from the USCG on
May 13, 2011, for a scoping meeting for the upcoming hearing
with Admiral Papp. During this meeting, staff were able to
discuss the hearing and request any information they needed.
On May 26, 2011, Committee staff met with representatives
from the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP). The briefing
covered issues regarding the Shiprider program and current and
potential integrated law enforcement programs at the Northern
Border.
On May 31, 2011, Committee staff held a meeting with
representatives from the Government Accountability Office
regarding the upcoming U.S. Coast Guard hearing. The purpose of
the meeting was to discuss the work GAO had done regarding
Coast Guard acquisition plans and other challenges facing the
Coast Guard.
Following September 11, 2001, the USCG greatly increased
its maritime security operations, including its focus on Ports
and Waterways Coastal Security (PWCS) and defense readiness
missions. On June 14, 2011, the Subcommittee held a hearing on
``Securing the Nation's Ports and Maritime Border--A Review of
the Coast Guard Post--9/11 Homeland Security Missions.'' The
Subcommittee received testimony from Admiral Papp, Commandant
of the USCG. In the hearing, the Subcommittee examined what
Admiral Papp meant when he stated that the service may need to
``reduce the number and range of capabilities [the USCG has]
added since 9/11, until properly resourced and this will be
acceptable.''
Committee staff met with representatives from the
Government Accountability Office (GAO) on January 4, 2012, to
discuss the report entitled ``Maritime Security: Coast Guard
Needs to Improve Use and Management of Interagency Operations
Centers.'' [GAO-112-202].
On January 5, 2012, Committee staff received a briefing
from DHS on their maritime biometrics program. The briefing
covered section 807 of the 2010 Coast Guard Authorization Act
(Pub. L. 111-281).
On February 1, 2012, Committee staff met with
representatives from DHS components to discuss the upcoming
hearing on Global Supply Chain Security. The meeting covered
potential information that would be raised in the hearing and
helped to address staff concerns. This hearing focused on
maintaining the security and integrity of the supply chain
through a risk-based methodology.
The Subcommittee held a hearing on February 7, 2012,
entitled ``Balancing Maritime Security and Trade Facilitation:
Protecting our Ports, Increasing Commerce and Securing the
Supply Chain--Part I.'' The Subcommittee received testimony
from Hon. Jerrold Nadler, a Representative in Congress from the
8th District of New York; Mr.David Heyman, Assistant Secretary,
Office of Policy, Department of Homeland Security; Mr.Kevin
McAleenan, Acting Assistant Commissioner, Office of Field
Operations, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of
Homeland Security; Rear Admiral Paul Zukunft, Assistant
Commandant for Marine Safety, Security and Stewardship, U.S.
Coast Guard, Department of Homeland Security; and Mr.Stephen
Caldwell, Director, Maritime and Coast Guard Issues, Homeland
Security and Justice Team, Government Accountability Office.
On April 27, 2012, the Subcommittee considered H.R.4251,
the ``Securing Maritime Activities Through Risk-based Targeting
for Port Security Act.'' See action on H.R.4251, discussed
above.
On June 19, 2012, Committee staff met with members of the
Asia-Pacific Council of American Chambers of Commerce and
received a firsthand account of the benefits U.S. businesses in
Asia bring back to the U.S. economy. Staff discussed the Asia-
Pacific Economic Cooperation Business Travel Cards Act of 2011
(Pub. L. 112-54) and the Securing Maritime Activities through
Risk-based Targeting for Port Security Act (H.R.4251).
Representatives from the Department of Energy briefed
Committee staff on July 25, 2012 in regards to the Megaports
program. Staff questioned the representatives about the
program's current deployment status and future funding levels
that call into question the program's viability.

BORDER SECURITY THREATS

On July 8, 2011, the Subcommittee received a classified
Member-only briefing on current border security threats to the
Nation. Members were briefed by representatives from the
Department of Homeland Security, including the Office of
Intelligence and Analysis and Customs and Border Protection.
The Chairs of the Full Committee and the Subcommittee sent
a letter to the Secretary of Homeland Security on November 21,
2011, expressing concern over the Department's apparent failure
to issue guidelines to Federal, State, and local law
enforcement officials on how to identify noncompliance with
Federal laws that apply to cross-border trucking between the
United States and the United Mexican States. The Department
sent a response on January 20, 2012.
On December 14, 2011, the Subcommittee held a Member-only
classified briefing on current border security threats to the
Nation. Representatives from the Department of Homeland
Security, including the Office of Intelligence and Analysis and
Customs and Border Protection, were present to respond to
Member questions.
On January 5, 2012, representatives from Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) met with Committee staff to discuss the
Government Accountability Office report entitled ``Arizona
Border Surveillance Technology: More Information on Plans and
Costs is Needed before Proceeding'' [GAO-12-22].
Committee staff received a briefing on January 26, 2012, by
the U.S. Border Patrol on their Consequence Delivery System.
The Consequence Delivery System is the Border Patrol's new
system to send illegal Mexican immigrants back to Mexico.
On February 8, 2012, Committee staff met with
representatives from the Department of Homeland Security to
discuss the U.S. Border Patrol's new strategy to secure the
Southwest Border.
The Subcommittee held a field hearing in Phoenix, Arizona,
on May 21, 2012, entitled ``Stopping the Flow of Illicit Drugs
in Arizona by Leveraging State, Local, and Federal Information
Sharing.'' The Subcommittee received testimony from Mr.Matthew
C. Allen, Special Agent in Charge, Homeland Security
Investigations--Phoenix, U.S. Immigration and Customs
Enforcement, Department of Homeland Security; Mr.Douglas
Coleman, Special Agent in Charge, Drug Enforcement
Administration--Phoenix, Department of Justice; Brigadier
General Jose Salinas, Director, Joint Staff, Arizona Dept. of
Emergency and Military Affairs, Arizona National Guard; Lt.
Col. Jeffery Stanhope, Assistant Director, Criminal
Investigations, Arizona Department of Public Safety;
Ms.Elizabeth Kempshall, Executive Director, Arizona Region,
Southwest Border High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area; and Dr.
Jay F. Nunamaker, Jr., Director, BORDERS, The University of
Arizona. This hearing focused on the failure to prevent the
illicit flow of narcotics and its effects on communities across
the United States, particularly in transit areas, such as
Phoenix, Arizona. The drug cartels are an innovative and
adaptive enemy, illustrating the need for a comprehensive
approach to securing our borders.
On August 6, 2012, Committee staff were briefed by
representatives from the Government Accountability Office on
the status of the now published report titled ``Federal
Leadership Needed to Address Remaining Vulnerabilities'' [GAO-
12-893]. The report looks at the ability of States to verify
license applicants' identities.
Committee staff went on a site visit on September 5, 2012
to the Intellectual Property Rights Center. Staff members were
able to tour the center and review the task force model of the
government's response to global intellectual property theft.
On June 1, 2011, Committee staff met with representatives
from the Department of Homeland Security for a Northern Border
Strategy brief. The briefing provided a confidential briefing
on the major themes of the Northern Border Strategy as well as
the President's ``Beyond the Border'' program for North
American perimeter security and travel/trade facilitation.
Committee staff held a conference call with the New York
State Division of Criminal Justice Services on June 23, 2011,
for a Northern Border Brief. The call familiarized staff with
the work of the Franklin County District Attorney's Drug Task
Force; smuggling and human trafficking concerns regarding
Native American reservations; and the Division of Criminal
Justice Services Homeland Security grant initiative to use
License Plate Reader technology to track illegal activity in
the area.
On July 8, 2011, the Subcommittee hosted a Member-only
classified briefing. The briefing provided an assessment of
current border security threats to the Nation. Members were
briefed by representatives from DHS, including the Office of
Intelligence and Analysis and U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP).
The Subcommittee met with representatives from US-VISIT
regarding biometrics on July 15, 2011. Subject matter experts
from US-VISIT provided staff with a briefing focusing on the
use of biometrics.
On September 26, 2011, Committee staff met with
representatives from CBP regarding their Border Condition
Index. CBP provided an overview of the Index and answered
questions from Committee staff.
In preparation for the June 19, 2012 hearing on border
security threats to the Homeland, Committee staff met with
representatives from the U.S. Coast Guard on June 7, 2012.
Then, on June 14, 2012, Committee staff held a hearing
preparation brief with representatives from Customs and Border
Protection. Both of these meetings covered potential
information that would be raised in the hearing and helped to
address questions staff members had on a variety of topics.
On June 19, 2012, the Subcommittee held a hearing entitled
``Border Security Threats to the Homeland: DHS' Response to
Innovative Tactics and Techniques.'' The Subcommittee received
testimony from Ms.Donna A. Bucella, Assistant Commissioner,
Office of Intelligence and Investigative Liaison, U.S. Customs
and Border Protection, Department of Homeland Security;
Mr.James A. Dinkins, Executive Associate Director, Homeland
Security Investigations, U.S. Immigration and Customs
Enforcement, Department of Homeland Security; Rear Admiral
William D. Lee, Deputy for Operations Policy & Capabilities,
U.S. Coast Guard, Department of Homeland Security; and Rear
Admiral Charles D. Michel, Director, Joint Interagency Task
Force South. The hearing focused on DHS' need to look forward
in order to anticipate the security vulnerabilities at or near
the border, and be prepared to adapt to the use of novel
techniques, such as border tunnels, ultra light aircraft, as
well as panga boats and semi and fully submersible vessels.

MARITIME BORDERS

The U.S. Coast Guard (USCG) has been designated as the lead
agency for maritime security. However, within the Department of
Homeland Security, other components share the responsibility of
securing the Nation's coastal waterways and maritime borders.
Working together in areas of joint authority, the USCG and the
U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) deploy an array of air
and marine assets in the Nation's fight against the illegal
flow of drugs and illegal immigration. In addition, the USCG
and CBP routinely join forces with State and local law
enforcement agencies to form a multi-agency cooperative effort
designed to keep the Nation's coastal waterways and maritime
borders safe and secure.
Maritime security is crucial for the Nation's economic
well-being. Commerce is the lifeblood of our Nation's economy;
it moves in and out of our ports every day, but it is both a
benefit and a vulnerability that those who seek to do us harm
could exploit. Cooperation, training, and collaboration must
take place and must be practiced among the multiple agencies
that have jurisdiction on our waterways well before an incident
takes place.
On June 24, 2011, Committee staff met with representatives
from the USCG regarding the National Security Cutters (NSC)
Program. At the meeting staff discussed the acquisition status
of the NSCs, current use of NSCs, and future location
information for NSCs.
The Subcommittee held a briefing on July 5, 2011, with
subject matter experts from the USCG and CBP Air and Marine.
The Subcommittee received a briefing from the USCG on July
5, 2011, on the voluntary standards for State and local law
enforcement for port security operations.
Committee staff met with the Government Accountability
Office on July 7, 2011, to discuss Interagency Operation
Centers and their Maritime Domain Awareness reports.
The Subcommittee met with representatives from the CBP, the
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), and the U.S.
Coast Guard on July 11, 2011, regarding the Maritime Operations
Coordination Plan. The staff discussed operational benefits and
challenges presented by the plan with the affected agencies.
On July 12, 2011, the Subcommittee held a hearing entitled
``Protecting the Maritime Borders--Leveraging Law Enforcement
Cooperation to Enhance Security Along America's Coasts.'' The
Subcommittee received testimony from Major General Michael C.
Kostelnik (Ret.), Assistant Commissioner, Office of Customs and
Border Protection Air and Marine, U.S. Customs and Border
Protection, Department of Homeland Security; Rear Admiral Paul
F. Zukunft, Assistant Commandant for Marine Safety, Security
and Stewardship, United States Coast Guard, Department of
Homeland Security; Sheriff Tim Donnellon, St. Clair County
Sheriff's Office, Michigan; and Sheriff Adrian Garcia, Harris
County Sheriff's Office, Texas.
Committee staff met with representatives from the Port of
Los Angeles and the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center on
August 3, 2011, to examine the Port Security Grant Program and
maritime security training.
On August 3, 2011, Committee staff met with representatives
from the USCG regarding security planning. The meeting
specifically focused on standardizing security planning and
training.
On August 11, 2011, Committee staff met with
representatives from the USCG on the various classification
societies. In the meeting the different societies were
discussed, as well as what benefits and limitations shippers
experience in the different societies.
On September 6, 2011, the Subcommittee staff met with
representatives from ICE regarding the National Initiative for
Illicit Trade Enforcement (NIITE). This was a new National
program which is a partnership with public, private, and
international organizations to prevent the exploitation of
international trade, travel, and financial systems through the
use of established relationships we have with the trade, law
enforcement, and intelligence communities. NIITE operations
have revolved primarily around the targeting of sea container
cargo.
Representatives from the U.S. Coast Guard met with
Committee staff on July 23, 2012, regarding semi-submersibles.
Committee staff was provided information on the current
threats, known technology available, and the path forward.
On September 6, 2012, Committee staff visited the U.S.
Naval Research Laboratory to discuss and preview the Department
of Homeland Security Directorate of Science and Technology's
self propelled semi-submersible vessel PLUTO and an additional
confiscated smuggling vessel.

VISA SECURITY

The 9/11 Commission Report included 41 specific
recommendations to better prevent, prepare for, and respond to
future terrorist attacks. These included recommendations on
targeting terrorist travel, completing biometric entry-exit
screening, and improving information sharing. The Commission
concluded that visa and immigration inspection failures
contributed to September 11, 2011, terrorist attacks. The
Commission stated that ``(t)here were opportunities for
intelligence and law enforcement to exploit al-Qaeda's travel
vulnerabilities.''
Committee staff met with representatives from the U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP) on August 18, 2011, to
receive an update on visa security, including the CBP Targeting
and the Immigration Advisory Program.
On August 29, 2011, the Subcommittee had a briefing from
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and the Department of
State regarding visa security and terror travel. Among other
things, the issues discussed included: The Student Exchange
Visitor Program, the Counterterrorism and Criminal Exploitation
Unit, and the Visa Security Program.
The Subcommittee received a briefing on August 30, 2011,
from the Government Accountability Office on visa security
products, including the different products available and their
benefits and limitations in the field.
On September 13, 2011, the Subcommittee held a hearing
entitled ``Ten Years after 9/11: Can Terrorists Still Exploit
our Visa System?'' The Subcommittee received testimony from
Mr.Thomas Winkowski, Assistant Commissioner, Office of Field
Operations, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of
Homeland Security; Mr.Edward Ramotowski, Acting Deputy
Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Consular Affairs, U.S.
Department of State; Mr.John Cohen, Deputy Counterterrorism
Coordinator, Department of Homeland Security; Mr.Peter T. Edge,
Deputy Associate Director, Homeland Security Investigations,
Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Department of Homeland
Security; and Mr.Richard M. Stana, Director, Homeland Security
and Justice, Government Accountability Office. The hearing
examined the Department of Homeland Security and other U.S.
Government efforts to secure the border by addressing gaps in
the visa security system, including challenges in identifying
individuals who overstay their visas.
The Subcommittee received a classified briefing on refugee
and special immigrant visa screening on September 15, 2011.
On October 25, 2011, Committee staff met with
representatives from the Department of Homeland Security to
discuss Enhanced Biographics, Counterterrorism Advisory Board/
Counterterror Coordinator Update, and the Enhanced Biographic
Exit project.
Representatives from Immigration and Customs Enforcement
met with Committee staff on September 15, 2011, to discuss
issues surrounding visa overstays in relation to the upcoming
hearing on the relation between terrorists and the visa
overstay problem.
On March 6, 2012, the Subcommittee held a hearing entitled
``From the 9/11 Hijackers to Amine el-Khalifi: Terrorists and
the Visa Overstay Problem.'' The Subcommittee received
testimony from Mr.John Cohen, Deputy Counterterrorism
Coordinator, Department of Homeland Security; Mr.Peter T. Edge,
Deputy Associate Director, Homeland Security Investigations,
Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Department of Homeland
Security; and Mr.David Donahue, Deputy Assistant Secretary of
State for Consular Affairs, U.S. Department of State. The
purpose of this hearing was to examine the efforts of the
Department of Homeland Security to secure the border by
addressing gaps in the visa system, particularly challenges in
identifying individuals who overstay their visas.
Members of the Government Accountability Office met with
Committee staff on July 26, 2012, to discuss the published
report titled ``DHS Needs to Take Actions to Strengthen
Monitoring of Schools'' [GAO-12-895]. The report took a look at
Immigration and Customs Enforcement's process to identify and
assess risks posed by schools in the Student and Exchange
Visitors Program.
On August 6, 2012, Committee staff conducted a site visit
to the Counterterrorism and Criminal Exploitation Unit, and
received a briefing on the unit's three areas of focus:
National Security Threat Task Force, Student and Exchange
Visitor Information System Exploitation, and Terrorist Tracking
and Pursuit.
To better understand how terrorists and suspected
terrorists are screened prior to entering the U.S. and
currently in the country. Committee staff conducted a site
visit to the Terrorist Screening Center on August 28, 2012.
While there, Committee staff received a briefing on terrorist
watchlisting, including information on how the screening
process is handled, how the Terrorist Screening Database is
tied together and how the participating agencies work together.
In preparation for the hearing on September 11, 2012,
Committee staff held a briefing with representatives from both
the Department of Homeland Security and the Department of
Defense on September 7, 2012. During the briefing, staff
examined visa security programs overseas as well as enhanced
vetting of visa applicants before a visa is issued.
On September 11, 2012, the Subcommittee held a hearing
entitled ``Eleven Years Later: Preventing Terrorists from
Coming to America.'' The Subcommittee received testimony from
Ms.Kelli Ann Walther, Deputy Assistant Secretary, Office of
Policy, Department of Homeland Security; Mr.Kevin McAleenan,
Acting Assistant Commissioner, Office of Field Operations,
Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland Security;
Mr.John Woods, Assistant Director, National Security
Investigations, Homeland Security Investigations, Immigration
and Customs Enforcement, Department of Homeland Security;
Mr.Charles K. Edwards, Acting Inspector General, Office of the
Inspector General, Department of Homeland Security; and
Mr.Edward Ramotowski, Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of
Consular Affairs, U.S. Department of State. This hearing
provided Committee Members the opportunity to examine how gaps
and vulnerabilities in the visa security system have been
addressed to prevent terrorists from entering the Nation.

IMMIGRATION ENFORCEMENT

On June 17, 2011, the Director of U.S. Immigration and
Customs Enforcement released a memorandum regarding the
practice of ``prosecutorial discretion.'' The memo outlined an
expansive list of circumstances that could make an individual
eligible for delayed or deferred action, based upon
prosecutorial discretion. While the use of prosecutorial
discretion is not new, there is a significant difference
between its previous application and establishing a formal
process to systematically, on an on-going basis, block illegal
aliens from being placed in removal proceedings, stop already-
initiated removal proceedings, and end deportations for
potentially large numbers of criminal aliens. The memo also
listed several categories that mirror groups that would have
been eligible for relief under the DREAM Act, which failed to
pass in both Houses of Congress.
The Subcommittee held a hearing on October 4, 2011,
entitled ``Does Administrative Amnesty Harm our Efforts to Gain
and Maintain Operational Control of the Border?'' The
Subcommittee received testimony from Chief Michael J. Fisher,
Border Patrol, Customs and Border Protection, Department of
Homeland Security; Mr.Kumar C. Kibble, Deputy Director,
Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Department of Homeland
Security; and Ms.Ruth Ellen Wasem, Ph.D., Specialist in
Immigration Policy, Congressional Research Service. This
hearing examined U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement's
immigration enforcement priorities and whether they have an
impact on border security.
On August 31, 2011, the Committee staff met with
representatives from the Congressional Research Service on the
administrative amnesty. The meeting focused on trends in
immigration throughout the years as a result of the policies of
different Administrations.
Committee staff met with representatives from U.S. Customs
and Border Protection on September 26, 2011, to discuss the
Border Condition Index. The Border Condition Index is based on
the outcomes of border activity.
Committee staff met with representatives from ICE regarding
prosecutorial discretion on September 26, 2011. Staff discussed
the ICE memos released by the Director.
On September 30, 2011, Committee staff met with
representatives from U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
to discuss work authorization in regards to the ICE memos
published on prosecutorial discretion in the field.
Representatives from the Department of Homeland Security's
Office of the Inspector General briefed Committee staff on
February 8, 2012, on their recent report on CBP's management of
bonded facilities entitled ``CBP's Management Control of Bonded
Facilities.'' [OIG-12-25]
On February 10, 2012, Committee staff were briefed and
asked for input on ICE's Mass Migration Plan. In the event of a
mass immigrant migration, ICE is charged with housing and
processing immigrants.
On July 10, 2012, the Subcommittee held a hearing entitled
``Building a Secure Community: How Can DHS Better Leverage
State and Local Partnerships?'' The Subcommittee received
testimony from The Honorable John Morton, Director, U.S.
Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Department of Homeland
Security. The purpose of the hearing was for Members to
question Director Morton on the effectiveness of State and
local partnerships, such as Secure Communities, as well as
other initiatives that leverage State and local law enforcement
to enforce immigration law.

LEVERAGING DOD TECHNOLOGY

In an era of diminishing budgets, the Department of
Homeland Security must look to the Department of Defense (DoD)
for existing technology that may have an application for
security Nationwide. Billions of taxpayer dollars have been
spent since the attacks of September 11, 2001, on DoD research
and development--that investment should also be used to secure
the Nation here at home. Defense technology has already been
used successfully in a handful of cases on both land and sea
borders of the United States. As the Nation draws down in Iraq
and Afghanistan, surveillance equipment used successfully in
theaters of war may have surveillance applications to help
Border Patrol Agents gain and maintain operational control of
the border.
On June 6, 2011, Committee staff met with the Department of
Homeland Security's Science and Technology Directorate (S&T) on
strategic priorities and a general open discussion. Among the
issues discussed, the Subcommittee examined S&T activities
regarding border and maritime security, including explosives
detection and threat and risk assessments.
Committee staff met with representatives from the
Government Accountability Office (GAO) on June 20, 2011, to
receive an update on SBInet. Staff were briefed on the work GAO
has done regarding SBInet and U.S. Customs and Border
Protection's steps forward.
On October 18, 2011, Committee staff met with GAO regarding
various border technologies. During this meeting GAO discussed
post-SBInet technologies.
Committee staff met with representatives from the U.S.
Coast Guard (USCG) on November 2, 2011, regarding its
coordination with and use of existing DoD technology. In the
briefing, USCG discussed their process to obtain available DoD
technologies and specific examples of how this has proven
useful at a tactical level.
Committee staff met with representatives from the DoD for a
pre-hearing meeting regarding DHS's use of DoD technology.
During this meeting staff were able to discuss the November 8,
2011, hearing and examine DoD's position on the topic.
On November 9, 2011, Committee staff met with Mr.Borkowski,
Mr.Benda, and agency staff for a pre-hearing briefing to inform
Committee staff on the current situation regarding the use of
technologies.
The Subcommittee held a hearing on November 15, 2011,
entitled ``Protecting the Homeland: How can DHS use DoD
Technology to Secure the Border?'' The Subcommittee received
testimony from Hon. Paul N. Stockton, Assistant Secretary of
Defense for Homeland Defense and Americas' Security Affairs,
Office of Undersecretary of Defense for Policy, Department of
Defense; Mr.Mark Borkowski, Assistant Commissioner, Office of
Technology Innovation and Acquisition, Border Patrol, U.S.
Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland Security;
Dr. Adam Cox, Acting Deputy Director, Homeland Security
Advanced Research Projects Agency, Department of Homeland
Security; and Mr.Michael Tangora, Deputy Assistant Commandant
and Director of Acquisition Services, United States Coast
Guard, Department of Homeland Security.
On May 4, 2012, Committee staff met with representatives
from CBP regarding Utilization of Retrograded DoD Equipment.
This is a CBP effort led by the Office of Technology Innovation
and Acquisition (OTIA).

TRUSTED TRAVELER

On May 30, 2012, the Chair and Ranking Members of the
Subcommittee on Oversight, Investigations and Management and
the Subcommittee on Border and Maritime Security sent a letter
to the GAO requesting a review of the Department's Trusted
Traveler programs to include the extent to which these programs
have improved the facilitation of commerce and trade across
U.S. borders, their impact on security, the effectiveness of
the application process, and how the Department measures the
programs' performance. The GAO has indicated that this review
will be completed in 2013.

----------

Subcommittee Hearings Held

``Securing Our Borders--Operational Control and the Path
Forward.'' February 15, 2011. (Serial No. 111-4)
``Strengthening the Border--Finding the Right Mix of Personnel,
Infrastructure and Technology.'' March 15, 2011.
(Serial No. 112-10)
``Using Resources Effectively to Secure Our Border at Ports of
Entry--Stopping the Illicit Flow of Money, Guns, and
Drugs.'' April 15, 2011. (Serial No. 112-15)
``Border Security and Enforcement _ Department of Homeland
Security's Cooperation with State and Local Law
Enforcement Stakeholders.'' May 3, 2011. (Serial No.
112-20)
``Securing the Nation's Ports and Maritime Border--A Review of
the Coast Guard Post 9/11 Homeland Security Mission.''
June 14, 2011. (Serial No. 112-30)
``Protecting the Maritime Borders--Leveraging Law Enforcement
Cooperation to Enhance Security Along America's
Coasts.'' July 12, 2011 (Serial No. 112-37)
``Ten Years after 9/11: Can Terrorists Still Exploit our Visa
System?'' September 13, 2011. (Serial No. 112-43)
``Does Administrative Amnesty Harm Our Efforts to Gain and
Maintain Operational Control of the Border?'' October
4, 2011. (Serial No. 112-47)
``Protecting the Homeland: How Can DHS Use DoD Technology to
Secure the Border?'' November 15, 2011. (Serial No.
112-56)
``Balancing Maritime Security and Trade Facilitation:
Protecting our Ports, Increasing Commerce and Securing
the Supply Chain--Part I.'' February 7, 2012. (Serial
No. 112-65)
``From the 9/11 Hijackers to Amine el-Khalifi: Terrorists and
the Visa Overstay Problem.'' March 6, 2012. (Serial No.
112-73)
``Boots on the Ground or Eyes in the Sky: How Best to Utilize
the National Guard to Achieve Operational Control.''
April 17, 2012. (Serial No. 112-83)
``Using Technology To Facilitate Trade and Enhance Security at
Our Ports of Entry.'' May 1, 2012. (Laredo, Texas)
(Serial No. 112-87)
``Measuring Border Security: U.S. Border Patrol's New Strategic
Plan and the Path Forward.'' May 8, 2012. (Serial No.
112-88)
``Stopping the Flow of Illicit Drugs in Arizona by Leveraging
State, Local, and Federal Information Sharing.'' May
21, 2012. (Phoenix, Arizona) (Serial No. 112-94)
``Border Security Threats to the Homeland: DHS' Response to
Innovative Tactics and Techniques.'' June 19, 2012.
(Serial No., 112-98)
``Building a Secure Community: How Can DHS Better Leverage
State and Local Partnerships?'' July 10, 2012. (Serial
No. 112-102)
``Eleven Years Later: Preventing Terrorists from Coming to
America.'' Sep. 11, 2012. (Serial No. 112-113)
Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and Intelligence

Patrick Meehan, Pennsylvania, Chairman

Paul C. Broun, Georgia,
Vice Chair
Chip Cravaack, Minnesota
Joe Walsh, Illinois
Ben Quayle, Arizona
E. Scott Rigell, Virginia
Billy Long, Missouri
Peter T. King, New York
(Ex
Officio) Brian Higgins, New York
Loretta Sanchez, California
Kathleen C. Hochul, New York
Janice Hahn, California
Ron Barber, Arizona
Bennie G. Thompson, Mississippi
(Ex Officio)

----------

During the 112th Congress, the Subcommittee on
Counterterrorism and Intelligence held 175 hearings, receiving
testimony from 61 witnesses, and considered two measures.

----------

Legislative Activities of the Subcommittee

WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTION ENHANCEMENT ACT OF 2011

Pub. Law 112-199 S. 743 (H.R.3289)

Summary

Legislative History

S. 743, the Senate companion measure, was introduced in the
Senate on April 6, 2011, by Mr.Akaka and 13 original co-
sponsors and referred to the Senate Committee on Homeland
Security and Governmental Affairs.
The Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental
Affairs considered S.743 on October 19, 2011, and ordered the
measure to be reported to the Senate with an amendment,
favorably.
The Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental
Affairs reported S.743 to the Senate on April 19, 2012 as
S.Rpt. 112-155.
The Senate considered and passed S.743 by unanimous consent
on May 8, 2012.
S. 743 was received in the House on May 9, 2012, and
referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform,
and in addition to the House Permanent Select Committee on
Intelligence and the Committee on Homeland Security, for a
period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker. Within the
Committee, S.743 was referred to the Subcommittee on Oversight,
Investigations, and Management, and in addition to the
Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and Intelligence.
The Chair of the Committee on Homeland Security sent a
letter to the Chair of the Committee on Oversight and
Government Reform on September 19, 2012, agreeing to waive
further consideration of S.734 in order to expedite
consideration on the House Floor. The letter further requested
the appointment of Conferees should a House-Senate Conference
be called. On that same date, the Chair of the Committee on
Oversight and Government Reform responded and agreed to the
jurisdictional interests of the Committee, the request for an
appointment of Conferees, and the agreement to waive further
consideration.
The House agreed, by unanimous consent, on September 28,
2012, to discharge the Committee on Oversight and Government
Reform, the Committee on Homeland Security, and the Permanent
Select Committee on Intelligence from further consideration of
S. 743 and passed the bill, as amended.
On November 13, 2012, the Senate concurred in the amendment
of the House to S. 743.
S. 743 was presented to the President on November 16, 2012.
Signed into law on November 27, 2012, as Public Law 112-199.

H.R.3289
H.R.3289, the House companion measure, was introduced in
the House on November 1, 2011, by Mr.Issa, Mr.Cummings,
Mr.Platts, and Mr.Van Hollen, and referred to the Committee on
Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to the
Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence and the Committee on
Homeland Security. Within the Committee, H.R.3289 was referred
to the Subcommittee on Oversight, Investigations, and
Management.
The Committee on Oversight and Government Reform considered
H.R.3289 on November 3, 2011, and ordered the measure to be
reported to the House, amended, by a recorded vote of 35 yeas
and 0nays.
The Committee on Oversight and Government Reform reported
H.R.3289 to the House on May 30, 2012 as H. Rpt. 112-508, Part
I. The referral of the bill to the House Permanent Select
Committee on Intelligence and the Committee on Homeland
Security was extended for a period ending not later then
October 1, 2012. On October 1, 2012, the Permanent Select
Committee on Intelligence and the Committee on Homeland
Security were discharged from further consideration of
H.R.3289.

WMD INTELLIGENCE AND INFORMATION SHARING ACT OF 2011

H.R.2764

Summary

This legislation requires the Department of Homeland
Security's Office of Intelligence and Analysis to support the
analysis and dissemination of information regarding threats
involving chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear
weapons throughout the Department and among other Federal,
State, local, and private sector partners.

Legislative History

H.R.2764 was introduced in the House on August 1, 2011, by
Mr.Meehan, Ms.Speier, Mr.Pascrell, Mr.Marino, Mr.King of New
York, and Mr.Rogers of Alabama, and referred to the Committee
on Homeland Security. Within the Committee, H.R.2764 was
referred to the Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and
Intelligence.
The Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and Intelligence
considered H.R.2764 on November 15, 2011, and ordered the
measure to be reported to the Full Committee with a favorable
recommendation, without amendment, by voice vote.
The Full Committee considered H.R.2764 on March 28, 2012,
and ordered the measure to be favorably reported to the House,
amended, by voice vote.
The Committee reported H.R.2764 to the House on May 8,
2012, as H. Rpt. 112-466.
The House considered H.R.2764 on May 30, 2012, under
Suspension of the Rules, and passed the measure by voice vote.
H.R.2764 was received in the Senate on June 4, 2012, read
twice, and referred to the Senate Committee on Homeland
Security and Governmental Affairs.

MASS TRANSIT INTELLIGENCE PRIORITIZATION ACT

H.R.3140

Summary

This legislation requires the Secretary of Homeland
Security to prioritize the assignment of officers and analysts
to participate in State and local fusion centers in
jurisdictions with mass transit systems. These officers and
analysts will be responsible for the creation of mass transit
intelligence products to assist in the effective protection of
mass transit systems and promote consistent and timely
distribution of mass transit information, relevant to security,
among these jurisdictions.

Legislative History

H.R.3140 was introduced in the House on October 6, 2011, by
Ms.Speier and Mr.Meehan, and referred to the Committee on
Homeland Security. Within the Committee, H.R.3140 was referred
to the Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and Intelligence.
The Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and Intelligence
considered H.R.3140 on November 15, 2011, and ordered the
measure reported to the Full Committee with a favorable
recommendation, without amendment, by voice vote.
The Full Committee considered H.R.3140 on March 28, 2012,
and ordered the measure to be favorably reported to the House,
without amendment, by voice vote.
The Committee reported H.R.3140 to the House on May 8,
2012, as H. Rpt. 112-467.
The House considered H.R.3140 on May 30, 2012, under
Suspension of the Rules, and passed the measure by voice vote.
H.R.3140 was received in the Senate on June 4, 2012, read
twice, and referred to the Senate Committee on Homeland
Security and Governmental Affairs.

----------

Oversight Activities of the Subcommittee

THREAT FROM AL-QAEDA TO THE U.S. HOMELAND

The Subcommittee has made significant efforts to examine
the evolving threat from al-Qaeda and its various franchises
throughout the world.
The Committee staff held multiple meetings with and
briefings by stakeholders, including the Department of Homeland
Security, experts from the Center for Strategic and
International Studies, the Rand Corporation, and experts on al-
Qaeda from academia and retired intelligence operatives.
On February 15, 2011, the Subcommittee received a
classified Member-only briefing by the Deputy Assistant
Secretary of Defense, Special Operations and Combating
Terrorism, the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA); the Deputy
Director for Special Operations, J3, The Joint Staff; a Senior
Intelligence Analyst, Middle East Branch of the Joint
Intelligence Task Force on Counterterrorism; a Republic of
Yemen Analyst, Middle East Branch of the Joint Intelligence
Task Force on Counterterrorism; a Senior Intelligence Officer,
Middle East and North Africa Branch, the Defense Intelligence
Agency (DIA), Directorate of Intelligence; and a Yemen Analyst,
Middle East and North Africa Analysis branch of the DIA
Directorate of Intelligence, on the threat from al-Qaeda in the
Arabian Peninsula.
On April 27, 2011, Committee staff conducted a site visit
to the United States Military Academy at West Point, and met
with representatives from the Combating Terrorism Center at
West Point and West Point cadets.
Committee staff also conducted an in-depth examination of
the various terrorism threats and U.S. counterterrorism policy.
On March 2, 2011, the Subcommittee held a hearing entitled
``Terrorist Threat to the U.S. Homeland-al-Qaeda in the Arabian
Peninsula (AQAP).'' The Subcommittee received testimony from
Dr. Jarret Brachman, Managing Director, Cronus Global; Dr.
Christopher Boucek, Associate, Carnegie Endowment for
International Peace; and Mr.Barak Barfi, Research Fellow, New
America Foundation. The Subcommittee hearing was followed by a
classified Member-only briefing from the National
Counterterrorism Center, the Department of Homeland Security,
and the Federal Bureau of Investigation.

RECENT UNREST IN NORTH AFRICA AND THE MIDDLE EAST:
THE IMPLICATIONS FOR U.S. HOMELAND SECURITY

Committee staff attended multiple briefings from noted
experts on policy implications regarding the uprisings across
North Africa and the Middle East. These insurgencies occurred
against established authoritarian regimes in Spring 2011,
creating an event referred to as the Arab Spring. Committee
staff investigated the potential policy and security
ramifications for the United States as a result of the
uprisings. Specific topics included the importation of liquid
natural gas from the Republic of Yemen and common areas of
interest in counterterrorism and security between the United
States and Saudi Arabia.
On April 6, 2011, the Subcommittee held a hearing entitled
``Unrest in the Middle East and North Africa: Ramifications for
U.S. Homeland Security.'' The Subcommittee received testimony
from Mr.Philip Mudd, Senior Research Fellow, New America
Foundation; Mr.Thomas Joscelyn, Senior Fellow and Executive
Director, Center for Law and Counter Terrorism, Foundation for
the Defense of Democracies; Mr.Rick ``Ozzie'' Nelson, Director
and Senior Fellow, Homeland Security and Counterterrorism
Program, Center for Strategic and International Studies; and
Mr.Brian Katulis, Senior Fellow, Center for American Progress.
From July 24 through 27, 2012, Committee staff attended an
interagency workshop focused on ``Countering Security Threats
in Egypt and the Sinai Peninsula,'' and the security situation
in the region as a result of the 2011 revolutions.

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY'S
INTELLIGENCE AND ANALYSIS DIRECTORATE

As part of its oversight, Committee staff met with
officials from a number of offices and agencies within the
Department of Homeland Security (DHS), including the Office of
Intelligence and Analysis (I&A), the Office of the Assistant
Secretary for Policy, the Federal Emergency Management Agency
(FEMA), the Office of Operations Coordination and Planning, the
DHS Counter Intelligence mission and the Fusion Center program
office, DHS I&A Hiring Authorities, the U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) Office of Intelligence and Investigative
Liaison, the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) Homeland
Security Investigations Intelligence Office (HIS-Intel), the
DHS Science and Technology Directorate, the DHS Open Source
Enterprise, and programs within the U.S. Secret Service.
On January 24, 2011, the Committee conducted a Member site
visit to the National Counterterrorism Center (NCTC) to educate
Members on the NCTC and receive a threat briefing from the NCTC
Director. The NCTC was established in August 2004 by Executive
Order 13354, and codified by the Intelligence Reform and
Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 (Pub.L. 108-458). The NCTC
serves as the primary organization within the United States
Government for integrating and analyzing all terrorism-related
intelligence that has a foreign nexus. The Subcommittee Chair
also conducted meetings with the Federal Bureau of
Investigation, both in Washington, DC and in Pennsylvania, as
well as DHS Under Secretary for Intelligence and Analysis.
Committee staff attended security conferences including the
National Fusion Center Conference held in March 2011 in Denver,
Colorado, and the Aspen Security Forum held July 27 through 30,
2011 in Aspen, Colorado. In addition, Committee staff traveled
to New York City, New York for security briefings by the New
York City Police Department and the New York State Intelligence
Center.
On June 1, 2011, the Subcommittee held a hearing entitled
``The DHS Intelligence Enterprise--Past, Present, and Future.''
The Subcommittee received testimony from Hon. Caryn Wagner,
Under Secretary for the Office of Intelligence and Analysis,
Department of Homeland Security; Rear Admiral Thomas Atkin,
Assistant Commandant for Intelligence and Criminal
Investigation, U.S. Coast Guard; Mr.Daniel Johnson, Assistant
Administrator for Intelligence, Transportation Security
Administration; Mr.James Chaparro, Assistant Director for
Intelligence, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement; and
Ms.Susan Mitchell, Deputy Assistant Commissioner, Office of
Intelligence and Operations Coordination, U.S. Customs and
Border Protection.
On November 15, 2011, the Subcommittee Chair sent a letter
to the Commissioner of CBP urging an investigation into the
conduct of CBP Officers at the Philadelphia International
Airport.

DOMESTIC RADICALIZATION

The Subcommittee aided the Full Committee in its efforts to
examine domestic radicalization, violent extremism, and threat
mitigation. Committee staff held over 15 meetings with domestic
and international experts and academics. The meetings focused
on discussing the current threat of homegrown terrorism and
violent extremism within the United States and what measures
can be taken to address this problem. Briefers included
representatives of the Ahmaddiyya Group, the World Organization
for Resource Development and Education, the Anti-Defamation
League, a former United States attorney with expertise in this
area, representatives from Johns Hopkins University,
representatives from the New York Department of Corrections,
and representatives from the U.S. Bureau of Prisons, among
others.
On April 14, 2011, the Minority initiated a classified
Member briefing from the Department of Homeland Security and
the Federal Bureau of Investigation on the issue of domestic
radicalization.
Committee staff, in conjunction with staff from the Senate
Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs,
attended multiple conferences and conducted site visits to the
U.S. Coast Guard's Intelligence Coordination Center.
On February 28, 2012, the Subcommittee held a hearing
entitled ``Federal Government Intelligence Sharing with State,
Local, and Tribal Law Enforcement: An Assessment Ten Years
After 9/11.'' The Subcommittee received testimony from Hon.
Scott McAllister, Deputy Under Secretary, State and Local
Program Office, Office of Intelligence and Analysis, Department
of Homeland Security; Hon. Louis F. Quijas, Assistant
Secretary, Office for State and Local Law Enforcement,
Department of Homeland Security; Mr.Eric Velez-Villar,
Assistant Director, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Department
of Justice; and Ms.Maurita Bryant, National First Vice
President, National Organization of Black Law Enforcement
Executives.

THREAT TO THE U.S. HOMELAND FROM SOUTH ASIA

The Subcommittee examined events in South Asia as they
relate to the United States, and in particular, monitored
events in the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, including the
killing of Osama bin Laden. Committee staff met with
representatives of the Council on Foreign Relations, the New
America Foundation, the RAND Corporation and the Carnegie
Endowment for International Peace to better understand the
complex social and political environment in South Asia.
Committee staff were briefed by multiple experts with personal
experiences in Pakistan, Afghanistan, and India regarding
conditions on the ground in these critical areas and
implications for counterterrorism policy and intelligence
gathering.
The Subcommittee Chair consulted with representatives from
the Embassy of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan on May 2, 2011,
regarding the situation within Pakistan and the killing of al-
Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden.
The Subcommittee held a hearing on May 3, 2011, entitled
``The Threat to the U.S. Homeland Emanating from Pakistan.''
The Subcommittee received testimony from Dr. Frederick Kagan,
Resident Scholar and Director, American Enterprise Institute
Critical Threats Project; Dr. Seth Jones, Senior Political
Scientist, The RAND Corporation; Mr.Stephen Tankel, Visiting
Fellow, South Asia Program, The Carnegie Endowment for
International Peace; and Mr.Shuja Nawaz, Director, South Asia
Center, The Atlantic Council. The hearing focused on the recent
successful action against Osama bin Laden by the U.S. Special
Forces in Pakistan, Pakistan's support to the War on Terror,
and the plethora of terrorist organizations based in Pakistan.
On November 8, 2011 Committee staff were briefed by a
French Magistrate for his work investigating Sajid Mir, a key
figure in the 2008 Mumbai attacks.

STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIPS

The Subcommittee made efforts to foster relationships with
counterpart bodies in different countries and regions around
the world. Members and Committee staff held meetings to include
the representatives from the governments of both the United
Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the State of
Israel.
On February 16, 2011, the Subcommittee Chair met with the
Ambassador of Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan and other embassy
representatives to discuss counterterrorism, intelligence
issues, and US-Jordanian bilateral relations.
The Subcommittee Chair addressed Members of the World
Affairs Council on April 15, 2011, on the issues of
counterterrorism and intelligence.
On July 16, 2011, Committee staff participated in a staff
delegation to London, England, where they met with
representatives from the British Home Office and the
Association of Chief Police Officers. Staff examined the United
Kingdom's ``Prevent'' strategy and security for the 2012 London
Summer Olympic Games.
On July 30, 2012, the Subcommittee held a field hearing in
Buffalo, New York entitled ``Beyond Borders: Are the Department
of Homeland Security's International Agreements Ensuring
Actionable Intelligence to Combat Threats to the U.S.
Homeland?'' The Subcommittee received testimony from Ms.Deborah
Meyers, Director, Canadian Affairs, Office of International
Affairs, Department of Homeland Security; Mr.Daniel J.
Neaverth, Jr., Commissioner, Department of Emergency Services,
Erie County; and Mr.James Voutour, Sheriff, Niagara County, New
York. The hearing examined information sharing between Federal,
State, local, and Canadian partners and its impact on
streamlining the flow of trade securely across the Northern
Border.

TERROR FINANCE

The Subcommittee examined issues surrounding terror
financing. Committee staff received a briefing from Financial
Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) officials on Mexican drug
cartels. Additionally, Committee staff met with the Federal
Bureau of Investigation's Terrorist Financing Operations
Section, the Drug Enforcement Agency's Special Operations
Division, and the former Ambassador to the Organization of
American States to discuss Latin American drug trafficking
organizations and their connections with international terror
networks.
On April 7, 2011, the Subcommittee Chair sent letters to
the Secretary of State and the Attorney General of the United
States requesting their personal involvement to secure drug
kingpin Walid Makled's extradition to the United States.
Committee staff received a briefing from the Cyber Division
and National Cyber Forensics and Training Alliance, of the
Federal Bureau of Investigation on May 9, 2011. The Committee
received a letter response from the Department of Justice on
July 18, 2011; and from the Department of State on August 25,
2011.
On May 18, 2012, the Subcommittee held a hearing entitled
``Terrorist Financing Since 9/11: Assessing an Evolving al-
Qaeda and State Sponsors of Terrorism.'' The Subcommittee
received testimony from Dr. Jonathan Schanzer, Vice President
of Research, Foundation for Defense of Democracies; Mr.John
Cassara, Private Citizen; Mr.Dennis Lormel, President and CEO,
DML Associates, LLC; and Hon. Sue Eckert, Senior Fellow, Watson
Institute for International Studies, Brown University.

WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION

On December 13, 2011, Committee staff received a briefing
from representatives from the Central Intelligence Agency to
discuss possible chemical weapons in Syria.
On January 5, 2011, Committee staff visited the Defense
Threat Reduction Agency and received a briefing on the Agency's
Strategic Command Center. Topics of discussion included:
Cooperative threat reduction and international engagement;
planning, readiness, and operational support; research and
development; and integration of technology with tactics,
techniques, and procedures to work across the interagency
process on the key weapons of mass destruction (WMD) issues of
nonproliferation, counter proliferation, and consequence
management.
Additionally, on March 11, 2011, Committee staff met with
representatives from the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)
on the FBI's Weapons of Mass Destruction Program.
On May 13, 2011, the Subcommittee on Cybersecurity,
Infrastructure Protection, and Security Technologies, the
Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and Intelligence, and the
Subcommittee on Emergency Preparedness, Response, and
Communications received a classified Member-only briefing by
representatives from the National Counterterrorism Center and
the National Counter-proliferation Center, both of the Office
of the Director of National Intelligence, on the threat from
four categories of WMDs that terrorists may seek to acquire and
use in a WMD terrorist attack--chemical, biological,
radiological, and nuclear.
The Subcommittee considered H.R.2764, legislation requiring
the Department of Homeland Security to support the analysis and
dissemination of information regarding threats involving
chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear weapons
throughout the Department and among stakeholders. For further
information see H.R.2764, discussed above.
The Subcommittee held a hearing on November 15, 2012,
entitled ``WMD Terrorism: Assessing the Continued Homeland
Threat.'' The Subcommittee received testimony from Mr. Randall
J. Larsen, Chief Executive Officer, The Bipartisan WMD
Terrorism Research Center; and Dr. Leonard A. Cole, Director,
Program on Terror Medicine and Security, University of Medicine
and Dentistry of New Jersey, testifying on behalf of The Aspen
Institute.

HEZBOLLAH IN LATIN AMERICA

On May 31, 2011, Committee staff met with Ambassador Roger
F. Noriega, Visiting Fellow with the American Enterprise
Institute and former U.S. Ambassador to the Organization of
American States. The meeting focused on Hezbollah's activity in
Latin America.
Committee staff held a meeting with the president of IBI
Consultants and Senior Fellow at the International Assessment
and Strategy Center, on June 1, 2011, to discuss Hezbollah in
Latin America.
On June 10, 2011, Committee staff held a meeting with the
Senior Fellow and Director of The Washington Institute's Stein
Program on Counterterrorism and Intelligence, and professorial
lecturer in international relations and strategic studies at
Johns Hopkins University's Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced
International Studies (SAIS). The meeting focused on
Hezbollah's activity in Latin America.
The Subcommittee held a hearing on July 7, 2011, entitled
``Hezbollah in Latin America--Implications for U.S. Homeland
Security.'' The Subcommittee received testimony from Ambassador
Roger F. Noriega, Visiting Fellow, The American Enterprise
Institute; Mr.Douglas Farah, Senior Fellow, The International
Assessment and Strategy Center; Mr.Ilan Berman, Vice President,
American Foreign Policy Council; and Dr. Melani Cammett,
Director, Middle East Studies Program, Brown University.
On September 13, 2011, the Members of the Subcommittee
received a classified briefing to further respond to Member
concerns. Representatives from the Drug Enforcement
Administration and the Department of State were present.
The Subcommittee Members received a classified briefing on
April 17, 2012, by representatives from the Department of
Defense's U.S. Southern Command (SOUTHCOM).

UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE

On September 14, 2011, the Subcommittee held a hearing
entitled ``United States Secret Service: Examining Protective
and Investigative Missions and Challenges in 2012.'' The
Subcommittee received testimony from Mr.Mark Sullivan,
Director, United States Secret Service (USSS).
Committee staff held a meeting with representatives from
the USSS on April 7, 2011, to discuss the FY 2012 Budget
Request submission. The briefing covers various issues
including the protection of persons and facilities; various
National Special Security Events (NSSE); Presidential candidate
nominee protection for the 2012 election cycle; domestic field
operations and headquarters; and management and administration.
On May 19, 2011, Committee staff attended a site visit to the
USSS Headquarters in Washington, DC.
On February 16, 2012, Subcommittee staff received a
briefing on the Fiscal Year 2013 budget allocation for the
USSS.
On April 19, 2012, the Chair of the Full Committee
initiated an investigation into an alleged incident involving
United States Secret Service personnel and foreign nationals in
Cartagena, Colombia.
The Chair of the Full Committee sent a letter to the
Director of the Secret Service on April 20, 2012, with
questions relating to the alleged incident in Cartagena,
Colombia. On May 1, 2012, the Committee received a response
letter from the USSS.
On May 4, 2012, Committee staff received a briefing from
multiple representatives from the USSS and the Department of
Homeland Security to provide additional information in response
to the April 20 letter.
The Chair of the Full Committee sent a letter to the
Secretary of State on May 15, 2012, requesting that three State
Department personnel on the ground in Colombia be made
available to the Committee for its investigation.
On October 9, 2012, Committee staff received a briefing
from the Department of Homeland Security Office of Inspector
General (OIG) on the status of the OIG's ongoing investigations
into the Cartagena incident.
Committee staff will continue to work with the OIG's office
as the investigation continues.

TERRORIST TRAVEL AND INTELLIGENCE SHARING

On October 5, 2011, the Subcommittee held a hearing
entitled ``Intelligence Sharing and Terrorist Travel: How DHS
Addresses the Mission of Providing Security, Facilitating
Commerce and Protecting Privacy for Passengers Engaged in
International Travel.'' The Subcommittee received testimony
from Hon. David Heyman, Assistant Secretary for Policy,
Department of Homeland Security; Ms.Mary Ellen Callahan, Chief
Privacy Officer, Department of Homeland Security; and Mr.Thomas
Bush, Executive Director of Automation and Targeting, Office of
Intelligence and Investigative Liaison, Customs and Border
Protection, Department of Homeland Security.
The Subcommittee Chair sent a letter to the Secretary of
Homeland Security, the Director of the Federal Bureau of
Investigation (FBI), and the Director of National Intelligence
(DNI), on May 13, 2011, to inquire about their roles in the
analysis and appropriate distribution and response to the cache
of information that was collected from Osama bin Laden's
compound. The DNI responded on June 27, 2011; the FBI on July
21, 2011; and the Department of Homeland Security on September
6, 2011.
Additionally, the Subcommittee considered H.R.3140,
legislation to address these concerns. See H.R.3140, discussed
above.

IRANIAN THREAT TO THE U.S. HOMELAND

Following the arrest of Manssor Arbabsiar for his alleged
role in a plot to assassinate the Ambassador to the United
States from the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, the Subcommittee
worked to understand the nature of the threat from Iranian
State-sponsored terrorism in the United States. Committee staff
received briefings from various think tanks.
On October 26, 2011, the Subcommittee on Counterterrorism
and Intelligence and the Subcommittee on Oversight,
Investigations, and Management held a joint hearing entitled
``Iranian Terror Operations on American Soil.'' The
Subcommittees received testimony from General Jack Keane (Ret.
U.S. Army), Private Citizen; Mr.Reuel Marc Gerecht, Senior
Fellow, Foundation for Defense of Democracies; Dr. Matt Levitt,
Director, Stein Program on Counterterrorism and Intelligence,
The Washington Institute for Near East Policy; Dr. Lawrence
Korb, Senior Fellow, Center For American Progress Action Fund;
and Colonel Timothy J. Geraghty (Ret. U.S. Marine Corps),
Private Citizen.
The Subcommittee Chair received a classified briefing from
the Central Intelligence Agency on the Iranian plot to
assassinate the Saudi Arabian Ambassador to the United States
on October 27, 2011.
On April 26, 2012 the Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and
Intelligence and the Subcommittee on Cybersecurity,
Infrastructure Protection, and Security Technologies held a
joint hearing entitled ``Iranian Cyber Threat to the U.S.
Homeland.'' The Subcommittees received testimony from Mr.Frank
J. Cilluffo, Associate Vice President and Director, Homeland
Security Policy Institute, The George Washington University;
Mr.Ilan Berman, Vice President, American Foreign Policy
Council; and Mr.Roger Caslow, Executive Cyberconsultant, Suss
Consulting.
On July 25, 2012, the Subcommittee on Oversight,
Investigations, and Management and the Subcommittee on
Counterterrorism and Intelligence held a joint Member briefing
on the Department of Homeland Security's contingency plans in
the event of an increased threat to the U.S. Homeland from
Iranian terrorism following a potential military action against
the illicit Iranian nuclear program. Representatives from the
Department responded to Member questions.

BOKO HARAM

The Subcommittee has continued to monitor the changing
threat landscape for emerging dangers to the U.S. homeland.
After a bombing of a United Nations building in Abuja, Nigeria,
and increased international attention, Committee staff began
studying Boko Haram, a Nigerian militant group with suspected
ties to al-Qaeda. Committee staff were briefed by
representatives from the Council on Foreign Relations, the
Congressional Research Service, and the Sahel Blog. Committee
staff also received a classified briefing from the National
Counterterrorism Center.
On September 13, 2011, the Subcommittee Chair and Ranking
Member sent a letter to the Secretary of State to urge the
Department of State's Office of the Coordination for
Counterterrorism to initiate an investigation and compile an
administrative record in order to determine whether Nigerian
Islamist sect Boko Haram should be designated a Foreign
Terrorist Organization (FTO). The Committee received a response
on September 18, 2011.
Committee staff attended a briefing organized by the House
Committee on Foreign Affairs on Boko Haram on September 27,
2011. Briefers included representatives from the various think
tanks and policy experts.
On November 30, 2011, the Subcommittee held a hearing
entitled ``Boko Haram--Emerging Threat to the U.S. Homeland.''
The Subcommittee received testimony from Dr. J. Peter Pham,
Director, Michael S.Ansari Africa Center, Atlantic Council of
the U.S.; Ms.Lauren Ploch, Africa Analyst, Congressional
Research Service; Dr. Ricardo Laremont, Professor of Political
Science and Sociology, Binghamton University, State University
of New York; and Ms.Jennifer G. Cooke, Director, Africa
Program, Center for Strategic and International Studies.
Also on November 30, 2011, the Subcommittee released a
report entitled ``Boko Haram--Emerging Threat to the U.S.
Homeland,'' which summarized their extensive study of the
organization's history and current activity.
The Chair of the Subcommittee spoke before the Heritage
Foundation on March 6, 2012, on the emerging threat from Boko
Haram.
On March 30, 2012, the Full Committee and Subcommittee
Chairs sent a letter to the Secretary of State urging the
designation of Boko Haram as a Foreign Terrorist Organization.
The Chairs of the Full Committee and the Subcommittee sent
an additional letter to the Secretary of State regarding Boko
Haram on May 18, 2012. The Chairs of the Full Committee and the
Subcommittee expressed their concern that the Department of
State has yet to take any action regarding the designation of
Boko Haram as a Foreign Terrorist Organization.

ON-LINE TERRORIST OPERATIONS

The Subcommittee examined the issue of terrorist operatives
and sympathizers using the internet as a tool to promote their
ideology and communicate with one another. Committee staff
received briefings from several experts, including
representatives from the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the
Department of State's Center for Strategic Counterterrorism
Communications, the Center for Naval Analyses, the National
Defense University, and other policy experts.
On December 6, 2011, the Subcommittee held a hearing
entitled ``Jihadist Use of Social Media--How to Prevent
Terrorism and Preserve Innovation.'' The Subcommittee received
testimony from Mr.William McCants, Analyst, Center for Naval
Analyses; Mr.Andrew Aaron Weisburd, Director, Society for
Internet Research; and Mr.Brian Michael Jenkins, Senior Advisor
to the RAND President, RAND Corporation.
On August 1, 2012, the Committee sponsored the Foundation
for Defense of Democracies in an event in the Capitol Visitor's
Center entitled, ``Facebook Fatwa: Saudi Clerics, Wahhabi Islam
and the Threat of Social Media Radicalization.'' The briefing
focused on online radicalization in the Middle East.

SOCIAL MEDIA

On February 15, 2012, the Members of the Subcommittee
received a classified briefing on the efforts by the Department
of Homeland Security's Office of Intelligence and Analysis to
collect intelligence via social media in order to enhance
situational awareness to help deter, detect, and prevent terror
attacks, and to manage natural disasters and other domestic
incidents. Representatives from the Department of Homeland
Security responded to Member questions.
The Subcommittee held a hearing on February 16, 2012,
entitled ``DHS Monitoring of Social Networking and Media:
Enhancing Intelligence Gathering and Ensuring Privacy.'' The
Subcommittee received testimony from Ms.Mary Ellen Callahan,
Chief Privacy Officer, Department of Homeland Security; and
Mr.Richard Chavez, Director, Office of Operations Coordinating
and Planning, Department of Homeland Security.

TERRORIST THREAT TO ENERGY SECURITY

In response to planned closure of oil refineries in the
northeastern United States, the Subcommittee held a field
hearing in Aston, Pennsylvania, on March 19, 2012, entitled
``The Implications of Refinery Closures for U.S. Homeland
Security and Critical Infrastructure Safety.'' The Subcommittee
received testimony from Dr. Howard Gruenspecht, Acting
Administrator, Energy Information Administration, Department of
Energy; Mr.Brandon Wales, Director, Homeland Infrastructure
Threat and Risk Analysis Center, Department of Homeland
Security; Mr.Charles Drevna, President, American Fuel and
Petrochemical Manufactures; and Mr.Robert ``Bob'' Greco, Group
Director, Downstream and Industry Operations, American
Petroleum Institute.

ECONOMIC ESPIONAGE

On June 28, 2012, the Subcommittee held a hearing entitled
``Economic Espionage: A Foreign Intelligence Threat to American
Jobs and Homeland Security.'' The Subcommittee received
testimony from Dr. Stuart Graham, Chief Economist, U.S. Patent
and Trademark Office, Department of Commerce; Mr.John P. Woods,
Assistant Director, Homeland Security Investigations,
Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Department of Homeland
Security; Mr.Frank Figliuzzi, Assistant Director,
Counterintelligence Division, Federal Bureau of Investigation,
Department of Justice; and Mr.Gregory C. Wilshusen, Director,
Information Security Issues, Government Accountability Office.

REFUGEE PROGRAMS

On December 4, 2012, the Subcommittee held a hearing
entitled ``Terrorist Exploitation of Refugee Programs.'' The
Subcommittee received testimony from Mr. Lawrence F. Bartlett,
Director, Office of Refugee Admissions, Bureau of Population,
Refugees, and Migration, U.S. Department of State; Ms. Barbara
Strack, Chief, Refugee Affairs Division, United States
Citizenship and Immigration Services, Department of Homeland
Security; and Ms. Dawn Scalici, Deputy Undersecretary, Office
of Intelligence and Analysis, Department of Homeland Security.
The purpose of this hearing was to examine the refugee
screening processes and their vulnerability to terrorist
exploitation.

----------

Subcommittee Hearings Held

``Terrorist Threat to the U.S. Homeland--Al-Qaeda in the
Arabian Peninsula (AQAP).'' March 2, 2011. (Serial No.
112-5)
``Unrest in the Middle East and North Africa: Ramifications for
U.S. Homeland Security.'' April 6, 2011. (Serial No.
112-16)
``The Threat to the U.S. Homeland Emanating from Pakistan.''
May 3, 2011. (Serial No. 112-21)
``The DHS Intelligence Enterprise--Past, Present, and Future.''
June 1, 2011. (Serial No. 112-27)
``Hezbollah in Latin America--Implications for U.S. Homeland
Security.'' July 7, 2011. (Serial No. 112-35)
``United States Secret Service: Examining Protective and
Investigative Missions and Challenges in 2012.''
September 14, 2011. (Serial No. 112-44)
``Intelligence Sharing and Terrorist Travel: How DHS Addresses
the Mission of Providing Security, Facilitating
Commerce and Protecting Privacy for Passengers Engaged
in International Travel.''October 5, 2011. (Serial No.
112-49)
``Iranian Terror Operation on American Soil.'' Joint with the
Subcommittee on Oversight, Investigations, and
Management, October 26, 2011. (Serial No. 112-54)
``Boko Haram--Emerging Threat to the U.S. Homeland.'' November
30, 2011. (Serial No. 112-60)
``Jihadist Use of Social Media--How to Prevent Terrorism and
Preserve Innovation.'' December 6, 2011. (Serial No.
112-62)
``DHS Monitoring of Social Networking and Media: Enhancing
Intelligence Gathering and Ensuring Privacy.'' February
16, 2012. (Serial No. 112-68)
``Federal Government Intelligence Sharing with State, Local and
Tribal Law Enforcement: An Assessment Ten Years After
9/11.'' February 28, 2012. (Serial No. 112-70)
``The Implications of Refinery Closures for U.S. Homeland
Security and Critical Infrastructure Safety.'' (Aston,
Pennsylvania) March 19, 2012. (Serial No. 112-76)
``Iranian Cyber Threat to the U.S. Homeland.'' Joint with the
Subcommittee on Cybersecurity, Infrastructure
Protection, and Security Technologies. April 26, 2012.
(Serial No. 112-86)
``Terrorist Financing Since 9/11: Assessing an Evolving al-
Qaeda and State Sponsors of Terrorism.'' May 18, 2012.
(Serial No. 112-93)
``Economic Espionage: A Foreign Intelligence Threat to American
Jobs and Homeland Security.'' June 28, 2012. (Serial
No. 112-100)
``Beyond Borders: Are the Department of Homeland Security's
International Agreements Ensuring Actionable
Intelligence to Combat Threats to the U.S. Homeland?''
(Buffalo, New York) July 30, 2012. (Serial No. 112-111)
``WMD Terrorism: Assessing the Continued Homeland Threat.''
November 15, 2012. (Serial No. 112-122)
``Terrorist Exploitation of Refugee Programs.'' December 4,
2012. (Serial No. 112-125)
Committee on Homeland Security Oversight Plan for the 112th Congress

Rule X. Clause 2(d) of the Rules of the House of
Representatives for the 112th Congress requires each standing
Committee in the first session of a Congress to adopt an
oversight plan for the two-year period of the Congress and to
submit the plan to the Committee on Oversight and Government
Reform and the Committee on House Administration.
Rule XI, clause 1(d)(1) requires each Committee to submit
to the House of Representatives not later than January 2, of
each odd-numbered year, a report on the activities of that
committee under Rule X and Rule XI during the Congress ending
on January 3 of such year. Clause 1(2)(d)(3) of Rule XI also
requires that such report include a summary of the action taken
and recommendations made with respect to each such plan; and a
summary of any additional oversight activities undertaken by
the Committee, and any recommendations made or actions taken
thereon.
Part A of this section contains the Committee on Homeland
Security Oversight Plan for the 112th Congress which the Full
Committee considered and adopted by unanimous consent on
January 26, 2011, a quorum being present.
Part B of this section contains a summary of the actions
taken by the Committee on Homeland Security to implement the
Oversight Plan for the 112th Congress and the recommendations
made with respect to this plan. Part B also contains a summary
of the additional oversight activities undertaken by the
Committee, and the recommendations made or actions taken
thereon.

