[House Report 117-694]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]


                                                 Union Calendar No. 510

117th Congress, 2d Session - - - - - - - - - - - - House Report 117-694 



                        REPORT ON THE ACTIVITIES

                                 of the

              COMMITTEE ON SCIENCE, SPACE, AND TECHNOLOGY

                     U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                                for the

                    ONE HUNDRED SEVENTEENTH CONGRESS

                                     








[GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]









                                     


 December 30, 2022.--Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on 
            the State of the Union and ordered to be printed 
            
                             _________
                              
                 U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE
                 
*50-181                  WASHINGTON : 2023
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
                         LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL

                              ----------                              

               Committee on Science, Space, and Technology,
                                 Washington, DC, December 30, 2022.
Hon. Nancy Pelosi,
Speaker, House of Representatives,
Washington, DC.
    Dear Speaker Pelosi: Pursuant to House Rule XI(1)(d)(1), I 
respectfully submit the activities report for the Committee on 
Science, Space, and Technology for the 117th Congress.
    Thank you for your attention to this matter.
            Sincerely,
                                     Eddie Bernice Johnson,
                                                        Chairwoman.  
                                                        
                                                        
                                                        
                                                        
                                                        
                                                        
                                                        
                                                        
                                                        
                                                        
                                                        
                                                        
                                                        
                                                        
                                                        
                                                        
                                                        
                                                        
                                                        
                                                        
                                                        
                                                        
                                                        
                                                        
                                                        
                                                        
                                                        
                                                        
                                                        
                                                        
                                                        
              COMMITTEE ON SCIENCE, SPACE, AND TECHNOLOGY
                    One Hundred Seventeenth Congress

                                 ------                                
             Hon. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON, Texas, Chairwoman
               Hon. FRANK LUCAS, Oklahoma, Ranking Member
Democratic Members (23)              Republican Members (19)
ZOE LOFGREN, California              MO BROOKS, Alabama
SUZANNE BONAMICI, Oregon             BILL POSEY, Florida
AMI BERA, California                 RANDY WEBER, Texas
HALEY STEVENS, Michigan, Vice Chair  BRIAN BABIN, Texas
MIKIE SHERRILL, New Jersey           ANTHONY GONZALEZ, Ohio
JAMAAL BOWMAN, New York              MICHAEL WALTZ, Florida
MELANIE STANSBURY, New Mexico        JAMES R. BAIRD, Indiana
BRAD SHERMAN, California             DANIEL WEBSTER, Florida
ED PERLMUTTER, Colorado              MIKE GARCIA, California
JERRY McNERNEY, California           STEPHANIE I. BICE, Oklahoma
PAUL TONKA, New York                 YOUNG KIM, California
BILL FOSTER, Illinois                RANDY FEENSTRA, Iowa
DONALD NORCROSS, New Jersey          JAKE LaTURNER, Kansas
DON BEYER, Virginia                  CARLOS A. GIMENEZ, Florida
SEAN CASTEN, Illinois                JAY OBERNOLTE, California
CONER LAMB, Pennsylvania             PETER MEIJER, Michigan
DEBORAH ROSS, North Carolina         JAKE ELLZEY, Texas
GWEN MOORE, Wisconsin                MIKE CAREY, Ohio
DAN KILDEE, Michigan
SUSAN WILD, Pennsylvania
LIZZIE FLETCHER, Texas
Vacancy
                                 ------                                
                         Subcommittee on Energy

                 Hon. JAMAAL BOWMAN, New York, Chairman
Democratic Members (10)*             Republican Members (8)*
SUZANNE BONAMICI, Oregon             RANDY WEBER, Texas, Ranking Member
HALEY STEVENS, Michigan              JAMES R. BAIRD, Indiana
MELANIE STANSBURY, New Mexico        MIKE GARCIA, California
JERRY McNERNEY, California           MICHAEL WALTZ, Florida
DONALD NORCROSS, New Jersey          CARLOS A. GIMENEZ, Florida
SEAN CASTEN, Illinois                PETER MEIJER, Michigan
CONOR LAMB, Pennsylvania             JAY OBERNOLTE, California
DEBORAH ROSS, North Carolina
                                 ------                                

                      Subcommittee on Environment

              Hon. MIKIE SHERRILL, New Jersey, Chairwoman
Democratic Members (7)*              Republican Members (5)*
SUZANNE BONAMICI, Oregon             STEPHANIE BICE, Oklahoma, Ranking 
DAN KILDEE, Michigan                     Member
LIZZIE FLETCHER, Texas               ANTHONY GONZALEZ, Ohio
SEAN CASTEN, Illinois                RANDY FEENSTRA, Iowa
Vacancy                              CARLOS A. GIMENEZ, Florida
                .................................................

              Subcommittee on Investigations and Oversight

                  Hon. BILL FOSTER, Illinois, Chairman
Democratic Members (6)*              Republican Members (4)*
ED PERLMUTTER, Colorado              JAY OBERNOLTE, California, Ranking 
AMI BERA, California                     Member
GWEN MOORE, Wisconsin                STEPHANIE BICE, Oklahoma
SEAN CASTEN, Illinois                MIKE CAREY, Ohio

                  *The Full Committee Chair and Ranking Minority 
                    Member (RMM) shall serve as ex-officio 
                    Members of all Subcommittees.
                Subcommittee on Research and Technology

                Hon. HALEY STEVENS, Michigan, Chairwoman
Democratic Members (9)*              Republican Members (7)*
MELANIE STANSBURY, New Mexico        RANDY FEENSTRA, Iowa, Ranking 
PAUL TONKA, New York                     Member
GWEN MOORE, Wisconsin                ANTHONY GONZALEZ, Ohio
SUSAN WILD, Pennsylvania             JAMES R. BAIRD, Indiana
BILL FOSTER, Illinois                JAKE LATURNER, Kansas
CONOR LAMB, Pennsylvania             PETER MEIJER, Michigan
DEBORAH ROSS, North Carolina         JAKE ELLZEY, Texas
                                 ------                                

                 Subcommittee on Space and Aeronautics

                   Hon. DON BEYER, Virginia, Chairman
Democratic Members (8)*              Republican Members (6)*
ZOE LOFGREN, California              BRIAN BABIN, Texas, Ranking Member
AMI BERA, California                 MO BROOKS, Alabama
BRAD SHERMAN, California             BILL POSEY, Florida
ED PERLMUTTER, Colorado              DANIEL WEBSTER, Florida
DONALD NORCROSS, New Jersey          YOUNG KIM, California
Vacancy

                  *The Full Committee Chair and Ranking Minority 
                    Member (RMM) shall serve as ex-officio 
                    Members of all Subcommittees.  
                    
                    
                    
                    
                    
                    
                    
                    
                    
                    
                    
                    
                    
                    
                    
                    
                    
                    
                    
                    
                    
                    
                    
                    
                    
                    
                    
                            C O N T E N T S

                                 ------                                

                      Report on Activities of the
              Committee on Science, Space, and Technology
                             117th Congress

                                                                   Page
Chapter I: Legislation Enacted into Law..........................     1

    1.1. P.L. 117-44, Surface Transportation Extension Act of 
      2021.......................................................     1
    1.2. P.L. 117-52, Further Surface Transportation Extension 
      Act of 2021................................................     2
    1.3. P.L. 117-58, Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act.....     2
    1.4. P.L. 117-167, CHIPS and Science Act.....................     3
    1.5. P.L. 117-169, Inflation Reduction Act of 2022...........     5
    1.6. P.L. 117-81, National Defense Authorization Act for 
      Fiscal Year 2022...........................................     5
    1.7. P.L. 117-248, PFAS Act..................................     6
    1.8. P.L. 117-263, James M. Inhofe National Defense 
      Authorization Act for Fiscal year 2023.....................     7
    1.9. P.L. 117-246, Empowering the U.S. Fire Administration 
      Act........................................................     7
    1.10. P.L. 117-316, FLOODS Act...............................     8
    1.11. P.L. 117-229, PRECIP Act...............................     8

Chapter II: Other Committee Legislation (bold indicates bills 
  primarily referred to the Committee on Science, Space, and 
  Technology)....................................................     9

    2.1 H.R. 1, For the People Act of 2021.......................     9
    2.2 H.R. 144, Supporting Early-Career Research Act...........     9
    2.3 H.R. 204, STEM Opportunities Act.........................    10
    2.4 H.R. 210, Rural STEM Education Research Act..............    10
    2.5 H.R. 847, Promoting Digital Privacy Technologies Act.....    11
    2.6 H.R. 1437, PRECIP Act....................................    11
    2.7 H.R. 1447, COAST Research Act of 2021....................    12
    2.8 H.R. 1480, Helping Emergency Responders Overcome Act of 
      2019.......................................................    12
    2.9 H.R. 1850, Supporting Research and Development for First 
      Responders Act.............................................    13
    2.10 H.R. 2027, MSI STEM Achievement.........................    13
    2.11 H.R. 2225, National Science Foundation for the Future 
      Act........................................................    14
    2.12 H.R. 2533, NEAR Act of 2021.............................    15
    2.13 H.R. 2695, Combating Sexual Harassment in Science Act...    15
    2.14 H.R. 3228, National Coastal Resilience Data and services 
      Act........................................................    16
    2.15 H.R. 3482, National Center for the Advancement of 
      Aviation Act of 2022.......................................    16
    2.16 H.R. 3588, Mathematical and Statistical Modeling 
      Education Act..............................................    17
    2.17 H.R. 3593, Department of Energy Science for the Future 
      Act........................................................    17
    2.18 H.R. 3756, Department of Homeland Security Climate 
      Change Research Act........................................    18
    2.19 H.R. 3858, National Science and Technology Strategy Act 
      of 2021....................................................    19
    2.20 H.R. 3952, NOAA Chief Scientist Act.....................    19
    2.21 H.R. 4270, Abandoned Well Remediation Research and 
      Development Act............................................    20
    2.22 H.R. 4521, Bioeconomy Research and Development Act of 
      2021.......................................................    20
    2.23 H.R. 4588, Regional Innovation Act of 2021..............    21
    2.24 H.R. 4599, SUPER Act of 2021............................    22
    2.25 H.R. 4606, Energizing Technology Transfer Act...........    23
    2.26 H.R. 4609, National Institute of Standards and 
      Technology for the Future Act of 2021......................    24
    2.27 H.R. 4819, National Nuclear University Research 
      Infrastructure Reinvestment Act of 2021....................    25
    2.28 H.R. 5324, NWR Modernization Act of 2021................    26
    2.29 H.R. 5746, NASA Enhanced Use Leasing Extension Act of 
      2021.......................................................    26
    2.30 H.R. 6291, Micro Act....................................    27
    2.31 H.R. 6845, Commercial Remote Sensing Amendment Act of 
      2022.......................................................    27
    2.32 H.R. 6933, Cost-Share Accountability Act of 2022........    28
    2.33 H.R. 7180, Brycen Gray and Ben Price COVID-19 Cognitive 
      Research Act...............................................    28
    2.34 H.R. 7289, Federal PFAS Research Evaluation Act.........    29
    2.35 H.R. 7361, National Weather Service Communications 
      Improvement Act............................................    29
    2.36 H.R. 7569, Energy Cybersecurity University Leadership 
      Act of 2022................................................    29

Chapter III: Oversight, Investigations, and Other Activities of 
  the Committee..................................................    30

    3.1 Hearings Before the Full Committee.......................    30
        3.1(a) February 19, 2021--The Science of Covid-19 
          Vaccines and Encouraging Vaccine Uptake. Hearing Volume 
          No. 117-1..............................................    30
        3.1(b) February 25, 2021--Building Back the U.S. Research 
          Enterprise: Covid Impacts and Recovery. Hearing Volume 
          No. 117-2..............................................    30
        3.1(c) March 12, 2021--The Science Behind Impacts of The 
          Climate Crisis. Hearing Volume No. 117-3...............    31
        3.1(d) March 18, 2021--Lessons Learned from The Texas 
          Blackouts: Research Needs for A Secure And Resilient 
          Grid. Hearing Volume No. 117-5.........................    31
        3.1(e) April 15, 2021--Reimagining Our Innovation Future. 
          Hearing Volume No. 117-8...............................    32
        3.1(f) May 27, 2021--Overview of The Science and Energy 
          Research Enterprise Of The U.S. Department Of Energy. 
          Hearing Volume No. 117-18..............................    32
        3.1(g) June 9, 2021--Building Regional Innovation 
          Economies. Hearing Volume No. 117-20...................    33
        3.1(h) June 23, 2021--A Review of The President's Fiscal 
          Year 2022 Budget Proposal for Nasa. Hearing Volume No. 
          117-21.................................................    33
        3.1(i) June 29, 2021--The State of Federal Wildland Fire 
          Science: Examining Opportunities for Further Research & 
          Coordination. Hearing Volume No. 117-23................    33
        3.1(j) July 20, 2021--Spectrum Needs for Observations in 
          Earth And Space Sciences. Hearing Volume No. 117-26....    34
        3.1(k) September 29, 2021--Members' Day Hearing: House 
          Committee on Science, Space, And Technology. Hearing 
          Volume No. 117-32......................................    34
        3.1(l) October 14, 2021--The Future of Forecasting: 
          Building A Weather-Ready Nation on All Fronts. Hearing 
          Volume No. 117-34......................................    35
        3.1(m) December 2, 2021--Ensuring American Leadership in 
          Microelectronics. Hearing Volume No. 117-40............    35
        3.1(n) February 8, 2022--Data Challenges Impacting Human 
          Trafficking Research and Development of Anti-
          Trafficking Technological Tools. Hearing Volume No. 
          117-43.................................................    36
        3.1(o) March 8, 2022--Federal Climate Adaptation and 
          Resilience for The 21st Century. Hearing Volume No. 
          117-47.................................................    36
        3.1(p) April 28, 2022--Now or Never: The Urgent Need for 
          Ambitious Climate Action. Hearing Volume No. 117-55....    37
        3.1(q) June 8, 2022--Detecting and Quantifying Methane 
          Emissions from The Oil And Gas Sector. Hearing Volume 
          No. 117-60.............................................    37
        3.1(r) September 20, 2022--Amplifying the Arctic: 
          Strengthening Science to Respond To A Rapidly Changing 
          Arctic. Hearing Volume No. 117-68......................    38
        3.1(s) December 6, 2022--Building A Safer Antarctic 
          Research Environment. Hearing Volume No. 117-72........    38

    3.2 Hearings Before the Subcommittee on Energy...............    39

        3.2(a) March 25, 2021--Building Technologies Research for 
          A Sustainable Future. Hearing Volume No. 117-7.........    39
        3.2(b) May 4, 2021--Climate and Energy Science Research 
          at The Department Of Energy. Hearing Volume No. 117-12.    39
        3.2(c) May 19, 2021--Accelerating Discovery: The Future 
          of Scientific Computing at The Department Of Energy. 
          Hearing Volume No. 117-16..............................    40
        3.2(d) July 16, 2021--Fostering Equity in Energy 
          Innovation. Hearing Volume No. 117-25..................    41
        3.2(e) November 17, 2021--Fostering A New Era of Fusion 
          Energy Research and Technology Development. Hearing 
          Volume No. 117-38......................................    41
        3.2(f) February 17, 2022--H2success: Research and 
          Development to Advance A Clean Hydrogen Future. Hearing 
          Volume No. 117-45......................................    42
        3.2(g) March 16, 2022--Bioenergy Research and Development 
          for The Fuels And Chemicals Of Tomorrow. Hearing Volume 
          No. 117-48.............................................    42
        3.2(h) April 27, 2022--Science and Energy Research 
          Infrastructure Needs of The U.S. Department Of Energy. 
          Hearing Volume No. 117-54..............................    43
        3.2(i) June 22, 2022--Investigating the Nature of Matter, 
          Energy, Space, And Time. Hearing Volume No. 117-61.....    43
        3.2(j) July 13, 2022--Nuclear Waste Cleanup: Research and 
          Development Opportunities for The Department Of 
          Energy's Office Of Environmental Management. Hearing 
          Volume No. 117-64......................................    44

    3.3 Hearings Before the Subcommittee on Environment..........    44
        3.3(a) April 21, 2021--Working Towards Climate Equity: 
          The Case for A Federal Climate Service. Hearing Volume 
          No. 117-9..............................................    44
        3.3(b) June 7, 2021--Defining A National `Oceanshot': 
          Accelerating Ocean and Great Lakes Science and 
          Technology. Hearing Volume No. 117-19..................    45
        3.3(c) July 21, 2021--Silent Killer: The Rising Problem 
          of Extreme Heat in The U.S. Hearing Volume No. 117-27..    45
        3.3(d) September 23, 2021--Advancing Earth System Science 
          and Stewardship at Noaa. Hearing Volume No. 117-30.....    46
        3.3(e) December 7, 2021--Forever Chemicals: Research and 
          Development for Addressing The Pfas Problem. Hearing 
          Volume No. 117-41......................................    46
        3.3(f) March 2, 2022--From Gray to Green: Advancing The 
          Science Of Nature-Based Infrastructure. Hearing Volume 
          No. 117-46.............................................    47
        3.3(g) June 14, 2022--What's The Forecast: A Look at The 
          Future of Weather Research. Hearing Volume No. 117-58..    47
        3.3(h) Thursday June 23, 2022--Assessing Federal Programs 
          for Measuring Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks. Hearing 
          Volume No. 117-62......................................    48
        3.3(i) Wednesday September 21, 2022--Looking Back to 
          Predict the Future: The Next Generation Of Weather 
          Satellites. Hearing Volume No. 117-69..................    48

    3.4 Hearings Before the Subcommittee on Investigations And 
      Oversight..................................................    49
        3.4(a) March 17, 2021--Brain Drain: Rebuilding the 
          Federal Scientific Workforce. Hearing Volume No. 117-4.    49
        3.4(b) May 12, 2021--Covid-19 Variants and Evolving 
          Research Needs. Hearing Volume No. 117-14..............    49
        3.4(c) May 25, 2021--Solarwinds and Beyond: Improving the 
          Cybersecurity Of Software Supply Chains. Hearing Volume 
          No. 117-17.............................................    50
        3.4(d) July 14, 2021--Principles for Outbreak 
          Investigation: Covid-19 And Future Infectious Diseases. 
          Hearing Volume No. 117-24..............................    50
        3.4(e) September 28, 2021--The Disinformation Black Box: 
          Researching Social Media Data. Hearing Volume No. 117-
          31.....................................................    51
        3.4(f) October 5, 2021--Balancing Open Science and 
          Security in The U.S. Research Enterprise. Hearing 
          Volume No. 117-33......................................    51
        3.4(g) October 21, 2021--Judicious Spending to Enable 
          Success at The Office Of Nuclear Energy. Hearing Volume 
          No. 117-36.............................................    52
        3.4(h) March 31, 2022--The New Normal: Preparing for And 
          Adapting to The Next Phase Of Covid-19. Hearing Volume 
          No. 117-51.............................................    52
        3.4(i) April 21, 2022--Field Hearing--Pedal to The Metal: 
          Electric Vehicle Batteries and The Critical Minerals 
          Supply Chain. Hearing Volume No. 117-57................    53
        3.4(j) May 11, 2022--Securing the Digital Commons: Open-
          Source Software Cybersecurity. Hearing Volume No. 117-
          56.....................................................    53
        3.4(k) June 29, 2022--Privacy in The Age of Biometrics. 
          Hearing Volume No. 117-63..............................    54
        3.4(l) July 20, 2022--Paper Mills and Research 
          Misconduct: Facing the Challenges Of Scientific 
          Publishing. Hearing Volume No. 117-65..................    54
        3.4(m) September 15, 2022--The Fountain of Youth? The 
          Quest for Aging Therapies. Hearing Volume No. 117-67...    55

    3.5 Hearings Before the Subcommittee on Research And 
      Technology.................................................    55
        3.5(a) April 28, 2021--National Science Foundation: 
          Advancing Research for The Future of U.S. Innovation. 
          Hearing Volume No. 117-10..............................    55
        3.5(b) May 6, 2021--National Science Foundation: 
          Advancing Research for The Future of U.S. Innovation 
          Part Ii. Hearing Volume No. 117-13.....................    56
        3.5(c) June 24, 2021--Plastic Waste Reduction and 
          Recycling Research: Moving from Staggering Statistics 
          To Sustainable Systems. Hearing Volume No. 117-22......    56
        3.5(d) October 5, 2021--Balancing Open Science and 
          Security in The U.S. Research Enterprise. Hearing 
          Volume No. 117-33......................................    57
        3.5(e) November 10, 2021--Weathering the Storm: 
          Reauthorizing the National Windstorm Impact Reduction 
          Program. Hearing Volume No. 117-37.....................    57
        3.5(f) February 15, 2022--Strengthening the U.S. 
          Microelectronics Workforce. Hearing Volume No. 117-44..    58
        3.5(g) March 17, 2022--Setting the Standards: 
          Strengthening U.S. Leadership in Technical Standards. 
          Hearing Volume No. 117-49..............................    58
        3.5(h) April 6, 2022--Sbir Turns 40: Evaluating Support 
          for Small Business Innovation. Hearing Volume No. 117-
          52.....................................................    59
        3.5(i) May 20, 2022--Field Hearing--Building A Workforce 
          to Navigate the Electric Vehicle Future. Hearing Volume 
          No. 117-57.............................................    59
        3.5(j) June 23, 2022--Assessing Federal Programs for 
          Measuring Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks. Hearing 
          Volume No. 117-62......................................    60
        3.5(k) September 29, 2022--Trustworthy Ai: Managing the 
          Risks of Artificial Intelligence. Hearing Volume No. 
          117-70.................................................    60
        3.5(l) December 14, 2022--Building Regional Innovation 
          Economies Part Ii. Hearing Volume No. 117-XX...........    61

    3.6 Hearings Before the Subcommittee on Space and Aeronautics    61
        3.6(a) March 24, 2021--Examining R&D Pathways to 
          Sustainable Aviation. Hearing Volume No. 117-6.........    61
        3.6(b) April 29, 2021--What Do Scientists Hope to Learn 
          with Nasa's Mars Perseverance Rover? Hearing Volume No. 
          117-11.................................................    62
        3.6(c) May 18, 2021--Nasa's Earth Science and Climate 
          Change Activities: Current Roles and Future 
          Opportunities. Hearing Volume No. 117-15...............    62
        3.6(d) July 29, 2021--Enabling Mission Success from The 
          Ground Up: Addressing Nasa's Urgent Infrastructure 
          Needs. Hearing Volume No. 117-28.......................    62
        3.6(e) September 21, 2021--Nasa's Future in Low Earth 
          Orbit: Considerations for International Space Station 
          Extension And Transition. Hearing Volume No. 117-29....    63
        3.6(f) October 20, 2021--Accelerating Deep Space Travel 
          with Space Nuclear Propulsion. Hearing Volume No. 117-
          35.....................................................    63
        3.6(g) December 1, 2021--A Review of The Decadal Survey 
          for Astronomy And Astrophysics In The 2020s. Hearing 
          Volume No. 117-39......................................    64
        3.6(h) March 1, 2022--Keeping Our Sights on Mars Part 3: 
          A Status Update and Review Of Nasa's Artemis 
          Initiative. Hearing Volume No. 117-42..................    64
        3.6(i) May 12, 2022--Space Situational Awareness: Guiding 
          the Transition to A Civil Capability. Hearing Volume 
          No. 117-50.............................................    65
        3.6(j) May 26, 2022--A Review of The Decadal Strategy for 
          Planetary Science And Astrobiology 2023 2032. Hearing 
          Volume No. 117-59......................................    65
        3.6(k) July 28, 2022--Exploring Cyber Space: 
          Cybersecurity Issues for Civil and Commercial Space 
          Systems. Hearing Volume No. 117-66.....................    65
        3.6(l) September 21, 2022--Looking Back to Predict the 
          Future: The Next Generation Of Weather Satellites. 
          Hearing Volume No. 117-69..............................    66
        3.6(m) November 16, 2022--Unfolding the Universe: Initial 
          Science Results from The James Webb Space Telescope. 
          Hearing Volume No. 117-71..............................    66

Chapter IV: Appendix.............................................    67

    4.1 History of the Committee.................................    67
    4.2 Views and Estimates of the Committee on Science, Space, 
      and Technology for FY2022..................................    69
    4.2(a). Minority Views and Estimates for FY 2022.............    72
    4.3. Views and Estimates of the Committee on Science, Space, 
      and Technology for FY 2023.................................    75
    4.4. Oversight plan for the 117th Congress...................    79
    4.5. History of Appointments.................................    89
    4.6. Rules of the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology    91









                                                Union Calendar No. 510
117th Congress    }                                     {       Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 2d Session       }                                     {      117-694

======================================================================




 
   REPORT ON THE ACTIVITIES OF THE COMMITTEE ON SCIENCE, SPACE, AND 
                               TECHNOLOGY

                                _______
                                

 December 30, 2022.--Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on 
            the State of the Union and ordered to be printed

                                _______
                                

    Ms. Johnson of Texas, from the Committee on Science, Space, and 
                  Technology, submitted the following

                              R E P O R T

                Chapter I: Legislation Enacted into Law

     1.1 P.L. 117-44, Surface Transportation Extension Act of 2021


Purpose

    The purpose of P.L. 117-44 is to extend Federal-aid 
highway, highway safety, and transit programs authorized in 
previous surface transportation legislation from the previous 
end date of September 30, 2021, through October 31, 2021.

Legislative History

    H.R. 5434, Surface Transportation Extension Act of 2021, 
was introduced by Peter A. DeFazio on September 30, 2021, and 
referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, 
and in addition to the Committees on Ways and Means, Natural 
Resources, Science, Space, and Technology, Energy and Commerce, 
and Oversight and Reform. On October 1, 2021, the House 
considered H.R. 5434 under suspension of the rules, and the 
bill passed by a record vote of Y-365 and N-51.
    On October 1, 2021, the Senate considered and passed H.R. 
5434 by unanimous consent.
    On October 2, 2021, H.R. 5434 was signed by the President 
and became Public Law 117-44.

 1.2 P.L. 117-52, Further Surface Transportation Extension Act of 2021


Purpose

    The purpose of P.L. 117-52 is to extend Federal-aid 
highway, highway safety, and transit programs authorized in 
previous surface transportation legislation from the previous 
end date of October 31, 2021, through December 3, 2021.

Legislative History

    H.R. 5763, Further Surface Transportation Extension Act of 
2021, was introduced by Peter A. DeFazio on October 28, 2021, 
and referred to the Committee on Transportation and 
Infrastructure, and in addition to the Committees on Ways and 
Means, Natural Resources, Science, Space, and Technology, 
Energy and Commerce, and Oversight and Reform. On October 28, 
2021, the House considered H.R. 5763 under suspension of the 
rules, and the bill passed by a record vote of Y-358 and N-59.
    On October 28, 2021, the Senate considered and passed H.R. 
5763 by unanimous consent.
    On October 31, 2021, H.R. 5763 was signed by the President 
and became Public Law 117-52.

        1.3 P.L. 117-58, Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act


Purpose

    The purpose of P.L. 117-58 is to reauthorize Federal-aid 
highway, highway safety, and transit programs authorized in 
previous surface transportation legislation and also to 
authorize and/or fund new programs related to infrastructure 
and energy. In addition to the types of programs typically 
authorized in ``highway bills'', P.L. 117-58 established a new 
Advanced Research Projects Agency-Infrastructure (ARPA-I) 
program. This program is modeled on the Department of Defense 
DARPA program to provide support for scientific and technical 
solutions to infrastructure challenges.
    There is a total of approximately $38 billion in funding 
for energy related activities that could implicate programs 
within the jurisdiction of the Committee on Science, Space, and 
Technology. Approximately $9 billion of that is funding for 
various activities authorized in the Energy Act of 2020 
(contained within P.L. 116-260), including various clean energy 
demonstration projects, nuclear power demonstration projects, 
and critical material research, development, and demonstration 
activities. Another $29 billion in funding is allocated to 
other energy research, development, demonstration, and 
deployment activities. Since the breakdown of development/
demonstration activities versus deployment activities for some 
of this funding is left to the Department of Energy in carrying 
out the programs, the breakdown of exactly which of this 
funding would be allocated to programs under the jurisdiction 
of the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology remains 
unclear at the time of publication. Major programs funded from 
this $29 billion include activities related to carbon removal, 
hydrogen, battery recycling, grid reliability, and carbon 
storage.

Legislative History

    H.R. 3684, the INVEST in America Act was introduced on June 
4, 2021, and referred to the Committee on Transportation and 
Infrastructure. On June 21, 2021, Chairman Peter A. DeFazio and 
Chairwoman Eddie Bernice Johnson exchanged letters 
acknowledging the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology's 
jurisdiction over H.R. 3684 and waiving referral of the bill to 
the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology. On June 22, 
2021, the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 
reported H.R. 3684 to the House with an amendment. On July 1, 
2021, the House passed H.R. 3684 by a record vote of Y-221 and 
N-201.
    On August 10, 2021, the Senate passed H.R. 3684, with an 
amendment, by a record vote of Y-69 and N-30.
    On November 5, 2021, the House passed H.R. 3684 by a record 
vote of Y-228 and N-205.
    The President signed H.R. 3684 on November 15, 2021, and it 
became Public Law 117-58.

