Senate Report 116-103 - DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE APPROPRIATIONS BILL, 2020

[Senate Report 116-103]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

Calendar No. 205

116th Congress } { Report
SENATE
1st Session } { 116-103

======================================================================

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE APPROPRIATIONS BILL, 2020

_______

September 12, 2019.--Ordered to be printed

Mr. Shelby, from the Committee on Appropriations,
submitted the following

REPORT

[To accompany S. 2474]

The Committee on Appropriations reports the bill (S. 2474)
making appropriations for the Department of Defense for the
fiscal year ending September 30, 2020, and for other purposes,
reports favorably thereon and recommends that the bill do pass.

New obligational authority

Total of bill as reported to the Senate.................$687,546,478,000
Amount of 2019 appropriations........................... 668,515,759,000
Amount of 2020 budget estimate.......................... 690,617,564,000
Bill as recommended to Senate compared to--
2019 appropriations................................. +19,030,719,000
2020 budget estimate................................ -3,071,086,000

CONTENTS

----------
Background:
Page
Purpose of the Bill.......................................... 5
Hearings..................................................... 5
Summary of the Bill.......................................... 5
Committee Recommendations.................................... 5
Classified Program Adjustments............................... 6
Budget Justification Materials for Special Access Programs... 6
Definition of Program, Project and Activity.................. 6
Reprogramming Guidance....................................... 7
Funding Increases............................................ 7
Congressional Special Interest Items......................... 8
Recommendations to Enhance the Congressional Review Process.. 8
Civilian Pay Increase........................................ 9
Committee Initiatives........................................ 9
Night Court.................................................. 10
Providing Acquisition Documents and Program Transparency..... 12
Army Acquisition Roles and Responsibilities.................. 12
Air Force Strategic Budgeting................................ 13
Fifth Generation Wireless.................................... 13
Missile Defense Agency....................................... 14
Joint Strike Fighter......................................... 17
F-15EX....................................................... 18
EC-37B Compass Call.......................................... 19
Readiness.................................................... 19
Political Activity by Members of the Armed Forces............ 20
Title I:
Military Personnel:
Reprogramming Guidance for Military Personnel Accounts... 22
Military Personnel Special Interest Items................ 22
Military Personnel Overview.............................. 23
Military Personnel, Army................................. 24
Military Personnel, Navy................................. 25
Military Personnel, Marine Corps......................... 26
Military Personnel, Air Force............................ 29
Reserve Personnel, Army.................................. 31
Reserve Personnel, Navy.................................. 32
Reserve Personnel, Marine Corps.......................... 32
Reserve Personnel, Air Force............................. 33
National Guard Personnel, Army........................... 34
National Guard Personnel, Air Force...................... 34
Title II:
Operation and Maintenance:
Operation and Maintenance, Army.......................... 42
Operation and Maintenance, Navy.......................... 46
Operation and Maintenance, Marine Corps.................. 51
Operation and Maintenance, Air Force..................... 52
Operation and Maintenance, Space Force................... 55
Operation and Maintenance, Defense-Wide.................. 57
Operation and Maintenance, Army Reserve.................. 62
Operation and Maintenance, Navy Reserve.................. 63
Operation and Maintenance, Marine Corps Reserve.......... 64
Operation and Maintenance, Air Force Reserve............. 65
Operation and Maintenance, Army National Guard........... 66
Operation and Maintenance, Air National Guard............ 69
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces............... 71
Environmental Restoration, Army.......................... 71
Environmental Restoration, Navy.......................... 71
Environmental Restoration, Air Force..................... 71
Environmental Restoration, Defense-Wide.................. 71
Environmental Restoration, Formerly Used Defense Sites... 71
Overseas Humanitarian, Disaster, and Civic Aid........... 72
Cooperative Threat Reduction Account..................... 72
Department of Defense Acquisition Workforce Development Fund. 72
Title III:
Procurement:
Aircraft Procurement, Army............................... 77
Missile Procurement, Army................................ 80
Procurement of Weapons and Tracked Combat Vehicles, Army. 84
Procurement of Ammunition, Army.......................... 88
Other Procurement, Army.................................. 92
Aircraft Procurement, Navy............................... 103
Weapons Procurement, Navy................................ 108
Procurement of Ammunition, Navy and Marine Corps......... 113
Shipbuilding and Conversion, Navy........................ 117
Other Procurement, Navy.................................. 122
Procurement, Marine Corps................................ 131
Aircraft Procurement, Air Force.......................... 135
Missile Procurement, Air Force........................... 143
Space Procurement, Air Force............................. 147
Procurement of Ammunition, Air Force..................... 149
Other Procurement, Air Force............................. 151
Procurement, Defense-Wide................................ 155
Defense Production Act Purchases......................... 160
Joint Urgent Operational Needs Fund...................... 163
Title IV:
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation:
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Army......... 167
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy......... 180
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air Force.... 202
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-Wide. 216
Operational Test and Evaluation, Defense................. 229
Title V:
Revolving and Management Funds:
Defense Working Capital Funds............................ 230
Title VI:
Other Department of Defense Programs:
Defense Health Program................................... 232
Chemical Agents and Munitions Destruction, Defense....... 242
Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense... 244
Office of the Inspector General.......................... 245
Title VII:
Related Agencies:
Central Intelligence Agency Retirement and Disability
System
Fund................................................... 246
Intelligence Community Management Account................ 246
Title VIII: General Provisions................................... 247
Title IX: Overseas Contingency Operations/Global War on
Terrorism:
Department of Defense--Military.............................. 255
Military Personnel:
Military Personnel, Army................................. 256
Military Personnel, Navy................................. 257
Military Personnel, Marine Corps......................... 258
Military Personnel, Air Force............................ 259
Reserve Personnel, Army.................................. 260
Reserve Personnel, Navy.................................. 260
Reserve Personnel, Marine Corps.......................... 261
Reserve Personnel, Air Force............................. 261
National Guard Personnel, Army........................... 261
National Guard Personnel, Air Force...................... 262
Operation and Maintenance:
Operation and Maintenance, Army.......................... 262
Operation and Maintenance, Navy.......................... 263
Operation and Maintenance, Marine Corps.................. 264
Operation and Maintenance, Air Force..................... 265
Operation and Maintenance, Defense-Wide.................. 266
Operation and Maintenance, Army Reserve.................. 268
Operation and Maintenance, Navy Reserve.................. 268
Operation and Maintenance, Marine Corps Reserve.......... 269
Operation and Maintenance, Air Force Reserve............. 269
Operation and Maintenance, Army National Guard........... 270
Operation and Maintenance, Air National Guard............ 270
Afghanistan Security Forces Fund......................... 271
Procurement:
Aircraft Procurement, Army............................... 275
Missile Procurement, Army................................ 275
Procurement of Weapons and Tracked Combat Vehicles, Army. 276
Procurement of Ammunition, Army.......................... 277
Other Procurement, Army.................................. 278
Aircraft Procurement, Navy............................... 280
Weapons Procurement, Navy................................ 280
Procurement of Ammunition, Navy and Marine Corps......... 282
Other Procurement, Navy.................................. 283
Procurement, Marine Corps................................ 283
Aircraft Procurement, Air Force.......................... 284
Missile Procurement, Air Force........................... 284
Procurement of Ammunition, Air Force..................... 285
Other Procurement, Air Force............................. 285
Procurement, Defense-Wide................................ 286
National Guard and Reserve Equipment..................... 287
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation:
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Army......... 288
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy......... 288
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air Force.... 289
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-Wide. 289
Revolving and Management Funds: Defense Working Capital Funds 290
Other Department of Defense Programs:
Defense Health Program................................... 290
Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense... 291
Office of the Inspector General.......................... 291
General Provisions--This Title........................... 292
Title X: Additional Appropriations for Disaster Relief........... 294
General Provision--This Title................................ 294
Compliance With Paragraph 7, Rule XVI of the Standing Rules of
the
Senate......................................................... 295
Compliance With Paragraph 7(c), Rule XXVI of the Standing Rules
of the Senate.................................................. 297
Compliance With Paragraph 12, Rule XXVI of the Standing Rules of
the Senate..................................................... 297
Budgetary Impact of Bill......................................... 298
Comparative Statement of New Budget Authority.................... 299

BACKGROUND

Purpose of the Bill

This bill makes appropriations for the military functions
of the Department of Defense for the period October 1, 2019,
through September 30, 2020. Functional areas include the pay,
allowances, and support of military personnel, operation and
maintenance of the forces, procurement of equipment and
systems, and research, development, test and evaluation.
Appropriations for foreign military assistance, military
construction, family housing, nuclear weapons programs, and
civil defense are provided in other bills.

Hearings

The Appropriations Subcommittee on Defense began hearings
on March 13, 2019, and concluded them on June 5, 2019, after
nine separate sessions. The subcommittee heard testimony from
representatives of the Department of Defense and the
Intelligence Community.

Summary of the Bill

The Committee recommendation of $687,546,478,000 includes
funding to develop, maintain, and equip the military forces of
the United States and for other purposes, including
$70,665,000,000 in overseas contingency operations,
$1,710,245,000 in emergency funding and $514,000,000 in
mandatory spending.
The fiscal year 2020 budget request for activities funded
in the Department of Defense appropriations bill totals
$690,617,564,000 in new budget authority, including
$163,980,474,000 in overseas contingency operations funding,
and $514,000,000 in mandatory spending.
In fiscal year 2019, the Congress appropriated
$667,319,910,000 for activities funded in this bill. This
amount includes $599,405,910,000 in base appropriations and
$67,914,000,000 in overseas contingency operations
appropriations provided in Public Law 115-245. Additionally,
Congress appropriated $1,195,849,000 in emergency
appropriations for fiscal year 2019 in Public Laws 116-20 and
116-26. The Committee recommends that funds requested for Coast
Guard overseas contingency operations be appropriated directly
to the Department of Homeland Security.
The Committee recommendation in this bill is
$19,030,719,000 above the amount provided in fiscal year 2019
and $3,071,086,000 below the amount requested for fiscal year
2020.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS

The following table displays the recommendations for each
title:

[In thousands of dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fiscal year 2019 Fiscal year 2020 Committee
enacted estimate recommendation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Title I--Military Personnel............................... 138,537,041 143,476,503 142,983,813
Title II--Operation and Maintenance....................... 193,682,875 123,944,614 200,610,130
Title III Procurement..................................... 135,362,619 118,923,130 132,837,153
Title IV--Research, development, test and evaluation...... 94,896,708 102,647,545 104,282,139
Title V--Revolving and management funds................... 1,641,115 1,426,211 1,580,211
Title VI--Other Department of Defense Programs............ 36,212,133 35,147,087 35,728,689
Title VII--Related Agencies............................... 1,036,424 1,072,000 1,053,400
Title VIII--General provisions (net)...................... -1,963,005 ................ -3,904,302
Title IX--Overseas Contingency Operations................. 67,914,000 163,980,474 70,665,000
Title X--Additional Appropriations for Disaster Relief.... ................ ................ 1,710,245
Additional Supplemental Appropriations for Disaster Relief 1,051,000 ................ ................
Act, 2019 (Public Law 116-20)............................
Emergency Supplemental Appropriations for Humanitarian 144,849 ................ ................
Assistance and Security at the Southern Border Act, 2019
(Public Law 116-26)......................................
-----------------------------------------------------
Net grand total..................................... 668,515,759 690,617,564 687,546,478
=====================================================
Total mandatory and discretionary (incl. 676,092,849 698,476,379 695,405,293
scorekeeping adjustments)..........................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Committee has displayed recommended adjustments in
tables presented under each appropriation account.
These adjustments reflect the following Committee actions:
elimination of funds requested for programs which are lower
priority, duplicative, or not supported by firm requirements in
out-year development or procurement appropriations; deletion of
excess funds based on program delays or slow execution;
addition of funds to reflect congressional priorities and to
rectify shortfalls in the budget estimate; and implementation
of recommendations in the National Defense Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year 2020.

CLASSIFIED PROGRAM ADJUSTMENTS

The Committee recommends adjustments to certain classified
programs, as explained in the classified annex to the
Committee's report.

BUDGET JUSTIFICATION MATERIALS FOR SPECIAL ACCESS PROGRAMS

The Committee recommends additional adjustments to the
budget justification materials provided in the Special Access
Program Annual Report to Congress submitted in accordance with
Title 10, United States Code, Section 119(a)(1), as explained
in the classified annex to the Committee's report. It is
expected that these adjustments will be incorporated in future
budget submissions.

Definition of Program, Project and Activity

For the purposes of the Balanced Budget and Emergency
Deficit Control Act of 1985 (Public Law 99-177), as amended by
the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Reaffirmation
Act of 1987 (Public Law 100-119), and by the Budget Enforcement
Act of 1990 (Public Law 101-508), the terms ``program, project,
and activity'' for appropriations contained in this act shall
be defined as the most specific level of budget items
identified in the Department of Defense Appropriations Act,
2020, the related classified annexes and Committee reports, and
P-1 and R-1 budget justification documents as subsequently
modified by congressional action.
The following exception to the above definition shall
apply: the military personnel and the operation and maintenance
accounts, for which the term ``program, project, and activity''
is defined as the appropriations accounts contained in the
Department of Defense Appropriations Act.
At the time the President submits the budget request for
fiscal year 2021, the Secretary of Defense is directed to
transmit to the congressional defense committees budget
justification documents to be known as the ``M-1'' and ``O-1''
which shall identify, at the budget activity, activity group,
and sub-activity group level, the amounts requested by the
President to be appropriated to the Department of Defense for
military personnel and operation and maintenance in any budget
request, or amended budget request, for fiscal year 2021.

Reprogramming Guidance

The Secretary of Defense is directed to continue to follow
the reprogramming guidance for acquisition accounts as
specified in the report accompanying the House version of the
Department of Defense appropriations bill for fiscal year 2008
(House Report 110-279). The dollar threshold for reprogramming
funds shall remain at $10,000,000 for military personnel;
$15,000,000 for operation and maintenance; $20,000,000 for
procurement; and $10,000,000 for research, development, test
and evaluation.
Also, the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) is
directed to continue to provide the congressional defense
committees annual DD Form 1416 reports for titles I and II and
quarterly, spreadsheet-based DD Form 1416 reports for service
and defense-wide accounts in titles III and IV of this act.
Reports for titles III and IV shall comply with guidance
specified in the explanatory statement accompanying the
Department of Defense Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 2006.
The Department shall continue to follow the limitation that
prior approval reprogrammings are set at either the specified
dollar threshold or 20 percent of the procurement or research,
development, test and evaluation line, whichever is less. These
thresholds are cumulative from the base for reprogramming value
as modified by any adjustments. Therefore, if the combined
value of transfers into or out of a military personnel (M-1),
an operation and maintenance (O-1), a procurement (P-1), or a
research, development, test and evaluation (R-1) line exceeds
the identified threshold, the Secretary of Defense must submit
a prior approval reprogramming to the congressional defense
committees. In addition, guidelines on the application of prior
approval reprogramming procedures for congressional special
interest items are established elsewhere in this report.

Funding Increases

The funding increases outlined in the tables for each
appropriation account shall be provided only for the specific
purposes indicated in the tables.

Congressional Special Interest Items

Items for which additional funds have been recommended or
items for which funding is specifically reduced as shown in the
tables detailing Committee recommended adjustments or in
paragraphs using the phrase ``only for'' or ``only to'' are
congressional special interest items for the purpose of the
Base for Reprogramming [DD Form 1414]. Each of these items must
be carried on the DD Form 1414 at the stated amount, as
specifically addressed elsewhere in this report.

Recommendations to Enhance the Congressional Review Process

The foundation of the congressional budget review process
is the budget justification materials provided by the
Department of Defense. Therefore, it is imperative that the
materials are accurate and informative. Although the majority
of the budget volumes and exhibits are sufficient, the
Committee is concerned about particular gaps that prohibit
adequate congressional oversight. To further inform the
congressional review, the Committee directs the following
actions for the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense
(Comptroller) [OUSD(C)]:
--Improve the coordination among all stakeholders for
crosscutting budgetary issues. These crosscutting
issues include, but are not limited to, the Information
Technology budget, the European Deterrence Initiative,
Joint Urgent Operational Needs [JUONs], and audit
costs. These types of budget topics cross multiple
appropriations and while some are addressed in the
budget justification, some data is only provided via
question and answer between the Committee and the
services and defense agencies. As an example, OUSD(C)
provided to the Committee (upon request) a helpful
summary of all JUONs included in the fiscal year 2020
President's budget request. However, the Committee
found inconsistencies in the data when compared to the
service justification materials, which caused confusion
and doubt in the validity of the estimates. Improving
the coordination between OUSD(C) and the services with
regard to high interest, crosscutting issues should
reduce these inconsistencies.
--Refine OUSD(C)'s role in the development of estimates for
supplemental appropriations for emergencies or other
emergent requirements. The military services are eager
to inform the Committee about damage estimates or other
emergent requirements as they became available,
however, the services have historically been hesitant
to provide such information without OUSD(C)'s approval
first. The Committee notes that in 2018, hurricanes
Florence and Michael devastated a significant number of
Department of Defense facilities. While the affected
military services provided timely damage estimates,
those coming from OUSD(C) were delayed and, in some
cases, conflicted with the information previously
provided by the services. Additionally, the Committee
received conflicting cost estimates for the amounts
needed to support border operations. The OUSD(C) used a
cost model to formulate budget requests for border
support contradicting estimates from the military
services charged with executing the mission. In both of
these instances, the Committee found the data provided
by the military services more accurate, timely, and
informative. The Committee appreciates OUSD(C)'s desire
to coordinate the transmission of such data; however,
it is important that the Committee maintain
communication with the services. Therefore, the
OUSD(C)'s guidance shall not restrict the services'
ability to provide information directly to the
Committee through any point in the process. Clarifying
OUSD(C)'s processes and procedures for providing such
information to the Committee should benefit all
stakeholders.
--Reduce the time it takes to respond to congressional
inquiries about the budget request. The responses to
questions for the defense agencies on their operation
and maintenance requests have historically taken an
inordinate amount of time. During this cycle, nearly
one-third of the responses were received by the
Committee up to six weeks after the questions were
sent. In another case, the Committee requested the
Fiscal Year 2020 Working Capital Fund Rate guidance
that was used to formulate the budget request, yet
OUSD(C) refused to provide it. Timely responses allow
for a smoother budget review and better inform
Committee recommendations.
--Include appropriation and line item detail in Table 3 of
the European Deterrence Initiative justification book.
--Establish a standard process for submitting responses to
recurring requests for additional information regarding
the annual budget submission, including, but not
limited to, information regarding proposed changes to
general provisions; documents detailing the assumptions
of budget estimates, such as inflation guidance; and
accurate documentation in support of executed Rapid
Acquisition Authority.

Civilian Pay Increase

The Committee notes that the President's fiscal year 2020
budget request called for a civilian pay freeze while including
a 3.1 percent pay increase for the military, the largest in 10
years. However, on August 30, 2019, the President transmitted
an alternative plan for pay adjustments that called for a 2.6
percent across-the-board increase for civilian pay in January
of 2020. The Committee supports the alternative pay plan and is
evaluating the impact to the Department of Defense. In order to
inform this assessment, the Committee directs the Secretary of
Defense to provide the estimated cost of a 2.6 percent pay
increase for calendar year 2020 by appropriation account to the
House and Senate Appropriations Committees not later than
September 30, 2019.

Committee Initiatives

The Committee recognizes the importance of continuing to
invest in the priorities outlined in the 2018 National Defense
Strategy and has made important investments to maintain and
modernize our forces and our capabilities. We must ensure that
our Nation has a competitive approach to force development and
a consistent, multiyear investment that restores warfighting
readiness and integrates cutting edge technology. Today's
security environment is affected by rapid technological
advancements, expanding to more actors with lower barriers of
entry, and moving at accelerating speed, all of which are
changing the character of war. In order to maintain overmatch
against adversaries across the domain spectrum, the Committee
recommends additional investments in areas such as basic
research, hypersonics, 5G, artificial intelligence, missile
defense, cybersecurity, and complimentary aspects including
test and evaluation infrastructure. The drive to develop new
technologies is relentless and we must not fall behind;
however, the development of new technologies is not enough, we
must also ensure that they are fielded. To that end, the
Committee has prioritized the importance of accelerating the
transition of technologies and capabilities from concept to
production. Rather than spending decades in development we must
seek to more quickly deploy these innovations to benefit the
warfighter. The Committee notes that the Department's
technological advantage depends on a healthy and secure
national security innovation base and as such recommends
additional investments in the defense industrial base as well
as manufacturing communities across the country.
The Committee expects that the Department will sustain and
support continued investments in these areas in the fiscal year
2021 President's budget request. Additionally, the Committee
directs the Secretary of Defense to provide a spend plan for
execution of the additional fiscal year 2020 resources provided
for committee initiatives not later than 60 days following
enactment of this act.
Finally, the Committee directs that funds for these
initiatives are to be competitively awarded or provided to
programs that have received competitive awards in the past.

Night Court

The Committee notes that in advance of the President's
fiscal year 2020 budget request, the Department of the Army
undertook a bottom-up review of all programs, projects and
activities in an effort to identify and realign $25,000,000,000
to resource the Army's top modernization priorities over the
Future Years Defense Program [FYDP]. By the Army's own
estimate, the final adjustments exceeded $31,000,000,000 of
realignments to support and fully fund the 31 Army program
priorities under the purview of the Army Futures Command and
supporting Cross-Functional Teams [CFTs]. This included the
realignment of $15,047,944,000 from legacy or underperforming
acquisition programs identified to the congressional defense
committees in a consolidated list of 93 program eliminations
and 93 program truncations.
The Committee further notes that since fiscal year 2018,
the Army has repeatedly engaged the congressional defense
committees through requests for fiscal realignments after the
budget submissions, requests to resource unfunded requirements
outside of the traditional budget cycle, and reprogramming
actions during the year of execution for new start CFT
priorities. Prior to passage of the Consolidated Appropriations
Act, 2018 (Public Law 115-141), but after the House Committee
on Appropriations marked up the Department of Defense
Appropriations Act, 2018 (H.R. 3219), the Army submitted a
request to the Senate Committee on Appropriations to realign
resources for a new network modernization strategy by
truncating and cancelling existing network programs. Then,
during execution of fiscal year 2018 resources, the Army
submitted multiple reprogramming requests to stand-up or
accelerate CFT programs, including the Enhanced Night Vision
Goggle--Binocular, Synthetic Training Environment, Heads Up
Display 3.0 (now Integrated Visual Augmentation System),
Maneuver-Short Range Air Defense, Next Generation Combat
Vehicle, Next Generation Squad Weapon, Deep Strike Cannon
Artillery System and Future Vertical Lift. After the submission
of the fiscal year 2019 President's budget request, the Army
submitted a request to realign its Science and Technology
resources; and additional reprogramming actions for CFT
priorities were submitted during the year of execution.
The Committee recognizes the need for modernization and
practical disconnects between budget cycles and strategy
changes requiring flexible resourcing authorities. The
Committee also recognizes the benefits of conducting a bottom-
up review of legacy programs identifying areas ripe for
efficiency, consolidation, or elimination. However, the
Committee is concerned with continued program reviews in fiscal
year 2021 targeting a reported $10,000,000,000 for realignment
into CFT priorities. This represents a clear disconnect between
Army messaging with the fiscal year 2020 President's budget
request that the Army's priorities were fully funded in the
fiscal year 2020 FYDP. Of additional concern are indications
that the Office of the Secretary of Defense [OSD] is
undertaking a similar process for review of defense agencies
and activities in preparation for the fiscal year 2021
President's budget submission.
Continued, wide-ranging truncation or elimination of
programs without notification to the congressional defense
committees in advance of the subsequent budget submission leads
to inefficiencies and misappropriation of resources in the
current budget request being considered. In many cases, the
congressional defense committees were required to authorize
programs and appropriate resources within the fiscal year 2019
defense bills for programs that had already been eliminated or
truncated within the Department's subsequent Program Objective
Memorandum and budget review cycles. With the continued, senior
level reviews for the Army and the Office of the Secretary of
Defense, the Committee is in a position to again appropriate
resources to programs that will be truncated or eliminated in
the fiscal year 2021 budget request.
Therefore, the Committee directs the Secretary of the Army
and the Secretary of Defense to provide documentation to the
congressional defense committees concurrent with the fiscal
year 2021 President's budget request that highlights all
program truncations or eliminations resulting from senior level
``Night Courts''. This document shall maintain the format of
the Army's list of fiscal year 2020 program eliminations and
truncations. Further, the Committee directs that for each
program eliminated or truncated, to include those in the
operation and maintenance accounts, the Secretary of the Army
and the Secretary of Defense will submit spend plans for all
fiscal year 2020 appropriations allocated to those programs.
The spend plans shall also include narrative justification
explaining the necessity of prior year funding still available
for obligation given the fiscal year 2021 funding levels and a
timeline within the Department highlighting at what point
decisions were made to truncate or eliminate each program.

Providing of Acquisition Documents and Program Transparency

The Committee is dismayed with the Army's lack of
transparency and reluctance to provide the Committee access to
common acquisition documents, to include acquisition decision
memoranda, acquisition strategies, and Simplified Acquisition
Management Plans, during its budget and program reviews. The
Committee requested several standard acquisition documents
which are critical in tracking the status of programs in
relation to the previously submitted budget request and
justification documents during its review of the fiscal year
2020 budget request and was repeatedly met with resistance from
the Army.
The Committee understands that budget requests are
formulated well in advance of their submission to Congress and
that fact-of-life changes require up-to-date briefings and
ongoing dialogue in order for the Committee to provide
appropriate resources for dynamic programs. Additionally, the
Committee is supportive of the desire to reform and streamline
the acquisition process; however, such reforms should be
transparent to Congress. In prior fiscal years the
aforementioned documents were freely shared, which facilitated
a more transparent and productive budget and program review.
The Committee urges the Army to review its current practices
with an eye towards returning to the constructive information
exchange of prior years. Such review should include the
consideration of all relevant authorities, policies and
procedures regarding the Committee's access to documentation.
The Secretary of the Army shall provide a briefing to the
Committee on the findings of the review not later than 30 days
after enactment of this act.

Army Acquisition Roles and Responsibilities

The Committee has supported efforts by the Army to address
modernization shortfalls and deliver critically needed
capabilities to the warfighter through establishment of Cross-
Functional Teams [CFTs] and ultimately the stand-up of Army
Futures Command [AFC]. However, questions remain on the roles
and responsibilities of AFC and the Assistant Secretary of the
Army (Acquisition, Logistics & Technology) [ASA(ALT)]. As an
example, the Committee recently learned of a newly created
Science Advisor position within AFC, which seems to be
duplicative of the longstanding role of the Deputy Assistant
Secretary of the Army for Research and Technology.
Additionally, the Committee was concerned to learn that funding
decisions on investment accounts, to include science and
technology programs, would be directed by AFC rather than
ASA(ALT).
While the Committee supports AFC's role in establishing
requirements and synchronizing program development across the
Army, it affirms that ASA(ALT) has a statutory role in the
planning and resourcing of acquisition programs. The ASA(ALT)
should maintain a substantive impact on the Army's long-range
investments, not just serve as a final approval authority.
Therefore, the Committee directs the Secretary of the Army to
provide a report that outlines the roles, responsibilities, and
relationships between ASA(ALT) and AFC to the congressional
defense committees not later than 90 days after enactment of
this act. The report shall include a clear description of the
responsibilities of each organization throughout the phases of
the planning, programming, budgeting, and execution of
resources.

AIR FORCE STRATEGIC BUDGETING

The Committee is concerned with the Air Force's fiscal year
2020 future years defense program and recent strategic
budgeting decisions. The last 3 years of record investment
funding levels for the Department should have afforded the Air
Force the opportunity to make responsible and deliberate
strategic budgeting decisions as well as plan for the prospect
of a top-line leveling or downturn. Instead, the Air Force has
reversed acquisition strategies on key investment programs,
divested or insufficiently funded key capabilities in the out-
years, and failed to transition some critical technologies to
programs of record.
While the Committee recognizes the uncertainty caused by
the threat of sequestration and Defense budget caps in recent
years, it also notes that recent budget requests have far
exceeded these budget caps, insulating the Air Force from
making difficult choices. The Committee fears that the lack of
strategic budgeting decisions, which can be delayed in the
current budget environment, could have a detrimental impact on
the effectiveness of the Air Force in the future budget
environment. Therefore, the Committee directs Air Force
leadership, to include the Air Force Deputy Chief of Staff for
Plans and Programs, to brief the congressional defense
committees not later than 30 days after the release of the
fiscal year 2021 President's budget request on its strategic
budgeting decisions, to include a classified component, as well
as changes to key investment programs, divestments, and out-
year funding disconnects.

FIFTH GENERATION WIRELESS

Fifth Generation wireless [5G] is anticipated to produce
dramatic improvements in data speed, volume and latency that
have the potential to enable transformational technologies that
will both revolutionize and challenge Department of Defense
processes and operations.
An April 2019 Defense Innovation Board [DIB] report noted
that 5G ecosystems of technology can revolutionize Department
operations, networks, and information processes by allowing
volumes of data to be shared in close time across
geographically dispersed systems. In particular, 5G has the
potential to provide the Department expanded network
capabilities that will enable new technologies like hypersonic
weapons and hypersonic defenses to be deployed.
This new 5G technology also presents serious risks if the
U.S. does not lead the field in 5G infrastructure and systems
and instead must rely on foreign components embedded throughout
the 5G network. The DIB report also cautioned that while the
United States continues to pursue investments in the mmWave
spectrum to support 5G technology, the rest of the world, led
by China, is focused on building out sub-6 spectrum
infrastructure. The report noted that the Department will have
to develop spectrum strategies, including whether and how to
share sub-6 spectrum currently used by the Department while
ensuring spectrum security and performance, and how to operate
on the sub-6 infrastructure developed by China and expected to
be used by the much of rest of the world. In this scenario,
which the DIB viewed as likely, the Department will need
significant investment in system security and resiliency to
enable operations on a network infrastructure that will be
highly vulnerable to cyber-attack.
The Committee believes there is an urgency to addressing
these issues and supports the Department's efforts to prepare
for this changing landscape through its Next Generation
Information Communications Technology [5G-XG] program. The
program seeks to harness emerging information communications
technologies to enhance military capabilities and potentially
accelerate U.S. deployment of new commercial products and
services enabled by 5G networks. Accordingly, the Committee
recommends an increase of $436,000,000 in Research,
Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-Wide for the 5G-XG
program. The Committee directs the Secretary of Defense to
provide a spend plan for the funding prior to obligation of
fiscal year 2020 funds and, not later than 60 days after the
enactment of this act, to report to the congressional defense
committees on how it is addressing the DIB recommendations.

MISSILE DEFENSE AGENCY

Missile Defense Agency Priorities, Unfunded Requirements
and Budget.--The fiscal year 2020 President's budget request
for the Missile Defense Agency [MDA] is $9,385,907,000
(excluding appropriations for Military Construction), a
decrease of $919,667,000 from amounts enacted for fiscal year
2019. Further, with submission of the fiscal year 2020
President's budget request, the Director, MDA, submitted to the
congressional defense committees a list of unfunded priorities
for fiscal year 2020 totaling in excess of $1,900,000,000. The
Committee recommends $10,537,895,000 for MDA activities in this
bill in fiscal year 2020, including $635,136,000 for unfunded
requirements; $692,000,000 for additional MDA unfunded
requirements identified subsequent to the budget submission; a
realignment of $728,000,000 following the termination of the
Redesigned Kill Vehicle program, as addressed elsewhere in this
report; as well as funding for additional MDA priorities.
The Committee is concerned by the apparent disconnect among
the 2018 National Defense Strategy, the 2019 Missile Defense
Review and the fiscal year 2020 President's budget request for
MDA. Further, the Committee notes that acquisition strategies
and cost estimates for several programs identified as MDA
priorities, to include the Hypersonic and Ballistic Tracking
Space Sensor, laser demonstration and scaling programs, and
advanced discrimination efforts have changed from the previous
year, despite full funding provided for these efforts in the
Department of Defense Appropriations Acts for fiscal years 2018
and 2019. The Committee expects greater programmatic and fiscal
alignment consistent with the aforementioned documents among
the Director, MDA; the Under Secretary of Defense (Research and
Engineering); the Under Secretary of Defense (Acquisition and
Sustainment); the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller); the
Director, Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation; and the
Director, Office of Management and Budget in future budget
submissions.
Missile Defense Agency Workforce.--The Committee notes that
with the fiscal year 2020 President's budget request, the
Missile Defense Agency is proposing to reduce its civilian
Full-Time Equivalent [FTE] target by 4.17 percent from fiscal
year 2019. The Committee further notes that if approved, this
would represent a 8.58 percent reduction to MDA's civilian FTEs
since fiscal year 2017, while MDA's overall budget has
increased by over 30 percent since that time. Additionally, MDA
has proposed a reduction of 5.6 percent to its military
authorizations since fiscal year 2017, to include the
elimination of the position of the Deputy Director, MDA.
Further, the Committee notes that the Director, MDA, submitted
with the fiscal year 2020 President's budget request a list of
unfunded requirements with estimated costs in excess of
$8,000,000,000 over the next 5 years and requires additional
civilian FTE to manage and oversee; as well as proposed a
realignment of over $12,000,000,000 in current budget plans for
development of a Next Generation Interceptor for Ground-based
Midcourse Defense.
The Committee is concerned by the apparent disconnect
between MDA's workforce and mission requirements. Therefore,
the Under Secretary of Defense (Acquisition and Sustainment) in
coordination with the Director, MDA, is directed to submit to
the congressional defense committees, no later than with the
fiscal year 2021 President's budget request, an assessment on
MDA's current and required workforce size, qualifications and
makeup to address MDA requirements.
Hypersonic and Ballistic Tracking Space Sensor.--The fiscal
year 2020 President's budget request includes no funds to
continue the development of a Hypersonic and Ballistic Tracking
Space Sensor [HBTSS], previously named the Space Sensor Layer
[SSL] program. The Committee notes that $14,000,000 was
requested and appropriated for SSL in fiscal year 2018, and
$73,000,000 was appropriated for SSL in fiscal year 2019,
consistent with the fiscal year 2019 unfunded requirement for
SSL identified by the Director, Missile Defense Agency. For
fiscal year 2020, the Director, MDA, has identified a HBTSS
unfunded requirement of $108,000,000 to continue development of
on-orbit testbeds. The Committee understands that these on-
orbit testbeds will demonstrate a capability to detect and
track emerging threats and conventional ballistic missiles,
support missile warning and missile defense, and support the
overhead persistent infrared enterprise; and that such a
capability is consistent with U.S. missile defense programs and
capabilities called for in the 2019 Missile Defense Review.
The Committee recommends $108,000,000 for HBTSS in fiscal
year 2020. The Committee directs the Director, MDA, to submit
to the congressional defense committees, no later than with the
submission of the fiscal year 2021 President's budget request,
the acquisition strategy for HBTSS, to include the contract-
type determination and rationale therefor, plans for technical
data management, sustainment strategy, integrated master test
plan and integrated master schedule, as well as a cost
estimate. The Director, Operational Test and Evaluation, is
directed to submit, not later than 30 days thereafter, to the
congressional defense committees, an assessment of MDA's
proposed test strategy for HBTSS. Further, the Under Secretary
of Defense (Research and Engineering) is directed to provide to
the congressional defense committees, with submission of the
fiscal year 2021 President's budget request, an acquisition
roadmap for MDA space sensor acquisition programs that
identifies synergies, as well as decision points and off-ramps
for complimentary programs funded by MDA, as well as the
Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency and the Space
Development Agency.
Redesigned Kill Vehicle Program Termination and Development
of Next Generation Interceptor.--Subsequent to the submission
of the fiscal year 2020 President's budget request, the Under
Secretary of Defense (Research and Engineering) terminated for
convenience the Redesigned Kill Vehicle [RKV] program and
initiated the development of a Next Generation Interceptor
[NGI] for U.S. Ground-based Midcourse Defense [GMD]. The
Committee has been briefed by the Under Secretary of Defense
(Research and Engineering) and the Director, MDA, about these
proposed program adjustments and supports developing and
fielding an operational NGI while continuing to sustain and
modernize current GMD capabilities. Therefore, the Committee
recommends a realignment of $728,000,000 of fiscal year 2019
and 2020 GMD funds to support a competitive acquisition of the
NGI while addressing current GMD requirements.
The Director, MDA, is directed to submit to the
congressional defense committees, not later than with
submission of the fiscal year 2021 President's budget request,
the acquisition strategy for a competitive NGI program, to
include the contract-type determination and rationale therefor,
plans for technical data management, sustainment strategy,
integrated master test plan and integrated master schedule, as
well as a cost estimate. The Director, Operational Test and
Evaluation, is directed to submit, not later than 30 days
thereafter, to the congressional defense an assessment of MDA's
proposed test strategy for NGI. Additionally, the Director,
Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation, is directed to submit
to the congressional defense committees with submission of the
fiscal year 2021 President's budget request an Independent Cost
Estimate for the NGI program, and the Under Secretary of
Defense (Comptroller) is directed to certify to the
congressional defense committees with submission of the fiscal
year 2021 President's budget request full funding for the NGI
acquisition strategy.
Use of Research, Development, Test and Evaluation
Appropriations.--The fiscal year 2020 President's budget
request includes $41,000,000 in Research, Development, Test and
Evaluation, Defense-Wide, program element 0604672C, for
activities that have previously been requested and appropriated
in Military Construction, Defense-Wide appropriations. The
Committee does not agree with this proposed use of research and
development funds, nor the associated legislative proposals,
and recommends a reduction to the budget request accordingly.
Further, the Committee directs that none of the funds
appropriated in this act for research, development, test and
evaluation may be used for military construction activities,
unless expressly stated so in this act.
AEGIS Baselines Budget Estimates.--As expressed elsewhere
in this report, the Committee remains concerned with
consistently evolving requirements and costs to develop and
field AEGIS baseline capability upgrades. The Committee
recommends a 10 percent increase for AEGIS Baseline 9 over
amounts enacted for fiscal year 2019.

Joint Strike Fighter

F-35 Production.--The fiscal year 2020 President's budget
request includes 78 F-35 Joint Strike Fighters [JSF], 19 fewer
than were provided in the Department of Defense Appropriations
Act, 2019 (Public Law 115-245). The Committee notes that the
Department of Defense continues to request fewer than 60 F-35A
variants and a stable F-35B procurement profile was reduced by
more than half to 10 aircraft in the fiscal year 2020
President's budget request. As a result, the Committee
recommends an additional $156,000,000 in advance procurement
for the F-35A, as delineated on the Air Force unfunded priority
list, and $1,056,000,000 to procure 12 additional F-35As in
fiscal year 2020. In addition, the Committee recommends
$791,970,000 to procure 6 additional F-35Bs for the Marine
Corps.
The Committee understands that the Department of Defense
took several actions to prepare for Turkey's removal from the
F-35 program, given its acquisition of the Russian-made S-400
air and missile defense system. Turkey joined the F-35 program
in 2002, has been a significant industrial participant, and
planned to procure 100 F-35As for approximately $8,000,000,000.
The Department has implemented changes to its supply base and
supply chain to accommodate the loss of Turkish industrial
participation. As a result, the Committee recommends
$250,400,000 to help offset the cost of establishing alternate
sources in the F-35 supply chain. The Committee also
understands that the Department wants to maintain its
contractual handshake agreement on Lots 12 through 14, which
included 24 F-35A aircraft for Turkey. The Committee provides
funding for 18 additional aircraft, as outlined above, and
encourages the Department to take further action to maintain
the current handshake agreement to avoid disruption in upcoming
deliveries.
Economic Order Quantity.--The Committee recommendation
fully funds the Department's request for $544,000,000 in
advance procurement for Economic Order Quantity [EOQ] of
material and equipment for 270 U.S. F-35 aircraft to be
procured in fiscal years 2021 through 2023. The Committee also
supports the Air Force's unfunded priority request of
$62,000,000 for additional EOQ funding, as part of its
recommendation for advance procurement funding in fiscal year
2020. According to Joint Program Office [JPO] estimates, the
EOQ recommended for fiscal year 2020 along with $558,000,000
programmed for fiscal year 2021 would save the Department
approximately $410,000,000 in additional material costs. The
Committee directs the Director of the Cost Assessment and
Program Evaluation [CAPE] to provide an analysis of this
savings estimate to the congressional defense committees not
later than 30 days after enactment of this act.
The Committee supported the first request for JSF EOQ in
the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2018 (Public Law
115-141) and notes that the significant savings estimated by
the JPO was not fully realized in the execution of this
funding. The JPO initial estimate of total program savings as
presented in the fiscal year 2018 budget request was
$1,200,000,000. A follow-on analysis by the Director of CAPE
concluded that anticipated total savings would be $595,000,000.
Current JPO estimates further revise down the savings to
$435,000,000, approximately one-third of the initial savings
estimate. The Committee notes that actual savings will be
realized and confirmed when parts are delivered and directs the
F-35 Program Executive Officer to provide a report to the
congressional defense committees not later than 30 days after
enactment of this act on the final cost savings realized on the
fiscal year 2018 EOQ investment.
Configuration Management.--The Committee notes that as of
March 2019, 292 F-35 aircraft were fielded and that by the end
of 2022, that number will approach 1,000 aircraft. Concurrently
with the fielding of additional aircraft, the JPO is developing
and fielding incremental software upgrades as part of
Continuous Capability Development and Delivery of F-35 Block 4
efforts. The Committee understands that these upgrades are
intended to be fielded in no less than six-month increments
with the intent to respond quickly to warfighter needs and
other program adjustments.
The Committee supports the prudent development and fielding
of additional F-35 capabilities but is concerned that current
plans do not sufficiently address configuration management
among fielded aircraft, simulators and trainers, spare parts
and operator training requirements. In particular, the
Committee notes that upgrades to simulator software packages
are not synchronized with deployed aircraft. The Committee
directs the Under Secretary of Defense (Acquisition and
Sustainment) to provide to the congressional defense
committees, not later than with submission of the fiscal year
2021 President's budget request, a comprehensive plan for
configuration management and control of F-35 fleet
capabilities, to include simulators, trainers, operator
training, and aircraft within deployed squadrons.

F-15EX

The fiscal year 2020 President's budget requests
$1,050,000,000 for 8 F-15EX fighters, the first new fighter jet
procured by the Air Force in more than a decade. While the
Committee understands the Air Force's need to maintain fighter
capacity and mitigate problems associated with legacy F-15C/D
aircraft that are approaching the end of their service life,
the Committee continues to have questions about the sole-source
acquisition strategy and program baseline for F-15EX. Further,
the Committee understands that the first two aircraft will
deliver in fiscal year 2022 and be used to integrate and test
U.S-only communications and electronic warfare software and
hardware. Accordingly, the Committee recommends transferring
$364,400,000 from Aircraft Procurement, Air Force to Research,
Development, Test and Evaluation, Air Force for the procurement
of two test aircraft and half of the requested amount for non-
recurring engineering.
The Committee understands that the last six aircraft are
not scheduled to deliver until the end of fiscal year 2023.
Further, the Committee was provided different rationale and
justifications from Air Force leadership, the Cost Assessment
and Program Evaluation office, and the F-15 program office on
the inclusion of F-15EX in the fiscal year 2020 President's
budget request. Therefore, the Committee directs that of the
funds provided in Aircraft Procurement, Air Force for the
remaining F-15EX aircraft, no more than $37,200,000 for long-
lead materials may be obligated until the Secretary of the Air
Force provides to the congressional defense committees a report
detailing: a comprehensive review of options to address the Air
Force fighter capacity shortfall; an approved program
acquisition strategy; an acquisition program baseline; a test
and evaluation master plan; a life-cycle sustainment plan; and
a post-production fielding strategy.

EC-37B Compass Call

The Committee remains committed to ensuring the U.S. Air
Force's electronic warfare capabilities continue to counter
modern threats and has supported the Air Force plan to
modernize the fleet of Compass Call aircraft by cross-decking
the mission electronics to a more capable and sustainable
airframe. As the Air Force has stated that cross-decking two
aircraft per year is the optimum rate for cost effectiveness
and delivering capability to the warfighter, the Committee was
disappointed to see only one aircraft funded in the fiscal year
2020 President's budget request. The Committee is also aware of
the significance of the Baseline 4 low-band capability upgrade
and believes the development and first Baseline 4 aircraft
procurement should be accelerated into fiscal year 2020.
Accordingly, the Committee recommends an additional
$332,500,000 across the Aircraft Procurement, Air Force, and
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air Force, accounts
to accelerate the Baseline 4 capabilities into the EC-37B
Compass Call fleet.

Readiness

The Committee recommends an additional $1,100,000,000 in
title IX of this act to be transferred to the operation and
maintenance accounts and be divided proportionately among the
services and the National Guard and reserve components. This
funding shall be used only to improve military readiness,
including increased training, depot maintenance, and base
operations support. None of the funding provided may be used
for recruiting, marketing, or advertising programs. The funding
provided is a congressional special interest item. The
Secretary of Defense and the Service Secretaries are directed
to submit a detailed spending plan by sub-activity group to the
House and Senate Appropriations Committees not less than 30
days prior to the obligation of these funds. These transfers
may be implemented 30 days after congressional notification
unless an objection is received from either the House or Senate
Appropriations Committees.
Political Activity by Members of the Armed Forces.--The
Committee remains strongly committed to the principle that the
United States Armed Forces must remain an apolitical military
profession. In particular, the Committee reiterates its support
for DoD Directive 1334.10, Political Activity by Members of the
Armed Forces, which outlines that, ``members on active duty
should not engage in partisan political activity, and that
members not on active duty should avoid inferences that their
political activities imply or appear to imply official
sponsorship, approval, or endorsement...'' Further, the
Committee commends Secretary of Defense Mark Esper and General
Mark Milley for their recent public comments stating their
personal commitments that this principle will remain a bedrock
principle of military professionalism.

TITLE I

MILITARY PERSONNEL

Funds appropriated under this title provide the resources
required for basic pay, retired pay accrual, employers'
contribution for Social Security taxes, basic allowance for
subsistence, basic allowance for housing, special and incentive
pays, permanent change of station travel, and other personnel
costs for uniformed members of the Armed Forces.
The President's fiscal year 2020 budget requests a total of
$143,476,503,000 for military personnel appropriations. This
request funds an Active component end strength of 1,339,500 and
a Reserve component end strength of 800,800.

SUMMARY OF COMMITTEE ACTION

The Committee recommends military personnel appropriations
totaling $142,983,813,000 for fiscal year 2020. This is
$492,690,000 below the budget estimate.
Committee recommended military personnel appropriations for
fiscal year 2020 are summarized below:

SUMMARY OF MILITARY PERSONNEL APPROPRIATIONS
[In thousands of dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Change from
Account 2020 budget Committee budget
estimate recommendation estimate
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Military Personnel:
Military Personnel, Army.................................... 43,347,472 42,968,799 -378,673
Military Personnel, Navy.................................... 31,831,199 31,763,263 -67,936
Military Personnel, Marine Corps............................ 14,175,211 14,088,775 -86,436
Military Personnel, Air Force............................... 31,284,959 31,261,759 -23,200

Reserve Personnel:
Reserve Personnel, Army..................................... 4,964,671 4,920,866 -43,805
Reserve Personnel, Navy..................................... 2,123,947 2,121,507 -2,440
Reserve Personnel, Marine Corps............................. 838,854 837,854 -1,000
Reserve Personnel, Air Force................................ 2,038,040 2,022,340 -15,700

National Guard Personnel:
National Guard Personnel, Army.............................. 8,808,305 8,912,605 +104,300
National Guard Personnel, Air Force......................... 4,063,845 4,086,045 +22,200
-----------------------------------------------
Total................................................... 143,476,503 142,983,813 -492,690
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Committee recommended end strengths for fiscal year 2020
are summarized below:

RECOMMENDED END STRENGTH
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2019 2020 budget Committee Change from
authorization estimate recommendation budget estimate
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Active:
Army................................ 487,500 480,000 480,000 ................
Navy................................ 335,400 340,500 340,500 ................
Marine Corps........................ 186,100 186,200 186,200 ................
Air Force........................... 329,100 332,800 332,800 ................
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal........................ 1,338,100 1,339,500 1,339,500 ................

Selected Reserve:
Army Reserve........................ 199,500 189,500 189,500 ................
Navy Reserve........................ 59,100 59,000 59,000 ................
Marine Corps Reserve................ 38,500 38,500 38,500 ................
Air Force Reserve................... 70,000 70,100 70,100 ................
Army National Guard................. 343,500 336,000 336,000 ................
Air National Guard.................. 107,100 107,700 107,700 ................
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal........................ 817,700 800,800 800,800 ................
=======================================================================
Total........................... 2,155,800 2,140,300 2,140,300 ................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Committee recommended end strengths for full-time support
of the Reserve and Guard for fiscal year 2020 are summarized
below:

RECOMMENDED ACTIVE GUARD AND RESERVE END STRENGTH
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2019 2020 budget Committee Change from
authorization estimate recommendation budget estimate
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Active Guard and Reserve:
Army Reserve:....................... 16,386 16,511 16,511 ................
Navy Reserve:....................... 10,110 10,155 10,155 ................
Marine Corps Reserve:............... 2,261 2,386 2,386 ................
Air Force Reserve:.................. 3,849 4,431 4,431 ................
Army National Guard:................ 30,595 30,595 30,595 ................
Air National Guard:................. 19,861 22,637 22,637 ................
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Total........................... 83,062 86,715 86,715 ................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Reprogramming Guidance for Military Personnel Accounts

Military Personnel Special Interest Items

Items for which additional funds have been provided or have
been specifically reduced as shown in the project level tables
or in paragraphs using the phrase ``only for'' or ``only to''
in this report are congressional special interest items for the
purpose of the Base for Reprogramming (DD Form 1414). Each of
these items must be carried on the DD Form 1414 at the stated
amount as specifically addressed in the Committee report. Below
Threshold Reprogrammings may not be used to either restore or
reduce funding from congressional special interest items as
identified on the DD Form 1414.

Military Personnel Overview

Reserve Component Budget Reporting.--The Committee
continues its requirement for the Department to provide a semi-
annual detailed report to the congressional defense committees
showing transfers between subactivities within the military
personnel appropriation. Reports shall be submitted not later
than 30 days following the end of the second quarter and 30
days following the end of the fiscal year.
Defense Personal Property Program.--The Committee shares
the Department of Defense's stated goals of improving both the
moving experience for military members and their families and
the efficiency in contracting for those services. However, the
Committee is concerned that the changes proposed have the
potential to increase costs to the government and create new
challenges for military families. The Committee acknowledges
that section 355 included in S. 1790, the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020, as passed by the
Senate, prohibits a contract award until Congress has received
a requested report on the administration of the Defense
Personal Property Program from the Comptroller General of the
United States. The Committee commends the Department for
soliciting input from those communities affected by the
proposed changes, including the military services,
representatives for military families as well as industry, and
urges the Department to address substantive concerns that are
raised during those exchanges as well as any potential issues
that are raised in the Comptroller General's report.
Advanced Trauma Training Program for National Guard and
Reserve.--The Committee recognizes the valuable support
universities, hospitals, and other military partners provide by
offering civilian-based emergency response trauma training and
critical care training including public health, bio-
environmental, and biomedical instruction to sustain medics'
and medical providers' capabilities of the National Guard
Enhanced Response Forces Packages [CERFP], National Guard
Homeland Response Forces [NGHRF], the Army Reserve Consequence
Management Response Forces [CCMRF] and other National Guard and
Reserves medical conversion/readiness requirements. The
Committee encourages the National Guard and Reserves to
continue pursuing state-of-the-art trauma training with these
civilian partners, thus maintaining unit medical readiness
postures at optimum levels as military healthcare providers in
CERFPs, NGHRFs, and CCMRFs maintain their individual skills to
respond effectively to emergency incidents on the homeland.
Furthermore, in order to minimize the civilian-military
operational gaps in the event of a catastrophic incident, the
Committee also encourages the development of enhanced medical
and critical care preparedness medical training programs
focusing on public health curriculums and the epidemiology of
public health diseases, mass casualty triage, advanced disaster
life support, advanced hazardous material life support,
emergency dental, and psychological health by increasing
civilian-based advanced trauma expertise gained through day-to-
day experiences and medical research programs.
Military Personnel and Extremist Ideologies.--Not later
than 120 days after the enactment of this act, the Committee
directs the Secretary of Defense to submit an unclassified
report to the House and Senate Appropriations Committees that
details: (1) current policies of the Department and each
service on white supremacist, neo-Nazi, terrorist, gang and
other extremist affiliations by service members and recruits;
(2) procedures of the Department and each service to identify
and mitigate such affiliations; and (3) the number of
violations the Department and each service has identified in
the prior 12 months and a description of each violation
including the nature of the affiliation and disciplinary and
other measures taken in each case. This report may include a
classified annex only to the extent necessary.

Military Personnel, Army

Appropriations, 2019.................................... $42,690,042,000
Budget estimate, 2020................................... 43,347,472,000
Committee recommendation................................ 42,968,799,000

The Committee recommends an appropriation of
$42,968,799,000. This is $378,673,000 below the budget
estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this
appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

ACTIVITY 1: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF OFFICERS
5 BASIC PAY 7,521,813 7,521,813 ..............
10 RETIRED PAY ACCRUAL 2,327,136 2,327,136 ..............
11 THRIFT SAVINGS PLAN MATCHING CONTRIBUTIONS 75,832 75,832 ..............
25 BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR HOUSING 2,173,982 2,173,982 ..............
30 BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR SUBSISTENCE 289,916 289,916 ..............
35 INCENTIVE PAYS 94,521 94,521 ..............
40 SPECIAL PAYS 357,377 357,377 ..............
45 ALLOWANCES 198,232 198,232 ..............
50 SEPARATION PAY 56,700 56,700 ..............
55 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 574,217 574,217 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 1 13,669,726 13,669,726 ..............

ACTIVITY 2: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL
60 BASIC PAY 13,774,829 13,774,829 ..............
65 RETIRED PAY ACCRUAL 4,264,203 4,264,203 ..............
66 THRIFT SAVINGS PLAN MATCHING CONTRIBUTIONS 96,028 96,028 ..............
80 BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR HOUSING 4,684,587 4,684,587 ..............
85 INCENTIVE PAYS 88,082 88,082 ..............
90 SPECIAL PAYS 1,115,638 1,115,638 ..............
95 ALLOWANCES 731,968 731,968 ..............
100 SEPARATION PAY 266,807 266,807 ..............
105 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 1,053,774 1,053,774 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 2 26,075,916 26,075,916 ..............

ACTIVITY 3: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF CADETS
110 ACADEMY CADETS 90,098 90,098 ..............

ACTIVITY 4: SUBSISTENCE OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL
115 BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR SUBSISTENCE 1,234,543 1,234,543 ..............
120 SUBSISTENCE-IN-KIND 661,633 661,633 ..............
121 FAMILY SUBSISTENCE SUPPLEMENTAL ALLOWANCE 50 50 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 4 1,896,226 1,896,226 ..............

ACTIVITY 5: PERMANENT CHANGE OF STATION
125 ACCESSION TRAVEL 139,802 139,802 ..............
130 TRAINING TRAVEL 141,782 141,782 ..............
135 OPERATIONAL TRAVEL 433,985 433,985 ..............
140 ROTATIONAL TRAVEL 669,799 669,799 ..............
145 SEPARATION TRAVEL 214,770 214,770 ..............
150 TRAVEL OF ORGANIZED UNITS 1,812 1,812 ..............
155 NON-TEMPORARY STORAGE 698 698 ..............
160 TEMPORARY LODGING EXPENSE 60,824 60,824 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 5 1,663,472 1,663,472 ..............

ACTIVITY 6: OTHER MILITARY PERSONNEL COSTS
170 APPREHENSION OF MILITARY DESERTERS 234 234 ..............
175 INTEREST ON UNIFORMED SERVICES SAVINGS 128 128 ..............
180 DEATH GRATUITIES 42,600 42,600 ..............
185 UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS 68,731 68,731 ..............
195 EDUCATION BENEFITS 6,006 6,006 ..............
200 ADOPTION EXPENSES 496 496 ..............
210 TRANSPORTATION SUBSIDY 11,623 11,623 ..............
215 PARTIAL DISLOCATION ALLOWANCE 74 74 ..............
217 RESERVE OFFICERS TRAINING CORPS (ROTC) 105,698 107,198 +1,500
218 JUNIOR ROTC 29,746 39,746 +10,000
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 6 265,336 276,836 +11,500

LESS REIMBURSABLES -313,302 -313,302 ..............
UNDISTRIBUTED ADJUSTMENT .............. -390,173 -390,173
=================================================
TOTAL, ACTIVE FORCES, ARMY 42,347,472 42,968,799 -378,673
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, TITLE I, MILITARY PERSONNEL, ARMY 43,347,472 42,968,799 -378,673
=================================================
TOTAL, TRICARE ACCRUAL PAYMENTS (PERMANENT, 2,186,006 2,186,006 ..............
INDEFINITE AUTHORITY) (PUBLIC LAW 108-375)
=================================================
TOTAL, MILITARY PERSONNEL, ARMY 45,533,478 45,154,805 -378,673
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by
the Committee:

Military Personnel, Navy

Appropriations, 2019.................................... $30,164,481,000
Budget estimate, 2020................................... 31,831,199,000
Committee recommendation................................ 31,763,263,000

The Committee recommends an appropriation of
$31,763,263,000. This is $67,936,000 below the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this
appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

ACTIVITY 1: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF OFFICERS
5 BASIC PAY 4,561,662 4,561,662 ..............
10 RETIRED PAY ACCRUAL 1,411,830 1,411,830 ..............
11 THRIFT SAVINGS PLAN MATCHING CONTRIBUTIONS 59,653 59,653 ..............
25 BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR HOUSING 1,599,286 1,599,286 ..............
30 BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR SUBSISTENCE 172,715 172,715 ..............
35 INCENTIVE PAYS 167,877 167,877 ..............
40 SPECIAL PAYS 457,901 457,901 ..............
45 ALLOWANCES 120,046 120,046 ..............
50 SEPARATION PAY 43,367 43,367 ..............
55 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 347,668 347,668 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 1 8,942,005 8,942,005 ..............

ACTIVITY 2: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL
60 BASIC PAY 10,279,881 10,279,881 ..............
65 RETIRED PAY ACCRUAL 3,186,556 3,186,556 ..............
66 THRIFT SAVINGS PLAN MATCHING CONTRIBUTIONS 100,891 100,891 ..............
80 BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR HOUSING 4,785,627 4,785,627 ..............
85 INCENTIVE PAYS 109,034 109,034 ..............
90 SPECIAL PAYS 1,006,625 1,006,625 ..............
95 ALLOWANCES 624,120 624,120 ..............
100 SEPARATION PAY 84,737 84,737 ..............
105 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 786,411 786,411 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 2 20,963,882 20,963,882 ..............

ACTIVITY 3: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF MIDSHIPMEN
110 MIDSHIPMEN 85,203 85,203 ..............

ACTIVITY 4: SUBSISTENCE OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL
115 BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR SUBSISTENCE 847,463 847,463 ..............
120 SUBSISTENCE-IN-KIND 432,870 432,870 ..............
121 FAMILY SUBSISTENCE SUPPLEMENTAL ALLOWANCE 5 5 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 4 1,280,338 1,280,338 ..............

ACTIVITY 5: PERMANENT CHANGE OF STATION
125 ACCESSION TRAVEL 91,470 91,470 ..............
130 TRAINING TRAVEL 102,482 102,482 ..............
135 OPERATIONAL TRAVEL 231,305 231,305 ..............
140 ROTATIONAL TRAVEL 280,181 280,181 ..............
145 SEPARATION TRAVEL 113,668 113,668 ..............
150 TRAVEL OF ORGANIZED UNITS 30,258 30,258 ..............
155 NON-TEMPORARY STORAGE 13,695 13,695 ..............
160 TEMPORARY LODGING EXPENSE 16,398 16,398 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 5 879,457 879,457 ..............

ACTIVITY 6: OTHER MILITARY PERSONNEL COSTS
170 APPREHENSION OF MILITARY DESERTERS 37 37 ..............
175 INTEREST ON UNIFORMED SERVICES SAVINGS 1,252 1,252 ..............
180 DEATH GRATUITIES 22,100 22,100 ..............
185 UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS 41,522 41,522 ..............
195 EDUCATION BENEFITS 8,745 8,745 ..............
200 ADOPTION EXPENSES 178 178 ..............
210 TRANSPORTATION SUBSIDY 4,270 4,270 ..............
215 PARTIAL DISLOCATION ALLOWANCE 34 34 ..............
217 RESERVE OFFICERS TRAINING CORPS (ROTC) 21,458 22,258 +800
218 JUNIOR ROTC 15,259 20,259 +5,000
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 6 114,855 120,655 +5,800

LESS REIMBURSABLES -434,541 -434,541 ..............
UNDISTRIBUTED ADJUSTMENT .............. -73,736 -73,736
=================================================
TOTAL, ACTIVE FORCES, NAVY 31,831,199 31,763,263 -67,936
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, TITLE I, MILITARY PERSONNEL, NAVY 31,831,199 31,763,263 -67,936
=================================================
TOTAL, TRICARE ACCRUAL PAYMENTS (PERMANENT, 1,549,638 1,549,638 ..............
INDEFINITE AUTHORITY) (PUBLIC LAW 108-375)
=================================================
TOTAL, MILITARY PERSONNEL, NAVY 33,380,837 33,312,901 -67,936
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by
the Committee:

Military Personnel, Marine Corps

Appropriations, 2019.................................... $13,779,038,000
Budget estimate, 2020................................... 14,175,211,000
Committee recommendation................................ 14,088,775,000

The Committee recommends an appropriation of
$14,088,775,000. This is $86,436,000 below the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this
appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

ACTIVITY 1: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF OFFICERS
5 BASIC PAY 1,715,465 1,715,465 ..............
10 RETIRED PAY ACCRUAL 530,702 530,702 ..............
11 THRIFT SAVINGS PLAN MATCHING CONTRIBUTIONS 27,890 27,890 ..............
25 BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR HOUSING 537,566 537,566 ..............
30 BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR SUBSISTENCE 67,825 67,825 ..............
35 INCENTIVE PAYS 51,099 51,099 ..............
40 SPECIAL PAYS 4,125 4,125 ..............
45 ALLOWANCES 50,685 50,685 ..............
50 SEPARATION PAY 15,112 15,112 ..............
55 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 131,233 131,233 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 1 3,131,702 3,131,702 ..............

ACTIVITY 2: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL
60 BASIC PAY 5,349,883 5,349,883 ..............
65 RETIRED PAY ACCRUAL 1,653,002 1,653,002 ..............
66 THRIFT SAVINGS PLAN MATCHING CONTRIBUTIONS 113,526 113,526 ..............
80 BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR HOUSING 1,599,187 1,599,187 ..............
85 INCENTIVE PAYS 7,937 7,937 ..............
90 SPECIAL PAYS 204,034 204,034 ..............
95 ALLOWANCES 315,811 315,811 ..............
100 SEPARATION PAY 94,173 94,173 ..............
105 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 408,685 408,685 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 2 9,746,238 9,746,238 ..............

ACTIVITY 4: SUBSISTENCE OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL
115 BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR SUBSISTENCE 430,434 430,434 ..............
120 SUBSISTENCE-IN-KIND 400,978 400,978 ..............
121 FAMILY SUBSISTENCE SUPPLEMENTAL ALLOWANCE 10 10 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 4 831,422 831,422 ..............

ACTIVITY 5: PERMANENT CHANGE OF STATION
125 ACCESSION TRAVEL 53,167 53,167 ..............
130 TRAINING TRAVEL 18,363 18,363 ..............
135 OPERATIONAL TRAVEL 167,868 167,868 ..............
140 ROTATIONAL TRAVEL 111,200 111,200 ..............
145 SEPARATION TRAVEL 77,577 77,577 ..............
150 TRAVEL OF ORGANIZED UNITS 682 682 ..............
155 NON-TEMPORARY STORAGE 10,505 10,505 ..............
160 TEMPORARY LODGING EXPENSE 4,345 4,345 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 5 443,707 443,707 ..............

ACTIVITY 6: OTHER MILITARY PERSONNEL COSTS
170 APPREHENSION OF MILITARY DESERTERS 273 273 ..............
175 INTEREST ON UNIFORMED SERVICES SAVINGS 19 19 ..............
180 DEATH GRATUITIES 13,100 13,100 ..............
185 UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS 26,734 26,734 ..............
195 EDUCATION BENEFITS 3,611 3,611 ..............
200 ADOPTION EXPENSES 100 100 ..............
210 TRANSPORTATION SUBSIDY 1,487 1,487 ..............
215 PARTIAL DISLOCATION ALLOWANCE 108 108 ..............
216 SGLI EXTRA HAZARD PAYMENTS 2,075 2,075 ..............
218 JUNIOR ROTC 3,866 5,930 +2,064
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 6 51,373 53,437 +2,064

LESS REIMBURSABLES -29,231 -29,231 ..............
UNDISTRIBUTED ADJUSTMENT .............. -88,500 -88,500
=================================================
TOTAL, ACTIVE FORCES, MARINE CORPS 14,175,211 14,088,775 -86,436
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, TITLE I, MILITARY PERSONNEL, MARINE CORPS 14,175,211 14,088,775 -86,436
=================================================
TOTAL, TRICARE ACCRUAL PAYMENTS (PERMANENT, 859,667 859,667 ..............
INDEFINITE AUTHORITY) (PUBLIC LAW 108-375)
=================================================
TOTAL, MILITARY PERSONNEL, MARINE CORPS 15,034,878 14,948,442 -86,436
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by
the Committee:

Military Personnel, Air Force

Appropriations, 2019.................................... $30,074,691,000
Budget estimate, 2020................................... 31,284,959,000
Committee recommendation................................ 31,261,759,000

The Committee recommends an appropriation of
$31,261,759,000. This is $23,200,000 below the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this
appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

ACTIVITY 1: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF OFFICERS
5 BASIC PAY 5,419,404 5,419,404 ..............
10 RETIRED PAY ACCRUAL 1,666,501 1,666,501 ..............
11 THRIFT SAVINGS PLAN MATCHING CONTRIBUTIONS 68,361 68,361 ..............
25 BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR HOUSING 1,630,177 1,630,177 ..............
30 BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR SUBSISTENCE 204,432 204,432 ..............
35 INCENTIVE PAYS 349,589 349,589 ..............
40 SPECIAL PAYS 337,986 337,986 ..............
45 ALLOWANCES 119,612 119,612 ..............
50 SEPARATION PAY 43,588 43,588 ..............
55 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 413,905 413,905 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 1 10,253,555 10,253,555 ..............

ACTIVITY 2: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL
60 BASIC PAY 9,912,417 9,912,417 ..............
65 RETIRED PAY ACCRUAL 3,061,954 3,061,954 ..............
66 THRIFT SAVINGS PLAN MATCHING CONTRIBUTIONS 77,645 77,645 ..............
80 BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR HOUSING 4,017,647 4,017,647 ..............
85 INCENTIVE PAYS 61,239 61,239 ..............
90 SPECIAL PAYS 337,702 337,702 ..............
95 ALLOWANCES 630,858 630,858 ..............
100 SEPARATION PAY 136,265 136,265 ..............
105 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 758,300 758,300 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 2 18,994,027 18,994,027 ..............

ACTIVITY 3: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF CADETS
110 ACADEMY CADETS 80,959 80,959 ..............

ACTIVITY 4: SUBSISTENCE OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL
115 BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR SUBSISTENCE 1,047,572 1,047,572 ..............
120 SUBSISTENCE-IN-KIND 159,138 159,138 ..............
121 FAMILY SUBSISTENCE SUPPLEMENTAL ALLOWANCE 3 3 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 4 1,206,713 1,206,713 ..............

ACTIVITY 5: PERMANENT CHANGE OF STATION
125 ACCESSION TRAVEL 102,944 102,944 ..............
130 TRAINING TRAVEL 59,189 59,189 ..............
135 OPERATIONAL TRAVEL 284,731 284,731 ..............
140 ROTATIONAL TRAVEL 453,527 453,527 ..............
145 SEPARATION TRAVEL 162,547 162,547 ..............
150 TRAVEL OF ORGANIZED UNITS 4,347 4,347 ..............
155 NON-TEMPORARY STORAGE 26,215 26,215 ..............
160 TEMPORARY LODGING EXPENSE 33,162 33,162 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 5 1,126,662 1,126,662 ..............

ACTIVITY 6: OTHER MILITARY PERSONNEL COSTS
170 APPREHENSION OF MILITARY DESERTERS 12 12 ..............
175 INTEREST ON UNIFORMED SERVICES SAVINGS 2,299 2,299 ..............
180 DEATH GRATUITIES 15,000 15,000 ..............
185 UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS 22,571 22,571 ..............
195 EDUCATION BENEFITS 28 28 ..............
200 ADOPTION EXPENSES 395 395 ..............
210 TRANSPORTATION SUBSIDY 2,718 2,718 ..............
215 PARTIAL DISLOCATION ALLOWANCE 492 492 ..............
217 RESERVE OFFICERS TRAINING CORPS (ROTC) 46,429 46,429 ..............
218 JUNIOR ROTC 20,439 27,439 +7,000
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 6 110,383 117,383 +7,000

LESS REIMBURSABLES -487,340 -487,340 ..............
UNDISTRIBUTED ADJUSTMENT .............. -30,200 -30,200
=================================================
TOTAL, ACTIVE FORCES, AIR FORCE 31,284,959 31,261,759 -23,200
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, TITLE I, MILITARY PERSONNEL, AIR FORCE 31,284,959 31,261,759 -23,200
=================================================
TOTAL, TRICARE ACCRUAL PAYMENTS (PERMANENT, 1,514,694 1,514,694 ..............
INDEFINITE AUTHORITY) (PUBLIC LAW 108-375)
=================================================
TOTAL, MILITARY PERSONNEL, AIR FORCE 32,799,653 32,776,453 -23,200
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by
the Committee:

Reserve Personnel, Army

Appropriations, 2019.................................... $4,836,947,000
Budget estimate, 2020................................... 4,964,671,000
Committee recommendation................................ 4,920,866,000

The Committee recommends an appropriation of
$4,920,866,000. This is $43,805,000 below the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this
appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

ACTIVITY 1: RESERVE COMPONENT TRAINING AND SUPPORT
10 PAY GROUP A TRAINING (15 DAYS & DRILLS 24/48) 1,591,993 1,591,993 ..............
20 PAY GROUP B TRAINING (BACKFILL FOR ACTIVE DUTY) 45,748 45,748 ..............
30 PAY GROUP F TRAINING (RECRUITS) 201,613 201,613 ..............
40 PAY GROUP P TRAINING (PIPELINE RECRUITS) 6,717 6,717 ..............
60 MOBILIZATION TRAINING 2,373 2,373 ..............
70 SCHOOL TRAINING 240,785 240,785 ..............
80 SPECIAL TRAINING 382,398 382,398 ..............
90 ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT 2,358,782 2,358,782 ..............
94 THRIFT SAVINGS PLAN MATCHING CONTRIBUTIONS 11,205 11,205 ..............
100 EDUCATION BENEFITS 22,714 22,714 ..............
120 HEALTH PROFESSION SCHOLARSHIP 61,392 61,392 ..............
130 OTHER PROGRAMS 38,951 38,951 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 1 4,964,671 4,964,671 ..............

UNDISTRIBUTED ADJUSTMENT .............. -43,805 -43,805
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, TITLE I, RESERVE PERSONNEL, ARMY 4,964,671 4,920,866 -43,805
=================================================
TOTAL, TRICARE ACCRUAL PAYMENTS (PERMANENT, 394,612 394,612 ..............
INDEFINITE AUTHORITY) (PUBLIC LAW 108-375)
=================================================
TOTAL, RESERVE PERSONNEL, ARMY 5,359,283 5,315,478 -43,805
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by
the Committee:

Reserve Personnel, Navy

Appropriations, 2019.................................... $2,049,021,000
Budget estimate, 2020................................... 2,123,947,000
Committee recommendation................................ 2,121,507,000

The Committee recommends an appropriation of
$2,121,507,000. This is $2,440,000 below the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this
appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

ACTIVITY 1: RESERVE COMPONENT TRAINING AND SUPPORT
10 PAY GROUP A TRAINING (15 DAYS & DRILLS 24/48) 712,650 712,650 ..............
20 PAY GROUP B TRAINING (BACKFILL FOR ACTIVE DUTY) 7,839 7,839 ..............
30 PAY GROUP F TRAINING (RECRUITS) 54,101 54,101 ..............
60 MOBILIZATION TRAINING 12,537 12,537 ..............
70 SCHOOL TRAINING 56,593 56,593 ..............
80 SPECIAL TRAINING 124,738 124,738 ..............
90 ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT 1,091,583 1,091,583 ..............
94 THRIFT SAVINGS PLAN MATCHING CONTRIBUTIONS 6,326 6,326 ..............
100 EDUCATION BENEFITS 1,116 1,116 ..............
120 HEALTH PROFESSION SCHOLARSHIP 56,464 56,464 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 1 2,123,947 2,123,947 ..............

UNDISTRIBUTED ADJUSTMENT .............. -2,440 -2,440
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, TITLE I, RESERVE PERSONNEL, NAVY 2,123,947 2,121,507 -2,440
=================================================
TOTAL, TRICARE ACCRUAL PAYMENTS (PERMANENT, 136,926 136,926 ..............
INDEFINITE AUTHORITY) (PUBLIC LAW 108-375)
=================================================
TOTAL, RESERVE PERSONNEL, NAVY 2,260,873 2,258,433 -2,440
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by
the Committee:

Reserve Personnel, Marine Corps

Appropriations, 2019.................................... $782,390,000
Budget estimate, 2020................................... 838,854,000
Committee recommendation................................ 837,854,000

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $837,854,000.
This is $1,000,000 below the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this
appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

ACTIVITY 1: RESERVE COMPONENT TRAINING AND SUPPORT
10 PAY GROUP A TRAINING (15 DAYS & DRILLS 24/48) 290,938 290,938 ..............
20 PAY GROUP B TRAINING (BACKFILL FOR ACT DUTY) 46,716 46,716 ..............
30 PAY GROUP F TRAINING (RECRUITS) 139,238 139,238 ..............
60 MOBILIZATION TRAINING 1,422 1,422 ..............
70 SCHOOL TRAINING 24,532 24,532 ..............
80 SPECIAL TRAINING 53,388 53,388 ..............
90 ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT 264,360 264,360 ..............
94 THRIFT SAVINGS PLAN MATCHING CONTRIBUTIONS 3,759 3,759 ..............
95 PLATOON LEADER CLASS 8,283 8,283 ..............
100 EDUCATION BENEFITS 6,218 6,218 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 1 838,854 838,854 ..............

UNDISTRIBUTED ADJUSTMENT .............. -1,000 -1,000
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, TITLE I, RESERVE PERSONNEL, MARINE CORPS 838,854 837,854 -1,000
=================================================
TOTAL, TRICARE ACCRUAL PAYMENTS (PERMANENT, 77,427 77,427 ..............
INDEFINITE AUTHORITY) (PUBLIC LAW 108-375)
=================================================
TOTAL, RESERVE PERSONNEL, MARINE CORPS 916,281 915,281 -1,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by
the Committee:

Reserve Personnel, Air Force

Appropriations, 2019.................................... $1,860,406,000
Budget estimate, 2020................................... 2,038,040,000
Committee recommendation................................ 2,022,340,000

The Committee recommends an appropriation of
$2,022,340,000. This is $15,700,000 below the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this
appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

ACTIVITY 1: RESERVE COMPONENT TRAINING AND SUPPORT
10 PAY GROUP A TRAINING (15 DAYS & DRILLS 24/48) 722,193 722,193 ..............
20 PAY GROUP B TRAINING (BACKFILL FOR ACTIVE DUTY) 102,802 102,802 ..............
30 PAY GROUP F TRAINING (RECRUITS) 54,454 54,454 ..............
40 PAY GROUP P TRAINING (PIPELINE RECRUITS) 2,669 2,669 ..............
60 MOBILIZATION TRAINING 760 760 ..............
70 SCHOOL TRAINING 169,565 169,565 ..............
80 SPECIAL TRAINING 329,355 329,355 ..............
90 ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT 570,532 570,532 ..............
94 THRIFT SAVINGS PLAN MATCHING CONTRIBUTIONS 3,390 3,390 ..............
100 EDUCATION BENEFITS 15,395 15,395 ..............
120 HEALTH PROFESSION SCHOLARSHIP 64,474 64,474 ..............
130 OTHER PROGRAMS (ADMIN & SUPPORT) 2,451 2,451 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 1 2,038,040 2,038,040 ..............

UNDISTRIBUTED ADJUSTMENT .............. -15,700 -15,700
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, TITLE I, RESERVE PERSONNEL, AIR FORCE 2,038,040 2,022,340 -15,700
=================================================
TOTAL, TRICARE ACCRUAL PAYMENTS (PERMANENT, 139,697 139,697 ..............
INDEFINITE AUTHORITY) (PUBLIC LAW 108-375)
=================================================
TOTAL, RESERVE PERSONNEL, AIR FORCE 2,177,737 2,162,037 -15,700
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by
the Committee:

National Guard Personnel, Army

Appropriations, 2019.................................... $8,600,945,000
Budget estimate, 2020................................... 8,808,305,000
Committee recommendation................................ 8,912,605,000

The Committee recommends an appropriation of
$8,912,605,000. This is $104,300,000 above the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this
appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

ACTIVITY 1: RESERVE COMPONENT TRAINING AND SUPPORT
10 PAY GROUP A TRAINING (15 DAYS & DRILLS 24/48) 2,607,324 2,607,324 ..............
30 PAY GROUP F TRAINING (RECRUITS) 539,742 539,742 ..............
40 PAY GROUP P TRAINING (PIPELINE RECRUITS) 44,401 44,401 ..............
70 SCHOOL TRAINING 529,639 529,639 ..............
80 SPECIAL TRAINING 813,283 818,283 +5,000
90 ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT 4,182,249 4,182,749 +500
94 THRIFT SAVINGS PLAN MATCHING CONTRIBUTIONS 19,194 19,194 ..............
100 EDUCATION BENEFITS 72,473 72,473 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 1 8,808,305 8,813,805 +5,500

UNDISTRIBUTED ADJUSTMENT .............. -121,800 -121,800
ADVANCED TRAUMA TRAINING .............. 1,100 +1,100
OPERATION GUARDIAN SUPPORT .............. 219,500 +219,500
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, TITLE I, NATIONAL GUARD PERSONNEL, ARMY 8,808,305 8,912,605 +104,300
=================================================
TOTAL, TRICARE ACCRUAL PAYMENTS (PERMANENT, 703,636 703,636 ..............
INDEFINITE AUTHORITY) (PUBLIC LAW 108-375)
=================================================
TOTAL, NATIONAL GUARD PERSONNEL, ARMY 9,511,941 9,616,241 +104,300
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by
the Committee:

National Guard Cyber Units.--The Committee is aware of the
critical capability that the National Guard provides to state
governments, and in support of the Defense Department's
national cyber defense mission. The Committee strongly urges
the Department to prioritize continued development of cyber
capabilities within the National Guard, and ensure cyber
capabilities in every State.

