Senate Report 113-85 - DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE APPROPRIATIONS BILL, 2014

[Senate Report 113-85]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

Calendar No. 163
113th Congress Report
SENATE
1st Session 113-85

======================================================================

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE APPROPRIATIONS BILL, 2014

_______

August 1, 2013.--Ordered to be printed

_______

Mr. Durbin, from the Committee on Appropriations,
submitted the following

REPORT

[To accompany S. 1429]

The Committee on Appropriations reports the bill (S. 1429)
making appropriations for the Department of Defense for the
fiscal year ending September 30, 2014, and for other purposes,
reports favorably thereon and recommends that the bill do pass.

New obligational authority

Total of bill as reported to the Senate.................$587,462,934,000
Amount of 2013 appropriations\1\........................ 596,970,970,000
Amount of 2014 budget estimate.......................... 589,636,069,000
Bill as recommended to Senate compared to--
2013 appropriations................................. -9,508,036,000
2014 budget estimate................................ -2,173,135,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public
Law 112-25.

CONTENTS

----------
Background:
Page
Purpose of the Bill.......................................... 5
Hearings..................................................... 5
Summary of the Bill.......................................... 5
Definition of Program, Project and Activity.................. 6
Committee Initiatives........................................ 7
Title I:
Military Personnel:
Military Personnel Overview.............................. 17
Military Personnel, Army................................. 18
Military Personnel, Navy................................. 20
Military Personnel, Marine Corps......................... 22
Military Personnel, Air Force............................ 24
Reserve Personnel, Army.................................. 26
Reserve Personnel, Navy.................................. 27
Reserve Personnel, Marine Corps.......................... 28
Reserve Personnel, Air Force............................. 29
National Guard Personnel, Army........................... 30
National Guard Personnel, Air Force...................... 31
Title II:
Operation and Maintenance:
Operation and Maintenance, Army.......................... 37
Operation and Maintenance, Navy.......................... 41
Operation and Maintenance, Marine Corps.................. 44
Operation and Maintenance, Air Force..................... 46
Operation and Maintenance, Defense-Wide.................. 49
Operation and Maintenance, Army Reserve.................. 53
Operation and Maintenance, Navy Reserve.................. 54
Operation and Maintenance, Marine Corps Reserve.......... 55
Operation and Maintenance, Air Force Reserve............. 56
Operation and Maintenance, Army National Guard........... 57
Operation and Maintenance, Air National Guard............ 59
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces............... 60
Environmental Restoration, Army.......................... 60
Environmental Restoration, Navy.......................... 60
Environmental Restoration, Air Force..................... 60
Environmental Restoration, Defense-Wide.................. 60
Environmental Restoration, Formerly Used Defense Sites... 61
Overseas Humanitarian, Disaster, and Civic Aid........... 61
Cooperative Threat Reduction Account..................... 61
Department of Defense Acquisition Workforce Development
Fund................................................... 62
Title III:
Procurement:
Aircraft Procurement, Army............................... 66
Missile Procurement, Army................................ 70
Procurement of Weapons and Tracked Combat Vehicles, Army. 71
Procurement of Ammunition, Army.......................... 76
Other Procurement, Army.................................. 79
Aircraft Procurement, Navy............................... 88
Weapons Procurement, Navy................................ 93
Procurement of Ammunition, Navy and Marine Corps......... 96
Shipbuilding and Conversion, Navy........................ 99
Other Procurement, Navy.................................. 102
Procurement, Marine Corps................................ 111
Aircraft Procurement, Air Force.......................... 115
Missile Procurement, Air Force........................... 121
Procurement of Ammunition, Air Force..................... 126
Other Procurement, Air Force............................. 128
Procurement, Defense-Wide................................ 132
Defense Production Act Purchases......................... 137
National Guard and Reserve Equipment..................... 140
Title IV:
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation:
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Army......... 146
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy......... 154
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air Force.... 163
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-Wide. 172
Operational Test and Evaluation, Defense................. 181
Title V:
Revolving and Management Funds:
Defense Working Capital Funds............................ 183
National Defense Sealift Fund............................ 184
Title VI:
Other Department of Defense Programs:
Defense Health Program................................... 185
Chemical Agents and Munitions Destruction, Defense....... 195
Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense... 197
Joint Urgent Operational Needs Fund...................... 197
Office of the Inspector General.......................... 198
Title VII:
Related Agencies:
Central Intelligence Agency Retirement and Disability
System
Fund................................................... 199
Intelligence Community Management Account................ 199
Title VIII: General Provisions................................... 200
Title IX: Overseas Deployments and Other Programs:
Department of Defense--Military.............................. 206
Military Personnel:
Military Personnel, Army................................. 207
Military Personnel, Navy................................. 208
Military Personnel, Marine Corps......................... 209
Military Personnel, Air Force............................ 210
Reserve Personnel, Army.................................. 211
Reserve Personnel, Navy.................................. 212
Reserve Personnel, Marine Corps.......................... 212
Reserve Personnel, Air Force............................. 213
National Guard Personnel, Army........................... 213
National Guard Personnel, Air Force...................... 214
Operation and Maintenance:
Operation and Maintenance, Army.......................... 214
Operation and Maintenance, Navy.......................... 216
Operation and Maintenance, Marine Corps.................. 217
Operation and Maintenance, Air Force..................... 217
Operation and Maintenance, Defense-Wide.................. 218
Operation and Maintenance, Army Reserve.................. 219
Operation and Maintenance, Navy Reserve.................. 219
Operation and Maintenance, Marine Corps Reserve.......... 220
Operation and Maintenance, Air Force Reserve............. 220
Operation and Maintenance, Army National Guard........... 220
Operation and Maintenance, Air National Guard............ 221
Afghanistan Infrastucture Fund........................... 221
Afghanistan Security Forces Fund......................... 222
Procurement:
Aircraft Procurement, Army............................... 224
Missile Procurement, Army................................ 224
Procurement of Ammunition, Army.......................... 225
Other Procurement, Army.................................. 225
Aircraft Procurement, Navy............................... 226
Weapons Procurement, Navy................................ 227
Procurement of Ammunition, Navy and Marine Corps......... 227
Other Procurement, Navy.................................. 228
Procurement, Marine Corps................................ 228
Aircraft Procurement, Air Force.......................... 229
Missile Procurement, Air Force........................... 229
Procurement of Ammunition, Air Force..................... 230
Other Procurement, Air Force............................. 230
Procurement, Defense-Wide................................ 230
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation:
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Army......... 231
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy......... 231
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air Force.... 232
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-Wide. 232
Revolving and Management Funds: Defense Working Capital Funds 232
Other Department of Defense Programs:
Defense Health Program................................... 233
Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense... 233
Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Fund............ 234
Joint Urgent Operational Needs Fund...................... 235
Office of the Inspector General.......................... 235
General Provisions--This Title........................... 235
Compliance With Paragraph 7, Rule XVI of the Standing Rules of
the
Senate......................................................... 237
Compliance With Paragraph 7(c), Rule XXVI of the Standing Rules
of the Senate.................................................. 239
Compliance With Paragraph 12, Rule XXVI of the Standing Rules of
the Senate..................................................... 239
Budgetary Impact of Bill......................................... 240
Comparative Statement of Budget Authority........................ 241

BACKGROUND

Purpose of the Bill

This bill makes appropriations for the military functions
of the Department of Defense for the period October 1, 2013,
through September 30, 2014. Functional areas include the pay,
allowances, and support of military personnel, operation and
maintenance of the forces, procurement of equipment and
systems, and research, development, test and evaluation.
Appropriations for foreign military assistance, military
construction, family housing, nuclear weapons programs, and
civil defense are provided in other bills.

Hearings

The Appropriations Subcommittee on Defense began hearings
on April 17, 2013, and concluded them on July 17, 2013, after
nine separate sessions. The subcommittee heard testimony from
representatives of the Department of Defense, other Federal
agencies, and representatives of organizations.

Summary of the Bill

The Committee recommendation of $587,462,934,000 includes
funding to develop, maintain, and equip the military forces of
the United States in nonemergency appropriations.
The fiscal year 2014 budget request for activities funded
in the Department of Defense appropriations bill totals
$589,636,069,000 in new budget authority, including
$80,558,154,000 in contingency funding and $514,000,000 in
mandatory spending.
In fiscal year 2013, the Congress appropriated
$596,970,970,000 for activities funded in this bill. This
amount includes $509,927,697,000 in nonemergency
appropriations, $86,954,838,000 in overseas contingency
operations appropriations and $88,335,000 in disaster relief
appropriations.
The Committee recommendation in this bill is $9,508,036,000
below the amount provided in fiscal year 2013 and
$2,173,135,000 below the amount requested for fiscal year 2014.
The Committee recommends that $227,033,000 requested for Coast
Guard activities be appropriated directly to the Department of
Homeland Security.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS

The following table displays the recommendations for each
title:

[In thousands of dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fiscal year 2013 Fiscal year 2014 Committee
enacted estimate recommendation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Title I--Military personnel............................... 127,364,770 130,399,881 129,133,927
Title II--Operation and maintenance....................... 173,265,602 175,097,941 178,573,167
Title III--Procurement.................................... 100,218,282 98,153,503 98,368,753
Title IV--Research, development, test and evaluation...... 69,836,195 67,520,236 65,806,815
Title V--Revolving and management funds................... 2,211,102 2,276,527 2,304,205
Title VI--Other Department of Defense programs............ 35,479,789 35,461,127 36,080,718
Title VII--Related agencies............................... 1,047,716 1,082,271 1,082,671
Title VIII--General provisions (net)...................... 504,341 -913,571 -1,510,465
Title IV--Overseas Contingency Operations................. 86,954,838 80,558,154 77,623,143
Disaster Relief Appropriations, 2013...................... 88,335 ................ ................
-----------------------------------------------------
Net grand total..................................... 596,970,970 589,636,069 587,462,934
=====================================================
Total discretionary\1\.............................. 604,696,635 596,584,069 594,410,934
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\Includes scorekeeping adjustments.

The Committee has displayed recommended adjustments in
tables presented under each appropriation account.
These adjustments reflect the following Committee actions:
elimination of funds requested for programs which are lower
priority, duplicative, or not supported by firm requirements in
out-year development or procurement appropriations; deletion of
excess funds based on program delays or slow execution;
addition of funds to reflect congressional priorities and to
rectify shortfalls in the budget estimate; and implementation
of recommendations in S. 1197, the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014, as reported.
The Committee directs that the funding increases outlined
in these tables shall be provided only for the specific
purposes indicated in the table.

CLASSIFIED PROGRAM ADJUSTMENTS

The Committee recommends adjustments to certain classified
programs, as explained in the classified annex to the
Committee's report.

Definition of Program, Project and Activity

In fiscal year 2014, for purposes of the Balanced Budget
and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 (Public Law 99-177),
as amended, the term ``program, project and activity'' for
appropriations contained in this act shall be defined as the
most specific level of budget items identified in the
Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2014 and the P-1 and
R-1 budget justification documents as subsequently modified by
congressional action. The following exception to the above
definition shall apply: for the military personnel and
operation and maintenance accounts the term ``program, project
and activity'' is defined as the appropriations accounts
contained in the Department of Defense Appropriations Act.
In carrying out any Presidential sequestration, the
Department of Defense and agencies shall conform to the
definition for ``program, project and activity'' set forth
above.

Committee Initiatives

The Committee has included funding above the President's
budget request for several programmatic initiatives which the
Committee believes are of inherent value for national defense.
In several cases, funds are restored for programs which were
included in previous Department of Defense budget requests, and
several are for programs that the Committee believes are
necessary to improve defense even though they have not been
included under the request formulated by the Department of
Defense. For instance, the Committee provides additional
research funding in the following areas: alternative energy,
unexploded ordnance and landmine detection, nanotechnology,
advanced metals and materials, military burn treatment, and
traumatic brain injury and psychological health. The Committee
believes additional research funding is warranted in these and
other areas to ensure that the Department of Defense continues
to pursue technological advances that are critical to our
national defense. The Committee has also provided funding for
programs that are chronically underfunded, such as range
conservation. The Committee directs that funds for these
initiatives are to be competitively awarded or provided to
programs that have received competitive awards in the past.

F-35 JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER

On June 19, 2013, the Committee held its first dedicated
hearing on the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter [JSF]. While the
program is making progress in the development and test of the
aircraft, significant challenges remain. Therefore, the
Committee recommends the following adjustments to the fiscal
year 2014 budget request to ensure that the program stays
focused on reducing risk in the development and test phase,
remains on a positive trend of reducing concurrency costs, and
is affordable for both U.S. and allied purchase now and into
the future.
The Department's fiscal year 2014 request maintains
production of F-35 aircraft at 29 aircraft, consistent with
2013 levels, but increases advance procurement of 2015 aircraft
by 13, to a total of 42 aircraft. This would be a 45-percent
increase in production when the F-35 program continues to
experience considerable challenges with software development,
system reliability, and maintenance system development. Given
the scope of issues that must be addressed in this phase of the
program, a large increase in the production of aircraft is not
yet warranted. However, the Committee acknowledges the positive
trends in the program and understands the need to increase
production rates to bring down unit cost. Therefore, the
Committee recommends an increase in fiscal year 2014 advance
procurement of seven aircraft for the Air Force variant for a
total of 26 aircraft, a reduction in advance procurement of
four aircraft and $48,000,000. In addition, the Committee does
not recommend increased advance procurement for the Navy F-35
variant since it remains behind the other two variants in
testing, a reduction of two aircraft and $31,500,000. This
recommendation provides a 24-percent increase in F-35
production from fiscal year 2014 to fiscal year 2015, or an
increase of seven aircraft.
The budget request includes $32,000,000 to start the
follow-on development program. The Committee believes it is too
early to start new efforts when the current development program
still has challenges and, therefore, recommends a $20,000,000
reduction. The remaining funds should be used to complete the
analysis and staffing necessary to finalize the F-35 follow-on
development capabilities development document that should be
approved by the Joint Requirements Oversight Council [JROC]
during fiscal year 2014. Furthermore, the Committee notes that
the F-35 draft schedule for follow-on Block 4 capabilities
would span over 6 years, would be concurrent with the ongoing
F-35 development efforts, and is projected to cost
$3,800,000,000. Given the current fiscal environment and the
anticipated ramp-up of F-35 production during this same time
period, the Committee believes Block 4, as currently planned,
is unaffordable. Understanding that the F-35 international
partners are interested in getting their specific weapons
integrated onto the aircraft and will fund the requisite work,
the Committee encourages the Secretary of Defense and the JROC
to place priority on integrating these weapons onto the F-35
during Block 4 follow-on development.
In addition, the Department requests $10,000,000 to assess
B61 nuclear bomb integration onto the F-35. The Committee
understands the Department is currently planning that the B61
capability will deliver as part of Block 4, but the JROC has
not approved the capability content of Block 4. Therefore, the
Committee recommends no funding for F-35 dual capable aircraft.

F-35 MANAGEMENT

The Committee supports the Department's decision to modify
the F-35 management charter and specify that the Program
Executive Officer [PEO] serves at the pleasure of the Secretary
of Defense rather than for a 2-year term. The Committee
believes the F-35 program will benefit from consistent
leadership that will ensure positive programmatic changes
become embedded in the F-35 culture.

CYBER MISSION FORCES

National Guard and Reserves in the Cyber National Mission
Forces.--With submission of the fiscal year 2014 budget
request, the Department of Defense--through U.S. Cyber Command
and the National Security Agency--formally submitted its
proposed realignment of cyber mission forces into National
Mission Teams, Combat Mission Teams, and Cyber Protection
Teams. Over the next several years, the military services will
be providing additional cyber mission forces to U.S. Cyber
Command, composed of an active duty, civilian, and contractor
workforce that has yet to be determined. The Committee notes
that National Guard and Reserve personnel possess unique skill
sets and operate under distinct authorities that could be
utilized to meet the national cyber mission force needs. Yet,
the Department of Defense has not provided the congressional
defense committees a comprehensive analysis regarding the role
that National Guard and Reserve forces could fulfill as cyber
mission forces are established, nor a cost comparison for
filling cyber mission forces with active versus Guard and
Reserve forces, or a mix thereof.
Therefore, the Committee directs the U.S. Cyber Command, in
conjunction with the Office of the Secretary of Defense, to
provide to the congressional defense committees no later than
60 days after enactment of this act, a classified and
unclassified report that includes:
--the current number and location of Reserve Component cyber
units, as well as skill sets provided by each of these
units;
--the number of individual teams, their composition by number
of personnel, and missions each of the services are
establishing for U.S. Cyber Command;
--the skill sets required to meet cyber mission team
requirements;
--a cost-benefit-analysis of meeting these requirements with
teams comprised of solely active duty personnel,
compared to teams partially or fully filled with
National Guard or Reserve personnel; and
--an analysis of cyber missions that are being considered for
the National Guard and/or Reserves.
Training of Cyber National Mission Forces.--The expansion
of cyber mission forces requires extensive training of
personnel to meet the needs identified by U.S. Cyber Command.
Each of the services provides personnel with different skill
sets and knowledge levels, and therefore generate different
training requirements. Therefore, the Committee directs the
U.S. Cyber Command, in conjunction with the Secretary of
Defense, to provide to the congressional defense committees, no
later than 90 days after enactment of this act, a classified
and unclassified report that includes:
--an identification and analysis of training requirements
necessary to meet U.S. Cyber Command cyber mission
personnel initial and full operational capability;
--a roadmap of training to be provided to active duty and
Guard and Reserve personnel to meet those requirements;
--cost estimates by service and mission team to meet training
requirements for each cyber mission team; and
--an estimated timeline to complete the training required to
reach full operational capability of the cyber mission
teams, as proposed in the fiscal year 2014 budget.
Further, the Committee notes the limitations in existing
training resources to meet cyber mission force training
requirements in the near-term. Therefore, the Committee
recommends that the military services analyze existing training
opportunities and infrastructure, taking into account existing
facilities and pre-existing synergies with the Department of
Defense and Intelligence Community when establishing their
training programs. The Committee directs U.S. Cyber Command to
provide to the congressional defense committees, no later than
90 days after enactment of this act, an analysis of U.S.
Government cyber mission force training infrastructure.
Army Cyber Forces Footprint.--Army cyber forces are
currently dispersed throughout the continental United States,
with key elements co-located with U.S. Cyber Command, and other
service cyber components, which allows for significant
synergies and operational efficiencies. The Committee
understands that the Army is currently reviewing its cyber
forces footprint. Following conversations with Army leadership,
the Committee understands that these discussions are
preliminary, and that no funds are included in the fiscal year
2014 budget request to modify or move the Army's cyber
missions. The Committee directs the Army to brief the
congressional defense committees on any proposed adjustments to
the Army's cyber footprint, to include the associated training,
infrastructure and sustainment costs.

SHIP MODERNIZATION, OPERATIONS AND SUSTAINMENT FUND

With the fiscal year 2014 budget submission, the Navy again
proposes to prematurely retire seven Ticonderoga-class guided
missile cruisers and two amphibious dock landing ships that
have a combined remaining service life of over 100 years. The
Committee notes that this proposal was rejected by the Congress
in the Fiscal Year 2013 National Defense Authorization Act and
the Fiscal Year 2013 Department of Defense Appropriations Act;
and that Congress provided significant funds to man, operate,
sustain and modernize these ships. As previously expressed in
Senate Report 112-196, the Committee is concerned with this
proposed elimination of force structure and believes it is
disconnected from the strategic shift to the Asia-Pacific,
creates future unaffordable shipbuilding requirements, and
exacerbates force structure shortfalls that negatively impact
the Department's ability to meet Combatant Command
requirements.
The Committee notes that some key assumptions that led the
Navy to propose prematurely retiring these ships have changed.
This includes the material condition of at least one ship being
superior to what the Navy assumed, as well as the scope and
cost of modernization efforts required for these platforms to
maintain their operational relevance for the balance of their
service lives. The Committee believes that further adjustments
to projected modernization efforts could be made, resulting in
cost savings while retaining valuable operational capability in
the near-term.
Therefore, the Committee again recommends denying these
proposed premature retirements and retaining this force
structure in its entirety. The Committee recommends
$2,422,400,000, to man, operate, sustain, upgrade and modernize
only CG-63, CG-64, CG-65, CG-66, CG-68, CG-69, CG-73, LSD-41
and LSD-46 in the Ship Modernization, Operations and
Sustainment Fund, as specified elsewhere in this act.
Recognizing the time required to plan and execute shipyard
availabilities and modernization periods, the Committee makes
these funds available until September 30, 2021. However, the
Committee also believes that upgrades to these ships have been
delayed for too long, and therefore directs the Secretary of
the Navy to upgrade at least one of the above listed
Ticonderoga-class cruisers starting in fiscal year 2014. The
Committee believes that this recommendation provides the fiscal
relief required by the Navy to maintain this critical force
structure and allows the Navy sufficient time to budget for
this force structure in future budget submissions.

PATRIOT MODERNIZATION

The fiscal year 2014 budget request includes $70,053,000 in
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Army and
$256,438,000 in Missile Procurement, Army for modernization of
the Patriot air missile defense system. The Committee notes and
continues its support for modernization of the aging Patriot
system; however, the Committee remains concerned with the Army
acquisition and funding strategies for this program. First, the
Committee notes that while the Army recently updated its
decades-old requirements document, the new requirements
document is so vague that it precludes a detailed understanding
of specific technologies required, development and fielding
schedules, and costs of the overall effort. The Committee
further notes that the current modernization spiral is slated
to cost close to $2,000,000,000 over the next 5 years, with an
additional $800,000,000 required thereafter. The scope and cost
of additional spirals are still to be determined, but the
Committee notes that the current spiral's costs are
significant, and that when combined with the costs of future
spirals the total modernization program would likely breach
thresholds for what ordinarily would be an Acquisition Category
I program. Therefore, the Committee is concerned that the Army
plans to sole-source most of its modernization program and
bypass full and open competition, which has repeatedly shown to
reduce costs. Finally, the Committee notes that contrary to
previously stated intentions from Army leaders, the Army does
not have a funded plan to harvest developed technologies from
programs previously terminated by the Army for use in the
Patriot Modernization program, such as the Surface Launched
Advanced Medium Range Air to Air Missile [SLAMRAAM], the Joint
Land Attack Cruise Missile Defense Elevated Netted Sensor
System [JLENS] and the Medium Extended Air Defense System
[MEADS], which were terminated after a combined investment of
approximately $6,000,000,000. Therefore, the Committee does not
recommend full support for the Army's request. However,
recognizing the urgent need to address current capability gaps,
the Committee recommends $231,916,000 for Patriot
modernization, including $202,716,000 in Missile Procurement,
Army for the procurement of 22 radar digital processors, an
increase of 17 units over 2013. The Committee directs that not
more than 50 percent of research and development funds for
Patriot modernization may be obligated until 30 days after the
Secretary of the Army provides to the congressional defense
committees a plan that establishes an open system software
architecture for future upgrades and technology refresh to the
Patriot system in the near-term. Further, the Committee directs
the Secretary of the Army, in conjunction with the Under
Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology and Logistics,
to provide with the fiscal year 2015 budget submission an
acquisition strategy that incorporates full and open
competition for Patriot modernization in the near-, mid-, and
long-term.

EXPANSION OF GENERAL AND FLAG OFFICERS

The Committee supports a proposal from the Chairman of the
Joint Chiefs of Staff that would reduce general and flag
officers along with the accompanying support services. The U.S.
military is 30 percent smaller now than at the end of the Cold
War, yet has 20 percent more three- and four-star officers. The
Committee is concerned about the costs of general and flag
officers as the size of the military forces decreases. The
Committee reduces the appropriation for general and flag
officer operation and maintenance and military personnel
accounts by $8,000,000, and supports General Dempsey's plan to
reduce the Department by 144 general and flag officers over the
next 5 years. To better understand the costs of senior military
officers, the Committee directs the Comptroller General to
provide a report to the congressional defense committees. The
report shall include all direct and support costs associated
with general and flag officers to include basic pay, basic
allowance for subsistence, basic allowance for housing, travel
and per diem costs. The report shall also include the direct
costs of all officers and enlisted aides assigned to or
supporting general or flag officers; the travel and per diem
costs of such aides, the annual expenditures for military
housing provided to general and flag officers and executive
healthcare. The Committee addresses this issue in section 8069
of this act.

SUICIDE PREVENTION

The Committee applauds the efforts of the Department
regarding suicide prevention but shares the concern of the
Secretary of Defense that more can and should be done to
address this tragic situation. Therefore, the Committee adds
$10,000,000 for the Office of Suicide Prevention and encourages
the Department to consider funding community-based initiatives
to include efforts that will assist Reserve Component Forces
and their families after the transitional healthcare period has
ended, as authorized by section 706 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013.

SEXUAL ASSAULT

The Committee remains extremely concerned with the level of
sexual assault in the military. The most recent report from the
Department found cases of reported sexual assaults increased 6
percent in 2012. Additionally, multiple reports have surfaced
since the beginning of the year of military officials in roles
designated to prevent and respond to sexual assault committing
these very offenses themselves. This is simply unacceptable.
The Committee supports the Department initiative to rescreen
and retrain recruiters and sexual assault prevention officers
but believes more needs to be done to create a culture
throughout the military in which sexual assault is not
tolerated.
The Committee also believes that victims of sexual assault
should not be subjected to further alienation during the
investigation and prosecution of their case. In January 2013,
the Air Force began a Special Victims' Counsel pilot program
that provides victims with a trained military lawyer to provide
legal assistance and support as a case makes its way through
the often arduous criminal justice process. The Committee
commends the Air Force on this program and sees it as a
positive step in giving victims the voice and support they
deserve. Therefore, the Committee recommends $25,000,000 for
the Department to implement the Special Victims' Counsel
program across all the services, consistent with the
recommendation in S. 1197, the National Defense Authorization
Act for Fiscal Year 2014, as reported.

OPERATIONAL RESERVE

The Committee recognizes the capability and commitment to
deploy shown by the Guard and Reserve components over the past
12 years of war and applauds their transition from a strategic
to an operational reserve. As the Department continues to face
budgetary constraints and force structure reductions, the
Committee believes the value of the Guard and Reserve must be
taken into account when determining the appropriate mix between
the Active and Reserve components. The Committee encourages the
Department to capitalize on the investments made in the Guard
and Reserve and appropriately plan and budget for the
utilization of the operational reserve through U.S. Code title
10, section 12304b Selected Reserve: order to active duty for
preplanned missions in support of combatant commands.

COMMISSION ON MILITARY SERVICE ACADEMY SUPERINTENDENTS

The Committee acknowledges that the military is undergoing
a period of significant change. It is facing the end of two
wars, the eligibility of women to serve in combat roles, and
the repeal of Don't Ask Don't Tell. The military is also facing
significant obstacles presented by high rates of suicide and
sexual assaults. The Superintendents at the Military Service
Academies play an important role in training future military
leaders who will be critical to addressing these and other
challenges. The Committee believes that identifying criteria
for Service Academy Superintendent selection and evaluation
should be a priority within the Department of Defense.
The Committee includes a provision that would create a
Commission to conduct a comprehensive analysis on the role of a
modern military Service Academy Superintendent, including the
criteria for selecting and evaluating the performance of a
Superintendent. The Commission would be temporary and advisory.
The Commission shall be made up of seven members appointed
by the Secretary of Defense. In carrying out its duties, the
Commission shall examine:
What is the role of a Superintendent?
What are the criteria for selecting a Superintendent?
What are the criteria for evaluating the performance of a
Superintendent?
What is necessary to ensure that the military can cultivate
effective Superintendents?
What role does diversity play in the selection of a
Superintendent?
What is the ability of Superintendents to adapt and respond
to the changes in the military?
To what extent is the nature of the work of a
Superintendent changing, and what skills are needed to adapt to
an evolving leadership role?
The Commission is required to produce a report not later
than 6 months after the enactment of this act and shall be
terminated 90 days after the issuance of this report.

ENGAGEMENT ON ARCTIC ISSUES

The Committee notes that the physical changes in the Arctic
are unprecedented in both their rate and scope of change. In
addition to the economic and social concerns, numerous studies,
including the 2010 Quadrennial Defense Review and the U.S. Navy
Arctic Roadmap, have documented the significant impact that a
rapidly changing Arctic has on National Security, to include an
increasing number of vessels expected to be operating in the
Arctic Ocean in the summer and fall months.
The Arctic Council has grown significantly in recent years
with increased influence, visibility, and membership. As of May
2013, China, Japan, Singapore, India, The Republic of Korea and
Italy have been granted observer status. In 2015, the U.S. will
assume its 2-year Chair of the Arctic Council, succeeding
Canada in this role. In view of the increasing significance and
importance of the Arctic Council, and the United States'
upcoming leadership in this body, the Committee urges the
Secretary of Defense to continue to examine ways the Department
can support engagement on Arctic issues, including funding for
better Arctic Domain Awareness, mapping the U.S. Arctic waters,
and enhanced observations and prediction of Arctic weather,
ocean, and ice conditions.

NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY REPORTS

The Committee directs the National Security Agency [NSA] to
provide to the congressional intelligence committees, and the
Senate Committee on the Judiciary, and the House Committee on
the Judiciary, no later than 90 days after enactment of this
act:
--A report, unclassified to the greatest extent possible,
setting forth:
--For the last 5 years, on an annual basis, the number of
records acquired by NSA as part of the bulk
telephone metadata program authorized by the
Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, pursuant
to section 215 of the USA PATRIOT Act, and the
number of such records that have been reviewed by
NSA personnel in response to a query of such
records;
--To the extent possible, an estimate of the number of
records of United States persons that have been
acquired by NSA as part of the bulk telephone
metadata program and the number of such records
that have been reviewed by NSA personnel in
response to a query.
--A report, unclassified to the greatest extent possible, and
with a classified annex if necessary, describing all
NSA bulk collection activities, including when such
activities began, the cost of such activities, what
types of records have been collected in the past, what
types of records are currently being collected, and any
plans for future bulk collection.
--A report, unclassified to the greatest extent possible, and
with a classified annex if necessary, including a list
of terrorist activities that were disrupted, in whole
or in part, with the aid of information obtained
through NSA's telephone metadata program and whether
this information could have been promptly obtained by
other means.

PRESERVATION OF MILITARY HISTORY

The Committee recognizes the importance of preserving
military history, especially that which is related to U.S.
campaigns on foreign soil. Military history and education
facilities are integral to the preservation of the national
history of the United States and are a direct reminder of the
service and sacrifices made by members of the military
services, the Coast Guard, Merchant Marines, and their
families. The Committee encourages the Secretary of Defense and
the Secretaries and Chiefs of each military Department to
examine these national assets to ensure the Nation's continued
commitment to the preservation of military history.

TITLE I

MILITARY PERSONNEL

Funds appropriated under this title provide the resources
required for basic pay, retired pay accrual, employers'
contribution for Social Security taxes, basic allowance for
subsistence, basic allowance for housing, special and incentive
pays, permanent change of station travel, and other personnel
costs for uniformed members of the Armed Forces.
The President's fiscal year 2014 budget requests a total of
$130,399,881,000 for military personnel appropriations. This
request funds an Active component end strength of 1,361,400 and
a Reserve component end strength of 833,700.

SUMMARY OF COMMITTEE ACTION

The Committee recommends military personnel appropriations
totaling $129,133,927,000 for fiscal year 2014. This is
$1,265,954,000 below the budget estimate.
Committee recommended military personnel appropriations for
fiscal year 2014 are summarized below:

SUMMARY OF MILITARY PERSONNEL APPROPRIATIONS
[In thousands of dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Change from
Account 2014 budget Committee budget
estimate recommendation estimate
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Military Personnel:
Military Personnel, Army.................................... 41,037,790 40,796,005 -241,785
Military Personnel, Navy.................................... 27,824,444 27,606,615 -217,829
Military Personnel, Marine Corps............................ 12,905,216 12,720,114 -185,102
Military Personnel, Air Force............................... 28,519,877 28,252,060 -267,817
Reserve Personnel:
Reserve Personnel, Army..................................... 4,565,261 4,430,784 -134,477
Reserve Personnel, Navy..................................... 1,891,936 1,846,795 -45,141
Reserve Personnel, Marine Corps............................. 677,499 657,841 -19,658
Reserve Personnel, Air Force................................ 1,758,629 1,719,497 -39,132
National Guard Personnel:
National Guard Personnel, Army.............................. 8,041,268 7,959,072 -82,196
National Guard Personnel, Air Force......................... 3,177,961 3,145,144 -32,817
-----------------------------------------------
Total..................................................... 130,399,881 129,133,927 -1,265,954
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Committee recommended end strengths for fiscal year 2014
are summarized below:

RECOMMENDED END STRENGTH
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2013 2014 budget Committee Change from
Item authorization estimate recommendation budget estimate
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Active:
Army................................ 552,100 520,000 520,000 ................
Navy................................ 322,700 323,600 323,600 ................
Marine Corps........................ 197,300 190,200 190,200 ................
Air Force........................... 329,460 327,600 327,600 ................
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal.......................... 1,401,560 1,361,400 1,361,400 ................
=======================================================================
Selected Reserve:
Army Reserve........................ 205,000 205,000 205,000 ................
Navy Reserve........................ 62,500 59,100 59,100 ................
Marine Corps Reserve................ 39,600 39,600 39,600 ................
Air Force Reserve................... 70,880 70,400 70,400 ................
Army National Guard................. 358,200 354,200 354,200 ................
Air National Guard.................. 105,700 105,400 105,400 ................
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal.......................... 841,880 833,700 833,700 ................
=======================================================================
TOTAL............................. 2,243,440 2,195,100 2,195,100 ................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Committee recommended end strengths for full-time support
of the Reserve and Guard for fiscal year 2014 are summarized
below:

RECOMMENDED ACTIVE GUARD AND RESERVE END STRENGTH
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2013 2014 budget Committee Change from
Item authorization estimate recommendation budget estimate
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Active Guard and Reserve:
Army Reserve........................ 16,277 16,261 16,261 ................
Navy Reserve........................ 10,114 10,159 10,159 ................
Marine Corps Reserve................ 2,261 2,261 2,261 ................
Air Force Reserve................... 2,888 2,911 2,911 ................
Army National Guard................. 32,060 32,060 32,060 ................
Air National Guard.................. 14,765 14,734 14,734 ................
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL............................. 78,365 78,386 78,386 ................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Military Personnel Overview

Reserve Component Budget Reporting.--The Committee
continues its requirement for the Department to provide a semi-
annual detailed report to the congressional defense committees
showing transfers between subactivities within the military
personnel appropriation. Reports shall be submitted not later
than 30 days following the end of the second quarter and 30
days following the end of the fiscal year.
Permanent Change of Station [PCS].--The Committee notes
that the services expect to underexecute their PCS budgets by
more than $124,000,000 in fiscal year 2013 due to lower average
costs per move and fewer overall moves than budgeted. This
underexecution comes on top of the $146,792,500 reduction to
PCS budgets in the Consolidated and Further Continuing
Appropriations Act, 2013. While the Committee awaits the report
required by that bill from the Under Secretary of Defense
(Personnel and Readiness) on potential efficiencies in the PCS
program, it believes savings can be realized in the fiscal year
2014 PCS program and recommends a total reduction of
$294,265,000 across the services' operational and rotational
base budgets. The Committee supports the services' increased
time on station goals and encourages them to continue working
to meet these established goals.
Unobligated Balances.--A Government Accountability Office
analysis of past year obligation rates shows that the services
continue to underexecute their military personnel accounts. Due
to excess unobligated balances, the Committee recommends a
total reduction of $491,239,000 from the fiscal year 2014
military personnel accounts.
Enlistment of DACA Recipients.--The Committee is concerned
that immigrants who have received Deferred Action for Childhood
Arrivals [DACA] are not authorized to enlist in the Armed
Forces, which has a negative impact on military recruitment and
readiness. Under 10 U.S.C. section 504, Service Secretaries can
authorize the enlistment of non-citizens when it is ``vital to
the national interest.'' Enlisting DACA recipients would allow
the Armed Forces to access an expanded pool of recruits. To be
eligible for DACA, an individual must have entered the United
States as a child; graduated from secondary school, obtained a
general equivalency degree, or be currently enrolled in school;
and not have a serious criminal record. DACA recipients are, by
definition, educated and integrated into American society, and
many have shown an interest in and aptitude for military
service through participation in Junior Reserve Officers'
Training Corps [JROTC]. The requirements to qualify for DACA
are similar to those for legislation known as the DREAM
[Development Relief and Education of Alien Minors] Act. In
2011, Dr. Clifford Stanley, then-Undersecretary of Defense for
Personnel and Readiness, testified in support of the DREAM Act,
noting it would allow the Department of Defense ``to expand the
market of high-quality youth to the advantage of military
recruitment and readiness.'' In 2010, then-Secretary of Defense
Robert Gates said the DREAM Act ``will result in improved
recruitment results and attendant gains in unit manning and
military performance.'' Accordingly, the Committee directs the
Secretary of Defense, no later than 90 days after enactment of
this act, to provide an unclassified report to the
congressional defense committees on the feasibility and impact
on military recruitment and readiness of authorizing the
enlistment of DACA recipients.
Accession of Officers With Auditory Impairments.--The
Committee directs the Department of the Air Force to study the
feasibility and advisability of permitting individuals with
auditory impairments, including deafness, to access as officers
in the Armed Forces.

Military Personnel, Army

Appropriations, 2013\1\................................. $40,146,213,000
Budget estimate, 2014................................... 41,037,790,000
Committee recommendation................................ 40,796,005,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public
Law 112-25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of
$40,796,005,000. This is $241,785,000 below the budget
estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this
appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

ACTIVITY 1: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF OFFICERS
BASIC PAY 6,751,445 6,751,445 ..............
RETIRED PAY ACCRUAL 2,182,873 2,182,873 ..............
BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR HOUSING 2,110,476 2,110,476 ..............
BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR SUBSISTENCE 281,099 281,099 ..............
INCENTIVE PAYS 89,669 89,669 ..............
SPECIAL PAYS 374,353 374,353 ..............
ALLOWANCES 225,840 225,840 ..............
SEPARATION PAY 107,216 107,216 ..............
SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 513,274 513,274 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 1 12,636,245 12,636,245 ..............

ACTIVITY 2: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL
BASIC PAY 12,761,868 12,714,118 -47,750
RETIRED PAY ACCRUAL 4,130,751 4,130,751 ..............
BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR HOUSING 4,653,429 4,653,429 ..............
INCENTIVE PAYS 95,637 95,637 ..............
SPECIAL PAYS 507,912 469,912 -38,000
ALLOWANCES 915,101 915,101 ..............
SEPARATION PAY 287,133 287,133 ..............
SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 976,224 976,224 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 2 24,328,055 24,242,305 -85,750

ACTIVITY 3: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF CADETS
ACADEMY CADETS 77,959 77,959 ..............

ACTIVITY 4: SUBSISTENCE OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL
BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR SUBSISTENCE 1,252,752 1,252,752 ..............
SUBSISTENCE-IN-KIND 707,647 707,647 ..............
FAMILY SUBSISTENCE SUPPLEMENTAL ALLOWANCE 2,121 2,121 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 4 1,962,520 1,962,520 ..............

ACTIVITY 5: PERMANENT CHANGE OF STATION
ACCESSION TRAVEL 169,697 169,697 ..............
TRAINING TRAVEL 126,908 126,908 ..............
OPERATIONAL TRAVEL 524,098 471,688 -52,410
ROTATIONAL TRAVEL 693,315 623,983 -69,332
SEPARATION TRAVEL 222,146 222,146 ..............
TRAVEL OF ORGANIZED UNITS 9,887 9,887 ..............
NON-TEMPORARY STORAGE 10,160 10,160 ..............
TEMPORARY LODGING EXPENSE 40,238 40,238 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 5 1,796,449 1,674,707 -121,742

ACTIVITY 6: OTHER MILITARY PERSONNEL COSTS
APPREHENSION OF MILITARY DESERTERS 960 960 ..............
INTEREST ON UNIFORMED SERVICES SAVINGS 725 725 ..............
DEATH GRATUITIES 61,900 61,900 ..............
UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS 282,863 282,863 ..............
EDUCATION BENEFITS 636 636 ..............
ADOPTION EXPENSES 4,326 4,326 ..............
RESERVE INCOME REPLACEMENT PROGRAM 326 326 ..............
SGLI EXTRA HAZARD PAYMENTS 117,559 117,559 ..............
RESERVE OFFICERS TRAINING CORPS (ROTC) 42,407 42,407 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 6 511,702 511,702 ..............

LESS REIMBURSABLES -275,140 -275,140 ..............

UNDISTRIBUTED ADJUSTMENT .............. -34,293 -34,293
=================================================
TOTAL, ACTIVE FORCES, ARMY 41,037,790 40,796,005 -241,785
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, MILITARY PERSONNEL, ARMY 41,037,790 40,796,005 -241,785
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by
the Committee:

[In thousands of dollars]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2014 budget Committee Change from
Line Item request recommendation budget request
------------------------------------------------------------------------
BA 2: PAY AND
ALLOWANCES OF
ENLISTED
PERSONNEL

60 Basic Pay 12,761,868 12,714,118 -47,750
Improving .............. .............. -47,750
funds
management:
Lower than
budgeted
strength
levels
90 Special Pays 507,912 469,912 -38,000
Improving .............. .............. -38,000
funds
management:
Enlistment
bonuses
excess to
requirement

BA 5: PERMANENT
CHANGE OF
STATION TRAVEL

135 Operational 524,098 471,688 -52,410
Travel
Improving .............. .............. -52,410
funds
management:
PCS
efficiency
140 Rotational Travel 693,315 623,983 -69,332
Improving .............. .............. -69,332
funds
management:
PCS
efficiency

UNDISTRIBUTED
ADJUSTMENT
Improving .............. -34,293 -34,293
funds
management:
Unobligated
balances
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Military Personnel, Navy

Appropriations, 2013\1\................................. $26,866,844,000
Budget estimate, 2014................................... 27,824,444,000
Committee recommendation................................ 27,606,615,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public
Law 112-25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of
$27,606,615,000. This is $217,829,000 below the budget
estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this
appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

ACTIVITY 1: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF OFFICERS
BASIC PAY 3,934,736 3,934,736 ..............
RETIRED PAY ACCRUAL 1,273,217 1,273,217 ..............
BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR HOUSING 1,413,796 1,413,796 ..............
BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR SUBSISTENCE 160,319 160,319 ..............
INCENTIVE PAYS 131,293 131,293 ..............
SPECIAL PAYS 432,843 432,843 ..............
ALLOWANCES 127,172 127,172 ..............
SEPARATION PAY 39,244 39,244 ..............
SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 299,218 299,218 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 1 7,811,838 7,811,838 ..............

ACTIVITY 2: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL
BASIC PAY 8,610,541 8,610,541 ..............
RETIRED PAY ACCRUAL 2,789,555 2,789,555 ..............
BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR HOUSING 3,977,998 3,929,998 -48,000
INCENTIVE PAYS 103,672 103,672 ..............
SPECIAL PAYS 877,215 817,215 -60,000
ALLOWANCES 590,803 590,803 ..............
SEPARATION PAY 255,663 255,663 ..............
SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 658,707 658,707 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 2 17,864,154 17,756,154 -108,000

ACTIVITY 3: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF MIDSHIPMEN
MIDSHIPMEN 77,592 77,592 ..............

ACTIVITY 4: SUBSISTENCE OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL
BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR SUBSISTENCE 764,626 764,626 ..............
SUBSISTENCE-IN-KIND 439,545 439,545 ..............
FAMILY SUBSISTENCE SUPPLEMENTAL ALLOWANCE 12 12 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 4 1,204,183 1,204,183 ..............

ACTIVITY 5: PERMANENT CHANGE OF STATION
ACCESSION TRAVEL 102,042 102,042 ..............
TRAINING TRAVEL 96,869 96,869 ..............
OPERATIONAL TRAVEL 272,379 245,141 -27,238
ROTATIONAL TRAVEL 301,392 271,253 -30,139
SEPARATION TRAVEL 133,977 133,977 ..............
TRAVEL OF ORGANIZED UNITS 36,790 36,790 ..............
NON-TEMPORARY STORAGE 1,212 1,212 ..............
TEMPORARY LODGING EXPENSE 8,545 8,545 ..............
OTHER 3,514 3,514 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 5 956,720 899,343 -57,377

ACTIVITY 6: OTHER MILITARY PERSONNEL COSTS
APPREHENSION OF MILITARY DESERTERS 199 199 ..............
INTEREST ON UNIFORMED SERVICES SAVINGS 1,660 1,660 ..............
DEATH GRATUITIES 17,400 17,400 ..............
UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS 124,716 116,716 -8,000
EDUCATION BENEFITS 18,809 18,809 ..............
ADOPTION EXPENSES 210 210 ..............
TRANSPORTATION SUBSIDY 5,750 5,750 ..............
PARTIAL DISLOCATION ALLOWANCE 92 92 ..............
RESERVE OFFICERS TRAINING CORPS (ROTC) 21,271 21,271 ..............
JUNIOR ROTC 14,069 14,069 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 6 204,176 196,176 -8,000

LESS REIMBURSABLES -294,219 -294,219 ..............

UNDISTRIBUTED ADJUSTMENT .............. -44,452 -44,452
=================================================
TOTAL, ACTIVE FORCES, NAVY 27,824,444 27,606,615 -217,829
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, MILITARY PERSONNEL, NAVY 27,824,444 27,606,615 -217,829
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by
the Committee:

80 Basic Allowance 3,977,998 3,929,998 -48,000
For Housing
Improving .............. .............. -48,000
funds
management:
Excess to
requirement
90 Special Pays 877,215 817,215 -60,000
Improving .............. .............. -60,000
funds
management:
Reenlistment
bonuses
excess to
requirement

BA 5: PERMANENT
CHANGE OF
STATION TRAVEL

135 Operational 272,379 245,141 -27,238
Travel
Improving .............. .............. -27,238
funds
management:
PCS
efficiency
140 Rotational Travel 301,392 271,253 -30,139
Improving .............. .............. -30,139
funds
management:
PCS
efficiency

BA 6: OTHER
MILITARY
PERSONNEL COSTS

185 Unemployment 124,716 116,716 -8,000
Benefits
Improving .............. .............. -8,000
funds
management:
Excess to
requirement

UNDISTRIBUTED
ADJUSTMENT
Improving .............. -44,452 -44,452
funds
management:
Unobligated
balances
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Military Personnel, Marine Corps

Appropriations, 2013\1\................................. $12,515,011,000
Budget estimate, 2014................................... 12,905,216,000
Committee recommendation................................ 12,720,114,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public
Law 112-25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of
$12,720,114,000. This is $185,102,000 below the budget
estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this
appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

ACTIVITY 1: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF OFFICERS
BASIC PAY 1,458,728 1,459,828 +1,100
RETIRED PAY ACCRUAL 472,134 472,134 ..............
BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR HOUSING 479,739 479,739 ..............
BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR SUBSISTENCE 61,565 61,565 ..............
INCENTIVE PAYS 40,634 40,634 ..............
SPECIAL PAYS 12,746 12,746 ..............
ALLOWANCES 43,866 43,866 ..............
SEPARATION PAY 16,856 16,856 ..............
SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 110,942 110,942 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 1 2,697,210 2,698,310 +1,100

ACTIVITY 2: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL
BASIC PAY 4,746,121 4,703,321 -42,800
RETIRED PAY ACCRUAL 1,533,530 1,533,530 ..............
BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR HOUSING 1,652,636 1,652,636 ..............
INCENTIVE PAYS 9,832 9,832 ..............
SPECIAL PAYS 154,862 125,862 -29,000
ALLOWANCES 335,728 335,728 ..............
SEPARATION PAY 73,213 73,213 ..............
SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 362,126 362,126 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 2 8,868,048 8,796,248 -71,800

ACTIVITY 4: SUBSISTENCE OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL
BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR SUBSISTENCE 438,034 438,034 ..............
SUBSISTENCE-IN-KIND 296,986 296,986 ..............
FAMILY SUBSISTENCE SUPPLEMENTAL ALLOWANCE 10 10 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 4 735,030 735,030 ..............

ACTIVITY 5: PERMANENT CHANGE OF STATION
ACCESSION TRAVEL 57,933 57,933 ..............
TRAINING TRAVEL 23,061 23,061 ..............
OPERATIONAL TRAVEL 209,371 188,434 -20,937
ROTATIONAL TRAVEL 101,809 95,128 -6,681
SEPARATION TRAVEL 93,399 93,399 ..............
TRAVEL OF ORGANIZED UNITS 784 784 ..............
NON-TEMPORARY STORAGE 6,888 6,888 ..............
TEMPORARY LODGING EXPENSE 14,918 14,918 ..............
OTHER 3,312 3,312 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 5 511,475 483,857 -27,618

ACTIVITY 6: OTHER MILITARY PERSONNEL COSTS
APPREHENSION OF MILITARY DESERTERS 751 751 ..............
INTEREST ON UNIFORMED SERVICES SAVINGS 20 20 ..............
DEATH GRATUITIES 10,100 10,100 ..............
UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS 96,264 96,264 ..............
EDUCATION BENEFITS 2,375 2,375 ..............
ADOPTION EXPENSES 72 72 ..............
TRANSPORTATION SUBSIDY 3,085 3,085 ..............
PARTIAL DISLOCATION ALLOWANCE 102 102 ..............
JUNIOR ROTC 5,035 5,035 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 6 117,804 117,804 ..............

LESS REIMBURSABLES -24,351 -24,351 ..............

UNDISTRIBUTED ADJUSTMENT .............. -86,784 -86,784
=================================================
TOTAL, ACTIVE FORCES, MARINE CORPS 12,905,216 12,720,114 -185,102
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, MILITARY PERSONNEL, MARINE CORPS 12,905,216 12,720,114 -185,102
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by
the Committee:

5 Basic Pay 1,458,728 1,459,828 +1,100
Marine Corps .............. .............. +1,100
unfunded
requirement:
Marine
Security
Guard
expansion

BA 2: PAY AND
ALLOWANCES OF
ENLISTED
PERSONNEL

60 Basic Pay 4,746,121 4,703,321 -42,800
Improving .............. .............. -66,000
funds
management:
Projected
underexecuti
on
Marine Corps .............. .............. +23,200
unfunded
requirement:
Marine
Security
Guard
expansion
90 Special Pays 154,862 125,862 -29,000
Improving .............. .............. -10,000
funds
management:
Projected
underexecuti
on
Improving .............. .............. -19,000
funds
management:
Reenlistment
bonuses
excess to
requirement

BA 5: PERMANENT
CHANGE OF
STATION TRAVEL

135 Operational 209,371 188,434 -20,937
Travel
Improving .............. .............. -20,937
funds
management:
PCS
efficiency
140 Rotational Travel 101,809 95,128 -6,681
Improving .............. .............. -10,181
funds
management:
PCS
efficiency
Marine Corps .............. .............. +3,500
unfunded
requirement:
Marine
Security
Guard
expansion

UNDISTRIBUTED
ADJUSTMENT
Improving .............. -86,784 -86,784
funds
management:
Unobligated
balances
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Military Personnel, Air Force

Appropriations, 2013\1\................................. $28,015,805,000
Budget estimate, 2014................................... 28,519,877,000
Committee recommendation................................ 28,252,060,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public
Law 112-25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of
$28,252,060,000. This is $267,817,000 below the budget
estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this
appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

ACTIVITY 1: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF OFFICERS
BASIC PAY 4,896,132 4,856,132 -40,000
RETIRED PAY ACCRUAL 1,577,877 1,577,877 ..............
BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR HOUSING 1,498,352 1,498,352 ..............
BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR SUBSISTENCE 197,950 197,950 ..............
INCENTIVE PAYS 206,177 206,177 ..............
SPECIAL PAYS 303,634 303,634 ..............
ALLOWANCES 134,661 134,661 ..............
SEPARATION PAY 122,844 122,844 ..............
SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 372,960 372,960 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 1 9,310,587 9,270,587 -40,000

ACTIVITY 2: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL
BASIC PAY 8,764,297 8,759,297 -5,000
RETIRED PAY ACCRUAL 2,831,706 2,831,706 ..............
BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR HOUSING 3,610,470 3,610,470 ..............
INCENTIVE PAYS 42,599 42,599 ..............
SPECIAL PAYS 341,821 341,821 ..............
ALLOWANCES 590,403 590,403 ..............
SEPARATION PAY 176,663 176,663 ..............
SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 670,467 670,467 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 2 17,028,426 17,023,426 -5,000

ACTIVITY 3: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF CADETS
ACADEMY CADETS 69,612 69,612 ..............

ACTIVITY 4: SUBSISTENCE OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL
BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR SUBSISTENCE 977,880 977,880 ..............
SUBSISTENCE-IN-KIND 156,439 156,439 ..............
FAMILY SUBSISTENCE SUPPLEMENTAL ALLOWANCE 33 33 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 4 1,134,352 1,134,352 ..............

ACTIVITY 5: PERMANENT CHANGE OF STATION
ACCESSION TRAVEL 86,485 86,485 ..............
TRAINING TRAVEL 79,127 66,127 -13,000
OPERATIONAL TRAVEL 327,304 294,574 -32,730
ROTATIONAL TRAVEL 512,982 461,684 -51,298
SEPARATION TRAVEL 169,760 169,760 ..............
TRAVEL OF ORGANIZED UNITS 16,123 16,123 ..............
NON-TEMPORARY STORAGE 41,132 41,132 ..............
TEMPORARY LODGING EXPENSE 30,183 30,183 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 5 1,263,096 1,166,068 -97,028

ACTIVITY 6: OTHER MILITARY PERSONNEL COSTS
APPREHENSION OF MILITARY DESERTERS 124 124 ..............
INTEREST ON UNIFORMED SERVICES SAVINGS 3,440 3,440 ..............
DEATH GRATUITIES 16,500 16,500 ..............
UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS 65,562 65,562 ..............
EDUCATION BENEFITS 209 209 ..............
ADOPTION EXPENSES 628 628 ..............
TRANSPORTATION SUBSIDY 5,900 5,900 ..............
PARTIAL DISLOCATION ALLOWANCE 1,930 1,930 ..............
RESERVE OFFICERS TRAINING CORPS (ROTC) 29,849 29,849 ..............
JUNIOR ROTC 16,373 16,373 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 6 140,515 140,515 ..............

LESS REIMBURSABLES -426,711 -426,711 ..............

UNDISTRIBUTED ADJUSTMENT .............. -125,789 -125,789
=================================================
TOTAL, ACTIVE FORCES, AIR FORCE 28,519,877 28,252,060 -267,817
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, MILITARY PERSONNEL, AIR FORCE 28,519,877 28,252,060 -267,817
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by
the Committee:

5 Basic Pay 4,896,132 4,856,132 -40,000
Improving .............. .............. -40,000
funds
management
: Lower
than
budgeted
strength
levels

BA 2: PAY AND
ALLOWANCES OF
ENLISTED
PERSONNEL

60 Basic Pay 8,764,297 8,759,297 -5,000
Improving .............. .............. -5,000
funds
management
: Active
Duty for
Operationa
l Support
excess to
requiremen
t

BA 5: PERMANENT
CHANGE OF
STATION TRAVEL

130 Training Travel 79,127 66,127 -13,000
Improving .............. .............. -13,000
funds
management
: Excess
to
requiremen
t
135 Operational 327,304 294,574 -32,730
Travel
Improving .............. .............. -32,730
funds
management
: PCS
efficiency
140 Rotational 512,982 461,684 -51,298
Travel
Improving .............. .............. -51,298
funds
management
: PCS
efficiency

UNDISTRIBUTED
ADJUSTMENT
Improving .............. -125,789 -125,789
funds
management
:
Unobligate
d balances
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Reserve Personnel, Army

Appropriations, 2013\1\................................. $4,450,941,000
Budget estimate, 2014................................... 4,565,261,000
Committee recommendation................................ 4,430,784,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public
Law 112-25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of
$4,430,784,000. This is $134,477,000 below the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this
appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

ACTIVITY 1: RESERVE COMPONENT TRAINING AND SUPPORT
PAY GROUP A TRAINING (15 DAYS & DRILLS 24/48) 1,578,274 1,558,274 -20,000
PAY GROUP B TRAINING (BACKFILL FOR ACTIVE DUTY) 39,508 39,508 ..............
PAY GROUP F TRAINING (RECRUITS) 276,721 265,221 -11,500
PAY GROUP P TRAINING (PIPELINE RECRUITS) 13,225 13,225 ..............
MOBILIZATION TRAINING 7,629 7,629 ..............
SCHOOL TRAINING 206,138 206,138 ..............
SPECIAL TRAINING 261,954 261,954 ..............
ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT 2,034,705 2,034,705 ..............
EDUCATION BENEFITS 22,687 22,687 ..............
HEALTH PROFESSION SCHOLARSHIP 63,459 63,459 ..............
OTHER PROGRAMS 60,961 60,961 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 1 4,565,261 4,533,761 -31,500

UNDISTRIBUTED ADJUSTMENT .............. -102,977 -102,977
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL RESERVE PERSONNEL, ARMY 4,565,261 4,430,784 -134,477
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by
the Committee:

10 Pay Group A 1,578,274 1,558,274 -20,000
Training (15
Days & Drills
24/48)
Improving .............. .............. -20,000
funds
management
: Lower
than
budgeted
strength
levels
30 Pay Group F 276,721 265,221 -11,500
Training
(Recruits)
Improving .............. .............. -11,500
funds
management
:
Projected
underexecu
tion

UNDISTRIBUTED
ADJUSTMENT
Improving .............. -102,977 -102,977
funds
management
:
Unobligate
d balances

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Reserve Personnel, Navy

Appropriations, 2013\1\................................. $1,871,550,000
Budget estimate, 2014................................... 1,891,936,000
Committee recommendation................................ 1,846,795,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public
Law 112-25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of
$1,846,795,000. This is $45,141,000 below the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this
appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

ACTIVITY 1: RESERVE COMPONENT TRAINING AND SUPPORT
PAY GROUP A TRAINING (15 DAYS & DRILLS 24/48) 602,319 602,319 ..............
PAY GROUP B TRAINING (BACKFILL FOR ACTIVE DUTY) 9,489 9,489 ..............
PAY GROUP F TRAINING (RECRUITS) 50,501 50,501 ..............
MOBILIZATION TRAINING 8,986 8,986 ..............
SCHOOL TRAINING 55,326 50,726 -4,600
SPECIAL TRAINING 101,870 89,470 -12,400
ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT 1,006,454 1,002,454 -4,000
EDUCATION BENEFITS 104 104 ..............
HEALTH PROFESSION SCHOLARSHIP 56,887 56,887 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 1 1,891,936 1,870,936 -21,000

UNDISTRIBUTED ADJUSTMENT .............. -24,141 -24,141
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, RESERVE PERSONNEL, NAVY 1,891,936 1,846,795 -45,141
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by
the Committee:

70 School Training 55,326 50,726 -4,600
Improving .............. .............. -4,600
funds
management:
Unit
conversion
training
excess to
requirement
80 Special Training 101,870 89,470 -12,400
Improving .............. .............. -12,400
funds
management:
Active Duty
special
training
excess to
requirement
90 Administration 1,006,454 1,002,454 -4,000
and Support
Improving .............. .............. -1,000
funds
management:
Full-time
support
bonuses
excess to
requirement
Improving .............. .............. -3,000
funds
management:
Officer
retention
bonuses
excess to
requirement

UNDISTRIBUTED
ADJUSTMENT
Improving .............. -24,141 -24,141
funds
management:
Unobligated
balances
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Reserve Personnel, Marine Corps

Appropriations, 2013\1\................................. $657,382,000
Budget estimate, 2014................................... 677,499,000
Committee recommendation................................ 657,841,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public
Law 112-25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $657,841,000.
This is $19,658,000 below the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this
appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

ACTIVITY 1: RESERVE COMPONENT TRAINING AND SUPPORT
PAY GROUP A TRAINING (15 DAYS & DRILLS 24/48) 233,722 233,722 ..............
PAY GROUP B TRAINING (BACKFILL FOR ACTIVE DUTY) 30,555 30,555 ..............
PAY GROUP F TRAINING (RECRUITS) 135,088 135,088 ..............
MOBILIZATION TRAINING 3,677 3,677 ..............
SCHOOL TRAINING 19,448 19,448 ..............
SPECIAL TRAINING 18,968 18,968 ..............
ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT 227,453 217,453 -10,000
PLATOON LEADER CLASS 7,770 7,770 ..............
EDUCATION BENEFITS 818 818 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 1 677,499 667,499 -10,000

UNDISTRIBUTED ADJUSTMENT .............. -9,658 -9,658
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, RESERVE PERSONNEL, MARINE CORPS 677,499 657,841 -19,658
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by
the Committee:

Administration And Support 227,453 217,453 -10,000
Improving funds management: Full-time pay and .............. .............. -10,000
allowances projected underexecution

UNDISTRIBUTED ADJUSTMENT
Improving funds management: Unobligated balances .............. -9,658 -9,658
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Reserve Personnel, Air Force

Appropriations, 2013\1\................................. $1,720,152,000
Budget estimate, 2014................................... 1,758,629,000
Committee recommendation................................ 1,719,497,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public
Law 112-25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of
$1,719,497,000. This is $39,132,000 below the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this
appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

ACTIVITY 1: RESERVE COMPONENT TRAINING AND SUPPORT
PAY GROUP A TRAINING (15 DAYS & DRILLS 24/48) 672,181 664,181 -8,000
PAY GROUP B TRAINING (BACKFILL FOR ACTIVE DUTY) 104,818 100,068 -4,750
PAY GROUP F TRAINING (RECRUITS) 73,281 73,281 ..............
PAY GROUP P TRAINING (PIPELINE RECRUITS) 755 755 ..............
MOBILIZATION TRAINING 568 568 ..............
SCHOOL TRAINING 149,078 149,078 ..............
SPECIAL TRAINING 295,335 295,335 ..............
ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT 388,973 374,973 -14,000
EDUCATION BENEFITS 13,507 13,507 ..............
HEALTH PROFESSION SCHOLARSHIP 55,220 55,220 ..............
OTHER PROGRAMS (ADMIN & SUPPORT) 4,913 4,913 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 1 1,758,629 1,731,879 -26,750

UNDISTRIBUTED ADJUSTMENT .............. -12,382 -12,382
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, RESERVE PERSONNEL, AIR FORCE 1,758,629 1,719,497 -39,132
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by
the Committee:

10 Pay Group A 672,181 664,181 -8,000
Training (15
Days & Drills
24/48)
Improving .............. .............. -8,000
funds
management
: Lower
than
budgeted
officer
strength
20 Pay Group B 104,818 100,068 -4,750
Training
(Backfill for
Active Duty)
Improving .............. .............. -4,750
funds
management
: Lower
than
budgeted
strength
levels
90 Administration 388,973 374,973 -14,000
and Support
Improving .............. .............. -14,000
funds
management
: Reserve
incentive
program
excess to
requiremen
t

UNDISTRIBUTED
ADJUSTMENT
Improving .............. -12,382 -12,382
funds
management
:
Unobligate
d balances
------------------------------------------------------------------------

National Guard Personnel, Army

Appropriations, 2013\1\................................. $7,971,044,000
Budget estimate, 2014................................... 8,041,268,000
Committee recommendation................................ 7,959,072,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public
Law 112-25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of
$7,959,072,000. This is $82,196,000 below the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this
appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

ACTIVITY 1: RESERVE COMPONENT TRAINING AND SUPPORT
PAY GROUP A TRAINING (15 DAYS & DRILLS 24/48) 2,400,466 2,392,466 -8,000
PAY GROUP F TRAINING (RECRUITS) 557,753 540,503 -17,250
PAY GROUP P TRAINING (PIPELINE RECRUITS) 35,718 35,718 ..............
SCHOOL TRAINING 576,399 576,399 ..............
SPECIAL TRAINING 665,242 665,242 ..............
ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT 3,779,017 3,758,017 -21,000
EDUCATION BENEFITS 26,673 26,673 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 1 8,041,268 7,995,018 -46,250

UNDISTRIBUTED ADJUSTMENT .............. -35,946 -35,946
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, NATIONAL GUARD PERSONNEL, ARMY 8,041,268 7,959,072 -82,196
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by
the Committee:

10 Pay Group A 2,400,466 2,392,466 -8,000
Training (15
Days & Drills
24/48)
Improving .............. .............. -8,000
funds
management
: Lower
than
budgeted
strength
levels
30 Pay Group F 557,753 540,503 -17,250
Training
(Recruits)
Improving .............. .............. -17,250
funds
management
: Lower
than
budgeted
strength
levels
90 Administration 3,779,017 3,758,017 -21,000
and Support
Improving .............. .............. -21,000
funds
management
:
Enlistment
bonuses
initial
payments
excess to
requiremen
t

UNDISTRIBUTED
ADJUSTMENT
Improving .............. -35,946 -35,946
funds
management
:
Unobligate
d balances
------------------------------------------------------------------------

National Guard Personnel, Air Force

Appropriations, 2013\1\................................. $3,149,828,000
Budget estimate, 2014................................... 3,177,961,000
Committee recommendation................................ 3,145,144,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public
Law 112-25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of
$3,145,144,000. This is $32,817,000 below the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this
appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

ACTIVITY 1: RESERVE COMPONENT TRAINING AND SUPPORT
PAY GROUP A TRAINING (15 DAYS & DRILLS 24/48) 943,573 925,573 -18,000
PAY GROUP F TRAINING (RECRUITS) 111,468 111,468 ..............
PAY GROUP P TRAINING (PIPELINE RECRUITS) 5,006 5,006 ..............
SCHOOL TRAINING 250,327 250,327 ..............
SPECIAL TRAINING 165,588 165,588 ..............
ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT 1,684,563 1,684,563 ..............
EDUCATION BENEFITS 17,436 17,436 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 1 3,177,961 3,159,961 -18,000

UNDISTRIBUTED ADJUSTMENT .............. -14,817 -14,817
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, NATIONAL GUARD PERSONNEL, AIR FORCE 3,177,961 3,145,144 -32,817
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by
the Committee:

10 Pay Group A Training (15 Days & Drills 24/48) 943,573 925,573 -18,000
Improving funds management: Travel active duty ............... ............... -18,000
for training projected underexecution

UNDISTRIBUTED ADJUSTMENT
Improving funds management: Unobligated balances ............... -14,817 -14,817
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

TITLE II

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE

Funds appropriated under this title provide the resources
required to prepare for and conduct combat operations and other
peace time missions. These funds are used to purchase fuel and
spare parts for training operations, pay supporting civilian
personnel, and purchase supplies, equipment, and service
contracts for the repair of weapons and facilities.
The President's fiscal year 2014 budget requests a total of
$175,097,941,000 for operation and maintenance appropriations.