PART A--COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY OVERSIGHT PLAN

Clause 2(d) of Rule X of the Rules of the House of
Representatives for the 112th Congress requires each standing
Committee to adopt an oversight plan for the two-year period of
the Congress and to submit the plan to the Committees on
Oversight and Government Reform and House Administration not
later than February 15th of the first session of the Congress.
This is the oversight plan for the Committee on Homeland
Security for the 112th Congress. It includes the areas in which
the Committee expects to conduct oversight during the 112th
Congress, but does not preclude oversight or investigation of
additional matters as the need arises.
In the 112th Congress, the Full Committee will examine
terrorist threats against the Homeland, including the
increasing threat of homegrown terrorism and Islamic
radicalization in the Homeland, as evidenced by the terrorist
attacks at Fort Hood and Times Square, and thwarted plots on
the New York City subway and in Portland, Oregon. As stated by
the Attorney General, in the last 24 months, there have been
126 terrorism-related indictments, including 50 against United
States citizens. The Committee will also analyze the
radicalization of United States residents by foreign terrorist
organizations via the Internet and the influence of English
speaking radicals such as Anwar Al Awlaki. The Committee also
intends to examine what approach the Department of Homeland
Security (DHS) plans to take to address the increasing
radicalization of individuals within the United States.
During the 112th Congress, the Committee will also examine
the effect on National security of the transportation of
unprivileged enemy combatants to the United States to be
detained and tried before a jury in a Federal civilian court.
The examination will include a review of the potential risk of
holding high-value detainees, such as Khalid Sheikh Mohammed
and other co-conspirators of the attacks of September 11th, on
domestic soil; the risk of inadvertent disclosure of sensitive
information during the trial; and the recommendations delivered
by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS or Department) as
part of the Guantanamo Review Task Force.
The Committee will also examine the Obama Administration's
policy concerning the Detention Center at the U.S. Naval
Station Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. This oversight will include a
review of the Secretary of Homeland Security's role as a member
of the President's Guantanamo Detention Task Force, as outlined
in Executive Order 13492. Furthermore, the Committee will
examine the Homeland security ramifications of the
Administration's plans to purchase detention space within the
United States for the purposes of detaining enemy combatants
currently held at Guantanamo Bay and conducting military
commissions for terrorists detained at Guantanamo.

SUBCOMMITTEE ON COUNTERTERRORISM AND INTELLIGENCE

counterterrorism

In the 112th Congress, the Committee will examine the
counterterrorism policies of the U.S. Government, with specific
focus on the Department of Homeland Security. This examination
will include an assessment of the worldwide threat against the
U.S. homeland from al-Qaeda core, al-Qaeda in the Arabian
Peninsula (AQAP), al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM), al
Shahbab, Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT)
and other emerging terrorist groups.

department of homeland security intelligence enterprise

During the 112th Congress, the Committee will conduct
oversight of the Department of Homeland Security's Intelligence
Enterprise, including intelligence activities throughout the
Department and component agencies. Additionally, the Committee
will oversee the progress made in the coordination and
collaboration of information collection and intelligence
analysis occurring across the DHS Intelligence Enterprise, as
well as the further development and role of the Homeland
Security Intelligence Council (HSIC) in coordination and
collaboration with Departmental intelligence activities.
During the 112th Congress, the Committee will review
efforts to build the intelligence, analytical, and assessment
capabilities of the Department and to ensure its full
participation in the Intelligence Community as part of its
homeland security mission. The Committee will examine whether
the Department is receiving relevant intelligence and law
enforcement information from other Federal agencies in a timely
manner; whether the Secretary of Homeland Security is
appropriately involved in the prioritization of the Federal
Government's intelligence collection requirements for homeland
security purposes; and the Department's role in managing,
distributing, and otherwise using terrorist threat information
in furtherance of its homeland security mission.
Additionally, the Committee will examine the hiring
authorities, practices, and career-development of intelligence
analysts and professionals within the Department. The Committee
will examine the progress of DHS intelligence analyst training
programs, and whether they are meeting the needs of both the
Department and State, local, and private sector partners.

counterintelligence

Throughout the 112th Congress, the Committee will track the
development of the newly reorganized Department of Homeland
Security Counterintelligence Program, to ensure it is fully
meeting the Department's needs. The primary mission of the DHS
Counterintelligence Division (CPD) is to prevent adversaries
from penetrating the department to exploit sensitive
information, operations, programs, personnel, and resources.

information sharing

During the 112th Congress, the Committee will examine the
progress being made to improve terrorist and homeland security
information sharing efforts among Federal, State, and local
Governments, law enforcement entities, first responders,
emergency management personnel, and the private sector. The
Committee intends to explore the Department of Homeland
Security's coordination and collaboration with the National
Counterterrorism Center (NCTC), particularly through the
Interagency Threat Assessment and Coordination Group, and
efforts to disseminate necessary terrorist threat information
among Federal, State, and local Governments and the private
sector. While supporting the Department's and Government-wide
information sharing efforts, the Committee will review efforts
to ensure the security of sensitive and classified information
and guard against unlawful access or disclosure, as in the case
of WikiLeaks.
In addition to examining the Office of Intelligence and
Analysis, the Committee will examine the Department of Homeland
Security's efforts to establish policy for and coordinate
information sharing efforts from across the Federal Government
to and from State and local fusion centers throughout the
country. Additionally, the Committee will examine the
Department's internal processes and coordination efforts in
sharing information between the fusion centers and the
Department. Further, the Committee will examine unclassified
information designations and whether such designations impact
the ability of the Department or other Federal agencies to
share information among Federal, State, local and private
sector partners.

the national operations center

The Department of Homeland Security's National Operations
Center (NOC) serves as the National nerve center for
information sharing and domestic incident management, by
increasing the vertical coordination among Federal, State, and
local Government and private sector partners. In the 112th
Congress, the Committee will oversee the Department's efforts
to collect and fuse information in the NOC in order to maintain
domestic situational awareness, and to carry out its role as
the primary National-level center during domestic incidents and
special events.

united states secret service

In the 112th Congress, the Committee will examine the
Homeland security operations of the United States Secret
Service, including its critical role of protecting the
President of the United States and presidential candidates in
the 2012 presidential election.

SUBCOMMITTEE ON BORDER AND MARITIME SECURITY

operational control of the border

During the 112th Congress, the Committee will focus on
additional policies and resources necessary for the Department
to gain operational control over the land and maritime borders
of the United States, including but not limited to personnel,
technology, infrastructure, and coordination. The Committee
will also assess the status of programs and international
agreements to secure U.S. land borders on the north and the
south from illegal entry by persons or contraband.
Furthermore, the Committee continues to be concerned about
the threat of spill-over violence stemming from the rise of
drug cartels and the increasingly violent conflict throughout
Mexico. During the 112th Congress, the Committee will conduct
rigorous oversight of these issues.

border screening and terrorist travel

In the 112th Congress, the Committee intends to review
efforts to ensure the deployment and implementation of
technology, training, and infrastructure enhancements to assist
border and consular officials in identifying, intercepting, and
disrupting terrorists or others who would do our Nation harm
and who are attempting to enter or travel within the United
States. As a part of this review, the Committee will monitor
the Department's efforts to detect, detain, and remove aliens
apprehended at or near U.S. borders and ports of entry who are
subject to deportation, particularly those from special
interest countries. The Committee will address security-related
deficiencies in the immigration and naturalization process that
terrorists could use to gain entry to or remain in the country
for illegitimate purposes. These weaknesses have and will
continue to be exploited by terrorists and those seeking to
commit terrorist acts. The Committee intends to explore
challenges preventing the aggressive deployment of personnel to
high-risk visa issuing posts to improve visa security.
The Committee will also examine the integration, security,
and reliability of criminal, immigration, and terrorist
databases used to screen persons seeking to enter this country,
to include advanced passenger information and the US-VISIT
program. The Committee will also assess the development of
secure travel documents. In addition, the Committee will
examine the integration and effectiveness of transportation and
border security screening systems for detecting high-risk
passengers and cargo transported within the United States and
across our borders.

port and maritime security

In the 112th Congress, the Committee will examine various
aspects of port and maritime security, including the security
of port facilities; the screening of vessels, passengers,
cargo, and crew for potential terrorists, terrorist weapons,
and contraband; the development of international security
standards for shipping and containers; and the implementation
and operation of the Transportation Worker Identification Card
(TWIC). The Committee also plans to review how the Department
manages risk emerging from maritime threats and vulnerabilities
such as small boats that could be utilized in acts of
terrorism.
The Committee plans to review the efficiency and
effectiveness of the Department's supply chain security
programs, such as the Customs Trade Partnership against
Terrorism (C-TPAT) and the Container Security Initiative (CSI),
to ensure a proper balance between the facilitation of lawful
trade and the security of America. This will include an
assessment of implementation of the Maritime and Transportation
Security Act of 2002 (Pub. L. 107-295), the Security and
Accountability for Every (SAFE) Port Act of 2006 (Pub. L. 109-
347), relevant provisions of the Intelligence Reform and
Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 (Pub. L. 108-458), and the
Implementing Recommendations of the 9/11 Commission Act of 2007
(Pub. L. 110-53).

u.s. coast guard

In the 112th Congress, the Committee plans to review the
Coast Guard's homeland security missions, to include ports,
waterways, and coastal security; drug interdiction; migrant
interdiction; law enforcement; and defense readiness. The
Committee will examine Coast Guard afloat, aviation, and shore-
based operations in support of these missions to ensure that
the service is using a risk-based, layered strategy to enforce
laws and keep America's waters secure. This will include a
specific assessment of the Coast Guard's anti-terrorist
capabilities, most notably those found within the Deployable
Operations Group and its units, including Maritime Safety and
Security Teams, Port Security Units, Tactical Law Enforcement
Teams, and the Maritime Security Response Team. Additionally,
the Committee will review resource and asset needs within the
Coast Guard to determine whether the service is operationally
ready to address threats and emergencies while pursuing a long-
term sustainable path of fleet recapitalization. The Committee
will specifically examine the progress, efficiency, and
efficacy of acquisitions programs such as the Integrated
Deepwater Systems project to ensure major procurements remain
on schedule without a reduction in readiness throughout the
service.
Furthermore, the Committee will closely investigate the
Coast Guard's specific maritime security operations and
initiatives, such as the International Port Security Program
and the inspection of vessels originating from ports with
inadequate anti-terrorism measures. The Committee will examine
these and other programs to ensure that the service is
developing a full sense of maritime domain awareness and
executing all of its missions in the most effective manner
possible to keep America secure.

SUBCOMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION SECURITY

national strategy for transportation security

During the 112th Congress, the Committee will examine the
Department of Homeland Security's continuing efforts to
implement the National Strategy for Transportation Security;
the efforts of the Transportation Security Administration (TSA)
in fulfilling its mandate under the Aviation and Transportation
Security Act of 2001; and TSA's policies and programs to
address security threats against all modes of transportation.
The Committee's review will consider the Department's capacity
for protecting the most at-risk transportation systems, the
resiliency of critical infrastructure related to
transportation, the development and deployment of technology to
detect biological, chemical, and radiological threats,
passenger screening, and other methods to prevent or mitigate
terrorist attacks. Additionally, the Committee will examine the
Department's staffing needs, its inventory and use of detection
canines, and its allocation and objectives for transportation
security grants.

passenger and baggage screening

During the 112th Congress, the Committee will review TSA's
deployment of technology and implementation of procedures
related to the screening of passengers in all modes of
transportation and will examine TSA's balancing security
interests with the need for the efficient flow of travel,
including privacy and civil liberties safeguards. The Committee
will conduct oversight on the cost and effectiveness of
technology related to the screening of baggage; information
sharing within the Federal interagency process; coordination
with international partners, and the effectiveness of the
credentialing process. The Committee will also review TSA's
passenger search policies and pre-screening programs, including
the screening of passengers against no-fly and selectee lists,
the performance of the Secure Flight program, and other
measures that affect the security of domestic and international
air travelers.

aviation security

In the 112th Congress, the Committee will examine the risks
and consequences of terrorist attacks on passenger and cargo
aircraft, as well as the development of security measures to
reduce or mitigate such risks. The Committee's oversight will
review programs and procedures implemented by the Department of
Homeland Security related to the security of all types of
aircraft, including commercial passenger, air cargo, and
general aviation aircraft. In addition, the Committee will
examine airport perimeter and access controls and technology
for limiting access to the secure areas of commercial and
general aviation airports. The Committee will also examine the
training and management of the Federal Air Marshal Service.

surface transportation

In the 112th Congress, the Committee will review the
Transportation Security Administration's efforts to secure
surface transit systems, including the most at-risk mass
transit systems, buses, subway light rail, and passenger rail,
freight rail, pipelines, and highway systems. Moreover, in
examining the security of surface transportation systems, the
Committee will consider the roles and responsibilities of other
DHS components including the Federal Emergency Management
Agency (FEMA), as well as agencies external to DHS, including
the Department of Transportation's (DOT) Federal Transit
Administration (FTA) and Federal Railroad Administration (FRA),
State and local agencies and private industry. The Committee's
examination will include a review of TSA plans for providing
resources to adequately train and staff surface transportation
inspector units.

SUBCOMMITTEE ON EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS, RESPONSE, AND COMMUNICATIONS

federal preparedness and response

During the 112th Congress, the Committee will examine the
Administration's efforts to review and update Homeland Security
Presidential Directive 8 (HSPD-8), which directs the Department
to create a National program and multi-year planning system to
conduct terrorism preparedness-related exercises, and the
impact the delay caused by this review has had on efforts to
update the National Planning Scenarios and other preparedness
activities. The Committee will also examine the Department's
efforts to implement the Post Katrina Emergency Management
Reform Act of 2006.

national response and incident management

In the 112th Congress, the Committee will examine the
effectiveness of the National Response Framework (NRF),
including the Department's role in coordinating the response
efforts of all applicable Federal departments and agencies and
the coordination among the Department and State and local
Governments, first responders, nongovernmental organizations
and the private sector in implementing the NRF. The Committee
will also examine the development and integration of doctrine
that addresses prevention, protection, and recovery, including
the draft National Disaster Recovery Framework. In addition,
during the 112th Congress, the Committee will oversee the
Department's implementation of the National Incident Management
System (NIMS), including the Department's integration of NIMS
with the NRF.

interoperable communications

In the 112th Congress, the Committee will monitor the
progression of the Emergency Communications Preparedness Center
and the Department's Office of Emergency Communications and
Office of Interoperability and Compatibility. Specifically, the
Committee will review the Department's coordination and
planning, technical assistance, communications standards, and
best practices for interoperable communications systems and the
proposed public safety wireless broadband network for first
responders. The Committee will also oversee the Department's
implementation of grants for interoperable communications. In
addition, the Committee will examine the Department's progress
in the establishment of the Integrated Public Alerts and
Warnings System to ensure interoperability among different
warning systems.

assistance to state and local governments and
first responders

In the 112th Congress, the Committee will examine the
extent to which the Department implements a risk-based approach
to the allocation of grants and ways to improve the
Department's administration of grants to enhance the ability of
State and local Governments and emergency responders to
mitigate against, prevent, protect against, respond to, and
recover from a terrorism attack or natural disaster. The
Committee will review the coordination of the Department's
grant programs with other agencies across the Federal
Government; coordination within the Department in developing
guidance and administering grants; challenges in the funding
pipeline; strength of regional partnerships developed through
grants; and the distribution and expenditure of such grants at
the State and local levels. The Committee will also review on-
going efforts to measure grant funding investments against
improved preparedness capabilities.

first responder training

During the 112th Congress, the Committee will review the
Department's terrorism preparedness training programs,
incorporation of such training into first responder
certification processes, the level of coordination among
Federal, State, and local training programs and the awareness
of first responders serving State, local and Tribal Governments
concerning these programs. The Committee will also review
existing DHS training centers and determine whether the
Department optimally utilizes these facilities to enhance first
responder terrorism preparedness.

exercises and simulations

In the 112th Congress, the Committee will monitor the
Department's implementation of HSPD-8 and its progress in
creating a planning system to conduct terrorism preparedness-
related exercises. To that end, the Committee will examine the
Departments' National Exercise Program and on-going efforts to
streamline and improve it to ensure the program enhances the
preparedness of the Nation. The Committee will review whether
FEMA is incorporating lessons learned from National exercises
into future training, planning, exercises, and other
activities. The Committee will conduct oversight of the
National Level Exercise 2011 (NLE 2011), which is centered on a
catastrophic earthquake in the New Madrid Seismic Zone and
examine related Department of Defense (DoD) led exercises.

chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear planning, preparedness,
and response

During the 112th Congress, the Committee will examine the
significant challenges posed by chemical, biological,
radiological, and nuclear (CBRN) weapons to homeland security
and assess the Government's progress in implementing security
strategies including prevention, preparedness, and response
approaches that utilize multiple tools and policies to reduce
the likelihood and impact of CBRN attacks and, thus, the CBRN
risk to the Nation. The Committee will oversee the Department's
efforts to understand the evolving CBRN threat landscape, as
well as integrate and share this information. The Committee
will examine the Department's capability to mitigate CBRN risks
through appropriate means including preparedness and response
to CBRN threats with a focus on public health capacity to
respond. In particular, the Committee will look at the capacity
of the medical community to ready its existing resources,
develop its capabilities, and surge in times of crisis. A
critical facet of the Nation's medical preparedness for CBRN
threats is the availability of effective medical
countermeasures. The Committee will consider issues such as
priorities for countermeasure development and State and local
preparedness for distribution and dispensing of
countermeasures. The Committee will also oversee preparedness
for agricultural terrorism events, to include food defense
policies and veterinary leadership at the Department of
Homeland Security.

SUBCOMMITTEE ON CYBERSECURITY, INFRASTRUCTURE PROTECTION, AND SECURITY
TECHNOLOGIES

cybersecurity

In the 112th Congress, the Committee will examine the
Department's role in hardening our National critical
infrastructure against cyber attacks by fortifying Federal
civilian networks and collaborating with the private sector to
develop the means to detect and prevent cyber attacks, reduce
vulnerabilities, provide incident response, and facilitate
recovery. That oversight will consider the Department's ability
to detect the incursion of malicious activity; attribute the
source of that activity; and promote best practices, risk
assessments, and sharing of threat information across all
levels of Government and the private sector. In addition, the
Committee will examine the Department's ability to foster
cybersecurity research, development, and educational activities
to secure cyber networks. Additionally, the Committee will
examine the Department's efforts to recruit and train
cybersecurity personnel. The Committee will also examine the
resiliency of National critical infrastructure to withstand
cyber attacks and the need to optimize supply chain risk
management to protect against manipulation without
unnecessarily impeding commerce.
The Committee will review the integration of the various
cyber missions carried out across the Federal Government,
including the Department's collaboration with the defense and
intelligence agencies and its role in fulfilling the goals of
the National Cyber Security Plan. The Committee also will
examine the development and implementation of the National
Cyber Incident Response Plan, which expands upon the National
Response Framework.

the safety act

The Support Anti-terrorism by Fostering Effective
Technologies Act (the SAFETY Act) was included as subtitle G of
the Homeland Security Act of 2002, and authorized the Secretary
of the Department of Homeland Security to designate, upon
application, certain anti-terrorism products and services as
qualified to participate in a Federal liability protection
program. The SAFETY Act helps to foster the creation of anti-
terrorism products and services and facilitates job creation.
During the 112th Congress, the Committee will review the need
for further congressional guidance on the process and criteria
used to review and approve applications for SAFETY Act
certification and designation; the process and criteria used to
renew SAFETY Act certifications and designations; expansion of
SAFETY Act protection for risk mitigation strategies,
processes, and procedures; the increased use of SAFETY Act
protection internationally; and the Department's ability to
keep pace with the rising demand for SAFETY Act protections.

critical infrastructure protection

Pursuant to Homeland Security Presidential Directive 7
(HSPD-7), the Department is responsible for integrating sector
specific strategies into a National Strategy for Critical
Infrastructure Protection, and for coordinating Federal efforts
across all such infrastructure sectors. During the 112th
Congress, Committee oversight will focus on the implementation
of the National Strategy for Critical Infrastructure
Protection, including the Department's National coordination
responsibilities and its sector specific critical
infrastructure protection responsibilities. The Committee will
also examine the Department's efforts to assess National
critical infrastructure priorities by maintaining the National
Asset Database.
In addition, the Committee will review the Department's
progress in identifying, prioritizing, recommending, and
implementing protective measures to reduce vulnerabilities for
critical infrastructure and key resources, including its
administration of programs to promote private sector sharing of
critical infrastructure threat and vulnerability-related
information, and its administration of systems and programs to
provide timely warnings of potential risks to critical
infrastructure.

safety and security of federal buildings and facilities

In the 112th Congress, the Committee will continue to
monitor the safety and security of Federal buildings and
Facilities, including the role and responsibility of the
Federal Protective Service.

chemical facility security

In the 112th Congress, the Committee will continue to
examine the implementation, scope, and impact of the
Department's existing authority and regulations to secure
chemical facilities and take action, as appropriate, to
optimally balance the program's effectiveness in reducing the
risk posed by certain chemical facilities and the everyday
demands for chemicals in commerce.

science and technology

During the 112th Congress, the Committee will oversee the
capability of the Department's Science and Technology
Directorate to rapidly develop and deliver products and
technology solutions to its customers, including the operating
components of DHS, and State and local emergency responders and
officials, to help them secure the Homeland by preventing,
protecting against, and responding to terrorist threats and
natural disasters. The Committee will examine, in particular,
the Department's progress in developing a more rigorous process
to identify, prioritize, and fund research, development,
testing, and evaluation (RDT&E) opportunities that balances
risk to the Homeland with cost, impact, and time to deliver.
The Committee will review the Department's efforts to
coordinate the Homeland security research and development
agenda and leverage scientific knowledge and technical
expertise, research, and facilities at relevant universities,
research institutions, Government and National laboratories,
and the private sector, including the Homeland Security Centers
of Excellence and Federal Funded Research and Development
Centers. The Committee will also assess the status of the
Department's technical infrastructure and workforce to ensure
current and future homeland security RDT&E needs will be met.
The Committee will review the Department's activities
relating to evaluation, testing, and certification of private
sector homeland security technologies. The Committee will
evaluate the Department's role in facilitating the transfer and
commercialization of exiting technologies (including
modification of military technologies) for use by Federal,
State, local and Tribal Government and first responders.

technology to counter chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear
threats

During the 112th Congress, the Committee will examine the
Department's progress in improving the Nation's capability to
counter the threat of terrorist use of chemical, biological,
radiological, and nuclear weapons in the United States through
multi-layered approaches that emphasize early detection at the
Federal, State, and local levels, as well as post-event
capabilities for remediation. The Committee will oversee the
Department's development and implementation of the overarching
strategic plan for the Global Nuclear Detection Architecture.
The Committee will review the Department's chemical,
biological, radiological, and nuclear analysis capabilities and
information sharing mechanisms to provide actionable
information and an integrated operating system to guide
decision makers in carrying out appropriate responses,
including interdiction. To enhance the ability to interdict
chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear smuggling
across U.S. borders (land, air, and sea), the Committee will
oversee the Department's progress in employing risk-based
methods for developing, testing, certifying, deploying, and
operating current and next generation chemical, biological,
radiological, and nuclear detection equipment. The Committee
will also examine the Department's ability to detect chemical,
biological, radiological, and nuclear materials in the interior
of the U.S. and the Department's coordination with State and
local partners to reduce the risk of radiological and nuclear
terrorism to metropolitan urban areas and critical
infrastructure through expanding the Securing the Cities
Initiative. Finally, the Committee will examine the
Department's chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear
forensic activities to support National priorities for
deterrence, attribution, and prosecution.

SUBCOMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT, INVESTIGATIONS, AND MANAGEMENT

departmental operations and efficiency initiatives

In the 112th Congress, the Committee will oversee the
Department of Homeland Security's day-to-day operations to
ensure that it is operating in the most efficient and effective
manner possible. Pursuant to Clause 2(d)(F) of the Rules of the
House of Representatives, the Committee will work to identify
potential opportunities to eliminate duplicative or unnecessary
programs, find efficiencies that will contribute to the
Department's ability to meet its vital missions, and identify
areas for cost savings. The Committee will also conduct
rigorous oversight to ensure departmental regulations enhance
security without posing an unnecessary barrier to private
sector job creation. The Committee will fully investigate
homeland security programs and practices, as warranted.

financial management

In the 112th Congress, the Committee will continue its
oversight of the Department of Homeland Security's efforts to
consolidate its 13 separate financial management systems into
one, unified system, known as the Transformation and Systems
Consolidation (TASC) project. In coordination with this review,
the Committee will also review the Department's efforts to
enhance internal controls and provide information that will
enable clean audit opinions.

departmental workforce

Throughout the 112th Congress, the Committee will monitor
the Department's efforts to recruit and retain personnel and to
address employee concerns set forth in the Office of Personnel
Management's Federal Human Capital Survey and the Department's
own personnel surveys, which have indicated morale problems
across the Department. In addition, the Committee will examine
the Department's Balanced Workforce Initiative, which seeks to
convert contractor positions into Federal employees, to ensure
an appropriate balance is struck between Federal employees and
private contracts and guard against any unnecessary elimination
of private sector jobs.

information technology systems management

During the 112th Congress, the Committee will review the
Department's efforts to address information technology (IT)
challenges, including the management and integration of the
Department's IT systems. The Committee will review the
authorities and activities of the Chief Information Officer
(CIO) and component CIOs to ensure the effective management and
coordination of these key functions. The Committee will also
monitor the Department's progress in IT architectural planning,
investment management, policy development, operations, and
related personnel management.

hspd-12 implementation

In the 112th Congress, the Committee will monitor the
Department's implementation of Homeland Security Presidential
Directive-12 (HSPD-12), Policy for a Common Identification
Standard for Federal Employees and Contractors, including the
Department's completion of card issuance, installation of card
readers, and other identification security efforts, such as the
use of logical access control systems.

headquarters consolidation

In the 112th Congress, the Committee will review the
Department's efforts to consolidate its headquarters from more
than 40 locations throughout the National Capital Region to
eight or nine locations. The cornerstone of this effort is the
St. Elizabeth's headquarters consolidation project. The
Committee will monitor the progress of the consolidation to
ensure the plan is completed on time and within budget.

acquisition management

During the 112th Congress, the Committee will review the
efforts of the Department of Homeland Security to improve the
integration and coordination of the procurement functions of
its components, and to ensure that effective management
controls are put in place to prevent contract waste, fraud, and
abuse while promoting efficiency and effectiveness. The
Committee will review the authorities and activities of the
Chief Procurement Officer to ensure the effective management of
this key function. The Committee also will review the
Department's implementation of Section 831(a) of the Homeland
Security Act of 2002, which grants the Secretary authority with
respect to research and development projects to use more
flexible contracting mechanisms in an effort to attract
``nontraditional Government contractors'' for needed homeland
security technologies, as well as the Secretary's use of other
streamlined acquisition practices.

privacy and civil liberties

Section 222 of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (the Act)
created a Privacy Officer for the Department of Homeland
Security to ensure that the Department's information gathering
and analysis functions and other programs across its components
adhere to established standards for the protection of privacy.
Section 705 of the Act also established an Officer for Civil
Rights and Liberties to review and assess information alleging
abuses of civil rights or civil liberties by employees and
officials of the Department of Homeland Security. During the
112th Congress, the Committee will monitor the Department's
efforts under such laws to strike an appropriate balance
between the need to combat terrorist attacks against the United
States with the privacy expectations and civil rights of U.S.
citizens.
PART B--IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY OVERSIGHT
PLAN FOR THE 112TH CONGRESS

Part B of this section contains a summary of the actions
taken by the Committee on Homeland Security to implement the
Oversight Plan for the 112th Congress and the recommendations
made with respect to this plan. Part B also contains a summary
of the additional oversight activities undertaken by the
Committee, and the recommendations made or actions taken
thereon.

FULL COMMITTEE

Additional Oversight Functions

Counterterrorism

Homegrown Radicalization

Terrorist Detention and Trials

On May 11, 2011, the Chair of the Full Committee sent a
letter to the Secretary of Defense and the Chairman of the
Joints Chief of Staff requesting an explanation of news reports
that terrorist detainees held at Guantanamo may be able to
receive visits from wives and family members and the potential
damage to our National security posed by the prospects of such
visits.

united states secret service

The Committee initiated an investigation into an alleged
incident involving USSS personnel and foreign nationals in
Cartigena, Colombia. The Full Committee Chair has sent a letter
to the Director of the USSS with questions related to the
alleged incident, and received a response letter. Furthermore,
Committee staff received a briefing from multiple
representatives from the USSS and the Department of Homeland
Security providing additional information in response to the
April 20 letter. The Chair of the Full Committee also sent a
letter to the Secretary of State requesting to have the
Department of State make three Departmental personnel on the
ground in Colombia available to the Committee for its
investigation. Committee staff will continue to work with the
OIG's office as the investigation concludes.

SUBCOMMITTEE ON COUNTERTERRORISM AND INTELLIGENCE

counterterrorism

During the 112th Congress, the Subcommittee on
Counterterrorism and Intelligence examined the counterterrorism
policies of the U.S. Government with a focus on the Department
of Homeland Security (DHS). The Subcommittee received several
classified briefing by representatives from DHS, the National
Counterterrorism Center (NCTC), and the Federal Bureau of
Investigation (FBI).
The Subcommittee also monitored counterterrorism policies
outside of the Department in the wider U.S. Intelligence
Community. Subcommittee Members received classified briefings
from the Defense Intelligence Agency and the Joint Staff on the
threat from al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula, as well as
classified briefings from the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) and
the Department of State on Hezbollah activities in the Western
Hemisphere. The Subcommittee also conducted briefings on the
threat from weapons of mass destruction (WMD), the Department
of the Treasury's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, the
FBI's Terrorist Financing Operations Section, and the DEA's
Special Operations Division relating to drug trafficking
organizations and their connections to international terror
networks. Committee staff also received a briefing from the
FBI's Cyber Division and their National Cyber Forensics and
Training Alliance on terror financing. Committee staff also
visited the Defense Threat Reduction Agency within the
Department of Defense, to receive a briefing on their Strategic
Command Center.
The Chair and Ranking Member of the Subcommittee sent a
letter to the Secretary of State to encourage the Department's
Office of the Coordinator for Counterterrorism to initiate an
investigation to determine whether the Nigerian Islamist sect
Boko Haram should be designated a Foreign Terrorist
Organization. Additionally, the Full Committee Chair and the
Subcommittee Chair pursued this request with the Secretary of
State, with two additional letters.

department of homeland security intelligence enterprise

The Subcommittee continued its oversight of the Department
of Homeland Security (DHS) Intelligence Enterprise, examining
intelligence activities of the Department and its components.
The Subcommittee received briefings from each component agency
within DHS with intelligence responsibilities and capabilities.
The Subcommittee held a hearing, ``The DHS Intelligence
Enterprise--Past, Present, and Future.''

counterintelligence

The Subcommittee staff received a briefing from the
Department of Homeland Security's Counterintelligence Program
Division (CPD) on the status of its reorganization, and will
continue to further examine the reorganized and the CPD mission
and operations following its recent reorganization.

information sharing

The Subcommittee continued to monitor improvements to the
terrorist and homeland security information sharing effort
among Federal, State, and local Governments, law enforcement
entities, first responders, emergency management personnel and
the private sector. This oversight included briefings by the
New York City Police Department (NYPD), the New York State
Intelligence Center, the Department of Homeland Security Fusion
Center Program Office, and the Department of Homeland Security
(DHS) Open Source Enterprise. Committee staff also attended the
National Fusion Center Conference held in March 2011 in Denver,
Colorado. Additionally, Committee staff attended the National
Fusion Center Training Event held in Phoenix, Arizona in April
2012.
The Chair of the Subcommittee sent a letter to the
Secretary of Homeland Security, the Director of the Federal
Bureau of Investigation and the Director of National
Intelligence to request information on how each of their
agencies took part in the distribution and response to the
cache of information that was collected from Osama bin Laden's
compound.
The Subcommittee held a hearing entitled ``Intelligence
Sharing and Terrorist Travel: How DHS Addresses the Mission of
Providing Security, Facilitating Commerce, and Protecting
Privacy for Passengers Engaged in International Travel.''
Witnesses included the Assistant Secretary for Policy at the
Department of Homeland Security, the Department's Chief Privacy
Officer, and the Executive Director of Automation and Targeting
for the U.S. Customs and Border Protection's Office of
Intelligence and Investigations.
On November 15, 2011, the Subcommittee passed H.R.2764, the
WMD Intelligence and Information Sharing Act; and H.R.3140, the
Mass Transit Intelligence Prioritization Act, to enhance
information sharing capabilities of DHS and fusion centers
across the country.
The Subcommittee held a hearing on February 28, 2012,
entitled ``Federal Government Intelligence Sharing with State,
local, and Tribal Law Enforcement: An Assessment Ten Years
After 9/11.''

the national operations center

As part of its continued oversight of DHS intelligence
sharing efforts, the Subcommittee examined the role that
unclassified information designations play in efforts to share
information among Federal agencies, including DHS, and State,
local, and private sector partners in the coming session. It
also examined the National Operations Center (NOC) within the
Department and its efforts to collect and fuse information in
order to provide domestic situational awareness as the primary
National-level center during domestic incidents and special
events.
The Subcommittee held a hearing on February 26, 2012,
entitled ``DHS Monitoring of Social Networking and Media:
Enhancing Intelligence Gathering and Ensuring Privacy.'' The
Subcommittee also received a classified briefing on this issue
on February 15, 2012.

united states secret service

The Subcommittee examined the operations of the United
States Secret Service (USSS), including its critical role of
protecting the President of the United States and presidential
candidates in the 2012 presidential election. Committee staff
held multiple meetings with representatives from the USSS, and
also conducted a site visit to their headquarters.
On September 14, 2011, the Subcommittee held a hearing
entitled ``United States Secret Service: Examining Protective
and Investigative Missions and Challenges in 2012,'' which
focused on the operations of the USSS and their role in 2012
presidential election.
The Committee initiated an investigation into an alleged
incident involving USSS personnel and foreign nationals in
Cartigena, Colombia. The investigation is still on-going,
however, the Full Committee Chair has sent a letter to the
Director of the USSS with questions related to the alleged
incident, and received a response letter. Furthermore,
Committee staff received a briefing from multiple
representatives from the USSS and the Department of Homeland
Security providing additional information in response to the
April 20 letter. The Chair of the Full Committee also sent a
letter to the Secretary of State requesting to have the
Department of State make three Departmental personnel on the
ground in Colombia available to the Committee for its
investigation.
Committee staff will continue to work with the OIG's office
as the investigation concludes.

SUBCOMMITTEE ON BORDER AND MARITIME SECURITY

operational control of the border

During the 112th Congress, the Subcommittee on Border and
Maritime Security focused on what the Department of Homeland
Security must do to gain operational control over the land and
maritime borders of the United States both at, and between,
ports of entry. The Subcommittee held hearings on these topics
on February 15, 2011, March 15, 2011, May 3, 2011, July 12,
2011, November 15, 2011, April 17, 2012, May 1, 2012, and May
8, 2012. The Subcommittee also considered the following
measures: H.R.1299, H.R.915, and H.R.1922. The Chair and
Ranking Member of the Subcommittee sent a letter to the
Commissioner of the Customs and Border Protection regarding
personnel at the borders and ports of entry on June 1, 2011.
Additionally, the Chair of the Full Committee and the Chair of
the Subcommittee sent a letter to the President requesting an
extension of the deployment of National Guard troops on the
Southwest border.
In 2011, the Subcommittee held several oversight hearings
on obtaining operational control of land borders. The first
hearing was held on February 15, 2011, and was entitled
``Securing our Borders--Operational Control and the Path
Forward.'' The following hearing on March 15, 2011, entitled
``Strengthening the Border--Finding the Right Mix of Personnel,
Infrastructure, and Technology.'' This hearing focused on the
Department's efforts to secure the border after the
cancellation of the Secure Border Initiative (SBInet). The
hearing focused on how the Department measures operational
control of the border. On May 3, 2011, the Subcommittee held a
hearing entitled ``Border Security and Enforcement--Department
of Homeland Security's Cooperation with State and Local Law
Enforcement.'' The hearing focused on the Department's efforts
to work efficiently with State and local law enforcement. The
Subcommittee shifted focus to the maritime border on July 12,
2011, with the hearing entitled ``Protecting the Maritime
Borders--Leveraging Law Enforcement Cooperation to Enhance
Security along America's Coasts.'' This hearing focused on how
the U.S. Coast Guard, Customs and Border Protection, and other
vital law enforcement agencies work together to secure
America's ports and coasts. In 2012, the Subcommittee continued
its oversight of obtaining operational control by holding a
hearing on May 8, 2012, entitled ``Measuring Border Security:
U.S. Border Patrol's New Strategic Plan and the Path Forward''
to better understand the Border Patrol's latest border security
strategy.
In an era of diminishing budgets, the Department of
Homeland Security must look to the Department of Defense to
transfer existing technology and resources that may have an
application for Homeland Security. The Subcommittee's first
hearing held on this topic was on November 15, 2011, entitled
``Protecting the Homeland: How can DHS use DoD technology to
secure the border?'' Then, on April 17, 2012, the Subcommittee
examined the National Guard's role on the border during the
hearing entitled ``Boots on the Ground or Eyes in the Sky: How
Best to Utilize the National Guard to Achieve Operational
Control.''
The Subcommittee also considered legislation regarding
operational control of the border. In response to the
Government Accountability Office's report that less than 44
percent of the Southwest border is secure, H.R.1299, the
``Secure Border Act of 2011,'' was introduced March 31, 2011;
considered by the Subcommittee on June 2, 2011. The Full
Committee considered the measure on September 21, 2011, and
reported it to the House on November 12, 2011. H.R.915, the
``Jaime Zapata Border Enforcement Security Task Force Act'' was
introduced on March 3, 2011, considered by the Subcommittee on
June 2, 2011. The Full Committee considered the measures on
September 21, 2011, and reported to the House on November 4,
2011. The bill establishes a Border Enforcement Security Task
Force (BEST) program within U.S. Immigration and Customs
Enforcement to enhance border security. H.R.1922, providing
U.S. Customs and Border Protection with access to Federal lands
to carry out certain security activities in the Southwest
Border region was introduced on May 13, 2011, considered by the
Subcommittee on June 2, 2011. Provisions of H.R.1922 were
included in Title VI of H.R.3116 as reported by the Committee.
On June 19, 2012, the Subcommittee held a hearing to
consider actions being taken by the Department to ensure they
stay a step ahead of the novel methods of illegal cross border
activity.

border screening and terrorist travel

In the 112th Congress, the Subcommittee reviewed efforts to
ensure the deployment and implementation of technology,
training, and infrastructure enhancements to assist border and
consular officials in identifying, intercepting, and disrupting
terrorists. The Subcommittee assessed weaknesses at the border
and areas that continue to be exploited by terrorists. The
Subcommittee held hearings on these topics on March 15, 2011,
April 5, 2011, May 3, 2011, September 13, 2011 November 15,
2011, March 6, 2012, and May 1, 2012. The Subcommittee
considered the following measures: H.R.1299, H.R.915, and
H.R.1922.
The Chair of the Full Committee and the Chair of the
Subcommittee sent a letter to the Secretary of Homeland
Security expressing their concerns regarding the Department of
Homeland Security's apparent failure to issue guidelines for
Federal, State, and local law enforcement officials on how to
identify noncompliance with Federal Laws that apply to cross-
border trucking between the United States and Mexico.
In regards to border screening and terrorist travel, the
Subcommittee held several oversight hearings. The first was on
March 15, 2011, entitled ``Strengthening the Border--Finding
the Right Mix of Personnel, Infrastructure, and Technology.''
This hearing focused on the Department's efforts to secure the
border after the cancellation of the Secure Border Initiative
(SBInet). Then on April 5, 2011, the Subcommittee held a
hearing entitled ``Using Resources Effectively to Secure our
Border at Ports of Entry--Stopping the Illicit Flow of Money,
Guns, and Drugs,'' examining how resources are allocated and
deployed at the ports of entry in terms of manpower, canine
units, and infrastructure. On May 3, 2011, the Subcommittee
held a hearing entitled ``Border Security and Enforcement--
Department of Homeland Security's Cooperation with State and
Local Law Enforcement.'' The hearing focused on the
Department's efforts to work efficiently with State and local
law enforcement. The Subcommittee also held a hearing on
November 15, 2011, entitled ``Protecting the Homeland: How can
DHS use DoD technology to secure the border?'' Continuing its
oversight, the Subcommittee held a hearing addressing gaps in
the visa system, particularly challenges in identifying
individuals who overstay their visas on March 6, 2012. The
title of the hearing was ``From the 9/11 Hijackers to Amine el-
Khalifi: Terrorists and the Visa Overstay Problem.'' Then on
May 1, 2012, the Subcommittee held a field hearing in Laredo,
Texas, entitled ``Using Technology to Facilitate Trade and
Enhance Security at our Ports of Entry.'' Additionally, the
Subcommittee held a field hearing in Phoenix, Arizona on May
21, 2012, regarding drug smuggling across the Arizona border,
entitled ``Stopping the Illicit Drugs in Arizona by Leveraging
State, Local, and Federal Information Sharing.'' On July 10,
2012, the Subcommittee held a hearing titled, ``Building a
Secure Community: How Can DHS Better Leverage State and Local
Partnerships?'' to provide an opportunity to discuss with ICE
Director Morton how the Department is utilizing state and local
law enforcement in their efforts to enforce our Nation's
immigrations and customs laws. The Subcommittee also held a
hearing on the anniversary of September 11th, to take a look at
the terrorist watchlisting and visa vetting overseas.
The Subcommittee also considered legislation regarding
border screening and terrorist travel. In response to a
Government Accountability Office's report that less than 44
percent of the Southwest Border is secure, H.R.1299, the
``Secure Border Act of 2011'', was introduced March 31, 2011,
considered by the Subcommittee on June 2, 2011, by the Full
Committee on September 21, 2011, and reported to the House on
November 12, 2011. H.R.915, the ``Jaime Zapata Border
Enforcement Security Task Force Act'' was introduced on March
3, 2011, considered by the Subcommittee on June 2, 2011, by the
Full Committee on September 21, 2011, and reported to the House
on November 4, 2011, and passed by the House on May 30, 2012.
The bill establishes a Border Enforcement Security Task Force
(BEST) program in U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement to
enhance border security. H.R.1922, ``Providing U.S. Customs and
Border Protection with Access to Federal Lands to Carry Out
Certain Security Activities in the Southwest Border Region was
introduced May 13, 2011, considered by the Subcommittee on June
2, 2011, and provisions of H.R.1922 were included in Title VI
of H.R.3116 as reported to the House. This bill grants CBP
access for to Federal lands to carry out certain security
activities in the Southwest Border region.

port and maritime security

In the 112th Congress, the Subcommittee has examined
various aspects of port and maritime security, including port
facilities, cargo and passenger screening, and the supply chain
process. The Subcommittee held hearings on these topics on July
12, 2011, June 14, 2011, and February 7, 2012. The Subcommittee
considered measure H.R.4251.
The Subcommittee held its first hearing on port and
maritime security on June 14, 2011. The hearing was entitled
``Securing the Nation's Ports and Maritime Border--A Review of
the Coast Guard's Post 9/11 Homeland Security Missions,''
focusing the Coast Guard's greatly increased maritime security
operations and range of capabilities. Then, on July 12, 2011,
the Subcommittee held the hearing titled ``Protecting the
Maritime Borders--Leveraging Law Enforcement Cooperation to
Enhance Security along America's Coasts.'' This hearing focused
on how the U.S. Coast Guard, U.S. Customs and Border
Protection, and other vital law enforcement agencies work
together to secure America's ports and coasts. Continuing
oversight of port and maritime security issues, the
Subcommittee held a hearing analyzing the Nation's supply chain
security. The hearing, held on February 7, 2012, entitled
``Balancing Trade and Security: Protecting our Ports,
Facilitating Commerce, and Securing the Supply Chain.''
The Subcommittee also considered legislation regarding port
and maritime security. In order to authorize, enhance, and
reform certain port security programs through increased
efficiency and risk-based coordination within the Department of
Homeland Security, the Subcommittee considered H.R.4251, the
``Securing Maritime Activities through Risk-based Targeting for
Port Security Act'' or the ``SMART Port Act.'' H.R.4251 was
introduced on March 22, 2012, considered by the Subcommittee on
April 27, 2012, and favorably reported to the Full Committee.

u.s. coast guard

In the 112th Congress, the Subcommittee has continually
reviewed and assessed the U.S. Coast Guard (USCG). The Members
focused on the USCG's homeland security missions and post 9/11
duties. The Subcommittee held a hearing to receive testimony
from the Commandant of the USCG on the state of the Homeland
security responsibilities of the Coast Guard. Additionally, the
Chair of the Full Committee and the Chair of the Subcommittee
sent a letter to the Commandant regarding the USCG budget
proposal and concerns regarding the Coast Guard's post-9/11
missions. The Subcommittee held a follow-up hearing with the
Coast Guard and Customs and Border Protection to ensure both
agencies are cooperating and leveraging their jurisdiction and
assets to enhance security along the maritime borders. The
Subcommittee held a third hearing to examine the use of
Department of Defense technology to secure our Nation's
borders, including maritime borders. The hearing included a
discussion on how the USCG uses Department of Defense (DoD)
technology and how the USCG leverages its unique role to assist
with the transfer of technology between the DoD and the
Department of Homeland Security.
With regards to certain Coast Guard security roles, the
Subcommittee considered H.R.4251, to authorize, enhance, and
reform certain port security programs through increased
efficiency and risk-based coordination within the Department of
Homeland Security. H.R.4251, the ``Securing Maritime Activities
through Risk-based Targeting for Port Security Act'' or the
``SMART Port Act'' was introduced on March 22, 2012, considered
by the Subcommittee on April 27, 2012, and favorably reported
to the Full Committee.

SUBCOMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION SECURITY

national strategy for transportation security

During the 112th Congress the Subcommittee on
Transportation Security examined the legislative and policy
efforts of the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) to
implement the National strategy for transportation security,
TSA's efforts to fulfill its mandates under the Aviation and
Transportation Security Act of 2001, and its overall
initiatives to address security threats against all modes of
transportation. The first hearing held by the Subcommittee this
Congress occurred on February 10, 2011. This hearing, entitled
``Terrorism and Transportation Security,'' which focused on the
broad scope of threats to all of our Nation's diverse
transportation systems.
Additionally, the Subcommittee held two Member briefings
focusing on the TSA's authorization priorities for 2012 and
2013, and on the TSA's recent internal reorganization. On March
30, 2012, the Subcommittee Chair led a CODEL to Asia to examine
surface and aviation transportation security initiatives, and
discuss opportunities for increased partnership between the
United States and Asia on security. On May 8, 2012, the
Subcommittee held a hearing to examine the partnerships between
the United States and the Asia Pacific region. Additionally,
from May 14-15, 2012 Subcommittee Members conducted a site
visit to New York City, New York to review various high-risk
transportation targets throughout the region.
The Subcommittee held a classified briefing on threats to
our Nation's transportation systems in June 2012.
On July 10, 2012, the Subcommittee held a hearing entitled,
``Challenging the Status Quo at TSA: Perspectives on the Future
of Transportation Security'' to identify innovative ideas to
secure critical transportation infrastructure.
The Majority staff of the Subcommittee on Transportation
Security released a report on September 10, 2012 entitled,
``Rebuilding TSA into a Smarter, Leaner Organization.'' The
report outlined findings and recommendations from the
Subcommittee's oversight during the 112th Congress in order to
identify specific ways to help TSA evolve to meet the next
terrorist threat. Additionally, on September 11, 2012 the
Subcommittee held a hearing entitled, ``Eleven Years After 9/11
Can TSA Evolve To Meet the Next Terrorist Threat?'' to ask
policy experts, stakeholders and TSA leadership what steps TSA
can take to become a leaner, smarter organization and meet the
needs of the traveling public.

passenger and baggage screening

The screening of travelers is a significant part of TSA's
day-to-day operations. This year TSA has expanded its use of
alternative passenger screening methods, including, the
Behavior Detection Officer (BDO) Screening of Passengers by
Observation Techniques (SPOT) and the implementation of TSA
Pre^TM.
The Subcommittee held a Member briefing on the Behavior
Detection Officer (BDO) Screening of Passengers by Observation
Techniques (SPOT) program. The Committee sent a letter to the
Administrator of TSA requesting more information about a recent
report of racial profiling by behavior detection officers at
one of our Nation's largest airports. Additionally, Committee
staff conducted several meetings and briefings to obtain
updates from TSA regarding the expanded use of this program.
The Chair of the Subcommittee conducted a site visit to Atlanta
Hartsfield-Jackson International Airport to observe the TSA
Pre^TM checkpoint lanes that are being piloted
there.
Technology and proper implementation of standard operating
procedures are critical components in helping the
Transportation Security Administration (TSA) achieve its
mission. It is incumbent upon the committee to ensure that TSA
is deploying technology and implementing its procedures in a
way that is efficient and effective. The Committee and
Subcommittee sent several oversight letters to TSA regarding
the use of technology.
The Committee also continues to focus on the size,
behavior, and conduct of TSA's Screener workforce. On June 7,
2012 the Subcommittee held a hearing to discuss TSA's efforts
to improve its relationship with the traveling public, while
continuing to improve its mission. In addition, on August 1,
2012, the Subcommittee held a hearing to establish on the
record TSA's efforts to weed out employees prone to criminal or
negligent behavior before they become another bad news story
for TSA; and to examine how TSA adjudicates cases where
employee misconduct has occurred.
The Screening Partnership Program (SPP) continues to be an
area of interest for the Subcommittee. The Chair of the
Subcommittee sent a letter to the Administrator of TSA
regarding a United States Court of Federal Claims ruling
involving one of TSA's SPP participants. The Court found that
TSA's selection process for SPP participants was flawed, and
did not select the most qualified applicant based on the
evaluation criteria set out in the Request for Proposal issued
by TSA.
Additionally, the Chair of the Subcommittee and a Member of
the Committee sent a letter to the Administrator of TSA
regarding TSA's use of storage facilities for purchased
technology. TSA provided a briefing in response to the letter.
On February 7, 2012, the Subcommittee held a hearing to discuss
the Screening Partnership Program and the recent United States
Court of Federal Claims ruling.
In addition, on December 8, 2011, the Subcommittee held a
closed hearing to discuss passenger screening technologies.
This hearing was a follow-up to a classified Subcommittee
Member briefing on passenger screening technologies that
occurred on November 18, 2011. It is imperative that TSA
continue to develop new and innovative technology in an effort
to combat emerging threats to aviation. This hearing and
briefing were an opportunity to examine technology
capabilities, and work together toward continuous improvement.
On February 22, 2012, the Subcommittee Chair sent a letter to
the Government Accountability Office (GAO) requesting to be a
co-requestor of a report investigating the Transportation
Security Administration's National Explosives Detection Canine
Program. Additionally, on April 25, 2012 the Subcommittee held
a follow-up classified Member briefing to continue the
discussion on passenger screening technologies.

aviation security

The Subcommittee recognizes the grave consequences of a
terrorist attack on any of our Nation's transportation systems.
Subcommittee hearings and oversight activities consider the
risks and consequences of a terrorist attack, and what measures
can be taken to prevent an attack. In addition to the
Subcommittee's broad oversight activities related to the risk
of terrorism, the Subcommittee held a hearing to discuss
specifically the risks and consequences of an attack on air
commerce, which is a known target for terrorists overseas.
In preparation for considering the Transportation Security
Administration Authorization Act of 2011, the Subcommittee held
two hearings. The first hearing occurred on June 2, 2011 and
was entitled, ``Authorizing the Transportation Security
Administration for Fiscal Years 2012 and 2013.'' The second
hearing occurred on July 12, 2011 and was entitled, ``Industry
Perspectives: Authorizing the Transportation Security
Administration for fiscal years 2012 and 2013.'' During the
course of preparation of this legislation, Committee staff met
with numerous stakeholders in both the public and private
sector in order to hear their thoughts and concerns.
On September 14, 2011 the Subcommittee held a markup of the
Subcommittee print, ``Transportation Security Administration
Authorization Act of 2011.'' On September 22, 2011, the Chairs
of the Full Committee the Subcommittee introduced H.R.3011, the
Transportation Security Administration Authorization Act of
2011.
Technology plays a critical role in the Transportation
Security Administration's (TSA) ability to protect our Nation's
travelers and transportation systems. Over the course of the
year, the Subcommittee met with numerous industry partners of
TSA, along with other relevant Government representatives.
These meetings were held to discuss ways to improve TSA's
technology procurement process to enhance security and promote
private sector job growth.
In February 2011, the Chair of the Subcommittee met with
the Assistant Administrator for Transportation Sector Network
Management (TSNM) of the Transportation Security Administration
to discuss various initiatives TSNM is employing to secure our
Nation's aviation and surface transportation systems. As a
result of that meeting, the Chair of the Subcommittee sent an
oversight letter seeking additional information about how we
can improve transportation security through technology and
other resources.
The Subcommittee held a series of three hearings during the
Fall of 2011 entitled, ``TSA Reform: Exploring Innovations in
Technology Procurement to Stimulate Job Growth.'' Over the
course of these hearings, the Subcommittee had the opportunity
to hear from past and present TSA and DHS officials responsible
for technology procurement and development, as well as from
technology companies that serve as critical partners of TSA.
The Subcommittee continues to review and oversee the
Federal Air Marshal Service. The Federal Air Marshal Service
serves as a critical layer of defense in aviation security, and
the Subcommittee continues to work to ensure that the Federal
Air Marshal Service receives the resources and support it needs
to achieve its mission under TSA's new internal structure. The
Subcommittee met with leadership of the Federal Air Marshal
Service to discuss the progress that has been made since the
attacks of September 11, 2001, and the importance of taking a
risk-based approach to security. The Subcommittee postponed a
hearing scheduled for December 13, 2011 to discuss the Federal
Air Marshal Service 10 years after the attacks of September 11,
2001. The Subcommittee held a hearing on this issue on February
16, 2012.
The Subcommittee continues to monitor and review the role
and impact of transportation inspectors, along with TSA's other
partners within DHS and throughout the Federal Government that
play a role in securing our Nation's transportation systems.
Committee staff have received numerous briefings on the role of
transportation security inspectors. In September 2011,
Committee staff conducted a site visit to JFK International
Airport and observed air cargo security inspectors.
Additionally, on February 6, 2012, the Subcommittee conducted a
Member site visit to Washington Dulles International Airport.
On February 28, 2012, the Subcommittee held a Member
briefing to examine TSA's air cargo security initiatives.
Additionally, on March 28, 2012, the Subcommittee held a
hearing to examine TSA's large screening workforce and
bureaucracy.
On March 21, 2012, the Subcommittee held a Member briefing
to discuss TSA's delayed rulemaking regarding Foreign Repair
Stations for Aircraft. As a follow-up to this briefing on March
27, 2012, the Subcommittee Chair and Mr.Walberg sent a letter
to the Secretary of Homeland Security regarding this issue.
The Subcommittee continues to review security breaches and
violations of airport perimeter and access controls. Members of
the Committee and Subcommittee have sent oversight letters to
the Transportation Security Administration regarding perimeter
security and access control. The Subcommittee met with
officials from TSA, as well as local agencies and the private
sector, to discuss this issue. On May 16, 2012, the
Subcommittee held a hearing to examine TSA's access controls
oversight. On May 16, 2012, the Chairman and Ranking Member of
the Subcommittee sent Administrator Pistole a letter to express
concerns regarding TSA's access control oversight
vulnerabilities.
The Subcommittee conducted a site visit to the TSA Systems
Integration Facility located at Washington Reagan National
Airport. Members observed the Credential Authentication
Technology--Boarding Pass Scanning Systems (CAT-BPSS), which
TSA expects will eventually replace the current procedure used
by security officers to verify fraudulent or altered documents
at passenger screening checkpoints at U.S. airports.
On June 19, 2012 the Subcommittee held a hearing entitled,
``Is TSA's Planned Purchase of CAT/BPSS a Wise Use of Taxpayer
Dollars?'' During this hearing the Subcommittee raised its
concerns with the planned purchasing of this technology,
specifically, to what extent the agency has developed
meaningful requirements, cost-benefit analyses, and identified
operational challenges for the Credential Authentication
Technology Boarding Pass Scanning System (CAT/BPSS).
The Subcommittee held a hearing on July 18, 2012 to address
the findings of a Government Accountability Office (GAO) report
[GAO-12-875] entitled, ``General Aviation Security: Weaknesses
Exist in TSA's Process for Ensuring Foreign Flight Students Do
Not Pose a Security Threat.'' The purpose of this hearing was
for the agencies and industry stakeholders involved with the
Alien Flight Student Program to discuss how they are ensuring
that foreign nationals enrolling in U.S. flight schools are
being properly vetted before they receive flight training and
apply for an FAA airman's certificate. Prior to this hearing,
the Subcommittee had received briefings from the Government
Accountability Office and Immigration and Customs Enforcement
about this issue. As a result of this hearing, the Chair and
Members of the Subcommittee sent letters to both the
Administrator of the Transportation Security Administration and
the Secretary of Homeland Security to raise concerns identified
in the GAO report and discussion at the hearing. The
Subcommittee also received a follow up briefing on September
19, 2012 to discuss the progress that has been made towards
implementing the recommendations of the GAO report.

surface transportation

The Subcommittee continues to review and oversee the
Transportation Security Administration's (TSA) surface
transportation initiatives. On February 16, 2011, the
Subcommittee held a classified Member briefing from TSA in
order to examine current threats to our Nation's transportation
security. Additionally, the Chair of the Subcommittee sent a
letter to the Assistant Administrator for Transportation Sector
Network Management requesting detailed information on TSA's
efforts to secure pipeline and surface transportation assets.
The Subcommittee considered several pieces of legislation
to improve transportation security. This includes, H.R.1690,
the MODERN Security Credentials Act. Committee staff met with
various surface transportation stakeholders, both in
preparation for the introduction of H.R.3011 and H.R.1690, and
in conducting oversight and review of surface transportation
security. Additionally, on September 30, 2011 Committee staff
conducted a site visit to observe the security of mass transit
assets in New York City, New York. In 2012, the Subcommittee
plans to conduct additional site visits to observe surface
transportation security inspectors.
On January 11, 2012, the Subcommittee staff conducted a
site visit to Baltimore-Washington International Airport to
observe surface transportation security inspectors.
On May 31, 2012, the Subcommittee held a hearing entitled
``TSA's Surface Inspection Program: Strengthening Security or
Squandering Scant Resources?'' The Subcommittee received
testimony from Chief John O'Connor, Amtrak Police Department;
Mr.Skip Elliott, Vice President, Public Safety and Environment,
CSX; Mr.Philip L. Byrd Sr., President, Bulldog Hiway Express,
testifying on behalf of the American Trucking Associations;
Mr.William C. Blankenship, Chief Operating Officer, Greyhound
Lines, Inc.; and Mr.Doug Morris, Director, Safety and Security
Operations, Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association.
On June 20, 2012, Members of the Subcommittee received a
briefing from representatives from the Association of American
Railroads on railroad security.