National Guard Personnel, Air Force

Appropriations, 2019.................................... $3,699,080,000
Budget estimate, 2020................................... 4,063,845,000
Committee recommendation................................ 4,086,045,000

The Committee recommends an appropriation of
$4,086,045,000. This is $22,200,000 above the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this
appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

ACTIVITY 1: RESERVE COMPONENT TRAINING AND SUPPORT
10 PAY GROUP A TRAINING (15 DAYS & DRILLS 24/48) 935,299 935,299 ..............
30 PAY GROUP F TRAINING (RECRUITS) 81,644 81,644 ..............
40 PAY GROUP P TRAINING (PIPELINE RECRUITS) 7,969 7,969 ..............
70 SCHOOL TRAINING 357,890 357,890 ..............
80 SPECIAL TRAINING 218,104 220,104 +2,000
90 ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT 2,438,963 2,439,463 +500
94 THRIFT SAVINGS PLAN MATCHING CONTRIBUTIONS 10,083 10,083 ..............
100 EDUCATION BENEFITS 13,893 13,893 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 1 4,063,845 4,066,345 +2,500

UNDISTRIBUTED ADJUSTMENT .............. -12,200 -12,200
ADVANCED TRAUMA TRAINING .............. 2,200 +2,200
OPERATION GUARDIAN SUPPORT .............. 29,700 +29,700
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, TITLE I, NATIONAL GUARD PERSONNEL, AIR FORCE 4,063,845 4,086,045 +22,200
=================================================
TOTAL, TRICARE ACCRUAL PAYMENTS (PERMANENT, 254,512 254,512 ..............
INDEFINITE AUTHORITY) (PUBLIC LAW 108-375)
=================================================
TOTAL, NATIONAL GUARD PERSONNEL, AIR FORCE 4,318,357 4,340,557 +22,200
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by
the Committee:

TITLE II

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE

Funds appropriated under this title provide the resources
required to prepare for and conduct combat operations and other
peace time missions. These funds are used to purchase fuel and
spare parts for training operations, pay supporting civilian
personnel, and purchase supplies, equipment, and service
contracts for the repair of weapons and facilities.
The President's fiscal year 2020 budget requests a total of
$123,944,614,000 for operation and maintenance appropriations.

SUMMARY OF COMMITTEE ACTION

The Committee recommends operation and maintenance
appropriations totaling $200,610,130,000 for fiscal year 2020.
This is $76,665,516,000 above the budget estimate.
Committee recommended operation and maintenance
appropriations for fiscal year 2020 are summarized below:

SUMMARY OF OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE APPROPRIATIONS
[In thousands of dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Change from
Account 2020 budget Committee budget
estimate recommendation estimate
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Operation and Maintenance:
Operation and Maintenance, Army............................. 22,797,873 40,437,663 +17,639,790
Operation and Maintenance, Navy............................. 25,952,718 48,200,088 +22,247,370
Operation and Maintenance, Marine Corps..................... 3,928,045 7,608,598 +3,680,553
Operation and Maintenance, Air Force........................ 21,278,499 43,092,286 +21,813,787
Operation and Maintenance, Space Force...................... 72,436 72,436 ..............
Operation and Maintenance, Defense-Wide..................... 37,399,341 37,236,175 -163,166
Operation and Maintenance, Army Reserve..................... 1,080,103 2,990,610 +1,910,507
Operation and Maintenance, Navy Reserve..................... 261,284 1,100,116 +838,832
Operation and Maintenance, Marine Corps Reserve............. 61,090 292,076 +230,986
Operation and Maintenance, Air Force Reserve................ 2,231,445 3,222,818 +991,373
Operation and Maintenance, Army National Guard.............. 3,335,755 7,588,903 +4,253,148
Operation and Maintenance, Air National Guard............... 3,612,156 6,732,792 +3,120,636
United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces......... 14,771 14,771 ..............
Environmental Restoration, Army............................. 207,518 209,218 +1,700
Environmental Restoration, Navy............................. 335,932 335,932 ..............
Environmental Restoration, Air Force........................ 302,744 402,744 +100,000
Environmental Restoration, Defense-Wide..................... 9,105 9,105 ..............
Environmental Restoration, Formerly Used Defense Sites...... 216,499 216,499 ..............
Overseas Humanitarian, Disaster, and Civic Aid.............. 108,600 108,600 ..............
Cooperative Threat Reduction Account........................ 338,700 338,700 ..............
Department of Defense Acquisition Workforce Development Fund 400,000 400,000 ..............
-----------------------------------------------
Total..................................................... 123,944,614 200,610,130 +76,665,516
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

REPROGRAMMING GUIDANCE FOR OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE ACCOUNTS

The Committee directs the Secretary of Defense to submit
the Base for Reprogramming (DD Form 1414) for each of the
fiscal year 2020 appropriation accounts not later than 60 days
after the enactment of this act. The Secretary of Defense is
prohibited from executing any reprogramming or transfer of
funds for any purpose other than originally appropriated until
the aforementioned report is submitted to the House and Senate
Appropriations Committees.
The Committee directs the Secretary of Defense to use the
normal prior approval reprogramming procedures to transfer
funds in the services' operation and maintenance accounts
between O-1 budget activities, or between subactivity groups in
the case of Operation and Maintenance, Defense-Wide, in excess
of $15,000,000. In addition, the Secretary of Defense shall
follow prior approval reprogramming procedures for transfers in
excess of $15,000,000 out of the following readiness sub-
activity groups:
Army:
Maneuver units
Modular support brigades
Land forces operations support
Aviation assets
Force readiness operations support
Land forces depot maintenance
Base operations support
Facilities sustainment, restoration and
modernization
Specialized skill training
Navy:
Mission and other flight operations
Fleet air training
Aircraft depot maintenance
Mission and other ship operations
Ship depot maintenance
Facilities sustainment, restoration and
modernization
Marine Corps:
Operational forces
Field logistics
Depot maintenance
Facilities sustainment, restoration and
modernization
Air Force:
Primary combat forces
Combat enhancement forces
Depot purchase equipment maintenance
Facilities sustainment, restoration and
modernization
Contractor logistics support and system support
Flying hour program
Air Force Reserve:
Primary combat forces
Air National Guard:
Aircraft operations
Additionally, the Committee directs the Secretary of
Defense to use normal prior approval reprogramming procedures
when implementing transfers in excess of $15,000,000 into the
following budget sub-activities:
Operation and Maintenance, Army:
Recruiting and advertising
Operation and Maintenance, Army National Guard:
Other personnel support/recruiting and
advertising

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE BUDGET EXECUTION DATA

The Committee directs the Secretary of Defense to continue
to provide the congressional defense committees with quarterly
budget execution data. Such data should be provided not later
than 45 days after the close of each quarter of the fiscal
year, and should be provided for each O-1 budget activity,
activity group, and sub-activity group for each of the active,
defense-wide, reserve, and National Guard components. For each
O-1 budget activity, activity group, and sub-activity group,
these reports should include the budget request and actual
obligation amount, the distribution of unallocated
congressional adjustments to the budget request, all
adjustments made by the Department in establishing the Base for
Reprogramming (DD Form 1414) report, all adjustments resulting
from below threshold reprogrammings, and all adjustments
resulting from prior approval reprogramming requests.

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE SPECIAL INTEREST ITEMS

Items for which additional funds have been provided or have
been specifically reduced as shown in the project level tables
or in paragraphs using the phrase ``only for'' or ``only to''
in the Committee report are congressional special interest
items for the purpose of the Base for Reprogramming (DD Form
1414). Each of these items must be carried on the DD Form 1414
at the stated amount as specifically addressed in the Committee
report. Below Threshold Reprogrammings may not be used to
either restore or reduce funding from congressional special
interest items as identified on the DD Form 1414.

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OVERVIEW

Civilian Workforce.--The Committee expects the Department
of Defense to maintain a stable, effective, right-sized
civilian cadre. The Committee further expects the hiring
process to be responsive and efficient in order to build the
workforce needed to achieve its mission and strategic goals.
The Committee recognizes the critical role that the civilian
workforce plays every day in ensuring the mission success of
the Armed Forces.
Contract Services Spending.--The Committee is concerned
that the Department of Defense lacks adequate policies,
procedures, and controls in place to enforce limitations on the
annual amounts expended on contracted services. There is
further concern that not all contracted services are being
subjected to spending limitations because of the exclusion of
contracted services involving Economy Act transfers between and
within Department of Defense components. Additionally, because
of the disparity between the levels of contracted services
captured in the Inventory of Contracts for Services, required
under section 2330a of title 10, United States Code, and what
the Department budgets for contracted services, it appears as
though the Department does not deliberately plan for most
contracted services. The Committee urges the Under Secretary of
Defense (Comptroller) to review the efforts of the financial
management and acquisition communities to implement effective
control mechanisms for contracted services spending.
Tobacco Use in the Military.--Tobacco use is the leading
cause of preventable death in the United States, with more than
480,000 deaths attributable to cigarette smoking each year. The
Department of Defense has affirmed the goal of a tobacco-free
military, and has implemented a range of programs including
public education campaigns, the banning of all tobacco use
during basic training, and the prohibition of tobacco use by
instructors in the presence of students. The Committee supports
the Secretary of Defense's Policy Memorandum 16-001 from April
8, 2016, directing the military services ``to ensure a
comprehensive tobacco policy that assists with preventing
initiation of tobacco use, helping those who want to quit using
tobacco succeed, and decreasing exposure to second-hand smoke
for all our people.'' As a result, the Committee retains a
provision from the Department of Defense Appropriations Act,
2019 (Public Law 115-245) directing the elimination of the
price subsidy provided to tobacco products at military
exchanges.
Voluntary Military Education Programs--Enforcing Memorandum
of Understanding.--The Committee supports the Department of
Defense's commitment to enforcing the terms of the current
Memorandum of Understanding [MOU] with all educational
institutions providing educational programs through the
Department of Defense tuition assistance program. The Committee
is also supportive of the Department's efforts to increase
participating institutions' understanding of their contractual
obligations as MOU signatories and the procedures for
enforcement as outlined in Department of Defense Instruction
[DODI] 1322.25. The Committee urges the Department to maintain
vigorous defense of these responsibilities in order to protect
the integrity and quality of voluntary military education
programs.
Drinking Water Contamination.--The Committee remains
concerned about the health implications of contaminated
drinking water due to perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl
substances [PFAS]. The Committee worked with the military
services to assess unfunded executable requirements in fiscal
year 2020 due to issues associated with PFAS and provided
additional funding accordingly. The Committee intends to
aggressively follow up with the services on procedures for
timely remediation and community notification.
For the National Guard, the Committee has increased funding
for such purposes in the operation and maintenance accounts.
However, the Committee acknowledges that section 319 included
in S. 1790, the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal
Year 2020, as passed by the Senate, proposes the establishment
of environmental restoration accounts for the National Guard
components and may consider transferring the increases to the
new accounts pending the outcome of National Defense
Authorization Act conference negotiations.
Uncontaminated Water for Agricultural Purposes.--The
Committee recognizes section 1073 included in S. 1790, the
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020, as
passed by the Senate, and urges the secretaries of the military
services to keep the congressional defense committees apprised
of plans to use these authorities.
Boards for Correction of Military Records.--The Air Force
Review Board Agency, Army Review Boards Agency, and the Board
of Naval Corrections play a decisive role ensuring that
military personnel enjoy fair, just, and equitable decisions as
it pertains to their service records and benefits. However, the
Committee is concerned that the Boards have failed to modernize
personnel, processes, and infrastructure at the pace required
for demonstrated increases in the volume and complexity of its
caseloads. As a result, the Boards are significantly under-
resourced. The Committee also notes that none of the Boards
have current, validated needs assessments for personnel,
information technology, and operations, which are critical to
the budget process. The Committee has not yet received the
report directed by the Department of Defense Appropriations
Act, 2018, and awaits receipt of the service Secretaries' plans
to address these resourcing issues.
Perfluorinated Chemicals Contamination and First Responder
Exposure.--The Committee remains concerned about the health
implications of contaminated drinking water due to
perfluorinated chemicals [PFCs], including the exposure of
Department of Defense firefighter and first responder
personnel. The Committee understands that the Air Force
currently uses Phos-Chek 3 foam, which contains trace amounts
of PFCs, but does not accumulate in the body. Given the lack of
definitive guidance around exposure levels, the Committee urges
the Secretary of the Air Force to accelerate adoption of other
forms of foam which would meet military specifications and do
not contain PFCs. The Committee further urges the Secretary of
Defense to coordinate with the Agency for Toxic Substances and
Disease Registry on validated blood assay research for these
chemicals and integrate that knowledge into the policies and
procedures for Department of Defense first responders. Finally,
the Committee directs the Assistant Secretary of Defense
(Health Affairs) to brief the House and Senate Appropriations
Committees not later than 180 days after the enactment of this
act on a plan to test and track potential first responder
exposure to these chemicals as part of their existing, annual
medical surveillance exams.
Military Spouse Employment.--The Committee recognizes the
challenges military spouses face when seeking and retaining
employment and the impact these issues can have on a military
family. Military Spouse Economic Empowerment Zones were
launched in 2018 in cities across America to address local
military spouse unemployment and underemployment issues through
the efforts of local working groups. These groups work to
establish a range of local employment-related resources and to
identify opportunities as well as barriers to entry for
military spouses seeking meaningful employment. The Committee
encourages the Secretary of Defense to continue to facilitate
collaboration between local and national employers, educational
institutions, and community organizations to build a robust
employment network for military spouses.
The Committee further encourages the Secretary of Defense
to enter into a cooperative agreement with the Council of State
Governments to assist in the funding and development of
interstate compacts on licensed occupations, in an effort to
increase military spouse employment by removing limits on the
portability of employment licenses and credentials across State
lines.
Operation and Maintenance Budget Justification.--The
Committee commends the Department for the improvements in the
Operation and Maintenance budget materials made over the past
several years. To further inform the congressional review, the
Committee directs the following actions:
--The Commander, United States Special Operations Command, in
coordination with the Assistant Secretary of Defense
for Special Operations and Low-Intensity Conflict, and
the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller), shall
develop and submit performance criteria for each sub-
activity group with the fiscal year 2021 President's
budget request.
--The Secretary of Defense shall submit a separate OP-5 and
OP-32 exhibit for each line that is requested on the O-
1 breakout of Operation and Maintenance Programs. This
direction is specifically for the Operation and
Maintenance, Defense-Wide [O&M, DW] appropriation. The
fiscal year 2020 President's budget request broke out
cyber lines in O&M, DW yet the narrative associated
with those new lines is buried within the exhibit for
each agency. In another instance, the budget request
for The Joint Chiefs of Staff includes four separate
lines on the O-1 yet there is only one OP-5 exhibit
rolling up all of those lines and does not provide
sufficient detail for each.
--Each service shall include details required by Section N of
the Exhibit OP-5 Base Support Program [Attachment 8] as
shown in the Department of Defense Financial Management
Regulation [DoD 7000.14-R]. This references Child and
Youth Development Programs and the services shall
provide data for each and every category on the list in
the Regulations such as the number of child development
centers, total number of children receiving care, total
number of children on the waitlist, etc. Additionally,
there shall be a new category to capture the funding
level for childcare programs specifically.
Disaster Relief Assistance to the Bahamas.--The Committee
is deeply concerned about the destruction and devastation in
the Bahamas by Hurricane Dorian and appreciates that the
Department of Defense has already taken steps to provide
humanitarian and disaster relief funding and support, including
logistics, transportation, health, and engineering assessments
using Overseas Humanitarian, Disaster and Civic Aid [OHDACA]
funding. The Committee encourages the Department to continue to
prioritize OHDACA funds for these recovery efforts and to
report to the congressional defense committees accounting for
these expenditures and any additional costs due to damage from
Hurricane Dorian to military installations or assets.

Operation and Maintenance, Army

Appropriations, 2019.................................... $40,145,482,000
Budget estimate, 2020................................... 22,797,873,000
Committee recommendation................................ 40,437,663,000

The Committee recommends an appropriation of
$40,437,663,000. This is $17,639,790,000 above the budget
estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this
appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

BUDGET ACTIVITY 1: OPERATING FORCES

LAND FORCES
10 MANEUVER UNITS .............. 1,729,422 +1,729,422
20 MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES .............. 122,815 +122,815
30 ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADES .............. 716,356 +716,356
40 THEATER LEVEL ASSETS .............. 878,891 +878,891
50 LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT .............. 1,227,477 +1,227,477
60 AVIATION ASSETS .............. 1,255,606 +1,255,606

LAND FORCES READINESS
70 FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT 408,031 3,114,315 +2,706,284
80 LAND FORCES SYSTEMS READINESS 417,069 426,269 +9,200
90 LAND FORCES DEPOT MAINTENANCE .............. 983,327 +983,327

LAND FORCES READINESS SUPPORT
100 BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT .............. 7,976,933 +7,976,933
110 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION, & MODERNIZATION 4,326,840 4,330,840 +4,000
120 MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONAL HEADQUARTERS 405,612 405,612 ..............

COMBATANT COMMAND SUPPORT
160 US AFRICA COMMAND 251,511 234,511 -17,000
170 US EUROPEAN COMMAND 146,358 146,358 ..............
180 US SOUTHERN COMMAND 191,840 209,840 +18,000
190 US FORCES KOREA 57,603 57,603 ..............
200 CYBERSPACE ACTIVITIES--CYBERSPACE OPERATIONS 423,156 423,156 ..............
210 CYBER SPACE ACTIVITIES--CYBERSECURITY 551,185 551,185 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 1 7,179,205 24,790,516 +17,611,311

BUDGET ACTIVITY 2: MOBILIZATION

MOBILITY OPERATIONS
220 STRATEGIC MOBILITY 380,577 380,577 ..............
230 ARMY PREPOSITIONED STOCKS 362,942 362,942 ..............
240 INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS 4,637 5,637 +1,000
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 2 748,156 749,156 +1,000

BUDGET ACTIVITY 3: TRAINING AND RECRUITING

ACCESSION TRAINING
250 OFFICER ACQUISITION 157,175 157,175 ..............
260 RECRUIT TRAINING 55,739 55,739 ..............
270 ONE STATION UNIT TRAINING 62,300 62,300 ..............
280 SENIOR RESERVE OFFICERS TRAINING CORPS 538,357 538,357 ..............

BASIC SKILL AND ADVANCED TRAINING
290 SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING 969,813 969,813 ..............
300 FLIGHT TRAINING 1,234,049 1,395,049 +161,000
310 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION 218,338 218,338 ..............
320 TRAINING SUPPORT 554,659 554,659 ..............

RECRUITING AND OTHER TRAINING AND EDUCATION
330 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING 716,056 706,056 -10,000
340 EXAMINING 185,034 185,034 ..............
350 OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION 214,275 214,275 ..............
360 CIVILIAN EDUCATION AND TRAINING 147,647 147,647 ..............
370 JUNIOR RESERVE OFFICERS TRAINING CORPS 173,812 176,812 +3,000
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 3 5,227,254 5,381,254 +154,000

BUDGET ACTIVITY 4: ADMIN & SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES

LOGISTICS OPERATIONS
390 SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION 559,229 559,229 ..............
400 CENTRAL SUPPLY ACTIVITIES 929,944 929,944 ..............
410 LOGISTICS SUPPORT ACTIVITIES 629,981 629,981 ..............
420 AMMUNITION MANAGEMENT 458,771 451,771 -7,000

SERVICEWIDE SUPPORT
430 ADMINISTRATION 428,768 418,768 -10,000
440 SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS 1,512,736 1,472,736 -40,000
450 MANPOWER MANAGEMENT 272,738 272,738 ..............
460 OTHER PERSONNEL SUPPORT 391,869 361,869 -30,000
470 OTHER SERVICE SUPPORT 1,901,165 1,881,165 -20,000
480 ARMY CLAIMS ACTIVITIES 198,765 198,765 ..............
490 REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT 226,248 226,248 ..............
500 FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT AND AUDIT READINESS 315,489 287,489 -28,000
510 INTERNATIONAL MILITARY HEADQUARTERS 427,254 427,254 ..............
520 MISC. SUPPORT OF OTHER NATIONS 43,248 43,248 ..............

OTHER PROGRAMS
OTHER PROGRAMS 1,347,053 1,372,383 +25,330
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 4 9,643,258 9,533,588 -109,670

OVERESTIMATION OF CIVILIAN FTE TARGETS .............. -105,000 -105,000
TRANSFER: THAAD SUSTAINMENT FROM OMDW MDA LINE .............. 87,149 +87,149
Public Law 115-68 IMPLEMENTATION AT COCOMS .............. 1,000 +1,000
=================================================
TOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, ARMY 22,797,873 40,437,663 +17,639,790
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by
the Committee:

[In thousands of dollars]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Change from
Line Item 2020 budget Committee budget
estimate recommendation estimate
------------------------------------------------------------------------
111 Maneuver Units .............. 1,729,422 +1,729,422
Transfer: .............. .............. +1,735,922
From Title
IX to
Title II
for base
requiremen
ts
Improving .............. .............. -6,500
funds
management
: Program
decrease
unaccounte
d for
112 Modular Support .............. 122,815 +122,815
Brigades
Transfer: .............. .............. +127,815
From Title
IX to
Title II
for base
requiremen
ts
Maintain .............. .............. -5,000
Program
Affordabil
ity:
Unjustifie
d growth
113 Echelons Above .............. 716,356 +716,356
Brigade
Transfer: .............. .............. +716,356
From Title
IX to
Title II
for base
requiremen
ts
114 Theater Level .............. 878,891 +878,891
Assets
Transfer: .............. .............. +890,891
From Title
IX to
Title II
for base
requiremen
ts
Maintain .............. .............. -12,000
Program
Affordabil
ity:
Unjustifie
d growth
115 Land Forces .............. 1,227,477 +1,227,477
Operations
Support
Transfer: .............. .............. +1,232,477
From Title
IX to
Title II
for base
requiremen
ts
Maintain .............. .............. -5,000
Program
Affordabil
ity:
Unjustifie
d growth
116 Aviation Assets .............. 1,255,606 +1,255,606
Transfer: .............. .............. +1,355,606
From Title
IX to
Title II
for base
requiremen
ts
Maintain .............. .............. -100,000
Program
Affordabil
ity:
Projected
underexecu
tion
121 Force Readiness 408,031 3,114,315 +2,706,284
Operations
Support
Transfer: .............. .............. +2,824,284
From Title
IX to
Title II
for base
requiremen
ts
Maintain .............. .............. -60,000
Program
Affordabil
ity:
Unjustifie
d growth
Restoring .............. .............. -30,000
acquisitio
n
accountabi
lity:
Synthetic
Training
Environmen
t
Improving .............. .............. -20,000
funds
management
: Program
decrease
unaccounte
d for
Maintain .............. .............. -8,000
Program
Affordabil
ity:
Reduce
duplicatio
n
122 Land Forces 417,069 426,269 +9,200
Systems
Readiness
Improving .............. .............. -20,000
funds
management
: Program
decrease
unaccounte
d for
Program .............. .............. +3,300
increase:
Multi-Doma
in Task
Force-Powe
r
Projection
Support
Team
Program .............. .............. +2,500
increase:
Exercise
integratio
n and
experiment
ation
Program .............. .............. +2,300
increase:
MDO live
fire
capability
demos
Program .............. .............. +2,000
increase:
Joint
combined
war games
Program .............. .............. +12,000
increase:
ICEWS unit
integratio
n and
training
support
Program .............. .............. +7,100
increase:
Pacific
Multi-Doma
in PED
architectu
re support
123 Land Forces .............. 983,327 +983,327
Depot
Maintenance
Transfer: .............. .............. +983,327
From Title
IX to
Title II
for base
requiremen
ts
131 Base Operations .............. 7,976,933 +7,976,933
Support
Transfer: .............. .............. +8,047,933
From Title
IX to
Title II
for base
requiremen
ts
Maintain .............. .............. -70,000
Program
Affordabil
ity:
Unjustifie
d growth
Maintain .............. .............. -6,000
program
affordabil
ity:
Remove one-
time
fiscal
year 2019
cost
Program .............. .............. +5,000
increase:
PFAS
remediatio
n
132 Facilities 4,326,840 4,330,840 +4,000
Sustainment,
Restoration &
Modernization
Program .............. .............. +4,000
increase:
Advanced
Manufactur
ing COE
sustainmen
t
141 US Africa 251,511 234,511 -17,000
Command
Transfer to .............. .............. -17,000
Title IX:
Personnel
Recovery
and
Casualty
Evacuation
Support
143 US Southern 191,840 209,840 +18,000
Command
Program .............. .............. +18,000
increase:
SOUTHCOM
Multi-Miss
ion
support
vessel
213 Industrial 4,637 5,637 +1,000
Preparedness
Program .............. .............. +1,000
increase:
Advanced
Manufactur
ing COE
technology
roadmappin
g
322 Flight Training 1,234,049 1,395,049 +161,000
Program .............. .............. +161,000
increase:
Aviation
training
331 Recruiting and 716,056 706,056 -10,000
Advertising
Maintain .............. .............. -10,000
Program
Affordabil
ity:
Unjustifie
d growth
for
Accessioni
ng
Informatio
n
Environmen
t
335 Junior Reserve 173,812 176,812 +3,000
Officer
Training Corps
Program .............. .............. +3,000
increase
411 Security 1,347,053 1,372,383 +25,330
Programs
Program .............. .............. +10,330
increase:
SOUTHCOM
ISR
Operations
and
Technical
Network
Analysis
Center
Program .............. .............. +15,000
increase:
SOUTHCOM
SAR
424 Ammunition 458,771 451,771 -7,000
Management
Maintain .............. .............. -7,000
Program
Affordabil
ity:
Unjustifie
d growth
431 Administration 428,768 418,768 -10,000
Maintain .............. .............. -10,000
Program
Affordabil
ity:
Unjustifie
d growth
432 Servicewide 1,512,736 1,472,736 -40,000
Communications
Improving .............. .............. -40,000
funds
management
: Program
decrease
unaccounte
d for
434 Other Personnel 391,869 361,869 -30,000
Support
Maintain .............. .............. -30,000
Program
Affordabil
ity:
Unjustifie
d growth
435 Other Service 1,901,165 1,881,165 -20,000
Support
Maintain .............. .............. -20,000
Program
Affordabil
ity:
Unjustifie
d growth
438 Financial 315,489 287,489 -28,000
Improvement
and Audit
Readiness
Improving .............. .............. -28,000
funds
management
: Program
decrease
unaccounte
d for
UNDIST Maintain .............. -100,000 -105,000
program
affordability:
Overestimation
of civilian
FTE targets
UNDIST Transfer: THAAD .............. 87,149 +87,149
sustainment
from O&M DW
MDA line
UNDIST Program .............. 1,000 +1,000
increase:
Public Law 115-
68
implementation
at Combatant
Commands
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Army Sustainment, Restoration and Modernization and
Facility Reduction Funding.--The Committee supports the robust
funding level requested in fiscal year 2020 for facility
sustainment, restoration and modernization. The Secretary of
the Army is encouraged to use a portion of these funds for the
demolition of contaminated military facilities that are no
longer in use.
Energy Resilience.--Energy resilience promotes Army
readiness by anticipating, preparing for, and adapting to
changing conditions. It enables the Army to withstand, respond
to, and recover from disruptions in the availability of energy,
land, and water resources. The Committee encourages the
Secretary of the Army to focus on the restoration of energy and
water systems to critical facilities and to continue
development and training on the resiliency of these systems.
Organizational Clothing and Individual Equipment.--The
Committee commends the Army for taking the necessary steps to
address capability gaps by modernizing cold weather
organizational clothing and individual equipment [OCIE]. The
Committee encourages the Secretary of the Army to make cold
weather OCIE items, including handwear, available to all
eligible soldiers as soon as possible. Further, the Committee
supports efforts to support a strong domestic industrial base
to ensure the availability of innovative and cost-effective
cold weather OCIE items.
United States Southern Command Synthetic Aperture Radar.--
The Committee recommends $15,000,000 in order to achieve a
greater level of geospatial intelligence of the features,
objects, activities and environments in the United States
Southern Command [SOUTHCOM] area of operations. Further, the
Committee recommends funds be used to leverage relationships
with academic partners to establish a database of SAR-derived
geospatial information for SOUTHCOM operations based on the
most technically advanced SAR systems available and the use of
automated intelligence and machine learning techniques.

Operation and Maintenance, Navy

Appropriations, 2019.................................... $48,034,826,000
Budget estimate, 2020................................... 25,952,718,000
Committee recommendation................................ 48,200,088,000

The Committee recommends an appropriation of
$48,200,088,000. This is $22,247,370,000 above the budget
estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this
appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

BUDGET ACTIVITY 1: OPERATING FORCES

AIR OPERATIONS
10 MISSION AND OTHER FLIGHT OPERATIONS .............. 4,659,109 +4,659,109
20 FLEET AIR TRAINING 2,284,828 2,284,828 ..............
30 AVIATION TECHNICAL DATA AND ENGINEERING SERVICES .............. 59,299 +59,299
40 AIR OPERATIONS AND SAFETY SUPPORT 155,896 155,896 ..............
50 AIR SYSTEMS SUPPORT 719,107 719,107 ..............
60 AIRCRAFT DEPOT MAINTENANCE .............. 1,154,181 +1,154,181
70 AIRCRAFT DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT 60,402 60,402 ..............
80 AVIATION LOGISTICS 1,241,421 1,241,421 ..............

SHIP OPERATIONS
90 MISSION AND OTHER SHIP OPERATIONS .............. 3,297,262 +3,297,262
100 SHIP OPERATIONS SUPPORT AND TRAINING 1,031,792 1,031,792 ..............
110 SHIP DEPOT MAINTENANCE .............. 6,861,298 +6,861,298
120 SHIP DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT .............. 2,069,141 +2,069,141

COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS/SUPPORT
130 COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS 1,378,856 1,364,856 -14,000
150 SPACE SYSTEMS AND SURVEILLANCE 276,245 276,245 ..............
160 WARFARE TACTICS 675,209 675,209 ..............
170 OPERATIONAL METEOROLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY 389,516 389,516 ..............
180 COMBAT SUPPORT FORCES 1,536,310 1,463,310 -73,000
190 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 161,579 161,579 ..............
210 COMBATANT COMMANDERS CORE OPERATIONS 59,521 59,521 ..............
220 COMBATANT COMMANDERS DIRECT MISSION SUPPORT 93,978 98,978 +5,000
230 MILITARY INFORMATION SUPPORT OPERATIONS 8,641 8,641 ..............
240 CYBERSPACE ACTIVITIES 496,385 496,385 ..............

WEAPONS SUPPORT
260 FLEET BALLISTIC MISSILE 1,423,339 1,423,339 ..............
280 WEAPONS MAINTENANCE 924,069 914,069 -10,000
290 OTHER WEAPON SYSTEMS SUPPORT 540,210 537,110 -3,100

BASE SUPPORT
300 ENTERPRISE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 1,131,627 1,111,627 -20,000
310 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION 3,029,634 3,029,634 ..............
320 BASE OPERATING SUPPORT .............. 4,346,943 +4,346,943
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 1 17,618,565 39,950,698 +22,332,133

BUDGET ACTIVITY 2: MOBILIZATION

READY RESERVE AND PREPOSITIONING FORCES
330 SHIP PREPOSITIONING AND SURGE 942,902 922,902 -20,000
340 READY RESERVE FORCE 352,044 352,044 ..............

ACTIVATIONS/INACTIVATIONS
360 SHIP ACTIVATIONS/INACTIVATIONS 427,555 402,555 -25,000

MOBILIZATION PREPAREDNESS
370 FLEET HOSPITAL PROGRAM 137,597 137,597 ..............
390 COAST GUARD SUPPORT 24,604 24,604 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 2 1,884,702 1,839,702 -45,000

BUDGET ACTIVITY 3: TRAINING AND RECRUITING

ACCESSION TRAINING
400 OFFICER ACQUISITION 150,765 150,765 ..............
410 RECRUIT TRAINING 11,584 11,584 ..............
420 RESERVE OFFICERS TRAINING CORPS 159,133 159,433 +300

BASIC SKILLS AND ADVANCED TRAINING
430 SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING 911,316 911,316 ..............
450 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION 185,211 185,211 ..............
460 TRAINING SUPPORT 267,224 267,224 ..............

RECRUITING, AND OTHER TRAINING AND EDUCATION
470 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING 209,252 209,252 ..............
480 OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION 88,902 88,902 ..............
490 CIVILIAN EDUCATION AND TRAINING 67,492 67,492 ..............
500 JUNIOR ROTC 55,164 55,164 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 3 2,106,043 2,106,343 +300

BUDGET ACTIVITY 4: ADMIN & SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES

SERVICEWIDE SUPPORT
510 ADMINISTRATION 1,143,358 1,127,358 -16,000
530 CIVILIAN MANPOWER AND PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT 178,342 178,342 ..............
540 MILITARY MANPOWER AND PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT 418,413 418,413 ..............

LOGISTICS OPERATIONS AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT
580 SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION 157,465 157,465 ..............
600 PLANNING, ENGINEERING AND DESIGN 485,397 485,397 ..............
610 ACQUISITION AND PROGRAM MANAGEMENT 654,137 647,137 -7,000

SECURITY PROGRAMS
650 NAVAL INVESTIGATIVE SERVICE 718,061 718,061 ..............

OTHER PROGRAMS
OTHER PROGRAMS 588,235 595,535 +7,300
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 4 4,343,408 4,327,708 -15,700

REMOVAL OF ONE TIME fiscal year 2019 INCREASE .............. -100,000 -100,000
TRANSFER: AEGIS SUSTAINMENT FROM OMDW MDA LINE .............. 75,237 +75,237
Public Law 115-68 IMPLEMENTATION AT COCOMS .............. 400 +400
=================================================
TOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, NAVY 25,952,718 48,200,088 +22,247,370
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by
the Committee:

Private Contracted Ship Maintenance.--The fiscal year 2020
President's budget request included bill language within
Operation and Maintenance, Navy [O&M, Navy] designating the
amount budgeted for private contracted ship maintenance as
available for a 2-year period. The rationale behind extending
the period of availability is that historically, ship
maintenance has been a significant contributor to undisbursed
balances in O&M, Navy, accounting for more than 20 percent of
the annual unexpended balances. Arguably, a multi-year period
of availability for ship maintenance funding would generate a
substantial financial benefit and help to improve funding
reversions to the Treasury.
The Committee firmly believes that operation and
maintenance funding shall continue to remain available for 1
year. However, the Committee acknowledges that maintenance
trends indicate pricing or growth in scope changes are
occurring well after the fiscal year has ended. According to
Navy data, approximately two-thirds of ship availabilities
complete in the second year. Therefore, the Committee
recommends a pilot program to fund the private contracted ship
maintenance planned for the Pacific Fleet in fiscal year 2020
through Other Procurement, Navy [OPN]. This proposal would
provide the Department of the Navy with a solution to the
challenges associated with ship maintenance by extending the
period of availability.
In this proposed pilot, the Secretary of the Navy shall
target 100 percent obligation of the depot maintenance funding
in OPN during the first fiscal year, but can retain the ability
to reapply de-obligations to other increasing costs or emergent
requirements. The pilot will also allow more flexibility to
address requirements late in the fiscal year without
unproductive time constraints, and enable de-obligations and
re-obligations of appropriated funds more effectively in the
second or third fiscal year. Finally, the Secretary of the Navy
shall provide an annual assessment of the progress of the pilot
program to the congressional defense committees, including
benefits or disadvantages of continuing the pilot.
Naval Shipyard Apprentice Program.--The Committee directs
that during fiscal year 2020 the Navy shall induct classes of
no fewer than 100 apprentices, respectively, at each of the
naval shipyards. The Committee further directs the Navy to
include the costs of the fiscal year 2021 class of apprentices
in its budget request.
U.S. Coast Guard.--The Committee is aware that Department
of Defense [DoD] regulations currently restrict DoD mission
appropriated funded activities from offering reimbursable rates
to non-DoD agencies. This restriction forces the Navy to charge
the U.S. Coast Guard fully burdened rates for drydocking
services at Navy shipyards rather than reimbursable rates.
Therefore, the Committee directs that funds appropriated under
Operation and Maintenance, Navy may be used to pay overhead
costs incurred by a Naval Shipyard when drydocking U.S. Coast
Guard ships.
Talent Management and Talent Acquisition.--The Committee is
aware of a newly emerging class of artificial intelligence [AI]
technology called Cross-Enterprise AI that could provide Navy
Personnel Command the ability to use AI to integrate existing
silos of data and systems to augment decisionmaking and drive
better outcomes with little or no workflow or IT
transformation. The Committee encourages the Secretary of the
Navy to consider the return on investment and efficacy of
leveraging commercial solutions that include cloud-based and
rapidly configurable use dynamic model-based AI foundation to
enable closed-loop machine learning on existing Navy enterprise
systems.
Virginia-Class Material.--The Committee is aware of the
Department of Defense's March 12, 2019, Report to Congress on
Submarine Depot Maintenance and is concerned with material
availability and cost increases for depot maintenance of
Virginia-class submarines. As noted in the report, a lack of
material availability has contributed to an increase in costs,
as well as increased reliance on cannibalization of material
from other operational platforms in support of maintenance
schedules, which adds to maintenance requirements and generates
additional follow-on availability requirements. The Committee
encourages the Secretary of the Navy to continue to update
Virginia-class maintenance plans, improve material forecasting
tools, and adjust acquisition strategies to resolve the need
for cannibalization of materials and reduce risk of material
not being available.

Operation and Maintenance, Marine Corps

Appropriations, 2019.................................... $6,540,049,000
Budget estimate, 2020................................... 3,928,045,000
Committee recommendation................................ 7,608,598,000

The Committee recommends an appropriation of
$7,608,598,000. This is $3,680,553,000 above the budget
estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this
appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

BUDGET ACTIVITY 1: OPERATING FORCES

EXPEDITIONARY FORCES
10 OPERATIONAL FORCES .............. 767,224 +767,224
20 FIELD LOGISTICS 1,278,533 1,264,533 -14,000
30 DEPOT MAINTENANCE .............. 232,991 +232,991

USMC PREPOSITIONING
40 MARITIME PREPOSITIONING .............. 100,396 +100,396

COMBAT OPERATIONS/SUPPORT
50 CYBERSPACE ACTIVITIES 203,580 203,580 ..............

BASE SUPPORT
60 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION 1,115,742 1,559,034 +443,292
70 BASE OPERATING SUPPORT .............. 2,150,650 +2,150,650
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 1 2,597,855 6,278,408 +3,680,553

BUDGET ACTIVITY 3: TRAINING AND RECRUITING

ACCESSION TRAINING
80 RECRUIT TRAINING 21,240 21,240 ..............
90 OFFICER ACQUISITION 1,168 1,168 ..............

BASIC SKILLS AND ADVANCED TRAINING
100 SPECIALIZED SKILLS TRAINING 106,601 106,601 ..............
110 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION 49,095 49,095 ..............
120 TRAINING SUPPORT 407,315 407,315 ..............

RECRUITING AND OTHER TRAINING EDUCATION
130 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING 210,475 210,475 ..............
140 OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION 42,810 42,810 ..............
150 JUNIOR ROTC 25,183 25,183 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 3 863,887 863,887 ..............

BUDGET ACTIVITY 4: ADMIN & SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES

SERVICEWIDE SUPPORT
160 SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION 29,894 29,894 ..............
170 ADMINISTRATION 384,352 384,352 ..............

SECURITY PROGRAMS
SECURITY PROGRAMS 52,057 52,057 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 4 466,303 466,303 ..............
=================================================
TOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, MARINE CORPS 3,928,045 7,608,598 +3,680,553
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by
the Committee:

Operation and Maintenance, Air Force

Appropriations, 2019.................................... $40,379,184,000
Budget estimate, 2020................................... 21,278,499,000
Committee recommendation................................ 43,092,286,000

The Committee recommends an appropriation of
$43,092,286,000. This is $21,813,787,000 above the budget
estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this
appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

BUDGET ACTIVITY 1: OPERATING FORCES

AIR OPERATIONS
10 PRIMARY COMBAT FORCES 729,127 729,127 ..............
20 COMBAT ENHANCEMENT FORCES 1,318,770 1,358,770 +40,000
30 AIR OPERATIONS TRAINING 1,486,790 1,348,970 -137,820
40 DEPOT MAINTENANCE .............. 2,646,792 +2,646,792
50 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION 3,675,824 4,142,435 +466,611
50 CYBERSPACE SUSTAINMENT .............. 228,811 +228,811
60 CONTRACTOR LOGISTICS SUPPORT AND SYSTEM SUPPORT .............. 8,329,364 +8,329,364
70 FLYING HOUR PROGRAM .............. 3,248,773 +3,248,773
80 BASE OPERATING SUPPORT .............. 7,181,487 +7,181,487

COMBAT RELATED OPERATIONS
90 GLOBAL C3I AND EARLY WARNING 964,553 964,553 ..............
100 OTHER COMBAT OPERATIONS SUPPORT PROGRAMS 1,032,307 1,032,307 ..............
110 CYBERSPACE ACTIVITIES 670,076 670,076 ..............

SPACE OPERATIONS
130 LAUNCH FACILITIES 179,980 179,980 ..............
140 SPACE CONTROL SYSTEMS 467,990 467,990 ..............

COCOM
170 US NORTHCOM/NORAD 184,655 184,655 ..............
180 US STRATCOM 478,357 478,357 ..............
190 US CYBERCOM 323,121 347,921 +24,800
200 US CENTCOM 160,989 160,989 ..............
210 US SOCOM 6,225 6,225 ..............
220 US TRANSCOM 544 544 ..............
220 CENTCOM CYBERSPACE SUSTAINMENT 2,073 2,073 ..............
230 USSPACECOM 70,588 70,588 ..............

OPERATING FORCES
CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 1,322,944 1,319,883 -3,061
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 1 13,074,913 35,100,670 +22,025,757

BUDGET ACTIVITY 2: MOBILIZATION

MOBILITY OPERATIONS
230 AIRLIFT OPERATIONS 1,158,142 1,158,142 ..............
240 MOBILIZATION PREPAREDNESS 138,672 138,672 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 2 1,296,814 1,296,814 ..............

BUDGET ACTIVITY 3: TRAINING AND RECRUITING

ACCESSION TRAINING
280 OFFICER ACQUISITION 130,835 130,835 ..............
290 RECRUIT TRAINING 26,021 26,021 ..............
300 RESERVE OFFICER TRAINING CORPS (ROTC) 121,391 121,391 ..............

BASIC SKILLS AND ADVANCED TRAINING
330 SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING 454,539 414,539 -40,000
340 FLIGHT TRAINING 600,565 600,565 ..............
350 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION 282,788 282,788 ..............
360 TRAINING SUPPORT 123,988 113,988 -10,000

RECRUITING, AND OTHER TRAINING AND EDUCATION
380 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING 167,731 167,731 ..............
390 EXAMINING 4,576 4,576 ..............
400 OFF DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION 211,911 211,911 ..............
410 CIVILIAN EDUCATION AND TRAINING 219,021 214,021 -5,000
420 JUNIOR ROTC 62,092 65,092 +3,000
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 3 2,405,458 2,353,458 -52,000

BUDGET ACTIVITY 4: ADMIN & SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES

LOGISTICS OPERATIONS
430 LOGISTICS OPERATIONS 664,926 664,926 ..............
440 TECHNICAL SUPPORT ACTIVITIES 101,483 101,483 ..............

SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES
480 ADMINISTRATION 892,480 892,480 ..............
490 SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS 152,532 122,532 -30,000
500 OTHER SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES 1,254,089 1,204,089 -50,000
510 CIVIL AIR PATROL CORPORATION 30,070 39,100 +9,030

SUPPORT TO OTHER NATIONS
530 INTERNATIONAL SUPPORT 136,110 136,110 ..............

SECURITY PROGRAMS
SECURITY PROGRAMS 1,269,624 1,269,624 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 4 4,501,314 4,430,344 -70,970

UNJUSTIFIED GROWTH .............. -90,000 -90,000
Public Law 115-68 IMPLEMENTATION AT COCOMS .............. 1,000 +1,000
=================================================
TOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, AIR FORCE 21,278,499 43,092,286 +21,813,787
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by
the Committee:

Mission Defense Teams.--Mission Defense Teams are an
organic pathfinder capability assigned to Air Force wing
commands and are charged with identifying, analyzing and
defending the Air Force's most critical assets from
adversaries. The Committee encourages the Secretary of the Air
Force to provide robust funding levels for Defensive Cyberspace
Operations to help these highly qualified teams keep up with
emerging threats and vulnerabilities in order to reduce overall
risk to mission.
Air Force Auxiliary Airfield Runway Replacement.--Gila Bend
Air Force Auxiliary Field is an emergency landing and training
facility used by Luke Air Force Base and Davis-Monthan Air
Force Base aircraft and units from other nearby bases using the
Barry M. Goldwater Air Force Range complex. The Committee
encourages the Secretary of the Air Force to prioritize funding
the replacement of the current end-of-runway turnaround at Gila
Bend Air Force Auxiliary Field to accommodate increased air
traffic.

Operation and Maintenance, Space Force

Appropriations, 2019....................................................
Budget estimate, 2020................................... $72,436,000
Committee recommendation................................ 72,436,000

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $72,436,000.
This is equal to the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this
appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

BUDGET ACTIVITY 1: OPERATING FORCES

AIR OPERATIONS
270 BASE SUPPORT 72,436 72,436 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 1 72,436 72,436 ..............
=================================================
TOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, SPACE FORCE 72,436 72,436 ..............
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Operation and Maintenance, Space Force.--Adversary
development of space systems, to both offensively and
defensively counter U.S. space superiority is a growing
national security challenge. In the past few years the Air
Force has taken steps to bolster our space capabilities and
defenses, but the Committee believes more must be done to
increase the integration of military capabilities in space into
the planning and execution of military operations, and to
improve the acquisition of new technologies for space
operations. While targeted and even increased spending can
certainly help improve our space capabilities, integration and
strategic space challenges are not likely to be addressed
without improving integration of space warfighters with the
combatant commands and streamlining acquisition procedures.
Such change efforts have minimal costs with potentially
substantial impacts. Moreover, devoting more resources to space
operations without a strategic plan may only result in more
bureaucracy, overhead, and duplication. The approach for the
future of space operations must have an appropriate balance of
increasing warfighting capability, improving acquisition
efficiency, and minimizing bureaucratic growth.
The recommendation includes $72,436,000, which is equal to
the budget request and the amount authorized in S. 1790, the
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020, as
passed by the Senate, for Operation and Maintenance, Space
Force. The Committee notes that of these amounts, $53,845,000
was requested to conduct studies and analysis necessary for the
efficient implementation of the Space Force, $8,686,000 was
requested for transfer of certain civilian positions from other
appropriations, and $9,905,000 was requested for the hire of 65
full time equivalents.
This allocation of funds constitutes a reasonable approach
to examining and informing Congress and the Department of
Defense on critical issues regarding the establishment of a
Space Force and limiting bureaucratic growth before major
implementation decisions are made. Accordingly, the Committee
directs the Secretary of the Air Force to provide a spend plan
broken out by month for fiscal year 2020 for the Operation and
Maintenance, Space Force funding to the congressional defense
committees not later than 30 days after the enactment of this
act. The spend plan shall include, but not be limited to,
funding for civilian personnel (including the number of full
time equivalents), supplies and materials, and contract
support. If there is a change to the spend plan in any given
month, the Secretary of the Air Force shall provide written
notification to the congressional defense committees not later
than 10 days following the end of that month explaining any
adjustments.

Operation and Maintenance, Defense-Wide

Appropriations, 2019.................................... $35,613,354,000
Budget estimate, 2020................................... 37,399,341,000
Committee recommendation................................ 37,236,175,000

The Committee recommends an appropriation of
$37,236,175,000. This is $163,166,000 below the budget
estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this
appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

BUDGET ACTIVITY 1: OPERATING FORCES
10 JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF 409,542 392,542 -17,000
20 JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF 579,179 579,179 ..............
30 JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF--CYBER 24,598 24,598 ..............
40 SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND COMBAT DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES 1,075,762 1,070,262 -5,500
50 SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND CYBERSPACE ACTIVITIES 14,409 14,409 ..............
60 SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND INTELLIGENCE 501,747 480,885 -20,862
70 SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND MAINTENANCE 559,300 540,057 -19,243
80 SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND MANAGEMENT/OPERATIONAL 177,928 177,928 ..............
HEADQUARTERS
90 SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND OPERATIONAL SUPPORT 925,262 925,149 -113
100 SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND THEATER FORCES 2,764,738 2,723,421 -41,317
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 1 7,032,465 6,928,430 -104,035

BUDGET ACTIVITY 3: TRAINING AND RECRUITING
50 DEFENSE ACQUISITION UNIVERSITY 180,250 180,250 ..............
60 JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF RECRUITING, AND OTHER TRAINING AND 100,610 100,610 ..............
EDUCATION
70 SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT 33,967 33,967 ..............
EDUCATION
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 3 314,827 314,827 ..............

BUDGET ACTIVITY 4: ADMIN & SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES
80 CIVIL MILITARY PROGRAMS 165,707 245,063 +79,356
100 DEFENSE CONTRACT AUDIT AGENCY 627,467 627,467 ..............
190 DEFENSE CONTRACT AUDIT AGENCY--CYBER 3,362 3,362 ..............
110 DEFENSE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT AGENCY 1,438,068 1,423,068 -15,000
210 DEFENSE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT AGENCY--CYBER 24,391 24,391 ..............
120 DEFENSE HUMAN RESOURCES ACTIVITY 892,438 952,438 +60,000
130 DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEMS AGENCY 2,012,885 1,992,885 -20,000
240 DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEMS AGENCY--CYBER 601,223 636,360 +35,137
150 DEFENSE LEGAL SERVICES AGENCY 34,632 34,632 ..............
160 DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY 415,699 432,999 +17,300
170 DEFENSE MEDIA ACTIVITY 202,792 202,792 ..............
180 DEFENSE PERSONNEL ACCOUNTING AGENCY 144,881 153,881 +9,000
190 DEFENSE SECURITY COOPERATION AGENCY 696,884 667,133 -29,751
200 DEFENSE COUNTERINTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY AGENCY 889,664 894,664 +5,000
340 DEFENSE COUNTERINTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY AGENCY--CYBER 9,220 12,220 +3,000
360 DEFENSE TECHNICAL INFORMATION CENTER 3,000 3,000 ..............
220 DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY SECURITY AGENCY 35,626 35,626 ..............
230 DEFENSE THREAT REDUCTION AGENCY 568,133 568,133 ..............
400 DEFENSE THREAT REDUCTION AGENCY--CYBER 13,339 13,339 ..............
250 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE EDUCATION ACTIVITY 2,932,226 2,917,226 -15,000
280 OFFICE OF ECONOMIC ADJUSTMENT 59,513 134,513 +75,000
290 OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 1,604,738 1,607,738 +3,000
420 MISSILE DEFENSE AGENCY 522,529 438,473 -84,056
470 OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE--CYBER 48,783 48,783 ..............
480 SPACE DEVELOPMENT AGENCY 44,750 44,750 ..............
310 WASHINGTON HEADQUARTERS SERVICES 324,001 324,001 ..............

OTHER PROGRAMS 15,736,098 15,640,381 -95,717
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 4 30,052,049 30,079,318 +27,269

SEXUAL TRAUMA TREATMENT PILOT PROGRAM .............. 2,000 +2,000
UNJUSTIFIED GROWTH .............. -80,000 -80,000
BUDGET JUSTIFICATION INCONSISTENCIES .............. -25,000 -25,000
VIETNAM DIOXIN REMEDIATION .............. 15,000 +15,000
Public Law 115-68 IMPLEMENTATION AT COCOMS .............. 1,600 +1,600
=================================================
TOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, DEFENSE-WIDE 37,399,341 37,236,175 -163,166
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by
the Committee:

[In thousands of dollars]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Change from
Line Item 2020 budget Committee budget
estimate recommendation estimate
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1PL1 Joint Chiefs of 409,542 392,542 -17,000
Staff
Improving .............. .............. -12,000
funds
management
: Program
decrease
unaccounte
d for
Improving .............. .............. -5,000
funds
management
: Remove
one-time
fiscal
year 2019
costs
1PL6 Special 1,075,762 1,070,262 -5,500
Operations
Command Combat
Development
Activities
Classified .............. .............. -5,500
adjustment
1PLU Special 501,747 480,885 -20,862
Operations
Command
Intelligence
Insufficien .............. .............. -2,181
t budget
justificat
ion:
Repricing
civilian
personnel
realignmen
ts
Improving .............. .............. -1,504
funds
management
: Remove
one-time
fiscal
year 2019
increase
Maintain .............. .............. -7,318
program
affordabil
ity:
Unjustifie
d growth
Improving .............. .............. -9,959
funds
management
: Revised
program
baseline
Improving .............. .............. -2,200
funds
management
:
Overestima
tion of
contractor
FTE
Program .............. .............. +2,300
increase:
Identity
Management
1PL7 Special 559,300 540,057 -19,243
Operations
Command
Maintenance
Maintain .............. .............. -5,276
program
affordabil
ity:
Unjustifie
d growth
Insufficien .............. .............. -2,512
t budget
justificat
ion:
Inconsiste
ncies in
budget
materials
Maintain .............. .............. -11,455
program
affordabil
ity:
Unjustifie
d program
baseline
1PLV Special 925,262 925,149 -113
Operations
Command
Operational
Support
Maintain .............. .............. -675
program
affordabil
ity: Base
support
pricing
adjustment
Insufficien .............. .............. -7,715
t budget
justificat
ion: One-
time base
support
decreases
not
properly
accounted
for
Improving .............. .............. -10,646
funds
management
:
Underexecu
tion
Improving .............. .............. -7,899
funds
management
: Program
decrease
unaccounte
d for
Maintain .............. .............. -1,678
program
affordabil
ity:
Unjustifie
d growth
Program .............. .............. +28,500
increase:
Identity
Management
1PLR Special 2,764,738 2,723,421 -41,317
Operations
Command
Theater Forces
Improving .............. .............. -13,440
funds
management
: Remove
one-time
fiscal
year 2019
increase
Maintain .............. .............. -1,096
program
affordabil
ity:
Unjustifie
d CLS
growth
Insufficien .............. .............. -881
t budget
justificat
ion:
Repricing
civilian
personnel
realignmen
ts
Improving .............. .............. -20,900
funds
management
:
Overestima
tion of
flying
hours
Transfer .............. .............. -5,000
Preservati
on of the
Force and
Family-Beh
avioral
Health:
SOCOM-requ
ested to
DHP O&M In-
House Care
4GT3 Civil Military 165,707 245,063 +79,356
Programs
Program .............. .............. +50,000
increase:
National
Guard
Youth
Challenge
Program .............. .............. +15,000
increase:
STARBASE
Program .............. .............. +14,356
increase:
Innovative
Readiness
Training
4GTO Defense 1,438,068 1,423,068 -15,000
Contract
Management
Agency
Improving .............. .............. -20,000
funds
management
: Program
decreases
unaccounte
d for
Program .............. .............. +5,000
increase:
Demonstrat
ion
project
for
contractor
s
employing
persons
with
disabiliti
es
4GT8 Defense Human 892,438 952,438 +60,000
Resources
Activity
Maintain .............. .............. -10,000
program
affordabil
ity:
Unjustifie
d growth
Program .............. .............. +35,000
increase:
Special
Victims'
Counsel
Program .............. .............. +20,000
increase:
Beyond the
Yellow
Ribbon
Program .............. .............. +15,000
increase:
Defense
Language
Training
Centers
4GT9 Defense 2,012,885 1,992,885 -20,000
Information
Systems Agency
Maintain .............. .............. -20,000
program
affordabil
ity:
Unjustifie
d growth
4GU9 Defense 601,223 636,360 +35,137
Information
Systems Agency-
Cyber
Transfer .............. .............. +35,137
from O&MDW
line 999:
Sharkseer
4GTB Defense 415,699 432,999 +17,300
Logistics
Agency
Program .............. .............. +17,300
increase:
Procuremen
t
Technical
Assistance
Program
4GTC Defense 144,881 153,881 +9,000
Personnel
Accounting
Agency
Program .............. .............. +9,000
increase:
Missing in
Action
accounting
program
4GTD Defense 696,884 667,133 -29,751
Security
Cooperation
Agency
Maintain .............. .............. -30,000
program
affordabil
ity:
Unjustifie
d growth
Transfer: .............. .............. +249
From Title
IX to
Title II
for George
C.
Marshall
Center
4GTE Defense 889,664 894,664 +5,000
Counterintelli
gence and
Security
Agency
Program .............. .............. +5,000
increase:
Access to
criminal
records
for local
law
enforcemen
t
4GTG Defense 9,220 12,220 +3,000
Counterintelli
gence and
Security
Agency-Cyber
Program .............. .............. +3,000
increase:
Defensive
cyber and
counterint
elligence
operations
4GTJ Department of 2,932,226 2,917,226 -15,000
Defense
Education
Activity
Maintain .............. .............. -20,000
program
affordabil
ity:
Overestima
tion of
civilian
FTE
targets
Improving .............. .............. -50,000
funds
management
: Remove
one-time
fiscal
year 2019
increase
Program .............. .............. +40,000
increase:
Impact Aid
Program .............. .............. +10,000
increase:
Impact Aid
for
children
with
disabiliti
es
Program .............. .............. +5,000
increase:
Family
advocacy
program
4GTM Office of 59,513 134,513 +75,000
Economic
Adjustment
Program .............. .............. +75,000
increase:
Defense
Community
Infrastruc
ture
Program
4GTN Office of the 1,604,738 1,607,738 +3,000
Secretary of
Defense
Maintain .............. .............. -37,000
program
affordabil
ity:
Unjustifie
d growth
Program .............. .............. +10,000
increase:
CDC water
contaminat
ion study
and
assessment
Program .............. .............. +5,000
increase:
WWII
Commemorat
ive
program
Program .............. .............. +4,000
increase:
Interstate
compacts
for
licensure
and
credential
ing
Program .............. .............. +3,000
increase:
National
Commission
on
Military
Aviation
Safety
Program .............. .............. +5,000
increase:
Cyber
institutes
Program .............. .............. +3,000
increase:
Resilience
planning
Program .............. .............. +10,000
increase:
Readiness
and
Environmen
tal
Protection
Initiative
011A Missile Defense 522,529 438,473 -84,056
Agency
Improving .............. .............. -12,670
funds
management
: THAAD
prior year
underexecu
tion
Transfer: .............. .............. -87,149
THAAD
sustainmen
t to O&M
Army
Undistribu
ted
Transfer: .............. .............. -75,237
AEGIS
sustainmen
t to O&M
Navy
Undistribu
ted
Program .............. .............. +16,000
increase:
Electronic
Equipment
Unit
modernizat
ion
Program .............. .............. +15,000
increase:
Cooling
Equipment
Unit
refurbishm
ent
Program .............. .............. +3,000
increase:
Cooling
Equipment
Unit
refurbishm
ent kits
Program .............. .............. +57,000
increase:
Spares
9999 Classified 15,736,098 15,640,381 -95,717
Programs
Classified .............. .............. -60,580
adjustment
Transfer to .............. .............. -35,137
DISA:
Sharkseer
UNDIST Maintain .............. -80,000 -80,000
program
affordability:
Unjustified
growth
UNDIST Maintain .............. -25,000 -25,000
program
affordability:
Budget
justification
inconsistencie
s
UNDIST Program .............. 2,000 +2,000
increase:
Sexual trauma
treatment
pilot program
UNDIST Program .............. 15,000 +15,000
increase:
Vietnam Dioxin
Remediation
UNDIST Program .............. 1,600 +1,600
increase:
Public Law 115-
68
implementation
at Combatant
Commands
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Special Victims' Counsel Program.--The Committee remains
concerned with the level of sexual assault in the military and
supports the Department's continuing efforts to strengthen its
sexual assault prevention and response program. The needs of
victims of sexual assault for legal advice and guidance are
particularly acute. To ensure that the Department continues to
make progress protecting a victim's confidentiality and ending
alienation during the investigation and prosecution of their
case, the Committee recommends $35,000,000 for implementation
of the Special Victims' Counsel Program across the services.
Defense Language and National Security Education Office.--
The Committee recognizes that, in partnership with universities
across the country, the Defense Language and National Security
Education Office provides critical college accredited training
for service members and government officials in a number of
languages and strategic cultures. The Committee encourages the
Department of Defense to continue placing a high priority on
the Language Training Centers and the Language Flagship
strategic language training program and designates the funding
included in the fiscal year 2020 President's budget request for
the Language Training Centers as a congressional special
interest item.
Defense POW/MIA Accounting Agency.--The Committee remains
committed to the significant remains recovery goals outlined in
the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010
(Public Law 111-84) and commends the Defense POW/MIA Accounting
Agency [DPAA] for undertaking trial contracts with Carnegie R1
Research Universities in furtherance of that goal. These
partnerships have significantly increased recovery rates while
also generating savings of approximately seventy percent
compared to prior internal efforts. In light of this progress
and the continued need for additional recovery efforts, the
Committee recommends an additional $15,000,000 for DPAA to
expand this pilot effort into a systematic research and
recovery process through partnerships with Carnegie R1 research
universities.
Military Childcare.--The Committee recognizes the
importance of military childcare to readiness and retention
goals, and understands the strain that lack of access can put
on servicemembers and their families. The Committee is
concerned that the Department of Defense lacks a comprehensive
plan to address the shortage of available childcare in many
locations. Therefore, the Committee directs the Secretary of
Defense, in conjunction with the service secretaries, to submit
to the congressional defense committees a report on the current
status of Department of Defense childcare, efforts underway to
increase childcare capacity, and recommendations on reducing
availability shortfalls. The report shall detail capacity,
enrollment, staffing, and waitlist data for all childcare
facilities to include child development centers, before and
after school programs, and family childcare programs. The
report shall also include: overall and current facility
capacity, current facility enrollment, the process for
determining capacity, current waitlist and estimated time to
placement, average salary for direct care staff and staffing
shortfalls, and processes for determining funding allocations.
The report shall also consider the degree to which childcare is
available in the community through the fee-assistance program,
the number of families receiving fee assistance, the fee
assistance wait list, and the amount subsidized per child.
Finally, the report shall include information on childcare
facilities where normal operations were interrupted by the
deterioration of facility infrastructure or conditions that do
not meet the relevant standards set by the Department or
outside expert organizations. Based on this data, the report
shall conclude with a prioritized list of the top 50 overall
child development center construction requirements for new,
refurbishment, or expansion, which shall be ranked in order of
need. The report shall detail each service's process for
prioritization of child development program construction
requirements in relation to the overall service construction
requirement. This report shall be submitted not later than 180
days after the enactment of this act.
Sexual Trauma Treatment Pilot Program.--The Committee
recommends $2,000,000 to implement section 702 of the National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (Public Law 115-
232), A Pilot Program on Treatment of Members of the Armed
Forces for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Related to Military
Sexual Trauma. The Committee encourages the Secretary of
Defense to take the following actions associated with this
proposed increase: (1) that this funding be used in partnership
with public, private, and/or non-profit healthcare
organizations, universities and/or institutions which meet the
criteria set forth in section 702, (2) to enable testing of new
models of care that would be evidence-based and measurable, and
(3) to use a value-based purchasing structure for this pilot
program, in addition to a defined grant amount to cover the
necessary associated costs.
Security Assistance Reporting Requirements.--The Secretary
of Defense is directed to submit reports, on a quarterly basis,
to the congressional defense committees not later than 30 days
after the last day of each quarter of the fiscal year that
detail commitment, obligation, and expenditure data by sub-
activity group for Operation and Maintenance, Defense-Wide,
Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

Operation and Maintenance, Army Reserve

Appropriations, 2019.................................... $2,781,402,000
Budget estimate, 2020................................... 1,080,103,000
Committee recommendation................................ 2,990,610,000

The Committee recommends an appropriation of
$2,990,610,000. This is $1,910,507,000 above the budget
estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this
appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

BUDGET ACTIVITY 1: OPERATING FORCES

LAND FORCES
10 MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES .............. 11,927 +11,927
20 ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADES .............. 533,015 +533,015
30 THEATER LEVEL ASSETS .............. 119,517 +119,517
40 LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT .............. 543,468 +543,468
50 AVIATION ASSETS .............. 86,670 +86,670

LAND FORCES READINESS
60 FORCES READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT 390,061 390,061 ..............
70 LAND FORCES SYSTEM READINESS 101,890 101,890 ..............
80 DEPOT MAINTENANCE .............. 48,503 +48,503

LAND FORCES READINESS SUPPORT
90 BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT .............. 592,407 +592,407
100 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION 444,376 444,376 ..............
110 MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONS HEADQUARTERS 22,095 22,095 ..............
120 CYBERSPACE ACTIVITIES--CYBERSPACE OPERATIONS 3,288 3,288 ..............
130 CYBERSPACE ACTIVITIES--CYBERSECURITY 7,655 7,655 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 1 969,365 2,904,872 +1,935,507

ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES
120 SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION 14,533 14,533 ..............
130 ADMINISTRATION 17,231 17,231 ..............
140 SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS 14,304 14,304 ..............
150 PERSONNEL/FINANCIAL ADMINISTRATION 6,129 6,129 ..............
160 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING 58,541 58,541 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 4 110,738 110,738 ..............

OVERESTIMATION OF CIVILIAN FTE TARGETS .............. -25,000 -25,000
=================================================
TOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, ARMY RESERVE 1,080,103 2,990,610 +1,910,507
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by
the Committee:

Operation and Maintenance, Navy Reserve

Appropriations, 2019.................................... $1,018,006,000
Budget estimate, 2020................................... 261,284,000
Committee recommendation................................ 1,100,116,000

The Committee recommends an appropriation of
$1,100,116,000. This is $838,832,000 above the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this
appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

BUDGET ACTIVITY 1: OPERATING FORCES

RESERVE AIR OPERATIONS
10 MISSION AND OTHER FLIGHT OPERATIONS .............. 629,220 +629,220
20 INTERMEDIATE MAINTENANCE 8,767 8,767 ..............
30 AIRCRAFT DEPOT MAINTENANCE .............. 108,236 +108,236
40 AIRCRAFT DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT 463 463 ..............
50 AVIATION LOGISTICS 26,014 26,014 ..............

RESERVE SHIP OPERATIONS
60 SHIP OPERATIONAL SUPPORT AND TRAINING 583 583 ..............

RESERVE COMBAT OPERATIONS SUPPORT
70 COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS 17,883 17,883 ..............
80 COMBAT SUPPORT FORCES 128,079 128,079 ..............
90 CYBERSPACE ACTIVITIES 356 356 ..............

RESERVE WEAPONS SUPPORT
100 ENTERPRISE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 26,133 26,133 ..............

BASE OPERATING SUPPORT
110 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION 35,397 35,397 ..............
120 BASE OPERATING SUPPORT .............. 101,376 +101,376
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 1 243,675 1,082,507 +838,832

ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES
130 ADMINISTRATION 1,888 1,888 ..............
140 MILITARY MANPOWER & PERSONNEL 12,778 12,778 ..............
160 ACQUISITION AND PROGRAM MANAGEMENT 2,943 2,943 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 4 17,609 17,609 ..............
=================================================
TOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, NAVY RESERVE 261,284 1,100,116 +838,832
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by
the Committee:

Operation and Maintenance, Marine Corps Reserve

Appropriations, 2019.................................... $271,570,000
Budget estimate, 2020................................... 61,090,000
Committee recommendation................................ 292,076,000

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $292,076,000.
This is $230,986,000 above the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this
appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

BUDGET ACTIVITY 1: OPERATING FORCES

EXPEDITIONARY FORCES
10 OPERATING FORCES .............. 106,484 +106,484
20 DEPOT MAINTENANCE .............. 18,429 +18,429
30 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION 47,516 47,516 ..............
40 BASE OPERATING SUPPORT .............. 106,073 +106,073
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 1 47,516 278,502 +230,986

BUDGET ACTIVITY 4: ADMIN & SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES

ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES
60 ADMINISTRATION 13,574 13,574 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 4 13,574 13,574 ..............
=================================================
TOTAL, OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MARINE CORPS 61,090 292,076 +230,986
RESERVE
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by
the Committee:

Operation and Maintenance, Air Force Reserve

Appropriations, 2019.................................... $3,191,734,000
Budget estimate, 2020................................... 2,231,445,000
Committee recommendation................................ 3,222,818,000

The Committee recommends an appropriation of
$3,222,818,000. This is $991,373,000 above the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this
appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

BUDGET ACTIVITY 1: OPERATING FORCES

AIR OPERATIONS
10 PRIMARY COMBAT FORCES 1,781,413 1,736,413 -45,000
20 MISSION SUPPORT OPERATIONS 209,650 209,650 ..............
30 DEPOT MAINTENANCE .............. 494,235 +494,235
40 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION 128,746 128,746 ..............
70 CYBERSPACE ACTIVITIES 1,673 1,673 ..............
50 CONTRACTOR LOGISTICS SUPPORT AND SYSTEM SUPPORT .............. 256,512 +256,512
60 BASE OPERATING SUPPORT .............. 380,626 +380,626
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 1 2,121,482 3,207,855 +1,086,373

BUDGET ACTIVITY 4: ADMIN & SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES

ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES
70 ADMINISTRATION 69,436 69,436 ..............
80 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING 22,124 22,124 ..............
90 MILITARY MANPOWER AND PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT 10,946 10,946 ..............
100 OTHER PERSONNEL SUPPORT 7,009 7,009 ..............
110 AUDIOVISUAL 448 448 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 4 109,963 109,963 ..............

OVERESTIMATION OF CIVILIAN FTE TARGETS .............. -60,000 -60,000
PROGRAM REALIGNMENT UNACCOUNTED FOR .............. -35,000 -35,000
=================================================
TOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, AIR FORCE RESERVE 2,231,445 3,222,818 +991,373
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by
the Committee:

Operation and Maintenance, Army National Guard

Appropriations, 2019.................................... $7,118,831,000
Budget estimate, 2020................................... 3,335,755,000
Committee recommendation................................ 7,588,903,000

The Committee recommends an appropriation of
$7,588,903,000. This is $4,253,148,000 above the budget
estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this
appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

BUDGET ACTIVITY 1: OPERATING FORCES

LAND FORCES
10 MANEUVER UNITS .............. 775,671 +775,671
20 MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES .............. 195,334 +195,334
30 ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE .............. 771,048 +771,048
40 THEATER LEVEL ASSETS .............. 94,726 +94,726
50 LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT .............. 33,696 +33,696
60 AVIATION ASSETS .............. 981,819 +981,819

LAND FORCES READINESS
70 FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT 743,206 745,106 +1,900
80 LAND FORCES SYSTEMS READINESS 50,963 50,963 ..............
90 LAND FORCES DEPOT MAINTENANCE .............. 258,278 +258,278

LAND FORCES READINESS SUPPORT
100 BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT .............. 1,145,576 +1,145,576
110 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION 1,113,475 1,113,475 ..............
120 MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONAL HEADQUARTERS 1,001,042 986,042 -15,000
130 CYBERSPACE ACTIVITIES--CYBERSPACE OPERATIONS 8,448 8,448 ..............
140 CYBERSPACE ACTIVITIES--CYBERSECURITY 7,768 7,768 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 1 2,924,902 7,167,950 +4,243,048

BUDGET ACTIVITY 4: ADMIN & SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES

ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES
130 SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION 9,890 9,890 ..............
140 ADMINISTRATION 71,070 71,070 ..............
150 SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS 68,213 62,213 -6,000
160 MANPOWER MANAGEMENT 8,628 8,628 ..............
170 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING 250,376 250,376 ..............
180 REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT 2,676 2,676 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 4 410,853 404,853 -6,000

OVERESTIMATION OF CIVILIAN FTE TARGETS .............. -20,000 -20,000
OPERATION GUARDIAN SUPPORT .............. 36,100 +36,100
=================================================
TOTAL, OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY NATIONAL GUARD 3,335,755 7,588,903 +4,253,148
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by
the Committee:

National Guard Preventative Mental Health Program.--The
Committee recognizes the importance of building a holistic
mental health fitness model to reduce suicide, remove stigma
for help-seeking behavior, and fortify individuals before they
experience high-stress events. The National Guard Bureau's
Warrior Readiness and Fitness program was created to coordinate
and enhance mental health efforts across the National Guard at
the Federal and State levels in order to improve readiness and
build resiliency in servicemembers. The Committee recommends
additional funding for National Guard preventative mental
health programs and directs the Chief, National Guard Bureau to
submit a report not later than 180 days after the enactment of
this act with a plan to establish a permanent office for mental
health that shall report to the Chief directly.
Large-Scale National Guard Exercises.--Full spectrum combat
readiness for the National Guard is enhanced by participating
in combined live fire exercises that emphasize close air
support, joint fire support, air mobility, and ground maneuver
components. Exercises such as Northern Strike, hosted annually
by the Michigan National Guard, provide an opportunity to
maximize the full-spectrum combat readiness of National Guard
units through realistic, cost-effective joint fires training in
an adaptable environment, with an emphasis on joint and
coalition force cooperation. The Committee encourages the
Chief, National Guard Bureau to continue to prioritize large-
scale exercises that include international partners and align
with the National Defense Strategy.
State Partnership Program.--The State Partnership Program
[SPP] has been successfully building relationships for over 25
years by linking a State's National Guard with the armed forces
or equivalent of a partner country in a cooperative, mutually
beneficial relationship. It includes 75 unique security
partnerships involving 81 nations around the globe. The
Committee recognizes the importance of SPP and encourages
continued robust support of this important partnership program.
National Guard Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and
Nuclear Response Forces.--Every state, especially those in
close proximity to the National Capital Region, must be
prepared for chemical, biological, radiological or nuclear
[CBRN] threats. The Committee encourages the Secretary of
Defense to continue to place a high priority on CBRN Response
Forces to increase Department of Defense overall domestic
disaster response readiness.

Operation and Maintenance, Air National Guard

Appropriations, 2019.................................... $6,420,697,000
Budget estimate, 2020................................... 3,612,156,000
Committee recommendation................................ 6,732,792,000

The Committee recommends an appropriation of
$6,732,792,000. This is $3,120,636,000 above the budget
estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this
appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

BUDGET ACTIVITY 1: OPERATING FORCES

AIR OPERATIONS
10 AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS 2,497,967 2,482,967 -15,000
20 MISSION SUPPORT OPERATIONS 600,377 612,477 +12,100
30 DEPOT MAINTENANCE .............. 879,467 +879,467
40 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION 400,734 401,902 +1,168
80 CYBERSPACE ACTIVITIES 25,507 25,507 ..............
80 CYBERSPACE SUSTAINMENT .............. 24,742 +24,742
50 CONTRACTOR LOGISTICS SUPPORT AND SYSTEM SUPPORT .............. 1,299,089 +1,299,089
60 BASE OPERATING SUPPORT .............. 945,270 +945,270
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 1 3,524,585 6,671,421 +3,146,836

BUDGET ACTIVITY 4: ADMIN & SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES

SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES
70 ADMINISTRATION 47,215 47,215 ..............
80 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING 40,356 40,356 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 4 87,571 87,571 ..............

OVERESTIMATION OF CIVILIAN FTE TARGETS .............. -30,000 -30,000
OPERATION GUARDIAN SUPPORT .............. 3,800 +3,800
=================================================
TOTAL, OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AIR NATIONAL GUARD 3,612,156 6,732,792 +3,120,636
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by
the Committee:

Air National Guard Tuition Assistance.--The Committee
supports the establishment of an Air National Guard tuition
assistance program similar to that of the Army National Guard
and encourages the Chief, National Guard Bureau, to include the
tuition assistance program for both the Army and Air Guard in
its future budget requests.
Joint Force Headquarters Analysis Cells.--Intelligence
Fusion Centers are information sharing hubs that provide
threat-related information between Federal, State, local and
tribal agencies. The Kansas Intelligence Fusion Center,
established in 2009, is one such center whose mission focuses
on counterterrorism, cybersecurity and biological threats
through a decentralized approach where State direction allows
private stakeholders the flexibility to determine which
critical infrastructure areas merit the dedication of
resources. The Committee recognizes that the National Guard
Bureau is developing a Joint Force Headquarters Analysis Cell
concept to expand State-level intelligence capabilities. As
this work progresses, the Committee encourages the Chief,
National Guard Bureau to consult with State-level entities such
as the Kansas National Guard to integrate key aspects of
concepts that have already proved successful at the State
level.
Air National Guard C-17 Assault Strip.--Camp Shelby
Auxiliary Field, owned by the Mississippi Air National Guard,
includes an assault landing strip that was specifically
designed and built to satisfy C-17 tactical training
requirements. The assault landing training facility currently
serves multiple C-17 units in the Midwest and Southeast region
but it was originally constructed to meet the training demands
of the Air National Guard's 172nd Airlift Wing, which is
responsible for funding its operational costs. The Committee
encourages the Chief, National Guard Bureau to prioritize small
investments necessary for annual operation and maintenance for
assault landing strip facilities such as Camp Shelby Auxiliary
Field to ensure future proficiency and long-term capability.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Appropriations, 2019.................................... $14,662,000
Budget estimate, 2020................................... 14,771,000
Committee recommendation................................ 14,771,000

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $14,771,000.
This is equal to the budget estimate.

Environmental Restoration, Army

Appropriations, 2019.................................... $235,809,000
Budget estimate, 2020................................... 207,518,000
Committee recommendation................................ 209,218,000

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $209,218,000.
This is $1,700,000 above the budget estimate to address costs
associated with remediating contamination caused by
perfluorinated chemicals.