                1.4 P.L. 117-167, CHIPS and Science Act


Purpose

    The purpose of P.L. 117-167, the CHIPS and Science Act, is 
to provide funding to advance the domestic semiconductor 
industry and to authorize civilian research and development 
activities at the National Science Foundation, Department of 
Energy, National Institute of Standards and Technology, 
National Aeronautics and Space Administration, and Department 
of Commerce.
    P.L. 117-167 consists of three parts. Division A relates to 
funding for domestic semiconductor manufacturing and domestic 
semiconductor research and development. This Division provides 
for $54.2 billion in direct appropriations for semiconductor 
activities and wireless supply chain innovation. The bulk of 
this funding would be stewarded by the Department of Commerce 
for semiconductor manufacturing incentives ($39 billion) and 
research and development ($11 billion). The Department of 
Commerce would also steward $1.5 billion for wireless supply 
chain innovation. Additional monies are appropriated to the 
National Science Foundation ($200 million), Department of 
Defense ($2 billion), and Department of State ($500 million) 
for other semiconductor activities.
    Division B consists of a large number of civilian science 
authorizations and policy provisions. This includes 
comprehensive multi-year authorizations for the National 
Science Foundation, National Institute of Standards and 
Technology, and the Department of Energy's Office of Science. 
In addition to these authorizations, Division B includes 
authorizations for a Regional Innovation and Technology Hub 
Program (Department of Commerce), ocean acidification programs 
(National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration) and applied 
energy programs at the Department of Energy. Division B also 
includes several major policy provisions relating to broadening 
participation in science and combating sexual harassment in 
science.
    Division B contains a number of provisions the Science 
Committee had previously marked up and/or considered on the 
House floor. Science Committee legislation contained in P.L. 
117-167 includes: H.R. 144, Supporting Early-Career Research 
Act, H.R. 204, STEM Opportunities Act, H.R. 210, Rural STEM 
Education Research Act, H.R. 1447, COAST Research Act of 2021, 
H.R. 2027, MSI STEM Achievement Act, H.R. 2225, National 
Science Foundation for the Future Act, H.R. 2695, Combating 
Sexual Harassment in Science Act, H.R. 3593, Department of 
Energy Science for the Future Act, H.R. 3858, National Science 
and Technology Strategy Act of 2021, H.R. 4521, Bioeconomy 
Research and Development Act of 2021, H.R. 4588, Regional 
Innovation Act of 2021, H.R. 4599, SUPER Act of 2021, H.R. 
4606, Energizing Technology Transfer Act, H.R. 4609, National 
Institute of Standards and Technology for the Future Act of 
2021, H.R. 4819, National Nuclear University Research 
Infrastructure Reinvestment Act of 2021, and, H.R. 6291, Micro 
Act.
    Division C provides supplemental funding for Supreme Court 
security.

Legislative History

    H.R. 4521, the Bioeconomy Research and Development Act of 
2021, was introduced by Eddie Bernice Johnson on July 19, 2021, 
and referred to the Committee on Science, Space, and 
Technology, and in addition to the Committees on Agriculture 
and Energy and Commerce. On January 28, 2022, the Committee on 
Science, Space, and Technology reported the bill to the House 
(H.R. 117-235).
    H.R. 4521 was then used as the vehicle for the America 
COMPETES Act of 2022. On February 4, 2022, the House passed 
H.R. 4521 by a record vote of Y-222 and N-210.
    On March 28, 2022, the Senate amended H.R. 4521 with the 
text of S. 1260, the United States Innovation and Competition 
Act of 2021, and the amended bill passed by a recorded vote of 
Y-68 and N-28.
    On March 30, 2022, Ms. Haley Stevens moved that the House 
disagree to the Senate amendment to H.R. 4521 and request a 
conference, and the motion was agreed to by unanimous consent. 
On April 28, 2022, the Senate agreed to a motion to insist on 
the Senate amendment to H.R. 4521 and go to conference by a 
record vote of Y-67 and N-27.
    On May 12, 2022, the conference committee for H.R. 4521 met 
for the first time. There were no further official meetings of 
the conference committee. In late July 2022, the respective 
leaders of the House and Senate decided to move forward with 
provisions of the H.R. 4521 relating to semiconductors and 
science, and to use a different legislative vehicle for this 
purpose: H.R. 4346, the Supreme Court Security Funding Act of 
2022.
    On July 27, 2022, the Senate concurred in the House 
amendment to the Senate amendment to H.R. 4346 with an 
amendment by a record vote of Y-64 and N-33.
    On July 28, 2022, the House agreed to the Senate amendment 
to the House amendment to the Senate amendment by a record vote 
of Y-243, N-187, and Present-1.
    On August 9, 2022, H.R. 4346 was signed by the President 
and became Public Law 117-167.

           1.5 P.L. 117-169, Inflation Reduction Act of 2022


Purpose

    The purpose of P.L. 117-169 is to alter tax policy, make 
Federal investments, and reduce the deficit, among other 
things.
    Provisions relevant to the Committee on Science, Space, and 
Technology focus on investments at the National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration and the Department of Energy. 
Section 40004 invests $490 million in forecasting research and 
systems, climate research and services, computing capacity, and 
hurricane hunters at NOAA. Section 50172 invests $2 billion in 
national laboratory infrastructure at DOE. Section 50176 
invests $700 million in research, development, demonstration, 
and deployment activities related to High-Assay Low-Enriched 
Uranium.

Legislative History

    H.R. 5376, the Inflation Reduction Act, was legislation 
that was considered pursuant to budget reconciliation 
procedures established by the Budget Act. This process was 
initiated with S. Con. Res. 14, A concurrent resolution setting 
forth the congressional budget for the United State Government 
for fiscal year 2022 and setting for the appropriate budgetary 
levels for fiscal years 2023 through 2031. S. Con. Res. 14 was 
introduced in the Senate on August 9, 2021. On August 9, 2021, 
the Senate Committee on the Budget discharged the resolution 
pursuant. On August 11, 2021, S. Con. Res 14 passed the Senate 
by a record vote of Y-50 and N-49. On August 24, 2021, S. Con 
Res. 14 passed the House pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 
601, which passed the House on August 24, 2021, by a record 
vote of Y-220 and N-212.
    On September 9, 2021, the Committee on Science, Space, and 
Technology met to consider a Committee Print to comply with the 
reconciliation directive included in section 2002 of the 
concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal year 2022, S. 
Con. Res. 14. The Committee favorably reported the Committee 
Print to the Budget Committee by a recorded vote of Y-21 and N-
17.
    H.R. 5376 was introduced on September 27, 2021, by Budget 
Committee Chairman John A. Yarmuth.
    On November 19, 2021, the House considered H.R. 5376 and 
the bill passed by a record vote of Y-220 and N-213.
    On August 7, 2022, the Senate considered and passed H.R. 
5376 by a record vote of Y-51 and N-50.
    On August 12, 2022, the House considered and passed H.R. 
5376 by a record vote of Y-220 and N-207.
    On August 16, 2022 H.R. 5376 was signed by the President 
and became Public Law 117-169.

  1.6 P.L. 117-81, National Defense Authorization Act For Fiscal Year 
                                  2022


Purpose

    The purpose of the National Defense Authorization Act For 
Fiscal Year 2022 is to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 
2022 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for 
military construction, and for defense activities of the 
Department of Energy, to prescribe military personnel strengths 
for such fiscal year, and for other purposes. In addition, the 
bill contained items in the Committee on Science's 
jurisdiction.

Legislative History

    On July 2, 2021, Representative Adam Smith introduced H.R. 
4350, the National Defense Authorization Act For Fiscal Year 
2022.
    On September 21, 2021 H.R. 6395 was considered under the 
provisions of rule H. Res. 667, and on September 23, 2021 the 
amended bill passed the House by a record vote 316-113.
    On May 13, 2021 Senator Rick Scott introduced S. 1605, 
which was referred to the Senate Committee on Energy and 
Natural Resources, was discharged from Committee by unanimous 
consent and passed the Senate without Amendment by unanimous 
consent.
    By July 20, 2021 the seven subcommittees of the Senate 
Armed Services Committee marked up draft legislative proposals 
with recommendations for matters in the Fiscal Year 2022 NDAA. 
On July 21, 2021 the full Senate Armed Services Committee 
considered the legislation in a closed session and voted 23-3 
to order an original bill reflecting changes agreed to in 
markup. On September 22, 2021 the Senate Armed Services 
Committee reported S. 2792, introduced by Senator Jack Reed and 
filed the report. On November 19, Senator Jack Reed offered on 
the floor an amendment in the nature of a substitute to H.R. 
4350 to replace the text of the House-passed legislation with 
S. 2792. The Senate failed to agree to end debate on the 
amendment and cloture failed to be invoked by a vote of 45-51.
    On December 7, the House and Senate Armed Services 
Committees released a bicameral negotiated text that the two 
committees had reached an agreement on. The agreement text was 
filed as an amendment to S.1605 under consideration in the 
House. Then S. 1605 was considered under the provisions of 
H.Res. 838, and the amended bill passed the House by a record 
vote 363-70. On December 15, the Senate agreed to the House 
amendment to S. 1605 by a record vote 88-11.
    On December 27, 2021 S.1607 was signed by the President and 
became Public Law 117-81.

                       1.7 P.L. 117-248, PFAS Act


Purpose

    The purpose of P.L. 117-28 is to require the Department of 
Homeland Security to develop guidance and curriculum for 
firefighters and other emergency response personnel on how to 
prevent exposure and release of PFAS.

Legislative History

    S. 231, PFAS Act, was introduced by Senator Gary Peters on 
February 4, 2021. On July 29, 2021, the Senate considered and 
passed S. 231 by unanimous consent.
    On December 1, 2022, the House considered and passed S. 231 
under suspension of the rules by a record vote of Y-400 and N-
22.
    On December 20, 2022, S. 231 was signed by the President 
and became Public Law 117-248.

 1.8 P.L. 117-263, James M. Inhofe National Defense Authorization Act 
                          for Fiscal Year 2023


Purpose

    The purpose of the National Defense Authorization Act For 
Fiscal Year 2023 is to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 
20234 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for 
military construction, and for defense activities of the 
Department of Energy, to prescribe military personnel strengths 
for such fiscal year, and for other purposes. In addition, the 
bill contained items in the Committee on Science's jurisdiction 
related to research and development on distributed ledger 
technology, artic research budgets, financial assistance for 
test bed construction, acquisition of hurricane hunter 
aircraft, ocean exploration, and other items.

Legislative History

    H.R. 7900, the National Defense Authorization Act for 
Fiscal year 2023 , was introduced by Representative Adam Smith 
on May 27, 2022. On July 14, 2022, the House considered and 
passed H.R. 7900 by a record vote of Y-329 and N-101.
    On December 8, 2022, the House passed H. Res. 1512 under 
suspension of the rules by a record vote of Y-350 and N-80. 
Pursuant to that resolution, the text of H.R. 7776 was amended 
with the negotiated text of H.R. 7900 and passed the House.
    On December 15, 2022, the Senate passed the House amendment 
to the Senate amendment to H.R. 7776 by a record vote of Y-83 
and N-11.
    On December 23, 2022, H.R. 7776 was signed by the President 
and became Public Law 117-263.

     1.9 P.L. 117-246, Empowering the U.S. Fire Administration Act


Purpose

    The purpose of H.R. 7077 is to authorize the U.S. Fire 
Administration to conduct on-site investigations of fires, in 
coordination and cooperation with appropriate federal, state, 
and local authorities and issues reports on such 
investigations.

Legislative History

    H.R. 7077, the Empowering the U.S. Fire Administration Act, 
was introduced by Representative Torres on March 15, 2022. On, 
the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology marked up the 
bill ordered the bill reported favorably by voice vote.
    On May 11, 2022, the House considered and passed H.R. 7077 
under suspension of the rules by a record vote of Y-379 and N-
37.
    On December 6, 2022, the Senate considered and passed H.R. 
7077, with an amendment, by unanimous consent.
    On December 14, 2022, the House considered and passed H.R. 
7077 under suspension of the rules by a record vote of Y-349 
and N-80.
    On December 20, 2022, H.R. 7077 was signed by the President 
and became Public Law 117-246.

                     1.10 P.L. 117-316, FLOODS Act


Purpose

    The purpose of S. 558 is to direct the National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration to establish a National Integrated 
Flood Information System to coordinate and integrate flood 
research, and other purposes.

Legislative History

    S. 558, the FLOODS Act, was introduced by Senator Roger 
Wicker on March 3, 2021. On September 30, 2021, the Senate 
considered and passed S. 558 by unanimous consent.
    On December 14, 2022, the House considered and passed S. 
558 under suspension of the rules by a record vote of Y-349 and 
N-80.
    On December 27, 2022, S. 558 was signed by the President 
and became Public Law 117-316.

                     1.11 P.L. 117-229, PRECIP Act


Purpose

    The purpose of P.L. 117-229 is to direct the National 
Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) to support a 
study to understand best practices to support precipitation 
estimation, to regularly update out-of-date precipitation data 
in the U.S., and authorize funding for the study and for the 
precipitation estimates outlined in the bill.
    The Act also contains continuing funding for the federal 
government for one week.

Legislative History

    H.R. 1437, PRECIP Act, was introduced by Representative 
Mikie Sherrill on February 26, 2021. On November 16, 2021, the 
Committee on Science, Space, and Technology met to markup H.R. 
1437, and it was favorably reported to the House with an 
amendment. On May 2, 2022, the House considered and passed H.R. 
1437 under suspension of the rules by a record vote of Y-333 
and N-81.
    On November 17, 2022, the Senate passed an amended H.R. 
1437 by unanimous consent.
    On December 14, 2022, the House considered and passed H.R. 
1437 (amended to include a continuous resolution for government 
funding) by a record vote of Y-224 and N-201.
    On December 15, 2022, the Senate agreed to the House 
amendment to the Senate amendment to H.R. 1437 by a record vote 
of Y-71 and N-19.
    On December 16, 2022, H.R. 1437 was signed by the President 
and became Public Law 117-229.

Chapter II: Other Committee Legislation (bold indicates bills primarily 
      referred to the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology)

                 2.1 H.R. 1, For the People Act of 2021


Purpose

    The purpose of H.R. 1 is to expand Americans' access to the 
ballot box, reduce the influence of big money in politics, 
strengthen ethics rules for public servants, and implement 
other anti-corruption measures.

Legislative History

    On January 1, 2021, John P. Sarbanes introduced H.R. 1, 
which was referred to the Committee on House Administration and 
in addition to the Committee on Intelligence (Permanent 
Select); Judiciary; Oversight and Reform; Science, Space, and 
Technology; Education and Labor; Ways and Means; Financial 
Services; Ethics; Homeland Security; and, Armed Services. H.R. 
1 was reported from the Committee on House Administration on 
March 2, 2021, and all other committees were discharged of 
consideration of the bill. The House considered H.R. 1 under 
the provisions of H. Res. 179 from March 2-3 2021, and the bill 
passed the House by record vote of 220-210.

           2.2 H.R. 144, Supporting Early-Career Research Act


Purpose

    The purpose of H.R. 144 is to forestall the loss of 
research talent by establishing a temporary early career 
research fellowship program.

Legislative History

    Chairwoman Eddie Bernice Johnson introduced H.R. 144 on 
January 4, 2021, with Ranking Member Frank Lucas and the bill 
was referred solely to the Committee on Science, Space, and 
Technology. On February 25, 2021, the Committee on Science, 
Space, and Technology held a hearing entitled, Building Back 
the U.S. Research Enterprise: COVID Impacts and Recovery. On 
March 9, 2021, the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology 
met to consider H.R. 144. The bill was ordered reported by 
voice vote. The Committee reported the bill to the House on 
April 14, 2021. On May 17 and 18, 2021, H.R. 144 was considered 
under suspension of the rules, the yeas and nays were demanded, 
and passed the House by record vote of 350-75
    The text of H.R. 144 was also included in Division B, Title 
VI, Subtitle A of H.R 4521, the America COMPETES Act of 2022. 
From February 2, 2022 to February 4, 2022, H.R. 4521 was 
considered under the provisions of the rule H. Res. 900 and on 
February 4, 2022 the bill passed the House by a record vote of 
222-210. On April 7, 2022 the Speaker appointed conferees from 
the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology and included 
Committee members for consideration of Division B, Title VI, 
Subtitle A. This language was taken out of conference 
negotiations and added as an amendment by the Senate to P.L. 
117-80, the Chips and Science Act of 2022.
    For further information regarding the legislative history 
of P.L. 117-80, please refer to entry 1.xx in Chapter 1.

                  2.3 H.R. 204, STEM Opportunities Act


Purpose

    The purpose of H.R. 204 is to direct the Director of the 
Office of Science and Technology Policy to carry out programs 
and activities to ensure that Federal science agencies and 
institutions of higher education receiving Federal research and 
development funding are fully engaging their entire talent 
pool.

Legislative History

    On May 9, 2019, the full Committee held a hearing entitled, 
Achieving the Promise of a Diverse STEM Workforce. Chairwoman 
Eddie Bernice Johnson introduced H.R. 204 on January 5, 2021, 
with Ranking Member Frank Lucas and the bill was referred 
solely to the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology. On 
May 17 and 18, 2021, H.R. 204 was considered under suspension 
of the rules, the yeas and nays were demanded, and passed the 
House by record vote of 350-75.
    The text of H.R. 204 was also included in Division B, Title 
V, Subtitle A of H.R 4521, the America COMPETES Act of 2022. 
From February 2, 2022 to February 4, 2022, H.R. 4521 was 
considered under the provisions of the rule H. Res. 900 and on 
February 4, 2022 the bill passed the House by a record vote of 
222-210. On April 7, 2022 the Speaker appointed conferees from 
the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology and included 
Committee members for consideration of Division B, Title V, 
Subtitle A. This language was taken out of conference 
negotiations and added as an amendment by the Senate to P.L. 
117-80, the Chips and Science Act of 2022.
    For further information regarding the legislative history 
of P.L. 117-80, please refer to entry 1.xx in Chapter 1.

            2.4 H.R. 210, Rural STEM Education Research Act


Purpose

    The purpose of H.R. 210 is to coordinate Federal research 
and development efforts focused on STEM education and workforce 
development in rural areas, including the development and 
application of new technologies to support and improve rural 
STEM education.

Legislative History

    On May 8, 2019, the Subcommittee on Research and Technology 
held a hearing entitled, A Review of the National Science. On 
May 9, 2019, the full Committee held a hearing entitled, 
Achieving the Promise of a Diverse STEM Workforce. Ranking 
Member Frank Lucas introduced H.R. 210 on January 5, 2021, with 
Chairwoman Eddie Bernice Johnson and the bill was referred 
solely to the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology. On 
May 17 and 18, 2021, H.R. 210 was considered under suspension 
of the rules, the yeas and nays were demanded, and passed the 
House by record vote of 350-75.
    The text of H.R. 210 was also included in Division B, Title 
V, Subtitle B of H.R 4521, the America COMPETES Act of 2022. 
From February 2, 2022 to February 4, 2022, H.R. 4521 was 
considered under the provisions of the rule H. Res. 900 and on 
February 4, 2022 the bill passed the House by a record vote of 
222-210. On April 7, 2022 the Speaker appointed conferees from 
the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology and included 
Committee members for consideration of Division B, Title V, 
Subtitle B. This language was taken out of conference 
negotiations and added as an amendment by the Senate to P.L. 
117-80, the Chips and Science Act of 2022.
    For further information regarding the legislative history 
of P.L. 117-80, please refer to entry 1.xx in Chapter 1.

        2.5 H.R. 847, Promoting Digital Privacy Technologies Act


Purpose

    The purpose of H.R. 847 is to support research on privacy 
enhancing technologies and promote responsible data use.

Legislative History

    On March 11, 2020, the Subcommittee on Research and 
Technology held a hearing entitled, Reauthorization of the 
National Institute of Standards and Technology. Haley Stevens 
introduced H.R. 847 on February 4, 2021, with Anthony Gonzalez 
and the bill was referred solely to the Committee on Science, 
Space, and Technology. On Wednesday, April 28, 2021, the 
Subcommittee on Research and Technology held a hearing 
entitled, National Science Foundation: Advancing Research for 
The Future of U.S. Innovation. On September 28, 2021, the 
Investigations and Oversight Subcommittee held a hearing 
entitled, The Disinformation Black Box: Researching Social 
Media Data. On January 19, 2022, the Full Committee on Science, 
Space, and Technology met to consider H.R. 847. The bill was 
ordered to be reported favorably as amended by voice vote. On 
March 3, 2022, the Committee reported the bill to the House.
    On May 10, 2022, H.R. 847 was considered under suspension 
of the rules, the yeas and nays were demanded, and passed the 
House by record vote of 401-19.

                       2.6 H.R. 1437, PRECIP Act


Purpose

    The purpose of H.R. 1437 is to amend the Weather Research 
and Forecasting Innovation Act of 2017 to direct the National 
Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration to provide comprehensive 
and regularly updated Federal precipitation information.

Legislative History

    Mikie Sherrill introduced H.R. 1437 on February 26, 2021, 
with Deborah Ross and the bill was referred solely to the 
Committee on Science, Space, and Technology. On April 21, 2021, 
the Subcommittee on the Environment held a hearing titled 
Working Towards Climate Equity: The Case for a Federal Climate 
Service. The purpose of the hearing was to highlight the need 
for a strengthened Federal role in climate risk information. On 
October 16, 2021, the Committee on Science, Space, and 
Technology met to consider H.R. 1437 and ordered the bill to be 
favorably reported as amended to the House by voice vote. On 
May 3, 2022, H.R. 1437 was reported to the House. On May 10 and 
11, 2022, H.R. 1437 was considered under suspension of the 
rules, the yeas and nays were demanded, and passed the House by 
record vote of 333-81. On May 12, 2022 the Senate Received the 
bill. On November 17, 2022 the Senate passed the bill with an 
amendment by Unanimous Consent.

               2.7 H.R. 1447, COAST Research Act of 2021


Purpose

    The purpose of H.R. 1447 is to amend the Federal Ocean 
Acidification Research and Monitoring Act of 2009 to establish 
an Ocean Acidification Advisory Board, to expand and improve 
the research on Ocean Acidification and Coastal Acidification, 
to establish and maintain a data archive system for Ocean 
Acidification data and Coastal Acidification data.

Legislative History

    On April 7, 2019, the Environment Subcommittee held a 
hearing focused on climate change impacts on our nation's 
oceans and coasts, where ocean acidification was discussed as a 
major associated impact. Suzanne Bonamici introduced H.R. 1447 
on March 1, 2021, with Don Young and the bill was referred 
solely to the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology. On 
May 17 and 18, 2021, H.R. 1447 was considered under suspension 
of the rules, the yeas and nays were demanded, and passed the 
House by record vote of 350-75.
    The text of H.R. 1447 was also included in Division B, 
Title VI, Subtitle E of H.R 4521, the America COMPETES Act of 
2022. From February 2, 2022 to February 4, 2022, H.R. 4521 was 
considered under the provisions of the rule H. Res. 900 and on 
February 4, 2022 the bill passed the House by a record vote of 
222-210. On April 7, 2022 the Speaker appointed conferees from 
the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology and included 
Committee members for consideration of Division B, Title VI, 
Subtitle E. This language was taken out of conference 
negotiations and added as an amendment by the Senate to P.L. 
117-80, the Chips and Science Act of 2022.
    For further information regarding the legislative history 
of P.L. 117-80, please refer to entry 1.xx in Chapter 1.

    2.8 H.R. 1480, Helping Emergency Responders Overcome Act of 2019


Purpose

    The purpose of H.R. 1480 is to require the Secretary of 
Health and Human Services to improve the detection, prevention, 
and treatment of mental health issues among public safety 
officers.

Legislative History

    Ami Bera introduced H.R. 1480 on March 2, 2021, with Brian 
Fitzpatrick. The bill was referred to the Committee on Energy 
and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Science, 
Space, and Technology. After the Committee on Science, Space 
and Technology was consulted and the Committee on Energy and 
Commerce made assurances that the Committee on Science, Space 
and Technology's jurisdiction would not be diminished, 
prejudiced, or altered, Chairwoman Johnson of the Committee on 
Science, Space and Technology and Chairman Pallone of the 
Committee on Energy and Commerce exchanged correspondence and 
the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology waived formal 
consideration of H.R. 1480. On May 11 and 12, 2021, H.R. 1480 
was considered under suspension of the rules, the yeas and nays 
were demanded, and passed the House by record vote of 349-74.

2.9 H.R. 1850, Supporting Research and Development for First Responders 
                                  Act


Purpose

    The purpose of H.R. 1850 is to amend the Homeland Security 
Act of 2002 relating to the National Urban Security Technology 
Laboratory.

Legislative History

    Representative Kathleen Rice introduced H.R. 1850 on March 
11, 2021, with Andrew Garbarino. The bill was referred solely 
to the Committee on Homeland Security. In the 116th Congress 
the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology claimed 
jurisdiction over a version of H.R. 1850 and were consulted 
during its consideration. In the 117th after seeing that H.R. 
1850 was similar in form to the version in the prior congress, 
Chairwoman Johnson did not insist on a sequential referral on 
condition that the decision to forgo the referral be a waiver, 
reduction, or altering of the jurisdiction of the Committee on 
Science, Space, and Technology. Chairman Thompson of the 
Committee on Homeland Security agreed to these conditions and 
the two Chairs exchanged correspondences on July 7 and 8 2021. 
On July 20, 2021, H.R. 1850 was considered under suspension of 
the rules, the yeas and nays were demanded, and passed the 
House by record vote of 319-105.

                  2.10 H.R. 2027, MSI STEM Achievement


Purpose

    The purpose of H.R. 2027 is to direct Federal science 
agencies and the Office of Science and Technology Policy to 
undertake activities to improve the quality of undergraduate 
STEM education and enhance the research capacity at the 
Nation's HBCUs, TCUs, and MSIs

Legislative History

    On May 9, 2019, the full Committee held a hearing entitled, 
Achieving the Promise of a Diverse STEM Workforce. Chairwoman 
Eddie Bernice Johnson introduced H.R. 2027 on March 18, 2021, 
with Michael Waltz. The bill was referred solely to the 
Committee on Science, Space, and Technology. On May 17 and 18, 
2021, H.R. 2027 was considered under suspension of the rules, 
the yeas and nays were demanded, and passed the House by record 
vote of 350-75.
    The text of H.R. 2027 was also included in Division B, 
Title V, Subtitle C of H.R 4521, the America COMPETES Act of 
2022. From February 2, 2022 to February 4, 2022, H.R. 4521 was 
considered under the provisions of the rule H. Res. 900 and on 
February 4, 2022 the bill passed the House by a record vote of 
222-210. On April 7, 2022 the Speaker appointed conferees from 
the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology and included 
Committee members for consideration of Division B, Title V, 
Subtitle C. This language was taken out of conference 
negotiations and added as an amendment by the Senate to P.L. 
117-80, the Chips and Science Act of 2022.
    For further information regarding the legislative history 
of P.L. 117-80, please refer to entry 1.xx in Chapter 1.

     2.11 H.R. 2225, National Science Foundation for the Future Act


Purpose

    The purpose of H.R. 2225 is to authorize appropriations for 
fiscal years 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025, and 2026 for the National 
Science Foundation.

Legislative History

    Chairwoman Eddie Bernice Johnson introduced H.R. 2225 on 
March 26, 2021 with Ranking Member Frank Lucas. The bill was 
referred solely to the Committee on Science, Space, and 
Technology. On April 15, 2021, the Science, Space, and 
Technology Committee held a hearing entitled, Reimagining Our 
Innovation Future. On April 28, 2021 and May 6, 2021, the 
Research and Technology Subcommittee held a two-part hearing 
entitled, National Science Foundation: Advancing Research for 
the Future of U.S. Innovation. On May 13, 2021, the Research 
and Technology Subcommittee met to consider H.R. 2225 and 
favorably forwarded H.R. 2225 to the full committee. On June 
15, 2021, the Full Committee on Science, Space, and Technology 
met to consider H.R. 2225 and ordered the bill as amended to be 
favorably reported to the House by voice vote. On June 28, 
2021, H.R. 2225 was reported to the House and considered under 
suspension of the rules, the yeas and nays were demanded, and 
passed the House by record vote of 345-67.
    The text of H.R. 2225 was also included in Division B, 
Title III (Division B, Title VI, Subtitle D for Malign foreign 
talent recruitment program) of H.R 4521, the America COMPETES 
Act of 2022. From February 2, 2022 to February 4, 2022, H.R. 
4521 was considered under the provisions of the rule H. Res. 
900 and on February 4, 2022 the bill passed the House by a 
record vote of 222-210. On April 7, 2022 the Speaker appointed 
conferees from the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology 
and included Committee members for consideration of Division B, 
Title III. This language was taken out of conference 
negotiations and added as an amendment by the Senate to P.L. 
117-80, the Chips and Science Act of 2022.
    For further information regarding the legislative history 
of P.L. 117-80, please refer to entry 1.xx in Chapter 1.

                    2.12 H.R. 2533, NEAR Act of 2021


Purpose

    The purpose of H.R. 2533 is to provide for a study by the 
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine 
examining the impact of ocean acidification and other stressors 
in estuarine environments.

Legislative History

    On April 7, 2019, the Environment Subcommittee held a 
hearing focused on climate change impacts on our nation's 
oceans and coasts, where ocean acidification was discussed as a 
major associated impact. The Committee on Science, Space, and 
Technology favorably reported an identical version of H.R. 2533 
and passed the bill on suspension in 116th Congress. Bill Posey 
introduced H.R. 2533 on April 14, 2021, with Suzanne Bonamici. 
The bill was referred to the Committee on Science, Space, and 
Technology, and in addition to the Committee on Natural 
Resources. On April 16, 2021 Chairman Raul Grijalva of the 
Committee on Natural Resources and Chairwoman Johnson of the 
Committee on Science, Space, and Technology exchanged 
correspondence in which the Committee on Science, Space, and 
Technology acknowledge the Committee on Natural Resource's 
jurisdiction over provisions of the H.R. 2533 and Chairman 
Grijalva waived his Committee's formal jurisdiction for the 
purposes of consideration of this bill. On May 17 and 18, 2021, 
H.R. 2533 was considered under suspension of the rules, the 
yeas and nays were demanded, and passed the House by record 
vote of 350-75.

       2.13 H.R. 2695, Combating Sexual Harassment in Science Act


Purpose

    The purpose of H.R. 2695 is to provide for research to 
better understand the causes and consequences of sexual 
harassment affecting individuals in the scientific, technical, 
engineering, and mathematics workforce and to examine policies 
to reduce the prevalence and negative impact of such 
harassment.