SUMMARY OF COMMITTEE ACTION

The Committee recommends operation and maintenance
appropriations totaling $178,573,167,000 for fiscal year 2014.
This is $3,475,226,000 above the budget estimate.
Committee recommended operation and maintenance
appropriations for fiscal year 2014 are summarized below:

SUMMARY OF OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE APPROPRIATIONS
[In thousands of dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Change from
Account 2014 budget Committee budget
estimate recommendation estimate
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Operation and Maintenance:
Operation and Maintenance, Army............................. 35,073,077 36,938,580 +1,865,503
Operation and Maintenance, Navy............................. 39,945,237 41,613,205 +1,667,968
Operation and Maintenance, Marine Corps..................... 6,254,650 6,359,736 +105,086
Operation and Maintenance, Air Force........................ 37,270,842 37,626,333 +355,491
Operation and Maintenance, Defense-Wide..................... 32,997,693 32,597,068 -400,625
Operation and Maintenance, Army Reserve..................... 3,095,036 3,096,436 +1,400
Operation and Maintenance, Navy Reserve..................... 1,197,752 1,208,552 +10,800
Operation and Maintenance, Marine Corps Reserve............. 263,317 261,317 -2,000
Operation and Maintenance, Air Force Reserve................ 3,164,607 3,148,307 -16,300
Operation and Maintenance, Army National Guard.............. 7,054,196 7,082,599 +28,403
Operation and Maintenance, Air National Guard............... 6,566,004 6,505,204 -60,800
United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces......... 13,606 13,606 ..............
Environmental Restoration, Army............................. 298,815 298,815 ..............
Environmental Restoration, Navy............................. 316,103 316,103 ..............
Environmental Restoration, Air Force........................ 439,820 439,820 ..............
Environmental Restoration, Defense-Wide..................... 10,757 10,757 ..............
Environmental Restoration, Formerly Used Defense Sites...... 237,443 287,443 +50,000
Overseas Humanitarian, Disaster, and Civic Aid.............. 109,500 109,500 ..............
Cooperative Threat Reduction Account........................ 528,455 528,455 ..............
OCOTF....................................................... 5,000 .............. -5,000
Department of Defense Acquisition Workforce Development Fund 256,031 131,331 -124,700
-----------------------------------------------
Total..................................................... 175,097,941 178,573,167 +3,475,226
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OVERVIEW

Civilian Workforce.--The civilian workforce has faced many
challenges over the past several years. The last pay raise was
in 2010. In 2013, the Department took specific action to
release temporary employees, freeze hiring, and furlough most
of its civilian workforce due to sequestration. The Committee
recognizes the critical role that the civilian workforce plays
every day in ensuring the mission success of the Armed Forces.
The Committee is increasingly concerned over the impact of
these challenges on the Department's ability to maintain a
stable, effective, right-sized civilian cadre. Therefore, the
Committee fully funds the 1 percent pay raise for civilian
employees as requested.
Overestimation of Civilian Workforce.--While the Committee
supports a strong civilian workforce, the fiscal year 2014
budget request substantially overestimates the number of
civilians that will be employed during fiscal year 2014.
Through analysis directed by the Committee during the budget
review, each service and defense agency identified the current
estimate for civilian full time equivalents [FTE] that will be
on the books in fiscal year 2013 and it is far short of what
was planned for in the budget request. The results showed that
the total difference between the planned fiscal year 2013 FTE
level and the current estimate is approximately 11,660 FTE.
That means that at the beginning of fiscal year 2014 the
Department of Defense will have 11,660 fewer FTE than the
planned starting number. Considering that the fully-burdened
average salary of Department of Defense civilians is
approximately $100,000 that could mean an overstatement of
about $1,200,000,000 in the operation and maintenance accounts
based on the overestimation of civilian FTE levels at the
beginning of fiscal year 2014. The Committee recommendation
includes an overestimation reduction.
Voluntary Military Education Programs--Tracking Outcomes.--
The Committee is concerned about the lack of information
available on the outcomes of students receiving Tuition
Assistance and My Career Advancement Account [MyCAA] benefits.
Therefore, the Committee directs the Department to submit a
report tracking such outcomes of each of these programs. The
report shall be submitted on or before June 1, 2014, and shall
include, but not be limited to, the following data totals for
calendar year 2013: an aggregate graduation rate, loan default
rate, and average indebtedness. Additionally, the report shall
then disaggregate the data to show these same metrics by
sector: public, private for-profit, and private not-for-profit.
Finally, the report shall include the percentage of
servicemembers utilizing the Top-Up program for voluntary
military education and the average dollar amount of usage.
Additionally, the Department is encouraged to make an effort to
gather data on the jobs attained after graduation, specifically
whether those jobs can be reasonably said to be in the field of
study identified in the students' education plans.
Voluntary Military Education Programs--Education Service
Officers and Third Party Audits.--The Committee recognizes the
importance of voluntary military education programs to the
continued education of our men and women in uniform and their
spouses. In recent years, the programs have grown in popularity
among servicemembers and, as such, in cost to the Federal
Government. The Committee notes recent efforts to improve
oversight; however, questions remain as to the effectiveness of
these efforts.
The Committee is concerned that the ratio of Education
Service Officers [ESOs] to servicemembers is not optimized to
provide the level of support required to properly advise
servicemembers about educational opportunities and the
financial obligations tied to them. The Committee is also
concerned about the number and transparency of third party
audits of schools within the Department's Tuition Assistance
program. The Committee encourages the Department to further
analyze the ratio of ESOs to servicemembers and the number and
transparency of third party audits to make improvements during
fiscal year 2014.
In order to better inform future requests, the Committee
directs the Government Accountability Office [GAO] to provide a
report to the congressional defense committees making
recommendations on the issues of ESO ratios and third party
audits within 90 days of the date of enactment of this act.
Within the analysis, the Committee suggests the GAO review
counseling service ratios in educational support programs
across the Government to measure the Department of Defense's
efforts against those of similar programs. Also, the GAO shall
review the current third party audits of schools within the
Tuition Assistance program and provide recommendations for
improvements to the audit process, if warranted, and shall
provide examples of organizations with the expertise to conduct
such reviews.
Extremity Protection Program.--The Committee encourages the
Department of Defense to fully fund the Cold Weather Protective
Equipment--Extremity Protection Program in order to sustain
research and development programs, acquisition requirements and
to maintain a basic combat capability in protective equipment
for servicemembers.
Telecommunications Expense Management.--The Consolidated
Appropriations Act, 2012, directed the Secretary of Defense to
complete a study and assess the feasibility of using commercial
off-the-shelf [COTS] telecommunication expense management
solutions to improve enterprise visibility over the
Department's telecommunications expenses and identify possible
efficiencies in this growing technological area. Since that
study was completed, the Department of Defense Chief
Information Officer [CIO] promulgated guidance regarding the
use of these management solutions. The Committee is concerned
that the military services are not yet in compliance with the
CIO's guidance. Therefore, the Committee recommends that the
Secretary of Defense defer new large telecommunications
contracts until the Department has begun to proactively manage
telecommunications usage utilizing competitively awarded COTS
expense management solutions in accordance with the CIO
guidance.
Combat and Camouflage Utility Uniforms.--The Committee is
concerned about the high cost of and disparity in protection
from separate combat and camouflage utility uniforms fielded by
the military services. The Committee believes that the
Secretary of Defense should take steps to end separate
development and fielding of service-specific combat and
camouflage utility uniforms and adopt and field the same combat
and camouflage utility uniforms for use by all members of the
Armed Forces to the maximum extent practicable. The issue is
addressed in section 8038 of this act which is consistent with
S. 1197, the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
2014, as reported.
Presidential Management Fellows Program.--The Committee is
concerned about the future of the Presidential Management
Fellow [PMF] Program in the Office of the Secretary of Defense
[OSD]. The PMF Program serves as an important tool to grow
young professionals as future leaders in OSD. In this time of
budget uncertainty, it is essential that the Department
capitalize on its investment in the next generation of
leadership and plan to incorporate them into the workforce. The
Committee directs the Department to continue to fully fund the
program at the President's budget request level and offer
placement of no fewer than three new PMFs into the program in
fiscal year 2014. The Committee further directs that successful
PMFs shall be converted into full-time permanent positions
within the Office of the Secretary of Defense at the completion
of the PMF program.
Reserve and Guard Access to the National Military Command
Center.--The Committee is concerned about the recent limitation
in access for Guard and Reserve personnel assigned on long-term
orders to drill in the National Military Command Center (NMCC)
under Joint Staff Instruction 5241.01G. Members of the Guard
and Reserve perform critical functions to the NMCC and their
presence enables continued cost-effective operations. The
Committee directs that Guard and Reserve personnel drilling in
the NMCC shall be provided the same access as Active Duty and
civilian personnel assigned to the NMCC.
Advanced Trauma Training Program for National Guard and
Reserve.--The Committee recognizes the valuable support
universities, hospitals, and other military partners provide by
offering civilian-based emergency response trauma training to
sustain medics' and medical providers' capabilities of the
National Guard Enhanced Response Forces Packages [CERFP],
National Guard Homeland Response Forces [NGHRF], and the Army
Reserve Consequence Management Response Forces [CCMRF]. The
Committee encourages the National Guard and Reserve to continue
pursuing state of the art trauma training with these civilian
partners, thus maintaining unit medical readiness postures at
optimum levels as the CERFPs, NGHRFs, and CCMRFs military
healthcare providers maintain their individual skills to
respond effectively to emergency incidents on the Homeland.
Furthermore, in order to minimize the civilian-military
operational gaps, in the event of a catastrophic incident, the
Committee also encourages the development of enhanced
preparedness medical training programs focusing on mass
casualty triage, advanced disaster life support, advanced
hazardous material life support, emergency dental, and
psychological health by increasing civilian-based advanced
trauma expertise gained through day-to-day experiences and
medical research programs.
Decontamination Lotion.--The Committee recognizes the
importance of chemical warfare countermeasures that can be
carried by individual service members and packaged in
individual troop kits. In the event of a chemical attack,
immediate access to decontamination measures will be critical
to mitigate serious injuries due to exposure. The Committee
encourages the Department of Defense to place a high priority
on current and developing decontamination agents and fully fund
annual service specific requirements.
New Strategic Arms Treaty.--The Committee is concerned
about a possible delay in announcing New Strategic Arms Treaty
force structure levels and encourages the Secretary of Defense
to make those announcements prior to submission of the Fiscal
Year 2015 budget request.
Joint Prisoner of War/Missing in Action Accounting Command
[JPAC] Efforts.--Section 1509 of the Fiscal Year 2010 National
Defense Authorization Act [NDAA] directed the Department of
Defense to ensure that at least 200 missing persons are
accounted for under the JPAC program annually beginning in
fiscal year 2015. The Committee encourages the Department to
consider partnering with research universities with expertise
in archeology and remains recovery to assist in becoming
compliant with the NDAA mandates.
Dual-Status Military Technicians.--Military technicians are
civilian employees of the Department of Army or Department of
the Air Force, employed by a State Adjutant General, but they
are also members of the military because they are required to
be drilling (part-time) military members of the National Guard.
These technicians provide the day-to-day continuity in the
operation and training of National Guard Units. Given their
dual-status role, military technicians are required to maintain
the same individual-level of readiness as their Active
component counterparts and directly contribute to unit-level
readiness in support of National Guard missions. As such, the
Committee encourages the Department of Defense to treat
military technician pay the same as their Active component
counterparts when planning for employee furloughs.
Stuart Creek 2 Wildfire.--The Stuart Creek 2 Fire, which
has burned 85,018 acres near residential areas of Fairbanks,
Alaska, began June 19, 2013, on a military training range 25
miles east of North Pole. The Army is currently investigating
whether or not the fire was caused by live fire artillery on
the Army's Yukon Training Range. The Committee is deeply
concerned about reports that the live fire artillery exercise
was permitted to occur notwithstanding the advice of the Bureau
of Land Management's Alaska Fire Service and the Fort
Wainwright Garrison that it be postponed due to the high
potential for wildfire. Accordingly, the Committee directs the
Army to review its procedures for determining when to postpone
exercises due to wildfire risk in light of the outcome of its
investigation into the Stuart Creek Fire, and to report to the
congressional defense committees on its conclusions no later
than April 15, 2014.

Operation and Maintenance, Army

Appropriations, 2013\1\................................. $35,367,901,000
Budget estimate, 2014................................... 35,073,077,000
Committee recommendation................................ 36,938,580,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public
Law 112-25.
\2\Includes emergency funding of $5,370,000 in the Disaster Relief
Appropriations Act, 2013 (division A of Public Law 113-2).

The Committee recommends an appropriation of
$36,938,580,000. This is $1,865,503,000 above the budget
estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this
appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

BUDGET ACTIVITY 1: OPERATING FORCES

LAND FORCES
MANEUVER UNITS 888,114 1,276,685 +388,571
MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES 72,624 80,890 +8,266
ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADES 617,402 674,028 +56,626
THEATER LEVEL ASSETS 602,262 614,866 +12,604
LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT 1,032,484 1,154,051 +121,567
AVIATION ASSETS 1,287,462 1,379,121 +91,659

LAND FORCES READINESS
FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT 3,559,656 3,540,427 -19,229
LAND FORCES SYSTEMS READINESS 454,477 454,477 ..............
LAND FORCES DEPOT MAINTENANCE 1,481,156 2,584,156 +1,103,000

LAND FORCES READINESS SUPPORT
BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT 7,278,154 7,413,375 +135,221
FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION, & MODERNIZATION 2,754,712 3,129,712 +375,000
MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONAL HEADQUARTERS 425,271 425,271 ..............
COMBATANT COMMANDER'S CORE OPERATIONS 185,064 185,064 ..............
COMBATANT COMMANDERS ANCILLARY MISSIONS 463,270 463,270 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 1 21,102,108 23,375,393 +2,273,285

BUDGET ACTIVITY 2: MOBILIZATION

MOBILITY OPERATIONS
STRATEGIC MOBILITY 360,240 360,240 ..............
ARMY PREPOSITIONED STOCKS 192,105 192,105 ..............
INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS 7,101 7,101 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 2 559,446 559,446 ..............

BUDGET ACTIVITY 3: TRAINING AND RECRUITING

ACCESSION TRAINING
OFFICER ACQUISITION 115,992 115,992 ..............
RECRUIT TRAINING 52,323 52,323 ..............
ONE STATION UNIT TRAINING 43,589 43,589 ..............
SENIOR RESERVE OFFICERS TRAINING CORPS 453,745 453,745 ..............

BASIC SKILL AND ADVANCED TRAINING
SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING 1,034,495 1,034,495 ..............
FLIGHT TRAINING 1,016,876 1,051,876 +35,000
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION 186,565 186,565 ..............
TRAINING SUPPORT 652,514 652,514 ..............

RECRUITING AND OTHER TRAINING AND EDUCATION
RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING 485,500 485,500 ..............
EXAMINING 170,912 170,912 ..............
OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION 251,523 251,523 ..............
CIVILIAN EDUCATION AND TRAINING 184,422 184,422 ..............
JUNIOR RESERVE OFFICERS TRAINING CORPS 181,105 185,105 +4,000
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 3 4,829,561 4,868,561 +39,000

BUDGET ACTIVITY 4: ADMIN & SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES

SECURITY PROGRAMS
SECURITY PROGRAMS 1,023,946 1,023,946 ..............

LOGISTICS OPERATIONS
SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION 690,089 690,089 ..............
CENTRAL SUPPLY ACTIVITIES 774,120 774,120 ..............
LOGISTICS SUPPORT ACTIVITIES 651,765 651,765 ..............
AMMUNITION MANAGEMENT 453,051 453,051 ..............

SERVICEWIDE SUPPORT
ADMINISTRATION 487,737 460,955 -26,782
SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS 1,563,115 1,563,115 ..............
MANPOWER MANAGEMENT 326,853 313,853 -13,000
OTHER PERSONNEL SUPPORT 234,364 234,364 ..............
OTHER SERVICE SUPPORT 1,212,091 1,191,091 -21,000
ARMY CLAIMS ACTIVITIES 243,540 243,540 ..............
REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT 241,101 241,101 ..............
BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT 226,291 226,291 ..............

SUPPORT OF OTHER NATIONS
SUPPORT OF NATO OPERATIONS 426,651 426,651 ..............
MISC. SUPPORT OF OTHER NATIONS 27,248 27,248 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 4 8,581,962 8,521,180 -60,782

OVERESTIMATE OF CIVILIAN FTE TARGETS .............. -378,000 -378,000
DTRA TRANSFER NOT ACCOUNTED FOR .............. -8,000 -8,000
=================================================
TOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, ARMY 35,073,077 36,938,580 +1,865,503
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by
the Committee:

Army Force Structure.--In late June of 2013, the Army
announced plans to reduce its number of brigade combat teams
[BCTs] from 45 to 33 by the end of fiscal year 2017 as a result
of the Budget Control Act of 2011. The near-term funding
reductions will be met through a reduction in authorized end
strength from approximately 570,000 Active Duty and 358,000
Army National Guard to approximately 490,000 and 350,000,
respectively. The Army Reserve will forgo a planned growth of
1,000 soldiers and will remain at 205,000. Twelve BCTs will be
eliminated, but the remaining BCTs will be reorganized by
adding one maneuver battalion (from 2 to 3) as well as engineer
and fire capabilities, to make armor and infantry BCTs more
lethal, flexible, and agile.
Despite the timing of the announcement, the Army claims
that the budgetary implications of the restructuring decisions
are included in the fiscal year 2014 President's budget
submission. However, the cost of the restructuring cannot be
identified in the budget justification. Therefore, the
Committee directs the Army to provide a full cost analysis of
its restructuring and stationing decisions to the congressional
defense committees no later than 90 days after the enactment of
this act. The cost analysis shall include the following data
broken out by fiscal year beginning in fiscal year 2014 and for
each subsequent fiscal year across the future year defense plan
[FYDP]: (a) the costs and savings assumed by appropriation with
line item detail, and (b) workforce implications by showing
changes broken out by civilian and contractor personnel.

Operation and Maintenance, Navy

Appropriations, 2013\1\................................. $41,599,550,000
Budget estimate, 2014................................... 39,945,237,000
Committee recommendation................................ 41,613,205,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public
Law 112-25.
\2\Includes emergency funding of $40,015,000 in the Disaster Relief
Appropriations Act, 2013 (division A of Public Law 113-2).

The Committee recommends an appropriation of
$41,613,205,000. This is $1,667,968,000 above the budget
estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this
appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

BUDGET ACTIVITY 1: OPERATING FORCES

AIR OPERATIONS
MISSION AND OTHER FLIGHT OPERATIONS 4,952,522 5,064,522 +112,000
FLEET AIR TRAINING 1,826,404 1,826,404 ..............
AVIATION TECHNICAL DATA AND ENGINEERING SERVICES 38,639 38,639 ..............
AIR OPERATIONS AND SAFETY SUPPORT 90,030 155,030 +65,000
AIR SYSTEMS SUPPORT 362,700 362,700 ..............
AIRCRAFT DEPOT MAINTENANCE 915,881 1,036,881 +121,000
AIRCRAFT DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT 35,838 35,838 ..............
AVIATION LOGISTICS 379,914 379,914 ..............

SHIP OPERATIONS
MISSION AND OTHER SHIP OPERATIONS 3,884,836 4,620,836 +736,000
SHIP OPERATIONS SUPPORT AND TRAINING 734,852 734,852 ..............
SHIP DEPOT MAINTENANCE 5,191,511 5,191,511 ..............
SHIP DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT 1,351,274 1,381,274 +30,000

COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS/SUPPORT
COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS 701,316 681,316 -20,000
ELECTRONIC WARFARE 97,710 97,710 ..............
SPACE SYSTEMS AND SURVEILLANCE 172,330 172,330 ..............
WARFARE TACTICS 454,682 454,682 ..............
OPERATIONAL METEOROLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY 328,406 328,406 ..............
COMBAT SUPPORT FORCES 946,429 1,087,297 +140,868
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 142,249 142,249 ..............
DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT 2,603 2,603 ..............
COMBATANT COMMANDERS CORE OPERATIONS 102,970 102,970 ..............
COMBATANT COMMANDERS DIRECT MISSION SUPPORT 199,128 199,128 ..............

WEAPONS SUPPORT
CRUISE MISSILE 92,671 92,671 ..............
FLEET BALLISTIC MISSILE 1,193,188 1,193,188 ..............
IN-SERVICE WEAPONS SYSTEMS SUPPORT 105,985 105,985 ..............
WEAPONS MAINTENANCE 532,627 532,627 ..............
OTHER WEAPON SYSTEMS SUPPORT 304,160 304,160 ..............

BASE SUPPORT
ENTERPRISE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 1,011,528 1,011,528 ..............
FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION 1,996,821 2,096,821 +100,000
BASE OPERATING SUPPORT 4,460,918 4,830,918 +370,000
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 1 32,610,122 34,264,990 +1,654,868

BUDGET ACTIVITY 2: MOBILIZATION

READY RESERVE AND PREPOSITIONING FORCES
SHIP PREPOSITIONING AND SURGE 331,576 331,576 ..............

ACTIVATIONS/INACTIVATIONS
AIRCRAFT ACTIVATIONS/INACTIVATIONS 6,638 6,638 ..............
SHIP ACTIVATIONS/INACTIVATIONS 222,752 272,752 +50,000

MOBILIZATION PREPAREDNESS
FLEET HOSPITAL PROGRAM 73,310 73,310 ..............
INDUSTRIAL READINESS 2,675 2,675 ..............
COAST GUARD SUPPORT 23,794 23,794 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 2 660,745 710,745 +50,000

BUDGET ACTIVITY 3: TRAINING AND RECRUITING

ACCESSION TRAINING
OFFICER ACQUISITION 148,516 148,516 ..............
RECRUIT TRAINING 9,384 9,384 ..............
RESERVE OFFICERS TRAINING CORPS 139,876 139,876 ..............

BASIC SKILLS AND ADVANCED TRAINING
SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING 630,069 630,069 ..............
FLIGHT TRAINING 9,294 9,294 ..............
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION 169,082 169,082 ..............
TRAINING SUPPORT 164,368 164,368 ..............

RECRUITING, AND OTHER TRAINING AND EDUCATION
RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING 241,733 242,833 +1,100
OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION 139,815 139,815 ..............
CIVILIAN EDUCATION AND TRAINING 94,632 94,632 ..............
JUNIOR ROTC 51,373 53,373 +2,000
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 3 1,798,142 1,801,242 +3,100

BUDGET ACTIVITY 4: ADMIN & SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES

SERVICEWIDE SUPPORT
ADMINISTRATION 886,088 886,088 ..............
EXTERNAL RELATIONS 13,131 13,131 ..............
CIVILIAN MANPOWER AND PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT 115,742 115,742 ..............
MILITARY MANPOWER AND PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT 382,150 382,150 ..............
OTHER PERSONNEL SUPPORT 268,403 268,403 ..............
SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS 317,293 317,293 ..............

LOGISTICS OPERATIONS AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT
SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION 207,128 207,128 ..............
PLANNING, ENGINEERING AND DESIGN 295,855 295,855 ..............
ACQUISITION AND PROGRAM MANAGEMENT 1,140,484 1,140,484 ..............
HULL, MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL SUPPORT 52,873 52,873 ..............
COMBAT/WEAPONS SYSTEMS 27,587 27,587 ..............
SPACE AND ELECTRONIC WARFARE SYSTEMS 75,728 75,728 ..............

SECURITY PROGRAMS
NAVAL INVESTIGATIVE SERVICE 543,026 543,026 ..............

SUPPORT OF OTHER NATIONS
INTERNATIONAL HEADQUARTERS AND AGENCIES 4,965 4,965 ..............

OTHER PROGRAMS
OTHER PROGRAMS 545,775 545,775 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 4 4,876,228 4,876,228 ..............

FURTHER EFFICIENCIES TO BE GAINED FROM CONSOLIDATING .............. -10,000 -10,000
CONTRACTING EFFORTS
OVERESTIMATE OF FY13 BASELINE FOR CIVILIAN COMPENSATION .............. -30,000 -30,000
=================================================
TOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, NAVY 39,945,237 41,613,205 +1,667,968
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by
the Committee:

[In thousands of dollars]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2014 budget Committee Change from
Line Item estimate recommendation budget estimate
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1A1A MISSION AND 4,952,522 5,064,522 +112,000
OTHER FLIGHT
OPERATIONS
Restoring .............. .............. +51,000
Readiness
: Navy
Unfunded
Requireme
nt for
Other
Flight
Operation
s
Restoring .............. .............. +61,000
Readiness
:
Departmen
t of the
Navy
Unfunded
Requireme
nt for
Special
Purpose
Marine
Air
Ground
Task
Force-
Crisis
Response
(Aviation
)
1A4A AIR OPERATIONS 90,030 155,030 +65,000
AND SAFETY
SUPPORT
Restoring .............. .............. +65,000
Readiness
: Navy
Unfunded
Requireme
nt for
Naval Air
Systems
Command
1A5A AIRCRAFT DEPOT 915,881 1,036,881 +121,000
MAINTENANCE
Restoring .............. .............. +121,000
Readiness
: Navy
Unfunded
Requireme
nt for
Air Depot
Maintenan
ce
1B1B MISSION AND 3,884,836 4,620,836 +736,000
OTHER SHIP
OPERATIONS
Restoring .............. .............. +225,000
Readiness
: Navy
Unfunded
Requireme
nt for
Other
Ship
Operation
s
Transfer .............. .............. +511,000
from
Title IX:
Ship
Operation
s
1B5B SHIP DEPOT 1,351,274 1,381,274 +30,000
OPERATIONS
SUPPORT
Restoring .............. .............. +30,000
Readiness
: Navy
Unfunded
Requireme
nt for
Ship
Depot
Operation
s Support
1C1C COMBAT 701,316 681,316 -20,000
COMMUNICATION
S
Budget .............. .............. -20,000
Documenta
tion
Disparity
:
Justifica
tion Does
Not Match
Summary
of Price
and
Program
Changes
for DISN
Subscript
ion
Services
1C6C COMBAT SUPPORT 946,429 1,087,297 +140,868
FORCES
Reduce .............. .............. -11,132
Duplicati
on: Human
Resource
Functions
Restoring .............. .............. +112,000
Readiness
: Navy
Unfunded
Requireme
nt for
Navy
Expeditio
nary
Combat
Enterpris
e Reset/
Depot
Restoring .............. .............. +40,000
Readiness
: Navy
Unfunded
Requireme
nt for
Fleet
Cyber
Command/
Navy
Cyber
Forces
BSM1 SUSTAINMENT, 1,996,821 2,096,821 +100,000
RESTORATION
AND
MODERNIZATION
Navy .............. .............. +100,000
Unfunded
Requireme
nt for
Facility
Sustainme
nt,
Restorati
on and
Moderniza
tion
BSS1 BASE OPERATING 4,460,918 4,830,918 +370,000
SUPPORT
Navy .............. .............. +360,000
Unfunded
Requireme
nt for
Environme
ntal
Complianc
e,
Collatera
l
Equipment
and Shore
Infrastru
cture
Environmen .............. .............. +10,000
tal
Conservat
ion for
Ranges to
Address
Shortfall
s
2B2G SHIP 222,752 272,752 +50,000
ACTIVATIONS/
INACTIVATIONS
Navy .............. .............. +50,000
Unfunded
Requireme
nt for
Completio
n of USS
ENTERPRIS
E
3C1L RECRUITING AND 241,733 242,833 +1,100
ADVERTISING
Naval Sea .............. .............. +1,100
Cadet
Corps
3C5L JUNIOR ROTC 51,373 53,373 +2,000
Increase .............. .............. +2,000
for JROTC
Program
4A2M EXTERNAL 13,131 13,131 ...............
RELATIONS
Funds .............. .............. [1,000]
Budgeted
for
Stennis
Center
for
Public
Service
Available
Only for
Execution
of That
Program
UNDIST Maintain .............. .............. -10,000
Program
Affordability
: Further
Efficiencies
to be Gained
from
Consolidating
Contracting
Efforts
UNDIST Improving .............. .............. -30,000
Funds
Management:
Overstatement
of Fiscal
Year 2013
Baseline for
Civilian
Compensation
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Naval Shipyard Apprentice Program.--The Committee directs
that during fiscal year 2014 the Navy shall induct classes of
no fewer than 100 apprentices, respectively, at each of the
naval shipyards. The Committee further directs the Navy to
include the costs of the fiscal year 2015 class of apprentices
in its budget request.
U.S. Coast Guard.--The Committee is aware that Department
of Defense [DOD] regulations currently restrict DOD mission
appropriated funded activities from offering reimbursable rates
to non-DOD agencies. This restriction forces the Navy to charge
the U.S. Coast Guard fully burdened rates for drydocking
services at Navy shipyards rather than reimbursable rates.
Therefore, the Committee directs that funds appropriated under
Operation and Maintenance, Navy may be used to pay overhead
costs incurred by a Naval Shipyard when drydocking U.S. Coast
Guard ships.

Operation and Maintenance, Marine Corps

Appropriations, 2013\1\................................. $6,026,999,000
Budget estimate, 2014................................... 6,254,650,000
Committee recommendation................................ 6,359,736,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public
Law 112-25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of
$6,359,736,000. This is $105,086,000 above the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this
appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

BUDGET ACTIVITY 1: OPERATING FORCES

EXPEDITIONARY FORCES
OPERATIONAL FORCES 837,012 935,098 +98,086
FIELD LOGISTICS 894,555 894,555 ..............
DEPOT MAINTENANCE 223,337 279,337 +56,000

USMC PREPOSITIONING
MARITIME PREPOSITIONING 97,878 97,878 ..............
FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION 774,619 774,619 ..............
BASE OPERATING SUPPORT 2,166,661 2,151,661 -15,000
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 1 4,994,062 5,133,148 +139,086

BUDGET ACTIVITY 3: TRAINING AND RECRUITING

ACCESSION TRAINING
RECRUIT TRAINING 17,693 17,693 ..............
OFFICER ACQUISITION 896 896 ..............

BASIC SKILLS AND ADVANCED TRAINING
SPECIALIZED SKILLS TRAINING 100,806 100,806 ..............
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION 46,928 46,928 ..............
TRAINING SUPPORT 356,426 356,426 ..............

RECRUITING AND OTHER TRAINING EDUCATION
RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING 179,747 179,747 ..............
OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION 52,255 52,255 ..............
JUNIOR ROTC 23,138 23,138 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 3 777,889 777,889 ..............

BUDGET ACTIVITY 4: ADMIN & SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES

SERVICEWIDE SUPPORT
SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION 43,816 43,816 ..............
ADMINISTRATION 305,107 321,107 +16,000
ACQUISITION AND PROGRAM MANAGEMENT 87,500 87,500 ..............

SECURITY PROGRAMS
SECURITY PROGRAMS 46,276 46,276 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 4 482,699 498,699 +16,000

OVERESTIMATE OF CIVILIAN FTE TARGETS .............. -35,000 -35,000
UNJUSTIFIED GROWTH FOR STUDY AND ANALYSIS CONTRACTORS .............. -15,000 -15,000
=================================================
TOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, MARINE CORPS 6,254,650 6,359,736 +105,086
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by
the Committee:

Operation and Maintenance, Air Force

Appropriations, 2013\1\\2\.............................. $34,743,007,000
Budget estimate, 2014................................... 37,270,842,000
Committee recommendation................................ 37,626,333,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public
Law 112-25.
\2\Includes emergency funding of $8,500,000 in the Disaster Relief
Appropriations Act, 2013 (division A of Public Law 113-2).

The Committee recommends an appropriation of
$37,626,333,000. This is $355,491,000 above the budget
estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this
appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

BUDGET ACTIVITY 1: OPERATING FORCES

AIR OPERATIONS
PRIMARY COMBAT FORCES 3,295,814 3,442,614 +146,800
COMBAT ENHANCEMENT FORCES 1,875,095 1,875,095 ..............
AIR OPERATIONS TRAINING 1,559,109 1,549,109 -10,000
DEPOT MAINTENANCE 5,956,304 6,500,404 +544,100
FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION 1,834,424 1,909,424 +75,000
BASE OPERATING SUPPORT 2,779,811 2,789,811 +10,000

COMBAT RELATED OPERATIONS
GLOBAL C3I AND EARLY WARNING 913,841 902,329 -11,512
OTHER COMBAT OPERATIONS SUPPORT PROGRAMS 916,837 916,837 ..............
TACTICAL INTELLIGENCE AND SPECIAL ACTIVITIES 720,349 720,349 ..............

SPACE OPERATIONS
LAUNCH FACILITIES 305,275 305,275 ..............
SPACE CONTROL SYSTEMS 433,658 433,658 ..............
COMBATANT COMMANDERS DIRECT MISSION SUPPORT 1,146,016 1,141,116 -4,900
COMBATANT COMMANDERS CORE OPERATIONS 231,830 231,830 ..............
TRANSFER TO TITLE IX: READINESS AND DEPOT
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 1 21,968,363 22,717,851 +749,488

BUDGET ACTIVITY 2: MOBILIZATION

MOBILITY OPERATIONS
AIRLIFT OPERATIONS 2,015,902 2,015,902 ..............
MOBILIZATION PREPAREDNESS 147,216 142,216 -5,000
DEPOT MAINTENANCE 1,556,232 1,556,232 ..............
FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION 167,402 161,402 -6,000
BASE SUPPORT 707,040 707,040 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 2 4,593,792 4,582,792 -11,000

BUDGET ACTIVITY 3: TRAINING AND RECRUITING

ACCESSION TRAINING
OFFICER ACQUISITION 102,334 102,334 ..............
RECRUIT TRAINING 17,733 17,733 ..............
RESERVE OFFICER TRAINING CORPS (ROTC) 94,600 94,600 ..............
FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION 217,011 217,011 ..............
BASE SUPPORT (ACADEMIES ONLY) 800,327 800,327 ..............

BASIC SKILLS AND ADVANCED TRAINING
SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING 399,364 399,364 ..............
FLIGHT TRAINING 792,275 792,275 ..............
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION 248,958 248,958 ..............
TRAINING SUPPORT 106,741 106,741 ..............
DEPOT MAINTENANCE 319,331 339,331 +20,000

RECRUITING, AND OTHER TRAINING AND EDUCATION
RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING 122,736 122,736 ..............
EXAMINING 3,679 3,679 ..............
OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION 137,255 137,255 ..............
CIVILIAN EDUCATION AND TRAINING 176,153 176,153 ..............
JUNIOR ROTC 67,018 69,018 +2,000
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 3 3,605,515 3,627,515 +22,000

BUDGET ACTIVITY 4: ADMIN & SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES

LOGISTICS OPERATIONS
LOGISTICS OPERATIONS 1,103,684 1,023,684 -80,000
TECHNICAL SUPPORT ACTIVITIES 919,923 919,923 ..............
DEPOT MAINTENANCE 56,601 56,601 ..............
FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION 281,061 281,061 ..............
BASE SUPPORT 1,203,305 1,198,128 -5,177

SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES
ADMINISTRATION 593,865 593,865 ..............
SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS 574,609 574,609 ..............
OTHER SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES 1,028,600 1,003,600 -25,000
CIVIL AIR PATROL CORPORATION 24,720 28,400 +3,680

SECURITY PROGRAMS
SECURITY PROGRAMS 1,227,796 1,220,296 -7,500

SUPPORT TO OTHER NATIONS
INTERNATIONAL SUPPORT 89,008 89,008 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 4 7,103,172 6,989,175 -113,997

OVERESTIMATE OF CIVILIAN FTE TARGETS .............. -281,000 -281,000
OVERSIGHT OF SPARE PARTS CHARGES .............. -10,000 -10,000
=================================================
TOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, AIR FORCE 37,270,842 37,626,333 +355,491
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by
the Committee:

[In thousands of dollars]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2014 budget Committee Change from
Line Item estimate recommendation budget estimate
------------------------------------------------------------------------
011A PRIMARY COMBAT 3,295,814 3,442,614 +146,800
FORCES
Restoring .............. .............. +146,800
Readiness
: Air
Force
Unfunded
Requireme
nt for
Flying
Hours and
Training
Ranges
011D AIR OPERATIONS 1,559,109 1,549,109 -10,000
TRAINING
(OJT,
MAINTAIN
SKILLS)
Maintain .............. .............. -30,000
Program
Affordabi
lity:
Unjustifi
ed
Increase
for
Training
Contracts
Increase .............. .............. +20,000
for
Ranges
011M DEPOT 5,956,304 6,500,404 +544,100
MAINTENANCE
Restoring .............. .............. +544,100
Readiness
: Air
Force
Unfunded
Requireme
nt for
Weapon
System
Sustainme
nt
011R FACILITIES 1,834,424 1,909,424 +75,000
SUSTAINMENT,
RESTORATION &
MODERNIZA-
TION
Air Force .............. .............. +75,000
Unfunded
Requireme
nt for
Facility
Sustainme
nt,
Restorati
on and
Moderniza
tion
011Z BASE SUPPORT 2,779,811 2,789,811 +10,000
Environmen .............. .............. +10,000
tal
Conservat
ion for
Ranges to
Address
Shortfall
s
012A GLOBAL C3I AND 913,841 902,329 -11,512
EARLY WARNING
Budget .............. .............. -9,000
Documenta
tion
Disparity
:
Justifica
tion Does
Not Match
Summary
of Price
and
Program
Changes
for DISN
Subscript
ion
Services
Budget .............. .............. -2,512
Documenta
tion
Disparity
: Foreign
Currency
Fluctuati
on
Pricing
Requested
as
Program
Growth
015A COMBATANT 1,146,016 1,141,116 -4,900
COMMANDERS
DIRECT
MISSION
SUPPORT
Classified .............. .............. -4,900
Program
Decrease
021D MOBILIZATION 147,216 142,216 -5,000
PREPAREDNESS
Budget .............. .............. -5,000
Documenta
tion
Disparity
:
Unjustifi
ed
Program
Growth
for the
Afloat
Prepositi
on Fleet
021R FACILITIES 167,402 161,402 -6,000
SUSTAINMENT,
RESTORATION &
MODERNIZA-
TION
Improving .............. .............. -6,000
Funds
Managemen
t:
Reimbursa
ble Costs
From the
Transport
ation
Working
Capital
Fund
Requested
as
Program
Growth
032M DEPOT 319,331 339,331 +20,000
MAINTENANCE
Authorizat .............. .............. +20,000
ion
Adjustmen
t: Depot
Maintenan
ce
033E JUNIOR ROTC 67,018 69,018 +2,000
Increase .............. .............. +2,000
for JROTC
Program
041A LOGISTICS 1,103,684 1,023,684 -80,000
OPERATIONS
Budget .............. .............. -80,000
Documenta
tion
Disparity
:
Cancellat
ion of
Expeditio
nary
Command
Support
System
Not
Accounted
for in
Justifica
tion
041Z BASE SUPPORT 1,203,305 1,198,128 -5,177
Maintain .............. .............. -5,177
Program
Affordabi
lity:
Public-
Private
Competiti
ons
042G OTHER 1,028,600 1,003,600 -25,000
SERVICEWIDE
ACTIVITIES
Budget .............. .............. -25,000
Documenta
tion
Disparity
:
Justifica
tion Does
Not Match
Summary
of Price
and
Program
Changes
for the
Defense
Finance
and
Accountin
g
Services
Bill
042I CIVIL AIR 24,720 28,400 +3,680
PATROL
Civil Air .............. .............. +3,680
Patrol
UNDIST SECURITY 1,227,796 1,220,296 -7,500
PROGRAMS
Classified .............. .............. -7,500
Adjustmen
t
UNDIST Maintain .............. .............. -281,000
Program
Affordability
:
Overestimatio
n of Civilian
Full Time
Equivalent
Targets
UNDIST Improving .............. .............. -10,000
Funds
Management:
Air Force
Oversight of
Spare Parts
Charges
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Demonstration Program for Contractors Employing Persons
with Disabilities.--The Committee commends the Air Force for
fulfilling requirements for the scanning and digitization of
millions of personnel records through the employment of persons
with severe disabilities, who would otherwise receive social
security disability benefits. This effort has allowed those
with disabilities to find sustainable employment and achieve
self-sufficiency, while ultimately achieving substantial
taxpayer savings. The Committee encourages the Air Force to
continue this important program using eligible contractors for
its scanning and digitization requirements and other
appropriate work.
Lajes Air Base.--The Committee supports the continued
bilateral relationship the United States has with Portugal,
particularly with respect to United States-NATO operations.
However, given current budget constraints, the Committee
recognizes the Air Force's need to consolidate its force
structure and operations at Lajes Air Base on Terceira Island
in the Azores. The Committee understands this reduction will
also impact host country civilian positions and the local
economy. The Committee encourages the Department to continue to
work closely with Portuguese and Azorean officials to minimize
the economic impacts to the local population and to continue to
explore all possibilities for other U.S. Government uses of
Lajes Air Base. The Committee directs the Secretary of Defense
to provide a report to the congressional defense committees not
later than 90 days after the enactment of this act on United
States Air Force plans for a continued U.S. presence at Lajes
Air Base; steps to be taken to mitigate adverse effects on the
surrounding community; and initiatives to strengthen and
enhance the strategic relationship between the U.S. and
Portugal.

Operation and Maintenance, Defense-Wide

Appropriations, 2013\1\................................. $31,820,931,000
Budget estimate, 2014................................... 32,997,693,000
Committee recommendation................................ 32,597,068,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public
Law 112-25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of
$32,597,068,000. This is $400,625,000 below the budget
estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this
appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

BUDGET ACTIVITY 1: OPERATING FORCES

JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF 472,239 450,539 -21,700
SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND 5,261,463 5,131,233 -130,230
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 1 5,733,702 5,581,772 -151,930

BUDGET ACTIVITY 3: TRAINING AND RECRUITING

DEFENSE ACQUISITION UNIVERSITY 157,397 157,397 ..............
NATIONAL DEFENSE UNIVERSITY 84,899 84,899 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 3 242,296 242,296 ..............

BUDGET ACTIVITY 4: ADMIN & SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES

CIVIL MILITARY PROGRAMS 144,443 182,443 +38,000
DEFENSE CONTRACT AUDIT AGENCY 612,207 583,207 -29,000
DEFENSE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT AGENCY 1,378,606 1,319,606 -59,000
DEFENSE HUMAN RESOURCES ACTIVITY 763,091 766,091 +3,000
DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEMS AGENCY 1,326,243 1,340,749 +14,506
DEFENSE LEGAL SERVICES AGENCY 29,933 29,933 ..............
DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY 462,545 461,517 -1,028
DEFENSE MEDIA ACTIVITY 222,979 222,979 ..............
DEFENSE POW /MISSING PERSONS OFFICE 21,594 21,594 ..............
DEFENSE SECURITY COOPERATION AGENCY 788,389 761,589 -26,800
DEFENSE SECURITY SERVICE 546,603 559,103 +12,500
DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY SECURITY AGENCY 35,151 35,151 ..............
DEFENSE THREAT REDUCTION AGENCY 438,033 438,033 ..............
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE EDUCATION ACTIVITY 2,713,756 2,713,756 ..............
MISSILE DEFENSE AGENCY 256,201 385,057 +128,856
OFFICE OF ECONOMIC ADJUSTMENT 371,615 98,315 -273,300
OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 2,010,176 1,978,176 -32,000
WASHINGTON HEADQUARTERS SERVICES 616,572 611,572 -5,000
OTHER PROGRAMS 14,283,558 14,219,129 -64,429
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 4 27,021,695 26,728,000 -293,695

IMPACT AID .............. 40,000 +40,000
IMPACT AID FOR CHILDREN WITH DISABILITIES .............. 5,000 +5,000
=================================================
TOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, DEFENSE- WIDE 32,997,693 32,597,068 -400,625
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by
the Committee:

Special Operations Command Budget Justification
Materials.--The level of detail provided in budget
justification documents is not sufficient for Special
Operations Command's [SOCOM] operation and maintenance [O&M]
resources. With increased requirements driving larger budget
requests, the Committee needs more itemized information in
order to conduct proper oversight. Therefore, the Committee
directs that budget activities be established for SOCOM's O&M
budget. Additionally, SOCOM is directed to submit an OP-5
Operation and Maintenance Detail exhibit and OP-32 Summary of
Price and Program Changes exhibit for each budget subactivity.
Finally, the Committee directs that normal prior approval
reprogramming procedures be used to transfer funds between
budget activities in excess of $15 million. The following table
assigns the budget activity and budget subactivity structure:

Budget Activity 1 includes Subactivities:
Combat Development Activities
Flight Operations
Other Operations
Ship/Boat Operations
Base Support
Communications
Force Related Training
Intelligence
Maintenance
Management/Operational Headquarters
Operational Support

Budget Activity 3 includes Subactivities:
Professional Development
Specialized Skill Training

Budget Activity 4 includes Subactivity:
Acquisition/Program Management

Defense Language and National Security Education Office.--
The Committee recognizes that, in partnership with universities
across the country, the Defense Language and National Security
Education Office provides critical training for servicemembers
and government officials in a number of languages and strategic
cultures, including those of the Arab world, Afghanistan,
China, and Iran. The Committee encourages the Department of
Defense to continue placing a high priority on these programs
to ensure warfighters receive the language and culture training
needed to complete their missions effectively.
Military Use Airspace.--The Committee encourages the
Department of Defense to continue to utilize national assets
such as the Hays Military Operations Area to maintain airborne
combat readiness for both manned and remotely piloted aircraft.
Middle East Regional Security Studies Programs.--The
Committee encourages the Department of Defense to continue to
support established university programs that promote region-
wide informal workshops and task forces on arms control,
regional security, and related topics to the Middle East for
Arab, Israeli and other officials and experts engaged in these
issues.
Meals Ready-To-Eat War Reserve.--The Committee is concerned
that the Defense Logistics Agency's [DLA] potential reduction
of its Meals Ready-to-Eat [MRE] war reserve could harm the
industrial base and threaten the Department's ``Go to War''
capabilities. Therefore, the Committee encourages the Director
of DLA, in conjunction with the military services and industry,
to develop a comprehensive plan to address the aggregate MRE
requirements for each of the military services that considers
war time surge requirements and timely rotation of the MRE war
reserve.
Military Dependent Student Online Assistance.--The
Committee understands children of Active Duty military families
are faced with unique educational challenges in part because of
frequent changes of station over the course of childhood. In
order to meet these challenges, military parents can
substantially benefit from access to Internet-based educational
resources that can be brought to bear on the individualized
needs of their children. The Department is encouraged to
provide an assessment tool with accompanying resource material
that helps parents to engage with children to develop
conceptual understandings and to improve learning and skills.
Wildlife Trafficking.--The proceeds of animal poaching and
wildlife trafficking are known to fund armed conflict on the
African continent, including by the Lord's Resistance Army and
other destabilizing groups in the Great Lakes Region. The
Committee supports efforts by Africa Command and Special
Operations Command to assist in the mitigation of these illegal
activities through their capacity-building engagements with
African governments and authorities, including ``train the
trainer'' exchanges and exercises. The Committee expects Africa
Command and Special Operations Command to continue these
engagements in areas affected by wildlife trafficking.
The Committee also directs the Secretary of Defense to
provide a report to the congressional defense committees within
120 days of enactment of this act describing the planned
activities to support implementation of the Executive Order
establishing the Presidential Task Force on Wildlife
Trafficking.

Operation and Maintenance, Army Reserve

Appropriations, 2013\1\................................. $3,178,723,000
Budget estimate, 2014................................... 3,095,036,000
Committee recommendation................................ 3,096,436,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public
Law 112-25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of
$3,096,436,000. This is $1,400,000 above the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this
appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

BUDGET ACTIVITY 1: OPERATING FORCES

LAND FORCES
MANEUVER UNITS 1,621 1,621 ..............
MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES 24,429 24,429 ..............
ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADES 657,099 657,099 ..............
THEATER LEVEL ASSETS 122,485 122,485 ..............
LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT 584,058 584,058 ..............
AVIATION ASSETS 79,380 79,380 ..............

LAND FORCES READINESS
FORCES READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT 471,616 471,616 ..............
LAND FORCES SYSTEM READINESS 74,243 74,243 ..............
DEPOT MAINTENANCE 70,894 70,894 ..............

LAND FORCES READINESS SUPPORT
BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT 569,801 569,801 ..............
FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION 294,145 330,545 +36,400
MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONS HEADQUARTERS 51,853 51,853 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 1 3,001,624 3,038,024 +36,400

BUDGET ACTIVITY 4: ADMIN & SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES

ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES
SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION 10,735 10,735 ..............
ADMINISTRATION 24,197 24,197 ..............
SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS 10,304 10,304 ..............
PERSONNEL/FINANCIAL ADMINISTRATION 10,319 10,319 ..............
RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING 37,857 37,857 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 4 93,412 93,412 ..............

OVERESTIMATE OF CIVILIAN FTE TARGETS .............. -35,000 -35,000
=================================================
TOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, ARMY RESERVE 3,095,036 3,096,436 +1,400
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by
the Committee:

Operation and Maintenance, Navy Reserve

Appropriations, 2013\1\................................. $1,254,689,000
Budget estimate, 2014................................... 1,197,752,000
Committee recommendation................................ 1,208,552,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public
Law 112-25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of
$1,208,552,000. This is $10,800,000 above the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this
appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

BUDGET ACTIVITY 1: OPERATING FORCES

RESERVE AIR OPERATIONS
MISSION AND OTHER FLIGHT OPERATIONS 586,620 588,520 +1,900
INTERMEDIATE MAINTENANCE 7,008 7,008 ..............
AIRCRAFT DEPOT MAINTENANCE 100,657 100,657 ..............
AIRCRAFT DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT 305 9,205 +8,900
AVIATION LOGISTICS 3,927 3,927 ..............

RESERVE SHIP OPERATIONS
MISSION AND OTHER SHIP OPERATIONS 75,933 75,933 ..............
SHIP OPERATIONAL SUPPORT AND TRAINING 601 601 ..............
SHIP DEPOT MAINTENANCE 44,364 44,364 ..............

RESERVE COMBAT OPERATIONS SUPPORT
COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS 15,477 15,477 ..............
COMBAT SUPPORT FORCES 115,608 115,608 ..............

RESERVE WEAPONS SUPPORT
WEAPONS MAINTENANCE 1,967 1,967 ..............
ENTERPRISE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 43,726 43,726 ..............

BASE OPERATING SUPPORT
FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION 69,011 69,011 ..............
BASE OPERATING SUPPORT 109,604 109,604 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 1 1,174,808 1,185,608 +10,800

BUDGET ACTIVITY 4: ADMIN & SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES

ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES
ADMINISTRATION 2,905 2,905 ..............
MILITARY MANPOWER & PERSONNEL 14,425 14,425 ..............
SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS 2,485 2,485 ..............
ACQUISITION AND PROGRAM MANAGEMENT 3,129 3,129 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 4 22,944 22,944 ..............
=================================================
TOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, NAVY RESERVE 1,197,752 1,208,552 +10,800
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by
the Committee:

Operation and Maintenance, Marine Corps Reserve

Appropriations, 2013\1\................................. $277,011,000
Budget estimate, 2014................................... 263,317,000
Committee recommendation................................ 261,317,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public
Law 112-25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $261,317,000.
This is $2,000,000 below the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this
appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

BUDGET ACTIVITY 1: OPERATING FORCES

EXPEDITIONARY FORCES
OPERATING FORCES 96,244 96,244 ..............
DEPOT MAINTENANCE 17,581 17,581 ..............
FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION 32,438 32,438 ..............
BASE OPERATING SUPPORT 95,259 95,259 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 1 241,522 241,522 ..............

BUDGET ACTIVITY 4: ADMIN & SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES

ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES
SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION 894 894 ..............
ADMINISTRATION 11,743 11,743 ..............
RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING 9,158 9,158 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 4 21,795 21,795 ..............

OVERESTIMATE OF CIVILIAN FTE TARGETS .............. -2,000 -2,000
=================================================
TOTAL, OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MARINE CORPS 263,317 261,317 -2,000
RESERVE
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by
the Committee:

Operation and Maintenance, Air Force Reserve

Appropriations, 2013\1\................................. $3,257,020,000
Budget estimate, 2014................................... 3,164,607,000
Committee recommendation................................ 3,148,307,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public
Law 112-25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of
$3,148,307,000. This is $16,300,000 below the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this
appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

BUDGET ACTIVITY 1: OPERATING FORCES

AIR OPERATIONS
PRIMARY COMBAT FORCES 1,857,951 1,857,951 ..............
MISSION SUPPORT OPERATIONS 224,462 216,462 -8,000
DEPOT MAINTENANCE 521,182 521,182 ..............
FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION 89,704 98,404 +8,700
BASE OPERATING SUPPORT 360,836 360,836 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 1 3,054,135 3,054,835 +700

BUDGET ACTIVITY 4: ADMIN & SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES

ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES
ADMINISTRATION 64,362 64,362 ..............
RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING 15,056 15,056 ..............
MILITARY MANPOWER AND PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT 23,617 23,617 ..............
OTHER PERSONNEL SUPPORT 6,618 6,618 ..............
AUDIOVISUAL 819 819 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 4 110,472 110,472 ..............

OVERESTIMATE OF CIVILIAN FTE TARGETS .............. -17,000 -17,000
=================================================
TOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, AIR FORCE 3,164,607 3,148,307 -16,300
RESERVE.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by
the Committee:

Operation and Maintenance, Army National Guard

Appropriations, 2013\1\\2\.............................. $7,147,885,000
Budget estimate, 2014................................... 7,054,196,000
Committee recommendation................................ 7,082,599,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public
Law 112-25.
\2\Includes emergency funding of $3,165,000 in the Disaster Relief
Appropriations Act, 2013 (division A of Public Law 113-2).

The Committee recommends an appropriation of
$7,082,599,000. This is $28,403,000 above the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this
appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

BUDGET ACTIVITY 1: OPERATING FORCES

LAND FORCES
MANEUVER UNITS 800,880 800,880 ..............
MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES 178,650 178,650 ..............
ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE 771,503 771,503 ..............
THEATER LEVEL ASSETS 98,699 98,699 ..............
LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT 38,779 38,779 ..............
AVIATION ASSETS 922,503 922,503 ..............

LAND FORCES READINESS
FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT 761,056 761,056 ..............
LAND FORCES SYSTEMS READINESS 62,971 62,971 ..............
LAND FORCES DEPOT MAINTENANCE 233,105 233,105 ..............

LAND FORCES READINESS SUPPORT
BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT 1,019,059 1,029,059 +10,000
FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION 712,139 786,339 +74,200
MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONAL HEADQUARTERS 1,013,715 1,000,418 -13,297
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 1 6,613,059 6,683,962 +70,903

BUDGET ACTIVITY 4: ADMIN & SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES

ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES
SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION 10,812 10,812 ..............
ADMINISTRATION 78,284 78,284 ..............
SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS 46,995 46,995 ..............
MANPOWER MANAGEMENT 6,390 6,390 ..............
RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING 297,105 297,105 ..............
REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT 1,551 1,551 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 4 441,137 441,137 ..............

OVERESTIMATE OF CIVILIAN FTE TARGETS .............. -22,500 -22,500

TRAVEL BUDGET REDUCTION .............. -20,000 -20,000
=================================================
TOTAL, OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY NATIONAL 7,054,196 7,082,599 +28,403
GUARD.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by
the Committee:

National Guard Industrial Base.--The National Guard
Readiness Sustainment and Maintenance Program serves as a surge
capacity during wartime to support Army depots and other
facilities in the repair, reset, and recap of Army and Army
National Guard equipment. It also provides an independent
source of repair for the National Guard to increase the
equipment on hand of National Guard units and to sustain a
greater degree of readiness than could otherwise be maintained.
The Committee urges that no less than the amount provided for
the National Guard Readiness Sustainment and Maintenance
Program in the fiscal year 2013 appropriations bill be provided
in the Land Forces Depot Maintenance, Army National Guard
account for the repair and return of equipment and vehicles.

Operation and Maintenance, Air National Guard

Appropriations, 2013\1\\2\.............................. $6,491,531,000
Budget estimate, 2014................................... 6,566,004,000
Committee recommendation................................ 6,505,204,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public
Law 112-25.
\2\Includes emergency funding of $5,775,000 in the Disaster Relief
Appropriations Act, 2013 (division A of Public Law 113-2).

The Committee recommends an appropriation of
$6,505,204,000. This is $60,800,000 below the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this
appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

BUDGET ACTIVITY 1: OPERATING FORCES

AIR OPERATIONS
AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS 3,371,871 3,371,871 ..............
MISSION SUPPORT OPERATIONS 720,305 720,305 ..............
DEPOT MAINTENANCE 1,514,870 1,514,870 ..............
FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION 296,953 325,153 +28,200
BASE OPERATING SUPPORT 597,303 597,303 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 1 6,501,302 6,529,502 +28,200

BUDGET ACTIVITY 4: ADMIN & SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES

SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES
ADMINISTRATION 32,117 32,117 ..............
RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING 32,585 32,585 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 4 64,702 64,702 ..............