SUBCOMMITTEE ON EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS, RESPONSE, AND COMMUNICATIONS

federal preparedness and response

During the 112th Congress, the Subcommittee conducted
oversight of efforts at the Federal, State, local, and private
sector levels to prepare for, respond to, and recover from
terrorist attacks and natural disasters. Through a series of
hearings, field hearings, site visits, and briefings, the
Subcommittee worked to ensure that the whole community is
engaged in these efforts. The Subcommittee held hearings to
review the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA)
implementation of the Post Katrina Emergency Management Reform
Act, to receive the perspective of State and local emergency
response providers, to receive an update on the Federal
Government's ability to alert and warn the public of an
impending emergency, and to assess best practices and lessons
learned from recent disasters. The Subcommittee also approved
legislation authorizing the Integrated Public Alert and Warning
System. The Subcommittee will continue its oversight of these
vital issues to ensure the continued improvement of our
Nation's preparedness and response capabilities.

national response and incident management

The Subcommittee has paid particular attention to the
Administration's development and roll out of Presidential
Policy Directive (PPD) 8--National Preparedness, which repealed
and replaced Homeland Security Presidential Directive 8,
particularly as it relates to the development of the National
Preparedness System and the various mandated frameworks.
Subcommittee Members and staff received numerous briefings on
FEMA's effort to implement the requirements of PPD-8, including
FEMA's review of the National Response Framework and
development of the National Disaster Recovery Framework. The
Subcommittee will continue oversight of the development and
implementation of this important doctrine and its integration
with the National Incident Management System.

interoperable communications

Through a series of briefings and a hearing, the
Subcommittee has conducted oversight on the various offices
responsible for interoperable and emergency communications
within the Department of Homeland Security. The Subcommittee
has met with representatives from the Office of Emergency
Communications (OEC) to assess OEC's leadership role in the
Department and with the Emergency Communications Preparedness
Center. The Subcommittee has also conducted oversight on the
proposed development of a National interoperable wireless
broadband network for public safety. The Subcommittee will
continue this oversight throughout the remainder of the 112th
Congress.

assistance to state and local governments and
first responders

The Department of Homeland Security has awarded more than
$34 billion to State and local Governments and first responders
since the September 11th terrorist attacks. To ensure the
Department of Homeland Security is allocating this funding
based on risk, the Subcommittee held a number of hearings and
briefings; including a classified briefing on the risk formula
used to allocate these grant funds. The Subcommittee has paid
particular attention to the Department's oversight of the grant
funds, visiting the Grant Programs Directorate to receive an
update on the development of the Non-Disaster (ND) Grants
System and programmatic and financial reviews of the grant
awards. In addition, the Subcommittee has been monitoring the
FEMA's work with the National Academy of Public Administration
to develop long-overdue performance measures and metrics for
these programs. The Subcommittee also engaged the Government
Accountability Office in work to review the efficiency of these
programs. Finally, the Subcommittee approved H.R.1129, the
Homeland Security Grant Management Improvement Act on December
8, 2011 to ensure flexibility in the use of State Homeland
Security Grant Program and Urban Area Security Initiative funds
and to ensure the appropriate management and oversight of these
programs. The Subcommittee also approved H.R.1411, the
Metropolitan Medical Response System Program Act, to authorize
expenditures under the medial preparedness grant program.
In the remainder of the 112th Congress, the Subcommittee
will continue its oversight of these grant programs to ensure
that law enforcement, first responders, and emergency managers
have the tools they need to prevent, prepare for, mitigate
against, and respond to terrorist attacks and natural
disasters.

first responder training

As part of its oversight of first responder training
programs, the Subcommittee conducted a number of site visits to
training centers funded by the Department of Homeland Security
or through first responder grant programs. Committee staff
visited the Center for Domestic Preparedness, the National
Emergency Response and Rescue Training Center, and training
centers run by local law enforcement. The Subcommittee also
received a number of briefings from Federal and State training
providers.

exercises and simulations

Throughout the first session of the 112th Congress,
Subcommittee Members and staff received numerous briefings on
the National Exercise Program and National Level Exercise 2011,
which was held from May 16 through 19, 2011, and simulated a
catastrophic earthquake in the New Madrid Seismic Zone.
Committee staff also observed exercises conducted by the
Department of Defense and local Governments. The Subcommittee
will continue to examine the extent to which lessons learned
are reviewed, incorporated into programs and plans, and shared
with State and local exercise participants.

chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear planning, preparedness,
and response

The Subcommittee has been effective in implementing its
planned oversight activities for chemical, biological,
radiological, and nuclear (CBRN) preparedness activities. A
Member-level threat briefing regarding weapons of mass
destruction allowed Members to better understand the threat
landscape, and determine where resources should be prioritized.
Members have assessed how well the Department, and the Nation
as a whole, is capable of mitigating CBRN risks. They have done
this through rigorous oversight of the Department's
biosurveillance programs, including BioWatch, through the
introduction and approval of legislation to authorize the
Metropolitan Medical Response System Program, and through
hearings on issues including Office of Health Affairs
priorities and medical countermeasure availability. The series
of hearings held on medical countermeasures in particular
afforded Members an opportunity to ensure that the Department
and its partner agencies have committed resources appropriately
to this priority area. The Subcommittee Chair tasked the
Government Accountability Office with examining the state of
the Nation's surveillance and response capability for an
agricultural incident that would affect homeland security,
including through the means of biological terrorism.

SUBCOMMITTEE ON CYBERSECURITY, INFRASTRUCTURE PROTECTION, AND SECURITY
TECHNOLOGIES

cybersecurity

During the 112th Congress the Subcommittee on
Cybersecurity, Infrastructure Protection, and Security
Technologies examined the legislative and policy efforts to
harden the Nation's critical infrastructure against cyber
attacks. Those efforts included a review of the Department of
Homeland Security's ability to detect and prevent malicious
incursions. The Subcommittee held an oversight hearing entitled
``The DHS Cybersecurity Mission: Promoting Innovation and
Securing Critical Infrastructure on April 15, 2011.'' To
understand the nexus between cyber and physical infrastructure
security, the Subcommittee also held a hearing, ``Examining the
Cyber Threat to Critical Infrastructure and the American
Economy'' in March 16, 2011.
The Subcommittee received a briefing on the status of the
Einstein 3 program and from the Director of the United States
Computer Emergency Readiness Team. The Subcommittee organized
three classified Member briefings on cybersecurity operations.
The Chair of the Subcommittee introduced H.R.3674 to
address the vulnerabilities and on-going cyber threats against
the Nation's critical infrastructures. In the second session of
the 112th Congress, the Subcommittee will focus on the various
cyber missions of the Department of Homeland Security and
review the integration of those missions.
Committee Members and staff have continued to receive both
classified and unclassified briefings regarding Federal
cybersecurity efforts focused on protecting critical
infrastructure sectors, information sharing programs, the Joint
Cybersecurity Services Program and the Enhanced Cybersecurity
Service, as well as the Department of Homeland Security's
contributions to the National Initiative on Cybersecurity
Education and the Department's Cyber Education Office.

the safety act

While the Support Anti-terrorism by Fostering Effective
Technologies Act (the SAFETY Act) was included as subtitle G of
the Homeland Security Act of 2002, there is a need for
oversight of the certification and designation process during
the 112th Congress. On September 14, 2011, Committee staff
received their first quarterly briefing from the Department of
Homeland Security on the status of SAFETY Act implementation.
Topics discussed included SAFETY Act progress in terms of
numbers of certifications and designations, addition of new
block designations and certifications, and other
accomplishments to-date as well as challenges. Quarterly
briefings continued throughout the Congress, allowing
transparency not only into the numbers of certifications and
designations, but also into how the program has evolved in its
contributions to homeland security.

critical infrastructure protection

As part of its oversight of the Department of Homeland
Security's (DHS) efforts to secure the Nation's critical
infrastructure, the Subcommittee held a series of briefings and
initiated Government Accountability Office (GAO) studies on its
efforts to integrate sector specific strategies into the
National Strategy for Critical Infrastructure Protection. The
Subcommittee has also monitored the Department of
Infrastructure Protection's ability to identify and assess
threats to critical infrastructures. The Subcommittee has
requested GAO investigations into the tiering methodology for
critical infrastructure and ordered a review of the
Department's ability to identify and plan around cross-sector
dependencies.
To review the Office of Infrastructure Protection's ability
to share information and manage relationships with private
sector and academic partners the Subcommittee conducted
numerous site visits. Those include but are not exclusive to: A
briefing, and a tour of a transatlantic cable landing vessel,
on-site briefings at a DHS Center of Excellence, overview of
electric grid vulnerability assessments in Arlington County,
and a visit to the Department of Defense Cyber Command.
In the course of monitoring the Department's expanding
international portfolio in the area of critical infrastructure,
Committee staff has received briefings from department
officials, including but not exclusive to: A July 20, 2011
classified briefing on the Critical Foreign Dependencies
Initiative, and Operation Global Shield, a counter-
proliferation initiative launched by the Department. Bipartisan
staff traveled with DHS officials to observe the Department's
organization and stewardship of the annual US-EU Critical
Infrastructure Experts Meeting.
As the 112th Congress progresses, the Subcommittee will
continue focusing on the organization and functionality of the
office, its ability to execute its strategic plan, the quality
of its information sharing efforts with stakeholders, and its
implementation of recommendations from the GAO and the 9/11
Commission.
The Subcommittee held a hearing focusing on Federal efforts
to acquire the next generation of radiation detection
technology and the underlying Global Nuclear Detection
Architecture. The Subcommittee continued to conduct oversight
over the Department's efforts regarding risks posed from
weapons of mass destruction, the transport of toxic chemicals,
and the biosurveillance efforts of the Department.

safety and security of federal buildings and facilities

On July 26, 2011, the Chair of the Subcommittee introduced
H.R.2658, the Federal Protective Service Reform and Enhancement
Act. The bill aims to improve security of Federal facilities by
directing the Secretary of Homeland Security to establish
minimum training standards, improve systems for verifying guard
certifications, and standardize training. Committee staff
conducted a number of site visits and meetings with the Federal
Protective Service (FPS) to address on-going concerns with
contract guard management and site security assessments. The
Subcommittee Chair sent four letters requesting GAO studies to
delve further into FPS' challenges. Those requests include a
request to review the adequacy of Federal evacuation plans, a
status update on FPS' management of its contract guard program,
FPS plans for conducting facility risk assessments in light of
management delays, and a review of the adequacy of those
assessments. The Chair of the Subcommittee continued to hold
hearings and conduct oversight of Federal Protective Service's
ability to carry out its mission. The Subcommittee reviewed a
report from the GAO regarding FPS not assessing risks at
Federal facilities in a manner consistent with standards of the
National Infrastructure Protection Plan's risk management
framework [GAO-12-739]. A hearing was held examining the
preliminary findings of the report.

chemical facility security

The Subcommittee held a hearing entitled ``Preventing
Chemical Terrorism: Building a Foundation of Security at Our
Nation's Chemical Facilities'' on February 11, 2011. Following
this oversight hearing, the Subcommittee introduced H.R.901 the
Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Security Authorization Act of
2011 (CFATS). Committee staff participated in numerous
meetings, including conferences, with CFATS stakeholders.
From January through December, staff met with various
representatives from the private sector in addition to Federal
Government entities impacted, or prospectively impacted, by
CFATS, including the DHS National Protection and Programs
Directorate, the United States Coast Guard, the Environmental
Protection Agency, and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. In
addition to working towards the passage of H.R.901, or similar
extension of CFATS authority, the Committee's legislative and
oversight priorities will focus on CFATS implementation and
oversight of the ammonium nitrate rule.
The Subcommittee continued oversight of the Chemical
Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards Program with particular focus
on processes designed to address the Infrastructure Security
Compliance Division.

science and technology

The Subcommittee has undertaken a series of oversight
measures aimed at ensuring that the Department of Homeland
Security's Science and Technology Directorate (S&T) is capable
of rapidly delivering needed products and services to its
customers so that they can meet their homeland security
mission. The Subcommittee on Cybersecurity, Infrastructure
Protection, and Security Technologies held an important
oversight hearing at which the Under Secretary for Science and
Technology testified on plans for ensuring successful
allocation of limited resources. This hearing allowed
examination of the Department's progress in developing a more
rigorous process to identify, prioritize, and fund research,
development, testing, and evaluation opportunities.
At another hearing, the Deputy Under Secretary for Science
and Technology, along with other witnesses, testified to S&T's
utilization of the Department of Energy National Laboratories,
and this hearing served to highlight key challenges in the
Directorate's intra- and interagency research and development
efforts. Committee staff also undertook a series of in-depth
briefings with the Directorate, which will continue throughout
the 112th Congress. These meetings, which cover priorities,
budgeting, timelines, and forward project planning, address the
spectrum of S&T's activities, and are critical to keeping
Members informed about successes and continued challenges
within the Directorate.
The Science and Technology title of H.R.3116, the
authorization bill for the Department, emphasized Member
priorities for ensuring that the Department is sufficiently
focused and organized in its efforts to coordinate the Homeland
security research and development agenda and ensure adequate
leveraging of existing scientific knowledge and technical
expertise.

technology to counter chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear
threats

The Subcommittee has undertaken oversight to examine and
address gaps in the Nation's capability to counter the threat
from chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear (CBRN)
weapons. A joint Subcommittee hearing was held to examine
legislation (H.R.2356) to address policy needs in weapons of
mass destruction prevention and preparedness. Staff meetings
with the Department on the status of efforts such as prevention
and preparedness for CBRN terrorism at the new World Trade
Center site, progress of the BioWatch detection program, and
status of implementation of the Global Nuclear Detection
Architecture have all informed oversight over CBRN
preparedness, particularly with regard to technology. GAO
requests and Member letters provided further information on the
Department's detection and analysis capabilities. Site visits
to locations such as the National Bioforensics and Analysis
Center and a full scale exercise of the Securing the Cities
program allow further important insight into interdiction,
response, and attribution capabilities.

SUBCOMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT, INVESTIGATIONS, AND MANAGEMENT

departmental operations and efficiency initiatives

During the 112th Congress the Subcommittee on Oversight,
Investigations, and Management oversaw the Department of
Homeland Security's (DHS) day to day operations to ensure it
was functioning in the most efficient and effective manner
possible. The Subcommittee conducted briefings with numerous
agencies, including the DHS Under Secretary for Management and
the Chief Human Capital Officers.
In an effort to review specific DHS component practices and
regulations, on October 17, 2011, the Subcommittee held a field
hearing at the Texas State Capitol in Austin, Texas entitled
``Texas Wildfire Review: Did Bureaucracy Prevent a Timely
Response?'' The Subcommittee examined the Federal response to
the wildfire disaster, and the process by which local and State
Government had to initiate in order to receive necessary
support from the Federal Government. In addition, prior to the
hearing, Committee staff conducted a site visit to Bastrop,
Texas to view the damage as a result of the fires and meet with
Texas Department of Public Safety officials.
The Subcommittee also worked to identify potential
opportunities to eliminate duplicative or unnecessary programs,
find efficiencies that contribute to the Department's ability
to meet its vital missions, and identify areas for cost
savings. The Subcommittee held a hearing entitled, ``Homeland
Security Contracting: Does the Department Effectively Leverage
Emerging Technologies?''
Furthermore, the Subcommittee conducted oversight to ensure
departmental regulations enhanced security without posing an
unnecessary barrier to job creation. On July 7, 2011, the
Subcommittee held a hearing entitled, ``Homeland Security
Investigations: Examining DHS's efforts to Protect American
Jobs and Secure the Homeland.'' The Chair of the Subcommittee
and two Subcommittee Members sent a letter to the Secretaries
of Homeland Security and Treasury requesting information in
regards to the Trade Secrets Act and how it has been applied to
U.S. Customs and Border Protection policy between Government
and private sector efforts to combat intellectual property
theft.
Violence along the U.S. Southwestern Border has become an
increasing problem for the safety and security of our Nation's
citizens. To examine this threat and locate potential gaps in
homeland security, the Subcommittee held a hearing entitled ``A
Call to Action: Narco-Terrorism's Threat to the Southern U.S.
Border.'' The Chair of the Subcommittee sent a letter to the
Secretary of Homeland Security regarding the findings reached
as a result of the hearing and requesting the Department review
and further develop a comprehensive border strategy. In
accordance with the Subcommittee's focus of border threats, the
Subcommittee also examined the Merida Initiative and
participated in a joint hearing with the Committee on Foreign
Affairs Subcommittee on Western Hemisphere to assess the
Initiative's potential benefits and its effectiveness against
terrorist operations of drug cartels.
During the 2nd session of the 112th Congress, the
Subcommittee continued its oversight of the Department's day to
day operations. In an effort to examine the current strategy
documents produced by the Department that guide its daily
programs and activities and to monitor their effective
implementation, on February 3, 2012, the Subcommittee held a
hearing entitled ``Is DHS Effectively Implementing a Strategy
to Counter Emerging Threats?'' In addition, to continue its
examination of duplication and opportunities for cost savings
within the Department, on March 8, 2012, the Subcommittee held
a hearing entitled ``Eliminating Waste, Fraud, Abuse, and
Duplication in the Department of Homeland Security.''

financial management

The Transformation and Systems Consolidation (TASC) project
was launched to consolidate DHS's 13 separate financial
management systems into one unified system. In an effort to
review this project, the Subcommittee held several meetings
with Governmental and private sector stakeholders to discuss
the TASC contract. Additionally, the Chair of the Subcommittee
and the Chair of the Subcommittee on Emergency Preparedness,
Response and Communications sent a letter to the FEMA
administrator regarding the processes that are in place to vet
employees, particularly those with access to financial systems
and internal controls within FEMA's payroll systems to help
identify possible fraudulent activity.
The Department still lacks effective program management,
clear roles and processes for program governance, sharing of
best practices, and access to timely, reliable and analyzed
data on more than $18 billion in acquisitions and investments.
As a result, on March 1, 2012, the Subcommittee held a hearing
entitled ``Building One DHS: Why Can't Management Information
be Integrated?''
In addition, on April 27, 2012, the Subcommittee Chair sent
a letter to the Under Secretary for Management of the
Department of Homeland Security requesting information
regarding National and international conferences attended by
DHS personnel and how resources are spent.
The Subcommittee continued to monitor TASC during the
second session of this Congress and also reviewed the
Department's efforts to enhance internal controls and provide
information that will enable positive audits.

departmental workforce

The Subcommittee monitored the Department's efforts to
recruit and retain personnel and employee morale issues. The
Chair and Ranking Member of the Subcommittee sent a letter to
the Government Accountability Office requesting specific
information on the extent to which the Department of Homeland
Security (DHS) has identified the root causes of low employee
morale and progress made in addressing these issues within the
Department. In addition, throughout the first session of the
112th Congress, Committee staff met with management leaders at
DHS, including its Chief Human Capital Officer, Chief
Procurement Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief
Administrative Officer, and Chief Information Officer.
During the second session of the 112th Congress in a
continued effort to examine the problem of low morale, on March
22, 2012, the Subcommittee held a hearing entitled ``Building
One DHS: Why is Employee Morale Low?'' Following the March 22
hearing, the Subcommittee chair sent a letter to the Secretary
of Homeland Security encouraging the Department to work with
stakeholders, leadership, and DHS employees to adopt a robust
plan to improve morale within the agency.
On February 9, 2012 the Subcommittee hosted a Member
briefing on the Department's management goals and priorities
for 2012. The briefing was led by the DHS Under Secretary for
Management, Mr.Rafael Borras. Main topics covered during the
briefing included strengthening DHS's acquisition process,
contracting duplication, a simplified budget structure,
improper payments, and progress made on the Department's
``qualified'' audit opinion.
The Subcommittee Chair sent a letter to the Comptroller
General of the United States on April 24, 2012, requesting to
be a co-requester of two reports that GAO is preparing on the
Department of Homeland Security's Office of Policy and
intelligence analysis capabilities at the request of the Senate
Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Over the past two years several reports of DHS employees
acting unethically and in some cases criminally have eroded the
faith entrusted to them by the American people. In response,
the Subcommittee held a hearing on May 17, 2012, entitled
``Department of Homeland Security: An Examination of Ethical
Standards.'' Furthermore, on April 24, 2012, the Subcommittee
Chair asked to become a co-requester of a report that the
Government Accountability Office (GAO) is preparing on
personnel misconduct in the Transportation Security
Administration at the request of the Chairman of the House
Transportation and Infrastructure Committee. In addition,
Subcommittee staff again met with management leaders at DHS.

information technology systems management

In an effort to review the Department of Homeland
Security's (DHS) practices to address information technology
challenges, including the management and integration of the
Department's information technology (IT) systems, the
Department's progress in IT architectural planning, investment
management, policy development and operations, the Chair and
Ranking Member of the Subcommittee sent a letter to the
Government Accountability Office (GAO) requesting a review to
assess how the Department is managing IT investments.
Additionally, the Chair and Ranking Member of the Subcommittee
requested GAO to evaluate the extent to which DHS has
established IT governance and oversight structures and how
these are being used to manage and oversee IT investments.

hspd-12 implementation

On June 25, 2012 Subcommittee staff was briefed by both the
Government Accountability Office and the Department of Homeland
Security on the Department's implementation of Homeland
Security Presidential Directive-12 (HSPD-12), including DHS's
completion of card issuance, installation of card readers, and
other identification security efforts.

headquarters consolidation

The Subcommittee conducted a Member site visit to the
Department of Homeland Security Consolidated Headquarters site
at St. Elizabeths to examine the progress of construction and
the status of consolidation efforts. As a continued effort to
closely monitor this project, during the second session of the
112th Congress, Subcommittee staff were briefed from DHS
officials and General Services Administration on updates to the
St. Elizabeths facility and discussed upcoming budget requests.
Additionally, Subcommittee staff conducted a section site visit
to the St. Elizabeths campus.

acquisition management

As an additional oversight responsibility, the Subcommittee
reviewed the efforts of the Department of Homeland Security
(DHS) to improve the integration and coordination of the
procurement functions of its components to ensure effective
management and the prevention of contract waste, fraud and
abuse. The Chair and Ranking Member of the Subcommittee sent a
letter to the Government Accountability Office (GAO) requesting
a review of contracting mechanisms at the Department. The
Subcommittee met with the Chief Procurement Officer at DHS to
discuss management authorities and procurement activities.
Furthermore, in an effort to review the Department's
implementation of Section 831(a) of the Homeland Security Act
of 2002, and to examine DHS's process for seeking out
technologies across DHS components, the Federal Government and
the private sector, the Subcommittee held a hearing entitled,
``Homeland Security Contracting: Does the Department
Effectively Leverage Emerging Technologies?''
On March, 21, 2012, the Subcommittee Chair sent a letter to
the Comptroller General asking to be a co-requester of a report
that GAO is preparing on the Department of Homeland Security's
acquisition policy at the request of the Senate Committee on
Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
On August 1, 2012, in an effort to help improve future
acquisition and contracting outcomes in the Department, the
Subcommittee issued an investigative report titled,
``Initiatives Needed to Correct Weaknesses in the Department of
Homeland Security's Acquisition and Contracting Policies.'' The
report, which highlighted shortcomings in DHS's acquisition and
contracting practices, identified poorly managed programs
resulting in homeland security capabilities being delivered
late, costing more, and doing less than expected.
Furthermore, on September 21, 2012, the Subcommittee held a
hearing entitled ``DHS Acquisition Management Challenges:
Solution for Saving Taxpayer Dollars.''

privacy and civil liberties

The Subcommittee held a field hearing entitled, ``Ten Years
After 9/11: Assessing Airport Security and Preventing a Future
Terrorist Attack,'' which examined the Screening Passengers by
Observation Techniques (SPOT) program. SPOT attempts to screen
passengers using a behavioral analysis technique which some
believe is discriminatory. On December 9, 2011, the Chair of
the Subcommittee sent a letter to the Secretary of Homeland
Security regarding the hearing's findings and recommendations.
Additionally, on August 16, 2012, the Subcommittee Chair
and Ranking Member asked to become a co-requester of a report
that the Government Accountability Office (GAO) is preparing on
the Transportation Security Administration's behavior detection
program at the request of the Chair of the House Transportation
and Infrastructure Committee.
On July 19, 2012, the Subcommittee held a hearing entitled
``Using Unmanned Aerial Systems Within the Homeland: Security
Game Changer?'' While this hearing focused on DHS's role in
overseeing the use of UASs within the homeland, the hearing
also highlighted the use of drones for domestic surveillance by
law enforcement and the issue of privacy.

=======================================================================

A P P E N D I C E S

=======================================================================

APPENDIX I

Committee Rules--Committee on Homeland Security

Adopted January 26, 2011

RULE I.--GENERAL PROVISIONS.

(A) Applicability of the Rules of the U.S. House of
Representatives.--The Rules of the U.S. House of
Representatives (the ``House'') are the rules of the
Committee on Homeland Security (the ``Committee'') and
its subcommittees insofar as applicable.

(B) Applicability to Subcommittees.--Except where the
terms ``Full Committee'' and ``subcommittee'' are
specifically mentioned, the following rules shall apply
to the Committee's subcommittees and their respective
Chairmen and Ranking Minority Members to the same
extent as they apply to the Full Committee and its
Chairman and Ranking Minority Member.

(C) Appointments by the Chairman.--Clause 2(d) of Rule
XI of the House shall govern the designation of a Vice
Chairman of the Full Committee.

(D) Recommendation of Conferees.--Whenever the Speaker
of the House is to appoint a conference committee on a
matter within the jurisdiction of the Full Committee,
the Chairman shall recommend to the Speaker of the
House conferees from the Full Committee. In making
recommendations of Minority Members as conferees, the
Chairman shall do so with the concurrence of the
Ranking Minority Member of the Committee.

(E) Motions to Disagree.--The Chairman is directed to
offer a motion under clause 1 of Rule XXII of the Rules
of the House whenever the Chairman considers it
appropriate.

(F) Committee Website.--The Chairman shall maintain an
official Committee web site for the purposes of
furthering the Committee's legislative and oversight
responsibilities, including communicating information
about the Committee's activities to Committee Members,
other Members, and the public at large. The Ranking
Minority Member may maintain a similar web site for the
same purposes. The official Committee web site shall
display a link on its home page to the web site
maintained by the Ranking Minority Member.

(G) Activity Report.--Not later than the 30th day after
June 1 and December 1, the Committee shall submit to
the House a semiannual report on the activities of the
Committee. After adjournment sine die of a regular
session of Congress, or after December 15, whichever
occurs first, the Chair may file the second or fourth
semiannual report with the Clerk at any time and
without approval of the Committee provided that a copy
of the report has been available to each Member of the
Committee for at least seven calendar days and the
report includes any supplemental, minority, or
additional views submitted by a Member of the
Committee.

RULE II.--TIME OF MEETINGS.

(A) Regular Meeting Date.--The regular meeting date and
time for the transaction of business of the Full
Committee shall be at 10:00 a.m. on the first Wednesday
that the House is in Session each month, unless
otherwise directed by the Chairman.

(B) Additional Meetings.--At the discretion of the
Chairman, additional meetings of the Committee may be
scheduled for the consideration of any legislation or
other matters pending before the Committee or to
conduct other Committee business. The Committee shall
meet for such purposes pursuant to the call of the
Chairman.

(C) Consideration.--Except in the case of a special
meeting held under clause 2(c)(2) of House Rule XI, the
determination of the business to be considered at each
meeting of the Committee shall be made by the Chairman.

RULE III.--NOTICE AND PUBLICATION.

(A) Notice.--

(1) Hearings.--Pursuant to clause 2(g)(3) of
rule XI of the Rules of the House of
Representatives, the Chairman of the Committee
shall make public announcement of the date,
place, and subject matter of any hearing before
the Full Committee or subcommittee, which may
not commence earlier than one week after such
notice. However, if the Chairman of the
Committee, with the concurrence of the Ranking
Minority Member, determines that there is good
cause to begin the hearing sooner, or if the
Committee so determines by majority vote, a
quorum being present for the transaction of
business, the Chairman shall make the
announcement at the earliest possible date. The
names of all witnesses scheduled to appear at
such hearing shall be provided to Members no
later than 48 hours prior to the commencement
of such hearing.

(2) Meetings.--The date, time, place and
subject matter of any meeting, other than a
hearing or a regularly scheduled meeting, may
not commence earlier than the third day on
which Members have notice thereof except in the
case of a special meeting called under clause
2(c)(2) of House Rule XI. These notice
requirements may be waived if the Chairman with
the concurrence of the Ranking Minority Member,
determines that there is good cause to begin
the meeting sooner or if the Committee so
determines by majority vote, a quorum being
present for the transaction of business.

(a) Copies of any measure or matter to
be considered for approval by the
Committee at any meeting, including any
mark, print or amendment in the nature
of a substitute shall be provided to
the Members at least 24 hours in
advance.

(b) At least 24 hours prior to the
commencement of a meeting for the
markup of a measure or matter, the text
of such measure or matter, including
any mark, print or amendment in the
nature of a substitute, shall be made
publicly available in electronic form
and, to the extent practicable, posted
on the official Committee web site.

(c) Not later than 24 hours after
concluding a meeting to consider a
measure or matter, the text of such
measure or matter as ordered forwarded
or reported, including any adopted
amendments, shall be made publicly
available in electronic form and, to
the extent practicable, posted on the
official Committee web site.

(3) Publication.--The meeting or hearing
announcement shall be promptly published in the
Daily Digest portion of the Congressional
Record. To the greatest extent practicable,
meeting announcements shall be entered into the
Committee scheduling service of the House
Information Resources.

RULE IV.--OPEN MEETINGS AND HEARINGS; BROADCASTING.

(A) Open Meetings.--All meetings and hearings of the
Committee shall be open to the public including to
radio, television, and still photography coverage,
except as provided by Rule XI of the Rules of the House
or when the Committee, in open session and with a
majority present, determines by recorded vote that all
or part of the remainder of that hearing on that day
shall be closed to the public because disclosure of
testimony, evidence, or other matters to be considered
would endanger the National security, compromise
sensitive law enforcement information, tend to defame,
degrade or incriminate a witness, or violate any law or
rule of the House of Representatives.

(B) Broadcasting.--Whenever any hearing or meeting
conducted by the Committee is open to the public, the
Committee shall permit that hearing or meeting to be
covered by television broadcast, internet broadcast,
print media, and still photography, or by any of such
methods of coverage, in accordance with the provisions
of clause 4 of Rule XI of the Rules of the House.
Operation and use of any Committee operated broadcast
system shall be fair and nonpartisan and in accordance
with clause 4(b) of Rule XI and all other applicable
rules of the Committee and the House. Priority shall be
given by the Committee to members of the Press
Galleries. Pursuant to clause 2(e) of rule XI of the
Rules of the House of Representatives, the Committee
shall, to the greatest extent practicable, provide
audio and video coverage of each hearing or meeting in
a manner that allows the public to easily listen to and
view the proceedings and shall maintain the recordings
of such coverage in a manner that is easily accessible
to the public.

(C) Transcripts.--A transcript shall be made of the
testimony of each witness appearing before the
Committee during a Committee hearing. All transcripts
of meetings or hearings that are open to the public
shall be made available.

RULE V.--PROCEDURES FOR MEETINGS AND HEARINGS.

(A) Opening Statements.--At any meeting of the
Committee, the Chairman and Ranking Minority Member
shall be entitled to present oral opening statements of
five minutes each. Other Members may submit written
opening statements for the record. The Chairman
presiding over the meeting may permit additional
opening statements by other Members of the Full
Committee or of that subcommittee, with the concurrence
of the Ranking Minority Member.

(B) The Five-Minute Rule.--The time any one Member may
address the Committee on any bill, motion, or other
matter under consideration by the Committee shall not
exceed five minutes, and then only when the Member has
been recognized by the Chairman, except that this time
limit may be extended when permitted by unanimous
consent.

(C) Postponement of Vote.--The Chairman may postpone
further proceedings when a record vote is ordered on
the question of approving any measure or matter or
adopting an amendment. The Chairman may resume
proceedings on a postponed vote at any time, provided
that all reasonable steps have been taken to notify
Members of the resumption of such proceedings,
including, when practicable, circulation of notice by
the Clerk of the Committee. When proceedings resume on
a postponed question, notwithstanding any intervening
order for the previous question, an underlying
proposition shall remain subject to further debate or
amendment to the same extent as when the question was
postponed.

(D) Contempt Procedures.--No recommendation that a
person be cited for contempt of Congress shall be
forwarded to the House unless and until the Full
Committee has, upon notice to all its Members, met and
considered the alleged contempt. The person to be cited
for contempt shall be afforded, upon notice of at least
72 hours, an opportunity to state why he or she should
not be held in contempt prior to a vote of the Full
Committee, with a quorum being present, on the question
whether to forward such recommendation to the House.
Such statement shall be, in the discretion of the
Chairman, either in writing or in person before the
Full Committee.

RULE VI.--WITNESSES.

(A) Questioning of Witnesses.--

(1) Questioning of witnesses by Members will be
conducted under the five-minute rule unless the
Committee adopts a motion permitted by clause
2(j)(2) of House Rule XI.

(2) In questioning witnesses under the five-
minute rule, the Chairman and the Ranking
Minority Member shall first be recognized. In a
subcommittee meeting or hearing, the Chairman
and Ranking Minority Member of the Full
Committee are then recognized. All other
Members that arrive before the commencement of
the meeting or hearing will be recognized in
the order of seniority on the Committee,
alternating between Majority and Minority
Members. Committee Members arriving after the
commencement of the hearing shall be recognized
in order of appearance, alternating between
Majority and Minority Members, after all
Members present at the beginning of the hearing
have been recognized. Each Member shall be
recognized at least once before any Member is
given a second opportunity to question a
witness.

(3) The Chairman, in consultation with the
Ranking Minority Member, or the Committee by
motion, may permit an extension of the period
of questioning of a witness beyond five minutes
but the time allotted must be equally
apportioned to the Majority party and the
Minority and may not exceed one hour in the
aggregate.

(4) The Chairman, in consultation with the
Ranking Minority Member, or the Committee by
motion, may permit Committee staff of the
Majority and Minority to question a witness for
a specified period of time, but the time
allotted must be equally apportioned to the
Majority and Minority staff and may not exceed
one hour in the aggregate.

(B) Minority Witnesses.--Whenever a hearing is
conducted by the Committee upon any measure or matter,
the Minority party Members on the Committee shall be
entitled, upon request to the Chairman by a majority of
those Minority Members before the completion of such
hearing, to call witnesses selected by the Minority to
testify with respect to that measure or matter during
at least one day of hearing thereon.

(C) Oath or Affirmation.--The Chairman of the Committee
or any Member designated by the Chairman, may
administer an oath to any witness.

(D) Statements by Witnesses.--

(1) Consistent with the notice given, witnesses
shall submit a prepared or written statement
for the record of the proceedings (including,
where practicable, an electronic copy) with the
Clerk of the Committee no less than 48 hours in
advance of the witness's appearance before the
Committee. Unless the 48 hour requirement is
waived or otherwise modified by the Chairman,
after consultation with the Ranking Minority
Member, the failure to comply with this
requirement may result in the exclusion of the
written testimony from the hearing record and/
or the barring of an oral presentation of the
testimony. The Clerk of the Committee shall
provide any such prepared or written statement
submitted to the Clerk prior to the hearing to
the Members of the Committee prior to the
commencement of the hearing.

(2) To the greatest extent practicable, the
written testimony of each witness appearing in
a non--Governmental capacity shall include a
curriculum vita and a disclosure of the amount
and source (by agency and program) of any
Federal grant (or subgrant thereof) or contract
(or subcontract thereof) received during the
current fiscal year or either of the two
preceding fiscal years by the witness or by an
entity represented by the witness. Such
disclosures shall be made publicly available,
with appropriate redactions to protect the
privacy of the witness, in electronic form not
later than one day after the witness appears.

RULE VII.--QUORUM.

Quorum Requirements.--Two Members shall constitute a quorum
for purposes of taking testimony and receiving evidence. One-
third of the Members of the Committee shall constitute a quorum
for conducting business, except for (1) reporting a measure or
recommendation; (2) closing Committee meetings to the public,
pursuant to Committee Rule IV; (3) authorizing the issuance of
subpoenas; and (4) any other action for which an actual
majority quorum is required by any rule of the House of
Representatives or by law. The Chairman shall make reasonable
efforts, including consultation with the Ranking Minority
Member when scheduling meetings and hearings, to ensure that a
quorum for any purpose will include at least one Minority
Member of the Committee.

RULE VIII.--DECORUM.

(A) Breaches of Decorum.--The Chairman may punish
breaches of order and decorum, by censure and exclusion
from the hearing; and the Committee may cite the
offender to the House for contempt.

(B) Access to Dais.--Access to the dais before, during,
and after a hearing, markup, or other meeting of the
Committee shall be limited to Members and staff of the
Committee. Subject to availability of space on the
dais, Committee Members' personal staff may be present
on the dais during a hearing if their employing Member
is seated on the dais and during a markup or other
meeting if their employing Member is the author of a
measure or amendment under consideration by the
Committee, but only during the time that the measure or
amendment is under active consideration by the
Committee, or otherwise at the discretion of the
Chairman, or of the Ranking Minority Member for
personal staff employed by a Minority Member.

(C) Wireless Communications Use Prohibited.--During a
hearing, mark-up, or other meeting of the Committee,
ringing or audible sounds or conversational use of
cellular telephones or other electronic devices is
prohibited in the Committee room.

RULE IX.--SUBCOMMITTEES.

(A) Generally.--The Full Committee shall be organized
into the following six standing subcommittees and shall
have specific responsibility for such measures or
matters as the Chairman refers to it:

(1) Subcommittee on Border and Maritime
Security

(2) Subcommittee on Emergency Preparedness,
Response and Communications

(3) Subcommittee on Transportation Security

(4) Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and
Intelligence

(5) Subcommittee on Cybersecurity,
Infrastructure Protection, and Security
Technologies

(6) Subcommittee on Oversight, Investigations,
and Management

(B) Selection and Ratio of Subcommittee Members.--The
Chairman and Ranking Minority Member of the Full
Committee shall select their respective Members of each
subcommittee. The ratio of Majority to Minority Members
shall be comparable to the Full Committee, except that
each subcommittee shall have at least two more Majority
Members than Minority Members.

(C) Ex Officio Members.--The Chairman and Ranking
Minority Member of the Full Committee shall be ex
officio members of each subcommittee but are not
authorized to vote on matters that arise before each
subcommittee. The Chairman and Ranking Minority Member
of the Full Committee shall only be counted to satisfy
the quorum requirement for the purpose of taking
testimony and receiving evidence.

(D) Powers and Duties of Subcommittees.--Except as
otherwise directed by the Chairman of the Full
Committee, each subcommittee is authorized to meet,
hold hearings, receive testimony, mark up legislation,
and report to the Full Committee on all matters within
its purview. Subcommittee Chairmen shall set hearing
and meeting dates only with the approval of the
Chairman of the Full Committee. To the greatest extent
practicable, no more than one meeting and hearing
should be scheduled for a given time.

(E) Special Voting Provision.--If a tie vote occurs in
a Subcommittee on the question of forwarding any
measure to the Full Committee, the measure shall be
placed on the agenda for Full Committee consideration
as if it had been ordered reported by the Subcommittee
without recommendation.

RULE X.--COMMITTEE PANELS.

(A) Designation.--The Chairman of the Full Committee,
with the concurrence of the Ranking Minority Member,
may designate a panel of the Committee consisting of
Members of the Committee to inquire into and take
testimony on a matter or matters that warrant enhanced
consideration and to report to the Committee.

(B) Duration.--No panel appointed by the Chairman shall
continue in existence for more than six months after
the appointment.

(C) Party Ratios and Appointment.--Consistent with the
party ratios established by the Majority party, all
Majority members of the panels shall be appointed by
the Chairman of the Committee, and all Minority members
shall be appointed by the Ranking Minority Member of
the Committee. The Chairman of the Committee shall
choose one of the Majority Members so appointed who
does not currently chair another Subcommittee of the
Committee to serve as Chairman of the panel. The
Ranking Minority Member of the Committee shall
similarly choose the Ranking Minority Member of the
panel.

(D) Ex Officio Members.--The Chairman and Ranking
Minority Member of the Full Committee may serve as ex--
officio Members of each committee panel but are not
authorized to vote on matters that arise before a
committee panel and shall not be counted to satisfy the
quorum requirement for any purpose other than taking
testimony.

(E) Jurisdiction.--No panel shall have legislative
jurisdiction.

(F) Applicability of Committee Rules.--Any designated
panel shall be subject to all Committee Rules herein.

RULE XI.--REFERRALS TO SUBCOMMITTEES.

Referral of Bills and Other Matters by Chairman.--Except
for bills and other matters retained by the Chairman for Full
Committee consideration, each bill or other matter referred to
the Full Committee shall be referred by the Chairman to one or
more subcommittees within two weeks of receipt by the
Committee. In referring any measure or matter to a
subcommittee, the Chair may specify a date by which the
subcommittee shall report thereon to the Full Committee. Bills
or other matters referred to subcommittees may be reassigned or
discharged by the Chairman.

RULE XII.--SUBPOENAS.

(A) Authorization.--Pursuant to clause 2(m) of Rule XI
of the House, a subpoena may be authorized and issued
under the seal of the House and attested by the Clerk
of the House, and may be served by any person
designated by the Full Committee for the furtherance of
an investigation with authorization by--

(1) a majority of the Full Committee, a quorum
being present; or

(2) the Chairman of the Full Committee, after
consultation with the Ranking Minority Member
of the Full Committee, during any period for
which the House has adjourned for a period in
excess of 3 days pursuant to a concurrent
resolution when, in the opinion of the Chairman
of the Full Committee, authorization and
issuance of the subpoena is necessary to obtain
the material or testimony set forth in the
subpoena. The Chairman of the Full Committee
shall notify Members of the Committee of the
authorization and issuance of a subpoena under
this rule as soon as practicable, but in no
event later than one week after service of such
subpoena.

(B) Disclosure.--Provisions may be included in a
subpoena with the concurrence of the Chairman and the
Ranking Minority Member of the Full Committee, or by
the Committee, to prevent the disclosure of the Full
Committee's demands for information when deemed
necessary for the security of information or the
progress of an investigation, including but not limited
to prohibiting the revelation by witnesses and their
counsel of Full Committee's inquiries.

(C) Subpoena duces tecum.--A subpoena duces tecum may
be issued whose return to the Committee Clerk shall
occur at a time and place other than that of a
regularly scheduled meeting.

(D) Affidavits and Depositions.--The Chairman of the
Full Committee, in consultation with the Ranking
Minority Member of the Full Committee, or the Committee
may authorize the taking of an affidavit or deposition
with respect to any person who is subpoenaed under
these rules but who is unable to appear in person to
testify as a witness at any hearing or meeting. Notices
for the taking of depositions shall specify the date,
time and place of examination. Depositions shall be
taken under oath administered by a Member or a person
otherwise authorized by law to administer oaths. Prior
consultation with the Ranking Minority Member of the
Full Committee shall include written notice three
business days before any deposition is scheduled to
provide an opportunity for Minority staff to be present
during the questioning.

RULE XIII.--COMMITTEE STAFF.

(A) Generally.--Committee staff members are subject to
the provisions of clause 9 of House Rule X and must be
eligible to be considered for routine access to
classified information.

(B) Staff Assignments.--For purposes of these rules,
Committee staff means the employees of the Committee,
detailees, fellows, or any other person engaged by
contract or otherwise to perform services for, or at
the request of, the Committee. All such persons shall
be either Majority, Minority, or shared staff. The
Chairman shall appoint, determine remuneration of,
supervise, and may remove Majority staff. The Ranking
Minority Member shall appoint, determine remuneration
of, supervise, and may remove Minority staff. In
consultation with the Ranking Minority Member, the
Chairman may appoint, determine remuneration of,
supervise and may remove shared staff that is assigned
to service of the Committee. The Chairman shall certify
Committee staff appointments, including appointments by
the Ranking Minority Member, as required.

(C) Divulgence of Information.--Prior to the public
acknowledgement by the Chairman or the Committee of a
decision to initiate an investigation of a particular
person, entity, or subject, no member of the Committee
staff shall knowingly divulge to any person any
information, including non-classified information,
which comes into his or her possession by virtue of his
or her status as a member of the Committee staff, if
the member of the Committee staff has a reasonable
expectation that such information may alert the subject
of a Committee investigation to the existence, nature,
or substance of such investigation, unless authorized
to do so by the Chairman or the Committee.

RULE XIV.--COMMITTEE MEMBER AND COMMITTEE STAFF TRAVEL.

(A) Approval of Travel.--Consistent with the primary
expense resolution and such additional expense
resolutions as may have been approved, travel to be
reimbursed from funds set aside for the Committee for
any Committee Member or Committee staff shall be paid
only upon the prior authorization of the Chairman.
Travel may be authorized by the Chairman for any
Committee Member or Committee staff only in connection
with official Committee business, such as the
attendance of hearings conducted by the Committee and
meetings, conferences, site visits, and investigations
that involve activities or subject matters under the
general jurisdiction of the Full Committee.

(1) Proposed Travel by Majority Party Committee
Members and Committee Staff.--In the case of
proposed travel by Majority party Committee
Members or Committee staff, before such
authorization is given, there shall be
submitted to the Chairman in writing the
following: (a) the purpose of the travel; (b)
the dates during which the travel is to be made
and the date or dates of the event for which
the travel is being made; (c) the location of
the event for which the travel is to be made;
(d) the estimated total cost of the travel; and
(e) the names of Members and staff seeking
authorization. On the basis of that
information, the Chairman shall determine
whether the proposed travel is for official
Committee business, concerns a subject matter
under the jurisdiction of the Full Committee,
and is not excessively costly in view of the
Committee business proposed to be conducted.

(2) Proposed Travel by Minority Party Committee
Members and Committee Staff.--In the case of
proposed travel by Minority party Committee
Members or Committee staff, the Ranking
Minority Member shall provide to the Chairman a
written representation setting forth the
information specified in items (a), (b), (c),
(d) and (e) of subparagraph (1) and his or her
determination that such travel complies with
the other requirements of subparagraph (1).

(B) Foreign Travel.--All Committee Members and
Committee staff requests for foreign travel must
include a written representation setting forth the
information specified in items (a), (b), (c), (d) and
(e) of subparagraph (A)(1) and be submitted to the
Chairman not fewer than ten business days prior to the
start of the travel. Within thirty days of the
conclusion of any such foreign travel authorized under
this rule, there shall be submitted to the Chairman a
written report summarizing the information gained as a
result of the travel in question, or other Committee
objectives served by such travel. The requirements of
this section may be waived or abridged by the Chairman.

(C) Compliance with Committee Travel Policy and
Guidelines.--Travel must be in accordance with the
Committee Travel Policy and Guidelines, as well as with
House Rules, the Travel Guidelines and Regulations and
any additional guidance set forth by the Committee on
Ethics and the Committee on House Administration.
Committee Members and staff shall follow these rules,
policies, guidelines, and regulations in requesting and
proceeding with any Committee--related travel.

RULE XV.--CLASSIFIED AND CONTROLLED UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION.

(A) Security Precautions.--Committee staff offices,
including Majority and Minority offices, shall operate
under strict security precautions administered by the
Security Officer of the Committee. A security officer
shall be on duty at all times during normal office
hours. Classified documents and controlled unclassified
information (CUI)--formerly known as sensitive but
unclassified (SBU) information--may be destroyed,
discussed, examined, handled, reviewed, stored,
transported and used only in an appropriately secure
manner in accordance with all applicable laws,
executive orders, and other governing authorities. Such
documents may be removed from the Committee's offices
only in furtherance of official Committee business.
Appropriate security procedures, as determined by the
Chairman in consultation with the Ranking Minority
Member, shall govern the handling of such documents
removed from the Committee's offices.

(B) Temporary Custody of Executive Branch Material.--
Executive branch documents or other materials
containing classified information in any form that were
not made part of the record of a Committee hearing, did
not originate in the Committee or the House, and are
not otherwise records of the Committee shall, while in
the custody of the Committee, be segregated and
maintained by the Committee in the same manner as
Committee records that are classified. Such documents
and other materials shall be returned to the Executive
branch agency from which they were obtained at the
earliest practicable time.

(C) Access by Committee Staff.--Access to classified
information supplied to the Committee shall be limited
to Committee staff members with appropriate security
clearances and a need-to-know, as determined by the
Chairman or Ranking Minority Member, and under the
direction of the Majority or Minority Staff Directors.

(D) Maintaining Confidentiality.--No Committee Member
or Committee staff shall disclose, in whole or in part
or by way of summary, to any person who is not a
Committee Member or authorized Committee staff for any
purpose or in connection with any proceeding, judicial
or otherwise, any testimony given before the Committee
in executive session. Classified information and
controlled unclassified information (CUI) shall be
handled in accordance with all applicable laws,
executive orders, and other governing authorities and
consistently with the provisions of these rules and
Committee procedures.

(E) Oath.--Before a Committee Member or Committee staff
may have access to classified information, the
following oath (or affirmation) shall be executed:

I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will not
disclose any classified information received in
the course of my service on the Committee on
Homeland Security, except as authorized by the
Committee or the House of Representatives or in
accordance with the Rules of such Committee or
the Rules of the House.

Copies of the executed oath (or affirmation) shall be
retained by the Clerk of the Committee as part of the
records of the Committee.

(F) Disciplinary Action.--The Chairman shall
immediately consider disciplinary action in the event
any Committee Member or Committee staff member fails to
conform to the provisions of these rules governing the
disclosure of classified or unclassified information.
Such disciplinary action may include, but shall not be
limited to, immediate dismissal from the Committee
staff, criminal referral to the Justice Department, and
notification of the Speaker of the House. With respect
to Minority staff, the Chairman shall consider such
disciplinary action in consultation with the Ranking
Minority Member.

RULE XVI.--COMMITTEE RECORDS.

(A) Committee Records.--Committee Records shall
constitute all data, charts and files in possession of
the Committee and shall be maintained in accordance
with clause 2(e) of House Rule XI .

(B) Legislative Calendar.--The Clerk of the Committee
shall maintain a printed calendar for the information
of each Committee Member showing any procedural or
legislative measures considered or scheduled to be
considered by the Committee, and the status of such
measures and such other matters as the Committee
determines shall be included. The calendar shall be
revised from time to time to show pertinent changes. A
copy of such revisions shall be made available to each
Member of the Committee upon request.

(C) Members Right To Access.--Members of the Committee
and of the House shall have access to all official
Committee Records. Access to Committee files shall be
limited to examination within the Committee offices at
reasonable times. Access to Committee Records that
contain classified information shall be provided in a
manner consistent with these rules.

(D) Removal of Committee Records.--Files and records of
the Committee are not to be removed from the Committee
offices. No Committee files or records that are not
made publicly available shall be photocopied by any
Member.

(E) Executive Session Records.--Evidence or testimony
received by the Committee in executive session shall
not be released or made available to the public unless
agreed to by the Committee. Members may examine the
Committee's executive session records, but may not make
copies of, or take personal notes from, such records.

(F) Availability of Committee Records.--The Committee
shall keep a complete record of all Committee action
including recorded votes and attendance at hearings and
meetings. Information so available for public
inspection shall include a description of each
amendment, motion, order, or other proposition,
including the name of the Member who offered the
amendment, motion, order, or other proposition, and the
name of each Member voting for and each Member voting
against each such amendment, motion, order, or
proposition, as well as the names of those Members
present but not voting. Such record shall be made
available to the public at reasonable times within the
Committee offices and also made publicly available in
electronic form and posted on the official Committee
web site within 48 hours of such record vote.

(G) Separate and Distinct.--All Committee records and
files must be kept separate and distinct from the
office records of the Members serving as Chairman and
Ranking Minority Member. Records and files of Members'
personal offices shall not be considered records or
files of the Committee.

(H) Disposition of Committee Records.--At the
conclusion of each Congress, non-current records of the
Committee shall be delivered to the Archivist of the
United States in accordance with Rule VII of the Rules
of the House.

(I) Archived Records.--The records of the Committee at
the National Archives and Records Administration shall
be made available for public use in accordance with
Rule VII of the Rules of the House. The Chairman shall
notify the Ranking Minority Member of any decision,
pursuant to clause 3(b)(3) or clause 4(b) of the Rule,
to withhold a record otherwise available, and the
matter shall be presented to the Committee for a
determination on the written request of any member of
the Committee. The Chairman shall consult with the
Ranking Minority Member on any communication from the
Archivist of the United States or the Clerk of the
House concerning the disposition of noncurrent records
pursuant to clause 3(b) of the Rule.

RULE XVII.-- COMMITTEE RULES.

(A) Availability of Committee Rules in Electronic
Form.--Pursuant to clause 2(a) of rule XI of the Rules
of the House of Representatives, the Committee shall
make its rules publicly available in electronic form
and posted on the official Committee web site and shall
submit such rules for publication in the Congressional
Record not later than 30 days after the Chairman of the
Committee is elected in each odd-numbered year.

(B) Changes to Committee Rules.--These rules may be
modified, amended, or repealed by the Full Committee
provided that a notice in writing of the proposed
change has been given to each Member at least 48 hours
prior to the meeting at which action thereon is to be
taken and such changes are not inconsistent with the
Rules of the House of Representatives.
APPENDIX II

Membership Changes

January 2011

On January 5, 2011, Mr.Peter T. King of New York was
elected as Chairman and Mr.Bennie G. Thompson of Mississippi as
Ranking Member pursuant to H. Res. 6 and H. Res.7 respectively.
The Majority Members of the Committee were elected to the
Committee on January 18, 2011, pursuant to H. Res. 37; and the
Minority Members on January 19, 2011, pursuant to H. Res. 39.
Mr.Blake Farenthold of Texas was elected to the Committee
pursuant to H. Res. 42 on January 19, 2011.
Mr.Mo Brooks of Alabama was elected to the Committee
pursuant to H. Res. 53 on January 25, 2011.
----------

COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY

Peter T. King, New York, Chairman

SUBCOMMITTEE ON CYBERSECURITY, INFRASTRUCTURE PROTECTION, AND SECURITY
TECHNOLOGIES

Daniel E. Lungren, California, Chairman

SUBCOMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION SECURITY

Mike Rogers, Alabama, Chairman

Daniel E. Lungren, California
Tim Walberg, Michigan
Chip Cravaack, Minnesota
Joe Walsh, Illinois, Vice Chair
Mo Brooks, Alabama
Peter T. King, New York
(Ex Officio) Sheila Jackson Lee, Texas
Danny K. Davis, Illinois
Jackie Speier, California
Cedric L. Richmond, Louisiana
Bennie G. Thompson, Mississippi
(Ex Officio)
______

SUBCOMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT, INVESTIGATIONS, AND MANAGEMENT

Michael T. McCaul, Texas, Chairman

Gus M. Bilirakis, Florida
Billy Long, Missouri, Vice Chair
Jeff Duncan, South Carolina
Tom Marino, Pennsylvania
Peter T. King, New York
(Ex Officio) Jackie Speier, California
Yvette D. Clarke, New York
Danny K. Davis, Illinois
Bennie G. Thompson, Mississippi
(Ex Officio)
______

SUBCOMMITTEE ON EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS, RESPONSE, AND COMMUNICATIONS

Gus M. Bilirakis, Florida, Chairman

Joe Walsh, Illinois
E. Scott Rigell, Virginia
Tom Marino, Pennsylvania, Vice
Chair
Blake Farenthold, Texas
Peter T. King, New York
(Ex Officio) Laura Richardson, California
Donna M. Christensen, U.S. Virgin
Islands
Hansen Clarke, Michigan
Bennie G. Thompson, Mississippi
(Ex Officio)
______

SUBCOMMITTEE ON BORDER AND MARITIME SECURITY

Candice S.Miller, Michigan, Chairman

Mike Rogers, Alabama
Michael T. McCaul, Texas
Paul C. Broun, Georgia
Ben Quayle, Arizona, Vice Chair
E. Scott Rigell, Virginia
Jeff Duncan, South Carolina
Peter T. King, New York
(Ex Officio) Henry Cuellar, Texas
Loretta Sanchez, California
Donna M. Christensen, U.S. Virgin
Islands
Brian Higgins, New York
Hansen Clarke, Michigan
Bennie G. Thompson, Mississippi
(Ex Officio)
______

SUBCOMMITTEE ON COUNTERTERRORISM AND INTELLIGENCE

Patrick Meehan, Pennsylvania, Chairman

Paul C. Broun, Georgia, Vice Chair
Chip Cravaack, Minnesota
Joe Walsh, Illinois
Ben Quayle, Arizona
E. Scott Rigell, Virginia
Billy Long, Missouri
Peter T. King, New York
(Ex Officio) Jane Harman, California
Loretta Sanchez, California
Sheila Jackson Lee, Texas
Henry Cuellar, Texas
Brian Higgins, New York
Bennie G. Thompson, Mississippi
(Ex Officio)

March 7, 2011

On February 28, 2011, Ms.Jane Harman of California resigned
as a Member of the House of Representatives. On March 7, 2011,
Mrs.Donna M. Christensen resigned as a Member of the Committee
on Homeland Security. The Memberships of the Subcommittees were
modified on March 14, 2011 to reflect these vacancies.
The Committee on Homeland Security Membership and
Subcommittee Membership was as follows:

COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY

Peter T. King, New York, Chairman

SUBCOMMITTEE ON CYBERSECURITY, INFRASTRUCTURE PROTECTION, AND SECURITY
TECHNOLOGIES

Daniel E. Lungren, California, Chairman

SUBCOMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION SECURITY

Mike Rogers, Alabama, Chairman

SUBCOMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT, INVESTIGATIONS, AND MANAGEMENT

Michael T. McCaul, Texas, Chairman

SUBCOMMITTEE ON EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS, RESPONSE, AND COMMUNICATIONS

Gus M. Bilirakis, Florida, Chairman

Joe Walsh, Illinois
E. Scott Rigell, Virginia
Tom Marino, Pennsylvania, Vice
Chair
Blake Farenthold, Texas
Peter T. King, New York
(Ex Officio) Laura Richardson, California
Hansen Clarke, Michigan
Vacancy
Bennie G. Thompson, Mississippi
(Ex Officio)
______

SUBCOMMITTEE ON BORDER AND MARITIME SECURITY

Candice S.Miller, Michigan, Chairman

SUBCOMMITTEE ON COUNTERTERRORISM AND INTELLIGENCE

Patrick Meehan, Pennsylvania, Chairman

Paul C. Broun, Georgia, Vice Chair
Chip Cravaack, Minnesota
Joe Walsh, Illinois
Ben Quayle, Arizona
E. Scott Rigell, Virginia
Billy Long, Missouri
Peter T. King, New York
(Ex Officio) Jackie Speier, California
Loretta Sanchez, California
Henry Cuellar, Texas
Brian Higgins, New York
Vacancy
Bennie G. Thompson, Mississippi
(Ex Officio)

June 2, 2011

Ms.Kathleen C. Hochul of New Work was elected to the
Committee on June 2, 2011 pursuant to H. Res. 293. On July 6,
2011, Ms.Hochul was appointed to Subcommittees.
The Committee on Homeland Security Membership and
Subcommittee Membership was as follows:

COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY

Peter T. King, New York, Chairman

SUBCOMMITTEE ON CYBERSECURITY, INFRASTRUCTURE PROTECTION, AND SECURITY
TECHNOLOGIES

Daniel E. Lungren, California, Chairman

SUBCOMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION SECURITY

Mike Rogers, Alabama, Chairman

SUBCOMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT, INVESTIGATIONS, AND MANAGEMENT

Michael T. McCaul, Texas, Chairman

SUBCOMMITTEE ON EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS, RESPONSE, AND COMMUNICATIONS

Gus M. Bilirakis, Florida, Chairman

Joe Walsh, Illinois
E. Scott Rigell, Virginia
Tom Marino, Pennsylvania, Vice
Chair
Blake Farenthold, Texas
Peter T. King, New York
(Ex Officio) Laura Richardson, California
Hansen Clarke, Michigan
Kathleen C. Hochul, New York
Bennie G. Thompson, Mississippi
(Ex Officio)
______

SUBCOMMITTEE ON BORDER AND MARITIME SECURITY

Candice S.Miller, Michigan, Chairman

SUBCOMMITTEE ON COUNTERTERRORISM AND INTELLIGENCE

Patrick Meehan, Pennsylvania, Chairman

Paul C. Broun, Georgia, Vice Chair
Chip Cravaack, Minnesota
Joe Walsh, Illinois
Ben Quayle, Arizona
E. Scott Rigell, Virginia
Billy Long, Missouri
Peter T. King, New York
(Ex Officio) Jackie Speier, California
Loretta Sanchez, California
Henry Cuellar, Texas
Brian Higgins, New York
Kathleen C. Hochul, New York
Bennie G. Thompson, Mississippi
(Ex Officio)

August 17, 2011

Ms.Janice Hahn of California was elected to the Committee
on July 28, 2011 pursuant to H. Res. 377. On August 17,
additional changes were made to the Subcommittee Memberships.
The Committee on Homeland Security Membership and
Subcommittee Membership was as follows:

COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY

Peter T. King, New York, Chairman

SUBCOMMITTEE ON CYBERSECURITY, INFRASTRUCTURE PROTECTION, AND SECURITY
TECHNOLOGIES

Daniel E. Lungren, California, Chairman

SUBCOMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION SECURITY

Mike Rogers, Alabama, Chairman

SUBCOMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT, INVESTIGATIONS, AND MANAGEMENT

Michael T. McCaul, Texas, Chairman

SUBCOMMITTEE ON EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS, RESPONSE, AND COMMUNICATIONS

Gus M. Bilirakis, Florida, Chairman

Joe Walsh, Illinois
E. Scott Rigell, Virginia
Tom Marino, Pennsylvania, Vice
Chair
Blake Farenthold, Texas
Peter T. King, New York
(Ex Officio) Laura Richardson, California
Hansen Clarke, Michigan
Kathleen C. Hochul, New York
Bennie G. Thompson, Mississippi
(Ex Officio)
______

SUBCOMMITTEE ON BORDER AND MARITIME SECURITY

Candice S.Miller, Michigan, Chairman

SUBCOMMITTEE ON COUNTERTERRORISM AND INTELLIGENCE

Patrick Meehan, Pennsylvania, Chairman

Paul C. Broun, Georgia, Vice Chair
Chip Cravaack, Minnesota
Joe Walsh, Illinois
Ben Quayle, Arizona
E. Scott Rigell, Virginia
Billy Long, Missouri
Peter T. King, New York
(Ex Officio) Jackie Speier, California
Loretta Sanchez, California
Brian Higgins, New York
Kathleen C. Hochul, New York
Janice Hahn, California
Bennie G. Thompson, Mississippi
(Ex Officio)

October 2011

Mr.Mo Brooks of Alabama resigned as a Member of the
Committee on Homeland Security. Mr.Robert L. Turner of New York
was elected to the Committee on pursuant to H. Res. 420.
On October 26, 2011, Mr.Turner was appointed to
Subcommittees.
The Committee on Homeland Security Membership and
Subcommittee Membership was as follows:

COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY

Peter T. King, New York, Chairman

SUBCOMMITTEE ON CYBERSECURITY, INFRASTRUCTURE PROTECTION, AND SECURITY
TECHNOLOGIES

Daniel E. Lungren, California, Chairman

SUBCOMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION SECURITY

Mike Rogers, Alabama, Chairman

Daniel E. Lungren, California
Tim Walberg, Michigan
Chip Cravaack, Minnesota
Joe Walsh, Illinois, Vice Chair
Robert L. Turner, New York
Peter T. King, New York
(Ex Officio) Sheila Jackson Lee, Texas
Danny K. Davis, Illinois
Jackie Speier, California
Cedric L. Richmond, Louisiana
Bennie G. Thompson, Mississippi
(Ex Officio)
______

SUBCOMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT, INVESTIGATIONS, AND MANAGEMENT

Michael T. McCaul, Texas, Chairman

SUBCOMMITTEE ON EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS, RESPONSE, AND COMMUNICATIONS

Gus M. Bilirakis, Florida, Chairman

SUBCOMMITTEE ON BORDER AND MARITIME SECURITY

Candice S.Miller, Michigan, Chairman

SUBCOMMITTEE ON COUNTERTERRORISM AND INTELLIGENCE

Patrick Meehan, Pennsylvania, Chairman

Paul C. Broun, Georgia, Vice Chair
Chip Cravaack, Minnesota
Joe Walsh, Illinois
Ben Quayle, Arizona
E. Scott Rigell, Virginia
Billy Long, Missouri
Peter T. King, New York
(Ex Officio) Jackie Speier, California
Loretta Sanchez, California
Brian Higgins, New York
Kathleen C. Hochul, New York
Janice Hahn, California
Bennie G. Thompson, Mississippi
(Ex Officio)

February 2012

Ms.Jackie Speier of California resigned as a Member of the
Committee on Homeland Security on February 16, 2012.
On February 27, 2012, changes were made to Subcommittee
assignments, and on June 26, 2012, Mr.Ron Barber of Arizona was
appointed to the Committee and filled the remaining vacancies
on the Subcommittees.
The Committee on Homeland Security Membership and
Subcommittee Membership was as follows:

COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY

Peter T. King, New York, Chairman

SUBCOMMITTEE ON CYBERSECURITY, INFRASTRUCTURE PROTECTION, AND SECURITY
TECHNOLOGIES

Daniel E. Lungren, California, Chairman

SUBCOMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION SECURITY

Mike Rogers, Alabama, Chairman

SUBCOMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT, INVESTIGATIONS, AND MANAGEMENT

Michael T. McCaul, Texas, Chairman

SUBCOMMITTEE ON EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS, RESPONSE, AND COMMUNICATIONS

Gus M. Bilirakis, Florida, Chairman

SUBCOMMITTEE ON BORDER AND MARITIME SECURITY

Candice S.Miller, Michigan, Chairman

SUBCOMMITTEE ON COUNTERTERRORISM AND INTELLIGENCE

Patrick Meehan, Pennsylvania, Chairman

Paul C. Broun, Georgia, Vice Chair
Chip Cravaack, Minnesota
Joe Walsh, Illinois
Ben Quayle, Arizona
E. Scott Rigell, Virginia
Billy Long, Missouri
Peter T. King, New York
(Ex Officio) Brian Higgins, New York
Loretta Sanchez, California
Kathleen C. Hochul, New York
Janice Hahn, California
Ron Barber, Arizona
Bennie G. Thompson, Mississippi
(Ex Officio)
APPENDIX III

List of Public Laws

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Public Law Date Approved Bill Title
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
112-54.............................. November 12, 2011...... S. 1487 (H.R.2042).. ``Asia-Pacific Economic
Cooperation Business
Travel Cards Act of
2011''
To authorize the
Secretary of Homeland
Security, in
coordination with the
Secretary of State, to
establish a program to
issue Asia-Pacific
Economic Cooperation
Business Travel Cards,
and for other purposes.