Legislative History

    On June 12, 2019 the Committee on Science, Space, and 
Technology held a hearing entitled Combating Sexual Harassment 
in Science. Chairwoman Eddie Bernice Johnson introduced H.R. 
2695 on April 20, 2021, with Ranking Member Frank Lucas. On May 
17 and 18, 2021, H.R. 2695 was considered under suspension of 
the rules, the yeas and nays were demanded, and passed the 
House by record vote of 350-75.
    The text of H.R. 2225 was also included in Division B, 
Title V, Subtitle D of H.R 4521, the America COMPETES Act of 
2022. From February 2, 2022 to February 4, 2022, H.R. 4521 was 
considered under the provisions of the rule H. Res. 900 and on 
February 4, 2022 the bill passed the House by a record vote of 
222-210. On April 7, 2022 the Speaker appointed conferees from 
the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology and included 
Committee members for consideration of Division B, Title V, 
Subtitle D. This language was taken out of conference 
negotiations and added as an amendment by the Senate to P.L. 
117-80, the Chips and Science Act of 2022.
    For further information regarding the legislative history 
of P.L. 117-80, please refer to entry 1.xx in Chapter 1.

   2.14 H.R. 3228, National Coastal Resilience Data and Services Act


Purpose

    The purpose of H.R. 3228 is to direct the Secretary of 
Commerce, acting through the Administrator of the National 
Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, to improve science, 
data, and services that enable sound decision making in 
response to coastal flood risk, including impacts of sea level 
rise, storm events, changing Great Lakes water levels, and land 
subsidence.

Legislative History

    On May 13, 2021, H.R. 3228 was introduced by Nydia M. 
Velazquez and referred to the Committee on Natural Resources, 
and in addition to the Committee on Science, Space, and 
Technology. H.R. 3228 was ordered to be reported as amended 
from the Committee on Natural Resources by voice vote on 
January 19, 2022, and Chairwoman Johnson exchanged 
correspondence with Chair Raul Grijalva and discharged the 
Committee on Science, Space, and Technology of further 
consideration. The Committee on Natural Resources met to 
consider H.R. 3228 and ordered the bill to be favorably 
reported as amended to the House by voice vote.

2.15 H.R. 3482, National Center for the Advancement of Aviation Act of 
                                  2022


Purpose

    The purpose of H.R. 3482 is to establish the National 
Center for the Advancement of Aviation.

Legislative History

    On May 25, 2021, H.R. 3482 was introduced by Andre Carson 
and referred solely to the Committee on Transportation and 
Infrastructure. On July 20, 2021, the Subcommittee held a 
hearing titled Bridging the Gap: Improving Diversity and 
Inclusion in the U.S. Aviation Workforce. On July 23, 2021, 
Chairwoman Johnson wrote to Speaker of the House of 
Representatives, Nancy Pelosi making a claim to a sequential 
referral for the Committee on Science, Space and Technology. 
The Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure met to 
consider the bill on April 28, 2022, and ordered the bill to be 
reported to the House, as amended, by voice vote. On September 
27, 2022, Chairwoman Johnson exchanged correspondence with 
Chairman DeFazio acknowledging the Committee on Science, Space, 
and Technology's jurisdiction over provisions of H.R. 3482 and 
Chairwoman Johnson foregoing consideration. On September 28, 
2022, H.R. 3482 was reported and then was considered under 
suspension of the rules, the yeas and nays were demanded, and 
passed the House by record vote of 369-56.

  2.16 H.R. 3588, Mathematical and Statistical Modeling Education Act


Purpose

    The purpose of H.R. 3588 is to coordinate Federal research 
and development efforts focused on modernizing mathematics in 
STEM education through mathematical and statistical modeling, 
including data-driven and computational thinking, problem, 
project, and performance-based learning and assessment, 
interdisciplinary exploration, and career connections.

Legislative History

    On May 28, 2021, H.R. 3588 was introduced by Chrissy 
Houlahan, James Baird, and Jerry McNerney, and referred solely 
to the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology. On April 
28, 2021, and May 6, 2021, the Subcommittee on Research and 
Technology held a two-part hearing to discuss opportunities and 
challenges for leveraging and expanding the National Science 
Foundation mission to continue to advance excellent research; 
improve STEM education and research training; increase research 
accessibility, and accountability; and accelerate research to 
address major societal challenges. On April 5, 2022, the 
Committee on Science, Space, and Technology met to consider 
H.R. 3588. No amendments to the bill text were offered and the 
Committee ordered the bill to be favorably reported to the 
House by voice vote. On June 14, 2022, H.R. 3588 was reported 
to the House. On July 26, 2022, H.R. 3588 was considered under 
suspension of the rules, the yeas and nays were demanded, and 
passed the House by record vote of 323-92.

    2.17 H.R. 3593, Department of Energy Science for the Future Act


Purpose

    The purpose of H.R. 3593 is to provide guidance for and 
investment in the research and development activities of this 
Department of Energy Office and Science.

Legislative History

    On January 15, 2020, in a hearing entitled The Department 
of Energy's Office of Science: Exploring the Next Frontiers in 
Energy Research and Scientific Discovery, the Subcommittee on 
Energyexamined the Office of Science as a whole and analyzed 
the research and development activities and facilities 
supported by the office--considering potential directions for 
its various programs. On September 11th, 2020, the Subcommittee 
on Energy held a legislative hearing entitled Biological 
Research at the Department of Energy: Leveraging DOE's Unique 
Capabilities to Respond to the COVID-19 Pandemic. On May 4, 
2021, the Subcommittee on Energy held a hearing, entitled 
Climate and Energy Science Research at the Department of 
Energy, that examined the Basic Energy Sciences program as a 
whole and the Earth and Environmental Systems Sciences Division 
within the Office of Science's BES program. On May 19, 2021, in 
a hearing entitled Accelerating Discovery: The Future of 
Scientific Computing at the Department of Energy, the 
Subcommittee on Energy examined the scientific computing 
capabilities stewarded by the Office of Science's Advanced 
Scientific Computing Research program, including its 
forthcoming exascale systems, and the implications of these 
capabilities for other scientific disciplines and their 
relevance to pressing societal challenges. The full Committee 
held a legislative hearing on May 27, 2021 entitled Overview of 
the Science and Energy Research Enterprise of the U.S. 
Department of Energy, that examined the research, development, 
demonstration, and commercialization programs and activities 
carried out by DOE.
    On May 28, 2021, Chairwoman Eddie Bernice Johnson 
introduced H.R. 3593 with Ranking Member Frank Lucas, which was 
solely referred to the Committee on Science, Space, and 
Technology. On June 15, 2021, the full Committee on Science, 
Space, and Technology met to consider H.R. 3593 and ordered the 
bill to be favorably reported as amended to the House by voice 
vote. On June 28, 2021, H.R. 3593 was reported to the House and 
considered under suspension of the rules, the yeas and nays 
were demanded, and passed the House by record vote of 351-68.
    The text of H.R. 3593 was also included in Division B, 
Title I of H.R 4521, the America COMPETES Act of 2022. From 
February 2, 2022 to February 4, 2022, H.R. 4521 was considered 
under the provisions of the rule H. Res. 900 and on February 4, 
2022 the bill passed the House by a record vote of 222-210. On 
April 7, 2022 the Speaker appointed conferees from the 
Committee on Science, Space, and Technology and included 
Committee members for consideration of Division B, Title I. 
This language was taken out of conference negotiations and 
added as an amendment by the Senate to P.L. 117-80, the Chips 
and Science Act of 2022.
    For further information regarding the legislative history 
of P.L. 117-80, please refer to entry 1.xx in Chapter 1.

2.18 H.R. 3756, Department of Homeland Security Climate Change Research 
                                  Act


Purpose

    The purpose of H.R. 3756 is to amend the Homeland Security 
Act of 2002 to require the Under Secretary for Science and 
Technology of the Department of Homeland Security to research 
and evaluate existing Federal research regarding approaches to 
mitigate climate change on homeland security and to identify 
areas for further research within the Department.

Legislative History

    A version of H.R. 3756 was introduced in the 116th Congress 
(H.R. 4737) and the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology 
issued a jurisdictional claim letter on October 22, 2019. 
Subsequently, the Committees on Homeland Security and Committee 
on Science, Space, and Technology worked cooperatively and as a 
result the Science Committee waived the claim to formal 
consideration. On June 8, 2021, H.R. 3756, introduced by Yvette 
Clark, was solely referred to the Committee on Homeland 
Security. On September 14, 2022, the full Committee on Homeland 
Security met to consider H.R. 3756 and ordered the bill to be 
favorably reported to the House by the Yeas and Nays: 19-14. On 
September 15, 2022, the Committees on Homeland Security and 
Committee on Science, Space, and Technology exchanged 
correspondence whereas the Science Committee agreed to again 
waive formal consideration of H.R. 3756 in light of a similar 
cooperation between committees.

  2.19 H.R. 3858, National Science and Technology Strategy Act of 2021


Purpose

    The purpose of H.R. 3858 is to establish a national science 
and technology strategy and a quadrennial science and 
technology review.

Legislative History

    On April 15, 2021, the Science, Space, and Technology 
Committee held a hearing entitled, Reimagining Our Innovation 
Future. The purpose of the hearing was to examine the current 
outlook for U.S. leadership in science and technology and 
discuss how new investments and new, inclusive models of 
partnership in science and technology can be leveraged to 
ensure continued leadership and address economic, security, 
environmental, public health, and other societal challenges 
from the local to the global level. On June 11, 2021, Michael 
Waltz introduced H.R. 3858 and was solely referred to the 
Committee on Science, Space, and Technology. On July 27, 2021, 
the full Committee on Science, Space, and Technology met to 
consider H.R. 3858 and ordered the bill to be favorably 
reported to the House by voice vote. There were no amendments. 
On February 18, 2022, H.R. 3858 was reported to the House.
    The text of H.R. 3858 was also included in Division B, 
Title VI, Subtitle B of H.R 4521, the America COMPETES Act of 
2022. From February 2, 2022, to February 4, 2022, H.R. 4521 was 
considered under the provisions of the rule H. Res. 900 and on 
February 4, 2022 the bill passed the House by a record vote of 
222-210. On April 7, 2022, the Speaker appointed conferees from 
the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology and included 
Committee members for consideration of Division B, Title VI, 
Subtitle B. This language was taken out of conference 
negotiations and added as an amendment by the Senate to P.L. 
117-80, the Chips and Science Act of 2022.
    For further information regarding the legislative history 
of P.L. 117-80, please refer to entry 1.xx in Chapter 1.

                2.20 H.R. 3952, NOAA Chief Scientist Act


Purpose

    The purpose of H.R. 3952 is to strengthen the role of the 
Chief Scientist of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric 
Administration in order to promote scientific integrity and 
advance the Administration's world-class research and 
development portfolio.

Legislative History

    On June 16, 2021, Mikie Sherrill and Randy Feenstra 
introduced H.R. 3952 and the bill was referred to the Committee 
on Science, Space, and Technology, and in addition to the 
Committee on Natural Resources. On September 23, 2021, the 
Subcommittee on the Environment held a hearing titled Advancing 
Earth System Science and Stewardship at NOAA. On April 5, 2022, 
the Full Committee on Science, Space, and Technology met to 
consider H.R. 3952 and ordered the bill to be favorably 
reported as amended to the House by voice vote. On May 24, 
2022, Eddie Bernice Johnson and Chairman Raul Grijalva or the 
Committee on Natural Resources exchanged correspondence and in 
response to the Committees working cooperatively together on 
H.R. 3952 and in respect of the provisions within the 
jurisdiction of the Committee on Natural Resources, Chairman 
Grijalva waived further consideration of H.R. 3952. On June 16, 
2022, H.R. 3952 was reported to the House. On July 27, 2022, 
H.R. 3952 was considered under suspension of the rules, the 
yeas and nays were demanded, and passed the House by record 
vote of 336-90.

2.21 H.R. 4270, Abandoned Well Remediation Research and Development Act


Purpose

    The purpose of H.R. 4270 is to amend the Energy Policy Act 
of 2005 to direct the Secretary of Energy to carry out a 
research, development, and demonstration program with respect 
to abandoned wells.

Legislative History

    On May 27th, 2021, the Committee on Science, Space, and 
Technology held a hearing titled Overview of the Science and 
Energy Research Enterprise of the U.S. Department of Energy, 
that examined the research, development, demonstration, and 
commercialization programs and activities carried out by the 
Department of Energy. Conor Lamb introduced H.R. 4270 on June 
30, 2021, with Stephanie Bice and the bill was referred solely 
to the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology. On January 
19, 2022, the Committee on Science, Space and Technology met to 
consider H.R. 4270 and ordered the bill to be favorably 
reported as amended to the House by voice vote. On October 7, 
2022, H.R. 4270 was reported to the House.

    2.22 H.R. 4521, Bioeconomy Research and Development Act of 2021


Purpose

    The purpose of H.R. 4521 is to provide for a coordinated 
Federal research initiative to ensure continued United States 
leadership in engineering biology.

Legislative History

    On March 12, 2019, the Subcommittee on Research and 
Technology of the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology 
held a hearing to review the opportunities and challenges with 
new and emerging bioscience and biotechnologies with 
application in agriculture, energy, and manufacturing; to 
examine the role of the federal government in research and 
development and oversight of such science and technologies; and 
to examine the status of U.S. leadership in engineering 
biology. On April 15, 2021, the Committee on Science, Space, 
and Technology held a hearing entitled, Reimagining Our 
Innovation Future. The purpose of the hearing was to examine 
the current outlook for U.S. leadership in science and 
technology and discuss how new investments and new models of 
partnership in science and technology can be leveraged to 
ensure continued leadership and address economic, security, 
environmental, public health, and other societal challenges 
from the local to the global level.
    Chairwoman Eddie Bernice Johnson introduced H.R. 4521 on 
June 19, 2021, with Ranking Member Frank Lucas and it was 
referred to the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, in 
addition to the Committee on Agriculture, and the Committee on 
Energy and Commerce. On January 19, 2022, the Committee on 
Science, Space, and Technology met to consider H.R. 4521 and 
ordered the bill to be favorably reported as amended to the 
House by voice vote. On January 28, 2022, H.R. 4521 was 
reported to the House and the Committee on Agriculture and the 
Committee on Energy and Commerce were discharged.
    H. Res. 900, was reported out by the House Committee on 
Rules on February 2, 2022. H.Res. 900 included an amendment in 
the nature of a substitute consisting of the text of Rules 
Committee Print 117-31 and H.R 4521 became the America COMPETES 
Act of 2022 with text added to it from other bills. From 
February 2, 2022 to February 4, 2022, H.R. 4521 was considered 
under the provisions of the rule H. Res. 900, the text reported 
out of Committee was moved to Division B, Title IV and on 
February 4, 2022 the bill passed the House by a record vote of 
222-210. On March 28, 2022, the Senate agreed to and passed 
H.R. 4521 with an amendment that struck all House text and 
inserted the United States Innovation and Competition Act of 
2021. On April 4, 2022, the House rejected the Senate Amendment 
and requested a conference. On April 7, 2022, the Speaker 
appointed conferees from the Committee on Science, Space, and 
Technology and included Committee members for consideration of 
Division B, Title IV. On April 28, 2022, the Senate insisted on 
its amendment and agreed to the House request for a conference. 
The language of H.R. 4521 was taken out of conference 
negotiations and added as an amendment by the Senate to P.L. 
117-80, the CHIPS and Science Act of 2022.
    For further information regarding the legislative history 
of P.L. 117-80, please refer to entry 1.xx in Chapter 1.

            2.23 H.R. 4588, Regional Innovation Act of 2021


Purpose

    The purpose of H.R. 4588 is to amend the Stevenson-Wydler 
Technology Innovation Act of 1980 to establish a regional 
technology and innovation hub program.

Legislative History

    On July 17, 2020, the Subcommittee on Energy held a hearing 
entitled, From Lab to Market: Accelerating our Progress toward 
Economic Recovery and a Clean Energy Future. The purpose of the 
hearing was to examine technology transfer activities at the 
Department of Energy and their potential contributions to 
economic recovery from the current COVID-19 pandemic, including 
regional clean energy innovation initiatives. On April 15, 
2021, the Science, Space, and Technology Committee held a 
hearing entitled, Reimagining Our Innovation Future. The 
purpose of the hearing was to examine the current outlook for 
U.S. leadership in science and technology and discuss how new 
investments and new, inclusive models of partnership in science 
and technology can be leveraged to ensure continued leadership 
and address economic, security, environmental, public health, 
and other societal challenges from the local to the global 
level. And on June 9, 2021, the Research and Technology 
Subcommittee held a hearing entitled, Building Regional 
Innovation Economies. The purpose of this hearing is to explore 
the role of the Department of Commerce, and particularly the 
Economic Development Agency (EDA), in supporting the 
development of regional innovation economies, and the 
opportunities for and challenges to expanding this role, 
including in partnership with Federal science agencies.
    Susan Wild introduced H.R. 4588 on June 20, 2021, with 
James Baird and it was solely referred to the Committee on 
Science, Space, and Technology. On June 27, 2021, the Committee 
on Science, Space, and Technology met to consider H.R. 4588 and 
ordered the bill to be favorably reported as amended to the 
House by voice vote. On February 28, 2022, H.R. 4521 was 
reported to the House.
    The text of H.R. 4588 was also included in Division B, 
Title VI, Subtitle C of H.R 4521, the America COMPETES Act of 
2022. From February 2, 2022 to February 4, 2022, H.R. 4521 was 
considered under the provisions of the rule H. Res. 900 and on 
February 4, 2022 the bill passed the House by a record vote of 
222-210. On April 7, 2022, the Speaker appointed conferees from 
the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology and included 
Committee members for consideration of Division B, Title VI, 
Subtitle C. This language was taken out of conference 
negotiations and added as an amendment by the Senate to P.L. 
117-80, the Chips and Science Act of 2022.
    For further information regarding the legislative history 
of P.L. 117-80, please refer to entry 1.xx in Chapter 1.

                   2.24 H.R. 4599, SUPER Act of 2021


Purpose

    The purpose of H.R. 4599 is to strengthen and enhance the 
competitiveness of American manufacturing through the research 
and development of advanced technologies to reduce steelmaking 
emissions.

Legislative History

    On March 26, 2019, the Research and Technology Subcommittee 
and the Energy Subcommittee of the Committee on Science, Space, 
and Technology held a joint hearing to examine ways to 
substantially lower greenhouse gas emissions in the 
manufacturing sector through both federal investment and 
public-private partnerships. On June 19, 2019, the Energy 
Subcommittee of the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology 
held a hearing to examine the Department of Energy's fossil 
energy research and development activities.
    Anthony Gonzalez introduced H.R. 4599 on July 21, 2021, 
with Conor Lamb and it was referred solely to the Committee on 
Science, Space, and Technology. On July 27, 2021, the Committee 
on Science, Space, and Technology met to consider H.R. 4599 and 
ordered the bill to be favorably reported as amended to the 
House by voice vote. On January 18, 2022, H.R. 4599 was 
reported to the House.
    The text of H.R. 4599 was also included in Division B, 
Title VI, Subtitle M of H.R 4521, the America COMPETES Act of 
2022. From February 2, 2022 to February 4, 2022, H.R. 4521 was 
considered under the provisions of the rule H. Res. 900 and on 
February 4, 2022 the bill passed the House by a record vote of 
222-210. On April 7, 2022, the Speaker appointed conferees from 
the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology and included 
Committee members for consideration of Division B, Title VI, 
Subtitle M. This language was taken out of conference 
negotiations and added as an amendment by the Senate to P.L. 
117-80, the Chips and Science Act of 2022.
    For further information regarding the legislative history 
of P.L. 117-80, please refer to entry 1.xx in Chapter 1.

           2.25 H.R. 4606, Energizing Technology Transfer Act


Purpose

    The purpose of H.R. 4606 is to establish programs and 
authorities to facilitate the commercial application of clean 
energy and related technologies in the United States.

Legislative History

    On July 17, 2020, the Subcommittee on Energy held a 
legislative hearing entitled From Lab to Market: Accelerating 
our Progress Toward Economic Recovery and a Clean Energy 
Future. The hearing discussed how the draft Energizing 
Technology Transfer Act would authorize a series of activities 
for DOE to support and administer programs to accelerate the 
commercialization of clean energy and other technologies 
relevant to the mission of the Department of Energy, including 
those developed at the national laboratories, and to modernize 
the management and administration of demonstration projects and 
prize competitions, among other activities.
    Debra Ross introduced H.R. 4606 on July 21, 2021 with Peter 
Meijer and the bill was solely referred to the Committee on 
Science, Space, and Technology. On July 27, 2021, the Committee 
on Science, Space, and Technology met to consider H.R. 4606 and 
ordered the bill to be favorably reported as amended to the 
House by voice vote. On August 19, 2022, H.R. 4606 was reported 
to the House.
    The text of H.R. 4606 was also included in Division B, 
Title VI, Subtitle J of H.R 4521, the America COMPETES Act of 
2022. From February 2, 2022 to February 4, 2022, H.R. 4521 was 
considered under the provisions of the rule H. Res. 900 and on 
February 4, 2022 the bill passed the House by a record vote of 
222-210. On April 7, 2022, the Speaker appointed conferees from 
the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology and included 
Committee members for consideration of Division B, Title VI, 
Subtitle J. This language was taken out of conference 
negotiations and added as an amendment by the Senate to P.L. 
117-80, the Chips and Science Act of 2022.
    For further information regarding the legislative history 
of P.L. 117-80, please refer to entry 1.xx in Chapter 1.

2.26 H.R. 4609, National Institute of Standards and Technology for the 
                           Future Act of 2021


Purpose

    The purpose of H.R. 4609 is to reauthorize the National 
Institute of standards and Technology.

Legislative History

    On March 11, 2020, the Subcommittee on Research and 
Technology held a hearing entitled, Reauthorization of the 
National Institute of Standards and Technology. The purpose of 
the hearing was to explore the major areas of research under 
the National Institute of Standards and Technology laboratory 
programs, the agency's role in working with industry to advance 
U.S. competitiveness, and key facilities construction and 
maintenance issues on the NIST campuses in Maryland and 
Colorado.
    On April 15, 2021, the Science, Space, and Technology 
Committee held a hearing entitled, Reimagining Our Innovation 
Future. The purpose of the hearing was to examine the current 
outlook for U.S. leadership in science and technology and 
discuss how new investments and new, inclusive models of 
partnership in science and technology can be leveraged to 
ensure continued leadership and address economic, security, 
environmental, public health, and other societal challenges 
from the local to the global level.
    On May 25, 2021, the Investigations and Oversight 
Subcommittee held a joint hearing with the Research and 
Technology Subcommittee entitled, SolarWinds and Beyond: 
Improving the Cybersecurity of Software Supply Chains. The 
purpose of the hearing was to examine the causes and impacts of 
recent supply chain attacks on Federal Agencies, explore how 
Federal Agencies currently mitigate their software supply chain 
risks, and consider how best to improve software supply chain 
security.
    On June 9, 2021 the Research and Technology Subcommittee 
held a hearing entitled, Building Regional Innovation 
Economies. The purpose of this hearing was to explore the role 
of the Department of Commerce, including NIST's extramural 
manufacturing programs, in supporting the development of 
regional innovation economies, and the opportunities for and 
challenges to expanding this role, including in partnership 
with Federal science agencies.
    On July 20, 2021 the full Committee held a hearing 
entitled, Spectrum Needs for Observational Earth and Space 
Science. The hearing examined research and development efforts 
to examine spectral interference, including work at NIST.
    Haley Stevens introduced H.R. 4609 on July 21, 2021, with 
Michael Waltz and was referred solely to the Committee on 
Science, Space, and Technology. On July 27, 2021, the Committee 
on Science, Space, and Technology met to consider H.R. 4609 and 
ordered the bill to be favorably reported as amended to the 
House by voice vote. On February 18, 2022, H.R. 4609 was 
reported to the House.
    The text of H.R. 4609 was also included in Division B, 
Title II of H.R 4521, the America COMPETES Act of 2022. From 
February 2, 2022 to February 4, 2022, H.R. 4521 was considered 
under the provisions of the rule H. Res. 900 and on February 4, 
2022 the bill passed the House by a record vote of 222-210. On 
April 7, 2022 the Speaker appointed conferees from the 
Committee on Science, Space, and Technology and included 
Committee members for consideration of Division B, Title II. 
This language was taken out of conference negotiations and 
added as an amendment by the Senate to P.L. 117-80, the Chips 
and Science Act of 2022.
    For further information regarding the legislative history 
of P.L. 117-80, please refer to entry 1.xx in Chapter 1.

  2.27 H.R. 4819, National Nuclear University Research Infrastructure 
                        Reinvestment Act of 2021


Purpose

    The purpose of H.R. 4819 is to require the Secretary of 
Energy to revitalize existing university infrastructure 
relating to nuclear science and engineering and establish new 
university-based nuclear science and engineering facilities.

Legislative History

    Anthony Gonzalez introduced H.R. 4819 on July 29, 2021, 
with Bill Foster and the bill was referred solely to the 
Committee on Science, Space, and Technology. On October 21, 
2021, the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology held a 
hearing entitled Judicious Spending to Enable Success at the 
Office of Nuclear Energy to examine nuclear energy research and 
development activities at the Department of Energy. On January 
19, 2022, the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology met 
to consider H.R. 4819 and ordered the bill to be favorably 
reported as amended to the House by voice vote. On September 
14, 2022, H.R. 4819 was reported to the House.
    The text of H.R. 4819 was also included in Division B, 
Title VI, Subtitle L of H.R 4521, the America COMPETES Act of 
2022. From February 2, 2022 to February 4, 2022, H.R. 4521 was 
considered under the provisions of the rule H. Res. 900 and on 
February 4, 2022 the bill passed the House by a record vote of 
222-210. On April 7, 2022 the Speaker appointed conferees from 
the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology and included 
Committee members for consideration of Division B, Title VI, 
Subtitle L. This language was taken out of conference 
negotiations and added as an amendment by the Senate to P.L. 
117-80, the Chips and Science Act of 2022.
    For further information regarding the legislative history 
of P.L. 117-80, please refer to entry 1.xx in Chapter 1.

             2.28 H.R. 5324, NWR Modernization Act of 2021


Purpose

    The purpose of H.R. 5324 is to provide guidance for and 
investment in the upgrade and modernization of the National 
Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Weather Radio All 
Hazards network.

Legislative History

    Stephanie Bice introduced H.R. 5324 on September 22, 2021, 
with Mikie Sherrill and was referred solely to the Committee on 
Science, Space, and Technology. On September 23, 2021, the 
Subcommittee on the Environment held a hearing titled Advancing 
Earth System Science and Stewardship at NOAA. On October 14, 
2021 the full committee on Science, Space, and Technology held 
a hearing titled The Future of Forecasting: Building a Weather-
Ready Nation on All Fronts.
    On October 16, 2021, the Committee on Science, Space, and 
Technology met to consider H.R. 5324 and ordered the bill to be 
favorably reported as amended to the House by voice vote. On 
March 6, 2022, H.R. 5324 was reported to the House. On May 10 
and 11, 2022, H.R. 5324 was considered under suspension of the 
rules, the yeas and nays were demanded, and passed the House by 
record vote of 397-20. H.R. 5324 was received in the Senate and 
referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and 
Transportation.

    2.29 H.R. 5746, NASA Enhanced Use Leasing Extension Act of 2021


Purpose

    The purpose of H.R. 5746 is to amend title 51, United 
States Code, to extend the authority of the National 
Aeronautics and Space Administration to enter into leases of 
non-excess property of the Administration.

Legislative History

    Don Beyer introduced H.R. 5746 on October 27, 2021, with 
Brian Babin and was referred solely to the Committee on 
Science, Space, and Technology. On December 8, 2021, H.R. 5746 
was considered under suspension of the rules, and the bill 
passed the House by voice vote. The Senate received H.R. 5746 
and passed it with an amendment. The House received H.R 5746, 
and under H. Res. 868, the text of H.R 5746 was replaced by an 
amendment with the text of rule Committee Print 117-28, The 
Freedom to Vote: John R. Lewis Act. On January 13, 2022, H.R. 
5746 was considered under the provisions of the rule H. Res. 
868 and the House agreed with an amendment to the Senate 
amendment by a record vote of 220-203. The Senate failed to 
invoke cloture on the motion to concur with the House 
amendment.

                       2.30 H.R. 6291, Micro Act


Purpose

    The purpose of H.R. 6291 is to provide for a comprehensive 
and integrative program to accelerate microelectronics research 
and development at the Department of Energy.

Legislative History

    On Thursday, December 2, 2021, the Committee on Science, 
Space, and Technology held a hearing entitled Ensuring American 
Leadership in Microelectronics to examine the status of U.S. 
leadership in advanced microelectronics development and 
manufacturing, to discuss how new investments and partnership 
models can support continued U.S. leadership, and to explore 
the role of the federal government in supporting domestic 
microelectronics innovation and manufacturing throughout the 
supply chain.
    Paul Tonko introduced H.R. 6291 on December 14, 2021, with 
Jake Ellzey and was referred solely to the Committee on 
Science, Space, and Technology. On January 19, 2022, the 
Committee on Science, Space, and Technology met to consider 
H.R. 6291 and ordered the bill to be favorably reported as 
amended to the House by voice vote. On August 19, 2022, H.R. 
46291 was reported to the House.
    The text of H.R. 6291 was also included in Division B, 
Title VI, Subtitle K of H.R 4521, the America COMPETES Act of 
2022. From February 2, 2022 to February 4, 2022, H.R. 4521 was 
considered under the provisions of the rule H. Res. 900 and on 
February 4, 2022 the bill passed the House by a record vote of 
222-210. On April 7, 2022 the Speaker appointed conferees from 
the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology and included 
Committee members for consideration of Division B, Title VI, 
Subtitle K. This language was taken out of conference 
negotiations and added as an amendment by the Senate to P.L. 
117-80, the Chips and Science Act of 2022.
    For further information regarding the legislative history 
of P.L. 117-80, please refer to entry 1.xx in Chapter 1.

    2.31 H.R. 6845, Commercial Remote Sensing Amendment Act of 2022


Purpose

    The purpose of H.R. 6845 is to provide for transparent 
licensing of commercial remote sensing systems.

Legislative History

    On May 18, 2021, the Committee on Science, Space, and 
Technology held a hearing entitled NASA's Earth Science and 
Climate Change Activities: Current Roles and Future 
Opportunities. Ranking Member Frank Lucas introduced H.R. 6845 
on February 24, 2022, with Ed Perlmutter and it was referred 
solely to the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology. On 
April 5, 2022, the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology 
met to consider H.R. 6845 and ordered the bill to be favorably 
reported as amended to the House by voice vote. On July 1, 
2022, H.R. 6845 was reported to the House. On July 26, 2022, 
H.R. 6845 was considered under suspension of the rules, and the 
bill passed the House by voice vote. The Senate received and 
referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and 
Transportation on July 28, 2022.