OVERESTIMATE OF CIVILIAN FTE TARGETS .............. -89,000 -89,000
=================================================
TOTAL, OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AIR NATIONAL GUARD 6,566,004 6,505,204 -60,800
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by
the Committee:

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Appropriations, 2013\1\................................. $13,498,000
Budget estimate, 2014................................... 13,606,000
Committee recommendation................................ 13,606,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public
Law 112-25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $13,606,000.
This is equal to the budget estimate.

Environmental Restoration, Army

Appropriations, 2013\1\................................. $335,478,000
Budget estimate, 2014................................... 298,815,000
Committee recommendation................................ 298,815,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public
Law 112-25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $298,815,000.
This is equal to the budget estimate.

Environmental Restoration, Navy

Appropriations, 2013\1\................................. $310,184,000
Budget estimate, 2014................................... 316,103,000
Committee recommendation................................ 316,103,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public
Law 112-25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $316,103,000.
This is equal to the budget estimate.

Environmental Restoration, Air Force

Appropriations, 2013\1\................................. $528,565,000
Budget estimate, 2014................................... 439,820,000
Committee recommendation................................ 439,820,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public
Law 112-25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $439,820,000.
This is equal to the budget estimate.

Environmental Restoration, Defense-Wide

Appropriations, 2013\1\................................. $11,118,000
Budget estimate, 2014................................... 10,757,000
Committee recommendation................................ 10,757,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public
Law 112-25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $10,757,000.
This is equal to the budget estimate.

Environmental Restoration, Formerly Used Defense Sites

Appropriations, 2013\1\................................. $287,164,000
Budget estimate, 2014................................... 237,443,000
Committee recommendation................................ 287,443,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public
Law 112-25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $287,443,000.
This is $50,000,000 above the budget estimate to help address
unfunded needs.

Overseas Humanitarian, Disaster, and Civic Aid

Appropriations, 2013\1\................................. $108,615,000
Budget estimate, 2014................................... 109,500,000
Committee recommendation................................ 109,500,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public
Law 112-25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $109,500,000.
This is equal to the budget estimate.

Cooperative Threat Reduction Account

Appropriations, 2013\1\................................. $518,426,000
Budget estimate, 2014................................... 528,455,000
Committee recommendation................................ 528,455,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public
Law 112-25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $528,455,000.
This is equal to the budget estimate.
Cooperative Threat Reduction.--The Department of Defense
Cooperative Threat Reduction [CTR] program has proven highly
successful in its efforts to secure and dismantle weapons of
mass destruction and their associated infrastructure in the
former Soviet Union and former Soviet bloc countries. On June
17, 2013, the Russian Government did not renew the umbrella
agreement with the United States Government. Therefore, the
fiscal year 2014 program will change substantially from its
original plan. The Committee recommends full funding in fiscal
year 2014, but directs the Department to keep the congressional
defense committees fully informed of changes to the existing
program.
Improving Oversight.--For many years, the Cooperative
Threat Reduction program has not been able to obligate its
funding in a timely manner. Furthermore, the program has
significant flexibility and lacks oversight of its funding. For
example, the program realigned 25 percent of the budget across
different sub-accounts after enactment. This flexibility allows
for quick reaction changes in spending, but the Committee has
no insight as to why or when these funding changes occur.
Therefore, the Committee directs the Cooperative Threat
Reduction program to follow standard Department of Defense
reprogramming procedures when transferring a cumulative amount
of $20,000,000 or 10 percent, whichever is lesser between sub-
accounts.

Department of Defense Acquisition Workforce Development Fund

Appropriations, 2013\1\................................. $50,132,000
Budget estimate, 2014................................... 256,031,000
Committee recommendation................................ 131,331,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public
Law 112-25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $131,331,000.
This is $124,700,000 below the budget estimate.
Mandatory Transfers.--The Defense Acquisition Workforce
Development Fund has been instrumental in increasing the
quantity and quality of the Department's acquisition workforce.
Since 2008, the acquisition workforce has increased by 21
percent. The Committee believes the emphasis on improving the
workforce is starting to positively impact overall acquisition
performance. The General Accounting Office's 2013 assessment of
selected weapon programs identified a handful of positive
trends: More than 60 percent of programs realized an increase
in buying power; an increased percentage of programs are
meeting cost performance metrics; and eight of the ten
costliest programs reported cost decreases over the past year.
The fiscal year 2014 budget justification for Defense
Acquisition Workforce Development Fund states that the
Department is now close to meeting its acquisition workforce
hiring goals. The budget justification explains that the
Department is now shifting its focus ``from rebuilding
workforce capacity to sustaining levels required to perform the
acquisition mission with acceptable risk and increase our focus
on deliberate training and development of that workforce.''
Interestingly, the project level funding amounts in the budget
justification do not correlate with this narrative. For fiscal
year 2013, recruiting and hiring was estimated to be
$374,000,000, while the fiscal year 2014 request is
$498,700,000. With planned recruiting and hiring efforts
leveling off or declining in fiscal year 2014, the budget
request is overstated by $124,700,000.
The Committee believes this incongruity between the
Department's stated strategy and the funding request is caused
by the mandatory spending amounts established in title 10 of
United States Code, section 1705. In fiscal year 2014, the
amounts established in title 10 require the Department make
available at least 80 percent of $800,000,000 either through
transfer from operation and maintenance appropriations, or
through direct appropriations. Requiring the Department to
spend $640,000,000 in fiscal year 2014 is excessive, especially
given the fact that the fiscal year 2013 required spending
amount was $400,000,000. Moreover, this Committee has
encouraged the Department to fully fund its Defense Acquisition
Workforce Development Fund request through the normal
appropriations process, instead of relying on the mandated
transfers that are excess to need.
Over the past few years, the Committee has urged the
Department to provide accurate and executable estimates of
their annual spending needs. The Committee notes that these
estimates have never been provided. Therefore, the Committee
directs the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition,
Technology, and Logistics to provide to the congressional
defense committees within 15 days of the delivery of the fiscal
year 2015 President's budget request, an estimate of Defense
Acquisition Workforce Development Fund funding needs for fiscal
year 2015 through fiscal year 2019. This estimate should
represent the annual, executable funding need given the current
state of the acquisition workforce. Further, the Committee
urges the Secretary of Defense to fully fund the Defense
Acquisition Workforce Development Fund up to this estimated
amount.

TITLE III

PROCUREMENT

Funds appropriated under this title provide the resources
required to purchase military equipment and hardware, including
aircraft, ships, missiles, combat vehicles, ammunition,
weapons, electronic sensors and communications equipment, and
other procurement items.
The President's fiscal year 2014 budget requests a total of
$98,153,503,000 for procurement appropriations.

SUMMARY OF COMMITTEE ACTION

The Committee recommends procurement appropriations
totaling $98,368,753,000 for fiscal year 2014. This is
$215,250,000 above the budget estimate.
Committee recommended procurement appropriations for fiscal
year 2014 are summarized below:

SUMMARY OF PROCUREMENT APPROPRIATIONS
[In thousands of dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Change from
Account 2014 budget Committee budget
estimate recommendation estimate
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Procurement:
Aircraft Procurement, Army.................................. 5,024,387 4,931,222 -93,165
Missile Procurement, Army................................... 1,334,083 1,277,125 -56,958
Procurement of Weapons and Tracked Combat Vehicles, Army.... 1,597,267 1,572,828 -24,439
Procurement of Ammunition, Army............................. 1,540,437 1,454,067 -86,370
Other Procurement, Army..................................... 6,465,218 6,242,899 -222,319
Aircraft Procurement, Navy.................................. 17,927,651 17,501,539 -426,112
Weapons Procurement, Navy................................... 3,122,193 3,107,400 -14,793
Procurement of Ammunition, Navy and Marine Corps............ 589,267 594,467 +5,200
Shipbuilding and Conversion, Navy........................... 14,077,804 14,420,693 +342,889
Other Procurement, Navy..................................... 6,310,257 6,058,377 -251,880
Procurement, Marine Corps................................... 1,343,511 1,325,407 -18,104
Aircraft Procurement, Air Force............................. 11,398,901 10,917,270 -481,631
Missile Procurement, Air Force.............................. 5,343,286 5,178,486 -164,800
Procurement of Ammunition, Air Force........................ 759,442 759,442 ..............
Other Procurement, Air Force................................ 16,760,581 17,542,627 +782,046
Procurement, Defense-Wide................................... 4,534,083 4,434,769 -99,314
National Guard and Reserve Equipment........................ .............. 1,000,000 +1,000,000
Defense Production Act Purchases............................ 25,135 50,135 +25,000
-----------------------------------------------
Total..................................................... 98,153,503 98,368,753 +215,250
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ordnance Plant Recapitalization.--The Committee notes that
the Department of Defense [DOD] does not have a long-term
strategic capital improvement plan in place to support its
aging ordnance plants. These facilities are supporting a
multitude of essential DOD requirements in support of the
warfighter, yet these activities could be disrupted if basic
infrastructure needs, such as heating and cooling, power
generation, safety and environmental hazards are not addressed
in the near future. Therefore, the Committee directs the
Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of the Army to jointly
establish a multi-year recapitalization plan for the ordnance
plants, including the industrial reserve, addressing these
infrastructure and environmental challenges, and to include the
required funds in future budget requests based on the most
urgent needs identified. The ordnance facility recapitalization
plan shall be submitted to the congressional defense committees
not later than 90 days after enactment of this act.
High Mobility Multi-Purpose Wheeled Vehicle [HMMWV].--The
Committee recognizes the value the HMMWV has brought to the
military, not only in contingency operations, but also in
support of domestic emergency response and humanitarian
assistance efforts. Furthermore, ensuring the capacity of the
U.S. industrial base is a national imperative. The Committee
further recognizes that the Army National Guard and the state
Adjutants General strongly support HMMWV modernization and have
consistently included new model HMMWVs among its funding
priorities. Therefore, the Committee urges the Department to
continue to invest in and procure HMMWVs as part of its
enduring vehicle fleet.
Organic Industrial Base of the United States.--The
Committee notes that the organic industrial base of the U.S.
military advances a vital national security interest by
producing necessary materials, munitions, and hardware when
sources outside of the U.S. military are unable to meet this
urgent need as quickly as the organic industrial base, saving
the lives of warfighters. The Committee believes that the
capacity of the organic industrial base of the U.S. military
must be maintained and discourages the Department of Defense
from taking any action that would deteriorate this essential
capability.
Arsenal Sustainment Initiative.--The Committee supports the
ongoing efforts of the Department of the Army to develop the
Army Organic Industrial Base Strategy. This process is
identifying manufacturing capabilities at each organic
industrial facility that are critical for this country to
sustain in wartime and peacetime in case the U.S. military is
called to act. However, the Committee is concerned that while
the Army Organic Industrial Base Strategy is identifying
capabilities, it will not fund these capabilities at a level
adequate to maintain them. In particular, the Nation's arsenals
are at risk of not having the capacity to respond rapidly to
meet the Department's needs. Due to the nature of operating
under the Working Capital Fund, the slowdown in production and
production capacity caused by sequestration is causing the
workload rates to increase for these plants to the point where
they are not able to compete for public/private partnerships
and other business to help sustain capacity in peacetime. In
order to ensure that this industrial base is competitive, cost-
effective, and ready when called on, the Committee recommends
$150,000,000 to the Army Defense Working Capital Fund for the
Industrial Mobilization Capacity account to address the issue
of non-competitive rates at the arsenals, which will better
allow the arsenals to engage in public-private partnerships to
maintain these critical capabilities.
In addition, the Committee directs the Secretary of the
Army to assign the arsenals sufficient workload to maintain the
critical capabilities identified in the Army Organic Industrial
Base Strategy Report and ensure cost efficiency and technical
competence in peacetime, while preserving the ability to
provide an effective and timely response to mobilizations,
national defense contingency situations, and other emergency
requirements.
Further, the Committee directs the Secretary of the Army to
release the Army Organic Industrial Base Strategy Report within
30 days of enactment of this act, and brief the congressional
defense committees within 90 days of this act on its plan to
ensure sufficient workload for the efficient operation of the
arsenals.
Army Organic Industrial Base.--The Committee directs the
Secretary of the Army to provide 45-day written notification to
the congressional defense committees prior to the Secretary
approving a civilian reductions in force that will result in an
employment loss of 50 or more full-time employees at any Army
organic industrial base facility. The notification shall
include the impact that the proposed reduction in force will
have on the ability to maintain the organic industrial base
critical manufacturing capabilities as delineated in the Army
Organic Industrial Base Strategy Report, a detailed accounting
of the costs of implementing the reduction in force, and an
assessment of the cost of, and time necessary, to restore any
lost capability to meet future organic wartime manufacturing
needs.
Light-Weight Ammunition.--As noted in the Senate report
accompanying S. 1197, the National Defense Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year 2014, a current project the Department of
Defense is executing under Defense Production Act, Title III
authority is developing a domestic production capability for
light-weight polymer-based ammunition. The Committee agrees
this effort has the potential to provide the warfighter with
improved battlefield mobility and better survivability.
Additionally, it has the potential to decrease logistical
burdens and reduce fuel consumption in military operations.
Accordingly, the Committee encourages the Department to
continue this effort and provide a briefing or report to this
Committee no later than February 1, 2014, on ammunition
projects which could enhance warfighter capabilities and reduce
logistical burdens.

Aircraft Procurement, Army

Appropriations, 2013\1\................................. $6,020,798,000
Budget estimate, 2014................................... 5,024,387,000
Committee recommendation................................ 4,931,222,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public
Law 112-25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of
$4,931,222,000. This is $93,165,000 below the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this
appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

[Dollars in thousands]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Change from
2014 budget Committee -------------------------------
Item Qty. estimate Qty. recommendation Budget
Qty. estimate
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, ARMY

AIRCRAFT

FIXED WING
UTILITY F/W CARGO AIRCRAFT 1 19,730 1 18,052 .............. -1,678
AERIAL COMMON SENSOR (ACS) (MIP) 4 142,050 2 85,050 -2 -57,000
MQ-1 UAV 15 518,460 15 518,460 .............. ..............
RQ-11 (RAVEN) .............. 10,772 .............. 10,150 .............. -622

ROTARY
HELICOPTER, LIGHT UTILITY (LUH) 10 96,227 10 171,227 .............. +75,000
AH-64 APACHE BLOCK IIIA REMAN 42 608,469 42 608,469 .............. ..............
AH-64 APACHE BLOCK IIIA REMAN (AP-CY) .............. 150,931 .............. 150,931 .............. ..............
UH-60 BLACKHAWK (MYP) 65 1,046,976 65 1,032,915 .............. -14,061
UH-60 BLACKHAWK (MYP) (AP-CY) .............. 116,001 .............. 116,001 .............. ..............
CH-47 HELICOPTER 28 801,650 28 801,650 .............. ..............
CH-47 HELICOPTER (AP-CY) .............. 98,376 .............. 82,534 .............. -15,842
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, AIRCRAFT .............. 3,609,642 .............. 3,595,439 .............. -14,203

MODIFICATION OF AIRCRAFT
MQ-1 PAYLOAD--UAS .............. 97,781 .............. 97,781 .............. ..............
GUARDRAIL MODS (MIP) .............. 10,262 .............. 10,262 .............. ..............
MULTI SENSOR ABN RECON (MIP) .............. 12,467 .............. 10,467 .............. -2,000
AH-64 MODS .............. 53,559 .............. 53,559 .............. ..............
CH-47 CARGO HELICOPTER MODS .............. 149,764 .............. 149,764 .............. ..............
UTILITY/CARGO AIRPLANE MODS .............. 17,500 .............. 14,000 .............. -3,500
UTILITY HELICOPTER MODS 167 74,095 167 84,095 .............. +10,000
KIOWA WARRIOR 3 184,044 3 108,282 .............. -75,762
NETWORK AND MISSION PLAN .............. 152,569 .............. 144,869 .............. -7,700
COMMS, NAV SURVEILLANCE .............. 92,779 .............. 92,779 .............. ..............
GATM ROLLUP .............. 65,613 .............. 65,613 .............. ..............
RQ-7 UAV MODS .............. 121,902 .............. 121,902 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, MODIFICATION OF AIRCRAFT .............. 1,032,335 .............. 953,373 .............. -78,962

SUPPORT EQUIPMENT AND FACILITIES

GROUND SUPPORT AVIONICS
AIRCRAFT SURVIVABILITY EQUIPMENT .............. 47,610 .............. 47,610 .............. ..............
SURVIVABILITY CM .............. 5,700 .............. 5,700 .............. ..............
CMWS .............. 126,869 .............. 126,869 .............. ..............

OTHER SUPPORT
AVIONICS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 705 6,809 705 6,809 .............. ..............
COMMON GROUND EQUIPMENT .............. 65,397 .............. 65,397 .............. ..............
AIRCREW INTEGRATED SYSTEMS .............. 45,841 .............. 45,841 .............. ..............
AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL .............. 79,692 .............. 79,692 .............. ..............
INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES .............. 1,615 .............. 1,615 .............. ..............
LAUNCHER, 2.75 ROCKET .............. 2,877 .............. 2,877 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, SUPPORT EQUIPMENT AND FACILITIES .............. 382,410 .............. 382,410 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, ARMY .............. 5,024,387 .............. 4,931,222 .............. -93,165
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by
the Committee:

Aerial Common Sensor.--The Army is requesting $142,050,000
for the first year of production of four enhanced medium
altitude reconnaissance and surveillance system [EMARSS]
aircraft. The program has experienced two cost overruns on the
development aircraft and has not completed the limited user
testing. Therefore, the Committee recommends reducing the
procurement request by $57,000,000 and two aircraft.
UH-72A Lakota Light Utility Helicopter [LUH].--The budget
request includes $96,227,000 to procure 10 UH-72A Lakota
Helicopters. The request also proposes ending Lakota production
after the fiscal year 2014 buy and truncating the total program
at 315 aircraft instead of the originally planned 346. The UH-
72A Lakota program was established to replace aging UH-1 and
OH-58 fleets which were already years past their directed
retirement dates and to augment the UH-60 fleet which was more
costly to procure and operate than a UH-72A. The Lakota program
has achieved cost, schedule, and performance goals and is a
more cost effective approach to performing utility missions
than operating aging and more expensive helicopters; therefore,
the Committee does not support program truncation short of the
original requirement and provides $171,227,000 to purchase 20
UH-72A Lakota helicopters in fiscal year 2014.
Kiowa Warrior Modifications.--The Army requests
$184,044,000 to procure a new cockpit and other modifications.
For the last couple of years, the Committee has been
encouraging the Army to focus on the replacement aircraft and
only modify the safety issues associated with this platform.
Therefore, the Committee recommends a reduction of $75,000,000
and directs the remaining funds to only focus on the approved
safety issues, the dual channel full authority digital engine
control system.
RQ-7 Shadow Unmanned Aerial Vehicle and OH-58 Kiowa Warrior
Modification Programs.--The RQ-7 unmanned aerial vehicle
modifications total procurement budget from previous years
through fiscal year 2018 is over $2,069,000,000. In addition,
the OH-58 Kiowa Warrior Modifications procurement budget from
previous years through fiscal year 2018 is over $2,500,000,000.
Given the scope and size of planned investments, these programs
exceed the threshold for designation as Acquisition Category
[ACAT] 1D or Major Defense Acquisition Programs [MDAPs].
Currently, both programs are classified as lower acquisition
category programs, which receive less Office of the Secretary
of Defense [OSD] oversight and require less justification
documentation than MDAPs. The Committee directs the Secretary
of Defense to designate the RQ-7 unmanned aerial vehicle and
OH-58 Kiowa Warrior programs and all of their associated
program element investments as single ACAT 1D or MDAPs as
defined under chapter 144 of title 10 of United States Code.
All provisions and reporting requirements of such chapter shall
apply to the programs, and any upgrades, improvements or
modifications to the RQ-7 or OH-58 platforms shall be reviewed
within the regulatory review process established by the
Secretary of Defense for MDAPs.
In addition, the Committee is concerned over the unlimited
modifications to existing systems which causes programs such as
Armed Aerial Scout to continually get deferred until they are
eventually terminated because the Army cannot afford to
continually modernize existing systems at the same time they
are trying to provide new capability.

Missile Procurement, Army

Appropriations, 2013\1\................................. $1,533,407,000
Budget estimate, 2014................................... 1,334,083,000
Committee recommendation................................ 1,277,125,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public
Law 112-25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of
$1,277,125,000. This is $56,958,000 below the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this
appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

OTHER MISSILES

SURFACE-TO-AIR MISSILE SYSTEM
MSE MISSILE 56 540,401 56 540,401 .............. ..............

AIR-TO-SURFACE MISSILE SYSTEM
HELLFIRE SYS SUMMARY .............. 4,464 .............. 4,464 .............. ..............

ANTI-TANK/ASSAULT MISSILE SYSTEM
JAVELIN (AAWS-M) SYSTEM SUMMARY 449 110,510 449 110,510 .............. ..............
TOW 2 SYSTEM SUMMARY 988 49,354 988 49,354 .............. ..............
TOW 2 SYSTEM SUMMARY (AP-CY) .............. 19,965 .............. 19,965 .............. ..............
GUIDED MLRS ROCKET (GMLRS) 1,788 237,216 1,788 233,980 .............. -3,236
MLRS REDUCED RANGE PRACTICE ROCKETS (RRPR) 2,412 19,022 2,412 19,022 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, OTHER MISSILES .............. 980,932 .............. 977,696 .............. -3,236

MODIFICATION OF MISSILES

MODIFICATIONS
PATRIOT MODS .............. 256,438 .............. 202,716 .............. -53,722
STINGER MODS .............. 37,252 .............. 37,252 .............. ..............
ITAS/TOW MODS .............. 20,000 .............. 20,000 .............. ..............
MLRS MODS .............. 11,571 .............. 11,571 .............. ..............
HIMARS MODIFICATIONS .............. 6,105 .............. 6,105 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, MODIFICATION OF MISSILES .............. 331,366 .............. 277,644 .............. -53,722

SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS
SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS .............. 11,222 .............. 11,222 .............. ..............

SUPPORT EQUIPMENT AND FACILITIES
AIR DEFENSE TARGETS .............. 3,530 .............. 3,530 .............. ..............
ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (MISSILES) .............. 1,748 .............. 1,748 .............. ..............
PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT .............. 5,285 .............. 5,285 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, SUPPORT EQUIPMENT AND FACILITIES .............. 10,563 .............. 10,563 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, MISSILE PROCUREMENT, ARMY .............. 1,334,083 .............. 1,277,125 .............. -56,958
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by
the Committee:

Procurement of Weapons and Tracked Combat Vehicles, Army

Appropriations, 2013\1\................................. $1,855,371,000
Budget estimate, 2014................................... 1,597,267,000
Committee recommendation................................ 1,572,828,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public
Law 112-25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of
$1,572,828,000. This is $24,439,000 below the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this
appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

TRACKED COMBAT VEHICLES
STRYKER VEHICLE .............. 374,100 .............. 419,100 .............. +45,000

MODIFICATION OF TRACKED COMBAT VEHICLES
STRYKER (MOD) .............. 20,522 .............. 20,522 .............. ..............
FIST VEHICLE (MOD) .............. 29,965 .............. 29,965 .............. ..............
BRADLEY PROGRAM (MOD) .............. 158,000 .............. 158,000 .............. ..............
HOWITZER, MED SP FT 155MM M109A6 (MOD) .............. 4,769 .............. 4,769 .............. ..............
PALADIN PIPM MOD IN SERVICE 18 260,177 18 219,477 .............. -40,700
IMPROVED RECOVERY VEHICLE (M88A2 HERCULES) 32 111,031 32 111,031 .............. ..............
ASSAULT BRIDGE (MOD) .............. 2,500 .............. 2,500 .............. ..............
ARMORED BREACHER VEHICLE 14 62,951 14 62,951 .............. ..............
M88 FOV MODS .............. 28,469 .............. 28,469 .............. ..............
JOINT ASSAULT BRIDGE .............. 2,002 .............. 2,002 .............. ..............
M1 ABRAMS TANK (MOD) .............. 178,100 .............. 178,100 .............. ..............
ABRAMS UPGRADE PROGRAM .............. .............. .............. 90,000 .............. +90,000

SUPPORT EQUIPMENT AND FACILITIES
PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT (TCV-WTCV) .............. 1,544 .............. 1,544 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, TRACKED COMBAT VEHICLES .............. 1,234,130 .............. 1,328,430 .............. +94,300

WEAPONS AND OTHER COMBAT VEHICLES
INTEGRATED AIR BURST WEAPON SYS FAMILY 1,424 69,147 .............. .............. -1,424 -69,147
MORTAR SYSTEMS .............. 5,310 .............. 5,310 .............. ..............
XM320 GRENADE LAUNCHER MODULE (GLM) 5,061 24,049 5,061 24,049 .............. ..............
CARBINE 41,897 70,846 12,000 21,254 -29,897 -49,592
COMMON REMOTELY OPERATED WEAPONS STATION 242 56,580 242 56,580 .............. ..............
HANDGUN .............. 300 .............. 300 .............. ..............

MOD OF WEAPONS AND OTHER COMBAT VEH
M777 MODS .............. 39,300 .............. 39,300 .............. ..............
M4 CARBINE MODS .............. 10,300 .............. 10,300 .............. ..............
M2 50 CAL MACHINE GUN MODS .............. 33,691 .............. 33,691 .............. ..............
M249 SAW MACHINE GUN MODS .............. 7,608 .............. 7,608 .............. ..............
M240 MEDIUM MACHINE GUN MODS .............. 2,719 .............. 2,719 .............. ..............
SNIPER RIFLES MODIFICATIONS .............. 7,017 .............. 7,017 .............. ..............
M119 MODIFICATIONS .............. 18,707 .............. 18,707 .............. ..............
M16 RIFLE MODS .............. 2,136 .............. 2,136 .............. ..............
MODIFICATIONS LESS THAN $5.0M (WOCV-WTCV) .............. 1,569 .............. 1,569 .............. ..............

SUPPORT EQUIPMENT AND FACILITIES
ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (WOCV-WTCV) .............. 2,024 .............. 2,024 .............. ..............
PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT (WOCV-WTCV) .............. 10,108 .............. 10,108 .............. ..............
INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS .............. 459 .............. 459 .............. ..............
SMALL ARMS EQUIPMENT (SOLDIER ENH PROG) .............. 1,267 .............. 1,267 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, WEAPONS AND OTHER COMBAT VEHICLES .............. 363,137 .............. 244,398 .............. -118,739

SPARE AND REPAIR PARTS
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, PROCUREMENT OF W&TCV, ARMY .............. 1,597,267 .............. 1,572,828 .............. -24,439
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by
the Committee:

Procurement of Ammunition, Army

Appropriations, 2013\1\\2\.............................. $1,640,450,000
Budget estimate, 2014................................... 1,540,437,000
Committee recommendation................................ 1,454,067,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public
Law 112-25.
\2\Includes emergency funding of $1,310,000 in the Disaster Relief
Appropriations Act, 2013 (division A of Public Law 113-2).

The Committee recommends an appropriation of
$1,454,067,000. This is $86,370,000 below the budget estimate.

committee recommended program

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this
appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

AMMUNITION

SMALL/MEDIUM CAL AMMUNITION
CTG, 5.56MM, ALL TYPES .............. 112,167 .............. 87,167 .............. -25,000
CTG, 7.62MM, ALL TYPES .............. 58,571 .............. 53,571 .............. -5,000
CTG, HANDGUN, ALL TYPES .............. 9,858 .............. 9,858 .............. ..............
CTG, .50 CAL, ALL TYPES .............. 80,037 .............. 55,037 .............. -25,000
CTG, 25MM, ALL TYPES .............. 16,496 .............. 6,196 .............. -10,300
CTG, 30MM, ALL TYPES .............. 69,533 .............. 50,033 .............. -19,500
CTG, 40MM, ALL TYPES .............. 55,781 .............. 55,781 .............. ..............

MORTAR AMMUNITION
60MM MORTAR, ALL TYPES .............. 38,029 .............. 38,029 .............. ..............
81MM MORTAR, ALL TYPES .............. 24,656 .............. 24,656 .............. ..............
120MM MORTAR, ALL TYPES .............. 60,781 .............. 60,781 .............. ..............

TANK AMMUNITION
CTG TANK 105MM AND 120MM: ALL TYPES .............. 121,551 .............. 121,551 .............. ..............

ARTILLERY AMMUNITION
CTG, ARTY, 75MM AND 105MM: ALL TYPES .............. 39,825 .............. 39,825 .............. ..............
ARTILLERY PROJECTILE, 155MM, ALL TYPES .............. 37,902 .............. 37,902 .............. ..............
PROJ 155MM EXTENDED RANGE XM982 802 67,896 802 66,326 .............. -1,570
ARTILLERY PROPELLANTS, FUZES AND PRIMERS, ALL .............. 71,205 .............. 71,205 .............. ..............
TYPES

MINES

NETWORKED MUNITIONS

ROCKETS
SHOULDER LAUNCHED MUNITIONS, ALL TYPES .............. 1,012 .............. 1,012 .............. ..............
ROCKET, HYDRA 70, ALL TYPES .............. 108,476 .............. 108,476 .............. ..............

OTHER AMMUNITION
DEMOLITION MUNITIONS, ALL TYPES .............. 24,074 .............. 24,074 .............. ..............
GRENADES, ALL TYPES .............. 33,242 .............. 33,242 .............. ..............
SIGNALS, ALL TYPES .............. 7,609 .............. 7,609 .............. ..............
SIMULATORS, ALL TYPES .............. 5,228 .............. 5,228 .............. ..............

MISCELLANEOUS
AMMO COMPONENTS, ALL TYPES .............. 16,700 .............. 16,700 .............. ..............
NON-LETHAL AMMUNITION, ALL TYPES .............. 7,366 .............. 7,366 .............. ..............
CAD/PAD ALL TYPES .............. 3,614 .............. 3,614 .............. ..............
ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION .............. 12,423 .............. 12,423 .............. ..............
AMMUNITION PECULIAR EQUIPMENT .............. 16,604 .............. 16,604 .............. ..............
FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION (AMMO) .............. 14,328 .............. 14,328 .............. ..............
CLOSEOUT LIABILITIES .............. 108 .............. 108 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, AMMUNITION .............. 1,115,072 .............. 1,028,702 .............. -86,370

AMMUNITION PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT

PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT
PROVISION OF INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES .............. 242,324 .............. 242,324 .............. ..............
CONVENTIONAL MUNITIONS DEMILITARIZATION, ALL .............. 179,605 .............. 179,605 .............. ..............
ARMS INITIATIVE .............. 3,436 .............. 3,436 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, AMMUNITION PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT .............. 425,365 .............. 425,365 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, ARMY .............. 1,540,437 .............. 1,454,067 .............. -86,370
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by
the Committee:

Small Caliber Trace Domestic Second Source.--The Committee
is concerned about the single point failure risk associated
with small caliber traced projectiles. The Committee directs
the Secretary of the Army to conduct a study on the
requirements to establish a fully capable U.S.-based second
source for small caliber traced projectiles. The Committee
urges the Secretary of the Army to investigate the expansion of
existing facilities to maximize previous U.S. Government
investments. The Committee directs the Secretary of the Army to
provide a report and recommendations from this study to the
congressional defense committees within 90 days of enactment of
this act.

Other Procurement, Army

Appropriations, 2013\1\................................. $5,734,087,000
Budget estimate, 2014................................... 6,465,218,000
Committee recommendation................................ 6,242,899,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public
Law 112-25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of
$6,242,899,000. This is $222,319,000 below the budget estimate.

committee recommended program

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this
appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

TACTICAL AND SUPPORT VEHICLES

TACTICAL VEHICLES
TACTICAL TRAILERS/DOLLY SETS 25 4,000 25 4,000 .............. ..............
SEMITRAILERS, FLATBED 40 6,841 40 6,841 .............. ..............
FAMILY OF MEDIUM TACTICAL VEH (FMTV) 837 223,910 837 223,910 .............. ..............
FIRETRUCKS & ASSOCIATED FIREFIGHTING EQUIPMEN .............. 11,880 .............. 11,880 .............. ..............
FAMILY OF HEAVY TACTICAL VEHICLES (FHTV) 220 14,731 220 14,731 .............. ..............
PLS ESP 74 44,252 74 44,252 .............. ..............
HVY EXPANDED MOBILE TACTICAL TRUCK EXT SERV 77 39,525 77 39,525 .............. ..............
TACTICAL WHEELED VEHICLE PROTECTION KITS 746 51,258 746 51,258 .............. ..............
MODIFICATION OF IN SVC EQUIP 34 49,904 34 49,904 .............. ..............
MINE-RESISTANT AMBUSH-PROTECTED MODS .............. 2,200 .............. 52,200 .............. +50,000

NON-TACTICAL VEHICLES
HEAVY ARMORED SEDAN .............. 400 .............. 400 .............. ..............
PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLES .............. 716 .............. 716 .............. ..............
NONTACTICAL VEHICLES, OTHER .............. 5,619 .............. 5,619 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, TACTICAL AND SUPPORT VEHICLES .............. 455,236 .............. 505,236 .............. +50,000

COMMUNICATIONS AND ELECTRONICS EQUIPMENT

COMM--JOINT COMMUNICATIONS
WIN-T--GROUND FORCES TACTICAL NETWORK 2,139 973,477 2,139 973,477 .............. ..............
SIGNAL MODERNIZATION PROGRAM .............. 14,120 .............. 620 .............. -13,500
JOINT INCIDENT SITE COMMUNICATIONS CAPABILITY .............. 7,869 .............. 7,869 .............. ..............
JCSE EQUIPMENT (USREDCOM) .............. 5,296 .............. 5,296 .............. ..............

COMM--SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS
DEFENSE ENTERPRISE WIDEBAND SATCOM SYSTEMS 31 147,212 31 147,212 .............. ..............
TRANSPORTABLE TACTICAL COMMAND COMMUNICATIONS .............. 7,998 .............. 598 .............. -7,400
SHF TERM .............. 7,232 .............. 7,232 .............. ..............
NAVSTAR GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM (SPACE) .............. 3,308 .............. 3,308 .............. ..............
SMART-T (SPACE) .............. 13,992 .............. 13,992 .............. ..............
GLOBAL BRDCST SVC--GBS 94 28,206 94 28,206 .............. ..............
MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP (TAC SAT) 15 2,778 15 2,778 .............. ..............

COMM--C3 SYSTEM
ARMY GLOBAL CMD & CONTROL SYS (AGCCS) .............. 17,590 .............. 17,590 .............. ..............

COMM--COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS
ARMY DATA DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (DATA RADIO) .............. 786 .............. .............. .............. -786
JOINT TACTICAL RADIO SYSTEM 10,523 382,930 10,523 382,930 .............. ..............
MID-TIER NETWORKING VEHICULAR RADIO (MNVR) 130 19,200 130 19,200 .............. ..............
RADIO TERMINAL SET, MIDS LVT(2) .............. 1,438 .............. 1,438 .............. ..............
SINCGARS FAMILY .............. 9,856 .............. .............. .............. -9,856
AMC CRITICAL ITEMS--OPA2 2,066 14,184 2,066 14,184 .............. ..............
TRACTOR DESK .............. 6,271 .............. 6,271 .............. ..............
SOLDIER ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM COMM/ELECTRONICS .............. 1,030 .............. .............. .............. -1,030
TACTICAL COMMUNICATIONS AND PROTECTIVE SYSTEM 15,967 31,868 15,967 31,868 .............. ..............
UNIFIED COMMAND SUITE .............. 18,000 .............. 18,000 .............. ..............
RADIO, IMPROVED HF (COTS) FAMILY .............. 1,166 .............. 1,166 .............. ..............
FAMILY OF MED COMM FOR COMBAT CASUALTY CARE .............. 22,867 .............. 22,867 .............. ..............

COMM--INTELLIGENCE COMM
CI AUTOMATION ARCHITECTURE (MIP) .............. 1,512 .............. 1,512 .............. ..............
RESERVE CA/MISO GPF EQUIPMENT 323 61,096 323 61,096 .............. ..............

INFORMATION SECURITY
TSEC--ARMY KEY MGT SYS (AKMS) .............. 13,890 .............. 13,890 .............. ..............
INFORMATION SYSTEM SECURITY PROGRAM--ISSP 1,133 23,245 1,133 23,245 .............. ..............
FAMILY OF BIOMETRICS .............. 3,800 .............. 3,800 .............. ..............
COMMUNICATIONS SECURITY (COMSEC) 877 24,711 877 24,711 .............. ..............

COMM--LONG HAUL COMMUNICATIONS
BASE SUPPORT COMMUNICATIONS .............. 43,395 .............. 43,395 .............. ..............

COMM--BASE COMMUNICATIONS
INFORMATION SYSTEMS .............. 104,577 .............. 104,577 .............. ..............
DEFENSE MESSAGE SYSTEM (DMS) .............. 612 .............. 612 .............. ..............
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT MODERNIZATION PROGRAM .............. 39,000 .............. 39,000 .............. ..............
INSTALLATION INFO INFRASTRUCTURE MOD PROGRAM .............. 248,477 .............. 248,477 .............. ..............

ELECT EQUIP

ELECT EQUIP--TACT INT REL ACT (TIARA)
JTT/CIBS-M (MIP) .............. 824 .............. 824 .............. ..............
PROPHET GROUND (MIP) 10 59,198 10 55,398 .............. -3,800
DCGS-A (MIP) 2,717 267,214 2,717 267,214 .............. ..............
JOINT TACTICAL GROUND STATION (JTAGS) 5 9,899 5 9,899 .............. ..............
TROJAN (MIP) .............. 24,598 .............. 24,598 .............. ..............
MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP (INTEL SPT) (MIP) .............. 1,927 .............. 1,927 .............. ..............
CI HUMINT AUTO REPRTING AND COLL (CHARCS) (MIP) .............. 6,169 .............. 6,169 .............. ..............
MACHINE FOREIGN LANGUAGE TRANSLATION SYSTEM .............. 2,924 .............. 2,924 .............. ..............

ELECT EQUIP--ELECTRONIC WARFARE (EW)
LIGHTWEIGHT COUNTER MORTAR RADAR 18 40,735 18 40,735 .............. ..............
EW PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT TOOLS .............. 13 .............. 13 .............. ..............
ENEMY UAS .............. 2,800 .............. 2,800 .............. ..............
COUNTERINTELLIGENCE/SECURITY COUNTERMEASURES .............. 1,237 .............. 1,237 .............. ..............
CI MODERNIZATION (MIP) .............. 1,399 .............. 1,399 .............. ..............

ELECT EQUIP--TACTICAL SURV. (TAC SURV)
SENTINEL MODS 86 47,983 86 35,983 .............. -12,000
SENSE THROUGH THE WALL (STTW) .............. 142 .............. .............. .............. -142
NIGHT VISION DEVICES 6,879 202,428 6,879 164,928 .............. -37,500
LONG RANGE ADVANCED SCOUT SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM .............. 5,183 .............. 5,183 .............. ..............
NIGHT VISION, THERMAL WPN SIGHT .............. 14,074 .............. 10,074 .............. -4,000
SMALL TACTICAL OPTICAL RIFLE MOUNTED MLRF 1,491 22,300 1,491 22,300 .............. ..............
GREEN LASER INTERDICTION SYSTEM .............. 1,016 .............. 1,016 .............. ..............
INDIRECT FIRE PROTECTION FAMILY OF SYSTEMS 5 55,354 5 55,354 .............. ..............
ARTILLERY ACCURACY EQUIP .............. 800 .............. 800 .............. ..............
PROFILER .............. 3,027 .............. 3,027 .............. ..............
MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP (FIREFINDER RADARS) .............. 1,185 .............. 1,185 .............. ..............
JOINT BATTLE COMMAND--PLATFORM (JBC-P) 3,866 103,214 3,866 103,214 .............. ..............
MOD OF IN-SERVICE EQUIPMENT (LLDR) 167 26,037 167 26,037 .............. ..............
MORTAR FIRE CONTROL SYSTEM 120 23,100 120 23,100 .............. ..............
COUNTERFIRE RADARS 19 312,727 19 312,727 .............. ..............

ELECT EQUIP--TACTICAL C2 SYSTEMS
FIRE SUPPORT C2 FAMILY 574 43,228 574 43,228 .............. ..............
BATTLE COMMAND SUSTAINMENT SUPPORT SYSTEM 167 14,446 167 14,446 .............. ..............
FAAD C2 .............. 4,607 .............. 4,607 .............. ..............
AIR & MSL DEFENSE PLANNING & CONTROL SYS (AMD) 8 33,090 8 33,090 .............. ..............
IAMD BATTLE COMMAND SYSTEM .............. 21,200 .............. 21,200 .............. ..............
LIFE CYCLE SOFTWARE SUPPORT (LCSS) .............. 1,795 .............. 1,795 .............. ..............
NETWORK MANAGEMENT INITIALIZATION AND SERVICE .............. 54,327 .............. 54,327 .............. ..............
MANEUVER CONTROL SYSTEM (MCS) 2,959 59,171 2,959 59,171 .............. ..............
GLOBAL COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM--ARMY .............. 83,936 .............. 83,936 .............. ..............
LOGISTICS AUTOMATION .............. 25,476 .............. 25,476 .............. ..............
RECONNAISSANCE AND SURVEYING INSTRUMENT SET 212 19,341 212 19,341 .............. ..............

ELECT EQUIP--AUTOMATION
ARMY TRAINING MODERNIZATION .............. 11,865 .............. 11,865 .............. ..............
AUTOMATED DATA PROCESSING EQUIPMENT .............. 219,431 .............. 196,831 .............. -22,600
GENERAL FUND ENTERPRISE BUSINESS SYSTEM .............. 6,414 .............. 6,414 .............. ..............
HIGH PERF COMPUTING MOD PROGRAM .............. 62,683 .............. 62,683 .............. ..............
RESERVE COMPONENT AUTOMATION SYS (RCAS) .............. 34,951 .............. 34,951 .............. ..............

ELECT EQUIP--AUDIO VISUAL SYS (A/V)
ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (A/V) .............. 7,440 .............. 7,440 .............. ..............
ITEMS LESS THAN $5M (SURVEYING EQUIPMENT) 16 1,615 16 1,615 .............. ..............

ELECT EQUIP--SUPPORT
PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT (C-E) .............. 554 .............. 554 .............. ..............
BCT EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES .............. 20,000 .............. 20,000 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, COMMUNICATIONS AND ELECTRONICS .............. 4,266,066 .............. 4,153,452 .............. -112,614
EQUIPMENT

OTHER SUPPORT EQUIPMENT

CHEMICAL DEFENSIVE EQUIPMENT
FAMILY OF NON-LETHAL EQUIPMENT (FNLE) .............. 762 .............. .............. .............. -762
BASE DEFENSE SYSTEMS (BDS) 3,759 20,630 3,759 20,630 .............. ..............
CBRN SOLDIER PROTECTION 24,530 22,151 24,530 22,151 .............. ..............

BRIDGING EQUIPMENT
TACTICAL BRIDGING 2 14,188 2 14,188 .............. ..............
TACTICAL BRIDGE, FLOAT-RIBBON 34 23,101 34 23,101 .............. ..............
COMMON BRIDGE TRANSPORTER RECAP .............. 15,416 .............. 15,416 .............. ..............

ENGINEER (NON-CONSTRUCTION) EQUIPMENT
GROUND STANDOFF MINE DETECTION SYSTEM (GSTAMIDS) 311 50,465 311 42,765 .............. -7,700
ROBOTIC COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM .............. 6,490 .............. 6,490 .............. ..............
EOD ROBOTICS SYSTEMS RECAPITALIZATION .............. 1,563 .............. 1,563 .............. ..............
EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DISPOSAL EQPMT (EOD EQPMT) 6,774 20,921 6,774 20,921 .............. ..............
REMOTE DEMOLITION SYSTEMS .............. 100 .............. 100 .............. ..............
ITEMS LESS THAN $5M, COUNTERMINE EQUIPMENT 70 2,271 70 2,271 .............. ..............

COMBAT SERVICE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
HEATERS AND ECU'S 464 7,269 464 7,269 .............. ..............
LAUNDRIES, SHOWERS AND LATRINES .............. 200 .............. 200 .............. ..............
SOLDIER ENHANCEMENT .............. 1,468 .............. 1,468 .............. ..............
PERSONNEL RECOVERY SUPPORT SYSTEM (PRSS) 31,530 26,526 31,530 26,526 .............. ..............
GROUND SOLDIER SYSTEM 5,547 81,680 5,547 81,680 .............. ..............
FIELD FEEDING EQUIPMENT 217 28,096 217 28,096 .............. ..............
CARGO AERIAL DEL & PERSONNEL PARACHUTE SYSTEM 6,904 56,150 6,904 44,677 .............. -11,473
MORTUARY AFFAIRS SYSTEMS 248 3,242 248 3,242 .............. ..............
FAMILY OF ENGR COMBAT AND CONSTRUCTION SETS 289 38,141 289 38,141 .............. ..............
ITEMS LESS THAN $5M (ENG SPT) 210 5,859 210 5,859 .............. ..............

PETROLEUM EQUIPMENT
DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS, PETROLEUM & WATER 508 60,612 508 60,612 .............. ..............

MEDICAL EQUIPMENT
COMBAT SUPPORT MEDICAL 3,258 22,042 3,258 22,042 .............. ..............
MEDEVAC MISSION EQUIPMENT PACKAGE (MEP) 88 35,318 88 35,318 .............. ..............

MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT
MOBILE MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT SYSTEMS 25 19,427 25 19,427 .............. ..............
ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (MAINT EQ) 347 3,860 347 3,860 .............. ..............

CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT
GRADER, ROAD MTZD, HVY, 6X4 (CCE) .............. 2,000 .............. 2,000 .............. ..............
SCRAPERS, EARTHMOVING 52 36,078 52 36,078 .............. ..............
MISSION MODULES--ENGINEERING 13 9,721 13 9,721 .............. ..............
HYDRAULIC EXCAVATOR 109 50,122 109 50,122 .............. ..............
TRACTOR, FULL TRACKED 84 28,828 84 28,828 .............. ..............
ALL TERRAIN CRANES 19 19,863 19 2,613 .............. -17,250
HIGH MOBILITY ENGINEER EXCAVATOR (HMEE) FOS 34 23,465 34 19,645 .............. -3,820
ENHANCED RAPID AIRFIELD CONSTRUCTION CAPAP 109 13,590 109 .............. .............. -13,590
CONST EQUIP ESP 80 16,088 80 16,088 .............. ..............
ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (CONST EQUIP) 66 6,850 66 6,850 .............. ..............

RAIL FLOAT CONTAINERIZATION EQUIPMENT
ARMY WATERCRAFT ESP .............. 38,007 .............. 38,007 .............. ..............
ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (FLOAT/RAIL) .............. 10,605 .............. 10,605 .............. ..............

GENERATORS
GENERATORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT 5,239 129,437 5,239 129,437 .............. ..............

MATERIAL HANDLING EQUIPMENT
ROUGH TERRAIN CONTAINER HANDLER .............. 1,250 .............. 1,250 .............. ..............
FAMILY OF FORKLIFTS 60 8,260 60 8,260 .............. ..............

TRAINING EQUIPMENT
COMBAT TRAINING CENTERS SUPPORT 309 121,710 309 61,710 .............. -60,000
TRAINING DEVICES, NONSYSTEM 8,181 225,200 8,181 215,200 .............. -10,000
CLOSE COMBAT TACTICAL TRAINER 15 30,063 15 30,063 .............. ..............
AVIATION COMBINED ARMS TACTICAL TRAINER (AVCA) 2 34,913 2 34,913 .............. ..............
GAMING TECHNOLOGY IN SUPPORT OF ARMY TRAINING .............. 9,955 .............. 9,955 .............. ..............

TEST MEASURE AND DIG EQUIPMENT (TMD)
CALIBRATION SETS EQUIPMENT 3 8,241 3 8,241 .............. ..............
INTEGRATED FAMILY OF TEST EQUIPMENT (IFTE) 1,810 67,506 1,810 67,506 .............. ..............
TEST EQUIPMENT MODERNIZATION (TEMOD) 2,105 18,755 2,105 18,755 .............. ..............

OTHER SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
M25 STABILIZED BINOCULAR 647 5,110 647 5,110 .............. ..............
RAPID EQUIPPING SOLDIER SUPPORT EQUIPMENT .............. 5,110 .............. .............. .............. -5,110
PHYSICAL SECURITY SYSTEMS (OPA3) .............. 62,904 .............. 62,904 .............. ..............
BASE LEVEL COM'L EQUIPMENT .............. 1,427 .............. 1,427 .............. ..............
MODIFICATION OF IN-SVC EQUIPMENT (OPA-3) 1,936 96,661 1,936 96,661 .............. ..............
PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT (OTH) .............. 2,450 .............. 2,450 .............. ..............
SPECIAL EQUIPMENT FOR USER TESTING 69 11,593 69 11,593 .............. ..............
AMC CRITICAL ITEMS OPA3 1,597 8,948 1,597 8,948 .............. ..............
TRACTOR YARD .............. 8,000 .............. 8,000 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, OTHER SUPPORT EQUIPMENT .............. 1,680,658 .............. 1,550,953 .............. -129,705

SPARE AND REPAIR PARTS
INITIAL SPARES--C&E 15 59,700 15 29,700 .............. -30,000
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, SPARE AND REPAIR PARTS .............. 59,700 .............. 29,700 .............. -30,000

CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS .............. 3,558 .............. 3,558 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, OTHER PROCUREMENT, ARMY .............. 6,465,218 .............. 6,242,899 .............. -222,319
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by
the Committee:

[In thousands of dollars]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2014 budget Committee Change from
Line Item estimate recommendation budget estimate
------------------------------------------------------------------------
13Mine-Resistant 2,200 52,200 +50,000
Ambush-Protected
[MRAP] Mods
Army unfunded .............. .............. +50,000
requirement:
MRAP Mods
19Signal 14,120 620 -13,500
Modernization
Program
Restoring .............. .............. -13,500
acquisition
accountabili
ty: program
delay
23Transportable 7,998 598 -7,400
Tactical Command
Communications
Restoring .............. .............. -7,400
acquisition
accountabili
ty: program
delay
32Army Data 786 .............. -786
Distribution
System (DATA
RADIO)
Improving .............. .............. -786
funds
management:
transitioned
to
sustainment
in fiscal
year 2013
36Sincgars Family 9,856 .............. -9,856
Improving .............. .............. -9,856
funds
management:
transitioned
to
sustainment
in fiscal
year 2013
40Soldier 1,030 .............. -1,030
Enhancement
Program Comm/
Electronics
Reduce .............. .............. -1,030
duplication
65Prophet Ground 59,198 55,398 -3,800
Restoring .............. .............. -3,800
acquisition
accountabili
ty: hardware
unit cost
growth
82Sentinel Mods 47,983 35,983 -12,000
Restoring .............. .............. -12,000
acquisition
accountabili
ty: Mode 5
fielding
delay
83Sense Through the 142 .............. -142
Wall [STTW]
Program .............. .............. -142
termination:
Program
previously
terminated
84Night Vision 202,428 164,928 -37,500
Devices
Restoring .............. .............. -37,500
acquisition
accountabili
ty:
excessive
unit cost
increase
86Night Vision, 14,074 10,074 -4,000
Thermal Wpn
Sight
Restoring .............. .............. -4,000
acquisition
accountabili
ty:
excessive
fielding
support
costs
116Automated Data 219,431 196,831 -22,600
Processing Equip
Restoring .............. .............. -22,600
acquisition
accountabili
ty:
Integrated
Pay and
Personnel
System
hardware
procurement
concurrency
126Family of Non- 762 .............. -762
Lethal Equipment
[FNLE]
Program .............. .............. -762
termination:
Program
previously
terminated
134Grnd Standoff 50,465 42,765 -7,700
Mine Detectn
Sysm [GSTAMIDS]
Restoring .............. .............. -7,700
acquisition
accountabili
ty: Husky
Mounted
Detection
system late
contract
award
148Cargo Aerial Del 56,150 44,677 -11,473
& Personnel
Parachute System
Budget .............. .............. -11,473
documentatio
n disparity:
risk
mitigation
unjustified
request
164All Terrain 19,863 2,613 -17,250
Cranes
Restoring .............. .............. -17,250
acquisition
accountabili
ty:
procurement
concurrency
166High Mobility 23,465 19,645 -3,820
Engineer
Excavator [HMEE]
Maintain .............. .............. -14,050
program
affordabilit
y: transfer
from HMEE
Airborne
Maintain .............. .............. +10,230
program
affordabilit
y: transfer
to HMEE Type
1
168Enhanced Rapid 13,590 .............. -13,590
Airfield
Construction
Reduce .............. .............. -13,590
duplication
176Combat Training 121,710 61,710 -60,000
Centers Support
Restoring .............. .............. -60,000
acquisition
accountabili
ty: program
delay
177Training Devices, 225,200 215,200 -10,000
Nonsystem
Improving .............. .............. -10,000
funds
management:
unobligated
prior year
funds
185Rapid Equipping 5,110 .............. -5,110
Soldier Support
Equipment
Restoring .............. .............. -5,110
acquisition
accountabili
ty: Rapid
Equipping
Force funded
in OCO
195Initial Spares-- 59,700 29,700 -30,000
C&E
Improving .............. .............. -30,000
funds
management:
unobligated
prior year
funds
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Warfighter Integrated Network-Tactical Most Economical
Rate.--The Warfighter Integrated Network-Tactical [WIN-T]
Increment 2 is currently in low-rate initial production with a
full-rate production decision anticipated in September 2013.
Over the past 2 years, the Committee has been critical of the
Army's budgeting processes and, specifically, how the Army
budgets to buy equipment based on the number of Army units to
receive that particular set of equipment for a given year.
While this seems like a reasonable budgeting approach, the
Army's tendency to dramatically fluctuate equipment purchases
year-after-year makes this strategy inefficient and
unaffordable. In the case of WIN-T, the Army plans to procure a
large amount of equipment over the next few years. Under the
Army's current procurement strategy, quantities purchased at
the individual piece of equipment level, will fluctuate year-
by-year causing unnecessary price spikes. Therefore, the
Committee directs the Army, working with the Office of the
Secretary of Defense Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation
[OSD CAPE], to perform a WIN-T business case analysis that
defines the specific equipment needs over the life of the WIN-T
Increment 2 program, and determines the most efficient and
economical buying strategy that also meets the Army's force
generation requirements. Not less than 15 days after delivery
of the President's fiscal year 2015 budget request, the Army
and OSD CAPE shall provide a briefing to the congressional
defense committees on the outcome of the WIN-T business case
analysis.
High Mobility Engineer Excavator Airborne Requirement.--The
Army requests $23,465,000 for 34 High Mobility Engineer
Excavators [HMEEs]. Four of these HMEEs are type I which means
they are C-130 and CH-47 transportable. Thirty of these HMEEs
are ``airborne'' and cost nearly twice as much as the type I.
The Army's budget request describes the HMEE airborne as ``air-
droppable in a C-17.'' For the authority to procure the HMEE
airborne, the Army uses an operational requirements document
[ORD] dated August 15, 2000, which outlines low velocity
airdrop as a threshold requirement for the HMEE airborne. The
Committee is concerned that the Army is using a requirement
document that was approved 13 years ago as justification to
procure an HMEE variant at nearly twice the cost. The Committee
directs the Joint Requirements Oversight Council review the ORD
for the HMEE type I/II for validity given changing joint
operational concepts and the current fiscal climate.
Additionally, the Committee reduces the funding to procure 30
HMEE airborne and restores a portion to procure 30 additional
HMEE type I.
Joint Tactical Radio System [JTRS] Manpack.--The Army
requests $323,730,000 for 3,123 Joint Tactical Radio System
[JTRS] manpack units. The Army is currently conducting a full
and open competition to award a 5-year contract to a single
vendor. The JTRS manpack industrial base consists of multiple
vendors, who have invested significantly in their manpack
products, and are competing for this contract award. The
Committee understands that the vendors who lose the 5-year JTRS
manpack contract award will likely pull out of the program.
When the Army tries to compete the next JTRS manpack contract
award in 5 years, there will likely be only one vendor left.
The future JTRS manpack program will not receive benefit from
vendor investment, innovation, or price competition. Therefore,
the Committee directs the Under Secretary of Defense for
Acquisition, Technology and Logistics to review the Army's
manpack competition and contracting plans and provide, no later
than 90 days after enactment of this act, to the congressional
defense committees an assessment of how the objectives of
increased savings and performance through competition over the
life of the JTRS manpack program will be achieved.

Aircraft Procurement, Navy

Appropriations, 2013\1\................................. $17,359,213,000
Budget estimate, 2014................................... 17,927,651,000
Committee recommendation................................ 17,501,539,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public
Law 112-25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of
$17,501,539,000. This is $426,112,000 below the budget
estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this
appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

COMBAT AIRCRAFT
EA-18G 21 2,001,787 21 1,781,787 .............. -220,000
F/A-18E/F (FIGHTER) HORNET (MYP) .............. 206,551 .............. 206,551 .............. ..............
F/A-18E/F (FIGHTER) HORNET (MYP) (AP-CY) .............. .............. .............. 75,000 .............. +75,000
JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER 4 1,135,444 4 1,058,744 .............. -76,700
JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER (AP-CY) .............. 94,766 .............. 63,266 .............. -31,500
JSF STOVL 6 1,267,260 6 1,216,260 .............. -51,000
JSF STOVL (AP-CY) .............. 103,195 .............. 103,195 .............. ..............
V-22 (MEDIUM LIFT) 18 1,432,573 18 1,432,573 .............. ..............
V-22 (MEDIUM LIFT) (AP-CY) .............. 55,196 .............. 55,196 .............. ..............
UH-1Y/AH-1Z 25 749,962 25 749,962 .............. ..............
UH-1Y/AH-1Z (AP-CY) .............. 71,000 .............. 71,000 .............. ..............
MH-60S (MYP) 18 383,831 18 383,831 .............. ..............
MH-60S (MYP) (AP-CY) .............. 37,278 .............. 37,278 .............. ..............
MH-60R 19 599,237 19 599,237 .............. ..............
MH-60R (AP-CY) .............. 231,834 .............. 231,834 .............. ..............
P-8A POSEIDON 16 3,189,989 16 3,189,989 .............. ..............
P-8A POSEIDON (AP-CY) .............. 313,160 .............. 313,160 .............. ..............
E-2D ADV HAWKEYE 5 997,107 5 997,107 .............. ..............
E-2D ADV HAWKEYE (AP-CY) .............. 266,542 .............. 266,542 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, COMBAT AIRCRAFT .............. 13,136,712 .............. 12,832,512 .............. -304,200

TRAINER AIRCRAFT
JPATS 29 249,080 29 249,080 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, TRAINER AIRCRAFT .............. 249,080 .............. 249,080 .............. ..............