Environmental Restoration, Navy

Appropriations, 2019.................................... $365,883,000
Budget estimate, 2020................................... 335,932,000
Committee recommendation................................ 335,932,000

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $335,932,000.
This is equal to the budget estimate.

Environmental Restoration, Air Force

Appropriations, 2019.................................... $365,808,000
Budget estimate, 2020................................... 302,744,000
Committee recommendation................................ 402,744,000

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $402,744,000.
This is $100,000,000 above the budget estimate to address costs
associated with remediating contamination caused by
perfluorinated chemicals.

Environmental Restoration, Defense-Wide

Appropriations, 2019.................................... $19,002,000
Budget estimate, 2020................................... 9,105,000
Committee recommendation................................ 9,105,000

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $9,105,000.
This is equal to the budget estimate.

Environmental Restoration, Formerly Used Defense Sites

Appropriations, 2019.................................... $248,673,000
Budget estimate, 2020................................... 216,499,000
Committee recommendation................................ 216,499,000

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $216,499,000.
This is equal to the budget estimate.

Overseas Humanitarian, Disaster, and Civic Aid

Appropriations, 2019.................................... $117,663,000
Budget estimate, 2020................................... 108,600,000
Committee recommendation................................ 108,600,000

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $108,600,000.
This is equal to the budget estimate.

Cooperative Threat Reduction Account

Appropriations, 2019.................................... $350,240,000
Budget estimate, 2020................................... 338,700,000
Committee recommendation................................ 338,700,000

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $338,700,000.
This is equal to the budget estimate.

committee recommended program

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this
appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

Strategic Offensive Arms Elimination............................ 492 492 ..............
Chemical Weapons Destruction.................................... 12,856 12,856 ..............
Global Nuclear Security......................................... 33,919 33,919 ..............
Biological Threat Reduction Program............................. 183,642 183,642 ..............
WMD Proliferation Prevention.................................... 79,869 79,869 ..............
Other Assessments/Admin Costs................................... 27,922 27,922 ..............
-----------------------------------------------
Total, Cooperative Threat Reduction....................... 338,700 338,700 ..............
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Department of Defense Acquisition Workforce
Development Fund

Appropriations, 2019.................................... $450,000,000
Budget estimate, 2020................................... 400,000,000
Committee recommendation................................ 400,000,000

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $400,000,000.
This is equal to the budget estimate.

committee recommended program

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this
appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

Transition of the Department of Defense Acquisition
Workforce Development Fund to a Department of Defense
Acquisition Workforce Development Account.--The Committee
recommends an appropriation of $400,000,000 for the Department
of Defense Acquisition Workforce Development Fund [DAWDF],
consistent with the fiscal year 2020 President's budget
request. The Committee supports the proposal included in S.
1790, the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
2020, as passed by the Senate, to transition the DAWDF to a
traditional appropriations account, reflecting congressional
action of the previous three fiscal years. The Committee notes
that the establishment of a traditional appropriations account
merely address funding mechanisms for DAWDF and does not impact
other title 10 authorities related to the Department of Defense
acquisition workforce.
Consistent with previous years, the Committee recommends
appropriations for DAWDF and retains general provisions
prohibiting the application of alternative funding mechanisms
such as remittances and the transfer of expiring funds. The
Committee reiterates its support for the Department of Defense
acquisition workforce and expects the Under Secretary of
Defense (Comptroller) and Director, Cost Assessment and Program
Evaluation, to continue including funding requests for the
Department of Defense acquisition workforce through regular
appropriations in future budget submissions.
Department of Defense Acquisition Workforce Initiatives.--
The Committee notes that the Department of Defense Acquisition
Workforce Development Fund was established in 2008 to provide
for the recruitment, training and retention of Department of
Defense acquisition workforce personnel. The Committee further
notes that the purpose, authorities and funding mechanisms for
DAWDF have repeatedly been adjusted in recent years and that
DAWDF now accounts for the funding of 5 percent of new hires
into the acquisition workforce and less than 2 percent of
overall Department of Defense acquisition workforce funding.
The Committee understands that DAWDF funds are now primarily
applied to increasing the readiness of the acquisition
workforce in support of warfighter demands in accordance with
the 2018 National Defense Strategy.
The Committee notes that the Under Secretary of Defense
(Acquisition and Sustainment) has identified several critical
acquisition workforce initiatives that are not included in the
fiscal year 2020 President's budget request. The Committee
proposes to accelerate the implementation of these initiatives
and recommends funding adjustments in fiscal year 2020 to DAWDF
for the Department of Defense SMART CORPS, the transformation
of the course curriculum at the Defense Acquisition University,
and a critical skills hiring initiative, consistent with
proposals provided to the congressional defense committees by
the Under Secretary of Defense (Acquisition and Sustainment).
The Committee directs that no funds for these purposes may
be obligated or expended until 30 days after the Under
Secretary of Defense (Acquisition and Sustainment) provides
updated implementation and execution plans to the congressional
defense committees for these initiatives. Further, the
Committee designates these initiatives as special interest
items for the purposes of reprogramming guidance.
Department of Defense Acquisition Workforce Development
Fund Reprogramming Guidance.--The Secretary of Defense is
directed to follow reprogramming guidance for the Department of
Defense Acquisition Workforce Development Fund consistent with
reprogramming guidance for acquisition accounts detailed
elsewhere in this report. The dollar threshold for
reprogramming funds shall be $10,000,000.
Department of Defense Acquisition Workforce Reporting
Requirements.--The Committee directs the Under Secretary for
Defense (Acquisition and Sustainment) to provide the Department
of Defense Acquisition Workforce Development Fund annual report
to the congressional defense committees not later than 30 days
after submission of the fiscal year 2021 President's budget
request. Further, the Under Secretary of Defense (Acquisition
and Sustainment) is directed to provide the congressional
defense committees, with the fiscal year 2021 President's
budget request, additional details regarding total funding for
the acquisition workforce by funding category and
appropriations account, as previously requested.

TITLE III

PROCUREMENT

Funds appropriated under this title provide the resources
required to purchase military equipment and hardware, including
aircraft, ships, missiles, combat vehicles, ammunition,
weapons, electronic sensors and communications equipment, and
other procurement items.
The President's fiscal year 2020 budget requests a total of
$118,923,130,000 for procurement appropriations.

SUMMARY OF COMMITTEE ACTION

The Committee recommends procurement appropriations
totaling $132,837,153,000 for fiscal year 2020. This is
$13,914,023,000 above the budget estimate.
Committee recommended procurement appropriations for fiscal
year 2020 are summarized below:

SUMMARY OF PROCUREMENT APPROPRIATIONS
[In thousands of dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Change from
Account 2020 budget Committee budget
estimate recommendation estimate
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Procurement:
Aircraft Procurement, Army.................................. 3,696,429 3,766,529 +70,100
Missile Procurement, Army................................... .............. 3,030,944 +3,030,944
Procurement of Weapons and Tracked Combat Vehicles, Army.... 4,715,566 4,463,582 -251,984
Procurement of Ammunition, Army............................. .............. 2,572,771 +2,572,771
Other Procurement, Army..................................... 7,443,101 7,220,947 -222,154
Aircraft Procurement, Navy.................................. 18,522,204 18,573,560 +51,356
Weapons Procurement, Navy................................... .............. 3,963,067 +3,963,067
Procurement of Ammunition, Navy and Marine Corps............ .............. 872,251 +872,251
Shipbuilding and Conversion, Navy........................... 23,783,710 24,366,431 +582,721
Other Procurement, Navy..................................... 9,652,956 10,568,201 +915,245
Procurement, Marine Corps................................... 3,090,449 3,045,749 -44,700
Aircraft Procurement, Air Force............................. 16,784,279 17,308,918 +524,639
Missile Procurement, Air Force.............................. 2,889,187 2,589,166 -300,021
Space Procurement, Air Force................................ 2,414,383 2,460,605 +46,222
Procurement of Ammunition, Air Force........................ .............. 1,625,661 +1,625,661
Other Procurement, Air Force................................ 20,687,857 21,083,464 +395,607
Procurement, Defense-Wide................................... 5,109,416 5,285,914 +176,498
Defense Production Act Purchases............................ 34,393 39,393 +5,000
Joint Urgent Operational Needs Fund......................... 99,200 .............. -99,200
-----------------------------------------------
Total..................................................... 118,923,130 132,837,153 +13,914,023
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

reprogramming guidance for acquisition accounts

The Secretary of Defense is directed to continue to follow
the reprogramming guidance as specified in the report
accompanying the House version of the Department of Defense
appropriations bill for fiscal year 2008 (House Report 110-
279). Specifically, the dollar threshold for reprogramming
funds will remain at $20,000,000 for procurement and
$10,000,000 for research, development, test and evaluation.
Also, the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) is
directed to continue to provide the congressional defense
committees quarterly, spreadsheet-based DD Form 1416 reports
for service and defense-wide accounts in titles III and IV of
this act. Reports for titles III and IV shall comply with
guidance specified in the explanatory statement accompanying
the Department of Defense Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year
2006. The Department shall continue to follow the limitation
that prior approval reprogrammings are set at either the
specified dollar threshold or 20 percent of the procurement or
research, development, test and evaluation line, whichever is
less. These thresholds are cumulative from the base for
reprogramming value as modified by any adjustments. Therefore,
if the combined value of transfers into or out of a procurement
(P-1), or a research, development, test and evaluation (R-1)
line exceeds the identified threshold, the Secretary of Defense
must submit a prior approval reprogramming to the congressional
defense committees. In addition, guidelines on the application
of prior approval reprogramming procedures for congressional
special interest items are established elsewhere in this
report.

FUNDING INCREASES

The funding increases outlined in the tables for each
appropriation account shall be provided only for the specific
purposes indicated in the tables.

PROCUREMENT SPECIAL INTEREST ITEMS

Items for which additional funds have been recommended or
items for which funding is specifically reduced as shown in the
tables detailing Committee recommended adjustments or in
paragraphs using the phrase ``only for'' or ``only to'' are
congressional special interest items for the purpose of the
Base for Reprogramming (DD Form 1414). Each of these items must
be carried on the DD Form 1414 at the stated amount, as
specifically addressed in elsewhere in this report.

PROCUREMENT OVERVIEW

Army Organic Industrial Base.--The Committee directs the
Secretary of the Army to provide 45-day written notification to
the congressional defense committees prior to the Secretary
approving civilian reductions in force that will result in an
employment loss of 50 or more full-time employees at any Army
organic industrial base facility. The notification shall
include the impact that the proposed reduction in force will
have on the ability to maintain the organic industrial base
critical manufacturing capabilities as delineated in the Army
Organic Industrial Base Strategy Report, a detailed accounting
of the costs of implementing the reduction in force, and an
assessment of the cost of, and time necessary, to restore any
lost capability to meet future organic wartime manufacturing
needs.
Arsenal Sustainment Initiative.--The Committee continues to
support the Department of the Army's efforts to ensure that the
critical manufacturing capabilities of the nation's organic
industrial base are maintained, and commends the Army for
issuing a definitive make-or-buy directive for the
manufacturing arsenals. The new guidance ensures that the
arsenals will be given fair consideration for every Army
acquisition; provides for a 30-day review of all such decisions
by the Army Acquisition Executive; requires all private sector
companies to consider the arsenals as a potential supplier of
component parts; and provides for an annual review of this
overall process. The Committee encourages the Army to implement
the new directive consistently to ensure the arsenals have the
workload necessary to maintain the proficiency and capacity to
meet the manufacturing needs of the nation during war and
peacetime. The Committee notes that it has not yet received
detailed recommendations from the Secretary of Defense on how
the Air Force, Navy, and Marine Corps can better use the
arsenals for their manufacturing needs, or what opportunities
may exist for the arsenals to assist the services and the
Defense Logistics Agency to procure for our spare parts
inventory, as required by Senate Report 114-63.

Aircraft Procurement, Army

Appropriations, 2019.................................... $4,299,566,000
Budget estimate, 2020................................... 3,696,429,000
Committee recommendation................................ 3,766,529,000

The Committee recommends an appropriation of
$3,766,529,000. This is $70,100,000 above the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this
appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

[Dollars in thousands]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Change from
2020 budget Committee -------------------------------
Line Item Qty. estimate Qty. recommendation Budget
Qty. estimate
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, ARMY

AIRCRAFT

FIXED WING
2 UTILITY F/W CARGO AIRCRAFT 1 16,000 .............. .............. -1 -16,000
4 RQ-11 (RAVEN) .............. 23,510 .............. 13,210 .............. -10,300

ROTARY
5 TACTICAL UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEM (TUAS) .............. 12,100 .............. .............. .............. -12,100
7 HELICOPTER, LIGHT UTILITY [LUH] .............. .............. .............. 45,600 .............. +45,600
8 AH-64 APACHE BLOCK IIIA REMAN 48 806,849 48 806,849 .............. ..............
9 AH-64 APACHE BLOCK IIIA REMAN [AP-CY] .............. 190,870 .............. 190,870 .............. ..............
12 UH-60 BLACKHAWK [MYP] 73 1,411,540 73 1,397,740 .............. -13,800
13 UH-60 BLACKHAWK [MYP] [AP-CY] .............. 79,572 .............. 79,572 .............. ..............
14 UH-60 BLACKHAWK A AND L MODELS 25 169,290 25 169,290 .............. ..............
15 CH-47 HELICOPTER 8 140,290 8 140,290 .............. ..............
16 CH-47 HELICOPTER [AP-CY] .............. 18,186 .............. 46,186 .............. +28,000
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, AIRCRAFT .............. 2,868,207 .............. 2,889,607 .............. +21,400

MODIFICATION OF AIRCRAFT
19 UNIVERSAL GROUND CONTROL EQUIPMENT .............. 2,090 .............. 2,090 .............. ..............
20 GRAY EAGLE MODS2 .............. 14,699 .............. 28,699 .............. +14,000
21 MULTI SENSOR ABN RECON [MIP] .............. 35,189 .............. 35,189 .............. ..............
22 AH-64 MODS .............. 58,172 .............. 58,172 .............. ..............
23 CH-47 CARGO HELICOPTER MODS .............. 11,785 .............. 11,785 .............. ..............
24 GRCS SEMA MODS [MIP] .............. 5,677 .............. 5,677 .............. ..............
25 ARL SEMA MODS [MIP] .............. 6,566 .............. 6,566 .............. ..............
26 EMARSS SEMA MODS [MIP] .............. 3,859 .............. 20,959 .............. +17,100
27 UTILITY/CARGO AIRPLANE MODS .............. 15,476 .............. 15,476 .............. ..............
28 UTILITY HELICOPTER MODS .............. 6,744 .............. 24,344 .............. +17,600
29 NETWORK AND MISSION PLAN .............. 105,442 .............. 105,442 .............. ..............
30 COMMS, NAV SURVEILLANCE .............. 164,315 .............. 164,315 .............. ..............
32 GATM ROLLUP .............. 30,966 .............. 30,966 .............. ..............
33 RQ-7 UAV MODS .............. 8,983 .............. 8,983 .............. ..............
34 UAS MODS .............. 10,205 .............. 10,205 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, MODIFICATION OF AIRCRAFT .............. 480,168 .............. 528,868 .............. +48,700

SUPPORT EQUIPMENT AND FACILITIES

GROUND SUPPORT AVIONICS
35 AIRCRAFT SURVIVABILITY EQUIPMENT .............. 52,297 .............. 52,297 .............. ..............
36 SURVIVABILITY CM .............. 8,388 .............. 8,388 .............. ..............
37 CMWS .............. 13,999 .............. 13,999 .............. ..............
38 COMMON INFRARED COUNTERMEASURES .............. 168,784 .............. 168,784 .............. ..............

OTHER SUPPORT
39 AVIONICS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT .............. 1,777 .............. 1,777 .............. ..............
40 COMMON GROUND EQUIPMENT .............. 18,624 .............. 18,624 .............. ..............
41 AIRCREW INTEGRATED SYSTEMS .............. 48,255 .............. 48,255 .............. ..............
42 AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL .............. 32,738 .............. 32,738 .............. ..............
44 LAUNCHER, 2.75 ROCKET .............. 2,201 .............. 2,201 .............. ..............
45 LAUNCHER GUIDED MISSILE: LONGBOW HELLFIRE XM2 9 991 9 991 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, SUPPORT EQUIPMENT AND FACILITIES .............. 348,054 .............. 348,054 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, ARMY .............. 3,696,429 .............. 3,766,529 .............. +70,100
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by
the Committee:

CH-47 Cargo Helicopter.--The Committee encourages the Army
to accelerate retrofit of MH/CH-47 aircraft with vibration
control systems to reduce aircrew fatigue, improve performance
and increase operational time between maintenance of certain
aircraft components.
CH-47F Block II program.--The Committee recommendation
restores Advanced Procurement funds to support the Army's
procurement of the CH-47F Block II program as certified in July
2017. Prior to submitting the fiscal year 2021 President's
budget request, the Committee strongly encourages the Secretary
of the Army to assess the increased cost, expected production
issues as well as industrial base risks of delaying the
successful acquisition program.

Missile Procurement, Army

Appropriations, 2019.................................... $3,145,256,000
Budget estimate, 2020...................................................
Committee recommendation................................ 3,030,944,000

The Committee recommends an appropriation of
$3,030,944,000. This is $3,030,944,000 above the budget
estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this
appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

OTHER MISSILES

SURFACE-TO-AIR MISSILE SYSTEM
1 SYSTEM INTEGRATION AND TEST PROCUREMENT .............. .............. .............. 107,157 .............. +107,157
2 M-SHORAD--PROCUREMENT .............. .............. 17 79,800 +17 +79,800
3 MSE MISSILE .............. .............. 138 664,499 +138 +664,499
4 INDIRECT FIRE PROTECTION CAPABILITY .............. .............. .............. 9,337 .............. +9,337
6 HELLFIRE SYS SUMMARY .............. .............. 1,870 193,284 +1,870 +193,284

AIR-TO-SURFACE MISSILE SYSTEM
7 JOINT AIR-TO-GROUND MSLS [JAGM] .............. .............. 609 220,766 +609 +220,766

ANTI-TANK/ASSAULT MISSILE SYSTEM
8 JAVELIN (AAWS-M) SYSTEM SUMMARY .............. .............. 672 138,405 +672 +138,405
9 TOW 2 SYSTEM SUMMARY .............. .............. 1,460 107,958 +1,460 +107,958
10 TOW 2 SYSTEM SUMMARY [AP-CY] .............. .............. .............. 10,500 .............. +10,500
11 GUIDED MLRS ROCKET [GMLRS] .............. .............. 6,489 744,810 +6,489 +744,810
12 MLRS REDUCED RANGE PRACTICE ROCKETS (RRPR) .............. .............. 2,982 27,555 +2,982 +27,555
14 ARMY TACTICAL MSL SYS [ATACMS] .............. .............. 146 170,013 +146 +170,013
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, OTHER MISSILES .............. .............. .............. 2,474,084 .............. +2,474,084

MODIFICATION OF MISSILES

MODIFICATIONS
16 PATRIOT MODS .............. .............. .............. 278,716 .............. +278,716
17 ATACMS MODS .............. .............. .............. 85,320 .............. +85,320
18 GMLRS MOD .............. .............. .............. 5,094 .............. +5,094
19 STINGER MODS .............. .............. .............. 81,615 .............. +81,615
20 AVENGER MODS .............. .............. .............. 14,107 .............. +14,107
21 ITAS/TOW MODS .............. .............. .............. 3,469 .............. +3,469
22 MLRS MODS .............. .............. .............. 39,019 .............. +39,019
23 HIMARS MODIFICATIONS .............. .............. .............. 12,483 .............. +12,483
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, MODIFICATION OF MISSILES .............. .............. .............. 519,823 .............. +519,823

SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS
24 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS .............. .............. .............. 26,444 .............. +26,444

SUPPORT EQUIPMENT AND FACILITIES
25 AIR DEFENSE TARGETS .............. .............. .............. 10,593 .............. +10,593
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, MISSILE PROCUREMENT, ARMY .............. .............. .............. 3,030,944 .............. +3,030,944
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by
the Committee:

Procurement of Weapons and Tracked Combat Vehicles, Army

Appropriations, 2019.................................... $4,486,402,000
Budget estimate, 2020................................... 4,715,566,000
Committee recommendation................................ 4,463,582,000

The Committee recommends an appropriation of
$4,463,582,000. This is $251,984,000 below the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this
appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

TRACKED COMBAT VEHICLES
2 ARMORED MULTI PURPOSE VEHICLE (AMPV) 65 264,040 59 230,307 -6 -33,733

MODIFICATION OF TRACKED COMBAT VEHICLES
3 STRYKER (MOD) .............. 144,387 .............. 147,387 .............. +3,000
4 STRYKER UPGRADE 152 550,000 152 513,858 .............. -36,142
5 BRADLEY PROGRAM (MOD) .............. 638,781 .............. 415,740 .............. -223,041
6 M109 FOV MODIFICATIONS .............. 25,756 .............. 25,756 .............. ..............
7 PALADIN PIPM MOD IN SERVICE 53 553,425 53 553,425 .............. ..............
9 ASSAULT BRIDGE (MOD) .............. 2,821 .............. 2,821 .............. ..............
10 ASSAULT BREACHER VEHICLE 6 31,697 6 31,697 .............. ..............
11 M88 FOV MODS .............. 4,500 .............. 4,500 .............. ..............
12 JOINT ASSAULT BRIDGE 44 205,517 44 205,517 .............. ..............
13 M1 ABRAMS TANK (MOD) .............. 348,800 .............. 348,800 .............. ..............
14 ABRAMS UPGRADE PROGRAM 165 1,752,784 165 1,752,784 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, TRACKED COMBAT VEHICLES .............. 4,522,508 .............. 4,232,592 .............. -289,916

WEAPONS AND OTHER COMBAT VEHICLES
15 M240 MEDIUM MACHINE GUN (7.62MM) .............. .............. .............. 11,600 .............. +11,600
16 MULTI-ROLE ANTI-ARMOR ANTI-PERSONNEL WEAPON .............. 19,420 .............. 16,864 .............. -2,556
17 GUN AUTOMATIC 30MM M230 .............. 20,000 .............. .............. .............. -20,000
19 MORTAR SYSTEMS .............. 14,907 .............. 14,085 .............. -822
20 XM320 GRENADE LAUNCHER MODULE (GLM) .............. 191 .............. 191 .............. ..............
21 PRECISION SNIPER RIFLE .............. 7,977 .............. 5,747 .............. -2,230
22 COMPACT SEMI-AUTOMATIC SNIPER SYSTEM .............. 9,860 .............. 9,860 .............. ..............
23 CARBINE .............. 30,331 .............. 30,331 .............. ..............
24 SMALL ARMS--FIRE CONTROL .............. 8,060 .............. .............. .............. -8,060
25 COMMON REMOTELY OPERATED WEAPONS STATION .............. 24,007 .............. 24,007 .............. ..............
26 MODULAR HANDGUN SYSTEM .............. 6,174 .............. 6,174 .............. ..............

MOD OF WEAPONS AND OTHER COMBAT VEH
28 MK-19 GRENADE MACHINE GUN MODS .............. 3,737 .............. 3,737 .............. ..............
29 M777 MODS .............. 2,367 .............. 12,367 .............. +10,000
30 M4 CARBINE MODS .............. 17,595 .............. 17,595 .............. ..............
33 M240 MEDIUM MACHINE GUN MODS .............. 8,000 .............. 8,000 .............. ..............
34 SNIPER RIFLES MODIFICATIONS .............. 2,426 .............. 2,426 .............. ..............
35 M119 MODIFICATIONS .............. 6,269 .............. 56,269 .............. +50,000
36 MORTAR MODIFICATION .............. 1,693 .............. 1,693 .............. ..............
37 MODIFICATIONS LESS THAN $5.0M (WOCV-WTCV) .............. 4,327 .............. 4,327 .............. ..............

SUPPORT EQUIPMENT AND FACILITIES
38 ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (WOCV-WTCV) .............. 3,066 .............. 3,066 .............. ..............
39 PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT (WOCV-WTCV) .............. 2,651 .............. 2,651 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, WEAPONS AND OTHER COMBAT VEHICLES .............. 193,058 .............. 230,990 .............. +37,932
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, PROCUREMENT OF W&TCV, ARMY .............. 4,715,566 .............. 4,463,582 .............. -251,984
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by
the Committee:

Armored Multi-Purpose Vehicle Reporting Requirement.--As
expressed in the report accompanying the House version of the
Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2017 (House Report
114-577), the Secretary of the Army is required to report
quarterly on the cost, schedule, and performance of the Armored
Multi-Purpose Vehicle [AMPV] program. The Committee notes that
on January 25, 2019, the AMPV program successfully achieved its
Milestone C and entry into Low-rate Initial Production.
Therefore, the Committee rescinds the reporting requirement as
directed to the Secretary of the Army and encourages the
Assistant Secretary of the Army for Acquisition, Logistics and
Technology to engage the congressional defense committees,
outside of the standard program engagements, should changes to
the acquisition strategy or significant issues arise.
Self-Propelled Howitzer.--The Committee is aware that the
Field Artillery Squadron [FA SQDN], 2d Calvary Regiment [2CR]
has identified lethality and mobility capability gaps with the
current M777A2 towed howitzer. The towed howitzer's speed and
mobility limitations during cross-country traversal, along with
emplacement and displacement timelines inhibit the FA SQDN's
ability to keep pace with the formation and place the crew's
survival at increased risk during a decisive action scenario
against a peer adversary. As a result of these limitations, 2CR
submitted an Operational Needs Statement for 24 155mm self-
propelled howitzers operating in three batteries. Additionally,
citing similar limitations, Forces Command endorsed a
Capabilities Needs Statement, originating from the XVIII
Airborne Corps, for a Wheeled Self-Propelled 105mm howitzer for
employment across select Infantry Brigade Combat Teams [IBCT].
The Committee believes that these requirements support the
National Defense Strategy and better enables 2CR and IBCTs to
compete with peer adversaries. Therefore, the Committee
recommends an additional $60,000,000 and encourages the
Secretary of the Army to rapidly field this critical
capability.

Procurement of Ammunition, Army

Appropriations, 2019.................................... $2,276,330,000
Budget estimate, 2020...................................................
Committee recommendation................................ 2,572,771,000

The Committee recommends an appropriation of
$2,572,771,000. This is $2,572,771,000 above the budget
estimate.

committee recommended program

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this
appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

AMMUNITION

SMALL/MEDIUM CAL AMMUNITION
1 CTG, 5.56MM, ALL TYPES .............. .............. .............. 65,520 .............. +65,520
2 CTG, 7.62MM, ALL TYPES .............. .............. .............. 114,228 .............. +114,228
3 CTG, HANDGUN, ALL TYPES .............. .............. .............. 17,807 .............. +17,807
4 CTG, .50 CAL, ALL TYPES .............. .............. .............. 62,860 .............. +62,860
5 CTG, 20MM, ALL TYPES .............. .............. .............. 35,920 .............. +35,920
6 CT6, 25MM, ALL TYPES .............. .............. .............. 8,990 .............. +8,990
7 CTG, 30MM, ALL TYPES .............. .............. .............. 66,471 .............. +66,471
8 CTG, 40MM, ALL TYPES .............. .............. .............. 103,952 .............. +103,952

MORTAR AMMUNITION

9 60MM MORTAR, ALL TYPES .............. .............. .............. 50,580 .............. +50,580
10 81MM MORTAR, ALL TYPES .............. .............. .............. 61,873 .............. +61,873
11 120MM MORTAR, ALL TYPES .............. .............. .............. 125,452 .............. +125,452

TANK AMMUNITION
12 CTG TANK 105MM AND 120MM: ALL TYPES .............. .............. .............. 111,659 .............. +111,659

ARTILLERY AMMUNITION
13 CTG, ARTY, 75MM AND 105MM: ALL TYPES .............. .............. .............. 44,675 .............. +44,675
14 ARTILLERY PROJECTILE, 155MM, ALL TYPES .............. .............. .............. 231,537 .............. +231,537
15 PROJ 155MM EXTENDED RANGE XM982 .............. .............. 441 56,027 +441 +56,027
16 ARTILLERY PROPELLANTS, FUZES AND PRIMERS, ALL .............. .............. .............. 271,602 .............. +271,602
TYPES

MINES
17 MINES AND CLEARING CHARGES, ALL TYPES .............. .............. .............. 38,639 .............. +38,639

ROCKETS
18 SHOULDER LAUNCHED MUNITIONS, ALL TYPES .............. .............. .............. 67,528 .............. +67,528
19 ROCKET, HYDRA 70, ALL TYPES .............. .............. .............. 175,994 .............. +175,994

OTHER AMMUNITION
20 CAD/PAD ALL TYPES .............. .............. .............. 7,595 .............. +7,595
21 DEMOLITION MUNITIONS, ALL TYPES .............. .............. .............. 51,651 .............. +51,651
22 GRENADES, ALL TYPES .............. .............. .............. 46,282 .............. +46,282
23 SIGNALS, ALL TYPES .............. .............. .............. 18,609 .............. +18,609
24 SIMULATORS, ALL TYPES .............. .............. .............. 16,054 .............. +16,054

MISCELLANEOUS
25 AMMO COMPONENTS, ALL TYPES .............. .............. .............. 2,661 .............. +2,661
27 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION .............. .............. .............. 9,213 .............. +9,213
28 AMMUNITION PECULIAR EQUIPMENT .............. .............. .............. 10,044 .............. +10,044
29 FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION (AMMO) .............. .............. .............. 18,492 .............. +18,492
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, AMMUNITION .............. .............. .............. 1,891,915 .............. +1,891,915

AMMUNITION PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT

PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT
31 PROVISION OF INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES .............. .............. .............. 474,511 .............. +474,511
32 CONVENTIONAL MUNITIONS DEMILITARIZATION, ALL .............. .............. .............. 202,512 .............. +202,512
33 ARMS INITIATIVE .............. .............. .............. 3,833 .............. +3,833
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, AMMUNITION PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT .............. .............. .............. 680,856 .............. +680,856
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, ARMY .............. .............. .............. 2,572,771 .............. +2,572,771
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by
the Committee:

[In thousands of dollars]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Change from
Line Item 2020 budget Committee budget
estimate recommendation estimate
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1Ctg, 5.56mm, All .............. 65,520 +65,520
Types
Transfer: From .............. .............. +68,949
Title IX to
Title III for
base
requirements
Restoring .............. .............. -3,429
acquisition
accountabilit
y: M855A1
Clipped Bulk
Pack unit
cost growth
2CTG, 7.62mm, All .............. 114,228 +114,228
Types
Transfer: From .............. .............. +114,228
Title IX to
Title III for
base
requirements
3CTG, Handgun, All .............. 17,807 +17,807
Types
Transfer: From .............. .............. +17,807
Title IX to
Title III for
base
requirements
4CTG, .50 Cal, All .............. 62,860 +62,860
Types
Transfer: From .............. .............. +63,966
Title IX to
Title III for
base
requirements
Restoring .............. .............. -1,106
acquisition
accountabilit
y: Blank,
M1A1 w/MP
Link unit
cost growth
5CTG, 20mm, All .............. 35,920 +35,920
Types
Transfer: From .............. .............. +35,920
Title IX to
Title III for
base
requirements
6CTG, 25mm, All .............. 8,990 +8,990
Types
Transfer: From .............. .............. +8,990
Title IX to
Title III for
base
requirements
7CTG, 30mm, All .............. 66,471 +66,471
Types
Transfer: From .............. .............. +68,813
Title IX to
Title III for
base
requirements
Restoring .............. .............. -2,342
acquisition
accountabilit
y: TP-T,
MK239 Single
unit cost
growth
8CTG, 40mm, All .............. 103,952 +103,952
Types
Transfer: From .............. .............. +103,952
Title IX to
Title III for
base
requirements
960MM Mortar, All .............. 50,580 +50,580
Types
Transfer: From .............. .............. +50,580
Title IX to
Title III for
base
requirements
1081MM Mortar, All .............. 61,873 +61,873
Types
Transfer: From .............. .............. +59,373
Title IX to
Title III for
base
requirements
Program .............. .............. +2,500
increase:
M819
11120MM Mortar, All .............. 125,452 +125,452
Types
Transfer: From .............. .............. +125,452
Title IX to
Title III for
base
requirements
12Cartridges, Tank, .............. 111,659 +111,659
105MM and 120MM,
All Types
Transfer: From .............. .............. +171,284
Title IX to
Title III for
base
requirements
Restoring .............. .............. -15,002
acquisition
accountabilit
y: HEMP-T
XM1147
schedule
delay
Restoring .............. .............. -44,623
acquisition
accountabilit
y: APFSDS-T
M829A4
schedule
delay
13Artillery .............. 44,675 +44,675
Cartridges, 75MM
& 105MM, All
Types
Transfer: From .............. .............. +44,675
Title IX to
Title III for
base
requirements
14Artillery .............. 231,537 +231,537
Projectile,
155MM, All Types
Transfer: From .............. .............. +266,037
Title IX to
Title III for
base
requirements
Restoring .............. .............. -4,500
acquisition
accountabilit
y: M795 IM
Metal Part
contract
delay
Restoring .............. .............. -30,000
acquisition
accountabilit
y: XM1113
early to need
15Proj 155mm .............. 56,027 +56,027
Extended Range
M982
Transfer: From .............. .............. +57,434
Title IX to
Title III for
base
requirements
Restoring .............. .............. -1,407
acquisition
accountabilit
y: Product
engineering
growth
16Artillery .............. 271,602 +271,602
Propellants,
Fuzes and
Primers, All
Transfer: From .............. .............. +271,602
Title IX to
Title III for
base
requirements
17Mines & Clearing .............. 38,639 +38,639
Charges, All
Types
Transfer: From .............. .............. +55,433
Title IX to
Title III for
base
requirements
Restoring .............. .............. -16,194
acquisition
accountabilit
y: APOBS
contract
award delays
Restoring .............. .............. -600
acquisition
accountabilit
y: FUZE PD
M739 Series
unit cost
discrepancy
18Shoulder Launched .............. 67,528 +67,528
Munitions, All
Types
Transfer: From .............. .............. +74,878
Title IX to
Title III for
base
requirements
Restoring .............. .............. -14,550
acquisition
accountabilit
y: BDM
program
delays
Program .............. .............. +7,200
increase:
AT4CS Tandem
Warhead
19Rocket, Hydra 70, .............. 175,994 +175,994
All Types
Transfer: From .............. .............. +175,994
Title IX to
Title III for
base
requirements
20CAD/PAD, All Types .............. 7,595 +7,595
Transfer: From .............. .............. +7,595
Title IX to
Title III for
base
requirements
21Demolition .............. 51,651 +51,651
Munitions, All
Types
Transfer: From .............. .............. +51,651
Title IX to
Title III for
base
requirements
22Grenades, All .............. 46,282 +46,282
Types
Transfer: From .............. .............. +40,592
Title IX to
Title III for
base
requirements
Restoring .............. .............. -2,310
acquisition
accountabilit
y: XM111
offensive
hand grenade
early to need
Program .............. .............. +8,000
increase
23Signals, All Types .............. 18,609 +18,609
Transfer: From .............. .............. +18,609
Title IX to
Title III for
base
requirements
24Simulators, All .............. 16,054 +16,054
Types
Transfer: From .............. .............. +16,054
Title IX to
Title III for
base
requirements
25Ammo Components, .............. 2,661 +2,661
All Types
Transfer: From .............. .............. +5,261
Title IX to
Title III for
base
requirements
Improving .............. .............. -2,600
Funds
Management:
Prior year
carryover
26Non-Lethal
Ammunition, All
Types
Transfer: From .............. .............. +715
Title IX to
Title III for
base
requirements
Improving .............. .............. -715
Funds
Management:
Prior year
carryover
27Items Less Than $5 .............. 9,213 +9,213
Million (AMMO)
Transfer: From .............. .............. +9,213
Title IX to
Title III for
base
requirements
28Ammunition .............. 10,044 +10,044
Peculiar
Equipment
Transfer: From .............. .............. +10,044
Title IX to
Title III for
base
requirements
29First Destination .............. 18,492 +18,492
Transportation
(AMMO)
Transfer: From .............. .............. +18,492
Title IX to
Title III for
base
requirements
30Closeout .............. .............. ..............
Liabilities
Transfer: From .............. .............. +99
Title IX to
Title III for
base
requirements
Improving .............. .............. -99
Funds
Management:
Prior year
carryover
31Industrial .............. 474,511 +474,511
Facilities
Transfer: From .............. .............. +474,511
Title IX to
Title III for
base
requirements
32Conventional .............. 202,512 +202,512
Munitions
Demilitarization
Transfer: From .............. .............. +202,512
Title IX to
Title III for
base
requirements
33Arms Initiative .............. 3,833 +3,833
Transfer: From .............. .............. +3,833
Title IX to
Title III for
base
requirements
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Other Procurement, Army

Appropriations, 2019.................................... $7,844,691,000
Budget estimate, 2020................................... 7,443,101,000
Committee recommendation................................ 7,220,947,000

The Committee recommends an appropriation of
$7,220,947,000. This is $222,154,000 below the budget estimate.

committee recommended program

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this
appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

TACTICAL AND SUPPORT VEHICLES

TACTICAL VEHICLES
1 TACTICAL TRAILERS/DOLLY SETS .............. 12,993 .............. 12,993 .............. ..............
2 SEMITRAILERS, FLATBED: .............. 102,386 .............. 102,386 .............. ..............
3 HIGH MOBILITY MULTI-PURPOSE WHEELED VEHICLE .............. 127,271 .............. 127,271 .............. ..............
(HMMWV)
4 GROUND MOBILITY VEHICLES (GMV) .............. 37,038 .............. 37,038 .............. ..............
6 JOINT LIGHT TACTICAL VEHICLE 2,530 996,007 2,530 972,407 .............. -23,600
7 TRUCK, DUMP, 20t (CCE) .............. 10,838 .............. 10,838 .............. ..............
8 FAMILY OF MEDIUM TACTICAL VEH [FMTV] .............. 72,057 .............. 138,057 .............. +66,000
9 FIRETRUCKS & ASSOCIATED FIREFIGHTING EQUIPMENT .............. 28,048 .............. 25,037 .............. -3,011
10 FAMILY OF HEAVY TACTICAL VEHICLES [FHTV] .............. 9,969 .............. 9,969 .............. ..............
11 PLS ESP .............. 6,280 .............. 6,280 .............. ..............
12 HEAVY EXPANDED MOBILE TACTICAL TRUCK EXT SERV .............. 30,841 .............. 95,185 .............. +64,344
13 HMMWV RECAPITALIZATION PROGRAM .............. 5,734 .............. 5,734 .............. ..............
14 TACTICAL WHEELED VEHICLE PROTECTION KITS .............. 45,113 .............. 45,113 .............. ..............
15 MODIFICATION OF IN SVC EQUIP .............. 58,946 .............. 57,112 .............. -1,834

NON-TACTICAL VEHICLES
17 HEAVY ARMORED SEDAN .............. 791 .............. 791 .............. ..............
18 PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLES .............. 1,416 .............. 1,416 .............. ..............
19 NONTACTICAL VEHICLES, OTHER .............. 29,891 .............. 28,804 .............. -1,087
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, TACTICAL AND SUPPORT VEHICLES .............. 1,575,619 .............. 1,676,431 .............. +100,812

COMMUNICATIONS AND ELECTRONICS EQUIPMENT

COMM--JOINT COMMUNICATIONS
21 SIGNAL MODERNIZATION PROGRAM .............. 153,933 .............. 133,913 .............. -20,020
22 TACTICAL NETWORK TECHNOLOGY MOD IN SERVICE .............. 387,439 .............. 351,139 .............. -36,300
23 SITUATION INFORMATION TRANSPORT .............. 46,693 .............. 46,693 .............. ..............
25 JCSE EQUIPMENT (USREDCOM) .............. 5,075 .............. 5,075 .............. ..............

COMM--SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS
28 DEFENSE ENTERPRISE WIDEBAND SATCOM SYSTEMS .............. 101,189 .............. 101,189 .............. ..............
29 TRANSPORTABLE TACTICAL COMMAND COMMUNICATIONS .............. 77,141 .............. 99,641 .............. +22,500
30 SHF TERM .............. 16,054 .............. 16,054 .............. ..............
31 ASSURED POSITIONING, NAVIGATION AND TIMING .............. 41,074 .............. 31,674 .............. -9,400
32 SMART-T (SPACE) .............. 10,515 .............. 10,515 .............. ..............
33 GLOBAL BRDCST SVC--GBS .............. 11,800 .............. 11,800 .............. ..............
34 ENROUTE MISSION COMMAND (EMC) .............. 8,609 .............. 8,609 .............. ..............

COMM--C3 SYSTEM
38 COE TACTICAL SERVER INFRASTRUCTURE (TSI) .............. 77,533 .............. 31,672 .............. -45,861

COMM--COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS
39 HANDHELD MANPACK SMALL FORM FIT (HMS) .............. 468,026 .............. 468,026 .............. ..............
40 RADIO TERMINAL SET, MIDS LVT(2) .............. 23,778 .............. 23,778 .............. ..............
44 SPIDER FAMILY OF NETWORKED MUNITIONS INCREASE .............. 10,930 .............. 10,930 .............. ..............
46 UNIFIED COMMAND SUITE .............. 9,291 .............. 18,291 .............. +9,000
47 COTS COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT .............. 55,630 .............. 55,630 .............. ..............
48 FAMILY OF MED COMM FOR COMBAT CASUALTY CARE .............. 16,590 .............. 16,590 .............. ..............
49 ARMY COMMUNICATIONS & ELECTRONICS .............. 43,457 .............. 37,856 .............. -5,601

COMM--INTELLIGENCE COMM
50 CI AUTOMATION ARCHITECTURE [MIP] .............. 10,470 .............. 10,470 .............. ..............
51 DEFENSE MILITARY DECEPTION INITIATIVE .............. 3,704 .............. 3,704 .............. ..............

INFORMATION SECURITY
53 FAMILY OF BIOMETRICS .............. 1,000 .............. 1,000 .............. ..............
54 INFORMATION SYSTEM SECURITY PROGRAM-ISSP .............. 3,600 .............. 3,600 .............. ..............
55 COMMUNICATIONS SECURITY (COMSEC) .............. 160,899 .............. 147,097 .............. -13,802
56 DEFENSIVE CYBER OPERATIONS .............. 61,962 .............. 56,962 .............. -5,000
57 INSIDER THREAT PROGRAM--UNIT ACTIVITY MONITOR .............. 756 .............. 756 .............. ..............
58 PERSISTENT CYBER TRAINING ENVIRONMENT .............. 3,000 .............. 3,000 .............. ..............

COMM--LONG HAUL COMMUNICATIONS
59 BASE SUPPORT COMMUNICATIONS .............. 31,770 .............. 31,770 .............. ..............

COMM--BASE COMMUNICATIONS
60 INFORMATION SYSTEMS .............. 159,009 .............. 159,009 .............. ..............
61 EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT MODERNIZATION PROGRAM .............. 4,854 .............. 4,854 .............. ..............
62 HOME STATION MISSION COMMAND CENTERS (MSMCC) .............. 47,174 .............. 47,174 .............. ..............
63 INSTALLATION INFO INFRASTRUCTURE MOD PROGRAM .............. 297,994 .............. 297,994 .............. ..............

ELECT EQUIP

ELECT EQUIP--TACT INT REL ACT [TIARA]
66 JTT/CIBS-M [MIP] .............. 7,686 .............. 7,686 .............. ..............
68 DCGS-A [MIP] .............. 180,350 .............. 146,568 .............. -33,782
70 TROJAN [MIP] .............. 17,368 .............. 17,368 .............. ..............
71 MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP (INTEL SPT) [MIP] .............. 59,052 .............. 59,052 .............. ..............

ELECT EQUIP--ELECTRONIC WARFARE [EW]
77 LIGHTWEIGHT COUNTER MORTAR RADAR .............. 5,400 .............. 5,400 .............. ..............
78 EW PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT TOOLS .............. 7,568 .............. 7,568 .............. ..............
79 AIR VIGILANCE (AV) .............. 8,953 .............. 8,953 .............. ..............
81 MULTI-FUNCTION ELECTRONIC WARFARE (MFEW) SYST .............. 6,420 .............. .............. .............. -6,420
83 COUNTERINTELLIGENCE/SECURITY COUNTERMEASURES .............. 501 .............. 501 .............. ..............
84 CI MODERNIZATION [MIP] .............. 121 .............. 121 .............. ..............

ELECT EQUIP--TACTICAL SURV. (TAC SURV)
85 SENTINEL MODS .............. 115,210 .............. 115,210 .............. ..............
86 NIGHT VISION DEVICES .............. 236,604 .............. 64,017 .............. -172,587
88 SMALL TACTICAL OPTICAL RIFLE MOUNTED MLRF .............. 22,623 .............. 22,623 .............. ..............
90 INDIRECT FIRE PROTECTION FAMILY OF SYSTEMS .............. 29,127 .............. 29,127 .............. ..............
91 FAMILY OF WEAPON SIGHTS (FWS) .............. 120,883 .............. 81,541 .............. -39,342
94 JOINT BATTLE COMMAND--PLATFORM [JBC-P] .............. 265,667 .............. 256,546 .............. -9,121
95 JOINT EFFECTS TARGETING SYSTEM (JETS) .............. 69,720 .............. 69,720 .............. ..............
96 MOD OF IN-SERVICE EQUIPMENT (LLDR) .............. 6,044 .............. 6,044 .............. ..............
97 COMPUTER BALLISTICS: LHMBC XM32 .............. 3,268 .............. 3,268 .............. ..............
98 MORTAR FIRE CONTROL SYSTEM .............. 13,199 .............. 13,199 .............. ..............
99 MORTAR FIRE CONTROL SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS .............. 10,000 .............. 10,000 .............. ..............
100 COUNTERFIRE RADARS .............. 16,416 .............. 16,416 .............. ..............

ELECT EQUIP--TACTICAL C2 SYSTEMS
102 FIRE SUPPORT C2 FAMILY .............. 13,197 .............. 13,197 .............. ..............
103 AIR & MSL DEFENSE PLANNING & CONTROL SYS (AMD .............. 24,730 .............. 24,730 .............. ..............
104 IAMD BATTLE COMMAND SYSTEM .............. 29,629 .............. 22,000 .............. -7,629
105 LIFE CYCLE SOFTWARE SUPPORT [LCSS] .............. 6,774 .............. 6,774 .............. ..............
106 NETWORK MANAGEMENT INITIALIZATION AND SERVICE .............. 24,448 .............. 24,448 .............. ..............
107 MANEUVER CONTROL SYSTEM [MCS] .............. 260 .............. 260 .............. ..............
108 GLOBAL COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM-ARMY .............. 17,962 .............. 8,815 .............. -9,147
109 INTEGRATED PERSONNEL AND PAY SYSTEM-ARMY .............. 18,674 .............. 8,287 .............. -10,387
110 RECONNAISSANCE AND SURVEYING INSTRUMENT SET .............. 11,000 .............. 11,000 .............. ..............
111 MOD OF IN-SERVICE EQUIPMENT (ENFIRE) .............. 7,317 .............. 7,317 .............. ..............

ELECT EQUIP--AUTOMATION
112 ARMY TRAINING MODERNIZATION .............. 14,578 .............. 14,578 .............. ..............
113 AUTOMATED DATA PROCESSING EQUIPMENT .............. 139,342 .............. 128,542 .............. -10,800
114 GENERAL FUND ENTERPRISE BUSINESS SYSTEM .............. 15,802 .............. 15,802 .............. ..............
115 HIGH PERF COMPUTING MOD PROGRAM .............. 67,610 .............. 87,610 .............. +20,000
116 CONTRACT WRITING SYSTEM .............. 15,000 .............. 6,000 .............. -9,000
117 CSS COMMUNICATIONS .............. 24,700 .............. 24,700 .............. ..............
118 RESERVE COMPONENT AUTOMATION SYS [RCAS] .............. 27,879 .............. 27,879 .............. ..............

ELECT EQUIP--AUDIO VISUAL SYS (A/V)
120 ITEMS LESS THAN $5M (SURVEYING EQUIPMENT) .............. 5,000 .............. 5,000 .............. ..............

ELECT EQUIP--SUPPORT
122 BCT EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES .............. 22,302 .............. .............. .............. -22,302
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, COMMUNICATIONS AND ELECTRONICS .............. 4,039,333 .............. 3,624,332 .............. -415,001
EQUIPMENT

OTHER SUPPORT EQUIPMENT

CHEMICAL DEFENSIVE EQUIPMENT
126 CBRN DEFENSE .............. 25,828 .............. 22,607 .............. -3,221
127 SMOKE & OBSCURANT FAMILY: SOF (NON AAO ITEM) .............. 5,050 .............. 5,050 .............. ..............

BRIDGING EQUIPMENT
128 TACTICAL BRIDGING .............. 59,821 .............. 59,821 .............. ..............
129 TACTICAL BRIDGE, FLOAT-RIBBON .............. 57,661 .............. 57,661 .............. ..............
130 BRIDGE SUPPLEMENTAL SET .............. 17,966 .............. 17,966 .............. ..............
131 COMMON BRIDGE TRANSPORTER RECAP .............. 43,155 .............. 43,155 .............. ..............

ENGINEER (NON-CONSTRUCTION) EQUIPMENT
132 HANDHELD STANDOFF MINEFIELD DETECTION SYS-HST .............. 7,570 .............. 7,570 .............. ..............
133 GROUND STANDOFF MINE DETECTION SYSTEM [GSTAMIDS] .............. 37,025 .............. 37,025 .............. ..............
135 HUSKY MOUNTED DETECTION SYSTEM (HMDS) .............. 83,082 .............. 76,897 .............. -6,185
136 ROBOTIC COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM .............. 2,000 .............. 2,000 .............. ..............
137 EOD ROBOTICS SYSTEMS RECAPITALIZATION .............. 23,115 .............. 23,115 .............. ..............
138 ROBOTICS AND APPLIQUE SYSTEMS .............. 101,056 .............. 99,037 .............. -2,019
140 RENDER SAFE SETS KITS OUTFITS .............. 18,684 .............. 18,684 .............. ..............
142 FAMILY OF BOATS AND MOTORS .............. 8,245 .............. 8,245 .............. ..............

COMBAT SERVICE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
143 HEATERS AND ECU'S .............. 7,336 .............. 7,336 .............. ..............
145 PERSONNEL RECOVERY SUPPORT SYSTEM [PRSS] .............. 4,281 .............. 4,281 .............. ..............
146 GROUND SOLDIER SYSTEM .............. 111,955 .............. 114,505 .............. +2,550
147 MOBILE SOLDIER POWER .............. 31,364 .............. 29,943 .............. -1,421
148 FORCE PROVIDER .............. .............. .............. 12,000 .............. +12,000
149 FIELD FEEDING EQUIPMENT .............. 1,673 .............. 15,973 .............. +14,300
150 CARGO AERIAL DEL & PERSONNEL PARACHUTE SYSTEM .............. 43,622 .............. 39,170 .............. -4,452
151 FAMILY OF ENGR COMBAT AND CONSTRUCTION SETS .............. 11,451 .............. 11,451 .............. ..............
152 ITEMS LESS THAN $5M (ENG SPT) .............. 5,167 .............. 4,128 .............. -1,039

PETROLEUM EQUIPMENT
154 DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS, PETROLEUM & WATER .............. 74,867 .............. 72,118 .............. -2,749

MEDICAL EQUIPMENT
155 COMBAT SUPPORT MEDICAL .............. 68,225 .............. 89,831 .............. +21,606

MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT
156 MOBILE MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT SYSTEMS .............. 55,053 .............. 80,053 .............. +25,000
157 ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (MAINT EQ) .............. 5,608 .............. 5,608 .............. ..............

CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT
161 HYDRAULIC EXCAVATOR .............. 500 .............. 500 .............. ..............
162 TRACTOR, FULL TRACKED .............. 4,835 .............. 4,835 .............. ..............
163 ALL TERRAIN CRANES .............. 23,936 .............. 23,003 .............. -933
164 HIGH MOBILITY ENGINEER EXCAVATOR [HMEE] FOS .............. 27,188 .............. 27,188 .............. ..............
166 CONST EQUIP ESP .............. 34,790 .............. 34,790 .............. ..............
167 ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (CONST EQUIP) .............. 4,381 .............. 4,381 .............. ..............

RAIL FLOAT CONTAINERIZATION EQUIPMENT
168 ARMY WATERCRAFT ESP .............. 35,194 .............. 35,194 .............. ..............
169 MANEUVER SUPPORT VESSEL (MSV) .............. 14,185 .............. .............. .............. -14,185
170 ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (FLOAT/RAIL) .............. 6,920 .............. 6,920 .............. ..............

GENERATORS
171 GENERATORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT .............. 58,566 .............. 111,040 .............. +52,474
172 TACTICAL ELECTRIC POWER RECAPITALIZATION .............. 14,814 .............. 14,814 .............. ..............

MATERIAL HANDLING EQUIPMENT
173 FAMILY OF FORKLIFTS .............. 14,864 .............. 13,864 .............. -1,000

TRAINING EQUIPMENT
174 COMBAT TRAINING CENTERS SUPPORT .............. 123,411 .............. 123,411 .............. ..............
175 TRAINING DEVICES, NONSYSTEM .............. 220,707 .............. 207,748 .............. -12,959
176 SYNTHETIC TRAINING ENVIRONMENT (STE) .............. 20,749 .............. .............. .............. -20,749
178 AVIATION COMBINED ARMS TACTICAL TRAINER (AVCA .............. 4,840 .............. 4,840 .............. ..............
179 GAMING TECHNOLOGY IN SUPPORT OF ARMY TRAINING .............. 15,463 .............. 15,463 .............. ..............

TEST MEASURE AND DIG EQUIPMENT [TMD]
180 CALIBRATION SETS EQUIPMENT .............. 3,030 .............. 3,030 .............. ..............
181 INTEGRATED FAMILY OF TEST EQUIPMENT [IFTE] .............. 76,980 .............. 76,980 .............. ..............
182 TEST EQUIPMENT MODERNIZATION [TEMOD] .............. 16,415 .............. 15,132 .............. -1,283

OTHER SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
184 RAPID EQUIPPING SOLDIER SUPPORT EQUIPMENT .............. 9,877 .............. 9,877 .............. ..............
185 PHYSICAL SECURITY SYSTEMS (OPA3) .............. 82,158 .............. 78,958 .............. -3,200
186 BASE LEVEL COM'L EQUIPMENT .............. 15,340 .............. 15,340 .............. ..............
187 MODIFICATION OF IN-SVC EQUIPMENT (OPA-3) .............. 50,458 .............. 63,458 .............. +13,000
189 BUILDING, PRE-FAB, RELOCATABLE .............. 14,400 .............. 32,700 .............. +18,300
190 SPECIAL EQUIPMENT FOR USER TESTING .............. 9,821 .............. 9,821 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, OTHER SUPPORT EQUIPMENT .............. 1,814,682 .............. 1,898,517 .............. +83,835

192 INITIAL SPARES--C&E .............. 9,757 .............. 9,757 .............. ..............
999 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS .............. 3,710 .............. 11,910 .............. +8,200
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, OTHER PROCUREMENT, ARMY .............. 7,443,101 .............. 7,220,947 .............. -222,154
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by
the Committee:

Joint Light Tactical Vehicle Trailers.--The Committee notes
that the Joint Light Tactical Vehicle [JLTV] Multi-Service
Operational Test & Evaluation, completed in April 2018,
demonstrated that the Army's existing Light Tactical Trailer
[LTT] is not compatible with the JLTV through its full mission
profile speeds. As a result, the Army Requirements Oversight
Council [AROC] issued a decision that restricted the mission
profiles for JLTVs fielded with the LTT. Additionally, a JLTV
Trailer Towing--Ground Safety Action was released on July 11,
2019, restricting users from employing the JLTV to tow trailers
where the HMMWV is the prime mover, including the LTT, absent
specific authorization from the Army Command/Army Service
Component Command.
The Committee further notes that on June 7, 2019, an AROC
determined that the JLTV should be fielded as a complete system
with the JLTV Trailer [JLTV-T] and set an initial JLTV-T
procurement quantity of 7,523. However, due to the sequencing
of events, the President's fiscal year 2020 budget submission
does not request funding for the Army's JLTV-T program. Given
the safety concerns, the reduced mission profiles with existing
trailers, and the Army's decision to pursue a JLTV-T program of
record, the Committee supports the Secretary of the Army's
pursuit of the JLTV-T and recognizes the disconnects from
budget submission to subsequent restrictions. Therefore, of the
funds made available within budget line item 6, Joint Light
Tactical Vehicle, up to $66,100,000 may be made available to
the Secretary of the Army for procurement of JLTV-Ts. The
Secretary of the Army shall notify the congressional defense
committees no later than 15-days prior to obligating funds on a
contract, including the amount of funding repurposed, contract
vehicle, and procurement quantity. Further, the Committee
expects that the Army will resource the program within the
fiscal year 2021 budget submission.
Standoff Robotic Explosive Detection System.--The Committee
notes that the Standoff Robotic Explosive Detection System
[SREHD] program consists of payload modules to be mounted on
man-portable unmanned ground vehicles, providing dismounted
soldiers with stand-off detection, marking and neutralization
capability for mines and explosive hazards. The Committee
further notes that despite procurement funding being
appropriated in the Department of Defense Appropriations Act,
2019 (Public Law 115-245), the Army has decided to complete a
final low-rate initial production buy with previously
appropriated fiscal year 2018 resources and execute an orderly
shutdown of the program. The Committee is concerned that this
approach will eliminate a soldier's capability to remain in a
protective posture while detecting and neutralizing threats.
Therefore, the Committee directs the Program Executive Office,
Combat Support and Combat Service Support [PEO CS & CSS] to
investigate the potential for integration of SREHD payload
modules onto the Man Transportable Robotic System Increment II
[MTRS Inc II] platform or other unmanned ground vehicles for
future deployment. The Committee further directs PEO CS & CSS
to provide a briefing to the congressional defense committees
addressing the following: capabilities and limitations of SREHD
payload modules; potential for integration of SREHD payload
modules onto the MTRS Inc II or other unmanned ground platform;
an overview of requirements for this capability; a breakout of
similar capabilities being developed or procured within the
Army; and a plan to resource integration efforts, if no such
capabilities exist.
Advanced Medium Mobile Power Sources.--The Committee is
pleased with the Department's Mobile Electric Power program
that aims to provide standardized and modern tactical electric
power across the military services. The Committee further notes
that a subcomponent of this effort, the Advanced Medium Mobile
Power Sources [AMMPS] program, consisting of 30kW and 60kW
trailer-mounted generators, includes a microgrid capability
that allows up-to six generators to automatically start and
stop, matching load demand. This capability increases
reliability and fuel-efficiency, thereby lowering operating
costs. While the Committee is pleased with the overall approach
of the Department, the Committee is concerned with the
Department of the Army's significant reduction to the AMMPS
program in the fiscal year 2020 President's budget request,
attributable to the Army's top-down reallocation effort to
resource Army priorities under the purview of Army Futures
Command and supporting Cross-Functional Teams. Therefore, the
Committee recommends an additional $52,474,000 for the AMMPS
program and encourages each of the Service Secretaries to
invest in capabilities that improve fuel-efficiency or reduce
the logistical burden of the operating forces.
Mine Resistant Ambush Protected Fleet.--The Committee
supports the continued sustainment and modernization of the
Army's Mine Resistant Ambush Protected [MRAP] fleet and
encourages the Secretary of the Army to continue investments in
the MRAP fleet, as long as soldiers operate in environments
where mines and improvised explosive devices are prevalent.
Advanced Manufacturing Center of Excellence.--Pursuant to
section 229 of the National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2019 (Public Law 115-232), the Under Secretary of
Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment and the Under Secretary
of Defense for Research and Engineering, in coordination with
the Service Secretaries, were directed to establish advanced
manufacturing activities within each military service. The
Committee remains supportive of these endeavors and recognizes
the Army for establishing a Center of Excellence for Advanced
and Additive Manufacturing at the Rock Island Arsenal--Joint
Manufacturing and Technology Center. Therefore, the Committee
encourages the Service Secretaries to allocate the appropriate
resources to sustain these initiatives throughout the next
Future Years Defense Program.

Aircraft Procurement, Navy

Appropriations, 2019.................................... $20,092,199,000
Budget estimate, 2020................................... 18,522,204,000
Committee recommendation................................ 18,573,560,000

The Committee recommends an appropriation of
$18,573,560,000. This is $51,356,000 above the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this
appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

COMBAT AIRCRAFT
1 F/A-18E/F (FIGHTER) HORNET [MYP] 24 1,748,934 24 1,721,134 .............. -27,800
2 F/A-18E/F (FIGHTER) HORNET [MYP] (AP) .............. 55,128 .............. 55,128 .............. ..............
3 JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER CV 20 2,272,301 20 2,210,051 .............. -62,250
4 JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER CV [AP-CY] .............. 339,053 .............. 339,053 .............. ..............
5 JSF STOVL 10 1,342,035 16 1,805,535 +6 +463,500
6 JSF STOVL [AP-CY] .............. 291,804 .............. 177,558 .............. -114,246
7 CH-53K (HEAVY LIFT) 6 807,876 6 807,876 .............. ..............
8 CH-53K (HEAVY LIFT) [AP-CY] .............. 215,014 .............. 215,014 .............. ..............
9 V-22 (MEDIUM LIFT) 10 966,666 10 966,666 .............. ..............
10 V-22 (MEDIUM LIFT) [AP-CY] .............. 27,104 .............. 27,104 .............. ..............
11 UH-1Y/AH-1Z .............. 62,003 .............. 62,003 .............. ..............
13 MH-60R .............. 894 .............. 894 .............. ..............
14 P-8A POSEIDON 6 1,206,701 6 1,139,401 .............. -67,300
16 E-2D ADV HAWKEYE 4 744,484 4 727,184 .............. -17,300
17 E-2D ADV HAWKEYE [AP-CY] .............. 190,204 .............. 190,204 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, COMBAT AIRCRAFT .............. 10,270,201 .............. 10,444,805 .............. +174,604

TRAINER AIRCRAFT
19 ADVANCED HELICOPTER TRAINING SYSTEM 32 261,160 32 261,160 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, TRAINER AIRCRAFT .............. 261,160 .............. 261,160 .............. ..............

OTHER AIRCRAFT
20 KC-130J 3 240,840 3 240,840 .............. ..............
21 KC-130J [AP-CY] .............. 66,061 .............. 66,061 .............. ..............
22 F-5 22 39,676 22 39,676 .............. ..............
23 MQ-4 TRITON 2 473,134 2 460,634 .............. -12,500
24 MQ-4 TRITON [AP-CY] .............. 20,139 .............. 20,139 .............. ..............
25 MQ-8 UAV .............. 44,957 .............. 44,957 .............. ..............
26 STUASL0 UAV .............. 43,819 .............. 43,819 .............. ..............
27 OTHER SUPPORT AIRCRAFT .............. .............. 1 14,300 +1 +14,300
28 VH-92A EXECUTIVE HELO 6 658,067 6 624,967 .............. -33,100
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, OTHER AIRCRAFT .............. 1,586,693 .............. 1,555,393 .............. -31,300

MODIFICATION OF AIRCRAFT
29 AEA SYSTEMS .............. 44,470 .............. 44,470 .............. ..............
30 AV-8 SERIES .............. 39,472 .............. 39,472 .............. ..............
31 ADVERSARY .............. 3,415 .............. 3,415 .............. ..............
32 F-18 SERIES .............. 1,207,089 .............. 1,139,670 .............. -67,419
33 H-53 SERIES .............. 68,385 .............. 68,385 .............. ..............
34 MH-60 SERIES .............. 149,797 .............. 147,297 .............. -2,500
35 H-1 SERIES .............. 114,059 .............. 107,309 .............. -6,750
36 EP-3 SERIES .............. 8,655 .............. 8,655 .............. ..............
38 E-2 SERIES .............. 117,059 .............. 117,059 .............. ..............
39 TRAINER A/C SERIES .............. 5,616 .............. 5,616 .............. ..............
40 C-2A .............. 15,747 .............. 13,747 .............. -2,000
41 C-130 SERIES .............. 122,671 .............. 85,266 .............. -37,405
42 FEWSG .............. 509 .............. 509 .............. ..............
43 CARGO/TRANSPORT A/C SERIES .............. 8,767 .............. 8,767 .............. ..............
44 E-6 SERIES .............. 169,827 .............. 166,527 .............. -3,300
45 EXECUTIVE HELICOPTERS SERIES .............. 8,933 .............. 8,933 .............. ..............
47 T-45 SERIES .............. 186,022 .............. 171,722 .............. -14,300
48 POWER PLANT CHANGES .............. 16,136 .............. 16,136 .............. ..............
49 JPATS SERIES .............. 21,824 .............. 21,824 .............. ..............
50 AVIATION LIFE SUPPORT MODS .............. 39,762 .............. 39,762 .............. ..............
51 COMMON ECM EQUIPMENT .............. 162,839 .............. 159,539 .............. -3,300
52 COMMON AVIONICS CHANGES .............. 102,107 .............. 102,107 .............. ..............
53 COMMON DEFENSIVE WEAPON SYSTEM .............. 2,100 .............. 2,100 .............. ..............
54 ID SYSTEMS .............. 41,437 .............. 41,437 .............. ..............
55 P-8 SERIES .............. 107,539 .............. 74,610 .............. -32,929
56 MAGTF EW FOR AVIATION .............. 26,536 .............. 26,536 .............. ..............
57 MQ-8 SERIES .............. 34,686 .............. 34,686 .............. ..............
58 V-22 (TILT/ROTOR ACFT) OSPREY .............. 325,367 .............. 325,367 .............. ..............
59 NEXT GENERATION JAMMER [NGJ] .............. 6,223 .............. .............. .............. -6,223
60 F-35 STOVL SERIES .............. 65,585 .............. 61,585 .............. -4,000
61 F-35 CV SERIES .............. 15,358 .............. 13,358 .............. -2,000
62 QUICK REACTION CAPABILITY (QRC) .............. 165,016 .............. 165,016 .............. ..............
63 MQ-4 SERIES .............. 27,994 .............. 27,994 .............. ..............
64 RQ-21 SERIES .............. 66,282 .............. 61,032 .............. -5,250
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, MODIFICATION OF AIRCRAFT .............. 3,497,284 .............. 3,309,908 .............. -187,376

AIRCRAFT SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS
67 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS .............. 2,166,788 .............. 2,263,108 .............. +96,320

AIRCRAFT SUPPORT EQUIPMENT AND FACILITIES
68 COMMON GROUND EQUIPMENT .............. 491,025 .............. 491,025 .............. ..............
69 AIRCRAFT INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES .............. 71,335 .............. 71,335 .............. ..............
70 WAR CONSUMABLES .............. 41,086 .............. 41,086 .............. ..............
72 SPECIAL SUPPORT EQUIPMENT .............. 135,740 .............. 135,740 .............. ..............
73 FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION .............. 892 .............. .............. .............. -892
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, AIRCRAFT SUPPORT EQUIPMENT & .............. 740,078 .............. 739,186 .............. -892
FACILITIES
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, NAVY .............. 18,522,204 .............. 18,573,560 .............. +51,356
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by
the Committee:

Weapons Procurement, Navy

Appropriations, 2019.................................... $3,711,576,000
Budget estimate, 2020...................................................
Committee recommendation................................ 3,963,067,000

The Committee recommends an appropriation of
$3,963,067,000. This is $3,963,067,000 above the budget
estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this
appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

BALLISTIC MISSILES

MODIFICATION OF MISSILES
1 TRIDENT II MODS .............. .............. .............. 1,177,251 .............. +1,177,251

SUPPORT EQUIPMENT AND FACILITIES
2 MISSILE INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES .............. .............. .............. 7,142 .............. +7,142
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BALLISTIC MISSILES .............. .............. .............. 1,184,393 .............. +1,184,393

OTHER MISSILES

STRATEGIC MISSILES
3 TOMAHAWK .............. .............. 90 355,556 +90 +355,556

TACTICAL MISSILES
4 AMRAAM .............. .............. 169 211,827 +169 +211,827
5 SIDEWINDER .............. .............. 292 115,473 +292 +115,473
7 STANDARD MISSILE .............. .............. 125 404,523 +125 +404,523
8 STANDARD MISSILE [AP-CY] .............. .............. .............. 96,085 .............. +96,085
9 SMALL DIAMETER BOMB II .............. .............. 750 108,452 +750 +108,452
10 RAM .............. .............. 120 106,765 +120 +106,765
12 HELLFIRE .............. .............. 29 1,525 +29 +1,525
15 AERIAL TARGETS .............. .............. .............. 145,880 .............. +145,880
17 OTHER MISSILE SUPPORT .............. .............. .............. 3,388 .............. +3,388
18 LRASM .............. .............. 24 72,544 +24 +72,544
19 LCS OTH MISSILE .............. .............. 18 38,137 +18 +38,137

MODIFICATION OF MISSILES
20 ESSM .............. .............. 60 110,059 +60 +110,059
21 HARPOON MODS .............. .............. .............. 25,447 .............. +25,447
22 HARM MODS .............. .............. .............. 183,740 .............. +183,740
23 STANDARD MISSILES MODS .............. .............. .............. 2,500 .............. +2,500

SUPPORT EQUIPMENT AND FACILITIES
24 WEAPONS INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES .............. .............. .............. 12,006 .............. +12,006
25 FLEET SATELLITE COMM FOLLOW-ON .............. .............. .............. 67,380 .............. +67,380

ORDNANCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
27 ORDNANCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT .............. .............. .............. 42,027 .............. +42,027
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, OTHER MISSILES .............. .............. .............. 2,103,314 .............. +2,103,314

TORPEDOES AND RELATED EQUIPMENT

TORPEDOES AND RELATED EQUIP
28 SSTD .............. .............. .............. 5,561 .............. +5,561
29 MK-48 TORPEDO .............. .............. 71 130,000 +71 +130,000
30 ASW TARGETS .............. .............. .............. 15,095 .............. +15,095

MOD OF TORPEDOES AND RELATED EQUIP
31 MK-54 TORPEDO MODS .............. .............. .............. 103,860 .............. +103,860
32 MK-48 TORPEDO ADCAP MODS .............. .............. .............. 39,508 .............. +39,508
33 QUICKSTRIKE MINE .............. .............. .............. 5,183 .............. +5,183

SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
34 TORPEDO SUPPORT EQUIPMENT .............. .............. .............. 68,225 .............. +68,225
35 ASW RANGE SUPPORT .............. .............. .............. 3,890 .............. +3,890

DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION
36 FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION .............. .............. .............. 3,803 .............. +3,803
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, TORPEDOES AND RELATED EQUIPMENT .............. .............. .............. 375,125 .............. +375,125

OTHER WEAPONS

GUNS AND GUN MOUNTS
37 SMALL ARMS AND WEAPONS .............. .............. .............. 13,607 .............. +13,607

MODIFICATION OF GUNS AND GUN MOUNTS
38 CIWS MODS .............. .............. .............. 44,126 .............. +44,126
39 COAST GUARD WEAPONS .............. .............. .............. 43,927 .............. +43,927
40 GUN MOUNT MODS .............. .............. .............. 62,579 .............. +62,579
41 LCS MODULE WEAPONS .............. .............. 90 10,998 +90 +10,998
43 AIRBORNE MINE NEUTRALIZATION SYSTEMS .............. .............. .............. 7,160 .............. +7,160
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, OTHER WEAPONS .............. .............. .............. 182,397 .............. +182,397

45 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS .............. .............. .............. 117,838 .............. +117,838
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, WEAPONS PROCUREMENT, NAVY .............. .............. .............. 3,963,067 .............. +3,963,067
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by
the Committee:

[In thousands of dollars]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Change from
Line Item 2020 budget Committee budget
estimate recommendation estimate
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 Trident II Mods .............. 1,177,251 +1,177,251
Transfer: .............. .............. +1,177,251
From Title
IX to Title
III for
base
requirement
s
2 Missile .............. 7,142 +7,142
Industrial
Facilities
Transfer: .............. .............. +7,142
From Title
IX to Title
III for
base
requirement
s
3 Tomahawk .............. 355,556 +355,556
Transfer: .............. .............. +386,730
From Title
IX to Title
III for
base
requirement
s
Restoring .............. .............. -13,380
acquisition
accountabil
ity:
Support
equipment
requirement
s
previously
funded
Restoring .............. .............. -8,370
acquisition
accountabil
ity: NAV/
COMMs kits
early to
need
Restoring .............. .............. -9,424
acquisition
accountabil
ity:
Recertifica
tions early
to need
4 AMRAAM .............. 211,827 +211,827
Transfer: .............. .............. +224,502
From Title
IX to Title
III for
base
requirement
s
Restoring .............. .............. -12,675
acquisition
accountabil
ity: AUR
unit cost
growth
5 Sidewinder .............. 115,473 +115,473
Transfer: .............. .............. +119,456
From Title
IX to Title
III for
base
requirement
s
Restoring .............. .............. -3,983
acquisition
accountabil
ity: AUR
unit cost
growth
7 Standard Missile .............. 404,523 +404,523
Transfer: .............. .............. +404,523
From Title
IX to Title
III for
base
requirement
s
8 Standard Missile .............. 96,085 +96,085
(AP)
Transfer: .............. .............. +96,085
From Title
IX to Title
III for
base
requirement
s
9 Small Diameter .............. 108,452 +108,452
Bomb II
Transfer: .............. .............. +118,466
From Title
IX to Title
III for
base
requirement
s
Restoring .............. .............. -10,014
acquisition
accountabil
ity: AUR
unit cost
growth
10 Ram .............. 106,765 +106,765
Transfer: .............. .............. +106,765
From Title
IX to Title
III for
base
requirement
s
12 Hellfire .............. 1,525 +1,525
Transfer: .............. .............. +1,525
From Title
IX to Title
III for
base
requirement
s
15 Aerial Targets .............. 145,880 +145,880
Transfer: .............. .............. +145,880
From Title
IX to Title
III for
base
requirement
s
16 Drones And
Decoys
Transfer: .............. .............. +20,000
From Title
IX to Title
III for
base
requirement
s
Restoring .............. .............. -20,000
acquisition
accountabil
ity:
Accelerated
acquisition
strategy
17 Other Missile .............. 3,388 +3,388
Support
Transfer: .............. .............. +3,388
From Title
IX to Title
III for
base
requirement
s
18 LRASM .............. 72,544 +72,544
Transfer: .............. .............. +143,200
From Title
IX to Title
III for
base
requirement
s
Restoring .............. .............. -70,656
acquisition
accountabil
ity:
Contract
delay
19 LCS OTH Missile .............. 38,137 +38,137
Transfer: .............. .............. +38,137
From Title
IX to Title
III for
base
requirement
s
20 ESSM .............. 110,059 +110,059
Transfer: .............. .............. +128,059
From Title
IX to Title
III for
base
requirement
s
Restoring .............. .............. -18,000
acquisition
accountabil
ity: AUR
unit cost
adjustment
21 Harpoon Mods .............. 25,447 +25,447
Transfer: .............. .............. +25,447
From Title
IX to Title
III for
base
requirement
s
22 Harm Mods .............. 183,740 +183,740
Transfer: .............. .............. +183,740
From Title
IX to Title
III for
base
requirement
s
23 Standard .............. 2,500 +2,500
Missiles Mods
Transfer: .............. .............. +22,500
From Title
IX to Title
III for
base
requirement
s
Maintain .............. .............. -20,000
program
affordabili
ty:
Unjustified
component
improvement
request
24 Weapons .............. 12,006 +12,006
Industrial
Facilities
Transfer: .............. .............. +1,958
From Title
IX to Title
III for
base
requirement
s
Program .............. .............. +10,048
increase:
NIROP
facilitizat
ion
25 Fleet Satellite .............. 67,380 +67,380
Comm Follow-On
Transfer: .............. .............. +67,380
From Title
IX to Title
III for
base
requirement
s
27 Ordnance Support .............. 42,027 +42,027
Equipment
Transfer: .............. .............. +109,427
From Title
IX to Title
III for
base
requirement
s
Classified .............. .............. -67,400
adjustment
28 SSTD .............. 5,561 +5,561
Transfer: .............. .............. +5,561
From Title
IX to Title
III for
base
requirement
s
29 MK-48 Torpedo .............. 130,000 +130,000
Transfer: .............. .............. +114,000
From Title
IX to Title
III for
base
requirement
s
Program .............. .............. +16,000
increase:
Additional
munitions
30 ASW Targets .............. 15,095 +15,095
Transfer: .............. .............. +15,095
From Title
IX to Title
III for
base
requirement
s
31 MK-54 Torpedo .............. 103,860 +103,860
Mods
Transfer: .............. .............. +119,453
From Title
IX to Title
III for
base
requirement
s
Restoring .............. .............. -15,593
acquisition
accountabil
ity: HAAWC
unit cost
growth
32 MK-48 Torpedo .............. 39,508 +39,508
ADCAP Mods
Transfer: .............. .............. +39,508
From Title
IX to Title
III for
base
requirement
s
33 Quickstrike Mine .............. 5,183 +5,183
Transfer: .............. .............. +5,183
From Title
IX to Title
III for
base
requirement
s
34 Torpedo Support .............. 68,225 +68,225
Equipment
Transfer: .............. .............. +79,028
From Title
IX to Title
III for
base
requirement
s
Improving .............. .............. -10,803
funds
management:
Prior year
carryover
35 ASW Range .............. 3,890 +3,890
Support
Transfer: .............. .............. +3,890
From Title
IX to Title
III for
base
requirement
s
36 First .............. 3,803 +3,803
Destination
Transportation
Transfer: .............. .............. +3,803
From Title
IX to Title
III for
base
requirement
s
37 Small Arms and .............. 13,607 +13,607
Weapons
Transfer: .............. .............. +14,797
From Title
IX to Title
III for
base
requirement
s
Restoring .............. .............. -1,190
acquisition
accountabil
ity: CSASS
previously
funded
38 CIWS Mods .............. 44,126 +44,126
Transfer: .............. .............. +44,126
From Title
IX to Title
III for
base
requirement
s
39 Coast Guard .............. 43,927 +43,927
Weapons
Transfer: .............. .............. +44,980
From Title
IX to Title
III for
base
requirement
s
Maintain .............. .............. -1,053
program
affordabili
ty:
Unjustified
ILS growth
40 Gun Mount Mods .............. 62,579 +62,579
Transfer: .............. .............. +66,376
From Title
IX to Title
III for
base
requirement
s
Maintain .............. .............. -1,127
program
affordabili
ty:
Unjustified
growth-Medi
um caliber
gun mounts
Maintain .............. .............. -2,670
program
affordabili
ty:
Unjustified
growth-MK
38
41 LCS Module .............. 10,998 +10,998
Weapons
Transfer: .............. .............. +14,585
From Title
IX to Title
III for
base
requirement
s
Improving .............. .............. -3,587
funds
management:
AURs early
to need
43 Airborne Mine .............. 7,160 +7,160
Neutralization
Systems
Transfer: .............. .............. +7,160
From Title
IX to Title
III for
base
requirement
s
45 Spares and .............. 117,838 +117,838
Repair Parts
Transfer: .............. .............. +126,138
From Title
IX to Title
II for base
requirement
s
Improving .............. .............. -8,300
funds
management:
Prior year
carryover
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Procurement of Ammunition, Navy and Marine Corps

Appropriations, 2019.................................... $952,682,000
Budget estimate, 2020...................................................
Committee recommendation................................ 872,251,000

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $872,251,000.
This is $872,251,000 above the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this
appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

PROC AMMO, NAVY

NAVY AMMUNITION
1 GENERAL PURPOSE BOMBS .............. .............. .............. 34,997 .............. +34,997
2 JDAM .............. .............. 2,844 70,413 +2,844 +70,413
3 AIRBORNE ROCKETS, ALL TYPES .............. .............. .............. 27,684 .............. +27,684
4 MACHINE GUN AMMUNITION .............. .............. .............. 4,793 .............. +4,793
5 PRACTICE BOMBS .............. .............. .............. 34,708 .............. +34,708
6 CARTRIDGES & CART ACTUATED DEVICES .............. .............. .............. 45,738 .............. +45,738
7 AIR EXPENDABLE COUNTERMEASURES .............. .............. .............. 77,301 .............. +77,301
8 JATOS .............. .............. .............. 7,262 .............. +7,262
9 5 INCH/54 GUN AMMUNITION .............. .............. .............. 19,161 .............. +19,161
10 INTERMEDIATE CALIBER GUN AMMUNITION .............. .............. .............. 37,193 .............. +37,193
11 OTHER SHIP GUN AMMUNITION .............. .............. .............. 39,291 .............. +39,291
12 SMALL ARMS & LANDING PARTY AMMO .............. .............. .............. 47,896 .............. +47,896
13 PYROTECHNIC AND DEMOLITION .............. .............. .............. 10,621 .............. +10,621
15 AMMUNITION LESS THAN $5 MILLION .............. .............. .............. 2,386 .............. +2,386
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, PROC AMMO, NAVY .............. .............. .............. 459,444 .............. +459,444

PROC AMMO, MARINE CORPS

MARINE CORPS AMMUNITION
16 MORTARS .............. .............. .............. 55,543 .............. +55,543
17 DIRECT SUPPORT MUNITIONS .............. .............. .............. 61,906 .............. +61,906
18 INFANTRY WEAPONS AMMUNITION .............. .............. .............. 52,088 .............. +52,088
19 COMBAT SUPPORT MUNITIONS .............. .............. .............. 40,048 .............. +40,048
20 AMMO MODERNIZATION .............. .............. .............. 14,325 .............. +14,325
21 ARTILLERY MUNITIONS .............. .............. .............. 184,376 .............. +184,376
22 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION .............. .............. .............. 4,521 .............. +4,521
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, PROC AMMO, MARINE CORPS .............. .............. .............. 412,807 .............. +412,807
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, PROCUREMENT OF AMMO, NAVY & MARINE .............. .............. .............. 872,251 .............. +872,251
CORPS
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by
the Committee:

Shipbuilding and Conversion, Navy

Appropriations, 2019.................................... $24,150,087,000
Budget estimate, 2020................................... 23,783,710,000
Committee recommendation................................ 24,366,431,000

The Committee recommends an appropriation of
$24,366,431,000. This is $582,721,000 above the budget
estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this
appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

FLEET BALLISTIC MISSILE SHIPS
1 OHIO REPLACEMENT SUBMARINE [AP-CY] .............. 1,698,907 .............. 1,821,907 .............. +123,000

OTHER WARSHIPS
2 CARRIER REPLACEMENT PROGRAM (CVN 80) .............. 2,347,000 .............. 1,062,000 .............. -1,285,000
XX CARRIER REPLACEMENT PROGRAM (CVN 81) .............. .............. .............. 1,174,750 .............. +1,174,750
3 VIRGINIA CLASS SUBMARINE 3 7,155,946 2 5,355,946 -1 -1,800,000
4 VIRGINIA CLASS SUBMARINE [AP-CY] .............. 2,769,552 .............. 2,969,552 .............. +200,000
5 CVN REFUELING OVERHAUL 1 647,926 1 614,626 .............. -33,300
6 CVN REFUELING OVERHAULS [AP-CY] .............. .............. .............. 16,900 .............. +16,900
7 DDG 1000 .............. 155,944 .............. 155,944 .............. ..............
8 DDG-51 3 5,099,295 3 5,099,295 .............. ..............
9 DDG-51 [AP-CY] .............. 224,028 .............. 779,028 .............. +555,000
11 FFG-FRIGATE 1 1,281,177 1 1,281,177 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, OTHER WARSHIPS .............. 19,680,868 .............. 18,509,218 .............. -1,171,650

AMPHIBIOUS SHIPS
12 LPD FLIGHT II .............. .............. 1 747,100 +1 +747,100
13 LPD FLIGHT II (AP) .............. 247,100 .............. .............. .............. -247,100
15 LHA REPLACEMENT .............. .............. 1 650,000 +1 +650,000
17 EXPEDITIONARY FAST TRANSPORT .............. .............. 1 261,000 +1 +261,000
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, AMPHIBIOUS SHIPS .............. 247,100 .............. 1,658,100 .............. +1,411,000

AUXILIARIES, CRAFT, AND PRIOR-YEAR PROGRAM COSTS
18 TAO FLEET OILER 2 981,215 2 981,215 .............. ..............
19 TAO FLEET OILER [AP-CY] .............. 73,000 .............. 73,000 .............. ..............
20 TOWING, SALVAGE, AND RESCUE SHIP (ATS) 2 150,282 1 88,204 -1 -62,078
22 LCU 1700 4 85,670 4 85,670 .............. ..............
23 OUTFITTING .............. 754,679 .............. 714,428 .............. -40,251
25 SERVICE CRAFT .............. 56,289 1 81,789 +1 +25,500
28 COMPLETION OF PY SHIPBUILDING PROGRAMS .............. 55,700 .............. 104,700 .............. +49,000
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, AUXILIARIES, CRAFT, AND PRIOR-YEAR .............. 2,156,835 .............. 2,129,006 .............. -27,829
PROGRAM

XX UNMANNED SURFACE VESSELS .............. .............. 2 248,200 +2 +248,200
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, SHIPBUILDING & CONVERSION, NAVY .............. 23,783,710 .............. 24,366,431 .............. +582,721
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by
the Committee:

Congressional Reporting on Submarine Construction
Programs.--Consistent with direction accompanying the
Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2016, the Assistant
Secretary of the Navy (Research, Development and Acquisition)
submits to the congressional defense committees quarterly
reports describing actions the Navy is taking to minimize costs
on the Virginia Payload Module [VPM] program. Additionally, the
Program Executive Officer, Submarines provides quarterly
construction metrics on the Columbia Class Submarine, Virginia
Class Submarine and VPM programs. The Committee directs the
Assistant Secretary of the Navy (Research, Development and
Acquisition) to consolidate and update these reporting
requirements in accordance with congressional guidance
regarding key metrics for these programs beginning in the
second quarter, fiscal year 2020.
CVN 80 and CVN 81 Budget Justification Materials.--The
fiscal year 2020 President's budget request includes
$2,347,000,000 for the incrementally funded procurement of CVN
80 and CVN 81 in accordance with contract authorities provided
by the Congress and implemented by the Department of Defense in
fiscal year 2019. The Committee notes that the Navy did not
update its congressional budget justification or briefing
materials in support of this acquisition and strategy, which
has fiscal implications well into the 2030s. The Committee
finds this unsatisfactory and directs the Assistant Secretary
of the Navy (Financial Management and Comptroller) to provide
not later than 30 days after enactment of this Act, proposals
for updated CVN 78 Class congressional budget justification
documents to the congressional defense committees in support of
future budget submissions, to be implemented with the fiscal
year 2021 President's budget request.
Virginia Class Submarine.--The fiscal year 2020 President's
budget request includes $9,925,498,000 for the procurement of
Virginia Class Submarines [VCS] under multi-year procurement
authority for Block V VCS provided by the Congress in fiscal
years 2018 and 2019. The Committee notes that conditions for
multi-year procurement authority include stable requirements,
funding availability and stability, design stability, as well
as realistic cost estimates. The Committee further notes that
with submission of the fiscal year 2020 President's budget
request, the Navy violated several of these tenets, in
particular with respect to program requirements and funding
stability, thus needlessly introducing uncertainty to the
Navy's acquisition enterprise and the submarine industrial
base. Following extensive discussions with the Navy and the
industrial base team, the Committee understands that challenges
in the execution of the current Block IV VCS multi-year
procurement contract as well as updated estimates for labor
hours required for the construction and delivery of 10 Block V
VCS with 9 Virginia Payload Modules from fiscal years 2019 to
2023 require adjustments to the fiscal year 2020 budget request
for VCS.
The Committee retains its strong support for VCS, long
considered a successful shipbuilding program after overcoming
earlier challenges. Further, the Committee is aware of the
industrial base synergies between the VCS and Columbia Class
Submarine [CLB] programs and is strongly concerned about any
negative perturbations the VCS could have on the CLB program.
Therefore, informed by discussions with the Navy and the
shipbuilder, the Committee recommends several adjustments to
the fiscal year 2020 budget request for VCS in support of a 10-
VCS multi-year procurement contract, as delineated in the table
of Committee Recommended Adjustments accompanying this section.
This includes a recommendation of $100,000,000 in Research,
Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy for design risk
reduction of SSN-812; as well as an additional $200,000,000 in
advance procurement for a 10th VCS with VPM, per the agreement
between the Navy and the shipbuilder. The Assistant Secretary
of the Navy (Research, Development and Acquisition) is directed
to provide to the congressional defense committees an updated
acquisition strategy for VCS Block V and SSN-812 no less than
30 days prior to the obligation and expenditure of those funds.
LPD Flight II.--The fiscal year 2020 President's budget
request includes $247,100,000 for advance procurement [AP] of
LPD 31. The Committee notes that $350,000,000 was appropriated
in AP for this ship in fiscal year 2019, but the Navy delayed
the procurement of LPD 31 and has not obligated or expended
these funds. Therefore, the Committee recommends adjusting
previously appropriated AP in accordance with the Navy's
requirements and recommends $747,100,000 for LPD 31 in fiscal
year 2020.