         2.32 H.R. 6933, Cost-Share Accountability Act of 2022


Purpose

    The purpose of H.R. 6933 is to amend the Energy Policy Act 
of 2005 to require reporting relating to certain cost-share 
requirements.

Legislative History

    On October 21, 2021, the Investigations and Oversight 
Subcommittee and the Energy Subcommittee of the Committee on 
Science, Space, and Technology Committee held a joint hearing 
entitled, Judicious Spending to Enable Success at the Office of 
Nuclear Energy, to review several large financial assistance 
awards made by the Department's Office of Nuclear Energy.
    Jay Obernolte introduced H.R. 6933 on March 3, 2022, with 
Bill Foster and it was referred solely to the Committee on 
Science, Space, and Technology. On April 5, 2022, the Full 
Committee on Science, Space, and Technology met to consider 
H.R. 3952 and ordered the bill to be favorably reported as 
amended to the House by voice vote. On June 14, 2022, H.R. 6933 
was reported to the House. On July 26 and 27, 2022, H.R. 3952 
was considered under suspension of the rules, the yeas and nays 
were demanded, and passed the House by record vote of 336-90. 
The Senate received H.R. 6933 and referred it to the Committee 
on Energy and Natural Resources on July 28, 2022.

 2.33 H.R. 7180, Brycen Gray and Ben Price COVID-19 Cognitive Research 
                                  Act


Purpose

    The purpose of H.R. 7180 is to authorize the Director of 
the National Science Foundation to award grants to support 
research on the disruption of regular cognitive processes 
associated with COVID-19 infection.

Legislative History

    Anthony Gonzalez introduced H.R. 7180 on March 21, 2022, 
with Susan Wild and Adam Kinzinger, and the bill was referred 
solely to the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology. On 
May 17, 2022, the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology 
met to consider H.R. 7180 and ordered the bill to be favorably 
reported to the House by voice vote. No amendments to H.R. 7180 
were offered. On June 15, 2022, H.R. 7180 was reported to the 
House. On July 26, 2022, H.R. 7180 was considered under 
suspension of the rules, the yeas and nays were demanded, and 
passed the House by record vote of 350-69. The Senate received 
H.R. 7180 and referred it to the Committee on Health, 
Education, Labor, and Pensions.

          2.34 H.R. 7289, Federal PFAS Research Evaluation Act


Purpose

    The purpose of H.R. 7289 is to provide for the National 
Academies to study and report on a federal research agenda to 
advance the understanding of perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl 
substances, commonly referred to as PFAS.

Legislative History

    On December 7, 2021, the Subcommittees on Environment and 
Research and Technology held a joint hearing titled Forever 
Chemicals: Research and Development for Addressing the PFAS 
Problem. Lizzie Fletcher introduced H.R. 7289 on March 30, 
2022, with Peter Meijer, and the bill was referred solely to 
the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology. On May 17, 
2022, the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology met to 
consider H.R. 7289 and ordered the bill to be favorably 
reported as amended to the House by voice vote. On July 13, 
2022, H.R. 7289 was reported to the House. On July 26, 2022, 
H.R. 7289 was considered under suspension of the rules, the 
yeas and nays were demanded, and passed the House by record 
vote of 359-62. The Senate received H.R. 7289 and referred it 
to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.

2.35 H.R. 7361, National Weather Service Communications Improvement Act


Purpose

    The purpose of H.R. 7361 is to upgrade the communications 
service used by the National Weather Service.

Legislative History

    On October 14, 2021, the Committee on Science, Space, and 
Technology held a hearing titled The Future of Forecasting: 
Building a Weather-Ready Nation on all Fronts. Randy Feenstra 
introduced H.R. 7361 on April 1, 2022, with Cynthia Axne, and 
it was referred solely to the Committee on Science, Space, and 
Technology. On May 17, 2022, the Committee on Science, Space, 
and Technology met to consider H.R. 7361 and ordered the bill 
be favorably reported to the House by voice vote. No amendments 
to H.R. 7361 were offered. On June 14, 2022, H.R. 7361 was 
reported to the House. On July 27, 2022, H.R. 7361 was 
considered under suspension of the rules, the yeas and nays 
were demanded, and passed the House by record vote of 336-90. 
The Senate received H.R. 7361 and referred to the Committee on 
Commerce, Science, and Transportation on July 28, 2022.

 2.36 H.R. 7569, Energy Cybersecurity University Leadership Act of 2022


Purpose

    The purpose of H.R. 7569 is to direct the Secretary of 
Energy to establish a program to provide financial assistance 
to graduate students and postdoctoral researchers pursuing 
certain courses of study relating to cybersecurity and energy 
infrastructure.

Legislative History

    On March 18, 2021, the Committee held a hearing entitled 
``Lessons Learned from the Texas Blackouts: Research Needs for 
a Secure and Resilient Grid.'' The purpose of the hearing was 
to understand the causes of the extended power outages in Texas 
and other southern and midwestern states during a severe winter 
storm in February 2021 and to examine associated grid research 
and development needs.
    Deborah Ross introduced H.R. 7569 on April 25, 2022, with 
Mike Carey and it was referred solely to the Committee on 
Science Space and Technology. On May 17, 2022, the Committee on 
Science, Space, and Technology met to consider H.R. 7569 and 
ordered to the bill to be favorably reported to the House by 
voice vote. No amendments to H.R. 7569 were offered. On June 
14, 2022, H.R. 7569 was reported to the House. On July 27, 
2022, H.R. 7569 was considered under suspension of the rules, 
the yeas and nays were demanded, and passed the House by record 
vote of 336-90. The Senate received H.R. 7569 and referred it 
to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources on July 28, 
2022.

                 3.1 Hearings Before the Full Committee


                      (a) Hearing Volume No. 117-1


February 19, 2021

     FULL COMMITTEE HEARING: THE SCIENCE OF COVID-19 VACCINES AND 
                       ENCOURAGING VACCINE UPTAKE

    The purpose of this hearing was to discuss some of the 
processes and research achievements that allowed for several 
safe and effective COVID-19 vaccines to be designed, 
manufactured, and distributed at a record pace. The Committee 
also considered how vaccine hesitancy and impediments to access 
may affect the pace of our national recovery from COVID-19, 
strategies for increasing vaccine uptake, and how scientists 
and vaccine developers are responding to new variants of the 
virus.
    Witnesses:
          Dr. Kathleen Neuzil of the University of 
        Maryland School of Medicine
          Dr. Philip Huang from the Dallas County 
        Department of Health and Human Services
          Mr. Keith Reed from the Oklahoma State 
        Department of Health
          Dr. Alison Buttenheim of the University of 
        Pennsylvania School of Nursing.

                      (b) Hearing Volume No. 117-2


February 25, 2021

  FULL COMMITTEE HEARING--BUILDING BACK THE U.S. RESEARCH ENTERPRISE: 
                       COVID IMPACTS AND RECOVERY

    The purpose of this hearing was to assess the near- and 
long-term impacts of the COVID-19 health crisis on the U.S. 
science and innovation enterprise. The Committee examined the 
steps taken to mitigate the spread of the virus and the 
consequences for research production, the pipeline of STEM 
talent, and U.S. economic competitiveness. The hearing was also 
an opportunity for Members to explore what is needed to recover 
from these setbacks and ensure the U.S. maintains its 
leadership role in science and innovation. This hearing was 
also an opportunity for the Committee to hear testimony on the 
Research Investment to Spark the Economy (RISE) Act and the 
Supporting Early-Career Researchers Act.
    Witnesses:
          Dr. Sudip Parikh, Chief Executive Officer, 
        American Association for the Advancement of Science
          Dr. Christopher Keane, Vice President for 
        Research, Washington State University
          Dr. Felice J. Levine, Executive Director, 
        American Educational Research Association
          Mr. Thomas Quaadman, Executive Vice 
        President, Center for Capital Markets Competitiveness, 
        U.S. Chamber of Commerce

                      (c) Hearing Volume No. 117-3


Friday, March 12, 2021

   FULL COMMITTEE HEARING: THE SCIENCE BEHIND IMPACTS OF THE CLIMATE 
                                 CRISIS

    The purpose of this hearing was to discuss the importance 
of science in understanding the impacts of the climate crisis, 
as well as how climate change is already impacting the U.S. on 
regional and local scales, including the record-setting 2020 
wildfire and Atlantic hurricane seasons and other recent 
climate disasters. This included a discussion of the 
disproportionate impacts of climate change on vulnerable 
communities. The Committee considered new advancements in 
climate science and understanding, such as in observational and 
predictive capabilities and the ability to quantify climate 
impacts and assess societal risk. This hearing was an 
opportunity to discuss the importance of science in advancing 
adaptation and mitigation solutions.
    Witnesses:
          Dr. Michael Oppenheimer, Albert G. Milbank 
        Professor of Geosciences and International Affairs, 
        Princeton University
          Dr. Zeke Hausfather, Director of Climate and 
        Energy, The Breakthrough Institute
          Dr. Noah Diffenbaugh, Kara J. Foundation 
        Professor, Department of Earth System Science, 
        Kimmelman Family Senior Fellow, Woods Institute for the 
        Environment, Stanford University
          Dr. Paula Bontempi, Dean, Graduate School of 
        Oceanography, Professor of Oceanography, University of 
        Rhode Island

                      (d) Hearing Volume No. 117-5


March 18, 2021

   FULL COMMITTEE HEARING: LESSONS LEARNED FROM THE TEXAS BLACKOUTS: 
             RESEARCH NEEDS FOR A SECURE AND RESILIENT GRID

    The purpose of the hearing was to understand what caused 
the recent extended power outages in Texas and other southern 
and midwestern states during a severe winter storm over the 
second weekend of February, and to examine associated grid 
research and development needs. Witnesses and Members discussed 
grid security research activities at the Department of Energy, 
including relevant grid technology, energy generation 
technology, and cybersecurity research. The hearing also served 
as a legislative hearing for a bill that was introduced in the 
116th Congress and was expected to be reintroduced in this 
Congress by Rep. Ami Bera, the GridSecurity Research and 
Development Act (H.R. 5760 in the 116th Congress). That bill 
authorized an interagency research, development, and 
demonstration program on electric grid and energy system 
cybersecurity, physical security, resilience, and emergency 
response.
    Witnesses:
           Dr. Jesse Jenkins, Assistant Professor of 
        Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Andlinger Center 
        for Energy and the Environment at Princeton University
           Dr. Varun Rai, Associate Dean for Research; 
        Professor of Public Affairs, LBJ School of Public 
        Affairs at the University of Texas at Austin
           Mr. Juan Torres, Associate Laboratory 
        Director, Energy Systems Integration National Renewable 
        Energy Laboratory
           Ms. Beth Garza, Senior Fellow, R Street 
        Institute
           Dr. Sue Tierney, Senior Advisor, Analysis 
        Group

                      (e) Hearing Volume No. 117-8


April 15, 2021

       FULL COMMITTEE HEARING--REIMAGINING OUR INNOVATION FUTURE

    The purpose of this hearing was to examine the current 
outlook for U.S. leadership in science and technology and 
discuss how new investments and new, inclusive models of 
partnership in science and technology can be leveraged to 
ensure continued leadership and address economic, security, 
environmental, public health, and other societal challenges 
from the local to the global level.
    Witnesses:
           Mr. Norm Augustine
           Dr. Frances H. Arnold, Linus Pauling 
        Professor of Chemical Engineering, Bioengineering and 
        Biochemistry, California Institute of Technology
           The Honorable Ernest J. Moniz, President and 
        Chief Executive Officer, Energy Futures Initiative, and 
        Former Secretary, U.S. Department of Energy
           Dr. Farnam Jahanian, President, Carnegie 
        Mellon University

                     (f) Hearing Volume No. 117-18


May 27, 2021

  FULL COMMITTEE HEARING: OVERVIEW OF THE SCIENCE AND ENERGY RESEARCH 
              ENTERPRISE OF THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

    The purpose of this hearing was to examine the research, 
development, demonstration, and commercialization programs and 
activities carried out by the Department of Energy (DOE). It 
also considered the goals and impacts of the Department's 
Fiscal Year 2022 discretionary budget request.
    Witness:
          The Honorable Jennifer Granholm, Secretary of Energy, 
        U.S. Department of Energy

                     (g) Hearing Volume No. 117-20


June 9, 2021

     FULL COMMITTEE HEARING--BUILDING REGIONAL INNOVATION ECONOMIES

    The purpose of this hearing was to explore the role of the 
Department of Commerce, and particularly the Economic 
Development Agency (EDA), in supporting the development of 
regional innovation economies, and the opportunities for and 
challenges to expanding this role, including in partnership 
with Federal science agencies.
    Witnesses:
           Mr. Dan Berglund, President and CEO, SSTI
           Professor Erica R.H. Fuchs, Department of 
        Engineering and Public Policy, Carnegie Mellon 
        University
           Ms. Paula Nas, Director, Office of Economic 
        Development, University of Michigan-Flint
           The Honorable Elizabeth Hutt Pollard, 
        Secretary of Science and Innovation, State of Oklahoma

                     (h) Hearing Volume No. 117-21


June 23, 2021

 FULL COMMITTEE HEARING: A REVIEW OF THE PRESIDENT'S FISCAL YEAR 2022 
                        BUDGET PROPOSAL FOR NASA

    The purpose of the hearing was to review the 
Administration's Fiscal Year (FY) 2022 budget request for the 
National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), and 
related issues.
    Witness:
          The Honorable Bill Nelson, Administrator, National 
        Aeronautics and Space Administration

                     (i) Hearing Volume No. 117-23


Tuesday, June 29, 2021

  FULL COMMITTEE HEARING: THE STATE OF FEDERAL WILDLAND FIRE SCIENCE: 
      EXAMINING OPPORTUNITIES FOR FURTHER RESEARCH & COORDINATION

    The hearing provided an opportunity to discuss the current 
state of wildland fire research, with a focus on how to improve 
understanding of on-the-ground conditions as well as how 
climate change is impacting wildfire risk. The Committee also 
examined research gaps and additional federal coordination, 
investment, and engagement needed to improve wildland fire 
prediction, management, and post-fire response.
    Witnesses:
           Dr. Craig B. Clements, Professor of 
        Meteorology and Director of the Wildfire 
        Interdisciplinary Research Center at San Jose State 
        University
           Dr. Jessica McCarty, Assistant Professor of 
        Geography and Director of the Geospatial Analysis 
        Center at Miami University
           Mr. George Geissler, State Forester and 
        Deputy for Wildland Fire and Forest Health and 
        Resiliency at the Washington Department of Natural 
        Resources
           Fire Chief Erik Litzenberg (Ret.), Chair of 
        the Wildland Fire Policy Committee at the International 
        Association of Fire Chiefs

                     (j) Hearing Volume No. 117-26


July 20, 2021

 FULL COMMITTEE HEARING: SPECTRUM NEEDS FOR OBSERVATIONS IN EARTH AND 
                             SPACE SCIENCES

    The purpose of this hearing was to review the spectrum 
needs of relevant science applications within the Committee's 
purview and consider threats of harmful interference in radio 
frequency bands used for observations that support weather 
forecasting and monitoring, climate science, and astronomy. The 
Committee examined remote sensing applications in the 23.6-24.0 
GHz band (also called the 23.8 GHz band), the potential for 
harmful interference from operations in the adjacent 24.25-
24.45 GHz band (commonly referred to as the 24 GHz band) that 
was auctioned for new applications by the Federal 
Communications Commission in 2019, and the consequences of such 
interference, including degradation of weather forecasting 
capabilities. Witnesses and Members discussed opportunities to 
ensure the needs of incumbent federal users and stakeholders in 
the scientific community are better accommodated in the federal 
spectrum management process. The Committee also considered 
research and technology development needs to help anticipate, 
evaluate, and mitigate harmful interference with spectrum used 
for passive observation.
    Witnesses:
           Mr. Andrew Von Ah of the U.S. Government 
        Accountability Office
           Mr. David Lubar from The Aerospace 
        Corporation
           Dr. Jordan Gerth from the University of 
        Wisconsin-Madison
           Mr. Bill Mahoney of the National Center for 
        Atmospheric Research
           Ms. Jennifer Manner from EchoStar 
        Corporation and Hughes Network Systems

                     (k) Hearing Volume No. 117-32


September 29, 2021

   FULL COMMITTEE HEARING: MEMBERS' DAY HEARING: HOUSE COMMITTEE ON 
                     SCIENCE, SPACE, AND TECHNOLOGY

    Witnesses:
           Representative Melanie Stansbury (D-NM)
           Representative Ed Case (D-HI)
           Representative Anna Eshoo (D-CA)
           Representative Bill Posey

                     (l) Hearing Volume No. 117-34


Thursday, October 14, 2021

 FULL COMMITTEE HEARING: THE FUTURE OF FORECASTING: BUILDING A WEATHER-
                       READY NATION ON ALL FRONTS

    The purpose of this hearing was to examine recent reforms, 
successes, and modernization efforts at the National Weather 
Service (NWS), how they support the goal of building a 
``weather-ready nation,'' and what these efforts mean for the 
NWS workforce. It was also an opportunity to discuss the 
findings and recommendations of several recent Government 
Accountability Office (GAO) reports on these topics and the 
status of NWS implementation of the recommendations. 
Additionally, the hearing included a discussion of the science 
and technology advancements needed to support forecasting 
improvements.
    Witnesses:
           Dr. Louis Uccellini, Assistant Administrator 
        for Weather Services and Director of the National 
        Weather Service (NWS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric 
        Administration (NOAA)
           Mr. Cardell Johnson, Acting Director, 
        Natural Resources and Environment, U.S. GAO
           Mr. John Werner, President, National Weather 
        Service Employees Organization (NWSEO)
           Mr. Erik Salna, Associate Director for 
        Education and Outreach, International Hurricane 
        Research Center, Extreme Events Institute, Florida 
        International University

                     (m) Hearing Volume No. 117-40


December 2, 2021

        FULL COMMITTEE HEARING--ENSURING AMERICAN LEADERSHIP IN 
                            MICROELECTRONICS

    The purpose of this hearing was to examine the status of 
U.S. leadership in advanced semiconductor development and 
manufacturing; to discuss how new investments and partnership 
models can support continued U.S. leadership; and to explore 
the role of the federal government in supporting domestic 
semiconductor innovation and manufacturing throughout the 
supply chain.
    Witnesses:
           Dr. Ann Kelleher, Executive Vice President 
        and General Manager of Technology Development, Intel 
        Corporation
           Mr. Manish Bhatia, Executive Vice President, 
        Global Operations, Micron Technology, Inc.
           Dr. Michael Witherell, Director, Lawrence 
        Berkeley National Laboratory
           Dr. Mung Chiang, Executive Vice President 
        and John A. Edwardson Dean, College of Engineering, 
        Purdue University

                     (n) Hearing Volume No. 117-43


February 8, 2022

  FULL COMMITTEE HEARING--DATA CHALLENGES IMPACTING HUMAN TRAFFICKING 
    RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT OF ANTI-TRAFFICKING TECHNOLOGICAL TOOLS

    The purpose of this hearing was to discuss scientific 
research and technology development to counter human 
trafficking in the United States, including trafficking for 
forced labor and sexual exploitation. This hearing was an 
opportunity for experts to provide information related to 
current gaps in human trafficking research, data analysis 
challenges, opportunities for technology development to disrupt 
human trafficking networks, strengthening partnerships between 
academia and practitioners, and challenges in translating 
research into evidence-based anti-trafficking policy. The 
hearing was also an opportunity to discuss legislation the 
Committee may consider to support coordinated interagency 
research and technology development to prevent, measure, and 
disrupt trafficking in persons.
    Witnesses:
           Dr. Gretta Goodwin, Director, Homeland 
        Security and Justice, U.S. Government Accountability 
        Office
           Dr. Louise Shelley, Omer L. and Nancy Hirst 
        Endowed Chair and University Professor, Director, 
        Terrorism, Transnational Crime and Corruption Center, 
        George Mason University
           Ms. Theresa Harris, Interim Program 
        Director, Scientific Responsibility, Human Rights and 
        Law Program, American Association for the Advancement 
        of Science
           Ms. Hannah Darnton, Associate Director, 
        Ethics, Human Rights, and Technology, Business for 
        Social Responsibility, Secretariate of Tech Against 
        Trafficking

                     (o) Hearing Volume No. 117-47


March 8, 2022

 FULL COMMITTEE HEARING: FEDERAL CLIMATE ADAPTATION AND RESILIENCE FOR 
                            THE 21ST CENTURY

    The purpose of this hearing was to evaluate the Federal 
Government's vulnerability to the impacts of climate change, 
and to assess the status of ongoing efforts to promote greater 
climate adaptation and resilience throughout Federal programs, 
operations, and facilities. The hearing explored the types of 
climate risks threatening Federal agencies and the urgent need 
to address those risks in order to protect Federal assets and 
investments. The hearing detailed the climate challenges 
confronting NASA, DOE, and NOAA, along with the adaptation and 
resilience strategies adopted by those agencies to respond to 
them. Finally, the hearing discussed potential opportunities to 
bolster Federal climate adaptation tools, including enhanced 
interagency resilience collaboration and the incorporation of 
accurate, up-to-date climate data into agency planning, 
implementation, and outreach.
    Witnesses:
           Dr. Richard Spinrad of the National Oceanic 
        and Atmospheric Administration
           Ms. Ingrid Kolb of the U.S. Department of 
        Energy
           Dr. Joel Carney of the National Aeronautics 
        and Space Administration
           Mr. Alfredo Gomez of the U.S. Government 
        Accountability Office.

                     (p) Hearing Volume No. 117-55


Thursday, April 28, 2022

  FULL COMMITTEE HEARING: NOW OR NEVER: THE URGENT NEED FOR AMBITIOUS 
                             CLIMATE ACTION

    This hearing provided an opportunity to examine the 
findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the three Working 
Group (WG) reports: WGI, ``The Physical Science Basis''; WGII, 
``Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability''; and WGIII, 
``Mitigation of Climate Change'' which would comprise the 
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's Sixth Assessment 
Report. The Committee considered the urgent need for adaptive 
research and development while meeting short- and long-term 
sustainable development goals. This hearing examined diverse 
communities' needs in order to rapidly adapt to climate change 
and extreme weather events.
    Witnesses:
           Ms. Ko Barrett, Vice-Chair, 
        Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; NOAA Senior 
        Advisor for Climate
           Mr. Jeremy Harrell, Chief Strategy Officer, 
        ClearPath
           Ms. Dominique M. David-Chavez, PhD, 
        Assistant Professor of Indigenous Natural Resource 
        Stewardship, Colorado State University
           Ms. Daniella Levine Cava, Mayor, Miami-Dade 
        County, Florida

                     (q) Hearing Volume No. 117-60


June 8, 2022

  FULL COMMITTEE HEARING: DETECTING AND QUANTIFYING METHANE EMISSIONS 
                      FROM THE OIL AND GAS SECTOR

    The purpose of this hearing was to assess the challenge of 
oil and gas sector methane leaks from a scientific, 
technological, and policymaking perspective. The hearing 
discussed the current scientific consensus regarding the role 
of methane leaks as a driver of oil and gas sector methane 
emissions. The hearing highlighted recent advances in 
innovative leak detection and repair technologies, as well as 
the importance of deploying such technologies broadly 
throughout oil and gas sector operations to achieve large-scale 
reductions in methane emissions. Finally, the hearing examined 
research gaps related to oil and gas sector methane emissions 
and opportunities for the Federal government to support 
scientific research activities pertaining to oil and gas sector 
methane leaks.
    Witnesses:
           Dr. David Lyon from the Environmental 
        Defense Fund
           Mr. Riley Duren from Carbon Mapper
           Dr. Brian Anderson from the National Energy 
        Technology Laboratory
           Dr. Greg Rieker from LongPath Technologies

                     (r) Hearing Volume No. 117-68


September 20, 2022

FULL COMMITTEE HEARING: AMPLIFYING THE ARCTIC: STRENGTHENING SCIENCE TO 
                  RESPOND TO A RAPIDLY CHANGING ARCTIC

    This hearing discussed the Interagency Arctic Research 
Policy Committee's Arctic Research Plan 2022-2026, which was 
informed by the U.S. Arctic Research Commission. The hearing 
explored gaps in research and analysis, needed improvements to 
federal science capabilities, research vessels and 
infrastructure, and barriers to strengthening our response to 
local and global climate change impacts, such as carbon and 
methane emissions released from permafrost thaw. Additionally, 
we discussed gaps in Arctic system monitoring, observing, 
modeling, and prediction efforts. Importantly, we examined the 
role of traditional knowledge holders and equitable practices 
in the coproduction of research, especially in critical areas 
such as food security and biodiversity. Finally, the hearing 
was an opportunity to discuss the impact of geopolitical 
tensions on science diplomacy in the Arctic and challenges for 
future international collaboration in key research including 
boreal forest fires, sea ice melt and land ice loss, 
particularly the Greenland Ice Sheet.
    Witnesses:
           Dr. Larry Hinzman, Assistant Director of 
        Polar Sciences, White House Office of Science and 
        Technology Policy and Executive Director, Interagency 
        Arctic Research and Policy Committee
           Dr. Mike Sfraga, Chair, U.S. Arctic Research 
        Commission
           Ms. Vera Kingeekuk Metcalf, Executive 
        Director, Eskimo Walrus Commission
           Dr. Susan Natali, Arctic Program Director, 
        Woodwell Climate Research Center

                     (s) Hearing Volume No. 117-72


December 6, 2022

FULL COMMITTEE HEARING: BUILDING A SAFER ANTARCTIC RESEARCH ENVIRONMENT

    The purpose of this hearing was to discuss the findings of 
a recent report on sexual harassment and assault in Antarctica. 
The hearing also examined the unique characteristics of remote 
research sites, including those managed by contractors, changes 
that have been made since the publication of the report, and 
additional steps that must be taken to protect those conducting 
and supporting the valuable research in Antarctica and other 
remote research sites.
    Witnesses:
           Dr. Karen Marrongelle, Chief Operating 
        Officer, National Science Foundation
           Ms. Kathleen Naeher, Chief Operating Officer 
        of the Civil Group, Leidos
           Dr. Angela V. Olinto, Dean of the Physical 
        Sciences Division and Albert A. Michelson Distinguished 
        Service Professor, University of Chicago
           Dr. Anne Kelly, Deputy Director, The Nature 
        Conservancy Alaska Chapter

             3.2 Hearings Before the Subcommittee on Energy


                      (a) Hearing Volume No. 117-7


March 25, 2021

SUBCOMMITTEE HEARING: BUILDING TECHNOLOGIES RESEARCH FOR A SUSTAINABLE 
                                 FUTURE

    The purpose of this hearing was to examine building 
technology research and development needs to reduce building 
energy usage and emissions. Witnesses and Members discussed 
building technology research, development, and demonstration 
activities at the Department of Energy (DOE) including grid 
interactive buildings, advanced building design, construction, 
and technologies such as improved building envelopes, windows, 
and lighting with a focus on the equitable distribution of the 
results of buildings research. New structures as well as 
retrofitting existing buildings were discussed. The hearing 
also examined ways that Congress and the Administration should 
consider directing the activities of the DOE Building 
Technologies Office (BTO). Legislative language to authorize 
and support such activities passed the House of Representatives 
in the 116th Congress as part of H.R. 4447, the Clean Economy 
Jobs and Innovation Act, but this language was not enacted.
    Witnesses:
           Dr. Nora Esram, Senior Director for Research 
        at American Council for an Energy- Efficient Economy
           Dr. Roderick Jackson, Laboratory Program 
        Manager for Buildings Research at National Renewable 
        Energy Laboratory
           Dr. James Tour, T.T. and W. F. Chao 
        Professor of Chemistry at Rice University Ms. 
        Jacqueline Patterson, Director of the NAACP 
        Environmental and Climate Justice Program
           Mr. Joseph Hagerman, Group Leader for 
        Building Integration and Controls at Oak Ridge National 
        Laboratory

                     (b) Hearing Volume No. 117-12


May 4, 2021

   SUBCOMMITTEE HEARING: CLIMATE AND ENERGY SCIENCE RESEARCH AT THE 
                          DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

    The Subcommittee's hearing examined two major components of 
the Department of Energy's Office of Science: the Basic Energy 
Sciences (BES) program as a whole and the Earth and 
Environmental Systems Sciences Division within the Office of 
Science's Biological and Environmental Research (BER) program. 
Within BES, the hearing focused on initiatives to advance 
material and chemical sciences research for a broad range of 
energy applications. Climate and environmental systems research 
and its importance to understanding and reducing the threat of 
climate change were examined, including the integration of 
socioeconomic factors. The hearing considered the expansion of 
access to user facilities, collaboration with industry, and 
approaches to bridging knowledge gaps to solve our nation's 
most pressing energy needs. Finally, the hearing examined ways 
that Congress and the Administration should consider directing 
the activities of these programs going forward.
    Witnesses:
           Dr. Kristin Persson, Director, Molecular 
        Foundry, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
           Dr. Fikile Brushett, Associate Professor of 
        Chemical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of 
        Technology
           Dr. Esther Takeuchi, Chair, 
        Interdisciplinary Science Department, Brookhaven 
        National Laboratory
           Dr. Xubin Zeng, Professor, Hydrology and 
        Atmospheric Sciences, The University of Arizona
           Dr. Narasimha Rao, Associate Professor of 
        Energy Systems, Yale School of the Environment

                     (c) Hearing Volume No. 117-16


May 19, 2021

SUBCOMMITTEE HEARING: ACCELERATING DISCOVERY: THE FUTURE OF SCIENTIFIC 
                 COMPUTING AT THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