OTHER AIRCRAFT
KC-130J 2 134,358 2 134,358 .............. ..............
KC-130J (AP-CY) .............. 32,288 .............. 32,288 .............. ..............
RQ-4 UAV (AP-CY) .............. 52,002 .............. 4,802 .............. -47,200
MQ-8 UAV 1 60,980 1 60,980 .............. ..............
OTHER SUPPORT AIRCRAFT 1 14,958 1 14,958 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, OTHER AIRCRAFT .............. 294,586 .............. 247,386 .............. -47,200

MODIFICATION OF AIRCRAFT
EA-6 SERIES .............. 18,577 .............. 18,577 .............. ..............
AEA SYSTEMS .............. 48,502 .............. 48,502 .............. ..............
AV-8 SERIES .............. 41,575 .............. 41,575 .............. ..............
ADVERSARY .............. 2,992 .............. 2,992 .............. ..............
F-18 SERIES .............. 875,371 .............. 788,076 .............. -87,295
H-46 SERIES .............. 2,127 .............. 2,127 .............. ..............
H-53 SERIES .............. 67,675 .............. 67,675 .............. ..............
SH-60 SERIES .............. 135,054 .............. 135,054 .............. ..............
H-1 SERIES .............. 41,706 .............. 41,706 .............. ..............
EP-3 SERIES .............. 55,903 .............. 77,903 .............. +22,000
P-3 SERIES .............. 37,436 .............. 37,436 .............. ..............
E-2 SERIES .............. 31,044 .............. 31,044 .............. ..............
TRAINER A/C SERIES .............. 43,720 .............. 32,620 .............. -11,100
C-2A .............. 902 .............. 902 .............. ..............
C-130 SERIES .............. 47,587 .............. 47,587 .............. ..............
FEWSG .............. 665 .............. 665 .............. ..............
CARGO/TRANSPORT A/C SERIES .............. 14,587 .............. 14,587 .............. ..............
E-6 SERIES .............. 189,312 .............. 183,218 .............. -6,094
EXECUTIVE HELICOPTERS SERIES .............. 85,537 .............. 85,537 .............. ..............
SPECIAL PROJECT AIRCRAFT .............. 3,684 .............. 13,684 .............. +10,000
T-45 SERIES .............. 98,128 .............. 98,128 .............. ..............
POWER PLANT CHANGES .............. 22,999 .............. 22,999 .............. ..............
JPATS SERIES .............. 1,576 .............. 1,576 .............. ..............
AVIATION LIFE SUPPORT MODS .............. 6,267 .............. 6,267 .............. ..............
COMMON ECM EQUIPMENT .............. 141,685 .............. 141,685 .............. ..............
COMMON AVIONICS CHANGES .............. 120,660 .............. 120,660 .............. ..............
COMMON DEFENSIVE WEAPON SYSTEM .............. 3,554 .............. 3,554 .............. ..............
ID SYSTEMS .............. 41,800 .............. 41,800 .............. ..............
P-8 SERIES .............. 9,485 .............. 9,485 .............. ..............
MAGTF EW FOR AVIATION .............. 14,431 .............. 13,431 .............. -1,000
MQ-8 SERIES .............. 1,001 .............. 1,001 .............. ..............
RQ-7 SERIES .............. 26,433 .............. 26,433 .............. ..............
V-22 (TILT/ROTOR ACFT) OSPREY .............. 160,834 .............. 160,834 .............. ..............
F-35 STOVL SERIES .............. 147,130 .............. 147,130 .............. ..............
F-35 CV SERIES .............. 31,100 .............. 31,100 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, MODIFICATION OF AIRCRAFT .............. 2,571,039 .............. 2,497,550 .............. -73,489

AIRCRAFT SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS
SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS .............. 1,142,461 .............. 1,141,238 .............. -1,223

AIRCRAFT SUPPORT EQUIPMENT AND FACILITIES
COMMON GROUND EQUIPMENT .............. 410,044 .............. 410,044 .............. ..............
AIRCRAFT INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES .............. 27,450 .............. 27,450 .............. ..............
WAR CONSUMABLES .............. 28,930 .............. 28,930 .............. ..............
OTHER PRODUCTION CHARGES .............. 5,268 .............. 5,268 .............. ..............
SPECIAL SUPPORT EQUIPMENT .............. 60,306 .............. 60,306 .............. ..............
FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION .............. 1,775 .............. 1,775 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, AIRCRAFT SUPPORT EQUIPMENT & .............. 533,773 .............. 533,773 .............. ..............
FACILITIES
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, NAVY .............. 17,927,651 .............. 17,501,539 .............. -426,112
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by
the Committee:

EA-18G Procurement.--The Navy requests $2,001,787,000 for
21 EA-18G aircraft. The Committee understands that the Navy
will procure these aircraft on a single-year contract versus a
multi-year contract vehicle. Due to this change in contract
type, the Navy budgeted for a 35-percent unit cost increase
over the fiscal year 2013 unit price. The Committee believes
this cost growth is excessive and recommends a reduction of
$175,000,000.
MQ-8 Fire Scout.--The Committee recommends $60,980,000, the
requested amount, for the MQ-8 Fire Scout. The Committee notes
a sharp decline in the quantity procured from the previous
fiscal year which results in a substantial unit cost increase.
The Navy is encouraged to pursue a more efficient production
profile and an innovative acquisition strategy to reduce unit
cost. If the Navy is able to negotiate a reasonable unit cost,
the Committee approves a buy-to-budget procurement of more than
one Fire Scout utilizing fiscal year 2014 funds.
Navy Tactical Aircraft Force Structure.--The F/A-18E/F
Super Hornet continues to be the Navy's premier carrier asset
for force projection, and it will remain the backbone of the
Navy's tactical aircraft fleet for the next 25 years. The
fiscal year 2014 budget indicates the end of domestic
production with the final procurement of EA-18G Growlers. The
Committee is concerned with the decision to end Super Hornet
production and believes a strong carrier-based fleet is vital
to the increased emphasis on the Pacific region. Due to the
delay in fielding the Navy variant of the Joint Strike Fighter,
ending the Super Hornet production prematurely creates risk in
the Navy's strike fighter force structure, and in the Nation's
production capacity and a competitive industrial base.
Therefore, the Committee recommends a $75,000,000 increase for
advance procurement of F/A-18 aircraft and expects the Navy to
procure additional aircraft in the fiscal year 2015 budget
request.
MH-60S and MH-60R Navy Helicopter.--The Committee is aware
that the Navy has identified a number of Seahawk airframe
upgrades that are currently not funded in the out-years but are
critical investments as performance requirements and weight
grow on the aircraft. The MH-60S and MH-60R have been in the
fleet since 2001 and 2006 respectively, and are expected to
remain in service as a critical battle group capability until
at least 2030. Investing in their currency and relevancy is
important for future operational effectiveness and success.
Therefore, the Committee encourages the Navy to continue
investing in improvements for these aircraft.

Weapons Procurement, Navy

Appropriations, 2013\1\................................. $3,032,863,000
Budget estimate, 2014................................... 3,122,193,000
Committee recommendation................................ 3,107,400,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public
Law 112-25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of
$3,107,400,000. This is $14,793,000 below the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this
appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

BALLISTIC MISSILES

MODIFICATION OF MISSILES
TRIDENT II MODS .............. 1,140,865 .............. 1,140,865 .............. ..............

SUPPORT EQUIPMENT AND FACILITIES
MISSILE INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES .............. 7,617 .............. 7,617 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BALLISTIC MISSILES .............. 1,148,482 .............. 1,148,482 .............. ..............

OTHER MISSILES

STRATEGIC MISSILES
TOMAHAWK 196 312,456 196 312,456 .............. ..............

TACTICAL MISSILES
AMRAAM 54 95,413 54 95,413 .............. ..............
SIDEWINDER 225 117,208 225 117,208 .............. ..............
JSOW 328 136,794 328 136,794 .............. ..............
STANDARD MISSILE 81 367,985 81 367,985 .............. ..............
RAM 66 67,596 66 65,943 .............. -1,653
HELLFIRE 363 33,916 363 33,916 .............. ..............
STAND OFF PRECISION GUIDED MUNITION 50 6,278 50 6,278 .............. ..............
AERIAL TARGETS .............. 41,799 .............. 39,460 .............. -2,339
OTHER MISSILE SUPPORT .............. 3,538 .............. 3,538 .............. ..............

MODIFICATION OF MISSILES
ESSM 53 76,749 53 76,749 .............. ..............
HARM MODS 143 111,902 143 111,902 .............. ..............

SUPPORT EQUIPMENT AND FACILITIES
WEAPONS INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES .............. 1,138 .............. 1,138 .............. ..............
FLEET SATELLITE COMM FOLLOW-ON .............. 23,014 .............. 23,014 .............. ..............

ORDNANCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
ORDNANCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT .............. 84,318 .............. 84,318 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, OTHER MISSILES .............. 1,480,104 .............. 1,476,112 .............. -3,992

TORPEDOES AND RELATED EQUIPMENT

TORPEDOES AND RELATED EQUIP
SSTD .............. 3,978 .............. 3,978 .............. ..............
ASW TARGETS .............. 8,031 .............. 8,031 .............. ..............

MOD OF TORPEDOES AND RELATED EQUIP
MK-46 TORPEDO MODS 150 125,898 150 125,898 .............. ..............
MK-48 TORPEDO ADCAP MODS 108 53,203 108 53,203 .............. ..............
QUICKSTRIKE MINE .............. 7,800 .............. 7,800 .............. ..............

SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
TORPEDO SUPPORT EQUIPMENT .............. 59,730 .............. 59,730 .............. ..............
ASW RANGE SUPPORT .............. 4,222 .............. 4,222 .............. ..............

DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION
FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION .............. 3,963 .............. 3,963 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, TORPEDOES AND RELATED EQUIPMENT .............. 266,825 .............. 266,825 .............. ..............

OTHER WEAPONS

GUNS AND GUN MOUNTS
SMALL ARMS AND WEAPONS .............. 12,513 .............. 12,513 .............. ..............

MODIFICATION OF GUNS AND GUN MOUNTS
CIWS MODS .............. 56,308 .............. 62,708 .............. +6,400
COAST GUARD WEAPONS .............. 10,727 .............. 7,269 .............. -3,458
GUN MOUNT MODS .............. 72,901 .............. 59,158 .............. -13,743
CRUISER MODERNIZATION WEAPONS .............. 1,943 .............. 1,943 .............. ..............
AIRBORNE MINE NEUTRALIZATION SYSTEMS .............. 19,758 .............. 19,758 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, OTHER WEAPONS .............. 174,150 .............. 163,349 .............. -10,801
SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS .............. 52,632 .............. 52,632 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, WEAPONS PROCUREMENT, NAVY .............. 3,122,193 .............. 3,107,400 .............. -14,793
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by
the Committee:

Procurement of Ammunition, Navy and Marine Corps

Appropriations, 2013\1\................................. $659,026,000
Budget estimate, 2014................................... 589,267,000
Committee recommendation................................ 594,467,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public
Law 112-25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $594,467,000.
This is $5,200,000 above the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this
appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

PROC AMMO, NAVY

NAVY AMMUNITION
GENERAL PURPOSE BOMBS .............. 37,703 .............. 37,703 .............. ..............
AIRBORNE ROCKETS, ALL TYPES .............. 65,411 .............. 65,411 .............. ..............
MACHINE GUN AMMUNITION .............. 20,284 .............. 20,284 .............. ..............
PRACTICE BOMBS .............. 37,870 .............. 37,870 .............. ..............
CARTRIDGES & CART ACTUATED DEVICES .............. 53,764 .............. 53,764 .............. ..............
AIR EXPENDABLE COUNTERMEASURES .............. 67,194 .............. 67,194 .............. ..............
JATOS .............. 2,749 .............. 2,749 .............. ..............
LRLAP .............. 3,906 .............. 3,906 .............. ..............
5 INCH/54 GUN AMMUNITION .............. 24,151 .............. 24,151 .............. ..............
INTERMEDIATE CALIBER GUN AMMUNITION .............. 33,080 .............. 33,080 .............. ..............
OTHER SHIP GUN AMMUNITION .............. 40,398 .............. 40,398 .............. ..............
SMALL ARMS & LANDING PARTY AMMO .............. 61,219 .............. 61,219 .............. ..............
PYROTECHNIC AND DEMOLITION .............. 10,637 .............. 10,637 .............. ..............
AMMUNITION LESS THAN $5 MILLION .............. 4,578 .............. 4,578 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, PROC AMMO, NAVY .............. 462,944 .............. 462,944 .............. ..............

PROC AMMO, MARINE CORPS

MARINE CORPS AMMUNITION
SMALL ARMS AMMUNITION .............. 26,297 .............. 26,297 .............. ..............
LINEAR CHARGES, ALL TYPES .............. 6,088 .............. 6,088 .............. ..............
40MM, ALL TYPES .............. 7,644 .............. 7,644 .............. ..............
60MM, ALL TYPES .............. 3,349 .............. 3,349 .............. ..............
120MM, ALL TYPES .............. 13,361 .............. 13,361 .............. ..............
GRENADES, ALL TYPES .............. 2,149 .............. 2,149 .............. ..............
ROCKETS, ALL TYPES .............. 27,465 .............. 27,465 .............. ..............
FUZE, ALL TYPES .............. 26,366 .............. 26,366 .............. ..............
AMMO MODERNIZATION .............. 8,403 .............. 8,403 .............. ..............
ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION .............. 5,201 .............. 10,401 .............. +5,200
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, PROC AMMO, MARINE CORPS .............. 126,323 .............. 131,523 .............. +5,200
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, PROCUREMENT OF AMMO, NAVY & MARINE .............. 589,267 .............. 594,467 .............. +5,200
CORPS
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by
the Committee:

Shipbuilding and Conversion, Navy

Appropriations, 2013\1\................................. $15,563,646,000
Budget estimate, 2014................................... 14,077,804,000
Committee recommendation................................ 14,420,693,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public
Law 112-25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of
$14,420,693,000. This is $342,889,000 above the budget
estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this
appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

OTHER WARSHIPS
CARRIER REPLACEMENT PROGRAM (AP-CY) .............. 944,866 .............. 917,553 .............. -27,313
VIRGINIA CLASS SUBMARINE 2 2,930,704 2 2,930,704 .............. ..............
VIRGINIA CLASS SUBMARINE (AP-CY) .............. 2,354,612 .............. 2,354,612 .............. ..............
CVN REFUELING OVERHAUL .............. 1,705,424 .............. 1,683,353 .............. -22,071
CVN REFUELING OVERHAULS (AP-CY) .............. 245,793 .............. 245,793 .............. ..............
DDG 1000 .............. 231,694 .............. 231,694 .............. ..............
DDG-51 1 1,615,564 1 1,615,564 .............. ..............
DDG-51 (AP-CY) .............. 388,551 .............. 379,551 .............. -9,000
LITTORAL COMBAT SHIP 4 1,793,014 4 1,793,014 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, OTHER WARSHIPS .............. 12,210,222 .............. 12,151,838 .............. -58,384

AMPHIBIOUS SHIPS
AFLOAT FORWARD STAGING BASE 1 524,000 1 579,300 .............. +55,300
JOINT HIGH SPEED VESSEL .............. 2,732 .............. 2,732 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, AMPHIBIOUS SHIPS .............. 526,732 .............. 582,032 .............. +55,300

AUXILIARIES, CRAFT, AND PRIOR-YEAR PROGRAM COSTS
MOORED TRAINING SHIP .............. 183,900 .............. 207,300 .............. +23,400
OUTFITTING .............. 450,163 .............. 438,136 .............. -12,027
LCAC SLEP 4 80,987 4 80,987 .............. ..............
COMPLETION OF PY SHIPBUILDING PROGRAMS .............. 625,800 .............. 960,400 .............. +334,600
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, AUXILIARIES, CRAFT, AND PRIOR-YEAR .............. 1,340,850 .............. 1,686,823 .............. +345,973
PROGRAM
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, SHIPBUILDING & CONVERSION, NAVY .............. 14,077,804 .............. 14,420,693 .............. +342,889
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by
the Committee:

Amphibious-class Warship Construction.--The Committee notes
that the fiscal year 2014 budget request submitted by the Navy,
once again, failed to present a plan to address the amphibious
lift shortfall that exists today. In January 2009, the Navy and
Marine Corps determined a minimum force of 33 ships is the
limit of acceptable risk in meeting a 38-ship amphibious
warship force requirement. As of now, there are 28 ships in the
Navy's amphibious fleet, with an average of only 22 ships
operationally available at any given time due to maintenance
and overhaul schedules. This level of assumed risk with
amphibious lift capability by the Department of the Navy deeply
concerns the Committee. Of particular concern is the impact it
has on the ability of Commanders to meet operations plans and
crisis response requirements, particularly as instability in
the Middle East continues and as the Department of Defense
rebalances its global posture towards the Asia-Pacific region.
The ability to address the amphibious lift shortfall is
exacerbated when the Navy funds only one amphibious class
warship in the current 5-year Future Years Defense Program.
This lack of commitment and funding by the Navy will not only
have a negative impact on meeting future operations plans and
crisis response requirements, but it will also have a negative
industrial base impact and lead to additional cost growth in
multiple shipbuilding programs. Therefore, the Committee
directs the Secretary of the Navy to provide a more responsible
amphibious warship acquisition plan to Congress with the fiscal
year 2015 budget submission.
DDG-51 Destroyer.--The Committee understands that the DDG-
51 program has a $304,000,000 shortfall due to prior year
sequestration reductions, and recommends an additional
$100,000,000 for the DDG-51 to allow the Navy to award the
tenth DDG-51 under the current multi-year procurement contract,
as previously authorized and appropriated. The Committee
understands that its fiscal year 2014 shipbuilding
recommendations create an outyear asset for the Navy to apply
to shortfalls.
Joint High Speed Vessel.--The Committee recommends that the
Navy continue to explore missions and projects that leverage
the flexibility of the Joint High Speed Vessel [JHSV] and
extend the mission envelope beyond in-theatre transport,
including considering the addition of an unmanned aerial system
and air surveillance capability to the JHSV.

Other Procurement, Navy

Appropriations, 2013\1\................................. $5,947,219,000
Budget estimate, 2014................................... 6,310,257,000
Committee recommendation................................ 6,058,377,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public
Law 112-25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of
$6,058,377,000. This is $251,880,000 below the budget estimate.

committee recommended program

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this
appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

SHIPS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT

SHIP PROPULSION EQUIPMENT
LM-2500 GAS TURBINE .............. 10,180 .............. 10,180 .............. ..............
ALLISON 501K GAS TURBINE .............. 5,536 .............. 5,536 .............. ..............
HYBRID ELECTRIC DRIVE (HED) .............. 16,956 .............. 3,956 .............. -13,000

GENERATORS
SURFACE COMBATANT HM&E .............. 19,782 .............. 19,782 .............. ..............

NAVIGATION EQUIPMENT
OTHER NAVIGATION EQUIPMENT .............. 39,509 .............. 39,509 .............. ..............

PERISCOPES
SUB PERISCOPES & IMAGING EQUIP .............. 52,515 .............. 52,515 .............. ..............

OTHER SHIPBOARD EQUIPMENT
DDG MOD .............. 285,994 .............. 208,374 .............. -77,620
FIREFIGHTING EQUIPMENT .............. 14,389 .............. 14,389 .............. ..............
COMMAND AND CONTROL SWITCHBOARD .............. 2,436 .............. 2,436 .............. ..............
LHA/LHD MIDLIFE .............. 12,700 .............. 12,700 .............. ..............
LCC 19/20 EXTENDED SERVICE LIFE .............. 40,329 .............. 37,329 .............. -3,000
POLLUTION CONTROL EQUIPMENT .............. 19,603 .............. 18,290 .............. -1,313
SUBMARINE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT .............. 8,678 .............. 8,678 .............. ..............
VIRGINIA CLASS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT .............. 74,209 .............. 74,209 .............. ..............
LCS CLASS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT .............. 47,078 .............. 47,078 .............. ..............
SUBMARINE BATTERIES .............. 37,000 .............. 37,000 .............. ..............
LPD CLASS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT .............. 25,053 .............. 25,053 .............. ..............
STRATEGIC PLATFORM SUPPORT EQUIP .............. 12,986 .............. 12,986 .............. ..............
DSSP EQUIPMENT .............. 2,455 .............. 2,455 .............. ..............
CG-MODERNIZATION .............. 10,539 .............. 10,539 .............. ..............
LCAC .............. 14,431 .............. 14,431 .............. ..............
UNDERWATER EOD PROGRAMS .............. 36,700 .............. 36,700 .............. ..............
ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION .............. 119,902 .............. 119,902 .............. ..............
CHEMICAL WARFARE DETECTORS .............. 3,678 .............. 3,678 .............. ..............
SUBMARINE LIFE SUPPORT SYSTEM .............. 8,292 .............. 8,292 .............. ..............

REACTOR PLANT EQUIPMENT
REACTOR COMPONENTS .............. 286,744 .............. 286,744 .............. ..............

OCEAN ENGINEERING
DIVING AND SALVAGE EQUIPMENT .............. 8,780 .............. 8,780 .............. ..............

SMALL BOATS
STANDARD BOATS .............. 36,452 .............. 32,072 .............. -4,380

TRAINING EQUIPMENT
OTHER SHIPS TRAINING EQUIPMENT .............. 36,145 .............. 36,145 .............. ..............

PRODUCTION FACILITIES EQUIPMENT
OPERATING FORCES IPE .............. 69,368 .............. 49,868 .............. -19,500

OTHER SHIP SUPPORT
NUCLEAR ALTERATIONS .............. 106,328 .............. 106,328 .............. ..............
LCS MODULES .............. 45,966 .............. 45,966 .............. ..............
LCS MCM MISSION MODULES .............. 59,885 .............. 59,885 .............. ..............
LCS SUW MISSION MODULES .............. 37,168 .............. 19,481 .............. -17,687

LOGISTICS SUPPORT
LSD MIDLIFE .............. 77,974 .............. 77,974 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, SHIPS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT .............. 1,685,740 .............. 1,549,240 .............. -136,500

COMMUNICATIONS AND ELECTRONICS EQUIPMENT

SHIP RADARS

SHIP SONARS
SPQ-9B RADAR .............. 27,934 .............. 27,934 .............. ..............
AN/SQQ-89 SURF ASW COMBAT SYSTEM .............. 83,231 .............. 83,231 .............. ..............
SSN ACOUSTICS .............. 199,438 .............. 197,852 .............. -1,586
UNDERSEA WARFARE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT .............. 9,394 .............. 9,394 .............. ..............
SONAR SWITCHES AND TRANSDUCERS .............. 12,953 .............. 12,953 .............. ..............
ELECTRONIC WARFARE MILDEC .............. 8,958 .............. 8,958 .............. ..............

ASW ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT
SUBMARINE ACOUSTIC WARFARE SYSTEM .............. 24,077 .............. 20,937 .............. -3,140
SSTD .............. 11,925 .............. 3,625 .............. -8,300
FIXED SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM .............. 94,338 .............. 94,338 .............. ..............
SURTASS .............. 9,680 .............. 9,680 .............. ..............
TACTICAL SUPPORT CENTER .............. 18,130 .............. 18,130 .............. ..............

ELECTRONIC WARFARE EQUIPMENT
AN/SLQ-32 .............. 203,375 .............. 178,075 .............. -25,300

RECONNAISSANCE EQUIPMENT
SHIPBOARD IW EXPLOIT .............. 123,656 .............. 123,656 .............. ..............
AUTOMATED IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM (AIS) .............. 896 .............. 896 .............. ..............

SUBMARINE SURVEILLANCE EQUIPMENT
SUBMARINE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT PROG .............. 49,475 .............. 49,475 .............. ..............

OTHER SHIP ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT
COOPERATIVE ENGAGEMENT CAPABILITY .............. 34,692 .............. 34,692 .............. ..............
TRUSTED INFORMATION SYSTEM (TIS) .............. 396 .............. 396 .............. ..............
NAVAL TACTICAL COMMAND SUPPORT SYSTEM (NTCSS) .............. 15,703 .............. 15,703 .............. ..............
ATDLS .............. 3,836 .............. 3,836 .............. ..............
NAVY COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM (NCCS) .............. 7,201 .............. 7,201 .............. ..............
MINESWEEPING SYSTEM REPLACEMENT .............. 54,400 .............. 54,400 .............. ..............
SHALLOW WATER MCM .............. 8,548 .............. 8,548 .............. ..............
NAVSTAR GPS RECEIVERS (SPACE) .............. 11,765 .............. 11,765 .............. ..............
ARMED FORCES RADIO AND TV .............. 6,483 .............. 6,483 .............. ..............
STRATEGIC PLATFORM SUPPORT EQUIP .............. 7,631 .............. 7,631 .............. ..............

TRAINING EQUIPMENT
OTHER TRAINING EQUIPMENT .............. 53,644 .............. 53,644 .............. ..............

AVIATION ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT
MATCALS .............. 7,461 .............. 7,461 .............. ..............
SHIPBOARD AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL .............. 9,140 .............. 9,140 .............. ..............
AUTOMATIC CARRIER LANDING SYSTEM .............. 20,798 .............. 20,798 .............. ..............
NATIONAL AIR SPACE SYSTEM .............. 19,754 .............. 19,754 .............. ..............
AIR STATION SUPPORT EQUIPMENT .............. 8,909 .............. 8,909 .............. ..............
MICROWAVE LANDING SYSTEM .............. 13,554 .............. 13,554 .............. ..............
ID SYSTEMS .............. 38,934 .............. 38,934 .............. ..............
TAC A/C MISSION PLANNING SYS (TAMPS) .............. 14,131 .............. 14,131 .............. ..............

OTHER SHORE ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT
DEPLOYABLE JOINT COMMAND AND CONT .............. 3,249 .............. 3,249 .............. ..............
TADIX-B .............. 11,646 .............. 11,646 .............. ..............
GCCS-M EQUIPMENT TACTICAL/MOBILE .............. 18,189 .............. 18,189 .............. ..............
DCGS-N .............. 17,350 .............. 17,350 .............. ..............
CANES .............. 340,567 .............. 325,340 .............. -15,227
RADIAC .............. 9,835 .............. 9,835 .............. ..............
CANES-INTELL .............. 59,652 .............. 55,262 .............. -4,390
GPETE .............. 6,253 .............. 6,253 .............. ..............
INTEG COMBAT SYSTEM TEST FACILITY .............. 4,963 .............. 4,963 .............. ..............
EMI CONTROL INSTRUMENTATION .............. 4,664 .............. 4,664 .............. ..............
ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION .............. 66,889 .............. 66,889 .............. ..............

SHIPBOARD COMMUNICATIONS
SHIP COMMUNICATIONS AUTOMATION .............. 23,877 .............. 23,877 .............. ..............
COMMUNICATIONS ITEMS UNDER $5M .............. 28,001 .............. 28,001 .............. ..............

SUBMARINE COMMUNICATIONS
SUBMARINE BROADCAST SUPPORT .............. 7,856 .............. 7,856 .............. ..............
SUBMARINE COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT .............. 74,376 .............. 74,376 .............. ..............

SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS
SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS .............. 27,381 .............. 27,381 .............. ..............
NAVY MULTIBAND TERMINAL (NMT) .............. 215,952 .............. 215,952 .............. ..............

SHORE COMMUNICATIONS
JCS COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT .............. 4,463 .............. 4,463 .............. ..............
ELECTRICAL POWER SYSTEMS .............. 778 .............. 778 .............. ..............

CRYPTOGRAPHIC EQUIPMENT
INFO SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM (ISSP) .............. 133,530 .............. 133,530 .............. ..............
MIO INTEL EXPLOITATION TEAM .............. 1,000 .............. 1,000 .............. ..............

CRYPTOLOGIC EQUIPMENT
CRYPTOLOGIC COMMUNICATIONS EQUIP .............. 12,251 .............. 12,251 .............. ..............

OTHER ELECTRONIC SUPPORT
COAST GUARD EQUIPMENT .............. 2,893 .............. 2,893 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, COMMUNICATIONS AND ELECTRONICS .............. 2,290,055 .............. 2,232,112 .............. -57,943
EQUIPMENT

AVIATION SUPPORT EQUIPMENT

SONOBUOYS
SONOBUOYS--ALL TYPES .............. 179,927 .............. 179,927 .............. ..............

AIRCRAFT SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
WEAPONS RANGE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT .............. 55,279 .............. 55,279 .............. ..............
EXPEDITIONARY AIRFIELDS .............. 8,792 .............. 8,792 .............. ..............
AIRCRAFT REARMING EQUIPMENT .............. 11,364 .............. 11,364 .............. ..............
AIRCRAFT LAUNCH & RECOVERY EQUIPMENT .............. 59,502 .............. 59,502 .............. ..............
METEOROLOGICAL EQUIPMENT .............. 19,118 .............. 19,118 .............. ..............
OTHER PHOTOGRAPHIC EQUIPMENT .............. 1,425 .............. 1,425 .............. ..............
AVIATION LIFE SUPPORT .............. 29,670 .............. 29,670 .............. ..............
AIRBORNE MINE COUNTERMEASURES .............. 101,554 .............. 86,054 .............. -15,500
LAMPS MK III SHIPBOARD EQUIPMENT .............. 18,293 .............. 18,293 .............. ..............
PORTABLE ELECTRONIC MAINTENANCE AIDS .............. 7,969 .............. 7,969 .............. ..............
OTHER AVIATION SUPPORT EQUIPMENT .............. 5,215 .............. 5,215 .............. ..............
AUTONOMIC LOGISTICS INFORMATION SYSTEM (ALIS) .............. 4,827 .............. 4,827 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, AVIATION SUPPORT EQUIPMENT .............. 502,935 .............. 487,435 .............. -15,500

ORDNANCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT

SHIP GUN SYSTEM EQUIPMENT
NAVAL FIRES CONTROL SYSTEM .............. 1,188 .............. 1,188 .............. ..............
GUN FIRE CONTROL EQUIPMENT .............. 4,447 .............. 4,447 .............. ..............

SHIP MISSILE SYSTEMS EQUIPMENT
NATO SEASPARROW .............. 58,368 .............. 58,368 .............. ..............
RAM GMLS .............. 491 .............. 491 .............. ..............
SHIP SELF DEFENSE SYSTEM .............. 51,858 .............. 51,858 .............. ..............
AEGIS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT .............. 59,757 .............. 59,757 .............. ..............
TOMAHAWK SUPPORT EQUIPMENT .............. 71,559 .............. 71,559 .............. ..............
VERTICAL LAUNCH SYSTEMS .............. 626 .............. 626 .............. ..............
MARITIME INTEGRATED PLANNING SYSTEM-MIPS .............. 2,779 .............. 2,779 .............. ..............

FBM SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
STRATEGIC MISSILE SYSTEMS EQUIP .............. 224,484 .............. 224,484 .............. ..............

ASW SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
SSN COMBAT CONTROL SYSTEMS .............. 85,678 .............. 85,678 .............. ..............
SUBMARINE ASW SUPPORT EQUIPMENT .............. 3,913 .............. 3,913 .............. ..............
SURFACE ASW SUPPORT EQUIPMENT .............. 3,909 .............. 3,909 .............. ..............
ASW RANGE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT .............. 28,694 .............. 28,694 .............. ..............

OTHER ORDNANCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DISPOSAL EQUIP .............. 46,586 .............. 46,586 .............. ..............
ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION .............. 11,933 .............. 11,933 .............. ..............

OTHER EXPENDABLE ORDNANCE
ANTI-SHIP MISSILE DECOY SYSTEM .............. 62,361 .............. 62,361 .............. ..............
SURFACE TRAINING DEVICE MODS .............. 41,813 .............. 41,813 .............. ..............
SUBMARINE TRAINING DEVICE MODS .............. 26,672 .............. 26,672 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, ORDNANCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT .............. 787,116 .............. 787,116 .............. ..............

CIVIL ENGINEERING SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLES .............. 5,600 .............. 5,600 .............. ..............
GENERAL PURPOSE TRUCKS .............. 3,717 .............. 3,717 .............. ..............
CONSTRUCTION & MAINTENANCE EQUIP .............. 10,881 .............. 10,881 .............. ..............
FIRE FIGHTING EQUIPMENT .............. 14,748 .............. 14,748 .............. ..............
TACTICAL VEHICLES .............. 5,540 .............. 5,540 .............. ..............
AMPHIBIOUS EQUIPMENT .............. 5,741 .............. .............. .............. -5,741
POLLUTION CONTROL EQUIPMENT .............. 3,852 .............. 3,852 .............. ..............
ITEMS UNDER $5 MILLION .............. 25,757 .............. 25,757 .............. ..............
PHYSICAL SECURITY VEHICLES .............. 1,182 .............. .............. .............. -1,182
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, CIVIL ENGINEERING SUPPORT EQUIPMENT .............. 77,018 .............. 70,095 .............. -6,923

SUPPLY SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
MATERIALS HANDLING EQUIPMENT .............. 14,250 .............. .............. .............. -14,250
OTHER SUPPLY SUPPORT EQUIPMENT .............. 6,401 .............. 6,401 .............. ..............
FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION .............. 5,718 .............. 5,718 .............. ..............
SPECIAL PURPOSE SUPPLY SYSTEMS .............. 22,597 .............. 22,597 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, SUPPLY SUPPORT EQUIPMENT .............. 48,966 .............. 34,716 .............. -14,250

PERSONNEL AND COMMAND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT

TRAINING DEVICES
TRAINING SUPPORT EQUIPMENT .............. 22,527 .............. 22,527 .............. ..............

COMMAND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
COMMAND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT .............. 50,428 .............. 50,428 .............. ..............
EDUCATION SUPPORT EQUIPMENT .............. 2,292 .............. 2,292 .............. ..............
MEDICAL SUPPORT EQUIPMENT .............. 4,925 .............. 4,925 .............. ..............
NAVAL MIP SUPPORT EQUIPMENT .............. 3,202 .............. .............. .............. -3,202
OPERATING FORCES SUPPORT EQUIPMENT .............. 24,294 .............. 11,019 .............. -13,275
C4ISR EQUIPMENT .............. 4,287 .............. .............. .............. -4,287
ENVIRONMENTAL SUPPORT EQUIPMENT .............. 18,276 .............. 18,276 .............. ..............
PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT .............. 134,495 .............. 134,495 .............. ..............
ENTERPRISE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY .............. 324,327 .............. 324,327 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, PERSONNEL AND COMMAND SUPPORT .............. 589,053 .............. 568,289 .............. -20,764
EQUIPMENT
SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS .............. 317,234 .............. 317,234 .............. ..............

CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS .............. 12,140 .............. 12,140 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, OTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY .............. 6,310,257 .............. 6,058,377 .............. -251,880
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by
the Committee:

[In thousands of dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2014 budget Committee Change from
Line Item estimate recommendation budget estimate
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 Hybrid Electric Drive [HED] 16,956 3,956 -13,000
Restoring acquisition accountability: Contract ............... ............... -13,000
delay
7 DDG Mod 285,994 208,374 -77,620
Restoring acquisition accountability: No funds ............... ............... -77,620
for Flight IIA DDG 79
11 LCC 19/20 Extended Service Life Program 40,329 37,329 -3,000
Improving funds management: Air Search Radar ............... ............... -3,000
installation funding ahead of need
12 Pollution Control Equipment 19,603 18,290 -1,313
Improving funds management: Prior years ............... ............... -1,313
underexecution
29 Standard Boats 36,452 32,072 -4,380
Improving funds management: CNIC force protection ............... ............... -4,380
medium contract delay
31 Operating Forces IPE 69,368 49,868 -19,500
Restoring acquisition accountability: Emergent ............... ............... -19,500
Repair Facility Navy-identified excess to
requirement
35 LCS SUW Mission Modules 37,168 19,481 -17,687
Improving funds management: Gun module contract ............... ............... -13,272
delay
Program termination: Irregular Warfare Module ............... ............... -4,415
40 SSN Acoustics 199,438 197,852 -1,586
Restoring acquisition accountability: SA106 hull ............... ............... -1,586
sensors low cost conformal array kits cost
growth
44 Submarine Acoustic Warfare System 24,077 20,937 -3,140
Improving funds management: CSA MK3 engineering ............... ............... -3,140
change growth
45 SSTD 11,925 3,625 -8,300
Restoring acquisition accountability: AN/SLQ-25C ............... ............... -8,300
ahead of need
49 AN/SLQ-32 203,375 178,075 -25,300
Restoring acquisition accountability: Excess to ............... ............... -25,300
requirement
76 CANES 340,567 325,340 -15,227
Improving funds management: Excess DDG-51 afloat ............... ............... -15,227
installation funding
78 CANES-Intell 59,652 55,262 -4,390
Improving funds management: Excess DDG-51 afloat ............... ............... -4,390
installation funding
107 Airborne Mine Countermeasures 101,554 86,054 -15,500
Restoring acquisition accountability: AN/AQS-24C ............... ............... -15,500
upgrade kits early to need
136 Amphibious Equipment 5,741 ............... -5,741
Improving funds management: Prior year carryover ............... ............... -5,741
139 Physical Security Vehicles 1,182 ............... -1,182
Improving funds management: Prior year carryover ............... ............... -1,182
140 Materials Handling Equipment 14,250 ............... -14,250
Improving funds management: Prior year carryover ............... ............... -14,250
149 Naval MIP Support Equipment 3,202 ............... -3,202
Improving funds management: Prior year carryover ............... ............... -3,202
151 Operating Forces Support Equipment 24,294 11,019 -13,275
Improving funds management: Prior year carryover ............... ............... -13,275
152 C4ISR Equipment 4,287 ............... -4,287
Improving funds management: Prior year carryover ............... ............... -4,287
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Destroyer Modernization.--The fiscal year 2014 budget
request includes $285,994,000 for continued modernization of
DDG-51 Destroyers. While the requested funding is consistent
with prior year efforts, the Committee notes that the Navy
proposes to change its Destroyer modernization strategy.
Instead of continuing with its original strategy of working
through the inventory of oldest ships, the Navy intends to
begin modernizing the newer, Flight IIA Destroyers beginning in
fiscal year 2016. The intent of the modernization program is to
increase the service life of the Destroyers and modernize their
combat capabilities. The Committee questions this revised
strategy and believes that the older Flight I and II Destroyers
should continue to be the focus of the Navy's modernization
program in order to ensure their operational readiness
throughout their projected service lives. Therefore, the
Committee recommends fully funding the modernization of DDG 60
and DDG 74 as requested, but recommends no funds for DDG 79,
the first Flight IIA Destroyer proposed for modernization.
Further, the Committee encourages the Navy to return to its
previous Destroyer modernization strategy of older ships in
future budget submissions.

Procurement, Marine Corps

Appropriations, 2013\1\................................. $1,409,548,000
Budget estimate, 2014................................... 1,343,511,000
Committee recommendation................................ 1,325,407,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public
Law 112-25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of
$1,325,407,000. This is $18,104,000 below the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this
appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

WEAPONS AND COMBAT VEHICLES

TRACKED COMBAT VEHICLES
AAV7A1 PIP .............. 32,360 .............. 32,360 .............. ..............
LAV PIP .............. 6,003 .............. 6,003 .............. ..............

ARTILLERY AND OTHER WEAPONS
EXPEDITIONARY FIRE SUPPORT SYSTEM .............. 589 .............. 589 .............. ..............
155MM LIGHTWEIGHT TOWED HOWITZER .............. 3,655 .............. 3,655 .............. ..............
HIGH MOBILITY ARTILLERY ROCKET SYSTEM .............. 5,467 .............. 5,467 .............. ..............
WEAPONS AND COMBAT VEHICLES UNDER $5 MILLION .............. 20,354 .............. 20,354 .............. ..............

OTHER SUPPORT
MODIFICATION KITS .............. 38,446 .............. 38,446 .............. ..............
WEAPONS ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM .............. 4,734 .............. 4,734 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, WEAPONS AND COMBAT VEHICLES .............. 111,608 .............. 111,608 .............. ..............

GUIDED MISSILES AND EQUIPMENT

GUIDED MISSILES
GROUND BASED AIR DEFENSE .............. 15,713 .............. 15,713 .............. ..............
JAVELIN 219 36,175 219 36,175 .............. ..............
ANTI-ARMOR WEAPONS SYSTEM--HEAVY (AAWS-H) .............. 1,136 .............. 1,136 .............. ..............

OTHER SUPPORT
MODIFICATION KITS .............. 33,976 .............. 30,078 .............. -3,898
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, GUIDED MISSILES AND EQUIPMENT .............. 87,000 .............. 83,102 .............. -3,898

COMMUNICATIONS AND ELECTRONICS EQUIPMENT

COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEMS
COMBAT OPERATIONS CENTER .............. 16,273 .............. 16,273 .............. ..............

REPAIR AND TEST EQUIPMENT
REPAIR AND TEST EQUIPMENT .............. 41,063 .............. 41,063 .............. ..............

OTHER SUPPORT (TEL)
COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM .............. 2,930 .............. 2,930 .............. ..............

COMMAND AND CONTROL
ITEMS UNDER $5 MILLION (COMM & ELEC) .............. 1,637 .............. 1,637 .............. ..............
AIR OPERATIONS C2 SYSTEMS .............. 18,394 .............. 18,394 .............. ..............

RADAR + EQUIPMENT (NON-TEL)
RADAR SYSTEMS .............. 114,051 .............. 99,198 .............. -14,853
RQ-21 UAS 25 66,612 25 66,612 .............. ..............

INTELL/COMM EQUIPMENT (NON-TEL)
FIRE SUPPORT SYSTEM .............. 3,749 .............. 3,749 .............. ..............
INTELLIGENCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT .............. 75,979 .............. 75,979 .............. ..............
RQ-11 UAV .............. 1,653 .............. 1,653 .............. ..............
DCGS-MC .............. 9,494 .............. 9,494 .............. ..............

OTHER COMM/ELEC EQUIPMENT (NON-TEL)
NIGHT VISION EQUIPMENT .............. 6,171 .............. 6,162 .............. -9

OTHER SUPPORT (NON-TEL)
COMMON COMPUTER RESOURCES .............. 121,955 .............. 119,173 .............. -2,782
COMMAND POST SYSTEMS .............. 83,294 .............. 83,294 .............. ..............
RADIO SYSTEMS .............. 74,718 .............. 74,718 .............. ..............
COMM SWITCHING & CONTROL SYSTEMS .............. 47,613 .............. 47,613 .............. ..............
COMM & ELEC INFRASTRUCTURE SUPPORT .............. 19,573 .............. 19,573 .............. ..............

CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS .............. 5,659 .............. 5,659 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, COMMUNICATIONS AND ELECTRONICS .............. 710,818 .............. 693,174 .............. -17,644
EQUIPMENT

SUPPORT VEHICLES

ADMINISTRATIVE VEHICLES
COMMERCIAL PASSENGER VEHICLES .............. 1,039 .............. 1,039 .............. ..............
COMMERCIAL CARGO VEHICLES .............. 31,050 .............. 31,050 .............. ..............

TACTICAL VEHICLES
5/4T TRUCK HMMWV (MYP) .............. 36,333 .............. 36,204 .............. -129
MOTOR TRANSPORT MODIFICATIONS .............. 3,137 .............. 3,137 .............. ..............
FAMILY OF TACTICAL TRAILERS .............. 27,385 .............. 27,385 .............. ..............

OTHER SUPPORT
ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION .............. 7,016 .............. 10,616 .............. +3,600
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, SUPPORT VEHICLES .............. 105,960 .............. 109,431 .............. +3,471

ENGINEER AND OTHER EQUIPMENT

ENGINEER AND OTHER EQUIPMENT
ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL EQUIP ASSORT .............. 14,377 .............. 14,377 .............. ..............
BULK LIQUID EQUIPMENT .............. 24,864 .............. 24,864 .............. ..............
TACTICAL FUEL SYSTEMS .............. 21,592 .............. 21,592 .............. ..............
POWER EQUIPMENT ASSORTED .............. 61,353 .............. 61,353 .............. ..............
AMPHIBIOUS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT .............. 4,827 .............. 4,827 .............. ..............
EOD SYSTEMS .............. 40,011 .............. 40,011 .............. ..............

MATERIALS HANDLING EQUIPMENT
PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT .............. 16,809 .............. 16,809 .............. ..............
GARRISON MOBILE ENGR EQUIP .............. 3,408 .............. 3,408 .............. ..............
MATERIAL HANDLING EQUIP .............. 48,549 .............. 48,549 .............. ..............
FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION .............. 190 .............. 190 .............. ..............

GENERAL PROPERTY
FIELD MEDICAL EQUIPMENT .............. 23,129 .............. 23,129 .............. ..............
TRAINING DEVICES .............. 8,346 .............. 8,346 .............. ..............
CONTAINER FAMILY .............. 1,857 .............. 1,824 .............. -33
FAMILY OF CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT .............. 36,198 .............. 36,198 .............. ..............
RAPID DEPLOYABLE KITCHEN .............. 2,390 .............. 2,390 .............. ..............

OTHER SUPPORT
ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION .............. 6,525 .............. 6,525 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, ENGINEER AND OTHER EQUIPMENT .............. 314,425 .............. 314,392 .............. -33
SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS .............. 13,700 .............. 13,700 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, PROCUREMENT, MARINE CORPS .............. 1,343,511 .............. 1,325,407 .............. -18,104
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by
the Committee:

Small Tactical Unmanned Aircraft System [STUAS]/RQ-21
UAS.--The fiscal year 2014 budget request includes $66,612,000
to begin full rate of production of the RQ-21 aircraft. The
Committee approves the President's request but remains
concerned about the long-term affordability of the system. In
Senate Report 112-196, the Committee indicated concern with the
lack of a capability development document, concurrency, and
lack of approval to enter production. Since then, the Marine
Corps has approved production, testing has been ongoing, and
most of the concurrency has been mitigated. To ensure future
affordability, the Committee encourages the Marine Corps to
establish a target price curve for future production lots,
continue lean manufacturing processes, and continue to identify
savings in future contract awards.

Aircraft Procurement, Air Force

Appropriations, 2013\1\................................. $11,758,481,000
Budget estimate, 2014................................... 11,398,901,000
Committee recommendation................................ 10,917,270,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public
Law 112-25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of
$10,917,270,000. This is $481,631,000 below the budget
estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this
appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

COMBAT AIRCRAFT

TACTICAL FORCES
F-35 19 3,060,770 19 2,911,270 .............. -149,500
F-35 (AP-CY) .............. 363,783 .............. 315,283 .............. -48,500
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, COMBAT AIRCRAFT .............. 3,424,553 .............. 3,226,553 .............. -198,000

AIRLIFT AIRCRAFT

TACTICAL AIRLIFT

OTHER AIRLIFT
C-130J 6 537,517 6 537,517 .............. ..............
C-130J ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) .............. 162,000 .............. 162,000 .............. ..............
HC-130J 1 132,121 1 132,121 .............. ..............
HC-130J .............. 88,000 .............. 88,000 .............. ..............
MC-130J 4 389,434 4 389,434 .............. ..............
MC-130J .............. 104,000 .............. 104,000 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, AIRLIFT AIRCRAFT .............. 1,413,072 .............. 1,413,072 .............. ..............

OTHER AIRCRAFT

HELICOPTERS
CV-22 OSPREY 3 230,798 3 230,798 .............. ..............

MISSION SUPPORT AIRCRAFT
CIVIL AIR PATROL A/C 6 2,541 6 10,200 .............. +7,659

OTHER AIRCRAFT
TARGET DRONES 41 138,669 41 138,669 .............. ..............
AC-130J 5 470,019 5 470,019 .............. ..............
RQ-4 UAV .............. 27,000 .............. 11,000 .............. -16,000
MQ-9 12 272,217 12 272,217 .............. ..............
RQ-4 BLOCK 40 PROC .............. 1,747 .............. 1,747 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, OTHER AIRCRAFT .............. 1,142,991 .............. 1,134,650 .............. -8,341

MODIFICATION OF INSERVICE AIRCRAFT

STRATEGIC AIRCRAFT
B-2A .............. 20,019 .............. 20,019 .............. ..............
B-1B .............. 132,222 .............. 121,222 .............. -11,000
B-52 .............. 111,002 .............. 99,145 .............. -11,857
LARGE AIRCRAFT INFRARED COUNTERMEASURES .............. 27,197 .............. 27,197 .............. ..............

TACTICAL AIRCRAFT
A-10 .............. 47,598 .............. 47,598 .............. ..............
F-15 .............. 354,624 .............. 354,624 .............. ..............
F-16 .............. 11,794 .............. 11,794 .............. ..............
F-22A .............. 285,830 .............. 285,830 .............. ..............
F-35 MODIFICATIONS .............. 157,777 .............. 157,777 .............. ..............

AIRLIFT AIRCRAFT
C-5 .............. 2,456 .............. 2,456 .............. ..............
C-5M .............. 1,021,967 .............. 919,717 .............. -102,250
C-17A .............. 143,197 .............. 143,197 .............. ..............
C-21 .............. 103 .............. 103 .............. ..............
C-32A .............. 9,780 .............. 9,780 .............. ..............
C-37A .............. 452 .............. 452 .............. ..............

TRAINER AIRCRAFT
GLIDER MODS .............. 128 .............. 128 .............. ..............
T68 .............. 6,427 .............. 6,427 .............. ..............
T-1 .............. 277 .............. 277 .............. ..............
T-38 .............. 28,686 .............. 28,686 .............. ..............

OTHER AIRCRAFT
U-2 MODS .............. 45,591 .............. 45,591 .............. ..............
KC-10A (ATCA) .............. 70,918 .............. 57,454 .............. -13,464
C-12 .............. 1,876 .............. 1,876 .............. ..............
MC-12W .............. 5,000 .............. 5,000 .............. ..............
C-20 MODS .............. 192 .............. 192 .............. ..............
VC-25A MOD .............. 263 .............. 263 .............. ..............
C-40 .............. 6,119 .............. 6,119 .............. ..............
C-130 .............. 58,577 .............. 58,577 .............. ..............
C130J MODS .............. 10,475 .............. 10,475 .............. ..............
C-135 .............. 46,556 .............. 4,526 .............. -42,030
COMPASS CALL MODS .............. 34,494 .............. 34,494 .............. ..............
RC-135 .............. 171,813 .............. 171,813 .............. ..............
E-3 .............. 197,087 .............. 142,615 .............. -54,472
E-4 .............. 14,304 .............. 14,304 .............. ..............
E-8 .............. 57,472 .............. 57,472 .............. ..............
H-1 .............. 6,627 .............. 6,627 .............. ..............
H-60 .............. 27,654 .............. 27,654 .............. ..............
RQ-4 UAV MODS .............. 9,313 .............. 9,313 .............. ..............
HC/MC-130 MODIFICATIONS .............. 16,300 .............. 16,300 .............. ..............
OTHER AIRCRAFT .............. 6,948 .............. 6,948 .............. ..............
MQ-1 MODS .............. 9,734 .............. 9,734 .............. ..............
MQ-9 MODS .............. 102,970 .............. 62,970 .............. -40,000
RQ-4 GSRA/CSRA MODS .............. 30,000 .............. 30,000 .............. ..............
CV-22 MODS .............. 23,310 .............. 23,310 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, MODIFICATION OF INSERVICE AIRCRAFT .............. 3,315,129 .............. 3,040,056 .............. -275,073

AIRCRAFT SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS
INITIAL SPARES/REPAIR PARTS .............. 463,285 .............. 463,285 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, AIRCRAFT SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS .............. 463,285 .............. 463,285 .............. ..............

AIRCRAFT SUPPORT EQUIPMENT AND FACILITIES

COMMON SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
AIRCRAFT REPLACEMENT SUPPORT EQUIP .............. 49,140 .............. 49,140 .............. ..............

POST PRODUCTION SUPPORT
B-1 .............. 3,683 .............. 3,683 .............. ..............
B-2A .............. 43,786 .............. 43,786 .............. ..............
B-52 .............. 7,000 .............. 7,000 .............. ..............
C-17A .............. 81,952 .............. 81,952 .............. ..............
C-135 .............. 8,597 .............. 8,597 .............. ..............
F-15 POST PRODUCTION SUPPORT .............. 2,403 .............. 2,403 .............. ..............
F-16 POST PRODUCTION SUPPORT .............. 3,455 .............. 3,238 .............. -217
F-22A .............. 5,911 .............. 5,911 .............. ..............

INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS
INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS .............. 21,148 .............. 21,148 .............. ..............

WAR CONSUMABLES
WAR CONSUMABLES .............. 94,947 .............. 94,947 .............. ..............

OTHER PRODUCTION CHARGES
OTHER PRODUCTION CHARGES .............. 1,242,004 .............. 1,242,004 .............. ..............

DARP
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, AIRCRAFT SUPPORT EQUIPMENT AND .............. 1,564,026 .............. 1,563,809 .............. -217
FACILITIES.

CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS .............. 75,845 .............. 75,845 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE .............. 11,398,901 .............. 10,917,270 .............. -481,631
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by
the Committee:

F-35 Conventional Take-off and Landing Total Quantities.--
During the Committee's hearing to review the Joint Strike
Fighter budget for fiscal year 2014, the Committee was informed
that the Air Force's planned F-35 procurement quantity of 1,763
aircraft is based on a one-for-one replacement of legacy
aircraft. While the F-35 will provide the Air Force with much
greater fifth generation fighter capability for certain future
threats, less capable aircraft may be effective and more cost-
effective to operate and maintain in other less contentious
scenarios. The Committee believes that given these times of
fiscal austerity, the Department of Defense should review the
Air Force tactical fighter force mix. The Committee directs the
Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, in conjunction with
the Air Force Chief of Staff, to deliver not later than 180
days after enactment of this act, to the congressional defense
committees an analysis that outlines the appropriate total
quantity of Air Force fifth generation and less capable
aircraft based on the anticipated threat during the next 30
years.
Air Force Missile Range Support and Security.--The fiscal
year 2014 budget request includes no funds for replacement of
the previously terminated Common Vertical Lift Support Platform
[CVLSP], leaving the Committee concerned that the Air Force's
number one priority to sustain an effective nuclear deterrent
is not being sufficiently supported. As outlined by the Defense
Science Board [DSB] Standing Task Force on Nuclear Weapons
Surety, failures continue in fundamental areas, impacting the
field forces and the replacement or upgrade of old equipment.
The lack of urgency in replacing equipment following the fiscal
year 2013 CVLSP termination at the request of the Air Force
results in the reliance on outdated, inadequate, and obsolete
40-year-old UH-1N helicopters that cannot meet full mission
requirements, and operate under waivers to support crews and
logistics at the ballistic missile bases.
Replacement of these aged platforms does not require a
significant new technological development program, instead the
UH-1N shortfalls in speed, range and endurance could be
remedied through the procurement of in-service, in-production
aircraft at lower cost and less acquisition risk to the
Government. This alternative acquisition approach could compare
favorably to the continued cost of sustaining the UH-1N, while
providing significantly enhanced performance and mission
capability. Therefore, the Committee believes the Department of
Defense through the Air Force should leverage existing
production capacity and submit a program for the replacement of
UH-1N fleet in the fiscal year 2015 budget submission.
C-130 Modernization.--The Committee notes the Air Force's
initiatives to reduce fuel consumption across its fleet,
including flight and durability tests of propulsion upgrades to
the legacy C-130 fleet. In the fiscal year 2014 budget request,
the Air Force requested, and the Committee approved, multiyear
procurement authority for new C-130J aircraft. However, since
the Air Force plans to operate over 200 legacy C-130H aircraft
until the year 2040, the Committee urges the Air Force to
consider upgrades to these aircraft to help achieve fuel
efficiency goals, to include comprehensive propulsion upgrades.

Missile Procurement, Air Force

Appropriations, 2013\1\................................. $4,955,827,000
Budget estimate, 2014................................... 5,343,286,000
Committee recommendation................................ 5,178,486,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public
Law 112-25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of
$5,178,486,000. This is $164,800,000 below the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this
appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

BALLISTIC MISSILES

MISSILE REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT--BALLISTIC
MISSILE REPLACEMENT EQ--BALLISTIC .............. 39,104 .............. 39,104 .............. ..............

OTHER MISSILES

TACTICAL
JASSM 183 291,151 183 291,151 .............. ..............
SIDEWINDER (AIM-9X) 225 119,904 225 119,904 .............. ..............
AMRAAM 199 340,015 199 340,015 .............. ..............
PREDATOR HELLFIRE MISSILE 413 48,548 413 48,548 .............. ..............
SMALL DIAMETER BOMB 144 42,347 144 42,347 .............. ..............

INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES
INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS/POLLUTION PREVENTION .............. 752 .............. 752 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, OTHER MISSILES .............. 842,717 .............. 842,717 .............. ..............

MODIFICATION OF INSERVICE MISSILES

CLASS IV
MM III MODIFICATIONS .............. 21,635 .............. 21,635 .............. ..............
AGM-65D MAVERICK .............. 276 .............. 276 .............. ..............
AGM-88A HARM .............. 580 .............. 580 .............. ..............
AIR LAUNCH CRUISE MISSILE .............. 6,888 .............. 6,888 .............. ..............
SMALL DIAMETER BOMB .............. 5,000 .............. 5,000 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, MODIFICATION OF INSERVICE MISSILES .............. 34,379 .............. 34,379 .............. ..............

SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS
INITIAL SPARES/REPAIR PARTS .............. 72,080 .............. 72,080 .............. ..............

OTHER SUPPORT

SPACE PROGRAMS
ADVANCED EHF .............. 379,586 .............. 379,586 .............. ..............
WIDEBAND GAPFILLER SATELLITES .............. 38,398 .............. 38,398 .............. ..............
GPS III SPACE SEGMENT 2 403,431 2 398,431 .............. -5,000
GPS III SPACE SEGMENT (AP-CY) .............. 74,167 .............. 74,167 .............. ..............
SPACEBORNE EQUIP (COMSEC) .............. 5,244 .............. 5,244 .............. ..............
GLOBAL POSITIONING (SPACE) .............. 55,997 .............. 55,997 .............. ..............
DEF METEOROLOGICAL SAT PROG (SPACE) .............. 95,673 .............. 85,873 .............. -9,800
EVOLVED EXPENDABLE LAUNCH VEH (SPACE) 5 1,852,900 5 974,037 .............. -878,863

EVOLVED EXPENDABLE LAUNCH VEH INFRASTRUCTURE .............. .............. .............. 728,863 .............. +728,863
(SPACE)
SBIR HIGH (SPACE) .............. 583,192 .............. 583,192 .............. ..............

SPECIAL PROGRAMS
SPECIAL UPDATE PROGRAMS .............. 36,716 .............. 36,716 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, OTHER SUPPORT .............. 3,525,304 .............. 3,360,504 .............. -164,800

CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS .............. 829,702 .............. 829,702 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, MISSILE PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE .............. 5,343,286 .............. 5,178,486 .............. -164,800
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by
the Committee:

Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle [EELV].--The Committee
supports the Air Force strategy to control space launch costs
through efficient procurement of launch services through block
buys, while pursuing a new entrant strategy to provide
competition in space launch missions. The Committee also
recognizes that greater efficiencies by the incumbent
contractor have produced substantial cost savings in the
program.
The Committee continues to be concerned by the lack of
visibility in the funding requests to support the EELV program,
and again recommends that procurement funding be separated into
one line for EELV launch services and a separate line for EELV
launch capability and associated costs.
The Committee also directs that the Secretary of the Air
Force specifically identify such funds requested in fiscal year
2015 and future budgets to support the sole source block buy of
EELV launch services, and such funds requested to support the
competitive award of launch services among the incumbent and
any qualified new entrants.
Small Diameter Bomb.--Small Diameter Bomb II [SDB II] is a
250 pound class precision-guided air-to-ground munition used
against both fixed and moving targets at standoff range in all
weather conditions. It is a joint Air Force/Navy program with
the Air Force as the lead service. A variant of SDB I, called
the Laser SDB I, has capability against moving targets in clear
weather. SDB II has experienced past delays with testing and
its integration with the Joint Strike Fighter. A rigorous
testing schedule remains including five guided test vehicle
test flights and two live fire test flights before achieving
milestone C and Low Rate Initial Production in fiscal year
2014.
The Committee is closely monitoring SDB II and believes an
overall review of the SDB program and its capability mix is
appropriate, and directs the Secretary of the Air Force to
brief the congressional defense committees on the status of the
SDB program consistent with S. 1197, the National Defense
Authorization Act for fiscal year 2014, as reported.

Procurement of Ammunition, Air Force

Appropriations, 2013\1\................................. $593,909,000
Budget estimate, 2014................................... 759,442,000
Committee recommendation................................ 759,442,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public
Law 112-25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $759,442,000.
This is equal to the budget estimate.

committee recommended program

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this
appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

PROCUREMENT OF AMMO, AIR FORCE
ROCKETS .............. 15,735 .............. 15,735 .............. ..............
CARTRIDGES .............. 129,921 .............. 129,921 .............. ..............

BOMBS
PRACTICE BOMBS .............. 30,840 .............. 30,840 .............. ..............
GENERAL PURPOSE BOMBS .............. 187,397 .............. 187,397 .............. ..............
JOINT DIRECT ATTACK MUNITION 6,965 188,510 6,965 188,510 .............. ..............

FLARE, IR MJU-7B
CAD/PAD .............. 35,837 .............. 35,837 .............. ..............
EXPLOSIVE ORDINANCE DISPOSAL (EOD) .............. 7,531 .............. 7,531 .............. ..............
SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS .............. 499 .............. 499 .............. ..............
MODIFICATIONS .............. 480 .............. 480 .............. ..............
ITEMS LESS THAN $5,000,000 .............. 9,765 .............. 9,765 .............. ..............

FUZES
FLARES .............. 55,864 .............. 55,864 .............. ..............
FUZES .............. 76,037 .............. 76,037 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, PROCUREMENT OF AMMO, AIR FORCE .............. 738,416 .............. 738,416 .............. ..............

WEAPONS
SMALL ARMS .............. 21,026 .............. 21,026 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, AIR FORCE .............. 759,442 .............. 759,442 .............. ..............
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Other Procurement, Air Force

Appropriations, 2013\1\................................. $17,059,965,000
Budget estimate, 2014................................... 16,760,581,000
Committee recommendation................................ 17,542,627,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public
Law 112-25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of
$17,542,627,000. This is $782,046,000 above the budget
estimate.

committee recommended program

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this
appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

VEHICULAR EQUIPMENT

PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLES
PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLE .............. 2,048 .............. 2,048 .............. ..............

CARGO + UTILITY VEHICLES
FAMILY MEDIUM TACTICAL VEHICLE .............. 8,019 .............. 8,019 .............. ..............
CAP VEHICLES .............. 946 .............. 946 .............. ..............
ITEMS LESS THAN $5M (CARGO) .............. 7,138 .............. 7,138 .............. ..............

SPECIAL PURPOSE VEHICLES
SECURITY AND TACTICAL VEHICLES .............. 13,093 .............. 13,093 .............. ..............
ITEMS LESS THAN $5M (SPECIAl) .............. 13,983 .............. 13,983 .............. ..............

FIRE FIGHTING EQUIPMENT
FIRE FIGHTING/CRASH RESCUE VEHICLES .............. 23,794 .............. 23,794 .............. ..............

MATERIALS HANDLING EQUIPMENT
ITEMS LESS THAT $5,000,000 .............. 8,669 .............. 8,669 .............. ..............

BASE MAINTENANCE SUPPORT
RUNWAY SNOW REMOVAL & CLEANING EQUIP .............. 6,144 .............. 6,144 .............. ..............
ITEMS LESS THAN $5M .............. 1,580 .............. 1,580 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, VEHICULAR EQUIPMENT .............. 85,414 .............. 85,414 .............. ..............

ELECTRONICS AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS EQUIP

COMM SECURITY EQUIPMENT (COMSEC)
COMSEC EQUIPMENT .............. 149,661 .............. 149,661 .............. ..............
MODIFICATIONS (COMSEC) .............. 726 .............. 726 .............. ..............

INTELLIGENCE PROGRAMS
INTELLIGENCE TRAINING EQUIPMENT .............. 2,789 .............. 2,789 .............. ..............
INTELLIGENCE COMM EQUIP .............. 31,875 .............. 67,575 .............. +35,700
ADVANCE TECH SENSORS .............. 452 .............. 452 .............. ..............
MISSION PLANNING SYSTEMS .............. 14,203 .............. 14,203 .............. ..............

ELECTRONICS PROGRAMS
TRAFFIC CONTROL/LANDING .............. 46,232 .............. 46,232 .............. ..............
NATIONAL AIRSPACE SYSTEM .............. 11,685 .............. 11,685 .............. ..............
BATTLE CONTROL SYSTEM--FIXED .............. 19,248 .............. 19,248 .............. ..............
THEATER AIR CONTROL SYS IMPRO .............. 19,292 .............. 19,292 .............. ..............
WEATHER OBSERVATION FORECAST .............. 17,166 .............. 17,166 .............. ..............
STRATEGIC COMMAND AND CONTROL .............. 22,723 .............. 44,023 .............. +21,300
CHEYENNE MOUNTAIN COMPLEX .............. 27,930 .............. 27,930 .............. ..............
TAC SIGNIT SPT .............. 217 .............. 217 .............. ..............