112-81.............................. December 31, 2011...... H.R.1540.............. ``National Defense
Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2012''
To authorize
appropriations for
Fiscal Year 2012 for
military activities of
the Department of
Defense, for military
construction, and for
defense activities of
the Department of
Energy, to prescribe
military personnel
strengths for such
fiscal year, and for
other purposes.

112-86.............................. January 3, 2012........ H.R.1801.............. ``Risk-Based Security
Screening for Members of
the Armed Forces Act''
To amend title 49, United
States Code, to provide
for expedited security
screenings for members
of the Armed Forces.

112-127............................. June 5, 2012........... H.R.4119.............. ``Border Tunnel
Prevention Act of 2012''
To reduce the trafficking
of drugs and to prevent
human smuggling across
the Southwest Border by
deterring the
construction and use of
border tunnels.

112-171............................. August 16, 2012........ H.R.3670.............. To require the
Transportation Security
Administration to comply
with the Uniformed
Services Employment and
Reemployment Rights Act.

112-199............................. November 27, 2012...... S.743................. ``Whistleblower
Protection Enhancement
Act of 2012''
To amend chapter 23 of
title 5, United States
Code, to clarify the
disclosures of
information protected
from prohibited
personnel practices,
require a statement in
nondisclosure policies,
forms, and agreements
that such policies,
forms, and agreements
conform with certain
disclosure protections,
provide certain
authority for the
Special Counsel, and for
other purposes.

112-205............................. December 77, 2012...... H.R.915............... ``Jaime Zapata Border
Enforcement Security
Task Force Act''
To establish a Border
Enforcement Security
Task Force program to
enhance border security
by fostering coordinated
efforts among Federal,
State, and local border
and law enforcement
officials to protect
United States border
cities and communities
from trans-national
crime, including
violence associated with
drug trafficking, arms
smuggling, illegal alien
trafficking and
smuggling, violence, and
kidnapping along and
across the international
borders of the United
States, and for other
purposes.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

APPENDIX IV

Committee Reports

H.Rpt. 112-127 First Semiannual Report on Legislative and
Oversight Activities of the Committee on
Homeland Security for the 112th Congress.
Filed June 28, 2011.

H.Rpt. 112-268 Jaime Zapata Border Enforcement Security Task
H.R.915 Force Act
To establish a Border Enforcement Security Task
Force program to enhance border security by
fostering coordinated efforts among Federal,
State, and local border and law enforcement
officials to protect United States border
cities and communities from trans-national
crime, including violence associated with drug
trafficking, arms smuggling, illegal alien
trafficking and smuggling, violence, and
kidnapping along and across the international
borders of the United States, and for other
purposes.
Filed November 4, 2011.

H.Rpt. 112-269 Aviation Security Stakeholder Participation Act
H.R.1447 of 2011
To amend title 49, United States Code, to direct
the Assistant Secretary of Homeland Security
(Transportation Security Administration) to
establish an Aviation Security Advisory
Committee, and for other purposes.
Filed November 4, 2011.

H.Rpt. 112-270 Transportation Security Administration Ombudsman
H.R.1165 Act of 2011
To amend title 49, United States Code, to
establish an Ombudsman Office within the
Transportation Security Administration for the
purpose of enhancing transportation security by
providing confidential, informal, and neutral
assistance to address work-place related
problems of Transportation Security
Administration employees, and for other
purposes.
Filed November 4, 2011.

H.Rpt. 112-271 Risk-Based Security Screening for Members of The
H.R.1801 Armed Forces Act
To amend title 49, United States Code, to
provide for expedited security screenings for
members of the Armed Forces.
Filed November 4, 2011.

H.Rpt. 112-272 Expressing the sense of the House of
H. Res. 255 Representatives that effective sharing of
passenger information from inbound
international flight manifests is a crucial
component of our national security and that the
Department of Homeland Security must maintain
the information sharing standards required
under the 2007 Passenger Name Record Agreement
between the United States and the European
Union.
Filed November 4, 2011.

H.Rpt. 112-274 Secure Border Act of 2011
H.R.1299 To achieve operation control of and improve
security at the international land borders of
the United States, and for other purposes.
Filed November 10, 2011.

H. Rpt. 112-351 Second Semiannual Report on Legislative and
Oversight Activities of the Committee on
Homeland Security for the 112th Congress.
Filed December 28, 2011

H. Rpt. 112-446 WMD Intelligence and Information Sharing Act of
H.R.2764 2011
To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to
establish weapons of mass destruction
intelligence and information sharing functions
of the Office of Intelligence and Analysis of
the Department of Homeland Security and to
require dissemination of information analyzed
by the Department to entities with
responsibilities relating to homeland security,
and for other purposes.
Filed May 8, 2012

H. Rpt. 112-467 Mass Transit Intelligence Prioritization Act
H.R.3140 To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to
direct the Secretary of Homeland Security to
prioritize the assignment of officers and
analysts to certain State and urban area fusion
centers to enhance the security of mass transit
systems.
Filed May 8, 2012

H. Rpt. 112-468 To amend title 49, United States Code, to direct
H.R.2179 the Assistant Secretary of Homeland Security
(Transportation Security Administration) to
transfer unclaimed money recovered at airport
security checkpoints to United Service
Organizations, Incorporated, and for other
purposes.
Filed May 8, 2012

H. Rpt. 112-498 Public Transit Security and Local Law
H.R.3857 Enforcement Support Act
To amend the Implementing Recommendations of the
9/11 Commission Act of 2007 to require the
Secretary of Homeland Security to include as an
eligible use the sustainment of specialized
operational teams used by local law enforcement
under the Transit Security Grant Program, and
for other purposes.
Filed May 30, 2012

H. Rpt. 112-499 Gauging American Port Security Act or the GAPS
H.R.4005 Act
To direct the Secretary of Homeland Security to
conduct a study and report to Congress on gaps
in port security in the United States and a
plan to address them.
Filed May 30, 2012

H. Rpt. 112-521 Securing Maritime Activities through Risk-based
H.R.4251 Targeting for Port Security Act or the SMART
Port Security Act
To authorize, enhance, and reform certain port
security programs through increased efficiency
and risk-based coordination within the
Department of Homeland Security, and for other
purposes.
Filed June 12, 2012

H. Rpt. 112-522 Third Semiannual Report on Legislative and
Oversight Activities of the Committee on
Homeland Security.
Filed June 12, 2012

H. Rpt. 112-523 To direct the Secretary of Homeland Security to
H.R.3173 reform the process for the enrollment,
activation, issuance, and renewal of a
Transportation Worker Identification Credential
(TWIC) to require, in total, not more than one
in-person visit to a designated enrollment
center.
Filed June 15, 2012

H. Rpt. 112-592, Pt. I Promoting and Enhancing Cybersecurity and
H.R.3674 Information Sharing Effectiveness Act of 2011
or the PRECISE Act of 2012
To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to
make certain improvements in the laws relating
to cybersecurity, and for other purposes.
Filed July 11, 2012

H. Rpt. 112-665, Pt. I WMD Prevention and Preparedness Act of 2011
H.R.2356 To enhance homeland security by improving
efforts to prevent, protect against, respond
to, and recover from an attack with a weapon of
mass destruction, and for other purposes.
Filed September 12, 2012

H. Rpt. 112-685, Pt. I Integrated Public Alert and Warning System
H.R.3563 Modernization Act of 2012
To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to
direct the Secretary of Homeland Security to
modernize and implement the national integrated
public alert and warning system to disseminate
homeland security information and other
information, and for other purposes.
Filed September 20, 2012

H. Rpt. 112-717, Pt. I Department of Homeland Security Authorization
H.R.3116 Act for Fiscal Year 2012
To authorize certain programs of the Department
of Homeland Security, and for other purposes.
Filed December 20, 2012

APPENDIX V

Status of Legislation Referred to the Committee

PUBLIC LAWS

Pub. Law 112-54 S.1487 (H.R.2042)._Asia-Pacific Economic
Cooperation Business Travel Cards Act of 2011. To require the
Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the
Secretary of State, to establish a program to issue Asia-
Pacific Economic Cooperation Business Travel Cards, and for
other purposes. Referred to Homeland Security and Governmental
Affairs Aug. 2, 2011. Reported amended Nov. 3, 2011; no written
report. Passed Senate amended Nov. 3, 2011. Received in House
and held at desk Nov. 3, 2011. Passed House Nov. 4, 2011.
Presented to the President Nov. 10, 2011. Approved Nov. 12,
2011. Public Law 112-54. (See also H.R.2042 under Legislation
in Senate, below.)
Pub. Law 112-81 H.R.1540 (H. Res. 269) (H. Res. 276) (H.
Res. 493) (S.1867)._National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2012. To authorize appropriations for Fiscal Year
2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense and
for military construction, to prescribe military personnel
strengths for Fiscal Year 2012, and for other purposes.
Referred to Armed Services Apr. 14, 2011. Reported amended May
17, 2011; Rept. 112-78. Union Calendar. Supplemental report
filed May 23, 2011; Pt. II. Considered May 24, 25, 2011. Passed
House amended May 26, 2011; Roll No. 375: 322-96. Received in
Senate and referred to Armed Services June 6, 2011. Committee
discharged. Passed Senate with amendment Dec. 1, 2011. Senate
insisted on its amendment and asked for a conference Dec. 1,
2011. House disagreed to Senate amendment and agreed to a
conference Dec. 7, 2011. Conference report filed in the House
Dec. 12, 2011; Rept. 112-329. House agreed to conference report
Dec. 14, 2011; Roll No. 932: 283-136. Senate agreed to
conference report Dec. 15, 2011; Roll No. 230: 86-13. Presented
to the President Dec. 21, 2011. Approved Dec. 31, 2011. Public
Law 112-81.
Pub. Law 112-86 H.R.1801_Risk-Based Security Screening for
Members of the Armed Forces Act. To amend title 49, United
States Code, to provide for expedited security screenings for
members of the Armed Forces. Referred to Homeland Security May
10, 2011. Reported amended Nov. 4, 2011; Rept. 112-271. Union
Calendar. Rules suspended. Passed House amended Nov. 29, 2011;
Roll No. 862: 404-0. Received in Senate and referred to
Commerce, Science and Transportation Nov. 30, 2011. Committee
discharged. Passed Senate with amendment Dec. 12, 2011. House
agreed to Senate amendment under suspension of the rules Dec.
20, 2011. Presented to the President Dec. 23, 2011. Approved
Jan. 3, 2012. Public Law 112-86.
Pub. Law. 112-171 H.R.3670._To require the Transportation
Security Administration to comply with the Uniformed Services
Employment and Reemployment Rights Act. Referred to Homeland
Security and in addition to Veterans' Affairs Dec. 14, 2011.
Reported from Veterans' Affairs May 18, 2012; Rept. 112-487,
Pt. I. Rules suspended. Passed House May 30, 2012. Received in
Senate and referred to Commerce, Science and Transportation
June 4, 2012. Committee discharged. Passed Senate Aug. 2, 2012.
Presented to the President Aug. 7, 2012. Approved Aug. 16,
2012. Public Law 112-171.
Pub. Law 112-127 H.R.4119 (S. 1236)._Border Tunnel
Prevention Act. To reduce the trafficking of drugs and to
prevent human smuggling across the Southwest Border by
deterring the construction and use of border tunnels. Referred
to the Judiciary and in addition to Ways and Means, and
Homeland Security Mar. 1, 2012. Reported from the Judiciary
Mar. 21, 2012; Rept. 112-418, Pt. I. Ways and Means and
Homeland Security discharged Mar. 21, 2012. Union Calendar.
Considered under suspension of rules May 15, 2012. Rules
suspended. Passed House amended May 16, 2012; Roll No. 256:
416-4. Received in Senate and passed May 17, 2012. Presented to
the President May 29, 2012. Approved June 5, 2012. Public Law
112-127.
Pub. Law 112-199 S. 743._To amend chapter 23 of title 5,
United States Code, to clarify the disclosures of information
protected from prohibited personnel practices, require a in
nondisclosure policies, forms, and agreements that such
policies, forms, and agreements conform with certain disclosure
protections, provide certain authority for the Special Counsel,
and for other purposes. Referred to Homeland Security and
Governmental Affairs Apr. 6 (Legislative day of Apr. 5), 2011.
Reported amended Apr. 19, 2012; Rept. 112-155. Passed Senate
amended May 8, 2012. Received in House and referred to
Oversight and Government Reform and in addition to
Intelligence, and Homeland Security May 9, 2012. Committees
discharged. Passed House with amendment Sept. 28, 2012. Senate
concurred to House amendment Nov. 13, 2012. Presented to the
President Nov. 16, 2012. Approved November 27, 2012. Public Law
112-199.
Pub. Law 112-205 H.R.915._Jaime Zapata Border Enforcement
Security Task Force Act. To establish a Border Enforcement
Security Task Force program to enhance border security by
fostering coordinated efforts among Federal, State, and local
border and law enforcement officials to protect United States
border cities and communities from trans-national crime,
including violence associated with drug trafficking, arms
smuggling, illegal alien trafficking and smuggling, violence,
and kidnapping along and across the international borders of
the United States, and for other purposes. Referred to Homeland
Security Mar. 3, 2011. Reported amended Nov. 4, 2011; Rept.
112-268. Union Calendar 179. Rules suspended. Passed House
amended May 30, 2012; Roll No. 296: 391-2. Received in Senate
and referred to Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs June
4, 2012. Reported with amendment Aug. 28, 2012; Rept. 112-206.
Passed Senate with amendment Sept. 22 (Legislative day of Sept.
21), 2012. House agreed to Senate amendment under suspension of
the rules Nov. 27, 2012; Roll No. 610: 397-4. Presented to the
President Nov. 30, 2012. Approved December 7, 2012. Public Law
112-205.
Pub. Law 112-213 H.R. 2838 (H. Res. 455) (H. Res. 825)._
Coast Guard and Maritime Transportation Act of 2012. To
authorize appropriations for the Coast Guard for fiscal years
2012 through 2015, and for other purposes. Referred to
Transportation and Infrastructure Sept. 2, 2011. Reported
amended Oct. 3, 2011; Rept. 112-229. Union Calendar. Considered
Nov. 4, 2011. Passed House amended Nov. 15, 2011. Received in
Senate and referred to Commerce, Science and Transportation
Nov. 16, 2011. Committee discharged. Passed Senate with
amendments Sept. 22 (Legislative day of Sept. 21), 2012. House
agreed to Senate amendments with an amendment pursuant to H.
Res. 825 Dec. 5, 2012. Senate agreed to House amendment to
Senate amendment Dec. 12, 2012. Presented to the President Dec.
14, 2012. Approved December 20, 2012. Public Law 112-213.
Pub. Law 112-217 S. 1998._DHS Audit Requirement Target Act
of 2012. To obtain an unqualified audit opinion, and improve
financial accountability and management at the Department of
Homeland Security. Referred to Homeland Security and
Governmental Affairs Dec. 15, 2011. Reported amended Nov. 2,
2012; Rept. 112-230. Passed Senate amended Nov. 28, 2012.
Received in House and referred to Homeland Security and in
addition to Oversight and Government Reform Nov. 29, 2012.
Rules suspended. Passed House Dec. 12, 2012. Presented to the
President Dec. 14, 2012. Approved December 20, 2012. Public Law
112-217.
Pub. Law 112-218 S. 3542 (H.R. 6028)._No-Hassle Flying Act
of 2012. To authorize the Assistant Secretary of Homeland
Security (Transportation Security Administration) to modify
screening requirements for checked baggage arriving from
preclearance airports, and for other purposes. Referred to
Commerce, Science and Transportation Sept. 13, 2012. Committee
discharged. Passed Senate amended Nov. 29, 2012. Received in
House and held at desk Nov. 30, 2012. Passed House Dec. 12,
2012. Presented to the President Dec. 14, 2012. Approved
December 20, 2012. Public Law 112-218.

LEGISLATION PRESENTED TO THE PRESIDENT

H.R. 4310 (H. Res. 656) (H. Res. 661) (H. Res. 829) (H.
Res. 840) (S. 3254)._To authorize appropriations for fiscal
year 2013 for military activities of the Department of Defense,
to prescribe military personnel strengths for fiscal year 2013,
and for other purposes. Referred to Armed Services Mar. 29,
2012. Reported amended May 11, 2012; Rept. 112-479. Union
Calendar. Supplemental report filed May 15, 2012; Pt. II.
Considered May 16, 17, 2012. Passed House amended May 18, 2012;
Roll No. 291: 299-120. Received in Senate and referred to Armed
Services June 19, 2012. Committee discharged. Dec. 4, 2012.
Passed Senate with amendment Dec. 4, 2012. Senate insisted on
its amendment and asked for a conference Dec. 4, 2012. Pursuant
to the provisions of H. Res. 829, papers are returned to the
Senate Senate proceedings of Dec. 4, 2012, vacated Dec. 12,
2012. Dec. 12, 2012. Passed Senate with amendment Dec. 12,
2012. Senate insisted on its amendment and asked for a
conference Dec. 12, 2012. House disagreed to Senate amendment
and agreed to a conference Dec. 13, 2012. Conference report
filed in the House Dec. 18, 2012; Rept. 112-705. House agreed
to conference report Dec. 20, 2012; Roll No. 645: 315-107.
Senate agreed to conference report Dec. 21, 2012; Record No.
229: 81-14.

LEGISLATION PASSED THE SENATE

H.R. 6328._Clothe a Homeless Hero Act . To amend title 49,
United States Code, to direct the Assistant Secretary of
Homeland Security (Transportation Security Administration) to
transfer unclaimed clothing recovered at airport security
checkpoints to local veterans organizations and other local
charitable organizations, and for other purposes. Referred to
Homeland Security Aug. 2, 2012. Rules suspended. Passed House
Nov. 27, 2012. Received in Senate Nov. 28, 2012. Passed Senate,
amended, Dec. 11, 2012.

LEGISLATION IN SENATE

H.R.1299._To achieve operational control of and improve
security at the international land borders of the United
States, and for other purposes. Referred to Homeland Security
Mar. 31, 2011. Reported amended Nov. 10, 2011; Rept. 112-274.
Union Calendar. Rules suspended. Passed House amended May 30,
2012. Received in Senate and referred to Homeland Security and
Governmental Affairs June 4, 2012.
H.R.1447._Aviation Security Stakeholder Participation Act.
To amend title 49, United States Code, to direct the Assistant
Secretary of Homeland Security (Transportation Security
Administration) to establish an Aviation Security Advisory
Committee, and for other purposes. Referred to Homeland
Security Apr. 8, 2011. Reported Nov. 4, 2011; Rept. 112-269.
Union Calendar. Considered under suspension of rules June 26,
2012. Rules suspended. Passed House amended June 28, 2012.
Received in Senate and referred to Commerce, Science and
Transportation June 29, 2012.
H.R.2042 (S.1487)._Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation
Business Travel Cards Act of 2011. To require the Secretary of
Homeland Security, in consultation with the Secretary of State,
to establish a program to issue Asia-Pacific Economic
Cooperation Business Travel Cards, and for other purposes.
Referred to Homeland Security May 26, 2011. Rules suspended.
Passed House Oct. 25, 2011. Received in Senate Oct. 31, 2011.
Ordered placed on the calendar Nov. 3, 2011. (See S.1487 listed
above under Public Laws.)
H.R.2578 (H.R.1505) (H. Res. 688)._To amend the Wild and
Scenic Rivers Act related to a segment of the Lower Merced
River in California, and for other purposes. Referred to
Natural Resources July 18, 2011. Reported Dec. 1, 2011; Rept.
112-303. Union Calendar. Passed House amended June 19, 2012;
Roll No. 387: 232-188. Received in Senate and referred to
Energy and Natural Resources June 20, 2012. Provisions of
H.R.1505 were included in H.R.2578, as passed by the House.
H.R.2764._WMD Intelligence and Information Sharing Act. To
amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to establish weapons of
mass destruction intelligence and information sharing functions
of the Office of Intelligence and Analysis of the Department of
Homeland Security and to require dissemination of information
analyzed by the Department to entities with responsibilities
relating to homeland security, and for other purposes. Referred
to Homeland Security Aug. 1, 2011. Reported amended May 8,
2012; Rept. 112-466. Union Calendar. Rules suspended. Passed
House amended May 30, 2012. Received in Senate and referred to
Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs June 4, 2012.
H.R.2903._FEMA Reauthorization Act. To reauthorize the
programs and activities of the Federal Emergency Management
Agency. Referred to Transportation and Infrastructure Sept. 13,
2011. Reported amended Sept. 14, 2012; Rept. 112-674, Pt. I.
Referred to Homeland Security Sept. 14, 2012 for a period
ending not later than Sept. 17, 2012. Homeland Security
discharged Sept. 17, 2012. Union Calendar. Rules suspended.
Passed House amended Sept. 19, 2012. Received in Senate and
referred to Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Sept.
20, 2012.
H.R.3140._Mass Transit Intelligence Prioritization Act. To
amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to direct the Secretary
of Homeland Security to prioritize the assignment of officers
and analysts to certain State and urban area fusion centers to
enhance the security of mass transit systems. Referred to
Homeland Security Oct. 6, 2011. Reported May 8, 2012; Rept.
112-467. Union Calendar. Rules suspended. Passed House May 30,
2012. Received in Senate and referred to Homeland Security and
Governmental Affairs June 4, 2012.
H.R.3173._Transportation Worker Identification Credential
(TWIC). To direct the Secretary of Homeland Security to reform
the process for the enrollment, activation, issuance, and
renewal of a Transportation Worker Identification Credential
(TWIC) to require, in total, not more than one in-person visit
to a designated enrollment center. Referred to Homeland
Security Oct. 12, 2011. Reported amended June 15, 2012; Rept.
112-523. Union Calendar. Considered under suspension of rules
June 26, 2012. Rules suspended. Passed House amended June 28,
2012. Received in Senate and referred to Commerce, Science and
Transportation June 29, 2012.
H.R.3857._Public Transit Security and Local Law Enforcement
Support Act. To amend the Implementing Recommendations of the
9/11 Commission Act of 2007 to require the Secretary of
Homeland Security to include as an eligible use the sustainment
of specialized operational teams used by local law enforcement
under the Transit Security Grant Program, and for other
purposes. Referred to Homeland Security Jan. 31, 2012. Reported
amended May 30, 2012; Rept. 112-498. Union Calendar. Considered
under suspension of rules Sept. 11, 2012. Rules suspended.
Passed House amended Sept. 12, 2012; Roll No. 570: 355-62.
Received in Senate and referred to Homeland Security and
Governmental Affairs Sept. 13, 2012.
H.R.4005._GAPS Act. To direct the Secretary of Homeland
Security to conduct a study and report to Congress on gaps in
port security in the United States and a plan to address them.
Referred to Homeland Security Feb. 9, 2012. Reported amended
May 30, 2012; Rept. 112-499. Union Calendar. Considered under
suspension of rules June 26, 2012. Rules suspended. Passed
House amended June 28, 2012; Roll No. 439: 411-9. Received in
Senate and referred to Homeland Security and Governmental
Affairs June 29, 2012.
H.R.4251._Securing Maritime Activities through Risk-based
Targeting for Port Security Act. To authorize, enhance, and
reform certain port security programs through increased
efficiency and risk-based coordination within the Department of
Homeland Security, and for other purposes. Referred to Homeland
Security Mar. 22, 2012. Reported amended June 12, 2012; Rept.
112-521. Union Calendar. Considered under suspension of rules
June 26, 2012. Rules suspended. Passed House amended June 28,
2012; Roll No. 438: 402-21. Received in Senate and referred to
Commerce, Science and Transportation June 29, 2012.
H.R.5843._To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to
permit use of certain grant funds for training conducted in
conjunction with a national laboratory or research facility.
Referred to Homeland Security May 18, 2012. Considered under
suspension of rules June 26, 2012. Rules suspended. Passed
House June 28, 2012. Received in Senate and referred to
Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs June 29, 2012.
H.R. 5913._DHS Accountability Act of 2012 . To create an
independent advisory panel to comprehensively assess the
management structure and capabilities related to the Department
of Homeland Security and make recommendations to improve the
efficiency and effectiveness of the management of the
Department. Referred to Homeland Security June 7, 2012. Rules
suspended. Passed House amended Nov. 27, 2012. Received in
Senate and referred to Homeland Security and Governmental
Affairs Nov. 28, 2012.
H.R. 5997._Medical Preparedness Allowable Use Act. To amend
the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to codify authority under
existing grant guidance authorizing use of Urban Area Security
Initiative and State Homeland Security Grant Program funding
for enhancing medical preparedness, medical surge capacity, and
mass prophylaxis capabilities. Referred to Homeland Security
June 21, 2012. Rules suspended. Passed House amended Nov. 27,
2012; Roll No. 609: 397-1. Received in Senate and referred to
Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Nov. 28, 2012.
H.R. 6025._Mandatory Operational Control Reporting and
Performance Measures Act of 2012. To provide for annual reports
on the status of operational control of the international land
and maritime borders of the United States and unlawful entries,
and for other purposes. Referred to Homeland Security and in
addition to the Judiciary June 26, 2012. Rules suspended.
Passed House amended Nov. 27, 2012. Received in Senate and
referred to Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Nov. 28,
2012.
H.R.6028._No-Hassle Flying Act. To authorize the Assistant
Secretary of Homeland Security (Transportation Security
Administration) to modify screening requirements for checked
baggage arriving from preclearance airports, and for other
purposes. Referred to Homeland Security June 26, 2012. Rules
suspended. Passed House amended Sept. 11, 2012. Received in
Senate and referred to Commerce, Science and Transportation
Sept. 12, 2012. See Action taken on S. 3542, listed above.
H.R.6368._Border Security Information Improvement Act. To
require the Department of Justice, in consultation with the
Department of Homeland Security, to provide a report to
Congress on the Departments' ability to track, investigate and
quantify cross-border violence along the Southwest Border and
provide recommendations to Congress on how to accurately track,
investigate, and quantify cross-border violence. Referred to
the Judiciary and in addition to Homeland Security Sept. 10,
2012. Rules suspended. Passed House amended Sept. 19, 2012.
Received in Senate and referred to the Judiciary Sept. 20,
2012.

LEGISLATION PASSED THE HOUSE

H. Res. 391._Expressing the sense of the House of
Representatives regarding the terrorist attacks launched
against the United States on September 11, 2001, on the 10th
anniversary of that date. Referred to Oversight and Government
Reform and in addition to Foreign Affairs, Armed Services,
Transportation and Infrastructure, the Judiciary, Homeland
Security, and Intelligence Sept. 7, 2011. Committees
discharged. Passed House Sept. 9, 2011.

LEGISLATION REPORTED TO THE HOUSE

H.R.901._Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Security
Authorization Act of 2011. To amend the Homeland Security Act
of 2002 to codify the requirement that the Secretary of
Homeland Security maintain chemical facility anti-terrorism
security regulations. Referred to Homeland Security and in
addition to Energy and Commerce Mar. 3, 2011. Reported amended
from Homeland Security Sept. 26, 2011; Rept. 112-224, Pt. I.
Referral to Energy and Commerce extended Sept. 26, 2011 for a
period ending not later than Nov. 11, 2011. Referral to Energy
and Commerce extended Nov. 11, 2011 for a period ending not
later than Jan. 6, 2012. Referral to Energy and Commerce
extended Jan. 6, 2012 for a period ending not later than Jan.
20, 2012. Referral to Energy and Commerce extended Jan. 20,
2012 for a period ending not later than Mar. 1, 2012. Referral
to Energy and Commerce extended Mar. 1, 2012 for a period
ending not later than Mar. 9, 2012. Referral to Energy and
Commerce extended Mar. 9, 2012 for a period ending not later
than June 8, 2012. Energy and Commerce discharged June 8, 2012.
Union Calendar 368.
H.R.1165._Transportation Security Administration Ombudsman
Act of 2011. To amend title 49, United States Code, to
establish an Ombudsman Office within the Transportation
Security Administration for the purpose of enhancing
transportation security by providing confidential, informal,
and neutral assistance to address work-place related problems
of Transportation Security Administration employees, and for
other purposes. Referred to Homeland Security Mar. 17, 2011.
Reported amended Nov. 4, 2011; Rept. 112-270. Union Calendar
181.
H.R.1505._To prohibit the Secretaries of the Interior and
Agriculture from taking action on public lands which impede
border security on such lands, and for other purposes. Referred
to Natural Resources and in addition to Agriculture, and
Homeland Security Apr. 13, 2011. Reported amended from Natural
Resources Apr. 17, 2012; Rept. 112-448, Pt. I. Agriculture and
Homeland Security discharged Apr. 17, 2012. Union Calendar 312.
Provisions of H.R.1505 were included in H.R.2578, as passed by
the House. See H.R.2578 listed above.
H.R.3116._Department of Homeland Security Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year 2012. To authorize certain programs of the
Department of Homeland Security, and for other purposes. Oct.
13, 2011 Ordered to be reported to the House, amended, by a
recorded vote of 20 yeas and 12 nays. Reported amended from
Homeland Security Dec. 20, 2012; Rept. 112-717, Pt. I. Referred
to Energy and Commerce, Science, Space, and Technology, and
Transportation and Infrastructure Dec. 20, 2012 for a period
ending not later than Dec. 21, 2012. Energy and Commerce,
Science, Space, and Technology, and Transportation and
Infrastructure discharged Dec. 21, 2012. Union Calendar 520.
H.R. 5806._To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to
require the Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management
Agency to provide guidance and coordination for outreach to
people with disabilities during emergencies, and for other
purposes. Referred to Transportation and Infrastructure and in
addition to Homeland Security May 17, 2012. Reported amended
from Transportation and Infrastructure Dec. 21, 2012; Rept.
112-719, Pt. I. Homeland Security discharged Dec. 21, 2012.
Union Calendar 522.
H. Res. 255._Expressing the sense of the House of
Representatives that effective sharing of passenger information
from inbound international flight manifests is a crucial
component of our national security and that the Department of
Homeland Security must maintain the information sharing
standards required under the 2007 Passenger Name Record
Agreement between the United States and the European Union.
Referred to Homeland Security May 10, 2011. Reported Nov. 4,
2011; Rept. 112-272. House Calendar 87.

LEGISLATION ORDERED TO BE REPORTED TO THE HOUSE

LEGISLATION PENDING AT FULL COMMITTEE

H.R.1129._Homeland Security Grant Management Improvement
Act. To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to prohibit
requiring the use of a specified percentage of a grant under
the Urban Area Security Initiative and State Homeland Security
Grant Program for specific purposes, and for other purposes.
Dec. 8, 2011, Subcommittee on Emergency Preparedness, Response,
and Communications reported to the Full Committee, amended,
voice vote.
H.R.1411._Metropolitan Medical Response System Program Act
of 2011. To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to ensure
continuation of the Metropolitan Medical Response System
Program, and for other purposes. Dec. 8, 2011, Subcommittee on
Emergency Preparedness, Response, and Communications reported
to the Full Committee, amended, voice vote.
H.R.1690._Modernizing of Documentation and Elimination of
Redundant Identification and Security Credentials Act or the
MODERN Security Credentials Act. To amend titles 49 and 46,
United States Code, and the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to
provide for certain improvements in surface transportation
security, and for other purposes. May 12, 2011 Subcommittee on
Transportation Security reported to the Full Committee,
amended, voice vote.
H.R.1922._To provide U.S. Customs and Border Protection
with access to Federal lands to carry out certain security
activities in the Southwest border region, and for other
purposes. Jun. 2, 2011 Subcommittee on Border and Maritime
Security reported to the Full Committee without amendment,
voice vote.
H.R.2658._Federal Protective Service Reform and Enhancement
Act. To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to enhance the
ability of the Federal Protective Service to provide adequate
security for the prevention of terrorist activities and for the
promotion of homeland security, and for other purposes. Jul.
28, 2011 Subcommittee on Cybersecurity, Infrastructure
Protection, and Security Technologies reported to the Full
Committee, amended, voice vote.
H.R.3011._Transportation Security Administration
Authorization Act of 2011. Sep. 14, 2011 Subcommittee on
Transportation Security reported to the Full Committee,
amended, by voice vote.
APPENDIX VI

Executive Communications, Memorials, Petitions and Presidential
Messages

EXECUTIVE COMMUNICATIONS

Executive Communication 170
January 20, 2011--Letter from Chief Privacy Officer,
Department of Homeland Security, transmitting the Department's
Privacy Office's report entitled, ``2010 Data Mining Report to
Congress'', pursuant to Pub.L. 110-53 (121 Stat. 266).

Executive Communication 256
January 26, 2011--Letter from Deputy Chief Counsel,
Regulations and Security Standards, Department of Homeland
Security, transmitting the Department's final rule -- Air Cargo
Security Requirements; Compliance Dates; Amendment [Docket No.:
TSA-2004-19515; Amendment Nos. 1544-7, 1546-4, and 1548-4]
(RIN: 1625-AA52) received January 18, 2011, pursuant to 5
U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A).

Executive Communication 596
February 28, 2011--Letter from Acting Director,
Acquisition Policy and Legislation Branch, Department of
Homeland Security, transmitting the Department's final rule --
Revision of Department of Homeland Security Acquisition
Regulation (RIN: 1601-AA16) received January 20, 2011, pursuant
to 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A).

Executive Communication 656
March 1, 2011--Letter from Chief, Border Security
Regulations Branch, Department of Homeland Security,
transmitting the Department's final rule -- Land Border Carrier
Initiative Program [Docket No.: USCBP-2006-0132] (RIN: 1651-
AA68) received February 28, 2011, pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
801(a)(1)(A).

Executive Communication 861
March 14, 2011--Letter from Deputy Director, Financial
Assistance Policy and Oversight, Department of Homeland
Security, transmitting the Department's final rule --
Department of Homeland Security Implementation of OMB Guidance
on Drug-Free Workplace Requirements [Docket No.: DHS-2010-0028]
(RIN: 1601-AA62) received February 15, 2011, pursuant to 5
U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A).

Executive Communication 882
March 15, 2011--Letter from Director, Office of National
Drug Control Policy, Executive Office of the President,
transmitting a letter regarding the Northern Boarder
Counternarcotics Strategy.

Executive Communication 1103
April 6, 2011--Letter from Acting Protected Critical
Infrastructure Information (PCII) Program Manager, Department
of Homeland Security, transmitting the Department's final rule
-- Procedures for Handling Critical Infrastructure Information
(RIN: 1601-AA14) received March 9, 2011, pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
801(a)(1)(A).

Executive Communication 1104
April 6, 2011--Letter from Director, Office of SAFETY Act
Implementation, Department of Homeland Security, transmitting
the Department's final rule -- Regulations Implementing the
Support Anti-terrorism by Fostering Effective Technologies Act
of 2002 (the SAFETY Act) [USCG-2003-15425] (RIN: 1601-AA15)
received March 9, 2011, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A).

Executive Communication 1217
April 11, 2011--Letter from Chief Privacy Officer,
Department of Homeland Security, transmitting the Department's
first quarter report for Fiscal Year 2011 from the Office of
Security and Privacy.

Executive Communication 1361
May 2, 2011--Letter from Chief Privacy Officer,
Department of Homeland Security, transmitting the Department's
first quarterly report for Fiscal Year 2011 from the Office of
Security and Privacy.

Executive Communication 1577
May 12, 2011--Letter from Administrator, Department of
Homeland Security, transmitting the Administration's
certification that the level of screening services and
protection provided at San Francisco International Airport will
be equal to or greater than the level that would be provided at
the airport by TSA Transportation Security Officers, pursuant
to 49 U.S.C. 44920(d).

Executive Communication 1671
May 24, 2011--Letter from Administrator, Department of
Homeland Security, transmitting the Administration's
certification that the level of screening services and
protection provided at Kansas City International Airport will
be equal to or greater than the level that would be provided at
the airport by TSA Transportation Security Officers.

Executive Communication 1687
May 25, 2011--Letter from Deputy Chief Counsel,
Regulations and Security Standards, Department of Homeland
Security, transmitting the Department's final rule -- Reporting
of Security Issues [Docket No.: TSA-2009-0014; Amendment No.
1503-4] (RIN: 1652-AA66) received April 15, 2011, pursuant to 5
U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A).

Executive Communication 1848
June 3, 2011--Letter from Chief Privacy Officer,
Department of Homeland Security, transmitting the Department's
first quarterly report for Fiscal Year 2011 from the Office of
Security and Privacy.

Executive Communication 1902
June 13, 2011--Letter from Director, Office of Management
and Budget, transmitting proposed legislation to improve
cybersecurity for the American people.

Executive Communication 2995
September 8, 2011--Letter from Deputy Chief Counsel,
Regulations and Security Standards, Department of Homeland
Security, transmitting the Department's ``Major'' final rule --
Air Cargo Screening [Docket No.: TSA-2009-0018; Amendment Nos.
1515-2, 1520-9, 1522-1, 1540-11, 1544-10, 1546-6, 1548-6, 1549-
1] (RIN: 1652-AA64) received August 11, 2011, pursuant to 5
U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A).

Executive Communication 3832
November 14, 2011--Letter from the Administrator, TSA,
Department of Homeland Security, transmitting the
Administration's certification that the level of screening
services and protection provided at Sioux Falls Regional
Airport will be equal to or greater than the level that would
be provided at the airport by TSA Transportation Security
Officers.

Executive Communication 3863
November 15, 2011--Letter from the Chief Privacy Officer,
Department of Homeland Security, transmitting the Privacy
Office third quarterly report for Fiscal Year 2011; to the
Committee on Homeland Security.

Executive Communication 3864
November 15, 2011--Letter from the Chief Privacy Officer,
Department of Homeland Security, transmitting a report
entitled, ``DHS Privacy Office 2011 Annual Report to
Congress''; to the Committee on Homeland Security.

Executive Communication 3929
November 17, 2011--Letter from Secretary, Department of
Homeland Security, transmitting a legislative proposal to
implement a pay reform initiative.

Executive Communication 4325
December 16, 2011--Letter from the Chief Privacy Officer,
Department of Homeland Security, transmitting the Privacy
Office fourth quarterly report for Fiscal Year 2011; to the
Committee on Homeland Security.

Executive Communication 4326
December 16, 2011--Letter from the Officer for Civil
Rights and Civil Liberties, Department of Homeland Security,
transmitting the Department's report for the Office of Civil
Rights and Civil Liberties for the Third Quarter of 2011;
jointly to the Committees on Homeland Security and the
Judiciary.

Executive Communication 5309
March 19, 2012--Letter from acting chief, Border Security
Regulations Branch, Department of Homeland Security,
transmitting the Department's final rule - Establishment of
Global Entry Program [USCBP-2008-0097] (RIN:1651-AA73) received
January 31, 2012, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A).

Executive Communication 6019
May 15, 2012--Letter from Administrator, Transportation
Security Administration, Department of Homeland Security,
transmitting the Administration's certification that the level
of screening services and protection provided at Greater
Rochester International Airport, Rochester, NY, Tupelo Regional
Airport, Tupelo, MS, and Key West International Airport, Key
West, FL will be equal to or greater than the level that would
be provided at the airport by TSA Transportation Security
Officers and that the screening company is owned and controlled
by citizens of the United States, pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 44920
Pub. L. 107-71, ( 108.

Executive Communication 6172
May 29, 2012--Letter from Deputy Chief Counsel,
Regulations and Security Standards, Department of Homeland
Security, transmitting the Department's final rule -
Transportation Security Administration Postal Zip Code Change;
Technical Amendment [Amendment No.: 1572-9] received April 24,
2012, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A).

Executive Communication 7424
August 7, 2012--Letter from Congressional Affairs
Division, Office of External Affairs, FEMA, Department of
Homeland Security, transmitting the Report on the Grants
Program Measurement Study.

Executive Communication 7425
August 7, 2012--Letter from Administrator, TSA,
Department of Homeland Security, transmitting a piece of draft
legislation.

Executive Communication 7437
August 7, 2012--Letter from Administrator, TSA,
Department of Homeland Security, transmitting a piece of draft
legislation.

Executive Communication 8017
September 21, 2012--Letter from Director, Acquisition
Policy and Legislation Branch, Department of Homeland Security,
transmitting the Department's final rule - Homeland Security
Acquisition Regulation (HSAR); Revision Initiative [HSAR Case
2009-002] [Docket No.: DHS-2009-0085] (RIN: 1601-AA28) received
September 4, 2012, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A).

Executive Communication 8126
October 19, 2012--A letter from the Acting Chief Privacy
Officer, Department of Homeland Security, transmitting a report
entitled, ``DHS Privacy Office 2012 Annual Report to
Congress''; to the Committee on Homeland Security.

----------

MEMORIALS

Memorial 66
June 16, 2011--Memorial of the Senate of the State of
Louisiana, relative to Senate Concurrent Resolution No. 3
memorializing the Congress to expedite a solution that will
provide public alert and warning in situations of war,
terrorist attack, natural disaster or other hazards to public
safety and well-being.

Memorial 83
July 8, 2011--Memorial of the Senate of the State of
Louisiana , relative to Senate Concurrent Resolution No. 3
memorializing the Congress to expedite a solution that will
provide public alert and warning in situations of war,
terrorist attack, natural disaster, or other hazards to public
safety.

Memorial 132
September 20, 2011--Memorial of the House of
Representatives of the State of New Hampshire, relative to
House Concurrent Resolution 9 urging the President and the
Congress to immediately address the serious privacy,
constitutional, safety, and religious freedom concerns
presented by advanced imaging technology employed by the
Transportation Security Agency; to the Committee on Homeland
Security.

Memorial 213
May 17, 2012--Memorial of the Senate of the State of
Arizona, relative to Senate Concurrent Resolution 1014
supporting an increase in the United States Customs and Border
protection personnel in the Tucson sector along the border
between the United States and Mexico.

Memorial 245
July 9, 2012--Memorial of the House of Representatives of
the State of Hawaii, relative to House Resolution No. 130
urging the Congress to enact the VISIT USA Act.

Memorial 246
July 9, 2012--Memorial of the House of Representatives of
the State of Hawaii, relative to House Resolution No. 25
supporting the Visa Improvements to Stimulate International
Tourism to the United State of America.

Memorial 278
August 7, 2012--Memorial of the House of Representatives
of the State of Hawaii, relative to House Resolution No. 98
urging the Congress to propose and support the inclusion of the
Philippines in the VISIT USA Act.

----------

PETITIONS

Petition 7
June 1, 2011--Petition of the Niagara County Legislature,
New York, relative to Resolution No. IL-030-11 declaring
opposition to H.R.1555.

Petition 10
June 16, 2011--Petition of Town of Cambria, New York,
relative to a resolution opposing H.R.1555.

Petition 36
February 7, 2012--Petition of the City of Lauderdale
Lakes, Florida, relative to Resolution No. 2011-121 setting
forth the City's 2012 Federal Legislative and Appropriations
priorities.

----------

PRESIDENTIAL MESSAGES

Presidential Message 50
April 19, 2012--Communication from the President of the
United States, transmitting the Administration's 2012 National
Drug Control Strategy, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 1504.

10
June 16, 2011--Petition of Town of Cambria, New York,
relative to a resolution opposing H.R.1555.

36
February 7, 2012--Petition of the City of Lauderdale
Lakes, Florida, relative to Resolution No. 2011-121 setting
forth the City's 2012 Federal Legislative and Appropriations
priorities.
APPENDIX VII

Committee Staff

MAJORITY STAFF

Michael J. Russell, Staff Director & Chief Counsel
Paul Anstine, Subcommittee on Border and Maritime Security
Staff Director
Jennifer Arangio, Senior Counsel
Diana Bergwin, Senior Subcommittee Clerk
Katherine Bonvechio, Professional Staff Member
Mandy Bowers, Senior Policy Director
Luke M. Burke, Senior Professional Staff Member
Dr. Ellen P. Carlin, Senior Professional Staff Member
Alan Carroll, Legislative Assistant
Kevin Carroll, Senior Counsel
April Corbett, Senior Press Assistant
Brett DeWitt, Senior Professional Staff Member
Johnathan Duecker, Senior Counterterrorism Advisor
Laura Fullerton, Professional Staff Member
Steven Giaier Parliamentarian
Kevin Gronberg, Senior Counsel
Benjamin R. Grove, Staff Assistant
Kevin Gundersen, Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and
Intelligence Staff Director
Zachary Harris, Subcommittee Clerk
Michele Ingwersen, Scheduler
Kerry A. Kinirons, Subcommittee on Emergency Preparedness,
Response, and Communications Staff Director
Kyle Klein, Staff Assistant
Marshall Macomber, Professional Staff Member
Michael McAdams, Press Assistant
Matthew McCabe, Senior Counsel
James Meek, Senior Investigator
Jason Miller, Senior Professional Staff Member
Coley C. O'Brien, Subcommittee on Cybersecurity, Infrastructure
Protection and Security Technologies Staff Director
Joan V. O'Hara, Counsel
Dr. R. Nick Palarino, Subcommittee on Oversight, Investigations
and Management Staff Director
Amanda J. Parikh, Subcommittee on Transportation Security Staff
Director
Edward Parkinson, Professional Staff Member
Meghann Peterlin, Senior Professional Staff Member
Krista Powers, Senior Professional Staff Member
MaryRose Rooney Legislative Assistant
Monica Sanders Investigative Counsel
Nicole Smith, Professional Staff Member
Jacobus Vreeburg, Deputy Parliamentarian
Kerry Ann Watkins, Senior Policy Director
Lauren Wenger, Senior Professional Staff Member
Jerry White, Parliamentarian
Dennis Wilson Security Director
Shane Wolfe, Communications Director/Counsel

MINORITY STAFF

I. Lanier Avant, Staff Director
Hillary Anderson, Research Assistant
Pizza Ashby, Professional Staff Member
Moira Bergin, Professional Staff Member
Cherri Branson, Chief Counsel for Oversight
Rosaline Cohen, Chief Counsel for Legislation
Adam M. Comis, Communications Director
Hope Goins, Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and Intelligence
Director and Counsel
Synarus Green, Professional Staff Member
Claytrice Henderson, Legislative Assistant
Cory Horton, Professional Staff Member
Nicole Wade Johnson, Office Manager
Deborah R. Mack, Professional Staff Member
Alison B. Northrop, Subcommittee on Border and Maritime
Security Director and Counsel
Marisela Salayandia, Senior Professional Staff Member
K. Christopher Schepis, Senior Professional Staff Member
Tamla T. Scott, Subcommittee on Oversight, Investigations and
Management Director and Counsel
Charles Snyder, Professional Staff Member
Nicole Tisdale, Senior Professional Staff Member / Counsel
Brian B. Turbyfill, Senior Professional Staff Member

SHARED COMMITTEE STAFF

Dawn M. Criste, Chief Financial Officer
Michael S.Twinchek, Chief Clerk
Natalie Nixon, Deputy Chief Clerk
Heather Crowell, GPO Detailee, Printer

FORMER MAJORITY STAFF

Dr. Diane L. Berry, Senior Professional Staff Member
Towner French, Chief Parliamentarian
Chris Mulrain, Professional Staff Member
Adam Paulson, Senior Legislative Assistant

FORMER MINORITY STAFF

Kimberly Alton, Professional Staff Member / Counsel
Christopher A. Beck, Subcommittee on Cybersecurity,
Infrastructure Protection and Security Technologies
Director
Curtis Brown, Professional Staff Member
Arianne Callender, Deputy Oversight Counsel
Mario H. Cantu, Professional Staff Member
Paula R. Delcambre, Professional Staff Member
Dena Graziano, Communications Director
Thomas C. McDaniels, Jr., Subcommittee on Transportation
Security Director
DeCarlo McLaren, Research Assistant
Stephen R. Vina, Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and
Intelligence Director
Patricia Zavala, Professional Staff Member
APPENDIX VIII

Witnesses

----------

-- A --

Adler, Jon, President, Federal Law Enforcement Officers
Association.
LOIM, Mar. 31, 2011, ``The U.S. Homeland Security Role
in the Mexican War Against Drug Cartels.''
Aguilar, Sylvia, Chief Deputy, El Paso County Sheriff's Office
Head Quarters.
LOIM, Oct. 14, 2011, ``A Call to Action: Narco-
Terrorism's Threat to the Southern U.S. Border.''
Ahmed, Qanta A. A., MD, FACP, FCCP, FAASM, Private Citizen.
LFULL, Jun. 20, 2012, ``The American Muslim Response to
Hearings on Radicalization within Their Community.''
Aimone, Michael A., Director, Business Enterprise Integration,
Office of the Deputy Undersecretary of Defense for
Installations and Environment, Office of Undersecretary
of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics,
Department of Defense.
LCIPST, Sep. 12, 2012, ``The EMP Threat: Examining the
Consequences.''
Ainslie, Ricardo C., PhD, Department of Educational Psychology,
College of Education, The University of Texas at
Austin.
LOIM, Mar. 31, 2011, ``The U.S. Homeland Security Role
in the Mexican War Against Drug Cartels.''
Allen, Matthew C., Special Agent in Charge, Homeland Security
Investigations - Phoenix, U.S. Immigration and Customs
Enforcement, Department of Homeland Security.
LBMS, May 21, 2012, field hearing in Phoenix, Arizona,
``Stopping the Flow of Illicit Drugs in Arizona by Leveraging
State, Local and Federal Information Sharing.''
Allen, Thad, ADm. (Ret.), Senior Vice President, Booz Allen
Hamilton.
LOIM, Mar. 22, 2012, ``Building One DHS: Why is Employee
Morale Low?''
Allison, Roderick J., Deputy Assistant Administrator for Law
Enforcement, Deputy Director, Federal Air Marshal
Service, Transportation Security Administration,
Department of Homeland Security.
LTS, Feb. 16, 2012, ``Last Line of Defense: the Federal
Air Marshal Service 10 Years After 9/11.''
Allmond, Bill, Vice President, Government and Public Relations,
Society of Chemical Manufacturers and Affiliates.
LCIPST, Mar. 6, 2012, ``The Chemical Facilities Anti-
Terrorism Standards Program: Addressing Its Challenges and
Finding a Way Forward.''
Alonso, Colby, Association of Flight Attendants.
LTS, July 10, 2012, ``Challenging the Status Quo at TSA:
Perspectives on the Future of Transportation Security.''
Alterman, Steve, President, Cargo Airline Association.
LTS, July 12, 2011, ``Industry Perspectives: Authorizing
the Transportation Security Administration for FY 2012 and
2013.''
Alvarez, Luis, Assistant Director, Immigration and Customs
Enforcement, Department of Homeland Security.
LOIM, Mar. 31, 2011, ``The U.S. Homeland Security Role
in the Mexican War Against Drug Cartels.''
Amey, Scott, General Counsel, Project On Government Oversight.
LOIM, July 15, 2011, ``Homeland Security Contracting:
Does the Department Effectively Leverage Emerging
Technologies?''
Amitay, Stephen D., Esq., Federal Legislative Counsel, National
Association of Security Companies.
LCIPST, July 13, 2011, ``Securing Federal Facilities:
Challenges of the Federal Protective Service and the Need for
Reform.''
LTS, Feb. 7, 2012, ``Screening Partnership Program: Why
is a Job-Creating, Public-Private Partnership Meeting
Resistance at TSA?''
Amoroso, Edward, Senior Vice President and Chief Security
Officer, AT&T.
LCIPST, Mar. 16, 2011, ``The DHS Cybersecurity Mission:
Promoting Innovation and Securing Critical Infrastructure.''
Anderson, David, Col., District Commander, Baltimore District,
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, U.S. Army, Department of
Defense.
LEPRC, Nov. 29, 2011, field hearing in La Plume,
Pennsylvania ``Ensuring Effective Preparedness and Response:
Lessons Learned from Hurricane Irene and Tropical Storm Lee.''
Anderson, Penny J., Director, Infrastructure Security
Compliance Division, Office of Infrastructure
Protection, Department of Homeland Security.
LCIPST, Mar. 6, 2012, ``The Chemical Facilities Anti-
Terrorism Standards Program: Addressing Its Challenges and
Finding a Way Forward.''
Arthur, Phyllis, Senior Director, Vaccines, Immunotherapeutics,
and Diagnostics Policy, Biotechnology Industry
Organization.
LEPRC, Apr. 13, 2011, ``Taking Measure of
Countermeasures: A review of government and industry efforts to
protect the homeland through accelerated research, development,
and acquisition of chemical, biological, radiological and
nuclear medical countermeasures.''
Atkin, Thomas, RADM, Assistant Commandant for Intelligence and
Criminal investigation, U.S. Coast Guard, Department of
Homeland Security.
LCTI, June 1, 2011, ``The DHS Intelligence Enterprise--
Past, Present, and Future.''
Austin, Donald, Commissioner, Detroit Fire Department.
LEPRC, Oct. 28, 2011, (Detroit, Michigan) ``The State of
Northern Border Preparedness: A Review of Federal, State, and
Local Coordination.''
Ayala, Janice, Assistant Director for Operations, United States
Immigrations and Customs Enforcement.
LOIM, July 21, 2012, ``The U.S. Caribbean Border: An
Open Road for Drug Traffickers and Terrorists.''

-- B --

Baca, Leroy, Sheriff, Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department.
LFULL, Mar. 10, 2011, ``The Extent of Radicalization in
the American Muslim Community and that Community's Response.''
Bailey, John, Professor, Government and Foreign Service,
Georgetown University.
LOIM, Mar. 31, 2011, ``The U.S. Homeland Security Role
in the Mexican War Against Drug Cartels.''
Baker, Stewart A., Former Assistant Secretary for Policy,
Department of Homeland Security.
LFULL, Sep. 20, 2012, ``The Department of Homeland
Security: An Assessment of the Department and a Roadmap for its
Future.''
Baker--McNeill, Jena, Private Citizen.
LOIM, July 7, 2011, ``Homeland Security Investigations:
Examining DHS's Efforts to Protect American Jobs and Secure the
Homeland.''
Barbero, Michael D., LTG, Director, Joint IED Defeat
Organization, United States Army, Department of
Defense.
LCIPST, July 12, 2012, ``Securing Ammonium Nitrate:
Using Lessons Learned in Afghanistan to Protect the Homeland
from IED's.''
Barfi, Barak, Research Fellow, New America Foundation.
LCTI, Mar. 2, 2011, ``Terrorist Threat to the U.S.
Homeland -- Al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP).''
Barnett, James A., RADM, Chief, Public Safety and Homeland
Security Bureau, Federal Communications Commission.
LEPRC, July 8, 2011, ``Communicating With the Public
During Emergencies: An Update on Federal Alert and Warning
Efforts.''
Bartlett, Lawrence F., Director, Office of Refugee Admissions,
Bureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration, U.S.
Department of State.
LCTI, Dec. 4, 2012. ``Terrorist Exploitation of Refugee
Programs.''
Bascetta, Cynthia, Managing Director, Health Care, Government
Accountability Office.
LEPRC, Apr. 13, 2011, ``Taking Measure of
Countermeasures: A review of government and industry efforts to
protect the homeland through accelerated research, development,
and acquisition of chemical, biological, radiological and
nuclear medical countermeasures.''
Beck, Chris, President, Electric Infrastructure Security
Council.
LCIPST, Sep. 12, 2012, ``The EMP Threat: Examining the
Consequences.''
Beers, Rand, Under Secretary, National Protection and Programs
Directorate, Department of Homeland Security.
LCIPST, Feb. 11, 2011, ``Preventing Chemical Terrorism:
Building a Foundation of Security At Our Nation's Chemical
Facilities.''
LCIPST, Mar. 6, 2012, ``The Chemical Facilities Anti-
Terrorism Standards Program: Addressing Its Challenges and
Finding a Way Forward.''
Ben-Ari, Guy, Deputy Director, Defense-Industrial Initiatives
Group, Fellow, International Security Program, Center
for Strategic and International Studies.
LTS, Oct. 13, 2011, ``TSA Reform: Exploring Innovations
in Technology Procurement to Stimulate Job Growth, Part II.''
Benda, Paul, Chief of Staff, Director, Homeland Security
Advanced Research Projects Agency, Department of
Homeland Security, Accompanied by Dr. Susan Hallowell,
Director, Transportation Security Laboratory.
LTS, November 3, 2011, ``TSA Reform: Exploring
Innovations in Technology Procurement to Stimulate Job Growth,
Part III.''
Benjamin, Georges C., M.D., Executive Director, American Public
Health Association.
LEPRC Jun. 6, 2012, ``The National Preparedness Report:
Assessing the State of Preparedness.''
Benson, Rodney G., Assistant Administrator, Chief of
Intelligence, Drug Enforcement Administration, U.S.
Department of Justice.
LOIM, JT. with the Committee on Foreign Affairs'
Subcommittee on the Western Hemisphere, Oct. 4, 2011, ``Merida
Part Two: Insurgency and Terrorism in Mexico.''
Berdnik, Richard H., Sheriff, Passaic County, New Jersey.
LCIPST & EPRC, June 23, 2011, ``H.R.----, the `WMD
Prevention and Preparedness Act of 2011.'''
Bergen, Peter, Director, National Security Studies Program, New
America Foundation.
LFULL, May 25, 2011, ``Threats to the American Homeland
after Killing Bin Laden: An Assessment.''
Berman, Ilan, Vice President, American Foreign Policy Council.
LCTI, July 7, 2011, ``Hezbollah in Latin America --
Implications for U.S. Homeland Security.''
LCTI and CIPST, April 26, 2012, ``Iranian Cyber Threat
to the U.S. Homeland.''
Berrick, Cathleen, Managing Director, Homeland Security and
Justice Issues , Government Accountability Office.
LOIM, Mar. 8, 2012, ``Eliminating Waste, Fraud, Abuse,
and Duplication in the Department of Homeland Security.''
Beutlich, John, Director of the Northern Region, Office of Air
& Marine, U.S. Customs and Border Protection,
Department of Homeland Security.
LEPRC, Oct. 28, 2011, (Detroit, Michigan) ``The State of
Northern Border Preparedness: A Review of Federal, State, and
Local Coordination.''
Bihi, Abdirizak, Director, Somali Education and Social Advocacy
Center.
LFULL, Mar. 10, 2011, ``The Extent of Radicalization in
the American Muslim Community and that Community's Response.''
Blank, Tom, Executive Vice President, Gephardt Government
Affairs.
LTS, July 10, 2012, ``Challenging the Status Quo at TSA:
Perspectives on the Future of Transportation Security.''
Blankenship, William C., Chief Operating Officer, Greyhound
Lines, Inc.
LTS, May 31, 2012, ``TSA's Surface Inspection Program:
Strengthening Security or Squandering Scant Resources?''
Blesdoe, Melvin, Private Citizen.
LFULL, Mar. 10, 2011, ``The Extent of Radicalization in
the American Muslim Community and that Community's Response.''
Bloom, Richard, Dr., Associate Vice President for Academics,
Director of Terrorism, Espionage, and Security Studies,
Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University.
LTS, July 10, 2012, ``Challenging the Status Quo at TSA:
Perspectives on the Future of Transportation Security.''
Borkowski, Mark, Assistant Commissioner, Office of Technology
Innovation and Acquisition, U.S. Customs and Border
Protection, Department of Homeland Security.
LBMS, Mar. 15, 2011, ``Strengthening the Border --
Finding the Right Mix of Personnel, Infrastructure and
Technology.''
LBMS, November 15, 2011, ``Protecting the Homeland: How
can DHS use DOD Technology to Secure the Border?''
LOIM, Sep. 21, 2012, ``DHS Acquisition Management
Challenges: Solution for Saving Taxpayer Dollars.''
Borras, Rafael, Under Secretary for Management and Chief
Acquisition Officer, Department of Homeland Security.
LOIM, July 15, 2011, ``Homeland Security Contracting:
Does the Department Effectively Leverage Emerging
Technologies?''
LOIM, Mar. 1, 2012, ``Building One DHS: Why Can't
Management Information be Integrated?''
Borras, Raphael, Under Secretary for Management, Department of
Homeland Security.
LEPRC and CIPST, Sep. 13, 2012, ``BioWatch Present and
Future: Meeting Mission Needs for Effective Biosurveillance?''
Bottum, James R., Vice Provost for Computing & Information
Technology, and Chief Information Officer, Clemson
University.
LCIPST, Oct. 6, 2011 ``Cloud Computing: What are the
Security Implications?''
Boucek, Dr. Christopher, Associate, Carnegie Endowment for
International Peace.
LCTI, Mar. 2, 2011, ``Terrorist Threat to the U.S.
Homeland -- Al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP).''
Bowman, Darrell S., Group Leader, Advanced Systems &
Applications, Virginia Tech Transportation Institute.
LTS, May 4, 2011, H.R.1690, the ``MODERN Security
Credentials Act.''
Boyland, Scott, Vice President & General Counsel, Safran Morpho
Detection.
LTS, Oct. 13, 2011, ``TSA Reform: Exploring Innovations
in Technology Procurement to Stimulate Job Growth, Part II.''
Brachman, Jarret, Dr., Managing Director, Cronus Global.
LCTI, Mar. 2, 2011, ``Terrorist Threat to the U.S.
Homeland -- Al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP).''
Braun, Michael A., Managing Partner, Spectre Group
International, LLC.
LFULL, Mar. 21, 2012, ``Iran, Hezbollah, and the Threat
to the Homeland.''
Bray, Robert S., Assistant Administrator for Law Enforcement,
Director, Federal Air Marshal Service, Transportation
Security Administration, Department of Homeland
Security.
LTS, Feb. 16, 2012, ``Last Line of Defense: the Federal
Air Marshal Service 10 Years After 9/11.''
Brown, Timothy, Senior Vice President, and Chief Architect for
Security, CA Technologies.
LCIPST, Oct. 6, 2011 ``Cloud Computing: What are the
Security Implications?''
Brownfield, William R., Assistant Secretary, Bureau of
International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs,
U.S. Department of State.
LOIM, JT. with the Committee on Foreign Affairs'
Subcommittee on the Western Hemisphere, Oct. 4, 2011, ``Merida
Part Two: Insurgency and Terrorism in Mexico.''
Brozena, James J., P.E., Executive Director, Luzerne County
Flood Protection Authority.
LEPRC, Nov. 29, 2011, field hearing in La Plume,
Pennsylvania ``Ensuring Effective Preparedness and Response:
Lessons Learned from Hurricane Irene and Tropical Storm Lee.''
Bryant, Maurita, National First Vice President, National
Organization of Black Law Enforcement Executives.
LCTI, Feb. 28, 2012, ``Federal Government Intelligence
Sharing with State, Local and Tribal Law Enforcement: An
Assessment Ten Years After 9/11.''
Bucella, Donna A., Assistant Commissioner, Office of
Intelligence and Investigative Liaison, U.S. Customs
and Border Protection, Department of Homeland Security.
LBMS, Jun. 19, 2012, ``Border Security Threats to the
Homeland: DHS' Response to Innovative Tactics and Techniques.''
Buford, James P., P.E.M., Director, Department of Homeland
Security and Emergency Management, Wayne County,
Michigan.
LEPRC, Oct. 28, 2011, (Detroit, Michigan) ``The State of
Northern Border Preparedness: A Review of Federal, State, and
Local Coordination.''
Bunce, Peter J., President and Chief Executive Officer, General
Aviation Manufacturers Association.
LTS, July 12, 2011, ``Industry Perspectives: Authorizing
the Transportation Security Administration for FY 2012 and
2013.''
Bush, Thomas, Executive Director of Automation and Targeting,
Office of Intelligence and Investigative Liaison,
Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland
Security.
LCTI, Oct. 5, 2011, ``Intelligence Sharing and Terrorist
Travel: How DHS Addresses the Mission of Providing Security,
Facilitating Commerce and Protecting Privacy for Passengers
Engaged in International Travel.''
Byman, Daniel L., Prof. Security Studies Program, School of
Foreign Service at Georgetown University and Senior
Fellow, Saban Center for Middle East Policy, The
Brookings Institution.
LOIM, June 3, 2011, ``Denying Safe Havens: Homeland
Security's Efforts to Counter Threats from Pakistan, Yemen and
Somalia.''
Byrd, Philip L., Sr., President, Bulldog Hiway Express,
testifying on behalf of the American Trucking
Associations.
LTS, May 31, 2012, ``TSA's Surface Inspection Program:
Strengthening Security or Squandering Scant Resources?''
Byrne, Sean J., Assistant Administrator, Human Capital,
Transportation Security Administration, Department of
Homeland Security.
LTS, Mar.28, 2012, ``Rightsizing TSA Bureaucracy and
Workforce Without Compromising Security.''