    The purpose of this hearing was to explore the unique 
scientific computing capabilities of the Department of Energy 
(DOE), including the forthcoming exascale systems, and to 
discuss the implications of these capabilities for other 
scientific disciplines and their relevance to pressing societal 
challenges. In addition, the Subcommittee used the hearing to 
understand the role of DOE research and workforce development 
programs in driving innovation in scientific computing, 
especially in light of advancements in artificial intelligence, 
quantum science, neuromorphic computing, and other new and 
emerging capabilities and computing paradigms. The hearing 
examined ways in which Congress can contribute to DOE's 
scientific computing mission.
    Witnesses:
           Dr. J. Stephen Binkley, Acting Director, 
        Office of Science, Department of Energy
           Dr. Georgia (Gina) Tourassi, Director, 
        National Center for Computational Sciences, Oak Ridge 
        National Laboratory
           Dr. Karen Willcox, Director, Oden Institute 
        for Computational Sciences and Associate Vice President 
        for Research, University of Texas at Austin
           Dr. Christopher Monroe, Co-Founder and Chief 
        Scientist, IonQ, Inc.
           Dr. Seny Kamara, Associate Professor of 
        Computer Science, Brown University

                     (d) Hearing Volume No. 117-25


July 16, 2021

      SUBCOMMITTEE HEARING: FOSTERING EQUITY IN ENERGY INNOVATION

    The purpose of this hearing was to examine best practices 
in clean energy research, development, demonstration, and 
commercial application activities to pursue an equitable energy 
transition for frontline and marginalized communities. 
Witnesses and members discussed how to ingrain equity within 
early research processes to enable the development of equitable 
energy solutions. The hearing also examined ways that Congress 
and the Administration should consider directing the Department 
of Energy's role in fostering equity within the agency's energy 
innovation activities and programs.
    Witnesses:
           Dr. Dan Kammen, Distinguished Professor of 
        Energy, University of California, Berkeley
           Dr. Myles Lennon, Professor of Environment 
        and Society and Anthropology, Brown University
           Dr. Shobita Parthasarathy, Professor of 
        Public Policy and Director, Science, Technology, and 
        Public Policy program, University of Michigan
           Mr. Bruno Grunau, Regional Director of 
        NREL's Cold Climate Housing Research Center (CCHRC) in 
        Fairbanks, Alaska

                     (e) Hearing Volume No. 117-38


November 17, 2021

SUBCOMMITTEE HEARING: FOSTERING A NEW ERA OF FUSION ENERGY RESEARCH AND 
                         TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT

    The purpose of this hearing was to examine the current 
status of fusion energy research and development (R&D) 
activities carried out by the U.S. Department of Energy, the 
private sector, and internationally. The hearing also 
considered next steps for Congress and the Administration to 
take in response to recent reports from the Fusion Energy 
Sciences Advisory Committee and the National Academies that 
provide roadmaps for fusion energy R&D and commercialization 
pathways over the next decade and beyond.
    Witnesses:
           Dr. Troy Carter, Director, Plasma Science 
        and Technology Institute, University of California, Los 
        Angeles and Chair, Fusion Energy Sciences Advisory 
        Committee Long Range Planning Subcommittee
           Dr. Tammy Ma, Program Element Leader for 
        High Energy Density Science, Lawrence Livermore 
        National Laboratory
           Dr. Robert Mumgaard, CEO, Commonwealth 
        Fusion Systems
           Dr. Kathryn McCarthy, Director, U.S. ITER 
        Project Office
           Dr. Steven Cowley, Director, Princeton 
        Plasma Physics Laboratory

                     (f) Hearing Volume No. 117-45


February 17, 2022

SUBCOMMITTEE HEARING: H2SUCCESS: RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT TO ADVANCE A 
                         CLEAN HYDROGEN FUTURE

    The purpose of this hearing was to examine the state of 
hydrogen research and development in the United States. 
Witnesses and Members discussed hydrogen research, development, 
and demonstration activities as they relate to the advancement 
of clean hydrogen, including production, storage, 
transportation, and utilization. The role of hydrogen in the 
decarbonization of energy and industrial sectors, as well as 
opportunities and challenges for hydrogen deployment and 
utilization was also discussed. The hearing examined potential 
strategies for this Committee to direct the activities of the 
Department of Energy's (DOE's) Hydrogen and Fuel Cell 
Technologies Office.
    Witnesses:
           Mr. Keith Wipke, Laboratory Program Manager, 
        Fuel Cell and Hydrogen Technologies Program, National 
        Renewable Energy Laboratory
           Dr. Julio Friedmann, Chief Scientist and 
        Head Carbon Wrangler, Carbon Direct
           Ms. Rachel Fakhry, Senior Advocate, Climate 
        and Clean Energy Program, Natural Resources Defense 
        Council
           Dr. Tomas Diaz de la Rubia, Vice President 
        for Research and Partnerships, University of Oklahoma
           Mr. Sheldon Kimber, Chief Executive Officer 
        and Co-Founder, Intersect Power

                     (g) Hearing Volume No. 117-48


March 16, 2022

SUBCOMMITTEE HEARING: BIOENERGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT FOR THE FUELS 
                       AND CHEMICALS OF TOMORROW

    The purpose of this hearing was to examine the status of 
bioenergy research, development, and demonstration (RD&D) 
activities carried out by the U.S. Department of Energy. The 
hearing also considered advancements in bioenergy research and 
the potential role of this resource in a cleaner energy 
transition. Lastly, the hearing helped inform future 
legislation to support and guide the U.S.'s bioenergy RD&D 
enterprise.
    Witnesses:
           Dr. Jonathan Male, Chief Scientist for 
        Energy Processes and Materials, Pacific Northwest 
        National Laboratory (PNNL)
           Dr. Andrew Leakey, Director of the Center 
        for Advanced Bioenergy and Bioproducts Innovation at 
        the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
           Dr. Laurel Harmon, Vice President of 
        Government Affairs, LanzaTech
           Dr. Eric Hegg, Professor, Biochemistry and 
        Molecular Biology, Michigan State University

                     (h) Hearing Volume No. 117-54


April 27, 2022

SUBCOMMITTEE HEARING: SCIENCE AND ENERGY RESEARCH INFRASTRUCTURE NEEDS 
                    OF THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

    The purpose of this hearing was to examine the goals and 
impacts of the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Fiscal Year 
(FY) 2023 budget request, with a primary focus on budget 
planning and management of construction of the DOE Office of 
Science's (SC) user facilities, experiments, and upgrades. 
There were additional questioning about the research, 
development, demonstration, and commercialization programs and 
activities carried out by DOE.
    Witness:
          Dr. Geraldine Richmond, Under Secretary for Science 
        and Innovation, U.S. Department of Energy

                     (i) Hearing Volume No. 117-61


Jun 22, 2022

   SUBCOMMITTEE HEARING: INVESTIGATING THE NATURE OF MATTER, ENERGY, 
                            SPACE, AND TIME

    The Subcommittee's hearing was to examine two major 
components of the Department of Energy's Office of Science: the 
High Energy Physics (HEP) program and the Nuclear Physics (NP) 
program. The Isotope Program and potential impacts and supply 
shortages due to the Russia-Ukraine conflict and the 
development of accelerator technology through the Accelerator 
R&D and Production program were also discussed. The hearing 
focused on initiatives to advance foundational research on the 
nature of matter, energy, and the cosmos; the construction and 
operation of large-scale experiments and unique user 
facilities; and the relevance of these research areas to the 
development of accelerator technologies, isotope production, 
and other applications. The centrality of these activities to 
U.S. preeminence in particle and nuclear physics, and to 
isotope research and supply, was also highlighted. Finally, the 
hearing examined ways that Congress and the Administration 
should consider directing the activities of these programs 
going forward.
    Witnesses:
           Dr. Asmeret Berhe, Director, Office of 
        Science, Department of Energy Professor Brian Greene, 
        Director, Center for Theoretical Physics, Columbia 
        University
           Dr. Lia Merminga, Director, Fermi National 
        Accelerator Laboratory
           Mr. Jim Yeck, Associate Laboratory Director 
        and Project Director, Electron-Ion Collider, Brookhaven 
        National Laboratory
           Mr. Michael Guastella, Executive Director, 
        Council on Radionuclides and Radiopharmaceuticals, Inc.

                     (j) Hearing Volume No. 117-64


July 13, 2022

 SUBCOMMITTEE HEARING NUCLEAR WASTE CLEANUP: RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT 
 OPPORTUNITIES FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY'S OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL 
                               MANAGEMENT

    The purpose of this hearing was to evaluate the Department 
of Energy's approach to research and development on new 
strategies and technologies to support the nuclear waste 
cleanup mission of its Office of Environmental Management (EM). 
Members and witnesses considered how better coordination and 
focused research investments at the Department could 
potentially reduce lifecycle costs and expedite schedules for 
both defense and non-defense environmental remediation around 
over a dozen Environmental Management sites.
    Witnesses:
           Mr. William ``Ike'' White, Senior Advisor, 
        Office of Environmental Management, U.S. Department of 
        Energy
           Dr. Vahid Majidi, Executive Vice President 
        and Director, Savannah River National Laboratory
           Dr. John Plodinec, Vice Chair, Committee on 
        the Independent Assessment of Science and Technology 
        for the Department of Energy's Defense Environmental 
        Cleanup
           Program, National Academies of Sciences, 
        Engineering, and Medicine
           Mr. Nathan Anderson, Director, Natural 
        Resources and Environment, U.S. Government 
        Accountability Office

          3.3 Hearings Before the Subcommittee on Environment


                      (a) Hearing Volume No. 117-9


Wednesday, April 21, 2021

 SUBCOMMITTEE ON ENVIRONMENT HEARING: WORKING TOWARDS CLIMATE EQUITY: 
                 THE CASE FOR A FEDERAL CLIMATE SERVICE

    The purpose of this hearing was to highlight the need for a 
strengthened Federal role in climate risk information. The 
hearing showcased the diverse constituencies urging improved 
investment in and coordination of Federal climate risk 
information, with a spotlight on local community planners, 
frontline communities, and adaptation professionals. The 
hearing was an opportunity to discuss the availability of 
climate information that impacts local decision-making, such as 
designing new roads, bridges, and dams, and implementing flood 
control projects. It also examined the current, fragmented 
landscape of Federal programs and nonfederal services that 
translate global climate data and model outputs to decision-
relevant information for adaptation and resilience planning.
    Witnesses:
           Richard Moss, PhD Senior Scientist, Pacific 
        Northwest National Laboratory's Joint Global Change 
        Research Institute at the University of Maryland, 
        Chair, Convening Board, SCAN, and Non-Resident Fellow, 
        Andlinger Center, Princeton University
           Ms. Beth Gibbons, Executive Director, 
        American Society of Adaptation Professionals
           Jeffrey B. Basara, PhD Director, Kessler 
        Atmospheric and Ecological Field Station, Executive 
        Associate Director, Hydrology and Water Security 
        Program, University of Oklahoma
           Ms. Liz Williams Russell, Climate Justice 
        Program Director, Foundation for Louisiana

                     (b) Hearing Volume No. 117-19


Monday, June 7, 2021

 SUBCOMMITTEE ON ENVIRONMENT HEARING: DEFINING A NATIONAL `OCEANSHOT': 
       ACCELERATING OCEAN AND GREAT LAKES SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY

    The purpose of this hearing was to discuss the importance 
of ocean, coastal, and Great Lakes research in the U.S., the 
science that needs to be done most urgently, and how we can 
point Federal investments in that direction. This hearing was 
an opportunity to hear from experts on innovative ideas for 
advancing ocean, coastal, and Great Lakes science and 
technology (S&T) and defining a national ``oceanshot'' as part 
of the U.S.'s participation and leadership in the UN Decade of 
Ocean Science for Sustainable Development (2021-2030). The 
hearing also discussed the importance of building a more 
diverse, equitable, and inclusive ocean, coastal, and Great 
Lakes science enterprise to underpin more creative and 
collaborative solutions. This hearing was timed to celebrate 
World Ocean Month in June and World Ocean Day on June 8.
    Witnesses:
           Mr. Craig McLean, Assistant Administrator 
        for Oceanic and Atmospheric Research and Acting Chief 
        Scientist, National Oceanic and Atmospheric 
        Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce
           Dr. Margaret Leinen, Vice Chancellor, Marine 
        Sciences, Director, Scripps Institution of Oceanography
           Dr. Michael P. Crosby, President & CEO, Mote 
        Marine Laboratory
           Dr. Robert D. Ballard, President, Ocean 
        Exploration Trust, Explorer-at-Large, National 
        Geographic Society

                     (c) Hearing Volume No. 117-27


Wednesday, July 21, 2021

SUBCOMMITTEE ON ENVIRONMENT HEARING: SILENT KILLER: THE RISING PROBLEM 
                      OF EXTREME HEAT IN THE U.S.

    This hearing provided an opportunity to discuss the state 
of our understanding of extreme heat events across the U.S., 
and touch on urban heat islands, the role of climate change, 
and impacts to public health. The Subcommittee also examined 
research gaps and additional Federal research, coordination, 
and monitoring needed to improve the U.S. response to extreme 
heat.
    Witnesses:
           Dr. Vivek Shandas, Ph.D., Professor, Nohad 
        A. Toulan School of Urban Studies and Planning, Founder 
        and Director, Sustaining Urban Places Research Lab, 
        Portland State University
           Dr. Melissa Guardaro, Ph.D., Assistant 
        Professor, Healthy Urban Environments & Knowledge 
        Exchange for Resilience, Global Institute of 
        Sustainability and Innovation, Arizona State University
           Mr. Shimon Elkabetz, CEO, Co-Founder, 
        Tomorrow.io
           Dr. Aaron Bernstein, MD, MPH, Interim 
        Director, The Center for Climate, Health, and the 
        Global Environment, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public 
        Health, Pediatrician, Boston Children's Hospital, 
        Fellow, Adrienne Arsht--Rockefeller Foundation 
        Resilience Center

                     (d) Hearing Volume No. 117-30


Thursday, September 23, 2021

SUBCOMMITTEE ON ENVIRONMENT HEARING: ADVANCING EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCE AND 
                          STEWARDSHIP AT NOAA

    The purpose of this hearing was to discuss the 
Administration's priorities for the National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) as they relate to climate 
science and services; scientific integrity; the scientific 
workforce; weather, water, and climate research and 
forecasting; and other issues within the Science Committee's 
jurisdiction. This hearing was an opportunity for Members to 
discuss their priorities related to the agency's mission.
    Witnesses:
          The Honorable Richard W. Spinrad, Ph.D., Under 
        Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere, and 
        Administrator, National Oceanic and Atmospheric 
        Administration

                     (e) Hearing Volume No. 117-41


Tuesday, December 7, 2021

   JOINT SUBCOMMITTEE ON ENVIRONMENT AND SUBCOMMITTEE ON RESEARCH & 
  TECHNOLOGY HEARING: FOREVER CHEMICALS: RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT FOR 
                      ADDRESSING THE PFAS PROBLEM

    The purpose of this hearing was to discuss the role of 
federal research and development to better understand the class 
of man-made chemicals known as per- and polyfluoroalkyl 
substances (PFAS). There remains much uncertainty surrounding 
their toxicity and human health effects, how to safely and 
effectively remove them from the environment, and how to detect 
and quantify the thousands of different PFAS compounds that 
exist. The hearing provided an opportunity to explore gaps in 
federal research efforts, methods for improved interagency 
coordination, opportunities to collaborate with state 
governments and non-government entities, and ideas for 
improving public understanding and education about PFAS. While 
there is a lot of attention on regulation and remediation of 
PFAS, there remains a great deal of work to better understand 
PFAS chemicals and the role the federal government can play to 
support the development of detection, monitoring, treatment, 
and destruction methods and technologies.
    Witnesses:
           Dr. Elsie Sunderland, Gordon McKay Professor 
        of Environmental Chemistry, Harvard John A. Paulson 
        School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard 
        T.H. Chan School of Public Health
           Ms. Abigail Hendershott, Executive Director, 
        Michigan PFAS Action Response Team (MPART)
           Ms. Amy Dindal, Director of Environmental 
        Research and Development, Battelle Memorial Institute
           Dr. Peter Jaffe, Professor, Department of 
        Civil and Environmental Engineering, Princeton 
        University

                     (f) Hearing Volume No. 117-46


Wednesday, March 2, 2022

SUBCOMMITTEE ON ENVIRONMENT HEARING: FROM GRAY TO GREEN: ADVANCING THE 
                 SCIENCE OF NATURE-BASED INFRASTRUCTURE

    This hearing provided an opportunity to discuss the state 
of the science related to nature-based infrastructure. The 
Subcommittee considered the environmental, economic, and social 
co-benefits of nature-based infrastructure and its contribution 
to resilient communities. Members had the opportunity to 
discuss the co-benefits of nature-based infrastructure and the 
research, development, and long-term monitoring needed to 
quantify these co-benefits. Finally, the Subcommittee examined 
research gaps and additional federal coordination, investment, 
and engagement needed to support the implementation of nature-
based infrastructure.
    Witnesses:
           Dr. Steven Thur, Director, National Centers 
        for Coastal Ocean Service, National Oceanic and 
        Atmospheric Administration
           Dr. Sherry Hunt, Supervisory Civil Engineer, 
        Agriculture Research Service, U.S. Department of 
        Agriculture
           Dr. Todd Bridges, Senior Research Scientist, 
        Environmental Science, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

                      (g) Hearing Volume No.117-58


Tuesday, June 14, 2022

SUBCOMMITTEE ON ENVIRONMENT HEARING: WHAT'S THE FORECAST: A LOOK AT THE 
                       FUTURE OF WEATHER RESEARCH

    This hearing provided an opportunity to discuss the highest 
priority investments needed for weather research and 
development over the next decade, as described in the National 
Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Science Advisory 
Board (SAB)'s ``Priorities for Weather Research'' report. This 
discussion included perspectives from the U.S. Weather 
Enterprise, comprised of public, private, and academic 
partners. This hearing also examined how investments in weather 
research and development can protect critical infrastructure, 
life, property, and enhance equity in the provision of weather 
services, while supporting the national economy.
    Witnesses:
           Dr. Scott Glenn, Board of Governors 
        Professor, Center for Ocean Observing Leadership of the 
        Department of Marine and Coastal Sciences, Rutgers 
        University
           Dr. Bradley Colman, President-Elect of the 
        American Meteorological Society; Director of Weather-
        Strategy, Bayer & The Climate Corporation
           Dr. Frederick H. Carr, Professor Emeritus, 
        School of Meteorology, University of Oklahoma
           Dr. Kevin R. Petty, VP, Weather and Earth 
        Intelligence, Spire Global, Inc.

                     (h) Hearing Volume No. 117-62


Thursday, June 23, 2022

   JOINT SUBCOMMITTEE ON ENVIRONMENT AND SUBCOMMITTEE ON RESEARCH & 
TECHNOLOGY HEARING: ASSESSING FEDERAL PROGRAMS FOR MEASURING GREENHOUSE 
                         GAS SOURCES AND SINKS

    The purpose of this hearing was to explore federal programs 
focused on monitoring, measuring, and verifying sources and 
sinks of greenhouse gas emissions (ghgs). the committee 
examined data and measurement challenges as well as research 
gaps related to improving ghg monitoring, measurement, and 
verification. finally, the committee discussed the measurement 
tools, methods, and standards that can enable industries and 
governments to have the information they need to manage 
emissions effectively and where congress should focus efforts 
to improve ghg monitoring, measurement, and verification.
    Witnesses:
           Dr. Eric K. Lin, Director, Material 
        Measurement Laboratory, National Institute of Standards 
        and Technology
           Dr. Ariel Stein, Acting Director, Global 
        Monitoring Laboratory and Director, Air Resources 
        Laboratory, National Oceanic and Atmospheric 
        Administration
           Dr. Karen St. Germain, Earth Science 
        Division Director, Science Mission Directorate, 
        National Aeronautics and Space Administration
           Dr. Bryan Hubbell, National Program Director 
        for Air, Climate, and Energy, Office of Research and 
        Development, United States Environmental Protection 
        Agency

                     (i) Hearing Volume No. 117-69


Wednesday, September 21, 2022

     JOINT SUBCOMMITTEE ON ENVIRONMENT AND SUBCOMMITTEE ON SPACE & 
   AERONAUTICS HEARING: LOOKING BACK TO PREDICT THE FUTURE: THE NEXT 
                    GENERATION OF WEATHER SATELLITES

    This hearing provided an opportunity to discuss the 
partnership between the national oceanic and atmospheric 
administration (noaa) and national aeronautics and space 
administration (nasa) in the development, testing, acquisition, 
launch and management of noaa's operational weather satellite 
programs. furthermore, this hearing examined how lessons 
learned from past challenges in recent weather satellite 
programs are being incorporated into the future goals, 
architecture, and capabilities for the next generation of 
weather satellites.
    Witnesses:
           Dr. Stephen Volz, Assistant Administrator, 
        National Environmental Satellite, Data, and Information 
        Services, NOAA
           Mr. John Gagosian, Joint Agency Satellite 
        Division Director, NASA
           Mr. Fred Meny, Assistant Inspector General 
        for Audit and Evaluation, U.S. Department of Commerce, 
        Office of Inspector General

  3.4 Hearings Before the Subcommittee on Investigations and Oversight


                      (a) Hearing Volume No. 117-4


March 17, 2021

 SUBCOMMITTEE HEARING: BRAIN DRAIN: REBUILDING THE FEDERAL SCIENTIFIC 
                               WORKFORCE

    The purpose of this hearing was to assess recent widespread 
departures of career scientists from the Federal Government. 
The Subcommittee examined the cause and extent of the 
employment decline within the federal scientific workforce, as 
well as the implications of a smaller scientific workforce for 
science-based agencies. The Subcommittee also discussed 
potential policies to rebuild federal scientific capacity.
    Witnesses:
           Ms. Candice Wright, Acting Director, 
        Science, Technology Assessment, and Analytics, U.S. 
        Government Accountability Office
           Mr. Max Stier, President and CEO,Partnership 
        for Public Service
           Dr. Andrew Rosenberg, Director of the Center 
        for Science and Democracy, Union of Concerned 
        Scientists
           Dr. Betsy Southerland, Former Director of 
        Science and Technology, Office of Water, Environmental 
        Protection Agency.

                     (b) Hearing Volume No. 117-14


May 12, 2021

  SUBCOMMITTEE HEARING: COVID-19 VARIANTS AND EVOLVING RESEARCH NEEDS

    The purpose of this hearing was to discuss how variants 
develop, how researchers identify and sequence variants, and 
how this information can be utilized by public health 
officials, government agencies, and medical practitioners to 
make decisions. The hearing examined the ways the Federal 
government can meet the research and forecasting needs that 
evolve as the virus continues to mutate. Members and witnesses 
discussed how the federal government can better coordinate its 
approach to best serve the American people through the COVID-19 
pandemic and beyond.
    Witnesses:
           Dr. Salim Abdool Karim, Director, Center for 
        the Aids Programme of Research in South Africa 
        (CAPRISA)
           Dr. Nathan Grubaugh, Assistant Professor of 
        Epidemiology, Yale School of Public Health
           Dr. Stephen Streiffer, Deputy Laboratory 
        Director for Science and Technology, Argonne National 
        Laboratory
           Dr. Caitlin Rivers, Senior Scholar, Johns 
        Hopkins Center for Health Security.

                     (c) Hearing Volume No. 117-17


May 25, 2021

 JOINT SUBCOMMITTEE HEARING, INVESTIGATIONS AND OVERSIGHT SUBCOMMITTEE 
LEAD, WITH RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY SUBCOMMITTEE: SOLARWINDS AND BEYOND: 
         IMPROVING THE CYBERSECURITY OF SOFTWARE SUPPLY CHAINS

    The purpose of this hearing was to examine the causes and 
impacts of recent supply chain attacks on Federal agencies, 
explore how Federal agencies currently mitigate their software 
supply chain risks, and consider how best to improve software 
supply chain security. The Subcommittees examined the 
challenges of Federal agency compliance with standards and best 
practices and heard recommendations on next steps to secure the 
software supply chain for Federal agencies, especially through 
improvements to the efficacy of guidance provided by the 
National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). The 
Subcommittees further explored how the Federal Government can 
help facilitate the adoption of supply chain standards and best 
practices within the private sector.
    Witnesses:
           Mr. Matthew Scholl, Chief, Computer Security 
        Division of the Information Technology Laboratory, NIST
           Dr. Trey Herr, Director, Cyber Statecraft 
        Initiative, the Atlantic Council
           Ms. Katie Moussouris, Founder and CEO, Luta 
        Security
           Mr. Vijay D'Souza, Director, Information 
        Technology and Cybersecurity, U.S. Government 
        Accountability Office.

                     (d) Hearing Volume No. 117-24


July 14, 2021

 SUBCOMMITTEE HEARING: PRINCIPLES FOR OUTBREAK INVESTIGATION: COVID-19 
                     AND FUTURE INFECTIOUS DISEASES

    The purpose of this hearing was to discuss the principles 
for investigating infectious disease outbreaks in the context 
of public interest in the origins of covid-19. the hearing 
considered how infectious diseases normally emerge; how 
understanding disease origins helps protect public health; 
methods for tracing outbreaks to a discrete origin; the 
scientific datasets and access that investigators need; and the 
principles for transparency, scientific integrity, objectivity, 
and public communication that accompany an ideal outbreak 
investigation.
    Witnesses:
           Dr. David Relman, Thomas C. and Joan M. 
        Merigan, Professor, Stanford University School of 
        Medicine, and Senior Fellow, Center for International 
        Security and Cooperation, Stanford University
           Dr. Stanley Perlman, Professor of 
        Microbiology and Immunology, the University of Iowa
           Dr. Connie Price, Chief Medical Officer, 
        Denver Health, and Professor of Medicine, Division of 
        Infectious Diseases, University of Colorado School of 
        Medicine
           Dr. Suzan Murray, Program Director, 
        Smithsonian Global Health Program, Smithsonian National 
        Zoo & Conservation Biology Institute

                     (e) Hearing Volume No. 117-31


September 28, 2021

SUBCOMMITTEE HEARING: THE DISINFORMATION BLACK BOX: RESEARCHING SOCIAL 
                               MEDIA DATA

    The purpose of this hearing was to discuss how researchers 
are able to access and analyze data from social media 
companies. Researchers testified about their work looking into 
the spread of misinformation and disinformation on social media 
platforms and how platforms drive traffic to advertisements and 
promoted posts. The hearing also explored the limitations of 
current tools, techniques, and datasets for researching social 
media platforms and how researchers have utilized information 
available to advertisers to flag privacy concerns to the 
platforms. The hearing examined how the Federal government can 
contribute to the ethical study of social media's impact on 
society while protecting the privacy of users.
    Witnesses:
           Dr. Alan Mislove, Professor and Interim 
        Dean, Khoury College of Computer Sciences, Northeastern 
        University
           Ms. Laura Edelson, Ph.D. Candidate and Co-
        Director, Cybersecurity for Democracy at New York 
        University
           Dr. Kevin Leicht, Professor, Department of 
        Sociology at the University of Illinois Urbana-
        Champaign

                     (f) Hearing Volume No. 117-33


October 5, 2021

 JOINT SUBCOMMITTEE HEARING, INVESTIGATIONS AND OVERSIGHT SUBCOMMITTEE 
LEAD, WITH RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY SUBCOMMITTEE: BALANCING OPEN SCIENCE 
              AND SECURITY IN THE U.S. RESEARCH ENTERPRISE

    The purpose of this hearing was to explore the risks to 
research integrity and security posed by undue foreign 
influence in the u.s. research enterprise. the subcommittees 
examined ongoing efforts at universities and federal science 
agencies to address these risks and the need for additional 
clarity regarding the scale and scope of the risks and best 
practices for securing federally funded fundamental research. 
they also discussed the risks of overcorrection, including the 
impact on researchers, institutions, and the competitiveness of 
the u.s. research enterprise.
    Witnesses:
           Dr. Maria Zuber, Co-Chair, National Science, 
        Technology, and Security Roundtable, National Academies 
        of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; Vice President 
        for Research and E. A. Griswold Professor of 
        Geophysics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
           Ms. Candice Wright Director, Science, 
        Technology Assessment, and Analytics, U.S. Government 
        Accountability Office
           Ms. Allison Lerner, Inspector General, 
        National Science Foundation
           Dr. Xiaoxing Xi, Laura H. Carnell Professor 
        of Physics, Temple University.

                     (g) Hearing Volume No. 117-36


October 21, 2021

 JOINT SUBCOMMITTEE HEARING, INVESTIGATIONS AND OVERSIGHT SUBCOMMITTEE 
LEAD, WITH ENERGY SUBCOMMITTEE: JUDICIOUS SPENDING TO ENABLE SUCCESS AT 
                      THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR ENERGY

    The purpose of this hearing was to discuss several 
financial assistance awards made by the Department of Energy's 
Office of Nuclear Energy on a non-competitive basis. The 
Members and Witnesses discussed best practices and principles 
for financial assistance agreements and contracting, including 
maximizing competition, limiting risk to the taxpayer, and 
informing spending decisions with technical and market analysis 
and documentation. The hearing sought to understand priorities 
of the Office of Nuclear Energy and discuss steps taken to date 
to carry out the relevant directions and authorizations 
provided in the Energy Act of 2020.
    Witnesses:
           Dr. Katy Huff, Acting Assistant Secretary, 
        Office of Nuclear Energy, U.S. Department of Energy
           Ms. Amy Roma, Founding Member, Nuclear 
        Energy and National Security Coalition, Atlantic 
        Council, and Partner, Hogan Lovells US LLP
           Dr. Todd Allen, Director, Michigan Memorial 
        Phoenix Project and Glenn F. andGladysH. Knoll 
        Department Chair of Nuclear Engineering and 
        Radiological Sciences, University of Michigan
           Mr. Scott Amey, General Counsel and 
        Executive Editorial Director, Project on Government 
        Oversight

                     (h) Hearing Volume No. 117-51


March 31, 2022

SUBCOMMITTEE HEARING: THE NEW NORMAL: PREPARING FOR AND ADAPTING TO THE 
                         NEXT PHASE OF COVID-19

    The purpose of this hearing was to discuss how research, 
data, and coordination efforts must evolve as COVID-19 surges 
ebb and flow. The hearing examined existing gaps in data and 
public health preparedness as we entered the third year of the 
pandemic in the United States. Members and witnesses discussed 
how the federal government can scale up data collection and 
communication to detect surges and variants as early as 
possible, and how federal guidance can best reflect the 
evolving threat of COVID-19 while minimizing social disruption.
    Witnesses:
           Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel, Vice Provost for Global 
        Initiatives, Co-Director of the Healthcare 
        Transformation Institute, and Levy University Professor 
        at the Perelman School of Medicine and The Wharton 
        School of the University of Pennsylvania
           Ms. Karen Ayala, Executive Director, DuPage 
        County Board of Health
           Dr. Lucy McBride, Practicing Primary Care 
        Physician in Washington, DC,
           Dr. Mariana Matus, CEO and Co-Founder, 
        Biobot Analytics.