SPECIAL COMM?09ELECTRONICS PROJECTS
GENERAL INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY .............. 49,627 .............. 49,627 .............. ..............
AF GLOBAL COMMAND & CONTROL SYSTEM .............. 13,559 .............. 13,559 .............. ..............
MOBILITY COMMAND AND CONTROL .............. 11,186 .............. 11,186 .............. ..............
AIR FORCE PHYSICAL SECURITY SYSTEM .............. 43,238 .............. 43,238 .............. ..............
COMBAT TRAINING RANGES .............. 10,431 .............. 20,431 .............. +10,000
C3 COUNTERMEASURES .............. 13,769 .............. 13,769 .............. ..............
GCSS?09AF FOS .............. 19,138 .............. 19,138 .............. ..............
THEATER BATTLE MGT C2 SYS .............. 8,809 .............. 8,809 .............. ..............
AIR OPERATIONS CENTER (AOC) .............. 26,935 .............. 26,935 .............. ..............

AIR FORCE COMMUNICATIONS
INFORMATION TRANSPORT SYSTEMS .............. 80,558 .............. 80,558 .............. ..............
AFNET .............. 97,588 .............. 97,588 .............. ..............
VOICE SYSTEMS .............. 8,419 .............. 8,419 .............. ..............
USCENTCOM .............. 34,276 .............. 34,276 .............. ..............

DISA PROGRAMS
SPACE BASED IR SENSOR PROG SPACE .............. 28,235 .............. 28,235 .............. ..............
NAVSTAR GPS SPACE .............. 2,061 .............. 2,061 .............. ..............
NUDET DETECTION SYS (NDS) SPACE .............. 4,415 .............. 4,415 .............. ..............
AF SATELLITE CONTROL NETWORK SPACE .............. 30,237 .............. 30,237 .............. ..............
SPACELIFT RANGE SYSTEM SPACE .............. 98,062 .............. 98,062 .............. ..............
MILSATCOM SPACE .............. 105,935 .............. 60,935 .............. -45,000
SPACE MODS SPACE .............. 37,861 .............. 35,861 .............. -2,000
COUNTERSPACE SYSTEM .............. 7,171 .............. 7,171 .............. ..............

ORGANIZATION AND BASE
TACTICAL C?09E EQUIPMENT .............. 83,537 .............. 83,537 .............. ..............
COMBAT SURVIVOR EVADER LOCATER .............. 11,884 .............. 8,428 .............. -3,456
RADIO EQUIPMENT .............. 14,711 .............. 14,711 .............. ..............
CCTV/AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT .............. 10,275 .............. 10,275 .............. ..............
BASE COMM INFRASTRUCTURE .............. 50,907 .............. 50,907 .............. ..............

MODIFICATIONS
COMM ELECT MODS .............. 55,701 .............. 55,701 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, ELECTRONICS AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS .............. 1,322,724 .............. 1,339,268 .............. +16,544
EQUIP

OTHER BASE MAINTENANCE AND SUPPORT EQUIP

PERSONAL SAFETY AND RESCUE EQUIP
NIGHT VISION GOGGLES .............. 14,524 .............. 3,640 .............. -10,884
ITEMS LESS THAN $5,000,000 (SAFETY) .............. 28,655 .............. 28,655 .............. ..............

DEPOT PLANT + MATERIALS HANDLING EQ
MECHANIZED MATERIAL HANDLING .............. 9,332 .............. 9,332 .............. ..............

BASE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
BASE PROCURED EQUIPMENT .............. 16,762 .............. 16,762 .............. ..............
CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS .............. 33,768 .............. 33,768 .............. ..............
PRODUCTIVITY CAPITAL INVESTMENT .............. 2,495 .............. 2,495 .............. ..............
MOBILITY EQUIPMENT .............. 12,859 .............. 12,859 .............. ..............
ITEMS LESS THAN $5M (BASE SUPPORT) .............. 1,954 .............. 1,954 .............. ..............

SPECIAL SUPPORT PROJECTS
DARP RC135 .............. 24,528 .............. 24,528 .............. ..............
DISTRIBUTED GROUND SYSTEMS .............. 137,819 .............. 137,819 .............. ..............
SPECIAL UPDATE PROGRAM .............. 479,586 .............. 479,586 .............. ..............
DEFENSE SPACE RECONNAISSANCE PROGRAM .............. 45,159 .............. 96,159 .............. +51,000
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, OTHER BASE MAINTENANCE AND SUPPORT .............. 807,441 .............. 847,557 .............. +40,116
EQUIP

SPARE AND REPAIR PARTS
SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS .............. 25,746 .............. 25,746 .............. ..............

CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS .............. 14,519,256 .............. 15,244,642 .............. +725,386
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, OTHER PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE .............. 16,760,581 .............. 17,542,627 .............. +782,046
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by
the Committee:

MQ-1/9 Remote Split Operations.--As a result of the Air
Force force structure actions, six Air National Guard squadrons
will transition to MQ-1/9 remote split operations by fiscal
year 2020. The Committee recommends $35,700,000 to fully fund a
shortfall that the Air Force identified to the Committee for
equipment to support the standup of these Squadron Operations
Centers. The Committee directs the Secretary of the Air Force
to submit an execution plan for these additional funds no later
than 90 days after the enactment of this act. The execution
plan should include detailed plans for funding, training,
manning, and equipping all six Air National Guard squadrons.
Further, the Committee directs that training will begin for all
six squadrons in fiscal year 2014 as previously indicated by
the Air Force and expects that funding to equip the remaining
squadrons will be included in the fiscal year 2015 budget
request.

Procurement, Defense-Wide

Appropriations, 2013\1\................................. $4,872,546,000
Budget estimate, 2014................................... 4,534,083,000
Committee recommendation................................ 4,434,769,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public
Law 112-25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of
$4,434,769,000. This is $99,314,000 below the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this
appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

MAJOR EQUIPMENT

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DCAA
MAJOR EQUIPMENT ITEMS LESS THAN $5M .............. 1,291 .............. 1,291 .............. ..............

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DCMA
MAJOR EQUIPMENT .............. 5,711 .............. 5,711 .............. ..............

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DHRA
PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION .............. 47,201 .............. 47,201 .............. ..............

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DISA
INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY .............. 16,189 .............. 16,189 .............. ..............
TELEPORT PROGRAM .............. 66,075 .............. 66,075 .............. ..............
ITEMS LESS THAN $5M .............. 83,881 .............. 69,375 .............. -14,506
NET CENTRIC ENTERPRISE SERVICES (NCES) .............. 2,572 .............. 2,572 .............. ..............
DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEMS NETWORK .............. 125,557 .............. 125,557 .............. ..............
CYBER SECURITY INITIATIVE .............. 16,941 .............. 16,941 .............. ..............

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DLA
MAJOR EQUIPMENT .............. 13,137 .............. 13,137 .............. ..............
MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DMACT 5 15,414 5 15,414 .............. ..............
AUTOMATION/EDUCATIONAL SUPPORT & LOGISTICS .............. 1,454 .............. 1,454 .............. ..............
EQUIPMENT .............. 978 .............. 978 .............. ..............
OTHER CAPITAL EQUIPMENT .............. 5,020 .............. 5,020 .............. ..............

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DEFENSE THREAT REDUCTION AGENCY
VEHICLES 2 100 2 100 .............. ..............
OTHER MAJOR EQUIPMENT 3 13,395 3 13,395 .............. ..............

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DTSA

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, MDA
THAAD SYSTEM 36 581,005 36 576,851 .............. -4,154
AEGIS BMD 52 580,814 52 580,814 .............. ..............
BMDS AN/TPY-2 RADARS .............. 62,000 .............. 62,000 .............. ..............
AEGIS ASHORE PHASE III 1 131,400 1 131,400 .............. ..............
IRON DOME SYSTEM 1 220,309 1 220,309 .............. ..............

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, NSA
INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM (ISSP) .............. 14,363 .............. 14,363 .............. ..............

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, OSD
MAJOR EQUIPMENT, OSD .............. 37,345 .............. 37,345 .............. ..............
MAJOR EQUIPMENT, INTELLIGENCE .............. 16,678 .............. 16,678 .............. ..............

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, TJS
MAJOR EQUIPMENT, TJS .............. 14,792 .............. 14,792 .............. ..............

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, WHS
MAJOR EQUIPMENT, WHS .............. 35,259 .............. 35,259 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, MAJOR EQUIPMENT .............. 2,108,881 .............. 2,090,221 .............. -18,660

SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND

AVIATION PROGRAMS
SOF ROTARY WING UPGRADES AND SUSTAINMENT .............. 112,456 .............. 110,456 .............. -2,000
MH-60 SOF MODERNIZATION PROGRAM .............. 81,457 .............. 81,457 .............. ..............
NON-STANDARD AVIATION .............. 2,650 .............. 2,650 .............. ..............
SOF U-28 .............. 56,208 .............. 56,208 .............. ..............
MH-47 CHINOOK .............. 19,766 .............. 19,766 .............. ..............
RQ-11 UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE .............. 850 .............. 850 .............. ..............
CV-22 SOF MODIFICATION 3 98,927 3 98,927 .............. ..............
MQ-1 UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE .............. 20,576 .............. 20,576 .............. ..............
MQ-9 UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE .............. 1,893 .............. 14,893 .............. +13,000
STUASL0 .............. 13,166 .............. 13,166 .............. ..............
PRECISION STRIKE PACKAGE .............. 107,687 .............. 93,520 .............. -14,167
AC/MC-130J .............. 51,870 .............. 51,870 .............. ..............
C-130 MODIFICATIONS .............. 71,940 .............. 61,317 .............. -10,623

SHIPBUILDING
UNDERWATER SYSTEMS .............. 37,439 .............. 30,439 .............. -7,000

AMMUNITION PROGRAMS
SOF ORDNANCE ITEMS UNDER $5,000,000 .............. 159,029 .............. 159,029 .............. ..............

OTHER PROCUREMENT PROGRAMS
SOF INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS .............. 79,819 .............. 79,819 .............. ..............
DCGS-SOF .............. 14,906 .............. 14,906 .............. ..............

OTHER ITEMS UNDER $5,000,000 .............. 81,711 .............. 79,604 .............. -2,107
SOF COMBATANT CRAFT SYSTEMS .............. 35,053 .............. 32,753 .............. -2,300
SPECIAL PROGRAMS .............. 41,526 .............. 9,526 .............. -32,000
TACTICAL VEHICLES .............. 43,353 .............. 37,353 .............. -6,000
WARRIOR SYSTEMS UNDER $5,000,000 .............. 210,540 .............. 210,540 .............. ..............
COMBAT MISSION REQUIREMENTS .............. 20,000 .............. 20,000 .............. ..............
SOF GLOBAL VIDEO SURVEILLANCE ACTIVITIES .............. 6,645 .............. 6,645 .............. ..............
SOF OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS INTELLIGENCE .............. 25,581 .............. 25,581 .............. ..............
SOF OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS .............. 191,061 .............. 191,061 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND .............. 1,586,109 .............. 1,522,912 .............. -63,197

CHEMICAL/BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE
INSTALLATION FORCE PROTECTION .............. 14,271 .............. 13,314 .............. -957
INDIVIDUAL PROTECTION .............. 101,667 .............. 101,667 .............. ..............
JOINT BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM .............. 13,447 .............. 13,447 .............. ..............
COLLECTIVE PROTECTION .............. 20,896 .............. 20,896 .............. ..............
CONTAMINATION AVOIDANCE .............. 144,540 .............. 133,040 .............. -11,500
TOTAL, CHEMICAL/BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE .............. .............. .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, CHEMICAL/BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE .............. 294,821 .............. 282,364 .............. -12,457

CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS .............. 544,272 .............. 539,272 .............. -5,000
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, PROCUREMENT, DEFENSE-WIDE .............. 4,534,083 .............. 4,434,769 .............. -99,314
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by
the Committee:

[In thousands of dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2014 budget Committee Change from
Line Item estimate recommendation budget estimate
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
12 Items Less Than $5 Million 83,881 69,375 -14,506
DISA requested transfer to O&M, DW DISA line for ............... ............... -14,506
the Senior Leadership Enterprise Program
25 THAAD 581,005 576,851 -4,154
Maintaining program affordability: Launchers ............... ............... -4,154
excess cost growth
43 Rotary Wing Upgrades and Sustainment 112,456 110,456 -2,000
Improving funds management: Block simulator ............... ............... -2,000
upgrades delayed
51 MQ-9 Unmanned Aerial Vehicle 1,893 14,893 +13,000
Authorization adjustment: MQ-9 Unmanned Aerial ............... ............... +13,000
Vehicle capability improvements
54 Precision Strike Package 107,687 93,520 -14,167
Restoring acquisition accountability: Contract ............... ............... -14,167
award delays since new start
57 C-130 Modifications 71,940 61,317 -10,623
Restoring acquisition accountability: Milestone C ............... ............... -10,623
delay to FY15
59 Underwater Systems 37,439 30,439 -7,000
Restoring acquisition accountability: Milestone C ............... ............... -7,000
delay to FY15
68 Other Items <$5M 81,711 79,604 -2,107
Improving funds management: Family of loudspeakers ............... ............... -2,107
unobligated
69 Combatant Craft Systems 35,053 32,753 -2,300
Improving funds management: Excess support costs ............... ............... -2,300
72 Special Programs 41,526 9,526 -32,000
Restoring acquisition accountability: Unjustified ............... ............... -32,000
request
73 Tactical Vehicles 43,353 37,353 -6,000
Improving funds management: Reduction for ............... ............... -6,000
underexecution
89 Installation Force Protection 14,271 13,314 -957
Restoring acquisition accountability: Early to ............... ............... -957
need Common Analytical Lab system
90 Individual Protection 101,667 101,667 ...............
Restoring acquisition accountability: Joint ............... ............... -10,000
Service Aircrew Mask milestone C delay to FY14
Department identified joint service ground purpose ............... ............... +10,000
mask shortfall
94 Contamination Avoidance 144,540 133,040 -11,500
Restoring acquisition accountability: Dismounted ............... ............... -11,500
Reconnaissance system milestone C delay to FY14
Classified Programs 544,272 539,272 -5,000
Classified adjustment ............... ............... -5,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Defense Production Act Purchases

Appropriations, 2013\1\................................. $223,236,000
Budget estimate, 2014................................... 25,135,000
Committee recommendation................................ 50,135,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public
Law 112-25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $50,135,000.
This is $25,000,000 above the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this
appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

DEFENSE PRODUCTION ACT PURCHASES .............. 25,135 .............. 50,135 .............. +25,000
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Additional Funding.--The Committee recognizes the critical
role that the DPA Title III program serves in strengthening the
U.S. defense industrial base and believes that this work is in
the national interest. Therefore, the Committee increases
funding for DPA by $25,000,000 over the budget request. The
Committee directs that the additional funding be competitively
awarded to new initiatives and priority consideration should be
given to completion of DPA projects initiated in prior years.
Furthermore, the Committee directs the Under Secretary of
Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics to inform
the congressional defense committees 30 days prior to any
obligation or expenditure of these funds.

National Guard and Reserve Equipment

Appropriations, 2013\1\................................. $1,500,000,000
Budget estimate, 2014...................................................
Committee recommendation................................ 1,000,000,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public
Law 112-25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of
$1,000,000,000. This is $1,000,000,000 above the budget
estimate.
The appropriation includes direction for each Reserve and
National Guard component commander to submit to the
congressional defense committees a detailed assessment of that
component's modernization priorities, not later than 30 days
after enactment of this act.

committee recommended program

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this
appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

RESERVE EQUIPMENT

ARMY RESERVE
MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT .............. .............. .............. 175,000 .............. +175,000

NAVY RESERVE
MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT .............. .............. .............. 70,000 .............. +70,000

MARINE CORPS RESERVE
MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT .............. .............. .............. 55,000 .............. +55,000

AIR FORCE RESERVE
MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT .............. .............. .............. 70,000 .............. +70,000
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, RESERVE EQUIPMENT .............. .............. .............. 370,000 .............. +370,000

NATIONAL GUARD EQUIPMENT

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD
MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT .............. .............. .............. 315,000 .............. +315,000

AIR NATIONAL GUARD
MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT .............. .............. .............. 315,000 .............. +315,000
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, NATIONAL GUARD EQUIPMENT .............. .............. .............. 630,000 .............. +630,000
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, NATIONAL GUARD AND RESERVE EQUIPMENT .............. .............. .............. 1,000,000 .............. +1,000,000
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

High-Priority Items.--The Committee directs that the
National Guard and Reserve Equipment Account shall be executed
by the Chiefs of the National Guard and Reserve components with
priority consideration given to the following items: 13K AT
Forklift; ARC 210 Radios for ANG F-16s; Arctic Sustainment
Kits; Base Physical Security Systems; Blue Force Tracker Next
Generation; CBRN Reconnaissance Equipment; Chemical and
Biological Protective Shelters; Coastal Riverine Force Boats
and Communications Upgrades; Counter Communications Systems;
Digital Radar Warning Receivers [ALR-69A] for F-16s; F-15 AESA
Radars; F-16/F-15/A-10 Radar Warning Receivers and Defensive
Systems Upgrades; General Engineering Equipment; Generation 4
Advanced Targeting Pods; HC-130 Hostile Fire Indication System;
Helmet-Mounted Integrated Targeting System; In-Flight Propeller
Balancing System; Integrated Vehicle Health Management System
for UH-72As; Internal and External Auxiliary Fuel Tanks for
Rotary Wing Aircraft; Joint Threat Emitters; KC-135 and C-130
Real Time Information in Cockpit [RTIC] Data Link; Large
Aircraft Infrared Countermeasures [LAIRCM]; Light Utility
Helicopters; Lightweight Multi-Band Satellite Terminal; Mobile
Ad Hoc Network Emergency Communications Equipment; Modernized
Medical Equipment Sets for HMMWVs; Modular Small Arms Training
Systems; Reactive Skin Decontamination Lotion; RED HORSE
Squadron Vehicles; Remotely Piloted Aircraft Squadron
Operations Centers and Targeting Unit Equipment; Simulation
Training Systems; Small and Light Arms; Tactical Trucks;
Targeting Pod Upgrades; UH-60 A-L Modernization; UH-60 Civilian
Communications Package A & B Kits; Ultra-Light Tactical
Vehicles; VSS Modernization for Geographically Separated Units
and Unified Capabilities; and Wireless Mobile Mesh Network
Systems.
Chemical and Biological Protective Shelters [CBPS].--The
Committee supports the National Guard's effort to acquire
critical dual use equipment. The Committee believes National
Guard and Reserve Equipment [NGRE] funds should be used to
acquire equipment identified on the NGRE Report for fiscal year
2014 Top 25 Equipment Modernization/Shortfall Category List,
such as CBPS. The CBPS is a self-contained, mobile medical unit
that is a rapidly deployable collective protection system
designed to operate in the forward battle area and for domestic
response. Previously, the Commission on National Guard and
Reserves stated that the Secretary of Defense should ensure
forces identified as rapid responders to domestic catastrophes
are ``manned, trained, and equipped to the highest levels of
readiness.'' The CBPS has been identified as a critical
shortfall item for the past 5 years and is essential to the
National Guard in support of both its national security and
homeland missions. Recent events and natural disasters
highlighted the need for a protected, mobile medical
capability. Therefore, the Committee encourages the Department
to use a portion of this funding to continue the procurement of
CBPS.
Intent of the National Guard and Reserve Equipment Account
[NGREA].--Congress established the National Guard and Reserve
Equipment Account [NGREA] in 1981 to provide the equipment
necessary to maintain the readiness of National Guard and
Reserve components. The Committee recognizes that the Active
components do not procure all of the required equipment
necessary to resource their reserve components, especially in a
time of fiscal constraint.
NGREA funding is intended to supplement the services' base
procurement appropriations, not substitute for it. The Active
components are still expected and required to fund and equip
their respective Guard and Reserve components to ensure reserve
units are at a high level of readiness should they need to be
deployed. Consistent with the total force concept, the Active
components serve as the procurement contracting authority in
support of the Guard and Reserve components.
Congress expects the Chiefs of the National Guard and
Reserve components to enhance readiness by procuring items that
the services' base appropriations do not fund. As already
established in law, NGREA funds have and should continue to be
used to procure new aircraft; major weapon systems that are
already established as a stable procurement program; equipment
support items; and modifications to rebuild, overhaul, or
refurbish existing items without expanding on the platform
capability currently supported by the Active components.
NGREA provides the needed flexibility to the Guard and
Reserve Chiefs to procure priority readiness items subject only
to the authority, direction, and control of the Secretary of
Defense. The Committee expects that the Guard and Reserve
Chiefs will continue to execute their portion of NGREA as
Congress has historically directed within the bill, and
outlined within the annual law pertaining to the NGRE account,
without prejudice to size or function of the Reserve unit
benefitting from this account.
Total Force.--The National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2013 established the National Commission on the
Structure of the Air Force to determine whether and how the
structure should be modified to best fulfill current and
anticipated mission requirements for the Air Force in a manner
consistent with available resources. As Congress awaits the
recommendations of the Commission, the Committee notes the
likelihood that the fleets of the Active, Guard, and Reserve
components will diverge in the coming years. As aircraft and
other equipment are increasingly operated solely by the Guard
and Reserve, the Committee directs the Active component to
continue to resource and invest in the necessary maintenance
and upgrades of these aircraft and equipment, to include
program management administration and research, development,
test, and evaluation efforts required to integrate items
procured using National Guard and Reserve Equipment funding.

TITLE IV

RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST AND EVALUATION

Funds appropriated under this title provide the resources
required to conduct a program of research, development, test
and evaluation, including research in basic science, applied
research, advanced technology development, demonstration and
validation, engineering and manufacturing development, and
operational systems development.
The President's fiscal year 2014 budget requests a total of
$67,520,236,000 for research, development, test and evaluation
appropriations.

SUMMARY OF COMMITTEE ACTION

The Committee recommends research, development, test and
evaluation appropriations totaling $65,806,815,000 for fiscal
year 2014. This is $1,713,421,000 below the budget estimate.
Committee recommended research, development, test and
evaluation appropriations for fiscal year 2014 are summarized
below:

SUMMARY OF RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST AND EVALUATION APPROPRIATIONS
[In thousands of dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Change from
Account 2014 budget Committee budget
estimate recommendation estimate
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation:
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Army............ 7,989,102 7,576,342 -412,760
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy............ 15,974,780 15,403,145 -571,635
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air Force....... 25,702,946 24,945,541 -757,405
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-Wide.... 17,667,108 17,695,487 +28,379
Operational Test and Evaluation, Defense.................... 186,300 186,300 ..............
-----------------------------------------------
Total..................................................... 67,520,236 65,806,815 -1,713,421
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST AND EVALUATION OVERVIEW

Alternative Energy Research.--The Committee continues to
believe in the fiscal and operational value of investing in
alternative energy research, and recommends an additional
$75,000,000 for Army, Navy and Air Force research and
development to continue research of promising alternative
energy technologies, such as renewable energies, alternative
fuels, and energy efficiencies. The Committee encourages the
services to examine opportunities to use the arbitrage of
affordable natural gas to enhance their energy usage
efficiency. Additional research is needed to improve the
efficiency and durability of technologies for advanced natural
gas engine and vehicle technologies, fuel storage, and fueling
infrastructure. Therefore, the Committee encourages the
military services to invest in natural gas vehicle and fueling
infrastructure research, development, and technology
demonstrations to address these areas.
Technology Transfer.--The Committee recognizes the
importance of transitioning technology between the Federal
Government and non-Federal organizations, academia, the
nonprofit sector, and State and local governments. Technology
transfer ensures that taxpayer investments in research and
development are used to benefit the economy and the general
public, along with promoting commercialization for small
businesses. Further, in fulfilling its responsibility to ensure
the full use of the results of the Nation's Federal investment
in research and development, the Committee encourages the
Department of Defense to place an increased focus on technology
transfer programs, which includes allocation of funds, and the
streamlining of programs and performance metrics for Federal
laboratories.
Small Business Innovative Research.--The Committee
recognizes the importance of the Small Business Innovative
Research [SBIR] program and its success in commercialization
from federally funded research and development projects. The
SBIR program creates jobs and encourages domestic small
businesses to engage in Federal research and development. The
Committee encourages the Department of Defense to place an
increased focus on considering SBIR awards to firms that employ
fewer than 50 people.
Solar Research in Dry-Dust Areas.--The Committee supports
efforts by the Department of Defense to become more energy
efficient. These efforts have demonstrated cost savings and are
an important part of the 2010 Quadrennial Defense Review and
the Department of Defense's Operational Energy Strategy.
Renewable energy, including solar, is an important part of
these efforts. Fort Bliss recently launched the largest
renewable energy project in the military's history--featuring a
20 megawatt solar farm--with the goal of Net Zero emissions on
base. The Committee believes solar initiatives are also
important for overseas operations, particularly in the Middle
East and Africa, where large amounts of energy often need to be
transported to theater and in-country supplies are unreliable.
However, dry-dust problems can prevent the optimal use of solar
energy in some areas. Therefore, the Committee urges the
Department of Defense to make research into the use of solar
energy in dry-dust regions a priority in fiscal year 2014.
FAA UAS Test Ranges.--The Committee supports the Federal
Aviation Administration's ongoing program to establish test
sites for civilian unmanned aircraft systems [UAS]. The
Committee understands that Department of Defense test ranges
are currently operating at capacity due to overwhelming demand
for UAS testing and because of continued growth in the UAS
industry. Because civilian test sites are limited, DOD sites
are serving both defense and civilian industry needs. The FAA's
program will serve to bolster testing capacity across the
industry and support this important and growing defense
capability.
National Network for Manufacturing Innovation.--The
Committee supports the administration's initiative to create
three new manufacturing institutes including two Department of
Defense-led institutes--a digital manufacturing and design
institute and a lightweight and modern metals manufacturing
institute. The two Department of Defense-led institutes, part
of the administration's larger National Network for
Manufacturing Innovation, will address the life cycle of
digital data across systems and accelerate the introduction and
use of more affordable products made with high strength-to-
weight alloys that improve performance and reduce energy
consumption. The institutes will increase domestic
manufacturing competitiveness and efficiency that is necessary
for our national defense by bringing together our Nation's
research and development, education, and training activities
for a skilled workforce and the deployment of technological
innovations in domestic production of goods.

Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Army

Appropriations, 2013\1\................................. $8,665,177,000
Budget estimate, 2014................................... 7,989,102,000
Committee recommendation................................ 7,576,342,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public
Law 112-25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of
$7,576,342,000. This is $412,760,000 below the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this
appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

BASIC RESEARCH
IN-HOUSE LABORATORY INDEPENDENT RESEARCH 21,803 21,803 ..............
DEFENSE RESEARCH SCIENCES 221,901 221,901 ..............
UNIVERSITY RESEARCH INITIATIVES 79,359 79,359 ..............
UNIVERSITY AND INDUSTRY RESEARCH CENTERS 113,662 113,662 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BASIC RESEARCH 436,725 436,725 ..............

APPLIED RESEARCH
MATERIALS TECHNOLOGY 26,585 56,585 +30,000
SENSORS AND ELECTRONIC SURVIVABILITY 43,170 43,170 ..............
TRACTOR HIP 36,293 36,293 ..............
AVIATION TECHNOLOGY 55,615 55,615 ..............
ELECTRONIC WARFARE TECHNOLOGY 17,585 17,585 ..............
MISSILE TECHNOLOGY 51,528 51,528 ..............
ADVANCED WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY 26,162 26,162 ..............
ADVANCED CONCEPTS AND SIMULATION 24,063 24,063 ..............
COMBAT VEHICLE AND AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGY 64,589 64,589 ..............
BALLISTICS TECHNOLOGY 68,300 76,300 +8,000
CHEMICAL, SMOKE AND EQUIPMENT DEFEATING TECHNOLOGY 4,490 4,490 ..............
JOINT SERVICE SMALL ARMS PROGRAM 7,818 7,818 ..............
WEAPONS AND MUNITIONS TECHNOLOGY 37,798 37,798 ..............
ELECTRONICS AND ELECTRONIC DEVICES 59,021 59,021 ..............
NIGHT VISION TECHNOLOGY 43,426 43,426 ..............
COUNTERMINE SYSTEMS 20,574 30,574 +10,000
HUMAN FACTORS ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY 21,339 21,339 ..............
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY TECHNOLOGY 20,316 20,316 ..............
COMMAND, CONTROL, COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY 34,209 34,209 ..............
COMPUTER AND SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY 10,439 10,439 ..............
MILITARY ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY 70,064 70,064 ..............
MANPOWER/PERSONNEL/TRAINING TECHNOLOGY 17,654 17,654 ..............
WARFIGHTER TECHNOLOGY 31,546 31,546 ..............
MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY 93,340 93,340 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, APPLIED RESEARCH 885,924 933,924 +48,000

ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT
WARFIGHTER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY 56,056 66,056 +10,000
MEDICAL ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY 62,032 70,032 +8,000
AVIATION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY 81,080 81,080 ..............
WEAPONS AND MUNITIONS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY 63,919 63,919 ..............
COMBAT VEHICLE AND AUTOMOTIVE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY 97,043 152,043 +55,000
COMMAND, CONTROL, COMMUNICATIONS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY 5,866 10,866 +5,000
MANPOWER, PERSONNEL AND TRAINING ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY 7,800 7,800 ..............
ELECTRONIC WARFARE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY 40,416 40,416 ..............
TRACTOR HIKE 9,166 9,166 ..............
NEXT GENERATION TRAINING & SIMULATION SYSTEMS 13,627 13,627 ..............
TRACTOR ROSE 10,667 10,667 ..............
COMBATING TERRORISM, TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 15,054 15,054 ..............
TRACTOR NAIL 3,194 3,194 ..............
TRACTOR EGGS 2,367 2,367 ..............
ELECTRONIC WARFARE TECHNOLOGY 25,348 25,348 ..............
MISSILE AND ROCKET ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY 64,009 84,009 +20,000
TRACTOR CAGE 11,083 11,083 ..............
HIGH PERFORMANCE COMPUTING MODERNIZATION PROGRAM 180,662 225,662 +45,000
LANDMINE WARFARE AND BARRIER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY 22,806 22,806 ..............
JOINT SERVICE SMALL ARMS PROGRAM 5,030 5,030 ..............
NIGHT VISION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY 36,407 36,407 ..............
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATIONS 11,745 11,745 ..............
MILITARY ENGINEERING ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY 23,717 23,717 ..............
ADVANCED TACTICAL COMPUTER SCIENCE & SENSOR TECHNOLOGY 33,012 33,012 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 882,106 1,025,106 +143,000

DEMONSTRATION & VALIDATION
ARMY MISSILE DEFENSE SYSTEMS INTEGRATION 15,301 15,301 ..............
ARMY MISSILE DEFENSE SYSTEMS INTEGRATION (SPACE) 13,592 13,592 ..............
LANDMINE WARFARE AND BARRIER--ADV DEV 10,625 .............. -10,625
TANK AND MEDIUM CALIBER AMMUNITION 30,612 30,612 ..............
ADVANCED TANK ARMAMENT SYSTEM (ATAS) 49,989 49,989 ..............
SOLDIER SUPPORT AND SURVIVABILITY 6,703 5,188 -1,515
TACTICAL ELECTRONIC SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM--AD 6,894 6,894 ..............
NIGHT VISION SYSTEMS ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT 9,066 9,066 ..............
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY TECHNOLOGY 2,633 2,633 ..............
WARFIGHTER INFORMATION NETWORK--TACTICAL 272,384 166,384 -106,000
NATO RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT 3,874 3,874 ..............
AVIATION--ADV DEV 5,018 5,018 ..............
LOGISTICS AND ENGINEER EQUIPMENT--ADV DEV 11,556 11,556 ..............
MEDICAL SYSTEMS--ADV DEV 15,603 15,603 ..............
SOLDIER SYSTEMS--ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT 14,159 14,159 ..............
INTEGRATED BROADCAST SERVICE 79 79 ..............
TECHNOLOGY MATURATION INITIATIVES 55,605 5,130 -50,475
INDIRECT FIRE PROTECTION CAPABILITY INCREMENT 2- INTERC 79,232 79,232 ..............
INTEGRATED BASE DEFENSE 4,476 4,476 ..............
ENDURANCE UAVS 28,991 .............. -28,991
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, DEMONSTRATION & VALIDATION 636,392 438,786 -197,606

ENGINEERING & MANUFACTURING DEVELOPMENT
AIRCRAFT AVIONICS 76,588 76,588 ..............
ARMED, DEPLOYABLE OH-58D 73,309 73,309 ..............
ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT 154,621 154,621 ..............
JOINT TACTICAL RADIO 31,826 31,826 ..............
MID-TIER NETWORKING VEHICULAR RADIO 23,341 23,341 ..............
ALL SOURCE ANALYSIS SYSTEM 4,839 4,839 ..............
TRACTOR CAGE 23,841 23,841 ..............
INFANTRY SUPPORT WEAPONS 79,855 90,500 +10,645
MEDIUM TACTICAL VEHICLES 2,140 2,140 ..............
JAVELIN 5,002 5,002 ..............
FAMILY OF HEAVY TACTICAL VEHICLES 21,321 21,321 ..............
AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL 514 514 ..............
NIGHT VISION SYSTEMS--SDD 43,405 43,405 ..............
COMBAT FEEDING, CLOTHING, AND EQUIPMENT 1,939 1,939 ..............
NON-SYSTEM TRAINING DEVICES--SDD 18,980 18,980 ..............
AIR DEFENSE COMMAND, CONTROL AND INTELLIGENCE--SDD 18,294 18,294 ..............
CONSTRUCTIVE SIMULATION SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 17,013 17,013 ..............
AUTOMATIC TEST EQUIPMENT DEVELOPMENT 6,701 6,701 ..............
DISTRIBUTIVE INTERACTIVE SIMULATIONS (DIS)--SDD 14,575 14,575 ..............
COMBINED ARMS TACTICAL TRAINER (CATT) CORE 27,634 27,634 ..............
BRIGADE ANALYSIS, INTEGRATION AND EVALUATION 193,748 100,000 -93,748
WEAPONS AND MUNITIONS--SDD 15,721 15,721 ..............
LOGISTICS AND ENGINEER EQUIPMENT--SDD 41,703 41,703 ..............
COMMAND, CONTROL, COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS--SDD 7,379 7,379 ..............
MEDICAL MATERIEL/MEDICAL BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE EQUIPMENT 39,468 39,468 ..............
LANDMINE WARFARE/BARRIER--SDD 92,285 92,285 ..............
ARTILLERY MUNITIONS 8,209 8,209 ..............
ARMY TACTICAL COMMAND & CONTROL HARDWARE & SOFTWARE 22,958 22,958 ..............
RADAR DEVELOPMENT 1,549 1,549 ..............
GENERAL FUND ENTERPRISE BUSINESS SYSTEM (GFEBS) 17,342 227 -17,115
FIREFINDER 47,221 20,221 -27,000
SOLDIER SYSTEMS--WARRIOR DEM/VAL 48,477 33,477 -15,000
ARTILLERY SYSTEMS 80,613 121,313 +40,700
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 68,814 68,814 ..............
ARMY INTEGRATED MILITARY HUMAN RESOURCES SYSTEM (A-IMH) 137,290 69,290 -68,000
ARMORED MULTI-PURPOSE VEHICLE 116,298 116,298 ..............
JOINT TACTICAL NETWORK CENTER 68,148 68,148 ..............
AMF JOINT TACTICAL RADIO SYSSTEM 33,219 33,219 ..............
JOINT AIR-TO-GROUND MISSILE (JAGM) 15,127 15,127 ..............
PAC-2/MSE MISSILE 68,843 68,843 ..............
ARMY INTEGRATED AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE (AIAMD) 364,649 369,649 +5,000
MANNED GROUND VEHICLE 592,201 423,201 -169,000
AERIAL COMMON SENSOR 10,382 10,382 ..............
NATIONAL CAPABILITIES INTEGRATION 21,143 21,143 ..............
JOINT LIGHT TACTICAL VEHICLE ENG AND MANUFACTURING 84,230 84,230 ..............
TROJAN--RH12 3,465 3,465 ..............
ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT 10,806 10,806 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, ENGINEERING & MANUFACTURING DEVELOPMENT 2,857,026 2,523,508 -333,518

RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT
THREAT SIMULATOR DEVELOPMENT 16,934 24,434 +7,500
TARGET SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 13,488 13,488 ..............
MAJOR T&E INVESTMENT 46,672 46,672 ..............
RAND ARROYO CENTER 11,919 19,419 +7,500
ARMY KWAJALEIN ATOLL 193,658 193,658 ..............
CONCEPTS EXPERIMENTATION PROGRAM 37,158 22,258 -14,900
ARMY TEST RANGES AND FACILITIES 340,659 340,659 ..............
ARMY TECHNICAL TEST INSTRUMENTATION AND TARGETS 66,061 66,061 ..............
SURVIVABILITY/LETHALITY ANALYSIS 43,280 43,280 ..............
AIRCRAFT CERTIFICATION 6,025 6,025 ..............
METEOROLOGICAL SUPPORT TO RDT&E ACTIVITIES 7,349 7,349 ..............
MATERIEL SYSTEMS ANALYSIS 19,809 19,809 ..............
EXPLOITATION OF FOREIGN ITEMS 5,941 5,941 ..............
SUPPORT OF OPERATIONAL TESTING 55,504 55,504 ..............
ARMY EVALUATION CENTER 65,274 65,274 ..............
SIMULATION & MODELING FOR ACQ, RQTS, & TNG (SMART) 1,283 1,283 ..............
PROGRAMWIDE ACTIVITIES 82,035 82,035 ..............
TECHNICAL INFORMATION ACTIVITIES 33,853 33,853 ..............
MUNITIONS STANDARDIZATION, EFFECTIVENESS AND SAFETY 53,340 58,340 +5,000
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY TECHNOLOGY MGMT SUPPORT 5,193 5,193 ..............
MANAGEMENT HEADQUARTERS (RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT) 54,175 54,175 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT 1,159,610 1,164,710 +5,100

OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT
MLRS PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 110,576 96,476 -14,100
LOGISTICS AUTOMATION 3,717 3,717 ..............
PATRIOT PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT 70,053 29,200 -40,853
AEROSTAT JOINT PROJECT OFFICE 98,450 .............. -98,450
1AEROSTAT EMD .............. 60,000 +60,000
1AEROSTAT COCOM EXERCISE .............. 38,450 +38,450
ADV FIELD ARTILLERY TACTICAL DATA SYSTEM 30,940 25,520 -5,420
COMBAT VEHICLE IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS 177,532 177,532 ..............
MANEUVER CONTROL SYSTEM 36,495 36,495 ..............
AIRCRAFT MODIFICATIONS/PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS 257,187 239,824 -17,363
AIRCRAFT ENGINE COMPONENT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 315 315 ..............
DIGITIZATION 6,186 6,186 ..............
MISSILE/AIR DEFENSE PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 1,578 1,578 ..............
OTHER MISSILE PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS 62,100 62,100 ..............
TRACTOR CARD 18,778 18,778 ..............
JOINT TACTICAL GROUND SYSTEM 7,108 7,108 ..............
SECURITY AND INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES 7,600 7,600 ..............
INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM 9,357 9,357 ..............
GLOBAL COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM 41,225 41,225 ..............
SATCOM GROUND ENVIRONMENT (SPACE) 18,197 18,197 ..............
WWMCCS/GLOBAL COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM 14,215 14,215 ..............
TACTICAL UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES 33,533 33,533 ..............
DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS 27,622 27,622 ..............
MQ-1 SKY WARRIOR A UAV 10,901 10,901 ..............
RQ-11 UAV 2,321 2,321 ..............
RQ-7 UAV 12,031 12,031 ..............
BIOMETRICS ENABLED INTELLIGENCE 12,449 12,449 ..............
END ITEM INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS ACTIVITIES 56,136 56,136 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 1,126,602 1,048,866 -77,736

CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 4,717 4,717 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, ARMY 7,989,102 7,576,342 -412,760
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by
the Committee:

[In thousands of dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2013 budget Committee Change from
Line Item estimate recommendation budget estimate
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
5 Materials Technology 26,585 56,585 +30,000
Materials research and technology ............... ............... +15,000
Nanotechnology research ............... ............... +5,000
Silicon carbide research ............... ............... +10,000
14 Ballistics Technology 68,300 76,300 +8,000
Authorization adjustment: WIAMAN schedule ............... ............... +8,000
adjustment
20 Countermine Systems 20,574 30,574 +10,000
Unexploded ordnance and landmine detection ............... ............... +10,000
research
29 Warfighter Advanced Technology 56,056 66,056 +10,000
Program increase ............... ............... +10,000
30 Medical Advanced Technology 62,032 70,032 +8,000
Military Burn Research Program ............... ............... +8,000
33 Combat Vehicle and Automotive Advanced Technology 97,043 152,043 +55,000
Alternative energy research ............... ............... +25,000
Program increase ............... ............... +30,000
34 Space Application Advanced Technology 5,866 10,866 +5,000
Program increase ............... ............... +5,000
45 Missile and Rocket Advanced Technology 64,009 84,009 +20,000
Restore unjustified reduction ............... ............... +20,000
47 High Performance Computing Modernization Program 180,662 225,662 +45,000
Restore unjustified reduction ............... ............... +45,000
56 Landmine Warfare and Barrier--Adv Dev 10,625 ............... -10,625
Restoring acquisition accountability: Forward ............... ............... -10,625
Reconnaissance and Explosive Hazard Detection
(FREHD) program deferred by the Army
60 Soldier Support and Survivability 6,703 5,188 -1,515
Restoring acquisition accountability: Rapid ............... ............... -1,515
Equipping Force non-base budget program
64 Warfighter Information Network-Tactical--DEM/VAL 272,384 166,384 -106,000
Maintaining program affordability: Increment III ............... ............... -106,000
excessive growth
72 Technology Maturation Initiatives 55,605 5,130 -50,475
Maintaining program affordability: DS3 ............... ............... -40,986
unjustified request
Improving funds management: DX1 excess carry- ............... ............... -9,489
over
76 Endurance UAVs 28,991 ............... -28,991
Program termination: LEMV ............... ............... -28,991
84 Infantry Support Weapons 79,855 90,500 +10,645
Restoring acquisition accountability: S62 Counter- ............... ............... +11,000
Defilade Target Engagement--transfer from WTCV
at request of Army for corrective actions
Restoring acquisition accountability: S63 ............... ............... -355
Individual Carbine program terminated by Army
102 Brigade Analysis, Integration and Evaluation 193,748 100,000 -93,748
Maintaining program affordability: NIE excessive ............... ............... -93,748
costs
111 General Fund Enterprise Business System [GFEBS] 17,342 227 -17,115
Improving funds management: DV6 GFEBS-SA--Fully ............... ............... -17,115
funded in fiscal year 2013, per Army re- quest
112 Firefinder 47,221 20,221 -27,000
Improving funds management: P3I program delays ............... ............... -27,000
113 Soldier Systems--Warrior Dem/Val 48,477 33,477 -15,000
Maintaining program affordability: S75 excessive ............... ............... -15,000
costs
114 Artillery Systems--EMD 80,613 121,313 +40,700
Restoring acquisition accountability: Transfer ............... ............... +40,700
from WTCV for Paladin at Army request
118 Integrated Personnel and Pay System-Army [IPPS-A] 137,290 69,290 -68,000
Restoring acquisition accountability: Increment ............... ............... -68,000
II excessive delays
125 Army Integrated Air and Missile Defense [AIAMD] 364,649 369,649 +5,000
Program increase for cyber security and supply ............... ............... +5,000
chain risk management
126 Manned Ground Vehicle 592,201 423,201 -169,000
Restoring acquisition accountability: Excess ............... ............... -99,000
technology development undefinitized contract
extension funding
Maintaining program affordability: Excessive ............... ............... -70,000
funding for prototypes
132 Threat Simulator Development 16,934 24,434 +7,500
Cyber test and evaluation enterprise ............... ............... +7,500
infrastructure
135 Rand Arroyo Center 11,919 19,419 +7,500
Restore unjustified reduction ............... ............... +7,500
137 Concepts Experimentation Program 37,158 22,258 -14,900
Reducing duplication: Project 317 contractor ............... ............... -14,900
growth
152 Munitions Standardization, Effectiveness and Safety 53,340 58,340 +5,000
Program increase ............... ............... +5,000
156 MLRS Product Improvement Program 110,576 96,476 -14,100
Restoring acquisition accountability: Project 78G ............... ............... -14,100
firm fixed price contract cost growth
159 Patriot Product Improvement 70,053 29,200 -40,853
Restoring acquisition accountability: Only for ............... ............... -40,853
near-term urgent improvements
160 Aerostat Joint Project Office 98,450 ............... -98,450
Restoring acquisition accountability: Transfer to ............... ............... -98,450
lines 160A and 160B for oversight
160A Aerostat Joint Program Office: Conclusion of EMD ............... 60,000 +60,000
effort only
Restoring acquisition accountability: Transfer ............... ............... +60,000
from line 160 for conclusion of EMD effort only
160B Aerostat Joint Program Office: COCOM exercise only ............... 38,450 +38,450
Restoring acquisition accountability: Transfer ............... ............... +38,450
from line 160 for COCOM exercise only
161 Adv Field Artillery Tactical Data System 30,940 25,520 -5,420
Improving funds management: Increment 2 Army ............... ............... -5,420
identified excess
164 Aircraft Modifications/Product Improvement Programs 257,187 239,824 -17,363
Improving funds management: Project 430 Block II ............... ............... -17,363
excess carryover
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Warfighter Information Network-Tactical [WIN-T] Increment
III.--The fiscal year 2014 budget request includes $271,284,000
for WIN-T Increment III, an increase of $92,652,000 over
amounts appropriated for fiscal year 2013, and an increase of
$195,032,000 over amounts previously programmed for fiscal year
2014. In the fiscal year 2014 budget submission, the Army has
also programmed an additional $249,608,000 over amounts
previously programmed for fiscal year 2015. The Committee
questions the fiscal soundness of adding close to $450,000,000
to this program in the next 2 fiscal years. The Committee notes
that a follow-on development contract award scheduled for
earlier this year has been delayed and that the program's
acquisition program baseline is expected to be revised later
this year. Therefore, the Committee finds this increase in
resources premature and recommends continuing the program at
fiscal year 2013 levels.
Army Network Integrated Evaluation [NIE].--The fiscal year
2014 budget request includes $193,748,000 for two Network
Integrated Evaluations [NIE], which are semi-annual assessments
and formal test events of network technologies in the context
of a military exercise. The Committee notes that to date, the
Army has conducted five such events, which include formal
development and operational tests of programs of record, as
well as informal evaluations of Government- or contractor-
provided systems in response to Army-identified capability
gaps. As confirmed in a Government Accountability Office August
2013 report assessing the NIE, the Committee is not aware of
significant successful technology transitions of the over 100
systems evaluated at the NIE to date, despite additional funds
having been provided by Congress specifically for that purpose.
The Committee further notes that the Army has not been able to
execute previously appropriated funding for the NIE and has
reprogrammed or carried-over over 90 percent of total fiscal
year 2012 and fiscal year 2013 funding. Given the fiscal
constraints the Army is facing, the Committee questions the
return on investment for NIE in its current form. Therefore,
the Committee recommends reducing the scope of the NIE,
allowing the Army and vendors to prioritize their investments
to support Army requirements.
Ground Combat Vehicle [GCV].--The fiscal year 2014 budget
request includes $592,201,000 for the Ground Combat Vehicle.
The program was restructured earlier this year using previously
appropriated funds. As part of the program's restructure, the
Army awarded two undefinitized contract actions [UCAs] in April
2013, which it plans to definitize by December 2013. The
Committee notes the historically measurable cost growth of UCAs
on development programs, as restated in the Department's 2013
annual report on the performance of the Department of Defense
acquisition system. The Army has budgeted over $140,000,000 for
these contracts in fiscal year 2014, which due to the fiscal
year 2013 funds already applied to the UCAs is excess to stated
requirements. Therefore, the Committee recommends a reduction
of $99,000,000 to the budget request for undefinitized contract
actions. In addition, the Army is planning to spend over
$470,000,000 over the next 3 fiscal years for the fabrication
of 12 GCV prototypes. While the Committee recognizes the value
of certain prototype activities during the development phase of
the program, the acquisition strategy and funding profile would
expend close to $40,000,000 per individual prototype vehicle.
Therefore, the Committee denies the $70,000,000 requested for
prototypes in fiscal year 2014. The Committee notes that none
of these adjustments affect the Government program office, nor
do they impede the Army's ability to award the GCV engineering
and manufacturing development contract in September 2014, as
planned.
Improved Military Tactical Batteries.--The Committee
continues to be concerned with the high operational and
maintenance costs, and performance issues related to the short
life of standard military vehicle batteries. The Committee
encourages the Army to continue efforts designed to capture
cost savings and performance improvements through storage and
operation of military vehicle batteries.
Prototype Integration Facility.--The Army prototype
integration facility [PIF] remains a key, award-winning
enterprise asset. The Committee notes that since 2002, the PIF
has executed in excess of $3,100,000,000 in rapid response,
quick reaction, and high-priority weapons system hardware and
services support to the warfighter. The PIF does not receive
mission or program budget funds and relies on customer funding
to execute specific weapon system program requirements. The
Committee encourages the Army to continue to support upgrades
to the PIF and to maintain the fast-response capability of the
PIF so that this unique and valuable asset will be available to
the warfighter to address current and future needs.
Engineering Systems Integration Labs.--The Committee is
aware of new technologies for the development and evaluation of
new weapon systems that can reduce costs and serve as an
effective platform for integrating advanced technology into a
weapon system. The use of Engineering Systems Integration Labs
[ESILs] has already proven valuable where they have been
utilized. The Committee urges the Army, in conjunction with
industry, to implement ESILs for all major weapon systems,
including legacy systems modernization programs.
Cybersecurity of Space Assets.--The Committee understands
it is an Army priority to augment its capability for
cybersecurity research on net-centric embedded weapon systems
and to research and evaluate technologies for space-based and
cyberspace applications for Army tactical ground forces. The
Army's strategic forces mission requirements include
maintaining Army force modernization in space. The Committee
encourages the Army to apply the appropriate resources to
ensure cyberspace technologies research for the security of
space assets, which in turn ensures our warfighters can receive
critical information in a battlefield environment. Leveraging
existing personnel and recently acquired technology development
management programs can provide services such as mitigation
strategies to agencies that develop, acquire, and maintain
space and net-centric weapons assets, to include the Missile
Defense Agency.
Warfighter Helmets.--The high prevalence of warfighters
returning from theater with short- and long-term brain injury
is indicative of Traumatic Brain Injury [TBI], and is a major
concern to the Committee. The Committee is aware of the
physical, emotional, psychological, social, and financial cost
associated with these type injuries. Therefore, the Committee
urges the Army Research Laboratory, in partnership with public
universities across the country, to leverage commercially
available technology for improved soldier-worn equipment,
particularly, pneumatic cushioning systems in military combat
helmets, to protect the health and safety of the warfighter.
Wireless Medical Technology.--The Committee supports
initiatives to improve casualty care of personnel through the
development of wireless medical monitoring systems with
enhanced data collection capabilities out to the point of
wounding. The Committee encourages the Army to utilize these
wireless medical technologies in demonstrations, operational
evaluations, and deployments in order to provide greater
patient care.

Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy

Appropriations, 2013\1\................................. $16,941,012,000
Budget estimate, 2014................................... 15,974,780,000
Committee recommendation................................ 15,403,145,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public
Law 112-25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of
$15,403,145,000. This is $571,635,000 below the budget
estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this
appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

BASIC RESEARCH
UNIVERSITY RESEARCH INITIATIVES 112,617 112,617 ..............
IN-HOUSE LABORATORY INDEPENDENT RESEARCH 18,230 18,230 ..............
DEFENSE RESEARCH SCIENCES 484,459 489,459 +5,000
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BASIC RESEARCH 615,306 620,306 +5,000

APPLIED RESEARCH
POWER PROJECTION APPLIED RESEARCH 104,513 104,513 ..............
FORCE PROTECTION APPLIED RESEARCH 145,307 170,307 +25,000
MARINE CORPS LANDING FORCE TECHNOLOGY 47,334 47,334 ..............
COMMON PICTURE APPLIED RESEARCH 34,163 34,163 ..............
WARFIGHTER SUSTAINMENT APPLIED RESEARCH 49,689 49,689 ..............
ELECTROMAGNETIC SYSTEMS APPLIED RESEARCH 97,701 97,701 ..............
OCEAN WARFIGHTING ENVIRONMENT APPLIED RESEARCH 45,685 45,685 ..............
JOINT NON-LETHAL WEAPONS APPLIED RESEARCH 6,060 6,060 ..............
UNDERSEA WARFARE APPLIED RESEARCH 103,050 103,050 ..............
FUTURE NAVAL CAPABILITIES ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEV 169,710 169,710 ..............
MINE AND EXPEDITIONARY WARFARE APPLIED RESEARCH 31,326 31,326 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, APPLIED RESEARCH 834,538 859,538 +25,000

ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT
POWER PROJECTION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY 48,201 48,201 ..............
FORCE PROTECTION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY 28,328 28,328 ..............
ELECTROMAGNETIC SYSTEMS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY 56,179 56,179 ..............
MARINE CORPS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION (ATD) 132,400 132,400 ..............
JOINT NON-LETHAL WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 11,854 11,854 ..............
FUTURE NAVAL CAPABILITIES ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEV 247,931 247,931 ..............
WARFIGHTER PROTECTION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY 4,760 4,760 ..............
NAVY WARFIGHTING EXPERIMENTS AND DEMONSTRATIONS 51,463 51,463 ..............
MINE AND EXPEDITIONARY WARFARE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY 2,000 2,000 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 583,116 583,116 ..............