Other Procurement, Navy

Appropriations, 2019.................................... $9,097,138,000
Budget estimate, 2020................................... 9,652,956,000
Committee recommendation................................ 10,568,201,000

The Committee recommends an appropriation of
$10,568,201,000. This is $915,245,000 above the budget
estimate.

committee recommended program

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this
appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

SHIPS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT

SHIP PROPULSION EQUIPMENT
1 SURFACE POWER EQUIPMENT .............. 14,490 .............. 14,490 .............. ..............

GENERATORS
2 SURFACE COMBATANT HM&E .............. 31,583 .............. 31,561 .............. -22

NAVIGATION EQUIPMENT
3 OTHER NAVIGATION EQUIPMENT .............. 77,404 .............. 77,404 .............. ..............

PERISCOPES
4 SUB PERISCOPES AND IMAGING SUPPORT EQUIPMENT .............. 160,803 .............. 160,803 .............. ..............
PROGRAM

OTHER SHIPBOARD EQUIPMENT
5 DDG MOD .............. 566,140 .............. 561,140 .............. -5,000
6 FIREFIGHTING EQUIPMENT .............. 18,223 .............. 18,223 .............. ..............
7 COMMAND AND CONTROL SWITCHBOARD .............. 2,086 .............. 2,086 .............. ..............
8 LHA/LHD MIDLIFE .............. 95,651 .............. 95,651 .............. ..............
9 POLLUTION CONTROL EQUIPMENT .............. 23,910 .............. 23,910 .............. ..............
10 SUBMARINE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT .............. 44,895 .............. 44,895 .............. ..............
11 VIRGINIA CLASS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT .............. 28,465 .............. 28,465 .............. ..............
12 LCS CLASS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT .............. 19,426 .............. 19,426 .............. ..............
13 SUBMARINE BATTERIES .............. 26,290 .............. 24,590 .............. -1,700
14 LPD CLASS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT .............. 46,945 .............. 46,945 .............. ..............
15 DOG-1000 SUPPORT EQUIPMENT .............. 9,930 .............. 8,530 .............. -1,400
16 STRATEGIC PLATFORM SUPPORT EQUIP .............. 14,331 .............. 14,331 .............. ..............
17 DSSP EQUIPMENT .............. 2,909 .............. 2,909 .............. ..............
18 CRUISER MODERNIZATION .............. 193,990 .............. 193,990 .............. ..............
19 LCAC .............. 3,392 .............. 3,392 .............. ..............
20 UNDERWATER EOD PROGRAMS .............. 71,240 .............. 71,240 .............. ..............
21 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION .............. 102,543 .............. 102,543 .............. ..............
22 CHEMICAL WARFARE DETECTORS .............. 2,961 .............. 2,961 .............. ..............
23 SUBMARINE LIFE SUPPORT SYSTEM .............. 6,635 .............. 6,635 .............. ..............
23 X SHIP MAINTENANCE, REPAIR AND MODERNIZATION .............. .............. .............. 1,200,000 .............. +1,200,000

REACTOR PLANT EQUIPMENT
24 REACTOR POWER UNITS .............. 5,340 .............. 5,340 .............. ..............
25 REACTOR COMPONENTS .............. 465,726 .............. 462,749 .............. -2,977

OCEAN ENGINEERING
26 DIVING AND SALVAGE EQUIPMENT .............. 11,854 .............. 11,854 .............. ..............

SMALL BOATS
27 STANDARD BOATS .............. 79,102 .............. 79,102 .............. ..............

PRODUCTION FACILITIES EQUIPMENT
28 OPERATING FORCES IPE .............. 202,238 .............. 202,238 .............. ..............

OTHER SHIP SUPPORT
29 LCS COMMON MISSION MODULES EQUIPMENT .............. 51,553 .............. 51,553 .............. ..............
30 LCS MCM MISSION MODULES .............. 197,129 .............. 134,157 .............. -62,972
31 LCS ASW MISSION MODULES .............. 27,754 .............. 27,754 .............. ..............
32 LCS SUW MISSION MODULES .............. 26,566 .............. 26,566 .............. ..............
33 LCS IN-SERVICE MODERNIZATION .............. 84,972 .............. 82,000 .............. -2,972

LOGISTICS SUPPORT
34 SMALL & MEDIUM UUV .............. 40,547 .............. 39,047 .............. -1,500
35 LSD MIDLIFE AND MODERNIZATION .............. 40,269 .............. 40,269 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUBTOTAL .............. 40,269 .............. 40,269 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, SHIPS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT .............. 2,797,292 .............. 3,918,749 .............. +1,121,457

COMMUNICATIONS AND ELECTRONICS EQUIPMENT

SHIP SONARS
36 SPQ-9B RADAR .............. 26,195 .............. 26,195 .............. ..............
37 AN/SQQ-89 SURF ASW COMBAT SYSTEM .............. 125,237 .............. 125,237 .............. ..............
38 SSN ACOUSTICS EQUIPMENT .............. 366,968 .............. 378,968 .............. +12,000
39 UNDERSEA WARFARE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT .............. 8,967 .............. 8,967 .............. ..............

ASW ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT
40 SUBMARINE ACOUSTIC WARFARE SYSTEM .............. 23,545 .............. 23,545 .............. ..............
41 SSTD .............. 12,439 .............. 12,439 .............. ..............
42 FIXED SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM .............. 128,441 .............. 128,441 .............. ..............
43 SURTASS .............. 21,923 .............. 21,923 .............. ..............

ELECTRONIC WARFARE EQUIPMENT
44 AN/SLQ-32 .............. 420,154 .............. 346,544 .............. -73,610

RECONNAISSANCE EQUIPMENT
45 SHIPBOARD IW EXPLOIT .............. 194,758 .............. 188,486 .............. -6,272
46 AUTOMATED IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM [AIS] .............. 5,368 .............. 5,368 .............. ..............

OTHER SHIP ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT
47 COOPERATIVE ENGAGEMENT CAPABILITY .............. 35,128 .............. 35,128 .............. ..............
48 NAVAL TACTICAL COMMAND SUPPORT SYSTEM [NTCSS] .............. 15,154 .............. 15,154 .............. ..............
49 ATDLS .............. 52,753 .............. 52,753 .............. ..............
50 NAVY COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM [NCCS] .............. 3,390 .............. 3,390 .............. ..............
51 MINESWEEPING SYSTEM REPLACEMENT .............. 19,448 .............. 19,448 .............. ..............
52 SHALLOW WATER MCM .............. 8,730 .............. 8,730 .............. ..............
53 NAVSTAR GPS RECEIVERS (SPACE) .............. 32,674 .............. 23,294 .............. -9,380
54 ARMED FORCES RADIO AND TV .............. 2,617 .............. 2,617 .............. ..............
55 STRATEGIC PLATFORM SUPPORT EQUIP .............. 7,973 .............. 7,973 .............. ..............

AVIATION ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT
56 ASHORE ATC EQUIPMENT .............. 72,406 .............. 72,406 .............. ..............
57 AFLOAT ATC EQUIPMENT .............. 67,410 .............. 64,910 .............. -2,500
58 ID SYSTEMS .............. 26,059 .............. 26,059 .............. ..............
59 JOINT PRECISION APPROACH AND LANDING SYSTEM .............. 92,695 .............. 78,195 .............. -14,500
60 NAVAL MISSION PLANNING SYSTEMS .............. 15,296 .............. 15,296 .............. ..............

OTHER SHORE ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT
61 TACTICAL/MOBILE C41 SYSTEMS .............. 36,226 .............. 36,226 .............. ..............
62 DCGS-N .............. 21,788 .............. 19,038 .............. -2,750
63 CANES .............. 426,654 .............. 395,154 .............. -31,500
64 RADIAC .............. 6,450 .............. 6,450 .............. ..............
65 CANES-INTELL .............. 52,713 .............. 52,713 .............. ..............
66 GPETE .............. 13,028 .............. 13,028 .............. ..............
67 MASF .............. 5,193 .............. 5,193 .............. ..............
68 INTEG COMBAT SYSTEM TEST FACILITY .............. 6,028 .............. 6,028 .............. ..............
69 EMI CONTROL INSTRUMENTATION .............. 4,209 .............. 4,209 .............. ..............
70 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION .............. 168,436 .............. 139,436 .............. -29,000

SHIPBOARD COMMUNICATIONS
71 SHIPBOARD TACTICAL COMMUNICATIONS .............. 55,853 .............. 50,053 .............. -5,800
72 SHIP COMMUNICATIONS AUTOMATION .............. 137,861 .............. 131,461 .............. -6,400
73 COMMUNICATIONS ITEMS UNDER $5M .............. 35,093 .............. 31,493 .............. -3,600

SUBMARINE COMMUNICATIONS
74 SUBMARINE BROADCAST SUPPORT .............. 50,833 .............. 50,833 .............. ..............
75 SUBMARINE COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT .............. 69,643 .............. 69,643 .............. ..............

SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS
76 SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS .............. 45,841 .............. 45,841 .............. ..............
77 NAVY MULTIBAND TERMINAL [NMT] .............. 88,021 .............. 81,785 .............. -6,236

SHORE COMMUNICATIONS
78 JCS COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT .............. 4,293 .............. 4,293 .............. ..............

CRYPTOGRAPHIC EQUIPMENT
79 INFO SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM [ISSP] .............. 166,540 .............. 166,540 .............. ..............
80 MIO INTEL EXPLOITATION TEAM .............. 968 .............. 968 .............. ..............

CRYPTOLOGIC EQUIPMENT
81 CRYPTOLOGIC COMMUNICATIONS EQUIP .............. 13,090 .............. 13,090 .............. ..............

OTHER ELECTRONIC SUPPORT
83 COAST GUARD EQUIPMENT .............. 61,370 .............. 61,370 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, COMMUNICATIONS AND ELECTRONICS .............. 3,255,859 .............. 3,076,311 .............. -179,548
EQUIPMENT

AVIATION SUPPORT EQUIPMENT

SONOBUOYS
85 SONOBUOYS--ALL TYPES .............. 260,644 .............. 310,644 .............. +50,000

AIRCRAFT SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
86 MINOTAUR .............. 5,000 .............. 5,000 .............. ..............
87 WEAPONS RANGE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT .............. 101,843 .............. 101,843 .............. ..............
88 AIRCRAFT SUPPORT EQUIPMENT .............. 145,601 .............. 145,601 .............. ..............
89 ADVANCED ARRESTING GEAR (AAG) .............. 4,725 .............. 4,725 .............. ..............
90 METEOROLOGICAL EQUIPMENT .............. 14,687 .............. 12,407 .............. -2,280
92 AIRBORNE MINE COUNTERMEASURES .............. 19,250 .............. 18,918 .............. -332
93 LAMPS EQUIPMENT .............. 792 .............. 792 .............. ..............
94 AVIATION SUPPORT EQUIPMENT .............. 55,415 .............. 55,415 .............. ..............
95 UMCS-UNMAN CARRIER AVIATION (UCA) MISSION CONTROL .............. 32,668 .............. 5,668 .............. -27,000
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, AVIATION SUPPORT EQUIPMENT .............. 640,625 .............. 661,013 .............. +20,388

ORDNANCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT

SHIP GUN SYSTEM EQUIPMENT
96 SHIP GUN SYSTEMS EQUIPMENT .............. 5,451 .............. 5,451 .............. ..............

SHIP MISSILE SYSTEMS EQUIPMENT
97 HARPOON SUPPORT EQUIPMENT .............. 1,100 .............. 1,100 .............. ..............
98 SHIP MISSILE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT .............. 228,104 .............. 293,104 .............. +65,000
99 TOMAHAWK SUPPORT EQUIPMENT .............. 78,593 .............. 57,593 .............. -21,000

FBM SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
100 STRATEGIC MISSILE SYSTEMS EQUIP .............. 280,510 .............. 280,510 .............. ..............

ASW SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
101 SSN COMBAT CONTROL SYSTEMS .............. 148,547 .............. 148,547 .............. ..............
102 ASW SUPPORT EQUIPMENT .............. 21,130 .............. 21,130 .............. ..............

OTHER ORDNANCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
103 EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DISPOSAL EQUIP .............. 15,244 .............. 15,244 .............. ..............
104 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION .............. 5,071 .............. 5,071 .............. ..............

OTHER EXPENDABLE ORDNANCE
105 ANTI-SHIP MISSILE DECOY SYSTEM .............. 41,962 .............. 37,318 .............. -4,644
106 SUBMARINE TRAINING DEVICE MODS .............. 75,057 .............. 75,057 .............. ..............
107 SURFACE TRAINING EQUIPMENT .............. 233,175 .............. 222,647 .............. -10,528
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, ORDNANCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT .............. 1,133,944 .............. 1,162,772 .............. +28,828

CIVIL ENGINEERING SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
108 PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLES .............. 4,562 .............. 4,562 .............. ..............
109 GENERAL PURPOSE TRUCKS .............. 10,974 .............. 9,474 .............. -1,500
110 CONSTRUCTION & MAINTENANCE EQUIP .............. 43,191 .............. 43,191 .............. ..............
111 FIRE FIGHTING EQUIPMENT .............. 21,142 .............. 21,142 .............. ..............
112 TACTICAL VEHICLES .............. 33,432 .............. 33,432 .............. ..............
114 POLLUTION CONTROL EQUIPMENT .............. 2,633 .............. 2,633 .............. ..............
115 ITEMS UNDER $5 MILLION .............. 53,467 .............. 53,467 .............. ..............
116 PHYSICAL SECURITY VEHICLES .............. 1,173 .............. 1,173 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, CIVIL ENGINEERING SUPPORT EQUIPMENT .............. 170,574 .............. 169,074 .............. -1,500

SUPPLY SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
117 SUPPLY EQUIPMENT .............. 16,730 .............. 16,730 .............. ..............
118 FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION .............. 5,389 .............. 5,389 .............. ..............
119 SPECIAL PURPOSE SUPPLY SYSTEMS .............. 654,674 .............. 593,574 .............. -61,100
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, SUPPLY SUPPORT EQUIPMENT .............. 676,793 .............. 615,693 .............. -61,100

PERSONNEL AND COMMAND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT

TRAINING DEVICES
120 TRAINING SUPPORT EQUIPMENT .............. 3,633 .............. 3,633 .............. ..............
121 TRAINING AND EDUCATION EQUIPMENT .............. 97,636 .............. 94,356 .............. -3,280

COMMAND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
122 COMMAND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT .............. 66,102 .............. 56,102 .............. -10,000
123 MEDICAL SUPPORT EQUIPMENT .............. 3,633 .............. 3,633 .............. ..............
125 NAVAL MIP SUPPORT EQUIPMENT .............. 6,097 .............. 6,097 .............. ..............
126 OPERATING FORCES SUPPORT EQUIPMENT .............. 16,905 .............. 16,905 .............. ..............
127 C4ISR EQUIPMENT .............. 30,146 .............. 30,146 .............. ..............
128 ENVIRONMENTAL SUPPORT EQUIPMENT .............. 21,986 .............. 21,986 .............. ..............
129 PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT .............. 160,046 .............. 160,046 .............. ..............
130 ENTERPRISE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY .............. 56,899 .............. 56,899 .............. ..............
133 NEXT GENERATION ENTERPRISE SERVICE .............. 122,832 .............. 122,832 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, PERSONNEL AND COMMAND SUPPORT .............. 585,915 .............. 572,635 .............. -13,280
EQUIPMENT

134 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS .............. 375,608 .............. 375,608 .............. ..............
CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS .............. 16,346 .............. 16,346 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, OTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY .............. 9,652,956 .............. 10,568,201 .............. +915,245
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by
the Committee:

Bromine-Free Water Purification Systems.--The Committee has
previously encouraged and provided funding for the Navy to
explore and pilot bromine-free shipboard water disinfectant
systems in destroyers, as it does with large deck ships. The
Committee understands that technology improvements make
bromine-free systems more practical for smaller ships and that
the current variants of the Littoral Combat Ship [LCS] use
bromine-based disinfectant methods under a waiver from the
Navy's Bureau of Medicine and Surgery [BUMED]. The Committee
encourages the Navy to accelerate the use of bromine-free water
disinfectant systems in both destroyers and LCS in order to
remove hazardous materials from ships and eliminate the need
for continued BUMED waivers.
Unmanned Underwater Vehicles.--The Committee is encouraged
by the Navy's ongoing efforts to explore, demonstrate, and
prove the utility of Unmanned Underwater Vehicles [UUVs] across
multiple concepts of operation and further encourages the Navy
to consider the use of ship-launched UUVs for the anti-
submarine warfare mission set.

Procurement, Marine Corps

Appropriations, 2019.................................... $2,719,870,000
Budget estimate, 2020................................... 3,090,449,000
Committee recommendation................................ 3,045,749,000

The Committee recommends an appropriation of
$3,045,749,000. This is $44,700,000 below the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this
appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

WEAPONS AND COMBAT VEHICLES

TRACKED COMBAT VEHICLES
1 AAV7A1 PIP .............. 39,495 .............. 39,495 .............. ..............
2 AMPHIBIOUS COMBAT VEHICLE 1.1 56 317,935 56 300,935 .............. -17,000
3 LAV PIP .............. 60,734 .............. 60,734 .............. ..............

ARTILLERY AND OTHER WEAPONS
4 155MM LIGHTWEIGHT TOWED HOWITZER .............. 25,065 .............. 25,065 .............. ..............
5 ARTILLERY WEAPONS SYSTEM .............. 100,002 .............. 100,002 .............. ..............
6 WEAPONS AND COMBAT VEHICLES UNDER $5 MILLION .............. 31,945 .............. 31,945 .............. ..............

OTHER SUPPORT
7 MODIFICATION KITS .............. 22,760 .............. 22,760 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, WEAPONS AND COMBAT VEHICLES .............. 597,936 .............. 580,936 .............. -17,000

GUIDED MISSILES AND EQUIPMENT

GUIDED MISSILES
8 GROUND BASED AIR DEFENSE .............. 175,998 .............. 175,998 .............. ..............
9 JAVELIN 97 20,207 97 20,207 .............. ..............
10 FOLLOW ON TO SMAW/FOAAWS .............. 21,913 .............. 21,913 .............. ..............
11 ANTI-ARMOR WEAPONS SYSTEM-HEAVY (AAWS-H)/TOW .............. 60,501 .............. 60,501 .............. ..............
12 GUIDED MLRS ROCKET [GMLRS] 210 29,062 210 29,062 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, GUIDED MISSILES AND EQUIPMENT .............. 307,681 .............. 307,681 .............. ..............

COMMUNICATIONS AND ELECTRONICS EQUIPMENT

COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEMS
13 COMMON AVIATION COMMAND AND CONTROL SYS .............. 37,203 .............. 37,203 .............. ..............

REPAIR AND TEST EQUIPMENT
14 REPAIR AND TEST EQUIPMENT .............. 55,156 .............. 55,156 .............. ..............
15 MODIFICATION KITS .............. 4,945 .............. 4,945 .............. ..............

OTHER SUPPORT (TEL)

COMMAND AND CONTROL
16 ITEMS UNDER $5 MILLION (COMM & ELEC) .............. 112,124 .............. 82,424 .............. -29,700
17 AIR OPERATIONS C2 SYSTEMS .............. 17,408 .............. 17,408 .............. ..............

RADAR + EQUIPMENT (NON-TEL)
18 RADAR SYSTEMS .............. 329 .............. 329 .............. ..............
19 GROUND/AIR TASK ORIENTED RADAR 8 273,022 8 273,022 .............. ..............

INTELL/COMM EQUIPMENT (NON-TEL)
21 GCSS-MC .............. 4,484 .............. 4,484 .............. ..............
22 FIRE SUPPORT SYSTEM .............. 35,488 .............. 35,488 .............. ..............
23 INTELLIGENCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT .............. 56,896 .............. 56,896 .............. ..............
25 UNMANNED AIR SYSTEMS (INTEL) .............. 34,711 .............. 34,711 .............. ..............
26 DCGS-MC .............. 32,562 .............. 32,562 .............. ..............

OTHER SUPPORT (NON-TEL)
30 NEXT GENERATION ENTERPRISE NETWORK (NGEN) .............. 114,901 .............. 114,901 .............. ..............
31 COMMON COMPUTER RESOURCES .............. 51,094 .............. 51,094 .............. ..............
32 COMMAND POST SYSTEMS .............. 108,897 .............. 108,897 .............. ..............
33 RADIO SYSTEMS .............. 227,320 .............. 229,320 .............. +2,000
34 COMM SWITCHING & CONTROL SYSTEMS .............. 31,685 .............. 31,685 .............. ..............
35 COMM & ELEC INFRASTRUCTURE SUPPORT .............. 21,140 .............. 21,140 .............. ..............
36 CYBERSPACE ACTIVITIES .............. 27,632 .............. 27,632 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, COMMUNICATIONS AND ELECTRONICS .............. 1,246,997 .............. 1,219,297 .............. -27,700
EQUIPMENT

SUPPORT VEHICLES

ADMINISTRATIVE VEHICLES
37 COMMERCIAL CARGO VEHICLES .............. 28,913 .............. 28,913 .............. ..............

TACTICAL VEHICLES
38 MOTOR TRANSPORT MODIFICATIONS .............. 19,234 .............. 19,234 .............. ..............
39 JOINT LIGHT TACTICAL VEHICLE 1,398 558,107 1,398 558,107 .............. ..............
40 FAMILY OF TACTICAL TRAILERS .............. 2,693 .............. 2,693 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, SUPPORT VEHICLES .............. 608,947 .............. 608,947 .............. ..............

ENGINEER AND OTHER EQUIPMENT

ENGINEER AND OTHER EQUIPMENT
41 ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL EQUIP ASSORT .............. 495 .............. 495 .............. ..............
42 TACTICAL FUEL SYSTEMS .............. 52 .............. 52 .............. ..............
43 POWER EQUIPMENT ASSORTED .............. 22,441 .............. 22,441 .............. ..............
44 AMPHIBIOUS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT .............. 7,101 .............. 7,101 .............. ..............
45 EOD SYSTEMS .............. 44,700 .............. 44,700 .............. ..............

MATERIALS HANDLING EQUIPMENT
46 PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT .............. 15,404 .............. 15,404 .............. ..............

GENERAL PROPERTY
47 FIELD MEDICAL EQUIPMENT .............. 2,898 .............. 2,898 .............. ..............
48 TRAINING DEVICES .............. 149,567 .............. 149,567 .............. ..............
49 FAMILY OF CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT .............. 35,622 .............. 35,622 .............. ..............
50 FAMILY OF INTERNALLY TRANSPORTABLE VEHICLE (ITV) .............. 647 .............. 647 .............. ..............

OTHER SUPPORT
51 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION .............. 10,956 .............. 10,956 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, ENGINEER AND OTHER EQUIPMENT .............. 289,883 .............. 289,883 .............. ..............
52 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS .............. 33,470 .............. 33,470 .............. ..............
CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS .............. 5,535 .............. 5,535 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, PROCUREMENT, MARINE CORPS .............. 3,090,449 .............. 3,045,749 .............. -44,700
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by
the Committee:

Aircraft Procurement, Air Force

Appropriations, 2019.................................... $17,112,337,000
Budget estimate, 2020................................... 16,784,279,000
Committee recommendation................................ 17,308,918,000

The Committee recommends an appropriation of
$17,308,918,000. This is $524,639,000 above the budget
estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this
appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

COMBAT AIRCRAFT

TACTICAL FORCES
1 F-35 48 4,274,359 60 5,286,259 +12 +1,011,900
2 F-35 [AP-CY] .............. 655,500 .............. 811,500 .............. +156,000
3 F-15E 8 1,050,000 6 628,000 -2 -422,000
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, COMBAT AIRCRAFT .............. 5,979,859 .............. 6,725,759 .............. +745,900

AIRLIFT AIRCRAFT/TACTICAL AIRLIFT
5 KC-46A TANKER 12 2,234,529 12 2,127,755 .............. -106,774

OTHER AIRLIFT
6 C-130J .............. 12,156 .............. 12,156 .............. ..............
8 MC-130J 8 871,207 9 857,607 +1 -13,600
9 MC-130J (AP) .............. 40,000 .............. 40,000 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, AIRLIFT AIRCRAFT .............. 3,157,892 .............. 3,037,518 .............. -120,374

OTHER AIRCRAFT

HELICOPTERS
10 COMBAT RESCUE HELICOPTER 12 884,235 .............. 856,735 -12 -27,500

MISSION SUPPORT AIRCRAFT
11 C-37A 2 161,000 2 147,500 .............. -13,500
12 CIVIL AIR PATROL A/C 4 2,767 4 11,000 .............. +8,233

OTHER AIRCRAFT
14 TARGET DRONES 37 130,837 37 130,837 .............. ..............
15 COMPASS CALL 1 114,095 2 254,895 +1 +140,800
16 OBSERVATION ATTACK REPLACEMENT (OA-X) LIGHT .............. .............. 6 210,000 +6 +210,000
ATTACK'
17 MQ-9 3 189,205 3 106,560 .............. -82,645
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, OTHER AIRCRAFT .............. 1,482,139 .............. 1,717,527 .............. +235,388

MODIFICATION OF INSERVICE AIRCRAFT

STRATEGIC AIRCRAFT
19 B-2A .............. 9,582 .............. 9,582 .............. ..............
20 B-1B .............. 22,111 .............. 12,958 .............. -9,153
21 B-52 .............. 69,648 .............. 36,001 .............. -33,647
22 LARGE AIRCRAFT INFRARED COUNTERMEASURES .............. 43,758 .............. 43,758 .............. ..............

TACTICAL AIRCRAFT
23 A-10 .............. 132,069 .............. 125,825 .............. -6,244
24 E-11 BACN/HAG .............. 70,027 .............. 70,027 .............. ..............
25 F-15 .............. 481,073 .............. 474,767 .............. -6,306
26 F-16 .............. 234,782 .............. 283,000 .............. +48,218
28 F-22A .............. 323,597 .............. 157,597 .............. -166,000
30 F-35 MODIFICATIONS .............. 343,590 .............. 299,590 .............. -44,000
31 F-15 EPAW .............. 149,047 .............. 125,417 .............. -23,630
32 INCREMENT 3.2b .............. 20,213 .............. 14,913 .............. -5,300
33 KC-46A MODS .............. 10,213 .............. 10,213 .............. ..............

AIRLIFT AIRCRAFT
34 C-5 .............. 73,550 .............. 57,937 .............. -15,613
36 C-17A .............. 60,244 .............. 60,244 .............. ..............
37 C-21 .............. 216 .............. 216 .............. ..............
38 C-32A .............. 11,511 .............. 11,511 .............. ..............
39 C-37A .............. 435 .............. 435 .............. ..............

TRAINER AIRCRAFT
40 GLIDER MODS .............. 138 .............. 138 .............. ..............
41 T6 .............. 11,826 .............. 11,826 .............. ..............
42 T-1 .............. 26,787 .............. 26,787 .............. ..............
43 T-38 .............. 37,341 .............. 37,341 .............. ..............

OTHER AIRCRAFT
44 U-2 MODS .............. 86,896 .............. 31,563 .............. -55,333
45 KC-10A [ATCA] .............. 2,108 .............. 2,108 .............. ..............
46 C-12 .............. 3,021 .............. 3,021 .............. ..............
47 VC-25A MOD .............. 48,624 .............. 37,724 .............. -10,900
48 C-40 .............. 256 .............. 256 .............. ..............
49 C-130 .............. 52,066 .............. 181,066 .............. +129,000
50 C130J MODS .............. 141,686 .............. 128,399 .............. -13,287
51 C-135 .............. 124,491 .............. 115,226 .............. -9,265
53 COMPASS CALL MODS .............. 110,754 .............. 282,247 .............. +171,493
54 COMBAT FLIGHT INSPECTION (CFIN) .............. 508 .............. 508 .............. ..............
55 RC-135 .............. 227,673 .............. 224,310 .............. -3,363
56 E-3 .............. 216,299 .............. 105,326 .............. -110,973
57 E-4 .............. 58,477 .............. 58,477 .............. ..............
58 E-8 .............. 28,778 .............. 48,778 .............. +20,000
59 AIRBORNE WARNING AND CONTROL SYSTEM .............. 36,000 .............. 32,821 .............. -3,179
60 FAMILY OF BEYOND LINE-OF-SIGHT TERMINALS .............. 7,910 .............. 2,367 .............. -5,543
61 H-1 .............. 3,817 .............. 3,817 .............. ..............
62 H-60 .............. 20,879 .............. 32,879 .............. +12,000
63 RQ-4 UAV MODS .............. 1,704 .............. 1,704 .............. ..............
64 HC/MC-130 MODIFICATIONS .............. 51,482 .............. 34,850 .............. -16,632
65 OTHER AIRCRAFT .............. 50,098 .............. 50,098 .............. ..............
66 MQ-9 MODS .............. 383,594 .............. 197,915 .............. -185,679
68 CV-22 MODS .............. 65,348 .............. 65,348 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, MODIFICATION OF INSERVICE AIRCRAFT .............. 3,854,227 .............. 3,510,891 .............. -343,336

AIRCRAFT SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS
69 INITIAL SPARES/REPAIR PARTS .............. 708,230 .............. 711,430 .............. +3,200
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, AIRCRAFT SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS .............. 708,230 .............. 711,430 .............. +3,200

AIRCRAFT SUPPORT EQUIPMENT AND FACILITIES

COMMON SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
72 AIRCRAFT REPLACEMENT SUPPORT EQUIP .............. 84,938 .............. 84,938 .............. ..............

POST PRODUCTION SUPPORT
73 B-2A .............. 1,403 .............. 1,403 .............. ..............
74 B-2B .............. 42,234 .............. 42,234 .............. ..............
75 B-52 .............. 4,641 .............. 2,341 .............. -2,300
76 C-17A .............. 124,805 .............. 124,805 .............. ..............
79 F-15 .............. 2,589 .............. 2,589 .............. ..............
81 F-16 POST PRODUCTION SUPPORT .............. 15,348 .............. 11,402 .............. -3,946
84 RQ-4 POST PRODUCTION CHARGES .............. 47,246 .............. 47,246 .............. ..............

INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS
86 INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS .............. 17,705 .............. 17,705 .............. ..............

WAR CONSUMABLES
87 WAR CONSUMABLES .............. 32,102 .............. 32,102 .............. ..............

OTHER PRODUCTION CHARGES
88 OTHER PRODUCTION CHARGES .............. 1,194,728 .............. 1,204,835 .............. +10,107
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, AIRCRAFT SUPPORT EQUIPMENT AND .............. 1,567,739 .............. 1,571,600 .............. +3,861
FACILITIES

CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS .............. 34,193 .............. 34,193 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE .............. 16,784,279 .............. 17,308,918 .............. +524,639
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by
the Committee:

MC-130J Procurement Quantities.--The Committee understands
that the Air Force is negotiating a third multi-year
procurement contract for C-130J aircraft that will utilize
fiscal year 2019 through 2023 funding. Currently, negotiations
have resulted in significant anticipated unit cost savings for
the fiscal year 2019 and fiscal year 2020 aircraft purchases,
and the Air Force has briefed the Committee on a plan to apply
these savings to accelerate acquisition of one trainer in
fiscal year 2019 and one additional MC-130J aircraft in fiscal
year 2020. The Committee is supportive of this approach and
directs the Secretary of the Air Force to follow through with
the planned procurement of a ninth MC-130J aircraft with fiscal
year 2020 funding.
MQ-9 Procurement Profile.--The Committee is concerned with
the procurement profile for MQ-9 Reapers through the future
years defense program as well as the quantity requested in the
fiscal year 2020 President's budget request. With the
additional aircraft added by Congress in fiscal year 2019, the
Air Force estimates a unit cost of $15,900,000 for 24 aircraft.
The Committee was dismayed to receive a fiscal year 2020
request for 12 aircraft at a unit cost of approximately
$20,000,000, which includes a 20 percent economic order
quantity penalty for a quantity buy below the optimized rate of
16 aircraft per year. The Committee also understands that the
Air Force is not appropriately budgeting for attrition reserve
requirements and recommends an additional $26,700,000 for MQ-9
Reapers. The Committee expects the Air Force to utilize this
additional funding along with the savings realized on the 12
budgeted aircraft to procure an additional four aircraft in
order to reach the optimized production rate of 16 aircraft.
Battlefield Airborne Communications Node.--The Committee
notes that the Battlefield Airborne Communications Node [BACN]
provides critical battlespace awareness as well as data
transfer, resilient communication sharing, and bridging across
disparate networks and platforms, including with partner
nations. The Committee commends the Secretary of the Air Force
for continuing to transition the BACN program to a program of
record and integrating sustainment, modernization, and future
year budget planning in the fiscal year 2020 President's budget
request. The Committee encourages the Secretary of the Air
Force to continue development of a modernization plan for the
BACN system that addresses anticipated future requirements as
well as near, mid-term, and future threats across the full
spectrum of joint operational communications. The plan should
support multi-domain and multi-level security command and
control architectures, high capacity backbone, combat cloud,
and data networking requirements in order to support
operational requirements across multiple theaters and combatant
commands supporting the joint force.
C-130J Aircraft for the Air National Guard.--The Committee
directs the Secretary of the Air Force to provide a report to
the congressional defense committees not later than 180 days
after the enactment of this act with an updated beddown plan
that transitions Air National Guard C-130H aircraft to C-130J
aircraft by fiscal year and location. The plan shall include
efforts to preserve Air National Guard missions during the
transition period between aircraft and includes data on impacts
on workforce and manufacturing capacity of the existing
industrial base supporting the C-130 program.

Missile Procurement, Air Force

Appropriations, 2019.................................... $2,585,004,000
Budget estimate, 2020................................... 2,889,187,000
Committee recommendation................................ 2,589,166,000

The Committee recommends an appropriation of
$2,589,166,000. This is $300,021,000 below the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this
appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

BALLISTIC MISSILES

MISSILE REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT--BALLISTIC
1 MISSILE REPLACEMENT EQ-BALLISTIC .............. 55,888 .............. 55,888 .............. ..............

OTHER MISSILES

TACTICAL
2 REPLAC EQUIP & WAR CONSUMABLES .............. 9,100 .............. 4,500 .............. -4,600
3 JOINT AIR-TO-GROUND MUNITION 60 15,000 60 15,000 .............. ..............
4 JOINT AIR-SURFACE STANDOFF MISSILE [JASSM] 411 482,525 411 482,525 .............. ..............
6 SIDEWINDER (AIM-9X) 355 160,408 355 155,289 .............. -5,119
7 AMRAAM 220 332,250 220 311,730 .............. -20,520
8 PREDATOR HELLFIRE MISSILE 1,531 118,860 1,531 118,860 .............. ..............
9 SMALL DIAMETER BOMB 7,078 275,438 7,078 275,438 .............. ..............
10 SMALL DIAMETER BOMB II 1,175 212,434 1,175 183,279 .............. -29,155

INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES
11 INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS/POLLUTION PREVENTION .............. 801 .............. 801 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, OTHER MISSILES .............. 1,606,816 .............. 1,547,422 .............. -59,394

MODIFICATION OF INSERVICE MISSILES

CLASS IV
12 ICBM FUZE MOD 6 5,000 .............. .............. -6 -5,000
13 ICBM FUZE MOD .............. 14,497 .............. 14,497 .............. ..............
14 MM III MODIFICATIONS .............. 50,831 .............. 50,831 .............. ..............
15 AGM-65D MAVERICK .............. 294 .............. 294 .............. ..............
16 AIR LAUNCH CRUISE MISSILE .............. 77,387 .............. 68,513 .............. -8,874
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, MODIFICATION OF INSERVICE MISSILES .............. 148,009 .............. 134,135 .............. -13,874

SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS
18 INITIAL SPARES/REPAIR PARTS .............. 1,910 .............. 1,910 .............. ..............
19 REPLEN SPARES/REPAIR PARTS .............. 82,490 .............. 72,490 .............. -10,000
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS .............. 84,400 .............. 74,400 .............. -10,000

SPECIAL PROGRAMS
23 SPECIAL UPDATE PROGRAMS .............. 144,553 .............. 134,553 .............. -10,000

CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS .............. 849,521 .............. 642,768 .............. -206,753
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, SPECIAL PROGRAMS .............. 994,074 .............. 777,321 .............. -216,753
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, MISSILE PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE .............. 2,889,187 .............. 2,589,166 .............. -300,021
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by
the Committee:

Space Procurement, Air Force

Appropriations, 2019.................................... $2,343,642,000
Budget estimate, 2020................................... 2,414,383,000
Committee recommendation................................ 2,460,605,000

The Committee recommends an appropriation of
$2,460,605,000. This is $46,222,000 above the budget estimate.

committee recommended program

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this
appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

SPACE PROGRAMS
1 ADVANCED EHF .............. 31,894 .............. 21,894 .............. -10,000
2 AF SATELLITE COMM SYSTEM .............. 56,298 .............. 56,298 .............. ..............
4 COUNTERSPACE SYSTEMS .............. 5,700 .............. 5,700 .............. ..............
5 FAMILY OF BEYOND LINE-OF-SIGHT TERMINALS .............. 34,020 .............. 29,020 .............. -5,000
7 GENERAL INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY--SPACE .............. 3,244 .............. 3,244 .............. ..............
8 GPS III FOLLOW ON 1 414,625 1 394,625 .............. -20,000
9 GPS III SPACE SEGMENT .............. 31,466 .............. 31,466 .............. ..............
12 SPACE COMMUNICATIONS SECURITY .............. 32,031 .............. 32,031 .............. ..............
13 MILSATCOM TERMINALS .............. 11,096 .............. 11,096 .............. ..............
15 EVOLVED EXPENDABLE LAUNCH VEHICLE 4 1,237,635 4 1,237,635 .............. ..............
16 SBIR HIGH (SPACE) .............. 233,952 .............. 233,952 .............. ..............
17 NUDET DETECTION SYSTEM SPACE .............. 7,432 .............. 7,432 .............. ..............
18 ROCKET SYSTEM LAUNCH PROGRAM .............. 11,473 .............. 11,473 .............. ..............
19 SPACE FENCE .............. 71,784 .............. 51,784 .............. -20,000
20 SPACE MODS SPACE .............. 106,330 .............. 106,330 .............. ..............
21 SPACELIFT RANGE SYSTEM SPACE .............. 118,140 .............. 118,140 .............. ..............
XX EO/IR WEATHER .............. .............. .............. 101,222 .............. +101,222

SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS
22 INITIAL SPARES/REPAIR PARTS .............. 7,263 .............. 7,263 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, SPACE PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE .............. 2,414,383 .............. 2,460,605 .............. +46,222
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by
the Committee:

Procurement of Ammunition, Air Force

Appropriations, 2019.................................... $1,485,856,000
Budget estimate, 2020...................................................
Committee recommendation................................ 1,625,661,000

The Committee recommends an appropriation of
$1,625,661,000. This is $1,625,661,000 above the budget
estimate.

committee recommended program

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this
appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

PROCUREMENT OF AMMO, AIR FORCE
1 ROCKETS .............. .............. .............. 132,968 .............. +132,968
2 CARTRIDGES .............. .............. .............. 140,449 .............. +140,449

BOMBS
3 PRACTICE BOMBS .............. .............. .............. 29,313 .............. +29,313
4 GENERAL PURPOSE BOMBS .............. .............. .............. 85,885 .............. +85,885
6 JOINT DIRECT ATTACK MUNITION .............. .............. 37,000 1,034,224 +37,000 +1,034,224
7 B61 .............. .............. 533 70,773 +533 +70,773

FLARE, IR MJU-7B
9 CAD/PAD .............. .............. .............. 47,069 .............. +47,069
10 EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DISPOSAL [EOD] .............. .............. .............. 6,133 .............. +6,133
11 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS .............. .............. .............. 533 .............. +533
12 MODIFICATIONS .............. .............. .............. 1,291 .............. +1,291
13 ITEMS LESS THAN $5,000,000 .............. .............. .............. 1,677 .............. +1,677

FLARES/FUZES
15 FLARES .............. .............. .............. 36,116 .............. +36,116
16 FUZES .............. .............. .............. 1,734 .............. +1,734
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, PROCUREMENT OF AMMO, AIR FORCE .............. .............. .............. 1,588,165 .............. +1,588,165

WEAPONS
17 SMALL ARMS .............. .............. .............. 37,496 .............. +37,496
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, AIR FORCE .............. .............. .............. 1,625,661 .............. +1,625,661
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by
the Committee:

Other Procurement, Air Force

Appropriations, 2019.................................... $20,884,225,000
Budget estimate, 2020................................... 20,687,857,000
Committee recommendation................................ 21,083,464,000

The Committee recommends an appropriation of
$21,083,464,000. This is $395,607,000 above the budget
estimate.

committee recommended program

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this
appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

VEHICULAR EQUIPMENT

PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLES
1 PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLE .............. 15,238 .............. 15,238 .............. ..............

CARGO + UTILITY VEHICLES
2 FAMILY MEDIUM TACTICAL VEHICLE .............. 34,616 .............. 34,616 .............. ..............
3 CAP VEHICLES .............. 1,040 .............. 1,700 .............. +660
4 ITEMS LESS THAN $5M (CARGO AND UTILITY VEHICLES) .............. 23,133 .............. 23,133 .............. ..............

SPECIAL PURPOSE VEHICLES
5 JOINT LIGHT TACTICAL VEHICLE .............. 32,027 .............. 32,027 .............. ..............
6 SECURITY AND TACTICAL VEHICLES .............. 1,315 .............. 1,315 .............. ..............
7 ITEMS LESS THAN $5M (SPECIAL PURPOSE VEHICLES) .............. 14,593 .............. 14,593 .............. ..............

FIRE FIGHTING EQUIPMENT
8 FIRE FIGHTING/CRASH RESCUE VEHICLES .............. 28,604 .............. 12,004 .............. -16,600

MATERIALS HANDLING EQUIPMENT
9 ITEMS LESS THAT $5M (MATERIALS HANDLING .............. 21,848 .............. 21,848 .............. ..............
EQUIPMENT)

BASE MAINTENANCE SUPPORT
10 RUNWAY SNOW REMOVAL & CLEANING EQUIP .............. 2,925 .............. 2,925 .............. ..............
11 ITEMS LESS THAN $5M (BASE MAINTENANCE SUPPORT .............. 55,776 .............. 55,776 .............. ..............
VEHICLES)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, VEHICULAR EQUIPMENT .............. 231,115 .............. 215,175 .............. -15,940

ELECTRONICS AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS EQUIP

COMM SECURITY EQUIPMENT(COMSEC)
13 COMSEC EQUIPMENT .............. 91,461 .............. 81,461 .............. -10,000

INTELLIGENCE PROGRAMS
14 INTERNATIONAL INTEL TECH AND ARCHITECTURES .............. 11,386 .............. 11,386 .............. ..............
15 INTELLIGENCE TRAINING EQUIPMENT .............. 7,619 .............. 7,619 .............. ..............
16 INTELLIGENCE COMM EQUIP .............. 35,558 .............. 35,558 .............. ..............

ELECTRONICS PROGRAMS
17 TRAFFIC CONTROL/LANDING .............. 17,939 .............. 29,939 .............. +12,000
19 BATTLE CONTROL SYSTEM--FIXED .............. 3,063 .............. 3,063 .............. ..............
21 WEATHER OBSERVATION FORECAST .............. 31,447 .............. 31,447 .............. ..............
22 STRATEGIC COMMAND AND CONTROL .............. 5,090 .............. 5,090 .............. ..............
23 CHEYENNE MOUNTAIN COMPLEX .............. 10,145 .............. 10,145 .............. ..............
24 MISSION PLANNING SYSTEMS .............. 14,508 .............. 14,508 .............. ..............
26 INTEGRATED STRAT PLAN AND ANALY NETWORK (ISPAN) .............. 9,901 .............. 8,601 .............. -1,300

SPECIAL COMM-ELECTRONICS PROJECTS
27 GENERAL INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY .............. 26,933 .............. 26,933 .............. ..............
28 AF GLOBAL COMMAND & CONTROL SYSTEM .............. 2,756 .............. 2,756 .............. ..............
29 BATTLEFIELD AIRBORNE CONTROL NODE (BACN) .............. 48,478 .............. 48,478 .............. ..............
30 MOBILITY COMMAND AND CONTROL .............. 21,186 .............. 21,186 .............. ..............
31 AIR FORCE PHYSICAL SECURITY SYSTEM .............. 178,361 .............. 178,361 .............. ..............
32 COMBAT TRAINING RANGES .............. 233,993 .............. 282,893 .............. +48,900
33 MINIMUM ESSENTIAL EMERGENCY COMM N .............. 132,648 .............. 132,648 .............. ..............
34 WIDE AREA SURVEILLANCE (WAS) .............. 80,818 .............. 42,118 .............. -38,700
35 C3 COUNTERMEASURES .............. 25,036 .............. 25,036 .............. ..............
36 INTEGRATED PERSONNEL AND PAY SYSTEM .............. 20,900 .............. .............. .............. -20,900
37 GCSS-AF FOS .............. 11,226 .............. 11,226 .............. ..............
38 DEFENSE ENTERPRISE ACCOUNTING AND MGMT .............. 1,905 .............. 1,905 .............. ..............
39 MAINTENANCE REPAIR AND OVERHAUL INITIATIVE .............. 1,912 .............. 1,912 .............. ..............
40 THEATER BATTLE MGT C2 SYS .............. 6,337 .............. 6,337 .............. ..............
41 AIR AND SPACE OPERATIONS CTR-WPN SYSTEM .............. 33,243 .............. 33,243 .............. ..............

AIR FORCE COMMUNICATIONS
43 INFORMATION TRANSPORT SYSTEMS .............. 69,530 .............. 62,280 .............. -7,250
44 AFNET .............. 147,063 .............. 131,063 .............. -16,000
45 JOINT COMMUNICATIONS SUPPORT ELEMENT (JCSE) .............. 6,505 .............. 6,505 .............. ..............
46 USCENTCOM .............. 20,190 .............. 20,190 .............. ..............
47 USSTRATCOM .............. 11,244 .............. 11,244 .............. ..............

ORGANIZATION AND BASE
48 TACTICAL C-E EQUIPMENT .............. 143,757 .............. 143,757 .............. ..............
50 RADIO EQUIPMENT .............. 15,402 .............. 15,402 .............. ..............
51 CCTV/AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT .............. 3,211 .............. 3,211 .............. ..............
52 BASE COMM INFRASTRUCTURE .............. 43,123 .............. 43,123 .............. ..............

MODIFICATIONS
53 COMM ELECT MODS .............. 14,500 .............. 14,500 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, ELECTRONICS AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS .............. 1,538,374 .............. 1,505,124 .............. -33,250
EQUIP

OTHER BASE MAINTENANCE AND SUPPORT EQUIP

PERSONAL SAFETY AND RESCUE EQUIP
54 ITEMS LESS THAN $5,000,000 (SAFETY) .............. 50,634 .............. 50,634 .............. ..............

DEPOT PLANT + MATERIALS HANDLING EQ
55 POWER CONDITIONING EQUIPMENT .............. 11,000 .............. 11,000 .............. ..............
56 MECHANIZED MATERIAL HANDLING .............. 11,901 .............. 11,901 .............. ..............

BASE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
57 BASE PROCURED EQUIPMENT .............. 23,963 .............. 23,963 .............. ..............
58 ENGINEERING AND EOD EQUIPMENT .............. 34,124 .............. 34,124 .............. ..............
59 MOBILITY EQUIPMENT .............. 26,439 .............. 26,439 .............. ..............
60 FUELS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT (FSE) .............. 24,255 .............. 24,255 .............. ..............
61 ITEMS LESS THAN $5M (BASE SUPPORT) .............. 38,986 .............. 38,986 .............. ..............

SPECIAL SUPPORT PROJECTS
63 DARP RC135 .............. 26,716 .............. 26,716 .............. ..............
64 DISTRIBUTED GROUND SYSTEMS .............. 116,055 .............. 116,055 .............. ..............
66 SPECIAL UPDATE PROGRAM .............. 835,148 .............. 835,148 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, OTHER BASE MAINTENANCE AND SUPPORT .............. 1,199,221 .............. 1,199,221 .............. ..............
EQUIP

SPARE AND REPAIR PARTS
67 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS .............. 81,340 .............. 81,340 .............. ..............
CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS .............. 17,637,807 .............. 18,082,604 .............. +444,797
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, OTHER PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE .............. 20,687,857 .............. 21,083,464 .............. +395,607
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by
the Committee:

Cold Weather Aviation System.--The Committee supports
fielding the Cold Weather Aviation System to both the Air Force
and the Air National Guard and encourages the Air Force
Secretary to work with the Chief, National Guard Bureau to
evaluate simultaneously fielding the uniform to reduce unit
costs and to protect air crews.

Procurement, Defense-Wide

Appropriations, 2019.................................... $6,822,180,000
Budget estimate, 2020................................... 5,109,416,000
Committee recommendation................................ 5,285,914,000

The Committee recommends an appropriation of
$5,285,914,000. This is $176,498,000 above the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this
appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

MAJOR EQUIPMENT

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DCMA
2 MAJOR EQUIPMENT .............. 2,432 .............. 2,432 .............. ..............

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DHRA
3 PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION .............. 5,030 .............. 5,030 .............. ..............

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DISA
8 INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY .............. 3,318 .............. 4,718 .............. +1,400
9 TELEPORT PROGRAM .............. 25,103 .............. 25,103 .............. ..............
10 ITEMS LESS THAN $5M .............. 26,416 .............. 26,416 .............. ..............
12 DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEMS NETWORK .............. 17,574 .............. 17,574 .............. ..............
14 WHITE HOUSE COMMUNICATION AGENCY .............. 45,079 .............. 45,079 .............. ..............
15 SENIOR LEADERSHIP ENTERPRISE .............. 78,669 .............. 87,669 .............. +9,000
16 JOINT REGIONAL SECURITY STACKS (JRSS) .............. 88,000 .............. 88,000 .............. ..............
17 JOINT SERVICE PROVIDER .............. 107,907 .............. 107,907 .............. ..............

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DLA
19 MAJOR EQUIPMENT .............. 8,122 .............. 8,122 .............. ..............

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DMACT
20 A--WEAPON SYSTEM COST .............. 10,961 .............. 10,961 .............. ..............

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DODEA
21 AUTOMATION/EDUCATIONAL SUPPORT & LOGISTICS .............. 1,320 .............. 1,320 .............. ..............

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DPAA
22 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DPAA 32 1,504 32 1,504 .............. ..............

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DSS
23 MAJOR EQUIPMENT .............. 496 .............. 496 .............. ..............

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DEFENSE THREAT REDUCTION AGENCY
25 VEHICLES .............. 211 .............. 211 .............. ..............
26 OTHER MAJOR EQUIPMENT .............. 11,521 .............. 11,521 .............. ..............

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, MDA
28 THAAD SYSTEM 37 425,863 37 388,543 .............. -37,320
29 GROUND BASED MIDCOURSE .............. 9,471 .............. 352,471 .............. +343,000
31 AEGIS BMD 37 600,773 30 327,374 -7 -273,399
XX AEGIS BMD SM-3 BLOCK IIA .............. .............. 7 238,000 +7 +238,000
32 AEGIS BMD (AP) .............. 96,995 .............. 96,995 .............. ..............
33 BMDS AN/TPY-2 RADARS .............. 10,046 .............. 10,046 .............. ..............
34 ISRAELI PROGRAMS 1 55,000 1 55,000 .............. ..............
35 SHORT RANGE BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE (SRBMD) 1 50,000 1 50,000 .............. ..............
36 AEGIS ASHORE PHASE III 1 25,659 1 25,659 .............. ..............
37 IRON DOME SYSTEM 1 95,000 1 95,000 .............. ..............
38 AEGIS BMD HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE 36 124,986 36 124,986 .............. ..............

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, NSA
44 INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM [ISSP] .............. 1,533 .............. 133 .............. -1,400

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, OSD
45 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, OSD .............. 43,705 .............. 43,705 .............. ..............

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, TJS
46 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, TJS .............. 6,905 .............. 6,905 .............. ..............
47 MAJOR EQUIPMENT--TJS CYBER .............. 1,458 .............. 1,458 .............. ..............

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, WHS
49 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, WHS .............. 507 .............. 507 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, MAJOR EQUIPMENT .............. 1,981,564 .............. 2,260,845 .............. +279,281

SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND

AVIATION PROGRAMS
53 SOF ROTARY WING UPGRADES AND SUSTAINMENT .............. 172,020 .............. 158,920 .............. -13,100
54 UNMANNED ISR .............. 15,208 .............. 15,208 .............. ..............
55 NON-STANDARD AVIATION .............. 32,310 .............. 32,310 .............. ..............
56 SOF U-28 .............. 10,898 .............. 10,898 .............. ..............
57 MH-47 CHINOOK .............. 173,812 .............. 173,812 .............. ..............
58 CV-22 SOF MODIFICATION .............. 17,256 .............. 17,256 .............. ..............
59 MQ-9 UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE .............. 5,338 .............. 5,338 .............. ..............
60 PRECISION STRIKE PACKAGE .............. 232,930 .............. 232,930 .............. ..............
61 AC/MC-130J .............. 173,419 .............. 131,819 .............. -41,600
62 C-130 MODIFICATIONS .............. 15,582 .............. 15,582 .............. ..............

SHIPBUILDING
63 UNDERWATER SYSTEMS .............. 58,991 .............. 58,991 .............. ..............

AMMUNITION PROGRAMS
64 SOF ORDNANCE ITEMS UNDER $5,000,000 .............. 279,992 .............. 246,592 .............. -33,400

OTHER PROCUREMENT PROGRAMS
65 SOF INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS .............. 100,641 .............. 100,641 .............. ..............
66 DCGS-SOF .............. 12,522 .............. 12,522 .............. ..............
67 OTHER ITEMS UNDER $5,000,000 .............. 103,910 .............. 103,910 .............. ..............
68 SOF COMBATANT CRAFT SYSTEMS .............. 33,088 .............. 33,088 .............. ..............
69 SPECIAL PROGRAMS .............. 63,467 .............. 63,467 .............. ..............
70 TACTICAL VEHICLES .............. 77,832 .............. 107,832 .............. +30,000
71 WARRIOR SYSTEMS UNDER $5,000,000 .............. 298,480 .............. 298,480 .............. ..............
72 COMBAT MISSION REQUIREMENTS .............. 19,702 .............. 19,702 .............. ..............
73 SOF GLOBAL VIDEO SURVEILLANCE ACTIVITIES .............. 4,787 .............. 4,787 .............. ..............
74 SOF OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS INTELLIGENCE .............. 8,175 .............. 8,175 .............. ..............
75 SOF OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS .............. 282,532 .............. 282,532 .............. ..............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND .............. 2,192,892 .............. 2,134,792 .............. -58,100

CHEMICAL/BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE
76 CHEMICAL BIOLOGICAL SITUATIONAL AWARENESS .............. 162,406 .............. 154,673 .............. -7,733
77 CB PROTECTION AND HAZARD MITIGATION .............. 188,188 .............. 170,788 .............. -17,400
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, CHEMICAL/BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE .............. 350,594 .............. 325,461 .............. -25,133

CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS .............. 584,366 .............. 564,816 .............. -19,550
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, PROCUREMENT, DEFENSE-WIDE .............. 5,109,416 .............. 5,285,914 .............. +176,498
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by
the Committee:

Procurement of Standard Missile-3 Block IB and Block IIA
Interceptors.--The fiscal year 2020 President's budget request
includes $459,768,000 in Procurement, Defense-Wide for the
procurement of no less than 30 Standard Missile-3 [SM-3] Block
IB interceptors using previously granted multi-year procurement
authority, which includes $96,995,000 in Advance Procurement
[AP] for economic order quantity items. The Committee
recommends full funding of AP for SM-3 Block IB interceptors
and understands that this will result in unit cost savings
above those included in the President's budget request due to
additional cost saving opportunities identified by the
Government and industry team. The Committee further understands
that this will provide opportunities to increase procurement
quantities over the multi-year procurement without additional
costs to the Government.
The Committee notes that under existing law, a multi-year
procurement contract may not be entered into until thirty days
after the Secretary of Defense certifies in writing to the
congressional defense committees that certain conditions are
satisfied, and directs that concurrent with such certification
the Under Secretary of Defense (Research and Engineering) shall
certify to the congressional defense committees the design and
technology readiness levels of critical SM-3 Block IB
interceptor components.
The Committee understands that opportunities to upgrade the
SM-3 Block IIA interceptor exist and directs that no funds for
the procurement of SM-3 Block IIA interceptors in fiscal year
2020 may be obligated or expended until thirty days after the
Under Secretary of Defense (Research and Engineering) certifies
to the congressional defense committees the design and
technology readiness levels of critical SM-3 Block IIA
interceptor components; as well as identifies additional
upgrades to the SM-3 Block IIA interceptor under consideration
and associated costs.
In addition, the Committee notes that the approved
acquisition objective [AAO] for the SM-3 interceptor is under
review. The Committee directs the Director, MDA, in conjunction
with the Assistant Secretary of the Navy (Research, Development
and Acquisition) to provide to the congressional defense
committees the updated AAO for SM-3 interceptors, consistent
with the format provided in response to such direction in
fiscal year 2017, not later than with submission of the fiscal
year 2021 President's budget request.
Chemical Protective Suits.--The Committee recognizes the
importance of maintaining warfighter capability during
contingency operations involving the hostile deployment of
chemical weapons and recommends continued support of the
organic industrial base for chemical protective suits.

Defense Production Act Purchases

Appropriations, 2019.................................... $53,578,000
Budget estimate, 2020................................... 34,393,000
Committee recommendation................................ 39,393,000

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $39,393,000.
This is $5,000,000 above the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this
appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

1 DEFENSE PRODUCTION ACT PURCHASES .............. 34,393 .............. 39,393 .............. +5,000
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, DEFENSE PRODUCTION ACT PURCHASES .............. 34,393 .............. 39,393 .............. +5,000
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Additional Funding.--The Committee recognizes the critical
role that the DPA title III program serves in strengthening the
U.S. defense industrial base, including its support of
Executive Order 13806, Assessing and Strengthening the
Manufacturing and Defense Industrial Base and Supply Chain
Resiliency of the United States. The Committee encourages the
DPA program to continue supporting Executive Order 13806, as
well as efforts to strengthen domestic fabric suppliers, and
will continue to monitor execution of funds and drawdown of the
DPA fund balance. Therefore, the Committee increases funding
for DPA by $5,000,000 over the budget request. The Committee
directs that the additional funding be competitively awarded to
new initiatives and priority consideration should be given to
completion of DPA projects initiated in prior years.
Furthermore, the Committee directs the Under Secretary of
Defense (Acquisition and Sustainment) to inform the
congressional defense committees 30 days prior to any
obligation or expenditure of these funds.

Joint Urgent Operational Needs Fund

Appropriations, 2019....................................................
Budget estimate, 2020................................... $99,200,000
Committee recommendation................................................

The Committee recommends no funding for the Joint Urgent
Operational Needs Fund.

TITLE IV

RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST AND EVALUATION

Funds appropriated under this title provide the resources
required to conduct a program of research, development, test
and evaluation, including research in basic science, applied
research, advanced technology development, demonstration and
validation, engineering and manufacturing development, and
operational systems development.
The President's fiscal year 2020 budget requests a total of
$102,647,545,000 for research, development, test and evaluation
appropriations.

SUMMARY OF COMMITTEE ACTION

The Committee recommends research, development, test and
evaluation appropriations totaling $104,282,139,000 for fiscal
year 2020. This is $1,634,594,000 above the budget estimate.
Committee recommended research, development, test and
evaluation appropriations for fiscal year 2020 are summarized
below:

SUMMARY OF RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST AND EVALUATION APPROPRIATIONS
[In thousands of dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Change from
Account 2020 budget Committee budget
estimate recommendation estimate
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation:
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Army............ 12,192,771 12,412,845 +220,074
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy............ 20,270,499 19,818,218 -452,281
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air Force....... 45,616,122 45,446,727 -169,395
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-Wide.... 24,346,953 26,371,649 +2,024,696
Operational Test and Evaluation, Defense.................... 221,200 232,700 +11,500
-----------------------------------------------
Total................................................... 102,647,545 104,282,139 +1,634,594
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

REPROGRAMMING GUIDANCE FOR ACQUISITION ACCOUNTS

FUNDING INCREASES

The funding increases outlined in the tables for each
appropriation account shall be provided only for the specific
purposes indicated in the tables.

RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST AND EVALUATION SPECIAL INTEREST ITEMS

RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST AND EVALUATION OVERVIEW

Basic Research.--The Committee understands that basic
research is the foundation for Department of Defense innovation
and future technologies. As the Under Secretary of Defense
(Research and Engineering) has in the past testified before the
Committee: ``The Department of Defense has the third largest
investment among Federal agencies in basic research at U.S.
universities, who have, through years of continued investments,
been the source of many of today's transformational
technologies. Traditionally, the Department has viewed the role
of universities as producing the research innovation, the
Department of Defense labs as the mechanism to nurture these
findings and to render them defense-applicable, and the defense
industrial base to integrate these new technologies into
acquisition programs.'' Accordingly, the Committee recommends
an increase of $307,820,000 above the fiscal year 2020 budget
request. This includes an additional $122,000,000 in Research,
Development, Test and Evaluation, Army; $76,500,000 in
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy; $50,000,000
in Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air Force; and
$59,320,000 in Research, Development, Test and Evaluation,
Defense-Wide.
Test and Evaluation Infrastructure for Technologies
Critical to the National Defense Strategy.--House Report 115-
952, the Joint Explanatory Statement of the Committee of
Conference accompanying the Department of Defense
Appropriations Act, 2019 directed the Under Secretary of
Defense (Research and Engineering), in conjunction with the
Director, Operational Test and Evaluation, and the Secretaries
of the Army, Navy and Air Force, to conduct an in-depth
assessment of the Department of Defense test and evaluation
infrastructure and to identify improvements required to address
future warfighting capabilities. The Committee understands that
the assessment discovered shortfalls in test and evaluation
infrastructure of several technologies that are critical for
implementing the 2018 National Defense Strategy, such as
hypersonics, space, directed energy and cyber. Therefore, the
Committee recommends an additional $235,250,000 in Research,
Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-Wide, program element
0604940D8Z, only for those purposes, as delineated in the
accompanying table of Committee Recommended Adjustments.
The Committee directs that none of these funds may be
obligated or expended until 30 days after the Under Secretary
of Defense (Research and Engineering) provides a briefing to
the congressional defense committees on the assessment
requested in fiscal year 2019, as well as an execution plan
developed, in conjunction with the Director, Operational Test
and Evaluation, and the Secretaries of the Army, Navy and Air
Force, for the additional funds recommended by the Committee.
Defense Industrial Base.--The Committee has reviewed the
``Executive Order 13806 on Assessing and Strengthening the
Manufacturing and Defense Industrial Base and Supply Chain
Resiliency of the United States'' report, which identified
risks and challenges to a healthy and resilient defense
industrial base. The Committee is encouraged by efforts led by
the Under Secretary of Defense (Acquisition and Sustainment) to
protect the defense industrial base in response to
vulnerabilities identified in the 13806 report. Further, the
Committee notes efforts by the Department of Defense to
strengthen oversight of the Committee on Foreign Investment in
the United States, which include expanding its jurisdiction in
accordance with congressional direction. However, the Committee
is concerned by the apparent lack of common visibility and
coordination among the military services and the Under
Secretary of Defense (Acquisition and Sustainment) regarding
the supply chain for critical technologies that affect
acquisition programs, to include the submarine industrial base;
the modernization of nuclear command and control; and
manufacturing efforts.
Therefore, the Committee recommends additional funds in
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-Wide for
industrial base analysis and sustainment and directs the Deputy
Secretary of Defense, in conjunction with the Under Secretary
of Defense (Acquisition and Sustainment) and the Secretaries of
the Army, Navy and Air Force, to submit to the congressional
defense committees with the fiscal year 2021 President's budget
the combined resource and policy strategy to address U.S.
defense industrial base vulnerabilities.
Submarine Workforce Development.--The Committee notes the
need to enhance the workforce pipeline for manufacturing in the
defense sector for certain technical professions, including
welding, pipefitting, electrical, machining, shipfitting,
carpentry, and others specialties to support the 2018 National
Defense Strategy. The Committee believes that expanding and
improving the capability and capacity of the submarine
industrial base workforce is critical to keep pace with current
Navy shipbuilding programs. However, the Committee is concerned
that the Navy-certified welding workforce may be insufficient
to meet Navy demands for the submarine build plan on time with
the required quality. In particular, the Committee notes the
current shortfall in the Virginia and Columbia-class technical
workforce and supports increased submarine industrial base
workforce training and education to address this shortfall.
Therefore, the Committee recommends an increase of $8,000,000
in Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-Wide for
submarine workforce development, and directs the Secretary of
Defense to work with the Secretaries of Labor, Education, and
Commerce to develop and implement a strategy for strengthening
the workforce pipeline for critical defense industries,
including new submarine construction.
Use of Research, Development, Test and Evaluation funding
for Military Construction.--The fiscal year 2020 President's
budget request includes $111,000,000 in research, development,
test and evaluation [RDTE], Air Force funding to support three
projects authorized by the Fiscal Year 2019 National Defense
Authorization Act (Public Law 115-232) for the fiscal year 2017
Defense Laboratory Modernization Pilot Program. The Committee
supports the three projects, but transfers the funding from the
Defense appropriations bill to the Military Construction
appropriations bill for more appropriate execution and
oversight. The Committee understands the Department of
Defense's challenge in prioritizing small, but critical
laboratory construction projects with larger, higher profile
construction projects. However, the Committee encourages the
Department of Defense to appropriately request the funding in
the Military Construction appropriations bill.

Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Army

Appropriations, 2019.................................... $11,083,824,000
Budget estimate, 2020................................... 12,192,771,000
Committee recommendation................................ 12,412,845,000

The Committee recommends an appropriation of
$12,412,845,000. This is $220,074,000 above the budget
estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this
appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

BASIC RESEARCH
2 DEFENSE RESEARCH SCIENCES 297,976 391,976 +94,000
3 UNIVERSITY RESEARCH INITIATIVES 65,858 65,858 ..............
4 UNIVERSITY AND INDUSTRY RESEARCH CENTERS 86,164 114,164 +28,000
5 CYBER COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH ALLIANCE 4,982 4,982 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BASIC RESEARCH 454,980 576,980 +122,000

APPLIED RESEARCH
10 LETHALITY TECHNOLOGY 26,961 61,961 +35,000
11 ARMY APPLIED RESEARCH 25,319 25,319 ..............
12 SOLDIER LETHALITY TECHNOLOGY 115,274 137,774 +22,500
13 GROUND TECHNOLOGY 35,199 137,699 +102,500
14 NEXT GENERATION COMBAT VEHICLE TECHNOLOGY 219,047 245,047 +26,000
15 NETWORK C3I TECHNOLOGY 114,516 140,016 +25,500
16 LONG RANGE PRECISION FIRES TECHNOLOGY 74,327 127,327 +53,000
17 FUTURE VERTICAL LIFT TECHNOLOGY 93,601 95,359 +1,758
18 AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY 50,771 90,771 +40,000
20 C3I APPLIED CYBER 18,947 18,947 ..............
38 MANPOWER/PERSONNEL/TRAINING TECHNOLOGY 20,873 20,873 ..............
40 MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY 99,155 101,155 +2,000
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, APPLIED RESEARCH 893,990 1,202,248 +308,258

ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT
42 MEDICAL ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY 42,030 52,030 +10,000
47 MANPOWER, PERSONNEL AND TRAINING ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY 11,038 11,038 ..............
50 ARMY ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 63,338 66,338 +3,000
51 SOLDIER LETHALITY ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY 118,468 129,468 +11,000
52 GROUND ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY 12,593 152,793 +140,200
59 C3I CYBER ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT 13,769 13,769 ..............
60 HIGH PERFORMANCE COMPUTING MODERNIZATION PROGRAM 184,755 224,755 +40,000
61 NEXT GENERATION COMBAT VEHICLE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY 160,035 222,035 +62,000
62 NETWORK C3I ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY 106,899 133,899 +27,000
63 LONG RANGE PRECISION FIRES ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY 174,386 189,386 +15,000
64 FUTURE VERTICAL LIFT ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY 151,640 148,892 -2,748
65 AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY 60,613 108,613 +48,000
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 1,099,564 1,453,016 +353,452

DEMONSTRATION & VALIDATION
73 ARMY MISSILE DEFENSE SYSTEMS INTEGRATION 10,987 62,487 +51,500
74 AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE SYSTEMS ENGINEERING 15,148 70,148 +55,000
75 LANDMINE WARFARE AND BARRIER--ADV DEV 92,915 66,215 -26,700
77 TANK AND MEDIUM CALIBER AMMUNITION 82,146 77,696 -4,450
78 ARMORED SYSTEM MODERNIZATION--ADV DEV 157,656 129,756 -27,900
79 SOLDIER SUPPORT AND SURVIVABILITY 6,514 6,514 ..............
80 TACTICAL ELECTRONIC SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM--AD 34,890 27,490 -7,400
81 NIGHT VISION SYSTEMS ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT 251,011 222,791 -28,220
82 ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY TECHNOLOGY 15,132 19,561 +4,429
83 NATO RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT 5,406 5,406 ..............
84 AVIATION--ADV DEV 459,290 447,940 -11,350
85 LOGISTICS AND ENGINEER EQUIPMENT--ADV DEV 6,254 6,254 ..............
86 MEDICAL SYSTEMS--ADV DEV 31,175 36,175 +5,000
87 SOLDIER SYSTEMS--ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT 22,113 22,113 ..............
88 ROBOTICS DEVELOPMENT 115,222 68,601 -46,621
90 ELECTRONIC WARFARE TECHNOLOGY MATURATION (MIP) 18,043 27,043 +9,000
91 ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES 10,023 10,023 ..............
92 FUTURE TACTICAL UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEM [FTUAS] 40,745 17,745 -23,000
93 LOWER TIER AIR MISSILE DEFENSE [LTAMID] SENSOR 427,772 379,772 -48,000
94 TECHNOLOGY MATURATION INITIATIVES 196,676 194,676 -2,000
95 MANEUVER--SHORT RANGE AIR DEFENSE [M-SHORAD] 33,100 35,400 +2,300
97 ARMY ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPING 115,116 112,806 -2,310
99 SYNTHETIC TRAINING ENVIRONMENT REFINEMENT AND PROTOTYPING 136,761 57,121 -79,640
100 HYPERSONICS 228,000 378,610 +150,610
102 FUTURE INTERCEPTOR 8,000 4,000 -4,000
103 UNIFIED NETWORK TRANSPORT 39,600 29,700 -9,900
104 MOBILE MEDIUM RANGE MISSILE 20,000 10,000 -10,000
106 CYBERSPACE OPERATIONS FORCES AND FORCE SUPPORT 52,102 42,202 -9,900
107 ASSURED POSITIONING, NAVIGATION AND TIMING [PNT] 192,562 136,110 -56,452
108 ARMY SPACE SYSTEMS INTEGRATION 104,996 104,996 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, DEMONSTRATION & VALIDATION 2,929,355 2,809,351 -120,004

ENGINEERING & MANUFACTURING DEVELOPMENT
109 AIRCRAFT AVIONICS 29,164 8,414 -20,750
110 ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT 70,539 57,539 -13,000
113 INFANTRY SUPPORT WEAPONS 106,121 80,279 -25,842
114 MEDIUM TACTICAL VEHICLES 2,152 .............. -2,152
115 JAVELIN 17,897 14,997 -2,900
116 FAMILY OF HEAVY TACTICAL VEHICLES 16,745 13,125 -3,620
117 AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL 6,989 5,781 -1,208
118 LIGHT TACTICAL WHEELED VEHICLES 10,465 2,965 -7,500
119 ARMORED SYSTEMS MODERNIZATION [ASM]--ENG DEV 310,152 301,324 -8,828
120 NIGHT VISION SYSTEMS--SDD 181,732 156,537 -25,195
121 COMBAT FEEDING, CLOTHING, AND EQUIPMENT 2,393 2,393 ..............
122 NON-SYSTEM TRAINING DEVICES--SDD 27,412 35,412 +8,000
123 AIR DEFENSE COMMAND, CONTROL AND INTELLIGENCE--SDD 43,502 23,502 -20,000
124 CONSTRUCTIVE SIMULATION SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 11,636 11,636 ..............
125 AUTOMATIC TEST EQUIPMENT DEVELOPMENT 10,915 10,915 ..............
126 DISTRIBUTIVE INTERACTIVE SIMULATIONS [DIS]--SDD 7,801 7,801 ..............
127 BRILLIANT ANTI-ARMOR SUBMUNITION [BAT] 25,000 25,000 ..............
128 COMBINED ARMS TACTICAL TRAINER [CATT] CORE 9,241 9,241 ..............
129 BRIGADE ANALYSIS, INTEGRATION AND EVALUATION 42,634 42,634 ..............
130 WEAPONS AND MUNITIONS--SDD 181,023 163,701 -17,322
131 LOGISTICS AND ENGINEER EQUIPMENT--SDD 103,226 100,826 -2,400
132 COMMAND, CONTROL, COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS--SDD 12,595 12,595 ..............
133 MEDICAL MATERIEL/MEDICAL BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE EQUIPMENT 48,264 48,264 ..............
134 LANDMINE WARFARE/BARRIER--SDD 39,208 39,208 ..............
135 ARMY TACTICAL COMMAND & CONTROL HARDWARE & SOFTWARE 140,637 143,974 +3,337
136 RADAR DEVELOPMENT 105,243 95,720 -9,523
137 GENERAL FUND ENTERPRISE BUSINESS SYSTEM [GFEBS] 46,683 42,883 -3,800
138 FIREFINDER 17,294 17,294 ..............
139 SOLDIER SYSTEMS--WARRIOR DEM/VAL 5,803 5,803 ..............
140 SUITE OF SURVIVABILITY ENHANCEMENT SYSTEMS--EMD 98,698 85,198 -13,500
141 ARTILLERY SYSTEMS 15,832 15,832 ..............
142 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 126,537 55,689 -70,848
143 INTEGRATED PERSONNEL AND PAY SYSTEM-ARMY [IPPS-A] 142,773 92,073 -50,700
144 ARMORED MULTI-PURPOSE VEHICLE 96,730 83,830 -12,900
145 INTEGRATED GROUND SECURITY SURVEILLANCE RESPONSE 6,699 6,699 ..............
CAPABILITY [IGSSR-C]
146 JOINT TACTICAL NETWORK CENTER [JTNC] 15,882 15,882 ..............
147 JOINT TACTICAL NETWORK [JTN] 40,808 40,808 ..............
149 GROUND-BASED OPERATIONAL SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM-- 3,847 3,847 ..............
EXPENDITIONARY [GBOSS-E]
150 TACTICAL SECURITY SYSTEM [TSS] 6,928 6,928 ..............
151 COMMON INFRARED COUNTERMEASURES [CIRCM] 34,488 23,179 -11,309
152 COMBATING WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION [CWMD] 10,000 10,000 ..............
154 NUCLEAR BIOLOGICAL CHEMICAL RECONNAISSANCE VEHICLE 6,054 6,054 ..............
155 DEFENSIVE CYBER TOOL DEVELOPMENT 62,262 45,662 -16,600
156 TACTICAL NETWORK RADIO SYSTEMS (LOW-TIER) 35,654 29,254 -6,400
157 CONTRACT WRITING SYSTEM 19,682 17,082 -2,600
158 MISSILE WARNING SYSTEM MODERNIZATION [MWSM] 1,539 1,539 ..............
159 AIRCRAFT SURVIVABILITY DEVELOPMENT 64,557 55,057 -9,500
160 INDIRECT FIRE PROTECTION CAPABILITY INC 2--BLOCK 1 243,228 236,428 -6,800
161 GROUND ROBOTICS 41,308 26,104 -15,204
162 EMERGING TECHNOLOGY INITIATIVES 45,896 12,996 -32,900
163 ARMY SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION 164,883 164,883 ..............
165 JOINT AIR-TO-GROUND MISSILE [JAGM] 9,500 6,585 -2,915
166 ARMY INTEGRATED AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE [AIAMD] 208,938 223,638 +14,700
167 MANNED GROUND VEHICLE 378,400 319,864 -58,536
168 NATIONAL CAPABILITIES INTEGRATION 7,835 7,835 ..............
169 JOINT LIGHT TACTICAL VEHICLE ENG AND MANUFACTURING 2,732 7,232 +4,500
170 AVIATION GROUND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 1,664 1,664 ..............
172 TROJAN--RH12 3,936 3,936 ..............
174 ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT 19,675 15,232 -4,443
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, ENGINEERING & MANUFACTURING DEVELOPMENT 3,549,431 3,100,773 -448,658

RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT
176 THREAT SIMULATOR DEVELOPMENT 14,117 59,117 +45,000
177 TARGET SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 8,327 28,327 +20,000
178 MAJOR T&E INVESTMENT 136,565 146,565 +10,000
179 RAND ARROYO CENTER 13,113 13,113 ..............
180 ARMY KWAJALEIN ATOLL 238,691 238,691 ..............
181 CONCEPTS EXPERIMENTATION PROGRAM 42,922 36,922 -6,000
183 ARMY TEST RANGES AND FACILITIES 334,468 361,468 +27,000
184 ARMY TECHNICAL TEST INSTRUMENTATION AND TARGETS 46,974 74,774 +27,800
185 SURVIVABILITY/LETHALITY ANALYSIS 35,075 35,075 ..............
186 AIRCRAFT CERTIFICATION 3,461 3,461 ..............
187 METEOROLOGICAL SUPPORT TO RDT&E ACTIVITIES 6,233 6,233 ..............
188 MATERIEL SYSTEMS ANALYSIS 21,342 21,342 ..............
189 EXPLOITATION OF FOREIGN ITEMS 11,168 11,168 ..............
190 SUPPORT OF OPERATIONAL TESTING 52,723 52,723 ..............
191 ARMY EVALUATION CENTER 60,815 60,815 ..............
192 ARMY MODELING AND SIMULATION X-CMD COLLABORATION AND 2,527 2,527 ..............
INTEG
193 PROGRAMWIDE ACTIVITIES 58,175 58,175 ..............
194 TECHNICAL INFORMATION ACTIVITIES 25,060 25,060 ..............
195 MUNITIONS STANDARDIZATION, EFFECTIVENESS AND SAFETY 44,458 49,458 +5,000
196 ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY TECHNOLOGY MGMT SUPPORT 4,681 4,681 ..............
197 MANAGEMENT HEADQUARTERS (RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT) 53,820 53,820 ..............
198 MILITARY GROUND-BASED CREW TECHNOLOGY 4,291 2,141 -2,150
199 RONALD REAGAN BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE TEST SITE 62,069 62,069 ..............
200 COUNTERINTEL AND HUMAN INTEL MODERNIZATION 1,050 1,050 ..............
201 ASSESSMENTS AND EVALUATIONS CYBER VULNERABILITIES 4,500 4,500 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT 1,286,625 1,413,275 +126,650

OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT
204 MLRS PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 22,877 19,877 -3,000
206 ANTI-TAMPER TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT 8,491 8,491 ..............
207 WEAPONS AND MUNITIONS PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS 15,645 15,645 ..............
209 LONG RANGE PRECISION FIRES [LRPF] 164,182 164,182 ..............
211 BLACKHAWK RECAP/MODERNIZATION 13,039 13,039 ..............
212 CHINOOK HELICOPTER PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 174,371 168,171 -6,200
213 FIXED WING AIRCRAFT 4,545 .............. -4,545
214 IMPROVED TURBINE ENGINE PROGRAM 206,434 206,434 ..............
216 AVIATION ROCKET SYSTEM PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT AND 24,221 21,130 -3,091
DEVELOPMENT
217 UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEM UNIVERSAL PRODUCTS 32,016 18,132 -13,884
218 APACHE FUTURE DEVELOPMENT 5,448 5,448 ..............
219 ARMY OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 49,526 45,026 -4,500
220 FAMILY OF BIOMETRICS 1,702 1,702 ..............
221 PATRIOT PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT 96,430 63,630 -32,800
222 JOINT AUTOMATED DEEP OPERATION COORDINATION SYSTEM 47,398 47,398 ..............
223 COMBAT VEHICLE IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS 334,463 306,044 -28,419
225 155MM SELF-PROPELLED HOWITZER IMPROVEMENTS 214,246 199,274 -14,972
226 AIRCRAFT MODIFICATIONS/PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS 16,486 13,778 -2,708
227 AIRCRAFT ENGINE COMPONENT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 144 144 ..............
228 DIGITIZATION 5,270 5,270 ..............
229 MISSILE/AIR DEFENSE PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 1,287 1,287 ..............
234 ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY TECHNOLOGY--OPERATIONAL SYSTEM 732 10,000 +9,268
235 LOWER TIER AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE [AMD] SYSTEM 107,746 99,746 -8,000
236 GUIDED MULTIPLE-LAUNCH ROCKET SYSTEM [GMLRS] 138,594 127,294 -11,300
238 SECURITY AND INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES 13,845 13,845 ..............
239 INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM 29,185 25,710 -3,475
240 GLOBAL COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM 68,976 48,376 -20,600
241 WWMCCS/GLOBAL COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM 2,073 2,073 ..............
245 INTEGRATED BROADCAST SERVICE [IBS] 459 459 ..............
246 TACTICAL UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES 5,097 5,097 ..............
247 AIRBORNE RECONNAISSANCE SYSTEMS 11,177 11,177 ..............
248 DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS 38,121 28,821 -9,300
250 RQ-11 UAV 3,218 3,218 ..............
251 RQ-7 UAV 7,817 7,817 ..............
252 BIOMETRICS ENABLED INTELLIGENCE 2,000 2,000 ..............
253 END ITEM INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS ACTIVITIES 59,848 98,348 +38,500
254 SATCOM GROUND ENVIRONMENT (SPACE) 34,169 34,169 ..............
255 JOINT TACTICAL GROUND SYSTEM 10,275 7,677 -2,598
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 1,971,553 1,849,929 -121,624

9999 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 7,273 7,273 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, ARMY 12,192,771 12,412,845 +220,074
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by
the Committee:

[In thousands of dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2020 budget Committee Change from
Line Item estimate recommendation budget estimate
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 Defense Research Sciences 297,976 391,976 +94,000
Basic research program increase ............... ............... +50,000
Program increase: Advanced hemostat products ............... ............... +15,000
Program increase: Multi-fuel ignition, chemistry ............... ............... +9,000
and control strategies for unmanned aircraft
systems hybrid propulsion
Program increase: Transmission electron ............... ............... +20,000
microscope
4 University and Industry Research Centers 86,164 114,164 +28,000
Program increase: Army artificial intelligence ............... ............... +6,000
innovation institute
Program increase: Materials in extreme dynamic ............... ............... +5,000
environments
Program increase: Catalyst ............... ............... +10,000
Program increase: Autonomous vehicles mobility ............... ............... +5,000
Program increase: University assisted ............... ............... +2,000
hypervelocity testing
10 Lethality Technology 26,961 61,961 +35,000
Program increase: Multimission medium range ............... ............... +20,000
railgun weapon system
Program increase: Mobile environment contaminant ............... ............... +5,000
sensors
Program increase: Hybrid additive manufacturing ............... ............... +10,000
12 Soldier Lethality Technology 115,274 137,774 +22,500
Program increase: Active and passive camouflage, ............... ............... +3,000
concealment and deception
Program increase: Human systems integration ............... ............... +10,000
Program increase: Expeditionary mobile base camp ............... ............... +5,000
technology
Program increase: Harnessing emerging research ............... ............... +4,500
opportunities to empower soldiers
13 Ground Technology 35,199 137,699 +102,500
Program increase: Materials manufacturing ............... ............... +10,000
processes
Program increase: Highly durable advanced ............... ............... +8,000
polymers for lightweight armor
Program increase: Cellulose nanocomposites ............... ............... +10,000
research
Program increase: Countermine program ............... ............... +5,000
Program increase: Materials research ............... ............... +17,500
Program increase: Additive manufacturing and ............... ............... +15,000
materials processing
Program increase: Cold weather military research ............... ............... +3,000
Program increase: Environmentally friendly ............... ............... +5,000
coatings technology
Program increase: Sensing technologies for rapid ............... ............... +4,000
hazard detection
Program increase: Cold spray technologies ............... ............... +15,000
Program increase: Center for research in extreme ............... ............... +10,000
batteries
14 Next Generation Combat Vehicle Technology 219,047 245,047 +26,000
Program increase: Structural thermoplastics ............... ............... +6,000
Program increase: Advanced materials development ............... ............... +10,000
for survivability
Program increase: Autonomous vehicle mobility ............... ............... +10,000
15 Network C3I Technology 114,516 140,016 +25,500
Program increase: Radioisotope power systems ............... ............... +5,000
Program increase: Anti-tamper technology ............... ............... +15,000
development
Program increase: Next generation synthetic ............... ............... +5,500
aperture radar
16 Long Range Precision Fires Technology 74,327 127,327 +53,000
Program increase ............... ............... +20,000
Program increase: Composite tube and propulsion ............... ............... +20,000
prototyping
Program increase: Novel printed armament ............... ............... +13,000
components
17 Future Vertical Lift Technology 93,601 95,359 +1,758
Restoring acquisition accountability: AI5 Next ............... ............... -9,242
gen tactical UAS demo canceled
Program increase: Rotary wing adaptive flight ............... ............... +6,000
control technology
Program increase: Technology transfer and ............... ............... +5,000
innovation
18 Air and Missile Defense Technology 50,771 90,771 +40,000
Program increase: COE in high-energy laser and ............... ............... +5,000
optical technology
Program increase: Cybersecurity and supply chain ............... ............... +15,000
risk management
Program increase: High-energy laser hardware in ............... ............... +20,000
the loop lab
40 Medical Technology 99,155 101,155 +2,000
Program increase: Safety and performance of ............... ............... +2,000
female warfighters in extreme heat
42 Medical Advanced Technology 42,030 52,030 +10,000
Program increase: Peer-reviewed military burn ............... ............... +10,000
research
50 Army Advanced Technology Development 63,338 66,338 +3,000
Program increase: Sensor and wireless ............... ............... +3,000
communications denial capabilities
51 Soldier Lethality Advanced Technology 118,468 129,468 +11,000
Program increase: Rapid safe advanced materials ............... ............... +6,000
Program increase: Multi-spectral sensor ............... ............... +5,000
mitigation
52 Ground Advanced Technology 12,593 152,793 +140,200
Program increase: Lead-acid battery life ............... ............... +10,000
extension
Program increase: Anticipating threats to natural ............... ............... +6,000
systems
Program increase: Robotic construction equipment ............... ............... +9,700
Program increase: Terrain conditions forecasting ............... ............... +6,000
Program increase: Environmental sensors for ............... ............... +3,000
explosives
Program increase: Robotic 4-D printing of ............... ............... +2,000
geopolymer-based composites
Program increase: Waste to energy disposal ............... ............... +3,000
Program increase: Advanced polymer development ............... ............... +4,500
for force protection
Program increase: Micrometeorological-soil ............... ............... +2,000
synthetic test environment
Program increase: Partnership and technology ............... ............... +5,000
transfer
Program increase: Sensor systems for underground ............... ............... +5,000
detection
Program increase: UAS mounted hostile threat ............... ............... +5,000
detection
Program increase: Electrical system safety and ............... ............... +2,000
reliability
Program increase: Infrastructure sustainment ............... ............... +2,000
Program increase: Army visual and tactical arctic ............... ............... +2,000
reconnaissance
Program increase: Heavy load simulator ............... ............... +6,000
Program increase: Measurement and control of ............... ............... +4,000
frozen surface properties
Program increase: Air-drop extended range ............... ............... +15,000
munitions
Program increase: Resilient energy systems ............... ............... +2,500
Program increase: Urban subterranean mapping ............... ............... +3,000
technology
Program increase: Operations in permafrost ............... ............... +4,000
environment
Program increase: Power generation technologies ............... ............... +5,000
in cold regions
Program increase: Sensing and prediction of ............... ............... +5,000
arctic maritime coastal ice conditions
Program increase: Thermosyphons ............... ............... +2,000
Program increase. Materials and manufacturing ............... ............... +3,500
technology for cold environments
Program increase: Energy technology research in ............... ............... +4,000
cold and arctic regions
Program increase: Research facility modernization ............... ............... +4,000
Program increase: Lightweight airfield matting ............... ............... +10,000
Program increase: Coastal ice sensing ............... ............... +5,000
60 High Performance Computing Modernization Program 184,755 224,755 +40,000
Program increase ............... ............... +40,000
61 Next Generation Combat Vehicle Advanced Technology 160,035 222,035 +62,000
Program increase: Advanced high strength and ............... ............... +3,000
lightweight steels
Program increase: Combat vehicle weight reduction ............... ............... +20,000
initiative
Program increase: Virtual and physical ............... ............... +10,000
prototyping
Program increase: HMMWV augmented reality system ............... ............... +5,000
Program increase: Health usage monitoring system ............... ............... +3,000
for HMMWV
Program increase: HMMWV autonomy ............... ............... +5,000
Program increase: HMMWV torque monitoring ............... ............... +2,000
Program increase: HMMWV automotive enhancements ............... ............... +10,000
Program increase: Additive manufacturing ............... ............... +4,000
62 Network C3I Advanced Technology 106,899 133,899 +27,000
Program increase: Sensor advanced technology ............... ............... +10,000
Program increase: Assured position, navigation, ............... ............... +9,000
and timing
Program increase: Payload and ground segment ............... ............... +8,000
research and development for small satellite
science and security applications
63 Long Range Precision Fires Advanced Technology 174,386 189,386 +15,000
Program increase: Missile rapid demonstration ............... ............... +15,000
capability
64 Future Vertical Lift Advanced Technology 151,640 148,892 -2,748
Restoring acquisition accountability: AI6 Next ............... ............... -21,748
gen tactical UAS demo canceled
Program increase: UAV fuel systems enhancements ............... ............... +2,000
Program increase: Surface tolerant advanced ............... ............... +5,000
adhesives
Program increase: Ferrium steels for improved ............... ............... +4,000
drive systems
Program increase: Stretch broken composite ............... ............... +8,000
material forms
65 Air and Missile Defense Advanced Technology 60,613 108,613 +48,000
Program increase: Advanced explosion resistant ............... ............... +5,000
window systems
Program increase: Silicon carbide power ............... ............... +8,000
electronics packaging
Program increase: Enterprise science and ............... ............... +10,000
technology demonstration prototyping
Program increase: High-energy laser development ............... ............... +25,000
for all-terrain vehicles
73 Army Missile Defense Systems Integration 10,987 62,487 +51,500
Program increase: Conventional mission ............... ............... +8,000
capabilities
Program increase: Hypersonic advanced technology ............... ............... +15,000
testbed
Program increase: Integrated environmental ............... ............... +16,000
control and power
Program increase: Pragmatic artificial ............... ............... +12,500
intelligence and new technology laboratory
74 Air and Missile Defense Systems Engineering 15,148 70,148 +55,000
Program increase: Accelerating cyber and supply ............... ............... +15,000
chain resiliency
Program increase: Artificial intelligence and ............... ............... +20,000
machine learning
Program increase: Joint interoperability of ............... ............... +20,000
integrated air and missile defense center
75 Landmine Warfare and Barrier--Adv Dev 92,915 66,215 -26,700
Restoring acquisition accountability: EK7 Area ............... ............... -26,700
denial capability development contract delay
77 Tank and Medium Caliber Ammunition 82,146 77,696 -4,450
Restoring acquisition accountability: FG1 C-DAEM ............... ............... -4,450
concurrency
78 Armored System Modernization--Adv Dev 157,656 129,756 -27,900
Improving funds management: Prior year carryover ............... ............... -25,900
Restoring acquisition accountability: Powertrain ............... ............... -2,000
maturation efforts duplication
80 Tactical Electronic Surveillance System--Adv Dev 34,890 27,490 -7,400
Restoring acquisition accountability: Advanced ............... ............... -7,400
miniaturized data acquisition system contract
delay
81 Night Vision Systems Advanced Development 251,011 222,791 -28,220
Restoring acquisition accountability: BQ5 ............... ............... -5,220
Capability set 3 unit cost growth
Improving funds management: BQ5 Funding carryover ............... ............... -21,500
Improving funds management: VT7 soldier maneuver ............... ............... -1,500
sensors prior year carryover
82 Environmental Quality Technology--Dem/Val 15,132 19,561 +4,429
Improving funds management: Prior year carryover ............... ............... -3,571
Program increase: Biopolymers for military ............... ............... +3,000
infrastructure
Program increase: Protective coatings ............... ............... +5,000
84 Aviation--Adv Dev 459,290 447,940 -11,350
Restoring acquisition accountability: FARA excess ............... ............... -71,250
growth
Improving funds management: FARA excess funding ............... ............... -20,700
for unawarded sixth vendor
Program increase: Future long-range assault ............... ............... +75,600
aircraft
Program increase: University partnerships ............... ............... +5,000
86 Medical Systems--Adv Dev 31,175 36,175 +5,000
Program increase: Transport telemedicine ............... ............... +5,000
technology
88 Robotics Development 115,222 68,601 -46,621
Restoring acquisition accountability: RCV phase 2 ............... ............... -15,780
excess growth
Restoring acquisition accountability: RCV phase 2 ............... ............... -3,726
test funding ahead of need
Restoring acquisition accountability: RCV phase 3 ............... ............... -27,115
funding ahead of need
90 Electronic Warfare Technology Maturation [MIP] 18,043 27,043 +9,000
Program increase: Counter drone RF-signal based ............... ............... +9,000
targeting
92 Future Tactical Unmanned Aircraft System [FTUAS] 40,745 17,745 -23,000
Restoring acquisition accountability: Air ............... ............... -15,000
Launched Effects funding early to need
Restoring acquisition accountability: Multi ............... ............... -8,000
Domain Task Force UAS demo delay
93 Lower Tier Air Missile Defense [LTAMD] Sensor 427,772 379,772 -48,000
Restoring acquisition accountability: Funds ............... ............... -48,000
excess to requirement
94 Technology Maturation Initiatives 196,676 194,676 -2,000
Restoring acquisition accountability: AX6 ............... ............... -2,000
Validation of APS layered protection funding
ahead of need
95 Maneuver--Short Range Air Defense (M-SHORAD) 33,100 35,400 +2,300
Transfer from title IX ............... ............... +6,000
Improving funds management: Prior year carryover ............... ............... -3,700
due to test delay
97 Army Advanced Component Development & Prototyping 115,116 112,806 -2,310
Classified adjustment ............... ............... -2,310
99 Synthetic Training Environment Refinement & 136,761 57,121 -79,640
Prototyping
Improving funds management: SD6 Synthetic ............... ............... -20,000
training environment prior year carryover
Restoring acquisition accountability: SV1 Soldier/ ............... ............... -59,640
squad virtual trainer funds excess to life cycle
cost estimate
100 Hypersonics 228,000 378,610 +150,610
Program increase ............... ............... +130,610
Program increase: Hypersonic and strategic ............... ............... +20,000
materials and structures center of excellence
102 Future Interceptor 8,000 4,000 -4,000
Restoring acquisition accountability: Funds ............... ............... -4,000
excess to requirement
103 Unified Network Transport 39,600 29,700 -9,900
Improving funds management: Funds excess to ............... ............... -9,900
requirement
104 Mobile Medium Range Missile 20,000 10,000 -10,000
Restoring acquisition accountability: Funds ............... ............... -10,000
excess to requirement
106 Cyberspace Operations Forces and Force Support 52,102 42,202 -9,900
Improving funds management: Prior year carryover ............... ............... -9,900
107 Assured Positioning, Navigation and Timing [PNT] 192,562 136,110 -56,452
Restoring acquisition accountability: Pseudolites ............... ............... -42,452
project terminated
Improving funds management: Excess growth ............... ............... -14,000
109 Aircraft Avionics 29,164 8,414 -20,750
Restoring acquisition accountability: Degraded ............... ............... -14,500
visual environment lack of strategy
Improving funds management: Prior year carryover ............... ............... -6,250
110 Electronic Warfare Development 70,539 57,539 -13,000
mproving funds management: MFEW Phase II excess ............... ............... -13,000
funding
113 Infantry Support Weapons 106,121 80,279 -25,842
Restoring acquisition accountability: FF2 Small ............... ............... -12,163
Arms Fire Control legacy weapons excess funding
Restoring acquisition accountability: S63 excess ............... ............... -4,379
new weapons systems development funding
Restoring acquisition accountability: S64 CROWS ............... ............... -9,300
funding excess
114 Medium Tactical Vehicles 2,152 ............... -2,152
Improving funds management: Prior year carryover ............... ............... -2,152
115 JAVELIN 17,897 14,997 -2,900
Restoring acquisition accountability: Lightweight ............... ............... -2,900
CLU delays
116 Family of Heavy Tactical Vehicles 16,745 13,125 -3,620
Improving funds management: Prior year carryover ............... ............... -3,620
117 Air Traffic Control 6,989 5,781 -1,208
Improving funds management: Prior year carryover ............... ............... -1,208
118 Light Tactical Wheeled Vehicles 10,465 2,965 -7,500
Restoring acquisition accountability: HMMWV UAH ............... ............... -7,500
recapitalization unjustified
119 Armored Systems Modernization (ASM)--Eng Dev 310,152 301,324 -8,828
Restoring acquisition accountability: Training ............... ............... -6,468
aids and devices development ahead of need
Improving funds management: Program management ............... ............... -2,360
carryover
120 Night Vision Systems--Eng Dev 181,732 156,537 -25,195
Restoring acquisition accountability: BQ6 Excess ............... ............... -4,500
test funding
Improving funds management: BQ6 Funding carryover ............... ............... -11,300
Restoring acquisition accountability: L67 ............... ............... -5,000
Enhanced Night Vision Goggle contract delay
Restoring acquisition accountability: L76 ............... ............... -2,995
Lightweight Laser Designator Range Finder
development funding excess to need
Improving funds management: L79 Joint Effects ............... ............... -1,400
Targeting Systems prior year carryover
122 Non-System Training Devices--Eng Dev 27,412 35,412 +8,000
Program increase: RF threat emitters for Army ............... ............... +8,000
combat training centers
123 Air Defense Command, Control and Intelligence--Eng 43,502 23,502 -20,000
Dev
Restoring acquisition accountability: ALPS lack ............... ............... -20,000
of strategy
130 Weapons and Munitions--Eng Dev 181,023 163,701 -17,322
Restoring acquisition accountability: S36 ............... ............... -12,850
Precision guidance kit EMD delay
Restoring acquisition accountability: EU6 XM1113 ............... ............... -4,472
EMD delay
131 Logistics and Engineer Equipment--Eng Dev 103,226 100,826 -2,400
Restoring acquisition accountability: EJ9 ............... ............... -7,400
Maneuver support vessel light EMD delay
Restoring acquisition accountability: HO2 ............... ............... -5,000
Tactical bridging delays
Program increase: Mobile camouflage net systems ............... ............... +10,000
135 Army Tactical Command & Control Hardware & Software 140,637 143,974 +3,337
Improving funds management: EJ5 Mounted computing ............... ............... -2,200
environment prior year carryover
Improving funds management: EJ6 Tactical ............... ............... -1,853
enhancement prior year carryover
Restoring acquisition accountability: ER9 Command ............... ............... -6,610
post integrated infrastructure contract delay
Program increase: Ultra-mobile remote ground ............... ............... +14,000
terminal
136 Radar Development 105,243 95,720 -9,523
Improving funds management: Excess A4 growth and ............... ............... -9,523
prior year carryover
137 General Fund Enterprise Business System [GFEBS] 46,683 42,883 -3,800
Improving funds management: GFEBS prior year ............... ............... -3,800
carryover
140 Suite of Survivability Enhancement Systems--EMD 98,698 85,198 -13,500
Restoring acquisition accountability: FE8 Laser ............... ............... -5,000
warning receiver efforts delayed
Restoring acquisition accountability: Abrams V3 ............... ............... -5,000
test funding excess
Restoring acquisition accountability: Bradley ............... ............... -8,500
delays
Program increase: Radar sensor technology ............... ............... +5,000
142 Information Technology Development 126,537 55,689 -70,848
Restoring acquisition accountability: Accessions ............... ............... -15,000
information environment contract delay
Restoring acquisition accountability: HRC ............... ............... -3,848
Accessioning IT unjustified request
Restoring acquisition accountability: Army ............... ............... -30,000
training information system unjustified growth
Improving funds management: Prior year carryover ............... ............... -22,000
143 Integrated Personnel and Pay System-Army (IPPS-A) 142,773 92,073 -50,700
Improving funds management: Prior year carryover ............... ............... -24,000
Restoring acquisition accountability: Program ............... ............... -26,700
delay due to change in strategy
144 Armored Multi-Purpose Vehicle [AMPV] 96,730 83,830 -12,900
Improving funds management: EMD carryover ............... ............... -8,300
Improving funds management: Program management ............... ............... -4,600
excess
151 Common Infrared Countermeasures [CIRCM] 34,488 23,179 -11,309
Restoring acquisition accountability: Prototype ............... ............... -9,010
manufacturing and S&T funding excess
Improving funds management: Test funding ............... ............... -2,299
carryover
155 Defensive CYBER Tool Development 62,262 45,662 -16,600
Restoring acquisition accountability: Contract ............... ............... -10,000
delays
Improving funds management: Excess growth ............... ............... -6,600
156 Tactical Network Radio Systems (Low-Tier) 35,654 29,254 -6,400
Improving funds management: Excess growth ............... ............... -6,400
157 Contract Writing System 19,682 17,082 -2,600
Improving funds management: Prior year carryover ............... ............... -2,600
159 Aircraft Survivability Development 64,557 55,057 -9,500
Restoring acquisition accountability: ER7 program ............... ............... -9,500
delay
160 Indirect Fire Protection Capability Inc 2--Block 1 243,228 236,428 -6,800
Restoring acquisition accountability: Funds ............... ............... -6,800
excess to requirement
161 Ground Robotics 41,308 26,104 -15,204
Restoring acquisition accountability: FB4 Common ............... ............... -2,400
robotic system testing previously funded
Improving funds management: FB6 SMET excess to ............... ............... -12,804
requirement
162 Emerging Technology Initiatives 45,896 12,996 -32,900
Restoring acquisition accountability: Optical ............... ............... -2,100
augmentation program canceled
Insufficient budget justification: Unjustified ............... ............... -20,800
request
Restoring acquisition accountability: Program ............... ............... -10,000
management excess
165 Joint Air-to-Ground Missile [JAGM] 9,500 6,585 -2,915
Improving funds management: Funds excess to ............... ............... -2,915
requirement
166 Army Integrated Air and Missile Defense [AIAMD] 208,938 223,638 +14,700
Improving funds management: Prior year carryover ............... ............... -15,300
due to test delays
Program increase: Accelerated integration to ............... ............... +30,000
counter emerging threats
167 Manned Ground Vehicle 378,400 319,864 -58,536
Restoring acquisition accountability: Excess ............... ............... -82,250
funding ahead of finalized acquisition strategy
Restoring acquisition accountability: Program ............... ............... -15,964
management excess
Restoring acquisition accountability: Test ............... ............... -7,822
funding ahead of need
Program increase: XM-913 systems ............... ............... +40,000
Program increase: Tactical communications ............... ............... +7,500
169 Joint Light Tactical Vehicle (JLTV) Engineering and 2,732 7,232 +4,500
Manufacturing Development Ph
Transfer: Army-requested transfer from OPA line 6 ............... ............... +4,500
174 Electronic Warfare Development 19,675 15,232 -4,443
Improving funds management: Excess growth ............... ............... -4,443
176 Threat Simulator Development 14,117 59,117 +45,000
Program increase: Cyber threat and vulnerability ............... ............... +20,000
assessments
Program increase: Cyber threat simulation ............... ............... +3,000
enhancement initiative
Program increase: Cybersecurity operations center ............... ............... +22,000
177 Target Systems Development 8,327 28,327 +20,000
Program increase: UAS swarm threat and mitigation ............... ............... +20,000
178 Major T&E Investment 136,565 146,565 +10,000
Program increase: High-powered microwave test and ............... ............... +10,000
evaluation assets
181 Concepts Experimentation Program 42,922 36,922 -6,000
Improving funds management: Excess growth ............... ............... -6,000
183 Army Test Ranges and Facilities 334,468 361,468 +27,000
Program increase: Distributed environment for ............... ............... +25,000
system-of-system cybersecurity testing
Program increase: Soil research for Army training ............... ............... +2,000
ranges
184 Army Technical Test Instrumentation and Targets 46,974 74,774 +27,800
Program increase: Cybersecurity of space and ............... ............... +24,500
missile defense assets
Program increase: Expandable rotorcraft ............... ............... +3,300
diagnostics
195 Munitions Standardization, Effectiveness and Safety 44,458 49,458 +5,000
Program increase: X-ray technologies ............... ............... +5,000
198 Military Ground-Based CREW Technology 4,291 2,141 -2,150
Improving funds management: Prior year carryover ............... ............... -2,150
204 MLRS Product Improvement Program 22,877 19,877 -3,000
Improving funds management: Prior year carryover ............... ............... -3,000
212 Chinook Product Improvement Program 174,371 168,171 -6,200
Restoring acquisition accountability: EMD ............... ............... -10,000
unjustified growth
Restoring acquisition accountability: Program ............... ............... -2,700
excess
Program increase: Block II lightweight ............... ............... +6,500
improvements
213 Fixed Wing Product Improvement Program 4,545 ............... -4,545
Improving funds management: Prior year carryover ............... ............... -4,545
216 Aviation Rocket System Product Improvement and 24,221 21,130 -3,091
Development
Improving funds management: Prior year carryover ............... ............... -3,091
217 Unmanned Aircraft System Universal Products 32,016 18,132 -13,884
Improving funds management: Prior year carryover ............... ............... -13,884
219 Army Operational Systems Development 49,526 45,026 -4,500
Classified adjustment ............... ............... -4,500
221 Patriot Product Improvement 96,430 63,630 -32,800
Restoring acquisition accountability: Excess ............... ............... -32,800
growth
223 Combat Vehicle Improvement Programs 334,463 306,044 -28,419
Restoring acquisition accountability: Bradley ............... ............... -12,292
improvements excess funding
Improving funds management: Bradley test funding ............... ............... -3,215
carryover
Restoring acquisition accountability: Stryker ............... ............... -10,200
ECP2 carryover
Improving funds management: Stryker program ............... ............... -2,712
management carryover
225 155mm Self-Propelled Howitzer Improvements 214,246 199,274 -14,972
Restoring acquisition accountability: Funding ............... ............... -4,972
excess to requirement
Improving funds management: Prior year carryover ............... ............... -10,000
226 Aircraft Modifications/Product Improvement Programs 16,486 13,778 -2,708
Improving funds management: Prior year carryover ............... ............... -2,708
234 Environmental Quality Technology--Operational System 732 10,000 +9,268
Dev
Improving funds management: Prior year carryover ............... ............... -732
Program increase: Securing the availability of ............... ............... +10,000
green, enhanced coatings
235 Lower Tier Air and Missile Defense [AMD] System 107,746 99,746 -8,000
Improving funds management: Prior year carryover ............... ............... -8,000
236 Guided Multiple-Launch Rocket System [GMLRS] 138,594 127,294 -11,300
Restoring acquisition accountability: Extended ............... ............... -11,300
range development contract delay
239 Information Systems Security Program 29,185 25,710 -3,475
Restoring acquisition accountability: DV4 Next ............... ............... -1,500
generation load device funding ahead of need
Improving funds management: DV5 Crypto ............... ............... -1,975
modernization prior year carryover
240 Global Combat Support System 68,976 48,376 -20,600
Restoring acquisition accountability: Inc 2 ............... ............... -14,100
contract delays
Restoring acquisition accountability: Inc 2 test ............... ............... -6,500
funding ahead of need
248 Distributed Common Ground/Surface Systems 38,121 28,821 -9,300
Restoring acquisition accountability: CD2 ............... ............... -6,300
contract delay
Improving funds management: Test funding excess ............... ............... -3,000
growth
253 End Item Industrial Preparedness Activities 59,848 98,348 +38,500
Program increase: Power take-off hybridization ............... ............... +7,000
Program increase: Tungsten manufacturing ............... ............... +10,000
affordability initiative for armaments
Program increase: Manufacturing technology ............... ............... +5,000
program
Program increase: Transparent armor ............... ............... +4,000
Program increase: Nanoscale materials ............... ............... +12,500
manufacturing
255 Joint Tactical Ground System 10,275 7,677 -2,598
Improving funds management: Prior year carryover ............... ............... -2,598
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Improved Turbine Engine Program.--The Committee understands
that the Army is pursuing an Improved Turbine Engine Program
[ITEP] that will deliver a next generation turbo-shaft engine
for Future Attack Reconnaissance Aircraft [FARA] as well as
current Black Hawk (H-60) and Apache (AH-64E) helicopter
fleets. From its inception in fiscal year 2016, the ITEP
program has experienced multiple delays, most recently a 1
month delay on the Engineering, Manufacturing, and Development
contract followed by a 3 month delay due to a contract protest.
The Committee understands that these delays have slowed the
execution of funds and made a portion of the fiscal year 2020
President's budget request excess to need. However, the
Committee also understands the importance of timing in ITEP
development to ensure engines are available in fiscal year 2022
to meet the FARA flight test schedule. Therefore, the Committee
recommends fully funding the fiscal year 2020 budget request
and encourages the Army to maintain its current program
schedule despite previous delays.
Medical Simulation Training.--The Committee supports
development and expanded use of next generation, simulation-
based medical training, which can improve readiness while
reducing cost and increasing flexibility of where and when
training is delivered. The Committee encourages the Army to
make continued investments in the development and efficacy
analysis of medical simulation training, tools, technologies,
and techniques.
Carbon Fiber and Graphite Foam Technology.--The Committee
understands that low-cost mesophase pitch carbon fiber and
graphitic carbon foam components may reduce vehicle weight and
fuel consumption, increase payload capacity, extend service
life, reduce vehicle signatures, improve survivability, and
utilize additive manufacturing technology to reduce cost in the
Next Generation Combat Vehicle program and encourages the Army
to continue efforts in this area.
Hostile Environment Outerwear.--As the Department continues
operations in hostile environments, the Committee believes that
improving the clothing of soldiers is a necessity. The
Committee encourages the Army to rapidly develop superior cold
weather and Arctic clothing for soldiers, expedite the
evaluation and integration of technologies and prototype
systems from the laboratory to operational use, and integrate
fabrics that reduce weight and increase mobility and comfort in
combat. This should include hand wear, footwear, and cold/wet
protective clothing systems.

Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy

Appropriations, 2019.................................... $18,510,564,000
Budget estimate, 2020................................... 20,270,499,000
Committee recommendation................................ 19,818,218,000

The Committee recommends an appropriation of
$19,818,218,000. This is $452,281,000 below the budget
estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this
appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

BASIC RESEARCH
1 UNIVERSITY RESEARCH INITIATIVES 116,850 137,850 +21,000
2 IN-HOUSE LABORATORY INDEPENDENT RESEARCH 19,121 19,121 ..............
3 DEFENSE RESEARCH SCIENCES 470,007 525,507 +55,500
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BASIC RESEARCH 605,978 682,478 +76,500

APPLIED RESEARCH
4 POWER PROJECTION APPLIED RESEARCH 18,546 52,546 +34,000
5 FORCE PROTECTION APPLIED RESEARCH 119,517 202,517 +83,000
6 MARINE CORPS LANDING FORCE TECHNOLOGY 56,604 64,104 +7,500
7 COMMON PICTURE APPLIED RESEARCH 49,297 49,297 ..............
8 WARFIGHTER SUSTAINMENT APPLIED RESEARCH 63,825 86,825 +23,000
9 ELECTROMAGNETIC SYSTEMS APPLIED RESEARCH 83,497 88,497 +5,000
10 OCEAN WARFIGHTING ENVIRONMENT APPLIED RESEARCH 63,894 82,082 +18,188
11 JOINT NON-LETHAL WEAPONS APPLIED RESEARCH 6,346 6,346 ..............
12 UNDERSEA WARFARE APPLIED RESEARCH 57,075 93,075 +36,000
13 FUTURE NAVAL CAPABILITIES APPLIED RESEARCH 154,755 156,195 +1,440
14 MINE AND EXPEDITIONARY WARFARE APPLIED RESEARCH 36,074 48,074 +12,000
15 INNOVATIVE NAVAL PROTOTYPES [INP] APPLIED RESEARCH 153,062 165,385 +12,323
16 SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT--ONR HEADQUARTERS 73,961 73,961 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, APPLIED RESEARCH 936,453 1,168,904 +232,451

ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT
17 FORCE PROTECTION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY 35,286 35,286 ..............
18 ELECTROMAGNETIC SYSTEMS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY 9,499 9,499 ..............
19 MARINE CORPS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION [ATD] 172,847 197,347 +24,500
20 JOINT NON-LETHAL WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 13,307 13,307 ..............
21 FUTURE NAVAL CAPABILITIES ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEV 231,907 233,107 +1,200
22 MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM 60,138 65,138 +5,000
23 WARFIGHTER PROTECTION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY 4,849 9,849 +5,000
25 NAVY WARFIGHTING EXPERIMENTS AND DEMONSTRATIONS 67,739 67,739 ..............
26 MINE AND EXPEDITIONARY WARFARE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY 13,335 13,335 ..............
27 INNOVATIVE NAVAL PROTOTYPES [INP] ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY 133,303 136,003 +2,700
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 742,210 780,610 +38,400

DEMONSTRATION & VALIDATION
28 AIR/OCEAN TACTICAL APPLICATIONS 32,643 42,643 +10,000
29 AVIATION SURVIVABILITY 11,919 11,919 ..............
30 AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS 1,473 1,473 ..............
31 ASW SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 7,172 7,172 ..............
32 TACTICAL AIRBORNE RECONNAISSANCE 3,419 3,419 ..............
33 ADVANCED COMBAT SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY 64,694 61,144 -3,550
34 SURFACE AND SHALLOW WATER MINE COUNTERMEASURES 507,000 148,600 -358,400
35 SURFACE SHIP TORPEDO DEFENSE 15,800 7,242 -8,558
36 CARRIER SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 4,997 4,997 ..............
37 PILOT FISH 291,148 186,328 -104,820
38 RETRACT LARCH 11,980 11,980 ..............
39 RETRACT JUNIPER 129,163 129,163 ..............
40 RADIOLOGICAL CONTROL 689 689 ..............
41 SURFACE ASW 1,137 1,137 ..............
42 ADVANCED SUBMARINE SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT 148,756 116,604 -32,152
43 SUBMARINE TACTICAL WARFARE SYSTEMS 11,192 11,192 ..............
44 SHIP CONCEPT ADVANCED DESIGN 81,846 81,846 ..............
45 SHIP PRELIMINARY DESIGN & FEASIBILITY STUDIES 69,084 22,534 -46,550
46 ADVANCED NUCLEAR POWER SYSTEMS 181,652 181,652 ..............
47 ADVANCED SURFACE MACHINERY SYSTEMS 25,408 157,408 +132,000
48 CHALK EAGLE 64,877 64,877 ..............
49 LITTORAL COMBAT SHIP [LCS] 9,934 16,934 +7,000
50 COMBAT SYSTEM INTEGRATION 17,251 17,251 ..............
51 OHIO REPLACEMENT PROGRAM 419,051 434,051 +15,000
52 LITTORAL COMBAT SHIP [LCS] MISSION MODULES 108,505 108,505 ..............
53 AUTOMATED TEST AND RE-TEST 7,653 7,653 ..............
54 FRIGATE DEVELOPMENT 59,007 59,007 ..............
55 CONVENTIONAL MUNITIONS 9,988 9,988 ..............
56 MARINE CORPS GROUND COMBAT/SUPPORT SYSTEM 86,464 70,264 -16,200
57 JOINT SERVICE EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DEVELOPMENT 33,478 33,478 ..............
58 OCEAN ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 5,619 5,619 ..............
59 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 20,564 20,564 ..............
60 NAVY ENERGY PROGRAM 26,514 43,014 +16,500
61 FACILITIES IMPROVEMENT 3,440 3,440 ..............
62 CHALK CORAL 346,800 310,400 -36,400
63 NAVY LOGISTIC PRODUCTIVITY 3,857 3,857 ..............
64 RETRACT MAPLE 258,519 192,019 -66,500
65 LINK PLUMERIA 403,909 396,509 -7,400
66 RETRACT ELM 63,434 63,434 ..............
67 LINK EVERGREEN 184,110 184,110 ..............
68 NATO RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT 7,697 7,697 ..............
69 LAND ATTACK TECHNOLOGY 9,086 5,900 -3,186
70 JOINT NONLETHAL WEAPONS TESTING 28,466 28,466 ..............
71 JOINT PRECISION APPROACH AND LANDING SYSTEMS 51,341 51,341 ..............
72 DIRECTED ENERGY AND ELECTRIC WEAPON SYSTEMS 118,169 118,169 ..............
73 F/A-18 INFRARED SEARCH AND TRACK [IRST] 113,456 113,456 ..............
74 DIGITAL WARFARE OFFICE 50,120 40,120 -10,000
75 SMALL AND MEDIUM UNMANNED UNDERSEA VEHICLES 32,527 29,077 -3,450
76 UNMANNED UNDERSEA VEHICLE CORE TECHNOLOGIES 54,376 54,376 ..............
77 RAPID PROTOTYPING, EXPERIMENTATION AND DEMONSTRATION 36,197 36,197 ..............
78 LARGE UNMANNED UNDERSEA VEHICLES 68,310 68,310 ..............
79 GERALD R. FORD CLASS NUCLEAR AIRCRAFT CARRIER 121,310 114,756 -6,554
80 LITTORAL AIRBORNE MCM 17,248 17,248 ..............
81 SURFACE MINE COUNTERMEASURES 18,735 18,735 ..............
82 TACTICAL AIR DIRECTIONAL INFRARED COUNTERMEASURES 68,346 68,346 ..............
84 NEXT GENERATION LOGISTICS 4,420 14,420 +10,000
85 RAPID TECHNOLOGY CAPABILITY PROTOTYPE 4,558 4,558 ..............
86 LX (R) 12,500 12,500 ..............
87 ADVANCED UNDERSEA PROTOTYPING 181,967 201,967 +20,000
88 COUNTER UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS [C-UAS] 5,500 3,100 -2,400
89 PRECISION STRIKE WEAPONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM 718,148 688,148 -30,000
90 SPACE & ELECTRONIC WARFARE [SEW] ARCHITECTURE/ENGINE 5,263 5,263 ..............
91 OFFENSIVE ANTI-SURFACE WARFARE WEAPON DEVELOPMENT 65,419 115,419 +50,000
92 ASW SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT--MIP 9,991 9,991 ..............
93 ADVANCED TACTICAL UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEM 21,157 45,407 +24,250
95 ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT--MIP 609 609 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, DEMONSTRATION & VALIDATION 5,559,062 5,107,692 -451,370

ENGINEERING & MANUFACTURING DEVELOPMENT
96 TRAINING SYSTEM AIRCRAFT 15,514 15,514 ..............
97 OTHER HELO DEVELOPMENT 28,835 38,835 +10,000
98 AV-8B AIRCRAFT--ENG DEV 27,441 27,441 ..............
100 STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT 3,642 3,642 ..............
101 MULTI-MISSION HELICOPTER UPGRADE DEVELOPMENT 19,196 19,196 ..............
104 WARFARE SUPPORT SYSTEM 8,601 8,601 ..............
105 TACTICAL COMMAND SYSTEM 77,232 77,232 ..............
106 ADVANCED HAWKEYE 232,752 235,252 +2,500
108 H-1 UPGRADES 65,359 65,359 ..............
109 ACOUSTIC SEARCH SENSORS 47,013 47,013 ..............
110 V-22A 185,105 198,455 +13,350
111 AIR CREW SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 21,172 21,172 ..............
112 EA-18 143,585 143,585 ..............
113 ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT 116,811 116,811 ..............
114 EXECUTIVE HELO DEVELOPMENT 187,436 187,436 ..............
116 NEXT GENERATION JAMMER [NGJ] 524,261 524,261 ..............
117 JOINT TACTICAL RADIO SYSTEM--NAVY [JTRS-Navy] 192,345 192,345 ..............
118 NEXT GENERATION JAMMER [NGJ] INCREMENT II 111,068 90,922 -20,146
119 SURFACE COMBATANT COMBAT SYSTEM ENGINEERING 415,625 375,875 -39,750
120 LPD-17 CLASS SYSTEMS INTEGRATION 640 640 ..............
121 SMALL DIAMETER BOMB [SDB] 50,096 50,096 ..............
122 STANDARD MISSILE IMPROVEMENTS 232,391 200,296 -32,095
123 AIRBORNE MCM 10,916 10,916 ..............
124 NAVAL INTEGRATED FIRE CONTROL-COUNTER AIR SYSTEMS ENG 33,379 33,379 ..............
125 ADVANCED ABOVE WATER SENSORS 34,554 34,554 ..............
126 SSN-688 AND TRIDENT MODERNIZATION 84,663 84,663 ..............
127 AIR CONTROL 44,923 44,923 ..............
128 SHIPBOARD AVIATION SYSTEMS 10,632 14,632 +4,000
129 COMBAT INFORMATION CENTER CONVERSION 16,094 16,094 ..............
130 AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE RADAR [AMDR] SYSTEM 55,349 26,669 -28,680
131 ADVANCED ARRESTING GEAR [AAG] 123,490 123,490 ..............
132 NEW DESIGN SSN 121,010 221,010 +100,000
133 SUBMARINE TACTICAL WARFARE SYSTEM 62,426 62,426 ..............
134 SHIP CONTRACT DESIGN/LIVE FIRE T&E 46,809 46,809 ..............
135 NAVY TACTICAL COMPUTER RESOURCES 3,692 3,692 ..............
137 MINE DEVELOPMENT 28,964 76,464 +47,500
138 LIGHTWEIGHT TORPEDO DEVELOPMENT 148,349 93,249 -55,100
139 JOINT SERVICE EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DEVELOPMENT 8,237 8,237 ..............
140 USMC GROUND COMBAT/SUPPORTING ARMS SYSTEMS--ENG DEV 22,000 22,000 ..............
141 PERSONNEL, TRAINING, SIMULATION, AND HUMAN FACTORS 5,500 5,500 ..............
142 JOINT STANDOFF WEAPON SYSTEMS 18,725 18,725 ..............
143 SHIP SELF DEFENSE (DETECT & CONTROL) 192,603 178,603 -14,000
144 SHIP SELF DEFENSE (ENGAGE: HARD KILL) 137,268 121,630 -15,638
145 SHIP SELF DEFENSE (ENGAGE: SOFT KILL/EW) 97,363 97,363 ..............
146 INTELLIGENCE ENGINEERING 26,710 46,710 +20,000
147 MEDICAL DEVELOPMENT 8,181 8,181 ..............
148 NAVIGATION/ID SYSTEM 40,755 45,755 +5,000
149 JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER [JSF]--EMD 1,710 1,710 ..............
150 JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER [JSF] 1,490 1,490 ..............
153 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 1,494 1,494 ..............
154 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 384,162 267,753 -116,409
155 ANTI-TAMPER TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT 4,882 4,882 ..............
156 CH-53K 516,955 506,955 -10,000
158 MISSION PLANNING 75,886 75,886 ..............
159 COMMON AVIONICS 43,187 43,187 ..............
160 SHIP TO SHORE CONNECTOR [SSC] 4,909 19,909 +15,000
161 T-AO (X) 1,682 1,682 ..............
162 UNMANNED CARRIER AVIATION 671,258 657,098 -14,160
163 JOINT AIR-TO-GROUND MISSILE [JAGM] 18,393 18,393 ..............
165 MULTI-MISSION MARITIME AIRCRAFT [MMA] 21,472 21,472 ..............
166 MULTI-MISSION MARITIME AIRCRAFT [MMA] INCREMENT 3 177,234 149,234 -28,000
167 MARINE CORPS ASSAULT VEHICLES SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT AND DEMO 77,322 50,222 -27,100
168 JOINT LIGHT TACTICAL VEHICLE [JLTV] SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT 2,105 2,105 ..............
AND DEMO
169 DDG-1000 111,435 111,435 ..............
172 TACTICAL CRYPTOLOGIC SYSTEMS 101,339 101,339 ..............
173 CYBER OPERATIONS TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 26,406 26,406 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, ENGINEERING & MANUFACTURING DEVELOPMENT 6,332,033 6,148,305 -183,728

RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT
174 THREAT SIMULATOR DEVELOPMENT 66,678 66,678 ..............
175 TARGET SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 12,027 12,027 ..............
176 MAJOR T&E INVESTMENT 85,348 85,348 ..............
178 STUDIES AND ANALYSIS SUPPORT--NAVY 3,908 3,908 ..............
179 CENTER FOR NAVAL ANALYSES 47,669 47,669 ..............
180 NEXT GENERATION FIGHTER 20,698 5,100 -15,598
182 TECHNICAL INFORMATION SERVICES 988 988 ..............
183 MANAGEMENT, TECHNICAL & INTERNATIONAL SUPPORT 102,401 122,401 +20,000
184 STRATEGIC TECHNICAL SUPPORT 3,742 3,742 ..............
186 RDT&E SHIP AND AIRCRAFT SUPPORT 93,872 93,872 ..............
187 TEST AND EVALUATION SUPPORT 394,020 394,020 ..............
188 OPERATIONAL TEST AND EVALUATION CAPABILITY 25,145 25,145 ..............
189 NAVY SPACE AND ELECTRONIC WARFARE [SEW] SUPPORT 15,773 15,773 ..............
190 SEW SURVEILLANCE/RECONNAISSANCE SUPPORT 8,402 8,402 ..............
191 MARINE CORPS PROGRAM WIDE SUPPORT 37,265 37,265 ..............
192 MANAGEMENT HEADQUARTERS--R&D 39,673 39,673 ..............
193 WARFARE INNOVATION MANAGEMENT 28,750 28,750 ..............
196 INSIDER THREAT 2,645 2,645 ..............
197 MANAGEMENT HEADQUARTERS (DEPARTMENTAL SUPPORT ACTIVITIES) 1,460 1,460 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT 990,464 994,866 +4,402

OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT
202 HARPOON MODIFICATIONS 2,302 2,302 ..............
203 F-35 C2D2 422,881 358,367 -64,514
204 F-35 C2D2 383,741 325,199 -58,542
205 COOPERATIVE ENGAGEMENT CAPABILITY [CEC] 127,924 127,924 ..............
207 STRATEGIC SUB & WEAPONS SYSTEM SUPPORT 157,676 119,766 -37,910
208 SSBN SECURITY TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM 43,354 43,354 ..............
209 SUBMARINE ACOUSTIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT 6,815 6,815 ..............
210 NAVY STRATEGIC COMMUNICATIONS 31,174 31,174 ..............
211 F/A-18 SQUADRONS 213,715 193,715 -20,000
213 SURFACE SUPPORT 36,389 36,389 ..............
214 TOMAHAWK AND TOMAHAWK MISSION PLANNING CENTER [TMPC] 320,134 226,234 -93,900
215 INTEGRATED SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM 88,382 100,382 +12,000
216 SHIP-TOWED ARRAY SURVEILLANCE SYSTEMS 14,449 14,449 ..............
217 AMPHIBIOUS TACTICAL SUPPORT UNITS 6,931 6,931 ..............
218 GROUND/AIR TASK ORIENTED RADAR 23,891 28,891 +5,000
219 CONSOLIDATED TRAINING SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 129,873 129,873 ..............
221 ELECTRONIC WARFARE [EW] READINESS SUPPORT 82,325 82,325 ..............
222 HARM IMPROVEMENT 138,431 129,829 -8,602
224 SURFACE ASW COMBAT SYSTEM INTEGRATION 29,572 29,572 ..............
225 MK-48 ADCAP 85,973 85,973 ..............
226 AVIATION IMPROVEMENTS 125,461 125,461 ..............
227 OPERATIONAL NUCLEAR POWER SYSTEMS 106,192 106,192 ..............
228 MARINE CORPS COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS 143,317 147,707 +4,390
229 COMMON AVIATION COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM 4,489 4,489 ..............
230 MARINE CORPS GROUND COMBAT/SUPPORTING ARMS SYSTEMS 51,788 51,788 ..............
231 MARINE CORPS COMBAT SERVICES SUPPORT 37,761 45,761 +8,000
232 USMC INTELLIGENCE/ELECTRONIC WARFARE SYSTEMS (MIP) 21,458 27,886 +6,428
233 AMPHIBIOUS ASSAULT VEHICLE 5,476 5,476 ..............
234 TACTICAL AIM MISSILES 19,488 19,488 ..............
235 ADVANCED MEDIUM RANGE AIR-TO-AIR MISSILE [AMRAAM] 39,029 39,029 ..............
239 SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS (SPACE) 34,344 34,344 ..............
240 CONSOLIDATED AFLOAT NETWORK ENTERPRISE SERVICES 22,873 22,873 ..............
241 INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM 41,853 46,353 +4,500
243 JOINT MILITARY INTELLIGENCE PROGRAMS 8,913 8,913 ..............
244 TACTICAL UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES 9,451 9,451 ..............
245 UAS INTEGRATION AND INTEROPERABILITY 42,315 42,315 ..............
246 DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND SYSTEMS/SURFACE SYSTEMS 22,042 22,042 ..............
248 MQ-4C TRITON 11,784 11,784 ..............
249 MQ-8 UAV 29,618 29,618 ..............
250 RQ-11 UAV 509 509 ..............
251 SMALL (LEVEL 0) TACTICAL UAS [STUASL0] 11,545 11,545 ..............
252 RQ-21A 10,914 10,914 ..............
253 MULTI-INTELLIGENCE SENSOR DEVELOPMENT 70,612 70,612 ..............
254 UNMANNED AERIAL SYSTEMS [UAS] PAYLOADS (MIP) 3,704 10,004 +6,300
255 RQ-4 MODERNIZATION 202,346 185,446 -16,900
256 MODELING AND SIMULATION SUPPORT 7,119 7,119 ..............
257 DEPOT MAINTENANCE (NON-IF) 38,182 48,182 +10,000
258 MARITIME TECHNOLOGY [MARITECH] 6,779 26,779 +20,000
259 SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS (SPACE) 15,868 15,868 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 3,491,162 3,267,412 -223,750

9999 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 1,613,137 1,667,951 +54,814
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, NAVY 20,270,499 19,818,218 -452,281
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by
the Committee:

[In thousands of dollars]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2020 budget Committee Change from
Line Item estimate recommendation budget estimate
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 University 116,850 137,850 +21,000
Research
Initiatives
Program .............. .............. +5,000
increase:
University
research
initiatives
Program .............. .............. +8,000
increase:
Advanced
digital
radars
Program .............. .............. +8,000
increase:
Aircraft
fleet
readiness
and
sustainment
3 Defense Research 470,007 525,507 +55,500
Sciences
Program .............. .............. +5,500
increase:
Navy ROTC
cybersecuri
ty training
program
Basic .............. .............. +50,000
research
program
increase
4 Power Projection 18,546 52,546 +34,000
Applied
Research
Program .............. .............. +14,000
increase:
Microwave
systems for
counter-UAS
defense
Program .............. .............. +20,000
increase:
Hypersonic
testing and
related
technology
development
5 Force Protection 119,517 202,517 +83,000
Applied
Research
Program .............. .............. +3,000
increase:
Lithium-ion
battery
safety and
performance
improvement
s
Program .............. .............. +8,500
increase:
Electric
propulsion
for
military
craft and
advanced
planing
hulls
Program .............. .............. +5,000
increase:
Hybrid
composite
structures
research
for
enhanced
mobility
Program .............. .............. +8,000
increase:
Test bed
for
autonomous
ship
systems
Program .............. .............. +9,500
increase:
Talent and
technology
for Navy
power and
energy
systems
Program .............. .............. +4,000
increase:
Compact
high flow
fan
Program .............. .............. +4,000
increase:
Network
cyber
security
and
resiliency
Program .............. .............. +20,000
increase:
Navy
alternative
energy
research,
development
, testing
and
deployment
Program .............. .............. +5,000
increase:
Data-model
fusion for
naval
platforms
and systems
Program .............. .............. +8,000
increase:
Energy
resilience
Program .............. .............. +8,000
increase:
Blue carbon
capture/
direct air
capture
6 Marine Corps 56,604 64,104 +7,500
Landing Force
Technology
Program .............. .............. +7,500
increase:
Interdiscip
linary
expeditiona
ry
cybersecuri
ty research
8 Warfighter 63,825 86,825 +23,000
Sustainment
Applied
Research
Program .............. .............. +4,000
increase:
Laser
peening
technology
Program .............. .............. +5,000
increase:
Lightweight
anti-corros
ion
nanotechnol
ogy coating
enhancement
Program .............. .............. +6,000
increase:
Polymer
coatings
for reduced
ice and
fouling
adhesion
Program .............. .............. +3,000
increase:
Undersea
domain
human
performance
requirement
s
Program .............. .............. +5,000
increase:
Engineered
systems to
prevent
hearing
loss
9 Electromagnetic 83,497 88,497 +5,000
Systems Applied
Research
Program .............. .............. +5,000
increase:
Electromagn
etic
systems
applied
research
10 Ocean 63,894 82,082 +18,188
Warfighting
Environment
Applied
Research
Improving .............. .............. -3,812
funds
management:
Unjustified
growth
Program .............. .............. +10,000
increase:
Naval
special
warfare
Program .............. .............. +5,000
increase:
Arctic
geospatial
information
Program .............. .............. +7,000
increase:
Task Force
Ocean
12 Undersea Warfare 57,075 93,075 +36,000
Applied
Research
Program .............. .............. +10,000
increase:
Navy and
academia
submarine
partnership
s
Program .............. .............. +4,000
increase:
Machine
discovery
and
invention
Program .............. .............. +5,000
increase:
Instrumente
d tow cable
Program .............. .............. +2,000
increase:
Navy
undersea
warfare
science and
technology
strategy
Program .............. .............. +8,000
increase:
Energetics
technology
Program .............. .............. +7,000
increase:
Autonomous
undersea
robotics
sytems
13 Future Naval 154,755 156,195 +1,440
Capabilities
Applied
Research
Improving .............. .............. -2,560
funds
management:
Advanced
analytics
and
decision
making
unjustified
growth
Program .............. .............. +4,000
increase:
C4ISR and
special
projects
14 Mine and 36,074 48,074 +12,000
Expeditionary
Warfare Applied
Research
Program .............. .............. +12,000
increase:
Underwater
mine defeat
capabilitie
s urgent
operational
need
15 Innovative Naval 153,062 165,385 +12,323
Prototypes
[INP] Applied
Research
Restoring .............. .............. -1,677
acquisition
accountabil
ity: MDUSV
program of
record
maturation
Program .............. .............. +4,000
increase:
Thermoplast
ic carbon-
fiber
composite
materials
research
Program .............. .............. +10,000
increase:
Thermoplast
ic
tailorable
universal
feedstock
composites
19 USMC Advanced 172,847 197,347 +24,500
Technology
Demonstration
[ATD]
Program .............. .............. +5,000
increase:
Robotic
protection
system
Program .............. .............. +10,000
increase:
Expeditiona
ry mission
planning
enabled by
high
fidelity
simulation
Program .............. .............. +2,500
increase:
Extended
range 155mm
projectile
Program .............. .............. +7,000
increase:
Adaptive
threat
force
21 Future Naval 231,907 233,107 +1,200
Capabilities
Advanced
Technology
Development
Program .............. .............. +1,200
increase:
Automated
critical
care system
22 Manufacturing 60,138 65,138 +5,000
Technology
Program
Program .............. .............. +5,000
increase:
Modern
shipbuildin
g
manufacturi
ng
23 Warfighter 4,849 9,849 +5,000
Protection
Advanced
Technology
Program .............. .............. +5,000
increase:
Novel
therapeutic
interventio
n
27 Innovative Naval 133,303 136,003 +2,700
Prototypes
[INP] Advanced
Technology
Development
Improving .............. .............. -12,300
funds
management:
Funds
excess to
requirement
s
Program .............. .............. +15,000
increase:
Advanced
thermal and
power
technology
for
improved
DEW SWAP
28 Air/Ocean 32,643 42,643 +10,000
Tactical
Applications
Program .............. .............. +10,000
increase:
Long
duration
autonomous
hydrographi
c survey
33 Advanced Combat 64,694 61,144 -3,550
Systems
Technology
Restoring .............. .............. -3,550
acquisition
accountabil
ity:
Project
3422 unit
cost growth
and
excessive
continuous
prototyping
34 Surface and 507,000 148,600 -358,400
Shallow Water
Mine
Countermeasures
Restoring .............. .............. -209,200
acquisition
accountabil
ity:
Project
3066
transfer
USV
procurement
to
Shipbuildin
g and
Conversion,
Navy
Restoring .............. .............. -70,000
acquisition
accountabil
ity:
Project
3066 LUSV
VLS concept
design
Restoring .............. .............. -39,200
acquisition
accountabil
ity:
Project
3066
transfer
USV C4 LLTM
procurement
to
Shipbuildin
g and
Conversion,
Navy
Restoring .............. .............. -40,000
acquisition
accountabil
ity:
Project
3066 VLS
LLTM early
to need
35 Surface Ship 15,800 7,242 -8,558
Torpedo Defense
Restoring .............. .............. -8,558
acquisition
accountabil
ity: Excess
sundown
costs
37 PILOT FISH 291,148 186,328 -104,820
Program .............. .............. -104,820
adjustment
42 Advanced 148,756 116,604 -32,152
Submarine
System
Development
Restoring .............. .............. -3,135
acquisition
accountabil
ity:
Project
2096
material
purchases
growth
early to
need
Restoring .............. .............. -29,017
acquisition
accountabil
ity:
Project
9710 lack
of
acquisition
strategies
45 Ship Preliminary 69,084 22,534 -46,550
Design &
Feasibility
Studies
Restoring .............. .............. -46,550
acquisition
accountabil
ity:
Project
0411 FSC
concept
development
early to
need
47 Advanced Surface 25,408 157,408 +132,000
Machinery
Systems
Program .............. .............. +7,000
increase:
Silicon
carbide
electronics
systems
Program .............. .............. +125,000
increase:
Surface
combatant
component-l
evel
prototyping
49 Littoral Combat 9,934 16,934 +7,000
Ship [LCS]
Program .............. .............. +7,000
increase:
Integrated
fire
control
land-based
test asset
51 Ohio Replacement 419,051 434,051 +15,000
Program .............. .............. +15,000
increase:
Materials
for
submarine
propulsor
application
s
56 Marine Corps 86,464 70,264 -16,200
Ground Combat/
Support System
Restoring .............. .............. -6,000
acquisition
accountabil
ity:
Project
1558
prototype
manufacturi
ng early to
need
Restoring .............. .............. -10,200
acquisition
accountabil
ity:
Project
7400 Sea
Mob
Amphibious
Reconnaissa
nce
Capability
product
development
60 Navy Energy 26,514 43,014 +16,500
Program
Program .............. .............. +11,500
increase:
Marine
energy
systems for
sensors and
microgrids
Program .............. .............. +5,000
increase:
Navy energy
program/
shore
energy
62 CHALK CORAL 346,800 310,400 -36,400
Program .............. .............. -36,400
adjustment
64 RETRACT MAPLE 258,519 192,019 -66,500
Program .............. .............. -66,500
adjustment
65 LINK PLUMERIA 403,909 396,509 -7,400
Program .............. .............. -7,400
adjustment
69 Land Attack 9,086 5,900 -3,186
Technology
Restoring .............. .............. -3,186
acquisition
accountabil
ity:
Project
3401 lack
of
acquisition
strategy
74 Digital Warfare 50,120 40,120 -10,000
Office
Restoring .............. .............. -10,000
acquisition
accountabil
ity:
Artificial
intelligenc
e
development
operations
unjustified
growth
75 Small and Medium 32,527 29,077 -3,450
Unmanned
Undersea
Vehicles
Project 3123 .............. .............. -3,450
improving
funds
management:
Delay and
Block II
concurrency
79 Gerald R. Ford 121,310 114,756 -6,554
Class Nuclear
Aircraft
Carrier (CVN 78-
80)
Improving .............. .............. -6,554
funds
management:
Revised
test
schedule
84 Next Generation 4,420 14,420 +10,000
Logistics
Program .............. .............. +10,000
increase:
Large-scale
3D printing
robotic
system
87 Advanced 181,967 201,967 +20,000
Undersea
Prototyping
Program .............. .............. +20,000
increase:
XLUUV
competitive
risk
reduction
88 Counter Unmanned 5,500 3,100 -2,400
Aircraft
Systems [C-UAS]
Reduce .............. .............. -2,400
duplication
: System
development
89 Precision Strike 718,148 688,148 -30,000
Weapons
Development
Program
Restoring .............. .............. -30,000
acquisition
accountabil
ity:
Project
3334
acquisition
and
contract
strategy
91 Offensive Anti- 65,419 115,419 +50,000
Surface Warfare
Weapon
Development
Program .............. .............. +50,000
increase:
LRASM 1.1
capability
improvement
s
93 Advanced 21,157 45,407 +24,250
Tactical
Unmanned
Aircraft System
Restoring .............. .............. -8,250
acquisition
accountabil
ity:
Project
3135
acquisition
and funding
strategy
Program .............. .............. +18,500
increase:
Large
unmanned
logistics
systems--ai
r
development
Program .............. .............. +14,000
increase:
Secure and
resilient
battlefield
networking
capabilitie
s
97 Other Helo 28,835 38,835 +10,000
Development
Program .............. .............. +10,000
increase:
Attack and
utility
replacement
aircraft
106 Advanced Hawkeye 232,752 235,252 +2,500
Restoring .............. .............. -9,500
acquisition
accountabil
ity: DSSC-6
Program .............. .............. +12,000
increase: E-
2D Hawkeye
radar
110 V-22A 185,105 198,455 +13,350
Program .............. .............. +5,000
increase:
Active
vibration
control
system
Program .............. .............. +8,350
increase:
Common
lightweight
cargo
system
118 Next Generation 111,068 90,922 -20,146
Jammer [NGJ]
Increment II
Restoring .............. .............. -20,146
acquisition
accountabil
ity: Change
in
acquisition
strategy
119 Surface 415,625 375,875 -39,750
Combatant
Combat System
Engineering
Restoring .............. .............. -39,750
acquisition
accountabil
ity: AEGIS
BL 9
unjustified
scope
expansion
122 Standard Missile 232,391 200,296 -32,095
Improvements
Restoring .............. .............. -39,095
acquisition
accountabil
ity:
Project
2063
contract
award
delays
Program .............. .............. +7,000
increase:
Advanced
carbon
nanotube
materials
research
128 Shipboard 10,632 14,632 +4,000
Aviation
Systems
Program .............. .............. +4,000
increase:
Aircraft
launch and
recovery
equipment
software
improvement
s
130 Air and Missile 55,349 26,669 -28,680
Defense Radar
[AMDR] System
Restoring .............. .............. -28,680
acquisition
accountabil
ity:
Advanced
distributed
radar
development
and
integration
concurrency
132 New Design SSN 121,010 221,010 +100,000
Restoring .............. .............. +100,000
acquisition
accountabil
ity:
Transfer
from
Shipbuildin
g and
Conversion,
Navy line
3, SSN-812
for SSN-812
design risk
reduction
137 Mine Development 28,964 76,464 +47,500
Program .............. .............. +47,500
increase:
Quick
strike
joint
direct
attack
munition
138 Lightweight 148,349 93,249 -55,100
Torpedo
Development
Improving .............. .............. -55,100
funds
management:
Project
3418
program
delays
143 Ship Self 192,603 178,603 -14,000
Defense (Detect
& Control)
Project .............. .............. -14,000
2178: CSEA
contract
award
delays
144 Ship Self 137,268 121,630 -15,638
Defense
(Engage: Hard
Kill)
Restoring .............. .............. -15,638
acquisition
accountabil
ity:
Project
2070 excess
test assets
146 Intelligence 26,710 46,710 +20,000
Engineering
Program .............. .............. +20,000
increase:
Command and
control
satellite
systems
cyber
security
148 Navigation/ID 40,755 45,755 +5,000
System
Program .............. .............. +5,000
increase:
Development
of
lightweight
security
identificat
ion Friend
or Foe
transmitter
154 Information 384,162 267,753 -116,409
Technology
Development
Improving .............. .............. -11,877
funds
management:
Project
2901 ePS
contract
award delay
Improving .............. .............. -9,869
funds
management:
Project
2905 SPOE
contract
award delay
Restoring .............. .............. -51,805
acquisition
accountabil
ity:
Project
2905 NP2
rapid
fielding
pilot
concurrency
Insufficient .............. .............. -4,804
budget
justificati
on: Project
2905
unjustified
budget
increase
Improving .............. .............. -14,703
funds
management:
Project
9406
contract
award delay
Improving .............. .............. -33,351
funds
management:
execution
delays
Program .............. .............. +10,000
increase:
NAVSEA
readiness
and
logistics
information
technology
digital
transformat
ion plan
156 CH-53K RDTE 516,955 506,955 -10,000
Improving .............. .............. -10,000
funds
management:
Early to
need
160 Ship to Shore 4,909 19,909 +15,000
Connector [SSC]
Program .............. .............. +15,000
increase:
Advanced
materials
and
manufacturi
ng for
naval
hovercraft
application
s
162 Unmanned Carrier 671,258 657,098 -14,160
Aviation [UCA]
Improving .............. .............. -14,160
funds
management:
CVN/UMCS
unjustified
growth
166 Multi-Mission 177,234 149,234 -28,000
Maritime [MMA]
Increment III
Restoring .............. .............. -28,000
acquisition
accountabil
ity:
Engineering
change
proposal 6
unjustified
increase
167 Marine Corps 77,322 50,222 -27,100
Assault
Vehicles System
Development &
Demonstration
Restoring .............. .............. -6,900
acquisition
accountabil
ity: Design
concurrency
for
additional
ACV
variants
Restoring .............. .............. -18,500
acquisition
accountabil
ity:
Procurement
of ACV-30
variants
early to
need
Improving .............. .............. -1,700
funds
management:
Technical
support
acceleratio
n
180 Next Generation 20,698 5,100 -15,598
Fighter
Restoring .............. .............. -15,598
acquisition
accountabil
ity: Next
Gen
Advanced
Engines
funding
requested
early to
need
183 Management, 102,401 122,401 +20,000
Technical &
International
Support
Program .............. .............. +20,000
increase:
Naval
research
laboratory
facilities
modernizati
on
203 Operational F-35 422,881 358,367 -64,514
C2D2
Prior year .............. .............. -64,514
execution
delays
204 Operational F-35 383,741 325,199 -58,542
C2D2
Prior year .............. .............. -58,542
execution
delays
207 Strategic Sub & 157,676 119,766 -37,910
Weapons System
Support
Restoring .............. .............. -49,910
acquisition
accountabil
ity:
Project
2228 D5LE2
technology
maturation
concurrency
with system
architectur
e and trade
analysis
Program .............. .............. +12,000
increase:
High
temperature
composite
material
capacity
expansion
211 F/A-18 Squadrons 213,715 193,715 -20,000
Restoring .............. .............. -20,000
acquisition
accountabil
ity:
Project
1662 USMC
capability
upgrades
undefined
requirement
214 Tomahawk and 320,134 226,234 -93,900
Tomahawk
Mission
Planning Center
[TMPC]
Restoring .............. .............. -93,900
acquisition
accountabil
ity:
Project
4034
program
acceleratio
n
215 Integrated 88,382 100,382 +12,000
Surveillance
System
Program .............. .............. +12,000
increase:
Transformat
ional
Reliable
Acoustic
Path
Systems
218 Ground/Air Task 23,891 28,891 +5,000
Oriented Radar
[G/ATOR]
Program .............. .............. +5,000
increase:
Low, slow,
small
targets
222 HARM Improvement 138,431 129,829 -8,602
Improving .............. .............. -8,602
funds
management:
Project
2189
contract
award delay
228 Marine Corps 143,317 147,707 +4,390
Communications
Systems
Program .............. .............. +4,390
increase:
Shipboard
integration
and AI
networking/
NOTM
231 Marine Corps 37,761 45,761 +8,000
Combat Services
Support
Program .............. .............. +5,000
increase:
Airborne
power
generation
technology
development
Program .............. .............. +3,000
increase:
UAV
alternative
power
generation
technologie
s
232 USMC 21,458 27,886 +6,428
Intelligence/
Electronic
Warfare Systems
(MIP)
Program .............. .............. +6,428
increase:
Advanced
electronic
warfare
digital
payload
241 Information 41,853 46,353 +4,500
Systems
Security
Program
Program .............. .............. +4,500
increase:
High
assurance
infrastruct
ure in
defense
systems
254 Unmanned Aerial 3,704 10,004 +6,300
Systems [UAS]
Payloads (MIP)
Program .............. .............. +6,300
increase:
Spectral
and
reconnaissa
nce imagery
for
tactical
exploitatio
n
255 RQ-4 202,346 185,446 -16,900
Modernization
Restoring .............. .............. -16,900
acquisition
accountabil
ity: IFC
5.0
concurrency
257 Depot 38,182 48,182 +10,000
Maintenance
(Non-IF)
Program .............. .............. +10,000
increase:
High
pressure
cold spray
systems
258 Maritime 6,779 26,779 +20,000
Technology
[MARITECH]
Program .............. .............. +20,000
increase:
Advanced
additive
technologie
s for
sustainment
of Navy
assets
999 Classified 1,613,137 1,667,951 +54,814
Programs
Program .............. .............. +47,000
increase:
Marine
Corps
Modernizati
on for C2
in a
degraded
environment
Classified .............. .............. +7,814
adjustment
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Prototyping for End Items.--The fiscal year 2020
President's budget request includes more than $1,750,000,000 in
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy for 30
programs that apply acquisition authorities and contracting
strategies enabled by legislative authorities provided for the
rapid development, rapid prototyping, rapid acquisition,
accelerated acquisition, or mid-tier acquisition (``section
804'') of warfighter capabilities. The spectrum of programs
exercising these types of acquisition authorities ranges from
existing programs that have already deployed prototypes to new
programs that by virtue of their scope and cost would otherwise
be subject to reporting requirements and acquisition
regulations applicable to traditional major acquisition
category I programs.
While supportive of efforts to deliver capability to the
warfighter in an accelerated manner, the Committee is concerned
that the growing trend toward acquisition-by-prototyping
approach limits the Navy's ability to successfully manage its
acquisition programs in the long-term by reducing full
understanding of long-term program costs; unnecessarily
narrowing down the industrial base early in the acquisition
process; and eliminating opportunities for future innovation by
reducing competitive opportunities over the course of the
acquisition.
The Assistant Secretary of the Navy (Research, Development
and Acquisition) is directed to submit to the congressional
defense committees with submission of the fiscal year 2021
President's budget request a complete list of approved Navy
acquisition programs utilizing prototyping or accelerated
acquisition authorities, along with a rational for each
selected acquisition strategy, as well as a cost estimate.
Further, the Assistant Secretary of the Navy (Research,
Development and Acquisition) is directed to provide, for each
such approved program, an assessment of the industrial base at
the component- and system-level, as well as for system-level
integration, to include opportunities for competition in the
acquisition. The Assistant Secretary of the Navy (Financial
Management and Comptroller) is directed to certify full funding
of the acquisition strategies for these programs in the fiscal
year 2021 President's budget request, and the Director,
Operational Test and Evaluation is directed to certify the
appropriateness of the Navy's planned test strategies for such
programs, to include a risk assessment.
Maritime Accelerated Acquisitions.--The fiscal year 2020
President's budget request includes $1,327,301,000 for programs
designated as Maritime Accelerated Acquisitions by the
Assistant Secretary of the Navy (Research, Development and
Acquisition) and the Chief of Naval Operations through the
Accelerated Acquisitions Board of Directors [AABOD]. The
Committee continues its support of efforts to support Combatant
Command and Fleet urgent and priority needs and recommends
$1,294,046,000 for these programs, consistent with prudent
financial management practices.
The Committee notes that in accordance with previous
direction, the Assistant Secretary of the Navy (Financial
Management and Comptroller) and the Assistant Secretary of the
Navy (Research, Development and Acquisition) provided with
submission of the fiscal year 2020 President's budget request
the acquisition strategy for each designated accelerated
acquisition program, to include the associated test strategies
as agreed to by the Chief of Naval Operations, the Assistant
Secretary of the Navy (Research, Development and Acquisition)
and the Director, Operational Test and Evaluation; and
certified that the fiscal year 2020 President's budget request
fully funds the respective acquisition strategies for each
designated accelerated acquisition program. The Committee
retains this direction for accelerated acquisition programs
with submission of the fiscal year 2021 President's budget
request.
Further, the Assistant Secretary of the Navy (Research,
Development and Acquisition) and the Director, Operational Test
and Evaluation are directed to update the congressional defense
committees in a timely manner on any modifications to the test
plans for these programs submitted with the fiscal year 2020
President's budget in the year of execution, to include impact
on schedule and cost.
Industrial Base for Unmanned and Autonomous Programs.--The
fiscal year 2020 President's budget request includes
$1,078,823,000 in Research, Development, Test and Evaluation,
Navy for unmanned systems programs, an increase of $412,697,000
over amounts enacted in fiscal year 2019. The Committee
believes that remotely piloted, unmanned and autonomous
technologies can provide valuable capability to the warfighter
by augmenting higher-end platforms through additional
capability or capacity; reducing risk to the warfighter; and
expanding the industrial base, to include commercial and non-
traditional vendors.
Therefore, the Committee is concerned that for several
unmanned programs the Navy is pursuing acquisition strategies
that would limit future competitive opportunities by awarding
system-level prototypes early in the acquisition process and
failing to articulate capability, requirements or technology
roadmaps to encourage industrial innovation. The Assistant
Secretary of the Navy (Research, Development and Acquisition)
is directed to submit to the congressional defense committees
with the fiscal year 2021 President's budget request such
acquisition roadmaps for each unmanned acquisition program that
include no less than mission requirements, program requirements
for each increment, key technologies, acquisition strategies,
test strategies, sub-system and system-level prototyping plans,
and cost estimates.
Budgeting for Weapon Systems Modernization.--The fiscal
year 2020 President's budget request includes $232,800,000 in
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy for continued
modernization of the E-2D Advanced Hawkeye. The Navy has been
modernizing the E-2D Advanced Hawkeye through a series of Delta
Systems Software Configuration [DSSC] builds in order to stay
ahead of advancing threats. For fiscal year 2020, the Navy is
requesting $39,000,000 to initiate DSSC #6, which will require
at least 6 years of development, integration and test and is
estimated to cost approximately $1,700,000,000 for development
and production. The Committee notes that the estimated
development cost alone for DSSC #6 would breach the acquisition
category I threshold for a new acquisition program.
The Navy is taking a similar incremental modernization
approach for several other aviation platforms, to include the
P-8A Poseidon and F/A-18E/F Super Hornet. The Committee
recognizes the need for continuous capability upgrades in light
of a constantly evolving threat environment, but is concerned
that a lack of full definition of modernization requirements,
costs and schedules challenges oversight of these efforts; as
well as reduces opportunities to innovate and save costs
through competition. Further the Committee has repeatedly
identified changes in scope or content of various modernization
increments or spirals, as well as test, delivery and fielding
schedules, but struggles to identify the corresponding
adjustments in respective annual budget requests. Therefore,
Assistant Secretary of the Navy (Research, Development and
Acquisition) is directed to provide to the congressional
defense committees with the fiscal year 2021 President's budget
request baselined modernization programs by incremental or
spiral, as applicable, for the E-2D Advanced Hawkeye, F/A-18E/F
and P-8 Poseidon identifying requirements, acquisition
strategies, decision milestones and criteria, costs, schedules
and contracting strategies.
MQ-25A Stingray.--The fiscal year 2020 President's budget
request includes $671,300,000 in Research, Development, Test
and Evaluation, Navy for continued development, integration and
test of the MQ-25A Stingray. This includes $63,000,000 for the
acquisition of three System Development Test Article [SDTA]
aircraft planned for the first quarter of fiscal year 2020,
following successful completion of the system design review
[SDR]. The Committee notes that in accordance with previous
congressional direction, the Assistant Secretary of the Navy
(Research, Development and Acquisition) and the Assistant
Secretary of the Navy (Financial Management and Comptroller)
submitted to the congressional defense committees with the
fiscal year 2020 President's budget request the acquisition
strategy for MQ-25A Stingray; as well as a certification that
the fiscal year 2020 President's budget request fully funds the
acquisition strategy, to include the test strategies as agreed
to by the Chief, Naval Operations and the Director, Operational
Test and Evaluation [DOTE]. The Committee understands that the
current MQ-25A Stingray Test and Evaluation Master Plan [TEMP]
is limited to developmental test only and is being updated to
reflect operational test requirements. The Committee directs
that DOTE provides a briefing to the congressional defense
committees on the revised TEMP, and the Assistant Secretary of
the Navy (Financial Management and Comptroller) brief the
congressional defense committees on the Navy's resourcing
strategy for the updated TEMP not later than 15 days after the
SDR.
Surface Navy Laser Weapon System.--The fiscal year 2020
President's budget request includes $89,234,000 in Research,
Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy for further development,
integration and test of one Surface Navy Laser Weapon System
[SNLWS] Increment I unit onto a DDG 51 class Flight IIA
destroyer in fiscal year 2021. Further, the Chief of Naval
Operations submitted a fiscal year 2020 unfunded requirement of
$80,000,000 in Other Procurement, Navy for the procurement and
installation of one additional SNLWS unit.
The Committee recommends $65,000,000 in Other Procurement,
Navy for the procurement of one additional SNLWS unit in fiscal
year 2020 and directs that none of the funds may be obligated
or expended until thirty days after the Assistant Secretary of
the Navy (Research, Development and Acquisition) provides a
briefing to the congressional defense committees detailing the
results of the Critical Design Review for SNLWS Increment I as
well as the acquisition strategy for future SNLWS increments
and other Navy Laser Family of Systems programs. Further, the
Assistant Secretary of the Navy (Financial Management and
Comptroller) is directed to certify to the congressional
defense committees with submission of the fiscal year 2021
President's budget request full funding for the first SNLWS
production laser weapon system, Government-furnished equipment,
Government-furnished information, engineering, support costs
and installation. Finally, the Director, Operational Test and
Evaluation, is directed to certify to the congressional defense
committees, not later than with submission of the fiscal year
2021 President's budget request, appropriate execution of the
previously agreed-to test approach for SNLWS.
Office of Naval Research Budget Structure.--The fiscal year
2020 President's budget request includes $2,284,641,000 for
science and technology research, a reduction of $267,028,000
from amounts enacted in fiscal year 2019. The Committee
continues to believe it is critical to invest in Navy
foundational research to ensure U.S. technical superiority in
the coming decades and recommends $2,631,992,000 for Navy
science and technology research in fiscal year 2020, an
increase of $347,351,000, or 15 percent, over the budget
request.
The Committee notes that consistent with congressional
direction, the fiscal year 2020 President's budget request for
the Office of Naval Research [ONR] retains the previously
agreed-upon program element structure for Navy science and
technology projects. The Committee continues to support this
budget structure. Further, the Committee believes that based on
lessons learned, prototyping efforts managed by ONR require
additional acquisition-type oversight, fiscal clarity and
adherence to financial management practices in order to avoid
the schedule and cost growth seen in the Solid State Laser-
Technology Maturation program. The Assistant Secretary of the
Navy (Financial Management and Comptroller) is directed to
present a plan to the congressional defense committees to
establish appropriate project units within the current ONR
budget structure for such projects.
Office of Naval Research Budget Justification Materials.--
The Committee notes the Chief, Naval Research's information
security concerns with respect to certain technology
development plans and concurs with the need to appropriately
manage the security posture relative to these efforts. However,
the Committee notes that the timely and transparent
transmission of details associated with these efforts to the
congressional defense committees remains highly unsatisfactory.
Therefore, the Committee directs the Assistant Secretary of the
Navy (Financial Management and Comptroller) to coordinate with
the Chief, Naval Research, to ensure that for the projects in
question, specific information required by the congressional
defense committees for their budget review be provided
concurrent with submission of the President's budget in the
appropriate format.
Task Force Ocean.--The fiscal year 2020 President's budget
request includes $19,052,000, an increase of $16,978,000 over
amounts enacted for fiscal year 2019, for ocean acoustics
science and technology efforts that will enable tactical
maneuver for the future submarine force. The Committee supports
these efforts and recommends an additional $7,000,000 for these
efforts. Further, the Committee directs the Chief, Naval
Research, to provide with submission of the fiscal year 2021
President's budget request a report detailing activities
conducted with these funds by project, to include transition
plans.
Unmanned Surface Vessels.--The fiscal year 2020 President's
budget request includes $446,800,000 in Research, Development,
Test and Evaluation, Navy for Medium [MUSV] and Large Unmanned
Surface Vessels [LUSV] and associated enabling capabilities.
The Committee fully supports additional investments in unmanned
and autonomous technologies, systems and sub-systems, including
surface and sub-surface vessels. However, the Committee is
concerned with the proposed acquisition and funding strategies
for the MUSV and LUSV in this budget request, to include the
Future Years Defense Program. Therefore, the Committee
recommends several adjustments, as detailed elsewhere in this
report, and directs the Assistant Secretary of the Navy
(Research, Development and Acquisition) to review the
acquisition strategies for these programs to address
congressional concerns, as appropriately balanced with
warfighter needs.
Future Surface Combatant Force.--The fiscal year 2020
President's budget request includes $80,145,000 for continued
studies and analyses of the Future Surface Combatant Force
[FSCF], to include concept refinement, trade studies, hull and
power design efforts and draft specification development of a
Large Surface Combatant [LSC]. The Committee understands that
the Navy plans to begin procuring a LSC in fiscal year 2025,
shortly after conclusion of the current DDG-51 Flight III
multi-year procurement program and the planned delivery of the
first ship under that multi-year procurement contract in fiscal
year 2024. The Committee finds this acquisition strategy high-
risk and recommends a reduction of $46,550,000 to the FSCF
request.
Further, the Committee is aware of the Navy's Surface
Capability Evolution Plan [SCEP], including the LSC, that
informs the FSCF, and directs the Assistant Secretary of the
Navy (Research, Development and Acquisition) to provide with
the fiscal year 2021 President's budget request the acquisition
strategies for each element of the SCEP, as previously
requested. Further, the Assistant Secretary of the Navy
(Financial Management and Comptroller) is directed to provide
with the fiscal year 2021 President's budget request cost
estimates for each element of the SCEP, and to certify full
funding in the budget request for each respective acquisition
strategy of the SCEP elements.
CVN 78 Sortie Generation Rate.--Consistent with direction
contained in Senate Report 115-290, accompanying the Department
of Defense Appropriations Act, 2019, the Program Executive
Officer, Aircraft Carriers, in coordination with the Director,
Operational Test and Evaluation, provided an updated plan to
the congressional defense committees for the CVN 78 Sortie
Generation Rate [SGR] demonstration schedule and test
requirements. Further, the Assistant Secretary of the Navy
(Financial Management and Comptroller) certified SGR
demonstration full funding in the fiscal year 2020 President's
budget request. The Committee notes the completed plans for
sustained SGR and that the plan for addressing the SGR surge
pace was to be developed by September 2019. Noting potential
delays to the CVN 78 schedule since submission of the fiscal
year 2020 President's budget request, the Program Executive
Officer, Aircraft Carriers, and the Director, Operational Test
and Evaluation, are directed to provide the congressional
defense committees an update on plans for addressing SGR surge
pace not later than October 1, 2019.
Conventional Prompt Strike.--The fiscal year 2020
President's budget request includes $593,120,000 for the
continued development of a Conventional Prompt Strike [CPS]
capability. The Committee notes that the Navy's CPS program
will build on efforts previously funded by the Department of
Defense with the intent of providing an initial CPS capability
for a sea-based platform in fiscal year 2025. The Committee
further notes that the Assistant Secretary of the Navy
(Research, Development and Acquisition) has approved Section
804 Middle Tier Acquisition rapid prototyping authority as the
acquisition strategy for this program. The Committee supports
the investment in technologies to address the evolving
hypersonic threat, and notes that under a 2018 Memorandum of
Agreement with the Army, Air Force, and Missile Defense Agency,
the Navy is tasked with designing an intermediate range
conventional prompt strike common hypersonic glide body for
transition to the Army for production.
The Committee is concerned that the Navy is accelerating
the CPS program in a near-sole source environment without a
clear understanding of technology and schedule risks, as well
as costs. The Committee notes that the Director, Cost
Assessment and Program Evaluation [CAPE], has not conducted an
Independent Cost Estimate [ICE] for CPS and that the Navy
continues to refine its cost estimate. The Committee further
notes that the Navy plans to invest in excess of $5,500,000,000
in CPS and associated efforts and procure a significant number
of CPS all up rounds prior to making a production decision.
The Committee directs the Director, CAPE, to provide with
submission of the fiscal year 2021 President's budget request
an ICE for CPS. Further, the Committee directs the Assistant
Secretary of the Navy (Research, Development and Acquisition)
to submit to the congressional defense committees, not later
than with submission of the fiscal year 2021 President's budget
request, the service cost position for CPS, as well as the test
strategy. Concurrently, the Assistant Secretary of the Navy
(Financial Management and Comptroller) is directed to certify
full funding of the acquisition requirements, and the Director,
Operational Test and Evaluation, is directed to certify the
equivalent of the test and evaluation master plan to the
congressional defense committees.
AEGIS Baselines Budget Estimates.--The fiscal year 2020
President's budget request includes $74,400,000 in Research,
Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy and $43,600,000 in
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-Wide for
AEGIS Baseline 9 upgrades, an increase of $89,000,000 over
amounts projected to be required for such efforts in fiscal
year 2020 in the previous budget request. While cautiously
optimistic that the Navy and Missile Defense Agency have
improved the common understanding and definitions of AEGIS
baseline capabilities, the Committee remains concerned by
constant changes to AEGIS baseline scope and requirements, many
of which are based on the introduction of new capabilities to
the warfighter, but not identified as such. The Committee is
concerned that the true development and fielding costs of new
or additional warfighter capabilities are obfuscated by the
lack of identification of associated costs levied on enabling
programs such as AEGIS. The Committee recommends a 10 percent
increase for AEGIS Baseline 9 over amounts enacted for fiscal
year 2019.
CH-53K System Demonstration Test Article Aircraft.--The
Committee notes that at the request of the Marine Corps, two
System Demonstration Test Article [SDTA] aircraft were added to
the CH-53K development program in fiscal year 2015, which
already included one ground test vehicle, four engineering
development models, and four SDTA aircraft. In January 2019,
the Committee was informed that the Marine Corps issued a `stop
work' for the 5th and 6th SDTA aircraft due to cost, schedule
and technical challenges, and that the Marine Corps
restructured the development and test schedule for the CH-53K
program.
The Committee notes that the 5th and 6th SDTA aircraft were
incrementally funded with research, development, test and
evaluation funding and that the reallocation of those parts to
production aircraft at this time would be inappropriate. The
Assistant Secretary of the Navy (Research, Development and
Acquisition) is directed to provide an update to the
congressional defense committees on the Marine Corps' plans for
the previously procured parts of the 5th and 6th SDTA aircraft
no less than thirty days prior to the execution of any such
plans, and the Assistant Secretary of the Navy (Financial
Management and Comptroller) is directed to certify to the
congressional defense committees the appropriate use of funds
for any such plans.
Offensive Anti-Surface Warfare/Long Range Anti-Ship Missile
1.1.--The fiscal year 2020 President's budget request includes
$65,400,000 in Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy
for continued development of the Offensive Anti-Surface
Warfare/Long Range Anti-Ship Missile 1.1 [LRASM 1.1]
capability. The Committee notes that with submission of the
fiscal year 2020 President's budget request, the Navy reduced
the scope of LRASM capability improvements, previously included
in LRASM 1.1. Given the evolving threat environment, the
Committee does not concur with this approach and recommends
$50,000,000 to address those shortfalls, including but not
limited to beyond line of sight capabilities, survivability
enhancements, range improvements and obsolescence upgrades.
The Committee directs the Director, Operational Test and
Evaluation to provide to the congressional defense committees
with the fiscal year 2021 President's budget request, an
updated plan for LRASM 1.0 and LRASM 1.1 full independent
operational test [IOT&E] to include an identification of the
required IOT&E rounds as well as an updated test and evaluation
master plan; and directs the Assistant Secretary of the Navy
(Research, Development and Acquisition) to submit an
acquisition strategy that supports that test strategy. Further,
the Assistant Secretary of the Navy (Financial Management and
Comptroller) is directed to certify that the fiscal year 2021
President's budget request for LRASM 1.0 and LRASM 1.1 fully
funds the development of capability improvements and the
associated test strategies.
Amphibious Combat Vehicle.--The fiscal year 2020
President's budget request includes $77,322,000 for continued
development of the Amphibious Combat Vehicle [ACV] 1.1 and 1.2,
which were merged into a single acquisition program subsequent
to the budget submission. The ACV program consists of a
personnel variant, as well as three additional supporting
mission role variants for command and control, gun and
recovery/maintenance missions. The Committee notes that in
fiscal year 2019, the Marine Corps accelerated the development
of the command and control mission variant by 1 year. The
Committee understands that the Marine Corps also plans to
accelerate the development of the gun mission role variant by 1
year in fiscal year 2020. Given the Marine Corps' long and
troubled acquisition history to replace and modernize the
Assault Amphibious Vehicle, the risk of destabilizing the
industrial base, as well as reports by the Director,
Operational Test and Evaluation, the Committee finds this
additional proposed acceleration risky and recommends no funds
for the procurement of the gun mission role variant in fiscal
year 2020.
Advanced Digital Radar Basic Research.--The Committee notes
the advances in the field of radar development with respect to
phased array radar technology in a digital design. The
Committee encourages the Navy to continue to support
partnerships with laboratory-based antenna test facilities that
will help the Navy understand, characterize, and calibrate
advanced all-digital radars. The Committee further notes that
the development of this technology is a critical enabler for
the Navy in the development of tools to increase target
detection, as well as to improve electronic warfare and
adaptive sensing capabilities and recommends an additional
$8,000,000 for these development efforts.
Aircraft Fleet Readiness and Sustainment.--The Committee
remains concerned about the long-term critical challenges
facing the Navy in maintaining the readiness of air vehicle
fleets and extending the useful life of aging aircraft. The
Committee continues to support the role and expertise
university research institutions can provide in performing
basic research and development that can translate into
technological capabilities to assist the Navy with addressing
current and future technical and engineering challenges in
these areas. The Committee recommends an additional $8,000,000
for basic university research in support of the Navy's long-
term, air vehicle fleet readiness and sustainment conducted at
university institutions with state-of-the art research and
development capabilities in structures and materials.
Lithium-ion Battery Safety and Performance Improvements.--
The Committee continues to support Navy investments in power
generation and energy storage research. The Committee
understands that development and deployment of lithium-ion
batteries are critical to Department of Defense missions, but
that safety incidents restrict their operational use.
Therefore, the Committee believes that the development and
qualification of materials technologies, including non-
flammable electrolytes, to reduce the risk of thermal runaway
and improve safety and performance in lithium-ion batteries
should be a research priority.
Electric Propulsion for Military Craft and Advanced Planing
Hulls.--The Committee notes with appreciation the high
operational tempo of Naval Special Warfare maritime units, such
as the Special Warfare Combatant Craft and Coastal Riverine
Force squadrons, in the performance of national missions that
require technological advantage, unsurpassed equipment
performance, and stealth. These units are equipped with a
variety of surface craft for transit to and from mission areas,
almost all of which are fossil fuel powered. The Committee is
aware that U.S. Special Operations Command has identified
mission-critical capability objectives for hybrid propulsion
technologies and low signature management that, in the face of
increasingly technologically advanced adversaries, make it
critical that such systems are fielded without delay.
Therefore, the Committee recommends an additional $8,500,000
for the design, development and testing of a complete marine
electric propulsion system.
Talent and Technology for Navy Power and Energy Systems.--
The Committee has supported the Navy's investment in next-
generation combat systems such as directed energy weapons.
While directed energy weapons are part of a strategy to
maintain military technological advantage, they also create new
energy challenges for the ships and submarines deploying them.
Therefore, the Committee recommends an increase of $9,500,000
for a combination of workforce talent and technology
development efforts in support of Navy power and energy
systems, such as bridge-to-university programs for
underprepared university enrollees and digital twin research.
Energy Resilience.--The Committee recognizes the need for
additional research to assist the Secretary of the Navy in
efforts to create a more robust energy infrastructure. To
achieve military energy resiliency, the Committee believes that
these challenges can be best met by leveraging experienced
energy university researchers in concert with industry partners
and the Navy. Specific areas of interest include addressing
electrical power intermittency, integrating renewable energy
sources into the grid, energy storage, improved micro-grids,
grid security, local generation of zero-carbon fuels, and the
inspection and structural health monitoring of critical energy
infrastructure.
Navy Alternative Energy Research.--The Committee recommends
an increase of $20,000,000 for Navy alternative energy
research. The Committee notes the value of investing in energy
research and encourages the Navy to continue research,
development, testing and deployment of advanced energy systems
with the potential to reduce the cost of energy and increase
energy security, reliability, and resiliency at Department of
Defense facilities while pursuing longer-term emphasis on grid-
connected power generation. The Committee understands that the
integration of emerging land and ocean-based energy generation
and end-use energy efficiency technologies has the potential to
improve Navy resilience. Further, the Committee encourages the
Navy to invest in energy demonstration activities relating to
Department of Defense facilities and activities in coordination
with other Federal agencies and entities.
Noise Induced Hearing Loss.--The Committee supports the
Department's noise induced hearing loss research and
development initiative and encourages the Navy to expand
research and development of a novel noise-level enabled drug
dosing and delivery system designed to shield the ear tissue
from mechanical stimuli that would otherwise cause temporary or
permanent hearing loss.
Energetics Research.--The Committee is concerned about
advances adversaries are making in advanced energetics and
believes that there is a need for a renewed, long-term
investment in research and development for advanced energetics
to increase the lethality, range and speed of weapons, develop
new leap-ahead capabilities, and to grow the national
energetics workforce. Therefore, the Committee recommends an
increase of $8,000,000 for energy technology research. The
Committee encourages the Department of the Navy to execute the
funding for the necessary efforts with the naval research and
development establishment best suited to advance the overall
knowledge, expertise and capability of energetics and to
incorporate these developments into advanced weapon systems.
Instrumented Tow Cable.--The Committee recognizes the
importance of accurate, real-time water temperature and other
environmental data to the operations of the Navy's submarine
force. The Committee remains concerned that there are
capability gaps and unmet requirements with existing
temperature and environmental data measurement that the fleet
uses to generate this information, including reliance on a
single point measurement system. Therefore, the Committee
encourages the Navy to complete a comprehensive review
examining the current system's limitations and explore the
efficacy of deploying a more sophisticated instrumented cable
system technology that enables real-time, multisource
collection to improve accuracy and fleet operations.
Resident Autonomous Undersea Robotics.--The Committee
encourages the Secretary of the Navy to continue supporting the
cost-effective development of resident autonomous undersea
robotic systems, including research, testing, and demonstration
of technologies that will support persistent surveillance,
security and related fleet readiness requirements. The
Committee believes that university-based research and
innovation centered on the development of resident autonomous
undersea robotic technologies will be essential in maintaining
competitive advantage in the future.
Automated Critical Care System.--The fiscal year 2020
President's budget request includes no funds to conclude
development of an automated critical care system. The Committee
notes that advanced medical care for marines and sailors
deployed in remote locations or on ships poses a serious and
unique challenge. The potential deterioration of these injured
service members while being stabilized, especially in prolonged
field care scenarios and during transport to a facility
possessing high-level medical care, especially in remote
austere deployments, is concerning. The Committee believes that
incorporation of state-of-the-art medical device technologies
such as automated critical care systems with decision support
may be the difference between life and death and will have a
significant impact in medical care for both the military and
civilian communities dealing with mass casualties. Therefore,
the Committee recommends $1,200,000 for additional development
of an automated critical care system.
Shipbuilding Manufacturing.--The Committee recognizes the
importance of building strong partnerships among Department of
Navy research labs, academia and naval shipyards that construct
our nation's submarines. The Committee encourages the Navy to
coordinate manufacturing efforts with industrial base partners
to ensure that funded research projects are relevant to
specific engineering and manufacturing needs, as well as
defined systems capabilities. Partnerships with academia should
focus on well-defined submarine and autonomous undersea vehicle
research needs, accelerated technology transition projects and
workforce development to help ensure a sustainable industrial
base. The Committee believes that all manufacturing efforts
should focus on reducing the cost of manufacturing and
sustaining the submarine fleet.
Silicon Carbide Electronics Systems.--The Committee
understands that use of silicon carbide power modules may
reduce the size and weight of power conversion modules and
other electronic systems necessary for advanced sensors and
weapon systems. Therefore, the Committee recommends $7,000,000
for silicon carbide electronics systems research and encourages
the Secretary of the Navy to continue to invest in advanced
power and energy technology, and accelerate the qualification
of silicon carbide power modules to be used on high power,
mission-critical Navy platforms accelerated through the use of
virtual system architecture in testing.
Marine Energy Systems for Sensors and Microgrids.--The
Committee recognizes that a broader range of experimentation,
prototyping, and development is necessary for powering maritime
security systems, at-sea persistent surveillance and
communications systems and for charging unmanned undersea
vehicles. The Committee encourages the Secretary of the Navy to
collaborate with affiliated research facilities to accelerate
the development and incorporation of new novel energy
technologies, such as marine hydrokinetic energy converters,
for autonomous systems and tactical energy solutions.
Active Vibration Control System.--The Committee encourages
the Navy and Marine Corps to consider the benefits of reducing
vibration in the V-22 engine nacelle to reduce maintenance
degraders and increase operational readiness of the aircraft.
Therefore, the Committee recommends an additional $5,000,000 to
demonstrate and optimize an active vibration control solution
within the overall nacelle improvement program.
Command and Control Satellite Systems Cyber Security.--The
Committee recognizes the vast, rapidly evolving space-based
cybersecurity threat facing the U.S. and the direct threats
this poses against the U.S. Government, critical infrastructure
components, and the general economy for security critical
functions. Therefore, the Committee recommends an additional
$20,000,000 for the development of Command and Control
Satellite Systems Cyber Security.
Spectral and Reconnaissance Imagery for Tactical
Exploitation.--The Committee recognizes the versatility and
broad application spectral and reconnaissance imagery for
tactical exploitation brings to the warfighter supporting
intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance mission
requirements. The Committee understands that certain
capabilities are available for integration and testing on the
Navy's RQ-21A Blackjack unmanned aircraft prior to completion
of an entire end-to-end system. Therefore, the Committee
recommends an additional $6,300,000 to prototype payloads for
development into mission kits for the RQ-21A Blackjack.
Additionally, these funds will provide for the field user
evaluations and other operational testing requirements.
High Pressure Cold Spray Systems.--The Committee notes that
sustainment drives significant acquisition costs to ships and
submarines, and understands that the utilization of high
pressure cold spray systems for ship and submarine maintenance
and repairs can result in significant cost savings. Therefore,
the Committee recommends an additional $10,000,000 for this
purpose.
Advanced Additive Technologies for Sustainment of Navy
Assets.--The Committee understands that to accelerate the
delivery of technical capabilities for the warfighter in a
timely manner, additional development of additive manufacturing
is required. The Committee recommends an additional $20,000,000
for this purpose.
Cyber Vulnerability Assessments and Evaluations.--The
Committee recognizes the importance of the Cyber Vulnerability
Assessments and Evaluations program within Research,
Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy, which is intended to
assess cyber vulnerabilities of major Navy weapons systems and
critical shore infrastructure. The Committee supports full
funding for these activities.
Arctic Mobility.--The Committee notes that the Arctic Ocean
continues to increase in strategic importance. The Committee
understands that a new generation of capabilities is necessary
to address the Navy's need for Arctic mobility, to include
power projection, search and rescue, humanitarian and disaster
relief, and logistical support for scientific research,
particularly in remote regions. Therefore, the Committee
directs the Secretary of the Navy to complete a comprehensive
review no later than 90 days after enactment of this Act of the
Navy's unmet requirements for the Arctic region and to provide
a plan to the congressional defense committees to research,
develop, prototype, test and evaluate materials and components
capable of allowing sustained operation of advanced amphibious
vehicles in Arctic, sub-zero temperature conditions.
Nuclear Sea-launched Cruise Missile Analysis of
Alternatives.--The Committee notes that the Navy's budget
request includes $5,000,000 to begin an analysis of
alternatives [AoA] for a new Nuclear Sea-launched Cruise
Missile [SLCM-N] pursuant to the 2018 Nuclear Posture Review's
call for the ``rapid development of a modern SLCM.'' The
recommendation includes full funding for this request. The
Committee directs the Director, Cost Analysis and Program
Evaluation [CAPE] to brief the congressional defense and
appropriations committees not later than 90 days after the
enactment of this Act on the scope and terms of the AoA, to
include evaluation criteria thereof. Further, the Committee
directs the Comptroller General of the Government
Accountability Office [GAO] to review these AoA scope and
terms, and brief the congressional defense and appropriations
committees not later than 60 days following the Director, CAPE
briefings to the congressional defense and appropriations
committees of the GAO findings.

Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air Force

Appropriations, 2019.................................... $41,229,475,000
Budget estimate, 2020................................... 45,616,122,000
Committee recommendation................................ 45,446,727,000

The Committee recommends an appropriation of
$45,446,727,000. This is $169,395,000 below the budget
estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this
appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

BASIC RESEARCH
1 DEFENSE RESEARCH SCIENCES 356,107 406,107 +50,000
2 UNIVERSITY RESEARCH INITIATIVES 158,859 158,859 ..............
3 HIGH ENERGY LASER RESEARCH INITIATIVES 14,795 14,795 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BASIC RESEARCH 529,761 579,761 +50,000

APPLIED RESEARCH
4 MATERIALS 128,851 210,351 +81,500
5 AEROSPACE VEHICLE TECHNOLOGIES 147,724 157,724 +10,000
6 HUMAN EFFECTIVENESS APPLIED RESEARCH 131,795 134,795 +3,000
7 AEROSPACE PROPULSION 198,775 219,775 +21,000
8 AEROSPACE SENSORS 202,912 214,912 +12,000
10 SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT--MAJOR HEADQUARTERS 7,968 7,968 ..............
12 CONVENTIONAL MUNITIONS 142,772 142,772 ..............
13 DIRECTED ENERGY TECHNOLOGY 124,379 124,379 ..............
14 DOMINANT INFORMATION SCIENCES AND METHODS 181,562 211,062 +29,500
15 HIGH ENERGY LASER RESEARCH 44,221 49,221 +5,000
16 SPACE TECHNOLOGY 124,667 154,667 +30,000
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, APPLIED RESEARCH 1,435,626 1,627,626 +192,000

ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT
17 ADVANCED MATERIALS FOR WEAPON SYSTEMS 36,586 50,086 +13,500
18 SUSTAINMENT SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY [S&T] 16,249 16,249 ..............
19 ADVANCED AEROSPACE SENSORS 38,292 42,292 +4,000
20 AEROSPACE TECHNOLOGY DEV/DEMO 102,949 202,949 +100,000
21 AEROSPACE PROPULSION AND POWER TECHNOLOGY 113,973 155,973 +42,000
22 ELECTRONIC COMBAT TECHNOLOGY 48,408 48,408 ..............
23 ADVANCED SPACECRAFT TECHNOLOGY 70,525 80,525 +10,000
24 MAUI SPACE SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM [MSSS] 11,878 11,878 ..............
25 HUMAN EFFECTIVENESS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 37,542 37,542 ..............
26 CONVENTIONAL WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY 225,817 225,817 ..............
27 ADVANCED WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY 37,404 37,404 ..............
28 MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM 43,116 105,716 +62,600
29 BATTLESPACE KNOWLEDGE DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION 56,414 56,414 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 839,153 1,071,253 +232,100

ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT
31 INTELLIGENCE ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT 5,672 5,672 ..............
32 COMBAT IDENTIFICATION TECHNOLOGY 27,085 27,085 ..............
33 NATO RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT 4,955 4,955 ..............
34 IBCM DLM/VAL 44,109 44,109 ..............
35 POLLUTION PREVENTION-DEM/VAL .............. 3,000 +3,000
36 AIR FORCE WEATHER SERVICES RESEARCH 772 772 ..............
37 ADVANCED ENGINE DEVELOPMENT 878,442 608,442 -270,000
38 LONG RANGE STRIKE 3,003,899 2,898,099 -105,800
39 DIRECTED ENERGY PROTOTYPING 10,000 24,000 +14,000
40 HYPERSONICS PROTOTYPING 576,000 576,000 ..............
41 INTEGRATED AVIONICS PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT 92,600 92,600 ..............
42 ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY AND SENSORS 23,145 23,145 ..............
43 NATIONAL AIRBORNE OPS CENTER [NAOC] RECAP 16,669 12,669 -4,000
44 TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER 23,614 27,614 +4,000
45 HARD AND DEEPLY BURIED TARGET DEFEAT SYSTEM 113,121 113,121 ..............
46 CYBER RESILIENCY OF WEAPON SYSTEMS-ACS 56,325 56,325 ..............
47 DEPLOYMENT AND DISTRIBUTION ENTERPRISE R&D 28,034 28,034 ..............
48 TECH TRANSITION PROGRAM 128,476 179,476 +51,000
49 GROUND BASED STRATEGIC DETERRENT 570,373 657,495 +87,122
50 LIGHT ATTACK ARMED RECONNAISSANCE [LAAR] SQUADRONS 35,000 2,000 -33,000
51 NEXT GENERATION AIR DOMINANCE 1,000,000 960,000 -40,000
52 THREE DIMENSIONAL LONG-RANGE RADAR 37,290 23,190 -14,100
53 UNIFIED PLATFORM [UP] 10,000 10,000 ..............
54 COMMON DATA LINK EXECUTIVE AGENT [CDL EA] 36,910 36,910 ..............
55 CYBERSPACE OPERATIONS FORCES AND FORCE SUPPORT 35,000 35,000 ..............
56 MISSION PARTNER ENVIRONMENTS 8,550 8,550 ..............
57 CYBER OPERATIONS TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 198,864 240,064 +41,200
58 ENABLED CYBER ACTIVITIES 16,632 16,632 ..............
60 CONTRACTING INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SYSTEM 20,830 20,830 ..............
61 GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM USER EQUIPMENT (SPACE) 329,948 320,598 -9,350
62 EO/IR WEATHER SYSTEMS 101,222 .............. -101,222
63 WEATHER SYSTEM FOLLOW-ON 225,660 205,660 -20,000
64 SPACE SITUATION AWARENESS SYSTEMS 29,776 24,776 -5,000
65 SPACE SYSTEMS PROTOTYPE TRANSITIONS [SSPT] 142,045 142,045 ..............
67 SPACE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY 64,231 59,231 -5,000
68 SPACE SECURITY AND DEFENSE PROGRAM 56,385 46,385 -10,000
69 PROTECTED TACTICAL ENTERPRISE SERVICE [PTES] 105,003 105,003 ..............
70 PROTECTED TACTICAL SERVICE [PTS] 173,694 163,694 -10,000
71 EVOLVED STRATEGIC SATCOM [ESS] 172,206 172,206 ..............
72 SPACE RAPID CAPABILITIES OFFICE 33,742 9,000 -24,742
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT 8,436,279 7,984,387 -451,892

ENGINEERING & MANUFACTURING DEVELOPMENT
73 FUTURE ADVANCED WEAPON ANALYSIS & PROGRAMS 246,200 5,000 -241,200
74 INTEGRATED AVIONICS PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT 67,782 67,782 ..............
75 NUCLEAR WEAPONS SUPPORT 4,406 4,406 ..............
76 ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT 2,066 2,066 ..............
77 TACTICAL DATA NETWORKS ENTERPRISE 229,631 189,631 -40,000
78 PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT 9,700 9,700 ..............
79 SMALL DIAMETER BOMB [SDB] 31,241 55,241 +24,000
80 AIRBORNE ELECTRONIC ATTACK 2 .............. -2
81 ARMAMENT/ORDNANCE DEVELOPMENT 28,043 28,043 ..............
82 SUBMUNITIONS 3,045 3,045 ..............
83 AGILE COMBAT SUPPORT 19,944 26,944 +7,000
84 LIFE SUPPORT SYSTEMS 8,624 8,624 ..............
85 COMBAT TRAINING RANGES 37,365 52,365 +15,000
86 F-35--EMD 7,628 7,628 ..............
87 LONG RANGE STANDOFF WEAPON 712,539 712,539 ..............
88 ICBM FUZE MODERNIZATION 161,199 161,199 ..............
89 JOINT TACTICAL NETWORK CENTER [JTNC] 2,414 2,414 ..............
91 OPEN ARCHITECTURE MANAGEMENT 30,000 30,000 ..............
93 KC-46 59,561 94,561 +35,000
94 ADVANCED PILOT TRAINING 348,473 332,173 -16,300
95 COMBAT RESCUE HELICOPTER 247,047 247,047 ..............
98 B-2 DEFENSIVE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM 294,400 250,100 -44,300
99 NUCLEAR WEAPONS MODERNIZATION 27,564 27,564 ..............
100 MINUTEMAN SQUADRONS 1 1 ..............
101 F-15 EPAWSS 47,322 47,322 ..............
102 STAND IN ATTACK WEAPON 162,840 162,840 ..............
103 FULL COMBAT MISSION TRAINING 9,797 9,797 ..............
106 C-32 EXECUTIVE TRANSPORT RECAPITALIZATION 9,930 9,930 ..............
107 PRESIDENTIAL AIRCRAFT REPLACEMENT 757,923 757,923 ..............
108 AUTOMATED TEST SYSTEMS 2,787 2,787 ..............
109 COMBAT SURVIVOR EVADER LOCATOR 2,000 2,000 ..............
110 GPS III FOLLOW ON [GPS IIIF] 462,875 447,875 -15,000
111 SPACE SITUATION AWARENESS OPERATIONS 76,829 56,829 -20,000
112 COUNTERSPACE SYSTEMS 29,037 29,037 ..............
113 WEATHER SYSTEM FOLLOW-ON 2,237 2,237 ..............
114 SILENT BARKER 412,894 362,894 -50,000
116 ADVANCED EHF MILSATCOM (SPACE) 117,290 117,290 ..............
117 POLAR MILSATCOM (SPACE) 427,400 401,400 -26,000
118 WIDEBAND GLOBAL SATCOM (SPACE) 1,920 1,920 ..............
119 SPACE BASED INFRARED SYSTEM [SBIRS] HIGH EMD 1 1 ..............
120 NEXT--GENERATION OPIR 1,395,278 1,930,778 +535,500
122 NATIONAL SECURITY SPACE LAUNCH EMD 432,009 462,009 +30,000
122A TACTICALLY RESPONSIVE LAUNCH OPERATIONS .............. 22,000 +22,000
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, ENGINEERING & MANUFACTURING DEVELOPMENT 6,929,244 7,144,942 +215,698

RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT
123 THREAT SIMULATOR DEVELOPMENT 59,693 59,693 ..............
124 MAJOR T&E INVESTMENT 181,663 75,663 -106,000
125 RAND PROJECT AIR FORCE 35,258 35,258 ..............
127 INITIAL OPERATIONAL TEST & EVALUATION 13,793 13,793 ..............
128 TEST AND EVALUATION SUPPORT 717,895 717,895 ..............
129 ACQ WORKFORCE--GLOBAL POWER 258,667 255,667 -3,000
130 ACQ WORKFORCE--GLOBAL VIG & COMBAT SYS 251,992 249,992 -2,000
131 ACQ WORKFORCE--GLOBAL REACH 149,191 149,191 ..............
132 ACQ WORKFORCE--CYBER, NETWORK, & BUS SYS 235,360 235,360 ..............
133 ACQ WORKFORCE--GLOBAL BATTLE MGMT 160,196 160,196 ..............
134 ACQ WORKFORCE--CAPABILITY INTEGRATION 220,255 228,255 +8,000
135 ACQ WORKFORCE--ADVANCED PRGM TECHNOLOGY 42,392 39,392 -3,000
136 ACQ WORKFORCE--NUCLEAR SYSTEMS 133,231 133,231 ..............
137 MANAGEMENT HQ--R&D 5,590 5,590 ..............
138 FACILITIES RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION--TEST & EVAL 88,445 88,445 ..............
139 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT--TEST AND EVALUATION SUPPORT 29,424 29,424 ..............
140 REQUIREMENTS ANALYSIS AND MATURATION 62,715 80,715 +18,000
141 MANAGEMENT HQ--T&E 5,013 5,013 ..............
142 ENTERPRISE INFORMATION SERVICES [EIS] 17,128 10,628 -6,500
143 ACQUISITION AND MANAGEMENT SUPPORT 5,913 5,913 ..............
144 GENERAL SKILL TRAINING 1,475 6,475 +5,000
146 INTERNATIONAL ACTIVITIES 4,071 4,071 ..............
147 SPACE TEST AND TRAINING RANGE DEVELOPMENT 19,942 19,942 ..............
148 SPACE AND MISSILE CENTER [SMC] CIVILIAN WORKFORCE 167,810 167,810 ..............
149 SPACE & MISSILE SYSTEMS CENTER--MHA 10,170 10,170 ..............
150 ROCKET SYSTEMS LAUNCH PROGRAM (SPACE) 13,192 13,192 ..............
151 SPACE TEST PROGRAM [STP] 26,097 26,097 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT 2,916,571 2,827,071 -89,500

OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT
152 ADVANCED BATTLE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM [ABMS] 35,611 43,611 +8,000
154 SPECIALIZED UNDERGRADUATE FLIGHT TRAINING 2,584 2,584 ..............
156 DEPLOYMENT & DISTRIBUTION ENTERPRISE R&D 903 903 ..............
157 F-35 C2D2 694,455 588,511 -105,944
158 AIR FORCE INTEGRATED MILITARY HUMAN RESOURCES SYSTEM 40,567 40,567 ..............
159 ANTI-TAMPER TECHNOLOGY EXECUTIVE AGENCY 47,193 47,193 ..............
160 FOREIGN MATERIEL ACQUISITION AND EXPLOITATION 70,083 70,083 ..............
161 HC/MC-130 RECAP RDT&E 17,218 17,218 ..............
162 NC3 INTEGRATION 25,917 25,917 ..............
164 B-52 SQUADRONS 325,974 329,974 +4,000
165 AIR-LAUNCHED CRUISE MISSILE [ALCM] 10,217 10,217 ..............
166 B-1B SQUADRONS 1,000 1,000 ..............
167 B-2 SQUADRONS 97,276 98,076 +800
168 MINUTEMAN SQUADRONS 128,961 104,219 -24,742
170 WORLDWIDE JOINT STRATEGIC COMMUNICATIONS 18,177 22,177 +4,000
171 INTEGRATED STRATEGIC PLANNING & ANALYSIS NETWORK 24,261 24,261 ..............
172 ICBM REENTRY VEHICLES 75,571 41,271 -34,300
174 UH-1N REPLACEMENT PROGRAM 170,975 170,975 ..............
176 MQ-9 UAV 154,996 127,296 -27,700
178 A-10 SQUADRONS 36,816 31,916 -4,900
179 F-16 SQUADRONS 193,013 193,013 ..............
180 F-15E SQUADRONS 336,079 694,229 +358,150
181 MANNED DESTRUCTIVE SUPPRESSION 15,521 15,521 ..............
182 F-22 SQUADRONS 496,298 546,298 +50,000
183 F-35 SQUADRONS 99,943 99,943 ..............
184 TACTICAL AIM MISSILES 10,314 10,314 ..............
185 ADVANCED MEDIUM RANGE AIR-TO-AIR MISSILE [AMRAAM] 55,384 55,384 ..............
186 COMBAT RESCUE--PARARESCUE 281 281 ..............
187 AF TENCAP 21,365 21,365 ..............
188 PRECISION ATTACK SYSTEMS PROCUREMENT 10,696 10,696 ..............
189 COMPASS CALL 15,888 31,888 +16,000
190 AIRCRAFT ENGINE COMPONENT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 112,505 112,505 ..............
191 JOINT AIR-TO-SURFACE STANDOFF MISSILE [JASSM] 78,498 78,498 ..............
192 AIR AND SPACE OPERATIONS CENTER [AOC] 114,864 114,864 ..............
193 CONTROL AND REPORTING CENTER [CRC] 8,109 8,109 ..............
194 AIRBORNE WARNING AND CONTROL SYSTEM [AWACS] 67,996 67,996 ..............
195 TACTICAL AIRBORNE CONTROL SYSTEMS 2,462 2,462 ..............
197 COMBAT AIR INTELLIGENCE SYSTEM ACTIVITIES 13,668 13,668 ..............
198 TACTICAL AIR CONTROL PARTY--MOD 6,217 4,117 -2,100
200 DCAPES 19,910 19,910 ..............
201 NATIONAL TECHNICAL NUCLEAR FORENSICS 1,788 1,788 ..............
202 SEEK EAGLE 28,237 28,237 ..............
203 USAF MODELING AND SIMULATION 15,725 15,725 ..............
204 WARGAMING AND SIMULATION CENTERS 4,316 4,316 ..............
205 BATTLEFIELD ABN COMM NODE [BACN] 26,946 26,946 ..............
206 DISTRIBUTED TRAINING AND EXERCISES 4,303 4,303 ..............
207 MISSION PLANNING SYSTEMS 71,465 71,465 ..............
208 TACTICAL DECEPTION 7,446 7,446 ..............
209 OPERATIONAL HG--CYBER 7,602 7,602 ..............
210 DISTRIBUTED CYBER WARFARE OPERATIONS 35,178 35,178 ..............
211 AF DEFENSIVE CYBERSPACE OPERATIONS 16,609 44,109 +27,500
212 JOINT CYBER COMMAND AND CONTROL [JCC2] 11,603 11,603 ..............
213 UNIFIED PLATFORM [UP] 84,702 84,702 ..............
219 GEOBASE 2,723 2,723 ..............
220 NUCLEAR PLANNING AND EXECUTION SYSTEM [NPES] 44,190 44,190 ..............
226 AIR FORCE SPACE AND CYBER NON-TRADITIONAL ISR FOR 3,575 3,575 ..............
BATTLESPACE AWARENESS
227 E-4B NATIONAL AIRBORNE OPERATIONS CENTER [NAOC] 70,173 42,623 -27,550
228 MINIMUM ESSENTIAL EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK 13,543 13,543 ..............
229 HIGH FREQUENCY RADIO SYSTEMS 15,881 15,881 ..............
230 INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM 27,726 27,726 ..............
232 GLOBAL FORCE MANAGEMENT--DATA INITIATIVE 2,210 2,210 ..............
234 MULTI DOMAIN COMMAND AND CONTROL [MDC2] 150,880 110,880 -40,000
235 AIRBORNE SIGINT ENTERPRISE 102,667 102,667 ..............
236 COMMERCIAL ECONOMIC ANALYSIS 3,431 3,431 ..............
239 C2 AIR OPERATIONS SUITE--C2 INFO SERVICES 9,313 9,313 ..............
240 CCMD INTELLIGENCE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 1,121 1,121 ..............
241 ISR MODERNIZATION & AUTOMATION DVMT [IMAD] 19,000 19,000 ..............
242 GLOBAL AIR TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT [GATM] 4,544 4,544 ..............
243 WEATHER SERVICE 25,461 27,461 +2,000
244 AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL, APPROACH, & LANDING SYSTEM [ATC] 5,651 5,651 ..............
245 AERIAL TARGETS 7,448 7,448 ..............
248 SECURITY AND INVESTIGATIVE ACTIVITIES 425 425 ..............
249 ARMS CONTROL IMPLEMENTATION 54,546 54,546 ..............
250 DEFENSE JOINT COUNTERINTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES 6,858 6,858 ..............
252 INTEGRATED BROADCAST SERVICE 8,728 8,728 ..............
253 DRAGON U-2 38,939 33,839 -5,100
254 ENDURANCE UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES .............. 15,000 +15,000
255 AIRBORNE RECONNAISSANCE SYSTEMS 122,909 122,909 ..............
256 MANNED RECONNAISSANCE SYSTEMS 11,787 11,787 ..............
257 DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS 25,009 25,009 ..............
258 RQ-4 UAV 191,733 191,733 ..............
259 NETWORK-CENTRIC COLLABORATIVE TARGET [TIARA] 10,757 10,757 ..............
260 NATO AGS 32,567 32,567 ..............
261 SUPPORT TO DCGS ENTERPRISE 37,774 37,774 ..............
262 INTERNATIONAL INTELLIGENCE TECHNOLOGY AND ARCHITECTURES 13,515 13,515 ..............
263 RAPID CYBER ACQUISITION 4,383 4,383 ..............
264 PERSONNEL RECOVERY COMMAND & CTRL [PRC2] 2,133 2,133 ..............
265 INTELLIGENCE MISSION DATA [IMD] 8,614 8,614 ..............
266 C-130 AIRLIFT SQUADRON 140,425 101,425 -39,000
267 C-5 AIRLIFT SQUADRONS 10,223 10,223 ..............
268 C-17 AIRCRAFT 25,101 25,101 ..............
269 C-130J PROGRAM 8,640 8,640 ..............
270 LARGE AIRCRAFT IR COUNTERMEASURES [LAIRCM] 5,424 5,424 ..............
272 KC-10S 20 20 ..............
274 CV-22 17,906 17,906 ..............
276 SPECIAL TACTICS/COMBAT CONTROL 3,629 3,629 ..............
277 DEPOT MAINTENANCE (NON-IF) 1,890 1,890 ..............
278 MAINTENANCE, REPAIR & OVERHAUL SYSTEM 10,311 10,311 ..............
279 LOGISTICS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY [LOGIT] 16,065 16,065 ..............
280 SUPPORT SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 539 539 ..............
281 OTHER FLIGHT TRAINING 2,057 2,057 ..............
282 OTHER PERSONNEL ACTIVITIES 10 10 ..............
283 JOINT PERSONNEL RECOVERY AGENCY 2,060 2,060 ..............
284 CIVILIAN COMPENSATION PROGRAM 3,809 3,809 ..............
285 PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION 6,476 4,376 -2,100
286 AIR FORCE STUDIES AND ANALYSIS AGENCY 1,443 1,443 ..............
287 FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 9,323 9,323 ..............
288 DEFENSE ENTERPRISE ACNTNG AND MGT SYS [DEAMS] 46,789 42,789 -4,000
289 GLOBAL SENSOR INTEGRATED ON NETWORK [GSIN] 3,647 3,647 ..............
290 SERVICE SUPPORT TO STRATCOM--SPACE ACTIVITIES 988 988 ..............
291 SERVICE SUPPORT TO SPACECOM ACTIVITIES 11,863 11,863 ..............
293 FAMILY OF ADVANCED BLOS TERMINALS [FAB-T] 197,388 177,388 -20,000
294 SATELLITE CONTROL NETWORK (SPACE) 61,891 56,891 -5,000
297 SPACE AND MISSILE TEST AND EVALUATION CENTER 4,566 4,566 ..............
298 SPACE INNOVATION, INTEGRATION AND RAPID TECHNOLOGY 43,292 38,292 -5,000
DEVELOPMENT
300 SPACELIFT RANGE SYSTEM (SPACE) 10,837 20,837 +10,000
301 GPS III SPACE SEGMENT 42,440 42,440 ..............
302 SPACE SUPERIORITY INTELLIGENCE 14,428 14,428 ..............
303 SPACE C2 72,762 72,762 ..............
304 NATIONAL SPACE DEFENSE CENTER 2,653 2,653 ..............
306 BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE RADARS 15,881 15,881 ..............
308 NUDET DETECTION SYSTEM (SPACE) 49,300 49,300 ..............
309 SPACE SITUATION AWARENESS OPERATIONS 17,834 14,834 -3,000
310 GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM III--OPERATIONAL CONTROL 445,302 445,302 ..............
SEGMENT
311 ENTERPRISE GROUND SERVICES 138,870 88,870 -50,000
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 6,499,982 6,594,996 +95,014

9999 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 18,029,506 17,616,691 -412,815
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, AIR 45,616,122 45,446,727 -169,395
FORCE
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by
the Committee:

Warfighter Physiological Performance.--The Committee
recognizes that physiological performance is a key factor in
warfighter mission readiness. The Committee supports efforts to
utilize sensor technologies to monitor the physiological
condition of warfighters but notes a capability gap in
predicting operational human performance. The Committee
encourages the Secretary of the Air Force to develop and refine
physiological algorithms to provide measures of real-time human
performance and operational readiness when accompanied with
current and future sensor technologies.
Counter Unmanned Aerial Systems Research.--The Committee
recognizes the critical importance of developing new
technologies to detect and counter adversarial unmanned aerial
systems [UAS] as individual or swarm threats. The Committee
notes that countering UAS operations presents a special series
of unmet communications, command and control, cyber, and
computation and intelligence challenges at the tactical edge.
The Committee encourages the Air Force Research Laboratory
Information Directorate to continue research and development
into the detection and countering of UAS using advanced
technologies to facilitate geo-location detection, determine
individual and swarm behavior, dissect swarms to identify
critical nodes, situational awareness, and mission intent.
Thermal Protection Systems.--The Committee understands that
thermal protection systems are critical for future hypersonic
and space vehicles. The Secretary of the Air Force is
encouraged to consider the production processes needed to
manufacture such capabilities and make key investments that
will further develop and transition novel thermal protection
systems into weapon systems.
Advanced Engine.--The fiscal year 2020 President's budget
request includes $878,442,000 for the Adaptive Engine
Transition Program [AETP]. The Committee continues to support
research and development in the next generation of turbine
engine technology that will provide fighter aircraft more
thrust and range, while being more energy efficient. The
Committee understands that the Department plans to conclude the
AETP program in fiscal year 2021 with the ground testing of
prototype engines. Despite the Committee encouraging the Air
Force to identify current and future programs for this
technology insertion (Senate Report 114-263), no programs,
including the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter, are either signaling a
demand for the next generation engine or budgeting appropriate
resources to transition the engine in the future years defense
program. Failure to transition the AETP program into production
would constitute a severely missed opportunity to capitalize on
more than $4,000,000,000 in research and development, and open
the door to our adversaries to eclipse fielded U.S. engine
technology in the coming years. The Committee finds these
consequences to be unacceptable. Therefore, the Committee
recommends a reduction of $270,000,000 to reflect the lack of a
transition plan and directs the Secretary of the Air Force to
provide, as part of the Department's fiscal year 2021 budget
submission, a roadmap to transition the research and
development accomplished under AETP and the previous Adaptive
Engine Technology Development Program. The roadmap should
clearly articulate the way forward with an advanced engine and
provide updated cost, schedule, competition, and transition
plans to other programs that will support advanced engine
development, engineering and manufacturing development, and/or
production activities.
Technology Transfer.--The Committee recognizes the
importance of technology transfer between the Federal
Government and non-Federal entities, such as academia,
nonprofit organizations, and State and local governments.
Technology transfer lowers the cost of new defense-related
technology development and ensures that taxpayer investments in
research and development benefit the economy and the industrial
base. The Committee encourages the Secretary of Defense to
continue support of technology transfer programs by allocating
sufficient funding and leveraging the work being performed by
Federal laboratories.
Light Attack Aircraft.--The fiscal year 2020 President's
budget request includes $35,000,000 in research, development,
test and evaluation funding to continue and expand the Light
Attack Program experimentation campaign. The Air Force began to
experiment with light attack aircraft in 2017 to consider ways
to lessen the operational requirements of 4th and 5th
generation fighter aircraft in more permissive and austere
environments and to strengthen international partner
capabilities, both goals supported in the 2018 National Defense
Strategy. The Air Force determined that non-developmental,
turbo-prop aircraft provided a low-cost and rapid fielding
option, while supporting the intended mission sets of the
experiment. Following the two experiments, it was also the
Committee's understanding that the Air Force planned to
leverage section 804 authority to release a Request for
Proposal [RFP] before the end of 2018, award a procurement
contract for light attack aircraft before the end of 2019, and
begin fielding a capability by fiscal year 2022. However, the
RFP was never released, and the fiscal year 2020 President's
budget requested funding to continue and expand the experiment
but delayed procurement of aircraft to fiscal year 2022.
The Committee does not support a continued or expanded
experiment and only recommends $2,000,000 in RDT&E funding to
support the continued development of a secure and exportable
tactical network, which compliments a light attack capability.
If the Air Force wants to consider other platforms, such as
rotary-wing or unmanned aircraft, neither of which tend to be
exportable to foreign partners nor offset the need for high-end
aircraft, the Committee encourages the Air Force to first
develop a requirement, rather than rely on undefined
experiments to determine a requirement.
The Committee recently supported a reprogramming request to
shift prior year congressional add funding to the Aircraft
Procurement, Air Force account in order for the Air Force to be
able to execute its current plan to procure six turbo-prop
aircraft with fiscal year 2018 and 2019 funding. The Committee
directs the Secretary of the Air Force to carry out this plan
and to provide necessary certifications of both types of turbo-
prop aircraft used in the second experiment. Further, the
Committee recommends an additional $210,000,000 in procurement
funding to procure six additional turbo-prop aircraft and
encourages the Air Force to revert back to the fiscal year 2019
plan and fund the acquisition program in fiscal year 2021
budget request. The Committee also directs the Secretary of the
Air Force to submit a report to the congressional defense
committees not later than 90 days after enactment of this act
on a revised light attack aircraft program plan, to include
updated costs, schedules, and procurement profiles as well as
the intended missions to be supported with a light attack
capability.
Advanced Battle Management System.--The Committee continues
to support the Air Force's new approach to command and control
in anti-access/area denial locations, the Advanced Battle
Management System [ABMS]. The Committee notes the Air Force's
efforts to outline the short, medium, and long-term phases of
the program and establish an architect to oversee multiple
programs across domains. The Committee supports the Air Force's
long-term vision of resilient and survivable networks against
near peer competitors. However, the Committee is concerned with
the near-term requirements of the first phase, given
disconnects between the Air Force's congressional reports on
ABMS and the fiscal year 2020 budget request. Therefore, the
Committee recommends an additional $8,000,000 for requirements
refinement and technology identification.
Further, with the submission of the fiscal year 2021 budget
request, the Committee directs the Secretary of the Air Force
to submit a report summarizing all related programs in
communications, battle management command and control, and
sensors that fall within the ABMS umbrella across the future
years defense program. The report should reference program
element funding lines and clearly link all activities with
funding lines in the fiscal year 2021 budget justification
documents. It should also clearly articulate all phase one
efforts, including initial operational capability timelines,
the status of related legacy activities, and linkages to
classified activities.
UH-1N Replacement Program.--The Committee supports the UH-
1N Replacement Program that will replace the Air Force fleet of
UH-1N aircraft with modern helicopters and close significant
mission capability gaps, including range, speed, endurance, and
troop capacity. The Committee is pleased that the Air Force
awarded a UH-1N replacement procurement contract in 2018 to
improve the security and surveillance of U.S. nuclear missile
fields and nuclear weapons convoys as well as support the U.S.
government continuity of operations mission in the National
Capital Region. The Committee encourages the Air Force to
maintain the current test and fielding plan to achieve an
initial operational capability in 2023 and consider efforts to
accelerate the schedule, when appropriate.

SPACE PROGRAMS

National Security Space Launch.--The Committee supports the
Air Force's acquisition strategy for next generation launch
vehicles and launch service procurement for National Security
Space Launch as the best path forward for transitioning from
the Russian RD-180 engine, increasing competition, and reducing
launch costs, while maintaining assured access to space. In
particular, the Committee supports the requirement that launch
providers must be able to meet all national security space
launch requirements, including the delivery into space of any
national security payload designated by the Secretary of
Defense or the Director of National Intelligence, as is
codified in 10 U.S.C. 2273. The Committee is concerned that
efforts to legislatively alter the competitive and transparent
source selection process would undermine the integrity of the
previously awarded Launch Service Agreement development
contracts and risk delaying transition from the RD-180 engine
and critical integration timelines of national security
missions with new launch systems. Therefore, the Committee
urges the Department to maintain the current acquisition
schedule and mission performance requirements. The Committee
opposes modifications to the Air Force strategy that would
confine the Phase 2 launch service procurement to fewer than
the planned 34 missions. Such a change would increase per-
launch costs while simultaneously introducing risks and costs
for certain national security payloads.
Next-Generation Overhead Persistent Infrared.--The
Committee remains supportive of the Air Force's efforts to
provide improved missile warning capabilities that are more
survivable against emerging threats. However, the Committee is
concerned that appropriately funding Next-Generation Overhead
Persistent Infrared [Next-Gen OPIR] to achieve the program's
rapid acquisition goals has not been a priority for the
Department of Defense. While the AF requested $1,395,278,000, a
substantial increase over the fiscal year 2019 budget of
$643,126,000, the request was still more than $630,000,000
short of the full program need. The Committee believes the
program will be a exemplar for rapid acquisition of space
programs, whether the program succeeds or fails. Failure will
have implications for Congress's willingness to fund future
programs using the National Defense Authorization Act section
804 rapid prototyping and fielding authorities for similarly
large, or even middle tier programs, for years to come.
Alternatively, if the program is to have any chance of success,
the Department cannot continue to rely on reprogramming
requests for its funding. Therefore the Committee recommends
$1,930,778,000 for Next-Gen OPIR, an increase of $535,500,000.
The Committee expects the Department to fully fund the program
in fiscal year 2021. The Committee continues to designate Next-
Gen OPIR as a congressional special interest item and continues
to direct the Secretary of the Air Force to provide quarterly
briefings to the congressional defense committees detailing
progress against cost and schedule milestones.
Electro Optical/Infrared Weather Strategy.--The Committee
is concerned about the Air Force's electro optical/infrared
[EO/IR] weather acquisition strategy. After several years of
fits and starts, the fiscal year 2019 budget request seemed to
have a viable path forward for interim and long-term solutions
to meet EO/IR weather gaps. Due to contract challenges with the
interim solution, however, the Air Force abandoned the strategy
as laid out in the fiscal year 2019 and 2020 budget submissions
and recently submitted, informally, its latest plan, a
distributed low earth orbit solution. While the Committee
appreciates some aspects of this new acquisition plan, in
particular, leveraging commercial investment via weather data
as a service, the Committee is concerned about the Department's
shift to what may be an overreliance on notional small
satellite constellations for a variety of challenging
acquisitions. No small satellite constellations currently exist
and potential challenges with communications and ground systems
have yet to be tested. Moreover the Committee has not been
afforded the opportunity for a briefing on the new proposal and
has many questions about the plans, timeline, and cost
assumptions. Therefore, the Committee recommends a rescission
of $74,400,000 from fiscal year 2019 and a reduction of
$24,742,000 from fiscal year 2020 from Research, Test,
Development, and Evaluation, Air Force, Space Rapid
Capabilities Office for the terminated ORS-8 program, which was
to be the interim EO/IR weather solution. In addition, the
Committee recommends a transfer of $101,222,000 from Research,
Test, Development, and Evaluation, Air Force, EO/IR Weather, to
Space Procurement, Air Force, EO/IR Weather, for the
procurement of an EO/IR weather sensor. The Committee welcomes
additional discussion with the Air Force about its new
acquisition strategy prior to conference discussion with the
House Appropriations Committee.
Tactically Responsive Space Launch.--The Committee believes
that demonstrating tactically responsive launch operations that
leverage new and innovative commercial capabilities will enable
Department of Defense space domain mission assurance and
strategic deterrence objectives. A coherent tactically
responsive launch concept of operations is needed to address
tactics, techniques, and procedures and support operationally
relevant satellite reconstitution demonstrations and pilot
programs. Therefore, the Committee recommends establishment of
a dedicated funding line for tactically responsive space launch
to improve visibility and oversight of small launch funding and
ensure the Department is focused on a program for responsive,
cost-effective small launch acquisition for evolving missions
and future national security space objectives. Additionally,
the Committee recommends an increase of $22,000,000 in
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air Force,
Tactically Responsive Space Launch.
Inland Launch.--The Committee directs the Secretary of
Defense to report, not later than 180 days after enactment of
this act, on the feasibility, potential benefits and risks, and
cost estimates of the establishment of an inland testing and
space corridor for hypersonic testing and space launch. The
report should give consideration to existing military test
ranges and spaceports and shall identify known regulatory,
statutory, or other impediments to using such facilities for
launch or hypersonic testing.

Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-Wide

Appropriations, 2019.................................... $23,691,836,000
Budget estimate, 2020................................... 24,346,953,000
Committee recommendation................................ 26,371,649,000

The Committee recommends an appropriation of
$26,371,649,000. This is $2,024,696,000 above the budget
estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this
appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

BASIC RESEARCH
1 DTRA UNIVERSITY STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP BASIC RESEARCH 26,000 26,000 ..............
2 DEFENSE RESEARCH SCIENCES 432,284 408,634 -23,650
3 BASIC RESEARCH INITIATIVES 48,874 118,874 +70,000
4 BASIC OPERATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH SCIENCE 54,122 45,092 -9,030
5 NATIONAL DEFENSE EDUCATION PROGRAM 92,074 100,074 +8,000
6 HISTORICALLY BLACK COLLEGES & UNIV [HBCU] 30,708 32,708 +2,000
7 CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM 45,238 57,238 +12,000
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BASIC RESEARCH 729,300 788,620 +59,320

APPLIED RESEARCH
8 JOINT MUNITIONS TECHNOLOGY 19,306 19,306 ..............
9 BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY 97,771 92,771 -5,000
11 LINCOLN LABORATORY RESEARCH PROGRAM 52,317 52,317 ..............
12 APPLIED RESEARCH FOR ADVANCEMENT S&T PRIORITIES 62,200 74,200 +12,000
13 INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY 442,556 414,390 -28,166
14 BIOLOGICAL WARFARE DEFENSE 34,588 34,588 ..............
15 CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM 202,587 204,687 +2,100
16 CYBER SECURITY RESEARCH 15,118 15,118 ..............
17 TACTICAL TECHNOLOGY 337,602 313,002 -24,600
18 MATERIALS AND BIOLOGICAL TECHNOLOGY 223,976 214,976 -9,000
19 ELECTRONICS TECHNOLOGY 332,192 317,192 -15,000
20 WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION DEFEAT TECHNOLOGIES 179,096 174,096 -5,000
21 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING INSTITUTE 9,580 9,580 ..............
22 SPECIAL OPERATIONS TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 40,569 40,569 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, APPLIED RESEARCH 2,049,458 1,976,792 -72,666

ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT
23 JOINT MUNITIONS ADVANCED TECH INSENSITIVE MUNITIONS AD 25,779 25,779 ..............
24 SO/LIC ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT 5,000 5,000 ..............
25 COMBATING TERRORISM TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT 70,517 86,517 +16,000
26 FOREIGN COMPARATIVE TESTING 24,970 24,970 ..............
28 COUNTERPROLIFERATION INITIATIVES--PROLIF PREV & DEFEAT 340,065 320,065 -20,000
29 ADVANCED CONCEPTS AND PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT 14,208 41,201 +26,993
30 WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY 10,000 .............. -10,000
31 ADVANCED RESEARCH 20,674 20,674 ..............
32 JOINT DOD-DOE MUNITIONS TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 18,773 18,773 ..............
33 ADVANCED AEROSPACE SYSTEMS 279,741 279,741 ..............
34 SPACE PROGRAMS AND TECHNOLOGY 202,606 172,606 -30,000
35 ANALYTIC ASSESSMENTS 19,429 19,429 ..............
36 ADVANCED INNOVATIVE ANALYSIS AND CONCEPTS 37,645 37,645 ..............
37 ADVANCED INNOVATIVE ANALYSIS AND CONCEPTS--MHA 14,668 14,668 ..............
38 COMMON KILL VEHICLE TECHNOLOGY 13,600 13,600 ..............
40 DEFENSE INNOVATION UNIT 29,398 29,398 ..............
41 TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION 60,000 30,000 -30,000
42 CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM--ADVANCED DEV 172,486 172,486 ..............
43 RETRACT LARCH 159,688 159,688 ..............
44 JOINT ELECTRONIC ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY 12,063 12,063 ..............
45 JOINT CAPABILITY TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATIONS 107,359 89,859 -17,500
46 NETWORKED COMMUNICATIONS CAPABILITIES 2,858 2,858 ..............
47 DEFENSE-WIDE MANUFACTURING SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY PROG 96,397 223,397 +127,000
48 MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM 42,834 52,834 +10,000
49 EMERGING CAPABILITIES TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 80,911 116,911 +36,000
50 GENERIC LOGISTICS R&D TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATIONS 10,817 12,217 +1,400
51 STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH PROGRAM 66,157 66,157 ..............
52 MICROELECTRONIC TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT AND SUPPORT 171,771 206,771 +35,000
53 JOINT WARFIGHTING PROGRAM 4,846 4,846 ..............
54 ADVANCED ELECTRONICS TECHNOLOGIES 128,616 111,616 -17,000
55 COMMAND, CONTROL AND COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS 232,134 231,134 -1,000
56 NETWORK-CENTRIC WARFARE TECHNOLOGY 512,424 486,824 -25,600
57 SENSOR TECHNOLOGY 163,903 158,903 -5,000
58 DISTRIBUTED LEARNING ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 13,723 13,723 ..............
59 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING INSTITUTE 15,111 15,111 ..............
60 QUICK REACTION SPECIAL PROJECTS 47,147 24,147 -23,000
61 ENGINEERING SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY 19,376 19,376 ..............
62 HIGH ENERGY LASER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM 85,223 85,223 ..............
63 TEST & EVALUATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY 175,574 191,574 +16,000
64 NATIONAL SECURITY INNOVATION NETWORK 25,000 25,000 ..............
65 OPERATIONAL ENERGY CAPABILITY IMPROVEMENT 70,536 44,536 -26,000
66 CWMD SYSTEMS 28,907 .............. -28,907
68 SPECIAL OPERATIONS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 89,154 103,154 +14,000
69 SPACE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT 20,000 20,000 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 3,742,088 3,790,474 +48,386

DEMONSTRATION & VALIDATION
70 NUCLEAR AND CONVENTIONAL PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT 42,695 42,695 ..............
71 WALKOFF 92,791 92,791 ..............
72 ACQUISITION ENTERPRISE DATA AND INFORMATION SERVICES 5,659 5,659 ..............
73 ENVIRONMENTAL SECURITY TECHNICAL CERTIFICATION PROGRAM 66,572 68,572 +2,000
74 BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE TERMINAL DEFENSE SEGMENT 302,761 306,761 +4,000
75 BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE MIDCOURSE DEFENSE SEGMENT 1,156,506 1,360,616 +204,110
76 CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM 83,662 80,162 -3,500
77 BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE SENSORS 283,487 283,288 -199
78 BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE ENABLING PROGRAMS 571,507 634,449 +62,942
79 SPECIAL PROGRAMS--MDA 377,098 512,098 +135,000
80 AEGIS BMD 727,479 723,639 -3,840
81 BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE COMMAND AND CONTROL, BATTLE 564,206 549,756 -14,450
MANAGEMENT
82 BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE JOINT WARFIGHTER SUPPORT 51,532 51,532 ..............

BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE INTERGRATION AND OPERATIONS
83 CENTER (MDIOC) 56,161 56,161 ..............
84 REGARDING TRENCH 22,424 22,424 ..............
85 SEA BASED X-BAND RADAR [SBX] 128,156 128,156 ..............
86 ISRAELI COOPERATIVE PROGRAMS 300,000 300,000 ..............
87 BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE TEST 395,924 399,738 +3,814
88 BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE TARGETS 554,171 611,939 +57,768
89 HUMANITARIAN DEMINING 10,820 10,820 ..............
90 COALITION WARFARE 11,316 11,316 ..............
91 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE CORROSION PROGRAM 3,365 11,165 +7,800
92 TECHNOLOGY MATURATION INITIATIVES 303,458 298,520 -4,938
93 MISSILE DEFEAT PROJECT 17,816 17,816 ..............
95 HYPERSONIC DEFENSE 157,425 395,268 +237,843
96 ADVANCED INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES 1,312,735 1,477,735 +165,000
97 TRUSTED AND ASSURED MICROELECTRONICS 542,421 542,421 ..............
98 RAPID PROTOTYPING PROGRAM 100,957 50,957 -50,000
99 DEFENSE INNOVATION UNIT [DIU] PROTOTYPING 92,000 92,000 ..............
100 DOD UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEM [UAS] COMMON DEVELOPMENT 3,021 7,021 +4,000
102 HOMELAND DEFENSE RADAR-HAWAII 274,714 173,548 -101,166
103 PACIFIC DISCRIMINATING RADAR 6,711 6,711 ..............
104 WARGAMING AND SUPPORT FOR STRATEGIC ANALYSIS [SSA] 3,751 3,751 ..............
105 DEFENSE RAPID INNOVATION PROGRAM 14,021 14,021 ..............
107 JOINT C5 CAPABILITY DEVELOPMENT, INTEGRATION AND 20,062 20,062 ..............
INTEROPERABILITY
108 LONG RANGE DISCRIMINATION RADAR 136,423 136,423 ..............
109 IMPROVED HOMELAND DEFENSE INTERCEPTORS 412,363 494,363 +82,000
110 BMD TERMINAL DEFENSE SEGMENT TEST 25,137 25,137 ..............
111 AEGIS BMD TEST 169,822 169,822 ..............
112 BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE SENSOR TEST 105,530 105,530 ..............
113 LAND-BASED SM-3 [LBSM3] 38,352 38,352 ..............
115 BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE MIDCOURSE DEFENSE SEGMENT TEST 98,139 98,139 ..............
117 ENTERPRISE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS 1,600 1,600 ..............
118 JOINT ELECTROMAGNETIC TECHNOLOGY [JET] PROGRAM 3,191 3,191 ..............
119 CYBER SECURITY INITIATIVE 1,138 11,138 +10,000
120 SPACE TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT AND PROTOTYPING 85,000 85,000 ..............
121 SPACE TRACKING AND SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM 35,849 36,349 +500
122 BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE SYSEM SPACE PROGRAMS 27,565 140,565 +113,000
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, DEMONSTRATION & VALIDATION 9,797,493 10,709,177 +911,684

ENGINEERING & MANUFACTURING DEVELOPMENT
123 NUCLEAR AND CONVENTIONAL PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT 11,276 11,276 ..............
124 PROMPT GLOBAL STRIKE CAPABILITY DEVELOPMENT 107,000 107,000 ..............
125 CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM 384,047 373,814 -10,233
126 JOINT TACTICAL INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM [JTIDS] 40,102 52,602 +12,500
127 WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION DEFEAT CAPABILITIES 13,100 13,100 ..............
128 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 3,070 3,070 ..............
129 HOMELAND PERSONNEL SECURITY INITIATIVE 7,295 7,295 ..............
130 DEFENSE EXPORTABILITY PROGRAM 17,615 17,615 ..............
131 OUSD(C) IT DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVES 15,653 5,653 -10,000
132 DOD ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT AND DEMONSTRATION 2,378 1,628 -750
133 DCMO POLICY AND INTEGRATION 1,618 1,618 ..............
134 DEFENSE AGENCY INITIATIVES FINANCIAL SYSTEM 27,944 23,944 -4,000
135 DEFENSE RETIRED AND ANNUITANT PAY SYSTEM [DRAS] 6,609 6,609 ..............
136 DEFENSE-WIDE ELECTRONIC PROCUREMENT CAPABILITIES 9,619 9,619 ..............
137 TRUSTED & ASSURED MICROELECTRONICS 175,032 175,032 ..............
138 INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM 425 425 ..............
139 GLOBAL COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM 1,578 1,578 ..............
140 DOD ENTERPRISE ENERGY INFORMATION MANAGEMENT [EEIM] 4,373 4,373 ..............
141 CWMD SYSTEMS: SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT AND DEMONSTRATION 12,854 12,854 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, ENGINEERING & MANUFACTURING DEVELOPMENT 841,588 829,105 -12,483

RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT
142 JOINT CAPABILITY EXPERIMENTATION 13,000 13,000 ..............
143 DEFENSE READINESS REPORTING SYSTEM [DRRS] 9,724 9,724 ..............
144 JOINT SYSTEMS ARCHITECTURE DEVELOPMENT 9,593 9,593 ..............
145 CENTRAL TEST AND EVALUATION INVESTMENT DEVELOPMENT 260,267 512,817 +252,550
146 ASSESSMENTS AND EVALUATIONS 30,834 30,834 ..............
147 MISSION SUPPORT 68,498 68,498 ..............
148 JOINT MISSION ENVIRONMENT TEST CAPABILITY [JMETC] 83,091 89,091 +6,000
149 TECHNICAL STUDIES, SUPPORT AND ANALYSIS 18,079 18,079 ..............
150 JOINT INTEGRATED AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE ORGANIZATION 70,038 70,038 ..............
152 SYSTEMS ENGINEERING 37,140 37,140 ..............
153 STUDIES AND ANALYSIS SUPPORT 4,759 4,759 ..............
154 NUCLEAR MATTERS--PHYSICAL SECURITY 8,307 8,307 ..............
155 SUPPORT TO NETWORKS AND INFORMATION INTEGRATION 9,441 9,441 ..............
156 GENERAL SUPPORT TO USD (INTELLIGENCE) 1,700 5,700 +4,000
157 CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM 110,363 110,363 ..............
166 SMALL BUSINESS INNOVATION RESEARCH/TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER 3,568 3,568 ..............
167 MAINTAINING TECHNOLOGY ADVANTAGE 19,936 19,936 ..............
168 DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS 16,875 15,875 -1,000
169 DEFENSE TECHNICAL INFORMATION CENTER [DTIC] 57,716 57,716 ..............
170 R&D IN SUPPORT OF DOD ENLISTMENT, TESTING & EVALUATION 34,448 29,448 -5,000
171 DEVELOPMENT TEST AND EVALUATION 22,203 22,203 ..............
172 MANAGEMENT HEADQUARTERS (RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT) 13,208 13,208 ..............
173 MANAGEMENT HEADQUARTERS DEFENSE TECHNICAL INFORMATION 3,027 3,027 ..............
CENTER [DTIC]
174 BUDGET AND PROGRAM ASSESSMENTS 8,017 8,017 ..............
175 ODNA TECHNOLOGY AND RESOURCE ANALYSIS 3,194 3,194 ..............
176 DEFENSE DIGITAL SERVICE [DDS] DEVELOPMENT SUPPORT 1,000 1,000 ..............
179 DEFENSE OPERATIONS SECURITY [OPSEC] 3,037 8,037 +5,000
180 JOINT STAFF ANALYTICAL SUPPORT 9,216 9,216 ..............
183 SUPPORT TO INFORMATION OPERATIONS [IO] CAPABILITIES 553 553 ..............
184 DEFENSE MILITARY DECEPTION PROGRAM OFFICE 1,014 1,014 ..............
185 COMBINED ADVANCED APPLICATIONS 58,667 48,667 -10,000
187 INTELLIGENCE CAPABILITIES AND INNOVATION INVESTMENTS 21,081 21,081 ..............
189 ALGORITHMIC WARFARE CROSS FUNCTIONAL TEAMS 221,235 221,235 ..............
191 COCOM EXERCISE ENGAGEMENT AND TRAINING TRANSFORMATION 40,073 40,073 ..............
192 DEFENSE EQUAL OPPORTUNITY MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE [DEOMI] 100 100 ..............
193 MANAGEMENT HEADQUARTERS--MDA 27,065 27,065 ..............
194 JOINT SERVICE PROVIDER [JSP] 3,090 3,090 ..............
9999 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 51,471 51,471 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT 1,354,628 1,606,178 +251,550

OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT
195 ENTERPRISE SECURITY SYSTEM [ESS] 7,945 7,945 ..............
196 JOINT ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE 208,834 208,834 ..............
197 REGIONAL INTERNATIONAL OUTREACH & PARTNERSHIP FOR PEAC 1,947 1,947 ..............
198 OVERSEAS HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE SHARED INFORMATION SY 310 310 ..............
199 INDUSTRIAL BASE ANALYSIS AND SUSTAINMENT SUPPORT 10,051 116,051 +106,000
200 OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 12,734 12,734 ..............
201 GLOBAL THEATER SECURITY COOPERATION MANAGEMENT 14,800 10,000 -4,800
202 CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE (OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS D 54,023 51,834 -2,189
203 PLANNING AND DECISION AID SYSTEM 4,537 4,537 ..............
204 C4I INTEROPERABILITY 64,122 64,122 ..............
210 DEFENSE INFO INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING & INTEGRATION 15,798 10,798 -5,000
211 LONG HAUL COMMUNICATIONS [DCS] 11,166 11,166 ..............
212 MINIMUM ESSENTIAL EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK 17,383 17,383 ..............
214 KEY MANAGEMENT INFRASTRUCTURE [KMI] 54,516 54,516 ..............
215 INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM 67,631 31,631 -36,000
216 INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM 289,080 344,198 +55,118
217 INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM 42,796 44,678 +1,882
218 GLOBAL COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM 25,218 17,218 -8,000
219 JOINT SPECTRUM CENTER (DEFENSE SPECTRUM ORGANIZATION) 21,698 21,698 ..............
220 JOINT INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT [JIE] 18,077 18,077 ..............
222 FEDERAL INVESTIGATIVE SERVICES INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 44,001 44,001 ..............
228 SECURITY AND INVESTIGATIVE ACTIVITIES 2,400 2,400 ..............
232 POLICY R&D PROGRAMS 6,301 6,301 ..............
233 NET CENTRICITY 21,384 21,384 ..............
235 DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS 6,359 6,359 ..............
238 DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS 2,981 2,981 ..............
241 INSIDER THREAT 1,964 1,964 ..............
242 HOMELAND DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER PROGRAM 2,221 2,221 ..............
250 LOGISTICS SUPPORT ACTIVITIES 1,361 1,361 ..............
251 PACIFIC DISASTER CENTERS 1,770 1,770 ..............
252 DEFENSE PROPERTY ACCOUNTABILITY SYSTEM 3,679 3,679 ..............
254 MQ-9 UAV 20,697 20,697 ..............
256 SPECIAL OPERATIONS AVIATION SYSTEMS ADVANCED DEV 245,795 250,395 +4,600
257 SPECIAL OPERATIONS INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 15,484 15,484 ..............
258 SOF OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS 166,922 150,154 -16,768
259 WARRIOR SYSTEMS 62,332 68,470 +6,138
260 SPECIAL PROGRAMS 21,805 21,005 -800
261 UNMANNED ISR 37,377 37,377 ..............
262 SOF TACTICAL VEHICLES 11,150 11,150 ..............
263 SOF MARITIME SYSTEMS 72,626 69,126 -3,500
264 SOF GLOBAL VIDEO SURVEILLANCE ACTIVITIES 5,363 5,363 ..............
265 SOF OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS INTELLIGENCE 12,962 12,962 ..............
266 SOF TELEPORT PROGRAM 6,158 6,158 ..............
300 NEXT GENERATION INFORMATION COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY .............. 436,000 +436,000
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 1,715,758 2,248,439 +532,681

999 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 4,116,640 4,422,864 +306,224
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, DEF-WIDE 24,346,953 26,371,649 +2,024,696
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by
the Committee:

[In thousands of dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Change from
Line Item 2020 budget Committee budget
estimate recommendation estimate
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 Defense Research Sciences 432,284 408,634 -23,650
Improving funds management: Program delays .............. .............. -23,650
3 Basic Research Initiatives 48,874 118,874 +70,000
Program increase: DEPSCOR .............. .............. +12,000
Program increase: Cyber research .............. .............. +8,000
Program increase: Basic research .............. .............. +50,000
4 Basic Operational Medical Research Science 54,122 45,092 -9,030
Improving funds management: Program delays .............. .............. -9,030
5 National Defense Education Program 92,074 100,074 +8,000
Program increase: Submarine workforce development .............. .............. +8,000
6 Historically Black Colleges and Universities/Minority 30,708 32,708 +2,000
Institutions
Program increase: Aerospace education, research and .............. .............. +2,000
innovation center
7 Chemical and Biological Defense Program 45,238 57,238 +12,000
Program increase: Smallpox antiviral post-exposure .............. .............. +12,000
prophylaxis
9 Biomedical Technology 97,771 92,771 -5,000
Improving funds management: Program delays .............. .............. -5,000
12 Applied Research for the Advancement of S&T Priorities 62,200 74,200 +12,000
Program increase: PFAS modeling .............. .............. +7,000
Program increase: Test center for quantum .............. .............. +5,000
communications and sensors
13 Information & Communications Technology 442,556 414,390 -28,166
Improving funds management: Program delays .............. .............. -13,166
Improving funds management: Unjustified increase .............. .............. -15,000
15 Chemical and Biological Defense Program 202,587 204,687 +2,100
Program increase: Coatings technologies .............. .............. +2,100
17 Tactical Technology 337,602 313,002 -24,600
Improving funds management: Program delays .............. .............. -14,600
Improving funds management: Prior year carryover .............. .............. -10,000
18 Materials and Biological Technology 223,976 214,976 -9,000
Improving funds management: Program delays .............. .............. -9,000
19 Electronics Technology 332,192 317,192 -15,000
Improving funds management: Program delays .............. .............. -15,000
20 Counter Weapons of Mass Destruction Applied Research 179,096 174,096 -5,000
Improving funds management: Unjustified growth .............. .............. -5,000
25 Combating Terrorism Technology Support 70,517 86,517 +16,000
Program increase: Bomb squad robot retrofitting .............. .............. +3,000
Program increase: Cooperative C-UAS development .............. .............. +13,000
28 Counter Weapons of Mass Destruction Advanced Technology 340,065 320,065 -20,000
Development
Maintain program affordability: Unjustified growth .............. .............. -20,000
29 Advanced Concepts and Performance Assessment 14,208 41,201 +26,993
Program increase: Cybersecurity of MDA DV left and .............. .............. +22,500
right of launch
Program increase: Cybersecurity .............. .............. +4,493
30 Weapons Technology 10,000 .............. -10,000
Restoring acquisition accountability: MD72 program .............. .............. -10,000
termination
34 Space Programs and Technology 202,606 172,606 -30,000
Improving funds management: RSGS program delays .............. .............. -30,000
41 Technology Innovation 60,000 30,000 -30,000
Improving funds management: Prior year carryover .............. .............. -30,000
45 Joint Capability Technology Demonstrations 107,359 89,859 -17,500
Improving funds management: Unjustified growth .............. .............. -17,500
47 Defense-Wide Manufacturing Science and Technology Program 96,397 223,397 +127,000
Program increase: Accelerated rapid prototyping .............. .............. +17,000
Program increase: Manufacturing cybersecurity .............. .............. +14,000
Program increase: HPC-enabled advanced manufacturing .............. .............. +17,000
Program increase: Advanced structural manufacturing .............. .............. +9,000
Program increase: Silicon based lasers .............. .............. +25,000
Program increase: Manufacturing enginering education .............. .............. +45,000
program
48 Manufacturing Technology Program 42,834 52,834 +10,000
Program increase: Steel Perforance Initiative .............. .............. +10,000
49 Emerging Capabilities Technology Development 80,911 116,911 +36,000
Program increase: Open source inteligence .............. .............. +3,000
Program increase: Remote advise and assist technology .............. .............. +8,000
development
Program increase: Disruptive air and missile defense .............. .............. +5,000
Program increase: Artificial intelligence enabled .............. .............. +10,000
sensor network
Program increase: High-altitude optical .............. .............. +10,000
reconnaissance unit and sensors
50 Generic Logistics R&D Technology Demonstrations 10,817 12,217 +1,400
Improving funds management: Prior year carryover .............. .............. -3,600
Program increase: Liquid hydrocarbon fuels .............. .............. +5,000
52 Microelectronics Technology Development and Support 171,771 206,771 +35,000
Program increase: Cyber accelerator .............. .............. +30,000
Program increase: GaN-on-Sibased RF Front-end .............. .............. +5,000
54 Advanced Electronics Technologies 128,616 111,616 -17,000
Improving funds management: Program delays .............. .............. -17,000
55 Command, Control and Communications Systems 232,134 231,134 -1,000
Improving funds management: Program delays .............. .............. -10,000
Program increase: Commercial satellite antenna .............. .............. +9,000
technology
56 Network-Centric Warfare Technology 512,424 486,824 -25,600
Improving funds management: Program delays .............. .............. -25,600
57 Sensor Technology 163,903 158,903 -5,000
Improving funds management: Program delays .............. .............. -5,000
60 Quick Reaction Special Projects 47,147 24,147 -23,000
Improving funds management: Prior year carryover .............. .............. -23,000
63 Test & Evaluation Science & Technology 175,574 191,574 +16,000
Program increase: Test resource management center .............. .............. +16,000
65 Operational Energy Capability Improvement 70,536 44,536 -26,000
Reduce duplication: Space solar power project .............. .............. -30,000
Program increase .............. .............. +4,000
66 CWMD Systems 28,907 .............. -28,907
Reduce duplication .............. .............. -28,907
68 SOF Advanced Technology Development 89,154 103,154 +14,000
Program increase: Identity management .............. .............. +14,000
73 Environmental Security Technical Certification Program 66,572 68,572 +2,000
Program increase: Technology demonstration program .............. .............. +2,000
74 Ballistic Missile Defense Terminal Defense Segment 302,761 306,761 +4,000
Program increase: Cybersecurity .............. .............. +4,000
75 Ballistic Missile Defense Midcourse Defense Segment 1,156,506 1,360,616 +204,110
RKV program termination: Transfer from line 109 to .............. .............. +180,000
GBI CE-I reliability SLEP only
Program increase: Cybersecurity .............. .............. +24,110
76 Chemical and Biological Defense Program--Dem/Val 83,662 80,162 -3,500
Improving funds management: Program delays (VAC VEE) .............. .............. -2,000
Improving funds management: Program delays (MPD) .............. .............. -1,500
77 Ballistic Missile Defense Sensors 283,487 283,288 -199
Restoring acquisition accountability: MD11 Modeling .............. .............. -21,993
and simulation development unjustified growth
Program increase: Cybersecurity .............. .............. +20,294
Program increase: Models and simulation unfunded .............. .............. +1,500
requirement
78 BMD Enabling Programs 571,507 634,449 +62,942
Program increase: Cybersecurity .............. .............. +62,942
79 Special Programs--MDA 377,098 512,098 +135,000
Program increase: Classified .............. .............. +135,000
80 AEGIS BMD 727,479 723,639 -3,840
Restoring acquisition accountability: BMD 5.1 .............. .............. -29,630
baseline unjustified growth
Improving funds management: AEGIS underlay funds .............. .............. -2,000
early to need
RKV program termination funding transfer: AEGIS .............. .............. +19,000
upgrades
Program increase: Cybersecurity .............. .............. +8,790
81 Ballistic Missile Defense Command and Control, Battle 564,206 549,756 -14,450
Management and Communications
Restoring acquisition accountability: Increment 7 .............. .............. -33,300
growth early to need
Program increase: Cybersecurity .............. .............. +18,850
87 Ballistic Missile Defense Test 395,924 399,738 +3,814
Program increase: Cybersecurity .............. .............. +3,814
88 Ballistic Missile Defense Targets 554,171 611,939 +57,768
Improving funds management: MRBM target contract .............. .............. -11,232
award delays
Program increase: HEMP hardening .............. .............. +69,000
91 Department of Defense Corrosion Program 3,365 11,165 +7,800
Program increase: Coatings technologies .............. .............. +5,000
Program increase: Military painter training and .............. .............. +2,800
applied research
92 Technology Maturation Initiatives 303,458 298,520 -4,938
Unclear budget justification: Flight test .............. .............. -4,938
95 Hypersonic Defense 157,425 395,268 +237,843
Program increase: Glide Phase Defeat Weapon System .............. .............. +25,000
Program increase: Engineering enablers .............. .............. +57,858
Program increase: Leverage and upgrade existing .............. .............. +43,942
systems
Program increase: Fiscal year 2020 partnered fight .............. .............. +111,043
test participation
96 Advanced Innovative Technologies 1,312,735 1,477,735 +165,000
Maintain program affordability: unjustified program .............. .............. -80,000
growth
Program increase: Hypervelocity Gun Weapon system .............. .............. +80,000
Program increase: Micro Nuclear Reactor Program .............. .............. +140,000
Program increase: Machine learning .............. .............. +10,000
Program increase: Advanced technologies to support .............. .............. +15,000
operational agility, fleet sustainability, and
offset advantage
98 Rapid Prototyping Program 100,957 50,957 -50,000
Reduce duplication .............. .............. -50,000
100 Department of Defense (DoD) Unmanned System Common 3,021 7,021 +4,000
Development
Program increase: Unmanned traffic management .............. .............. +4,000
102 Homeland Defense Radar--Hawaii (HDR-H) 274,714 173,548 -101,166
Improving funds management: Radar foundation and .............. .............. -41,166
thermal control system
Improving funds management: Funding acceleration .............. .............. -60,000
early to need
109 Improved Homeland Defense Interceptors 412,363 494,363 +82,000
RKV program termination: Transfer excess RKV funds to .............. .............. -140,000
line 75 for GBI CE-I reliability/SLEP only
RKV program terminiation: Transfer RKV funds to Next .............. .............. -222,363
Generation Interceptor program
RKV program termination: Transfer to Next Generation .............. .............. +222,363
Interceptor program from RKV program funds
RKV program termination: Next Generation Interceptor .............. .............. +222,000
Competitive Development
119 Cyber Security Initiative 1,138 11,138 +10,000
Program increase: Cheyenne Mountain cyber resilience .............. .............. +10,000
efforts
121 Space Tracking & Surveillance System 35,849 36,349 +500
Program increase: Cybersecurity .............. .............. +500
122 Ballistic Missile Defense System Space Programs 27,565 140,565 +113,000
Program increase: Hypersonic and ballistic tracking .............. .............. +108,000
space sensor development
Program increase: Cybersecurity .............. .............. +5,000
125 Chemical and Biological Defense Program--EMD 384,047 373,814 -10,233
Improving funds management: Program delays (ROCS) .............. .............. -4,500
Improving funds management: Program delays (MMPRDS) .............. .............. -2,533
Improving funds management: Program delays (CALS) .............. .............. -2,500
Improving funds management: Program delays (SSA) .............. .............. -700
126 Joint Tactical Information Distribution System [JTIDS] 40,102 52,602 +12,500
Program increase: Integrated Kinetic and Non-Kinetic .............. .............. +12,500
Nodal Analysis Capability Enhancement
131 OUSD(C) IT Development Initiatives 15,653 5,653 -10,000
Improving funds management: Prior year carryover .............. .............. -10,000
132 DOD Enterprise Systems Development and Demonstration 2,378 1,628 -750
Improving funds management: Prior year carryover .............. .............. -750
134 Defense Agency Initiatives [DAI]-Financial Systems .............. .............. -4,000
Improving funds management: Prior year carryover .............. .............. -4,000
145 Central Test and Evaluation Investment Development 260,267 512,817 +252,550
[CTEIP]
Program increase: Hypersonics--ground testing in .............. .............. +91,250
support of National Defense Strategy
Program increase: Hypersonics--flight test .............. .............. +14,000
infrastructure in support of National Defense
Strategy
Program increase: Space test infrastructure in .............. .............. +50,000
support of National Defense Strategy
Program increase: Directed energy infrastructure in .............. .............. +40,000
support of National Defense Strategy
Program increase: Cyber infrastructure in support of .............. .............. +40,000
National Defense Strategy
Program increase: Defense Threat Center of Excellence .............. .............. +17,300
148 Joint Mission Environment Test Capability [JMETC] 83,091 89,091 +6,000
Program increase .............. .............. +6,000
156 General Support to USD (Intelligence) 1,700 5,700 +4,000
Program increase .............. .............. +4,000
168 Defense Technology Analysis 16,875 15,875 -1,000
Improving funds management: Prior year carryover .............. .............. -4,000
Program increase: Technology transition .............. .............. +3,000
170 R&D in Support of DoD Enlistment, Testing and Evaluation 34,448 29,448 -5,000
Maintain program affordability: unjustified growth .............. .............. -5,000
179 Defense Operations Security Initiative [DOSI] 3,037 8,037 +5,000
Program increase: Cyber kinetic combat environment .............. .............. +5,000
185 Combined Advanced Applications 58,667 48,667 -10,000
Classified adjustment .............. .............. -10,000
199 Industrial Base Analysis and Sustainment Support 10,051 116,051 +106,000
Program increase: Machine and advanced manufacturing .............. .............. +20,000
Program increase: Automated textile manufacturing .............. .............. +10,000
Program increase: Precision optics .............. .............. +6,000
Program increase: Interdisciplinary center for .............. .............. +15,000
advanced manufacturing systems
Program increase: Rare earth elements from coal ash .............. .............. +5,000
Program increase: Defense manufacturing communities .............. .............. +50,000
201 Global Theater Security Cooperation Management 14,800 10,000 -4,800
Information Systems [G-TSCMIS]
Maintain program affordability: unjustified growth .............. .............. -4,800
202 Chemical and Biological Defense (Operational Systems 54,023 51,834 -2,189
Development)
Improving funds management: Program delays (SSA) .............. .............. -700
Improving funds management: Program delays (ALS MOD) .............. .............. -500
Improving funds management: Program delays (MODPROT) .............. .............. -500
Improving funds management: Program delays (JBAIDS) .............. .............. -489
210 Defense Info Infrastructure Engineering and Integration 15,798 10,798 -5,000
Improving funds management: Prior year carryover .............. .............. -5,000
215 Information Systems Security Program 67,631 31,631 -36,000
Maintan program affordability: Unjustified growth .............. .............. -36,000
216 Information Systems Security Program 289,080 344,198 +55,118
DOD requested transfer to Line 217: Sharkseer .............. .............. -1,882
Program increase: Centers for Academic Excellence .............. .............. +12,000
Program increase: Workforce transformation cyber .............. .............. +25,000
security initiative pilot
Program increase: Cyber scholarships for senior .............. .............. +10,000
military colleges
Program increase: Cyber security pathfinders .............. .............. +10,000
217 Information Systems Security Program 42,796 44,678 +1,882
DOD requested transfer from Line 216: Sharkseer .............. .............. +1,882
218 Global Command and Control System 25,218 17,218 -8,000
Improving Funds Management: Prior year carryover .............. .............. -8,000
256 Aviation Systems 245,795 250,395 +4,600
SOCOM requested transfer from PDW, Line 61: RFCM .............. .............. +8,400
Program increase: Aviation Systems, Future Vertical .............. .............. +8,800
Lift
Improving funds management: HEL ground test early to .............. .............. -7,000
need
Improving funds management: Unjustified growth (ITMS) .............. .............. -5,600
258 Operational Enhancements 166,922 150,154 -16,768
Classified Adjustment .............. .............. -16,768
259 Warrior Systems 62,332 68,470 +6,138
Improving Funds Management: Prior year carryover .............. .............. -5,000
Improving funds management: Unjustified growth (C- .............. .............. -3,000
UAS)
Improving funds management: NGLS excess to need .............. .............. -862
Program increase: SGM collaborative strike .............. .............. +15,000
enhancement
260 Special Programs 21,805 21,005 -800
Classified Adjustment .............. .............. -4,000
Program increase: Enhanced visual augmentation system .............. .............. +3,200
263 Maritime Systems 72,626 69,126 -3,500
Insufficient budget justification: Poor justification .............. .............. -6,500
materials [DCS]
Program increase: Driver propulsion device .............. .............. +3,000
300 NEXT GENERATION INFORMATION COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY .............. 436,000 +436,000
(5G)
Program increase .............. .............. +436,000
999 Classified Programs 4,116,640 4,422,864 +306,224
Classified adjustment .............. .............. +303,224
Program increase: Transport access control .............. .............. +3,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Strategic Capabilities Office.--Since its inception, the
Committee has been supportive of the Strategic Capabilities
Office [SCO], which uses existing weapons systems in new ways
to counter near peer adversaries. The Committee believes that
such focus on near term solutions to counter threats and
responsiveness to the needs of the Combatant Commands is vital,
however, the Committee shares concerns from within the
Department of Defense that SCO's ability to successfully
transition programs to service partners and ensure that
programs meet requirements needs improvement. The Committee
understands that the Department is conducting a review of SCO's
prior year budgets and the fiscal year 2020 budget submission,
including all current SCO projects and 2020 new starts. The
Committee always welcomes a reevaluation of budget priories and
oversight of programs within the Department, but notes that
revisiting program decisions a month prior to the start of the
fiscal year challenges effective congressional budget
oversight. Therefore, the Committee directs the Secretary of
Defense to provide the congressional defense committees with
the findings of the program review, including metrics on
transition success, and a funding realignment plan, by November
1, 2019. In addition, the Committee directs the Secretary to
provide to the congressional defense committees, quarterly
obligation and expenditure reports for SCO by project. Finally,
the Secretary shall report to the congressional defense
committees with recommendations for enhancing SCO's ability to
transition programs and ensure that programs within the SCO
portfolio are optimized to meet Department of Defense
requirements. Recommendations shall include changes that can be
made within the current SCO organizational structure, but may
include options for a broader reorganization. The report shall
include the views of each Combatant Command on the
recommendations.
User Activity Monitoring.--The Committee remains concerned
about insider threats to Department of Defense information
systems and appreciates the Department's effort to establish a
task force to develop an approach to user activity monitoring
[UAM] across the Department and identify challenges and
necessary resources to implement the approach. The Committee
urges the Department to expedite these UAM efforts and
establish a program that provides UAM coverage of all employees
with access to classified networks. The Committee also directs
that the Chief Information Officer report to the Committee not
later than 90 days after the enactment of this act, the
findings of the task force to date, including the timeline to
initiate a program for comprehensive UAM coverage across the
Department beginning in fiscal year 2020; a recommended
governance structure for managing execution of such a program;
any obstacles identified to establishing such a program to
include legal, financial, contractual, or cultural issues;
identification of the resources required to implement the
program in fiscal year 2020; and an explanation of how the
program complies with all relevant provisions of Executive
Order 13587 and CNSS Directive 504.
Cyber Education.--The Committee supports efforts by the
Department of Defense and National Security Agency to reduce
the vulnerability of our national information infrastructure by
promoting higher education and research in cyber defense and
producing professionals with cyber defense expertise.
Therefore, the Committee recommends an increase in Research,
Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-Wide of $12,000,000
for the National Centers for Academic Excellence Cyber Defense
program. The Committee recommends an additional increase of
$25,000,000 for the establishment of a workforce development
pilot program that would offer certificate-based courses
through the Centers for Academic Excellence in cybersecurity
and artificial intelligence. Finally, the Committee recommends
$10,000,000 to fund an initiative authorized in the John S.
McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019,
for the Secretary of Defense to designate Department of Defense
Cyber Institutes at institutions of higher education, with
consideration to the Senior Military Colleges, to award
scholarships, student and research support, and a K-12 cyber
education program.
Cyber Professionals From Minority Communities.--The
Committee is aware of the significant need for attracting well
qualified individuals with cyber training to aid the nation
against adversarial cyber threats. The Committee encourages the
Department of Defense and the intelligence community to review
opportunities to grow its workforce by focusing future
recruitment in underrepresented populations and minority
communities and to work with qualified historically black
colleges and universities to identify and recruit the next
generation of cyber professionals.
Manufacturing Innovation Institutes.--The Committee
continues to support the Manufacturing Innovation Institutes,
but notes that the Department of Defense lacks a comprehensive
approach to integrating the institutes into each service's
future year's research agenda. Therefore, the Committee directs
the Secretary of Defense to provide a briefing not later than
90 days after the enactment of this act, describing a plan for
sustained investment in the Manufacturing Innovation
Institutes, including integration with the military services to
facilitate transition of advanced manufacturing capabilities
into fielded systems and programs of record.
Manufacturing Engineering Programs.--The Committee
recognizes that the United States must maintain a technically
trained workforce to meet the defense industrial base
requirements of the Department of Defense. Therefore, the
Committee recommends an additional $45,000,000 above the fiscal
year 2020 President's budget request for manufacturing
engineering grants and encourages the Secretary of Defense to
prioritize funding under this program to support community
colleges and technical schools.
Micro Nuclear Reactors.--The Strategic Capabilities Office
[SCO] of the Department of Defense has initiated studies and
analysis to determine the feasibility and safety of developing
a transportable nuclear reactor to better satisfy the logistics
and other power needs of Department of Defense expeditionary
basing, humanitarian assistance, and disaster relief
operations. The Committee supports SCO's initial efforts to
develop preliminary engineering plans, address key technical
and manufacturing weaknesses, and build initial safety and
licensing documentation. The Committee recommends an additional
$140,000,000 in Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation;
Defense-Wide to expedite efforts toward a final engineering
design.
Precision Optics.--The Committee is aware that there are
challenges within the precision optical systems supply chain to
include increased competition from overseas suppliers, a
shortage of later-stage research and development investments,
and a shrinking skilled workforce. The Committee recognizes
that stable later-stage development of innovative optical
materials and optical manufacturing technologies is required.
Additional efforts should be made to stabilize the industry and
provide for optics technician training programs in key
geographical regions to insure a future technical workforce for
the industry.
Cheyenne Mountain Cyber Resiliency Efforts.--The Committee
notes the criticality of the Cheyenne Mountain Complex to U.S.
national security, including ballistic missile defense
operations, as well as the increasing cyber threat. Therefore,
the Committee recommends $10,000,000 for industrial control
systems cyber security solutions for key Department of Defense
installations critical to homeland defense and overseas
operations, with special emphasis on the Cheyenne Mountain
Complex.
Commercial Artificial Intelligence Solutions.--The
Committee is encouraged by the ongoing rapid fielding of
commercially-available technologies, and the contributions made
by small businesses, that utilize artificial intelligence for
the Department of Defense. Recent advances in commercially
available technology have made it possible to develop,
manufacture, and deploy technologies that can process
information more effectively and efficiently, and at much lower
cost than legacy systems. The Joint Artificial Intelligence
Center has already identified disaster response and predictive
maintenance as two National Mission Initiatives. Accordingly,
the Committee recommends that the Defense Innovation Unit
identify commercial artificial intelligence solutions in
support of those National Mission Initiatives. The Committee
also recommends that the Secretary of Defense take steps to
enhance the ability of small businesses, which demonstrate the
ability to advance artificial intelligence-related
capabilities, to compete for Joint Artificial Intelligence
Center projects and include a description of such small
business efforts in the fiscal year 2021 budget justification
materials.
Multi-Mission Payload-Medium.--The Committee is concerned
by the recent decision of the United States Special Operations
Command [USSOCOM] to transfer funds away from the Multi-Mission
Payload-Medium [MMP-M] prior to developmental and operational
testing needed to field this capability. The MMP-M system was
recently outfitted on a modified aircraft and was set to begin
operational testing in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2019
at the request of the Army Special Operations Command in order
to expand its capabilities on the physical and digital
battlefield. Given the funding and time spent on modifying the
MMP-M system and aircraft, it would be fiscally and
operationally prudent to follow through with the required
testing. The Committee directs the USSOCOM to finish
operational testing on the MMP-M system using previously
appropriated funds for this effort and provide a report to the
congressional defense committees on the results of the testing.
Advanced Electric Vertical Take Off and Landing Unmanned
Aerial System for Distributed Logistics and Test Range.--As
other nations increase their Arctic presence, it is imperative
that the U.S. military do the same. Therefore, the Committee
urges the Air Force to develop an advanced Electric Vertical
Take Off and Landing Unmanned Aerial System, including a five-
sensor detect and avoid system, for distributed logistics and a
test range to provide for demonstration of the system,
including operation in a GPS denied environment and to help
meet Arctic defense strategies.

Operational Test and Evaluation, Defense

Appropriations, 2019.................................... $381,009,000
Budget estimate, 2020................................... 221,200,000
Committee recommendation................................ 232,700,000

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $232,700,000.
This is $11,500,000 above the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the adjustments recommended by
the Committee:

Testing for Rapid Prototyping and Rapid Fielding
Programs.--The Director, Operational Test and Evaluation, in
coordination with the Under Secretary of Defense (Acquisition
and Sustainment) and the Under Secretary of Defense (Research
and Engineering), and with the cooperation of the respective
service test organizations, is directed to provide to the
congressional defense committees, concurrently with the fiscal
year 2021 President's budget request, an assessment of test
strategies for all current and proposed acquisition programs
using section 804 acquisition authorities. This assessment
shall include a review of test sufficiency, scope, realism,
data to be collected, as well as resources required to conduct
this testing.
Cyber Talent Recruitment Initiative.--The Committee notes
continued weaknesses in the Department of Defense's cyber
posture, to include challenges in the recruitment and retention
of qualified cyber talent. Therefore, the Committee recommends
the Department of Defense consider implementing a pilot program
to provide scholarships through qualified institutions of
higher education, including community colleges, to students who
are enrolled in programs that lead to degrees or specialized
program certifications in the cybersecurity field that support
Department of Defense requirements. The Committee believes that
the Department could benefit from such a program and
partnership with universities to create a cyber talent pipeline
that develops a cyber workforce. The Committee recommends
$1,500,000 to develop a program that identifies university
partners and a structure to award scholarships to build a
certified cyber defense workforce.

TITLE V

REVOLVING AND MANAGEMENT FUNDS

Defense Working Capital Funds

Appropriations, 2019.................................... $1,641,115,000
Budget estimate, 2020................................... 1,226,211,000
Committee recommendation................................ 1,580,211,000

The Committee recommends an appropriation of
$1,580,211,000. This is $354,000,000 above the budget estimate.

committee recommended program

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this
appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

[In thousands of dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Change from
Item 2020 budget Committee budget
estimate recommendation estimate
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Arsenals Initiative............................................. 57,467 202,467 +145,000
Program increase: Arsenals initiative....................... .............. .............. +145,000
Supply Management............................................... 32,130 32,130 ..............
Program increase: Pilot program for partnership with digital .............. 9,000 +9,000
manufacturing institute efforts................................
-----------------------------------------------
Total, Defense Working Capital Fund, Army............... 89,597 243,597 +154,000
===============================================
Supplies and Materials.......................................... 92,499 92,499 ..............
-----------------------------------------------
Total, Defense Working Capital Fund, Air Force.......... 92,499 92,499 ..............
===============================================
Defense Logistics Agency........................................ 49,085 49,085 ..............
-----------------------------------------------
Total, Defense Working Capital Fund, Defense-wide....... 49,085 49,085 ..............
===============================================
Commissary Operations........................................... 995,030 995,030 ..............
-----------------------------------------------
Total, Defense Working Capital Fund, Defense-wide, DECA. 995,030 995,030 ..............
===============================================
Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency................. .............. 200,000 +200,000
Transfer: DCSA funding from request as a separate working .............. .............. +200,000
capital fund...............................................
-----------------------------------------------
Total, Defense Working Capital Fund, Defense .............. 200,000 +200,000
Counterintelligence and Security Agency................
===============================================
Grand Total, Defense Working Capital Funds.............. 1,226,211 1,580,211 +354,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Meals Ready-to-Eat.--The Committee recommends full funding
for the Defense Logistics Agency's request of 2.5 million cases
of Meals Ready to Eat and reaffirms its support for the War
Reserve stock objective of 5.0 million cases and the minimum
sustainment rate for the industrial base.

Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency

Appropriations, 2019....................................................
Budget estimate, 2020................................... $200,000,000
Committee recommendation................................................

The Committee recommends full funding of the Defense
Counterintelligence and Security Agency under the Defense
Working Capital Funds heading.

TITLE VI

OTHER DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE PROGRAMS

Defense Health Program

Appropriations, 2019.................................... $34,007,519,000
Budget estimate, 2020................................... 32,998,687,000
Committee recommendation................................ 33,495,289,000

The Committee recommends an appropriation of
$33,495,289,000. This is $496,602,000 above the budget
estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this
appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE
10 IN-HOUSE CARE 9,570,615 9,322,915 -247,700
20 PRIVATE SECTOR CARE 15,041,006 14,983,506 -57,500
30 CONSOLIDATED HEALTH SUPPORT 1,975,536 1,938,036 -37,500
40 INFORMATION MANAGEMENT 2,004,588 1,902,788 -101,800
50 MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES 333,246 333,246 ..............
60 EDUCATION AND TRAINING 793,810 778,210 -15,600
70 BASE OPERATIONS/COMMUNICATIONS 2,093,289 2,093,289 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
SUBTOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 31,812,090 31,351,990 -460,100

PROCUREMENT
150 INITIAL OUTFITTING 26,135 7,651 -18,484
160 REPLACEMENT AND MODERNIZATION 225,774 225,774 ..............
170 JOINT OPERATIONAL MEDICINE INFORMATION SYSTEM 314 .............. -314
180 MILITARY HEALTH SYSTEM--DESKTOP TO DATACENTER 73,010 73,010 ..............
190 DOD HEALTH MANAGEMENT SYSTEM MODERNIZATION 129,091 129,091 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
SUBTOTAL, PROCUREMENT 454,324 435,526 -18,798

RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST AND EVALUATION
80 RESEARCH 12,621 12,621 ..............
90 EXPLORATORY DEVELOPMENT 84,266 84,266 ..............
100 ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT 279,766 279,766 ..............
110 DEMONSTRATION/VALIDATION 128,055 128,055 ..............
120 ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT 143,527 98,427 -45,100
130 MANAGEMENT AND SUPPORT 67,219 67,219 ..............
140 CAPABILITIES ENHANCEMENT 16,819 16,819 ..............
150 UNDISTRIBUTED MEDICAL RESEARCH .............. 1,020,600 +1,020,600
-------------------------------------------------
SUBTOTAL, RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST AND EVALUATION 732,273 1,707,773 +975,500
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM 32,998,687 33,495,289 +496,602
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by
the Committee:

Procurement.................................................. 454,324 435,526 -18,798
Restoring acquisition accountability: New facility ............... ............... -18,484
outfitting excess due to military construction delays...
Restoring acquisition accountability: JOMIS ahead of need ............... ............... -314

Research and Development..................................... 732,273 1,707,773 +975,500
Restoring acquisition accountability: DHMSM prior year ............... ............... -27,100
carryover...............................................
Restoring acquisition accountability: JOMIS excess growth ............... ............... -18,000
Restore core funding reduction........................... ............... ............... +212,100
Peer-reviewed ALS research............................... ............... ............... +20,000
Peer-reviewed breast cancer research..................... ............... ............... +120,000
Peer-reviewed cancer research............................ ............... ............... +90,000
Peer-reviewed epilepsy research.......................... ............... ............... +12,000
Peer-reviewed medical research........................... ............... ............... +350,000
Peer-reviewed melanoma research.......................... ............... ............... +20,000
Peer-reviewed ovarian cancer research.................... ............... ............... +10,000
Peer-reviewed prostate cancer research................... ............... ............... +64,000
Peer-reviewed rare cancers research...................... ............... ............... +7,500
Peer-reviewed traumatic brain injury and psychological ............... ............... +60,000
health research.........................................
Chronic pain management.................................. ............... ............... +15,000
Joint warfighter medical research........................ ............... ............... +25,000
Orthotics and prosthetics outcomes research.............. ............... ............... +15,000
--------------------------------------------------
Total................................................ 32,998,687 33,495,289 +496,602
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Defense Health Program Reprogramming Procedures.--The
Committee remains concerned regarding the transfer of funds
from the In-House Care budget sub-activity to pay for
contractor-provided medical care. To limit such transfers and
improve oversight within the Defense Health Program operation
and maintenance account, the Committee includes a provision
which caps the funds available for Private Sector Care under
the TRICARE program subject to prior approval reprogramming
procedures. The provision and accompanying report language
should not be interpreted by the Department as limiting the
amount of funds that may be transferred to the Direct Care
System from other budget activities within the Defense Health
Program. In addition, funding for the In-House Care and Private
Sector Care budget sub-activities are designated as
congressional special interest items. Any transfer of funds in
excess of $15,000,000 into or out of these sub-activities
requires the Secretary of Defense to follow prior approval
reprogramming procedures.
The Committee directs the Secretary of Defense to provide
written notification to the congressional defense committees of
cumulative transfers in excess of $10,000,000 out of the
Private Sector Care budget sub-activity not later than fifteen
days after such a transfer. The Committee further directs the
Assistant Secretary of Defense (Health Affairs) to provide
quarterly briefings to the congressional defense committees on
budget execution data for all of the Defense Health Program
budget activities not later than 30 days after the end of each
fiscal quarter and to adequately reflect changes to the budget
activities requested by the Services in future budget
submissions.
Carryover.--For fiscal year 2020, the Committee recommends
1 percent carryover authority for the operation and maintenance
account of the Defense Health Program. The Committee directs
the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Health Affairs) to submit a
detailed spend plan for any fiscal year 2019 designated
carryover funds to the congressional defense committees not
less than 30 days prior to executing the carryover funds.
Operation and Maintenance Reductions.--The Committee notes
that the budget justification materials for the Defense Health
Program do not delineate operation and maintenance funding
between the Defense Health Agency, Army, Navy, Air Force,
Uniformed Services University of Health Sciences, and National
Capital Region Medical Directorate. Given this lack of granular
visibility, the Department is expected to implement operation
and maintenance reductions among the various components in
accordance with their historical underexecution.
Electronic Health Record.--The Committee remains supportive
of the goal of the Departments of Defense and Veterans Affairs
to develop and deploy fully interoperable electronic health
records that can exchange data in a meaningful way and be used
in a dynamic environment to improve patient care and facilitate
smoother transitions for servicemembers from military service
to veteran status. After a nearly 2 year pause in the
deployment of Military Health System [MHS] GENESIS, the
Department of Defense is preparing its next waves of
deployments beginning in September 2019. The Committee expects
that many of the incidents identified in the Initial
Operational Test and Evaluation [IOT&E] have been corrected in
order to ensure a smoother deployment at upcoming sites and
looks forward to reviewing the results of the Full Operational
Test and Evaluation [FOT&E] report in June 2020. The Defense
Healthcare Management System Modernization [DHMSM] program
currently has a full deployment decision authority to proceed
milestone scheduled for the third quarter of fiscal year 2020.
The Committee believes that this decision should be informed by
and contingent upon the success of the fixes to the problems
identified in IOT&E and directs the Under Secretary of Defense
for Acquisition and Sustainment to brief the congressional
defense committees not later than 30 days after the full
deployment decision on the results of FOT&E.
The Committee understands that a total of 508 incidents
were identified among the four initial operating capability
sites, with 57 identified as high priority. Since IOT&E
concluded, approximately 122 of these incidents have been
resolved, while another 386 incidents remain open. Nearly two-
thirds of these open incidents have approved fixes and are
ready for re-test during the FOT&E period in early 2020. The
Committee directs the Program Executive Officer, Defense
Healthcare Management Systems [PEO DHMS] to provide monthly
reports not later than 15 days after the end of each month to
the congressional defense committees on the status of all open
incident reports as well as the 57 high priority incident
reports in order for the Committee to better track the progress
of the Department in resolving the multitude of issues
identified in the initial deployment of MHS GENESIS.
The PEO DHMS, in conjunction with the Director of the
Interagency Program Office [IPO], is directed to provide
quarterly reports not later than 30 days after the end of each
fiscal quarter to the congressional defense committees and the
Government Accountability Office on the cost and schedule of
the program, to include milestones, knowledge points, and
acquisition timelines, as well as quarterly obligation reports.
These reports should also include the following: (1) any
changes to the deployment timeline, including benchmarks, for
full operating capability; (2) any refinements to the cost
estimate for full operating capability and the total life cycle
cost of the project; and (3) the progress toward developing,
implementing, and fielding the interoperable electronic health
record throughout the two Departments' medical facilities. The
Committee further directs the PEO DHMS to continue briefing the
House and Senate Defense Appropriations Subcommittees on a
quarterly basis, coinciding with the report submission. The
Committee notes that these reporting requirements have been in
place since fiscal year 2016 and is disappointed that the PEO
DHMS failed to provide the updated program life cycle cost
estimate established in December 2018 or the updated deployment
schedule established in January 2019 as required in these
quarterly reports.
Additionally, the Committee directs the Comptroller General
to continue quarterly performance reviews of the deployment of
MHS GENESIS with a focus on whether the program is meeting
expected cost, schedule, scope, quality, and risk mitigation
expectations. The Committee expects PEO DHMS to facilitate
these quarterly performance reviews by providing the
Comptroller General with regular and in-depth access to the
program.
Finally, the Committee directs the IPO to continue to
provide quarterly reports to the House and Senate Subcommittees
on Appropriations for Defense and Military Construction,
Veterans Affairs, and Related Agencies on the progress of
interoperability between the two Departments.
Military Treatment Facility Transition.--The Committee is
dismayed with the lack of detail and timeliness of information
it has received regarding the transition of Military Treatment
Facilities [MTF] from the Services to the Defense Health Agency
[DHA]. The first eight MTFs transitioned under the control of
DHA in October 2018, and the Committee was briefed in January
2019 that east coast MTFs would transition in October 2019,
west coast MTFs in October 2020, and MTFs outside the
continental U.S. in October 2021. In July 2019, the Committee
learned secondhand about a new plan for all MTFs to transition
under DHA in October 2019, a plan that has since been reported
through Department media outlets yet still not confirmed to the
Committee, less than 1 month before the accelerated transition
is set to begin. Additional details regarding the transition,
such as a list of the functional capabilities and conditions
upon which the transfers would be based, have been requested
and not yet received. These are metrics that the Department has
set for itself and should be able to openly and expediently
share with congressional oversight committees. The Committee
finds these delays unacceptable.
The Committee directs the Comptroller General to submit a
report to the congressional defense committees not later than
90 days after the enactment of this act on the transition of
MTFs to the DHA. The report should include a review of
functions at facilities that have already transitioned,
including DHA's role, management, or administration support
that the Services are currently still providing and a timeline
for that support to cease; cost implications of the transition;
the current and planned DHA staffing model; and how the DHA
will ensure that the Services' medical requirements are
accounted for.
Traumatic Brain Injury/Psychological Health.--The Committee
recommends $60,000,000 above the fiscal year 2020 budget
request for continued research into treatment, prevention, and
detection of Traumatic Brain Injury [TBI] and improved
psychological health. The Committee directs the Assistant
Secretary of Defense (Health Affairs) to submit a report to the
congressional defense committees not later than 18 months after
the enactment of this act on expenditure and obligation data of
additional funding added by Congress for psychological health
and TBI. This report should include information on agreements
made with other government agencies.
Additionally, the Committee is aware of recent medical
advances in drug development for neurodegenerative diseases and
encourages the Department to further its research into
developing drugs that reverse, halt, or slow the
neurodegenerative process associated with TBI including
opportunities through public-private partnerships, such as the
Medical Technology Consortium. The Committee is also aware of
recent scientific evidence that suggests rotational
acceleration resulting from blunt impact is a contributing
factor to mild TBI [mTBI] and concussion and encourages the
Department to continue to work with and support research at
non-Department of Defense entities that have developed and
proposed rotational impact test methodologies to provide
enhanced protection solutions.
The Committee also notes that more work needs to be done to
diagnose TBI in all its forms, including mTBI and concussion.
The Committee encourages the Department to continue research
into and deployment of mTBI/concussion multi-modal diagnostic
devices that have been cleared by the Food and Drug
Administration. Finally, the Committee understands that chronic
migraine is often associated with post-traumatic headaches of
patients who suffer from TBI. Given the lack of data in this
area, the Committee encourages the Department to support
research to develop biomarkers useful in diagnosing and
monitoring TBI patients with chronic migraine or post-traumatic
headache.
Peer-Reviewed Medical Research Program.--The Committee
recommends $350,000,000 for the Peer-Reviewed Medical Research
Program. The Committee directs the Secretary of Defense, in
conjunction with the Service Surgeons General, to select
medical research projects of clear scientific merit and direct
relevance to military health. Research areas considered under
this funding are restricted to: arthritis, autism, burn pit
exposure, chronic migraine and post-traumatic headache,
congenital heart disease, constrictive bronchiolitis, diabetes,
Duchenne muscular dystrophy, dystonia, eating disorders,
emerging viral diseases, endometriosis, epidermolysis bullosa,
familial hypercholesterolemia, fibrous dysplasia, focal
segmental glomerulosclerosis, food allergies, Fragile X,
frontotemporal degeneration, Guillain-Barre Syndrome, gulf war
illness, hearing regeneration, hemorrhage control, hepatitis B,
hydrocephalus, immunomonitoring of intestinal transplants,
inflammatory bowel diseases, interstitial cystitis, lupus,
metals toxicology, mitochondrial disease, multiple sclerosis,
musculoskeletal health, myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic
fatigue syndrome, myotonic dystrophy, neurofibromatosis,
nutrition optimization, pancreatitis, Parkinson's, pathogen-
inactivated blood products, plant-based vaccines, polycystic
kidney disease, pressure ulcers, pulmonary fibrosis,
reconstructive transplantation, resilience training,
respiratory health, rheumatoid arthritis, sleep disorders and
restriction, spinal cord injury, spinal muscular atrophy,
sustained release drug delivery, trauma, tuberous sclerosis
complex, vascular malformations, vision, and women's heart
disease. The Committee emphasizes that the additional funding
provided under the Peer-Reviewed Medical Research Program shall
be devoted only to the purposes listed above.
Joint Warfighter Medical Research Program.--The Committee
recommends $25,000,000 for the Joint Warfighter Medical
Research Program. Funds shall be used to augment and accelerate
high priority Department of Defense and Service medical
requirements and to continue both core and congressionally-
directed prior year initiatives that are close to achieving
their objectives and yielding a benefit to military medicine.
These funds shall not be used for new projects or basic
research, and they shall be awarded at the discretion of the
Secretary of Defense following a review of medical research and
development gaps, as well as unfinanced medical requirements of
the Services. Further, the Committee directs the Assistant
Secretary of Defense (Health Affairs) to provide a report not
later than 18 months after the enactment of this act to the
congressional defense committees, which lists the projects that
receive funding. The report should include the funding amount
awarded to each project, a thorough description of each
project's research, and the benefit the research will provide
to the Department of Defense.
Peer-Reviewed Cancer Research Programs.--The Committee
recommends $120,000,000 for the peer-reviewed breast cancer
research program, $64,000,000 for the peer-reviewed prostate
cancer research program, $20,000,000 for a peer-reviewed
melanoma research program, $10,000,000 for the peer-reviewed
ovarian cancer research program, $7,500,000 for a peer-reviewed
rare cancers research program, and $90,000,000 for the peer-
reviewed cancer research program that would research cancers
not addressed in the aforementioned programs currently executed
by the Department of Defense.
The funds provided in the peer-reviewed cancer research
program are directed to be used to conduct research in the
following areas: bladder cancer; blood cancers; brain cancer;
colorectal cancer; esophageal cancer; head and neck cancer;
immunotherapy; kidney cancer; liver cancer; lung cancer;
mesothelioma; neuroblastoma; pancreatic cancer; pediatric brain
tumors; pediatric, adolescent, and young adult cancers; and
stomach cancer.
The funds provided under the peer-reviewed cancer research
program shall be used only for the purposes listed above. The
Committee directs the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Health
Affairs) to provide a report not later than 18 months after the
enactment of this act to the congressional defense committees
on the status of the peer-reviewed cancer research program. For
each research area, the report should include the funding
amount awarded, the progress of the research, and the relevance
of the research to servicemembers.
Orthotics and Prosthetics Outcomes Research.--The Committee
recommends $15,000,000 in support of orthotics and prosthetics
outcomes research. The focus of this research should be on
outcomes-based best practices through analysis of the merits of
clinical options currently available, not on the development or
improvement of new and existing technology. The Committee
directs the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Health Affairs) to
provide a report not later than 18 months after the enactment
of this act to the congressional defense committees on the
peer-reviewed projects that receive funding. The report should
include the funding amount awarded to each project and the
anticipated effect on patient care.
Chronic Pain Management Research.--The Committee recommends
$15,000,000 for a chronic pain management research program to
research opioid-alternative or non-addictive methods to treat
and manage chronic pain. Chronic pain is defined as a pain that
occurs on at least half the days for 6 months or more, and
which can be caused by issues including, but not limited to:
combat- and training-related physical or mental stress and
trauma, migraines and chronic headaches, traumatic brain
injury, arthritis, muscular-skeletal conditions, neurological
disease, tick and vector-borne disease, other insect-
transmitted or tropical disease, and cancer. The funds provided
in the chronic pain management research program shall be used
to conduct research on the effects of using prescription
opioids to manage chronic pain and for researching
alternatives, namely non-opioid or non-addictive methods to
treat and manage chronic pain, with a focus on issues related
to military populations. The Committee encourages the
Department to collaborate with non-military research
institutions, such as the institutions of the National
Institutes of Health Pain Consortium, and the institutions
represented in the Interagency Pain Research Coordinating
Committee, to address the efforts outlined in the 2016 National
Pain Strategy.
Warfighter Respiratory Health.--The Committee remains
concerned about respiratory ailments among deployed and
returning servicemembers and their deleterious effects on
combat and personnel readiness. It is estimated that
respiratory diseases affect more than 100,000 servicemembers
each year and result in almost 27,000 lost workdays per year.
The Committee has included respiratory health as part of the
Peer-Reviewed Medical Research Program and believes that
further development of a comprehensive, broad-based warfighter
respiratory research program is necessary to support overall
readiness. The Assistant Secretary of Defense (Health Affairs)
is directed to provide a report to the congressional defense
committees not later than 120 days after the enactment of this
act detailing the scope and impact of respiratory illness on
military personnel--particularly on deployed troops--dating
from the first Gulf War to the present.
Epilepsy Research.--The Committee is concerned about the
large number of service men and women returning from combat
zones who have sustained traumatic brain injuries [TBI] and the
long term consequences of TBI. These wounded warriors are at
high risk for developing post-traumatic epilepsy, depression,
cognitive difficulties, and post-traumatic stress disorder,
which may be interconnected. As current TBI longitudinal
studies have not included epilepsy, the Committee encourages
the Department to place greater priority and invest more
funding in longitudinal epidemiological research, including
epilepsy surveillance, to better understand the magnitude of
the problem and improve patient care and outcomes. To assist in
these efforts, the Committee recommends $12,000,000 in support
of epilepsy research. Additionally, the Committee urges the
Department to expand research into the mechanisms by which
brain injury produces epilepsy and research directed at the
prevention of epilepsy and concomitant comorbidities in those
known to be at high risk.
Melanoma Research.--The Committee understands that melanoma
diagnoses are increasing among active duty servicemembers and
that melanoma is the fifth most common cancer among veterans.
Recent research suggests that exposure to high levels of solar
radiation in young adulthood is associated with a higher risk
of melanoma mortality. Given the extreme and harsh conditions
servicemembers face in theater and the rise of this aggressive
and frequently deadly form of cancer, the Committee encourages
the Department to continue its investments in melanoma research
and recommends $20,000,000 for a peer-reviewed melanoma
research program.
Inclusion of Women and Minorities in the Congressionally-
Directed Medical Research Program.--The Committee recognizes
that the Congressionally-Directed Medical Research Program
supports essential research to respond to the healthcare needs
of servicemembers, their dependents, and retirees. In a series
of laws, including the 21st Century Cures Act, Congress
directed the National Institutes of Health to update relevant
policies and implement accountability mechanisms to ensure that
research supported by the agency included and conducted the
appropriate analysis to identify the differential impact of
research interventions on populations that are often
underrepresented in clinical research, including women, and
racial and ethnic minorities.
To continue improving the inclusion of women and minorities
in federally funded research, the Committee directs the
Department of Defense to develop a plan to ensure the
appropriate representation of women and minorities in its
extramural research. Specifically, this plan shall include
mechanisms to measure, enforce, assess the adequacy of, and
improve the: (1) representation of women and minorities in each
clinical trial, as well as the data on the specific challenges
researchers face in seeking to include women and minorities in
their studies; (2) examination of biological variables,
including the appropriate analysis of differential outcomes by
sex, in clinical research; (3) practice of making clinical
findings, subgroup analyses, and data publicly available, as
appropriate and applicable; and (4) requirements (including,
but not limited to, programmatic controls) and updated
guidelines to ensure the appropriate representation of women in
clinical research. Outcomes should also be analyzed for
potential sex differences. This plan should be developed in
coordination with the National Institutes of Health and
submitted to the congressional defense committees not later
than 180 days after the enactment of this act.
Medical Defense Against Infectious Disease.--The Committee
recognizes the importance of medical countermeasures to
naturally occurring infectious diseases, such as malaria,
Dengue, and Chikungunya viruses. These pose a significant
threat to the strategic access and operational effectiveness of
forces deployed outside the United States. The Committee
remains concerned with the Department's decisions over recent
years to precipitously decrease funding for malaria research,
particularly due to the emergence of increased malaria
resistance in Asia, as malaria remains the number one
infectious disease threat to U.S. servicemembers abroad. The
Committee commends the research on malaria and malaria vaccines
performed by the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research and
encourages the Department to continue investing in research for
chemoprophylaxis, surveillance, vaccine development, and other
countermeasures for malaria. The Committee further encourages
the Department to partner with colleges and universities that
have strong research programs in infectious diseases, as well
as other Federal agencies, foreign governments, international
agencies, and non-profit organizations.
Armed Forces Institute of Regenerative Medicine.--The
Committee is aware of the many emerging breakthrough treatments
for severely wounded servicemembers that have resulted from the
Army's leadership in pioneering and proving the value of a
peer-reviewed consortium approach in the field of regenerative
medicine. The Committee was disappointed to learn that the
Department plans to continue its efforts in this area with a
Regenerative Medicine Focused Research Award rather than renew
the Armed Forces Institute of Regenerative Medicine [AFIRM]
consortium model for a third period of performance, as strongly
suggested in the report accompanying the Senate version of the
Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2019 (Senate Report
115-290). The Committee encourages the Department to continue
to work with the universities and institutions involved in the
success of AFIRM I and II and establish a dedicated funding
line for regenerative medicine research in the fiscal year 2021
budget request.
Substance Abuse Pilot Program.--The Committee understands
that wounded, ill, and injured servicemembers and their
families face complicated and complex challenges, which at
times can lead to attempts at self-medication and other
substance use disorders. The Committee recognizes the need to
provide opioid safety and substance use educational resources
to at-risk servicemembers and their families in order to better
prepare them for their warrior care and transition. As such,
the Committee supports programs that utilize harm reduction
techniques and offer confidential educational information that
can reduce substance use, relapse, hospital visits, and
suicide. The Committee encourages the Department to establish a
health support and education pilot program at Army bases with
transition units to provide servicemembers and their families
with a comprehensive, Internet-based educational program and
tools related to substance use in order to assist and safeguard
their warrior care and transition.
National Intrepid Center of Excellence Satellite Strategic
Basing.--The Committee recognizes the value of the National
Intrepid Center of Excellence [NICoE] at Walter Reed National
Military Medical Center as a global leader in traumatic brain
injury [TBI] care, research, and education. In recent years,
the NICoE has broadened its reach to servicemembers and
families by establishing a successful model of satellite
centers, known as Intrepid Spirit Centers, which are located in
highly populated military and defense communities. The
Committee believes the Department of Defense and Department of
Veterans Affairs can benefit from a similar model and joint
project to serve both the active duty and veteran populations
in support of complementary and comprehensive recovery from the
effects of TBI. The Committee directs the Department of
Defense, in coordination with the Department of Veterans
Affairs, to provide a report not later than 180 days after
enactment of this act to the congressional defense committees
on the value and merit of establishing a joint NICoE Intrepid
Spirit Center that serves both active duty and veteran
populations for their mutual benefit and growth in treatment
and care. The report should include inputs from NICoE personnel
and analysis regarding localities in geographically rural areas
that are distant from existing or planned NICoE satellite
locations and that may have existing Department of Defense
medical facilities that partner with the Department of Veterans
Affairs, existing warrior transition units, or academic
institutions specializing in neurology.
Behavioral and Mental Health Care for National Guard and
Reserve.--The Committee recognizes that the men and women of
the National Guard and Reserve components need greater access
to care if they are to maintain a high state of medical
readiness to support regularly occurring deployments. It also
recognizes that the suicide rate in the reserve components is
consistently higher than the suicide rate for both the active
duty military and the civilian population. Therefore, the
Committee encourages the Department to better ensure that
periodic health assessments are followed by medical treatment
to address any behavioral or mental health conditions that
could impact a servicemember's ability to deploy, even if such
care falls outside of the pre-deployment window. This practice
would allow for a more medically ready, deployable force and
would expand access to behavioral and mental healthcare for
reserve component servicemembers.
Nurse Training in American Samoa.--The Committee recognizes
that the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences
[USUHS] is utilizing American Samoa as a training site for its
graduate nursing students. The territory is noted for having
the highest rate of military enlistment of any U.S. state or
territory, and the clinical experience in a remote, resource-
challenging environment assists in preparation for the future
demands placed on military nurses. Therefore, the Committee
encourages the USUHS to continue and expand its training
program for nursing students in American Samoa.

Chemical Agents and Munitions Destruction, Defense

Appropriations, 2019.................................... $993,816,000
Budget estimate, 2020................................... 985,499,000
Committee recommendation................................ 985,499,000

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $985,499,000.
This is equal to the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this
appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

1 CHEM DEMILITARIZATION--OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE .............. 107,351 .............. 107,351 .............. ..............
3 CHEM DEMILITARIZATION--PROCUREMENT .............. 2,218 .............. 2,218 .............. ..............
2 CHEM DEMILITARIZATION--RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, .............. 875,930 .............. 875,930 .............. ..............
TEST AND EVALUATION
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, CHEMICAL AGENTS AND MUNITIONS .............. 985,499 .............. 985,499 .............. ..............
DESTRUCTION, DEFENSE
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Assembled Chemical Weapons Alternatives Program.--The
Program Executive Office [PEO] Assembled Chemical Weapons
Alternatives [ACWA] is responsible for the safe and
environmentally compliant destruction of the remaining U.S.
chemical weapons stockpile stored at the U.S. Army Pueblo
Chemical Depot in Colorado and the Blue Grass Army Depot in
Kentucky. The Committee notes that Congress has appropriated
approximately $8,750,000,000 for the ACWA program through
fiscal year 2019, including an additional $127,000,000 in an
out-of-cycle March 2017 request for additional appropriations.
The fiscal year 2020 budget requests $870,000,000 for the
program, and the estimated total cost to complete the program
now exceeds $13,000,000,000.
In June 2017, the Department notified Congress that the
program experienced a significant Nunn-McCurdy unit cost breach
due to increases in required funding as a result of schedule
extensions, cost growth in explosive destruction technology,
and technical issues that led to systemization and operations
delays. A 2017 program office estimate showed program cost
growth of 21.6 percent over the approved acquisition program
baseline. A February 2018 Department of Defense Inspector
General Report found that schedule delays and cost increases
were due to a lack of contract oversight and that the program
was in jeopardy of not being able to meet the destruction
deadline of December 31, 2023.
The Committee was dismayed to learn in April 2019 that the
ACWA program had $251,000,000 in excess funding and to see this
funding repurposed for other Department priorities in a May
2019 reprogramming action. Additionally, the Committee has
serious concerns about the schedule and funding disconnect in
the current budget request that shows significant funding
requirements even past the December 2023 destruction deadline.
PEO ACWA is currently working on an updated program office
estimate, and the Office of Cost Assessment and Program
Evaluation [CAPE] is doing an independent cost estimate
expected to be complete in November 2019. The Committee directs
the PEO ACWA and the Director of CAPE to provide these
estimates to the congressional defense committees not later
than 15 days after their completion.

Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense

Appropriations, 2019.................................... $881,525,000
Budget estimate, 2020................................... 799,402,000
Committee recommendation................................ 884,402,000

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $884,402,000.
This is $85,000,000 above the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this
appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

Office of the Inspector General

Appropriations, 2019.................................... $329,273,000
Budget estimate, 2020................................... 363,499,000
Committee recommendation................................ 363,499,000

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $363,499,000.
This is equal to the budget estimate.

committee recommended program

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this
appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

Quarterly End Strength and Execution Reports.--The
Department of Defense Inspector General is directed to provide
quarterly reports to the congressional defense committees on
civilian personnel end strength, full-time equivalents, and
budget execution not later than 15 days after the end of each
fiscal quarter. The reports should contain quarterly civilian
personnel end strength and full-time equivalents as well as an
estimate of fiscal year end strength and fiscal year full-time
equivalents. The reports should also include quarterly budget
execution data along with revised fiscal year estimated
execution data. The Inspector General is directed to provide
realistic end of fiscal year estimates based on personnel
trends to date.

TITLE VII

RELATED AGENCIES

Central Intelligence Agency Retirement and Disability System Fund

Appropriations, 2019.................................... $514,000,000
Budget estimate, 2020................................... 514,000,000
Committee recommendation................................ 514,000,000

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $514,000,000.
This is equal to the budget estimate.

Intelligence Community Management Account

Appropriations, 2019.................................... $522,424,000
Budget estimate, 2020................................... 558,000,000
Committee recommendation................................ 539,400,000

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $539,400,000.
This is $18,600,000 below the budget estimate.

TITLE VIII

GENERAL PROVISIONS

Sec. 8001. Publicity/Propaganda Limitation.--Retains a
provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8002. Compensation/Employment of Foreign Nationals.--
Retains a provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8003. Obligation Rate of Appropriations.--Retains a
provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8004. Obligations in Last 2 Months of Fiscal Year.--
Retains and modifies a provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8005. General Transfer Authority.--Retains a provision
carried in previous years.
Sec. 8006. Project Level Adjustments.--Retains and modifies
a provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8007. Establishment of Reprogramming Baseline.--
Retains and modifies a provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8008. Working Capital Funds Cash Disbursements.--
Retains a provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8009. Special Access Programs Notification.--Retains a
provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8010. Multiyear Procurement Authority.--Retains and
modifies a provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8011. Humanitarian and Civic Assistance.--Retains a
provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8012. Restriction on Civilian Personnel End-
Strength.--Retains and modifies a provision carried in previous
years.
Sec. 8013. Lobbying.--Retains a provision carried in
previous years.
Sec. 8014. Educational Benefits and Bonuses.--Retains a
provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8015. Mentor-Protege Program.--Retains a provision
carried in previous years.
Sec. 8016. Strategic Delivery Vehicles.--Retains a
provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8017. Alcoholic Beverages.--Retains a provision
carried in previous years.
Sec. 8018. Demilitarization of Surplus Firearms.--Retains a
provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8019. Relocations into the National Capital Region.--
Retains a provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8020. Indian Financing Act.--Retains and modifies a
provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8021. Defense Media Activity.--Retains a provision
carried in previous years.
Sec. 8022. Burden Sharing With Kuwait.--Retains a provision
carried in previous years.
Sec. 8023. Civil Air Patrol.--Retains and modifies a
provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8024. federally Funded Research and Development
Centers.--Retains and modifies a provision carried in previous
years.
Sec. 8025. Carbon, Alloy, or Armor Steel Plate.--Retains a
provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8026. Congressional Defense Committee Definition.--
Retains a provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8027. Depot Maintenance Competition.--Retains a
provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8028. Reciprocal Trade Agreements.--Retains and
modifies a provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8029. Overseas Military Facility Investment.--Retains
a provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8030. Walking Shield.--Retains and modifies a
provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8031. Investment Item Unit Cost.--Retains a provision
carried in previous years.
Sec. 8032. POW/MIA Accounting Agency.--Inserts a new
provision allowing for expenses related to the acquisition of
vehicles for use by the POW/MIA accounting agency.
Sec. 8033. Asia-Pacific Regional Initiative.--Retains and
modifies a provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8034. Tobacco Use in the Military.--Retains a
provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8035. Working Capital Fund Investment Item
Restrictions.--Retains and modifies a provision carried in
previous years.
Sec. 8036. CIA Availability of Funds.--Retains and modifies
a provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8037. Tribal Lands Environmental Impact.--Retains and
modifies a provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8038. Buy American Act Compliance.--Retains a
provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8039. Field Operating Agencies.--Retains a provision
carried in previous years.
Sec. 8040. Contractor Conversion and Performance.--Retains
a provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8041. Rescissions.--The Committee recommends a general
provision rescinding funds from prior years as displayed below:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Amount
------------------------------------------------------------------------

2012 Appropriations

Shipbuilding and Conversion, Navy: DDG-51............... $44,500,000

------------------------------------------------------------------------

2018 Appropriations

Aircraft Procurement, Army:
Utility F/W Aircraft................................ 44,000,000
Missile Procurement, Army:
Indirect Fire Protection Capabilty.................. 5,182,000
Weapons and Tracked Combat Vehicles, Army:
Paladin Integrated Management....................... 115,078,000
Other Procurement, Army:
Tractor Yard........................................ 5,685,000
Aircraft Procurement, Navy:
C-40................................................ 68,781,000
Other Procurement, Navy:
AN/SLQ-32--Block 3 installation funding............. 4,548,000
Procurement, Marine Corps:
AAV7A1 PIP.......................................... 9,046,000
Aircraft Procurement, Air Force:
F-35................................................ 238,000,000
KC-46............................................... 76,000,000
HC-130J............................................. 6,522,000
MQ-9................................................ 37,900,000
A-10................................................ 5,900,000
KC-46 modifications................................. 1,213,000
C-130J modifications................................ 30,953,000
HC/MC-130 Modifications (MC AbMN)................... 14,700,000
Initial Spares/Repair Parts (MQ-9 spares)........... 24,400,000
RQ-4 Post Production Charges (Interim contractor 20,000,000
support)...........................................
Missile Procurement, Air Force:
Missile Replacement Eq-Ballistic.................... 39,173,000
Small Diameter Bomb................................. 36,800,000
Other Procurement, Air Force:
AFNET (ARAD)........................................ 26,000,000

------------------------------------------------------------------------

2019 Appropriations
Missile Procurement, Army:
Indirect Fire Protection Capabilty.................. 24,498,000
Javelin (Aaws-M) System Summary..................... 20,000,000
MLRS Mods........................................... 23,300,000
Weapons and Tracked Combat Vehicles, Army:
Armored Multi Purpose Vehicle....................... 37,106,000
Bradley Program (MOD)............................... 178,840,000
Other Procurement, Army:
Joint Light Tactical Vehicle-TADSS.................. 17,258,000
Joint Effects Training System....................... 60,900,000
Army Command Post Integrated Infrastructure......... 2,284,000
Global Combat Support System-Army................... 6,841,000
Contract Writing System............................. 5,927,000
Area Mine Detection System.......................... 4,100,000
Tractor Yard........................................ 4,956,000
Aircraft Procurement, Navy:
F-18 Series......................................... 71,300,000
V-22 (Tilt/Rotor Acft) Osprey....................... 19,000,000
Joint Strike Fighter CV............................. 47,600,000
JSF STOVL........................................... 52,800,000
Procurement of Ammunition, Navy and Marine Corps:
Direct support munitions--5/54" ammunition.......... 22,000,000
Shipbuilding and Conversion, Navy: DDG-51 (AP).......... 102,000,000
Shipbuilding and Conversion, Navy: LPD-17 (AP).......... 102,900,000
Other Procurement, Navy:
AN/SLQ-32--Block 3 installation funding............. 13,470,000
Unmanned carrier aviation mission control station... 11,300,000
Procurement, Marine Corps:
AAV7A1 PIP.......................................... 74,756,000
Aircraft Procurement, Air Force:
F-35................................................ 207,200,000
KC-46............................................... 32,055,000
C-130J.............................................. 1,008,000
MC-130J............................................. 38,951,000
Combat Rescue Helicopter............................ 26,400,000
KC-46 modifications................................. 8,547,000
C-17................................................ 52,000,000
F-15 *COM001*(APG82(V)1)............................ 19,300,000
F-16 modifications (AIFF mode 5).................... 36,381,000
F-22A modifications (Mode 5 IFF).................... 13,500,000
A-10 (ARC-210)...................................... 9,520,000
E-3 modifications................................... 14,553,000
E-8 modifications................................... 19,807,000
HC/MC-130 modifications (Block 8.1)................. 17,370,000
Other Production Charges (F-22 depot activation).... 30,000,000
Other aircraft (BACN)............................... 15,088,000
Aerial targets...................................... 61,860,000
Initial Spares/Repair Parts (F-15 EPAWSS)........... 4,034,000
Initial Spares/Repair Parts (KC-46A)................ 61,400,000
Missile Procurement, Air Force:
Missile Replacement Eq-Ballistic.................... 13,927,000
MMIII modifications................................. 26,052,000
Hellfire............................................ 25,752,000
Space Procurement, Air Force:
Integrated Broadcast Service........................ 5,000,000
Rocket Systems Launch Program....................... 5,000,000
Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle (SPACE)........... 85,100,000
Evolved Expendable Launch Capabililty............... 75,200,000
Other Procurement, Air Force:
Classified.......................................... 20,000,000
Procurement, Defense-Wide:
GMD (FF)............................................ 197,000,000
GMD (AP)............................................ 115,000,000
SKR B-kits.......................................... 10,000,000
STC/NGTC............................................ 25,000,000
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Army:
Assured PNT......................................... 23,000,000
Infantry Support Weapons--S62 Counter-Defilade 1,998,000
Target Engagement..................................
Night Vision Systems--Eng Dev--Joint Effects 1,150,000
Targeting Systems..................................
Weapons and Munitions--Eng Dev--EU6 XM1113.......... 5,100,000
Army Tactical Command & Control Hardware & Software-- 8,004,000
ER9 Unified Network Operations.....................
Firefinder--Hypervelocity Armament System........... 17,595,000
Soldier Systems--Warrior Dem/Val.................... 3,000,000
Suite of Survivability Enhancement Systems--EMD..... 5,914,000
Emerging Technology Initiatives..................... 7,100,000
AMF Joint Tactical Radio System..................... 15,964,000
Assessments and Evaluations Cyber Vulnerabilities... 22,000,000
Apache Product Improvement Program.................. 4,700,000
Improved Turbine Engine Program..................... 3,000,000
Unmanned Aircraft System Universal Products......... 9,595,000
Combat Vehicle Improvement Programs--M113 7,915,000
Improvements.......................................
Combat Vehicle Improvement Programs--Bradley........ 25,000,000
Other Missile Product Improvement Programs.......... 4,450,000
Information Systems Security Program................ 20,745,000
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy:
Classified program.................................. 105,000,000
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air Force:
KC-135.............................................. 2,600,000
ICBM Dem/Val........................................ 20,000,000
Hard and Deeply Buried Target Defeat System (HDBTDS) 4,800,000
Program............................................
B-1B Squadrons...................................... 15,000,000
Airborne Warning and Control System [AWACS]......... 11,600,000
Airborne Reconnaissance Systems..................... 26,000,000
RQ-4 UAV............................................ 9,650,000
C-130J Program...................................... 2,700,000
Classified programs................................. 70,600,000
Space Rapid Capabilities Office..................... 74,400,000
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-
Wide:
Improved Homeland Defense Interceptors.............. 267,000,000
Classified programs................................. 20,000,000
Defense Health Program--Research, Development, Test and
Evaluation:
RDTE JOMIS carryover................................ 26,200,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sec. 8042. Civilian Technician Reductions.--Retains a
provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8043. North Korea.--Retains and modifies a provision
carried in previous years.
Sec. 8044. Reserve Component Intelligence Reimbursement.--
Retains a provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8045. Counter-Drug Activities Transfer.--Retains a
provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8046. Funding to Maintain Competitive Rates at
Arsenals.--Retains and modifies a provision carried in previous
years.
Sec. 8047. United Service Organizations Grant.--Retains and
modifies a provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8048. Buy American Computers.--Retains a provision
carried in previous years.
Sec. 8049. Small Business Set-Asides.--Retains a provision
carried in previous years.
Sec. 8050. Contractor Bonuses.--Retains a provision carried
in previous years.
Sec. 8051. Reserve Peacetime Support.--Retains a provision
carried in previous years.
Sec. 8052. Unexpended Balances.--Retains and modifies a
provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8053. National Guard Distance Learning.--Retains a
provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8054. Sexual Assault Prevention Programs.--Retains and
modifies a provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8055. End-Item Procurement.--Retains and modifies a
provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8056. Buy American Waivers.--Retains a provision
carried in previous years.
Sec. 8057. Military Family Housing.--Retains a provision
carried in previous years.
Sec. 8058. Joint Capability Demonstration Project.--Retains
a provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8059. Secretary of Defense Reporting Requirement.--
Retains a provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8060. Missile Defense Authorization.--Retains a
provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8061. Armor-Piercing Ammo.--Retains a provision
carried in previous years.
Sec. 8062. Personal Property Lease Payments.--Retains a
provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8063. O&M, Army Transfer.--Retains and modifies a
provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8064. National Intelligence Program Separation.--
Retains and modifies a provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8065. O&M, Navy Transfer to Stennis Center.--Retains a
provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8066. Assignment of Forces.--Retains and modifies a
provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8067. Rapid Acquisition Authority Reporting
Requirement.--Retains a provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8068. Israeli Cooperative Programs.--Retains and
modifies a provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8069. Prior Year Shipbuilding.--Retains and modifies a
provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8070. Intelligence Authorization.--Retains and
modifies a provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8071. New Start Authority.--Retains a provision
carried in previous years.
Sec. 8072. Contingency Operations Budget Justification.--
Retains and modifies a provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8073. Nuclear Armed Interceptors.--Retains a provision
carried in previous years.
Sec. 8074. Rapid Acquisition Authority.--Retains a
provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8075. 53rd Weather Reconnaissance Squadron.--Retains a
provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8076. Integration of Foreign Intelligence.--Retains a
provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8077. Army Tactical UAVs.--Retains a provision carried
in previous years.
Sec. 8078. DNI R&D Waiver.--Retains and modifies a
provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8079. Shipbuilding Obligations.--Retains a provision
carried in previous years.
Sec. 8080. DNI Reprogramming Baseline.--Retains and
modifies a provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8081. Support to Friendly Foreign Countries.--Retains
a provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8082. Defense Acquisition Workforce Development
Fund.--Retains and modifies a provision carried in previous
years.
Sec. 8083. Child Soldiers.--Retains a provision carried in
previous years.
Sec. 8084. NIP Reprogramming.--Retains a provision carried
in previous years.
Sec. 8085. National Security Space Launch.--Inserts a new
provisions ensuring competitive launch by qualified
participants.
Sec. 8086. Congressional Intelligence Committee
Definition.--Retains a provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8087. Fisher House Authorization.--Retains a provision
carried in previous years.
Sec. 8088. Defense Acquisition Workforce Development
Fund.--Retains a provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8089. Public Disclosure of Agency Reports.--Retains a
provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8090. Contractor Compliance With the Civil Rights Act
of 1964.--Retains a provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8091. DOD-VA Medical Facility Demonstration.--Retains
and modifies a provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8092. Exchanging Ballistic Missile Defense
Information.--Retains a provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8093. Armored Vehicles.--Retains a provision carried
in previous years.
Sec. 8094. NIP Reprogramming.--Retains and modifies a
provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8095. Transfer of Detainees to or Within the United
States.--Retains a provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8096. Detainee Transfer to a Foreign Country or
Entity.--Retains and modifies a provision carried in previous
years.
Sec. 8097. War Powers Resolution.--Retains a provision
carried in previous years.
Sec. 8098. Rosoboronexport.--Retains a provision carried in
previous years.
Sec. 8099. Detainee Facilities.--Retains a provision
carried in previous years.
Sec. 8100. Ex Gratia Payments.--Retains and modifies a
provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8101. Public Disclosure of Grant Agreement.--Retains a
provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8102. Rapid Prototyping Fund reprogrammings and
account reductions.--Retains a provision carried in previous
years.
Sec. 8103. Restrictions on NSA.--Retains a provision
carried in previous years.
Sec. 8104. Transfers to Another Federal Agency.--Retains a
provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8105. Authority to Transfer O&M, Navy Funds to Ready
Reserve Force, Maritime Administration Account.--Retains and
modifies a provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8106. Support to Foreign Countries.--Retains a
provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8107. Crime Databases Reporting Requirement.--Retains
and modifies a provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8108. T-AO(X] Oiler Program.--Retains a provision
carried in previous years.
Sec. 8109. Rapid Prototyping with DAWDF.--Retains a
provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8110. Project Designated by the Secretary of
Defense.--Retains a provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8111. Prohibition on the Transfer of F-35 Aircraft to
Turkey.--Retains a provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8112. Authority to Use Funds for OPM Background
Investigations.--Retains and modifies a provision carried in
previous years.
Sec. 8113. Blocking Pornography on Computers.--Retains a
provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8114. Global Engagement Center Reprogrammings.--
Retains and modifies a provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8115. Closure of GTMO.--Retains a provision carried in
previous years.
Sec. 8116. Prohibition on Use of Equipment for Ceremonial
Honors.--Retains a provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8117. Integrity in Federal Contracting.--Retains a
provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 8118. Advance Billing for Background Investigations.--
Inserts a new provision regarding the advance billing of
background investigation services.