                     (i) Hearing Volume No. 117-57


April 21, 2022

   SUBCOMMITTEE FIELD HEARING: PEDAL TO THE METAL: ELECTRIC VEHICLE 
            BATTERIES AND THE CRITICAL MINERALS SUPPLY CHAIN

    The purpose of this hearing was to discuss the expected 
surge in demand for electric vehicle (ev) batteries over the 
next decade and consider the implications for critical minerals 
required in ev battery manufacturing, including cobalt, 
lithium, nickel, graphite, and manganese. the members and 
witnesses considered research opportunities to mitigate 
potential supply chain concerns, including new technologies for 
minerals extraction and processing, minerals recycling, and 
alternative battery chemistries. they also explored strategies 
to maximize the research, development, and demonstration 
investments already being supported by the department of energy 
(doe) pursuant to the energy act of 2020 and the infrastructure 
investment and jobs act (iija).
    Witnesses:
           Mr. Nate Baguio, Senior Vice President of 
        Commercial Development, Lion Electric Company
           Mr. Chris Nevers, Senior Director of Public 
        Policy, Rivian
           Dr. Venkat Srinivasan, Deputy Director of 
        the Joint Center for Energy Storage Research (JCESR) 
        and Director of the Argonne Collaborative Center for 
        Energy Storage Science (ACCESS), Argonne National 
        Laboratory
           Dr. Chibueze Amanchukwu, Neubauer Family 
        Assistant Professor of Molecular Engineering, 
        University of Chicago.

                     (j) Hearing Volume No. 117-56


May 11, 2022

 JOINT SUBCOMMITTEE HEARING, INVESTIGATIONS AND OVERSIGHT SUBCOMMITTEE 
 LEAD, WITH RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY SUBCOMMITTEE: SECURING THE DIGITAL 
              COMMONS: OPEN-SOURCE SOFTWARE CYBERSECURITY

    The purpose of this hearing was to discuss the unique 
benefits and risks inherent in open-source software, and to 
explore the ways in which industry and government can 
collaborate to enhance open-source cybersecurity. The hearing 
examined recent open-source software hacks and subsequent 
efforts to improve security for the development and deployment 
of open-sourced software. Members and witnesses discussed the 
Federal role in improving open-source cybersecurity, 
particularly at the National Institute of Standards and 
Technology (NIST). Finally, the hearing explored the use and 
potential misuse of open-source software in the development of 
critical technologies, including artificial intelligence (AI).
    Witnesses:
           Ms. Lauren Knausenberger, Chief Information 
        Officer, Department of the Air Force
           Mr. Brian Behlendorf, General Manager, Open 
        Source Security Foundation
           Ms. Amelie Erin Koran, Non-Resident Senior 
        Fellow, Atlantic Council
           Dr. Andrew Lohn, Senior Fellow, Center for 
        Security and Emerging Technology, Georgetown University

                     (k) Hearing Volume No. 117-63


June 29, 2022

         SUBCOMMITTEE HEARING: PRIVACY IN THE AGE OF BIOMETRICS

    The purpose of this hearing was to evaluate the privacy 
implications of biometrics technologies. The hearing sought to 
define the problem space for privacy and biometrics and 
technical strategies for balancing privacy and security based 
on use cases. Members and witnesses discussed research 
opportunities in privacy enhancing technologies for biometric 
applications and their potential to address privacy risks. They 
considered a recent high-profile court case involving facial 
recognition technology and the privacy risks of its use without 
appropriate guardrails. They also reviewed the current Federal 
uses of biometric technologies and discussed strategies to 
ensure appropriate privacy protections in those applications.
    Witnesses:
           Ms. Candice Wright, Director, Science, 
        Technology Assessment, and Analytics, U.S. Government 
        Accountability Office
           Dr. Charles H. Romine, Director, Information 
        Technology Laboratory, National Institute of Standards 
        and Technology
           Dr. Arun Ross, Professor, Department of 
        Computer Science and Engineering, Michigan State 
        University; Site Director, NSF Center for 
        Identification Technology Research.

                     (l) Hearing Volume No. 117-65


July 20, 2022

 SUBCOMMITTEE HEARING: PAPER MILLS AND RESEARCH MISCONDUCT: FACING THE 
                  CHALLENGES OF SCIENTIFIC PUBLISHING

    The purpose of this hearing was to discuss the current and 
future challenges in securing scientific literature from 
fraudulent academic papers. The hearing examined field-specific 
and industry-wide strategies for identifying fraud, the 
increasing number of fraudulent papers produced and sold by 
paper mills, and the impact of new technologies such as AI on 
both the perpetration and the detection of research misconduct. 
Members and witnesses discussed the successes of the largely 
volunteer post-publication review community, the challenges 
that community has faced, and the strategies publishers 
themselves are developing to combat research misconduct.
    Witnesses:
           Dr. Jennifer Byrne, Director of Biobanking, 
        New South Wales Health Pathology; Professor of 
        Molecular Oncology, University of Sydney
           Mr. Chris Graf, Research Integrity Director, 
        Springer Nature; Chair of the Governance Board, STM 
        Association Integrity Hub
           Dr. Brandon Stell, Neuroscientist, French 
        National Centre for Scientific Research; President and 
        Co-Founder, The PubPeer Foundation.

                     (m) Hearing Volume No. 117-67


September 15, 2022

   SUBCOMMITTEE HEARING: THE FOUNTAIN OF YOUTH? THE QUEST FOR AGING 
                               THERAPIES

    The purpose of this hearing was to discuss the state of 
geroscience, the study of aging and age-related diseases, and 
leading research efforts to develop therapeutic interventions 
that target aging and age-related diseases. The hearing 
examined the ethical and societal implications that may result 
as aging therapies grow closer to commercial readiness. It also 
considered the role of the federal government and barriers that 
may be affecting the research effort.
    Witnesses:
           Dr. Jay Olshansky, Professor of Public 
        Health, University of Chicago
           Dr. Laura Niedernhofer, Director, Institute 
        on the Biology of Aging and Metabolism; Medical 
        Discovery Team on the Biology of Aging; Professor, 
        Department of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology and 
        Biophysics, University of Minnesota
           Dr. Steve Horvath, Principal Investigator, 
        Altos Labs.

    3.5 Hearings Before the Subcommittee on Research and Technology


                     (a) Hearing Volume No. 117-10


April 28, 2021

    RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY SUBCOMMITTEE HEARING: NATIONAL SCIENCE 
    FOUNDATION: ADVANCING RESEARCH FOR THE FUTURE OF U.S. INNOVATION

    The purpose of this hearing was to discuss opportunities 
and challenges for leveraging and expanding the National 
Science Foundation mission to continue to advance excellent 
research; improve STEM education and research training; 
increase research accessibility, accountability, and security; 
and accelerate research to address major societal challenges. 
The Subcommittee considered the merits of the National Science 
Foundation for the Future Act for addressing such opportunities 
and challenges and examined the Administration's Fiscal Year 
2022 budget request for the National Science Foundation.
    Witnesses:
           Dr. Sethuraman Panchanathan, Director, 
        National Science Foundation
           Dr. Ellen Ochoa, Chair, National Science 
        Board

                     (b) Hearing Volume No. 117-13


May 6, 2021

    RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY SUBCOMMITTEE HEARING: NATIONAL SCIENCE 
 FOUNDATION: ADVANCING RESEARCH FOR THE FUTURE OF U.S. INNOVATION PART 
                                   II

    The purpose of this hearing was to discuss opportunities 
and challenges for leveraging and expanding the National 
Science Foundation mission to continue to advance excellent 
research; improve STEM education and research training; 
increase research accessibility, accountability, and security; 
and accelerate research to address major societal challenges. 
The Subcommittee considered the merits of the National Science 
Foundation for the Future Act for addressing such opportunities 
and challenges.
    Witnesses:
           Dr. Roger M. Wakimoto, Vice Chancellor for 
        Research and Creative Activities, University of 
        California, Los Angeles
           Ms. Gabriela Cruz Thompson, Director, 
        University Research and Collaboration, Intel Labs, 
        Intel Corporation
           Dr. Mahmud Farooque, Associate Director, 
        Consortium for Science, Policy and Outcomes, DC and 
        Clinical Associate Professor, School for the Future of 
        Innovation in Society, Arizona State University
           Dr. Gerald Blazey, Vice President for 
        Research and Innovation Partnerships, Northern Illinois 
        University
           Dr. P. Barry Butler, President, Embry-Riddle 
        Aeronautical University

                     (c) Hearing Volume No. 117-22


June 24, 2021

 SUBCOMMITTEE HEARING--PLASTIC WASTE REDUCTION AND RECYCLING RESEARCH: 
        MOVING FROM STAGGERING STATISTICS TO SUSTAINABLE SYSTEMS

    This hearing discussed federal research and development and 
standards development needs to help address the plastic waste 
crisis and barriers to the current recycling system. In 
addition, the Subcommittee explored challenges and 
opportunities for adopting sustainable upstream plastic waste 
reduction solutions and efficacy of existing lifecycle analysis 
models for assessing the impact of plastic waste and metrics 
for sustainability. The Subcommittee also considered the role 
that the Plastic Waste Reduction and Recycling Research Act can 
play in addressing these important issues.
    Witnesses:
           Ms. Keefe Harrison, Chief Executive Officer, 
        The Recycling Partnership
           Dr. Marc Hillmyer, Director and Principle 
        Investigator, University of Minnesota National Science 
        Foundation Center for Sustainable Polymers
           Dr. Gregory Keoleian, Director, Center for 
        Sustainable Systems, Peter M. Wege Professor of 
        Sustainable Systems, School for Environment and 
        Sustainability Professor, Civil and Environmental 
        Engineering, co-Coordinator, Engineering Sustainable 
        Systems Program, University of Michigan
           Mr. Joshua Baca, Vice President, Plastics 
        Division, American Chemistry Council

                     (d) Hearing Volume No. 117-33


October 5, 2021

  JOINT HEARING OF THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY & THE 
 SUBCOMMITTEE ON INVESTIGATIONS AND OVERSIGHT: BALANCING OPEN SCIENCE 
              AND SECURITY IN THE U.S. RESEARCH ENTERPRISE

    The purpose of this hearing was to explore the risks to 
research integrity and security posed by undue foreign 
influence in the U.S. research enterprise. The Subcommittees 
examined ongoing efforts at universities and federal science 
agencies to address these risks and the need for additional 
clarity regarding the scale and scope of the risks and best 
practices for securing federally funded fundamental research. 
They also discussed the risks of overcorrection, including the 
impact on researchers, institutions, and the competitiveness of 
the U.S. research enterprise.
    Witnesses:
           Dr. Maria Zuber, Co-Chair, National Science, 
        Technology, and Security Roundtable, National Academies 
        of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; Vice President 
        for Research and E.A. Griswold Professor of Geophysics, 
        Massachusetts Institute of Technology
           Ms. Candice N. Wright, Director, Science, 
        Technology Assessment, and Analytics, U.S. Government 
        Accountability Office
           Ms. Allison Lerner, Inspector General, 
        National Science Foundation
           Dr. Xiaoxing Xi, Laura H. Carnell Professor 
        of Physics, Temple University

                     (e) Hearing Volume No. 117-37


November 10, 2021

  RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY SUBCOMMITTEE HEARING: WEATHERING THE STORM: 
     REAUTHORIZING THE NATIONAL WINDSTORM IMPACT REDUCTION PROGRAM

    The purpose of this hearing was to review the activities of 
the National Windstorm Impact Reduction Program (NWIRP), 
including the importance of interagency collaboration. The 
Subcommittee also considered new and evolving challenges to 
improved windstorm and windstorm impact resilience, and 
opportunities to improve the Program.
    Witnesses:
           Dr. Scott Weaver, Director, National 
        Windstorm Impact Reduction Program, National Institute 
        of Standards and Technology
           Dr. Linda Blevins, Deputy Assistant 
        Director, Directorate for Engineering, National Science 
        Foundation
           Mr. Michael Grimm, Assistant Administrator 
        for Risk Management, Federal Emergency Management 
        Agency

                     (f) Hearing Volume No. 117-44


February 15, 2022

 RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY SUBCOMMITTEE HEARING: STRENGTHENING THE U.S. 
                       MICROELECTRONICS WORKFORCE

    The purpose of this hearing was to understand the critical 
workforce needs of the U.S. microelectronic manufacturing 
sectors as part of the ongoing investments in increasing 
domestic production. The Subcommittee examined current 
semiconductor workforce and training pipelines; explored gaps 
between current and future workforce needs; and discussed 
strategies to expand and diversify the microelectronics 
workforce.
    Witnesses:
           Ms. Shari Liss, Executive Director, SEMI 
        Foundation
           Dr. Osama Awadelkarim, UNESCO Chair 
        Professor and Director of the Center for Nanotechnology 
        Education and Utilization (CNEU), Pennsylvania State 
        University
           Dr. Tsu-Jae King Liu, Dean and Roy W. 
        Carlson Professor of Engineering, University of 
        California, Berkeley

                     (g) Hearing Volume No. 117-49


March 17, 2022

RESEARCH AND SUBCOMMITTEE HEARING: SETTING THE STANDARDS: STRENGTHENING 
                 U.S. LEADERSHIP IN TECHNICAL STANDARDS

    The purpose of this hearing was to discuss the nature and 
importance of the standards-setting process to U.S. 
competitiveness and national security. The Subcommittee 
examined the technical standards-setting processes both 
domestically and internationally; the current intergovernmental 
processes that support Federal coordination and information 
exchange activities for standards engagement; the barriers that 
U.S. organizations face to participating in standards 
development; and the risks to loss of U.S. leadership in 
standards setting.
    Witnesses:
           Dr. James K. Olthoff, Acting Director, 
        National Institute of Standards and Technology
           Ms. Mary Saunders, Vice President, 
        Government Relations and Public Policy, American 
        National Standards Institute (ANSI)
           Dr. Alissa Cooper, Vice President and Chief 
        Technology Officer, Technology Policy and Cisco Fellow, 
        Cisco Systems Inc.
           Mr. Andrew Updegrove, Partner, Gesmer 
        Updegrove L.L.P.

                     (h) Hearing Volume No. 117-52


April 6, 2022

RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY SUBCOMMITTEE HEARING: SBIR TURNS 40: EVALUATING 
                 SUPPORT FOR SMALL BUSINESS INNOVATION

    The purpose of this hearing was to review the role of the 
Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Program and Small 
Business Technology Transfer (STTR) Program in translating 
Federally funded research into commercial development, 
generating new economic growth, as well as in assisting federal 
science agencies in meeting their respective missions. The 
Subcommittee also considered recommendations for improvements 
to the SBIR and STTR Programs and received testimony on Small 
Business Innovation Research and Small Business Technology 
Transfer Improvements Act of 2021.
    Witnesses:
           J. Stephen Binkley Ph.D., Acting Director, 
        Office of Science, Department of Energy
           Dr. Ben Schrag, Program Director and Policy 
        Liaison, SBIR/STTR Program, Directorate for Technology, 
        Innovation and Partnerships, National Science 
        Foundation
           Dr. Maryann Feldman, S.K. Heninger 
        Distinguished Professor of Public Policy, Department of 
        Public Policy; Professor of Finance, Kenan-Flagler 
        Business School; Research Director, Kenan Institute of 
        Private Enterprise; The University of North Carolina at 
        Chapel Hill
           Mr. George Caravias, Chief Executive 
        Officer, Geofabrica Inc.
           Dr. Nigel Reuel, Associate Professor, Jack 
        R. and Carol A. Johnson Faculty Fellow, Director of 
        Graduate Education, Iowa State University

                     (i) Hearing Volume No. 117-57


May 20, 2022

 RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY SUBCOMMITTEE HEARING: BUILDING A WORKFORCE TO 
                  NAVIGATE THE ELECTRIC VEHICLE FUTURE

    The purpose of this hearing was to explore the workforce 
needs for the automotive mobility and electrification industry 
in order to position the United States at the center of growth 
for electric vehicles (EVs). Members explored issues facing 
workers across the emerging EV ecosystem, including design, 
manufacturing, installation, and maintenance of EVs and 
charging infrastructure. Witnesses provided insights and 
strategies for meeting clean energy goals while bolstering 
national competitiveness and ensuring shared prosperity for 
American workers.
    Witnesses:
           Ms. Marcia Black-Watson, Industry Engagement 
        Division Administrator, Workforce Development, Michigan 
        Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity
           Ms. Jennifer Mefford, National Co-Chair, 
        Electric Vehicle Infrastructure Training Program 
        (EVITP)
           Mr. Benigno ``Ben'' Cruz, Director, Center 
        for Advanced Automotive Technology (CAAT), Macomb 
        Community College
           Mr. Josh Nassar, Legislative Director, 
        United Auto Workers (UAW)

                     (j) Hearing Volume No. 117-62


June 23, 2022

 JOINT HEARING OF THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY AND THE 
 SUBCOMMITTEE ON ENVIRONMENT: ASSESSING FEDERAL PROGRAMS FOR MEASURING 
                    GREENHOUSE GAS SOURCES AND SINKS

    The purpose of this hearing was to explore Federal programs 
focused on monitoring, measuring, and verifying sources and 
sinks of greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs). The Committee 
examined data and measurement challenges as well as research 
gaps related to improving GHG monitoring, measurement, and 
verification. Finally, the Committee discussed the measurement 
tools, methods, and standards that can enable industries and 
governments to have the information they need to manage 
emissions effectively and where Congress should focus efforts 
to improve GHG monitoring, measurement, and verification.
    Witnesses:
           Dr. Eric K. Lin, Director, Material 
        Measurement Laboratory, National Institute of Standards 
        and Technology
           Dr. Ariel Stein, Acting Director, Global 
        Monitoring Laboratory and Director, Air Resources 
        Laboratory, National Oceanic and Atmospheric 
        Administration
           Dr. Karen M. St. Germain, Earth Science 
        Division Director, Science Mission Directorate, 
        National Aeronautics and Space Administration
           Dr. Bryan Hubbell, National Program Director 
        for Air, Climate, and Energy, Office of Research and 
        Development, United States Environmental Protection 
        Agency

                     (k) Hearing Volume No. 117-70


September 29, 2022

RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY SUBCOMMITTEE HEARING: TRUSTWORTHY AI: MANAGING 
                  THE RISKS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

    The purpose of this hearing was to discuss tools, best 
practices, and challenges in the design, development, testing, 
and deployment of trustworthy artificial intelligence (AI) 
systems. The Subcommittee examined efforts in academia, 
industry, and government to create a culture of responsibility 
around AI systems, identify and remove harmful bias in AI 
systems, improve explainability and transparency of AI systems, 
and mitigate other risks associated with AI systems. The 
Subcommittee also explored the National Institute of Standards 
and Technology's ongoing efforts to create an artificial 
intelligence risk management framework.
    Witnesses:
           Ms. Elham Tabassi, Chief of Staff, 
        Information Technology Laboratory, National Institute 
        of Standards and Technology
           Dr. Charles Isbell, Dean and John P. Imlay, 
        Jr. Chair of the College of Computing, Georgia 
        Institute of Technology
           Mr. Jordan Crenshaw, Vice President of the 
        Chamber Technology Engagement Center, U.S. Chamber of 
        Commerce
           Ms. Navrina Singh, Founder and Chief 
        Executive Officer, Credo AI

                     (l) Hearing Volume No. 117-XX


December 14, 2022

    RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY SUBCOMMITTEE HEARING--BUILDING REGIONAL 
                      INNOVATION ECONOMIES PART II

    The purpose of this hearing was to explore the role of the 
Department of Commerce's Economic Development Administration to 
promote regional innovation through support for community-led 
economic development strategies that increase geographic 
diversity and expand participation in the innovation economy, 
bolster domestic supply chains, grow manufacturing capacity, 
and strengthen community resilience across the United States.
    Witnesses:
           The Honorable Alejandra Y. Castillo, 
        Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Economic 
        Development, U.S. Department of Commerce
           Ms. Maureen Donohue Krauss, President and 
        Chief Executive Officer, Detroit Regional Partnership
           Mr. David Spalding, Raisbeck Endowed Dean of 
        the Debbie and Jerry Ivy College of Business and 
        Interim Vice President of Economic Development and 
        Industry Relations, Iowa State University
           Ms. Linda Olson, President and Chief 
        Executive Officer, Tampa Bay Wave

     3.6 Hearings Before the Subcommittee on Space and Aeronautics


                      (a) Hearing Volume No. 117-6


March 24, 2021

  SUBCOMMITTEE HEARING: EXAMINING R&D PATHWAYS TO SUSTAINABLE AVIATION

    The purpose of the hearing was to examine research and 
technology approaches to sustainable aviation, including 
activities for improving the energy efficiency and reducing the 
climate and environmental impacts of civil and commercial 
aviation; inform research and development priorities to achieve 
emissions reduction goals for aviation sector; and other 
issues.
    Witnesses:
           Dr. Karen A. Thole, Department Head and 
        Distinguished Professor, Department of Mechanical 
        Engineering, Pennsylvania State University
           Dr. R. John Hansman, Jr., T. Wilson 
        Professor of Aeronautics & Astronautics and Director, 
        MIT International Center for Air Transportation, 
        Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Chair, FAA 
        Research and Development Advisory Committee (REDAC); 
        Co-director, FAA Center of Excellence for Alternative 
        Jet Fuels and Environment (ASCENT)
           Mr. Steve Csonka, Executive Director, 
        Commercial Aviation Alternative Fuels Initiative 
        (CAAFI)

                     (b) Hearing Volume No. 117-11


April 29, 2021

SUBCOMMITTEE HEARING: WHAT DO SCIENTISTS HOPE TO LEARN WITH NASA'S MARS 
                          PERSEVERANCE ROVER?

    The purpose of the hearing was to explore the science of 
the National Aeronautics and Space Administration's Mars 2020 
Perseverance Rover mission, including key scientific objectives 
and plans, and overall Mars science exploration strategy, and 
other issues.
    Witnesses:
           Dr. Michael A. Meyer, Lead Scientist, Mars 
        Exploration Program, National Aeronautics and Space 
        Administration
           Dr. Bethany L. Ehlmann, Professor of 
        Planetary Science and Associate Director of the Keck 
        Institute for Space Studies, California Institute of 
        Technology; President, The Planetary Society; Co-
        Investigator, Mars 2020 Perseverance mission
           Dr. Tanja Bosak, Returned Sample Science Co-
        Lead, Mars 2020 Perseverance Rover; Professor and Lead 
        of the Option in Geology, Geochemistry, and Geobiology, 
        Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary 
        Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

                     (c) Hearing Volume No. 117-15


May 18, 2021

     SUBCOMMITTEE HEARING: NASA'S EARTH SCIENCE AND CLIMATE CHANGE 
           ACTIVITIES: CURRENT ROLES AND FUTURE OPPORTUNITIES

    The hearing examined the National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration's Earth science and climate change activities 
and plans, including the role of space-based observations, 
partnerships, and other issues.
    Witnesses:
           Dr. Karen M. St. Germain, Division Director, 
        Earth Sciences Division, Science Mission Directorate, 
        NASA
           Dr. Gavin Schmidt, Senior Climate Advisor 
        (Acting) and Director of Goddard Institute for Space 
        Studies, NASA
           Mr. Riley Duren, Research Scientist, Office 
        of Research, Innovation, and Impact, University of 
        Arizona; Chief Executive Officer, Carbon Mapper, Inc.
           Mr. Robbie Schingler, Co-Founder and Chief 
        Strategy Officer, Planet

                     (d) Hearing Volume No. 117-28


July 29, 2021

  SUBCOMMITTEE HEARING: ENABLING MISSION SUCCESS FROM THE GROUND UP: 
             ADDRESSING NASA'S URGENT INFRASTRUCTURE NEEDS

    The purpose of the hearing was to review the National 
Aeronautics and Space Administration's (NASA's) infrastructure 
and maintenance status, plans, and needs, including those 
related to physical infrastructure, mission support systems, 
research laboratories and test facilities, and to examine the 
enabling role of infrastructure in achieving NASA's current and 
future mission goals in science, aeronautics, human 
spaceflight, and space technology while ensuring the safety of 
agency personnel and operations.
    Witness:
      Mr. Robert Gibbs, Associate Administrator for the Mission 
Support Directorate, National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration

                     (e) Hearing Volume No. 117-29


September 21, 2021

SUBCOMMITTEE HEARING: NASA'S FUTURE IN LOW EARTH ORBIT: CONSIDERATIONS 
        FOR INTERNATIONAL SPACE STATION EXTENSION AND TRANSITION

    The purpose of the hearing is to examine the status of the 
International Space Station (ISS), NASA's requirements for 
future research and development in low Earth orbit, and plans 
for sustaining such activities once the ISS is no longer 
operating, among other issues.
    Witnesses:
           Ms. Robyn Gatens, Director, International 
        Space Station; National Aeronautics and Space 
        Administration
           Dr. Kathleen ``Kate'' Rubins, Astronaut; 
        National Aeronautics and Space Administration
           Mr. Jeffrey Manber, Chief Executive Officer; 
        Nanoracks, LLC
           Mr. Todd Harrison, Senior Fellow and 
        Director of the Aerospace Security Project; Center for 
        Strategic and International Studies
           Captain William Shepherd (USN, Retired), 
        Former Astronaut, National Aeronautics and Space 
        Administration

                     (f) Hearing Volume No. 117-35


October 20, 2021

SUBCOMMITTEE HEARING: ACCELERATING DEEP SPACE TRAVEL WITH SPACE NUCLEAR 
                               PROPULSION

    The purpose of the hearing was to understand the 
opportunities and challenges of space nuclear propulsion for 
enabling deep space exploration, examine the status of NASA's 
R&D activities and plans for space nuclear propulsion, and to 
consider government and industry contributions to and 
collaboration on advancing space nuclear propulsion, among 
other issues.
    Witnesses:
           Dr. Roger M. Myers, Co-Chair, Committee on 
        Space Nuclear Propulsion Technologies, National 
        Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine
           Dr. Bhavya Lal, Senior Advisor for Budget 
        and Finance; NASA
           Mr. Greg Meholic, Senior Project Leader, The 
        Aerospace Corporation
           Mr. Michael French, Vice President, Space 
        Systems; Aerospace Industries Association
           Dr. Franklin Chang Diaz, Founder and CEO, Ad 
        Astra Rocket Company

                     (g) Hearing Volume No. 117-39


December 1, 2021

    JOINT SUBCOMMITTEE ON SPACE AND AERONAUTICS AND SUBCOMMITTEE ON 
  RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY HEARING: A REVIEW OF THE DECADAL SURVEY FOR 
                ASTRONOMY AND ASTROPHYSICS IN THE 2020S

    The purpose of this hearing was to review the science 
priorities and recommendations from the decadal survey on 
astronomy and astrophysics, Pathways to Discovery in Astronomy 
and Astrophysics for the 2020s, recently released by the 
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine.
    Witnesses:
           Dr. Robert C. Kennicutt, Jr., Co-Chair, 
        Steering Committee, Committee for A Decadal Survey on 
        Astronomy and Astrophysics 2020, National Academies of 
        Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; Laureate 
        Professor, University of Arizona; and Professor of 
        Physics and Astronomy, Texas A&M University
           Dr. Fiona A. Harrison, Co-Chair, Steering 
        Committee, Committee for A Decadal Survey on Astronomy 
        and Astrophysics 2020, National Academies of Sciences, 
        Engineering, and Medicine; Harold A. Rosen Professor of 
        Physics, California Institute of Technology
           Mr. William Russell, Director, Contracting 
        and National Security Acquisitions, Government 
        Accountability Office

                     (h) Hearing Volume No. 117-42


March 1, 2022

   SUBCOMMITTEE HEARING: KEEPING OUR SIGHTS ON MARS PART 3: A STATUS 
             UPDATE AND REVIEW OF NASA'S ARTEMIS INITIATIVE

    The purpose of the hearing was to examine the status of 
plans and progress on the National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration's Artemis initiative; to review challenges 
related to the implementation of those activities; and to 
understand the factors that contribute to overall success in 
the nation's Moon to Mars efforts, among other issues.
    Witnesses:
           Mr. James Free, Associate Administrator, 
        Exploration Systems Development Mission Directorate, 
        National Aeronautics and Space Administration
           Mr. William Russell, Director, Contracting 
        and National Security Acquisitions, Government 
        Accountability Office
           Dr. Patricia Sanders, Chair, Aerospace 
        Safety Advisory Panel
           The Honorable Paul K. Martin, Inspector 
        General, National Aeronautics and Space Administration
           Mr. Daniel Dumbacher, Executive Director, 
        American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics

                     (i) Hearing Volume No. 117-50


May 12, 2022

    SUBCOMMITTEE HEARING: SPACE SITUATIONAL AWARENESS: GUIDING THE 
                    TRANSITION TO A CIVIL CAPABILITY

    The purpose of the hearing was to consider testimony 
regarding planning for the transition of certain space 
situational awareness services and information to a civil 
capability, among other issues.
    Witnesses:
           Dr. Matthew Hejduk, Senior Project Leader, 
        The Aerospace Corporation
           Dr. Moriba Jah, Associate Professor, 
        Aerospace Engineering and Engineering Mechanics 
        Department, Mrs. Pearlie Dashiell Henderson Centennial 
        Fellowship in Engineering, Oden Institute for 
        Computational Engineering and Sciences, The University 
        of Texas at Austin
           Mr. Andrew D'Uva, Senior Policy Advisor, 
        Space Data Association
           Mr. Kevin M. O'Connell, Founder, Space 
        Economy Rising, LLC
           Dr. Mariel Borowitz, Associate Professor, 
        Sam Nunn School of International Affairs, Ivan Allen 
        College of Liberal Arts, Georgia Institute of 
        Technology