DEMONSTRATION & VALIDATION
AIR/OCEAN TACTICAL APPLICATIONS 42,246 42,246 ..............
AVIATION SURVIVABILITY 5,591 5,591 ..............
DEPLOYABLE JOINT COMMAND AND CONTROL 3,262 3,262 ..............
AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS 74 74 ..............
ASW SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 7,964 7,964 ..............
TACTICAL AIRBORNE RECONNAISSANCE 5,257 5,257 ..............
ADVANCED COMBAT SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY 1,570 1,570 ..............
SURFACE AND SHALLOW WATER MINE COUNTERMEASURES 168,040 168,040 ..............
SURFACE SHIP TORPEDO DEFENSE 88,649 88,649 ..............
CARRIER SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 83,902 83,902 ..............
PILOT FISH 108,713 108,713 ..............
RETRACT LARCH 9,316 9,316 ..............
RETRACT JUNIPER 77,108 77,108 ..............
RADIOLOGICAL CONTROL 762 762 ..............
SURFACE ASW 2,349 2,349 ..............
ADVANCED SUBMARINE SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT 852,977 827,977 -25,000
SUBMARINE TACTICAL WARFARE SYSTEMS 8,764 8,764 ..............
SHIP CONCEPT ADVANCED DESIGN 20,501 20,501 ..............
SHIP PRELIMINARY DESIGN & FEASIBILITY STUDIES 27,052 27,052 ..............
ADVANCED NUCLEAR POWER SYSTEMS 428,933 428,933 ..............
ADVANCED SURFACE MACHINERY SYSTEMS 27,154 22,902 -4,252
CHALK EAGLE 519,140 519,140 ..............
LITTORAL COMBAT SHIP (LCS) 406,389 202,618 -203,771
LITTORAL COMBAT SHIP (LCS) MISSION PACKAGES .............. 203,771 +203,771
COMBAT SYSTEM INTEGRATION 36,570 18,470 -18,100
CONVENTIONAL MUNITIONS 8,404 8,404 ..............
MARINE CORPS ASSAULT VEHICLES 136,967 122,967 -14,000
MARINE CORPS GROUND COMBAT/SUPPORT SYSTEM 1,489 1,489 ..............
JOINT SERVICE EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DEVELOPMENT 38,422 38,422 ..............
COOPERATIVE ENGAGEMENT 69,312 64,012 -5,300
OCEAN ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 9,196 7,696 -1,500
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 18,850 18,850 ..............
NAVY ENERGY PROGRAM 45,618 45,618 ..............
FACILITIES IMPROVEMENT 3,019 3,019 ..............
CHALK CORAL 144,951 144,951 ..............
NAVY LOGISTIC PRODUCTIVITY 5,797 5,797 ..............
RETRACT MAPLE 308,131 289,031 -19,100
LINK PLUMERIA 195,189 176,189 -19,000
RETRACT ELM 56,358 56,358 ..............
LINK EVERGREEN 55,378 55,378 ..............
SPECIAL PROCESSES 48,842 48,842 ..............
NATO RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT 7,509 7,509 ..............
LAND ATTACK TECHNOLOGY 5,075 .............. -5,075
NONLETHAL WEAPONS 51,178 51,178 ..............
JOINT PRECISION APPROACH AND LANDING SYSTEMS 205,615 194,719 -10,896
TACTICAL AIR DIRECTIONAL INFRARED COUNTERMEASURES 37,227 37,227 ..............
ASE SELF-PROTECTION OPTIMIZATION 169 169 ..............
JOINT COUNTER RADIO CONTROLLED IED ELECTRONIC WARFARE. 20,874 20,874 ..............
PRECISION STRIKE WEAPONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM 2,257 2,257 ..............
SPACE & ELECTRONIC WARFARE (SEW) ARCHITECTURE/EN- GINE 38,327 38,327 ..............
OFFENSIVE ANTI-SURFACE WARFARE WEAPON DEVELOPMENT 135,985 105,985 -30,000
JOINT LIGHT TACTICAL VEHICLE ENGINEERING/ MANUFACTURING 50,362 50,362 ..............
ASW SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT--MIP 8,448 4,908 -3,540
ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT--MIP 153 153 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, DEMONSTRATION & VALIDATION 4,641,385 4,485,622 -155,763

ENGINEERING & MANUFACTURING DEVELOPMENT
OTHER HELO DEVELOPMENT 40,558 40,558 ..............
AV-8B AIRCRAFT--ENG DEV 35,825 33,325 -2,500
STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT 99,891 99,891 ..............
MULTI-MISSION HELICOPTER UPGRADE DEVELOPMENT 17,565 17,565 ..............
AIR/OCEAN EQUIPMENT ENGINEERING 4,026 4,026 ..............
P-3 MODERNIZATION PROGRAM 1,791 .............. -1,791
WARFARE SUPPORT SYSTEM 11,725 11,725 ..............
TACTICAL COMMAND SYSTEM 68,463 68,463 ..............
ADVANCED HAWKEYE 152,041 124,041 -28,000
H-1 UPGRADES 47,123 47,123 ..............
ACOUSTIC SEARCH SENSORS 30,208 30,208 ..............
V-22A 43,084 43,084 ..............
AIR CREW SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 11,401 11,401 ..............
EA-18 11,138 11,138 ..............
ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT 34,964 34,964 ..............
VH-71A EXECUTIVE HELO DEVELOPMENT 94,238 94,238 ..............
NEXT GENERATION JAMMER (NGJ) 257,796 257,796 ..............
JOINT TACTICAL RADIO SYSTEM--NAVY (JTRS-NAVY) 3,302 3,302 ..............
SURFACE COMBATANT COMBAT SYSTEM ENGINEERING 240,298 225,298 -15,000
LPD-17 CLASS SYSTEMS INTEGRATION 1,214 1,214 ..............
SMALL DIAMETER BOMB (SDB) 46,007 46,007 ..............
STANDARD MISSILE IMPROVEMENTS 75,592 75,592 ..............
AIRBORNE MCM 117,854 117,854 ..............
MARINE AIR GROUND TASK FORCE ELECTRONIC WARFARE 10,080 10,080 ..............
NAVAL INTEGRATED FIRE CONTROL-COUNTER AIR SYSTEMS ENG 21,413 21,413 ..............
FUTURE UNMANNED CARRIER-BASED STRIKE SYSTEM 146,683 133,683 -13,000
ADVANCED ABOVE WATER SENSORS 275,871 188,871 -87,000
SSN-688 AND TRIDENT MODERNIZATION 89,672 89,672 ..............
AIR CONTROL 13,754 13,754 ..............
SHIPBOARD AVIATION SYSTEMS 69,615 69,615 ..............
NEW DESIGN SSN 121,566 61,696 -59,870
SUBMARINE TACTICAL WARFARE SYSTEM 49,143 49,143 ..............
SHIP CONTRACT DESIGN/LIVE FIRE T&E 155,254 205,254 +50,000
NAVY TACTICAL COMPUTER RESOURCES 3,689 3,689 ..............
MINE DEVELOPMENT 5,041 5,041 ..............
LIGHTWEIGHT TORPEDO DEVELOPMENT 26,444 26,444 ..............
JOINT SERVICE EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DEVELOPMENT 8,897 8,897 ..............
PERSONNEL, TRAINING, SIMULATION, AND HUMAN FACTORS 6,233 4,233 -2,000
JOINT STANDOFF WEAPON SYSTEMS 442 442 ..............
SHIP SELF DEFENSE (DETECT & CONTROL) 130,360 119,610 -10,750
SHIP SELF DEFENSE (ENGAGE: HARD KILL) 50,209 46,025 -4,184
SHIP SELF DEFENSE (ENGAGE: SOFT KILL/EW) 164,799 114,799 -50,000
INTELLIGENCE ENGINEERING 1,984 1,984 ..............
MEDICAL DEVELOPMENT 9,458 9,458 ..............
NAVIGATION/ID SYSTEM 51,430 51,430 ..............
JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER (JSF)--EMD 512,631 492,631 -20,000
JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER (JSF) 534,187 514,187 -20,000
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 5,564 5,564 ..............
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 69,659 62,823 -6,836
CH-53K 503,180 471,280 -31,900
JOINT AIR-TO-GROUND MISSILE (JAGM) 5,500 .............. -5,500
MULTI-MISSION MARITIME AIRCRAFT (MMA) 317,358 240,358 -77,000
DDG-1000 187,910 187,910 ..............
TACTICAL COMMAND SYSTEM--MIP 2,140 2,140 ..............
TACTICAL CRYPTOLOGIC SYSTEMS 9,406 9,406 ..............
SPECIAL APPLICATIONS PROGRAM 22,800 22,800 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, ENGINEERING & MANUFACTURING DEVELOPMENT 5,028,476 4,643,145 -385,331

RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT
THREAT SIMULATOR DEVELOPMENT 43,261 43,261 ..............
TARGET SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 71,872 71,872 ..............
MAJOR T&E INVESTMENT 38,033 38,033 ..............
JOINT THEATER AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE ORGANIZATION 1,352 1,352 ..............
STUDIES AND ANALYSIS SUPPORT--NAVY 5,566 5,566 ..............
CENTER FOR NAVAL ANALYSES 48,345 48,345 ..............
TECHNICAL INFORMATION SERVICES 637 637 ..............
MANAGEMENT, TECHNICAL & INTERNATIONAL SUPPORT 76,585 84,585 +8,000
STRATEGIC TECHNICAL SUPPORT 3,221 3,221 ..............
RDT&E SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT 72,725 72,725 ..............
RDT&E SHIP AND AIRCRAFT SUPPORT 141,778 141,778 ..............
TEST AND EVALUATION SUPPORT 331,219 281,219 -50,000
OPERATIONAL TEST AND EVALUATION CAPABILITY 16,565 16,565 ..............
NAVY SPACE AND ELECTRONIC WARFARE (SEW) SUPPORT 3,265 3,265 ..............
SEW SURVEILLANCE/RECONNAISSANCE SUPPORT 7,134 7,134 ..............
MARINE CORPS PROGRAM WIDE SUPPORT 24,082 24,082 ..............
TACTICAL CRYPTOLOGIC ACTIVITIES 497 497 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT 886,137 844,137 -42,000

OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT
HARPOON MODIFICATIONS 699 699 ..............
UNMANNED COMBAT AIR VEHICLE (UCAV) ADVANCED COMPONENT 20,961 20,961 ..............
MARINE CORPS DATA SYSTEMS 35 35 ..............
CARRIER ONBOARD DELIVERY FOLLOW ON 2,460 2,460 ..............
STRIKE WEAPONS DEVELOPMENT 9,757 11,757 +2,000
STRATEGIC SUB & WEAPONS SYSTEM SUPPORT 98,057 98,057 ..............
SSBN SECURITY TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM 31,768 31,768 ..............
SUBMARINE ACOUSTIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT 1,464 1,464 ..............
NAVY STRATEGIC COMMUNICATIONS 21,729 21,729 ..............
RAPID TECHNOLOGY TRANSITION (RTT) 13,561 13,561 ..............
F/A-18 SQUADRONS 131,118 131,118 ..............
E-2 SQUADRONS 1,971 1,971 ..............
FLEET TELECOMMUNICATIONS (TACTICAL) 46,155 34,423 -11,732
SURFACE SUPPORT 2,374 2,374 ..............
TOMAHAWK AND TOMAHAWK MISSION PLANNING CENTER (TMPC) 12,407 12,407 ..............
INTEGRATED SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM 41,609 41,609 ..............
AMPHIBIOUS TACTICAL SUPPORT UNITS 7,240 4,682 -2,558
GROUND/AIR TASK ORIENTED RADAR 78,208 78,208 ..............
CONSOLIDATED TRAINING SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 45,124 45,124 ..............
CRYPTOLOGIC DIRECT SUPPORT 2,703 2,703 ..............
ELECTRONIC WARFARE (EW) READINESS SUPPORT 19,563 19,563 ..............
HARM IMPROVEMENT 13,586 13,586 ..............
TACTICAL DATA LINKS 197,538 197,538 ..............
SURFACE ASW COMBAT SYSTEM INTEGRATION 31,863 31,863 ..............
MK-48 ADCAP 12,806 10,106 -2,700
AVIATION IMPROVEMENTS 88,607 88,607 ..............
OPERATIONAL NUCLEAR POWER SYSTEMS 116,928 116,928 ..............
MARINE CORPS COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS 178,753 178,753 ..............
MARINE CORPS GROUND COMBAT/SUPPORTING ARMS SYSTEMS 139,594 118,719 -20,875
MARINE CORPS COMBAT SERVICES SUPPORT 42,647 35,647 -7,000
USMC INTELLIGENCE/ELECTRONIC WARFARE SYSTEMS (MIP) 34,394 34,394 ..............
TACTICAL AIM MISSILES 39,159 31,159 -8,000
ADVANCED MEDIUM RANGE AIR-TO-AIR MISSILE (AMRAAM) 2,613 2,613 ..............
JOINT HIGH SPEED VESSEL (JHSV) 986 986 ..............
SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS (SPACE) 66,231 66,231 ..............
CONSOLIDATED AFLOAT NETWORK ENTERPRISE SERVICES 24,476 24,476 ..............
INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM 23,531 23,531 ..............
NAVY METEOROLOGICAL AND OCEAN SENSORS--SPACE (METOC) 742 742 ..............
JOINT MILITARY INTELLIGENCE PROGRAMS 4,804 4,804 ..............
TACTICAL UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES 8,381 8,381 ..............
DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND SYSTEMS/SURFACE SYSTEMS 5,535 5,535 ..............
DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND SYSTEMS/SURFACE SYSTEMS 19,718 19,718 ..............
RQ-4 UAV 375,235 375,235 ..............
MQ-8 UAV 48,713 48,713 ..............
RQ-11 UAV 102 .............. -102
RQ-7 UAV 710 710 ..............
SMALL (LEVEL 0) TACTICAL UAS (STUASL0) 5,013 5,013 ..............
RQ-21A 11,122 9,122 -2,000
MULTI-INTELLIGENCE SENSOR DEVELOPMENT 28,851 28,851 ..............
MODELING AND SIMULATION SUPPORT 5,116 5,116 ..............
DEPOT MAINTENANCE (NON-IF) 28,042 28,042 ..............
INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS 50,933 50,933 ..............
MARITIME TECHNOLOGY (MARITECH) 4,998 4,998 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 2,200,690 2,147,723 -52,967

CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 1,185,132 1,219,558 +34,426
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, NAVY 15,974,780 15,403,145 -571,635
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by
the Committee:

[In thousands of dollars]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Change from
Line Item 2014 budget Committee budget
estimate recommendation estimate
------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 Defense Research 484,459 489,459 +5,000
Sciences
Nanotechnolog .............. .............. +5,000
y research
5 Force Protection 145,307 170,307 +25,000
Applied Research
Alternative .............. .............. +25,000
energy
research
42 Advanced 852,977 827,977 -25,000
Submarine System
Development
Improving .............. .............. -25,000
funds
management:
Unobligated
balances for
early to
need
affordabilit
y
initiatives
47 Advanced Surface 27,154 22,902 -4,252
Machinery
Systems
Improving .............. .............. -4,252
funds
management:
Behind in
execution
49 Littoral Combat 406,389 202,618 -203,771
Ship [LCS]
Transfer to .............. .............. -203,771
Line 49X
49X Littoral Combat .............. 203,771 +203,771
Ship [LCS]
Mission Packages
Transfer from .............. .............. +203,771
Line 49
50 Combat System 36,570 18,470 -18,100
Integration
Restoring .............. .............. -18,100
acquisition
accountabili
ty: Late
contract
awards
52 Marine Corps 136,967 122,967 -14,000
Assault Vehicles
Improving .............. .............. -14,000
funds
management:
Forward
financed
55 Cooperative 69,312 64,012 -5,300
Engagement (CEC)
Restoring .............. .............. -5,300
acquisition
accountabili
ty: Program
delay
56 Ocean Engineering 9,196 7,696 -1,500
Technology
Development
Improving .............. .............. -1,500
funds
management:
Forward
financed
62 RETRACT MAPLE 308,131 289,031 -19,100
Improving .............. .............. -19,100
funds
management:
Early to
need
63 LINK PLUMERIA 195,189 176,189 -19,000
Improving .............. .............. -4,000
funds
management:
Milestone
slips
Improving .............. .............. -15,000
funds
management:
Milestone
slips
68 Land Attack 5,075 -- -5,075
Technology
Improving .............. .............. -5,075
funds
management:
Early to
need
70 Joint Precision 205,615 194,719 -10,896
Approach and
Landing Systems--
Dem/Val
Restoring .............. .............. -3,459
acquisition
accountabili
ty: JPALS 1B
test early
to need
Restoring .............. .............. -7,437
acquisition
accountabili
ty: JPALS 1B
follow-on
platform
integration
delay
77 Offensive Anti- 135,985 105,985 -30,000
Surface Warfare
Weapon
Development
Restoring .............. .............. -30,000
acquisition
accountabili
ty: Program
delay
79 ASW Systems 8,448 4,908 -3,540
Development--MIP
Restoring .............. .............. -3,540
acquisition
accountabili
ty: Program
delay
82 AV-8B Aircraft-- 35,825 33,325 -2,500
Eng Dev
Maintaining .............. .............. -2,500
program
affordabilit
y: Excess
program
management
86 P-3 Modernization 1,791 -- -1,791
Program
Program .............. .............. -1,791
termination:
Program is
in
retirement
phase
89 Advanced Hawkeye 152,041 124,041 -28,000
Restoring .............. .............. -28,000
acquisition
accountabili
ty:
Undefined
follow on
development
for in-
flight
refueling
99 Surface Combatant 240,298 225,298 -15,000
Combat System
Engineering
(Aegis)
Restoring .............. .............. -15,000
acquisition
accountabili
ty: Schedule
delay
106 Unmanned Carrier 146,683 133,683 -13,000
Launched
Airborne
Surveillance and
Strike (UCLASS)
System
Restoring .............. .............. -13,000
acquisition
accountabili
ty: Schedule
delay
107 Advanced Above 275,871 188,871 -87,000
Water Sensors
Restoring .............. .............. -87,000
acquisition
accountabili
ty: AMDR MS
B 8 month
schedule
delay
112 New Design SSN 121,566 61,696 -59,870
Program .............. .............. -59,870
termination:
VA class
module
program
terminated
due to
affordabilit
y
114 Ship Contract 155,254 205,254 +50,000
Design/Live Fire
T&E
Increased LHA- .............. .............. +50,000
8 design
efforts
119 Personnel, 6,233 4,233 -2,000
Training,
Simulation, and
Human Factors
Improving .............. .............. -2,000
funds
management:
Prior year
carry over
121 Ship Self Defense 130,360 119,610 -10,750
(Detect &
Control)
Restoring .............. .............. -10,750
acquisition
accountabili
ty: DT/OT
schedule
delayed from
previous
year
122 Ship Self Defense 50,209 46,025 -4,184
(Engage: Hard
Kill)
Restoring .............. .............. -4,184
acquisition
accountabili
ty: RAM
testing de-
lays
123 Ship Self Defense 164,799 114,799 -50,000
(Engage: Soft
Kill/EW)
Restoring .............. .............. -50,000
acquisition
accountabili
ty: Block 3
EMD award
delay
127 Joint Strike 512,631 492,631 -20,000
Fighter (JSF)--
EMD
Maintain .............. .............. -10,000
program
affordabilit
y: F-135
Propulsion
system cost
growth
Restoring .............. .............. -5,000
acquisition
accountabili
ty: Follow-
on
development-
-no approved
capabilities
development
document
Restoring .............. .............. -5,000
acquisition
accountabili
ty:
Development
test and
evaluation--
no approved
capabilities
development
document
128 Joint Strike 534,187 514,187 -20,000
Fighter (JSF)--
EMD
Maintain .............. .............. -10,000
program
affordabilit
y: F-135
Propulsion
system cost
growth
Restoring .............. .............. -5,000
acquisition
accountabili
ty: Follow-
on
development-
-no approved
capabilities
development
document
Restoring .............. .............. -5,000
acquisition
accountabili
ty:
Development
test and
evaluation--
no approved
capabilities
development
document
130 Information 69,659 62,823 -6,836
Technology
Development
Restoring .............. .............. -6,836
acquisition
accountabili
ty:
Unjustified
request
132 CH-53K RDTE 503,180 471,280 -31,900
Restoring .............. .............. -31,900
acquisition
accountabili
ty:
Development
test delayed
to FY14
133 Joint Air-to- 5,500 -- -5,500
Ground Missile
[JAGM]
Program .............. .............. -5,500
termination:
Reduction
due to
program
termination
134 Multi-mission 317,358 240,358 -77,000
Maritime
Aircraft [MMA]
Restoring .............. .............. -77,000
acquisition
accountabili
ty:
Concurrency
and Spiral 2
development
delay
147 Management, 76,585 84,585 +8,000
Technical &
International
Support
Printed .............. .............. +8,000
Circuit
Board
Executive
Agent--Funds
Previous
NDAA mandate
151 Test and 331,219 281,219 -50,000
Evaluation
Support
Maintain .............. .............. -50,000
program
affordabilit
y:
Efficiencies
savings for
implementing
automated
test and
analysis
technologies
164 Strike Weapons 9,757 11,757 +2,000
Development
Restoring .............. .............. -2,000
acquisition
accountabili
ty:
Unjustified
request
F/A-18 .............. .............. +4,000
missile
flight
testing
172 Fleet 46,155 34,423 -11,732
Telecommunicatio
ns (Tactical)
Restoring .............. .............. -11,732
acquisition
accountabili
ty: Joint
Aerial Layer
Network
program
delay
176 Amphibious 7,240 4,682 -2,558
Tactical Support
Units
(Displacement
Craft)
Improving .............. .............. -2,558
funds
management:
Forward
financed
184 MK-48 ADCAP 12,806 10,106 -2,700
Improving .............. .............. -2,700
funds
management:
Test and
evaluation
award slip
189 Marine Corps 139,594 118,719 -20,875
Ground Combat/
Supporting Arms
Systems
Program .............. .............. -20,875
termination:
Marine
Personnel
Carrier
program
terminated
due to
affordabilit
y
190 Marine Corps 42,647 35,647 -7,000
Combat Services
Support
Improving .............. .............. -7,000
funds
management:
Prior year
carry over
192 Tactical AIM 39,159 31,159 -8,000
Missiles
Restoring .............. .............. -8,000
acquisition
accountabili
ty: Program
delay
215 RQ-11 UAV 102 -- -102
Restoring .............. .............. -102
acquisition
accountabili
ty: Should
be funded in
sustainment
219 RQ-21A 11,122 9,122 -2,000
Improving .............. .............. -2,000
funds
management:
Excess
program
management
Classified 1,185,132 1,219,558 +34,426
Programs
Classified .............. .............. +34,426
adjustments
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Next Generation Jammer.--Senate Report 112-196 directed the
Government Accountability Office to conduct a review of the
program to determine if there are redundancies across the
services and assess whether this effort should become a joint
service solution. The report is almost complete, and based on
the current recommendation, the Committee recommends the JROC
validate the requirements for this capability and determine
which DOD aircraft should carry this jammer. In addition, the
current acquisition strategy selects one contractor for the
program's Technology Development phase. The Committee is
concerned that this approach is inconsistent with some of the
basic tenets of the Weapon System Acquisition Reform Act of
2009, including those that encourage competition throughout the
acquisition life cycle, and directs the Navy to maintain
competition through the Next Generation Jammer program's
technology development phase. In addition, the Navy should
ensure that it acquires the necessary technical data rights and
allows for the type of open systems architecture approach that
would facilitate continued competition for the remainder of the
Next Generation Jammer acquisition program.
Navy Unmanned Combat Air System.--The Committee commends
the Navy on the historic launch and arrested landing of the X-
47B unmanned combat air system [UCAS] onboard an aircraft
carrier, which demonstrated an autonomous unmanned aircraft can
be safely integrated into Navy carrier operations. The Navy
plans to retire the aircraft at the end of the fiscal year,
after investing more than $1,500,000,000 in technology
development. However, the Committee is concerned that the Navy
plans to retire the aircraft prior to completing additional
risk reduction testing. Therefore, prior to retiring the
aircraft, the Committee directs the Navy to evaluate if the
Navy UCAS-D program can be used for additional risk reduction
activities to minimize ship integration challenges for the
future UCLASS program.
Advanced Hawkeye.--The fiscal year 2014 request includes
$152,041,000 for new technology development. A majority of the
request is to develop an in-flight refueling capability and
future, undefined capabilities. The contract award for the in-
flight refueling capability schedule was delayed by 6 months,
and the future development effort lacks clear requirements and
definition. As a result, the Committee recommends a reduction
of $28,000,000.
Air and Missile Defense Radar.--The fiscal year 2014
request includes $275,871,000 to continue the engineering and
manufacturing development phase. The Navy originally planned to
award the contract and down select to a single manufacturer in
November 2012 which was subsequently delayed to July 2013. As a
result of the delay, a majority of the fiscal year 2013 funding
will be awarded later than planned. Therefore, the Committee
recommends a reduction of $87,000,000.
Offensive Anti-Surface Warfare Weapon Development.--The
budget request includes $135,985,000 to begin development of a
new Navy anti-ship weapon. Over the last year, the Navy has
made several adjustments to the long range plan for this
program. As a result of the uncertainty, and until the Navy has
determined the exact requirements for this program, the
Committee recommends a reduction of $30,000,000.
Virginia Payload Module.--The Fiscal Year 2013 Defense
Appropriations Act reduced the fiscal year 2013 budget request
for the Virginia Payload Module by $90,000,000. The Committees
was concerned with increasing the Virginia-class submarine size
by a third to accommodate a 93.7 foot module in the submarine's
center. The Committee believes that the module's requirements
are not defined, and will result in instability to a proven
submarine design, disrupt a stable production line, and add
significant cost risk which is not affordable in these
difficult fiscal times. Initial cost estimates for development
alone were $800,000,000. Since then, the Navy has completed the
requirements validation, but the Joint Requirements Oversight
Committee validation is still incomplete. The Committee
recommends no funding for the Virginia Payload Module in fiscal
year 2014.
LHA 8 Amphibious Assault Ship.--The fiscal year 2014 budget
request includes $19,967,000 for LHA 8 amphibious assault ship
preliminary design efforts. The Committee is aware that the
Department of the Navy plans to reintroduce a well deck and
optimize the aviation capability of LHA 8, which is planned for
initial procurement funding in fiscal year 2015. As described
in the Senate report accompanying S. 1197, the National Defense
Act for Fiscal Year 2014, as reported, previous Navy efforts to
start ship construction prior to completing a ship's design
inevitably led to cost growth and schedule delays. Considering
growing fiscal pressure on the national defense budget and
increasing amphibious assault ship demands from combatant
commanders for contingency operations, theater security
cooperation, humanitarian assistance, and conventional
deterrence missions, the Committee believes it is essential
that LHA 8 be introduced in the most cost-effective manner.
Therefore, the Committee includes an additional $50,000,000 for
LHA 8 advance planning and design and directs the Department of
the Navy to work with industry to identify affordability and
producibility strategies that will lead to more efficient
construction of a large deck amphibious assault ship.
Ship Self Defense [SEWIP Block III].--The fiscal year 2014
request includes $164,799,000 to develop advanced technology
for the AN/SLQ-32 radar. The Block III acquisition strategy for
developing this new capability has shifted from beginning in
early fiscal year 2013 to mid-fiscal year 2014. Therefore, the
Committee recommends a reduction of $50,000,000.
Multi-Mission Maritime Aircraft.--The Navy requested
$317,358,000 to continue ``basic'' development, as well as
develop two separate software and hardware upgrades. Senate
Report 112-196 directed the Joint Requirements Oversight
Counsel [JROC] to validate the additional capabilities, which
is still incomplete. In addition to the requested modernization
efforts, the program has identified numerous corrections of
deficiencies in the existing system. Therefore, the Committee
recommends a reduction of $77,000,000 to the second increment
of development due to undefined requirements and significant
concurrency with ongoing development efforts. The Committee
also directs the JROC to validate the additional capabilities
and the Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation office to
conduct a business case analysis to determine whether this 6-
year development effort is affordable and provide the
assessment to the congressional defense committees.
Carrier Onboard Delivery [COD] Follow On.--The budget
request includes $2,460,000 to conduct an analysis of
alternatives for the program that will follow the COD. In an
effort to ensure the program has an affordable acquisition
strategy, the Committee directs the Navy to provide the
acquisition strategy to the congressional defense committees
prior to beginning the technology development phase.
F-18 Engine Upgrades.--The Committee understands that in
order to enable the future capabilities envisioned in the F/A-
18 and EA-18G aircraft growth roadmap or ``flight plan,'' the
Navy is considering the development of an F-414 engine upgrade.
The enhanced durability engine is a modular upgrade that will
provide options for additional power for future capabilities
which should make the engine more affordable and maintainable.
The Committee encourages the Navy to begin development of the
engine upgrade to support the capabilities envisioned in the
EA-18G and F/A-18E/F flight plans.
Marine Personnel Carrier [MPC].--The fiscal year 2014
request includes $20,875,000 to begin developing a survivable
and mobile platform to transport Marines when ashore. However,
the Marine Corps has subsequently decided to cancel this effort
due to affordability challenges. Consistent with S. 1197, the
National Defense Authorization Act for fiscal year 2014, as
reported, the Committee recommends reducing the budget request
by $20,875,000.
RQ-4 Triton UAV.--The fiscal year 2014 budget request
includes $375,235,000 to continue development of the RQ-4
Triton UAV program. Since last year, the program has
experienced a 2-year delay in development and added
$312,000,000 across fiscal year 2014 and 2015. The Committee is
concerned with this cost growth and similarities experienced in
the Air Force Global Hawk program. As a result, the Committee
directs the Government Accountability Office to do a thorough
review of the remaining tasks associated with completing
development, to determine if the risks are being repeated
across the two aircraft, and to provide a report to the defense
committees within 120 days after enactment of this act.
Defense Research Sciences.--The Committee encourages the
Department to continue to invest in advanced science and
technology research. Examples of research include high
temperature-resistant and other high performance materials,
advanced structural systems for next generation aircraft, and
other aerospace weapon systems. In addition, the Committee
encourages the Department to invest in functional polymeric
silicon materials for advanced energy storage, photovoltaic,
and electronic applications.
Power Generation and Storage.--The Committee encourages the
Department to continue development in power generation and
energy storage research, especially to improve the safety of
advanced batteries. The Committee notes that development and
deployment of Li-ion batteries with up to three times the
performance capability of other battery products are critical
to current and future DOD missions, but safety incidents have
hindered or even halted their widespread operational adoption.
As such, development and qualification of technologies to
reduce the risk of thermal runaway in Li-ion batteries should
be a priority for energy storage research.
Arctic Deep Water Basing.--The Committee commends the
Department's efforts to investigate potential security and
resource issues related to the opening of Arctic sea-routes.
The Committee encourages the Department to continue researching
a range of solutions and response, including Arctic forward
basing proposals. The Committee requests the Department to
provide a report to the congressional defense committees on
current and future programs related to Arctic security
solutions and provide an analysis of procurement and costs
related to both fixed and mobile Arctic basing options.
Flight Deck Cleaning.--The Committee is concerned with the
lack of efficiency, high-cost and environmental consequences of
the current method of cleaning flight decks on Navy ships.
Modern technology may provide opportunities for improving the
current process by reducing required manpower, decreasing
clean-time and mitigating environmental impacts thereby
improving operational readiness. Therefore, the Committee
encourages the Navy to continue to invest in more efficient and
effective methods for cleaning Navy flight decks.

Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air Force

Appropriations, 2013\1\................................. $25,399,175,000
Budget estimate, 2014................................... 25,702,946,000
Committee recommendation................................ 24,945,541,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public
Law 112-25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of
$24,945,541,000. This is $757,405,000 below the budget
estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this
appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

BASIC RESEARCH
DEFENSE RESEARCH SCIENCES 373,151 373,151 ..............
UNIVERSITY RESEARCH INITIATIVES 138,333 138,333 ..............
HIGH ENERGY LASER RESEARCH INITIATIVES 13,286 13,286 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BASIC RESEARCH 524,770 524,770 ..............

APPLIED RESEARCH
MATERIALS 116,846 121,846 +5,000
AEROSPACE VEHICLE TECHNOLOGIES 119,672 119,672 ..............
HUMAN EFFECTIVENESS APPLIED RESEARCH 89,483 89,483 ..............
AEROSPACE PROPULSION 197,546 197,546 ..............
AEROSPACE SENSORS 127,539 127,539 ..............
SPACE TECHNOLOGY 104,063 104,063 ..............
CONVENTIONAL MUNITIONS 81,521 81,521 ..............
DIRECTED ENERGY TECHNOLOGY 112,845 112,845 ..............
DOMINANT INFORMATION SCIENCES AND METHODS 138,161 138,161 ..............
HIGH ENERGY LASER RESEARCH 40,217 40,217 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, APPLIED RESEARCH 1,127,893 1,132,893 +5,000

ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT
ADVANCED MATERIALS FOR WEAPON SYSTEMS 39,572 54,572 +15,000
SUSTAINMENT SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (S&T) 12,800 12,800 ..............
ADVANCED AEROSPACE SENSORS 30,579 30,579 ..............
AEROSPACE TECHNOLOGY DEV/DEMO 77,347 77,347 ..............
AEROSPACE PROPULSION AND POWER TECHNOLOGY 149,321 159,321 +10,000
ELECTRONIC COMBAT TECHNOLOGY 49,128 43,428 -5,700
ADVANCED SPACECRAFT TECHNOLOGY 68,071 68,071 ..............
MAUI SPACE SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM (MSSS) 26,299 26,299 ..............
HUMAN EFFECTIVENESS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 20,967 20,967 ..............
CONVENTIONAL WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY 33,996 33,996 ..............
ADVANCED WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY 19,000 19,000 ..............
MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM 41,353 41,353 ..............
BATTLESPACE KNOWLEDGE DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION 49,093 49,093 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 617,526 636,826 +19,300

ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT
INTELLIGENCE ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT 3,983 3,983 ..............
PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT 3,874 3,874 ..............
SPACE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY 27,024 27,024 ..............
COMBAT IDENTIFICATION TECHNOLOGY 15,899 15,899 ..............
NATO RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT 4,568 4,568 ..............
INTERNATIONAL SPACE COOPERATIVE R&D 379 379 ..............
SPACE PROTECTION PROGRAM (SPP) 28,764 28,764 ..............
INTERCONTINENTAL BALLISTIC MISSILE 86,737 86,737 ..............
POLLUTION PREVENTION (DEM/VAL) 953 953 ..............
NEXT GENERATION BOMBER 379,437 379,437 ..............
TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER 2,606 2,606 ..............
HARD AND DEEPLY BURIED TARGET DEFEAT SYSTEM 103 103 ..............
REQUIREMENTS ANALYSIS AND MATURATION 16,018 16,018 ..............
AIR AND SPACE OPS CENTER 58,861 58,861 ..............
JOINT DIRECT ATTACK MUNITION 2,500 2,500 ..............
GROUND ATTACK WEAPONS FUZE DEVELOPMENT 21,175 21,175 ..............
OPERATIONALLY RESPONSIVE SPACE .............. 10,000 +10,000
TECH TRANSITION PROGRAM 13,636 38,636 +25,000
SERVICE SUPPORT TO STRATCOM--SPACE ACTIVITIES 2,799 2,799 ..............
THREE DIMENSIONAL LONG-RANGE RADAR 70,160 70,160 ..............
NAVSTAR GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM (USER EQUIPMENT) 137,233 137,233 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT 876,709 911,709 +35,000

ENGINEERING & MANUFACTURING DEVELOPMENT
INTELLIGENCE ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT 977 977 ..............
SPECIALIZED UNDERGRADUATE FLIGHT TRAINING 3,601 3,601 ..............
ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT 1,971 1,971 ..............
TACTICAL DATA NETWORKS ENTERPRISE 51,456 49,956 -1,500
PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT 50 .............. -50
SMALL DIAMETER BOMB (SDB) 115,000 115,000 ..............
COUNTERSPACE SYSTEMS 23,930 23,930 ..............
SPACE SITUATION AWARENESS SYSTEMS 400,258 400,258 ..............
AIRBORNE ELECTRONIC ATTACK 4,575 4,575 ..............
SPACE BASED INFRARED SYSTEM (SBIRS) HIGH EMD 352,532 322,832 -29,700
ARMAMENT/ORDNANCE DEVELOPMENT 16,284 16,284 ..............
SUBMUNITIONS 2,564 2,564 ..............
AGILE COMBAT SUPPORT 17,036 17,036 ..............
LIFE SUPPORT SYSTEMS 7,273 7,273 ..............
COMBAT TRAINING RANGES 33,200 25,300 -7,900
JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER (JSF) 816,335 796,335 -20,000
INTERCONTINENTAL BALLISTIC MISSILE 145,442 145,442 ..............
EVOLVED EXPENDABLE LAUNCH VEHICLE PROGRAM (SPACE) 27,963 27,963 ..............
LONG RANGE STANDOFF WEAPON 5,000 5,000 ..............
ICBM FUZE MODERNIZATION 129,411 118,411 -11,000
F-22 MODERNIZATION INCREMENT 3.2B 131,100 131,100 ..............
NEXT GENERATION AERIAL REFUELING AIRCRAFT 1,558,590 1,558,590 ..............
CSAR HH-60 RECAPITALIZATION 393,558 201,558 -192,000
HC/MC-130 RECAP RDT&E 6,242 6,242 ..............
ADVANCED EHF MILSATCOM (SPACE) 272,872 272,872 ..............
POLAR MILSATCOM (SPACE) 124,805 109,805 -15,000
WIDEBAND GLOBAL SATCOM (SPACE) 13,948 13,948 ..............
B-2 DEFENSIVE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM 303,500 303,500 ..............
NUCLEAR WEAPONS MODERNIZATION 67,874 6,174 -61,700
FULL COMBAT MISSION TRAINING 4,663 4,663 ..............
CV-22 46,705 46,705 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, ENGINEERING & MANUFACTURING DEVELOPMENT 5,078,715 4,739,865 -338,850

RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT
THREAT SIMULATOR DEVELOPMENT 17,690 17,690 ..............
MAJOR T&E INVESTMENT 34,841 34,841 ..............
RAND PROJECT AIR FORCE 32,956 32,956 ..............
INITIAL OPERATIONAL TEST & EVALUATION 13,610 12,310 -1,300
TEST AND EVALUATION SUPPORT 742,658 742,658 ..............
ROCKET SYSTEMS LAUNCH PROGRAM (SPACE) 14,203 14,203 ..............
SPACE TEST PROGRAM (STP) 13,000 13,000 ..............
FACILITIES RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION--TEST & EVAL 44,160 44,160 ..............
FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT--TEST AND EVALUATION SUPPORT 27,643 27,643 ..............
MULTI-SERVICE SYSTEMS ENGINEERING INITIATIVE 13,935 6,935 -7,000
SPACE AND MISSILE CENTER (SMC) CIVILIAN WORKFORCE 192,348 186,348 -6,000
ACQUISITION AND MANAGEMENT SUPPORT 28,647 28,647 ..............
GENERAL SKILL TRAINING 315 315 ..............
INTERNATIONAL ACTIVITIES 3,785 3,785 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT 1,179,791 1,165,491 -14,300

OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT
GPS III--OPERATIONAL CONTROL SEGMENT 383,500 383,500 ..............
WIDE AREA SURVEILLANCE 5,000 5,000 ..............
AIR FORCE INTEGRATED MILITARY HUMAN RESOURCES SYSTEM 90,097 34,097 -56,000
ANTI-TAMPER TECHNOLOGY EXECUTIVE AGENCY 32,086 22,086 -10,000
B-52 SQUADRONS 24,007 21,007 -3,000
AIR-LAUNCHED CRUISE MISSILE (ALCM) 450 450 ..............
B-1B SQUADRONS 19,589 19,589 ..............
B-2 SQUADRONS 100,194 100,194 ..............
STRAT WAR PLANNING SYSTEM--USSTRATCOM 37,448 37,448 ..............
REGION/SECTOR OPERATION CONTROL CENTER MODERNIZATION 1,700 1,700 ..............
WARFIGHTER RAPID ACQUISITION PROCESS (WRAP) RAPID TRAN 3,844 3,844 ..............
MQ-9 UAV 128,328 115,828 -12,500
A-10 SQUADRONS 9,614 9,614 ..............
F-16 SQUADRONS 177,298 177,298 ..............
F-15E SQUADRONS 244,289 244,289 ..............
MANNED DESTRUCTIVE SUPPRESSION 13,138 13,138 ..............
F-22 SQUADRONS 328,542 328,542 ..............
F-35 SQUADRONS 33,000 5,900 -27,100
TACTICAL AIM MISSILES 15,460 12,760 -2,700
ADVANCED MEDIUM RANGE AIR-TO-AIR MISSILE (AMRAAM) 84,172 84,172 ..............
COMBAT RESCUE AND RECOVERY 2,582 6,882 +4,300
COMBAT RESCUE--PARARESCUE 542 542 ..............
AF TENCAP 89,816 89,816 ..............
PRECISION ATTACK SYSTEMS PROCUREMENT 1,075 2,000 +925
COMPASS CALL 10,782 10,782 ..............
AIRCRAFT ENGINE COMPONENT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 139,369 109,969 -29,400
JOINT AIR-TO-SURFACE STANDOFF MISSILE (JASSM) 6,373 6,373 ..............
AIR AND SPACE OPERATIONS CENTER (AOC) 22,820 22,820 ..............
CONTROL AND REPORTING CENTER (CRC) 7,029 7,029 ..............
AIRBORNE WARNING AND CONTROL SYSTEM (AWACS) 186,256 186,256 ..............
TACTICAL AIRBORNE CONTROL SYSTEMS 743 743 ..............
COMBAT AIR INTELLIGENCE SYSTEM ACTIVITIES 4,471 4,471 ..............
TACTICAL AIR CONTROL PARTY--MOD 10,250 10,250 ..............
C2ISR TACTICAL DATA LINK 1,431 1,431 ..............
COMMAND AND CONTROL (C2) CONSTELLATION 7,329 7,329 ..............
DCAPES 15,081 15,081 ..............
JOINT SURVEILLANCE AND TARGET ATTACK RADAR SYSTEM 13,248 23,148 +9,900
SEEK EAGLE 24,342 24,342 ..............
USAF MODELING AND SIMULATION 10,448 10,448 ..............
WARGAMING AND SIMULATION CENTERS 5,512 5,512 ..............
DISTRIBUTED TRAINING AND EXERCISES 3,301 3,301 ..............
MISSION PLANNING SYSTEMS 62,605 62,605 ..............
CYBER COMMAND ACTIVITIES 68,099 38,099 -30,000
AF OFFENSIVE CYBERSPACE OPERATIONS 14,047 14,047 ..............
AF DEFENSIVE CYBERSPACE OPERATIONS 5,853 5,853 ..............
SPACE SUPERIORITY INTELLIGENCE 12,197 12,197 ..............
E-4B NATIONAL AIRBORNE OPERATIONS CENTER (NAOC) 18,267 13,267 -5,000
MINIMUM ESSENTIAL EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK 36,288 36,288 ..............
INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM 90,231 96,331 +6,100
GLOBAL COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM 725 725 ..............
MILSATCOM TERMINALS 140,170 95,170 -45,000
AIRBORNE SIGINT ENTERPRISE 117,110 117,110 ..............
GLOBAL AIR TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT (GATM) 4,430 4,430 ..............
CYBER SECURITY INITIATIVE 2,048 2,048 ..............
DOD CYBER CRIME CENTER 288 288 ..............
SATELLITE CONTROL NETWORK (SPACE) 35,698 35,698 ..............
WEATHER SERVICE 24,667 24,667 ..............
AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL, APPROACH, & LANDING SYSTEM (ATC) 35,674 39,174 +3,500
AERIAL TARGETS 21,186 21,186 ..............
SECURITY AND INVESTIGATIVE ACTIVITIES 195 195 ..............
ARMS CONTROL IMPLEMENTATION 1,430 1,430 ..............
DEFENSE JOINT COUNTERINTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES 330 10 -320
SPACE AND MISSILE TEST AND EVALUATION CENTER 3,696 3,696 ..............
SPACE WARFARE CENTER 2,469 2,469 ..............
INTEGRATED BROADCAST SERVICE 8,289 8,289 ..............
SPACELIFT RANGE SYSTEM (SPACE) 13,345 13,345 ..............
DRAGON U-2 18,700 18,700 ..............
ENDURANCE UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES 3,000 .............. -3,000
AIRBORNE RECONNAISSANCE SYSTEMS 37,828 50,328 +12,500
MANNED RECONNAISSANCE SYSTEMS 13,491 13,491 ..............
DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS 7,498 7,498 ..............
PREDATOR UAV (JMIP) 3,326 3,326 ..............
RQ-4 UAV 134,406 110,406 -24,000
NETWORK-CENTRIC COLLABORATIVE TARGET (TIARA) 7,413 7,413 ..............
COMMON DATA LINK (CDL) 40,503 40,503 ..............
NATO AGS 264,134 264,134 ..............
SUPPORT TO DCGS ENTERPRISE 23,016 23,016 ..............
GPS III SPACE SEGMENT 221,276 221,276 ..............
JSPOC MISSION SYSTEM 58,523 58,523 ..............
RAPID CYBER ACQUISITION 2,218 2,218 ..............
NUDET DETECTION SYSTEM (SPACE) 50,547 42,547 -8,000
SPACE SITUATION AWARENESS OPERATIONS 18,807 18,807 ..............
SHARED EARLY WARNING (SEW) 1,079 1,079 ..............
C-130 AIRLIFT SQUADRON 400 400 ..............
C-5 AIRLIFT SQUADRONS 61,492 61,492 ..............
C-17 AIRCRAFT 109,134 109,134 ..............
C-130J PROGRAM 22,443 22,443 ..............
LARGE AIRCRAFT IR COUNTERMEASURES (LAIRCM) 4,116 4,116 ..............
OPERATIONAL SUPPORT AIRLIFT 44,553 44,553 ..............
SPECIAL TACTICS/COMBAT CONTROL 6,213 6,213 ..............
DEPOT MAINTENANCE (NON-IF) 1,605 1,605 ..............
LOGISTICS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (LOGIT) 95,238 60,478 -34,760
SUPPORT SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 10,925 10,925 ..............
OTHER FLIGHT TRAINING 1,347 1,347 ..............
OTHER PERSONNEL ACTIVITIES 65 65 ..............
JOINT PERSONNEL RECOVERY AGENCY 1,083 1,083 ..............
CIVILIAN COMPENSATION PROGRAM 1,577 1,577 ..............
PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION 5,990 5,990 ..............
AIR FORCE STUDIES AND ANALYSIS AGENCY 786 786 ..............
FACILITIES OPERATION--ADMINISTRATION 654 654 ..............
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 135,735 135,735 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 4,423,014 4,169,459 -253,555

CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 11,874,528 11,664,528 -210,000
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, AIR 25,702,946 24,945,541 -757,405
FORCE
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by
the Committee:

[In thousands of dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fiscal year Committee Change from
Line Program element title 2013 base recommendation budget estimate
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 Materials 116,846 121,846 +5,000
Nanotechnology research ............... ............... +5,000
14 Advanced Materials for Weapon Systems 39,572 54,572 +15,000
Materials research and technology ............... ............... +10,000
Metals affordability research ............... ............... +5,000
18 Aerospace Propulsion and Power Technology 149,321 159,321 +10,000
Silicon carbide research ............... ............... +10,000
19 Electronic Combat Technology 49,128 43,428 -5,700
Restoring acquisition accountability: delayed ............... ............... -5,700
program start
52 Operationally Responsive Space ............... 10,000 +10,000
Authorization adjustment: Operationally ............... ............... +10,000
Responsive Space
53 Tech Transition Program 13,636 38,636 +25,000
Alternative energy research ............... ............... +25,000
64 Tactical Data Networks Enterprise 51,456 49,956 -1,500
Restoring acquisition accountability: 5th to 4th ............... ............... -1,500
Generation Gateway--program delay
65 Physical Security Equipment 50 ............... -50
Improving funds management: unobligated prior ............... ............... -50
year funds
70 Space Based Infrared System [SBIRS] High EMD 352,532 322,832 -29,700
Improving funds management: forward financing-- ............... ............... -29,700
ground development
75 Combat Training Ranges 33,200 25,300 -7,900
Restoring acquisition accountability: Advanced ............... ............... -7,900
Radar Threat System Development--late contract
award
78 F-35--EMD 816,335 796,335 -20,000
Maintaining program affordability: F-135 ............... ............... -20,000
Propulsion System cost growth
82 ICBM Fuze Modernization 129,411 118,411 -11,000
Maintaining program affordability: excessive ............... ............... -11,000
support cost growth
85 CSAR HH-60 Recapitalization 393,558 201,558 -192,000
Restoring acquisition accountability: reduce ............... ............... -192,000
unit cost
88 Polar MILSATCOM (SPACE) 124,805 109,805 -15,000
Budget documentation disparity: unjustified ............... ............... -15,000
increase
91 Nuclear Weapons Modernization 67,874 6,174 -61,700
Maintaining program affordability: B61 Life ............... ............... -61,700
Extension Program
103 Initial Operational Test & Evaluation 13,610 12,310 -1,300
Improving funds management: reduction for ............... ............... -1,300
historic underexecution
109 Multi-Service Systems Engineering Initiative 13,935 6,935 -7,000
Program termination: Multi-Service Systems ............... ............... -7,000
Engineering Initiative
110 Space and Missile Center (SMC) Civilian Workforce 192,348 186,348 -6,000
Improving funds management: unfilled positions ............... ............... -6,000
118 AF Integrated Personnel and Pay System (AF-IPPS) 90,097 34,097 -56,000
Improving funds management: fiscal year 2012 ............... ............... -56,000
funds available for development
119 Anti-Tamper Technology Executive Agency 32,086 22,086 -10,000
Improving funds management: forward financing ............... ............... -10,000
121 B-52 Squadrons 24,007 21,007 -3,000
Restoring acquisition accountability: 1760 ............... ............... -3,000
Internal Weapons Bay Upgrade--flight test delay
131 MQ-9 UAV 128,328 115,828 -12,500
Improving funds management: forward financing ............... ............... -12,500
138 F-35 Squadrons 33,000 5,900 -27,100
Restoring acquisition accountability: Follow-on ............... ............... -10,000
Development--no approved Capabilities
Development Document
Restoring acquisition accountability: ............... ............... -7,100
Developmental Test and Evaluation--no approved
Capabilities Development Document
Restoring acquisition accountability: B61--no ............... ............... -10,000
approved Capabilities Development Document
139 Tactical AIM Missiles 15,460 12,760 -2,700
Improving funds management: forward financing ............... ............... -2,700
142 Combat Rescue and Recovery 2,582 6,882 +4,300
Air National Guard shortfall: HH-60 Smart Multi- ............... ............... +4,300
Function Color Display
145 Precision Attack Systems Procurement 1,075 2,000 +925
Improving funds management: forward financing ............... ............... -1,075
Air National Guard shortfall: Sniper Digital ............... ............... +2,000
Video
147 Aircraft Engine Component Improvement Program 139,369 109,969 -29,400
Improving funds management: JSF Component ............... ............... -29,400
Improvement Program forward financing
162 Joint Surveillance/Target Attack Radar System 13,248 23,148 +9,900
[JSTARS]
Authorization adjustment: retain T-3 test ............... ............... +9,900
aircraft
169 Cyber Command Activities 68,099 38,099 -30,000
Improving funds management: forward financing ............... ............... -30,000
180 E-4B National Airborne Operations Center [NAOC] 18,267 13,267 -5,000
Maintaining program affordability: Low Frequency ............... ............... -5,000
Transmit System funds early to need
182 Information Systems Security Program 90,231 96,331 +6,100
Maintaining program affordability: concept ............... ............... -3,900
refinement
Authorization adjustment: ASACoE program ............... ............... +10,000
185 MILSATCOM Terminals 140,170 95,170 -45,000
Restoring acquisition accountability: FAB-T ............... ............... -45,000
195 Air Traffic Control, Approach, and Landing System 35,674 39,174 +3,500
(ATCALS)
Air National Guard shortfall: Remotely Piloted ............... ............... +3,500
Aircraft Ground Based Sense and Avoid
201 Defense Joint Counterintelligence Activities 330 10 -320
Maintaining program affordability ............... ............... -320
212 Endurance Unmanned Aerial Vehicles 3,000 ............... -3,000
Terminate ISIS ............... ............... -3,000
213 Airborne Reconnaissance Systems 37,828 50,328 +12,500
Authorization adjustment: Blue Devil Replacement ............... ............... +12,500
WAMI/NVDF
217 RQ-4 UAV 134,406 110,406 -24,000
Improving funds management: forward financing ............... ............... -24,000
226 NUDET Detection System (SPACE) 50,547 42,547 -8,000
Improving funds management: prior year carryover ............... ............... -8,000
242 Logistics Information Technology [LOGIT] 95,238 60,478 -34,760
Maintaining program affordability: delay ............... ............... -34,760
transformational projects
Classified Programs 11,874,528 11,664,528 -210,000
Classified adjustment ............... ............... -210,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Operationally Responsive Space.--The Department of Defense
Appropriations Act, 2013, provided $105,000,000 for
continuation of the Operationally Responsive Space program, in
accordance with the Fiscal Year 2013 National Defense
Authorization Act [NDAA]. The Air Force proposed to acquire a
low-cost weather satellite, which would leverage prior
investments in bus and sensor programs, which the Committee
supported.
However, this plan has not been approved by the Department
of Defense despite the identification of a key requirements gap
in weather data collection. The failure to provide a path
forward for the Operationally Responsive Space program stands
in stark contrast to the congressional rejection of the fiscal
year 2013 proposal to terminate the program.
The Committee finds that the Operationally Responsive Space
program is an important pathfinder to fielding future satellite
capabilities at an affordable cost. The Committee directs the
Secretary of the Air Force to provide the congressional defense
committees with a report describing the plans for executing the
available funding consistent with the mandates of the
Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2013 and the Fiscal
Year 2013 NDAA within 30 days after enactment of this act.
Family of Advanced Beyond-Line-of-Sight Terminals [FAB-
T].--The Air Force has adopted a competitive acquisition
strategy for the final development and procurement of FAB-T
systems. The key event in this acquisition will be a source
selection between two terminal solutions in early fiscal year
2014.
The Committee supports competitive acquisition strategies
to provide best value to the Government and has supported the
necessary funds for development of both FAB-T systems. However,
the Committee is concerned that there is not adequate
visibility on several aspects of the acquisition strategy,
including requirements definition and the basis for evaluation
of two technologies at different states of maturity.
Therefore, the Committee recommends a reduction of
$45,000,000 from Research, Development, Test and Evaluation,
Air Force, and $45,000,000 from Other Procurement, Air Force.
Combat Rescue Helicopter.--For fiscal year 2014, the Air
Force requests $393,558,000 to begin the engineering,
manufacturing, and development phase of the combat rescue
helicopter. The Committee recommends $201,558,000, a reduction
of $192,000,000, due to a delay in contract award. The
Committee fully supports this mission but believes replacement
of the existing HH-60G fleet can be accomplished in a less
costly manner.
Of the amount the Air Force requests in fiscal year 2014,
$245,000,000 is budgeted to buy two commercially available
helicopters, as well as procuring and integrating the mission
equipment. The Committee strongly believes that paying
$122,500,000 for an in-production helicopter, even with
integrated mission equipment, is excessive. Further, the Air
Force plans to spend nearly $1,400,000,000 for development and
test of nine helicopters followed by a procurement program that
currently shows an average procurement unit cost of $81,000,000
per helicopter. In the current fiscal environment, the
Department should be seeking innovative ways to recapitalize
the HH-60 fleet with platforms having affordable unit costs.
In the fiscal year 2011 Senate appropriations report 111-
295, this Committee zeroed out funding for the HH-60
Recapitalization program and expressed concern that the Air
Force's plan could produce results similar to the wasted
$200,000,000 spent on the Combat Search and Rescue-X program.
The Committee is concerned that the Air Force may be heading
down the same path and wants to fully understand the cost of
all mission and acquisition alternatives. Therefore, the
Committee directs the Office of the Secretary of Defense, Cost
Assessment and Program Evaluation to provide, not later than 90
days after enactment of this act, a briefing to the
congressional defense committees on a business case analysis of
the combat rescue helicopter. This analysis shall examine the
cost of all mission alternatives in addition to alternative
acquisition strategies to include utilizing existing contract
vehicles and post production modifications.
Logistics Information Technology.--The Air Force requests
$95,238,000 to remediate and modernize legacy logistics
information technology systems to meet the 2017 auditability
mandate as well as pursue transformational initiatives that
will eventually replace the legacy systems. The Committee fully
supports the Air Force's efforts to remediate and modernize
legacy systems to meet the 2017 mandate--but questions the
timing of pursuing transformational initiatives.
After spending $1,030,000,000 over several years to replace
the legacy logistics systems with the expeditionary combat
support system [ECSS], the Air Force terminated ECSS because an
additional $1,100,000,000 was needed to field 25 percent of the
original ECSS capability. As a potential root cause of the
failure to deliver ECSS, the Air Force sites ``lack of
enterprise resource planning [ERP] program management skills
within government.'' Given this assessment, the Committee
believes the Air Force should focus their skilled program
managers on projects that help the Air Force achieve
auditability in 2017 rather than on efforts that deliver much
later. Therefore, the Committee denies the request to begin
transformational initiatives and reduces logistics information
technology by $34,760,000.
High Capacity Optical Wireless Communications for Remotely
Piloted Vehicles.--The Committee supports Air Force development
of secure, high-bandwidth communications technologies for
assured communications networks and covertness in tactical
environments, including free-space optical technology.
Recognizing the military's increasing reliance on tactical and
intelligence data from remotely piloted air vehicles, and that
transmission capacity is already limited by radio frequency
spectrum and bandwidth, the Air Force is encouraged to continue
development and demonstration of next generation free-space
optical communications for remotely piloted air vehicles.
Engine Sensor Technology Research.--The Committee is aware
that ongoing research regarding dynamic engine sensors for
military aircraft may increase safety and decrease operation
and sustainment costs if the technology is fully matured. The
Committee encourages the Department to continue to support
innovative research on engine sensor technology with the goal
of improving performance, safety, and fuel efficiency.
Ground Based Radar Technologies.--The Committee understands
that the Air Force, Marine Corps, and the Army are each
considering the procurement of new ground radar solutions. The
Committee applauds the Marine Corps for pursuing a flexible,
multi-mission radar. Given the fiscally constrained budgetary
environment, the Committee encourages the Department of Defense
to carefully examine the services' ground-based radar
acquisition strategies to ensure procurement of the most
affordable and most efficient solution that meets the
warfighter requirements. The Committee believes the Department
should consider leveraging available technology and focus on
efficiency and affordability to potentially lower lifecycle
costs, accelerate deployment schedules, and reduce programmatic
risk.
Human Optimization of Autonomous Systems.--Unmanned Aerial
Systems have rapidly advanced to become invaluable to national
defense. The Committee praises the Air Force for its forward
leaning approach to evolving this technology as requirements
change and the threat adapts. Autonomous systems, the next
stage in that evolution, will demand testing and evaluation
systems and procedures that are developed solely for their
unique requirements. The Committee encourages the Air Force to
invest in the development of test and evaluation capabilities
for autonomy based systems.
Sensors Research by Air Force Minority Leaders Program.--
The Committee encourages the Air Force Research Laboratory to
carry out sensors research activities conducted by the Air
Force Minority Leaders Program for research in the disciplines
of materials and processing, sensors, and related enabling
academic specialties, and to meet critical defense
capabilities, science and technology, future workforce, and
technical program objectives for the Air Force.
Aerospace Propulsion.--The Committee is aware that ongoing
research regarding dynamic engine sensors for military aircraft
may increase safety and decrease operation and sustainment
costs if the technology is fully matured. The Committee
encourages the Department to continue to support innovative
research on engine sensor technology with the goal of improving
performance, safety, and fuel efficiency.
MQ-1 and MQ-9 Sense and Avoid Capability Development.--The
Committee recommendation includes $115,828,000 for enhancements
to the MQ-9 Reaper remotely piloted aircraft [RPA]. Of the
amount provided, no funds were requested by the Air Force for
development of a sense and avoid capability. The Committee
notes that the Air Force intends to base a portion of the
overall fleet of MQ-1 and MQ-9 RPAs in the United States in the
future, and that the scope of operations of any such aircraft
would substantially depend on domestic rules currently under
development by the Federal Aviation Administration.
Specifically, absent any sense and avoid capability, the MQ-1
and MQ-9 aircraft could be largely restricted to restricted
military airspace, which would greatly limit their potential
use in support of domestic authorities in the event of a
natural disaster or other domestic emergency. As a result, the
Committee encourages the Air Force to examine options for a
sense and avoid capability for MQ-1 and MQ-9 RPAs, and to
include a sense and avoid development effort in future year
budget requests.

Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-Wide

Appropriations, 2013\1\................................. $18,607,358,000
Budget estimate, 2014................................... 17,667,108,000
Committee recommendation................................ 17,695,487,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public
Law 112-25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of
$17,695,487,000. This is $28,379,000 above the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this
appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

BASIC RESEARCH
DTRA UNIVERSITY STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP BASIC RESEARCH 45,837 45,837 ..............
DEFENSE RESEARCH SCIENCES 315,033 315,033 ..............
BASIC RESEARCH INITIATIVES 11,171 11,171 ..............
BASIC OPERATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH SCIENCE 49,500 49,500 ..............
NATIONAL DEFENSE EDUCATION PROGRAM 84,271 84,271 ..............
HISTORICALLY BLACK COLLEGES & UNIV (HBCU) 30,895 30,895 ..............
CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM 51,426 51,426 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BASIC RESEARCH 588,133 588,133 ..............

APPLIED RESEARCH
JOINT MUNITIONS TECHNOLOGY 20,065 20,065 ..............
BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY 114,790 114,790 ..............
LINCOLN LABORATORY RESEARCH PROGRAM 46,875 41,875 -5,000
APPLIED RESEARCH FOR ADVANCEMENT S&T PRIORITIES 45,000 30,000 -15,000
INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY 413,260 400,760 -12,500
COGNITIVE COMPUTING SYSTEMS 16,330 16,330 ..............
BIOLOGICAL WARFARE DEFENSE 24,537 24,537 ..............
CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM 227,065 227,065 ..............
CYBER SECURITY RESEARCH 18,908 18,908 ..............
HUMAN, SOCIAL AND CULTURE BEHAVIOR MODELING (HSCB) APP .............. 2,500 +2,500
TACTICAL TECHNOLOGY 225,977 207,977 -18,000
MATERIALS AND BIOLOGICAL TECHNOLOGY 166,654 166,654 ..............
ELECTRONICS TECHNOLOGY 243,469 228,469 -15,000
WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION DEFEAT TECHNOLOGIES 175,282 175,282 ..............
SOFTWARE ENGINEERING INSTITUTE 11,107 11,107 ..............
SPECIAL OPERATIONS TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 29,246 29,246 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, APPLIED RESEARCH 1,778,565 1,715,565 -63,000

ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT
JOINT MUNITIONS ADVANCED TECH INSENSITIVE MUNITIONS AD 26,646 26,646 ..............
SO/LIC ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT 19,420 19,420 ..............
COMBATING TERRORISM TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT 77,792 102,792 +25,000
COUNTERPROLIFERATION INITIATIVES--PROLIF PREV & DE- FEAT 274,033 274,033 ..............
BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY 309,203 9,321 -299,882
ADVANCED CONCEPTS .............. 6,919 +6,919
DISCRIMINATION .............. 36,142 +36,142
WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY .............. 53,208 +53,208
ADVANCED C4ISR .............. 43,000 +43,000
ADVANCED RESEARCH .............. 19,188 +19,188
COMMON KILL VEHICLE TECHNOLOGY .............. 70,000 +70,000
JOINT DOD-DOE MUNITIONS TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 19,305 19,305 ..............
AGILE TRANSPO FOR THE 21ST CENTURY (AT21)--THEATER CA 7,565 7,565 ..............
SPECIAL PROGRAM--MDA TECHNOLOGY 40,426 40,426 ..............
ADVANCED AEROSPACE SYSTEMS 149,804 134,804 -15,000
SPACE PROGRAMS AND TECHNOLOGY 172,546 132,546 -40,000
CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM--ADVANCED DEV 170,847 170,847 ..............
JOINT ELECTRONIC ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY 9,009 9,009 ..............
JOINT CAPABILITY TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATIONS 174,428 174,428 ..............
NETWORKED COMMUNICATIONS CAPABILITIES 20,000 5,000 -15,000
CYBER SECURITY ADVANCED RESEARCH 19,668 19,668 ..............
HUMAN, SOCIAL AND CULTURE BEHAVIOR MODELING (HSCB) ADV .............. 2,500 +2,500
DEFENSE-WIDE MANUFACTURING SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY PROG 34,041 59,041 +25,000
EMERGING CAPABILITIES TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 61,971 61,971 ..............
GENERIC LOGISTICS R&D TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATIONS 20,000 20,000 ..............
DEPLOYMENT AND DISTRIBUTION ENTERPRISE TECHNOLOGY 30,256 30,256 ..............
STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH PROGRAM 72,324 72,324 ..............
MICROELECTRONIC TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT AND SUPPORT 82,700 82,700 ..............
JOINT WARFIGHTING PROGRAM 8,431 8,431 ..............
ADVANCED ELECTRONICS TECHNOLOGIES 117,080 107,080 -10,000
COMMAND, CONTROL AND COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS 239,078 239,078 ..............
NETWORK-CENTRIC WARFARE TECHNOLOGY 259,006 259,006 ..............
SENSOR TECHNOLOGY 286,364 276,364 -10,000
DISTRIBUTED LEARNING ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 12,116 12,116 ..............
SOFTWARE ENGINEERING INSTITUTE 19,008 19,008 ..............
QUICK REACTION SPECIAL PROJECTS 78,532 68,532 -10,000
JOINT EXPERIMENTATION 12,667 12,667 ..............
MODELING AND SIMULATION MANAGEMENT OFFICE 41,370 41,370 ..............
TEST & EVALUATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY 92,508 92,508 ..............
OPERATIONAL ENERGY CAPABILITY IMPROVEMENT 52,001 52,001 ..............
CWMD SYSTEMS 52,053 55,053 +3,000
SPECIAL OPERATIONS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 46,809 46,809 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 3,109,007 2,993,082 -115,925

DEMONSTRATION & VALIDATION
NUCLEAR AND CONVENTIONAL PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT 63,641 53,641 -10,000
RETRACT LARCH 19,152 19,152 ..............
WALKOFF 70,763 70,763 ..............
ADVANCE SENSOR APPLICATIONS PROGRAM 17,230 19,230 +2,000
ENVIRONMENTAL SECURITY TECHNICAL CERTIFICATION PROGRAM 71,453 71,453 ..............
BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE TERMINAL DEFENSE SEGMENT 268,990 268,990 ..............
BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE MIDCOURSE DEFENSE SEGMENT 1,033,903 891,047 -142,856
CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM 196,237 181,237 -15,000
BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE SENSORS 315,183 345,183 +30,000
BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE ENABLING PROGRAMS 377,605 377,605 ..............
SPECIAL PROGRAMS--MDA 286,613 286,613 ..............
AEGIS BMD 937,056 910,056 -27,000
SPACE SURVEILLANCE & TRACKING SYSTEM 44,947 44,947 ..............
BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE SYSTEM SPACE PROGRAMS 6,515 6,515 ..............
BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE C2BMC 418,355 405,515 -12,840
BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE JOINT WARFIGHTER SUPPORT 47,419 47,419 ..............
BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE INTERGRATION AND OPERATIONS 52,131 52,131 ..............
CENTER (MDIOC)
REGARDING TRENCH 13,864 13,864 ..............
SEA BASED X-BAND RADAR (SBX) 44,478 44,478 ..............
ISRAELI COOPERATIVE PROGRAMS 95,782 268,782 +173,000
BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE TEST 375,866 375,866 ..............
BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE TARGETS 495,257 495,257 ..............
HUMANITARIAN DEMINING 11,704 11,704 ..............
COALITION WARFARE 9,842 9,842 ..............
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE CORROSION PROGRAM 3,312 23,312 +20,000
ADVANCED INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES 130,000 130,000 ..............
DOD UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEM (UAS) COMMON DEVELOPMENT 8,300 8,300 ..............
WIDE AREA SURVEILLANCE 30,000 30,000 ..............
HUMAN, SOCIAL AND CULTURE BEHAVIOR MODELING (HSCB) RES .............. 2,500 +2,500
DEFENSE RAPID INNOVATION FUND .............. 150,000 +150,000
JOINT SYSTEMS INTEGRATION 7,402 7,402 ..............
JOINT FIRES INTEGRATION & INTEROPERABILITY TEAM 7,506 7,506 ..............
LAND-BASED SM-3 (LBSM3) 129,374 129,374 ..............
AEGIS SM-3 BLOCK IIA CO-DEVELOPMENT 308,522 308,522 ..............
JOINT ELECTROMAGNETIC TECHNOLOGY (JET) PROGRAM 3,169 3,169 ..............
CYBER SECURITY INITIATIVE 946 946 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, DEMONSTRATION & VALIDATION 5,902,517 6,072,321 +169,804

ENGINEERING & MANUFACTURING DEVELOPMENT
NUCLEAR AND CONVENTIONAL PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT 8,155 8,155 ..............
PROMPT GLOBAL STRIKE CAPABILITY DEVELOPMENT 65,440 65,440 ..............
CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM 451,306 421,306 -30,000
ADVANCED IT SERVICES JOINT PROGRAM OFFICE (AITS-JPO) 29,138 29,138 ..............
JOINT TACTICAL INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (JTIDS) 19,475 19,475 ..............
WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION DEFEAT CAPABILITIES 12,901 12,901 ..............
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 13,812 13,812 ..............
HOMELAND PERSONNEL SECURITY INITIATIVE 386 386 ..............
DEFENSE EXPORTABILITY PROGRAM 3,763 3,763 ..............
OUSD(C) IT DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVES 6,788 6,788 ..............
DOD ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT AND DEMONSTRATION 27,917 27,917 ..............
DCMO POLICY AND INTEGRATION 22,297 22,297 ..............
DEFENSE AGENCY INITIATIVES FINANCIAL SYSTEM 51,689 51,689 ..............
DEFENSE-WIDE ELECTRONIC PROCUREMENT CAPABILITY 6,184 6,184 ..............
GLOBAL COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM 12,083 12,083 ..............
DOD ENTERPRISE ENERGY INFORMATION MANAGEMENT (EEIM) 3,302 3,302 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, ENGINEERING & MANUFACTURING DEVELOPMENT 734,636 704,636 -30,000

RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT
DEFENSE READINESS REPORTING SYSTEM (DRRS) 6,393 6,393 ..............
JOINT SYSTEMS ARCHITECTURE DEVELOPMENT 2,479 2,479 ..............
CENTRAL TEST AND EVALUATION INVESTMENT DEVELOPMENT 240,213 240,213 ..............
ASSESSMENTS AND EVALUATIONS 2,127 2,127 ..............
THERMAL VICAR 8,287 8,287 ..............
JOINT MISSION ENVIRONMENT TEST CAPABILITY (JMETC) 31,000 31,000 ..............
TECHNICAL STUDIES, SUPPORT AND ANALYSIS 24,379 24,379 ..............
FOREIGN MATERIAL ACQUISITION AND EXPLOITATION 54,311 54,311 ..............
JOINT THEATER AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE ORGANIZATION 47,462 47,462 ..............
CLASSIFIED PROGRAM USD(P) .............. 106,000 +106,000
FOREIGN COMPARATIVE TESTING 12,134 12,134 ..............
SYSTEMS ENGINEERING 44,237 44,237 ..............
STUDIES AND ANALYSIS SUPPORT 5,871 5,871 ..............
NUCLEAR MATTERS--PHYSICAL SECURITY 5,028 5,028 ..............
SUPPORT TO NETWORKS AND INFORMATION INTEGRATION 6,301 6,301 ..............
GENERAL SUPPORT TO USD (INTELLIGENCE) 6,504 6,504 ..............
CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM 92,046 92,046 ..............
SMALL BUSINESS INNOVATION RESEARCH/CHALLENGE ADMINISTR 1,868 1,868 ..............
DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS 8,362 8,362 ..............
DEFENSE TECHNICAL INFORMATION CENTER (DTIC) 56,024 46,024 -10,000
R&D IN SUPPORT OF DOD ENLISTMENT, TESTING & EVALUATION 6,908 6,908 ..............
DEVELOPMENT TEST AND EVALUATION 15,451 15,451 ..............
MANAGEMENT HEADQUARTERS (RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT) 71,659 71,659 ..............
BUDGET AND PROGRAM ASSESSMENTS 4,083 4,083 ..............
OPERATIONS SECURITY (OPSEC) 5,306 5,306 ..............
JOINT STAFF ANALYTICAL SUPPORT 2,097 2,097 ..............
SUPPORT TO INFORMATION OPERATIONS (IO) CAPABILITIES 8,394 8,394 ..............
INTELLIGENCE SUPPORT TO INFORMATION OPERATIONS (IO) 7,624 7,624 ..............
COCOM EXERCISE ENGAGEMENT AND TRAINING TRANSFORMATION. 43,247 43,247 ..............
MANAGEMENT HEADQUARTERS--MDA 37,712 37,712 ..............
IT SOFTWARE DEV INITIATIVES 607 607 ..............

CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 54,914 54,914 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT 913,028 1,009,028 +96,000

OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT
ENTERPRISE SECURITY SYSTEM (ESS) 7,552 7,552 ..............
REGIONAL INTERNATIONAL OUTREACH & PARTNERSHIP FOR PEAC 3,270 3,270 ..............
OVERSEAS HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE SHARED INFORMATION SY 287 287 ..............
INDUSTRIAL BASE ANALYSIS AND SUSTAINMENT SUPPORT 14,000 14,000 ..............
OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 1,955 1,955 ..............
GLOBAL THEATER SECURITY COOPERATION MANAGEMENT 13,250 13,250 ..............
CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE (OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS D) 13,026 13,026 ..............
JOINT INTEGRATION AND INTEROPERABILITY 12,652 12,652 ..............
PLANNING AND DECISION AID SYSTEM 3,061 3,061 ..............
C4I INTEROPERABILITY 72,726 72,726 ..............
JOINT/ALLIED COALITION INFORMATION SHARING 6,524 6,524 ..............
NATIONAL MILITARY COMMAND SYSTEM-WIDE SUPPORT 512 512 ..............
DEFENSE INFO INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING & INTEGRATION 12,867 10,867 -2,000
LONG HAUL COMMUNICATIONS (DCS) 36,565 30,565 -6,000
MINIMUM ESSENTIAL EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK 13,144 13,144 ..............
PUBLIC KEY INFRASTRUCTURE (PKI) 1,060 1,060 ..............
KEY MANAGEMENT INFRASTRUCTURE (KMI) 33,279 33,279 ..............
INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM 10,673 10,673 ..............
INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM 181,567 181,567 ..............
GLOBAL COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM 34,288 34,288 ..............
JOINT SPECTRUM CENTER 7,741 7,741 ..............
NET-CENTRIC ENTERPRISE SERVICES (NCES) 3,325 3,325 ..............
JOINT MILITARY DECEPTION INITIATIVE 1,246 1,246 ..............
TELEPORT PROGRAM 5,147 5,147 ..............
SPECIAL APPLICATIONS FOR CONTINGENCIES 17,352 17,352 ..............
CYBER SECURITY INITIATIVE 3,658 3,658 ..............
CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE PROTECTION (CIP) 9,752 9,752 ..............
POLICY R&D PROGRAMS 3,210 4,210 +1,000
NET CENTRICITY 21,602 21,602 ..............
DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS 5,195 5,195 ..............
DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS 3,348 3,348 ..............
MQ-1 PREDATOR A UAV 641 641 ..............
HOMELAND DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER PROGRAM 2,338 2,338 ..............
INT'L INTELLIGENCE TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, ADVANCEMENT 4,372 4,372 ..............
INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS 24,691 24,691 ..............
LOGISTICS SUPPORT ACTIVITIES 4,659 4,659 ..............
MANAGEMENT HEADQUARTERS (JCS) 3,533 3,533 ..............
MQ-9 UAV 1,314 13,314 +12,000
SPECIAL OPERATIONS AVIATION SYSTEMS ADVANCED DEV 156,561 156,561 ..............
SPECIAL OPERATIONS INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 7,705 7,705 ..............
SOF OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS 42,620 42,620 ..............
WARRIOR SYSTEMS 17,970 17,970 ..............
SPECIAL PROGRAMS 7,424 7,424 ..............
SOF TACTICAL VEHICLES 2,206 2,206 ..............
SOF UNDERWATER SYSTEMS 18,325 18,325 ..............
SOF GLOBAL VIDEO SURVEILLANCE ACTIVITIES 3,304 3,304 ..............
SOF OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS INTELLIGENCE 16,021 16,021 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 867,518 872,518 +5,000

CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 3,773,704 3,740,204 -33,500
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, DEF-WIDE 17,667,108 17,695,487 +28,379
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by
the Committee:

[In thousands of dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Change from
Line Item 2014 budget Committee budget
estimate recommendation estimate
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
11 Lincoln Laboratory Research Program 46,875 41,875 -5,000
Authorization adjustment .............. .............. -5,000
13 Applied Research for the Advancement of S&T Priorities 45,000 30,000 -15,000
Authorization adjustment: PSC S&T reduction .............. .............. -15,000
14 Information & Communications Technology 413,260 400,760 -12,500
Authorization adjustment: Plan X increase .............. .............. +2,500
Restoring acquisition accountability: Program growth .............. .............. -15,000
21 Human, Social and Culture Behavior Modeling [HSCB] .............. 2,500 +2,500
Applied Research
Authorization adjustment: HSCB Applied Research .............. .............. +2,500
22 Tactical Technology 225,977 207,977 -18,000
Program cancellation .............. .............. -10,000
Improving funds management: Prior year carry over .............. .............. -8,000
24 Electronics Technology 243,469 228,469 -15,000
Restoring acquisition accountability: Program growth .............. .............. -10,000
Improving funds management: Prior year carry over .............. .............. -5,000
30 Combating Terrorism Technology Support 77,792 102,792 +25,000
Restore unjustified reduction .............. .............. +25,000
32 Ballistic Missile Defense Technology 309,203 9,321 -299,882
Improving funds management: Transfer funds to lines .............. .............. -299,882
32A-F for execution
32A Advanced Concepts and Performance Assessment .............. 6,919 +6,919
Improving funds management: Transfer from line 32 for .............. .............. +6,919
Advanced Concepts and Performance Assessment
32B Discrimination Sensor Technology .............. 36,142 +36,142
Improving funds management: Transfer from line 32 for .............. .............. +18,742
Discrimination Sensor Technology
Improving funds management: Transfer from line 32 for .............. .............. +6,500
Discrimination Algorithms
Improving funds management: Transfer from line 32 for .............. .............. +10,900
Space Sensor Technology
32C Weapons Technology .............. 53,208 +53,208
Improving funds management: Transfer from line 32 for .............. .............. +22,944
High Power Directed Energy
Improving funds management: Transfer from line 32 for .............. .............. +24,000
Solid DACS
Improving funds management: Transfer from line 32 for .............. .............. +6,264
Advanced Interceptor Technology
32D Advanced C4ISR .............. 43,000 +43,000
Improving funds management: Transfer from line 32 for .............. .............. +43,000
Advanced C4ISR
32E Advanced Research .............. 19,188 +19,188
Improving funds management: Transfer from line 32 for .............. .............. +19,188
Advanced Research
32F Common Kill Vehicle Technology .............. 70,000 +70,000
Improving funds management: Transfer from line 32 for .............. .............. +70,000
Common Kill Vehicle Technologies
37 Advanced Aerospace Systems 149,804 134,804 -15,000
Improving funds management: Prior year carryover .............. .............. -10,000
Program termination: Integrated Sensor is Structure .............. .............. -5,000
(ISIS)
38 Space Programs and Technology 172,546 132,546 -40,000
Program termination: SeeMe .............. .............. -10,000
Program termination: System F6 .............. .............. -30,000
42 Networked Communications Capabilities 20,000 5,000 -15,000
Authorization adjustment: Net Comm reduction .............. .............. -15,000
46 Human, Social and Culture Behavior Modeling [HSCB] .............. 2,500 +2,500
Advanced Development
Authorization adjustment: HSCB Advanced Development .............. .............. +2,500
47 Defense-Wide Manufacturing Science and Technology Pro- 34,041 59,041 +25,000
gram
Authorization adjustment: Industrial Base Initiative .............. .............. +25,000
Fund
55 Advanced Electronics Technologies 117,080 107,080 -10,000
Improving funds management: Prior year carryover .............. .............. -10,000
60 Sensor Technology 286,364 276,364 -10,000
Maintaining program affordability: Eliminate program .............. .............. -10,000
growth
63 Quick Reaction Special Projects 78,532 68,532 -10,000
Maintaining program affordability: Eliminate program .............. .............. -10,000
growth
71 CWMD Systems 52,053 55,053 +3,000
Authorization adjustment: CWMD Systems .............. .............. +3,000
75 Nuclear and Conventional Physical Security Equipment 63,641 53,641 -10,000
RDT&E ADC&P
Budget documentation disparity: Poor justification .............. .............. -10,000
materials
79 Advanced Sensors Application Program 17,230 19,230 +2,000
Authorization adjustment .............. .............. +2,000
82 Ballistic Missile Defense Midcourse Defense Segment 1,033,903 891,047 -142,856
Improving funds management: Transfer sustainment .............. .............. -142,856
funds to operation and maintenance, defense-wide for
execution
83 Chemical and Biological Defense Program--Dem/Val 196,237 181,237 -15,000
Restoring acquisition accountability: NGCS Schedule .............. .............. -5,000
de- lay
Restoring acquisition accountability: VAC FILO .............. .............. -10,000
Schedule delay
84 Ballistic Missile Defense Sensors 315,183 345,183 +30,000
Maintain Cobra Judy to augment discrimination capabil- .............. .............. +30,000
ity
88 AEGIS BMD 937,056 910,056 -27,000
Restoring acquisition accountability: Aegis BMD 5.1 .............. .............. -27,000
development cost growth
91 Ballistic Missile Defense Command and Control, Battle 418,355 405,515 -12,840
Management and Communication
Restoring acquisition accountability: Lack of Spiral .............. .............. -5,937
8.2x baseline
Restoring acquisition accountability: Spiral 8.4 .............. .............. -6,903
deferred by MDA
96 Israeli Cooperative Programs 95,782 268,782 +173,000
Israeli Upper tier .............. .............. +22,100
Israeli Arrow program .............. .............. +33,700
Short range ballistic missile defense .............. .............. +117,200
101 Department of Defense Corrosion Program 3,312 23,312 +20,000
Program increase .............. .............. +20,000
105 Human, Social and Culture Behavior Modeling [HSCB] .............. 2,500 +2,500
Research and Engineering
Authorization adjustment .............. .............. +2,500
106 Defense Rapid Innovation Program .............. 150,000 +150,000
Authorization adjustment .............. .............. +150,000
120 Chemical and Biological Defense Program--EMD 451,306 421,306 -30,000
Restoring acquisition accountability: JEM milestone B .............. .............. -2,000
delay
Restoring acquisition accountability: JBTDS milestone .............. .............. -4,000
B delay
Restoring acquisition accountability: CALS milestone .............. .............. -7,000
B delay
Restoring acquisition accountability: HFV milestone B .............. .............. -10,000
delay
Restoring acquisition accountability: VAC BOT .............. .............. -7,000
execution delay
145 Classified Program USD(P) .............. 106,000 +106,000
Program increase .............. .............. +106,000
160 Defense Technical Information Center [DTIC] 56,024 46,024 -10,000
Authorization adjustment: DTIC reduction .............. .............. -10,000
202 Defense Info Infrastructure Engineering and Integration 12,867 10,867 -2,000
Improving Funds Management: Prior year carryover .............. .............. -2,000
203 Long-Haul Communications--DCS 36,565 30,565 -6,000
Improving Funds Management: Prior year carryover .............. .............. -6,000
225 Policy R&D Programs 3,210 4,210 +1,000
Authorization adjustment: Conflict Records Research .............. .............. +1,000
Center
250 MQ-9 UAV 1,314 13,314 +12,000
Authorization adjustment: MQ-9 UAV .............. .............. +12,000
Classified Programs 3,773,704 3,740,204 -33,500
Classified adjustment .............. .............. -33,500
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Conventional Prompt Global Strike.--The fiscal year 2014
budget request includes $65,440,000 to continue the Prompt
Global Strike [PGS] program, a decrease from $200,383,000
appropriated in fiscal year 2013. The Committee continues to
support development of a PGS capability but recognizes the
challenges associated with hypersonic flight. For example,
after two failed flight tests, the Defense Advanced Research
Project Agency determined that critical technologies associated
with hypersonic test vehicle-2 were not mature enough to
proceed to more advanced flight testing. However, the Committee
notes the Army conducted a successful flight test of the
advanced hypersonic weapon [AHW] on November, 17, 2011.
Considering recent test outcomes and the growing possibility of
near term threats, the Committee directs the Secretary of
Defense to follow through on the stated intent of additional
fiscal year 2013 funding provided for continued planning and
completion of a second, longer range AHW flight test. Also
considering the fiscal constraints under which the Department
is operating, the Committee directs the Secretary to avoid
commitments that will cause funds to be used for design or
development efforts intended to support a significant departure
from HTV-2 or the Army's AHW payload delivery vehicle designs.
Under Vehicle Scanning Technologies.--The Committee
believes that improving under vehicle scanning technologies to
mitigate threats and improve access to military installations
should be a priority. The Committee recommends that the
Department of Defense develop and test systems for automated
under vehicle scanning to improve entry security.
Corrosion Resistance and Non-Skid Compliance.--The
Committee recommends that the Department of Defense Corrosion
Program advance Navy fuel and ballast tank corrosion monitoring
and non-skid coating compliance efforts throughout the
Department of Defense's maintenance community.
Assured Microelectronics.--The Committee understands that
the Department of Defense issued an instruction which mandates
assurance measures for all information and weapons systems that
are national security systems, mission assurance category one,
or are otherwise critical military and intelligence systems.
The Committee directs the Department to deliver a report within
180 days of the enactment of this act on the progress
implementing this assured microelectronics policy.
Lightweight Vehicle Protection.--As the Department becomes
more environmentally friendly, hybrid and electronically
powered vehicles with reduced weight allowances may require
tradeoffs in protection, payload and performance that could
place troops at risk. The Committee recommends that the
Department of Defense develop lighter weight protection systems
optimized for such vehicles.
Open Access to Federal Research.--The Committee is
concerned that despite significant Federal investments in
scientific research, public access to the published results are
limited. Improved access to cutting edge research will help
individuals and commercial enterprises more rapidly translate
research results into new products and services. To that end,
the Committee encourages the Department of Defense to continue
its actions to execute the Federal research public access
policy recommendations as outlined by the Office of Science and
Technology Policy in an effort to increase public access to
published scientific research.
Central Test and Evaluation Investment Program [CTEIP]
Range Upgrades.--The Committee is concerned with the condition
of the high speed test tracks at military test ranges. These
tracks provide significant missile and missile component
validation which can at times eliminate costly tests using air
launched vehicles. Therefore, the Committee encourages the
Department of Defense, through the Central Test and Evaluation
Investment Program, to develop ground test range upgrades that
provide low vibration Mach 3 speeds for testing of advanced
missiles and their components, launch vehicles, or other space
systems.

MISSILE DEFENSE AGENCY

Ballistic Missile Defense Technology.--The fiscal year 2014
budget request includes $309,203,000 for ballistic missile
defense technology research, an increase of $233,228,000, or
307 percent, over amounts appropriated in fiscal year 2013. The
Missile Defense Agency plans to execute these funds for six
distinct projects, each containing multiple subprojects.
However, the requested budget increase is not sustained in
future years. Therefore, to ensure appropriate oversight among
the many projects MDA plans to pursue, and to improve the
financial management of technology research funds, the
Committee transfers funds requested in fiscal year 2014 to six
separate project elements, consistent with MDA's budget
justification.
Acquisition Accountability in Development Programs.--The
fiscal year 2014 budget request includes $937,056,000 to
continue the development of multiple spirals of Aegis ballistic
missile defense [BMD] capabilities. While the Committee notes
the repeated success of the Aegis weapons system, the budget
request includes roughly $500,000,000 for the concurrent
development of Aegis BMD 4.0, Aegis BMD 5.0, and Aegis BMD 5.1.
Since 2007, MDA has obligated over $450,000,000 for development
of Aegis BMD 5.1, and the budget request for Aegis BMD 5.1 in
fiscal year 2014 is $239,000,000. Despite the significant
investment made to date in Aegis BMD 5.1 and the funding
increase requested in fiscal year 2014, MDA has not completed
an acquisition program baseline for Aegis BMD 5.1. Further, the
Government Accountability Office in its April 2013 report
identified unstable baselines as well as cost growth in the
Aegis program. Therefore, the Committee does not fully support
the increase sought for Aegis BMD 5.1, and recommends a
reduction of $27,000,000.
In addition, the fiscal year 2014 budget request includes
$418,355,000 for continued development of BMD command and
control, battle management and communications [C2BMC]. The
Committee fully supports the continued development of C2BMC.
However, the request includes $6,903,000 for spiral 8.4 which
has been deferred by MDA, and $6,937,000 to initiate a new
spiral (8.2x) for which MDA has budgeted over $120,000,000 over
the next 5 years. Furthermore, no cost or schedule baseline for
spiral 8.2x has been established. Given the repeated
adjustments to MDA's software development program baselines in
recent years, the Committee does not find it appropriate to
establish yet another new development spiral without first
establishing cost and schedule baselines. Therefore, the
Committee recommends a reduction to the request for spiral
8.2x. The Committee notes that this does not affect the
continued development and fielding of spirals 6.4 and 8.2.
Sharing of Classified United States Ballistic Missile
Defense Information With the Russian Federation.--The Committee
is concerned with the potential security risks associated with
sharing sensitive U.S. missile defense data and technology with
the Russian Federation. The Committee recognizes existing law
restricts the sharing of sensitive and classified ballistic
missile defense information with the Russian Federation, as
cited in Public Law 112-81, the National Defense Authorization
Act for Fiscal Year 2012. The Committee expects the
administration to continue to adhere to current law, until
superseded by any provision of an act authorizing
appropriations for the Department of Defense for fiscal year
2014 relating to this issue.

Operational Test and Evaluation, Defense

Appropriations, 2013\1\................................. $223,473,000
Budget estimate, 2014................................... 186,300,000
Committee recommendation................................ 186,300,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public
Law 112-25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $186,300,000.
This is equal to the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this
appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT
OPERATIONAL TEST AND EVALUATION 75,720 75,720 ..............
LIVE FIRE TESTING 48,423 48,423 ..............
OPERATIONAL TEST ACTIVITIES AND ANALYSES 62,157 62,157 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT 186,300 186,300 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, OPERATIONAL TEST AND EVALUATION, DE- FENSE 186,300 186,300 ..............
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

TITLE V

REVOLVING AND MANAGEMENT FUNDS

Defense Working Capital Funds

Appropriations, 2013\1\\2\.............................. $1,538,383,000
Budget estimate, 2014................................... 1,545,827,000
Committee recommendation................................ 1,695,827,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public
Law 112-25.
\2\Includes emergency funding of $24,200,000 in the Disaster Relief
Appropriations Act, 2013 (division A of Public Law 113-2).

The Committee recommends an appropriation of
$1,695,827,000. This is $150,000,000 above the budget estimate.

committee recommended program

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this
appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

[In thousands of dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Change from
Item 2014 budget Committee budget
estimate recommendation estimate
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Prepositioned War Reserve Stocks................................ 25,158 175,158 +150,000
Arsenal Initiative.......................................... .............. .............. +150,000
-----------------------------------------------
Total, Defense Working Capital Fund, Army................. 25,158 175,158 +150,000
===============================================
Supplies and Materials (Medical/Dental)......................... 61,731 61,731 ..............
-----------------------------------------------
Total, Defense Working Capital Fund, Air Force............ 61,731 61,731 ..............
===============================================
Defense Logistics Agency........................................ 46,428 46,428 ..............
-----------------------------------------------
Total, Defense Working Capital Fund, Defense-Wide......... 46,428 46,428 ..............
===============================================
Working Capital Fund--DECA...................................... 1,412,510 1,412,510 ..............
-----------------------------------------------
Total, Defense Working Capital Fund, Defense-Wide......... 1,412,510 1,412,510 ..............
===============================================
Grand Total, Defense Working Capital Funds................ 1,545,827 1,695,827 +150,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Defense Logistics Agency Fair and Reasonable Pricing
Analysis.--A Department of Defense Inspector General's [DODIG]
recently published audit report titled ``Acquisition Processes
and Contract Management'' [DODIG-2013-090] determined that
Defense Logistics Agency [DLA] Aviation contracting officers
did not routinely conduct fair and reasonable pricing analysis
when purchasing spare parts. Therefore, wasteful spending
resulted from agency personnel failing to negotiate good deals
or to perform adequate oversight. The audit found that DLA
Aviation paid approximately $13,700,000 in excess of fair and
reasonable prices for 1,469 orders. This included a $10 device
for which the defense contractor charged $2,286 a piece. In
another example, DLA paid $12,467 each for metal tube
assemblies that cover aircraft engine struts. The DODIG review
concluded that the agency should have paid a unit price of
approximately $1,167.
DLA is seeking a refund of $13,700,000 from the contractor
for the issues identified in the audit. However, the audit
found that ``DLA Aviation also may have made payments in excess
of the fair and reasonable price for an additional 20 delivery
orders. If prices are not corrected, DLA Aviation will continue
to overpay on future sole-source spare parts. . . . '' The
Committee is concerned about the lack of attention given to the
review of pricing for spare parts and believes the end
customer, in this case the Air Force, needs to improve its
oversight in the process as well. A reduction has been made to
the Air Force operation and maintenance budget to account for
savings that should be realized by the Air Force increasing its
scrutiny of pricing for spare parts. Additionally, the
Committee directs the Secretary of Defense to provide a report
to the congressional defense committees no later than 90 days
after the enactment of this act that examines the safeguards
that are or have been put in place to prevent future defense
contractor overpricing.

National Defense Sealift Fund

Appropriations, 2013\1\................................. $696,919,000
Budget estimate, 2014................................... 730,700,000
Committee recommendation................................ 608,378,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public
Law 112-25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $608,378,000.
This is $122,322,000 below the budget estimate.

committee recommended program

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this
appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

TITLE VI

OTHER DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE PROGRAMS

Defense Health Program

Appropriations, 2013\1\................................. $32,672,130,000
Budget estimate, 2014................................... 33,054,528,000
Committee recommendation................................ 33,607,019,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public
Law 112-25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of
$33,607,019,000. This is $552,491,000 above the budget
estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this
appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE
IN-HOUSE CARE 8,880,738 8,885,629 +4,891
PRIVATE SECTOR CARE 15,842,732 15,797,732 -45,000
CONSOLIDATED HEALTH SUPPORT 2,505,640 2,505,640 ..............
INFORMATION MANAGEMENT 1,450,619 1,454,219 +3,600
MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES 368,248 368,248 ..............
EDUCATION AND TRAINING 733,097 733,097 ..............
BASE OPERATIONS/COMMUNICATIONS 1,872,660 1,872,660 ..............
-------------------------------------------------

SUBTOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 31,653,734 31,617,225 -36,509

PROCUREMENT
DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM 671,181 671,181 ..............

RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST AND EVALUATION
DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM 729,613 1,318,613 +589,000
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM 33,054,528 33,607,019 +552,491
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by
the Committee:

[In thousands of dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2014 budget Committee Change from
Item request recommendation budget request
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE.................................... 31,653,734 31,617,225 -36,509
IN-HOUSE CARE............................................ 8,880,738 8,885,629 +4,891
Improving funds management: Pharmacy funding excess ............... ............... -3,895
to requirement......................................
Special Operations psychological resiliency--transfer ............... ............... +8,786
from OM, DW.........................................
PRIVATE SECTOR CARE...................................... 15,842,732 15,797,732 -45,000
Improving funds management: TRICARE historical ............... ............... -275,000
underexecution......................................
Improving funds management: Pharmaceutical drugs ............... ............... -67,000
excess growth.......................................
Authorization adjustment: Restore proposed TRICARE ............... ............... +297,000
fee increases.......................................
CONSOLIDATED HEALTH CARE................................. 2,505,640 2,505,640 ...............
INFORMATION MANAGEMENT................................... 1,450,619 1,454,219 +3,600
Accelerate HAIMS initiative.......................... ............... ............... +3,600
MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES.................................... 368,248 368,248 ...............
EDUCATION AND TRAINING................................... 733,097 733,097 ...............
BASE OPERATIONS AND COMMUNICATIONS....................... 1,872,660 1,872,660 ...............
PROCUREMENT.................................................. 671,181 671,181 ...............
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT..................................... 729,613 1,318,613 +589,000
Research and Development................................. 729,613 729,613 ...............
Peer-Reviewed Breast Cancer Research................. ............... ............... +120,000
Peer-Reviewed Cancer Research........................ ............... ............... +25,000
Peer-Reviewed Ovarian Cancer Research................ ............... ............... +10,000
Peer-Reviewed Prostate Cancer Research............... ............... ............... +64,000
Peer-Reviewed Traumatic Brain Injury and ............... ............... +60,000
Psychological Health Research.......................
Peer Reviewed Medical Research Program............... ............... ............... +200,000
Joint Warfighter Medical Research.................... ............... ............... +100,000
Orthotics and Prosthetics Outcomes Research.......... ............... ............... +10,000
--------------------------------------------------
TOTAL.............................................. 33,054,528 33,607,019 +552,491
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Defense Health Program Reprogramming Procedures.--The
Committee remains concerned regarding the transfer of funds
from direct (or in-house) care to pay for contractor-provided
medical care. To limit such transfers and improve oversight
within the Defense Health Program operation and maintenance
account, the Committee includes a provision which caps the
funds available for private sector care under the TRICARE
program subject to prior approval reprogramming procedures. The
provision and accompanying report language included by the
Committee should not be interpreted by the Department as
limiting the amount of funds that may be transferred to the
direct care system from other budget activities within the
Defense Health Program. In addition, the Committee continues to
designate the funding for the direct care system as a special
interest item. Any transfer of funds from the direct (or in-
house) care budget activity into the private sector care budget
activity or any other budget activity will require the
Department of Defense to follow prior approval reprogramming
procedures.
The Committee directs the Secretary of Defense to provide
written notification to the congressional defense committees of
cumulative transfers in excess of $15,000,000 out of the
private sector care budget subactivity. The Committee further
directs the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Health Affairs) to
provide quarterly reports to the congressional defense
committees on budget execution data for all of the Defense
Health Program accounts and to adequately reflect changes to
the budget activities requested by the services in future
budget submissions.
Carryover.--For fiscal year 2014, the Committee recommends
1 percent carryover authority for the operation and maintenance
account of the Defense Health Program. The Committee directs
the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Health Affairs) to submit a
detailed spending plan for any fiscal year 2013 designated
carryover funds to the congressional defense committees not
less than 30 days prior to executing the carryover funds.
Private Sector Care Underexecution.--According to a review
by the Government Accountability Office, the Department
underexecuted its private sector care budget by $1,356,245,000
in fiscal year 2011 and $1,463,178,000 in fiscal year 2012, for
an average of 8.9 percent underexecution. The Committee notes
that the Department included a reduction of $869,381,000 in its
fiscal year 2014 budget request to account for lower than
budgeted cost growth in private sector care. However, given the
continued trend of prior-year underexecution, the Committee
believes that additional savings can be realized and recommends
a reduction of $275,000,000 to the fiscal year 2014 budget
request. The Committee urges the Department to submit future
year budgets that are more closely aligned with recent provided
care patterns.
Collaboration with the Department of Veterans Affairs.--
While the Department of Defense [DOD] and the Department of
Veterans Affairs [VA] may have different missions, they are
bound together in a mutual mission to support those who have
served in the defense of the country. Over the past several
years, collaboration between the Departments has significantly
increased and the number of joint projects and services has
expanded. The Committee applauds these efforts and believes
that future information sharing between DOD and VA must
strengthen in order to ensure a seamless transition from active
duty and timely access to VA benefits. Nowhere is this more
evident than in the transmission of service treatment records
from DOD to VA. These records are essential in the VA's process
of making accurate and timely determinations of benefits to
which a veteran may be entitled.
The Committee has been deeply concerned that while
cooperation between the two Departments has significantly
increased, delays in information sharing still plague the
system. In order to increase the oversight of this process, the
recommendation includes bill language directing the DOD
Inspector General to work in coordination with the VA Office of
the Inspector General to assess the time it takes for service
treatment records to be transmitted to VA, impediments to
providing the records in a useable electronic format, and
recommendations to streamline this process. The Committee
further directs that this report be submitted to the Committees
on Appropriations of both Houses of Congress no later than July
31, 2014.
The Committee understands that 43 percent of veterans from
the Iraq and Afghanistan wars were National Guard and Reserve
members and that Guard and Reserve records are often the most
difficult for the VA to obtain because many of these veterans
saw multiple, nonconsecutive deployments with different units.
Currently, the VA must contact multiple individual units to
collect these records. The Committee encourages the Department
of Defense to establish a central clearinghouse for Guard and
Reserve records in order to speed the transfer of these records
and avoid future anticipated backlogs.
The Committee also believes that continuing the transition
from a paper-based to an electronic system of record transfer
is imperative in assisting the VA with providing benefits to
veterans in a timely manner. The Department of Defense is
currently deploying the Health Artifact Image Management
Solution [HAIMS], which provides DOD and VA healthcare
clinicians global access and awareness of images and documents
generated during the healthcare delivery process through the
continuum of care. The Committee provides an additional
$3,600,000 in order to accelerate this initiative and directs
DOD to transmit all records electronically to the VA by the end
of 2013.
In October 2010, DOD and VA established a first-of-its-kind
partnership with the opening of the Captain James A. Lovell
Federal Health Care Center [FHCC]. This is a fully integrated
Federal healthcare facility that serves Active Duty military,
their family members, military retirees, and veterans. The
Committee continues to support the pilot program at FHCC and
believes it will produce valuable lessons that can be used to
expand future collaboration between DOD and VA hospitals as
well as produce substantial savings to the taxpayer by
combining the two healthcare systems where practical.
integrated Electronic Health Record [iEHR].--The Committee
is frustrated with the disappointing effort displayed over the
past year by the Departments of Defense and Veterans Affairs to
continue development of an integrated Electronic Health Record
[iEHR]. Five years ago, full interoperability of electronic
records was mandated by the Congress. In 2011, the Departments
decided to replace their respective existing legacy electronic
health record systems and agreed to jointly develop an
electronic health record through the Interagency Program Office
[IPO]. The original schedule estimated operating capability for
iEHR by 2017.
In February 2013, because of cost and schedule issues, both
Secretaries decided to take iEHR in a different strategic
direction: focusing on creating an interoperable system and a
subsequent integrated health record, rather than building a
single integrated core system as previously agreed. The
Committee understands both Departments believe this new
approach will result in a lower overall cost of development and
an accelerated timeline for completion. However, the Committee
remains concerned by the lack of a well articulated plan
forward and the lack of results of development to date. For
instance, the Committee has yet to receive a detailed plan,
including a timeline, benchmarks, or total cost for this major
project. The Committee strongly believes that the current
environment of fragmented and stove-piped systems is not an
acceptable option. The Departments must develop and convey to
the Committee a coherent path forward for the successful
deployment of an interoperable system and integrated electronic
health record. Further, the IPO must be more transparent
regarding day-to-day functioning, including articulating a
clear governance structure and a detailed plan to manage and
maintain accountability on behalf of both Departments. In
short, the IPO must demonstrate to the Committee that it can
produce substantial achievements and adhere to a defined plan
forward within the budget estimates.
Included in Public Law 113-6 is a prohibition on obligation
or expenditure of fiscal year 2013 funds for the development of
iEHR until the Departments submit to the Appropriations
subcommittees of jurisdiction a plan for expenditure that meets
specifically outlined requirements. The Committee recently
received and is currently reviewing the expenditure plan. Due
to the Departments' inability to obligate fiscal year 2013 iEHR
development funds and the lack of compliance with the
requirements outlined in the bill, the Committee continues to
include bill language limiting the obligation or expenditure of
funds to 25 percent for the development of iEHR in fiscal year
2014 until both Departments provide the subcommittees of
jurisdiction an expenditure plan including a long-term roadmap
for the life of the project, with annual and total spending for
each Department and quarterly milestones. The expenditure plan
should also be submitted to the Government Accountability
Office [GAO] for review.
The Committee continues to expect briefings from the IPO on
a quarterly basis providing a detailed explanation of the cost
and schedule of iEHR development, including milestones,
knowledge points, and acquisition timelines as it impacts both
Departments, as well as quarterly obligation reports. The
Committee also directs the Department of Defense to provide
written notification to the Committees on Appropriations of the
House and Senate prior to obligating any contract or
combination of contracts in excess of $5,000,000.
Finally, the Committee is troubled by the lack of
transparency the Department of Defense has shown regarding the
information used to inform the decision to change strategy on
iEHR. The Committee directs the Director of the Office of Cost
Assessment Program Evaluation [CAPE] to provide a report not
later than 90 days after enactment of this act that includes
independent cost estimates for the following: the Department's
original plan of a single, integrated electronic health record
system; the Department adopting and modernizing the VA's
Veterans Health Information Systems and Technology Architecture
[VistA]; and the Department procuring a core system other than
but interoperable with VistA.
Traumatic Brain Injury [TBI]/Psychological Health [PH].--
The Committee recommends $60,000,000 above the fiscal year 2014
budget request for continued research into treatment and
prevention of traumatic brain injuries and improved
psychological health. Traumatic brain injury [TBI] has been
identified as the signature injury of the Iraq and Afghanistan
wars, but the long-term consequences of traumatic brain injury
and the relationship between post-traumatic stress, suicide,
sexual assault, and alcohol and substance abuse are poorly
understood. The Committee supports the Department's past
research efforts into each of these individual areas but
encourages the Department to conduct research that takes a more
holistic view of these issues in order to better understand how
they are interrelated and develop more effective treatment and
prevention strategies.
The Committee directs the Assistant Secretary of Defense
(Health Affairs) to submit a report to the congressional
defense committees within 180 days of enactment of this act on
expenditure and obligation data of additional funding added by
Congress for psychological health and traumatic brain injury.
This report should include information on agreements made with
other Government agencies.
Peer Reviewed Medical Research Program.--The Committee
recommends $200,000,000 for a Peer Reviewed Medical Research
Program. The Committee directs the Secretary of Defense, in
conjunction with the Service Surgeons General, to select
medical research projects of clear scientific merit and direct
relevance to military health. Research areas considered under
this funding are restricted to: acupuncture, alcohol and
substance abuse, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, arthritis,
autism, chronic migraine and post-traumatic headache,
congenital heart disease, DNA vaccine technology for
postexposure prophylaxis, duchenne muscular dystrophy,
epilepsy, food allergies, Fragile X syndrome, gulf war illness,
inflammatory bowel disease, interstitial cystitis, lupus,
malaria, metabolic disease, multiple sclerosis,
neurofibromatosis, orthopedics, pancreatitis, Parkinson's,
polycystic kidney disease, post-traumatic osteoarthritis,
psychotropic medications, reconstructive transplantation,
respiratory health, rheumatoid arthritis, segmental bone
defects, spinal cord injury, tinnitus, tuberous sclerosis
complex, and vision research. The Committee emphasizes that the
additional funding provided under the Peer Reviewed Medical
Research Program shall be devoted only to the purposes listed
above.
The Committee remains supportive of the medical research
being conducted by the Department that yields medical
breakthroughs for servicemembers and often translates to the
civilian population, as well. Along with the basic research
that is necessary in less mature research areas, the Committee
encourages the Department to pursue advanced research and
translational research projects when appropriate. The Committee
directs the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Health Affairs) to
provide a report to the congressional defense committees within
180 days of enactment of this Act on the breakdown of funding
in the Congressionally Directed Medical Research program
between basic and advanced research.
Joint Warfighter Medical Research Program.--The Committee
recommends $100,000,000 for the Joint Warfighter Medical
Research Program. Funds shall be used to augment and accelerate
high priority Department of Defense and service medical
requirements and to continue prior year initiatives that are
close to achieving their objectives and yielding a benefit to
military medicine. These funds shall not be used for new
projects or basic research, and they shall be awarded at the
discretion of the Secretary of Defense following a review of
medical research and development gaps, as well as unfinanced
medical requirements of the services. Further, the Committee
directs the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Health Affairs) to
provide a report not later than 180 days after the enactment of
this act to the congressional defense committees, which lists
the projects that receive funding. The report should include
the funding amount awarded to each project, a thorough
description of each project's research, and the benefit the
research will provide to the Department of Defense.
Peer-Reviewed Cancer Research Programs.--The Committee
includes $120,000,000 for the peer-reviewed breast cancer
research program, $64,000,000 for the peer-reviewed prostate
cancer research program, $10,000,000 for the peer-reviewed
ovarian cancer research program, and $25,000,000 for the peer-
reviewed cancer research program that would research cancers
not addressed in the aforementioned programs currently executed
by the Department of Defense.
The funds provided in the peer-reviewed cancer research
program are directed to be used to conduct research in the
following areas: kidney cancer, melanoma, mesothelioma,
myeloproliferative disorders, and neuroblastoma.
The funds provided under the peer-reviewed cancer research
program shall be used only for the purposes listed above. The
Committee directs the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Health
Affairs) to provide a report not later than 180 days after the
enactment of this act to the congressional defense committees
on the status of the peer-reviewed cancer research program. For
each research area, the report should include the funding
amount awarded, the progress of the research, and the relevance
of the research to servicemembers.
Orthotics and Prosthetics Outcomes Research.--The Committee
understands that over the last 10 years of war, more than 1,500
servicemembers have suffered a major amputation. The vast
majority of the acute care and initial rehabilitation of these
servicemembers has occurred within the Department's Advanced
Rehabilitation Centers, which continue to provide
rehabilitative techniques and advanced prosthetic technologies
that facilitate maximum functional outcomes. While the
Committee acknowledges the Department of Defense and Department
of Veterans Affairs joint conference on the State of the Art in
Orthotics and Prosthetics in March 2010, the Committee
recognizes that too little is known about which orthotic and
prosthetic supports, treatments, and technologies generate the
best outcomes for which patients. The Committee believes that
continued research on orthotics and prosthetics outcomes can
further improve care for servicemembers with limb loss and limb
impairment and support evidence-based practice by allowing
doctors to match servicemembers and veterans with the orthotic
or prosthetic that best works for them. Therefore, the
Committee provides $10,000,000 in support of such comparative
outcomes research and directs the Assistant Secretary of
Defense (Health Affairs) to provide a report not later than 180
days after the enactment of this act to the congressional
defense committees on the peer-reviewed projects that receive
funding. The report should include the funding amount awarded
to each project and the anticipated effect on patient care.
Healthy Base Initiative.--The Committee expects that the
Department will employ a strong underpinning and binding
paradigm to ensure the Department is focused and efficient in
its transition of Healthy Base Initiative [HBI] bases from
locations of multiple, stove-piped, often redundant, and
frequently uncoordinated base-level health and community
programs--and the eventual evolution of the participating HBI
bases to ``Blue Zones.'' The current and most comprehensive
framework for this new paradigm is Total Force Fitness [TFF],
which is already embedded in the Department's doctrine.
Not later than 180 days from enactment of this act, the
Secretary of Defense shall submit a report to the congressional
defense committees that includes a plan for the comprehensive
coordination and delivery of TFF onto the existing health and
community programs of bases selected to participate in the HBI
and similar DOD programs, such as Marine Total Fitness;
Comprehensive Soldier Fitness; Sleep, Activity, and Nutrition
[SAN] program; and family resilience programs. This plan should
address how the DOD will:
--conduct assessments of the scope of TFF domains in the DOD
in order to fully understand the expanse and redundancy
of existing programs;
--evaluate the efficiency and outcomes of existing programs
against TFF metrics;
--conduct realignment of base-level resources to ensure
strong and non-redundant program coverage across each
of the TFF domains;
--coordinate activities across the remaining programs;
--educate servicemembers and their families as to proper
program access and use; and
--conduct continual program and HBI evaluation against the
selected TFF metrics. The Committee encourages the
Department to seek the assistance of expert civilian
and military groups with experience in TFF and whole
systems/whole person integration.
The Committee strongly believes that such an approach to
base-level asset and program management will ensure a strong
and vibrant military community and transition bases into ``Blue
Zones'' of health, wellbeing, and resilience. Accordingly, the
Committee provides $3,000,000 in Operation and Maintenance,
Defense-Wide to expand the Healthy Base Initiative.
Reconstructive Transplantation.--The Committee recognizes
that the science and execution of complex transplants is at a
critical juncture. Transplantation is an important alternative
to prosthetics that restores function and sensation to the
recipient, and the Department has focused its research funding
in this area on the prevention of immune rejection, clinical
monitoring of transplant recipients, and standardization of
processes and protocols. The Committee supports continued
research into reconstructive transplantation in order to
achieve life-changing results for servicemembers and civilians
alike.
Prescription Effectiveness of Psychotropic Medications.--
The Committee supports the Department's efforts to treat
patients diagnosed with behavioral health disorders and
believes that recent efforts to use database-supported methods
in order to increase the accuracy and effectiveness of
prescription practices for mental health medications may not
only achieve cost savings but also improve patient care. The
Committee encourages the Department to continue these efforts
and looks forward to receiving an update once interim results
of this research are realized at the end of this calendar year.
Bioscavenger Medical Countermeasures.--The Committee is
concerned about the recent use of chemical agents in the Middle
East and supports the Department's efforts to develop multiple
nerve agent bioscavengers to protect the warfighter against
chemical nerve agent exposure. The Committee looks forward to
further advancement of this technology and encourages the
Department to consider scalability, productivity, and cost
effectiveness in its development.
Global Health Engagements.--The Department's global health
engagements support combatant commanders' efforts to build the
capacity of partner nations, manage and respond to local health
challenges, and promote regional stability by increasing access
to basic health services. The Committee encourages the
Assistant Secretary of Defense (Health Affairs), in
collaboration with the Uniformed Services University of Health
Sciences, to establish a learning tool to assess the efficiency
and effectiveness of global health engagements in meeting
national security goals.
Trauma Clinical Research Repository.--The Committee
recognizes that trauma-related deaths impact our military
services as well as the general civilian population, and the
life-saving impact of trauma clinical research can be seen on
the battlefield and in civilian trauma response. A trauma
clinical research repository, accessible to both public and
private researchers, would provide an opportunity to make
widely available the data resulting from current and future
research that could lead to significant advances in treatment
and improved outcomes in both the military and civilian
populations. Therefore, the Committee encourages the Department
of Defense to work with other Federal agencies and the private
sector to establish a trauma clinical research repository to
share and maximize critical trauma research data.
Pain Management.--The Committee recognizes that chronic
pain disorders are increasingly prevalent among servicemembers
and commends the Department for its initial steps to leverage
investments by the National Institutes of Health in the
development of the Pain Assessment Screening Tool and Outcomes
Registry [PASTOR] for its use throughout the Military Health
System [MHS]. The Committee encourages the Department to
implement PASTOR throughout the MHS in an effort to inform the
development of evidence-based approaches to chronic pain
management.
The Committee also supports the Department's research and
implementation efforts on holistic, multidisciplinary, and
multimodal approaches in seeking alternatives to opioid
analgesics for pain management. The Army's 2010 Pain Management
Task Force Report found that acupuncture in particular has
proven valuable in reducing an overreliance on use of
medications to treat pain. Recent research has shown the
effectiveness and tremendous promise of acupuncture as a
drugless, stigma-less approach in treating pain, stress,
anxiety, insomnia, and drug addiction. Despite the evidence of
acupuncture's value within the military, it is not universally
available, and there are no standards to guide the clinical
integration of acupuncture into models of care for wounded and
ill servicemembers. The Committee encourages the Department to
research the comparative effectiveness of acupuncture and
develop a comprehensive approach to pain management through the
appropriate integration of acupuncture and other integrative
medicine approaches.
Warfighter Respiratory Health.--The Committee understands
that respiratory diseases affect more than 100,000
servicemembers each year and is concerned about respiratory
ailments among deployed and returning servicemembers. Deployed
military personnel have nearly double the rate of respiratory
symptoms than non-deployed personnel. Beyond the decreased
quality of life for affected servicemembers, respiratory
diseases result in almost 27,000 lost workdays per year
according to the Department. The Committee encourages the
Department to provide adequate resources for research on
respiratory health.
Epilepsy Research.--The Committee is concerned about the
large number of servicemembers who have sustained traumatic
brain injuries [TBI] and are at high risk for developing post-
traumatic epilepsy. As current TBI longitudinal studies have
not included epilepsy, the Committee encourages the Department
to place greater priority on longitudinal epidemiological
research, including epilepsy surveillance, to better understand
the magnitude of the problem and improve patient care and
outcomes. In addition, the Committee urges the Department to
expand research into the mechanisms by which brain injury
produces epilepsy and prevention of epilepsy in those known to
be at high risk.
Melanoma Research.--The Committee understands that melanoma
diagnoses are increasing among Active Duty servicemembers and
that melanoma is the fifth most common cancer among veterans.
Recent research suggests that exposure to high levels of solar
radiation in young adulthood is associated with a higher risk
of melanoma mortality. Given the extreme and harsh conditions
servicemembers face in theater and the rise of this aggressive
and frequently deadly form of cancer, the Committee encourages
the Department to continue its investments in melanoma
research.
DNA Vaccine Technology for Post-Exposure Prophylaxis.--The
Committee is aware the Army is seeking industry partners to
develop a capability for rapid production of polyclonal
antibody-based medical countermeasures to prevent and treat
emerging infectious diseases. The use of DNA vaccines to
stimulate the production of polyclonal antibodies in
anseriformes has shown promise, and the Committee encourages
the Army to continue its research in this area.
Medical Defense Against Infectious Disease.--The Committee
recognizes the importance of medical countermeasures to
naturally occurring infectious diseases that pose a significant
threat to the operational effectiveness of forces deployed
outside the United States. Given the Department's recent
strategic realignment toward the Asia-Pacific region and the
prevalence of infectious diseases, the Committee encourages the
Department to address diseases of military importance by
encouraging collaboration with colleges and universities that
have strong research programs in the areas of malaria,
bacterial diarrhea, and viral diseases.
Convergence Science.--The U.S. Army Medical Research and
Materiel Command [MRMC] is responsible for the research,
development, and acquisition of medical materiel for the
health, protection, and enhanced performance of military
personnel. An emerging element of MRMC's efforts to provide the
most advanced medical technology is convergence science, which
is the merging of life, physical, and engineering sciences to
provide an integrated approach for achieving advances in
medical technology. Medical technology areas characterized by
the convergence science approach are bioinformatics, synthetic
biology, tissue engineering, biomaterials, and computational
biology. This approach is at the cutting edge of technical
advances led by top engineering universities and medical
institutions. The Committee encourages the Army to continue
this important work and advance this pioneering approach to
military medical technology.

Chemical Agents and Munitions Destruction, Defense

Appropriations, 2013\1\................................. $1,300,068,000
Budget estimate, 2014................................... 1,057,123,000
Committee recommendation................................ 1,057,123,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public
Law 112-25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of
$1,057,123,000. This is equal to the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this
appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

CHEM DEMILITARIZATION--OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE .............. 451,572 .............. 451,572 .............. ..............
CHEM DEMILITARIZATION--PROCUREMENT .............. 1,368 .............. 1,368 .............. ..............
CHEM DEMILITARIZATION--RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, .............. 604,183 .............. 604,183 .............. ..............
TEST AND EVALUATION
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, CHEMICAL AGENTS AND MUNITIONS .............. 1,057,123 .............. 1,057,123 .............. ..............
DESTRUCTION, DEFENSE
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense

Appropriations, 2013\1\................................. $1,157,733,000
Budget estimate, 2014................................... 938,545,000
Committee recommendation................................ 1,068,545,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public
Law 112-25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of
$1,068,545,000. This is $130,000,000 above the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by
the Committee:

[In thousands of dollars]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fiscal year Committee Change from
Line Item 2014 request recommendation budget request
------------------------------------------------------------------------
010 Drug 815,965 945,965 +130,000
Interdiction
and Counter-
Drug
Activities
Counter- .............. .............. +130,000
Drug
Program
State
Plans
030 Drug Demand 122,580 122,580 ..............
Reduction
Program
-------------------------------------------------
Total, 938,545 1,068,545 +130,000
Drug
Interdi
ction
and
Counter-
Drug
Activit
ies,
Defense
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Counter-Drug Intelligence Support.--The Committee
understands that the exploitation of open source intelligence,
particularly foreign media activity, has yielded substantial
value to counter-drug efforts. These efforts have created
regional expertise in geographical areas where it is hard or
dangerous to deploy U.S. assets and have provided indications
and warnings of criminal and extremist activity. The Committee
encourages the Department to continue tracking the effect and
influence of local media outlets on civilian populations at the
national and subnational level to provide detailed knowledge of
behavioral changes by groups, governments, and organizations.
National Guard Counter-Drug Schools.--The National Guard
Counter-Drug Schools program has the unique mission of
providing combatant commands, law enforcement agencies,
community-based organizations, and military personnel with
training to support and enhance their capabilities to detect,
interdict, disrupt and curtail drug trafficking. The Committee
feels this training is of utmost importance to ensure public
safety and national security and therefore urges the Department
to reverse the funding decline that this program has
experienced in recent years.

Joint Urgent Operational Needs Fund

Appropriations, 2013\1\.................................................
Budget estimate, 2014................................... $98,800,000
Committee recommendation................................................

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public
Law 112-25.

The Committee recommends no funding for the Joint Urgent
Operational Needs Fund.

Office of the Inspector General

Appropriations, 2013\1\................................. $349,859,000
Budget estimate, 2014................................... 312,131,000
Committee recommendation................................ 348,031,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public
Law 112-25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $348,031,000.
This is $35,900,000 above the budget estimate. This increase is
consistent with S. 1197, the National Defense Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year 2014, as reported.

TITLE VII

RELATED AGENCIES

Central Intelligence Agency Retirement and Disability System Fund

Appropriations, 2013\1\................................. $514,000,000
Budget estimate, 2014................................... 514,000,000
Committee recommendation................................ 514,000,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public
Law 112-25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $514,000,000.
This is equal to the budget estimate.

Intelligence Community Management Account

Appropriations, 2013\1\................................. $533,716,000
Budget estimate, 2014................................... 568,271,000
Committee recommendation................................ 568,671,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public
Law 112-25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $568,671,000.
This is $400,000 above the budget estimate.

TITLE VIII

GENERAL PROVISIONS

The following lists general provisions proposed by the
Committee. The Committee recommends inclusion of several
proposals which have been incorporated in previous
appropriations acts, provisions requested for inclusion by the
Defense Department, and new provisions. The Committee
recommendations are as follows:
Sec. 8001. Publicity/propaganda limitation.--Retains a
provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8002. Compensation/employment of foreign nationals.--
Retains a provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8003. Obligation rate of appropriations.--Retains a
provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8004. Obligations in last 2 months of fiscal year.--
Retains a provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8005. Transfers.--Retains and modifies a provision
carried in previous years.
Sec. 8006. Project Level Adjustments.--Retains a provision
carried in previous years.
Sec. 8007. Establishment of Reprogramming Baseline.--
Retains and modifies a provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8008.Working Capital Fund Cash Disbursements.--Retains
a provision carried in previous year.
Sec. 8009. Special Access Programs Notification.--Retains a
provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8010. Multiyear procurement authority.--Retains and
modifies a provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8011. Humanitarian and Civic Assistance.--Retains a
provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8012. Civilian Personnel Ceilings.--Retains and
modifies a provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8013. Lobbying.--Retains a provision carried in
previous years.
Sec. 8014. Educational benefits and bonuses.--Retains a
provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8015. Mentor-Protege Program.--Retains a provision
carried in previous years.
Sec. 8016. Anchor chains.--Retains a provision carried in
previous years.
Sec. 8017. Demilitarization of surplus firearms.--Retains a
provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8018. Relocations into the National Capital Region.--
Retains a provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8019. Indian Financing Act Incentives.--Retains and
modifies a provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8020. Defense Media Activity.--Retains a provision
carried in previous years.
Sec. 8021. Burdensharing.--Retains a provision carried in
previous years.
Sec. 8022. Civil Air Patrol.--Retains and modifies a
provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8023. Federally Funded Research and Development
Centers.--Retains and modifies a provision carried in previous
years.
Sec. 8024. Carbon, Alloy, or Armor Steel Plate.--Retains a
provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8025. Congressional Defense Committees Definition.--
Retains a provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8026. Depot Maintenance Competition.--Retains a
provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8027. Reciprocal Trade Agreements.--Retains and
modifies a provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8028. Overseas Military Facility Investment.--Retains
a provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8029. Walking Shield.--Retains a provision carried in
previous years.
Sec. 8030. Investment Item Unit Cost.--Retains a provision
carried in previous years.
Sec. 8031. Defense Working Capital Fund/Investment Item.--
Retains and modifies a provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8032. CIA Availability of Funds.--Retains and modifies
a provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8033. GDIP Information System.--Retains a provision
carried in previous years.
Sec. 8034. Indian Tribes Environmental Impact.--Retains and
modifies a provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8035. Compliance With the Buy America Act.--Retains a
provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8036. Competition for Consultants and Studies
Programs.--Retains a provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8037. Field operating agencies.--Retains a provision
carried in previous years.
Sec. 8038. Combat and Camouflage Utility Uniforms.--
Includes a new provision that restricts the design and fielding
of new combat and camouflage utility uniforms.
Sec. 8039. Organizational Analysis/Contraction Out.--
Retains a provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8040. Rescissions.--The Committee recommends a general
provision rescinding funds from the prior years as displayed
below:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Amount
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2012 Appropriations
Weapons Procurement, Navy:
Cruiser Modernization Weapons....................... $33,300,000
Other Procurement, Navy:
CG Modernization.................................... 266,486,000
Aircraft Procurement, Air Force:
C-27J Joint Cargo Aircraft.......................... 442,000,000
F-22................................................ 30,000,000
C-130 AMP........................................... 71,535,000
C-130J Mods--Block 7 upgrades....................... 6,200,000
MQ-9 Mods........................................... 30,000,000

2013 Appropriations
Cooperative Threat Reduction Account:
CTR................................................. 75,000,000
Other Procurement, Army:
Biometrics Enterprise............................... 40,000,000
Force Provider...................................... 5,000,000
CREW................................................ 15,426,000
Aircraft Procurement, Navy:
F/A-18E/F Advance Procurement....................... 30,256,000
Other Procurement, Navy:
Airborne Mine Countermeasures (OASIS termination)... 4,446,000
Aircraft Procurement, Air Force:
C-130J [AP]......................................... 20,000,000
C-27J Joint Cargo Aircraft.......................... 69,524,000
Spares--C-27J Joint Cargo Aircraft.................. 50,000,000
RQ-4: Production close-out.......................... 63,400,000
C-130J Mods: Block 7 upgrades....................... 19,166,000
KC-135 Mods......................................... 17,000,000
Other Procurement, Air Force:
Night Vision Goggles................................ 6,000,000
Procurement, Defense-wide:
DISA--Global Combat Support System.................. 2,703,000
CBDP--Decontamination............................... 464,000
CBDP--Collective Protection......................... 24,199,000
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Army:
IEWS: MFEW.......................................... 12,000,000
Aircraft Mods: UH-60L Digital Cockpit............... 10,000,000
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy:
RETRACT ELM......................................... 21,000,000
Joint Tactical Radio System......................... 30,000,000
Airborne Mine Countermeasures....................... 5,000,000
Line 114: Ship Contract Design...................... 10,000,000
Strategic Sub and Weapon System..................... 11,000,000
Global Command and Control System................... 357,000
RQ-11 UAV........................................... 400,000
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air Force:
Joint Precision Approach and Landing Systems........ 12,104,000
Defense Health Program:
Integrated Electronic Health Record--RDT&E.......... 61,299,000
Integrated Electronic Health Record--Procurement.... 104,600,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sec. 8041. Civilian Technicians Reductions.--Retains a
provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8042. Prohibition on Assistance to North Korea.--
Retains a provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8043. Reimbursement for Reserve Component Intelligence
Personnel.--Retains a provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8044. Civilian Medical Personnel Reductions.--Retains
a provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8045. Counter-Drug Activities Transfer.--Retains a
provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8046. Ball and Roller Bearings.--Retains a provision
carried in previous years.
Sec. 8047. Buy American Computers.--Retains a provision
carried in previous years.
Sec. 8048. Transfer to Other Agencies.--Retains a provision
carried in previous years.
Sec. 8049. Restrictions on Transfer of Equipment and
Supplies.--Retains a provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8050. Contractor Bonuses Due to Business
Restructuring.--Retains a provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8051. Reserve Peacetime Support to Active Duty and
Civilian Activities.--Retains a provision carried in previous
years.
Sec. 8052. Unexpended Balances.--Retains a provision
carried in previous years.
Sec. 8053. National Guard Distance Learning.--Retains a
provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8054. Heating Plants in Europe.--Retains a provision
carried in previous years.
Sec. 8055. End-Item Procurement.--Retains a provisions
carried in previous years.
Sec. 8056. Buy American Waivers.--Retains a provision
carried in previous years.
Sec. 8057. Training of Security Forces of a Foreign
Country.--Retains and modifies a provision carried in previous
years.
Sec. 8058. Repair and Maintenance of Military Family
Housing.--Retains a provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8059. JCTD Project.--Retains a provision carried in
previous years.
Sec. 8060. Secretary of Defense Reporting Requirement.--
Retains a provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8061. Support to Other Government Agencies.--Retains a
provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8062. Missile Defense Authorization.--Retains a
provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8063. Armor Piercing Ammo.--Retains a provision
carried in previous years.
Sec. 8064. Leasing Authority for National Guard Bureau.--
Retains a provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8065. Alcoholic Beverages.--Retains a provision
carried in previous years.
Sec. 8066. O&M, Army transfer.--Retains and modifies a
provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8067. Disbursements.--Retains and modifies a provision
carried in previous years.
Sec. 8068. Global Security Contingency Fund Authority.--
Retains and modifies a provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8069. General and Flag Officer Reduction.--Includes a
new provision reducing funding for General and Flag Officers
Sec. 8070. Israeli Cooperative Programs.--Retains and
modifies a provision carried in previous years.
Sec.8071. Assignment of Forces.--Retains and modifies a
provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8072. Prior Year Shipbuilding.--Retains and modifies a
provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8073. Intelligence Authorization.--Retains and
modifies a provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8074. New Start Authority.--Retains a provision
carried in previous years.
Sec. 8075. Contingency Operations Budget Justification.--
Retains a provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8076. Nuclear Armed Interceptors.--Retains a provision
carried in previous years.
Sec. 8077. Various Grant.--Retains a provision carried in
previous years.
Sec. 8078. 53rd Weather Reconnaissance Squadron.--Retains a
provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8079. Integration of Foreign Intelligence.--Retains a
provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8080. Notification of Reserve Mobilization.--Retains a
provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8081. SCN Transfer Authority.--Retains and modifies a
provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8082. SCN Judgment Fund.--Retains a provision carried
in previous years.
Sec. 8083. Army Tactical UAVs.--Retains a provision carried
in previous years.
Sec. 8084. Asia Pacific Regional Initiative.--Retains a
provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8085. DNI R&D Waiver.--Retains a and modifies
provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8086. Shipbuilding Obligations.--Retains a provision
carried in previous years.
Sec. 8087. Information Sharing.--Retains a provision
carried in previous years
Sec. 8088. Intelligence Baseline for Reprogramming.--
Retains a provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8089. NIP Reprogramming.--Retains a provision carried
in previous years.
Sec. 8090. Future Years Intelligence Budget.--Retains a
provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8091. Congressional Intelligence Committee
Definition.--Retains a provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8092. Cost of War Report.--Retains a provision carried
in previous years.
Sec. 8093. Fisher House Authorization.--Retains a provision
carried in previous years.
Sec. 8094. Defense Acquisition Workforce Development
Fund.--Retains a provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8095. Public Disclosure of Agency Reports.--Retains a
provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8096. Contractor Compliance with the Civil Rights Act
of 1964.--Retains a provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8097. 18th Aggressor Squadron.--Includes a new
provision that restricts transitioning of the Squadron from
Eielson Air Force Base.
Sec. 8098. DOD-VA Medical Facility Demonstration.--Retains
and modifies a provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8099. Travel and Conference Activities.--Retains and
modifies a provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8100. Senior Mentors.--Retains a provision carried in
previous years.
Sec. 8101. Armored Vehicles.--Retains a provision carried
in previous years.
Sec. 8102. Ship Modernization, Operations and Sustainment
Fund.--Retains and modifies a provision carried in previous
years.
Sec. 8103. For Profit Advertising.--Inserts a new provision
that prohibits voluntary military education funding from being
used for advertising and marketing.
Sec. 8104. For Profit Rule.--Inserts a new provision
designating voluntary military education funding as Federal
funding.
Sec. 8105. Superintendent Commission.--Inserts a new
provision that establishes a commission for Superintendents of
Service Academies
Sec. 8106. Economic Assumptions.--Inserts a new provision
on foreign currency fluctuations.
Sec. 8107. Transfer of Detainees to or within the United
States.--Retains and modifies a provision carried in previous
years.
Sec. 8108. Transfer of Detainees to a Foreign Country or
Entity.--Retains and modifies a provision carried in previous
years.
Sec. 8109. Detainee Facilities.--Retains and modifies a
provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8110. Corporations with Tax Liabilities.--Retains a
provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8111. Corporations Convicted of Felonies.--Retains a
provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8112. Procurement of RQ-4B Global Hawk.--Retains and
modifies a provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8113. Rosoboronexport.--Retains and modifies a
provision carried in previous.
Sec. 8114. President of Afghanistan.--Inserts a new
provision that prohibits the United States Government from
obligating or expending money for the personal benefit of the
President of Afghanistan.
Sec. 8115. Sexual Assault Special Victims Program.--Inserts
a new provision that establishes a Sexual Assault Special
Victims Program.
Sec. 8116. Afghanistan Tax.--Inserts a new provision that
requires the Department of Defense to reduce funds for the
Government of Islamic Republic of Afghanistan if taxes, duties,
penalties, and fees are imposed on the United States.
Sec. 8117. Ex Gratia Payments.--Inserts a new provision
regarding ex gratia payments by the United States.
Sec. 8118. Minuteman III Environmental Impact Analysis.--
Inserts a new provision that prohibits the use of funds for an
environmental impact analysis on Minuteman III silos.
Sec. 8119. Syrian Intervention.--Inserts a new provision
that prohibits the use of funds in contravention of the War
Powers Resolution with respect to Syria.