TITLE IX

OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS

Department of Defense--Military

The Committee recommends an appropriation of
$70,665,000,000 for operations related to Overseas Contingency
Operations. In fiscal year 2019 Congress appropriated
$67,914,000,000 for activities funded in this title in Public
Law 115-245.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table summarizes the Committee
recommendation:

[In thousands of dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fiscal year Fiscal year Committee
2019 enacted 2020 estimate recommendation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Military Personnel........................................... 4,660,661 4,485,808 4,485,808
Operation and Maintenance.................................... 49,478,483 134,149,216 53,340,943
Procurement.................................................. 12,627,028 23,143,022 11,183,170
Research, development, test and evaluation................... 1,193,394 1,646,732 833,762
Revolving and management funds............................... 15,190 20,100 20,100
Other Department of Defense Programs......................... 529,860 535,596 535,596
General Provisions (net)..................................... -590,616 ............... 265,621
--------------------------------------------------
Total, Overseas Contingency Operations................. 67,914,000 163,980,474 70,665,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

OVERVIEW

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

The Committee recommends $70,665,000,000 of additional
appropriations for Overseas Contingency Operations in fiscal
year 2020. This funding will ensure that resources, equipment,
and supplies are available for our servicemembers without
interruption, and will enable the Department to avoid absorbing
operational costs from within baseline programs that are
critical to future readiness and home-station activities.

REPORTING REQUIREMENTS

The Secretary of Defense is directed to submit reports, on
a quarterly basis, to the congressional defense committees not
later than 30 days after the last day of each quarter of the
fiscal year that detail commitment, obligation, and expenditure
data by sub-activity group for the Afghanistan Security Forces
Fund, the Counter-the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria Fund and
Operation and Maintenance, Defense-Wide, Defense Security
Cooperation Agency.

MILITARY PERSONNEL

The Committee recommends a total of $4,485,808,000 for pay,
allowances, and other personnel costs for Active, Reserve, and
Guard troops activated for duty in Afghanistan and other
contingency operations. This recommendation includes funding
for subsistence, permanent change of station travel, and
special pays including imminent danger pay, family separation
allowance, and hardship duty pay.

Military Personnel, Army

Appropriations, 2019.................................... $2,929,154,000
Budget estimate, 2020................................... 2,743,132,000
Committee recommendation................................ 2,743,132,000

The Committee recommends an appropriation of
$2,743,132,000. This is equal to the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:

005 Basic Pay 400,180 400,180 ..............
010 Retired Pay 97,644 97,644 ..............
Accrual
025 Basic Allowance 121,906 121,906 ..............
for Housing
030 Basic Allowance 14,524 14,524 ..............
for Subsistence
035 Incentive Pays 3,305 3,305 ..............
040 Special Pays 24,905 24,905 ..............
045 Allowances 27,510 27,510 ..............
050 Separation Pay 3,551 3,551 ..............
055 Social Security 30,600 30,600 ..............
Tax
-------------------------------------------------
Total 724,125 724,125 ..............
=================================================
BA 2: Pay and
Allowances of
Enlisted

060 Basic Pay 833,570 833,570 ..............
065 Retired Pay 203,392 203,392 ..............
Accrual
080 Basic Allowance 331,542 331,542 ..............
for Housing
085 Incentive Pays 2,024 2,024 ..............
090 Special Pays 76,026 76,026 ..............
095 Allowances 61,647 61,647 ..............
100 Separation Pay 1,009 1,009 ..............
105 Social Security 63,769 63,769 ..............
Tax
-------------------------------------------------
Total 1,572,979 1,572,979 ..............
=================================================
BA 4:
Subsistence of
Enlisted
Personnel

115 Basic Allowance 94,192 94,192 ..............
for Subsistence
120 Subsistence-In- 308,078 308,078 ..............
Kind
-------------------------------------------------
Total 402,270 402,270 ..............
=================================================
BA 5: Permanent
Change of
Station Travel

135 Operational 4,256 4,256 ..............
Travel
140 Rotational 1,028 1,028 ..............
Travel
160 Temporary 119 119 ..............
Lodging Expense
-------------------------------------------------
Total 5,403 5,403 ..............
=================================================
BA 6: Other
Military
Personnel Costs

175 Interest on 4,054 4,054 ..............
Uniformed
Services
Savings
180 Death Gratuities 2,800 2,800 ..............
185 Unemployment 21,703 21,703 ..............
Benefits
216 SGLI Extra 9,798 9,798 ..............
Hazard Payments
-------------------------------------------------
Total 38,355 38,355 ..............
=================================================
Total, 2,743,132 2,743,132 ..............
Military
Personnel
, Army
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Military Personnel, Navy

Appropriations, 2019.................................... $385,461,000
Budget estimate, 2020................................... 356,392,000
Committee recommendation................................ 356,392,000

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $356,392,000.
This is equal to the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:

005 Basic Pay 68,443 68,443 ..............
010 Retired Pay 16,700 16,700 ..............
Accrual
025 Basic Allowance 23,102 23,102 ..............
for Housing
030 Basic Allowance 2,256 2,256 ..............
for Subsistence
035 Incentive Pays 464 464 ..............
040 Special Pays 3,998 3,998 ..............
045 Allowances 6,868 6,868 ..............
055 Social Security 5,245 5,245 ..............
Tax
-------------------------------------------------
Total 127,076 127,076 ..............
=================================================
BA 2: Pay and
Allowances of
Enlisted

060 Basic Pay 83,786 83,786 ..............
065 Retired Pay 20,443 20,443 ..............
Accrual
080 Basic Allowance 45,506 45,506 ..............
for Housing
085 Incentive Pays 161 161 ..............
090 Special Pays 9,288 9,288 ..............
095 Allowances 15,668 15,668 ..............
105 Social Security 6,410 6,410 ..............
Tax
-------------------------------------------------
Total 181,262 181,262 ..............
=================================================
BA 4:
Subsistence of
Enlisted
Personnel

115 Basic Allowance 9,057 9,057 ..............
for Subsistence
120 Subsistence-In-K 23,095 23,095 ..............
ind
-------------------------------------------------
Total 32,152 32,152 ..............
=================================================
BA 5: Permanent
Change of
Station Travel

125 Accession Travel 3,151 3,151 ..............
135 Operational 698 698 ..............
Travel
140 Rotational 223 223 ..............
Travel
145 Separation 4,516 4,516 ..............
Travel
-------------------------------------------------
Total 8,588 8,588 ..............
=================================================
BA 6: Other
Military
Personnel Costs

185 Unemployment 3,654 3,654 ..............
Benefits
216 SGLI Extra 3,660 3,660 ..............
Hazard Payments
-------------------------------------------------
Total 7,314 7,314 ..............
=================================================
Total, 356,392 356,392 ..............
Military
Personnel
, Navy
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Military Personnel, Marine Corps

Appropriations, 2019.................................... $109,232,000
Budget estimate, 2020................................... 104,213,000
Committee recommendation................................ 104,213,000

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $104,213,000.
This is equal to the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:

005 Basic Pay 22,993 22,993 ..............
010 Retired Pay 5,610 5,610 ..............
Accrual
025 Basic Allowance 8,142 8,142 ..............
for Housing
030 Basic Allowance 764 764 ..............
for Subsistence
035 Incentive Pays 238 238 ..............
040 Special Pays 2,382 2,382 ..............
045 Allowances 2,859 2,859 ..............
050 Separation Pay 878 878 ..............
055 Social Security 1,759 1,759 ..............
Tax
-------------------------------------------------
Total 45,625 45,625 ..............
=================================================
BA 2: Pay and
Allowances of
Enlisted

060 Basic Pay 22,994 22,994 ..............
065 Retired Pay 5,611 5,611 ..............
Accrual
080 Basic Allowance 12,502 12,502 ..............
for Housing
085 Incentive Pays 5 5 ..............
090 Special Pays 5,284 5,284 ..............
095 Allowances 6,268 6,268 ..............
100 Separation Pay 877 877 ..............
105 Social Security 1,759 1,759 ..............
Tax
-------------------------------------------------
Total 55,300 55,300 ..............
=================================================
BA 4:
Subsistence of
Enlisted
Personnel

115 Basic Allowance 2,635 2,635 ..............
for Subsistence
-------------------------------------------------
Total 2,635 2,635 ..............
=================================================
BA 6: Other
Military
Personnel Costs

175 Interest on 238 238 ..............
Uniformed
Services
Savings
216 SGLI Extra 415 415 ..............
Hazard Payments
-------------------------------------------------
Total 653 653 ..............
=================================================
Total, 104,213 104,213 ..............
Military
Personnel
, Marine
Corps
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Military Personnel, Air Force

Appropriations, 2019.................................... $964,508,000
Budget estimate, 2020................................... 1,007,594,000
Committee recommendation................................ 1,007,594,000

The Committee recommends an appropriation of
$1,007,594,000. This is equal to the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:

005 Basic Pay 127,838 127,838 ..............
010 Retired Pay 31,197 31,197 ..............
Accrual
025 Basic Allowance 35,863 35,863 ..............
for Housing
030 Basic Allowance 3,919 3,919 ..............
for Subsistence
040 Special Pays 8,364 8,364 ..............
045 Allowances 4,788 4,788 ..............
055 Social Security 9,780 9,780 ..............
Tax
-------------------------------------------------
Total 221,749 221,749 ..............
=================================================
BA 2: Pay and
Allowances of
Enlisted

060 Basic Pay 326,053 326,053 ..............
065 Retired Pay 79,557 79,557 ..............
Accrual
080 Basic Allowance 137,589 137,589 ..............
for Housing
090 Special Pays 28,895 28,895 ..............
095 Allowances 18,225 18,225 ..............
105 Social Security 24,943 24,943 ..............
Tax
-------------------------------------------------
Total 615,262 615,262 ..............
=================================================
BA 4:
Subsistence of
Enlisted
Personnel

115 Basic Allowance 33,640 33,640 ..............
for Subsistence
120 Subsistence-In-K 117,601 117,601 ..............
ind
-------------------------------------------------
Total 151,241 151,241 ..............
=================================================
BA 6: Other
Military
Personnel Costs

180 Death Gratuities 700 700 ..............
185 Unemployment 11,653 11,653 ..............
Benefits
216 SGLI Extra 6,989 6,989 ..............
Hazard Payments
-------------------------------------------------
Total 19,342 19,342 ..............
=================================================
Total, 1,007,594 1,007,594 ..............
Military
Personnel
, Air
Force
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Reserve Personnel, Army

Appropriations, 2019.................................... $37,007,000
Budget estimate, 2020................................... 34,812,000
Committee recommendation................................ 34,812,000

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $34,812,000.
This is equal to the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:

080 Special Training 34,812 34,812 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
Total 34,812 34,812 ..............
=================================================
Total, 34,812 34,812 ..............
Reserve
Personnel,
Army
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Reserve Personnel, Navy

Appropriations, 2019.................................... $11,100,000
Budget estimate, 2020................................... 11,370,000
Committee recommendation................................ 11,370,000

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $11,370,000.
This is equal to the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:

080 Special Training 11,370 11,370 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
Total 11,370 11,370 ..............
=================================================
Total, 11,370 11,370 ..............
Reserve
Personnel
, Navy
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Reserve Personnel, Marine Corps

Appropriations, 2019.................................... $2,380,000
Budget estimate, 2020................................... 3,599,000
Committee recommendation................................ 3,599,000

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $3,599,000.
This is equal to the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:

080 Special Training 3,552 3,552 ..............
090 Administration 47 47 ..............
and Support
-------------------------------------------------
Total 3,599 3,599 ..............
=================================================
Total, 3,599 3,599 ..............
Reserve
Personnel
, Marine
Corps
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Reserve Personnel, Air Force

Appropriations, 2019.................................... $21,076,000
Budget estimate, 2020................................... 16,428,000
Committee recommendation................................ 16,428,000

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $16,428,000.
This is equal to the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:

080 Special Training 16,428 16,428 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
Total 16,428 16,428 ..............
=================================================
Total, 16,428 16,428 ..............
Reserve
Personnel,
Air Force
------------------------------------------------------------------------

National Guard Personnel, Army

Appropriations, 2019.................................... $195,283,000
Budget estimate, 2020................................... 202,644,000
Committee recommendation................................ 202,644,000

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $202,644,000.
This is equal to the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:

010 Pay Group A 65,231 65,231 ..............
Training (15
Days & Drills
24/48)
070 School Training 3,324 3,324 ..............
080 Special Training 115,437 115,437 ..............
090 Administration 18,652 18,652 ..............
and Support
-------------------------------------------------
Total 202,644 202,644 ..............
=================================================
Total, 202,644 202,644 ..............
National
Guard
Personnel,
Army
------------------------------------------------------------------------

National Guard Personnel, Air Force

Appropriations, 2019.................................... $5,460,000
Budget estimate, 2020................................... 5,624,000
Committee recommendation................................ 5,624,000

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $5,624,000.
This is equal to the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:

080 Special Training 5,624 5,624 ..............
-------------------------------------------------
Total 5,624 5,624 ..............
=================================================
Total, 5,624 5,624 ..............
National
Guard
Personnel,
Air Force
------------------------------------------------------------------------

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE

The Committee recommends $53,340,943,000 for the operation
and maintenance accounts. These funds are available to fund
overseas deployments and other activities by the services and
Special Operations Forces to include financing flying hours,
ship steaming days, ground operations, special airlift
missions, increased ship and aircraft maintenance, logistics
support, fuel purchases, base support, civilian personnel,
personnel support costs, overseas transportation,
communications support, facility management, and other
operation and maintenance requirements.

Operation and Maintenance, Army

Appropriations, 2019.................................... $18,548,500,000
Budget estimate, 2020................................... 37,987,549,000
Committee recommendation................................ 19,892,938,000

The Committee recommends an appropriation of
$19,892,938,000. This is $18,094,611,000 below the budget
estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:

Operation and Maintenance, Navy

Appropriations, 2019.................................... $5,172,155,000
Budget estimate, 2020................................... 31,734,683,000
Committee recommendation................................ 8,413,650,000

The Committee recommends an appropriation of
$8,413,650,000. This is $23,321,033,000 below the budget
estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:

Operation and Maintenance, Marine Corps

Appropriations, 2019.................................... $1,292,995,000
Budget estimate, 2020................................... 5,123,470,000
Committee recommendation................................ 1,362,917,000

The Committee recommends an appropriation of
$1,362,917,000. This is $3,760,553,000 below the budget
estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:

Operation and Maintenance, Air Force

Appropriations, 2019.................................... $9,828,674,000
Budget estimate, 2020................................... 33,028,712,000
Committee recommendation................................ 10,632,379,000

The Committee recommends an appropriation of
$10,632,379,000. This is $22,396,333,000 below the budget
estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:

Operation and Maintenance, Defense-Wide

Appropriations, 2019.................................... $8,105,991,000
Budget estimate, 2020................................... 8,448,612,000
Committee recommendation................................ 8,198,105,000

The Committee recommends an appropriation of
$8,198,105,000. This is $250,507,000 below the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:

Coalition Support Funds.--After several years of failing to
meet requirements in the National Defense Authorization Act
that Pakistan make significant progress against the Haqqani
Network in order to receive hundreds of millions of dollars in
Coalition Support Funds [CSF], the John S. McCain National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 terminated
Pakistan's eligibility for CSF. The Act left Pakistan eligible
for only $150,000,000 in border security assistance. The
Department's request, therefore, of $430,000,000 for CSF in
fiscal year 2020 has no justification. Accordingly, the
Committee recommends a reduction in Operation and Maintenance,
Defense-Wide of $430,000,000. The Committee notes that
$20,000,000 for the Coalition Readiness Support Program and
$250,000,000 in support for the border security activities of
certain partner nations remain in the recommendation elsewhere
in this appropriation.
Civilian Casualties Resulting from U.S. Military
Operations.--The Committee appreciates the appointment of the
Principal Deputy Under Secretary for Policy as the senior
Department of Defense official responsible for overseeing
policies relating to civilian casualties resulting from U.S.
military operations. The Committee urges the Administration to
move quickly to fill this vacant position. Additionally, the
Committee directs the Secretary of Defense and the Chairman of
the Joint Chiefs of Staff to consult with the Committee not
later than 90 days after the enactment of this act regarding
coordination across the Department and among the Global
Combatant Commands on the development and application of
policies related to civilian casualties, including to ensure
that the necessary personnel and resources are available on the
Joint Staff to advise the Chairman on strategy and planning
regarding compliance with such policies.
Ex Gratia Payments.--Not later than March 1, 2020, and
annually thereafter, the Secretary of Defense shall submit a
report to the congressional defense committees detailing the
total number of claims submitted to the United States
Government for ex gratia payments for damage, personal injury,
or death that is incident to combat operations of the Armed
Forces in a foreign country during the preceding 12 months. The
report shall also include the number of such payments offered,
including the respective amounts; whether a payment was made in
each case; and the authority and source of funds used to make
such payment. The report shall cover all ex gratia payments,
including, but not limited to, condolence, battle damage, and
Hero payments, made using any authority in this act, prior
appropriations acts, the National Defense Authorization Act, or
under Title 10, United States Code, including under the
Commanders Emergency Response Program or Title 10, United
States Code, Section 127. The Secretary of Defense shall
designate an office in the Department of Defense to be
responsible for maintaining such data and identity the office
in the report.

Operation and Maintenance, Army Reserve

Appropriations, 2019.................................... $41,887,000
Budget estimate, 2020................................... 1,986,599,000
Committee recommendation................................ 37,592,000

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $37,592,000.
This is $1,949,007,000 below the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:

Operation and Maintenance, Navy Reserve

Appropriations, 2019.................................... $25,637,000
Budget estimate, 2020................................... 886,868,000
Committee recommendation................................ 23,036,000

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $23,036,000.
This is $863,832,000 below the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:

Operation and Maintenance, Marine Corps Reserve

Appropriations, 2019.................................... $3,345,000
Budget estimate, 2020................................... 239,693,000
Committee recommendation................................ 8,707,000

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $8,707,000.
This is $230,986,000 below to the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:

Operation and Maintenance, Air Force Reserve

Appropriations, 2019.................................... $60,500,000
Budget estimate, 2020................................... 1,195,131,000
Committee recommendation................................ 29,758,000

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $29,758,000.
This is $1,165,373,000 below the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:

Operation and Maintenance, Army National Guard

Appropriations, 2019.................................... $110,729,000
Budget estimate, 2020................................... 4,376,939,000
Committee recommendation................................ 83,291,000

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $83,291,000.
This is $4,293,648,000 below the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:

Operation and Maintenance, Air National Guard

Appropriations, 2019.................................... $15,870,000
Budget estimate, 2020................................... 3,291,982,000
Committee recommendation................................ 176,909,000

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $176,909,000.
This is $3,115,073,000 below the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:

Afghanistan Security Forces Fund

Appropriations, 2019.................................... $4,920,000,000
Budget estimate, 2020................................... 4,803,978,000
Committee recommendation................................ 3,736,661,000

The Committee recommends an appropriation of
$3,736,661,000. This is $1,067,317,000 below the budget
estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:

Afghanistan Security Forces Fund Budget Submission
Requirements.--The Committee appreciates the efforts of the
Department of Defense to comply with prior year direction to
provide detailed execution information concurrent with the
budget request and Financial Activity Plan [FAP] submissions
for the Afghanistan Security Forces Fund [ASFF] appropriation.
This has enhanced the Committee's ability to conduct budget
analysis and make appropriate funding level recommendations.
The Committee remains concerned, however, that the budget
flexibility allowed within the ASFF appropriation has led to a
lack of budget discipline that challenges effective
congressional and executive branch oversight and risks wasteful
spending. For example, reductions recommended by the Committee
for the ASFF program in fiscal year 2019 were appealed by the
Department as too burdensome and likely to degrade the Afghan
security environment. Yet, after much of the recommended
reductions were withdrawn, the Department transferred
$604,000,000 out of the program, citing available balances due
to forward financing and contract savings. The Committee
believes this shows that the Department still does not have the
necessary fidelity of its annual ASFF budget needs.
Therefore, the Committee continues direction that the
Secretary shall provide budget justification materials that
include, the budget request amount, the appropriated amount,
and the actual obligation amount by line item, for the prior 2
fiscal years. In addition, concurrent with the submission of
each FAP, the Secretary of Defense shall provide the
congressional defense committees with line item detail of
planned funding movements within each ASFF sub-activity group
using line item titles from the appropriate year's budget
justification submission. Any line item that did not appear in
the budget justification submission shall be delineated as a
new line item in the line item detail accompanying the FAP. In
addition, the Committee recommends a $604,000,000 reductions to
the ASFF appropriation for contract savings and forward
financing.
Afghanistan Security Forces Fund Aviation.--In January
2019, the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan
Reconstruction [SIGAR] submitted an audit report to Congress
outlining concerns that the UH-60 program was successfully
meeting fielding dates, but the program was at risk of not
having sufficient numbers of trained pilots or maintainers. The
SIGAR found that ``based on the current UH-60 schedule, it is
unlikely that there will be enough pilots trained before all
159 UH-60s are delivered.'' The SIGAR noted that rather than
scale back or slow UH-60 deliveries, the Combined Security
Transition Command-Afghanistan [CSTC-A] had lowered targets for
trained pilots from 477 to 320, and the SIGAR found that even
the reduced target was unlikely to be met. The report also
described numerous problems with the plan to develop Afghan
maintenance personnel. The SIGAR's most troubling finding was
that ``DOD runs the risk that the aircraft it delivers will sit
idle in Afghanistan without enough pilots to fly them.''
The Committee has had longstanding concerns about the
ability of the Department of Defense to ensure that costly,
maintenance intensive equipment is not provided to partner
nations ahead of the utilization and maintenance capacity of
those partners. The Committee expressed such concerns in 2016
when the Department submitted a budget amendment requesting
fiscal year 2017 funding for the Afghan Aviation Initiative.
The Department noted at that time, and has continued to note
since, that the Afghan UH-60 program was designed to allow
flexibility to either accelerate or slow aircraft fielding in
order to adjust the pace of pilot and maintainer generation. In
light of the SIGAR report and indications that force reductions
may intensify maintenance and training challenges, the
Committee believes it is time to slow aircraft fielding.
Therefore, the Committee recommends a reduction of $463,317,000
for Afghanistan Security Forces Fund UH-60 procurement for
fiscal year 2020 and directs the Secretary of Defense to
suspend UH-60 procurements in fiscal year 2020. The Committee
welcomes discussions with the Department about how it has
addressed the SIGAR's recommendations, in particular, how CSTC-
A is accelerating and improving pilot and maintainer training
timelines and how the program will link pilot production to UH-
60 deliveries for future funding requests.

COUNTER-ISIS TRAIN AND EQUIP FUND

Appropriations, 2019.................................... $1,352,200,000
Budget estimate, 2020................................... 1,045,000,000
Committee recommendation................................ 745,000,000

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $745,000,000.
This is $300,000,000 below the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:

Counter-ISIS Train and Equip Fund.--The Committee supports
the Department of Defense's efforts to train and equip both the
Syrian Democratic Forces and Iraqi security forces through the
Counter-ISIS train and equip program [CTEF]. The Committee
notes, however, that the program has had long standing
challenges with program execution. For example, as of the third
quarter of fiscal year 2019, the program still had $285,000,000
of unobligated fiscal year 2018/2019 funds and $1,265,000,000
in unobligated fiscal year 2019/2020 funds. Moreover, the
program request for fiscal year 2020 included over $700,000,000
in weapons, equipment, and transportation and logistics for
weapons and equipment, but the Department was unable to provide
information to the Committee about the quantities of equipment/
weapons ordered in prior years, equipment/weapons received by
the Department from prior orders, equipment/weapons received by
partner security forces, equipment/weapons that remains in
transit, or battlefield equipment/weapons losses in prior
years. The Committee sees no justification for continuing to
fund large weapons purchases if the program is unable to
account for weapons on hand or under contract. Finally, the
Committee notes that the program requested CTEF border security
funding in fiscal year 2019, which it intended to use on a non-
reimbursable basis for partner nations. Such non-reimbursable
payments are not permissible under current law for CTEF border
security. Therefore, the Committee recommends rescissions of
$300,000,000 for unexecuted balances and $171,837,000 in
unexecutable border security funding from the fiscal year 2019
CTEF appropriation. In addition, the Committee recommends a
reduction to the fiscal year 2020 CTEF appropriation of
$300,000,000 to bring the program more in line with historic
execution trends. The Committee also directs the Secretary of
Defense, prior to the obligation of fiscal year 2020 funds for
weapons/equipment, to provide the congressional defense
committees with an accounting of weapons/equipment requested in
the fiscal year 2018 and 2019 budget submission, including what
equipment/weapons were ordered, delivered to the Department,
delivered to security forces in Iraq and Syria, or remains
undelivered. Of the undelivered equipment/weapons, the
Secretary shall include a timeline of expected deliveries.
Islamic State of Iraq and Syria Detainees.--The Committee
is concerned about the burden on the Syrian Democratic Forces
[SDF] of holding thousands of Islamic State of Iraq and Syria
[ISIS] detainees. The makeshift detention facilities are
overcrowded and vulnerable to the types of ISIS attacks that
led to the rise of the organization in 2012. The Committee
supports efforts of the Department of Defense and international
partners to fortify and construct detention facilities to
alleviate overcrowding, enhance humane detention, and ensure
the security of dangerous detainees. The Committee directs the
Department of Defense to notify the Committee 30 days prior to
obligation of funds for detention facility construction and
prohibits the use of Counter-ISIS Train and Equip Funds for any
other construction activity. Moreover, the Committee directs
the Department of Defense to engage with the SDF on ensuring
that detainees are afforded all protections due under the
Geneva Conventions.

PROCUREMENT

The Committee recommends $11,183,170,000 for the
procurement accounts. The Overseas Contingency Operations
funding supports our forces engaged in Operation Enduring
Freedom and other contingency operations. The Committee
recommends funding to replace combat losses and equipment left
behind in theater, augment and upgrade equipment for deploying
units, sustain munitions and other war consumables, and reset
the units returning home to an equipment-ready status. Funding
adjustments have been made in instances where the requirement
was poorly defined, funding was requested ahead of need or
program execution has been delayed.

Aircraft Procurement, Army

Appropriations, 2019.................................... $346,963,000
Budget estimate, 2020................................... 381,541,000
Committee recommendation................................ 463,241,000

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $463,241,000
below. This is $81,700,000 above the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:

Missile Procurement, Army

Appropriations, 2019.................................... $1,729,904,000
Budget estimate, 2020................................... 4,645,755,000
Committee recommendation................................ 1,423,589,000

The Committee recommends an appropriation of
$1,423,589,000. This is $3,222,166,000 below the budget
estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:

Procurement of Weapons and Tracked Combat Vehicles, Army

Appropriations, 2019.................................... $1,102,108,000
Budget estimate, 2020................................... 353,454,000
Committee recommendation................................ 346,306,000

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $346,306,000.
This is $7,148,000 below the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:

Procurement of Ammunition, Army

Appropriations, 2019.................................... $299,075,000
Budget estimate, 2020................................... 2,843,230,000
Committee recommendation................................ 148,682,000

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $148,682,000.
This is $2,694,548,000 below the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:

Other Procurement, Army

Appropriations, 2019.................................... $1,364,045,000
Budget estimate, 2020................................... 1,139,650,000
Committee recommendation................................ 1,120,504,000

The Committee recommends an appropriation of
$1,120,504,000. This is $19,146,000 below the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:

Aircraft Procurement, Navy

Appropriations, 2019.................................... $232,119,000
Budget estimate, 2020................................... 119,045,000
Committee recommendation................................ 42,045,000

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $42,045,000.
This is $77,000,000 below the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:

Weapons Procurement, Navy

Appropriations, 2019.................................... $14,134,000
Budget estimate, 2020................................... 4,332,710,000
Committee recommendation................................ 97,466,000

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $97,466,000.
This is $4,235,244,000 below the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:

[In thousands of dollars]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Change from
Line Item 2020 budget Committee budget
estimate recommendation estimate
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 Trident II Mods 1,177,251 .............. -1,177,251
Transfer: .............. .............. -1,177,251
From Title
IX to Title
III for
base
requirement
s
2 Missile 7,142 .............. -7,142
Industrial
Facilities
Transfer: .............. .............. -7,142
From Title
IX to Title
III for
base
requirement
s
3 Tomahawk 386,730 .............. -386,730
Transfer: .............. .............. -386,730
From Title
IX to Title
III for
base
requirement
s
4 AMRAAM 224,502 .............. -224,502
Transfer: .............. .............. -224,502
From Title
IX to Title
III for
base
requirement
s
5 Sidewinder 119,456 .............. -119,456
Transfer: .............. .............. -119,456
From Title
IX to Title
III for
base
requirement
s
7 Standard Missile 404,523 .............. -404,523
Transfer: .............. .............. -404,523
From Title
IX to Title
III for
base
requirement
s
8 Standard Missile 96,085 .............. -96,085
(AP)
Transfer: .............. .............. -96,085
From Title
IX to Title
III for
base
requirement
s
9 Small Diameter 118,466 .............. -118,466
Bomb II
Transfer: .............. .............. -118,466
From Title
IX to Title
III for
base
requirement
s
10 Ram 106,765 .............. -106,765
Transfer: .............. .............. -106,765
From Title
IX to Title
III for
base
requirement
s
11 Joint Air Ground 90,966 90,966 ..............
Missile [JAGM]
12 Hellfire 1,525 .............. -1,525
Transfer: .............. .............. -1,525
From Title
IX to Title
III for
base
requirement
s
15 Aerial Targets 152,380 6,500 -145,880
Transfer: .............. .............. -145,880
From Title
IX to Title
III for
base
requirement
s
16 Drones And 20,000 .............. -20,000
Decoys
Transfer: .............. .............. -20,000
From Title
IX to Title
III for
base
requirement
s
17 Other Missile 3,388 .............. -3,388
Support
Transfer: .............. .............. -3,388
From Title
IX to Title
III for
base
requirement
s
18 LRASM 143,200 .............. -143,200
Transfer: .............. .............. -143,200
From Title
IX to Title
III for
base
requirement
s
19 LCS OTH Missile 38,137 .............. -38,137
Transfer: .............. .............. -38,137
From Title
IX to Title
III for
base
requirement
s
20 ESSM 128,059 .............. -128,059
Transfer: .............. .............. -128,059
From Title
IX to Title
III for
base
requirement
s
21 Harpoon Mods 25,447 .............. -25,447
Transfer: .............. .............. -25,447
From Title
IX to Title
III for
base
requirement
s
22 Harm Mods 183,740 .............. -183,740
Transfer: .............. .............. -183,740
From Title
IX to Title
III for
base
requirement
s
23 Standard 22,500 .............. -22,500
Missiles Mods
Transfer: .............. .............. -22,500
From Title
IX to Title
III for
base
requirement
s
24 Weapons 1,958 .............. -1,958
Industrial
Facilities
Transfer: .............. .............. -1,958
From Title
IX to Title
III for
base
requirement
s
25 Fleet Satellite 67,380 .............. -67,380
Comm Follow-On
Transfer: .............. .............. -67,380
From Title
IX to Title
III for
base
requirement
s
27 Ordnance Support 109,427 .............. -109,427
Equipment
Transfer: .............. .............. -109,427
From Title
IX to Title
III for
base
requirement
s
28 SSTD 5,561 .............. -5,561
Transfer: .............. .............. -5,561
From Title
IX to Title
III for
base
requirement
s
29 MK-48 Torpedo 114,000 .............. -114,000
Transfer: .............. .............. -114,000
From Title
IX to Title
III for
base
requirement
s
30 ASW Targets 15,095 .............. -15,095
Transfer: .............. .............. -15,095
From Title
IX to Title
III for
base
requirement
s
31 MK-54 Torpedo 119,453 .............. -119,453
Mods
Transfer: .............. .............. -119,453
From Title
IX to Title
III for
base
requirement
s
32 MK-48 Torpedo 39,508 .............. -39,508
ADCAP Mods
Transfer: .............. .............. -39,508
From Title
IX to Title
III for
base
requirement
s
33 Quickstrike Mine 5,183 .............. -5,183
Transfer: .............. .............. -5,183
From Title
IX to Title
III for
base
requirement
s
34 Torpedo Support 79,028 .............. -79,028
Equipment
Transfer: .............. .............. -79,028
From Title
IX to Title
III for
base
requirement
s
35 ASW Range 3,890 .............. -3,890
Support
Transfer: .............. .............. -3,890
From Title
IX to Title
III for
base
requirement
s
36 First 3,803 .............. -3,803
Destination
Transportation
Transfer: .............. .............. -3,803
From Title
IX to Title
III for
base
requirement
s
37 Small Arms and 14,797 .............. -14,797
Weapons
Transfer: .............. .............. -14,797
From Title
IX to Title
III for
base
requirement
s
38 CIWS Mods 44,126 .............. -44,126
Transfer: .............. .............. -44,126
From Title
IX to Title
III for
base
requirement
s
39 Coast Guard 44,980 .............. -44,980
Weapons
Transfer: .............. .............. -44,980
From Title
IX to Title
III for
base
requirement
s
40 Gun Mount Mods 66,376 .............. -66,376
Transfer: .............. .............. -66,376
From Title
IX to Title
III for
base
requirement
s
41 LCS Module 14,585 .............. -14,585
Weapons
Transfer: .............. .............. -14,585
From Title
IX to Title
III for
base
requirement
s
43 Airborne Mine 7,160 .............. -7,160
Neutralization
Systems
Transfer: .............. .............. -7,160
From Title
IX to Title
III for
base
requirement
s
45 Spares and 126,138 .............. -126,138
Repair Parts
Transfer: .............. .............. -126,138
From Title
IX to Title
III for
base
requirement
s
-------------------------------------------------
Total, 4,332,710 97,466 -4,235,244
Weapons
Procureme
nt, Navy
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Procurement of Ammunition, Navy and Marine Corps

Appropriations, 2019.................................... $229,783,000
Budget estimate, 2020................................... 1,186,128,000
Committee recommendation................................ 204,814,000

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $204,814,000.
This is $981,314,000 below the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:

Other Procurement, Navy

Appropriations, 2019.................................... $181,173,000
Budget estimate, 2020................................... 357,600,000
Committee recommendation................................ 357,550,000

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $357,550,000.
This is $50,000 below the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:

Procurement, Marine Corps

Appropriations, 2019.................................... $58,023,000
Budget estimate, 2020................................... 20,589,000
Committee recommendation................................ 20,589,000

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $20,589,000.
This is equal to the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:

Aircraft Procurement, Air Force

Appropriations, 2019.................................... $955,248,000
Budget estimate, 2020................................... 309,110,000
Committee recommendation................................ 1,011,810,000

The Committee recommends an appropriation of
$1,011,810,000. This is $702,700,000 above the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:

Missile Procurement, Air Force

Appropriations, 2019.................................... $493,526,000
Budget estimate, 2020................................... 201,671,000
Committee recommendation................................ 201,671,000

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $201,671,000.
This is equal to the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:

Procurement of Ammunition, Air Force

Appropriations, 2019.................................... $1,371,516,000
Budget estimate, 2020................................... 2,607,394,000
Committee recommendation................................ 934,758,000

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $934,758,000.
This is $1,672,636,000 below the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:

Other Procurement, Air Force

Appropriations, 2019.................................... $3,677,276,000
Budget estimate, 2020................................... 4,193,098,000
Committee recommendation................................ 3,513,098,000

The Committee recommends an appropriation of
$3,513,098,000. This is $680,000,000 below the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:

Procurement, Defense-Wide

Appropriations, 2019.................................... $572,135,000
Budget estimate, 2020................................... 452,047,000
Committee recommendation................................ 447,047,000

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $447,047,000.
This is $5,000,000 below the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:

National Guard and Reserve Equipment

Appropriations, 2019.................................... $1,300,000,000
Budget estimate, 2020...................................................
Committee recommendation................................ 850,000,000

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $850,000,000.
This is $850,000,000 above the budget estimate.
The appropriation includes direction for the component
commanders of the Army Reserve, Marine Forces Reserve, Air
Force Reserve, Army National Guard and Air National Guard to
submit to the congressional defense committees a detailed
assessment of their component's modernization priorities, not
later than 30 days after enactment of this act.

committee recommended program

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:

RESERVE EQUIPMENT:
ARMY RESERVE:
Program increase: Miscellaneous equipment............... .............. 127,500 +127,500

NAVY RESERVE:
Program increase: Miscellaneous equipment............... .............. 42,500 +42,500

MARINE CORPS RESERVE:
Program increase: Miscellaneous equipment............... .............. 8,500 +8,500

AIR FORCE RESERVE:
Program increase: Miscellaneous equipment............... .............. 127,500 +127,500
-----------------------------------------------
TOTAL, RESERVE EQUIPMENT.................................. .............. 306,000 +306,000
===============================================

NATIONAL GUARD EQUIPMENT:
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD:
Program increase: Miscellaneous equipment............... .............. 272,000 +272,000

AIR NATIONAL GUARD:
Program increase: Miscellaneous equipment............... .............. 272,000 +272,000
-----------------------------------------------
TOTAL, NATIONAL GUARD EQUIPMENT........................... .............. 544,000 +544,000
===============================================
TOTAL, NATIONAL GUARD AND RESERVE EQUIPMENT............... .............. 850,000 +850,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

High-Priority Items.--The Committee directs that the
National Guard and Reserve Equipment account shall be executed
by the Chiefs of the National Guard and reserve components with
priority consideration given to the following items: Acoustic
Hailing Devices; Cold Weather and Mountaineering Gear and
Equipment, including Small Unit Support Vehicles; Counter-UAS
Systems; Crashworthy, Ballistically Tolerant Auxiliary Fuel
Systems; Detect and Avoid Systems for MQ-9 Aircraft; HMMWV
Modernization; MQ-9 Deployable Launch & Recovery Element
Mission Support Kits; and Solar Mobile Power Systems.

RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST AND EVALUATION

The Committee recommends $833,762,000 for research,
development, test and evaluation.

Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Army

Appropriations, 2019.................................... $300,604,000
Budget estimate, 2020................................... 204,124,000
Committee recommendation................................ 174,354,000

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $174,354,000.
This is $29,770,000 below the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:

Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy

Appropriations, 2019.................................... $167,812,000
Budget estimate, 2020................................... 164,410,000
Committee recommendation................................ 164,410,000

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $164,410,000.
This is equal to the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:

Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air Force

Appropriations, 2019.................................... $321,934,000
Budget estimate, 2020................................... 450,248,000
Committee recommendation................................ 128,248,000

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $128,248,000.
This is $322,000,000 below the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:

Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-Wide

Appropriations, 2019.................................... $403,044,000
Budget estimate, 2020................................... 827,950,000
Committee recommendation................................ 366,750,000

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $366,750,000.
This is $461,200,000 below the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:

REVOLVING AND MANAGEMENT FUNDS

Defense Working Capital Funds

Appropriations, 2019.................................... $15,190,000
Budget estimate, 2020................................... 20,100,000
Committee recommendation................................ 20,100,000

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $20,100,000.
This is equal to the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the programs recommended by the
Committee:

OTHER DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE PROGRAMS

Defense Health Program

Appropriations, 2019.................................... $352,068,000
Budget estimate, 2020................................... 347,746,000
Committee recommendation................................ 347,746,000

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $347,746,000.
This is equal to the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:

Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense

Appropriations, 2019.................................... $153,100,000
Budget estimate, 2020................................... 163,596,000
Committee recommendation................................ 163,596,000

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $163,596,000.
This is equal to the budget estimate.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this
appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

Office of the Inspector General

Appropriations, 2019.................................... $24,692,000
Budget estimate, 2020................................... 24,254,000
Committee recommendation................................ 24,254,000

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $24,254,000.
This is equal to the budget estimate.

GENERAL PROVISIONS--THIS TITLE

The following lists general provisions proposed by the
Committee. The Committee recommends inclusion of several
proposals which have been incorporated in previous
appropriations acts, provisions requested for inclusion by the
Defense Department, and new provisions. The Committee
recommendations are as follows:
Sec. 9001. Funds in Addition to Base.--Retains and modifies
a provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 9002. Special Transfer Authority.--Retains and
modifies a provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 9003. Supervision and Administration Costs.--Retains a
provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 9004. Vehicle Procurement.--Retains a provision
carried in previous years.
Sec. 9005. Commanders' Emergency Response Program.--Retains
a provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 9006. Coalition Lift and Sustainment.--Retains a
provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 9007. Permanent Military Installations.--Retains a
provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 9008. U.N. Convention Against Torture.--Retains a
provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 9009. Afghanistan Resource Oversight Council.--Retains
a provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 9010. Investment Unit Cost.--Retains a provision
carried in previous years.
Sec. 9011. O&M Readiness Funds and Transfer Authority.--
Inserts a new provision which provides for O&M readiness funds
and transfer authority.
Sec. 9012. Ukraine Security Assistance Initiative.--Retains
and modifies a provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 9013. Ukraine Replacement of Funds.--Retains a
provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 9014. Counterterrorism Partnerships Fund Excess
Equipment.--Retains a provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 9015. C-130 Cargo Aircraft Transfers.--Retains a
provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 9016. Afghanistan Security Forces Fund
Certification.--Retains provision carried in previous years.
Sec. 9017. Rescissions.--The Committee recommends a general
provision rescinding funds from prior years as displayed below:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Amount
------------------------------------------------------------------------

2018 Appropriations

Weapons and Tracked Combat Vehicles, Army:
Bradley Program (MOD)............................... $30,000,000

------------------------------------------------------------------------
2019 Appropriations

Operation and Maintenance: DSCA Security Cooperation.... 133,442,000
Operation and Maintenance: Coalition Support Funds...... 30,000,000
Counter-ISIS Train and Equip Fund....................... 471,837,000
Missile Procurement, Army:
Hellfire............................................ 13,176,000
Weapons and Tracked Combat Vehicles, Army:
Bradley Program (MOD)............................... 50,000,000
Common Remotely Operated Weapons Station............ 2,477,000
Other Procurement, Army:
Information Systems................................. 8,750,000
Aircraft Procurement, Air Force:
MQ-9................................................ 69,984,000
Large Aircraft Infrared Countermeasures............. 24,713,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sec. 9018. Saudi Coalition Support Prohibition.--Inserts a
new provision regarding a funds limitation for the Saudi-led
coalition in Yemen.
Sec. 9019. Emergency Designation.--Retains a provision
carried in previous years.

TITLE X

ADDITIONAL APPROPRIATIONS FOR DISASTER RELIEF (emergency)

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE--MILITARY

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $1,710,245,000
for necessary expenses related to the consequences of
Hurricanes Michael and Florence and flooding and earthquakes
occurring in fiscal year 2019.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table summarizes the Committee
recommendation:

[In thousands of dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fiscal year Fiscal year Committee
2019 enacted 2020 estimate recommendation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Operation and Maintenance....................................... .............. .............. 951,500
Procurement..................................................... .............. .............. 408,745
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation...................... .............. .............. 113,000
Defense Working Capital Funds................................... .............. .............. 237,000
-----------------------------------------------
Total, Additional Appropriations for Disaster Relief...... .............. .............. 1,710,245
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

GENERAL PROVISION--THIS TITLE

Sec. 10001. Emergency Designation.--Requires the President
to designate funding as an emergency.

COMPLIANCE WITH PARAGRAPH 7, RULE XVI OF THE STANDING RULES OF THE
SENATE

Paragraph 7 of rule XVI requires that Committee reports on
general appropriations bills identify each Committee amendment
to the House bill ``which proposes an item of appropriation
which is not made to carry out the provisions of an existing
law, a treaty stipulation, or an act or resolution previously
passed by the Senate during that session.''
The Committee recommends funding for the following accounts
which currently lack authorization for fiscal year 2020:

Military Personnel, Army
Military Personnel, Navy
Military Personnel, Marine Corps
Military Personnel, Air Force
Reserve Personnel, Air Force
Reserve Personnel, Army
Reserve Personnel, Navy
Reserve Personnel, Marine Corps
Reserve Personnel, Air Force
National Guard Personnel, Army
National Guard Personnel, Air Force
Operation and Maintenance, Army
Operation and Maintenance, Navy
Operation and Maintenance, Marine Corps
Operation and Maintenance, Air Force
Operation and Maintenance, Space Force
Operation and Maintenance, Defense-Wide
Operation and Maintenance, Army Reserve
Operation and Maintenance, Navy Reserve
Operation and Maintenance, Marine Corps Reserve
Operation and Maintenance, Air Force Reserve
Operation and Maintenance, Army National Guard
Operation and Maintenance, Air National Guard
United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
Environmental Restoration, Army
Environmental Restoration, Navy
Environmental Restoration, Air Force
Environmental Restoration, Defense-Wide
Environmental Restoration, Formerly Used Defense Sites
Overseas Humanitarian, Disaster, and Civic Aid
Cooperative Threat Reduction Account
Afghanistan Security Forces Fund
Counter-ISIS Train and Equip Fund
Aircraft Procurement, Army
Missile Procurement, Army
Procurement of Weapons and Tracked Combat Vehicles, Army
Procurement of Ammunition, Army
Other Procurement, Army
Aircraft Procurement, Navy
Weapons Procurement, Navy
Procurement of Ammunition, Navy and Marine Corps
Shipbuilding and Conversion, Navy
Ohio Replacement Submarine [AP]
Carrier Replacement Program [CVN 80]
Carrier Replacement Program [CVN 81]
Virginia Class Submarine
Virginia Class Submarine [AP]
CVN Refueling Overhauls
CVN Refueling Overhauls [AP]
DDG-1000
DDG-51
DDG-51 [AP]
FGG-Frigate
LPD Flight II
LHA Replacement Expeditionary Fast Transport
TAO Fleet Oiler
TAO Fleet Oiler [AP]
Towing, Salvage, and Rescue Ship
LCU 1700
Outfitting, Post Delivery, Conversions and First
Destination Transportation
Service Craft
Completion of Prior Year Shipbuilding Programs
Unmanned Surface Vessels
Other Procurement, Navy
Procurement, Marine Corps
Aircraft Procurement, Air Force
Missile Procurement, Air Force
Space Procurement, Air Force
Procurement of Ammunition, Air Force
Other Procurement, Air Force
Procurement, Defense-Wide
National Guard and Reserve Equipment
Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation, Army
Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation, Navy
Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation, Air Force
Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation, Defense-Wide
Operational Test and Evaluation, Defense
Defense Working Capital Funds
Defense Health Program
Chemical Agents and Munitions Destruction
Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities
Office of the Inspector General
Intelligence Community Management Account (ICMA)

COMPLIANCE WITH PARAGRAPH 7(c), RULE XXVI OF THE STANDING RULES OF THE
SENATE

Pursuant to paragraph 7(c) of rule XXVI, on September 12,
2019, the Committee ordered favorably reported an original bill
(S. 2474) making appropriations for the Department of Defense
for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2020, and for other
purposes, provided that the bill be subject to amendment and
that the bill be consistent with its budget allocation, and
provided that the Chairman of the Committee or his designee be
authorized to offer the substance of the original bill as a
Committee amendment in the nature of a substitute to the House
companion measure, by a recorded vote of 16-15, a quorum being
present. The vote was as follows:
Yeas Nays
Chairman Shelby Mr. Leahy
Mr. McConnell Mrs. Murray
Mr. Alexander Mrs. Feinstein
Ms. Collins Mr. Durbin
Ms. Murkowski Mr. Reed
Mr. Graham Mr. Tester
Mr. Blunt Mr. Udall
Mr. Moran Mrs. Shaheen
Mr. Hoeven Mr. Merkley
Mr. Boozman Mr. Coons
Mrs. Capito Mr. Schatz
Mr. Kennedy Ms. Baldwin
Mrs. Hyde-Smith Mr. Murphy
Mr. Daines Mr. Manchin
Mr. Rubio Mr. Van Hollen
Mr. Lankford

COMPLIANCE WITH PARAGRAPH 12, RULE XXVI OF THE STANDING RULES OF THE
SENATE

Paragraph 12 of rule XXVI requires that Committee reports
on a bill or joint resolution repealing or amending any statute
or part of any statute include ``(a) the text of the statute or
part thereof which is proposed to be repealed; and (b) a
comparative print of that part of the bill or joint resolution
making the amendment and of the statute or part thereof
proposed to be amended, showing by stricken-through type and
italics, parallel columns, or other appropriate typographical
devices the omissions and insertions which would be made by the
bill or joint resolution if enacted in the form recommended by
the Committee.''
The Committee bill as recommended contains no such
provisions.
------

BUDGETARY IMPACT OF BILL

PREPARED IN CONSULTATION WITH THE CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE PURSUANT TO SEC. 308(a), PUBLIC LAW 93-344, AS
AMENDED
[In millions of dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Budget authority Outlays
-------------------------------------------------------
Committee Amount in Committee Amount in
allocation bill allocation bill
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comparison of amounts in the bill with the subcommittee
allocation for 2020: Subcommittee on Defense:
Mandatory........................................... 514 514 514 \1\514
Discretionary....................................... 622,516 694,891 623,896 \1\665,265
Security........................................ 622,373 694,748 NA NA
Nonsecurity..................................... 143 143 NA NA
Projection of outlays associated with the
recommendation:
2020................................................ ............ ............ ............ \2\406,533
2021................................................ ............ ............ ............ 168,547
2022................................................ ............ ............ ............ 57,637
2023................................................ ............ ............ ............ 28,965
2024 and future years............................... ............ ............ ............ 23,020
Financial assistance to State and local governments for NA ............ NA ............
P2020.................................................. ......\2\

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\Includes outlays from prior-year budget authority.
\2\Excludes outlays from prior-year budget authority.

NA: Not applicable.

NOTE.--Consistent with the funding recommended in the bill for emergency requirements and for overseas
contingency operations and in accordance with subparagraphs (A)(i) and (A)(ii) of section 251(b)(2) of the
BBEDCA of 1985, the Committee anticipates that the Budget Committee will provide a revised 302(a) allocation
for the Committee on Appropriations reflecting an upward adjustment of $72,375,000,000 in budget authority
plus the associated outlays.

COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF NEW BUDGET (OBLIGATIONAL) AUTHORITY FOR FISCAL YEAR 2019 AND BUDGET ESTIMATES AND AMOUNTS RECOMMENDED IN THE BILL FOR FISCAL
YEAR 2020
[In thousands of dollars]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Senate Committee recommendation
compared with (+ or -)
Item 2019 Budget estimate Committee -----------------------------------
appropriation recommendation 2019
appropriation Budget estimate
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TITLE I

MILITARY PERSONNEL

Military Personnel, Army...................................... 42,690,042 43,347,472 42,968,799 +278,757 -378,673
Military Personnel, Navy...................................... 30,164,481 31,831,199 31,763,263 +1,598,782 -67,936
Military Personnel, Marine Corps.............................. 13,779,038 14,175,211 14,088,775 +309,737 -86,436
Military Personnel, Air Force................................. 30,074,691 31,284,959 31,261,759 +1,187,068 -23,200
Reserve Personnel, Army....................................... 4,836,947 4,964,671 4,920,866 +83,919 -43,805
Reserve Personnel, Navy....................................... 2,049,021 2,123,947 2,121,507 +72,486 -2,440
Reserve Personnel, Marine Corps............................... 782,390 838,854 837,854 +55,464 -1,000
Reserve Personnel, Air Force.................................. 1,860,406 2,038,040 2,022,340 +161,934 -15,700
National Guard Personnel, Army................................ 8,600,945 8,808,305 8,912,605 +311,660 +104,300
National Guard Personnel, Air Force........................... 3,699,080 4,063,845 4,086,045 +386,965 +22,200
=========================================================================================
Total, title I, Military Personnel...................... 138,537,041 143,476,503 142,983,813 +4,446,772 -492,690

Total, Tricare Accrual payments (permanent, ................ ................ ................ ................ ................
indefinite authority)..............................

Total, including Tricare................................ 138,537,041 143,476,503 142,983,813 +4,446,772 -492,690
=========================================================================================
TITLE II

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE

Operation and Maintenance, Army............................... 40,145,482 22,797,873 40,437,663 +292,181 +17,639,790
Operation and Maintenance, Navy............................... 48,034,826 25,952,718 48,200,088 +165,262 +22,247,370
Operation and Maintenance, Marine Corps....................... 6,540,049 3,928,045 7,608,598 +1,068,549 +3,680,553
Operation and Maintenance, Air Force.......................... 40,379,184 21,278,499 43,092,286 +2,713,102 +21,813,787
Operation and Maintenance, Space Force........................ ................ 72,436 72,436 +72,436 ................
Operation and Maintenance, Defense-Wide....................... 35,613,354 37,399,341 37,236,175 +1,622,821 -163,166
Operation and Maintenance, Army Reserve....................... 2,781,402 1,080,103 2,990,610 +209,208 +1,910,507
Operation and Maintenance, Navy Reserve....................... 1,018,006 261,284 1,100,116 +82,110 +838,832
Operation and Maintenance, Marine Corps Reserve............... 271,570 61,090 292,076 +20,506 +230,986
Operation and Maintenance, Air Force Reserve.................. 3,191,734 2,231,445 3,222,818 +31,084 +991,373
Operation and Maintenance, Army National Guard................ 7,118,831 3,335,755 7,588,903 +470,072 +4,253,148
Operation and Maintenance, Air National Guard................. 6,420,697 3,612,156 6,732,792 +312,095 +3,120,636
United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces........... 14,662 14,771 14,771 +109 ................
Environmental Restoration, Army............................... 235,809 207,518 209,218 -26,591 +1,700
Environmental Restoration, Navy............................... 365,883 335,932 335,932 -29,951 ................
Environmental Restoration, Air Force.......................... 365,808 302,744 402,744 +36,936 +100,000
Environmental Restoration, Defense-Wide....................... 19,002 9,105 9,105 -9,897 ................
Environmental Restoration, Formerly Used Defense Sites........ 248,673 216,499 216,499 -32,174 ................
Overseas Humanitarian, Disaster, and Civic Aid................ 117,663 108,600 108,600 -9,063 ................
Cooperative Threat Reduction Account.......................... 350,240 338,700 338,700 -11,540 ................
Department of Defense Acquisition Workforce Development Fund.. 450,000 400,000 400,000 -50,000 ................
=========================================================================================
Total, title II, Operation and Maintenance.............. 193,682,875 123,944,614 200,610,130 +6,927,255 +76,665,516
=========================================================================================
TITLE III

PROCUREMENT

Aircraft Procurement, Army.................................... 4,299,566 3,696,429 3,766,529 -533,037 +70,100
Missile Procurement, Army..................................... 3,145,256 ................ 3,030,944 -114,312 +3,030,944
Procurement of Weapons and Tracked Combat Vehicles, Army...... 4,486,402 4,715,566 4,463,582 -22,820 -251,984
Procurement of Ammunition, Army............................... 2,276,330 ................ 2,572,771 +296,441 +2,572,771
Other Procurement, Army....................................... 7,844,691 7,443,101 7,220,947 -623,744 -222,154
Aircraft Procurement, Navy.................................... 20,092,199 18,522,204 18,573,560 -1,518,639 +51,356
Weapons Procurement, Navy..................................... 3,711,576 ................ 3,963,067 +251,491 +3,963,067
Procurement of Ammunition, Navy and Marine Corps.............. 952,682 ................ 872,251 -80,431 +872,251
Shipbuilding and Conversion, Navy............................. 24,150,087 23,783,710 24,366,431 +216,344 +582,721
Other Procurement, Navy....................................... 9,097,138 9,652,956 10,568,201 +1,471,063 +915,245
Procurement, Marine Corps..................................... 2,719,870 3,090,449 3,045,749 +325,879 -44,700
Aircraft Procurement, Air Force............................... 17,112,337 16,784,279 17,308,918 +196,581 +524,639
Missile Procurement, Air Force................................ 2,585,004 2,889,187 2,589,166 +4,162 -300,021
Space Procurement, Air Force.................................. 2,343,642 2,414,383 2,460,605 +116,963 +46,222
Procurement of Ammunition, Air Force.......................... 1,485,856 ................ 1,625,661 +139,805 +1,625,661
Other Procurement, Air Force.................................. 20,884,225 20,687,857 21,083,464 +199,239 +395,607
Procurement, Defense-Wide..................................... 6,822,180 5,109,416 5,285,914 -1,536,266 +176,498
National Guard and Reserve Equipment.......................... 1,300,000 ................ ................ -1,300,000 ................
Defense Production Act Purchases.............................. 53,578 34,393 39,393 -14,185 +5,000
Joint Urgent Operational Needs Fund........................... ................ 99,200 ................ ................ -99,200
=========================================================================================
Total, title III, Procurement........................... 135,362,619 118,923,130 132,837,153 -2,525,466 +13,914,023
=========================================================================================
TITLE IV

RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST AND EVALUATION

Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Army.............. 11,083,824 12,192,771 12,412,845 +1,329,021 +220,074
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy.............. 18,510,564 20,270,499 19,818,218 +1,307,654 -452,281
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air Force......... 41,229,475 45,616,122 45,446,727 +4,217,252 -169,395
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-Wide...... 23,691,836 24,346,953 26,371,649 +2,679,813 +2,024,696
Operational Test and Evaluation, Defense...................... 381,009 221,200 232,700 -148,309 +11,500
=========================================================================================
Total, title IV, Research, Development, Test and 94,896,708 102,647,545 104,282,139 +9,385,431 +1,634,594
Evaluation.............................................
=========================================================================================
TITLE V

REVOLVING AND MANAGEMENT FUNDS

Defense Working Capital Funds................................. 1,641,115 1,226,211 1,580,211 -60,904 +354,000
Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency Working ................ 200,000 ................ ................ -200,000
Capital Fund.................................................
=========================================================================================
Total, title V, Revolving and Management Funds.......... 1,641,115 1,426,211 1,580,211 -60,904 +154,000
=========================================================================================
TITLE VI

OTHER DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE PROGRAMS

Defense Health Program:
Operation and maintenance................................. 30,953,422 31,812,090 31,351,990 +398,568 -460,100
Procurement............................................... 873,160 454,324 435,526 -437,634 -18,798
Research, development, test and evaluation................ 2,180,937 732,273 1,707,773 -473,164 +975,500
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Defense Health Program\1\........................ 34,007,519 32,998,687 33,495,289 -512,230 +496,602
=========================================================================================

Chemical Agents and Munitions Destruction, Defense:
Operation and maintenance................................. 105,997 107,351 107,351 +1,354 ................
Procurement............................................... 1,091 2,218 2,218 +1,127 ................
Research, development, test and evaluation................ 886,728 875,930 875,930 -10,798 ................
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Chemical Agents\2\............................... 993,816 985,499 985,499 -8,317 ................
=========================================================================================
Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense\1\..... 881,525 799,402 884,402 +2,877 +85,000
Office of the Inspector General\1\............................ 329,273 363,499 363,499 +34,226 ................
=========================================================================================
Total, title VI, Other Department of Defense Programs... 36,212,133 35,147,087 35,728,689 -483,444 +581,602
=========================================================================================
TITLE VII

RELATED AGENCIES

Central Intelligence Agency Retirement and Disability System 514,000 514,000 514,000 ................ ................
Fund.........................................................
Intelligence Community Management Account (ICMA).............. 522,424 558,000 539,400 +16,976 -18,600
=========================================================================================
Total, title VII, Related agencies...................... 1,036,424 1,072,000 1,053,400 +16,976 -18,600
=========================================================================================
TITLE VIII

GENERAL PROVISIONS

Additional transfer authority (Sec.8005)...................... (4,000,000) (5,000,000) (4,000,000) ................ (-1,000,000)
FFRDC (Sec.8024).............................................. -179,000 ................ -53,000 +126,000 -53,000
Rescissions (Sec.8041)........................................ -2,508,005 ................ -3,871,302 -1,363,297 -3,871,302
National grants (Sec.8047).................................... 44,000 ................ 20,000 -24,000 +20,000
Shipbuilding and conversion, Navy Judgment Fund............... ................ ................ ................ ................ ................
O&M, Defense-wide transfer authority (Sec.8051)............... (30,000) (30,000) (30,000) ................ ................
John C. Stennis Center for Public Service Development Trust (1,000) ................ (1,000) ................ (+1,000)
Fund (O&M, Navy transfer authority) (Sec.8065)...............
Fisher House Foundation....................................... 10,000 ................ ................ -10,000 ................
Revised economic assumptions.................................. -250,000 ................ ................ +250,000 ................
Fisher House O&M Army Navy Air Force transfer authority (11,000) (11,000) (11,000) ................ ................
(Sec.8087)...................................................
Defense Health O&M transfer authority (Sec.8091).............. (113,000) (127,000) (127,000) (+14,000) ................
Public Schools on Military Installations...................... 270,000 ................ ................ -270,000 ................
Revised fuel costs............................................ 750,000 ................ ................ -750,000 ................
Working Capital Fund, Army excess cash balances............... -50,000 ................ ................ +50,000 ................
Working Capital Fund, Navy excess cash balances............... -50,000 ................ ................ +50,000 ................
=========================================================================================
Total, title VIII, General Provisions................... -1,963,005 ................ -3,904,302 -1,941,297 -3,904,302
=========================================================================================
TITLE IX

OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS/GLOBAL WAR ON TERRORISM (GWOT)

Military Personnel

Military Personnel, Army (GWOT)............................... 2,929,154 2,743,132 2,743,132 -186,022 ................
Military Personnel, Navy (GWOT)............................... 385,461 356,392 356,392 -29,069 ................
Military Personnel, Marine Corps (GWOT)....................... 109,232 104,213 104,213 -5,019 ................
Military Personnel, Air Force (GWOT).......................... 964,508 1,007,594 1,007,594 +43,086 ................
Reserve Personnel, Army (GWOT)................................ 37,007 34,812 34,812 -2,195 ................
Reserve Personnel, Navy (GWOT)................................ 11,100 11,370 11,370 +270 ................
Reserve Personnel, Marine Corps (GWOT)........................ 2,380 3,599 3,599 +1,219 ................
Reserve Personnel, Air Force (GWOT)........................... 21,076 16,428 16,428 -4,648 ................
National Guard Personnel, Army (GWOT)......................... 195,283 202,644 202,644 +7,361 ................
National Guard Personnel, Air Force (GWOT).................... 5,460 5,624 5,624 +164 ................
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Military Personnel............................... 4,660,661 4,485,808 4,485,808 -174,853 ................
=========================================================================================
Operation and Maintenance

Operation & Maintenance, Army (GWOT).......................... 18,548,500 37,987,549 19,892,938 +1,344,438 -18,094,611
Operation & Maintenance, Navy (GWOT).......................... 5,172,155 31,734,683 8,413,650 +3,241,495 -23,321,033
(Coast Guard) (by transfer) (GWOT)...................... ................ (190,000) ................ ................ (-190,000)
Operation & Maintenance, Marine Corps (GWOT).................. 1,292,995 5,123,470 1,362,917 +69,922 -3,760,553
Operation & Maintenance, Air Force (GWOT)..................... 9,828,674 33,028,712 10,632,379 +803,705 -22,396,333
Operation & Maintenance, Defense-Wide (GWOT).................. 8,105,991 8,448,612 8,198,105 +92,114 -250,507
(Coalition support funds) (GWOT)........................ (900,000) (450,000) (20,000) (-880,000) (-430,000)
Operation & Maintenance, Army Reserve (GWOT).................. 41,887 1,986,599 37,592 -4,295 -1,949,007
Operation & Maintenance, Navy Reserve (GWOT).................. 25,637 886,868 23,036 -2,601 -863,832
Operation & Maintenance, Marine Corps Reserve (GWOT).......... 3,345 239,693 8,707 +5,362 -230,986
Operation & Maintenance, Air Force Reserve (GWOT)............. 60,500 1,195,131 29,758 -30,742 -1,165,373
Operation & Maintenance, Army National Guard (GWOT)........... 110,729 4,376,939 83,291 -27,438 -4,293,648
Operation & Maintenance, Air National Guard (GWOT)............ 15,870 3,291,982 176,909 +161,039 -3,115,073
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal................................................ 43,206,283 128,300,238 48,859,282 +5,652,999 -79,440,956

Afghanistan Security Forces Fund (GWOT)....................... 4,920,000 4,803,978 3,736,661 -1,183,339 -1,067,317
Counter-ISIS Train and Equip Fund (GWOT)...................... 1,352,200 1,045,000 745,000 -607,200 -300,000
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Operation and Maintenance........................ 49,478,483 134,149,216 53,340,943 +3,862,460 -80,808,273
=========================================================================================
Procurement

Aircraft Procurement, Army (GWOT)............................. 346,963 381,541 463,241 +116,278 +81,700
Missile Procurement, Army (GWOT).............................. 1,729,904 4,645,755 1,423,589 -306,315 -3,222,166
Procurement of Weapons and Tracked Combat Vehicles, Army 1,102,108 353,454 346,306 -755,802 -7,148
(GWOT).......................................................
Procurement of Ammunition, Army (GWOT)........................ 299,075 2,843,230 148,682 -150,393 -2,694,548
Other Procurement, Army (GWOT)................................ 1,364,045 1,139,650 1,120,504 -243,541 -19,146
Aircraft Procurement, Navy (GWOT)............................. 232,119 119,045 42,045 -190,074 -77,000
Weapons Procurement, Navy (GWOT).............................. 14,134 4,332,710 97,466 +83,332 -4,235,244
Procurement of Ammunition, Navy and Marine Corps (GWOT)....... 229,783 1,186,128 204,814 -24,969 -981,314
Other Procurement, Navy (GWOT)................................ 181,173 357,600 357,550 +176,377 -50
Procurement, Marine Corps (GWOT).............................. 58,023 20,589 20,589 -37,434 ................
Aircraft Procurement, Air Force (GWOT)........................ 955,248 309,110 1,011,810 +56,562 +702,700
Missile Procurement, Air Force (GWOT)......................... 493,526 201,671 201,671 -291,855 ................
Procurement of Ammunition, Air Force (GWOT)................... 1,371,516 2,607,394 934,758 -436,758 -1,672,636
Other Procurement, Air Force (GWOT)........................... 3,677,276 4,193,098 3,513,098 -164,178 -680,000
Procurement, Defense-Wide (GWOT).............................. 572,135 452,047 447,047 -125,088 -5,000
National Guard and Reserve Equipment (GWOT)................... ................ ................ 850,000 +850,000 +850,000
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Procurement...................................... 12,627,028 23,143,022 11,183,170 -1,443,858 -11,959,852
=========================================================================================
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation

Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army (GWOT)......... 300,604 204,124 174,354 -126,250 -29,770
Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Navy (GWOT)......... 167,812 164,410 164,410 -3,402 ................
Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force (GWOT).... 321,934 450,248 128,248 -193,686 -322,000
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-Wide 403,044 827,950 366,750 -36,294 -461,200
(GWOT).......................................................
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Research, Development, Test and Evaluation....... 1,193,394 1,646,732 833,762 -359,632 -812,970
=========================================================================================
Revolving and Management Funds

Defense Working Capital Funds (GWOT).......................... 15,190 20,100 20,100 +4,910 ................

Other Department of Defense Programs

Defense Health Program:
Operation & Maintenance (GWOT)............................ 352,068 347,746 347,746 -4,322 ................
Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense (GWOT). 153,100 163,596 163,596 +10,496 ................
Office of the Inspector General (GWOT)........................ 24,692 24,254 24,254 -438 ................
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Other Department of Defense Programs............. 529,860 535,596 535,596 +5,736 ................
=========================================================================================
TITLE IX General Provisions

Additional transfer authority (GWOT) (Sec.9002)............... (2,000,000) (4,500,000) (2,000,000) ................ (-2,500,000)
Ukraine Security Assistance Initiative (GWOT)................. 250,000 ................ ................ -250,000 ................
Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (GWOT)......... 500,000 ................ ................ -500,000 ................
Readiness (GWOT) (Sec.9011)................................... ................ ................ 1,100,000 +1,100,000 +1,100,000
Rescissions (GWOT) (Sec.9017)................................. -1,340,616 ................ -834,379 +506,237 -834,379
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, General Provisions............................... -590,616 ................ 265,621 +856,237 +265,621
=========================================================================================
Total, title IX (OCO/GWOT).............................. 67,914,000 163,980,474 70,665,000 +2,751,000 -93,315,474
=========================================================================================
TITLE X

ADDITIONAL APPROPRIATIONS FOR DISASTER RELIEF

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE

Operation and Maintenance, Navy (emergency)................... ................ ................ 370,400 +370,400 +370,400
Operation and Maintenance, Marine Corps (emergency)........... ................ ................ 64,000 +64,000 +64,000
Operation and Maintenance, Air Force (emergency).............. ................ ................ 471,400 +471,400 +471,400
Operation and Maintenance, Army National Guard (emergency).... ................ ................ 45,700 +45,700 +45,700
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Operation and Maintenance........................ ................ ................ 951,500 +951,500 +951,500
=========================================================================================
PROCUREMENT

Other Procurement, Navy (emergency)........................... ................ ................ 53,000 +53,000 +53,000
Procurement, Marine Corps (emergency)......................... ................ ................ 73,323 +73,323 +73,323
Aircraft Procurement, Air Force (emergency)................... ................ ................ 204,448 +204,448 +204,448
Other Procurement, Air Force (emergency)...................... ................ ................ 77,974 +77,974 +77,974
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Procurement...................................... ................ ................ 408,745 +408,745 +408,745
=========================================================================================
RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST AND EVALUATION

Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy (emergency).. ................ ................ 113,000 +113,000 +113,000

REVOLVING AND MANAGEMENT FUNDS

Defense Working Capital Funds (emergency)..................... ................ ................ 237,000 +237,000 +237,000
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, title X.......................................... ................ ................ 1,710,245 +1,710,245 +1,710,245
=========================================================================================
OTHER APPROPRIATIONS

ADDITIONAL SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATIONS FOR DISASTER RELIEF
ACT, 2019 (Public Law 116-20)

Operation and Maintenance

Operations and Maintenance, Marine Corps (emergency).......... 381,000 ................ ................ -381,000 ................
Operations and Maintenance, Air Force (emergency)............. 670,000 ................ ................ -670,000 ................
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Additional Supplemental Appropriations for 1,051,000 ................ ................ -1,051,000 ................
Disaster Relief Act, 2019..............................
=========================================================================================
EMERGENCY SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATIONS FOR HUMANITARIAN
ASSISTANCE AND SECURITY AT THE SOUTHERN BORDER ACT, 2019
(Public Law 116-26)

Operation and Maintenance

Operations and Maintenance, Army (emergency).................. 92,800 ................ ................ -92,800 ................
Operations and Maintenance, Marine Corps (emergency).......... 13,025 ................ ................ -13,025 ................
Operations and Maintenance, Air Force (emergency)............. 18,000 ................ ................ -18,000 ................
Operations and Maintenance, Army National Guard (emergency)... 21,024 ................ ................ -21,024 ................
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Emergency Supplemental Appropriations for 144,849 ................ ................ -144,849 ................
Humanitarian Assistance and Security at the Southern
Border Act, 2019 (Public Law 116-26)...................
=========================================================================================
Grand total............................................. 668,515,759 690,617,564 687,546,478 +19,030,719 -3,071,086
Appropriations...................................... (601,913,915) (526,637,090) (619,042,535) (+17,128,620) (+92,405,445)
Emergency appropriations............................ (1,195,849) ................ (1,710,245) (+514,396) (+1,710,245)
Global War on Terrorism (GWOT)...................... (69,254,616) (163,980,474) (71,499,379) (+2,244,763) (-92,481,095)
Rescissions......................................... (-2,508,005) ................ (-3,871,302) (-1,363,297) (-3,871,302)
Rescissions (GWOT).................................. (-1,340,616) ................ (-834,379) (+506,237) (-834,379)
(Transfer Authority).................................... 4,155,000 5,168,000 4,169,000 +14,000 -999,000
(Transfer Authority) (GWOT)............................. 2,000,000 4,500,000 2,000,000 ................ -2,500,000
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\Excludes GWOT New and Advance appropriations. Includes Prior GWOT Outlays.
\2\Includes GWOT and emergency (except permanent appropriations).