                     (j) Hearing Volume No. 117-59


May 26, 2022

 SUBCOMMITTEE HEARING: A REVIEW OF THE DECADAL STRATEGY FOR PLANETARY 
                   SCIENCE AND ASTROBIOLOGY 2023-2032

    The purpose of the hearing was to review the science 
priorities and recommendations from the decadal survey on 
planetary science and astrobiology, Origins, Worlds, and Life: 
A Decadal Strategy for Planetary Science and Astrobiology 2023-
2032, recently released by the National Academies of Sciences, 
Engineering, and Medicine.
    Witnesses:
           Dr. Robin M. Canup, Co-Chair, Steering 
        Group, Committee on the Planetary Science and 
        Astrobiology Decadal Survey, National Academies of 
        Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; Assistant Vice 
        President, Planetary Science Directorate, Southwest 
        Research Institute
           Dr. Philip R. Christensen, Co-Chair, 
        Steering Group, Committee on the Planetary Science and 
        Astrobiology Decadal Survey, National Academies of 
        Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; Arizona State 
        University

                     (k) Hearing Volume No. 117-66


July 28, 2022

 SUBCOMMITTEE HEARING: EXPLORING CYBER SPACE: CYBERSECURITY ISSUES FOR 
                   CIVIL AND COMMERCIAL SPACE SYSTEMS

    The purpose of the hearing was to examine cybersecurity for 
civil and commercial space systems, including current and 
potential cybersecurity risks, the status of policies and 
guidance regarding cybersecurity for space systems, and 
opportunities for facilitating and strengthening cybersecurity 
for civil and commercial space systems, among other issues.
    Witnesses:
           Dr. Theresa Suloway, Space Cybersecurity 
        Engineer, The MITRE Corporation
           Mr. Matthew Scholl, Chief, Computer Security 
        Division, Information Technology Laboratory, National 
        Institute of Standards and Technology
           Mr. Brandon Bailey, Senior Project Leader, 
        Cyber Assessments and Research Department, The 
        Aerospace Corporation

                     (l) Hearing Volume No. 117-69


September 21, 2022

    JOINT SUBCOMMITTEE ON SPACE AND AERONAUTICS AND SUBCOMMITTEE ON 
   ENVIRONMENT HEARING: LOOKING BACK TO PREDICT THE FUTURE: THE NEXT 
                    GENERATION OF WEATHER SATELLITES

    This hearing provided an opportunity to discuss the 
partnership between the National Oceanic and Atmospheric 
Administration (NOAA) and National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration (NASA) in the development, testing, acquisition, 
launch and management of NOAA's operational weather satellite 
programs. Furthermore, this hearing examined how lessons 
learned from past challenges in recent weather satellite 
programs are being incorporated into the future goals, 
architecture, and capabilities for the next generation of 
weather satellites.
    Witnesses:
           Dr. Stephen Volz, Assistant Administrator, 
        National Environmental Satellite, Data, and Information 
        Services, NOAA
           Mr. John Gagosian, Joint Agency Satellite 
        Division Director, NASA
           Mr. Fred Meny, Assistant Inspector General 
        for Audit and Evaluation, U.S. Department of Commerce, 
        Office of Inspector General

                     (m) Hearing Volume No. 117-71


November 16, 2022

  UNFOLDING THE UNIVERSE: INITIAL SCIENCE RESULTS FROM THE JAMES WEBB 
                            SPACE TELESCOPE

    The purpose of the hearing was to receive testimony on the 
initial science, scientific findings and discoveries of 
National Aeronautics and Space Administration's James Webb 
Space Telescope, as well as plans for future scientific 
investigations.
    Witnesses:
           Dr. Mark Clampin, Astrophysics Division 
        Director, National Aeronautics and Space Administration
           Dr. Steven L. Finkelstein, Professor of 
        Astronomy, University of Texas at Austin
           Dr. Natalie Batalha, Professor of Astronomy 
        and Astrophysics and Director of Astrobiology, 
        University of California, Santa Cruz

                          Chapter IV: Appendix

    4.1. History of the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology

    The Soviet Union launched the first satellite, Sputnik 1, 
into orbit on October 4, 1957, initiating the ``Space Race.'' 
When the 85th Congress reconvened in 1958, one of its first 
tasks was the creation of a Select Committee on Astronautics 
and Space Exploration. This Select Committee wrote the Space 
Act, which established the National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration (NASA) and the permanent House Committee on 
Science and Astronautics, the forerunner of the present 
Committee on Science, Space, and Technology.
    The Science and Astronautics Committee was the first 
standing committee created in the House in 11 years and the 
first committee since 1892 to be established for an entirely 
new area of jurisdiction. The Committee's initial jurisdiction 
included exploration and control of outer space, astronautical 
research and development, scientific research and development, 
science scholarships and legislation relating to scientific 
agencies. The scientific agencies under the Committee initially 
included the National Bureau of Standards (now the National 
Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), NASA, the 
National Aeronautics and Space Council and the National Science 
Foundation (NSF).
    In 1974, the Committee's name was changed to the 
``Committee on Science and Technology.'' At that time, the 
Committee's jurisdiction was expanded to include legislation 
related to energy, the environment, the atmosphere, civil 
aviation research and development and the National Weather 
Service. The Committee on Science and Technology was also given 
a ``special oversight'' function providing for exclusive 
responsibility among all Congressional Standing Committees to 
review and study, on a continuing basis, all laws, programs and 
government activities involving Federal non-military research 
and development.
    Civilian nuclear research and development was added to the 
Committee's jurisdiction in 1977 when the Joint Committee on 
Atomic Energy was abolished. The name was again changed at the 
outset of the 100th Congress to the Committee on Science, 
Space, and Technology. The Republican Party took control of the 
House in 1995 and officially changed the name to the 
``Committee on Science.''
    In its early years, the Committee was an important partner 
in the Apollo Program that led to a man landing on the moon and 
strengthening science education and scientific research. After 
the Committee's role expanded, the Committee has played an 
important role in much of the legislation Congress has 
considered dealing with domestic and international science, 
technology, standards, and competitiveness.
    After the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001, 
terrorism moved to the forefront of the Committee's agenda. The 
Science Committee worked to ensure that the Federal Government 
was investing in the science and technology necessary to combat 
terrorism over the long term and to assist our nation's first 
responders. Congress established the Department of Homeland 
Security (DHS) in 2002 primarily to improve the nation's 
ability to prevent terrorist attacks. The Science and 
Technology Directorate--created though bill language developed 
by the Committee on Science and Technology--funds research, 
development, testing and evaluation to improve homeland 
security, and works to transfer relevant technologies to 
federal, state, and local governments, and the private sector.
    When Democrats resumed control of Congress in 2007, the 
name of Committee was changed back to the ``Committee on 
Science and Technology.'' Enhancing long-term economic 
competitiveness through investments in science and technology 
emerged as a centerpiece of Committee activities in the 110th 
and 111th Congresses. In response to the National Academies' 
landmark report, Rising Above the Gathering Storm, the 
Committee led a bipartisan effort to advance the Academies' 
recommendations, culminating in President Bush's signature of 
the America COMPETES Act in 2007. The legislation, as enacted, 
put the budgets of three key federal science agencies on a path 
to double over ten years: NSF, NIST, and DOE Office of Science. 
In 2010, a reauthorization of the America COMPETES Act extended 
and expanded activities called for in the original legislation. 
It passed as one of the last votes of the 111th Congress and 
was signed into law in January, 2011.
    In the 112th Congress, Chairman Ralph Hall has added 
``Space'' back into the Committee's name: ``The Committee on 
Science, Space, and Technology''--a nod to the Committee's 
history, broad jurisdiction, and the importance of space 
exploration in maintaining American innovation and 
competitiveness.
    During the 113th, 114th, and 115th Congresses, the Science, 
Space, and Technology pursued a vigorous agenda of oversight of 
both federal programs and non-Federal entities under Chairman 
Lamar Smith. During this time, the committee also moved a 
number of space related bills, including notably, the U.S. 
Commercial Space Launch Competitiveness Act in the 114th 
Congress.
    At the start of the 116th Congress, Chairwoman Eddie 
Bernice Johnson became the first woman and first African 
American to Chair the Committee. The 116th Congress saw a 
return to extensive bipartisan legislating, with many of the 
Committee's key pieces of legislation sponsored or cosponsored 
by both Chairwoman Johnson and Ranking Member Frank D. Lucas. 
The second session of the 116th Congress brought unprecedented 
challenges related to the COVID-19 pandemic. During this 
session, and pursuant to changes to the House Rules, the 
Committee held its first remote hearings conducted via the 
internet. Under Chairwoman Johnson's continued leadership in 
the 117th Congress, the Committee continued to legislate in a 
bipartisan fashion. These efforts culminated in the enactment 
of the CHIPS and Science Act, which was the largest Science 
Committee led bill to ever be enacted.
    Today the Committee has jurisdiction over much of the non-
defense federal research and development (R&D) portfolio. The 
Committee has exclusive jurisdiction over NASA, NSF, NIST, the 
National Weather Service, and the White House Office of Science 
and Technology Policy and National Space Council. The Committee 
also has authority over the R&D activities at DOE and civilian 
National Laboratories, the Environmental Protection Agency, 
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Department of 
the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey, Department of 
Agriculture, Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation 
Administration, Department of Homeland Security, and U.S. Fire 
Administration.

   4.2. Views and Estimates of the Committee on Science, Space, and 
Technology On the Fiscal Year 2022 Budget Request for Submission to the 
                            Budget Committee

    The Committee looks forward to reviewing the President's 
detailed budget request later this spring. The following are 
the Committee's views on key priorities in the budget summary 
related to programs within the Science, Space, and Technology 
Committee jurisdiction.

                   National Science Foundation (NSF)

    After more than a decade of flat or declining funding, in 
constant dollars, the National Science Foundation would be 
provided a 20 percent increase to $10.2 billion in the 
President's fiscal year 2022 budget request. While the details 
have not yet been provided, the budget increase supports 
increases for NSF's overall fundamental research and STEM 
education mission, in addition to significant focused increases 
for climate change research, technology development, and 
programs to broaden participation in STEM. We applaud the 
proposed increase for NSF overall, and look forward to seeing 
the details.
    Notably, the budget includes a proposal for the creation of 
a new Directorate of Technology, Innovation, and Partnerships 
at NSF, the subject of ongoing discussion and debate in 
Congress. Since its creation in 1950, NSF has supported 
fundamental research across all fields of science and 
engineering, and STEM learning through all levels of education 
and training, in pursuit of its mission to promote the progress 
of science; advance the national health, prosperity, and 
welfare; secure the national defense; and for other purposes. 
From the beginning, a guiding assumption of the agency and its 
Congressional sponsors was that the results of these 
fundamental research investments would be picked up and 
translated into practice by industry and other potential users. 
While NSF rightly claims credit for the foundational science 
underlying countless innovations and the economic growth and 
other societal benefits that resulted, the translational work 
that brought these innovations into the market was typically 
not supported by the NSF.
    Moreover, in many of the NSF's most successful cases of 
their work leading to profound societal benefits, the 
downstream innovations that resulted from the NSF research were 
not foreseeable when the NSF made its initial investments. That 
is the very heart of the debate over the creation of a new 
directorate at NSF, one that would expand the mission of the 
agency from what it has been over the past 70 years. The 
Committee looks forward to continuing this discussion within 
Congress, and with the Biden Administration.

         National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)

    The budget supports investment in our country's economic 
competitiveness by promoting innovation in U.S. manufacturing 
and advance science, standards, and technology development at 
the Department of Commerce. Specifically, the budget would 
increase funding for NIST's scientific and technical research 
account by 16 percent to $916 million. The increased investment 
in NIST's core research account is the minimum needed for NIST 
to meet its statutory requirements in artificial intelligence, 
quantum science, cybersecurity, and resilience, while 
continuing to adequately support its many other critical areas 
of measurement science.
    The budget would more than double funding for NIST's 
manufacturing programs, including $150 million to fully fund 
two new Manufacturing USA institutes and an additional $125 
million for the Manufacturing Extension Partnership (MEP) 
program. Based on the previous competition NIST ran under the 
Manufacturing USA program, there are sufficient meritorious 
ideas to warrant two or more additional institutes. The MEP 
program plays an essential role in helping small and medium 
sized manufacturers adopt manufacturing innovations, protect 
their businesses and customers from cyberattacks, and compete 
in the global economy. We look forward to hearing more about 
the details of how the MEP program will implement the 
additional funding.
    The budget request is silent on NIST's construction 
account. NIST itself estimates a need of $200 million per year 
to address its decaying infrastructure and maintenance backlog, 
an amount well above the FY 2021 enacted level. Addressing 
NIST's construction and maintenance needs will remain a 
priority for the Committee.

          National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)

    The Administration has requested $24.7 billion for NASA in 
Fiscal Year 2022, a 6.3 percent increase from the FY 2021 
enacted appropriation of $23.2 billion. The Committee is 
encouraged about the priorities highlighted in the 
discretionary budget request summary for NASA, including 
support for robotic science exploration, advancing Earth and 
climate science, sustainable aviation, continuity in the Moon 
to Mars effort and a sustainable deep space exploration 
program, innovation and space technology, and increased support 
for science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) 
education activities that will expand opportunities for 
engaging underserved and underrepresented students in STEM 
fields. The Committee believes that NASA should continue to 
undertake the most cutting-edge research and serve as an 
inspiration to the next generation of scientists and engineers.
    NASA has achieved significant accomplishments, despite the 
additional challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic. The Committee 
looks forward to reviewing the full budget request and plans 
for FY 2022 and to understanding the extent of COVID 0919 
impacts on the agency's activities as it looks to reauthorize 
NASA's programs and activities.

                       Department of Energy (DOE)

    The discretionary request provides $46.1 billion overall 
for the Department of Energy in FY22, a 10.2 percent increase 
from the 2021 enacted level, and includes robust support for 
advanced nuclear energy technologies, renewable energy, 
electric vehicles, green hydrogen, innovative approaches to air 
conditioning and refrigeration, and a revitalized Office of 
Fossil Energy and Carbon Management, among many other important 
areas.
    The Committee is pleased that the request strongly supports 
a comprehensive approach to clean energy innovation. This 
Committee has jurisdiction over the Department of Energy's 
science and energy research, development, demonstration, and 
commercial application activities including its national 
laboratories and research facilities, and knows how critical 
continued support of these programs will be to meet this moment 
for a meaningful energy transition. In addition, the Committee 
is encouraged by the Administration's support of additional 
grants and workforce development programs for MSIs. To achieve 
the best solutions, we need a diverse array of experts seated 
at the table to keep pace with our competitors and deliver 
benefits to all Americans.
    The Committee also supports the Administration's goal of 
additional funding to support the DOE Office of Science's 
critical efforts to improve our competitiveness and decarbonize 
our country. However, we urge the administration to consider 
the benefits of additional funding to support some of our 
nation's most important science and energy research programs 
and facilities. The discretionary request includes a $400 
million increase to a total of $7.4 billion. The Committee 
believes that this level of growth is not sufficient for the 
current needs of the world-class user facilities, research 
programs, and national laboratories stewarded by the Office. 
The Committee also voices concern over the structure of an 
Advanced Research Projects Agency--Climate (ARPA-C). Although 
the Committee applauds the Administration's commitment to 
advancing breakthrough solutions for climate and energy, an 
ARPA model may not be the most appropriate leading pathway to 
addressing the significant climate resilience and adaptation 
problems at hand, and the Committee looks forward to continued 
discussion with the Administration regarding this proposal.

                 Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)

    The budget provides $11.2 billion for the EPA, a roughly 21 
percent increase to the 2021 enacted funding level. In recent 
years, the Committee has noted the need for increased funding 
for research and development at the EPA to ensure that 
regulations are scientifically sound, and to address the most 
pressing environmental challenges of today and in the future. 
The Committee is encouraged by the proposed increase, which 
would more than double the Agency's climate change research 
budget, and expect that this budget would also provide for 
increased funding for other important research and development 
initiatives such as PFAS, harmful algal blooms, and lead in 
water.
    The Committee applauds the Administration's commitment to 
assisting marginalized and underserved communities with an 
investment of $936 million to a new Accelerating Environmental 
and Economic Justice initiative at the agency. Finally, EPA has 
seen substantial attrition in its workforce in recent years, 
with the Committee finding significant impacts to the STEM 
workforce at the Agency in particular. Rebuilding the workforce 
of the agency is a key part of this budget with $110 million to 
restore EPA's critical staff capacity which will be crucial to 
the agency's research and development efforts to protect public 
health and the environment.

         National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

    The budget provides $6.9 billion for NOAA, a $1.4 billion 
increase from the 2021 enacted funding level. This budget 
prioritizes weather forecasting and climate observation work by 
providing $2 billion, an increase of $500 million from the 2021 
enacted level, to fund the next generation of satellites, as 
well as an array of other technologies, to improve weather and 
climate forecasts. Additionally, the Committee has identified a 
need for the federal government to provide robust actionable 
climate information to communities and is encouraged to see 
$800 million in this budget go towards expanding investments in 
climate research, as well as regional and local decision-making 
support, data, and tools to improve community resilience to 
climate change. These investments will not only help gird our 
cities and towns against the more frequent and intense impacts 
of climate change, but also provide opportunities to grow our 
scientific workforce, and invest in the modern infrastructure 
needed to support these efforts.

                                4.2(a).

                Committee on Science, Space, and Technology
                                       Washington, DC, May 7, 2021.
Hon. John Yarmuth,
Chairman, Committee on the Budget,
House of Representatives, Washington, DC.
    Dear Mr. Chairman: The House Science, Space, and Technology 
Committee Republicans appreciate the opportunity to share our 
views and estimates for the fiscal year 2022 budget cycle with 
respect to the programs within the Committee's jurisdiction, as 
well as our view of the budget process so far in the 117th 
Congress and how it should proceed as we move forward.
    The Science Committee has a long history of working on a 
bipartisan basis to develop and pass meaningful science and 
technology legislation into law, when given the opportunity by 
House leadership to conduct its work in regular order. 
Unfortunately, the broken budget and legislative process under 
the leadership of House Democrats has unnecessarily impeded our 
Committee's bipartisan work.
    The Science Committee has already been ostracized from the 
legislative process once in the 117th Congress when House 
Democratic leadership forced through the first budget 
reconciliation package without formal input from the Committee 
and its Members. The Science Committee had no opportunity to 
debate or discuss the $750 million allocated in the budget 
reconciliation package for research and development. Nor were 
we given the opportunity to address other missed opportunities 
for funding COVID relief for the research industry, which have 
broad bipartisan support. Budget reconciliation is a closed 
legislative process, and partisan wish lists are no way to 
approach the many opportunities that lie before us.
    Republicans support doubling funding for basic federal 
research over the next 10 years and bipartisan consensus exists 
to increase federal investment in research and development. 
There is also broad bipartisan support for more rapidly growing 
federal investment in basic research at the Department of 
Energy (DOE) Office of Science and the National Science 
Foundation (NSF) over the next 5 years, to contend with our 
global competitors like China. There is also bipartisan support 
for reauthorizing the National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration (NASA) to get America back to the Moon and on to 
Mars, to build our domestic STEM workforce and broaden 
participation in STEM studies and careers, and to foster 
American dominance in cutting-edge technologies.
    Science Committee Republicans are committed to working on 
legislation to accomplish these critically important 
objectives. However, this can only be accomplished if the House 
proceeds through regular order, in an open and transparent 
process, where Members are provided an opportunity to legislate 
and engage in robust debate and discourse. It cannot be 
achieved by circumventing committees of jurisdiction under the 
guise of budget reconciliation, or by poisoning bipartisan 
consensus with partisan priorities.
    Science and technology are essential to our national 
defense, economic security, and American prosperity. The basic 
research our government supports is foundational to our 
economic success and has allowed us to remain at the forefront 
of global science and technology innovation. We face very real 
threats to our scientific leadership from the Chinese Communist 
Party, and we can't afford to fall behind.
    There is momentum on both sides of the aisle in the House 
and Senate for legislation to secure our global science and 
technology leadership. But our investments should be 
comprehensive, strategic, and sustainable. Unfortunately, the 
Biden-Harris Administration has proposed a $50 billion fund for 
a top-down approach to developing technologies at the National 
Science Foundation, and the Senate is considering a proposal to 
create a $100 billion slush fund for technology development. 
These proposals are not responsible or sustainable. America's 
continued scientific leadership requires a comprehensive and 
strategic approach to research and development that provides 
long-term increased investment and stability across the 
research ecosystem. It also requires national collaboration and 
public-private partnerships with a focus on evolving 
technologies that are crucial to our national and economic 
security, like quantum information science, artificial 
intelligence, advanced manufacturing, and high-performance 
computing.
    The Republican Members of the Committee on Science, Space, 
and Technology will continue to build on the Committee's past 
work to ensure that the United States remains the world's 
leader in Research and Development. Committee Republicans 
believe that the only way to reach consensus and produce 
meaningful legislation on these matters is to engage in robust 
debate and dialogue, to proceed through regular legislative 
order, and to leave the partisan provisions for partisan 
measures. Anything less is an abdication of the Biden-Harris 
Administration's stated commitment to unity and would result in 
patchwork legislation that fails to serve the best interests of 
the American people.
    We have an opportunity to ensure that America remains at 
the forefront of science and technology research, development, 
and innovation. We call on the House leadership and the Budget 
Committee to seize this opportunity for bipartisan legislation 
in support of science and technology by avoiding reconciliation 
and proceeding through regular order with an open amendment 
process, and to check partisanship at the door. The American 
people deserve nothing less.
            Respectfully,
                                   Frank Lucas,
                                           Ranking Member, Committee on 
                                               Science, Space, and 
                                               Technology.
                                   Brian Babin, D.D.S.,
                                           Ranking Member, Subcommittee 
                                               on Space and 
                                               Aeronautics.
                                   Stephanie Bice,
                                           Ranking Member, Subcommittee 
                                               on Environment.
                                   Bill Posey,
                                           Member of Congress.
                                   Dr. James R. Baird,
                                           Member of Congress.
                                   Randy Weber,
                                           Ranking Member, Subcommittee 
                                               on Energy.
                                   Michael Waltz,
                                           Ranking Member, Subcommittee 
                                               on Research and 
                                               Technology.
                                   Jay Obernolte,
                                           Ranking Member, Subcommittee 
                                               on Investigations and 
                                               Oversight.
                                   Anthony Gonzalez,
                                           Member of Congress.
                                   Pete Sessions,
                                           Member of Congress.
                                   Daniel Webster,
                                           Member of Congress.
                                   Young Kim,
                                           Member of Congress.
                                   Jake LaTurner,
                                           Member of Congress.
                                   Peter Meijer,
                                           Member of Congress.
                                   Mike Garcia,
                                           Member of Congress.
                                   Randy Feenstra,
                                           Member of Congress.
                                   Carlos Gimenez,
                                           Member of Congress.

                                  4.3.

               Committee on Science, Space, and Technology,
                                      Washington, DC, May 20, 2022.
Hon. John Yarmuth,
Chairman, Committee on the Budget,
House of Representatives, Washington, DC.
Hon. Jason Smith,
Ranking Member, Committee on Budget,
House of Representatives, Washington, DC.
    Chairman Yarmuth and Ranking Member Smith: Please find 
enclosed the Majority Views and Estimates of the Committee on 
Science, Space, and Technology on the FY 2023 Budget Request. 
Thank you for your consideration.
            Sincerely,
                                     Eddie Bernice Johnson,
           Chairwoman, Committee on Science, Space, and Technology.

Views and Estimates of the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology 
  On the Fiscal Year 2022 Budget Request for Submission to the Budget 
                               Committee

                                   Eddie Bernice Johnson.
                                   Zoe Lofgren.
                                   Suzanne Bonamici.
                                   Ami Bera.
                                   Haley Stevens.
                                   Mikie Sherrill.
                                   Jamaal Bowman, Ed.D.
                                   Melanie Stansbury.
                                   Brad Sherman.
                                   Ed Perlmutter.
                                   Jerry McNerney.
                                   Paul Tonko.
                                   Bill Foster.
                                   Donald Norcross.
                                   Donald S. Beyer Jr.
                                   Sean Casten.
                                   Conor Lamb.
                                   Deborah K. Ross.
                                   Gwen Moore.
                                   Daniel T. Kildee.
                                   Lizzie Fletcher.

Views and Estimates of the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology 
  On the Fiscal Year 2023 Budget Request for Submission to the Budget 
                               Committee

    The following are the Committee's views on key priorities 
in the budget summary related to programs within the Science, 
Space, and Technology Committee jurisdiction.

                   National Science Foundation (NSF)

    The President's budget request includes $10.49 billion for 
NSF, an increase of $1.65 billion [19 percent] from the Fiscal 
Year (FY) 2022 appropriated level of $8.84 billion. While the 
proposed funding level falls short of what was authorized in 
the America COMPETES Act, it represents an important and 
overdue right-sizing of the agency, and we applaud the 
Administration's commitment to NSF. Among other the other 
priorities supported by the request, the additional funding 
will enable the Foundation to advance more cutting-edge 
research across all six research directorates; accelerate 
innovations in STEM education and training for students from 
all backgrounds; and move forward with the new Technology, 
Innovation and Partnerships (TIP) Directorate that will be 
focused on use-inspired research and technology-based solutions 
to pressing societal challenges. However, to allow the agency 
to properly support these and other initiatives as well as deal 
with the impact of covid on the construction of a number of its 
ongoing research projects, we support a further increase to a 
level of $12.5 billion, consistent with the level authorized in 
the America COMPETES Act. Such an increase is especially 
important to allow the agency to get its new TIP Directorate 
off the ground while continuing to increase core investments. 
It will also fund the many important existing and new STEM 
education and broadening participation programs authorized in 
COMPETES, which include a focus on geographic diversity.

         National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)

    The FY23 request for NIST is $1.47 billion, an increase of 
$237 million or 19 percent from the FY22 enacted level. Of 
this, Scientific and Technical Research Services--NIST's core 
measurement research and standards account--would increase by 
$162 million, or 20 percent. This request would increase 
funding for agency research into advanced communications, 
artificial intelligence, bioscience, climate and energy 
measurements, advanced manufacturing, and much more. The 
request would also increase funding for the NIST Center for 
Neutron Research to address the ongoing shutdown of the 
facility caused by an incident in February 2021. The Industrial 
Technology Services Account, which includes the Manufacturing 
Extension Partnership (MEP) Program and the Manufacturing USA 
institutes, would be increased by nearly $198 million or 113 
percent. This large increase would support two new 
Manufacturing USA institutes and a 74 percent increase for MEP. 
The request also increases NIST's construction budget to $120 
million. NIST has a significant construction and maintenance 
backlog on its two campuses. The agency estimates a need of 
$200 million per year for five years to address this 
challenge--an amount well above the President's budget request. 
We support funding for construction and maintenance at NIST's 
research campuses sufficient to address that backlog, so that 
NIST's scientists will have cutting-edge rather than crumbling 
facilities with which to carry out their critically important 
research.

             National Aeronautics and Space Administration

    The President's proposed FY23 investment of nearly $26 
billion in the nation's civil space and aeronautics programs, a 
$2 billion [8 percent] increase over the FY22 enacted 
appropriation, represents a serious commitment to NASA's 
programs and to a balanced NASA portfolio. The President's FY23 
budget request also proposes continued operations for the 
International Space Station and requests a 121% increase over 
the FY22 enacted appropriation for preliminary work on 
commercial space stations that NASA is seeking to use for 
research and related activities in low Earth orbit following 
the end of ISS operations. The PBR proposes increases over the 
FY22 enacted appropriations for space technology, STEM 
education, science, and aeronautics, including NASA's important 
work on sustainable aviation and Earth and climate-related 
science. Funding is also included for NASA's Artemis Moon-Mars 
human exploration initiative, but it remains to be seen whether 
it is sufficient to develop and carry out a serious and 
sustained campaign of crewed lunar missions at an acceptable 
level of mission and safety risk.

                       Department of Energy (DOE)

    The President's request provides $16 billion overall for 
Department of Energy science and energy research, development, 
demonstration, and commercial application activities in FY23, 
which would be a 16.7% increase over the total appropriated 
level for these activities in FY22. However, there is wide 
variation in how this proposed increase is distributed among 
DOE's programs, ranging from a 1.2% increase for nuclear energy 
R&D to 44.9% for energy efficiency and renewable energy R&D. 
The request also includes a proposed 55.6% increase for ARPA-E. 
DOE's Office of Science would receive a 4.3% increase. This 
level of growth at DOE's Office of Science is not sufficient to 
support the budget profiles that would be required to maintain 
the schedule and minimize the total project costs of the 
ongoing construction of a set of advanced research facilities 
currently stewarded by the Office. In addition, the proposed 
FY23 level for the DOE Office of Science is over a billion less 
than the FY22 authorization level for the Office included in 
the bipartisan DOE Science for the Future Act that is part of 
the America COMPETES Act. Further, the FY23 request for the 
Office of Science's fusion program would amount to a 1.4% 
increase over the FY22 appropriated level. That amount is 
significantly less than that authorized in the Energy Act of 
2020 and the DOE Science for the Future Act, and is 
inconsistent with the progress made to date and the potential 
benefits of improved support for fusion energy R&D. Finally, we 
support the President's request for the Advanced Research 
Projects Agency-Energy (ARPA-E), which now has a proven track 
record that can be measured in the number of new companies, 
patents, follow-on private sector funding, and follow-on 
partnerships that have resulted from ARPA-E's investments to 
date.