-- C --

Caldwell, Stephen, Director of Maritime and Coast Guard Issues,
Homeland Security and Justice Team, Government
Accountability Office.
LOIM, August 24, 2011, field hearing in Houston, Texas,
``Preventing an Economic Shock Wave: Securing the Port of
Houston from a Terrorist Attack.''
LBMS, Feb. 7, 2012, ``Balancing Maritime Security and
Trade Facilitation: Protecting our Ports, Increasing Commerce
and Securing the Supply Chain -- Part I.''
Calio, Nicholas E., President & Chief Executive Officer, Air
Transport Association.
LTS, July 12, 2011, ``Industry Perspectives: Authorizing
the Transportation Security Administration for FY 2012 and
2013.''
Callahan, Mary Ellen, Chief Privacy Officer, Department of
Homeland Security.
LCTI, Oct. 5, 2011, ``Intelligence Sharing and Terrorist
Travel: How DHS Addresses the Mission of Providing Security,
Facilitating Commerce and Protecting Privacy for Passengers
Engaged in International Travel.''
LCTI, Feb. 16, 2012, ``DHS Monitoring of Social
Networking and Media: Enhancing Intelligence Gathering and
Ensuring Privacy.''
Cammett, Dr. Melani, Director, Middle East Studies Program,
Brown University.
LCTI, July 7, 2011, ``Hezbollah in Latin America --
Implications for U.S. Homeland Security.''
Cannon, Glenn, Director, Pennsylvania Emergency Management
Agency.
LEPRC, Nov. 29, 2011, field hearing in La Plume,
Pennsylvania ``Ensuring Effective Preparedness and Response:
Lessons Learned from Hurricane Irene and Tropical Storm Lee.''
Cantor, Jonathan, Acting Chief Privacy, Department of Homeland
Security.
LTS, Nov. 15, 2012, ``TSA's Recent Scanner Shuffle: Real
Strategy of Wasteful Smokescreen?'' The Subcommittee received
testimony from
Carafano, James J., Ph.D., Director, Douglas and Sarah Allison
Center, for Foreign Policy Studies and Deputy Director,
Kathryn and Shelby Cullom Davis Institute for
International Studies, The Heritage Foundation.
LTS, Sep. 11, 2012, ``Eleven Years After 9/11 Can TSA
Evolve To Meet the Next Terrorist Threat?''
Carbone, Linda Jorge, Chief Executive Officer, Tampa Bay
Chapter & Florida's West Coast Region, American Red
Cross.
LEPRC, Jun. 10, 2011, ``Weathering the Storm: A State
and Local Perspective on Emergency Management.''
Carlin, Jane, Chair, Financial Services Sector Coordinating
Council.
LCIPST, Mar. 16, 2011, ``The DHS Cybersecurity Mission:
Promoting Innovation and Securing Critical Infrastructure.''
Carr, Douglass, Vice President, Safety, Security and
Regulation, National Business Aviation Association.
LTS, July 18, 2012, ``A Decade After 9/11 Could American
Flight Schools Still Unknowingly Be Training Terrorists?''
Carrow, William ``Bill'' D., President, The Association of
Public-Safety Communications Officials (APCO)
International.
LFULL, Mar. 30, 2011, ``Public Safety Communications:
Are the Needs of Our First Responders Being Met?''
Carter, Michael Robert, Dr., Senior Scientist, National
Ignition Facility and Photon Science Directorate,
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.
LCIPST, Apr. 19, 2012, ``The DHS and DOE National Labs:
Finding Efficiencies and Optimizing Outputs in Homeland
Security Research and Development.''
Caslow, Roger, Executive Cyberconsultant, Suss Consulting.
LCTI and CIPST, April 26, 2012, ``Iranian Cyber Threat
to the U.S. Homeland.''
Cassara, John, Private Citizen.
LCTI, May 18, 2012, ``Terrorist Financing Since 9/11:
Assessing an Evolving al Qaeda and State Sponsors of
Terrorism.''
Cassidy, Sean P., First Vice President, Air Line Pilots
Association, International.
LTS, May 16, 2012, ``Access Control Point Breaches at
Our Nation's Airports: Anomalies or Systemic Failures?''
Caudle, Sharon L., PhD, The Bush School of Government and
Public Service, Texas A&M University.
LOIM, Feb. 3, ``Is DHS Effectively Implementing a
Strategy to Counter Emerging Threats?''
Cauley, Gerry, President and C.E.O., North American Electric
Reliability Corporation.
LCIPST, Mar. 16, 2011, ``The DHS Cybersecurity Mission:
Promoting Innovation and Securing Critical Infrastructure.''
Chaparro, James, Assistant Director for Intelligence,
Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Department of
Homeland Security.
LCTI, June 1, 2011, ``The DHS Intelligence Enterprise--
Past, Present, and Future.''
Chavez, Richard, Director, Office of Operations Coordinating
and Planning, Department of Homeland Security.
LCTI, Feb. 16, 2012, ``DHS Monitoring of Social
Networking and Media: Enhancing Intelligence Gathering and
Ensuring Privacy.''
Cilluffo, Frank J., Associate Vice President and Director,
Homeland Security Policy Institute, The George
Washington University.
LCTI and CIPST, April 26, 2012, ``Iranian Cyber Threat
to the U.S. Homeland.''
LFULL, Sep. 20, 2012, ``The Department of Homeland
Security: An Assessment of the Department and a Roadmap for its
Future.''
LOIM, Nov. 16, 2012, ``A Line in the Sand: Assessing
Dangerous Threats to Our Nation's Borders.''
Clemmensen, Hank, Chief, Palatine Rural Fire Protection
District, testifying on behalf of the International
Association of Fire Chiefs.
LEPRC, April 26, 2012, ``Ensuring the Efficiency,
Effectiveness, and Transparency of Homeland Security Grants
(Part II): Stakeholder Perspectives.''
Cleroco, John M., Principal, Tiber Creek Partners LLC.
LEPRC, Apr. 13, 2011, ``Taking Measure of
Countermeasures: A review of government and industry efforts to
protect the homeland through accelerated research, development,
and acquisition of chemical, biological, radiological and
nuclear medical countermeasures.''
Clinton, Larry, President, Internet Security Alliance.
LCIPST, June 24, 2011, ``Examining the Homeland Security
Impact of the Obama Administration's Cybersecurity Proposal.''
Cohen, John, Deputy Counter-Terrorism Coordinator, Department
of Homeland Security.
LSep. 13, 2011, BMS, ``Ten Years after 9/11: Can
Terrorists Still Exploit our Visa System?''
LBMS, Mar. 6, 2012, ``From the 9/11 Hijackers to Amine
el-Khalifi: Terrorists and the Visa Overstay Problem.''
Cohn, Alan, Deputy Assistant Secretary, Office of Policy,
Department of Homeland Security.
LOIM, Feb. 3, ``Is DHS Effectively Implementing a
Strategy to Counter Emerging Threats?''
Cole, Dr. Leonard A., Director, Program on Terror Medicine and
Security, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New
Jersey. Testifying on behalf of The Aspen Institute.
LCTI, Nov. 15, 2012, ``TSA's Recent Scanner Shuffle:
Real Strategy of Wasteful Smokescreen?''
Coleman, Douglas, Special Agent in Charge, Drug Enforcement
Administration - Phoenix, Department of Justice.
LBMS, May 21, 2012, field hearing in Phoenix, Arizona,
``Stopping the Flow of Illicit Drugs in Arizona by Leveraging
State, Local and Federal Information Sharing.''
Coll, Steve, President and CEO, New America Foundation.
LOIM, June 3, 2011, ``Denying Safe Havens: Homeland
Security's Efforts to Counter Threats from Pakistan, Yemen and
Somalia.''
Concannon, Michael, Maj., Massachusetts State Police Troop F
Headquarters.
LOIM, Sep. 16, 2011, Boston, Massachusetts, ``Ten Years
After 9/11: Assessing Airport Security and Preventing a Future
Terrorist Attack.''
Cooke, Jennifer G., Director, Africa Program, Center for
Strategic and International Studies.
LCTI, Nov. 30, 2011, ``Boko Haram -- Emerging Threat to
the U.S. Homeland.''
Coon, Kiersten Todt, President and CEO, Liberty Group Ventures.
LEPRC and CIPST, May 9, 2012, ``First Responder
Technologies: Ensuring a Prioritized Approach for Homeland
Security Research and Development.''
Cornelis, Filip, Head of Unit for Aviation Security,
Directorate General for Mobility and Transport,
European Commission.
LTS, Apr. 7, 2011, ``Strengthening International
Cooperation on Aviation Security.''
Cortez, Richard F., Mayor, City of McAllen, Texas.
LBMS, April 5, 2011, ``Using Resources Effectively to
Secure Our Border at Ports of Entry _ Stopping the Illicit Flow
of Money, Guns and Drugs.''
Cox, Adam, Dr., Acting Deputy Director, Homeland Security
Advanced Research Projects Agency, Department of
Homeland Security.
LBMS, November 15, 2011, ``Protecting the Homeland: How
can DHS use DOD Technology to Secure the Border?''
Crosby, Mark, Chief of Public Safety & Security, Portland
International Airport, testifying on behalf of the
American Association of Airport Executives.
LTS, May 16, 2012, ``Access Control Point Breaches at
Our Nation's Airports: Anomalies or Systemic Failures?''
Curran, John, Chief Executive Officer, American Registry of
Internet Numbers.
LCIPST, Oct. 6, 2011 ``Cloud Computing: What are the
Security Implications?''
Czerwinski, Stanley J., Director, Intergovernmental Relations,
Governmental Accountability Office.
LEPRC Jun. 6, 2012, ``The National Preparedness Report:
Assessing the State of Preparedness.''

-- D --

Daddario, Richard, Deputy Commissioner for Counterterrorism,
New York City Police Department.
LFULL, May 4, 2011, ``Securing Our Nation's Mass Transit
Systems Against a Terrorist Attack.''
LCIPST, July 26, 2011, ``The Last Line of Defense:
Federal, State, and Local Efforts to Prevent Nuclear and
Radiological Terrorism Within the United States.''
LEPRC, April 26, 2012, ``Ensuring the Efficiency,
Effectiveness, and Transparency of Homeland Security Grants
(Part II): Stakeholder Perspectives.''
Davis, James H., Executive Director, Colorado Department of
Public Safety, testifying on behalf of the National
Governor's Association.
LEPRC, April 26, 2012, ``Ensuring the Efficiency,
Effectiveness, and Transparency of Homeland Security Grants
(Part II): Stakeholder Perspectives.''
DePallo, Michael, Director and General Manager, The Port
Authority Trans Hudson (PATH) Corporation, testifying
on behalf of the American Public Transportation
Association.
LEPRC, April 26, 2012, ``Ensuring the Efficiency,
Effectiveness, and Transparency of Homeland Security Grants
(Part II): Stakeholder Perspectives.''
Dever, Larry, Sheriff, Cochise County, Arizona.
LBMS, May 3, 2011, ``Border Security and Enforcement --
Department of Homeland Security's Cooperation with State and
Local Law Enforcement Stakeholders.''
Diehl, William, CAPT (Ret.), President, Greater Houston Port
Bureau.
LOIM, August 24, 2011, field hearing in Houston, Texas,
``Preventing an Economic Shock Wave: Securing the Port of
Houston from a Terrorist Attack.''
Dillingham, Gerald, Ph.D., Director, Physical Infrastructure
Issues, Government Accountability Office.
LOIM, July 19, 2012, ``Using Unmanned Aerial Systems
Within the Homeland: Security Game Changer?''
Dingell, John D., a Representative in Congress from the 15th
District of Michigan.
LFULL, Mar. 10, 2011, ``The Extent of Radicalization in
the American Muslim Community and that Community's Response.''
Dinkins, James A., Executive Associate Director, Homeland
Security Investigations, U.S. Immigration and Customs
Enforcement, Department of Homeland Security.
LBMS, Jun. 19, 2012, ``Border Security Threats to the
Homeland: DHS' Response to Innovative Tactics and Techniques.''
Dodaro, Eugene L., Comptroller General of the United States.
LFULL, Sep. 8, 2011, ``The Attacks of September 11th:
Where are We Today.''
Donahue, David, Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for
Consular Affairs, U.S. Department of State.
LBMS, Mar. 6, 2012, ``From the 9/11 Hijackers to Amine
el-Khalifi: Terrorists and the Visa Overstay Problem.''
Donnellon, Tim, Sheriff, St. Clair County Sheriff's Office,
Michigan.
LBMS, July 12, 2011, ``Protecting the Maritime Borders
-- Leveraging Law Enforcement Cooperation to Enhance Security
Along America's Coasts.''
Dow, Roger, President and Chief Executive Officer, U.S. Travel
Association.
LTS, May 8, 2012, ``Building Secure Partnerships in
Travel, Commerce, and Trade with the Asia-Pacific Region.''
Downing, Michael P., Commanding Officer, Counter-Terrorism and
Special Operations Bureau, Los Angeles Police
Department.
LJun. 15, 2011, FULL, ``The Threat of Muslim-American
Radicalization in U.S. Prisons.''
Doying, Annette, Director, Office of Emergency Management,
Pasco County, Florida.
LEPRC and CIPST, May 9, 2012, ``First Responder
Technologies: Ensuring a Prioritized Approach for Homeland
Security Research and Development.''
Dragani, Nancy, Chair, Response & Recovery Committee, National
Emergency Management Association.
LEPRC, Jun. 10, 2011, ``Weathering the Storm: A State
and Local Perspective on Emergency Management.''
Drevna, Charles, President, American Fuel and Petrochemical
Manufactures.
LCTI, Mar. 19, 2012, ``The Implications of Refinery
Closures for U.S. Homeland Security and Critical Infrastructure
Safety.''
Duke, Elaine C., President, Elaine Duke & Associates, LLC.
LTS, Sep. 22, 2011, ``TSA Reform: Exploring Innovations
in Technology Procurement to Stimulate Job Growth.''
Duncan, James G., Assistant Administrator, Office of
Professional Responsibility, Transportation Security
Administration, Department of Homeland Security.
LTS, Mar.28, 2012, ``Rightsizing TSA Bureaucracy and
Workforce Without Compromising Security.''
LOIM, May 17, 2012, ``Department of Homeland Security:
An Examination of Ethical Standards.''
Dunham, Wanda, Chief of Police and Emergency Management,
Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority, MARTA
Police Headquarters.
LTS, July 12, 2011, ``Industry Perspectives: Authorizing
the Transportation Security Administration for FY 2012 and
2013.''
Dunleavy, Patrick T., Ret. Deputy Inspector General, Criminal
Intelligence Unit, New York State Department of
Correctional Services.
LJun. 15, 2011, FULL, ``The Threat of Muslim-American
Radicalization in U.S. Prisons.''

-- E --

Eckert, Sue, Senior Fellow, Watson Institute for International
Studies, Brown University.
LCTI, May 18, 2012, ``Terrorist Financing Since 9/11:
Assessing an Evolving al Qaeda and State Sponsors of
Terrorism.''
Edge, Peter T., Deputy Associate Director, Homeland Security
Investigations, Immigration and Customs Enforcement,
Department of Homeland Security.
LSep. 13, 2011, BMS, ``Ten Years after 9/11: Can
Terrorists Still Exploit our Visa System?''
LBMS, Mar. 6, 2012, ``From the 9/11 Hijackers to Amine
el-Khalifi: Terrorists and the Visa Overstay Problem.''
Edmonds, James T., Chairman, The Port of Houston Authority.
LOIM, August 24, 2011, field hearing in Houston, Texas,
``Preventing an Economic Shock Wave: Securing the Port of
Houston from a Terrorist Attack.''
Edwards, Charles K., Acting Inspector General, Office of the
Inspector General, Department of Homeland Security.
LOIM, July 15, 2011, ``Homeland Security Contracting:
Does the Department Effectively Leverage Emerging
Technologies?''
LTS, November 3, 2011, ``TSA Reform: Exploring
Innovations in Technology Procurement to Stimulate Job Growth,
Part III.''
LTS, Dec. 8, 2011, ``A Review of Passenger Screening
Technology at U.S. Airports.''
LTS, Feb. 16, 2012, ``Last Line of Defense: the Federal
Air Marshal Service 10 Years After 9/11.''
LOIM, Mar. 1, 2012, ``Building One DHS: Why Can't
Management Information be Integrated?''
LOIM, Mar. 8, 2012, ``Eliminating Waste, Fraud, Abuse,
and Duplication in the Department of Homeland Security.''
LTS, May 16, 2012, ``Access Control Point Breaches at
Our Nation's Airports: Anomalies or Systemic Failures?''
LOIM, May 17, 2012, ``Department of Homeland Security:
An Examination of Ethical Standards.''
LBMS, Sep. 11, 2012, ``Eleven Years Later: Preventing
Terrorists from Coming to America.''
Edwards, Eric, Director, Disaster Emergency Communications
Division, Response Directorate, Federal Emergency
Management Agency, Department of Homeland Security.
LEPRC, Nov. 17, 2011, ``Ensuring Coordination and
Cooperation: A Review of the Emergency Communications Offices
Within the Department of Homeland Security.''
Elliott, Skip, Vice President, Public Safety and Environment,
CSX.
LTS, May 31, 2012, ``TSA's Surface Inspection Program:
Strengthening Security or Squandering Scant Resources?''
Ellison, Keith, a Representative in Congress from the 5th
District of Minnesota.
LFULL, Mar. 10, 2011, ``The Extent of Radicalization in
the American Muslim Community and that Community's Response.''
Emerson, Catherine, Chief Human Capital Officer, Department of
Homeland Security.
LOIM, Mar. 22, 2012, ``Building One DHS: Why is Employee
Morale Low?''
Entrekin, Todd, Sheriff, Etowah County, Alabama.
LBMS, May 3, 2011, ``Border Security and Enforcement --
Department of Homeland Security's Cooperation with State and
Local Law Enforcement Stakeholders.''
Essid, Chris, Director, Office of Emergency Communications,
Department of Homeland Security.
LEPRC, Nov. 17, 2011, ``Ensuring Coordination and
Cooperation: A Review of the Emergency Communications Offices
Within the Department of Homeland Security.''

-- F --

Fagbuyi, Fagbuyi, MD, Medical Director, Disaster Preparedness
and Emergency Management, Children's National Medical
Center.
LEPRC, Apr. 13, 2011, ``Taking Measure of
Countermeasures: A review of government and industry efforts to
protect the homeland through accelerated research, development,
and acquisition of chemical, biological, radiological and
nuclear medical countermeasures.''
Farah, Douglas, Senior Fellow, The International Assessment and
Strategy Center.
LCTI, July 7, 2011, ``Hezbollah in Latin America --
Implications for U.S. Homeland Security.''
LOIM, Nov. 16, 2012, ``A Line in the Sand: Assessing
Dangerous Threats to Our Nation's Borders.''
Farmer, Tom, Assistant Vice President, Security Safety &
Operations, American Association of Railroads.
LTS, July 12, 2011, ``Industry Perspectives: Authorizing
the Transportation Security Administration for FY 2012 and
2013.''
Figliuzzi, Frank, Assistant Director, Counterintelligence
Division, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Department
of Justice.
LCTI, Jun. 28, 2012, ``Economic Espionage: A Foreign
Intelligence Threat to American Jobs and Homeland Security.''
Finklea, Kristin, PhD, Analyst, Domestic Social Policy
Division.
LOIM, Mar. 31, 2011, ``The U.S. Homeland Security Role
in the Mexican War Against Drug Cartels.''
Fisher, Michael J., Chief, Border Patrol, U.S. Customs and
Border Protection, Department of Homeland Security.
LBMS, Feb. 15, 2011, ``Securing Our Borders --
Operational Control and the Path Forward.''
LBMS, Mar. 15, 2011, ``Strengthening the Border --
Finding the Right Mix of Personnel, Infrastructure and
Technology.''
LBMS, Oct. 4, 2011, ``Does Administrative Amnesty Harm
our Efforts to Gain and Maintain Operational Control of the
Border?''
LBMS, May 8, 2012, ``Measuring Border Security: U.S.
Border Patrol's New Strategic Plan and the Path Forward.''
Fitzgerald, Paul H., Sheriff, Story County Sheriff's Office,
testifying as First Vice President, National Sheriffs'
Association.
LFULL, Mar. 30, 2011, ``Public Safety Communications:
Are the Needs of Our First Responders Being Met?''
Flynn, Stephen E., Dr., Founding Co-Director, George J. Kostas
Research Institute for Homeland Security, Northeastern
University.
LOIM, April 24, 2012, ``America is Under Cyber Attack:
Why Urgent Action is Needed.''
Folk, William Anders, Former Assistant United States Attorney,
District of Minnesota.
LFULL, July 27, 2011, ``Al Shabaab: Recruitment and
Radicalization within the Muslim American Community and the
Threat to the Homeland.''
Forgety, Trey, Director of Government Relations, National
Emergency Number Association.
LEPRC, Sep. 12, 2012, ``Resilient Communications:
Current Challenges and Future Advancements.''
Fortuno, Luis, Governor of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.
LOIM, July 21, 2012, ``The U.S. Caribbean Border: An
Open Road for Drug Traffickers and Terrorists.''
Franks, Trent, a Representative in Congress from the 2nd
District of Arizona.
LCIPST, Sep. 12, 2012, ``The EMP Threat: Examining the
Consequences.''
Freed, Judson, Director of Emergency Management and Homeland
Security, Ramsey County, Minnesota, testifying on
behalf of the National Association of Counties.
LEPRC, April 26, 2012, ``Ensuring the Efficiency,
Effectiveness, and Transparency of Homeland Security Grants
(Part II): Stakeholder Perspectives.''
Freeman, Geoff, Chief Operating Officer, U.S. Travel
Association.
LTS, Sep. 11, 2012, ``Eleven Years After 9/11 Can TSA
Evolve To Meet the Next Terrorist Threat?''
Freni, Edward C., Director of Aviation, Massachusetts Port
Authority.
LOIM, Sep. 16, 2011, Boston, Massachusetts, ``Ten Years
After 9/11: Assessing Airport Security and Preventing a Future
Terrorist Attack.''
Fugate, W. Craig, Administrator, Federal Emergency Management
Agency, Department of Homeland Security.
LEPRC, Mar. 9, 2011, ``Ensuring Effective Preparedness
and Response -- An Assessment of the Fiscal Year 2012 Budget
Request for the Federal Emergency Management Agency.''
LFULL, May 4, 2011, ``Securing Our Nation's Mass Transit
Systems Against a Terrorist Attack.''
LEPRC, Oct. 25, 2011, ``Five Years Later: An Assessment
of the Post Katrina Emergency Management Reform Act.''

-- G --

Gabriel, Edward J., Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary,
Preparedness and Response, Department of Health and
Human Services.
LEPRC, Apr. 17, 2012, ``Taking Measure of
Countermeasures (Part 3): Protecting the Protectors.''
Gage, John, National President, American Federation of
Government Employees.
LTS, Feb. 7, 2012, ``Screening Partnership Program: Why
is a Job-Creating, Public-Private Partnership Meeting
Resistance at TSA?''
Gambler, Rebecca, Acting Director, Homeland Security and
Justice, U.S. Government Accountability Office.
LBMS, May 8, 2012, ``Measuring Border Security: U.S.
Border Patrol's New Strategic Plan and the Path Forward.''
Garcia, Adrian, Sheriff Harris County Sheriff's Office, Texas.
LBMS, July 12, 2011, ``Protecting the Maritime Borders
-- Leveraging Law Enforcement Cooperation to Enhance Security
Along America's Coasts.''
LOIM, August 24, 2011, field hearing in Houston, Texas,
``Preventing an Economic Shock Wave: Securing the Port of
Houston from a Terrorist Attack.''
Garza, Alexander G., MD, MPH, Assistant Secretary for Health
Affairs, Chief Medical Officer, Department of Homeland
Security.
LEPST, Mar. 17, 2011, ``Ensuring Effective Preparedness,
Response, and Recovery for Events Impacting Health Security.''
LEPRC, May 12, 2011, ``Taking Measure of Countermeasures
(Part 2): A Review of Efforts to Protect the Homeland Through
Distribution and Dispensing of CBRN Medical Countermeasures.''
LEPRC, Mar. 29, 2012, ``The Fiscal Year 2013 Budget
Request for the Department of Homeland Security's Office of
Health Affairs.''
LEPRC and CIPST, Sep. 13, 2012, ``BioWatch Present and
Future: Meeting Mission Needs for Effective Biosurveillance?''
Garza, Gene, Director of Field Operations Laredo Field Office,
Office of Field Operations, U.S. Customs & Border
Protection, Department of Homeland Security.
LBMS, May 1, 2012, field hearing in Laredo, Texas,
``Using Technology to Facilitate Trade and Enhance Security at
Our Ports of Entry.''
Geraghty, Timothy J., Colonel (Ret. US Marine Corps).
LCTI and OIM, Oct. 26, 2011, ``Iranian Terror Operations
on American Soil.''
Gerecht, Reuel Marc, Senior Fellow, Foundation for Defense of
Democracies.
LCTI and OIM, Oct. 26, 2011, ``Iranian Terror Operations
on American Soil.''
Gerstein, Daniel M., Dr., Deputy Under Secretary for Science
and Technology, Department of Homeland Security.
LCIPST, Apr. 19, 2012, ``The DHS and DOE National Labs:
Finding Efficiencies and Optimizing Outputs in Homeland
Security Research and Development.''
Gillespie, Al H., Chief, President & Chairman of the Board,
International Association of Fire Chiefs.
LEPRC, Apr. 17, 2012, ``Taking Measure of
Countermeasures (Part 3): Protecting the Protectors.''
Gilliland, Sam, Chief Executive Officer, Sabre Holdings.
LTS, Sep. 11, 2012, ``Eleven Years After 9/11 Can TSA
Evolve To Meet the Next Terrorist Threat?''
Gillmore, James, III, Former Governor of Virginia and Chairman
of the Congressional Advisory Panel to Assess Domestic
Response Capabilities for Terrorism Involving Weapons
of Mass Destruction.
LOIM, Mar. 8, 2012, ``Eliminating Waste, Fraud, Abuse,
and Duplication in the Department of Homeland Security.''
Goldstein, Mark L., Director Physical Infrastructure,
Government Accountability Office.
LCIPST, July 13, 2011, ``Securing Federal Facilities:
Challenges of the Federal Protective Service and the Need for
Reform.''
LCIPST, July 24, 2012, ``Securing Federal Facilities: An
Examination of FPS Progress in Improving Oversight and
Assessing Risk.''
Gonzalez, Jose D., Jose David Gonzalez Customs Brokerage.
LBMS, May 1, 2012, field hearing in Laredo, Texas,
``Using Technology to Facilitate Trade and Enhance Security at
Our Ports of Entry.''
Gonzalez, Sigifredo, Sheriff, Zapata County, State of Texas.
LOIM, May 11, 2011, ``On the Border and in the Line of
Fire: U.S. Law Enforcement, Homeland Security and Drug Cartel
Violence.''
Good, James, Owner, Arey Building Supply.
LEPRC, Nov. 29, 2011, field hearing in La Plume,
Pennsylvania ``Ensuring Effective Preparedness and Response:
Lessons Learned from Hurricane Irene and Tropical Storm Lee.''
Goucher, Suzanne D., President and CEO, Maine Association of
Broadcasters, testifying on behalf of the National
Alliance of State Broadcasting Associations.
LEPRC, July 8, 2011, ``Communicating With the Public
During Emergencies: An Update on Federal Alert and Warning
Efforts.''
Gowadia, Huban, Dr., Deputy Director, Domestic Nuclear
Detection Office, Department of Homeland Security.
LCIPST, Apr. 19, 2012, ``The DHS and DOE National Labs:
Finding Efficiencies and Optimizing Outputs in Homeland
Security Research and Development.''
LCIPST, July 26, 2012, ``Preventing Nuclear Terrorism:
Does DHS have an Effective and Efficient Nuclear Detection
Strategy?''
Graham, Stuart, Dr., Chief Economist, U.S. Patent and Trademark
Office, Department of Commerce.
LCTI, Jun. 28, 2012, ``Economic Espionage: A Foreign
Intelligence Threat to American Jobs and Homeland Security.''
Greco, Robert `Bob', Group Director, Downstream and Industry
Operations, American Petroleum Institute.
LCTI, Mar. 19, 2012, ``The Implications of Refinery
Closures for U.S. Homeland Security and Critical Infrastructure
Safety.''
Griffin, Robert, Dr., Director of First Responder Programs,
Science and Technology Directorate, Department of
Homeland Security.
LEPRC and CIPST, May 9, 2012, ``First Responder
Technologies: Ensuring a Prioritized Approach for Homeland
Security Research and Development.''
Gruber, Corey, Assistant Administrator, National Preparedness
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency,
Department of Homeland Security.
LEPRC, Mar. 20, 2012, ``Ensuring the Transparency,
Efficiency, and Effectiveness of Homeland Security Grants.''
Gruenspecht, Howard, Acting Administrator, Energy Information
Administration, Department of Energy.
LCTI, Mar. 19, 2012, ``The Implications of Refinery
Closures for U.S. Homeland Security and Critical Infrastructure
Safety.''
Guttman-McCabe, Christopher, Vice President, Regulatory
Affairs, CTIA -- The Wireless Association.
LEPRC, July 8, 2011, ``Communicating With the Public
During Emergencies: An Update on Federal Alert and Warning
Efforts.''

-- H --

Halinski, John W., Assistant Administrator, Office of Global
Strategies, Transportation Security Administration,
Department of Homeland Security.
LTS, Apr. 7, 2011, ``Strengthening International
Cooperation on Aviation Security.''
LTS, May 8, 2012, ``Building Secure Partnerships in
Travel, Commerce, and Trade with the Asia-Pacific Region.''
LTS, July 18, 2012, ``Breach of Trust: Addressing
Misconduct Among TSA Screeners.''
Hall, Terry, President, APCO International.
LEPRC, Sep. 12, 2012, ``Resilient Communications:
Current Challenges and Future Advancements.''
Halskinki, John, Deputy Administrator, Transportation Security
Administration, Department of Homeland Security.
LTS, Sep. 11, 2012, ``Eleven Years After 9/11 Can TSA
Evolve To Meet the Next Terrorist Threat?''
Hamilton, Lee, Bipartisan Policy Center.
LFULL, May 25, 2011, ``Threats to the American Homeland
after Killing Bin Laden: An Assessment.''
LFULL, Sep. 8, 2011, ``The Attacks of September 11th:
Where are We Today.''
Harbour, Tom, Director, Fire and Aviation Management, Forest
Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture.
LOIM, Oct. 17, 2011, ``Texas Wildfire Review: Did
Bureaucracy Prevent a Timely Response?''
Harman, Elizabeth, Assistant Administrator, Grant Programs
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency,
Department of Homeland Security.
LEPRC, Mar. 20, 2012, ``Ensuring the Transparency,
Efficiency, and Effectiveness of Homeland Security Grants.''
Hartwig, Daniel O., Deputy Chief -- Operations, BART Police
Department, San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit
(BART).
LFULL, May 4, 2011, ``Securing Our Nation's Mass Transit
Systems Against a Terrorist Attack.''
Hatchett, Richard J., Chief Medical Officer and Deputy
Director, Strategic Sciences and Management, Department
of Health and Human Services.
LEPRC, Apr. 13, 2011, ``Taking Measure of
Countermeasures: A review of government and industry efforts to
protect the homeland through accelerated research, development,
and acquisition of chemical, biological, radiological and
nuclear medical countermeasures.''
Hathaway, Melissa, President, Hathaway Global Strategies, LLC.
LCIPST, June 24, 2011, ``Examining the Homeland Security
Impact of the Obama Administration's Cybersecurity Proposal.''
Hawkins, George S., General Manager, District of Columbia Water
and Sewer Authority.
LCIPST, Feb. 11, 2011, ``Preventing Chemical Terrorism:
Building a Foundation of Security At Our Nation's Chemical
Facilities.''
Henning, Jens C., Vice President of Operations, General
Aviation Manufacturers Association.
LTS, July 18, 2012, ``A Decade After 9/11 Could American
Flight Schools Still Unknowingly Be Training Terrorists?''
Henry, Shawn, Former Executive Assistant Director, Criminal,
Cyber, Response, and Services Branch, Federal Bureau of
Investigation, Department of Justice.
LOIM, April 24, 2012, ``America is Under Cyber Attack:
Why Urgent Action is Needed.''
Hereford Jesse, Vice Chairman, Border Trade Alliance.
LBMS, May 1, 2012, field hearing in Laredo, Texas,
``Using Technology to Facilitate Trade and Enhance Security at
Our Ports of Entry.''
Heyman, David, Assistant Secretary for Policy, Department of
Homeland Security.
LCTI, Oct. 5, 2011, ``Intelligence Sharing and Terrorist
Travel: How DHS Addresses the Mission of Providing Security,
Facilitating Commerce and Protecting Privacy for Passengers
Engaged in International Travel.''
LBMS, Feb. 7, 2012, ``Balancing Maritime Security and
Trade Facilitation: Protecting our Ports, Increasing Commerce
and Securing the Supply Chain -- Part I.''
Hoffman, Bruce, Prof. Director, Center for Peace and Security
Studies and Director, Security Studies Program,
Georgetown University.
LOIM, June 3, 2011, ``Denying Safe Havens: Homeland
Security's Efforts to Counter Threats from Pakistan, Yemen and
Somalia.''
Hoggan, Kelley, Assistant Administrator, Office of Security
Capabilities, Transportation Security Administration,
Department of Homeland Security.
LTS, Jun. 19, 2012, ``Is TSA's Planned Purchase of CAT/
BPSS a Wise Use of Taxpayer Dollars?''
Horne, Thomas C., Attorney General, State of Arizona.
LOIM, May 11, 2011, ``On the Border and in the Line of
Fire: U.S. Law Enforcement, Homeland Security and Drug Cartel
Violence.''
Hruby, Jill, Vice President, International, Homeland and
Nuclear Security, Sandia National Laboratories.
LCIPST, Apr. 19, 2012, ``The DHS and DOE National Labs:
Finding Efficiencies and Optimizing Outputs in Homeland
Security Research and Development.''
Humphreys, Todd E., Ph.D, Assistant Professor, Cockrell School
of Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin.
LOIM, July 19, 2012, ``Using Unmanned Aerial Systems
Within the Homeland: Security Game Changer?''
Hussen, Ahmed, Canadian Somali Congress National President.
LFULL, July 27, 2011, ``Al Shabaab: Recruitment and
Radicalization within the Muslim American Community and the
Threat to the Homeland.''
Hutton, John, Director, Acquisition and Sourcing Management,
Government Accountability Office.
LOIM, Sep. 21, 2012, ``DHS Acquisition Management
Challenges: Solution for Saving Taxpayer Dollars.''

-- I, J --

Jackson, Michael P., President, Firebreak Partners, LLC.
LTS, Sep. 22, 2011, ``TSA Reform: Exploring Innovations
in Technology Procurement to Stimulate Job Growth.''
Jasser, M. Zuhdi, MD, President and Founder, American Islamic
Forum for Democracy.
LFULL, Mar. 10, 2011, ``The Extent of Radicalization in
the American Muslim Community and that Community's Response.''
LFULL, Jun. 20, 2012, ``The American Muslim Response to
Hearings on Radicalization within Their Community.''
Jenkins, Brian Michael, Senior Advisor to the RAND President,
RAND Corporation.
LCTI, Dec. 6, 2011, ``Jihadist Use of Social Media --
How to Prevent Terrorism and Preserve Innovation.''
Jenkins, William O., Jr., Director, Homeland Security and
Justice Issues, U.S. Government Accountability Office.
LEPRC, Mar. 20, 2012, ``Ensuring the Transparency,
Efficiency, and Effectiveness of Homeland Security Grants.''
LEPRC and CIPST, Sep. 13, 2012, ``BioWatch Present and
Future: Meeting Mission Needs for Effective Biosurveillance?''
Johnson, Charles Michael, Jr., Director, International
Counterterrorism & Security Assistance Issues,
Government Accountability Office.
LCIPST, July 12, 2012, ``Securing Ammonium Nitrate:
Using Lessons Learned in Afghanistan to Protect the Homeland
from IED's.''
Johnson, Daniel, Assistant Administrator for Intelligence,
Transportation Security Administration, Department of
Homeland Security.
LCTI, June 1, 2011, ``The DHS Intelligence Enterprise--
Past, Present, and Future.''
Jones, Seth, Senior Political Scientist, The RAND Corporation.
LCTI, May 3, 2011, ``The Threat to the U.S. Homeland
Emanating from Pakistan.''
Joscelyn, Thomas, Senior Fellow and Executive Director, Center
for Law and Counter Terrorism, Foundation for the
Defense of Democracies.
LCTI, Apr. 6, 2011, ``Unrest in the Middle East and
North Africa: Ramifications for U.S. Homeland Security.''
LFULL, July 27, 2011, ``Al Shabaab: Recruitment and
Radicalization within the Muslim American Community and the
Threat to the Homeland.''

-- K --

Kadlec, Robert P., Dr., Former Special Assistant to the
President for Biodefense.
LCIPST & EPRC, June 23, 2011, ``H.R.----, the `WMD
Prevention and Preparedness Act of 2011.'''
Kagan, Frederick, Resident Scholar and Director, American
Enterprise Institute Critical Threats Project.
LCTI, May 3, 2011, ``The Threat to the U.S. Homeland
Emanating from Pakistan.''
Kahl, Colin H., Senior Fellow, Center for a New American
Society.
LFULL, Mar. 21, 2012, ``Iran, Hezbollah, and the Threat
to the Homeland.''
Kane, Robin E., Assistant Administrator, Security Technology,
Transportation Security Administration, Department of
Homeland Security.
LTS, November 3, 2011, ``TSA Reform: Exploring
Innovations in Technology Procurement to Stimulate Job Growth,
Part III.''
LTS, Dec. 8, 2011, ``A Review of Passenger Screening
Technology at U.S. Airports.''
Katulis, Brian, Senior Fellow, Center for American Progress.
LCTI, Apr. 6, 2011, ``Unrest in the Middle East and
North Africa: Ramifications for U.S. Homeland Security.''
Keane, Jack, General (Ret. US Army).
LCTI and OIM, Oct. 26, 2011, ``Iranian Terror Operations
on American Soil.''
Kempshall, Elizabeth, Executive Director, Arizona Region,
Southwest Border High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area.
LBMS, May 21, 2012, field hearing in Phoenix, Arizona,
``Stopping the Flow of Illicit Drugs in Arizona by Leveraging
State, Local and Federal Information Sharing.''
Khan, Ali, MD, MPH, RADM, Director, Office of Public Health
Preparedness and Response, Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention.
LEPRC, May 12, 2011, ``Taking Measure of Countermeasures
(Part 2): A Review of Efforts to Protect the Homeland Through
Distribution and Dispensing of CBRN Medical Countermeasures.''
Kibble, Kumar, Deputy Director, U.S. Immigration and Customs
Enforcement, Department of Homeland Security.
LBMS, May 3, 2011, ``Border Security and Enforcement --
Department of Homeland Security's Cooperation with State and
Local Law Enforcement Stakeholders.''
LBMS, Oct. 4, 2011, ``Does Administrative Amnesty Harm
our Efforts to Gain and Maintain Operational Control of the
Border?''
Kidd, W. Nim, Assistant Director, Emergency Management, Texas
Department of Public Safety.
LOIM, Oct. 17, 2011, ``Texas Wildfire Review: Did
Bureaucracy Prevent a Timely Response?''
Kilduff, Edward,, Chief of Department, New York City Fire
Department, New York City, New York.
LEPRC and CIPST, May 9, 2012, ``First Responder
Technologies: Ensuring a Prioritized Approach for Homeland
Security Research and Development.''
Klemm, Hans G., Economic Coordinator, U.S. Senior Official for
Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation, Bureau of East Asian
and Pacific Affairs, U.S. Department of State.
LTS, May 8, 2012, ``Building Secure Partnerships in
Travel, Commerce, and Trade with the Asia-Pacific Region.''
Kniphfer, Allen W., Emergency Coordinator, Jefferson County,
Alabama.
LEPRC, July 8, 2011, ``Communicating With the Public
During Emergencies: An Update on Federal Alert and Warning
Efforts.''
Koerner, Timothy J., Vice President & Chief Security Officer,
Canadian National Railway Company.
LBMS, April 5, 2011, ``Using Resources Effectively to
Secure Our Border at Ports of Entry _ Stopping the Illicit Flow
of Money, Guns and Drugs.''
Kohlmann, Evan F., Flashpoint Global Partners.
LFULL, May 25, 2011, ``Threats to the American Homeland
after Killing Bin Laden: An Assessment.''
Koon, Bryan W., Director, Florida Division of Emergency
Management.
LEPRC, Jun. 10, 2011, ``Weathering the Storm: A State
and Local Perspective on Emergency Management.''
Ltestifying on behalf of the National Emergency
Management Association. EPRC, April 26, 2012, ``Ensuring the
Efficiency, Effectiveness, and Transparency of Homeland
Security Grants (Part II): Stakeholder Perspectives.''
Korb, Lawrence, Dr., Senior Fellow, Center For American
Progress Action Fund.
LCTI and OIM, Oct. 26, 2011, ``Iranian Terror Operations
on American Soil.''
Korosec, Stan, Vice President, Operations, Blue Water Bridge
Canada.
LBMS, April 5, 2011, ``Using Resources Effectively to
Secure Our Border at Ports of Entry _ Stopping the Illicit Flow
of Money, Guns and Drugs.''
Kosar, Kevin R., Analyst in American Government, Congressional
Research Service.
LCIPST, Dec. 6, 2011, ``Hearing on Draft Legislative
Proposal on Cybersecurity.''
Kostelnik, Michael C., (Maj. Gen. Ret.), Assistant
Commissioner, Office of CBP Air & Marine, U.S. Customs
and Border Protection, Department of Homeland Security.
LBMS, Mar. 15, 2011, ``Strengthening the Border --
Finding the Right Mix of Personnel, Infrastructure and
Technology.''
LBMS, July 12, 2011, ``Protecting the Maritime Borders
-- Leveraging Law Enforcement Cooperation to Enhance Security
Along America's Coasts.''
LOIM, July 21, 2012, ``The U.S. Caribbean Border: An
Open Road for Drug Traffickers and Terrorists.''
Koumans, Mark, Deputy Assistant Secretary, Office of
International Affairs, Department of Homeland Security.
LOIM, June 3, 2011, ``Denying Safe Havens: Homeland
Security's Efforts to Counter Threats from Pakistan, Yemen and
Somalia.''
LTS, May 8, 2012, ``Building Secure Partnerships in
Travel, Commerce, and Trade with the Asia-Pacific Region.''
Kwon, Mischel, President, Mischel Kwon Associates.
LCIPST, Mar. 16, 2011, ``Examining the Cyber Threat to
Critical Infrastructure and the American Economy.''

-- L --

Laremont, Ricardo, Professor of Political Science and
Sociology, Binghamton University, State University of
New York.
LCTI, Nov. 30, 2011, ``Boko Haram -- Emerging Threat to
the U.S. Homeland.''
Larsen, Randall J., Chief Executive Officer, The Bipartisan WMD
Terrorism Research Center.
LCTI, Nov. 15, 2012, ``TSA's Recent Scanner Shuffle:
Real Strategy of Wasteful Smokescreen?''
Lee, William D., RAdm., Deputy for Operations Policy &
Capabilities, U.S. Coast Guard, Department of Homeland
Security.
LBMS, Jun. 19, 2012, ``Border Security Threats to the
Homeland: DHS' Response to Innovative Tactics and Techniques.''
Lee, William, RdAm, Deputy for Operations, Policy, and
Capabilities, United States Coast Guard.
LOIM, July 21, 2012, ``The U.S. Caribbean Border: An
Open Road for Drug Traffickers and Terrorists.''
Leiter, Michael E., Director, National Counterterrorism Center.
LFULL, Feb. 9, 2011, ``Understanding the Homeland Threat
Landscape -- Considerations for the 112th Congress.''
LOIM, Sep. 14, 2012, ``Lessons From Fort Hood: Improving
our Ability to Connect the Dots.''
Lepore, Brian J., Director, Defense Capabilities and
Management, U.S. Government Accountability Office.
LBMS, Apr. 17, 2012, ``Boots on the Ground or Eyes in
the Sky: How Best to Utilize the National Guard to Achieve
Operational Control.''
Levi, Jeffrey, PhD, Executive Director, Trust for America's
Health.
LEPRC, May 12, 2011, ``Taking Measure of Countermeasures
(Part 2): A Review of Efforts to Protect the Homeland Through
Distribution and Dispensing of CBRN Medical Countermeasures.''
Levitt, Matt, Dr., Director, Stein Program on Counterterrorism
and Intelligence, The Washington Institute for Near
East Policy.
LCTI and OIM, Oct. 26, 2011, ``Iranian Terror Operations
on American Soil.''
LFULL, Mar. 21, 2012, ``Iran, Hezbollah, and the Threat
to the Homeland.''
Lewis, James A., Director and Senior Fellow, Technology and
Public Policy Program, Center for Strategic and
International Studies.
LCIPST, Mar. 16, 2011, ``Examining the Cyber Threat to
Critical Infrastructure and the American Economy.''
LOIM, April 24, 2012, ``America is Under Cyber Attack:
Why Urgent Action is Needed.''
Lilly, Scott, Senior Fellow, Center for American Progress.
LOIM, Mar. 8, 2012, ``Eliminating Waste, Fraud, Abuse,
and Duplication in the Department of Homeland Security.''
Lockwood, Bruce, Second Vice President, USA Council,
International Association of Emergency Managers.
LEPRC, Apr. 17, 2012, ``Taking Measure of
Countermeasures (Part 3): Protecting the Protectors.''
Long, Daris, Private Citizen.
LFULL, with the Senate Committee on Homeland Security
and Governmental Affairs Dec. 7, 2011, ``Homegrown Terrorism:
The Threat to Military Communities Inside the United States.''
Lopez, Gomecindo, Commander, Special Operations Bureau, El Paso
County, Texas.
LBMS, May 3, 2011, ``Border Security and Enforcement --
Department of Homeland Security's Cooperation with State and
Local Law Enforcement Stakeholders.''
Lord, Stephen M., Director, Homeland Security and Justice
Issues, Government Accountability Office.
LTS, Mar. 9, 2011, ``Securing Air Commerce From the
Threat of Terrorism.''
LOIM, Sep. 16, 2011, Boston, Massachusetts, ``Ten Years
After 9/11: Assessing Airport Security and Preventing a Future
Terrorist Attack.''
LTS, Sep. 22, 2011, ``TSA Reform: Exploring Innovations
in Technology Procurement to Stimulate Job Growth.''
LTS, Dec. 8, 2011, ``A Review of Passenger Screening
Technology at U.S. Airports.'' I10 LTS, Jun. 19, 2012,
``Is TSA's Planned Purchase of CAT/BPSS a Wise Use of Taxpayer
Dollars?''
LTS, July 18, 2012, ``A Decade After 9/11 Could American
Flight Schools Still Unknowingly Be Training Terrorists?''
LTS, Sep. 11, 2012, ``Eleven Years After 9/11 Can TSA
Evolve To Meet the Next Terrorist Threat?''
Lormel, Dennis, President and CEO, DML Associates, LLC.
LCTI, May 18, 2012, ``Terrorist Financing Since 9/11:
Assessing an Evolving al Qaeda and State Sponsors of
Terrorism.''
Lundry, R. Daryl, Director, Homeland Security & Emergency
Management, City of Detroit.
LEPRC, Oct. 28, 2011, (Detroit, Michigan) ``The State of
Northern Border Preparedness: A Review of Federal, State, and
Local Coordination.''

-- M --

Madden, John, Director, Homeland Security & Emergency
Management, State of Alaska, testifying on behalf of
the National Emergency Management Association.
LEPRC Jun. 6, 2012, ``The National Preparedness Report:
Assessing the State of Preparedness.''
Malady, Kyle, Senior Vice President, Global Network Engineering
and Operations, Verizon.
LEPRC, Sep. 12, 2012, ``Resilient Communications:
Current Challenges and Future Advancements.''
Maloney, Robert M., Director, Office of Emergency Management,
Baltimore, Maryland.
LEPRC, April 26, 2012, ``Ensuring the Efficiency,
Effectiveness, and Transparency of Homeland Security Grants
(Part II): Stakeholder Perspectives.''
Mancuso, Mario, Partner, Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver &
Jacobson, LLP.
LOIM, July 7, 2011, ``Homeland Security Investigations:
Examining DHS's Efforts to Protect American Jobs and Secure the
Homeland.''
Manji, Ishrad, Director, Moral Courage Project, New York
University.
LOIM, Sep. 14, 2012, ``Lessons From Fort Hood: Improving
our Ability to Connect the Dots.''
Mannan, Dr. M. Sam, PhD, PE, CSP, Regents Professor and
Director, Mary Kay O'Connor Process Safety Center,
Texas A&M University System.
LCIPST, Feb. 11, 2011, ``Preventing Chemical Terrorism:
Building a Foundation of Security At Our Nation's Chemical
Facilities.''
Manning, Timothy, Deputy Administrator, Protection and National
Preparedness, Federal Emergency Management Agency,
Department of Homeland Security.
LEPRC Jun. 6, 2012, ``The National Preparedness Report:
Assessing the State of Preparedness.''
Marriott, Jim, Chief, Aviation Security Branch, International
Civil Aviation Organization.
LTS, Apr. 7, 2011, ``Strengthening International
Cooperation on Aviation Security.''
Martinez, Wilfredo, Chairman, Laredo Chamber of Commerce,
Laredo, Texas.
LBMS, May 1, 2012, field hearing in Laredo, Texas,
``Using Technology to Facilitate Trade and Enhance Security at
Our Ports of Entry.''
Maurer, David C., Director, Homeland Security and Justice Team,
Government Accountability Office.
LOIM, July 15, 2011, ``Homeland Security Contracting:
Does the Department Effectively Leverage Emerging
Technologies?''
LCIPST, July 26, 2011, ``The Last Line of Defense:
Federal, State, and Local Efforts to Prevent Nuclear and
Radiological Terrorism Within the United States.''
LBMS, Nov. 17, 2011, ``S&T on a Budget: Finding Smarter
Approaches to Spur Innovation, Impose Discipline, Drive Job
Creation and Strengthen Homeland Security.''
LOIM, Feb. 3, ``Is DHS Effectively Implementing a
Strategy to Counter Emerging Threats?''
LOIM, Mar. 1, 2012, ``Building One DHS: Why Can't
Management Information be Integrated?''
LOIM, Mar. 22, 2012, ``Building One DHS: Why is Employee
Morale Low?''
LCIPST, July 26, 2012, ``Preventing Nuclear Terrorism:
Does DHS have an Effective and Efficient Nuclear Detection
Strategy?''
LFULL, Sep. 20, 2012, ``The Department of Homeland
Security: An Assessment of the Department and a Roadmap for its
Future.''
McAleenan, Kevin, Assistant Commissioner, Office of Field
Operations, United States Customs and Border
Protection.
LOIM, July 21, 2012, ``The U.S. Caribbean Border: An
Open Road for Drug Traffickers and Terrorists.''
McAleenan, Kevin, Acting Assistant Commissioner, Office of
Field Operations, U.S. Customs and Border Protection,
Department of Homeland Security.
LBMS, Feb. 7, 2012, ``Balancing Maritime Security and
Trade Facilitation: Protecting our Ports, Increasing Commerce
and Securing the Supply Chain -- Part I.''
LBMS, Sep. 11, 2012, ``Eleven Years Later: Preventing
Terrorists from Coming to America.''
McAllister, Scott, Deputy Under Secretary, State and Local
Program Office, Office of Intelligence and Analysis,
Department of Homeland Security.
LCTI, Feb. 28, 2012, ``Federal Government Intelligence
Sharing with State, Local and Tribal Law Enforcement: An
Assessment Ten Years After 9/11.''
McCaffrey, Barry R., (Gen. Ret.), President, BR McCaffrey
Associates, LLC.
LOIM, Oct. 14, 2011, ``A Call to Action: Narco-
Terrorism's Threat to the Southern U.S. Border.''
McCants, William, Analyst, Center for Naval Analyses.
LCTI, Dec. 6, 2011, ``Jihadist Use of Social Media --
How to Prevent Terrorism and Preserve Innovation.''
McClelland, Joseph, Director, Office of Electric Reliability,
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.
LCIPST, Sep. 12, 2012, ``The EMP Threat: Examining the
Consequences.''
McClure, David, PhD., Associate Administrator, Office of
Citizen Services and Innovative Technologies, General
Services Administration.
LCIPST, Oct. 6, 2011 ``Cloud Computing: What are the
Security Implications?''
McClure, Stuart, Chief Technology Officer, McAfee.
LOIM, April 24, 2012, ``America is Under Cyber Attack:
Why Urgent Action is Needed.''
McCraw, Steven C., Director, Texas Department of Public Safety.
LOIM, May 11, 2011, ``On the Border and in the Line of
Fire: U.S. Law Enforcement, Homeland Security and Drug Cartel
Violence.''
LBMS, May 1, 2012, field hearing in Laredo, Texas,
``Using Technology to Facilitate Trade and Enhance Security at
Our Ports of Entry.''
McDaniel, William, Chief Deputy, Montgomery County Sheriff's
Office, Conroe, Texas.
LOIM, July 19, 2012, ``Using Unmanned Aerial Systems
Within the Homeland: Security Game Changer?''
McGuire, Cheri, Vice President of Global Government Affairs and
Cybersecurity Policy, Symantec Corporation.
LCIPST, Dec. 6, 2011, ``Hearing on Draft Legislative
Proposal on Cybersecurity.''
McGurk, Sean, Director, National Cybersecurity and
Communications Integration Center, Department of
Homeland Security.
LCIPST, Mar. 16, 2011, ``The DHS Cybersecurity Mission:
Promoting Innovation and Securing Critical Infrastructure.''
McHargue, Mike, Director of Emergency Operations, Division of
Emergency Medical Operations, Florida Department of
Health.
LEPRC, May 12, 2011, ``Taking Measure of Countermeasures
(Part 2): A Review of Efforts to Protect the Homeland Through
Distribution and Dispensing of CBRN Medical Countermeasures.''
McIntosh, Chris, Interoperability Coordinator, Office of
Veterans Affairs and Homeland Security, Commonwealth of
Virginia.
LEPRC, Sep. 12, 2012, ``Resilient Communications:
Current Challenges and Future Advancements.''
McLaughlin, Christopher L., Assistant Administrator, Security
Operations, Transportation Security Administration,
Department of Homeland Security.
LOIM, Sep. 16, 2011, Boston, Massachusetts, ``Ten Years
After 9/11: Assessing Airport Security and Preventing a Future
Terrorist Attack.''
LTS, Mar.28, 2012, ``Rightsizing TSA Bureaucracy and
Workforce Without Compromising Security.''
LTS, July 11, 2012, ``Has TSA Met the Deadline to
Provide Expedited Screening to Military Service Members?''
Meyers, Deborah, Director, Canadian Affairs, Office of
International Affairs, Department of Homeland Security.
LCTI, July 30, 2012, field hearing in Buffalo, New York,
``Beyond Borders: Are the Department of Homeland Security's
International Agreements Ensuring Actionable Intelligence to
Combat Threats to the U.S. Homeland?''
Michel, Charles D., RAdm., Director, Joint Interagency Task
Force South.
LBMS, Jun. 19, 2012, ``Border Security Threats to the
Homeland: DHS' Response to Innovative Tactics and Techniques.''
Mitchell, Susan, Deputy Assistant Commissioner, Office of
Intelligence and Operations Coordination, Customs and
Border Protection, Department of Homeland Security.
LCTI, June 1, 2011, ``The DHS Intelligence Enterprise--
Past, Present, and Future.''
Moore, Linda K., Specialist in Telecommunications and Spectrum
Policy, Congressional Research Service.
LEPRC, Nov. 17, 2011, ``Ensuring Coordination and
Cooperation: A Review of the Emergency Communications Offices
Within the Department of Homeland Security.''
Mora, Frank, Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense, Western
Hemisphere Affairs, Department of Defense.
LOIM, Mar. 31, 2011, ``The U.S. Homeland Security Role
in the Mexican War Against Drug Cartels.''
Morgan, Daniel, Dr., Specialist in Science and Technology
Policy, Resources, Sciences, and Industry Division,
Congressional Research Service.
LCIPST, Apr. 19, 2012, ``The DHS and DOE National Labs:
Finding Efficiencies and Optimizing Outputs in Homeland
Security Research and Development.''
Morris, Doug, Director, Safety and Security Operations, Owner-
Operator Independent Drivers Association.
LTS, May 31, 2012, ``TSA's Surface Inspection Program:
Strengthening Security or Squandering Scant Resources?''
Morton, John, Director, U.S. Immigration and Customs
Enforcement, Department of Homeland Security.
LBMS, July 10, 2012, ``Building a Secure Community: How
Can DHS Better Leverage State and Local Partnerships?''
Moynihan, Timothy, Assistant Director, Office of Professional
Responsibility, Immigration and Customs Enforcement,
Department of Homeland Security.
LOIM, May 17, 2012, ``Department of Homeland Security:
An Examination of Ethical Standards.''
Mudd, Philip,, Senior Research Fellow, New America Foundation.
LCTI, Apr. 6, 2011, ``Unrest in the Middle East and
North Africa: Ramifications for U.S. Homeland Security.''
Mullen, Michael C., Executive Director, Express Association of
America.
LTS, May 8, 2012, ``Building Secure Partnerships in
Travel, Commerce, and Trade with the Asia-Pacific Region.''

-- N --

Naccara, George, Adm. (Ret.), Federal Security Director,
Transportation Security Administration, Department of
Homeland Security.
LOIM, Sep. 16, 2011, Boston, Massachusetts, ``Ten Years
After 9/11: Assessing Airport Security and Preventing a Future
Terrorist Attack.''
Nadler, Jerrold, a Representative in Congress from the 8th
District of New York.
LBMS, Feb. 7, 2012, ``Balancing Maritime Security and
Trade Facilitation: Protecting our Ports, Increasing Commerce
and Securing the Supply Chain -- Part I.''
Napolitano, Janet, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security.
LFULL, Feb. 9, 2011, ``Understanding the Homeland Threat
Landscape -- Considerations for the 112th Congress.''
LFULL, Mar. 3, 2011, ``The President's FY 2012 Budget
Request for the Department of Homeland Security.''
LFULL, Feb. 15, 2012, ``An Examination of the
President's FY 2013 Budget Request for the Department of
Homeland Security.''
LFULL, July 25, 2012, ``Understanding the Homeland
Threat Landscape.''
Nawaz, Shuja, Director, South Asia Center, The Atlantic
Council.
LCTI, May 3, 2011, ``The Threat to the U.S. Homeland
Emanating from Pakistan.''
Nayak, Dr. Nick, Chief Procurement Officer, Department of
Homeland Security.
LTS, November 3, 2011, ``TSA Reform: Exploring
Innovations in Technology Procurement to Stimulate Job Growth,
Part III.''
Neaverth, Daniel J., Jr., Commissioner, Department of Emergency
Services, Erie County.
LCTI, July 30, 2012, field hearing in Buffalo, New York,
``Beyond Borders: Are the Department of Homeland Security's
International Agreements Ensuring Actionable Intelligence to
Combat Threats to the U.S. Homeland?''
Nelson, Rick ``Ozzie'', Director and Senior Fellow, Homeland
Security and Counterterrorism Program, Center for
Strategic and International Studies.
LCTI, Apr. 6, 2011, ``Unrest in the Middle East and
North Africa: Ramifications for U.S. Homeland Security.''
LTS, July 10, 2012, ``Challenging the Status Quo at TSA:
Perspectives on the Future of Transportation Security.''
Nichols, Brian, Deputy Assistant Secretary, International
Narcotics, Law Enforcement Affairs, U.S. Department of
State.
LOIM, Mar. 31, 2011, ``The U.S. Homeland Security Role
in the Mexican War Against Drug Cartels.''
Nichols, John F., (Major General), Adjutant General, Texas
Military Forces Texas.
LOIM, Oct. 17, 2011, ``Texas Wildfire Review: Did
Bureaucracy Prevent a Timely Response?''
LBMS, Apr. 17, 2012, ``Boots on the Ground or Eyes in
the Sky: How Best to Utilize the National Guard to Achieve
Operational Control.''
Nicholson, David, Assistant Administrator, Finance and
Administration and Chief Financial Officer,
Transportation Security Administration, Department of
Homeland Security.
LTS, Mar.28, 2012, ``Rightsizing TSA Bureaucracy and
Workforce Without Compromising Security.''
Nocco, Chris, Sheriff, Pasco County Sheriff's Office, Pasco
County, Florida.
LEPRC, Apr. 17, 2012, ``Taking Measure of
Countermeasures (Part 3): Protecting the Protectors.''
Nojeim, Gregory T., Senior Counsel and Director, Project on
Freedom, Security & Technology, Center for Democracy &
Technology.
LCIPST, Dec. 6, 2011, ``Hearing on Draft Legislative
Proposal on Cybersecurity.''
Nomani, Asra, Private Citizen.
LFULL, Jun. 20, 2012, ``The American Muslim Response to
Hearings on Radicalization within Their Community.''
Noriega, Roger F., Ambassador, Visiting Fellow, The American
Enterprise Institute.
LCTI, July 7, 2011, ``Hezbollah in Latin America --
Implications for U.S. Homeland Security.''
Novak, Michael, Assistant Administrator, Training and Workforce
Engagement, Transportation Security Administration,
Department of Homeland Security.
LTS, Feb. 16, 2012, ``Last Line of Defense: the Federal
Air Marshal Service 10 Years After 9/11.''
Nunamaker, Jay F., Jr., Director, BORDERS, The University of
Arizona.
LBMS, May 21, 2012, field hearing in Phoenix, Arizona,
``Stopping the Flow of Illicit Drugs in Arizona by Leveraging
State, Local and Federal Information Sharing.''
Nutter, Michael A., Mayor of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
LEPRC, Mar. 20, 2012, ``Ensuring the Transparency,
Efficiency, and Effectiveness of Homeland Security Grants.''
Nyak, Nick, Dr., Chief Procurement Officer, Department of
Homeland Security.
LOIM, Sep. 21, 2012, ``DHS Acquisition Management
Challenges: Solution for Saving Taxpayer Dollars.''