TITLE IX

OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS

Department of Defense--Military

The Committee recommends an appropriation of
$77,623,143,000 for operations related to overseas contingency
operations. In fiscal year 2013 Congress appropriated
$86,954,838,000 for activities funded in this title.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table summarizes the Committee
recommendation:

[In thousands of dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fiscal year Fiscal year Committee
2013 enacted 2014 estimate recommendation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Military Personnel........................................... 14,116,821 9,689,307 9,405,307
Operation and Maintenance.................................... 62,131,012 62,829,052 60,586,019
Procurement.................................................. 8,979,438 5,351,979 5,171,602
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation................... 247,716 116,634 88,708
Revolving and Management Funds............................... 243,600 264,910 264,910
Other Department of Defense Programs......................... 3,096,303 2,306,272 2,157,497
General Provisions (net)..................................... -1,860,052 ............... -50,900
--------------------------------------------------
Total, Overseas Contingency Operations................. 86,954,838 80,558,154 77,623,143
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

OVERVIEW

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

The Committee recommends $77,623,143,000 of additional
appropriations for overseas contingency operations in fiscal
year 2014. This funding will ensure that resources, equipment,
and supplies are available for our servicemembers without
interruption, and will enable the Department to avoid absorbing
operational costs from within baseline programs that are
critical to future readiness and home-station activities.

REPORTING REQUIREMENTS

The Committee directs that the Department of Defense
continue to report incremental contingency operations costs for
Operation Enduring Freedom on a monthly basis in the Cost of
War Execution report as required by Department of Defense
Financial Management Regulation, chapter 23, volume 12. The
Committee further directs the Department to continue providing
the Cost of War reports to the congressional defense committees
that include the following information by appropriation:
funding appropriated, funding allocated, monthly obligations,
monthly disbursements, cumulative fiscal year obligations, and
cumulative fiscal year disbursements.
The Committee expects that in order to meet unanticipated
requirements, the Department of Defense may need to transfer
funds within these appropriations accounts for purposes other
than those specified in this report. The Committee directs the
Department of Defense to follow normal prior approval
reprogramming procedures should it be necessary to transfer
funding between different appropriations accounts in this
title.

MILITARY PERSONNEL

The Committee recommends a total of $9,405,307,000 for pay,
allowances, and other personnel costs for Active, Reserve, and
Guard troops activated for duty in Afghanistan and other
contingency operations. This recommendation includes funding
for subsistence, permanent change of station travel, and
special pays including imminent danger pay, family separation
allowance, and hardship duty pay.

Military Personnel, Army

Appropriations, 2013\1\................................. $9,790,082,000
Budget estimate, 2014................................... 6,747,515,000
Committee recommendation................................ 6,463,515,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public
Law 112-25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of
$6,463,515,000. This is $284,000,000 below the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:

5 Basic Pay 864,052 725,052 -139,000
Improving .............. .............. -139,000
funds
management:
Excess to
requirement
10 Retired Pay 238,058 238,058 ..............
Accrual
25 Basic Allowance 271,092 271,092 ..............
For Housing
30 Basic Allowance 34,598 34,598 ..............
For Subsistence
35 Incentive Pays 5,126 5,126 ..............
40 Special Pays 38,486 38,486 ..............
45 Allowances 19,132 19,132 ..............
50 Separation Pay 88,867 88,867 ..............
55 Social Security 65,940 65,940 ..............
Tax
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL 1,625,351 1,486,351 -139,000
=================================================
BA 2: PAY AND
ALLOWANCES OF
ENLISTED
PERSONNEL

60 Basic Pay 1,925,501 1,848,501 -77,000
Improving .............. .............. -77,000
funds
management:
Excess to
requirement
65 Retired Pay 543,288 543,288 ..............
Accrual
80 Basic Allowance 763,796 763,796 ..............
For Housing
85 Incentive Pays 2,427 2,427 ..............
90 Special Pays 176,568 176,568 ..............
95 Allowances 110,227 110,227 ..............
100 Separation Pay 180,287 180,287 ..............
105 Social Security 147,361 147,361 ..............
Tax
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL 3,849,455 3,772,455 -77,000
=================================================
BA 4:
SUBSISTENCE OF
ENLISTED
PERSONNEL

115 Basic Allowance 251,345 251,345 ..............
For Subsistence
120 Subsistence-In- 500,504 445,504 -55,000
Kind
Improving .............. .............. -55,000
funds
management:
Army
identified
excess to
requirement
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL 751,849 696,849 -55,000
=================================================
BA 5: PERMANENT
CHANGE OF
STATION TRAVEL

125 Accession Travel 11,091 11,091 ..............
130 Training Travel 8,926 8,926 ..............
135 Operational 105,220 105,220 ..............
Travel
140 Rotational 54,677 54,677 ..............
Travel
145 Separation 14,169 14,169 ..............
Travel
150 Travel of 622 622 ..............
Organized Units
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL 194,705 194,705 ..............
=================================================
BA 6: OTHER
MILITARY
PERSONNEL COSTS

175 Interest On 4,745 4,745 ..............
Uniformed
Services
Savings
180 Death Gratuities 7,449 7,449 ..............
185 Unemployment 204,833 191,833 -13,000
Benefits
Improving .............. .............. -13,000
Funds
Management:
Excess to
requirement
212 Reserve Income 40 40 ..............
Replacement
Program
216 SGLI Extra 73,261 73,261 ..............
Hazard Payments
219 Traumatic Injury 35,827 35,827 ..............
Protection
Coverage [T-
SGLI]
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL 326,155 313,155 -13,000
=================================================
TOTAL--MIL 6,747,515 6,463,515 -284,000
ITARY
PERSONNEL
, ARMY
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Military Personnel, Navy

Appropriations, 2013\1\................................. $774,225,000
Budget estimate, 2014................................... 558,344,000
Committee recommendation................................ 558,344,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public
Law 112-25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $558,344,000.
This is equal to the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:

5 Basic Pay 99,067 99,067 ..............
10 Retired Pay 24,271 24,271 ..............
Accrual
25 Basic Allowance 31,959 31,959 ..............
For Housing
30 Basic Allowance 3,427 3,427 ..............
For Subsistence
35 Incentive Pays 749 749 ..............
40 Special Pays 4,858 4,858 ..............
45 Allowances 7,458 7,458 ..............
55 Social Security 7,579 7,579 ..............
Tax
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL 179,368 179,368 ..............
=================================================
BA 2: PAY AND
ALLOWANCES OF
ENLISTED
PERSONNEL

60 Basic Pay 108,938 108,938 ..............
65 Retired Pay 26,690 26,690 ..............
Accrual
80 Basic Allowance 51,780 51,780 ..............
For Housing
85 Incentive Pays 296 296 ..............
90 Special Pays 11,931 11,931 ..............
95 Allowances 16,447 16,447 ..............
100 Separation Pay 179 179 ..............
105 Social Security 8,334 8,334 ..............
Tax
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL 224,595 224,595 ..............
=================================================
BA 4:
SUBSISTENCE OF
ENLISTED
PERSONNEL

115 Basic Allowance 12,359 12,359 ..............
For Subsistence
120 Subsistence-In- 22,956 22,956 ..............
Kind
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL 35,315 35,315 ..............
=================================================
BA 5: PERMANENT
CHANGE OF
STATION TRAVEL

125 Accession Travel 3,071 3,071 ..............
135 Operational 1,353 1,353 ..............
Travel
140 Rotational 2,559 2,559 ..............
Travel
145 Separation 4,472 4,472 ..............
Travel
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL 11,455 11,455 ..............
=================================================
BA 6: OTHER
MILITARY
PERSONNEL COSTS

180 Death Gratuities 1,200 1,200 ..............
185 Unemployment 62,168 62,168 ..............
Benefits
216 SGLI Extra 44,243 44,243 ..............
Hazard Payments
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL 107,611 107,611 ..............
=================================================
TOTAL--MIL 558,344 558,344 ..............
ITARY
PERSONNEL
, NAVY
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Military Personnel, Marine Corps

Appropriations, 2013\1\................................. $1,425,156,000
Budget estimate, 2014................................... 1,019,322,000
Committee recommendation................................ 1,019,322,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public
Law 112-25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of
$1,019,322,000. This is equal to the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:

5 Basic Pay 143,065 143,065 ..............
10 Retired Pay 41,321 41,321 ..............
Accrual
25 Basic Allowance 48,408 48,408 ..............
For Housing
30 Basic Allowance 6,073 6,073 ..............
For Subsistence
40 Special Pays 4,120 4,120 ..............
45 Allowances 4,155 4,155 ..............
50 Separation Pay 43,118 43,118 ..............
55 Social Security 10,937 10,937 ..............
Tax
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL 301,197 301,197 ..............
=================================================
BA 2: PAY AND
ALLOWANCES OF
ENLISTED
PERSONNEL

60 Basic Pay 267,486 267,486 ..............
65 Retired Pay 81,344 81,344 ..............
Accrual
80 Basic Allowance 89,578 89,578 ..............
For Housing
90 Special Pays 25,141 25,141 ..............
95 Allowances 16,905 16,905 ..............
100 Separation Pay 78,956 78,956 ..............
105 Social Security 20,463 20,463 ..............
Tax
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL 579,873 579,873 ..............
=================================================
BA 4:
SUBSISTENCE OF
ENLISTED
PERSONNEL

115 Basic Allowance 45,965 45,965 ..............
For Subsistence
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL 45,965 45,965 ..............
=================================================
BA 5: PERMANENT
CHANGE OF
STATION TRAVEL

140 Rotational 19,481 19,481 ..............
Travel
145 Separation 4,371 4,371 ..............
Travel
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL 23,852 23,852 ..............
=================================================
BA 6: OTHER
MILITARY
PERSONNEL COSTS

175 Interest on 930 930 ..............
Uniformed
Services
Savings
180 Death Gratuities 7,000 7,000 ..............
185 Unemployment 37,733 37,733 ..............
Benefits
216 SGLI Extra 22,772 22,772 ..............
Hazard Payments
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL 68,435 68,435 ..............
=================================================
TOTAL--MIL 1,019,322 1,019,322 ..............
ITARY
PERSONNEL
, MARINE
CORPS
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Military Personnel, Air Force

Appropriations, 2013\1\................................. $1,286,783,000
Budget estimate, 2014................................... 867,087,000
Committee recommendation................................ 867,087,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public
Law 112-25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $867,087,000.
This is equal to the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:

5 Basic Pay 131,007 131,007 ..............
10 Retired Pay 32,097 32,097 ..............
Accrual
25 Basic Allowance 39,926 39,926 ..............
For Housing
30 Basic Allowance 4,696 4,696 ..............
For Subsistence
40 Special Pays 7,394 7,394 ..............
45 Allowances 8,449 8,449 ..............
55 Social Security 10,022 10,022 ..............
Tax
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL 233,591 233,591 ..............
=================================================
BA 2: PAY AND
ALLOWANCES OF
ENLISTED
PERSONNEL

60 Basic Pay 229,591 229,591 ..............
65 Retired Pay 56,250 56,250 ..............
Accrual
80 Basic Allowance 95,564 95,564 ..............
For Housing
90 Special Pays 29,262 29,262 ..............
95 Allowances 25,480 25,480 ..............
105 Social Security 17,564 17,564 ..............
Tax
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL 453,711 453,711 ..............
=================================================
BA 4:
SUBSISTENCE OF
ENLISTED
PERSONNEL

115 Basic Allowance 24,177 24,177 ..............
For Subsistence
120 Subsistence-In- 72,502 72,502 ..............
Kind
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL 96,679 96,679 ..............
=================================================
BA 5: PERMANENT
CHANGE OF
STATION TRAVEL

135 Operational 4,003 4,003 ..............
Travel
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL 4,003 4,003 ..............
=================================================
BA 6: OTHER
MILITARY
PERSONNEL COSTS

180 Death Gratuities 600 600 ..............
185 Unemployment 28,841 28,841 ..............
Benefits
216 SGLI Extra 49,662 49,662 ..............
Hazard Payments
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL 79,103 79,103 ..............
=================================================
TOTAL--MIL 867,087 867,087 ..............
ITARY
PERSONNEL
, AIR
FORCE
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Reserve Personnel, Army

Appropriations, 2013\1\................................. $156,893,000
Budget estimate, 2014................................... 40,952,000
Committee recommendation................................ 40,952,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public
Law 112-25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $40,952,000.
This is equal to the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:

10 Pay Group A 10,494 10,494 ..............
Training (15
Days & Drills
24/48)
80 Special Training 30,458 30,458 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL 40,952 40,952 ..............
=================================================
TOTAL, 40,952 40,952 ..............
RESERVE
PERSONNEL
, ARMY
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Reserve Personnel, Navy

Appropriations, 2013\1\................................. $39,335,000
Budget estimate, 2014................................... 20,238,000
Committee recommendation................................ 20,238,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public
Law 112-25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $20,238,000.
This is equal to the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:

70 School Training 1,753 1,753 ..............
80 Special Training 18,100 18,100 ..............
90 Administration 385 385 ..............
And Support
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL 20,238 20,238 ..............
=================================================
TOTAL--RES 20,238 20,238 ..............
ERVE
PERSONNEL
, NAVY
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Reserve Personnel, Marine Corps

Appropriations, 2013\1\................................. $24,722,000
Budget estimate, 2014................................... 15,134,000
Committee recommendation................................ 15,134,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public
Law 112-25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $15,134,000.
This is equal to the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:

70 School Training 3,213 3,213 ..............
80 Special Training 11,679 11,679 ..............
90 Administration 242 242 ..............
And Support
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL 15,134 15,134 ..............
=================================================
TOTAL--RES 15,134 15,134 ..............
ERVE
PERSONNEL
, MARINE
CORPS
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Reserve Personnel, Air Force

Appropriations, 2013\1\................................. $25,348,000
Budget estimate, 2014................................... 20,432,000
Committee recommendation................................ 20,432,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public
Law 112-25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $20,432,000.
This is equal to the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:

80 Special Training 20,432 20,432 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL 20,432 20,432 ..............
=================================================
TOTAL--RES 20,432 20,432 ..............
ERVE
PERSONNEL
, AIR
FORCE
------------------------------------------------------------------------

National Guard Personnel, Army

Appropriations, 2013\1\................................. $583,804,000
Budget estimate, 2014................................... 393,364,000
Committee recommendation................................ 393,364,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public
Law 112-25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $393,364,000.
This is equal to the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:

10 Pay Group A 50,638 50,638 ..............
Training (15
Days & Drills
24/48)
70 School Training 19,444 19,444 ..............
80 Special Training 286,096 286,096 ..............
90 Administration 37,186 37,186 ..............
And Support
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL 393,364 393,364 ..............
=================================================
TOTAL, 393,364 393,364 ..............
NATIONAL
GUARD
PERSONNEL
, ARMY
------------------------------------------------------------------------

National Guard Personnel, Air Force

Appropriations, 2013\1\................................. $10,473,000
Budget estimate, 2014................................... 6,919,000
Committee recommendation................................ 6,919,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public
Law 112-25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $6,919,000.
This is equal to the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:

80 Special Training 6,919 6,919 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL 6,919 6,919 ..............
=================================================
TOTAL--NAT 6,919 6,919 ..............
IONAL
GUARD
PERSONNEL
, AIR
FORCE
------------------------------------------------------------------------

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE

The Committee recommends $60,586,019,000 for the operation
and maintenance accounts. These funds are available to fund
overseas deployments and other activities by the services and
Special Operations Forces to include financing flying hours,
ship steaming days, ground operations, special airlift
missions, increased ship and aircraft maintenance, logistics
support, fuel purchases, base support, civilian personnel,
personnel support costs, overseas transportation,
communications support, facility management, and other
operation and maintenance requirements.

Operation and Maintenance, Army

Appropriations, 2013\1\................................. $28,452,018,000
Budget estimate, 2014................................... 29,279,633,000
Committee recommendation................................ 28,663,919,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public
Law 112-25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of
$28,663,919,000. This is $615,714,000 below the budget
estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:

Commanders Emergency Response Program.--The Committee
recommends $50,000,000 for the Commanders Emergency Response
Program [CERP] in Afghanistan in fiscal year 2014. The
Committee directs the Army to submit monthly commitment,
obligation, and expenditure data for CERP to the congressional
defense committees no later than 30 days after each month.
CERP Projects.--The Committee includes language in the
Commander's Emergency Response Program [CERP] general provision
that requires all projects executed under this authority shall
be small scale, and shall not exceed $20,000,000 in cost
(including any ancillary or related elements in connection with
such project).

Operation and Maintenance, Navy

Appropriations, 2013\1\................................. $5,839,934,000
Budget estimate, 2014................................... 6,067,993,000
Committee recommendation................................ 5,329,960,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public
Law 112-25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of
$5,329,960,000. This is $738,033,000 below the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:

Operation and Maintenance, Marine Corps

Appropriations, 2013\1\................................. $4,116,340,000
Budget estimate, 2014................................... 2,669,815,000
Committee recommendation................................ 2,603,329,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public
Law 112-25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of
$2,603,329,000. This is $66,486,000 below the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:

Operation and Maintenance, Air Force

Appropriations, 2013\1\................................. $9,249,736,000
Budget estimate, 2014................................... 10,005,224,000
Committee recommendation................................ 9,964,224,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public
Law 112-25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of
$9,964,224,000. This is $41,000,000 below the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:

Operation and Maintenance, Defense-Wide

Appropriations, 2013\1\................................. $7,714,079,000
Budget estimate, 2014................................... 6,435,078,000
Committee recommendation................................ 6,435,078,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public
Law 112-25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of
$6,435,078,000. This is equal to the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:

Beyond Yellow Ribbon Programs.--The Committee provides an
additional $15,000,000 for the Yellow Ribbon Reintegration
Program Office under the Defense Human Resource Activity and
directs using the funds for National Guard and Reserve outreach
and reintegration programs, National Guard and Reserve
employment enhancement programs and peer-to-peer hotline
services for mental health and suicide prevention initiatives.
For the peer-to-peer hotline services, the Committee encourages
continued coordination between the Defense Human Resource
Activity, the National Guard Bureau and the Assistant Secretary
of Defense for Reserve Affairs.

Operation and Maintenance, Army Reserve

Appropriations, 2013\1\................................. $157,887,000
Budget estimate, 2014................................... 42,935,000
Committee recommendation................................ 42,935,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public
Law 112-25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $42,935,000.
This is equal to the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:

Operation and Maintenance, Navy Reserve

Appropriations, 2013\1\................................. $55,924,000
Budget estimate, 2014................................... 55,700,000
Committee recommendation................................ 55,700,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public
Law 112-25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $55,700,000.
This is equal to the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:

Operation and Maintenance, Marine Corps Reserve

Appropriations, 2013\1\................................. $25,477,000
Budget estimate, 2014................................... 12,534,000
Committee recommendation................................ 12,534,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public
Law 112-25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $12,534,000.
This is equal to the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:

Operation and Maintenance, Air Force Reserve

Appropriations, 2013\1\................................. $60,618,000
Budget estimate, 2014................................... 32,849,000
Committee recommendation................................ 32,849,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public
Law 112-25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $32,849,000.
This is equal to the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:

Operation and Maintenance, Army National Guard

Appropriations, 2013\1\................................. $392,448,000
Budget estimate, 2014................................... 199,371,000
Committee recommendation................................ 199,371,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public
Law 112-25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $199,371,000.
This is equal to the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:

Operation and Maintenance, Air National Guard

Appropriations, 2013\1\................................. $34,500,000
Budget estimate, 2014................................... 22,200,000
Committee recommendation................................ 22,200,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public
Law 112-25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $22,200,000.
This is equal to the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:

Afghanistan Infrastructure Fund

Appropriations, 2013\1\................................. $325,000,000
Budget estimate, 2014................................... 279,000,000
Committee recommendation................................ 279,000,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public
Law 112-25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $279,000,000.
This is equal to the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:

Afghanistan Security Forces Fund

Appropriations, 2013\1\................................. $5,124,167,000
Budget estimate, 2014................................... 7,726,720,000
Committee recommendation................................ 6,944,920,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public
Law 112-25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of
$6,944,920,000. This is $781,800,000 below the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:

Afghanistan Security Forces Fund.--The fiscal year 2014
request for the Afghanistan Security Forces Fund [ASFF] is
$7,726,727,000. This amount is a 50 percent increase from the
$5,124,167,000 funded in fiscal year 2013. Of this request,
$5,111,720,000 is for training, equipping and sustainment of
the Afghan national security forces [ANSF]. The request also
includes $2,615,000,000 for critical ``enablers.'' The critical
enablers request procures mobile strike vehicles, night vision
technology, howitzers, counter-improvised explosive device
technology for the ANSF and $1,126,900,000 for aircraft to
support the Afghanistan Air Force and the Afghan Special
Mission Wing.
In June, the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan
Reconstruction [SIGAR] issued a report raising doubts on the
Afghans' ability to fly and maintain Mi-17 aircraft for the
Afghan Special Mission Wing. The report also raised concern
over the Afghan military's ability to maintain the aircraft and
lack of Afghan pilots. In responding to the SIGAR's report, the
Department stated that the Special Mission Wing is only 1 year
old and logistics and maintenance capabilities are being
developed. The Committee is also concerned about conducting
additional business with the Russian company, Rosoboronexport,
the sole supplier of the Mi-17 helicopter. Therefore, the
Committee recommends a reduction to ASFF enablers in the amount
of $365,000,000 for the Mi-17 helicopter and maintains a
general provision prohibiting the Department from entering into
a contract with Rosoboronexport.
The Committee also recommends a reduction to ASFF enablers
in the amount of $416,800,000 for additional light air support
[LAS] aircraft. The budget request proposed funding for an
additional 20 light support aircraft for Afghanistan. The
original requirement that was outlined in 2009 identified a
need for only 20 aircraft; after several setbacks, that
contract was recently awarded by the Air Force with fiscal year
2012 funds. However, the fiscal year 2014 budget requests
funding for an additional 20 aircraft even though the
Department of Defense has not identified a requirement for more
LAS aircraft beyond the 20 that were awarded.
Recruiting and Retention of Women in Afghanistan National
Security Forces.--Of the funds provided for the Afghanistan
Security Forces Fund, the Committee directs that $15,000,000 be
directed toward the recruitment and retention of women in the
Afghan security forces. The funds should be focused on, but not
limited to, providing appropriate equipment for female security
and police forces, modification of facilities to allow for
female participation within the security and police forces and
training to include literacy training for women recruits but
also gender awareness training for male counterparts. The
Committee directs the Department of Defense to provide periodic
updates to the congressional defense committees on the efforts
to increase women participation in the Afghan armed forces.
Building Partnership Capacity [BPC] Program.--The BPC
program is an important force multiplier that enables the
United States military to build the capacity of partner nations
through the training and equipping of their counterterrorism,
counternarcotics, and counterinsurgency units. The Committee
concurs with the stated intent of the Air Force that the
indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity light air support [LAS]
contract for Afghanistan will not be used by any other nation
for future BPC program purchases. According to Air Force
testimony, the BPC program would provide a LAS capability to as
many as 27 nations. This would create a program of record in
excess of $9,500,000,000 if all other nations purchase at a
minimum the same number of planes as Afghanistan. As a result,
this program should be defined as a Major Defense Acquisition
Program [MDAP] as defined under chapter 144 of title 10 of
United States Code, with all provisions and reporting
requirements of such chapter applying to the program, and
should be reviewed within the regulatory review process
established by the Secretary of Defense for MDAPs. The
Committee directs the acquisition executive to ensure all
acquisitions under this program be in accordance with
Department of Defense regulations and procedures.

PROCUREMENT

The Committee recommends $5,171,602,000 for the procurement
accounts. The overseas contingency operations funding supports
our forces engaged in Operation Enduring Freedom and other
contingency operations. The Committee provides funding to
replace combat losses and equipment left behind in theater,
augment and upgrade equipment for deploying units, sustain
munitions and other war consumables, and reset the units
returning home to an equipment-ready status. Funding
adjustments have been made in instances where the requirement
was poorly defined, funding was requested ahead of need or
program execution has been delayed.

Aircraft Procurement, Army

Appropriations, 2013\1\................................. $550,700,000
Budget estimate, 2014................................... 771,788,000
Committee recommendation................................ 633,300,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public
Law 112-25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $633,300,000.
This is $138,488,000 below the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:

Saturn Arch.--The Army requests $48,000,000 to procure four
Saturn Arch aircraft. In March 2013, the Army received the
mission for the Saturn Arch program as well as eight aircraft
to complete the mission. The fiscal year 2014 budget requests
an additional four aircraft for this mission. The Committee
recommends no funds for the additional aircraft since the Army
has provided no justification for these aircraft.

Missile Procurement, Army

Appropriations, 2013\1\................................. $67,951,000
Budget estimate, 2014................................... 128,645,000
Committee recommendation................................ 128,645,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public
Law 112-25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $128,645,000.
This is equal to the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:

Procurement of Ammunition, Army

Appropriations, 2013\1\................................. $338,493,000
Budget estimate, 2014................................... 180,900,000
Committee recommendation................................ 190,900,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public
Law 112-25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $190,900,000.
This is $10,000,000 above the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:

Other Procurement, Army

Appropriations, 2013\1\................................. $1,740,157,000
Budget estimate, 2014................................... 603,123,000
Committee recommendation................................ 603,902,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public
Law 112-25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $603,902,000.
This is $779,000 above the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:

Aircraft Procurement, Navy

Appropriations, 2013\1\................................. $215,698,000
Budget estimate, 2014................................... 240,696,000
Committee recommendation................................ 211,176,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public
Law 112-25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $211,176,000.
This is $29,520,000 below the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:

Weapons Procurement, Navy

Appropriations, 2013\1\................................. $22,500,000
Budget estimate, 2014................................... 86,500,000
Committee recommendation................................ 86,500,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public
Law 112-25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $86,500,000.
This is equal to the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:

Procurement of Ammunition, Navy and Marine Corps

Appropriations, 2013\1\................................. $283,059,000
Budget estimate, 2014................................... 206,821,000
Committee recommendation................................ 206,821,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public
Law 112-25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $206,821,000.
This is equal to the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:

Other Procurement, Navy

Appropriations, 2013\1\................................. $98,882,000
Budget estimate, 2014................................... 17,968,000
Committee recommendation................................ 17,968,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public
Law 112-25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $17,968,000.
This is equal to the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:

Procurement, Marine Corps

Appropriations, 2013\1\................................. $822,054,000
Budget estimate, 2014................................... 129,584,000
Committee recommendation................................ 126,686,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public
Law 112-25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $126,686,000.
This is $2,898,000 below the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:

Aircraft Procurement, Air Force

Appropriations, 2013\1\................................. $305,600,000
Budget estimate, 2014................................... 115,668,000
Committee recommendation................................ 115,668,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public
Law 112-25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $115,668,000.
This is equal to the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:

Missile Procurement, Air Force

Appropriations, 2013\1\................................. $34,350,000
Budget estimate, 2014................................... 24,200,000
Committee recommendation................................ 24,200,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public
Law 112-25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $24,200,000.
This is equal to the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:

Procurement of Ammunition, Air Force

Appropriations, 2013\1\................................. $116,203,000
Budget estimate, 2014................................... 159,965,000
Committee recommendation................................ 159,965,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public
Law 112-25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $159,965,000.
This is equal to the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:

Other Procurement, Air Force

Appropriations, 2013\1\................................. $2,680,270,000
Budget estimate, 2014................................... 2,574,846,000
Committee recommendation................................ 2,554,596,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public
Law 112-25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of
$2,554,596,000. This is $20,250,000 below the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:

Procurement, Defense-Wide

Appropriations, 2013\1\................................. $188,099,000
Budget estimate, 2014................................... 111,275,000
Committee recommendation................................ 111,275,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public
Law 112-25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $111,275,000.
This is equal to the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:

RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST AND EVALUATION

The Committee recommends $88,708,000 for research,
development, test and evaluation.

Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Army

Appropriations, 2013\1\................................. $29,660,000
Budget estimate, 2014................................... 7,000,000
Committee recommendation................................ 13,500,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public
Law 112-25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $13,500,000.
This is $6,500,000 above the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:

Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy

Appropriations, 2013\1\................................. $52,519,000
Budget estimate, 2014................................... 34,426,000
Committee recommendation................................................

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public
Law 112-25.

The Committee recommends no appropriation.

Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air Force

Appropriations, 2013\1\................................. $53,150,000
Budget estimate, 2014................................... 9,000,000
Committee recommendation................................ 9,000,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public
Law 112-25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $9,000,000.
This is equal to the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:

Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-Wide

Appropriations, 2013\1\................................. $112,387,000
Budget estimate, 2014................................... 66,208,000
Committee recommendation................................ 66,208,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public
Law 112-25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $66,208,000.
This is equal to the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:

REVOLVING AND MANAGEMENT FUNDS

Defense Working Capital Funds

Appropriations, 2013\1\................................. $243,600,000
Budget estimate, 2014................................... 264,910,000
Committee recommendation................................ 264,910,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public
Law 112-25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $264,910,000.
This is equal to the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the programs recommended by the
Committee:

OTHER DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE PROGRAMS

Defense Health Program

Appropriations, 2013\1\................................. $993,898,000
Budget estimate, 2014................................... 904,201,000
Committee recommendation................................ 898,701,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public
Law 112-25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $898,701,000.
This is $5,500,000 below the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:

Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense

Appropriations, 2013\1\................................. $469,025,000
Budget estimate, 2014................................... 376,305,000
Committee recommendation................................ 376,305,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public
Law 112-25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $376,305,000.
This is equal to the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:

Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Fund

Appropriations, 2013\1\................................. $1,622,614,000
Budget estimate, 2014................................... 1,000,000,000
Committee recommendation................................ 871,725,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public
Law 112-25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $871,725,000.
This is $128,275,000 below the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:

Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Organization.--
JIEDDO continues to support an important mission protecting our
troops from improvised explosive devices [IED]. The fiscal year
2014 request is $1,000,000,000 in overseas contingency
operations. The Committee remains concerned with lack of
justification and redundancy in the JIEDDO program. Therefore,
the Committee reduces the fiscal year 2014 request by
$128,275,000 for specific activities that have been terminated
since the budget was submitted, lack of justification, or are
duplicative of other ongoing counter-IED efforts. The Committee
concurs with S. 1197, the National Defense Authorization Act
for fiscal year 2014, as reported, in regard to training the
force; however, retains the funding in JIEDDO for fiscal year
2014. The Committee directs all future counter-IED training to
be conducted by the appropriate service. The Committee also
rescinds $59,000,000 as a result of terminated programs.
Lastly, the Committee is concerned with JIEDDO's use of
contractors. JIEDDO has 93 individual service contracts which
authorizes 2,333 contractor positions, some of which are doing
inherit government work. In addition, the committee is
concerned with the costs of the contractors. For example, the
Contractor Support Services contract is for 361 people and
costs $83,400,000, which is roughly $230,700 per position;
whereas the costs of a government civilian is approximately
$100,000 less per full-time equivalent. As a result, the
Committee recommends a 25 percent reduction or $45,000,000 to
the staff and infrastructure request.

Joint Urgent Operational Needs Fund

Appropriations, 2013\1\.................................................
Budget estimate, 2014................................... $15,000,000
Committee recommendation................................................

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public
Law 112-25.

The Committee recommends no funding for the Joint Urgent
Operational Needs Fund.

Office of the Inspector General

Appropriations, 2013\1\................................. $10,766,000
Budget estimate, 2014................................... 10,766,000
Committee recommendation................................ 10,766,000

\1\Does not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public
Law 112-25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $10,766,000.
This is equal to the budget estimate.

GENERAL PROVISIONS--THIS TITLE

Sec. 9001. Provides that funds made available in this title
are in addition to amounts appropriated or made available for
the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2014.
Sec. 9002. Provides special transfer authority of up to
$4,000,000,000 of funds in this title, subject to the terms and
conditions in this act.
Sec. 9003. Provides the authority to obligate supervision
and administration costs associated with overseas construction
projects at the time the project was awarded.
Sec. 9004. Provides for the procurement of motor vehicles
for use by military and civilian employees of the Department of
Defense in Afghanistan.
Sec. 9005. Provides authority up to $50,000,000 of funds in
this title to fund the Commander's Emergency Response Program.
Sec. 9006. Provides for the use of funds to lift and
sustain coalition forces supporting military and stability
operations in Iraq and Afghanistan and requires quarterly
reports to the congressional defense committees.
Sec. 9007. Prohibits the use of funds made available in
this act to establish any permanent military installation or
base in Iraq or Afghanistan.
Sec. 9008. Prohibits the use of funds in this act to
contravene laws enacted or regulations promulgated to implement
the United Nations Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel,
Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment.
Sec. 9009. Requires the Afghanistan Resource Oversight
Council to oversee several programs in Afghanistan.
Sec. 9010. Provides authority for funding the Task Force
for Business and Stability Operations.
Sec. 9012. Provides authority for funding the activities of
the Office of Security Cooperation in Iraq.
Sec. 9013. Recessions.--The Committee recommends a general
provision rescinding funds from prior years as displayed below:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Amount
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2009/XXXX Appropriations
General Provisions:
Retroactive Stop Loss Special Pay Program........... $50,900,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMPLIANCE WITH PARAGRAPH 7, RULE XVI OF THE STANDING RULES OF THE
SENATE

Paragraph 7 of rule XVI requires that Committee reports on
general appropriations bills identify each Committee amendment
to the House bill ``which proposes an item of appropriation
which is not made to carry out the provisions of an existing
law, a treaty stipulation, or an act or resolution previously
passed by the Senate during that session.''
The Committee is filing an original bill, which is not
covered under this rule, but reports this information in the
spirit of full disclosure.
The Committee recommends funding for the following accounts
which currently lack authorization for fiscal year 2014:
Military Personnel, Army
Military Personnel, Navy
Military Personnel, Marine Corps
Military Personnel, Air Force
Reserve Personnel, Army
Reserve Personnel, Navy
Reserve Personnel, Marine Corps
Reserve Personnel, Air Force
National Guard Personnel, Army
National Guard Personnel, Air Force
Operation and Maintenance, Army
Operation and Maintenance, Navy
Operation and Maintenance, Marine Corps
Operation and Maintenance, Air Force
Operation and Maintenance, Defense-Wide
Operation and Maintenance, Army Reserve
Operation and Maintenance, Navy Reserve
Operation and Maintenance, Marine Corps Reserve
Operation and Maintenance, Air Force Reserve
Operation and Maintenance, Army National Guard
Operation and Maintenance, Air National Guard
United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
Environmental Restoration, Army
Environmental Restoration, Navy
Environmental Restoration, Air Force
Environmental Restoration, Defense-Wide
Environmental Restoration, Formerly Used Defense Sites
Overseas Humanitarian, Disaster, and Civic Aid
Cooperative Threat Reduction Account
Afghanistan Security Forces Fund
Afghanistan Infrastructure Fund
Aircraft Procurement, Army
Missile Procurement, Army
Procurement of Weapons and Tracked Combat Vehicles, Army
Procurement of Ammunition, Army
Other Procurement, Army
Aircraft Procurement, Navy
Weapons Procurement, Navy
Procurement of Ammunition, Navy and Marine Corps
Shipbuilding and Conversion, Navy
Carrier Replacement Program
Virginia Class Submarine
Virginia Class Submarine [AP]
CVN Refueling Overhaul
CVN Refueling Overhauls [AP]
DDG-1000 Program
DDG-51 Destroyer
DDG-51 Destroyer [AP]
Littoral Combat Ship
Afloat Forward Staging Base
Joint High Speed Vessel
Moored Training Ship
LCAC Service Life Extension Program
Outfitting, Post Delivery, Conversions and First
Destination Transportation
Completion of Prior year Shipbuilding Programs
Other Procurement, Navy
Procurement, Marine Corps
Aircraft Procurement, Air Force
Missile Procurement, Air Force
Procurement of Ammunition, Air Force
Other Procurement, Air Force
Procurement, Defense-Wide
National Guard and Reserve Equipment
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Army
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air Force
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-Wide
Operational Test and Evaluation, Defense
Defense Working Capital Funds
National Defense Sealift Fund
Defense Health Program
Chemical Agents and Munitions Destruction, Defense
Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense
Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Fund
Office of the Inspector General
Central Intelligence Agency Retirement and Disability
System Fund
Intelligence Community Management Account
Ship Modernization, Operations and Sustainment Fund

COMPLIANCE WITH PARAGRAPH 7(c), RULE XXVI OF THE STANDING RULES OF THE
SENATE

Pursuant to paragraph 7(c) of rule XXVI, on August 1, 2013,
the Committee ordered favorably an original bill (S. 1429)
making appropriations for the Department of Defense for the
fiscal year ending September 30, 2014, and for other purposes,
provided that the bill be subject to further amendment and that
the bill be consistent with its spending allocations, by a
recorded vote of 22-8, a quorum being present. The vote was as
follows:
Yeas Nays
Chairwoman Mikulski Mr. Shelby
Mr. Leahy Mr. McConnell
Mr. Harkin Mr. Alexander
Mrs. Murray Mr. Graham
Mrs. Feinstein Mr. Coats
Mr. Durbin Mr. Hoeven
Mr. Johnson Mr. Johanns
Ms. Landrieu Mr. Boozman
Mr. Reed
Mr. Pryor
Mr. Tester
Mr. Udall
Mrs. Shaheen
Mr. Merkley
Mr. Begich
Mr. Coons
Mr. Cochran
Ms. Collins
Ms. Murkowski
Mr. Kirk
Mr. Blunt
Mr. Moran

COMPLIANCE WITH PARAGRAPH 12, RULE XXVI OF THE STANDING RULES OF THE
SENATE

Paragraph 12 of rule XXVI requires that Committee reports
on a bill or joint resolution repealing or amending any statute
or part of any statute include ``(a) the text of the statute or
part thereof which is proposed to be repealed; and (b) a
comparative print of that part of the bill or joint resolution
making the amendment and of the statute or part thereof
proposed to be amended, showing by stricken-through type and
italics, parallel columns, or other appropriate typographical
devices the omissions and insertions which would be made by the
bill or joint resolution if enacted in the form recommended by
the Committee.''
The Committee bill as recommended contains no such
provisions.

BUDGETARY IMPACT OF BILL

PREPARED IN CONSULTATION WITH THE CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE PURSUANT TO SEC. 308(a), PUBLIC LAW 93-344, AS
AMENDED
[In millions of dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Budget authority Outlays
----------------------------------------------------
Committee Amount in Committee Amount in
guidance\1\ bill guidance bill
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comparison of amounts in the bill with Committee guidance
to its subcommittees of amounts in the budget resolution
for 2014: Subcommittee on Defense:
Mandatory.............................................. NA 514 NA \2\514
Discretionary.......................................... 516,624 594,411 NA \2\585,968
Security........................................... 516,416 594,203 NA NA
Nonsecurity........................................ 208 208 NA NA
Projections of outlays associated with the recommendation:
2014................................................... ............ ........... ........... \3\375,597
2015................................................... ............ ........... ........... 131,658
2016................................................... ............ ........... ........... 47,307
2017................................................... ............ ........... ........... 20,762
2018 and future years.................................. ............ ........... ........... 13,671
Financial assistance to State and local governments for NA ........... NA ...........
2014......................................................

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\There is no section 302(a) allocation to the Committee in fiscal year 2014.
\2\Includes outlays from prior-year budget authority.
\3\Excludes outlays from prior-year budget authority.

NA: Not applicable.

Consistent with the funding recommended in the bill for overseas contingency operations and in accordance with
section 251(b)(2)(A)(II) of the BBEDCA of 1985, the Committee anticipates that the Budget Committee will
provide, at the appropriate time, section 302(a) allocation for the Committee on Appropriations reflecting an
upward adjustment of $77,787,000,000 in budget authority plus associated outlays.

COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF NEW BUDGET (OBLIGATIONAL) AUTHORITY FOR FISCAL YEAR 2013 AND BUDGET ESTIMATES AND AMOUNTS RECOMMENDED IN THE BILL FOR FISCAL
YEAR 2014
[In thousands of dollars]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Senate Committee recommendation
compared with (+ or -)
Item 2013 Budget estimate Committee ---------------------------------
appropriation recommendation 2013
appropriation Budget estimate
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TITLE I

MILITARY PERSONNEL

Military Personnel, Army........................................... 40,146,213 41,037,790 40,796,005 +649,792 -241,785
Military Personnel, Navy........................................... 26,866,844 27,824,444 27,606,615 +739,771 -217,829
Military Personnel, Marine Corps................................... 12,515,011 12,905,216 12,720,114 +205,103 -185,102
Military Personnel, Air Force...................................... 28,015,805 28,519,877 28,252,060 +236,255 -267,817
Reserve Personnel, Army............................................ 4,450,941 4,565,261 4,430,784 -20,157 -134,477
Reserve Personnel, Navy............................................ 1,871,550 1,891,936 1,846,795 -24,755 -45,141
Reserve Personnel, Marine Corps.................................... 657,382 677,499 657,841 +459 -19,658
Reserve Personnel, Air Force....................................... 1,720,152 1,758,629 1,719,497 -655 -39,132
National Guard Personnel, Army..................................... 7,971,044 8,041,268 7,959,072 -11,972 -82,196
National Guard Personnel, Air Force................................ 3,149,828 3,177,961 3,145,144 -4,684 -32,817
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, title I, Military Personnel........................... 127,364,770 130,399,881 129,133,927 +1,769,157 -1,265,954
====================================================================================
TITLE II

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE

Operation and Maintenance, Army.................................... 35,362,531 35,073,077 36,938,580 +1,576,049 +1,865,503
Operation and Maintenance, Navy.................................... 41,559,535 39,945,237 41,613,205 +53,670 +1,667,968
Operation and Maintenance, Marine Corps............................ 6,026,999 6,254,650 6,359,736 +332,737 +105,086
Operation and Maintenance, Air Force............................... 34,734,507 37,270,842 37,626,333 +2,891,826 +355,491
Operation and Maintenance, Defense-Wide............................ 31,820,931 32,997,693 32,597,068 +776,137 -400,625
Operation and Maintenance, Army Reserve............................ 3,178,723 3,095,036 3,096,436 -82,287 +1,400
Operation and Maintenance, Navy Reserve............................ 1,254,689 1,197,752 1,208,552 -46,137 +10,800
Operation and Maintenance, Marine Corps Reserve.................... 277,011 263,317 261,317 -15,694 -2,000
Operation and Maintenance, Air Force Reserve....................... 3,257,020 3,164,607 3,148,307 -108,713 -16,300
Operation and Maintenance, Army National Guard..................... 7,144,720 7,054,196 7,082,599 -62,121 +28,403
Operation and Maintenance, Air National Guard...................... 6,485,756 6,566,004 6,505,204 +19,448 -60,800
Overseas Contingency Operations Transfer Account................... ............... 5,000 ............... ............... -5,000
United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces................ 13,498 13,606 13,606 +108 ...............
Environmental Restoration, Army.................................... 335,478 298,815 298,815 -36,663 ...............
Environmental Restoration, Navy.................................... 310,184 316,103 316,103 +5,919 ...............
Environmental Restoration, Air Force............................... 528,565 439,820 439,820 -88,745 ...............
Environmental Restoration, Defense-Wide............................ 11,118 10,757 10,757 -361 ...............
Environmental Restoration, Formerly Used Defense Sites............. 287,164 237,443 287,443 +279 +50,000
Overseas Humanitarian, Disaster, and Civic Aid..................... 108,615 109,500 109,500 +885 ...............
Cooperative Threat Reduction Account............................... 518,426 528,455 528,455 +10,029 ...............
Department of Defense Acquisition Workforce Development Fund....... 50,132 256,031 131,331 +81,199 -124,700
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, title II, Operation and maintenance................... 173,265,602 175,097,941 178,573,167 +5,307,565 +3,475,226
====================================================================================
TITLE III

Total, title III, Procurement................................ 100,218,282 99,106,242 98,368,753 -1,849,529 -737,489
Fiscal year 2014......................................... (100,218,282) (98,153,503) (98,368,753) (-1,849,529) (+215,250)
Advance appropriations fiscal year 2015.................. ............... (952,739) ............... ............... (-952,739)
====================================================================================
TITLE IV

RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST AND EVALUATION

Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Army................... 8,665,177 7,989,102 7,576,342 -1,088,835 -412,760
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy................... 16,941,012 15,974,780 15,403,145 -1,537,867 -571,635
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air Force.............. 25,399,175 25,702,946 24,945,541 -453,634 -757,405
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-Wide........... 18,607,358 17,667,108 17,695,487 -911,871 +28,379
Operational Test and Evaluation, Defense........................... 223,473 186,300 186,300 -37,173 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, title IV, Research, Development, Test and Evaluation.. 69,836,195 67,520,236 65,806,815 -4,029,380 -1,713,421
====================================================================================
TITLE V

REVOLVING AND MANAGEMENT FUNDS

Defense Working Capital Funds...................................... 1,514,183 1,545,827 1,695,827 +181,644 +150,000
National Defense Sealift Fund...................................... 696,919 730,700 608,378 -88,541 -122,322
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, title V, Revolving and Management Funds............... 2,211,102 2,276,527 2,304,205 +93,103 +27,678
====================================================================================
TITLE VI

OTHER DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE PROGRAMS

Defense Health Program:
Operation and maintenance...................................... 30,844,406 31,653,734 31,617,225 +772,819 -36,509
Procurement.................................................... 521,073 671,181 671,181 +150,108 ...............
Research, development, test and evaluation..................... 1,306,650 729,613 1,318,613 +11,963 +589,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Defense Health Program................................ 32,672,129 33,054,528 33,607,019 +934,890 +552,491
====================================================================================

Chemical Agents and Munitions Destruction, Defense:
Operation and maintenance...................................... 635,004 451,572 451,572 -183,432 ...............
Procurement.................................................... 18,567 1,368 1,368 -17,199 ...............
Research, development, test and evaluation..................... 646,497 604,183 604,183 -42,314 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Chemical Agents....................................... 1,300,068 1,057,123 1,057,123 -242,945 ...............
====================================================================================
Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense............. 1,157,733 938,545 1,068,545 -89,188 +130,000
Joint Urgent Operational Needs Fund................................ ............... 98,800 ............... ............... -98,800
Office of the Inspector General.................................... 349,859 312,131 348,031 -1,828 +35,900
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, title VI, Other Department of Defense Programs........ 35,479,789 35,461,127 36,080,718 +600,929 +619,591
====================================================================================
TITLE VII

RELATED AGENCIES

Central Intelligence Agency Retirement and Disability System Fund.. 514,000 514,000 514,000 ............... ...............
Intelligence Community Management Account (ICMA)................... 533,716 568,271 568,671 +34,955 +400
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, title VII, Related agencies........................... 1,047,716 1,082,271 1,082,671 +34,955 +400
====================================================================================
TITLE VIII

GENERAL PROVISIONS

Additional transfer authority (Sec. 8005).......................... (4,000,000) (4,000,000) (5,000,000) (+1,000,000) (+1,000,000)
Indian Financing Act incentives (Sec. 8019)........................ 14,980 ............... ............... -14,980 ...............
FFRDC (Sec. 8023).................................................. ............... ............... -40,000 -40,000 -40,000
Rescissions (Sec. 8040)............................................ -2,142,447 -1,021,571 -1,599,865 +542,582 -578,294
O&M, Defense-wide transfer authority (Sec. 8051)................... ............... (30,000) (30,000) (+30,000) ...............
Global Security Contingency Fund (O&M, Defense-wide transfer) (Sec. ............... (200,000) (200,000) (+200,000) ...............
8068).............................................................
Fisher House Foundation............................................ 3,995 ............... ............... -3,995 ...............
National grants (Sec. 8077)........................................ 43,942 ............... 20,000 -23,942 +20,000
Shipbuilding & conversion funds, Navy (Sec. 8081).................. 7,989 8,000 8,000 +11 ...............
Fisher House transfer authority (Sec. 8093)........................ ............... (11,000) (11,000) (+11,000) ...............
ICMA transfer authority (Sec. 8088)................................ ............... (20,000) (20,000) (+20,000) ...............
Defense Health O&M transfer authority (Sec. 8098).................. ............... (143,087) (143,087) (+143,087) ...............

Alternative Energy Resources for Deployed

Operation and Maintenance, Defense-Wide (Sec. 8105)................ 269,644 ............... ............... -269,644 ...............
(transfer authority)........................................... ............... (273,300) ............... ............... (-273,300)
Ship Modernization, Operations, Sustainment Fund (Sec. 8102)....... 2,378,956 ............... 324,400 -2,054,556 +324,400
Eliminate civilian pay raise (Sec. 8119)........................... -72,718 ............... ............... +72,718 ...............
Sexual assault special victims program (Sec. 8115)................. ............... ............... 25,000 +25,000 +25,000
A-12 Aircraft litigation in-kind settlement........................ ............... 100,000 ............... ............... -100,000
General/Flag Officers (Sec. 8069).................................. ............... ............... -8,000 -8,000 -8,000
Revised econonmic assumptions (Sec. 8106).......................... ............... ............... -242,000 -242,000 -242,000
Superintendents Commission (Sec. 8105)............................. ............... ............... 2,000 +2,000 +2,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Title VIII, General Provisions........................ 504,341 -913,571 -1,510,465 -2,014,806 -596,894
====================================================================================
TITLE IX

OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS (OCO)

Military Personnel

Military Personnel, Army (OCO)..................................... 9,790,082 6,747,515 6,463,515 -3,326,567 -284,000
Military Personnel, Navy (OCO)..................................... 774,225 558,344 558,344 -215,881 ...............
Military Personnel, Marine Corps (OCO)............................. 1,425,156 1,019,322 1,019,322 -405,834 ...............
Military Personnel, Air Force (OCO)................................ 1,286,783 867,087 867,087 -419,696 ...............
Reserve Personnel, Army (OCO)...................................... 156,893 40,952 40,952 -115,941 ...............
Reserve Personnel, Navy (OCO)...................................... 39,335 20,238 20,238 -19,097 ...............
Reserve Personnel, Marine Corps (OCO).............................. 24,722 15,134 15,134 -9,588 ...............
Reserve Personnel, Air Force (OCO)................................. 25,348 20,432 20,432 -4,916 ...............
National Guard Personnel, Army (OCO)............................... 583,804 393,364 393,364 -190,440 ...............
National Guard Personnel, Air Force (OCO).......................... 10,473 6,919 6,919 -3,554 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Military Personnel.................................... 14,116,821 9,689,307 9,405,307 -4,711,514 -284,000
====================================================================================
Operation & Maintenance, Army (OCO)................................ 28,452,018 29,279,633 28,663,919 +211,901 -615,714
Operation & Maintenance, Navy (OCO)................................ 5,839,934 6,067,993 5,329,960 -509,974 -738,033
Coast Guard (by transfer) (OCO)................................ ............... (227,033) ............... ............... (-227,033)
Operation & Maintenance, Marine Corps (OCO)........................ 4,116,340 2,669,815 2,603,329 -1,513,011 -66,486
Operation & Maintenance, Air Force (OCO)........................... 9,249,736 10,005,224 9,964,224 +714,488 -41,000
Operation & Maintenance, Defense-Wide (OCO)........................ 7,714,079 6,435,078 6,435,078 -1,279,001 ...............
Coalition support funds (OCO).................................. (1,650,000) (1,500,000) (1,500,000) (-150,000) ...............
Operation & Maintenance, Army Reserve (OCO)........................ 157,887 42,935 42,935 -114,952 ...............
Operation & Maintenance, Navy Reserve (OCO)........................ 55,924 55,700 55,700 -224 ...............
Operation & Maintenance, Marine Corps Reserve (OCO)................ 25,477 12,534 12,534 -12,943 ...............
Operation & Maintenance, Air Force Reserve (OCO)................... 60,618 32,849 32,849 -27,769 ...............
Operation & Maintenance, Army National Guard (OCO)................. 392,448 199,371 199,371 -193,077 ...............
Operation & Maintenance, Air National Guard (OCO).................. 34,500 22,200 22,200 -12,300 ...............
Overseas Contingency Operations Transfer Fund (OCO)................ 582,884 ............... ............... -582,884 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Operation and Maintenance.......................... 56,681,845 54,823,332 53,362,099 -3,319,746 -1,461,233
====================================================================================
Afghanistan Infrastructure Fund (OCO).............................. 325,000 279,000 279,000 -46,000 ...............
Afghanistan Security Forces Fund (OCO)............................. 5,124,167 7,726,720 6,944,920 +1,820,753 -781,800
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Operation and Maintenance............................. 62,131,012 62,829,052 60,586,019 -1,544,993 -2,243,033
====================================================================================
Procurement

Aircraft Procurement, Army (OCO)................................... 550,700 771,788 633,300 +82,600 -138,488
Missile Procurement, Army (OCO).................................... 67,951 128,645 128,645 +60,694 ...............
Procurement of Weapons and Tracked Combat Vehicles, Army (OCO)..... 15,422 ............... ............... -15,422 ...............
Procurement of Ammunition, Army (OCO).............................. 338,493 180,900 190,900 -147,593 +10,000
Other Procurement, Army (OCO)...................................... 1,740,157 603,123 603,902 -1,136,255 +779
Aircraft Procurement, Navy (OCO)................................... 215,698 240,696 211,176 -4,522 -29,520
Weapons Procurement, Navy (OCO).................................... 22,500 86,500 86,500 +64,000 ...............
Procurement of Ammunition, Navy and Marine Corps (OCO)............. 283,059 206,821 206,821 -76,238 ...............
Other Procurement, Navy (OCO)...................................... 98,882 17,968 17,968 -80,914 ...............
Procurement, Marine Corps (OCO).................................... 822,054 129,584 126,686 -695,368 -2,898
Aircraft Procurement, Air Force (OCO).............................. 305,600 115,668 115,668 -189,932 ...............
Missile Procurement, Air Force (OCO)............................... 34,350 24,200 24,200 -10,150 ...............
Procurement of Ammunition, Air Force (OCO)......................... 116,203 159,965 159,965 +43,762 ...............
Other Procurement, Air Force (OCO)................................. 2,680,270 2,574,846 2,554,596 -125,674 -20,250
Procurement, Defense-Wide (OCO).................................... 188,099 111,275 111,275 -76,824 ...............
National Guard and Reserve Equipment (OCO)......................... 1,500,000 ............... ............... -1,500,000 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Procurement........................................... 8,979,438 5,351,979 5,171,602 -3,807,836 -180,377
====================================================================================
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation

Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army (OCO)............... 29,660 7,000 13,500 -16,160 +6,500
Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Navy (OCO)............... 52,519 34,426 ............... -52,519 -34,426
Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force (OCO).......... 53,150 9,000 9,000 -44,150 ...............
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-Wide (OCO)..... 112,387 66,208 66,208 -46,179 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Research, Development, Test and Evaluation............ 247,716 116,634 88,708 -159,008 -27,926
====================================================================================
Revolving and Management Funds

Defense Working Capital Funds (OCO)................................ 243,600 264,910 264,910 +21,310 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Revolving and Management Funds........................ 243,600 264,910 264,910 +21,310 ...............
====================================================================================
Other Department of Defense Programs

Defense Health Program:
Operation and maintenance (OCO)................................ 993,898 904,201 898,701 -95,197 -5,500
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Defense Health Program................................ 993,898 904,201 898,701 -95,197 -5,500
====================================================================================
Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense (OCO)....... 469,025 376,305 376,305 -92,720 ...............
Joint IED Defeat Fund (OCO)........................................ 1,622,614 1,000,000 871,725 -750,889 -128,275
Joint Urgent Operational Needs Fund (OCO).......................... ............... 15,000 ............... ............... -15,000
Office of the Inspector General (OCO).............................. 10,766 10,766 10,766 ............... ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Other Department of Defense Programs.................. 3,096,303 2,306,272 2,157,497 -938,806 -148,775
====================================================================================
GENERAL PROVISIONS

Additional transfer authority (OCO) (Sec. 9002).................... (3,500,000) (4,000,000) (4,000,000) (+500,000) ...............
Rescissions (OCO) (Sec. 9013)...................................... -1,860,052 ............... -50,900 +1,809,152 -50,900
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, General Provisions.................................... -1,860,052 ............... -50,900 +1,809,152 -50,900
====================================================================================
Total, Title IX.............................................. 86,954,838 80,558,154 77,623,143 -9,331,695 -2,935,011

Overseas Contingency operations (OCO).................... (88,814,890) (80,558,154) (77,674,043) (-11,140,847) (-2,884,111)
Rescissions overseas contingency operations.............. (-1,860,052) ............... (-50,900) (+1,809,152) (-50,900)
====================================================================================
Total for the bill (net)............................... 596,882,635 590,588,808 587,462,934 -9,419,701 -3,125,874
====================================================================================
DISASTER RELIEF APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 2013

Operation and Maintenance (emergency).............................. 62,825 ............... ............... -62,825 ...............
Procurement (emergency)............................................ 1,310 ............... ............... -1,310 ...............
Defense working capital funds (emergency).......................... 24,200 ............... ............... -24,200 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Fiscal year 2013 Disaster Relief (Public Law 113-2)... 88,335 ............... ............... -88,335 ...............
====================================================================================
Total, Other Appropriations.................................. 88,335 ............... ............... -88,335 ...............
====================================================================================
Net grand total.............................................. 596,970,970 589,636,069 587,462,934 -9,508,036 -2,173,135
Appropriations........................................... (512,070,244) (510,099,486) (511,439,656) (-630,588) (+1,340,170)
Overseas Contingency operations (OCO).................... (88,814,890) (80,558,154) (77,674,043) (-11,140,847) (-2,884,111)
Rescissions.............................................. (-2,142,447) (-1,021,571) (-1,599,865) (+542,582) (-578,294)
Rescissions overseas contingency operations.............. (-1,860,052) ............... (-50,900) (+1,809,152) (-50,900)
Emergency appropriations................................. (88,335) ............... ............... (-88,335) ...............
Advance appropriations fiscal year 2015.................. ............... (952,739) ............... ............... (-952,739)
(By transfer).................................................. ............... ............... ............... ............... ...............
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------