-- O --

O'Connor, John, Chief, Amtrak Police Department.
LTS, May 31, 2012, ``TSA's Surface Inspection Program:
Strengthening Security or Squandering Scant Resources?''
O'Connor, John, Manager, National Coordinating Center for
Communications, National Protection and Programs
Directorate, Department of Homeland Security.
LEPRC, Nov. 17, 2011, ``Ensuring Coordination and
Cooperation: A Review of the Emergency Communications Offices
Within the Department of Homeland Security.''
O'Toole, Tara, Under Secretary, Science and Technology
Directorate, Department of Homeland Security.
LOIM, July 15, 2011, ``Homeland Security Contracting:
Does the Department Effectively Leverage Emerging
Technologies?''
LBMS, Nov. 17, 2011, ``S&T on a Budget: Finding Smarter
Approaches to Spur Innovation, Impose Discipline, Drive Job
Creation and Strengthen Homeland Security.''
LTS, Dec. 8, 2011, ``A Review of Passenger Screening
Technology at U.S. Airports.''
Olivier, Jeanne M. Olivier, A.A.E., Assistant Director,
Aviation Security & Technology, Aviation Department,
The Port Authority of New York & New Jersey, testifying
on behalf of the American Association of Airport
Executives.
LTS, May 4, 2011, H.R.1690, the ``MODERN Security
Credentials Act.''
Olsen, Matthew G., Director, National Counterterrorism Center.
LFULL, July 25, 2012, ``Understanding the Homeland
Threat Landscape.''
Oxford, Vayl, National Security Executive Policy Advisor,
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.
LCIPST, July 26, 2012, ``Preventing Nuclear Terrorism:
Does DHS have an Effective and Efficient Nuclear Detection
Strategy?''

-- P --

Pap, Robert J., Jr., Admiral, Commandant, United States Coast
Guard, Department of Homeland Security.
LBMS, Jun. 14, 2011, ``Securing the Nation's Ports and
Maritime Border -- A Review of the Coast Guard's Post 9/11
Homeland Security Missions.''
Parker, Gerald W., DDM, Deputy Assistant to the Secretary of
Defense, Chemical and Biological Defense, Department of
Defense.
LEPRC, Apr. 13, 2011, ``Taking Measure of
Countermeasures: A review of government and industry efforts to
protect the homeland through accelerated research, development,
and acquisition of chemical, biological, radiological and
nuclear medical countermeasures.''
Parks, Michael, RADM, Ninth District Commander, .S.Coast Guard,
Department of Homeland Security.
LEPRC, Oct. 28, 2011, (Detroit, Michigan) ``The State of
Northern Border Preparedness: A Review of Federal, State, and
Local Coordination.''
Parow, John E. ``Jack'', (Chief, Ret.), President and Chairman
of the Board, International Association of Fire Chiefs.
LFULL, Mar. 30, 2011, ``Public Safety Communications:
Are the Needs of Our First Responders Being Met?''
Pascrell, William J., Jr., a Representative in Congress from
the 8th District of New Jersey.
LCIPST and EPRC, June 23, 2011, ``H.R.----, the `WMD
Prevention and Preparedness Act of 2011.'''
Patel, Faiza, Co-Director, Liberty and National Security
Program, Brennan Center for Justice.
LFULL, Jun. 20, 2012, ``The American Muslim Response to
Hearings on Radicalization within Their Community.''
Patterson, L. Eric, Director, Federal Protective Service,
Department of Homeland Security
LCIPST, July 13, 2011, ``Securing Federal Facilities:
Challenges of the Federal Protective Service and the Need for
Reform.''.
LCIPST, July 24, 2012, ``Securing Federal Facilities: An
Examination of FPS Progress in Improving Oversight and
Assessing Risk.''
Paul, Kshemendra, Program Manager, Information Sharing
Environment, Office of the Director of National
Intelligence.
LOIM, Sep. 14, 2012, ``Lessons From Fort Hood: Improving
our Ability to Connect the Dots.''
Pavetto, Carl, Deputy Associate Administrator, Office of
Emergency Operations, National Nuclear Security
Administration, Department of Energy.
LCIPST, July 26, 2011, ``The Last Line of Defense:
Federal, State, and Local Efforts to Prevent Nuclear and
Radiological Terrorism Within the United States.''
Pearl, Marc A., President and CEO, Homeland Security & Defense
Business Council.
LOIM, July 15, 2011, ``Homeland Security Contracting:
Does the Department Effectively Leverage Emerging
Technologies?''
LTS, Oct. 13, 2011, ``TSA Reform: Exploring Innovations
in Technology Procurement to Stimulate Job Growth, Part II.''
Peerenboom, James, Dr., Director, Infrastructure Assurance
Center, Associate Director, Decision and Information
Sciences Division, Argonne National Laboratory.
LCIPST, July 24, 2012, ``Securing Federal Facilities: An
Examination of FPS Progress in Improving Oversight and
Assessing Risk.''
Penn, Damon, Assistant Administrator, National Continuity
Programs, Federal Emergency Management Agency,
Department of Homeland Security.
LEPRC, July 8, 2011, ``Communicating With the Public
During Emergencies: An Update on Federal Alert and Warning
Efforts.''
LEPRC, Nov. 17, 2011, ``Ensuring Coordination and
Cooperation: A Review of the Emergency Communications Offices
Within the Department of Homeland Security.''
Peralta, Manuel, Director of Safety and Health, National
Association of Letter Carriers.
LEPRC, Apr. 17, 2012, ``Taking Measure of
Countermeasures (Part 3): Protecting the Protectors.''
Perez, Mark, Homeland Security Advisor, Florida Department of
Law Enforcement.
LCIPST, July 26, 2011, ``The Last Line of Defense:
Federal, State, and Local Efforts to Prevent Nuclear and
Radiological Terrorism Within the United States.''
Pham, J. Peter, Dr., Director, Michael S.Ansari Africa Center,
Atlantic Council of the US.
LCTI, Nov. 30, 2011, ``Boko Haram -- Emerging Threat to
the U.S. Homeland.''
Phillips, Frances, Deputy Secretary for Public Health Services,
Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, State of
Maryland.
LEPRC and CIPST, Sep. 13, 2012, ``BioWatch Present and
Future: Meeting Mission Needs for Effective Biosurveillance?''
Pillai, Segaran P., PhD, Chief Medical and Science Advisor,
Chemical and Biological Division, Science and
Technology Directorate, Department of Homeland
Security.
LEPRC, Apr. 13, 2011, ``Taking Measure of
Countermeasures: A review of government and industry efforts to
protect the homeland through accelerated research, development,
and acquisition of chemical, biological, radiological and
nuclear medical countermeasures.''
Pistole, John S., Administrator, Transportation Security
Administration, Department of Homeland Security.
LTS, Feb. 10, 2011, ``Terrorism and Transportation
Security.''
LTS, Jun. 2, 2011, ``Authorizing the Transportation
Security Administration for Fiscal Years 2012 and 2013.''
LTS, Dec. 8, 2011, ``A Review of Passenger Screening
Technology at U.S. Airports.''
LTS, Feb. 7, 2012, ``Screening Partnership Program: Why
is a Job-Creating, Public-Private Partnership Meeting
Resistance at TSA?''
LTS, Jun. 7, 2012, ``TSA's Efforts to Fix Its Poor
Customer Service Reputation and Become a Leaner, Smarter
Agency.''
Ploch, Lauren, Africa Analyst, Congressional Research Service.
LCTI, Nov. 30, 2011, ``Boko Haram -- Emerging Threat to
the U.S. Homeland.''
Polk, James D., Dr., Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary,
Office of Health Affairs, Department of Homeland
Security.
LEPRC, Apr. 17, 2012, ``Taking Measure of
Countermeasures (Part 3): Protecting the Protectors.''
Pon, Jeff T. H., Dr., Chief Human Resources Officer, Society
for Human Resource Management.
LOIM, Mar. 22, 2012, ``Building One DHS: Why is Employee
Morale Low?''
Poole, Robert, Searle Freedom Trust Transportation Fellow,
Director of Transportation Policy, Reason Foundation.
LTS, July 10, 2012, ``Challenging the Status Quo at TSA:
Perspectives on the Future of Transportation Security.''
Pope, Amy, Deputy Chief of Staff & Counselor, Criminal
Division, Office of Assistant Attorney General, U.S.
Department of Justice.
LOIM, May 11, 2011, ``On the Border and in the Line of
Fire: U.S. Law Enforcement, Homeland Security and Drug Cartel
Violence.''
Quijas, Louis F., Assistant Secretary, Office for State and
Local Law Enforcement, Department of Homeland Security.
LCTI, Feb. 28, 2012, ``Federal Government Intelligence
Sharing with State, Local and Tribal Law Enforcement: An
Assessment Ten Years After 9/11.''

-- Q, R --

Ramotowski, Edward, Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of
Consular Affairs, U.S. Department of State.
LBMS, Sep. 11, 2012, ``Eleven Years Later: Preventing
Terrorists from Coming to America.''
Reese, Raymond, Corporate Health, Safety and Security Leader,
Colonial Pipeline Company.
LTS, July 12, 2011, ``Industry Perspectives: Authorizing
the Transportation Security Administration for FY 2012 and
2013.''
Reese, Shawn, Analyst, Emergency Management and Homeland
Security Policy, Congressional Research Service.
LOIM, Feb. 3, ``Is DHS Effectively Implementing a
Strategy to Counter Emerging Threats?''
Reimold, Dorothy, Assistant Director, Security and Travel
Facilitation, International Air Transport Association
Reitinger, Phillip, Deputy Under Secretary, National Protection
and Programs Directorate, Department of Homeland
Security.
LCIPST, Mar. 16, 2011, ``Examining the Cyber Threat to
Critical Infrastructure and the American Economy.''
Richards, Anne L., Assistant Inspector General for Audits,
Office of Inspector General, Department of Homeland
Security.
LTS, Dec. 8, 2011, ``A Review of Passenger Screening
Technology at U.S. Airports.''
LEPRC, Mar. 20, 2012, ``Ensuring the Transparency,
Efficiency, and Effectiveness of Homeland Security Grants.''
Ridge, Tom J., Former Secretary of Homeland Security.
LFULL, Sep. 8, 2011, ``The Attacks of September 11th:
Where are We Today.''
Risch, John, Alternate National Legislative Director, United
Transportation Union.
LTS, July 12, 2011, ``Industry Perspectives: Authorizing
the Transportation Security Administration for FY 2012 and
2013.''
Roberts, James Q., Principal Director for Special Operations &
Combating Terrorism, Office of Special Operations/Low-
Intensity Conflict & Interdependent Capabilities,
Department of Defense.
LOIM, June 3, 2011, ``Denying Safe Havens: Homeland
Security's Efforts to Counter Threats from Pakistan, Yemen and
Somalia.''
Rodriguez, Richard L., President, Chicago Transit Authority.
LFULL, May 4, 2011, ``Securing Our Nation's Mass Transit
Systems Against a Terrorist Attack.''
Rodriguez, Victor, Chief, McAllen Police Department, State of
Texas.
LOIM, May 11, 2011, ``On the Border and in the Line of
Fire: U.S. Law Enforcement, Homeland Security and Drug Cartel
Violence.''
Rojas, Martin, Vice President, Security & Operations, American
Trucking Association.
LTS, May 4, 2011, H.R.1690, the ``MODERN Security
Credentials Act.''
LTS, July 12, 2011, ``Industry Perspectives: Authorizing
the Transportation Security Administration for FY 2012 and
2013.''
Ron, Rafi, President, New Age Security Solutions.
LTS, Apr. 7, 2011, ``Strengthening International
Cooperation on Aviation Security.''
Rosenblum, Marc, PhD, Specialist in Immigration Policy,
Congressional Research Service.
LBMS, May 8, 2012, ``Measuring Border Security: U.S.
Border Patrol's New Strategic Plan and the Path Forward.''
LOIM, Nov. 16, 2012, ``A Line in the Sand: Assessing
Dangerous Threats to Our Nation's Borders.''
Rosenblum, Todd M., Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of
Defense, Homeland Defense and Americas' Security
Affairs, Department of Defense.
LTS, July 11, 2012, ``Has TSA Met the Deadline to
Provide Expedited Screening to Military Service Members?''
Rossides, Gale D., Deputy Administrator, Transportation
Security Administration, Department of Homeland
Security.
LTS, Dec. 8, 2011, ``A Review of Passenger Screening
Technology at U.S. Airports.''
Russell, John E. ``Rusty'', Director, Huntsville-Madison County
Emergency Management Agency, testifying on behalf of
International Association of Emergency Managers.
LEPRC, Jun. 10, 2011, ``Weathering the Storm: A State
and Local Perspective on Emergency Management.''
Russell, Tony, Regional Administrator, Region VI, Federal
Emergency Management Agency, Department of Homeland
Security.
LOIM, Oct. 17, 2011, ``Texas Wildfire Review: Did
Bureaucracy Prevent a Timely Response?''
Russo, Michael, Director of Global Security and Product
Protection, Eli Lilly and Company.
LOIM, July 7, 2011, ``Homeland Security Investigations:
Examining DHS's Efforts to Protect American Jobs and Secure the
Homeland.''

-- S --

Sadler, Stephen, Deputy Assistant Administrator, Transportation
Threat Assessment and Credentialing, Transportation
Security Administration, Department of Homeland
Security.
LTS, May 4, 2011, H.R.1690, the ``MODERN Security
Credentials Act.''
Salazar, Hugo E., (MG), Adjutant General, Arizona National
Guard.
LBMS, Mar. 15, 2011, ``Strengthening the Border --
Finding the Right Mix of Personnel, Infrastructure and
Technology.''
Salinas, Jose, Brg, Gen., Director, Joint Staff, Arizona Dept.
of Emergency & Military Affairs, Arizona National
Guard.
LBMS, May 21, 2012, field hearing in Phoenix, Arizona,
``Stopping the Flow of Illicit Drugs in Arizona by Leveraging
State, Local and Federal Information Sharing.''
Salinas, Raul G., Mayor, City of Laredo, Texas.
LBMS, Feb. 15, 2011, ``Securing Our Borders --
Operational Control and the Path Forward.''
Sammon, John P., Assistant Administrator, Office of Security
Policy and Industry Engagement, Transportation
Security. Administration, Department of Homeland
Security.
LTS, Mar. 9, 2011, ``Securing Air Commerce From the
Threat of Terrorism.''
LTS, May 16, 2012, ``Access Control Point Breaches at
Our Nation's Airports: Anomalies or Systemic Failures?''
Sanders, John, Assistant Administrator, Office of Security
Capabilities, Transportation Security Administration,
Department of Homeland Security.
LTS, Nov. 15, 2012, ``TSA's Recent Scanner Shuffle: Real
Strategy of Wasteful Smokescreen?''
Sands, Thomas, Captain, Deputy State Director, Emergency
Management & Homeland Security, State of Michigan.
LEPRC, Oct. 28, 2011, (Detroit, Michigan) ``The State of
Northern Border Preparedness: A Review of Federal, State, and
Local Coordination.''
Saunders, Mary H., Director, Standards Coordination Office,
National Institute of Standards and Technology.
LEPRC and CIPST, May 9, 2012, ``First Responder
Technologies: Ensuring a Prioritized Approach for Homeland
Security Research and Development.''
Sawyer, Reid L., LTC, Director, Combating Terrorism Center at
West Point.
LFULL, with the Senate Committee on Homeland Security
and Governmental Affairs Dec. 7, 2011, ``Homegrown Terrorism:
The Threat to Military Communities Inside the United States.''
Scales, Robert H. (MG Ret.), President, COLGEN, LP.
LOIM, Oct. 14, 2011, ``A Call to Action: Narco-
Terrorism's Threat to the Southern U.S. Border.''
Scalici, Dawn, Deputy Undersecretary, Office of Intelligence
and Analysis, Department of Homeland Security.
LCTI, Dec. 4, 2012. ``Terrorist Exploitation of Refugee
Programs.''
Schanzer, Jonathan, Vice President of Research, Foundation for
Defense of Democracies.
LCTI, May 18, 2012, ``Terrorist Financing Since 9/11:
Assessing an Evolving al Qaeda and State Sponsors of
Terrorism.''
Schneck, Phyllis, Vice President and Chief Technical Officer,
McAfee Inc.
LCIPST, Mar. 16, 2011, ``Examining the Cyber Threat to
Critical Infrastructure and the American Economy.''
Schneider, Paul, Principal, The Chertoff Group.
LOIM, Feb. 3, ``Is DHS Effectively Implementing a
Strategy to Counter Emerging Threats?''
Scott, Timothy J., Chief Security Officer and Corporate
Director, Emergency Services and Security, Dow
Chemical.
Ltestifying on behalf of the American Chemistry
Council.CIPST, Feb. 11, 2011, ``Preventing Chemical Terrorism:
Building a Foundation of Security At Our Nation's Chemical
Facilities.''
LCIPST, Mar. 6, 2012, ``The Chemical Facilities Anti-
Terrorism Standards Program: Addressing Its Challenges and
Finding a Way Forward.''
Sena, Mike, Deputy Director, Northern California Regional
Intelligence Center, estifying on behalf of the
National Fusion Center Association.
LEPRC Jun. 6, 2012, ``The National Preparedness Report:
Assessing the State of Preparedness.''
Serino, Richard, Deputy Administrator, Federal Emergency
Management Agency, Department of Homeland Security.
LEPRC, Feb. 29, 2012, ``The President's FY 2013 Budget
Request for the Federal Emergency Management Agency.''
Shannon, Greg, Dr., Chief Scientist for Computer Emergency
Readiness Team, Software Engineering Institute,
Carnegie Mellon University.
LCIPST, June 24, 2011, ``Examining the Homeland Security
Impact of the Obama Administration's Cybersecurity Proposal.''
LCIPST, Dec. 6, 2011, ``Hearing on Draft Legislative
Proposal on Cybersecurity.''
Sheaffer, James W., President, North American Public Sector,
Computer Sciences Corporation.
LCIPST, Oct. 6, 2011 ``Cloud Computing: What are the
Security Implications?''
Shirk, David, Dr., Director, Trans-Border Institute, University
of San Diego.
LOIM, Mar. 31, 2011, ``The U.S. Homeland Security Role
in the Mexican War Against Drug Cartels.''
Silber, Mitchell, Director, Intelligence Analysis, NYPD
Intelligence Division, New York City Police Department.
LFULL, Mar. 21, 2012, ``Iran, Hezbollah, and the Threat
to the Homeland.''
Silver, Mariko, Acting Assistant Secretary, Office of
International Affairs, U.S. Department of Homeland
Security.
LOIM, JT. with the Committee on Foreign Affairs'
Subcommittee on the Western Hemisphere, Oct. 4, 2011, ``Merida
Part Two: Insurgency and Terrorism in Mexico.''
Simay, Gregory L., At-Large Director, Los Angeles Regional
Interoperable Communication System.
LFULL, Mar. 30, 2011, ``Public Safety Communications:
Are the Needs of Our First Responders Being Met?''
Sims, Cedric, Dr., Executive Director, Office of Program
Accountability and Risk Management, Management
Directorate, Department of Homeland Security.
LTS, Dec. 8, 2011, ``A Review of Passenger Screening
Technology at U.S. Airports.''
Skinner, Richard L., Former Inspector General, Department of
Homeland Security.
LFULL, Sep. 20, 2012, ``The Department of Homeland
Security: An Assessment of the Department and a Roadmap for its
Future.''
Smith, Gerald ``Jerry'' L., II, FPEM, President, Florida
Emergency Preparedness Association.
LEPRC, Jun. 10, 2011, ``Weathering the Storm: A State
and Local Perspective on Emergency Management.''
Smith, Kevin, Former Assistant United States Attorney, Central
District of California.
LJun. 15, 2011, FULL, ``The Threat of Muslim-American
Radicalization in U.S. Prisons.''
Smith, Thomas E., Chief of Police, Saint Paul, Minnesota.
LFULL, July 27, 2011, ``Al Shabaab: Recruitment and
Radicalization within the Muslim American Community and the
Threat to the Homeland.''
Spires, Richard, Chief Information Officer, U.S. Department of
Homeland Security.
LCIPST, Oct. 6, 2011 ``Cloud Computing: What are the
Security Implications?''
Stana, Richard M., Director, Homeland Security and Justice,
Government Accountability Office.
LBMS, Feb. 15, 2011, ``Securing Our Borders --
Operational Control and the Path Forward.''
LBMS, Mar. 15, 2011, ``Strengthening the Border --
Finding the Right Mix of Personnel, Infrastructure and
Technology.''
LSep. 13, 2011, BMS, ``Ten Years after 9/11: Can
Terrorists Still Exploit our Visa System?''
Stanhope, Jeffery, Lt. Col., Assistant Director, Criminal
Investigations, Arizona Department of Public Safety.
LBMS, May 21, 2012, field hearing in Phoenix, Arizona,
``Stopping the Flow of Illicit Drugs in Arizona by Leveraging
State, Local and Federal Information Sharing.''
Staples, Todd, Commissioner, Texas Department of Agriculture.
LOIM, Oct. 14, 2011, ``A Call to Action: Narco-
Terrorism's Threat to the Southern U.S. Border.''
Starbuck, Kevin, CEM, Emergency Management Coordinator,
Amarillo/Potter/Randall Office of Emergency Management.
LOIM, Oct. 17, 2011, ``Texas Wildfire Review: Did
Bureaucracy Prevent a Timely Response?''
Starr, David, Director, Countermeasures Response Unit,
Emergency Preparedness & Response, NYC Department of
Health and Mental Hygiene.
LEPRC, May 12, 2011, ``Taking Measure of Countermeasures
(Part 2): A Review of Efforts to Protect the Homeland Through
Distribution and Dispensing of CBRN Medical Countermeasures.''
Steir, Max, President and CEO, The Partnership for Public
Service.
LOIM, Mar. 22, 2012, ``Building One DHS: Why is Employee
Morale Low?''
Stempfley, Bobbie, Deputy Assistant Secretary, Office of
Cybersecurity and Communications, Department of
Homeland Security.
LEPRC, Sep. 12, 2012, ``Resilient Communications:
Current Challenges and Future Advancements.''
Stepanovich, Amie, Litigation Counsel, Electronic Privacy
Information Center.
LOIM, July 19, 2012, ``Using Unmanned Aerial Systems
Within the Homeland: Security Game Changer?''
Stern, Warren M., Director, Domestic Nuclear Detection Office,
Department of Homeland Security.
LCIPST, July 26, 2011, ``The Last Line of Defense:
Federal, State, and Local Efforts to Prevent Nuclear and
Radiological Terrorism Within the United States.''
Stockton, Paul N., Assistant Secretary of Defense for Homeland
Defense and Americas' Security Affairs, Office of
Undersecretary of Defense for Policy, Department of
Defense.
LBMS, November 15, 2011, ``Protecting the Homeland: How
can DHS use DOD Technology to Secure the Border?''
LFULL, with the Senate Committee on Homeland Security
and Governmental Affairs Dec. 7, 2011, ``Homegrown Terrorism:
The Threat to Military Communities Inside the United States.''
LBMS, Apr. 17, 2012, ``Boots on the Ground or Eyes in
the Sky: How Best to Utilize the National Guard to Achieve
Operational Control.''
Strack, Barbara, Chief, Refugee Affairs Division, United States
Citizenship and Immigration Services, Department of
Homeland Security.
LCTI, Dec. 4, 2012. ``Terrorist Exploitation of Refugee
Programs.''
Stuteville, Jim, United States Army Senior Advisor,
Counterintelligence Operations and Liaison to the
Federal Bureau of Investigation.
LFULL, with the Senate Committee on Homeland Security
and Governmental Affairs Dec. 7, 2011, ``Homegrown Terrorism:
The Threat to Military Communities Inside the United States.''
Sullivan, Mark, Director, United States Secret Service.
LCTI, Sep. 14, 2011, ``United States Secret Service:
Examining Protective and Investigative Missions and Challenges
in 2012.''
Swecker, Christopher E., Private Citizen and former Assistant
Director, Criminal Investigative Division, Federal
Bureau of Investigation
LFULL, Mar. 21, 2012, ``Iran, Hezbollah, and the Threat
to the Homeland.''
Swift, William, Chairman, Airport Minority Advisory Council.
LTS, May 16, 2012, ``Access Control Point Breaches at
Our Nation's Airports: Anomalies or Systemic Failures?''

-- T --

Talent, Jim, Vice Chairman, The Bipartisan WMD Terrorism
Research Center.
LCIPST and EPRC, June 23, 2011, ``H.R.----, the `WMD
Prevention and Preparedness Act of 2011.'''
Tan, Lawrence E., Chief, Emergency Medical Services Division,
Department of Public Safety, New Castle County,
Delaware.
LEPRC, May 12, 2011, ``Taking Measure of Countermeasures
(Part 2): A Review of Efforts to Protect the Homeland Through
Distribution and Dispensing of CBRN Medical Countermeasures.''
Tangora, Michael, Deputy Assistant Commandant & Director of
Acquisition Services, United States Coast Guard,
Department of Homeland Security.
LBMS, November 15, 2011, ``Protecting the Homeland: How
can DHS use DOD Technology to Secure the Border?''
Tankel, Stephen, Visiting Fellow, South Asia Program, The
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
LCTI, May 3, 2011, ``The Threat to the U.S. Homeland
Emanating from Pakistan.''
Tierney, MaryAnn, Regional Administrator-Region III, Federal
Emergency Management Agency, Department of Homeland
Security.
LEPRC, Nov. 29, 2011, field hearing in La Plume,
Pennsylvania ``Ensuring Effective Preparedness and Response:
Lessons Learned from Hurricane Irene and Tropical Storm Lee.''
Toohey, Brian, President, Semiconductor Industry Association.
LOIM, July 7, 2011, ``Homeland Security Investigations:
Examining DHS's Efforts to Protect American Jobs and Secure the
Homeland.''
Townsend, Frances F., Senior Vice President, Worldwide
Government, Legal and Business Affairs, MacAndrews &
Forbes Holdings, Inc.
LFULL, May 25, 2011, ``Threats to the American Homeland
after Killing Bin Laden: An Assessment.''
Turetsky, David, Chief, Public Safety and Homeland Security
Bureau, Federal Communications Commission.
LEPRC, Sep. 12, 2012, ``Resilient Communications:
Current Challenges and Future Advancements.''

-- U --

Useem, Bert, Department Head and Professor, Sociology
Department, Purdue University.
LJun. 15, 2011, FULL, ``The Threat of Muslim-American
Radicalization in U.S. Prisons.''

-- V --

VanLoh, Mark, A.A.E., Director, Aviation Department, Kansas
City International Airport.
LTS, Feb. 7, 2012, ``Screening Partnership Program: Why
is a Job-Creating, Public-Private Partnership Meeting
Resistance at TSA?''
Vaughan, Martin, Executive Director, Southwest Region, Office
of Air and Marine, U.S. Customs & Border Protection,
Department of Homeland Security.
LBMS, Apr. 17, 2012, ``Boots on the Ground or Eyes in
the Sky: How Best to Utilize the National Guard to Achieve
Operational Control.''
Velasquez, Andrew, Regional Administrator -- Region V, Federal
Emergency Management Agency, Department of Homeland
Security.
LEPRC, Oct. 28, 2011, (Detroit, Michigan) ``The State of
Northern Border Preparedness: A Review of Federal, State, and
Local Coordination.''
Velez-Villar, Eric, Assistant Director, Federal Bureau of
Investigation, Department of Justice.
LCTI, Feb. 28, 2012, ``Federal Government Intelligence
Sharing with State, Local and Tribal Law Enforcement: An
Assessment Ten Years After 9/11.''
Vickers, Michael, Las Palmas Veterinary Hospital.
LOIM, Oct. 14, 2011, ``A Call to Action: Narco-
Terrorism's Threat to the Southern U.S. Border.''
Villarosa, Shari, Deputy Coordinator for Regional Affairs,
Department of State.
LOIM, June 3, 2011, ``Denying Safe Havens: Homeland
Security's Efforts to Counter Threats from Pakistan, Yemen and
Somalia.''
Vitiello, Ronald D., Deputy Chief, U.S. Customs and Border
Protection, Department of Homeland Security.
LBMS, May 3, 2011, ``Border Security and Enforcement --
Department of Homeland Security's Cooperation with State and
Local Law Enforcement Stakeholders.''
LBMS, Apr. 17, 2012, ``Boots on the Ground or Eyes in
the Sky: How Best to Utilize the National Guard to Achieve
Operational Control.''
Voutour, James, Sheriff, Niagara County, New York.
LCTI, July 30, 2012, field hearing in Buffalo, New York,
``Beyond Borders: Are the Department of Homeland Security's
International Agreements Ensuring Actionable Intelligence to
Combat Threats to the U.S. Homeland?''

-- W --

Wade, Gary E., Vice President Security, Atlas Air Worldwide
Holdings, Inc., Testifying on behalf of the Cargo
Airline Association.
LTS, May 8, 2012, ``Building Secure Partnerships in
Travel, Commerce, and Trade with the Asia-Pacific Region.''
Wagner, Caryn, Under Secretary, Office of Intelligence and
Analysis, Department of Homeland Security.
LCTI, June 1, 2011, ``The DHS Intelligence Enterprise--
Past, Present, and Future.''
LTS, Dec. 8, 2011, ``A Review of Passenger Screening
Technology at U.S. Airports.''
Wainio, Richard A., President and CEO, Tampa Port Authority,
testifying on behalf of the American Association of
Port Authorities.
LEPRC, April 26, 2012, ``Ensuring the Efficiency,
Effectiveness, and Transparency of Homeland Security Grants
(Part II): Stakeholder Perspectives.''
Wales, Brandon, Director, Homeland Infrastructure Threat and
Risk Analysis Center, Department of Homeland Security.
LCTI, Mar. 19, 2012, ``The Implications of Refinery
Closures for U.S. Homeland Security and Critical Infrastructure
Safety.''
LCIPST, Sep. 12, 2012, ``The EMP Threat: Examining the
Consequences.''
Walker, Hui-Shan, Emergency Management Coordinator, City of
Hampton, Virginia, testifying on behalf of the
International Association of Emergency Managers.
LEPRC, April 26, 2012, ``Ensuring the Efficiency,
Effectiveness, and Transparency of Homeland Security Grants
(Part II): Stakeholder Perspectives.''
Walker, Randall H., Director of Aviation, Las Vegas McCarran
International Airport, Clark County Department of
Aviation, testifying on behalf of the Airports Council
International -- North America.
LTS, May 4, 2011, H.R.1690, the ``MODERN Security
Credentials Act.''
Walther, Kelli Ann, Deputy Assistant Secretary, Office of
Policy, Department of Homeland Security.
LBMS, Sep. 11, 2012, ``Eleven Years Later: Preventing
Terrorists from Coming to America.''
Wasem, Ruth Ellen, Ph.D., Specialist in Immigration Policy,
Congressional Research Service.
LBMS, Oct. 4, 2011, ``Does Administrative Amnesty Harm
our Efforts to Gain and Maintain Operational Control of the
Border?''
Waters, Karen Shelton, Assistant Administrator, Office of
Acquisition, Transportation Security Administration,
Department of Homeland Security.
LOIM, Sep. 21, 2012, ``DHS Acquisition Management
Challenges: Solution for Saving Taxpayer Dollars.''
Weisburd, Andrew Aaron, Director, Society for Internet
Research.
LCTI, Dec. 6, 2011, ``Jihadist Use of Social Media --
How to Prevent Terrorism and Preserve Innovation.''
Wenner, Marita C., Volunteer Chair, Pennsylvania State Disaster
Committee, American Red Cross.
LEPRC, Nov. 29, 2011, field hearing in La Plume,
Pennsylvania ``Ensuring Effective Preparedness and Response:
Lessons Learned from Hurricane Irene and Tropical Storm Lee.''
Whitehead, James H, CAPT, Sector Commander, Sector Houston-
Galveston, United States Coast Guard, Department of
Homeland Security.
LOIM, August 24, 2011, field hearing in Houston, Texas,
``Preventing an Economic Shock Wave: Securing the Port of
Houston from a Terrorist Attack.''
Williams, Grayling, Director, Office of Counternarcotics
Enforcement, Department of Homeland Security.
LOIM, May 11, 2011, ``On the Border and in the Line of
Fire: U.S. Law Enforcement, Homeland Security and Drug Cartel
Violence.''
Williams, Jim, Vice Chair, Homeland Security Committee,
TechAmerica.
LOIM, July 15, 2011, ``Homeland Security Contracting:
Does the Department Effectively Leverage Emerging
Technologies?''
Williams, Leigh, BITS President, The Financial Services
Roundtable.
LCIPST, June 24, 2011, ``Examining the Homeland Security
Impact of the Obama Administration's Cybersecurity Proposal.''
Williams-Bridgers, Jacquie, Managing Director, International
Affairs and Trade, Government Accountability Office.
LOIM, June 3, 2011, ``Denying Safe Havens: Homeland
Security's Efforts to Counter Threats from Pakistan, Yemen and
Somalia.''
Willis, Chauncia, MPA, MEP, CEM, Emergency Coordinator, Office
of Emergency Management, City of Tampa, Florida.
LEPRC, Jun. 10, 2011, ``Weathering the Storm: A State
and Local Perspective on Emergency Management.''
Wilshusen, Gregory C., Director, Information Security Issues,
Government Accountability Office.
LCIPST, Mar. 16, 2011, ``Examining the Cyber Threat to
Critical Infrastructure and the American Economy.''
LCIPST, Oct. 6, 2011 ``Cloud Computing: What are the
Security Implications?''
LOIM, April 24, 2012, ``America is Under Cyber Attack:
Why Urgent Action is Needed.''
LCTI, Jun. 28, 2012, ``Economic Espionage: A Foreign
Intelligence Threat to American Jobs and Homeland Security.''
Wilson, Kerwin, General Manager for General Aviation, Office of
Security Policy and Industry Engagement, Transportation
Security Administration.
LTS, July 18, 2012, ``A Decade After 9/11 Could American
Flight Schools Still Unknowingly Be Training Terrorists?''
Winkowski, Thomas, Assistant Commissioner, Office of Field
Operations, U.S. Customs and Border Protection,
Department of Homeland Security.
LBMS, April 5, 2011, ``Using Resources Effectively to
Secure Our Border at Ports of Entry _ Stopping the Illicit Flow
of Money, Guns and Drugs.''
LSep. 13, 2011, BMS, ``Ten Years after 9/11: Can
Terrorists Still Exploit our Visa System?''
LOIM, May 17, 2012, ``Department of Homeland Security:
An Examination of Ethical Standards.''
Winter, Douglas, Deputy Chair, The William H. Webster
Commission.
LOIM, Sep. 14, 2012, ``Lessons From Fort Hood: Improving
our Ability to Connect the Dots.''
Witkowski, Christopher, Director, Air Safety, Health and
Security, Association of Flight Attendants -- CWA.
LTS, July 12, 2011, ``Industry Perspectives: Authorizing
the Transportation Security Administration for FY 2012 and
2013.''
Wolf, Frank, a Representative in Congress from the 10th
District of Virginia.
LFULL, Mar. 10, 2011, ``The Extent of Radicalization in
the American Muslim Community and that Community's Response.''
Woods, John, Assistant Director, National Security
Investigations, Homeland Security Investigations,
Immigrations and Customs Enforcement, Department of
Homeland Security.
LCTI, Jun. 28, 2012, ``Economic Espionage: A Foreign
Intelligence Threat to American Jobs and Homeland Security.''
LTS, July 10, 2012, ``Challenging the Status Quo at TSA:
Perspectives on the Future of Transportation Security.''
LTS, July 18, 2012, ``A Decade After 9/11 Could American
Flight Schools Still Unknowingly Be Training Terrorists?''
LBMS, Sep. 11, 2012, ``Eleven Years Later: Preventing
Terrorists from Coming to America.''
Wright, David, President, National Federal Protective Service
Union, American Federation of Government Employees.
LCIPST, July 13, 2011, ``Securing Federal Facilities:
Challenges of the Federal Protective Service and the Need for
Reform.''
LCIPST, Mar. 6, 2012, ``The Chemical Facilities Anti-
Terrorism Standards Program: Addressing Its Challenges and
Finding a Way Forward.''
Wulf, David, Deputy Director, Infrastructure Security
Compliance Division, Office of Infrastructure
Protection, Department of Homeland Security.
LCIPST, Mar. 6, 2012, ``The Chemical Facilities Anti-
Terrorism Standards Program: Addressing Its Challenges and
Finding a Way Forward.''

-- X, Y, Z --

Zukunft, Paul F., RAdm., Assistant Commandant for Marine
Safety, Security and Stewardship, United States Coast
Guard, Department of Homeland Security.
LBMS, July 12, 2011, ``Protecting the Maritime Borders--
Leveraging Law Enforcement Cooperation to Enhance Security
Along America's Coasts.''
APPENDIX IX

Printed Hearings

Number Title Date

112-1 ``Understanding the Homeland February 9, 2011
Threat Landscape --
Considerations for the 112th
Congress.''
Full Committee

112-2 ``Terrorism and Transportation February 10, 2011
Security.''
Subcommittee on Transportation
Security

112-3 ``Preventing Chemical February 11, 2011
Terrorism: Building A
Foundation of Security at Our
Nation's Chemical
Facilities.''
Subcommittee on Cybersecurity,
Infrastructure Protection and
Security Technologies

112-4 ``Securing Our Borders -- February 15, 2011
Operational Control and the
Path Forward.''
Subcommittee on Border and
Maritime Security

112-5 ``Terrorist Threat to the U.S. March 2, 2011
Homeland -- Al-Qaeda in the
Arabian Peninsula (AQAP).''
Subcommittee on
Counterterrorism and
Intelligence

112-6 ``The President's FY 2012 March 3, 2011
Budget Request for the
Department of Homeland
Security.''
Full Committee

112-7 ``Ensuring Effective March 9, 2011
Preparedness and Response --
An Assessment of the Fiscal
Year 2012 Budget Request for
the Federal Emergency
Management Agency''.
Subcommittee on Emergency
Preparedness, Response and
Coordination

112-8 ``Securing Air Commerce From March 9, 2011
the Threat of Terrorism.''
Subcommittee on Transportation
Security

112-9 Compilation of Hearings on ...................
Islamist Radicalization-- ...................
Volume I March 10, 2011
``The Extent of Radicalization ...................
in the American Muslim ...................
Community and that Community's June 15, 2011
Response.'' ...................
``The Threat of Muslim-American ...................
Radicalization in U.S. July 27, 2011
Prisons.''
``Al Shabaab: Recruitment and
Radicalization within the
Muslim American Community and
the Threat to the Homeland.''
Full Committee

112-10 ``Strengthening the Border -- March 15, 2011
Finding the Right Mix of
Personnel, Infrastructure and
Technology.''
Subcommittee on Border and
Maritime Security

112-11 ``Examining the Cyber Threat to March 16, 2011
Critical Infrastructure and
the American Economy.''
Subcommittee on Cybersecurity,
Infrastructure Protection and
Security Technologies

112-12 ``Ensuring Effective March 17, 2011
Preparedness, Response, and
Recovery for Events Impacting
Health Security.''
Subcommittee on Emergency
Preparedness, Response, and
Communications

112-13 ``The U.S. Homeland Security March 31, 2011
Role in the Mexican War
Against Drug Cartels.''
Subcommittee on Oversight,
Investigations and Management

112-14 ``The U.S. Homeland Security March 31, 2011
Role in the Mexican War
Against Drug Cartels.''
Subcommittee on Oversight,
Investigations and Management

112-15 ``Using Resources Effectively April 5, 2011
to Secure Our Border at Ports
of Entry -- Stopping the
Illicit Flow of Money, Guns
and Drugs.''
Subcommittee on Border and
Maritime Security

112-16 ``Unrest in the Middle East and April 6, 2011
North Africa: Ramifications
for U.S. Homeland Security.''
Subcommittee on
Counterterrorism and
Intelligence

112-17 ``Strengthening International April 7, 2011
Cooperation on Aviation
Security.''
Subcommittee on Transportation
Security

112-18 ``Taking Measure of ...................
Countermeasures.'' April 13, 2011
``(Part 1): A review of ...................
government and industry ...................
efforts to protect the ...................
Homeland through accelerated ...................
research, development, and May 12, 2011
acquisition of chemical,
biological, radiological and
nuclear medical
countermeasures.''
``(Part 2): A Review of Efforts
to Protect the Homeland
Through Distribution and
Dispensing of CBRN Medical
Countermeasures.''
Subcommittee on Emergency
Preparedness, Response and
Communications

112-19 ``The DHS Cybersecurity April 15, 2011
Mission: Promoting Innovation
and Securing Critical
Infrastructure.''
Subcommittee on Cybersecurity,
Infrastructure Protection and
Security Technologies

112-20 ``Border Security and May 3, 2011
Enforcement -- Department of
Homeland Security's
Cooperation with State and
Local Law Enforcement
Stakeholders.''
Subcommittee on Border and
Maritime Security

112-21 ``The Threat to the U.S. May 3, 2011
Homeland Emanating from
Pakistan.''
Subcommittee on
Counterterrorism and
Intelligence

112-22 ``Securing Our Nation's Mass May 4, 2011
Transit Systems Against a
Terrorist Attack.''
Full Committee

112-23 H.R.1690, the ``MODERN Security May 4, 2011
Credentials Act.''
Subcommittee on Transportation
Security

112-24 ``On the Border and in the Line May 11, 2011
of Fire: U.S. Law Enforcement,
Homeland Security and Drug
Cartel Violence.''
Subcommittee on Oversight,
Investigations, and Management

112-25 ``Threats to the American May 25, 2011
Homeland after Killing Bin
Laden: An Assessment.''
Full Committee

112-26 ``Unlocking the SAFETY Act's May 26, 2011
Potential to Promote
Technology and Combat
Terrorism.''
Cybersecurity, Infrastructure
Protection and Security
Technologies

112-27 ``The DHS Intelligence June 1, 2011
Enterprise--Past, Present, and
Future.''
Subcommittee on
Counterterrorism and
Intelligence

112-28 ``Authorizing the June 2, 2011
Transportation Security ...................
Administration for Fiscal July 12, 2011
Years 2012 and 2013.''
``Industry Perspectives:
Authorizing the Transportation
Security Administration for FY
2012 and 2013.''
Subcommittee on Transportation
Security

112-29 ``Denying Safe Havens: Homeland June 3, 2011
Security's Efforts to Counter
Threats from Pakistan, Yemen
and Somalia.''
Subcommittee on Oversight,
Investigations, and Management

112-30 ``Weathering the Storm: A State June 10, 2011
and Local Perspective on (Clearwater,
Emergency Management.'' Florida)
Subcommittee on Emergency
Preparedness, Response and
Communications

112-31 ``Securing the Nation's Ports June 14, 2011
and Maritime Border -- A
Review of the Coast Guard's
Post 9/11 Homeland Security
Missions.''
Subcommittee on Border and
Maritime Security

112-32 ``H.R.----, the `WMD Prevention June 23, 2011
and Preparedness Act of
2011.'''
Joint Subcommittee on Emergency
Preparedness, Response and
Communication and the
Subcommittee on Cybersecurity,
Infrastructure Protection and
Security Technologies

112-33 ``Examining the Homeland June 24, 2011
Security Impact of the Obama
Administration's Cybersecurity
Proposal.''
Subcommittee on Cybersecurity,
Infrastructure Protection and
Security Technologies

112-34 ``Homeland Security July 7, 2011
Investigations: Examining
DHS's Efforts to Protect
American Jobs and Secure the
Homeland.''
Subcommittee on Oversight,
Investigations, and Management

112-35 ``Hezbollah in Latin America -- July 7, 2011
Implications for U.S. Homeland
Security.''
Subcommittee on
Counterterrorism and
Intelligence

112-36 ``Communicating With the Public July 8, 2011
During Emergencies: An Update
on Federal Alert and Warning
Efforts.''
Subcommittee on Emergency
Communications, Preparedness,
and Response

112-37 ``Protecting the Maritime July 12, 2011
Borders -- Leveraging Law
Enforcement Cooperation to
Enhance Security Along
America's Coasts.''
Subcommittee on Border and
Maritime Security

112-38 ``Securing Federal Facilities: July 13, 2011
Challenges of the Federal
Protective Service and the
Need For Reform.''
Subcommittee on Cybersecurity,
Infrastructure Protection and
Security Technologies

112-39 ``Homeland Security July 15, 2011
Contracting: Does the
Department Effectively
Leverage Emerging
Technologies?''
Subcommittee on Oversight,
Investigations, and Management

112-40 ``The Last Line of Defense: July 26, 2011
Federal, State, and Local
Efforts to Prevent Nuclear and
Radiological Terrorism Within
the United States.''
Subcommittee on Cybersecurity,
Infrastructure Protection, and
Security Technologies

112-41 ``Preventing an Economic Shock August 24, 2011
Wave: Securing the Port of (Houston, Texas)
Houston from a Terrorist
Attack.''
Subcommittee on Oversight,
Investigations, and Management

112-42 ``The Attacks of September September 8, 2011
11th: Where are We Today.''
Full Committee

112-43 ``Ten Years after 9/11: Can September 13, 2011
Terrorists Still Exploit our
Visa System?''
Subcommittee on Border and
Maritime Security

112-44 ``United States Secret Service: September 14, 2011
Examining Protective and
Investigative Missions and
Challenges in 2012.''
Subcommittee on
Counterterrorism and
Intelligence

112-45 ``Ten Years After 9/11: September 16, 2011
Assessing Airport Security and (Boston,
Preventing a Future Terrorist Massachusetts)
Attack.''
Subcommittee on Oversight,
Investigations, and Management

112-46 ``TSA Reform: Exploring September 22, 2011
Innovations in Technology October 13, 2011
Procurement to Stimulate Job November 3, 2011
Growth.''
Subcommittee on Transportation
Security

112-47 ``Does Administrative Amnesty October 4, 2011
Harm our Efforts to Gain and
Maintain Operational Control
of the Border?''
Subcommittee on Border and
Maritime Security

112-48 ``Merida Part Two: Insurgency October 4, 2011
and Terrorism in Mexico.''
Joint hearing with the
Subcommittee on Oversight,
Investigations, and Management
and the Committee on Foreign
Affairs' Subcommittee on the
Western Hemisphere

112-49 ``Intelligence Sharing and October 5, 2011
Terrorist Travel: How DHS
Addresses the Mission of
Providing Security,
Facilitating Commerce and
Protecting Privacy for
Passengers Engaged in
International Travel.''
Subcommittee on
Counterterrorism and
Intelligence

112-50 ``Cloud Computing: What are the October 6, 2011
Security Implications?''
Subcommittee on Cybersecurity,
Infrastructure Protection, and
Security Technologies

112-51 ``A Call to Action: Narco- October 24, 2011
Terrorism's Threat to the
Southern U.S. Border.''
Subcommittee on Oversight,
Investigations, and Management

112-52 ``Texas Wildfire Review: Did October 17, 2011
Bureaucracy Prevent a Timely (Austin, Texas)
Response?''
Subcommittee on Oversight,
Investigations, and Management

112-53 ``Five Years Later: An October 25, 2011
Assessment of the Post Katrina
Emergency Management Reform
Act.''
Subcommittee on Emergency
Preparedness, Response, and
Communications

112-54 ``Iranian Terror Operation on October 26, 2011
American Soil.''
Subcommittee on
Counterterrorism and
Intelligence and the
Subcommittee on Oversight,
Investigations, and Management

112-55 ``The State of Northern Border October 28, 2011
Preparedness: A Review of
Federal, State, and Local
Coordination.''
Subcommittee on Emergency
Preparedness, Response, and
Communications

112-56 ``Protecting the Homeland: How November 15, 2011
can DHS use DOD Technology to
Secure the Border?''
Subcommittee on Border and
Maritime Security

112-57 ``S&T on a Budget: Finding November 17, 2011
Smarter Approaches to Spur
Innovation, Impose Discipline,
Drive Job Creation and
Strengthen Homeland
Security.''
Subcommittee on Cybersecurity,
Infrastructure Protection, and
Security Technologies

112-58 ``Ensuring Coordination and November 17, 2011
Cooperation: A Review of the
Emergency Communications
Offices Within the Department
of Homeland Security.''
Subcommittee on Emergency
Preparedness, Response, and
Communications

112-59 ``Ensuring Effective November 29, 2011
Preparedness and Response: (La Plume,
Lessons Learned from Hurricane Pennsylvania)
Irene and Tropical Storm
Lee.''
Subcommittee on Emergency
Preparedness, Response, and
Communications

112-60 ``Boko Haram - Emerging Threat November 30, 2011
to the U.S. Homeland.''
Subcommittee on
Counterterrorism and
Intelligence

112-61 ``Hearing on Draft Legislative December 6, 2011
Proposal on Cybersecurity.''
Subcommittee on Cybersecurity,
Infrastructure Protection, and
Security Technologies

112-62 ``Jihadist Use of Social Media - December 6, 2011
How to Prevent Terrorism and
Preserve Innovation.''
Subcommittee on
Counterterrorism and
Intelligence

112-63 Compilation of Hearings on December 7, 2011
Islamist Radicalization -
Volume II
``Homegrown Terrorism: The
Threat to Military Communities
Inside the United States.''
Full Committee and the Senate
Committee on Homeland Security
and Governmental Affairs

112-64 ``Is DHS Effectively February 3, 2012
Implementing a Strategy to
Counter Emerging Threats?''
Subcommittee on Oversight,
Investigations, and Management

112-65 ``Balancing Maritime Security February 7, 2012
and Trade Facilitation:
Protecting our Ports,
Increasing Commerce and
Securing the Supply Chain.''
Subcommittee on Border,
Maritime Security

112-66 ``Screening Partnership February 7, 2012
Program: Why is a Job- February 16, 2012
Creating, Public-Private
Partnership Meeting Resistance
at TSA?''
Subcommittee on Transportation
Security

112-67 ``An Examination of the February 15, 2012
President's FY 2013 Budget
Request for the Department of
Homeland Security.''
Full Committee

112-68 ``DHS Monitoring of Social February 16, 2012
Networking and Media:
Enhancing Intelligence
Gathering and Ensuring
Privacy.''
Subcommittee on
Counterterrorism and
Intelligence

112-69 ``Last Line of Defense: the February 16, 2012
Federal Air Marshal Service 10
Years After 9/11.''
Subcommittee on Transportation
Security

112-70 ``Federal Government February 28, 2012
Intelligence Sharing with
State, Local and Tribal Law
Enforcement: An Assessment Ten
Years After 9/11.''
Subcommittee on
Counterterrorism and
Intelligence

112-71 ``The President's FY 2013 February 29, 2012
Budget Request for the Federal
Emergency Management Agency.''
Subcommittee on Emergency
Preparedness, Response, and
Communications

112-72 ``Building One DHS: Why Can't March 1, 2012
Management Information be
Integrated?''
Subcommittee on Oversight,
Investigations, and Management

112-73 ``From the 9/11 Hijackers to March 6, 2012
Amine el-Khalifi: Terrorists
and the Visa Overstay
Problem.''
Subcommittee on Border and
Maritime Security

112-74 ``The Chemical Facilities Anti- March 6, 2012
Terrorism Standards Program:
Addressing Its Challenges and
Finding a Way Forward.''
Subcommittee on Cybersecurity,
Infrastructure Protection, and
Security Technologies

112-75 ``Eliminating Waste, Fraud, March 8, 2012
Abuse, and Duplication in the
Department of Homeland
Security.''
Subcommittee on Oversight,
Investigations, and Management

112-76 ``The Implications of Refinery March 19, 2012
Closures for U.S. Homeland (Aston,
Security and Critical Pennsylvania)
Infrastructure Safety.''
Subcommittee on
Counterterrorism and
Intelligence

112-77 ``Ensuring the Transparency, March 20, 2012
Efficiency, and Effectiveness April 26, 2012
of Homeland Security Grants.''
``Stakeholder Perspectives''
Subcommittee on Emergency
Preparedness, Response, and
Communications

112-78 Compilation of Hearings on ...................
Islamist Radicalization - March 21, 2012
Volume III June 20, 2012
``Iran, Hezbollah, and the
Threat to the Homeland.''
``The American Muslim Response
to Hearings on Radicalization
within their Community.''
Full Committee

112-79 ``Building One DHS: Why is March 22, 2012
Employee Morale Low?''
Subcommittee on Oversight,
Investigations, and Management

112-80 ``Rightsizing TSA Bureaucracy March 28, 2012
and Workforce Without
Compromising Security.''
Subcommittee on Transportation
Security

112-81 ``The Fiscal Year 2013 Budget March 29, 2012
Request for the Department of
Homeland Security's Office of
Health Affairs.''
Subcommittee on Emergency
Preparedness, Response, and
Communications

112-82 ``Taking Measure of April 17, 2012
Countermeasures (Part 3):
Protecting the Protectors.''
Subcommittee on Emergency
Preparedness, Response, and
Communications

112-83 ``Boots on the Ground or Eyes April 17, 2012
in the Sky: How Best to
Utilize the National Guard to
Achieve Operational Control.''
Subcommittee on Border and
Maritime Security

112-84 ``The DHS and DOE National April 19, 2012
Labs: Finding Efficiencies and
Optimizing Outputs in Homeland
Security Research and
Development.''
Subcommittee on Cybersecurity,
Infrastructure Protection, and
Security Technologies

112-85 ``America is Under Cyber April 24, 2012
Attack: Why Urgent Action is
Needed.''
Subcommittee on Oversight,
Investigations, and Management

112-86 ``Iranian Cyber Threat to the April 26, 2012
U.S. Homeland.''
Subcommittee on
Counterterrorism and
Intelligence and the
Subcommittee on Cybersecurity,
Infrastructure Protection, and
Security Technologies

112-87 ``Using Technology to May 1, 2012
Facilitate Trade and Enhance (Laredo, Texas)
Security at Our Ports of
Entry.''
Subcommittee on Border and
Maritime Security

112-88 ``Measuring Border Security: May 8, 2012
U.S. Border Patrol's New
Strategic Plan and the Path
Forward.''
Subcommittee on Border and
Maritime Security

112-89 ``Building Secure Partnerships May 8, 2012
in Travel, Commerce, and Trade
with the Asia-Pacific
Region.''
Subcommittee on Transportation
Security

112-90 ``First Responder Technologies: May 9, 2012
Ensuring a Prioritized
Approach for Homeland Security
Research and Development.''
Subcommittee on Emergency
Preparedness, Response, and
Communications and the
Subcommittee on Cybersecurity,
Infrastructure Protection, and
Security Technologies

112-91 ``Access Control Point Breaches May 16, 2012
at Our Nation's Airports:
Anomalies or Systemic
Failures?''
Subcommittee on Transportation
Security

112-92 ``Department of Homeland May 17, 2012
Security: An Examination of
Ethical Standards.''
Subcommittee on Oversight,
Investigations, and Management

112-93 ``Terrorist Financing Since 9/ May 18, 2012
11: Assessing an Evolving al
Qaeda and State Sponsors of
Terrorism.''
Subcommittee on
Counterterrorism and
Intelligence

112-94 ``Stopping the Flow of Illicit May 21, 2012
Drugs in Arizona by Leveraging (Phoenix, Arizona)
State, Local and Federal
Information Sharing.''
Subcommittee on Border and
Maritime Security

112-95 ``TSA's Surface Inspection May 31, 2012
Program: Strengthening
Security or Squandering Scant
Resources?''
Subcommittee on Transportation
Security

112-96 ``The National Preparedness June 6, 2012
Report: Assessing the State of
Preparedness.''
Subcommittee on Emergency
Preparedness, Response, and
Communications

112-97 ``TSA's Efforts to Fix Its Poor June 7, 2012
Customer Service Reputation
and Become a Leaner, Smarter
Agency.''
Subcommittee on Transportation
Security

112-98 ``Border Security Threats to June 19, 2012
the Homeland: DHS' Response to
Innovative Tactics and
Techniques.''
Subcommittee on Border and
Maritime Security

112-99 ``Is TSA's Planned Purchase of June 19, 2012
CAT/BPSS a Wise Use of
Taxpayer Dollars?''
Subcommittee on Transportation
Security

112-100 ``U.S.-Caribbean Border: Open June 21, 2012
Road for Drug Traffickers and
Terrorists.''
Subcommittee on Oversight,
Investigations, and Management

112-101 ``Economic Espionage: A Foreign June 28, 2012
Intelligence Threat to
American Jobs and Homeland
Security.''
Subcommittee on
Counterterrorism and
Intelligence

112-102 ``Building a Secure Community: July 10, 2012
How Can DHS Better Leverage
State and Local
Partnerships?''
Subcommittee on Border and
Maritime Security

112-103 ``Challenging the Status Quo at July 10, 2012
TSA: Perspectives on the
Future of Transportation
Security.''
Subcommittee on Transportation
Security

112-104 ``Has TSA Met the Deadline to July 11, 2012
Provide Expedited Screening to
Military Service Members?''
Subcommittee on Transportation
Security

112-105 ``Securing Ammonium Nitrate: July 12, 2012
Using Lessons Learned in
Afghanistan to Protect the
Homeland from IED's.''
Subcommittee on Cybersecurity,
Infrastructure Protection, and
Security Technologies

112-106 ``A Decade After 9/11: Could July 18, 2012
American Flight Schools Still
Unknowingly Be Training
Terrorists?''
Subcommittee on Transportation
Security

112-107 ``Using Unmanned Aerial Systems July 19, 2012
Within the Homeland: Security
Game Changer?''
Subcommittee on Oversight,
Investigations and Management

112-108 ``Understanding the Homeland July 25, 2012
Threat Landscape.''
Full Committee

112-109 ``Securing Federal Facilities: July 26, 2012
An Examination of FPS Progress
in Improving Oversight and
Assessing Risk.''
Subcommittee on Cybersecurity,
Infrastructure Protection, and
Security Technologies

112-110 ``Preventing Nuclear Terrorism: July 26, 2012
Does DHS have an Effective and
Efficient Nuclear Detection
Strategy?''
Subcommittee on Cybersecurity,
Infrastructure Protection, and
Security Technologies

112-111 ``Beyond Borders: Are the July 30, 2012
Department of Homeland (Buffalo, New York)
Security's International
Agreements Ensuring Actionable
Intelligence to Combat Threats
to the U.S. Homeland?''
Subcommittee on
Counterterrorism and
Intelligence

112-112 ``Breach of Trust: Addressing August 1, 2012
Misconduct Among TSA
Screeners.''
Subcommittee on Transportation
Security

112-113 ``Eleven Years Later: September 11, 2012
Preventing Terrorists from
Coming to America.''
Subcommittee on Border and
Maritime Security

112-114 ``Eleven Years After 9/11: Can September 11, 2012
TSA Evolve To Meet the Next
Terrorist Threat?''
Subcommittee on Transportation
Security

112-115 ``The EMP Threat: Examining the September 12, 2012
Consequences.''
Subcommittee on Cybersecurity,
Infrastructure Protection, and
Security Technologies

112-116 ``Resilient Communications: September 12, 2012
Current Challenges and Future
Advancements.''
Subcommittee on Emergency
Preparedness, Response, and
Communications

112-117 ``BioWatch Present and Future: September 13, 2012
Meeting Mission Needs for
Effective Biosurveillance?''
Subcommittee on Emergency
Preparedness, Response, and
Communications and the
Subcommittee on Cybersecurity,
Infrastructure Protection, and
Security Technologies

112-118 ``Lessons From Fort Hood: September 14, 2012
Improving our Ability to
Connect the Dots.''
Subcommittee on Oversight,
Investigations, and Management

112-119 ``The Department of Homeland September 20, 2012
Security: An Assessment of the
Department and a Roadmap for
its Future.''
Full Committee

112-120 ``DHS Acquisition Management September 21, 2012.
Challenges: Solutions for
Saving Taxpayer Dollars.''
Subcommittee on Oversight,
Investigations, and Management

112-121 ``TSA's Recent Scanner Shuffle: November 15, 2012
Real Strategy or Wasteful
Smokescreen?''
Subcommittee on Transportation
Security

112-122 ``WMD Terrorism: Assessing the November 15, 2012
Continued Homeland Threat.''
Subcommittee on
Counterterrorism and
Intelligence

112-123 ``A Line in the Sand: Assessing November 16, 2012
Dangerous Threats to Our
Nation's Borders.''
Subcommittee on Oversight,
Investigations, and Management

112-124 ``Terrorist Exploitation of December 4, 2012
Refugee Programs.''
Subcommittee on
Counterterrorism and
Intelligence

APPENDIX X

Committee Prints

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number Title
------------------------------------------------------------------------
111-A.................................. Rules of the Committee on
Homeland Security for the
112th Congress.

111-B.................................. Boko Haram: Emerging Threat to
the U.S. Homeland.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

APPENDIX XI

Summary of Committee Activities

COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY

Total Bills Referred to Committee................................ 131
Public Laws...................................................... 10
Bills Reported to the House...................................... 18

Hearings Held:
Days of Hearings.............................................
Full Committee........................................... 15
Subcommittee on Cybersecurity, Infrastructure Protection,
and Security Technologies.............................. 20
Subcommittee on Transportation Security.................. 23
Subcommittee on Oversight, Investigations, and Management 22
Subcommittee on Emergency Preparedness, Response, and
Communications......................................... 20
Subcommittee on Border and Maritime Security............. 18
Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and Intelligence........ 19

Total Days of Hearings................................... 134

Witnesses:
Full Committee........................................... 49
Subcommittee on Cybersecurity, Infrastructure Protection,
and Security Technologies.............................. 77
Subcommittee on Transportation Security.................. 134
Subcommittee on Oversight, Investigations, and Management 99
Subcommittee on Emergency Preparedness, Response, and
Communications......................................... 90
Subcommittee on Border and Maritime Security............. 74
Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and Intelligence........ 65

Total Witnesses Testifying............................... 431

Markups and Business Meetings Held (Days / Measures):
Full Committee........................................... 9/19
Subcommittee on Cybersecurity, Infrastructure Protection,
and Security Technologies.............................. 3/3
Subcommittee on Transportation Security.................. 3/5
Subcommittee on Oversight, Investigations, and Management 1/1
Subcommittee on Emergency Preparedness, Response, and
Communications......................................... 1/3
Subcommittee on Border and Maritime Security............. 2/4
Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and Intelligence........ 1/2

ADDITIONAL VIEWS

Introduction

During the 112th Congress, Democratic Members of the
Homeland Security Committee have diligently worked to assure
that the programs, policies, and practices of the Department of
Homeland Security are effective and efficient in safeguarding
the nation from the terrorist threat; addressing the
destructive impact of natural disasters; mitigating known and
unknown vulnerabilities, and ensuring resiliency in the
operation of both publicly and privately-owned facilities and
infrastructures. The Democratic Members are committed to
protecting the homeland and ensuring that in the event of a
terrorist attack or other catastrophic occurrence, the welfare
of each and every impacted American is of paramount concern.
The work undertaken by the Democratic Members of this
Committee has taken various forms, including introducing
legislation, arranging briefings from Administration officials,
and sending oversight requests to the Department of Homeland
Security. Most importantly, these efforts have been a
continuation of work done by the Democratic Majority in the
110th and 111th Congresses. Despite minority status, Democrats
have found a way to follow through on our earlier efforts
designed to protect the American people.
We had hoped to engage in collaborative efforts with the
Republican Majority. However, the Majority chose to pursue an
agenda that neither sought nor welcomed inclusion of the
Minority. The lack of bipartisan collaboration has led to the
filing of these Additional Views.
Under the Rules of the House, Activity Reports are intended
to reflect a comprehensive review of a Committee's legislative
and oversight activities. The goal must be to produce a report
of the highest caliber to inform our constituents--the American
taxpayer--of the actions we have taken on their behalf. In
compiling and reporting the activities of the Committee, we
create a record not for a political season, but for posterity.
Unfortunately, in producing the Activity Report, the
Majority opted to compile records of Committee activities that
were not officially noticed events. The report is replete with
vague, dateless references to meetings between Majority staff
and external, non-governmental stakeholders. Not only does this
raise questions about the influence these non-governmental
stakeholders may have had, it also may unintentionally create a
cloud over the work of this Committee.
Therefore, the Additional Views, filed herein are an
attempt to convey both the concerns of the Democratic Members
of the Committee and to provide a clear record of those
activities.

Legislative Activities of the Full Committee

Democratic Views

Legislative Activities of the Committee

At the beginning of the 112th Congress, hopes were high for
enactment of long-anticipated legislation to (1) authorize the
Department of Homeland Security; (2) bolster the cybersecurity
of critical infrastructure; and (3) comprehensively authorize
the Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards program. As the
curtain falls on the 112th Congress, the Committee has not only
failed to effectively legislate in these key areas but, in
general terms, has achieved a paltry legislative record. In
fact, remarkably, for the first time in its history, the
Committee failed to have a single piece of legislation produced
by this Committee considered by the full House under a rule.
The Committee's legislative record of ineffectiveness in
the 112th Congress cannot be easily explained away as the
obvious result of inactivity. To the contrary, throughout the
Congress, the Committee advanced a number of long-overdue
homeland security measures. Yet, the Republican Leadership has
not granted any of these measures the opportunity to be
considered on the House floor. The most prominent Committee-
approved sidelined bills are:
H.R. 3116, the ``Department of Homeland Security
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year (FY) 2012,'' which the Full
Committee voted to favorably report to the full House on
October 13, 2011, after a lively two-day mark-up session.
During the markup, Ranking Member Thompson stressed the
importance of securing a Congressional Budget Office (CBO) cost
estimate for H.R. 3116 since the measure, as amended, did not
include a top-line funding level for the Department of Homeland
Security's (DHS or Department) activities for Fiscal Year (FY)
2012. Specifically, near the end of the two-day mark up, after
about 80 new provisions were accepted, Ranking Member Thompson
made a unanimous consent request to postpone the vote on
ordering the measure reported to the House until the bill could
be scored by the Congressional Budget Office (CBO). This
request was made in an effort to provide CHS Members with the
opportunity to know the potential cost of H.R. 3116, as
amended, since there was no specificity as to top-line funding
in this massive bill. Given that the Committee acted after the
House approved H.R. 2017, the ``Department of Homeland Security
Appropriations Act of FY 2012,'' the failure to authorize a
top-line funding level in this legislation was tantamount to
rubber-stamping H.R. 2017, which funds DHS at 6.9 percent below
the level requested by President Obama and 2.6 percent below FY
2011 enacted levels. Ranking Member Thompson argued that as
authorizers, we have an obligation to guide the work of the
Appropriations Committee by setting spending levels in our
authorization bills. The request made by Ranking Member
Thompson was objected to by the Chairman and the Committee
proceeded to vote on the measure. Subsequently, the Majority
informed us that the Committee report on H.R. 3116 would be
filed on December 15, 2011 without the CBO cost estimate. At
the time, standing in the way of consideration of H.R. 3116 by
the Full House were a few other committees who had
jurisdictional claims on the measure. Over the past year,
Chairman King did not successfully negotiate with the three
other committees to get those claims resolved or even secure a
CBO cost estimate. Nevertheless, on December 20, 2012, with the
possibility of House action on H.R. 3116 implausible, the
report was filed and referrals were granted to three other
committees.
H.R. 3674, the ``Promoting and Enhancing
Cybersecurity and Information Sharing Effectiveness (PRECISE)
Act of 2011,'' which was favorably forwarded, on a bipartisan
basis, by the Subcommittee on Cybersecurity, Infrastructure
Protection and Security Technologies (CIPST) to the Full
Committee on February 1, 2012. Subsequently, CIPST Chairman
Lungren assured Ranking Member Thompson in a colloquy that the
when H.R. 3674 is considered at the Full Committee, the main
tenets of the PRECISE Act--to address the cyber threat to
critical infrastructure, to enhance DHS' role as the Federal
government's lead for cybersecurity, and to promote and enhance
information sharing while protecting civil liberties--would
remain ``intact'' when the PRECISE Act was considered by the
Full Committee.\1\ Yet, the Amendment in the Nature of a
Substitute to H.R. 3674 that was presented at the Full
Committee Markup for H.R. 3674 on April 18, 2012, contained
substantial revisions that undermined the Department's efforts
to strengthen the Nation's cybersecurity posture--particular
information systems owned and operated by critical
infrastructure holders.\2\ As a result, the bill lost
bipartisan support and ultimately was left behind when the
Republican Leadership scheduled measures for consideration
during so-called ``Cybersecurity Week.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\Colloquy during the Full Committee Markup of H.R. 3563, H.R.
2764, H.R. 3140, H.R. 2179, March 28, 2012.
\2\The House Republican Conference Cybersecurity Task Force for the
112th Congress recommended that ``Congress should consider carefully
targeted directives for limited regulation of particular critical
infrastructures,''\2\ however, no legislation that required
cybersecurity enhancements for critical infrastructure was presented to
the Full House during so-called ``Cyber Week'' (Week of April 23).
``Recommendations of the House Republican Cybersecurity Task Force,''
pg. 9. Available at: http://thornberry.house.gov/uploadedfiles/
cstf_final_recommendations.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
H.R. 901, the ``Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism
Security Authorization Act of 2011,'' which the Committee
favorably reported on September 26, 2011 was placed on the
Union Calendar on June 8, 2012 but was never scheduled for a
vote in the Full House. With the enactment of section 550 of
the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Appropriations Act,
2007 (P.L. 109-295), Congress granted DHS, for the first time,
authority to issue regulations relating to the security of the
Nation's chemical sector. Section 550 of the 2007 DHS
Appropriations Act was enacted as a short-term grant of
authority to allow DHS to begin moving forward with the design
and publication of regulations for the chemical sector while
congressional authorizers worked out policy and jurisdictional
differences to pass comprehensive CFATS authorization
legislation. For five years, enactment of comprehensive CFATS
authorization legislation has been elusive. In the absence of a
comprehensive CFATS bill, section 550 authority has been
repeatedly been extended by the Department's appropriators, not
its authorizers.
H.R. 2356, the ``WMD Prevention and Preparedness
Act of 2011,'' which was marked up by the Full Committee on May
9, 2012, reported to the House on September 12, 2012, and
placed on the Union Calendar on November 30, 2012. Title 18 of
the ``Implementing Recommendations of the 9/11 Commission Act
of 2007'' (P.L. 110-53) authorized the establishment of a
bipartisan commission to study the threat posed by the
proliferation of weapons of mass destruction (WMD). Congress
directed the independent Commission for the Prevention of WMD
Proliferation and Terrorism (Commission) to assess current
activities related to WMD prevention and preparedness. The
Commission, led by former Senators Bob Graham (Chair) and Jim
Talent (Vice-Chair), was charged with: Assessing Federal
activities, initiatives, and programs to prevent WMD
proliferation and terrorism; and providing a clear and
comprehensive strategy and concrete recommendations to address
the WMD threat. The Commission submitted a report entitled,
World at Risk: The Report of the Commission on the Prevention
of Weapons of Mass Destruction Proliferation and Terrorism to
the President and the Congress in December 2008. The Commission
concluded that: Unless the global community acts decisively and
urgently, a terrorist attack involving WMD will more likely
than not occur somewhere in the world by the end of 2013;
terrorists are more likely to obtain and use a biological
weapon than a nuclear weapon; and the United States government
needs to more aggressively limit the proliferation of
biological weapons and reduce the prospect of a biological
terrorist attack.
Commissioners Graham and Talent testified before the Full
Committee on April 21, 2010 that they believe that a WMD
terrorist attack will occur somewhere in the world by 2013.
They reiterated their view that the Nation has not done enough
to prevent and prepare for a domestic biological attack. They
also expressed their concern about the fractured state of
Congressional jurisdiction over homeland security matters and
their desire to see jurisdiction for the Department of Homeland
Security consolidated in the Committee on Homeland Security in
the House of Representatives, and the Committee on Homeland
Security and Governmental Affairs in the Senate. There was
broad agreement that enactment of H.R. 2356 is needed to better
address the gaps identified by the Commission and to better
organize efforts by the public and private sectors to prevent,
protect against, respond to, and recover from an attack
involving WMD.
The Committee also approved the following three measures,
all of which are on the Union Calendar but have yet to be
scheduled for votes before the Full House:
H.R. 1165, the ``Transportation Security
Administration Ombudsman Act of 2011,'' as introduced by Rep.
Sheila Jackson Lee (D-TX), the Ranking Member of the
Subcommittee on Transportation Security (TS);
H.R. 2179, to amend title 49, United States
Code, to direct the Assistant Secretary of Homeland Security
(Transportation Security Administration) to transfer unclaimed
money recovered at airport security checkpoints to United
Service Organizations, Incorporated, and for other purposes, as
introduced by Rep. Jeff Miller (R-FL); and
H.R. 3563, the ``Integrated Public Alert and
Warning System Modernization Act of 2012,'' as
introduced by Rep. Gus Bilirakis (R-FL), Chairman of
the Subcommittee on Emergency Preparedness, Response,
and Communications (EPRC).
We would note that while the aforementioned bills were
disregarded and denied the votes in the Full House, two bills,
authored by Democratic Members, that originated in the
Committee, were approved by the House and, ultimately, became
law. They are:
``Jaime Zapata Border Enforcement Security
Task Force Act'' (Rep. Cuellar (D-TX) H.R. 915; P.L.
112-205); and
To require the Transportation Security
Administration to comply with the Uniformed Services
Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (Rep. Walz (D-
MN) H.R. 3670; P.L. 112-171.
Even as a wide range of Committee-approved bills were
sidelined and never received votes in the House, the number of
bills that Chairman King simply discharged to the Full House is
staggering. Nearly half of all homeland security bills that the
Committee managed on the House floor were discharged, without
so much as a legislative hearing.
Another troubling aspect of how Chairman King managed the
Committee's legislative activities in the 112th Congress is the
confounding number of bills that saw no action at the Full
Committee after being favorably forwarded by a subcommittee.
Six bills that were approved at the subcommittee level that
never received consideration by the Full Committee. They are:
H.R. 1129, the ``Homeland Security Grant
Management Improvement Act,'' as introduced by Rep.
Laura Richardson, Ranking Member of the Subcommittee on
Emergency Preparedness, Response, and Communications
(EPRC), was favorably forwarded on December 8, 2011;
H.R. 1411, the ``Metropolitan Medical
Response System Program Act of 2011,'' as introduced by
Rep. Gus Bilirakis (R-FL), Chairman of the EPRC
Subcommittee, was favorably forwarded to the Full
Committee on December 8, 2011;
H.R. 1690, the ``MODERN Security Credentials
Act,'' as introduced by TS Chairman Rogers, was
favorably forwarded to the Full Committee on May 12,
2011;
H.R. 3011, the ``Transportation Security
Administration Authorization Act of 2011,'' as
introduced by TS Chairman Rogers, was favorably
forwarded to the Full Committee on September 14, 2011
as a Subcommittee Print.
H.R. 2658, the ``Federal Protective Service
Reform and Enhancement Act,'' as introduced by CIPST
Chairman Lungren, was favorably forwarded to the Full
Committee on July 28, 2011; and
H.R. 5806, the ``Outreach to People with
Disabilities During Emergencies Act,'' as introduced by
EPRC Ranking Member Richardson, was favorably forwarded
to the Full Committee on August 1, 2012.
In any discussion of the Committee's legislative record,
Chairman King's failure to aggressively pursue efforts to
consolidate legislative jurisdiction cannot be ignored. Since
the adoption of the Republican rules package in the 109th
Congress, the House has worked under an inefficient and
ineffective system of splintered jurisdiction over the
Department of Homeland Security. In advance of the commencement
of the 112th Congress, Chairman King stated that ``Homeland
Security jurisdiction must be consolidated and refined, and
Republican leadership will do that.''\3\ On January 14, 2012,
President Obama pointed to the failure to consolidate
jurisdiction over DHS as an example of government inefficiency
by stating the following:

\3\Congressional Quarterly; Post-Election Might Be Only Chance to
Streamline DHS Oversight; Sept. 20, 2010

``[DHS] was created to consolidate intelligence and
security agencies, but Congress didn't consolidate on
its side. So now [DHS] reports to over 100 different
congressional panels. That's a lot of paperwork. That's
a lot of reports to prepare. That's not adding value,
it's not making us safer to file a whole bunch of
reports all the time.''\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2012/01/13/remarks-
president-government-reform.

Despite Chairman King's assurance of jurisdictional reform,
and President Obama's call to action, the Republican Leadership
did nothing during the 112th Congress to consolidate
jurisdiction over DHS and implement the National Commission on
Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States recommendation that
the Committee serve as the ``principal point of oversight and
review for homeland security.''\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\The 9/11 Report: Final Report of the National Commission on
Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States, Ch. 13.4 Unity of Effort In
The Congress pp. 419-423.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
While the Republican Leadership's failure to consolidate
jurisdiction over DHS during the 112th Congress is troubling,
it is not the only cause for concern. Regardless of the
Committee's statement of legislative jurisdiction as set forth
in the Rules of the House, it is incumbent upon each Chair to
forcefully assert and defend the Committee's legislative
prerogatives. Unfortunately, Chairman King did not consistently
and forcefully assert the Committee's jurisdiction during the
112th Congress. As a result, the total number of measures
referred to the Committee declined by roughly fifteen percent
during the 112th Congress when compared to the 111th Congress.
The number of primary referrals received by the Committee
decreased dramatically, declining by over forty-five percent in
the last two years and the number of sole referrals declined by
roughly ten percent during the same period. To the astonishment
and frustration of the Democratic Members of the Committee,
Chairman King allowed other Committees to legislate on matters
within this Committee's jurisdiction without requesting so much
as a sequential referral on numerous occasions. This practice
started when Chairman King choose not request a referral of
H.R. 658, the ``FAA Reauthorization and Reform Act of 2011,''
despite the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure
including provisions in the measure that were clearly within
the legislative jurisdiction of our Committee. Unfortunately,
this practice persisted throughout the 112th Congress.

OVERSIGHT ACTIVITIES OF THE COMMITTEE

RADICALIZATION

Despite numerous requests from Ranking Member Thompson,
other Members of Congress, and over 150 non-governmental
organizations to broaden the scope of the radicalization
hearings to include testimony on all forms of domestic
extremism, the Majority focused solely on extremist
radicalization within the American Muslim Community.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\Thompson, Bennie, ``Homegrown Terrorists are not just Muslims.''
Politico. January 27, 2011. Lukens, Mark, et. al, February 20, 2011.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On March 10, 2011, the Committee held a hearing entitled
``The Extent of Radicalization in the American Muslim Community
and That Community's Response.'' This hearing would be the
beginning of a series of five such hearing held by the
Committee. Unfortunately, the narrow focus of each hearing led
to them being widely criticized as ``Un-American, divisive,
demonizing, and McCarthy-like.''\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\Packman, David. The David Packman Show; Opinion, The Times
Tribune, February 25, 2011 available at http://thetimes-tribune.com/
opinion/hearing-itself-radicalized-1.1109529#axzz1Evyl9tnI.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unfortunately, as the full committee hearings continued to
focus solely on one group, actions of other violent extremists
were apparently unnoticed.
In August 2012, four St. John Parish, Louisiana Sheriff
deputies were ambushed by members of the Sovereign Citizens
organization. According to the FBI, this group is ``an
extremist antigovernment group.'' The gunman critically wounded
two deputies and killed two others. The nexus between this
group and violent acts is not new. According to the FBI, an
accomplice in the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing was a Sovereign
Citizen.
On August 2012, a gunman entered a Sikh temple in Wisconsin
and shot ten worshipers, killing six, before turning the gun on
himself. Initial reports reveal that the gunman had strong ties
to the neo-Nazi and white supremacy movements.
In September 2012, a jury in Cleveland, Ohio convicted 16
people of federal hate crimes arising out of a series of
religiously-motivated assaults on practitioners of the Amish
religion. These convictions stem from a series of separate
hate-crime assaults that occurred in four Ohio counties between
September and November 2011.
On October 15, 2012, Ranking Member Thompson and
Congressman Richmond sent a letter to Chairman King once again
asking to expand the scope of the hearings to examine threats
from Domestic Violent Extremists. This letter has gone
unanswered.
As to the threat of Islamic radicalization examined at the
full committee's hearings, the objective evidence appears to
show that the Muslim community has been helpful in preventing
or thwarting terrorist attacks and countering the lure of
radicalization. United States Attorney General Eric Holder
stated that the cooperation of Muslim and Arab-American
communities has been absolutely ``essential in identifying, and
preventing terrorist threats.''\8\ On February 9, 2011, Michael
Leiter, Director of the National Counterterrorism Center,
testifying before the Committee, stated, ``many of our tips to
uncover active terrorist plots in the United States have come
from the Muslim community. So we have to make quite clear that
the communities are part of the solution and not part of the
problem.''\9\ Further, some statistics show that Muslim
communities have stepped forward to help prevent 1 out of 3 Al-
Qaeda related terror plots since September 11, 2001.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\Holder, Eric. Remarks at the Muslim Advocates Annual Dinner.
December 10, 2010. Available at http://www.justice.gov/iso/opa/ag/
speeches/2010/ag-speech-1012101.html.
\9\United States Congress. Committee on Homeland Security.
``Understanding the Homeland Threat Landscape--Considerations for the
112th Congress.'' February 9, 2011.
\10\Butel, Alejandro, Policy Report, ``Data on Post 9/11 Terrorism
in the United States,'' Muslim Public Affairs Council, at 3, (updated
Jan. 2011) available at http://www.mpac.org/assets/docs/publications/
MPAC-Post-911-Terrorism-Data.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
According to the Attorney General Holder ``the [terrorist]
threat has changed from simply worrying about foreigners coming
here, to worrying about people in the United States, American
citizens--raised here, born here, and who for whatever reason,
have decided that they are going to become radicalized and take
up arms against the nation in which they were born.''\11\
Domestic terrorism threats include animal rights extremists,
eco-terrorists, anarchists, anti-government extremists, black
separatists, white supremacists, anti-abortion extremists, as
well as Islamic extremists.\12\ According to a report by the
Muslim Public Affairs Council, there were 77 total terrorist
plots by U.S.-originated non-Muslim perpetrators against the
United States since 9/11.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\Interview, Good Morning America. ABC News. December 21, 2010.
\12\See also Federal Bureau of Investigation, ``Domestic Terrorism
in the Post-9/11 Era,'' September 7, 2009, http://www.fbi.gov/news/
stories/2009/september/domterror_090709.
\13\Butel, Alejandro, Policy Report, ``Data on Post 9/11 Terrorism
in the United States,'' Muslim Public Affairs Council, updated Jan.
2011, available at http://www.mpac.org/assets/docs/publications/MPAC-
Post-911-Terrorism-Data.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In comparison, there have been 44 total terrorist plots by
U.S. and foreign-originated Muslim perpetrators since 9/11.\14\
Recent examples of non-Muslim terrorist plots include the
sophisticated explosive device found at the site of a Martin
Luther King Day Parade in Spokane, Washington, which was likely
the work of white supremacists.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\Id.
\15\See http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/
2014398518_apwamlkparadeexplosive1stldwritethru.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A review of successfully executed terrorist attacks in
America since 9/11 indicates that non-Muslim plots are more
likely to reach the implementation stage than Muslim extremist
plots. For instance, using publicly available U.S. government
sources, the Congressional Research Service reports that non-
jihadist successful attacks outnumber jihadist attacks 30 to 3
since 9/11.\16\ Additionally, a study conducted by the
Institute for Homeland Security Solutions, found that only 40
out of the 86 terrorist cases examined from 1999 to 2009 had
links to Al Qaeda.\17\ Further, the RAND Corporation reports
that between September 11, 2001 and the end of 2009, a total of
46 cases of domestic radicalization and recruitment to jihadist
terrorism were reported in the United States.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\Jerome P. Bjelopera, Congressional Research Service,
Memorandum, Counting Terrorist Plots and Attacks Targeting the Homeland
(Mar. 1, 2011).
\17\Institute for Homeland Security Solutions, Building on Clues:
Examining Successes and Failures in Detecting U.S. Terrorist Plots,
1999-2009 (Oct. 2010).
\18\Brian Michael Jenkins, Rand Corp., Would be Warriors, at 4
(2010).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Placed in context, of the approximately 3 million Muslims
in the U.S., it appears that approximately 100 have joined
terrorist attacks--suggesting an American Muslim population
that is not interested in jihadist ideology.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\Brian Michael Jenkins, Rand Corp., Would be Warriors, at vii
(2010).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Given that the experts overwhelmingly agree that the
violent terrorist threat from Muslim extremists within the
United States is miniscule, the Majority's decision to devote
the time and resources necessary to conduct five full scale
hearings to examine violent extremists solely within this
population, while ignoring all other potential domestic terror
threats was unfortunate.
According to the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), in
2010, the number of hate groups topped 1,000, making the count
the highest on record since the (SPLC) began maintaining its
database in the 1980s.\20\ The most dramatic growth in the
radical right came in the antigovernment ``Patriot''
movement.\21\ One of these members of the Patriot movement, the
Hutaree Militia 9, a homegrown militia, was charged with
conspiracy to kill law enforcement officers in Michigan.\22\
Conspiracy-minded organizations, such as the Hutaree Militia 9
and other members of the Patriot movement that see the Federal
government as their primary enemy, grew by 61 percent over the
previous year.\23\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\Potok, Mark. ``The Year in Hate & Extremism, 2010'' Southern
Poverty Law Center. Spring 2011, available at http://www.splcenter.org/
get-informed/intelligence-report/browse-all-issues/2011/spring/the-
year-in-hate-extremism-2010.
\21\Id.
\22\Butel at 15.
\23\Potok, ``The Year in Hate & Extremism, 2010''.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition to terrorist actions undertaken by
ideologically motivated groups, the threat of acts intended to
instill fear and undermine legitimate authority may be
undertaken by individuals. Acting alone, these so called
``lone-wolf'' extremists may pose a danger. It should be noted
that formal affiliation with a group is not a necessary
predicate to radicalization, nor is it a necessary predicate to
training, obtaining resources, or otherwise supporting an
operational capability. Before the Department of Homeland
Security's ``Rightwing Extremism'' report (issued in April
2009), was taken offline, the Department reported ``lone wolves
and small terrorist cells embracing rightwing extremist
ideology are the most dangerous domestic terrorism threat in
the United States.''\24\ These findings were supported by a
recent Institute for Homeland Security Solutions report that
noted that lone wolf plots have been the most successful,
reaching execution more than twice as often as plots by
groups.\25\ In April 2010, FBI Director Robert Mueller
testified before a Senate Commerce Subcommittee that homegrown
extremists and lone wolf activity are as serious a threat to
the homeland as al Qaeda and its affiliates.\26\ Sadly, these
statements by top officials in the counterintelligence
community have been substantiated by the shooting of Rep.
Giffords in Arizona, the foiled attempt to bomb a mosque in
Dearborn, Michigan, and the Holocaust Museum shooting by James
W. Von Brunn, a white supremacist.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\24\Department of Homeland Security, Office of Intelligence and
Analysis, ``Rightwing Extremism: Current Economic and Political Climate
Fueling Resurgence in Radicalization and Recruitment.'' April 19, 2009,
p. 7.
\25\Institute for Homeland Security Solutions, Building on Clues:
Examining Successes and Failures in Detecting U.S. Terrorist Plots,
1999-2009 (Oct. 2010).
\26\U.S. Congress. Senate Committee on Appropriation. Subcommittee
on Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related Agencies. ``Hearing on FY
2011 Budget.'' April 15, 2010.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The failure to accurately assess and address the threat is
not merely an issue of philosophical debate. Such a failure can
yield dangerous consequences to national security interests, at
home and abroad. By examining violent extremism through the
lens of one particular ethnicity or religion, the Majority
ignored other potentially dangerous homeland security threats
posed by domestic extremists. Because domestic extremism--in
all forms--is a serious threat to the United States, combating
the terrorist threat depends on accurate intelligence, a cogent
assessment of the extent of the threat, and a thoughtful
determination of actions necessary to mitigate and engage the
threat. Unreliable information, hyperbolic statements, and
narrowly focused assessments of the nature and extent of the
threat will not further the goal of reducing or eliminating the
possibility of future attacks.

OVERSIGHT OF WASTE, FRAUD, AND ABUSE

One of the Committee's primary responsibilities is to
ensure that American taxpayer dollars are spent wisely by
eliminating waste, fraud, and abuse. The Democratic Members of
the Committee believe that conducting effective oversight
ensures that American taxpayer dollars are tracked and are
being spent wisely. As a result, the Committee should make it a
priority to identify high-risk programs and ensure transparency
within the Department.
Unfortunately, the Committee Majority has failed to
actively engage in diligent and on-going oversight of the basic
management and administrative functions of the Department.
Thus, the systems used in the day-to-day operations of this $60
billion Department, including acquisitions, financial
management, human resources, and information technology, have
gone largely unexamined by the Majority.
Moreover, while the Majority cites several instances of
oversight letters, outcomes or savings are rarely listed.
Therefore, while the letters provide an indication of the
occurrence of oversight, the Majority provides little
indication of the effectiveness of its oversight efforts.
Finally, the Majority failed to pursue important emerging
issues which threaten the safety and security of our nation. As
successful penetrations of our pipelines, water sector, and
financial sector have demonstrated, public and private sector
entities are hindered in their daily operations by the
increased frequency of cyber attacks. Yet despite these
realities, the Majority failed to aggressively pursue
examinations of cybersecurity vulnerabilities. In addition to
the increase in cyber incidents, the Federal government has
increased its budget to combat cyber vulnerabilities and tasked
DHS with a leadership role. A substantial expansion of the DHS
cybersecurity budget merits close oversight from the Committee
to ensure that taxpayer dollars are spent responsibly and
efficiently to address the deepening threat to our Nation from
malicious cyber actors.

SUBCOMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION SECURITY

OVERSIGHT ACTIVITIES OF THE SUBCOMMITTEE

During the second session of the 112th Congress, the
Republican Majority used the Subcommittee on Transportation
Security as a platform for demeaning Transportation Security
Officers (TSOs), holding no less than five hearings to
highlight anecdotal evidence of misconduct and performance
failures among the TSO workforce.\27\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\27\Hearings: Screening Partnership Program: Why is a Job-Creating,
Public-Private Partnership Meeting Resistance at TSA? (February 16,
2012); Rightsizing TSA Bureaucracy and Workforce Without Compromising
Security (March 28, 2012); Access Control Point Breaches at Our
Nation's Airports: Anomalies or Systemic Failures? (May 16, 2012);
TSA's Efforts to Fix Its Poor Customer Service Reputation and Become a
Leaner, Smarter Agency (June 7, 2012); Breach of Trust: Addressing
Misconduct Among TSA Screeners (August 1, 2012).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
While focusing on the TSA employees on the frontline of
aviation security, the Majority failed to examine the policies
and programs of TSA headquarters. Unfortunately, the decision
to ignore TSA's ongoing internal reorganization, has resulted
in a squandered opportunity to examine budgetary savings,
organizational efficiency, or operational enhancements--which
would have been beneficial to the American taxpayer and the
flying public.
Additionally, the Majority failed to undertake a serious
examination of the Screening of Passengers by Observational
Technique (SPOT) program despite repeated and well-publicized
incidents alleging widespread criticism for targeting
passengers for secondary screening solely on the basis of race
or ethnicity. On June 14, 2011 the Subcommittee received a
Members briefing on the TSA Screening of Passengers by
Observation Techniques (SPOT) program. Members were briefed by
representatives from the Transportation Security
Administration.
In a letter dated August 13, 2012, in response to the
Subcommittee on Transportation Security's lack of oversight of
the SPOT program, Ranking Member Thompson called upon Chairman
King to hold a Full Committee hearing to examine the program.
Ranking Member Thompson's request went unanswered. The
Democratic Members of the Committee have consistently
questioned the TSA Administrator and called for the immediate
suspension of SPOT program until it can be shown that the
program is effective and can be carried out without violating
the civil rights and civil liberties of the flying public.\28\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\28\See Letters from Ranking Member Thompson to Administrator
Pistole of August 12, 2011, November 30, 2011, April 13, 2012, and
August 13, 2012.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

THREATS TO AVIATION AND SURFACE TRANSPORTATION SECURITY

AIR COMMERCE

On August 1, 2010, the Department of Homeland Security met
the mandate in the Implementing Recommendations of the 9/11
Commission Act (Pub. L. 110-53) to screen 100 percent of air
cargo transported on domestic passenger aircraft flights and
flights departing the United States. The Transportation
Security Administration (TSA) is not currently able to screen
100 percent of inbound cargo on international passenger flights
but estimated it would meet the mandate by December 2011.
On March 9, 2011, the Subcommittee held a hearing entitled
``Securing Air Commerce From the Threat of Terrorism.'' The
Subcommittee received testimony from Mr. John Sammon, Assistant
Administrator, Transportation Sector Network Management,
Transportation Security Administration, Department of Homeland
Security; and Mr. Stephen Lord, Director, Homeland Security &
Justice Issues, Government Accountability Office. The purpose
of this hearing was to examine on-going challenges for securing
inbound cargo on international passenger flights to the United
States; TSA's efforts to develop screening measures in
collaboration with industry and foreign partners; and the
technology available to conduct those screening measures.
The Republican Majority held only a single briefing during
the second session of the 112th Congress on the security and
free flow of air cargo. The Republican Majority's lack of focus
on the security of air cargo during this period is striking in
light of the October 2010 terrorist plot in which explosive
devices were shipped on passenger and all-cargo aircraft
originating from Yemen, demonstrating the current and
persistent terrorist threat to aviation and revealing
vulnerabilities in the air cargo transportation system. Despite
the Republican Majority's lack of attention to this issue,
Democratic Members continued to conduct oversight of the TSA's
efforts to comply with the mandate in the Implementing
Recommendations of the 9/11 Commission Act (Pub. L. 110-53) to
screen 100 percent of air cargo transported on both domestic
and inbound international passenger flights. As of December 3,
2012, TSA is in compliance with the mandate.

TRANSPORTATION WORKER IDENTIFICATION CREDENTIAL

The Subcommittee has conducted oversight of TSA on
transportation security credentialing programs, including the
Transportation Worker Identification Credential (TWIC) in order
to eliminate inefficiencies and redundancies within the threat
assessment process and reduce costs for card applicants. In
addition to providing oversight of TSA, Committee staff met
with multiple private sector stakeholders representing
different modes of transportation.
On April 6, 2011, the Subcommittee held a Member briefing
on the Transportation Worker Identification Credential (TWIC)
Program. Representatives from the Transportation Security
Administration and the United States Coast Guard were present
to respond to Member questions.
These activities are in furtherance of the Oversight Plan.
However, it is unclear whether cost savings have resulted.

AVIATION SECURITY

The Subcommittee has continued to examine passenger and
baggage screening technology and procedures, international
cooperation issues, and Transportation Security
Administration's (TSA) security programs in order to identify
where progress has been made, and where shortfalls remain in
strengthening aviation security.
On April 7, 2011, the Subcommittee held a hearing entitled
``Strengthening International Cooperation on Aviation
Security.'' The Subcommittee received testimony from Mr. John
W. Halinski, Assistant Administrator, Office of Global
Strategies, Transportation Security Administration; Mr. Filip
Cornelis, Head of Unit for Aviation Security, Directorate
General for Mobility and Transport, European Commission; Mr.
Rafi Ron, President, New Age Security Solutions; and Mr. Jim
Marriott, Chief, Aviation Security Branch, International Civil
Aviation Organization. This hearing examined international
standards that are designed to ensure the security of both
passenger and all cargo aircraft; how the United States works
with its foreign partners to ensure screening equipment is up-
to-date and adequate for the volume and type of passengers,
baggage, and cargo it needs to screen; the success of the
foreign airport assessments program; and how TSA shares
information on security technology, passenger name record data,
and other vital security protocols with foreign partners.
Democratic Members of the Committee have conducted vigorous
oversight of the TSA's SPOT program during the second session
of the 112th Congress. Calling for the program to be suspended
until an independent third party review confirms the scientific
validity of the program and it is shown that the program can be
conducted without a disparate impact on minority populations.
On July 24, 2012, the TSA announced that flight attendants
would receive expedited security screening as part of the
second phase of the Known Crewmember (KCM) program. Under KCM,
pilots and flight attendants employed by U.S.-based airlines
receive expedited security screening at TSA checkpoints, after
their identities are verified. The Democratic Members of the
Committee had, since the inception of the program in 2011,
called upon TSA Administrator Pistole to include flight
attendants in the KCM. TSA's announcement that flight
attendants would be included in KCM came on the heels of
Democratic witness, Ms. Colby Alonso of the Association of
Flight Attendants' testimony before the Subcommittee at a
hearing titled ``Challenging the Status Quo at TSA:
Perspectives on the Future of Transportation Security.''

WORKER PROTECTIONS

After a ten-year struggle, TSOs were granted collective
bargaining rights in 2011 and secured their first collective
bargaining agreement in 2012, finally securing the basic
workplace rights that they deserve. This development came after
years of oversight conducted by Democratic Members of the
Committee of the employment conditions of TSOs. Throughout the
struggle to secure collective bargaining rights and the
subsequent negotiations for a contract, the Democratic Members
of the Committee continuously pushed for employment protections
for TSOs befitting their service.
On June 20, 2012, the TSA published a solicitation on the
Federal Business Opportunities website for an ``enterprise
insider threat software package'' capable of monitoring
employees' performing all TSA operations. On June 25, 2012,
Ranking Member Thompson and Subcommittee Ranking Member Jackson
Lee wrote to TSA Administrator Pistole inquiring about the
potential chilling effect such monitoring may have on employee
communications with the Office of Special Counsel, the
Department of Homeland Security Office of Inspector General and
the Congress of the United States. In light of those concerns,
Ranking Member Thompson and Subcommittee Ranking Member Jackson
Lee strongly recommended that TSA immediately withdraw the
solicitation and refrain from attempting to acquire technology
with similar capabilities. Following the initial letter,
Ranking Member Thompson and Subcommittee Ranking Member Jackson
Lee sent additional requests for information regarding the
solicitation for an ``enterprise insider threat software
package'' on July 25, 2012 and October 3, 2012. On November 5,
2012, TSA Administrator Pistole responded by informing the
Committee that to date, no insider threat software has been
procured by TSA as no acceptable responses to the initial
solicitation was received and no contract awarded.
On November 9, 2012, the Department of Homeland Security
Office of Inspector General (OIG) publicly released a report
titled Personnel Security and Internal Control at TSA's Legacy
Transportation Threat Assessment and Credentialing Office
(TTAC).\29\ A review of the report contains troubling
allegations of discrimination and the failure of management at
TTAC to properly act upon Equal Employment Opportunity
complaints and discourage the filing of such. On November 26,
2012, in response to the allegations contained in the OIG
report, Ranking Member Thompson wrote to Director of Federal
Sector Programs Brooks of the Equal Employment Opportunity
Commission requesting that he commence a review of allegations
of discrimination within the TSA. On November 30, 2012, Ranking
Member Thompson wrote to TSA Administrator Pistole, informing
him of the Democratic Members' concerns about TSA's failure to
concur with the OIG recommendation to establish an independent
panel to review claims of discrimination amongst legacy TTAC
employees.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\29\ OIG-13-05.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

FLIGHT SCHOOL SECURITY

On July 18, 2012, the Subcommittee on Transportation
Security held a hearing titled: ``A Decade After 9/11 Could
American Flight Schools Still Unknowingly Be Training
Terrorists?'' During the hearing, Ranking Member Thompson
inquired of TSA's General Manager for General Aviation, Mr.
Kerwin Wilson, whether a citizen on the No-Fly list would be
able to commence flight training without his or her name being
checked against the terrorist watchlist list. Mr. Kerwin
responded in the affirmative. On the next day, July 19, 2012,
Ranking Member Thompson introduced H.R. 6159, the Flight School
Security Act of 2012, which would require that individuals
seeking training in the operation of certain aircraft be
checked against the terrorist watchlist to ensure that such
individuals are non-threats to aviation. Despite a general
consensus amongst the Membership of the panel that the security
gap identified by Ranking Member Thompson should be closed and
H.R. 6159 being solely referred to the Committee on Homeland
Security and internally to the Subcommittee on Transportation
Security, no action was taken on this legislation by the
Committee. On July 30, 2012, Ranking Member Thompson wrote to
Subcommittee Chairman Rogers urging that the Members of
Subcommittee on Transportation Security be afforded the
opportunity to consider H.R. 6159. To date, Ranking Member
Thompson has not received a response to his request.

HEARINGS

Hearing

Screening Partnership Program: Why is a Job-Creating, Public-
Private Partnership Meeting Resistance at TSA?'' February 7,
16, 2012. (Serial No. 112-66)

Summary

Democratic Members used this hearing to emphasize that
efforts to privatize security screening operations would take
us back to a model similar to the one that failed us on 9/11.
Democrat Members also used this hearing to emphasis that they
support the Administration's decision to only expand the use of
private screeners at airports where there exists a clear and
substantial benefit to do so in light of both security and cost
concerns. The Democratic witness, AFGE National President John
Gage, aggressively asserted that a move back to the passenger
and baggage screening model in place on 9/11 would be
detrimental to aviation security. This hearing neither added
nor detracted from securing our nation's homeland security
posture as legislative changes to the program at issue had
already been included in the FAA Modernization Act (to which
the Committee neither received a referral nor had conferees
appointed) was headed to the President's desk for his signature
prior to the commencement of the hearing.

Following the Hearing

Following the hearing staff worked with TSA to gain
clarification on the impact of the changes to the controlling
law contained in the FAA Modernization Act and continued to
monitor the application/approval process.
On July 26, Ranking Member Thompson wrote to TSA
Administrator Pistole requesting a comprehensive list of
security breaches that have occurred at SPP airports between
January 2008 and May 2011.
On December 6, 2012, Ranking Member Thompson released the
following statement in response to a GAO report on the SPP
program: ``This report reveals that some privatized airports do
not perform passenger screening as well as their federalized
counterparts. It also reveals that TSA does not have the proper
controls in place to regularly monitor private screener
performance and does not validate data on attrition,
absenteeism, and injury rates for privatized screeners.''
``GAO also shows that under the current system, it is
impossible to accurately measure any system cost-savings or
efficiencies by moving to the SPP model. Therefore, I would
urge Administrator Pistole to refrain from approving additional
SPP airports until the costs and possible benefits can be
accurately assessed and we can more closely monitor the
program.''

Hearing

Last Line of Defense: the Federal Air Marshal Service 10 Years
After 9/11.'' February 16, 2012. (Serial No. 112-69)

Summary

This hearing was held at the request of Subcommittee
Ranking Member Jackson Lee. Democratic Members used the hearing
to examine FAMS with an emphasis on personnel and workforce
issues and to highlight the DHS OIG report titled: Allegations
of Misconduct and Illegal Discrimination and Retaliation in the
Federal Air Marshal Service. The Democratic witness, Acting
Inspector General, Charles K. Edwards, provided testimony in
line with the DHS OIG report, indicating that throughout its
investigation, it was clear that individual FAMS employees have
experienced discrimination or retaliation. He further
emphasized that employees perceptions of discrimination and
retaliation are extensive and that negative and conflicting
accounts of events surrounding unfair allegations were too many
to dismiss. This hearing added in securing our nation's
homeland security posture by shedding light on the pervasive
mistreatment of FAMS employees, aiding in rectifying the
problem and allowing those FAMS to perform their job function
without fear of workplace harassment.

Following the Hearing

Following the hearing, staff continued to oversee TSA's
efforts to address the perceptions of misconduct within FAMS.

Hearing

``Rightsizing TSA Bureaucracy and Workforce Without
Compromising Security.'' March 28, 2012. (Serial No. 112-80)

Summary

Democratic Members used this hearing as an opportunity to
question TSA's leadership about the expansion of the use of
BDOs despite the lack of scientific validation for the SPOT
program. Further, Democratic Members questioned TSA officials
about its on-going headquarters reorganization which has been
undertaken without first identifying operational efficiencies
and possible cost savings. The witnesses, all government, all
TSA, were not forthcoming regarding the use of BDOs or how the
reorganization would result in efficiencies. To the extent that
this hearing had any effect on our homeland security posture,
it had the effect of providing a platform for Republican
Members to demean Transportation Security Officers in the
public sphere by calling for mass layoffs.

Following the Hearing

Following the hearing, staff worked with the TSOs union
representative to develop a framework for deflecting openly
hostile criticism of TSO for purely partisan gains. Ultimately,
TSA, after urging from Democratic staff adopted a line about 25
percent of their employees being veterans.

Hearing

``Building Secure Partnerships in Travel, Commerce, and Trade
with the Asia-Pacific Region.'' May 8, 2012. (Serial No. 112-
89)

Summary

This hearing was used to examine lessons learned from the
Subcommittee's CODEL to China, South Korea, and Japan and to
obtain testimony regarding progress related to securing the
transportation security system internationally. This hearing
neither added nor detracted from securing our nation's homeland
security posture.

Following the Hearing: N/A

Hearing

``Access Control Point Breaches at Our Nation's Airports:
Anomalies or Systematic Failures.'' May 16, 2012. (Serial No.
112-91)

Summary

Democratic Members used this hearing to question TSA
regarding their statutory responsibility to ensure the proper
vetting of individuals with unescorted access to secure areas
of the airport and how it works with airport authorities and
fellow stakeholders to prevent the unauthorized intrusions into
secure areas of the airport. The Democratic witness, Mr.
William Swift, Chairman, Aviation Minority Advisory Council,
gave voice to concerns held by small businesses that operate in
airports. Including the limitations placed on small businesses
due to existing security directives controlling for the
issuance of SIDA badges to airport vendor employees. This
hearing neither added nor detracted from securing our nation's
homeland security posture but did allow Democratic Members an
opportunity to highlight their focus on small businesses.

Following the Hearing

Following the hearing, Ranking Member Thompson sent a
letter to TSA Administrator Pistole regarding TSA's policy for
the allocation of SIDA badges to vendors doing business in
airports. On July 5, 2012, Administrator Pistole responded and
informed the Committee that through the In-Depth Security
Review Working Group, which is composed of industry and TSA
personnel, new security measures are being developed to assist
airport operators with unique situations at their airports and
TSA anticipates that the new measures will offer more
flexibility in the SIDA badge limit.

Hearing

``TSA's Surface Inspection Program: Strengthening Security or
Squandering Scant Resources?'' May 31, 2012. (Serial No. 112-
95)

Summary

Democratic Members used this hearing to highlight the
importance of enhanced attention to threats to surface
transportation modes and the anticipated role of surface
inspectors. The Democratic witness, Mr. Doug Morris, Director
of Security Operations, Owner-Operator Independent Drivers
Association, highlighted the importance of the First Observer
Program which helps to increase awareness of security
vulnerabilities amongst frontline transportation workers.

Following the Hearing

Staff continued to encourage TSA to comply with the surface
transportation security provisions contained The Implementing
Recommendations of the 9/11 Commission Act of 2007 (9/11 Act),
which directed TSA to broaden its regulatory and programmatic
scope to include security initiatives for other modes of
transportation, including extensive provisions covering freight
rail, passenger rail, mass transit, highway, motor carrier,
maritime, and pipeline systems.
On December 2, 2012, Ranking Member Thompson submitted
comments to TSA's Request of Information published in the
Federal Register 77 Reg. 71430 pertaining to the Baseline
Assessment Security Enhancement program. Comments incorporated
an analysis of significant findings determined by members
throughout hearings held last Congress on the surface inspector
program at TSA and Democratic issues raised at this hearing,
including the need to improved training protocols for
Transportation Security Inspectors that can yield knowledgeable
inspectors in surface and mass transit modes of transportation.

Hearing

``TSA's Efforts to Fix Its Poor Customer Service Reputation and
Become a Leaner, Smarter Agency.'' June 7, 2012. (Serial No.
112-97)

Summary

In light of the lack of singular focus for this hearing,
Democratic Members used the hearing to shed light on TSA's
efforts to improve checkpoint screening processes and fulfill
Congressional mandates, including the 100% cargo screening
mandate, surface transportation security regulations, and
others initiatives that impact aviation security and airport
operations. The only witness, TSA Administrator Pistole, used
this hearing as an opportunity to highlight his efforts to
transition to a risk based screening model with the expansion
of the PreCheck pilot. To the extent that this hearing had any
effect on our homeland security posture, it had the effect of
providing a platform for Republican Members to demean
Transportation Security Officers in the public sphere by,
again, calling for mass layoffs.

Following the Hearing

Staff continued to conduct oversight of TSA's progress in
implementing the PreCheck pilot and its ability to fulfill the
mandate to screen 100% of cargo on international inbound
passenger planes.

Hearing

``Is TSA's Planned Purchase of CAT/BPSS a Wise Use of Taxpayer
Dollars?'' June 19, 2012. (Serial No. 112-99)

Summary

Democratic Members used this hearing to discuss the need
for TSA to permit an independent evaluation of the CAT/BPSS
system before a final contract award is made. Further,
Democratic Members used the hearing as a forum to highlight the
need for effective monitoring of the acquisition programs and
processes to ensure proper investment of taxpayer dollars. The
Democratic witness, Mr. Stephen Lord, Director Homeland
Security and Justice Issues at the Government Accountability
Office, highlighted the shortcomings in TSA's approach to the
testing, acquisition and deployment of security technology.
This hearing had the effect of enhancing our homeland security
posture by allowing Members the opportunity to emphasize that
in these austere times, taxpayer dollars being wasted on
unproven technologies will not be tolerated and they must be
used to enhance operational effectiveness.

Following the Hearing

Following the hearing, staff continued to monitor TSA's
planned acquisition of CAT/BPSS machines.

Hearing:

``Challenging the Status Quo at TSA: Perspectives on the Future
of Transportation Security'' July 10, 2012. (Serial No. 112-
103)

Summary

Democratic Members used this hearing to review existing TSA
aviation security policies to determine whether they
effectively address current threats. The Democratic witness,
Ms. Colby Alonso, Flight Attendant, Association of Flight
Attendants, emphasized the need for advanced training for
flight attendants and for the inclusion of flight attendants in
the Known Crewmember program. This hearing ultimately had the
effect of enhancing our security posture due to low risk
individuals, flight attendants, being included in the Known
Crewmember program in its aftermath. With their inclusion, TSOs
at checkpoints can now focus more attention on those we know
the least about, according to the company line.

Following the Hearing

Following the hearing, staff continued to press TSA to
include flight attendants in the Known Crewmember program as to
do so would be philosophically consistent with TSA's recent
shift to a risk based passenger screening system, namely the
expansion of PreCheck. On July 24, 2012, TSA announced that
flight attendants would be included in the Known Crewmember
program. Staff continues to monitor the process of including
this new population.

Hearing

``Has TSA Met the Deadline to Provide Expedited Screening to
Military Service Members?'' July 11, 2012. (Serial No. 112-104)

Summary

Democratic Members used this hearing to examine the
Transportation Security Administration's implementation of an
expedited passenger screening process for members of the Armed
Forces as mandated by Public Law 112-86, the Risk-Based
Security Screening for Members of the Armed Forces Act, and
highlight that TSA has a number of programs aimed at honoring
veterans and service members. The witnesses at the hearing, Mr.
Christopher L. McLaughlin, Assistant Administrator, Security
Operations, Transportation Security Administration, and Mr.
Todd Rosenblum, Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense
for Homeland Defense and Americas' Security Affairs, Department
of Defense, emphasized the collaborative relationship between
DoD and TSA when it comes to the passenger screening of members
of the armed forces.

Following the Hearing

Following the hearing staff continued to emphasize in
talking points that roughly 25 percent of our nation's TSOs are
veterans and deserve the respect that title demands, in the
face of calls for privatization and demonization by the
Republican Majority in the House.

Hearing

``A Decade After 9/11 Could American Flight Schools Still
Unknowingly Be Training Terrorists?'' July 18, 2012. (Serial
No. 112-106)

Summary

Democratic Members used this hearing as an opportunity to
highlight the fact that citizens are not checked against any
list, including the terrorist watchlist, prior to commencing
flight training. The Democratic witness, Mr. Douglas Carr, Vice
President for Safety, Security, Operations and Regulations,
National Business Aviation Association, emphasized that greater
collaboration with industry on the part of TSA is necessary to
ensure that its regulations and security directives are
successfully implemented. He also used the hearing to highlight
his association's support for Ranking Member Thompson's
Aviation Security Stakeholder Participation Act of 2012. This
hearing enhanced our security posture by highlighting a
potential security vulnerability and proposing a fix (H.R.
6159).

Following the Hearing

The day after the hearing, Ranking Member Thompson
introduced H.R. 6159, the Flight School Security Act of 2012,
which would require that individuals seeking training in the
operation of certain aircraft be checked against the terrorist
watchlist to ensure that such individuals are non-threats to
aviation. Despite a general consensus amongst the Membership of
the panel that the security gap identified by Ranking Member
Thompson should be closed and H.R. 6159 being solely referred
to the Committee on Homeland Security and internally to the
Subcommittee on Transportation Security, no action was taken on
this legislation by the Committee. On July 30, 2012, Ranking
Member Thompson wrote to Subcommittee Chairman Rogers urging
that the Members of Subcommittee on Transportation Security be
afforded the opportunity to consider H.R. 6159. To date,
Ranking Member Thompson has not received a response to his
request. Of the bills Ranking Member Thompson introduced during
the 112th Congress, no bill has garnered more cosponsor support
than H.R. 6159.

Hearing

``Breach of Trust: Addressing Misconduct Among TSA Screeners.''
August 1, 2012. (Serial No. 112-112)

Summary

Democratic Members used this hearing to examine TSA's
policies and procedures for addressing instances where TSOs
fail to comply with standard operating procedures or otherwise
violate the terms of their employment. By limiting the focus of
the hearing to frontline TSA screeners, the Republican Majority
signaled their intent to forgo a broader discussion of
misconduct and discipline for the entire TSA workforce and
contract screeners, a fact highlighted by Democratic Members.
The sole witness, Mr. John W. Halinski, Deputy Administrator,
Transportation Security Administration, defended the frontline
workforce during questioning and forcefully asserted that the
Majority's focus was mistakenly placed on anecdotal evidence of
misconduct rather than the overwhelming majority of TSOs who
perform their jobs effectively and without incident. To the
extent that this hearing had any effect on our homeland
security posture, it had the effect of providing a platform for
Republican Members to demean Transportation Security Officers
in the public sphere by, yet again, calling for mass layoffs.

Following the Hearing

Following the hearing staff continued to monitor the
performance of contract screeners and track instances of
misconduct amongst all screeners.

Hearing

``Eleven Years After 9/11 Can TSA Evolve To Meet the Next
Terrorist Threat?'' September 11, 2012. (Serial No. 112-114)

Summary

Democratic Members used this hearing to question TSA
regarding its security policies and assess its capacity to meet
the challenges posed by the evolving terrorist threat. The
Democratic witness, Mr. Steve Lord, Director, Homeland Security
and Justice Issues, Government Accountability Office, gave
voice to Democratic Members concerns about TSAs testing,
procurement and deployment of security technologies along with
related issues. Without prior notice, the Republican Majority
released a staff report the night before the hearing. This
hearing did not enhance or diminish our security posture.

Following the Hearing

Following the hearing, staff continued to monitor TSA's
efforts to comply with Congressional mandates, including the
screening of 100 percent of cargo on international inbound
passenger flights and requirements related to surface
transportation security.

Hearing

``TSA's Recent Scanner Shuffle: Real Strategy or Wasteful
Smokescreen?'' November 15, 2012. (Serial No. 112-121)

Summary

Prior to the hearing, the Committee was informed by TSA
that Rapiscan backscatter machines would be removed from major
airports and stored in a warehouse. Democratic Members used
this hearing as an opportunity to question TSA regarding its
deployment plan for the Rapiscan machines in light of the
difficulty the company has had in installing effective ATR
technology. Just prior to the hearing, the Republican Majority
released a letter to the press revealing that Rapiscan has
received a show cause letter from TSA in relation to
accusations that the company tampered with software during
testing without the knowledge or consent of the government.
This release of information by the Republican Majority resulted
in the company's stock price dropping between 30 and 40 percent
following the hearing. The Democratic witness, Lilly Coney,
Associate Director, Electronic Privacy Information Center, was
denied by the Republican Majority. The witnesses at the
hearing, Jonathan Cantor, Acting Chief Privacy Officer, DHS
Office of Privacy, and John Sanders, Assistant Administrator,
Office of Security Capabilities, both responded to Democratic
Member questions about due process, insisting that a fair and
equitable hearing should take place prior to the public release
of information that may be detrimental to the reputation of a
company.

Following the Hearing

Following the hearing staff has continued to question TSA
regarding their plan for the deployment of Rapiscan AIT
machines and the larger question of when they intend to reduce
the amount of security equipment acquired in storage. TSA
informs staff that they intend to close one of their storage
facilities in Texas in January of 2014.

BRIEFINGS

Briefing

Briefing on the Transportation Security Administration's (TSA)
progress toward issuing its final regulations to ensure the
security of foreign and domestic aircraft repair stations.
March 22, 2012.

Summary

Democratic Members used this briefing to discuss TSA's
progress toward complying with Section 611(b) of the Vision
100--Century of Aviation Reauthorization Act of 2003 requiring
the issuance of final regulations to ensure the security of
foreign and domestic aircraft repair stations. It was revealed
during this briefing that the Republican Majority was intent on
repealing the provision in The Implementing Recommendations of
the 9/11 Commission Act of 2007 (P.L. 110-53) barring the FAA
Administrator from certifying any new (previously non-
certificated) repair stations until the security regulations
were issued by TSA.

Following the Briefing

In light of John Sammon's statements during the briefing
indicating that TSA would support the repeal of the bar on
certifying new repair stations, staff set up a call between
Ranking Member Thompson and TSA Administrator Pistole to ensure
the Administrator knew that if, indeed that was TSA's position,
it was unsustainable. TSA Administrator Pistole informed
Ranking Member Thompson that Mr. Sammon had spoken out of turn
and TSA's official position was not to support the repeal of
the provision. On May 15, 2012, Ranking Member Thompson wrote
to TSA Administrator Pistole regarding this issue and got
confirmation that TSA's position had not shifted in a response
letter on June 6, 2012.

Briefing

Briefing on the Transportation Security Administration's (TSA)
administration of its Alien Flight Student Program (ASFP). June
7, 2012.

Summary

Democratic Members used this briefing to discuss with the
Government Accountability Office the findings and
recommendations made in its report on TSA's Alien Flight
Student Program titled: Weaknesses Exist in TSA's Process for
Ensuring Foreign Flight Students Do Not Pose a Security Threat.

Following the Briefing

The information gleaned from this briefing led to Ranking
Member Thompson's questioning during the Subcommittee hearing
on the Alien Flight Student Program that gave rise to his
introduction of H.R. 6159, the Flight School Security Act of
2012.

Briefing

Briefing with the Association of American Railroads to discuss
rail security. June 20, 2012.

Summary

This briefing provided Democratic Members the opportunity
to discuss the progress TSA has made in implementing the
mandates contained in the 9/11 Act regarding surface
transportation security.

Following the Briefing

Staff continued to monitor TSA's progress in complying with
the aforementioned mandates.

Briefing

Classified Member-only briefing on threats to transportation.
June 27, 2012.

Summary

Democratic Members used this briefing to discuss potential
and known threats to the transportation sector.

Following the Briefing

Staff continued to monitor classified information regarding
threats to transportation sectors and informed Democratic
Members of such information when prudent.

Briefing

Briefing on the Transportation Security Administration's (TSA)
failure to vet U.S. citizens who seek flight training.
September 19, 2012.

Summary

Democratic Members were informed of this briefing less than
24 hours in advance. Staff used the briefing to question TSA on
why it has shifted so often on the issue of whether it has the
legal authority to vet citizens seeking flight training and
point out, with Republican Members in attendance, that Ranking
Member Thompson has introduced legislation to address the very
issue they are concerned about.

Following the Briefing

Continued to solicit cosponsors for Ranking Member
Thompson's legislation addressing the issue.

SUBCOMMITTEE ON EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS, RESPONSE, AND COMMUNICATIONS

OVERSIGHT ACTIVITIES OF THE SUBCOMMITTEE

DISASTER PREPAREDNESS, RESPONSE AND RECOVERY

Since the beginning of the 112th Congress, States and
localities have experienced thwarted terror plots, severe
winter storms, tornados, a tsunami, and widespread flooding. It
is imperative that the Federal Government, along with its
partners at the State and local levels and the private sector,
works to prepare for and respond to terrorist attacks, natural
disasters, and other emergencies. Committee Democrats fought
drastic cuts in funding to vital Homeland Security Grant
Programs and to ensure that the limited funds available to
improve preparedness, response, and recovery capabilities is
invested in programs and technologies that will prove to make
America safer.
On February 8, 2011, the Subcommittee held a Member site
visit to the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA)
National Response Coordination Center in Washington, DC. This
visit provided Subcommittee Members with an overview of FEMA's
mission and operations and efforts to work with its State,
local, and private sector partners. Members met with officials
from throughout the agency including the Administrator and
Deputy Administrator of FEMA. Following the briefing, Members
toured the National Response Coordination Center.
On May 31, 2011, the Subcommittee held a Member site visit
to the American Red Cross' disaster operations center. The
visit provided information on the Red Cross' role in disaster
response and services it provides through its local chapters.
On June 6, 2012, the Subcommittee Members held a hearing
entitled ``The National Preparedness Report: Assessing the
State of Preparedness.'' At the hearing, witnesses testified
about National Preparedness Report (NPR), which assessed State
and local preparedness capabilities, and evaluated Federal
efforts to align resources to improving core capabilities.
Democratic Members focused their questioning on two areas
identified as in need of improvement in the NPR--long-term
recovery and cybersecurity--and explored how Homeland Security
Grant Program funding contributed to improvements in areas
identified as strengths (e.g.: planning, operational
communications, public health and medical services). Democrats
used the hearing to demonstrate the value of Homeland Security
Grant funds, the urgency for meaningful cybersecurity
legislation, and to the unacceptable gap in recovery
capabilities.
On August 7, 2012, Ranking Member Thompson submitted
comments to FEMA regarding the proposed Recovery Fact Sheet
RP9580.210, Personal Assistance Services in Shelters. Under
Ranking Member Thompson's leadership, Committee Democrats have
fought hard to ensure that Federal, State, and local emergency
response plans provide for adequate assistance to individuals
with disabilities. In his comments, Ranking Member Thompson
urged FEMA to provide clear guidance on how State and local
governments could secure resources needed to assist individuals
with specials needs, to clarify how State and local governments
can seek prompt reimbursement for such expense, and the role of
the Regional Disability Coordinator in helping State and local
governments determine and seek reimbursement for eligible
expenses.

ASSISTANCE TO STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS AND FIRST RESPONDERS

On June 10, 2011, the Subcommittee held a field hearing in
Clearwater, Florida entitled ``Weathering the Storm: A State
and Local Perspective on Emergency Management.'' The
Subcommittee received testimony from Mr. Bryan Koon, Director,
Florida Division of Emergency Management; Ms. Nancy Dragani,
Director, Ohio Emergency Management Agency (testifying on
behalf of the National Emergency Management Association); Mr.
Gerald Smith, Director, Lake County Division of Emergency
Management (testifying on behalf of the Florida Emergency
Preparedness Association); Mr. John ``Rusty'' Russell,
Director, Huntsville--Madison County (AL) Emergency Management
Agency (testifying on behalf of the International Association
of Emergency Managers); Ms. Chauncia Willis, Emergency
Coordinator, City of Tampa, Florida; and Ms. Linda Carbone,
Chief Executive Officer, Tampa Bay Chapter, American Red Cross.
The purpose of this hearing was to receive testimony
regarding the State and local perspective on emergency
management, including successes, challenges, and innovations.
Additionally, the hearing provided an opportunity for State and
local officials to discuss the Federal Emergency Management
Agency's progress in implementing the Post- Katrina Emergency
Management Reform Act of 2006.
This field hearing furthered the intention expressed in the
Oversight Plan to examine the impact of the Departments grant
programs upon the efforts of state and local agencies to
improve all-hazards preparedness. This hearing did not reveal
cost-savings to the Federal government.
On July 20, 2012, Ranking Member Thompson wrote to FEMA
Administrator Fugate and National Institute for Occupational
Health and Safety (NIOSH) Director Dr. John Howard, MD, MPH,
JD, to express concern regarding several documented
malfunctions of Drager Safety model PSS 7000, 4500 self-
contained breathing apparatus (SCBAs) purchased with funds from
the Federal Firefighter Grant program. Ranking Member Thompson
urged Administrator Fugate to inform grantees that the Drager
SCBA model was under review by NIOSH. Ranking Member Thompson
also urged NIOSH to review the care and maintenance
instructions for Drager's SCBAs, to suggest to the manufacturer
any improvements that would assist fire departments better
maintain the equipment, and to suggest any design modification
that could simplify maintenance procedures. Ranking Member
Thompson continues to work to ensure that the equipment first
responders purchase, particularly with Federal funds, meets the
standards necessary to keep first responders safe.
On September 12, 2012, the Subcommittee held a hearing
entitled ``Resilient Communications: Current Challenges and
Future Advancements.'' Members received testimony from the
following witnesses: David Turetsky, Chief of the Public Safety
& Homeland Security Bureau, Federal Communication Commission;
Ms. Roberta ``Bobbie'' Stempfley, Deputy Assistant Secretary,
Cybersecurity and Communications, National Protection and
Programs Directorate, Department of Homeland Security; Trey
Forgety, Director of Government Affairs, National Emergency
Number Association; Kyle Malady, Senior Vice President,
Verizon; Terry Hall, President, Association of Public Safety
Communication Officials International (APCO); and Chris
McIntosh, Statewide Interoperability Coordinator, Office of
Veterans Affairs and Homeland Security, Commonwealth of
Virginia.
Democratic Members sought to hold the Department
accountable for the $13 billion that have been invested in
developing State and local interoperable communications
capabilities over the past decade and to ensure that future
investments would yield the communications capabilities
Congress envisioned. In particular, Democratic Members sought
assurances that the First Responder Broadband Network would be
developed effectively and efficiently, inquired how Executive
Order 13618 on the Assignment of National Security and
Emergency Preparedness Communications Functions would improve
emergency communications capability and continuity,
investigated the cause of the public safety answering point
(PSAP) failures during the Derecho, assessed the implementation
of Next Generation 9-1-1 technologies and resources available
for future development, and State and local efforts to build a
robust interoperable emergency communications network. Having
already invested $13 billion in developing interoperable
communications capabilities, Committee Democrats emphasized
that the Federal government must do more to ensure that
investments will achieve the capabilities promised.
On November 27, 2012, Ranking Member Thompson wrote to
Under Secretary Rafael Borras to demand that the Department
take immediate action to improve interoperable communications
within the Department. On November 14, 2012, the Office of
Inspector General released a report entitled DHS' Oversight of
Interoperable Communications. The report found that although
DHS components have invested about $430 million in equipment
and resources to improve communications capabilities, the
Department has failed to achieve cross-component
interoperability, due largely to the fact that components do
not program their communications equipment appropriately and
train users to use find and use interoperable channels. Given
the large sums of money invested in developing interoperable
communications capabilities and difficult budget decisions
regarding future budget priorities that will need to be made in
the coming weeks and months, Ranking Member Thompson demanded
that the Department implement the policies and protocol
necessary to ensure the federal monies are not wasted.

MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONS OF THE FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY

The President's fiscal year 2012 budget request includes
$10.06 billion for FEMA, a $283 million reduction from the
level in the Fiscal Year (FY) 2011 Continuing Resolution. The
request included reductions in the Management and
Administration account, which were largely attributed to
efficiencies and streamlined business processes. The request
also proposed to restructure homeland security grant programs
through the elimination and consolidation of a number of
smaller grant programs into the large State Homeland Security
Grant Program and Urban Area Security Initiative funding
accounts.
On March 9, 2011, the Subcommittee held a hearing entitled
``Ensuring Effective Preparedness and Response--An Assessment
of the Fiscal Year (FY) 2012 Budget Request for the Federal
Emergency Management Agency.'' The Subcommittee received
testimony from Hon. W. Craig Fugate, Administrator, Federal
Emergency Management Agency, and Department of Homeland
Security.
The purpose of this hearing was to receive testimony on
FEMA's budget priorities, as expressed in the President's
Fiscal Year (FY) 2012 Budget Request submitted to Congress on
February 14, 2011. Under the President's $43.22 billion budget
request for the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), the
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) would receive $6.79
billion in FY 2012, a decrease of $323.32 million in total
budget authority from the amount anticipated under the FY 2011
Continuing Resolution (CR) budget.
On April 15, 2011, Subcommittee Chairman Bilirakis, Ranking
Member Thompson, and Senators Lieberman, Collins, and Akaka
sent a letter to the Comptroller General requesting that the
Government Accountability Office conduct a review of the
Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) workforce planning
and management efforts.
On October 12, 2012, Ranking Member Thompson wrote to FEMA
Administrator Craig Fugate to inquire about FEMA's efforts to
increase engagement with the private sector on its acquisitions
process. To ensure that FEMA achieves its goal ``to make a
friendlier government'' while preventing any unfair advantage
by a particular vendor, Ranking Member Thompson raised
questioned how reported modifications to FEMA's policies
related to the interaction between FEMA contracting officers
and vendors regarding ``acquisitions and process requirements''
would be consistent with the Federal Acquisition Regulations,
the U.S. Department of Homeland Security Acquisition
Regulation, the Homeland Security Acquisition Manual, the DHS
Vendor Communication Plan, and DHS ethics requirements.

MEDICAL PREPAREDNESS

EXERCISES AND SIMULATIONS

The Post-Katrina Emergency Management Reform Act of 2006
(PKEMRA) requires the FEMA Administrator to carry out a
national training and exercise program that should be as
realistic as practicable, stress State, local, and tribal
emergency response capacity, and provide a systemic evaluation
of readiness.\30\ As one component of this national exercise
program, PKEMRA further requires the Administrator to perform
periodic national level exercises that ``evaluate the
capability of Federal, state, local and tribal governments to
detect, disrupt, and prevent threatened or actual catastrophic
acts of terrorism, especially those involving weapons of mass
destruction.''\31\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\30\P.L. 109-295, sec. 648(b)(2), 6 U.S.C. 748.
\31\P.L. 109-295, sec. 648(b)(3), 6 U.S.C. 748.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On April 1, 2011, the Subcommittee held a Member briefing
on preparations for National Level Exercise (NLE) 2011. NLE
2011 was designed to prepare and coordinate a multiple-
jurisdictional integrated response to a national catastrophic
event. Members were briefed by FEMA's Deputy Administrator for
National Preparedness and the Director of the National Exercise
Program.
This briefing furthered the Oversight Plan for the 112th
Congress by allowing Members the opportunity to discuss plans
to implement new policy affecting PPD-8. This hearing did not
identify any instances or waste, fraud or abuse or identify any
cost savings to the Federal government.
On July 20, 2012, the Subcommittee Members were briefed on
the National Level Exercise Program. Tim Manning, Deputy
Administrator for National Preparedness and Protection, and Ms.
Roberta ``Bobbie'' Stempfley, Deputy Assistant Secretary,
Cybersecurity and Communications, NPPD, briefed Members on the
lessons learned from the National Level Exercise 2011, the
preliminary findings of the National Level Exercise 2012, and
the new structure of the National Level Exercise that will be
implemented in January 2013. In their oversight of the costly
National Level Exercise Program, Democratic Members have urged
FEMA to provide timely feedback to exercise participants and to
ensure that preparedness gaps identified in the exercise are
addressed.

PREPAREDNESS AND RESPONSE TO CHEMICAL, BIOLOGICAL, RADIOLOGICAL, AND
NUCLEAR THREATS

At a 2010 Committee on Homeland Security hearing with the
Commissioners of the Commission on the Prevention of Weapons of
Mass Destruction Proliferation and Terrorism (WMD Commission),
the Commissioners noted that ``it is more likely than not that
there will be a weapon of mass destruction used someplace on
earth by a terrorist group before the end of the year 2013 and
that it is more likely that the weapons will be biological
rather than nuclear.'' In the WMD Commission's report card on
U.S. Government efforts to protect the Nation from WMD
terrorism, the Federal government received a grade of ``F'' on
its efforts to enhance the Nation's capabilities for rapid
response to prevent biological attacks from inflicting mass
casualties.
On April 13, 2011, the Subcommittee began a series of
hearings entitled ``Taking Measure of Countermeasures.'' At the
first hearing, entitled ``A Review of Government and Industry
Efforts to Protect the Homeland Through Accelerated Research,
Development, and Acquisition of Chemical, Biological,
Radiological, and Nuclear Medical Countermeasures, '' the
Subcommittee received testimony from Ms. Cynthia Bascetta,
Managing Director, Health Care, Government Accountability
Office; Dr. Segaran P. Pillai, Chief Medical and Science
Advisor, Chemical and Biological Division, Science and
Technology Directorate, Department of Homeland Security; Dr.
Richard J. Hatchett, Chief Medical Officer and Deputy Director,
Strategic Sciences and Management, Department of Health and
Human Services; Dr. Gerald W. Parker, Deputy Assistant to the
Secretary of Defense, Chemical and Biological Defense,
Department of Defense; Ms. Phyllis Arthur, Senior Director,
Vaccines, Immunotherapeutics, and Diagnostics Policy,
Biotechnology Industry Organization; Mr. John M. Clerici,
Principal, Tiber Creek Partners LLC; and Dr. Daniel Fagbuyi,
Medical Director, Disaster Preparedness and Emergency
Management, Children's National Medical Center.
The purpose of this hearing was to receive testimony from
governmental and industry witnesses regarding efforts to
identify and develop medical countermeasures (MCMs) in response
to chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear (CBRNE)
threats. Members had the opportunity to question witnesses
about the level of cross-departmental/agency coordination, the
pharmaceutical industry's participation in MCM research and
development (R&D), and efforts to address impediments to MCM
development.
This hearing furthered the Oversight Plan for the 112th
Congress, by allowing Members the opportunity to more closely
examine the nation's level of preparedness to respond to a
chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear (CBRNE) event
affecting the general population. It did not uncover any
instances of waste, fraud or abuse or identify any cost
savings.
On May 12, 2011, the Subcommittee convened a hearing,
entitled ``A Review of Efforts to Protect the Homeland Through
Distribution and Dispensing of CBRN Medical Countermeasures.''
The Subcommittee received testimony from Dr. Alexander Garza,
Assistant Secretary for Health Affairs and Chief Medical
Officer, Office of Health Affairs, Department of Homeland
Security; Rear Admiral Ali Khan, Director, Office of Public
Health Preparedness and Response, Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention, Department of Health and Human Services; Mr.
Mike McHargue, Director of Emergency Operations, Division of
Emergency Medical Operations; Florida Department of Health; Mr.
David Starr, Director, Countermeasures Response Unit; New York
City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene; Chief Lawrence E.
Tan, Emergency Medical Services Division, New Castle County,
Delaware, and Dr. Jeffrey Levi, Executive Director, Trust for
America's Health.
The purpose of this hearing was to receive testimony
regarding coordination between Federal, State, local, and
private preparedness stakeholders for the distribution and
dispensing of medical countermeasures\32\ (MCMs) to the
American public in the event of a public health emergency.
Members had the opportunity to question officials about
management and distribution processes of the Strategic National
Stockpile (SNS), funding, coordination efforts, challenges, and
lessons learned from the 2009 H1N1 pandemic. This hearing
furthered the Oversight Plan for the 112th Congress by
providing Members a chance to discuss the challenges of the
distribution and dispensing of medical countermeasures
following a CBRNE attack. It did not uncover any waste of
federal funds.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\32\MCMS refers to diagnostic tests, drugs, vaccines, and other
treatments.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On May 13, 2011, the Subcommittee in conjunction with the
Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and Intelligence, and the
Subcommittee on Cybersecurity, Infrastructure Protection, and
Security Technologies, held a classified Member briefing on the
threat posed by WMD terrorism. Members were briefed by
representatives of the National Counterterrorism Center and the
National Counter-proliferation Center.
On July 12, 2012, Ranking Member Thompson wrote to
Secretary Napolitano to express concern regarding news reports
that BioWatch technology resulted in numerous ``false alarms''
and that the development of next generation technology,
Generation 3, was experiencing significant obstacles. The
Ranking Member questioned the efficacy of BioWatch technology,
whether the program is worth the cost, and whether the
technology is responsive to current threat assessments. Mindful
of the limited fiscal resources available to support
preparedness activities and the significant cost of the
BioWatch program, the Ranking Member insisted that the
Department provide to the Committee information related to
adjustments to the requirements for Generation 3 technology,
the timeline for deployment of Generation 3 technology, reports
of ``false alarms,'' and the Department's coordination with
State and local health officials.
On July 23, 2012, the Subcommittee Members participated in
a briefing and demonstration on BioWatch Generation 1/2
technology. Democratic Members sought information on whether
and how existing BioWatch technology works and to address
issues raised in a July 8, 2012, Los Angeles Times report,
which questioned whether continued investments the existing
BioWatch Program and BioWatch Generation 3 would yield improved
preparedness and response in the event of a biological attack.
Democratic Members again stressed the importance of using
reasoned threat assessments to allocate limited resources to
achieve homeland security needs.
On September 13, 2012, the Subcommittee on Emergency
Preparedness, Response, and Communications and the Subcommittee
on Cybersecurity, Infrastructure Protection, and Security
Technologies held a joint hearing entitled ``BioWatch Present
and Future: Meeting Mission Needs for Effective
Biosurveillance?'' Members received testimony from: Dr.
Alexander Garza, Assistant Secretary for Health Affairs and
Chief Medical Officer, Department of Homeland Security; Rafael
Borras, Under Secretary for Management, Department of Homeland
Security; William Jenkins, Jr., Director, Homeland Security and
Justice, Government Accountability Office; and Frances B.
Phillips, R.N., Deputy Secretary for Public Health Services,
Maryland Department of Public Health and Mental Hygiene.
Democratic Members explored criticisms of the BioWatch program,
including claims made in a series of Los Angeles Times articles
this summer suggesting that existing BioWatch technology is
unreliable and prone to ``false alarms'' and the findings of a
Government Accountability Office (GAO) investigation of the
development of BioWatch Generation-3 (Gen-3) technology that
identified a serious breakdown in the acquisition process.
Members also questioned witnesses about the current role and
future viability in Federal, State, and local biosurveillance
activities of the BioWatch program given current risk
assessments and the limited federal budget.

SUBCOMMITTEE ON BORDER AND MARITIME SECURITY

OVERSIGHT ACTIVITIES OF THE SUBCOMMITTEE

BORDER SECURITY BETWEEN THE PORTS OF ENTRY

On February 15, 2011, the Subcommittee held a hearing
entitled ``Securing Our Borders--Operational Control and the
Path Forward.'' The Subcommittee received testimony from Mr.
Michael J. Fisher, Chief, Border Patrol, U.S. Customs and
Border Protection, Department of Homeland Security; Mr. Richard
M. Stana, Director, Homeland Security and Justice, Government
Accountability Office; and Hon. Raul G. Salinas, Mayor, City of
Laredo, Texas. The purpose of the hearing was to examine DHS'
efforts to gain and maintain operational control of the border.
On March 15, 2011, the Subcommittee held a hearing entitled
``Strengthening the Border--Finding the Right Mix of Personnel,
Infrastructure and Technology.'' The Subcommittee received
testimony from Mr. Michael J. Fisher, Chief of the Border
Patrol, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of
Homeland Security; Mr. Mark Borkowski, Assistant Commissioner,
Office of Technology Innovation and Acquisition, U.S. Customs
and Border Protection, Department of Homeland Security; Mr.
Michael C. Kostelnik, (Maj. Gen. Ret.), Assistant Commissioner,
Office of CBP Air & Marine, U.S. Customs and Border Protection,
Department of Homeland Security; Major General Hugo E. Salazar,
Adjutant General, Arizona National Guard; and Mr. Richard M.
Stana, Director, Homeland Security and Justice, Government
Accountability Office. The purpose of the hearing was to
receive testimony about CBP's use of personnel, technology, and
infrastructure to gain and maintain operational control of the
Nation's borders.
On April 1, 2011, the Majority Members of the Subcommittee
sent a letter to the President of the United States requesting
an extension of the current National Guard deployment at the
Southwest border, past the June 30, 2011 deadline. The letter
further requested that the National Guard not be limited to
assisting civilian law enforcement, but to function to the full
extent allowed under Title 32, Section 502(f) duty status.
On May 3, 2011, hearing entitled ``Border Security and
Enforcement--Department of Homeland Security's Cooperation with
State and Local Law Enforcement Stakeholders.'' The
Subcommittee received testimony from Mr. Kumar Kibble, Deputy
Director, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Department
of Homeland Security; Mr. Ronald Vitiello, Deputy Chief, U.S.
Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland Security;
Sheriff Larry Dever, Cochise County Sheriff's Office, Arizona;
Sheriff Todd Entrekin, Etowah County Sheriff's Office, Alabama;
and Mr. Gomecindo Lopez, Commander, Special Operations Bureau,
El Paso County Sheriff's Office, Texas. The purpose of the
hearing was to examine the relationship between DHS and state
and local law enforcement agencies on matters of border
security and immigration enforcement. Members questioned the
witnesses regarding relevant border security and immigration
enforcement programs, explored the appropriate roles for
Federal, State, and local agencies, and discussed potential
areas for improving cooperation and coordination.
The above hearings furthered the Committee oversight plan
by examining policies and resources necessary for DHS to gain
operational control over the borders of the United States, and
to include staffing, technology, infrastructure, and improved
coordination. The Committee's oversight in this matter has not
resulted in savings to the Federal government.

SECURITY AT THE PORTS OF ENTRY

On April 5, 2011, the Subcommittee held a hearing entitled
``Using Resources Effectively to Secure Our Border at Ports of
Entry--Stopping the Illicit Flow of Money, Guns, and Drugs.''
The Subcommittee received testimony from Mr. Thomas Winkowski,
Assistant Commissioner, U.S. Customs and Border Protection,
Department of Homeland Security; Mr. Stan Korosec, Vice
President, Operations, Blue Water Bridge Canada; Mr. Timothy J.
Koerner, Vice President & Chief Security Officer; and Hon.
Richard F. Cortez, Mayor, City of McAllen, Texas. The purpose
of the hearing was to examine DHS' efforts to identify and
interdict security threats at U.S. ports of entry (POEs), and
particularly land border POEs. Members had the opportunity to
question witnesses about staffing, technology, and
infrastructure as well as DHS' security and facilitation
programs at POEs.
On June 1, 2011, Chairmen King and Miller and Ranking
Members Thompson and Cuellar sent a letter to CBP Commissioner
Alan Bersin requesting staffing information for CBP personnel
at ports of entry.
These activities furthered the Committee oversight plan by
examining policies and resources necessary for DHS to gain
operational control over the borders of the United States,
including staffing, technology, infrastructure, and improved
coordination. The Committee's oversight in this matter has not
resulted in savings to the Federal government.

SECURE COMMUNITIES

On July 10, 2012, the Subcommittee on Border and Maritime
Security held a hearing entitled ``Building a Secure Community:
How Can DHS Better Leverage State and Local Partnerships?'' The
sole witness at the hearing was Director John Morton, U.S.
Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).
Director Morton and Democratic Members highlighted the need
for ICE to use its limited resources to identify and remove
aliens who have committed crimes may pose a threat to their
communities, whether through Secure Communities or ICE's other
enforcement programs. Democratic Members raised concerns that
while the great majority of state and local law enforcement
officers are well-intentioned, Secure Communities may promote
racial profiling. At Ranking Member Thompson's request,
Director Morton agreed to brief the Committee on ICE's ongoing
assessments regarding possible racial profiling in the Secure
Communities program. Democratic Members of the Committee will
continue to conduct oversight of the Secure Communities
program, with emphasis on ICE's efforts to combat racial
profiling.

TERRORIST TRAVEL

On September 11, 2012, the Subcommittee on Border and
Maritime Security held a hearing entitled ``Eleven Years Later:
Preventing Terrorists from Coming to America.'' The Democratic
witness was Charles K. Edwards, Acting Inspector General,
Department of Homeland Security.
Under Democratic leadership in the 111th Congress, in the
wake of the attempted bombing of Flight 253 on Christmas Day
2009, the Full Committee held a hearing entitled ``Flight 253:
Learning Lessons from an Averted Tragedy'' and the Subcommittee
on Border, Maritime, and Global Counterterrorism held a follow-
up hearing to examine visa security and passenger prescreening
efforts related to the incident. The recent hearing was largely
informational, providing an update on efforts implemented by
DHS and the State Department since the 2009 incident and the 9/
11 attacks to prevent terrorist travel to the United States.
Democratic Members will use this information as part of our
ongoing oversight of DHS' efforts to prevent terrorist travel.

PORT AND MARITIME SECURITY

The United States Coast Guard (USCG) plays a vital role
within the Department of Homeland Security. The USCG safeguards
U.S. ports, waterways, and coastal waters; interdicts illegal
drug smuggling; performs search and rescue operations; inspects
and ensures safety for all maritime vessels entering the United
States; and aids in law enforcement on the water, all while
maintaining a state of defensive readiness. Following September
11, 2001, the USCG greatly increased its maritime security
operations, including its focus on Ports and Waterways Coastal
Security (PWCS) and defense readiness missions.
On April 13, 2011, the Subcommittee conducted a site visit
to USCG Headquarters in Washington, DC. Subcommittee Members
met with the Commandant of the Coast Guard and examined
security-related issues.
On June 14, 2011, the Subcommittee held a hearing on
``Securing the Nation's Ports and Maritime Border--A Review of
the Coast Guard Post 9/11 Homeland Security Missions.'' The
Subcommittee received testimony from Admiral Papp, Commandant
of the USCG. The purpose of the hearing was to receive
testimony on the USCG's efforts to identify and address
maritime security threats within U.S. ports, waterways, and
coastal waters, including issues related to training,
technology, programs, and the future of the USCG's homeland
security missions.
On July 25, 2012, Ranking Member Thompson sent a letter to
Secretary Napolitano requesting data regarding U.S. Customs and
Border Protection's efforts to identify and resolve high-risk
maritime cargo shipments before they reach the U.S. This letter
is part of Democratic Members' broader, ongoing efforts to
ensure DHS enhances the security of U.S.-bound maritime cargo
containers to prevent a potential attack on the U.S. through
maritime commerce.

TWIC

Since its inception, Democratic Members of the Committee
have vigorous oversight of the Transportation Worker
Identification Credential (TWIC) program in order to ensure the
program meets its security mandate while not unduly burdening
America's maritime and transportation workers. In part due to
this oversight, two important changes have been made to the
TWIC program to reduce the burden on workers required to
possess a TWIC. First, earlier this year DHS announced that as
of August 30, 2012, U.S. citizen TWIC holders whose credentials
are to expire on or before December 31, 2014, are able to
replace their expiring TWIC with a 3-year Extended Expiration
Date (EED) TWIC at a reduced cost. Second, at Ranking Member
Thompson's urging, H.R. 2838, the Coast Guard and Maritime
Transportation Act of 2012 passed by Congress in December 2012,
requires DHS to reform the process for TWIC enrollment,
activation, issuance, and renewal to require, in total, not
more than one in-person visit to a designated enrollment
center. Democratic Members will monitor the implementation of
the ``one-trip'' provision, as well as conduct close oversight
in the upcoming Congress of the implementation of the next
phase of the TWIC program.

SUBCOMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT, INVESTIGATIONS, AND MANAGEMENT

OVERSIGHT ACTIVITIES OF THE SUBCOMMITTEE

WAR AGAINST DRUG CARTELS

On March 31, 2011, the Subcommittee held a hearing entitled
``The U.S. Homeland Security Role in the Mexican War Against
Drug Cartels.'' The Subcommittee received testimony from Mr.
Luis Alvarez, Assistant Director, Immigration and Customs
Enforcement, Department of Homeland Security; Mr. Brian
Nichols, Deputy Assistant Secretary, International Narcotics
and Law Enforcement Affairs, U.S. Department of State; Mr.
Frank Mora, Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense, Western
Hemisphere Affairs, Department of Defense; Dr. Kristin Finklea,
Analyst, Domestic Social Policy Division, Congressional
Research Service; Mr. Jon Adler, President, Federal Law
Enforcement Officers Association; Dr. David Shirk, Director,
Trans-Border Institute, University of San Diego; Mr. John
Bailey, Professor, Government and Foreign Service, Georgetown
University; and Dr. Ricardo C. Ainslie, Department of
Educational Psychology, College of Education, The University of
Texas at Austin. The Subcommittee's Oversight Plan for the
112th Congress (Oversight Plan) does not address the
examination of Mexican Drug-Related Organizations or the
security of the Southwestern Border. As a result, this hearing
does not comport with the Subcommittee's Oversight Plan or
Clause 2(d)(F) of the Rules of the House of Representatives,
which require the Committee to identify potential opportunities
to eliminate duplicative or unnecessary programs, find
efficiencies that will contribute to the Department's ability
to meet its vital missions, and identify areas for cost
savings.
During a speech given March 24, 2011, the Secretary of
Homeland Security stated: ``the border is better now than it
ever has been.'' However, on May 11, 2011, the Subcommittee
held a follow-up hearing entitled ``On the Border and in the
Line of Fire: U.S. Law Enforcement, Homeland Security, and Drug
Cartel Violence,'' to examine current border security efforts
and reports of spill-over violence. The Subcommittee received
testimony from Mr. Grayling Williams, Director, Office of
Counternarcotics Enforcement, Department of Homeland Security;
Ms. Amy Pope, Deputy Chief of Staff & Counselor, Criminal
Division, Office of Assistant Attorney General, U.S. Department
of Justice; Mr. Steven C. McCraw, Director, Texas Department of
Public Safety; Hon. Thomas C. Horne, Attorney General, State of
Arizona; Sheriff Sigifredo Gonzalez, Zapata County, State of
Texas; and Chief Victor Rodriguez, McAllen Police Department,
State of Texas. The Subcommittee's Oversight Plan does not
address the examination of Mexican Drug-Related Organizations
or the security of the Southwestern Border. As a result, This
hearing did not comport with the Subcommittee's Oversight Plan
or Clause 2(d)(F) of the Rules of the House of Representatives,
which require the Committee to identify potential opportunities
to eliminate duplicative or unnecessary programs, find
efficiencies that will contribute to the Department's ability
to meet its vital missions, and identify areas for cost
savings.
On February 3, 2012, the Subcommittee held a hearing
entitled ``Is DHS Effectively Implementing a Strategy to
Counter Emerging Threats?'' Democrats were able to elicit
testimony in support of legislation seeking to strengthen the
Quadrennial Homeland Security (QHSR) process. Furthermore, this
hearing examined the notion of dismantling the traditional
distinctions between homeland and national security. This
position was supported by and set forth by the Administration
when, instead of releasing a National Security Strategy in
addition to a National Strategy on Homeland Security, as had
been the custom since 2002, President Obama issued a single
National Security Strategy, which contained sections dedicated
to homeland security matters.
On June 21, 2012, the Subcommittee held a hearing entitled
``U.S.-Caribbean Border: Open Road for Drug Traffickers and
Terrorists.'' The purpose of the hearing was to assess the
extent to which the Department of Homeland Security and its
components, such as the U.S. Coast Guard, U.S. Customs and
Border Protection and the Transportation Security
Administration need to adjust their strategies and resources in
order to protect America's Caribbean Border from the threat of
drug trafficking and related violence.
On July 19, 2012, the Subcommittee held a hearing entitled
``Using Unmanned Aerial Systems within the Homeland Security:
Game Changer?'' Recent changes in the law have expanded the use
of Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) in the national airspace
resulting in public agencies--including local law enforcement
utilizing unmanned systems in their daily operations. Since
2004, the Department of Homeland Security's Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) has utilized UAS to support its mission on the
border, between ports of entry and during natural disasters.
Moreover, CBP also flies UAS missions for the Federal Bureau of
Investigation, the Department of Defense, the National Oceanic
and Atmospheric Administration, local law enforcement, and
other agencies. Apart from CBP's ongoing UAS program, the
Department's Science and Technology Directorate (S&T) will play
a role in domestic UAV use. Presently, the Department does not
have any legal or legislative authority to govern or oversee
the use of UAS by local law enforcement.

DHS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

The Department of Homeland Security is the largest procurer
of information technology (IT) systems in the Federal civilian
Government with a fiscal year 2011 IT budget of roughly $6
billion. The Department plans to use these funds to manage 90
``major'' IT investments intended to assist the Department in
carrying out its mission of leading the National effort to
secure America against terrorist attacks and other threats and
hazards. DHS has reported that over half of these ``major''
investments have encountered or are at risk of encountering
significant cost and schedule shortfalls.
On May 27, 2011, Subcommittee Chairman McCaul and Ranking
Member Keating sent two letters to the Government
Accountability Office (GAO), the first requesting GAO to review
how well the Department is managing at-risk investments; the
second, to assess the extent to which the Department has
established IT governance and oversight structures, and how
these are used to manage and oversee IT investments.
On April 24, 2012, the Subcommittee held a hearing entitled
``America is Under Cyber Attack: Why Urgent Action is Needed.''
The purpose of the hearing was to raise awareness of the cyber
security threat. Democrats used the hearing to point out how
the nation's current weak cyber security posture was fostered
by a series of Bush Administration missteps including, the
failure to implement national strategy; the elimination of
cybersecurity experts from government service for political
purposes; the failure to connect the dots; a lack of
information sharing; and underfunding key cyber programs.

DENYING TERRORIST SAFE HAVENS

The Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act
(IRTPA) of 2004 and the National Defense Authorization Act
(NDAA) of 2010 require the Administration to report on U.S.
efforts to deny terrorists safe havens. A June 2011 GAO report
titled, ``Combating Terrorism: U.S. Government Should Improve
Its Reporting on Terrorist Safe Havens,'' reviewed the extent
to which the Department of State (DoS) identified and assessed
terrorist safe havens and interagency efforts to deny
terrorists safe havens. GAO found that although DoS does
identify existing terrorist safe havens in its Country Reports
on Terrorism, that report lacks the level of detail required by
Congress. Specifically, GAO states that ``the DoS report is
incomplete without including the contributions of its various
interagency partners to address terrorist safe havens.''
Additionally, the GAO notes that the U.S. Government has
not developed a list of all U.S. efforts to deny safe haven to
terrorists. DoS has identified only a few efforts that it
funds, but does not include other U.S. government funding
efforts, including funding by the Department of Defense (DoD).
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) currently receives
its funding for programs and activities that deny safe havens
from DoS and DoD.
Following the release of the GAO report, on June 3, 2011,
the Subcommittee held a hearing to examine the threat of safe
havens to the U.S. Homeland and what the Department of Homeland
Security, working in conjunction with other Federal government
agencies, does to combat this threat. The Committee seeks to
assess whether further actions are needed by the United States
to deny terrorist safe havens and strengthen at-risk States.
The subcommittee heard testimony from Ms. Jacquie Williams-
Bridgers, Managing Director, International Affairs and Trade,
Government Accountability Office; Mr. Mark Koumans, Deputy
Assistant Secretary for Policy, International Affairs,
Department of Homeland Security; Ms. Shari Villarosa, Deputy
Coordinator for Regional Affairs, Department of State; Mr.
James Q. Roberts, Principal Director for Special Operations and
Combating Terrorism, Office of Special Operations/Low-intensity
Conflict & Interdependent Capabilities, Department of Defense;
Mr. Steve Coll, President and CEO, New America Foundation; Dr.
Bruce Hoffman, Director of the Center for Peace and Security
Studies and Professor, Georgetown University; and Dr. Daniel
Byman, Director of Research and Senior Fellow, Saban Center for
Middle East Policy, Brookings Institution. The Subcommittee's
Oversight Plan does not address the examination of terrorist
safe havens or threat of overseas terrorist activities on the
U.S. homeland. As a result, this hearing did not comport with
the Subcommittee's Oversight Plan or Clause 2(d)(F) of the
Rules of the House of Representatives, which require the
Committee to identify potential opportunities to eliminate
duplicative or unnecessary programs, find efficiencies that
will contribute to the Department's ability to meet its vital
missions, and identify areas for cost savings.

DHS ACQUISITION MANAGEMENT

The Department of Homeland Security has been criticized in
the past for, among other things, failing to supervise projects
and allowing the costs of certain contracts to exceed initial
estimates. As a result of this lapse, on May 27, 2011
Subcommittee Chairman McCaul and Ranking Member Keating sent a
letter to GAO requesting a review of the contracting mechanisms
at the Department.
On March 1, 2012, the Subcommittee held a hearing entitled
``Building One DHS: Can Management Information be Integrated?''
The Democratic witness was Mr. David Maurer, Director, Homeland
Security and Justice, Government Accountability Office. Also
testifying at the hearing was the Department of Homeland
Security Undersecretary for Management Rafael Borras. Committee
Democrats have long-held the position that creating ``One DHS''
by establishing integrated, functional, management systems, in
addition to implementing line authorities from Components to
Department of Homeland Security headquarters will strengthen
Department of Homeland Security operations. As a result,
Democrat Members used the hearing to question Under Secretary
for Management Borras (USM) about newly developed oversight
initiatives at the Department designed to provide greater
accountability and transparency in the areas of acquisitions,
financial management, human capital and information management.
These new measures had never before been implemented at the
Department and according to the Government Accountability
Office, are a step in the right direction. Democrat Members
also discussed financial management in light of Democrat
initiatives which led to the cancellation of the Transformation
and Systems Consolidation (TASC) program, which was projected
to cost between $450 million and $1 billion without proper
oversight measures in place or concrete solutions to the
Department's financial management struggles.
On October 12, 2012, Ranking Member Thompson sent a letter
to the Honorable Richard Spires, the Chief Information Officer
for the Department of Homeland Security underscoring the
importance of ``One DHS'' and reducing redundancies in
Department of Homeland Security IT systems. The letter also
noted that building integrated systems that can be used by
multiple components, not only ensures a common operating
picture and facilities information sharing, but also saves
taxpayer dollars.
On March 8, 2012, the Subcommittee held a hearing entitled
``Eliminating Waste, Fraud, Abuse and Duplication at the
Department of Homeland Security.'' The Democratic witness was
Mr. Scott Lilly, Senior Fellow, Center for American Progress.
The focus of the hearing was a Government Accountability Office
(GAO) report examining Government-wide opportunities to reduce
duplication and prevent waste in Federal Government programs.
Democrat Members focused on efficiencies and policies that have
been implemented under the Democratic Administration that have
yielded significant reductions in duplication at the
Department. The Department has implemented 30 separate
efficiency initiatives across the agency resulting in more than
$1 billion in cost avoidances.
On March 26, 2012, Ranking Member Thompson wrote to the
Department of Homeland Security Office of Inspector General
regarding its March 22, 2012 report entitled ``Department of
Homeland Security's Compliance with the Improper Payments
Elimination and Recovery Act of 2010.'' In this correspondence,
Ranking Member Thompson raised concerns about duplicate
payments remitted by the Department of Homeland Security to
private sector venders, the lack of adequate internal controls
to prevent improper payments, and the implementation of
measures across Component agencies to reduce the likelihood of
future overpayments.
On April 17, 2012, Ranking Member Thompson sent a letter to
Undersecretary for Management Rafael Borras regarding the need
to improve policies and procedures governing financial
management and improper payments.
On September 21, 2012, the Subcommittee held a hearing
entitled ``DHS Acquisition Management Challenges: Solutions for
Saving Taxpayer Dollars.'' It is essential that the Department
ensures that its acquisition and procurement policies are
coherent and applied consistently with the requisite guidance
for implementation across all component agencies. More
importantly, it is critical that this Committee provide
vigorous oversight to ensure that the Department safeguards the
access of small, minority, women and veteran-owned and other
disadvantaged businesses to bid on contracts allocated by the
Department. Ranking Member Thompson's oversight into the
Department's acquisition policies and practices produced
several hearings under his Chairmanship that resulted in
approximately 12 reports or testimonies from GAO since 2006.
Following the hearing, on October 1, 2012, Ranking Member
Thompson sent a letter to the Comptroller General of the U.S.
requesting that a study be undertaken to determine how the
federal government's increased use strategic sourcing as a
contracting vehicle affects the ability of small, minority and
disadvantaged businesses to compete for contracts.

DHS WORKFORCE MORALE

The Department of Homeland Security has consistently ranked
as one of the Departments with the lowest morale among
employees within the Federal Government. Understanding why the
Department is considered such a difficult place to work is
imperative. The ``Best Places to Work in the Federal
Government'' rankings compiled by the Partnership for Public
Service and American University's Institute for the Study of
Public Policy Implementation showed DHS in 28th place out of 32
agencies in 2010, the same ranking as in 2009. Additionally, in
2010, the Department administered an internal survey, which
returned more than 10,000 completed responses. The findings of
this survey show leading indications of dissatisfaction ranging
from the Department not dealing with poor work performers to
the way promotions are decided. As a result, on May 27, 2011,
Subcommittee Chairman McCaul and Ranking Member Keating sent a
letter to GAO requesting an investigation into why this is the
case, specifically; to what extent the Department has
identified the root causes that have contributed to low
employee morale, and what progress has made in addressing these
issues within the Department.
On March 22, 2012, the Subcommittee held a hearing entitled
``Building One DHS: Why is Employee Morale Low?'' The
Department of Homeland Security has repeatedly ranked either
last or near last on federal employee surveys that rate
employees' experience working at the Department of Homeland
Security. Its workforce consists of more than 230,000 employees
and since its inception, addressing the unique needs of its
workforce has been a challenge. Democrat Members used the
hearing to (1) highlight the improvements that have been made
under the current Department of Homeland Security Democratic
Administration that have caused a slight but noticeable
improvement in the Department's rankings, but to also (2) hold
the Department accountable for the dismal employee satisfaction
rankings it continues to receive. Democrats also raised
concerns regarding the high turnover rate in the Department's
Chief Human Capital Officer (CHCO) position. Since the hiring
of its first Chief Human Capital Officer (CHCO) in May 2003,
the Department has employed eight separate CHCOs. The constant
turnover in this position has resulted in a lack of
institutional knowledge and the lack of a consistent strategy
to meet workplace challenges. Democrats highlighted how budget
cuts, both from the Republican majority and the Administration,
and other economic factors, such as threatened federal
government shutdowns and pay freezes have impacted employee
morale. Lastly, DHS has consistently lacked a diverse workforce
and Democrat Members used the hearing to advance the Democratic
position that diversity at the Department of Homeland Security,
at all levels, must be pursued.
On April 17, 2012, Ranking Member Thompson wrote a letter
to Secretary Napolitano reiterating Democratic concerns and
requesting information relating to diversity, the Department's
Leader Development and Senior Executive Service Candidate
programs, and the Department's development of exit surveys to
identify on-going challenges.
On May 17, 2012, the Subcommittee held a hearing entitled
``Department of Homeland Security: An Examination of Ethical
Standards.'' The DHS OIG has a very broad mandate and is
entitled to the right of first refusal regarding the
investigation of allegations of employee misconduct. Yet, due
to fiscal constraints, the OIG transferred a significant number
of corruption and misconduct cases against employees at ICE and
CBP in an effort to decrease its backlog. During the hearing,
the Acting Inspector General confirmed that the current fiscal
climate as the basis for its decision. The OIG's FY2012 budget
was $159 million (estimated to be obligated) and for FY2013
$162 million (in obligations associated with the budget
request). Given the size and total budget authority for the
Department, the OIG budget was not on par with other federal
agencies. For example, the Department of Health and Human
Services (HHS) has 65,000 employees, compared to the
Department's 230,000, yet the HHS OIG had a budget of $312
million in FY 2010 and $342 million in FY 2011. Likewise, the
Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) has 9,000
employees and a budget of approximately $40 billion; however,
its OIG's budget was $127 million in FY 2010 and $134 in FY
2011. Democrat Members urged an increase in the OIG's funding,
thus allowing for the Inspector General to accept and conduct
more investigations.

OVERSIGHT OF ST. ELIZABETHS CONSTRUCTION

The construction of the Department of Homeland Security
Headquarters at the St. Elizabeths facility is the largest
Federal construction project to occur in Washington, DC area
since the construction of the Pentagon. The project will bring
the Department components together under one roof and house
roughly 14,000 employees on the campus. Approximately $1
billion has been appropriated for its construction. On May 31,
2011, Members conducted a site visit to the St. Elizabeths
campus to examine the progress of construction and plans moving
forward. Despite the potential that oversight of this project
may identify areas for cost-savings, the Majority has failed to
seriously review this multi-billion dollar construction
project.

SUBCOMMITTEE ON COUNTERTERRORISM AND INTELLIGENCE

OVERSIGHT ACTIVITIES OF THE SUBCOMMITTEE

On February 15, 2011, the Subcommittee received a
classified Member-only briefing by the Deputy Assistant
Secretary of Defense, Special Operations and Combating
Terrorism, the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA); the Deputy
Director for Special Operations, J3, The Joint Staff; a Senior
Intelligence Analyst, Middle East Branch of the Joint
Intelligence Task Force on Counterterrorism; a Yemen Analyst,
Middle East Branch of the Joint Intelligence Task Force on
Counterterrorism; a Senior Intelligence Officer, Middle East
and North Africa Branch, the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA),
Directorate of Intelligence; and a Yemen Analyst, Middle East
and North Africa Analysis branch of the DIA Directorate of
Intelligence, on the threat from al-Qaeda in the Arabian
Peninsula.
Committee staff also conducted an in-depth examination of
the various terrorism threats and U.S. counterterrorism policy,
and as a result, on March 2, 2011, the Subcommittee held a
hearing entitled ``Terrorist Threat to the U.S. Homeland--al-
Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP).'' The Subcommittee
received testimony from Dr. Jarret Brachman, Managing Director,
Cronus Global; Dr. Christopher Boucek, Associate, Carnegie
Endowment for International Peace; and Mr. Barak Barfi,
Research Fellow, New America Foundation. The Subcommittee
hearing was followed by a classified Member-only briefing from
the National Counterterrorism Center, the Department of
Homeland Security, and the Federal Bureau of Investigation.

RECENT UNREST IN NORTH AFRICA AND THE MIDDLE EAST: THE IMPLICATIONS FOR
U.S. HOMELAND SECURITY

Committee staff attended briefings regarding the uprisings
across North Africa and the Middle East. On April 6, 2011 the
Subcommittee held a hearing entitled ``Unrest in the Middle
East and North Africa: Ramifications for U.S. Homeland
Security.'' The Subcommittee received testimony from Mr. Philip
Mudd, Senior Research Fellow, New America Foundation; Mr.
Thomas Joscelyn, Senior Fellow and Executive Director, Center
for Law and Counter Terrorism, Foundation for the Defense of
Democracies; Mr. Rick ``Ozzie'' Nelson, Director and Senior
Fellow, Homeland Security and Counterterrorism Program, Center
for Strategic and International Studies; and Mr. Brian Katulis,
Senior Fellow, Center for American Progress.

SUBCOMMITTEE OVERSIGHT OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY'S
INTELLIGENCE AND ANALYSIS DIRECTORATE

As part of its oversight, the Subcommittee met with
officials from a number of offices and agencies within the
Department of Homeland Security (DHS), including the Office of
Intelligence and Analysis, the Office of the Assistant
Secretary for Policy, the Federal Emergency Management Agency,
the Office of Operations Coordination and Planning, the DHS
Counter Intelligence mission and the Fusion Center program
office, and programs within the U.S. Secret Service.
On June 1, 2011, the Committee on Homeland Security's
Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and Intelligence held a
hearing entitled ``The DHS Intelligence Enterprise--Past,
Present, and Future.'' The Subcommittee received testimony from
the Honorable Caryn Wagner, Under Secretary for the Office of
Intelligence and Analysis, Department of Homeland Security;
Rear Admiral Thomas Atkin, Assistant Commandant for
Intelligence and Criminal Investigation, U.S. Coast Guard; Mr.
Daniel Johnson, Assistant Administrator for Intelligence, U.S.
Transportation Security Administration; Mr. James Chaparro,
Assistant Director for Intelligence, U.S. Immigration and
Customs Enforcement; and Ms. Susan Mitchell, Deputy Assistant
Commissioner, Office of Intelligence and Operations
Coordination, U.S. Customs and Border Protection.

DOMESTIC RADICALIZATION

The Subcommittee aided the Full Committee in its efforts to
understand domestic radicalization, violent extremism, and
threat mitigation. On April 14, 2011, the Subcommittee held a
classified briefing provided by the National Counterterrorism
Center on the issue of domestic radicalization.

THREAT TO THE U.S. HOMELAND FROM SOUTH ASIA

The Subcommittee has continued to examine events in South
Asia as they relate to the U.S. homeland, and in particular,
monitored events in Pakistan, including the killing of Osama
Bin Laden. Committee staff was briefed by multiple experts with
personal experiences in Pakistan, Afghanistan, and India
regarding conditions on the ground in these critical areas and
implications for counterterrorism policy and intelligence
gathering. On May 3, 2011 the Subcommittee held a hearing
entitled ``The Threat to the U.S. Homeland Emanating from
Pakistan.'' The Subcommittee received testimony from Dr.
Frederick Kagan, Resident Scholar and Director, American
Enterprise Institute Critical Threats Project; Dr. Seth Jones,
Senior Political Scientist, The RAND Corporation; Mr. Stephen
Tankel, Visiting Fellow, South Asia Program, The Carnegie
Endowment for International Peace; and Mr. Shuja Nawaz,
Director, South Asia Center, The Atlantic Council. The hearing
focused on the death of Bin Laden and Pakistan's role in the
War on Terror.

TERROR FINANCE

The Subcommittee has examined issues surrounding terror
financing. Majority staff has held numerous meetings with the
Federal Bureau of Investigation's Terrorist Financing
Operations Section, the Drug Enforcement Agency's Special
Operations Division, and the former Ambassador to the
Organization of American States. Unfortunately, the Minority
staff was not invited to the overwhelming majority of these
meetings.

WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION (WMD)

Committee staff visited the Defense Threat Reduction Agency
and received a briefing on the Agency's Strategic Command
Center. Topics of discussion included: cooperative threat
reduction and international engagement; planning, readiness,
and operational support; research and development; and
integration of technology with tactics, techniques, and
procedures to work across the interagency process on the key
WMD issues of nonproliferation, counter proliferation, and
consequence management.
On May 13, 2011, the Subcommittee on Cybersecurity,
Infrastructure Protection, and Security Technologies, the
Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and Intelligence, and the
Subcommittee on Emergency Preparedness, Response, and
Communications received a classified Member-only briefing by
representatives from the National Counterterrorism Center
(NCTC) and the National Counter-proliferation Center (NCPC),
both of the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, on
the threat from four categories of WMDs that terrorists may
seek to acquire and use in a WMD terrorist attack: chemical,
biological, radiological, and nuclear (CBRN).
On November 15, 2012, the Subcommittee held a hearing
titled ``WMD Terrorism: Assessing the Continued Threat''. Under
then Chairman Thompson's leadership in the 111th Congress, the
Committee passed H.R. 5498 ``The WMD Prevention and
Preparedness Act of 2010'' This House bill sought to address
the gaps identified by the WMD Commission by enhancing homeland
security and improving efforts to counter a WMD attack
(especially biological attacks). It addressed every stage of
the threat--from pre-event prevention and deterrence through to
post-event recovery. Testimony given during the November 2012
hearing indicated that the Committee's actions in the 111th and
112th Congresses were great steps toward preventing a mass
scale attack. The witnesses stated they supported virtually
every part of the legislation; however, the overlapping
jurisdictions involved in biodefense was a challenge.
On Thursday, December 4, 2012, the Subcommittee held a
hearing titled ``Terrorist Exploitation of Refugee Programs''.
The purpose of this hearing was to examine the refugee program
and its vulnerabilities. In 2011, two Iraqi refugees were
indicted and later convicted of providing material support to
Al Qaeda in Iraq. However, testimony indicated that the
Department of Homeland Security does not believe that these
individuals deliberately sought entry to the United States
through the refugee program with a specific intent on carrying
out an attack here.

SUBCOMMITTEE ON CYBERSECURITY, INFRASTRUCTURE PROTECTION, AND SECURITY
TECHNOLOGIES

OVERSIGHT ACTIVITIES OF THE SUBCOMMITTEE

CHEMICAL SECURITY

NUCLEAR REACTOR FACILITY SECURITY

On March 11, 2011, an earthquake and tsunami struck Japan
causing an on-going nuclear emergency at the Fukushima Daiichi
Nuclear Power Station and a global impact on the nuclear
sector. Committee staff have been examining the integrated
effort of numerous U.S. Government agencies to support Japan's
effort to respond to this event, as well as take lessons
learned and apply them to U.S. nuclear security activities, and
the related role of DHS, in order to better prepare the nuclear
sector for extreme events including terrorist attacks on the
homeland.
On March 25, 2011, Committee staff visited the Calvert
Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant on the Chesapeake Bay in Lusby,
Maryland. This facility is located approximately 50 miles
southeast of Washington, DC. The purpose of the trip was to
observe nuclear power plant security measures (physical
security, cybersecurity, and personnel security) to determine
how the facility interacts with the Department of Homeland
Security and State and local first responders to address
vulnerabilities and respond to a potential attack or accident
at the facility.
Committee staff toured the Nuclear Regulatory Commission
(NRC) Emergency Operations Center on May 6, 2011, and received
briefings on the mission, goals, and functions of the NRC and,
specifically, on the NRC Emergency Preparedness and Response
Program and the NRC's security policy and operations.
On May 12, 2011, Committee staff met with representatives
from the Indian Point Energy Center, a nuclear energy plant in
Buchanan, New York, on the Hudson River, approximately 25 miles
north of Manhattan. Similarly, these representatives provided
their perspective on the implications of the events at
Fukushima for the U.S. nuclear energy industry.
These activities have not resulted in a hearing or other
product therefore it is difficult to assess whether the
Oversight Plan goals have been met.

WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION

Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) pose a daunting challenge
to homeland security because of their great potential to cause
catastrophic consequences. Terrorists actively seek to acquire,
build, and use such weapons and technologies. Dangerous
chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear (CBRN)
materials, technology, and knowledge, often dual-use, circulate
with ease in our globalized economy and are controlled unevenly
around the world, making it difficult to limit their access and
movement and ultimately prevent terrorist acts.
On April 5, 2011, the Chair of the Subcommittee on
Cybersecurity, Infrastructure Protection, and Security
Technologies along with Chairman Bilirakis and Ranking Member
Richardson of the Subcommittee on Emergency Preparedness,
Response, and Communications, sent an oversight letter to the
Secretary of Homeland Security requesting responses related to
the procurement of Generation-3 BioWatch detection systems. No
response has been received.
On April 7, 2011, Committee staff observed the Securing the
Cities (STC) full-scale exercise in New York City, New York
(NYC). STC is a DNDO initiative designed to reduce the risk of
a radiological or nuclear attack on the NYC region by enhancing
regional capabilities to detect, identify, and interdict
illicit radioactive materials. STC involves 13 principal
partners coordinated through the New York Police Department
(NYPD).
The Subcommittee on Cybersecurity, Infrastructure
Protection, and Security Technologies along with the
Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and Intelligence, and the
Subcommittee on Emergency Preparedness, Response, and
Communications held a joint classified Member briefing on the
present and evolving threat of WMD terrorism on May 13, 2011.
Representatives from the Office of the Director of National
Intelligence, National Counterterrorism Center (NCTC), and the
National Counter Proliferation Center (NCPC) briefed Members.

SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY DIRECTORATE MANAGEMENT AND COORDINATION

During the 112th Congress, Committee staff has conducted
extensive meetings with Federal officials, academic experts,
the private sector, and other stakeholders on the mission and
operations of the Science and Technology (S&T) Directorate, the
component of the Department of Homeland Security responsible
for research, development, testing, and evaluation of homeland
security technologies. The Subcommittee's oversight has focused
on examining: (1) the linkage between the S&T's strategic plan
and its programs; (2) inadequate transparency and detail in its
budget justifications; (3) the persistent lack of
responsiveness to the needs of its customers and end-users; (4)
S&T's ability to provide scientific and technical support to
components throughout a technology's acquisition lifecycle; (5)
leveraging of the scientific capital of the Department of
Energy National laboratories, other Federal Departments and
Agencies, academia, and the private sector; and (6) the failure
to more rapidly develop and transition homeland security
technologies.
On May 13, 2011, Committee staff held a roundtable
discussion with Dr. Tara O'Toole, Under Secretary for Science
and Technology at the Department. Dr. O'Toole addressed the
shifting strategy of the Directorate toward rapid fielding of
technology and acquisition support, interagency collaboration
on research priorities, and the implications of proposed
research and development budget cuts on homeland security.

SAFETY ACT IMPLEMENTATION

The Support Anti-Terrorism by Fostering Effective
Technologies Act of 2002 (SAFETY Act), (6 U.S.C. 441 et seq.;
Title VIII, Subtitle G of Pub. L. 107-296, the Homeland
Security Act of 2002) is intended to encourage the development
and deployment of anti-terrorism technologies by limiting the
liability of sellers of the technology and others in the
distribution and supply chain for third-party claims arising
out of acts of terrorism where the technology has been deployed
to prevent, respond to, or recover from such act.
Committee staff met with Department officials to monitor
the program's progress and consulted with various stakeholders
concerned with the pace and requirements of the SAFETY Act
review process.
On May 26, 2011, the Subcommittee held a hearing entitled
``Unlocking the SAFETY Act's Potential to Promote Technology
and Combat Terrorism.'' The Subcommittee received testimony
from Mr. Paul Benda, Acting Deputy Under Secretary, Science &
Technology Directorate, Department of Homeland Security; Mr.
Marc Pearl, President and Chief Executive Officer, Homeland
Security and Defense Business Counsel; Mr. Brian Finch,
Partner, Dickstein Shapiro LLP; Mr. Scott Boylan, Vice
President and General Counsel, Morpho Detection, Inc.; and Mr.
Craig Harvey, Chief Operations Officer and Executive Vice
President, NVision Solutions, Inc. This hearing furthered the
Oversight Plan's intention to examine SAFETY Act
implementation. However, no Federal cost savings have been
revealed.

CYBERSECURITY THREAT

The threat posed by hackers, nation states, terrorists, and
common thieves to the critical infrastructure of the Nation has
increased in recent years.
On February 11, 2011, Members of the Subcommittee received
a classified Member-only briefing on an assessment of the
current cybersecurity threat. Representatives from the
Department of Homeland Security and the National Security
Agency were present.
On March 16, 2011 the Subcommittee held a hearing entitled
``Examining the Cyber Threat to Critical Infrastructure and the
American Economy.'' The Subcommittee received testimony from
Hon. Phillip Reitinger, Deputy Under Secretary, National
Protection and Programs Directorate, Department of Homeland
Security; Mr. Gregory C. Wilshusen, Director, Information
Security Issues, Government Accountability Office; Dr. Phyllis
Schneck, Vice President and Chief Technical Officer, McAfee
Inc.; Mr. James A. Lewis, Director and Senior Fellow,
Technology and Public Policy Program, Center for Strategic and
International Studies; and Ms. Mischel Kwon, President, Mischel
Kwon Associates.

CYBERSECURITY MISSION OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

The Department of Homeland Security is the primary point of
contact and coordination for all civilian, non-intelligence
U.S. Government networks as well as privately held critical
infrastructure. Understanding how the Department currently
fulfills that role and how it can improve its relationship with
other Federal agencies as well as with the private sector is an
important function of the Subcommittee. Committee staff
participated in numerous meetings with private stakeholders as
well as the Department to support the Members of the
Subcommittee in their conduct of oversight.
On April 15, 2011 the Subcommittee held a hearing entitled
``The DHS Cybersecurity Mission: Promoting Innovation and
Securing Critical Infrastructure.'' The Subcommittee received
testimony from Mr. Sean McGurk, Director, National
Cybersecurity and Communications Integration Center, Department
of Homeland Security; Mr. Gerry Cauley, President and CEO,
North American Electric Reliability Corporation; Ms. Jane
Carlin, Chair, Financial Services Sector Coordinating Council;
and Mr. Edward Amoroso, Senior Vice President and Chief
Security Officer, AT&T.
The Second Session of the 112th Congress was marked by the
failure of the Committee to have any significant cybersecurity
legislation considered by the House of Representatives. The
Committee's comprehensive cybersecurity legislation, H.R. 3674,
the Promoting and Enhancing Cybersecurity and Information
Sharing Effectiveness (PRECISE) Act, was moved forward in a
bipartisan process through the Subcommittee on Cybersecurity,
Infrastructure Protection and Security Technologies, being
reported favorably by voice vote. At a Full Committee markup on
March 28, 2012, Subcommittee Chairman Lungren assured Ranking
Member Thompson that the main tenets of the PRECISE Act--to
address the cyber threat to critical infrastructure, to enhance
DHS' role as the Federal government's lead for cybersecurity,
and to promote and enhance information sharing while protecting
civil liberties would remain ``intact'' when the PRECISE Act
was considered by the Full Committee.\33\ Unfortunately, the
Amendment in the Nature of a Substitute to H.R. 3674 that was
debuted at the Full Committee Markup for H.R. 3674 on April 18,
2012, contained substantial revisions along partisan lines. As
a result of the loss of bipartisan support for H.R. 3674, the
measure was not forwarded to the House of Representatives, and
the Committee failed to have any major pieces of cybersecurity
legislation considered during the entire 112th Congress.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\ 33\Colloquy during the Full Committee Markup of H.R. 3563, H.R.
2764, H.R. 2764, H.R. 3140, H.R. 2179, March 28, 2012.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In response to the Committee Republicans' unwillingness to
pursue meaningful legislation to protect critical
infrastructure from cyber attacks, Subcommittee Ranking Member
Clarke introduced H.R. 6221, the Identifying Cybersecurity
Risks to Critical Infrastructure Act of 2012 on July 26, 2012.
This bill would empower the Department of Homeland Security to
work with critical infrastructure owners and operators to
conduct risk assessments of critical infrastructure and
disseminate those assessments to raise awareness and facilitate
information sharing.
In addition to failing to advance the Committee's own
cybersecurity legislation, the Majority failed to assert
jurisdiction on cybersecurity bills reported from other
Committees.
On April 24, 2012, Ranking Member Thompson and Subcommittee
Ranking Member Clarke wrote to Chairman King and Chairman
Lungren registering concern that the Committee chose not to
request a sequential referral to H.R. 3523, the Cyber
Intelligence and Protection Act.
On March 19, 2012, Ranking Member Thompson and Subcommittee
Ranking Member Clarke wrote to Secretary Napolitano seeking
additional information and justification for the large increase
in the cybersecurity budget request, particularly with respect
to the development of a Cybersecurity Capability Improvements
program. Ranking Member Thompson and Subcommittee Ranking
Member Clarke further expressed concern over the budget
reductions in cybersecurity education and outreach.
On December 3, 2012, Ranking Member Thompson wrote to Under
Secretary for NPPD Rand Beers following up on a December 13,
2011 letter requesting details on human resource issues
surrounding recruitment and training at the Department of
Homeland Security.

FEDERAL PROTECTIVE SERVICE

On February 25, 2011, Committee staff visited a Federal
Protective Service (FPS) facility in Alexandria, Virginia.
Staff received an overview of FPS' mission to secure Federal
buildings. The visit included a brief on the agency's legal
authorities, as well as its budget, recruiting, and training
challenges.
On May 23, 2011, the Federal Protective Service Deputy
Director, provided staff briefing on bombing attempt and
corrective actions taken at the Detroit Federal Building.
On July 13, 2011, the Subcommittee held a hearing entitled
``Securing Federal Facilities: Challenges of the Federal
Protective Service and the Need for Reform.'' The hearing
examined the Federal Protective Service's lax management
practices after a major security breach occurred at the Patrick
V. McNamara federal building in Detroit in February 2011 when a
bag containing explosive materials was left undetected for 21
days.
On July 24, 2012, the Subcommittee held a hearing entitled
Securing Federal Facilities: An Examination of FPS' Progress in
Improving Oversight and Assessing Risk. The hearing revisited
the Federal Protective Service's failure to develop and
implement an effective tool to replace the Risk Assessment and
Management Program as part of a comprehensive risk management
strategy to oversee security at Federal facilities, manage
contract guards, and serve as the lead agency charged with
coordinating infrastructure protection government-wide.
Further, the hearing examined how the Federal Protective
Service's lack of a comprehensive risk management strategy
impedes the agency from fulfilling its mission to protect
federal facilities which jeopardizes national security.
Ranking Member Thompson introduced H.R. 176, the Federal
Protective Service Improvement and Accountability Act of 2011
during the 11th Congress and again on January 5, 2011 to
improve the agency's performance by adding 500 Federal Law
Enforcement officers, to direct the Federal Protective Services
to establish a dedicated contract oversight staff to monitor
contract guards, and to require the development of national
minimum standards for the training and certification of
contract guards. If enacted, the legislation would raise the
standards for hiring, training and certifying contract guards.
Following the hearing on July 13, 2011, Democratic
Committee staff began holding quarterly meetings with Federal
Protective Service officials to monitor their implementation of
the Modified Infrastructure Survey Tool, and to follow up on
contract and other management issues. Since 2008, Ranking
Member Thompson has requested 10 reports focusing on issues
related to the Federal Protective Service and federal facility
protection, with the most recent report dated August 2012.

NATIONAL PROTECTION AND PROGRAMS DIRECTORATE

On June 1, 2011 Chairman King and Chairman Lungren sent an
oversight letter to Assistant Secretary Rand Beers notifying
him that the reorganization of the National Programs and
Protection Directorate without notice to Congress was in
violation of the Homeland Security Act of 2002. The letter
requested an immediate and complete briefing on the matter to
the full committee. Unfortunately, the Minority was not invited
to sign this letter.
July 12, 2012--``Securing Ammonium Nitrate: Using Lessons
Learned in Afghanistan to Protect the Homeland from IED's.''
The purpose of the hearing was to receive testimony on the
collaborative efforts of U.S. agencies to detect and prevent
the smuggling of calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN) fertilizer and
other explosive precursors from Pakistan into Afghanistan. The
hearing addressed defense-related intelligence, information
sharing, and counter IED efforts performed overseas through
interagency, multi-lateral coordination.
July 26, 2011--``Preventing Nuclear Terrorism: Does DHS
have an Effective and Efficient Nuclear Detection Strategy?''
The hearing focused on the DHS Domestic Nuclear Detection
Office's (DNDO) strategy, the development of a global nuclear
detection architecture (GNDA), and what responsibilities,
activities, and anticipated funding needs the DNDO will have
under such a plan, and the Subcommittee's ability to conduct
meaningful oversight over the DNDO.
Bennie G. Thompson.