         National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

    The President's FY23 request for the National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) is $6.9 billion--an increase 
of $1.02 billion from the FY22 enacted level. This increase 
would support NOAA's work to predict the weather, including 
extreme weather associated with climate change, protect the 
oceans and coasts, and improve wildfire observation and 
prediction. Among the notable increases included in the request 
are $720 million towards the National Ocean Service (NOS), an 
increase of $70.80 million from the FY22 enacted level; $1.37 
billion towards the National Weather Service (NWS), an increase 
of $85.33 million from the FY22 enacted level; $824 million 
towards the Oceanic and Atmospheric Research (OAR), an increase 
of $176.05 million from the FY22 enacted level; $2.30 billion 
towards the National Environmental Satellite, Data, and 
Information Service (NESDIS), an increase of $680.88 million 
from the FY22 enacted level; and $608 million towards Mission 
Support (MS), an increase of $231.46 million from the FY22 
enacted level. It is also encouraging that the request includes 
a $376 million investment in NOAA's climate resilience 
activities. This includes $92 million for expanded climate 
competitive research grants. It also proposes an investment of 
$2.3 billion for the next generation of weather satellites. 
Other critically important areas of investment are a total of 
$120 million specifically for wildfire-related activities at 
NOAA, including prediction, detection, observation, modeling, 
forecasting, and research. Moreover, the request intends for 
funds otherwise allocated to also support NOAA's wildfire work. 
In addition, the request proposes at least $80 million for 
research supercomputing to support weather and climate model 
development. Sustained advances in research will require the 
advanced computing resources needed to support those advances. 
Finally, the request proposes an unprecedented level of funding 
increase for the Office of Space Commerce, an increase of $72 
million over the FY22 enacted level of $16 million. The request 
for the Office ``expands opportunities for civil space 
situational awareness and supports the long-term sustainability 
of the space environment by committing $88 million . . . in 
order to improve real-time tracking and reporting of space 
objects and debris.'' The Committee is preparing legislation 
directed at space situational awareness, and as a result of 
that will be determining what is an appropriate funding level 
for those activities at Commerce.

                 Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)

    The President's Budget Request for FY23 includes $11.9 
billion for EPA, a $2.34 billion increase from the FY22 enacted 
level. This significant increase would support EPA's work to 
follow the science, ensure scientific integrity and science-
based decision making and will help to restore EPA's capability 
to protect human health and the environment. The request 
provides an investment of $864 million, or 7.3% of EPA's total 
budget, for the Science and Technology account. This represents 
a $114 million increase in the Science and Technology budget 
from the $750 million enacted in the FY22 appropriations. 
Additionally, the request includes funding to support a total 
of 16,204 full-time equivalents (FTE), an increase of 1,907 
above the current level, to restore the Agency's capacity to 
carry out its important tasks. The request includes $644 
million and 1,853 FTEs for EPA's Office of Research and 
Development (ORD) as part of the prioritization of science 
within the EPA. The request provides a $37.5 million increase 
to Air, Climate, and Energy research within ORD from FY22 
enacted to conduct science and technology activities to develop 
and implement strategies to improve air quality and take action 
on climate change, as well as to improve wildfire readiness.

               4.4 Oversight plan for the 117th Congress


                 OVERSIGHT AUTHORITY & RESPONSIBILITIES

    The Committee on Science, Space, and Technology was first 
established as the Committee on Science and Astronautics on 
July 21, 1958 in a direct response to the Soviet Union's 1957 
launch of Sputnik 1, the world's first satellite. The Science 
Committee was created to help the United States foster 
innovation and stay globally competitive in the science and 
technology domains. House Rule X, clause 1 (p) sets forth the 
legislative jurisdiction of the Committee. However, Rule X, 
clause 3 (k) grants the Committee ``special oversight 
functions'' that stretches beyond its legislative jurisdiction. 
As this clause sets out: ``The Committee on Science, Space, and 
Technology shall review and study on a continuing basis laws, 
programs, and Government activities relating to nonmilitary 
research and development.''\1\ This provides the Committee with 
wide-ranging oversight authority over science and technology 
issues throughout the government.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    \1\House Rule X, clause 3, (k)--attached as Appendix A.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Each of the Committee's five subcommittees, as well as the 
full Committee, engage in oversight work as authorized by House 
rules. These five subcommittees include the Subcommittee on 
Energy, Subcommittee on Environment, Subcommittee on Research 
and Technology, Subcommittee on Space and Aeronautics, and the 
Subcommittee on Investigations and Oversight. Although each 
subcommittee engages in oversight efforts, the Committee's 
investigations and oversight activities are led and coordinated 
by the Investigations & Oversight (I&O) Subcommittee.

       INVESTIGATIONS AND OVERSIGHT EFFORTS IN THE 117TH CONGRESS

    The federal response to COVID-19. The Committee continued 
its oversight of the federal government's response to the 
COVID-19 pandemic, as well as the impact of the pandemic on the 
federal research enterprise. The Committee held five related 
hearings:
           February 19, 2021--Full Committee hearing: 
        The Science of COVID-19 Vaccines and Encouraging 
        Vaccine Uptake
           February 25, 2021--Full Committee hearing: 
        Building Back the U.S. Research Enterprise: Covid 
        Impacts and Recovery
           May 12, 2021--Investigations & Oversight 
        Subcommittee hearing: COVID-19 Variants and Evolving 
        Research Needs
           July 14, 2021--Investigations & Oversight 
        Subcommittee hearing: Principles for Outbreak 
        Investigation: COVID-19 and Future Infectious Diseases
           March 31, 2022--Investigations & Oversight 
        Subcommittee hearing: The New Normal: Preparing for and 
        Adapting to the Next Phase of COVID-19
    Scientific Integrity.The Committee continued its oversight 
of scientific integrity policies and procedures in the 
executive branch, as well as its scrutiny of alleged instances 
of political interference with federal scientific activities.
    Scientific advisory committees. Federal agencies receive 
scientific advice and analysis from independent science 
advisory committees to help inform policymaking. The Committee 
continued to examine the structure, independence, functionality 
and ethical requirements of these committees to ensure that 
they are able to deliver sound expertise without undue 
influence by special interests.
    Whistleblowers. The Committee maintained its open door 
policy for any whistleblower who would like to alert Congress 
to issues of waste, fraud, abuse, or mismanagement at agencies 
under the Committee's jurisdiction or within other activities 
within the Committee's broad oversight authority. The Committee 
takes confidentiality issues seriously and will always help to 
protect the identity of any individual who approaches the 
Committee with issues of concern.
    GAO & OIGs. The Committee coordinated with the Government 
Accountability Office (GAO) and the various Offices of 
Inspectors General (OIGs) within agencies under the Committee's 
legislative jurisdiction to ensure Departments, programs, and 
agencies were being transparent and implementing GAO and OIG 
recommendations. The Committee utilized the resources of the 
GAO and IG community to steer them towards oversight issues of 
concern to the Committee. The Committee continued to ensure the 
IG offices within the agencies under the Committee's 
jurisdiction are being managed appropriately and effectively.
    Cybersecurity. The Committee continued its work to ensure 
federal agencies complied with cybersecurity standards across 
the government, considered the quality and adequacy of the 
standards and best practices themselves, and investigated 
reported breaches of government and private sector computer 
systems when the public's privacy, safety, or security was 
endangered. The Committee held three related hearings, the 
Government Accountability Office (GAO) 2021 High Risk List 
included ``Ensuring the Cybersecurity of the Nation'' and the 
first two hearings on the list were held pursuant to Rule XI, 
clause 2, subsection (p).
           May 25, 2021--Joint Subcommittee hearing, 
        Investigations & Oversight Subcommittee lead, with 
        Research and Technology Subcommittee: Solarwinds and 
        Beyond: Improving the Cybersecurity of Software Supply 
        Chains, which was also held pursuant to Rule XI, clause 
        2, subsection (n).
           May 11, 2022--Joint Subcommittee hearing, 
        Investigations & Oversight Subcommittee lead, with 
        Research and Technology Subcommittee: Securing the 
        Digital Commons: Open-Source Software Cybersecurity
           July 28, 2022--Space & Aeronautics 
        Subcommittee hearing: Exploring Cyber Space: 
        Cybersecurity Issues for Civil and Commercial Space 
        Systems
    Voting system design and integrity. A multitude of election 
system vulnerabilities in the diffuse voting infrastructure in 
the United States were exposed following the 2016 and 2018 
elections. The 2020 election cycle then saw state election 
officials marshalling an unprecedented shift to mail-in and 
early voting in order reduce the spread of COVID-19. The 
Committee continued to conduct oversight on the cyber and 
physical security standards and best practices for the complete 
supply chain of voting system technologies to help ensure 
secure and resilient elections.
    Identifying and mitigating influence operations. The use of 
social media platforms for influence operations against the 
American public by both domestic and foreign actors has become 
an area of intense interest. The Committee examined what tools 
and technologies are being developed by the scientific and 
technical community to help identify these threats to mitigate 
their impact. The Investigations & Oversight Subcommittee held 
a related hearing on September 28, 2021: The Disinformation 
Black Box: Researching Social Media Data.
    Unauthorized use of private data. The unauthorized use of 
private data for commercial or political purposes is a growing 
concern. The Committee continued to examine such cases wherein 
public trust is breached, whether the perpetrator be a 
government or commercial entity and whether the intended use of 
the data is for financial, political, or other purposes. In an 
increasingly digital world, the Committee has a responsibility 
to expose Internet privacy failures and deliberate on potential 
solutions. A related full Committee Hearing occurred on 
February 8, 2022: Data Challenges Impacting Human Trafficking 
Research and Development of Anti-Trafficking Technological 
Tools. This hearing was also held pursuant to Rule XI, clause 
2, subsection (n).
    DHS Science & Technology Directorate. The Committee 
continued to reassert its oversight of the Department of 
Homeland Security's Science & Technology Directorate in the 
117th Congress. The Committee persisted with its ongoing 
examination of the S&T Directorate's programs and activities to 
ensure they are being managed efficiently and effectively.
    Sexual harassment in the sciences. Sexual harassment in 
academia drives talented scientists out of the field as some 
perpetrators continue to hold high-status positions and receive 
federal grant money. The Committee continued its bipartisan 
oversight of federal science agencies to ensure they have clear 
policies in place and handle reports of sexual harassment 
effectively and efficiently. A related full Committee hearing 
occurred on December 6, 2022: Building A Safer Antarctic 
Research Environment. This hearing was also held pursuant to 
Rule XI, clause 2, subsection (n).
    Academic espionage. The Committee continued to conduct 
bipartisan oversight into the coordination and collaboration 
between law enforcement, the intelligence community, and 
institutions of higher education regarding the protection of 
sensitive, often government-funded research. The Committee 
considered strategies to ensure the United States remains a 
global science leader while respecting the international 
collaborations that help foster U.S. innovation. A related 
Joint Subcommittee hearing, led by the Investigations & 
Oversight Subcommittee, with the Research and Technology 
Subcommittee, occurred on October 5, 2021: Balancing Open 
Science and Security in the U.S. Research Enterprise. This 
hearing was also held pursuant to Rule XI, clause 2, subsection 
(n)
    STEM Education. The Committee continued to review Science, 
Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) education 
related subjects, particularly the need to increase the 
diversity of individuals who have access to STEM education. The 
Committee examined the effectiveness of federal programs in 
improving the recruitment and retention of a diverse pool of 
individuals pursuing STEM-related degrees and careers. The 
Committee held two related hearings:
           April 15, 2021--Full Committee hearing: 
        Reimagining Our Innovation Future
           February 15, 2022--Research and Technology 
        Subcommittee hearing: Strengthening the U.S. 
        Microelectronics Workforce
    Arctic Research. The Committee continued to examine the 
scientific issues related to the warming of the Arctic and the 
environmental, social, public health, and safety and security 
implications that represents for the United States and the 
world, as well as the challenges of Arctic research itself. The 
Committee held two related hearings:
           September 20, 2022--Full Committee hearing: 
        Amplifying the Arctic: Strengthening Science to Respond 
        to a Rapidly Changing Arctic
           December 6, 2022--Full Committee hearing: 
        Building A Safer Antarctic Research Environment, which 
        was held pursuant to Rule XI, clause 2, subsection (n)
    Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP). The 
Committee continued to ensure that OSTP functioned as 
effectively as possible to confront national science 
priorities, including COVID-19, and fulfilled its statutorily 
mandated responsibilities.
    Public Access to Federally Funded Research. The Committee 
continued to explore how well the model for federally funded 
research papers was functioning to maximize both academic rigor 
in science publishing and public access to a taxpayer funded 
resource.
    Facial recognition technology. Facial recognition 
applications are growing widely around the globe, creating 
privacy concerns and enabling misidentification of individuals 
by law enforcement, particularly people of color. The Committee 
continued to explore the role of the National Institute of 
Standards and Technology and other federal science agencies in 
evaluating and validating the performance of facial recognition 
technologies. A related Investigations & Oversight Subcommittee 
hearing occurred on June 29, 2022: Privacy in the Age of 
Biometrics. This hearing was held pursuant to Rule XI, clause 
2, section (n).
    Critical infrastructure and electricity grid security. The 
Committee continued to conduct oversight over the state of the 
nation's critical infrastructure to ensure that vulnerabilities 
to cyberattacks, physical attacks, and natural hazards are 
identified and remedied to the extent possible, and to ensure 
the government has the capability to respond to such threats 
efficiently and effectively. A related full Committee hearing 
occurred on March 18, 2021: Lessons Learned from the Texas 
Blackouts: Research Needs for a Secure and Resilient Grid.
    Clean energy technologies in general. The Committee 
conducted oversight to ensure that the newly enacted 
authorizations for DOE energy research, development, 
demonstration, and commercial application (RDD&CA) programs in 
the Energy Act of 2020 as part of the FY2021 Consolidated 
Appropriations Act, P.L. 116-260, were executed faithfully. The 
Committee examined whether the Department's energy technology 
offices are supporting the full range of high value RDD&CA 
activities that the private sector is unable or unwilling to 
support on its own. The Committee evaluated potentially 
transformational clean energy technologies that could 
potentially receive additional federal support. The Committee 
held eight related hearings:
           March 25, 2021--Energy Subcommittee hearing: 
        Building Technologies Research for a Sustainable Future
           May 4, 2021--Energy Subcommittee hearing: 
        Climate and Energy Science Research at the Department 
        of Energy
           May 27, 2021--Full Committee hearing: 
        Overview of the Science and Energy Research Enterprise 
        of the U.S. Department of Energy
           July 16, 2021--Energy Subcommittee hearing: 
        Fostering Equity in Energy Innovation
           November 17, 2021--Energy Subcommittee 
        hearing: Fostering a New Era of Fusion Energy Research 
        and Technology Development
           February 17, 2022--Energy Subcommittee 
        hearing: H2Success: Research and Development to Advance 
        a Clean Hydrogen Future
           March 16, 2022--Energy Subcommittee hearing: 
        Time Change: Bioenergy Research and Development for the 
        Fuels and Chemicals of Tomorrow
           April 21, 2022--Investigations & Oversight 
        Subcommittee hearing: Pedal to the Metal: Electric 
        Vehicle Batteries and the Critical Minerals Supply 
        Chain
    DOE Laboratory Complex. The management, upkeep, and 
security of the Department's aging facilities remained a 
continuing concern of the Committee. Efforts continued to 
assure that the Department will meet its responsibilities to 
control risks in and around these facilities. A related Energy 
Subcommittee hearing occurred on April 27, 2022: Science and 
Energy Research Infrastructure Needs of the U.S. Department of 
Energy.
    Nuclear waste cleanup. Remediation and site management of 
legacy weapons sites accounts for over $6 billion annually from 
the Department of Energy. The Committee examined whether the 
Department is leveraging its science and technology 
capabilities to their maximum potential in order to achieve 
site cleanups more quickly and at less cost. The Government 
Accountability Office (GAO) High Risk List has included ``The 
U.S. Government's Environmental Liabilities'' since 2017, 
``Department of Energy's Contract and Project Management for 
the National Nuclear Security Administration and Office of 
Environmental Management'' was on the List in 2021 and the 
Energy Subcommittee held a hearing on July 13, 2022: Nuclear 
Waste Cleanup: Research and Development Opportunities for the 
Department of Energy's Office of Environmental Management, 
pursuant to rule XI, clause 2, subsection (p).
    Nuclear energy R&D spending. The Committee examined how the 
Department of Energy's Office of Nuclear Energy informs its 
decisions for financial assistance to private companies. A 
related Joint Subcommittee hearing, led by the Investigations & 
Oversight Subcommittee, with the Energy Subcommittee, occurred 
on October 21, 2021: Judicious Spending to Enable Success at 
the Office of Nuclear Energy a hearing. This hearing was held 
pursuant to Rule XI, clause 2, subsection (n).
    DOE Loan Programs Office. The Committee continued to 
provide oversight of the Department of Energy's Loan Programs 
Office, which the prior Administration sought to terminate, to 
ensure that the Office is diligently carrying out its statutory 
mission.
    Fusion research. The Committee continued to provide 
oversight of the Department of Energy's fusion energy research 
activities to ensure that direction provided in the Department 
of Energy Research and Innovation Act, P.L. 115-246, and the 
Energy Act of 2020, a Division of P.L. 116-260, is being 
faithfully executed, including the establishment of programs to 
advance inertial fusion for energy applications and to advance 
other innovative fusion energy concepts. The Committee also 
continued to oversee the U.S. contribution to the ITER fusion 
project to ensure that the Department is actually providing the 
resources that it has projected are required to minimize the 
project's schedule and total cost. A related Energy 
Subcommittee hearing occurred on November 17, 2021: Fostering a 
New Era of Fusion Energy Research and Technology Development.
    Emerging technologies. The Committee continued to examine 
emerging technologies such as autonomous vehicles, artificial 
intelligence, deep fakes, and gene editing. The positive use 
cases of each of these are well-documented, as are their high-
profile failures and misapplications. Where they are 
commercializing faster than the technical standards, 
cybersecurity standards and applicable public policies, 
emerging technologies may threaten the safety, security and 
privacy of the American people. The Committee examined their 
potential social, public health, economic, and security 
consequences. The Committee held three related hearings:
           September 28, 2021--Investigations & 
        Oversight Subcommittee hearing: The Disinformation 
        Black Box: Researching Social Media Data
           June 29, 2022--Investigations & Oversight 
        Subcommittee hearing: Privacy in the Age of Biometrics. 
        This hearing was held pursuant to Rule IX, clause 2, 
        section (n)
           September 29, 2022--Research and Technology 
        Subcommittee hearing: Trustworthy AI: Managing the 
        Risks of Artificial Intelligence
    Climate science. The Committee aggressively tracked 
emerging issues and scientific studies regarding global warming 
and climate science and elicited thoughtful science-based 
discussions on potential solutions and remedies to reduce 
greenhouse gas emissions. This included the role of federally 
funded research and innovative technology demonstration and 
development related to cutting-edge mitigation and adaptation 
strategies. The Committee held ten related hearings:
           March 12, 2021--Full Committee hearing: The 
        Science Behind Impacts of the Climate Crisis
           April 21, 2021--Environment Subcommittee 
        hearing: Working Towards Climate Equity: The Case for a 
        Federal Climate Service
           May 4, 2021--Energy Subcommittee hearing: 
        Climate and Energy Science Research at the Department 
        of Energy
           May 18, 2021--Space and Aeronautics 
        Subcommittee hearing: NASA's Earth Science and Climate 
        Change Activities: Current Roles and Future 
        Opportunities
           July 21, 2021--Environment Subcommittee 
        hearing: Silent Killer: The Rising Problem of Extreme 
        Heat in the U.S.
           September 23, 2021--Environment Subcommittee 
        hearing: Advancing Earth System Science and Stewardship 
        at NOAA
           April 28, 2022--Full Committee hearing: Now 
        or Never: The Urgent Need for Ambitious Climate Action
           June 23, 2022--Joint Subcommittee hearing, 
        Research and Technology Subcommittee lead, with 
        Environment Subcommittee: Assessing Federal Programs 
        for Measuring Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks
           September 20, 2022--Full Committee hearing: 
        Amplifying the Arctic: Strengthening Science to Respond 
        to a Rapidly Changing Arctic
    On March 8, 2022 the Full Committee held a hearing on 
Federal Climate Adaptation and Resilience for the 21st Century. 
The Government Accountability Office (GAO) 2021 High Risk List 
included ``Limiting the Federal Government's Fiscal Exposure by 
Better Managing Climate Change Risks'' and this hearing was 
held pursuant to Rule XI, clause 2, subsection (p) & (n).
    Environmental effects of COVID-19. The Committee examined 
how the vast societal and economic changes forced by COVID-19 
have temporarily affected global environmental air quality and 
considered implications for environmental management strategies 
going forward.
    Extreme weather hazards. The severity of storms, floods, 
fires, and hurricanes has increased tremendously over the past 
few years, leaving a path of death and multi-billion dollar 
destruction in their wake. The Committee examined various 
issues surrounding these extreme weather events, including the 
science behind these hazards and how climate change has 
increased the frequency and severity of these events, 
improvements to forecasting and warning, and proposed methods 
to reduce their impact. The Committee held three related 
hearings:
           June 29, 2021--Full Committee hearing: The 
        State of Federal Wildland Fire Science: Examining 
        Opportunities for Further Research & Coordination
           July 21, 2021--Environment Subcommittee 
        hearing: Silent Killer: The Rising Problem of Extreme 
        Heat in the U.S.
           November 10, 2021--Research and Technology 
        Subcommittee hearing: Weathering the Storm: 
        Reauthorizing the National Windstorm Impact Reduction 
        Program
    IRIS Program Oversight. The Committee continued its 
longstanding oversight of the EPA's Integrated Risk Information 
System (IRIS). IRIS develops critical toxicological assessments 
of environmental contaminants, providing the science that 
underpins regulations of toxic chemicals. Since a 2011 National 
Academies of Sciences (NAS) report on process issues at IRIS, 
the program has come a long way, and has received praise from 
NAS and EPA's Science Advisory Board (SAB) on its progress. The 
Committee's concerns that limited resources and political 
interference continue to restrict the IRIS program's 
productivity, resulting in delays to critical assessments, 
prompted continued oversight.
    EPA chemicals. The Committee continued its oversight work 
to ensure that the public is being protected from the release 
of toxic chemicals, that EPA is using the best available 
science in its chemical policy decisions, and that the agency 
is not unduly influenced by the industries it is legally 
mandated to regulate.
    Deregulatory actions at EPA. The Trump administration made 
rollbacks of environmental protection a hallmark of its policy 
agenda. The Committee continued to examine incidents where 
principles of scientific and analytical integrity were not met 
in the effort to promulgate these policy measures and evaluate 
strategies for ensuring EPA adheres to its mission of 
protecting human health and the environment in the future.
    Methane leak detection. Methane is a powerful greenhouse 
gas. Methane emissions in the U.S. are systemically 
underestimated by the EPA, largely due to poorly quantified 
leaks in the oil and natural gas sector. The Committee reviewed 
the effectiveness of current leak detection technologies and 
the need for additional data, research, and development. A 
related Full Committee hearing occurred on June 8, 2022: 
Detecting and Quantifying Methane Emissions from the Oil and 
Gas Sector.
    Earth observations satellite oversight. The Committee 
continued to review the federal government's development, 
management, and operation of its earth observations satellites 
at both the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration 
(NOAA) and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration 
(NASA). These satellites provide critical data that feed into 
weather forecasting and climate models. The current and future 
planning of the satellite architecture is crucial to ensuring 
continuity of data collection. The Committee held three related 
hearings:
           May 18, 2021--Space and Aeronautics 
        Subcommittee hearing: NASA's Earth Science and Climate 
        Change Activities: Current Roles and Future 
        Opportunities
           July 20, 2021--Full Committee hearing: 
        Spectrum Needs for Observations in Earth and Space 
        Sciences. This
           September 23, 2021--Environment Subcommittee 
        hearing: Advancing Earth System Science and Stewardship 
        at NOAA
           September 21, 2022--Joint Subcommittee 
        hearing, Space and Aeronautics Subcommittee lead, with 
        Environment Subcommittee: Looking Back to Predict the 
        Future: The Next Generation of Weather Satellites
    National Weather Service workforce issues. The Committee 
has been concerned with workforce issues at NOAA and the 
National Weather Service (NWS), which the GAO is currently 
investigating. The Committee continued to monitor these issues 
and work with the GAO to ensure workforce issues are handled 
effectively and efficiently in a manner that does not 
jeopardize the ability of NWS or NOAA to perform their crucial 
life-saving missions. A related Full Committee hearing occurred 
on October 14, 2021: The Future of Forecasting: Building a 
Weather-Ready Nation on All Fronts, which was held pursuant to 
Rule XI, clause 2, sub. Another related Subcommittee on 
investigations and Oversight hearing was held pursuant to Rule 
XI, clause 2, subsection (n), it was on March 17, 2021 and it 
was titled Brain Drain: Rebuilding the Federal Scientific 
Workforce.
    Access to the International Space Station (ISS). The 
Committee continued to examine NASA's oversight of contracted 
commercial crewed flights and the certification of commercial 
crew providers to ensure U.S. access to the ISS will continue 
safely and without a gap, as well as NASA's contingency plan 
should commercial crew certification or operational flights 
experience delays. A related Space and Aeronautics Subcommittee 
hearing occurred on September 21, 2021: NASA's Future in Low 
Earth Orbit: Considerations for International Space Station 
Extension and Transition.
    ISS research priorities. The International Space Station, 
and its crew and facilities, are precious and limited 
resources. The Committee conducted oversight of the use of the 
ISS, the prioritization of ISS resources to meet and enable key 
objectives, and plans for meeting such objectives once the ISS 
reaches the end of its operational life. A related Space and 
Aeronautics Subcommittee hearing occurred on September 21, 
2021: NASA's Future in Low Earth Orbit: Considerations for 
International Space Station Extension and Transition.
    Oversight of NASA's flagship science missions. The 
Committee continued to oversee the management of major flagship 
science mission development projects, including the James Webb 
Space Telescope, the Wide-field Infrared Survey Telescope, and 
the Europa Clipper spacecraft. The Committee held three related 
hearings:
           April 29, 2021--Space and Aeronautics 
        Subcommittee hearing: What Do Scientists Hope to Learn 
        with NASA's Mars Perseverance Rover?
           December 1, 2021--Joint Subcommittee on 
        Space and Aeronautics and Subcommittee on Research and 
        Technology Hearing: A Review of the Decadal Survey for 
        Astronomy and Astrophysics in the 2020s, which was held 
        pursuant to Rule XI, clause 2, subsection (n)
           March 1, 2022--Pursuant to Rule XI, clause 
        2, subsection (n)(2) the Space and Aeronautics 
        Subcommittee held the hearing: Keeping Our Sights on 
        Mars Part 3: A Status Update and Review of NASA's 
        Artemis Initiative
           November 16, 2022--Space and Aeronautics 
        Subcommittee hearing: Unfolding the Universe: Initial 
        Science Results from the James Webb Space Telescope
    On March 1, 2022 Pursuant to
    NASA Earth Science programs. NASA's Earth science programs 
offer valuable insights into Earth systems, climate change, 
severe weather, land change, and more. The Committee conducted 
oversight of NASA's Earth science program, its progress in 
implementing the priorities of the 2018 National Academies' 
Earth science decadal survey, and its contributions to climate 
change research. The Committee held two related hearings:
           May 18, 2021--Space and Aeronautics 
        Subcommittee hearing: NASA's Earth Science and Climate 
        Change Activities: Current Roles and Future 
        Opportunities
           September 21, 2022--Joint Subcommittee 
        hearing, Space and Aeronautics Subcommittee lead, with 
        Environment Subcommittee: Looking Back to Predict the 
        Future: The Next Generation of Weather Satellites
    Orbital Debris. Hundreds of thousands of debris objects 
orbit the Earth. Travelling at very high velocities, debris of 
any size can pose significant risk to active space systems and 
human spaceflight operations. Mega constellation deployments 
comprising thousands of small satellites increase potential 
collision risk. The Committee conducted oversight of NASA's 
activities in orbital debris monitoring, mitigation, and 
modeling, as well as its efforts to coordinate with other 
Federal agencies and internationally on orbital debris 
mitigation standards and guidelines.
    Human spaceflight schedule pressure. The Space Shuttle 
Challenger accident in 1986 made clear that launch pressure can 
lead to catastrophic consequences. In all expeditions, but 
particularly human space flight, oversight must be conducted to 
ensure that schedule pressures do not influence decisions that 
have implications for the overall safety of human spaceflight 
systems and operations. The Committee continued to assess all 
matters pertaining to launch pressure and human space flight.
    Lunar Campaign. The Trump Administration prioritized a 
return to lunar expeditions at NASA. Lunar missions could 
ostensibly contribute to the mission of getting humans to Mars. 
However, without clear objectives as part of a human 
exploration roadmap, significant investments in a lunar 
campaign could delay the United States' efforts to send humans 
to the surface of Mars by the 2030s. The Committee examined the 
status of lunar activities, NASA's management of development 
projects, and how they would contribute toward the goal of a 
manned mission to Mars. A related Space and Aeronautics 
Subcommittee hearing occurred on March 1, 2022: Keeping Our 
Sights on Mars Part 3: A Status Update and Review of NASA's 
Artemis Initiative.
    Civil Aeronautics Research and Development. The Committee 
evaluated research and development activities at the Federal 
Aviation Administration (FAA) and NASA's aeronautics research 
into topics including the next generation air transportation 
system (NextGen), the integration of unmanned aviation systems 
into the national airspace system, safety of civil aviation and 
aeronautics, and efforts to mitigate the environmental impacts 
of civil aviation. The Committee held three related hearings:
           March 24, 2021--Space and Aeronautics 
        Subcommittee hearing: Examining R&D Pathways to 
        Sustainable Aviation
           May 12, 2022--Space and Aeronautics 
        Subcommittee hearing: Space Situational Awareness: 
        Guiding the Transition to a Civil Capability
           July 28, 2022--Space and Aeronautics 
        Subcommittee hearing: Exploring Cyber Space: 
        Cybersecurity Issues for Civil and Commercial Space 
        Systems
    FAA Commercial Space Transportation. FAA's Office of 
Commercial Space Transportation licenses commercial launch and 
reentry vehicles and commercial spaceports. The Committee 
conducted oversight on the FAA's AST, its licensing activities, 
and the implementation of the FAA's updated launch and reentry 
licensing regulations. In addition, the Committee examined the 
growing commercial launch industry, including the emerging 
commercial human space flight industry, and the challenges 
facing it. The Committee held two related hearings:
           May 12, 2022-- Space and Aeronautics 
        Subcommittee hearing: Space Situational Awareness: 
        Guiding the Transition to a Civil Capability
           July 28, 2022--Space and Aeronautics 
        Subcommittee hearing: Exploring Cyber Space: 
        Cybersecurity Issues for Civil and Commercial Space 
        Systems

                   CONSULTATION WITH OTHER COMMITTEES

    The Committee coordinated on the following oversight 
priorities with other House Committees as appropriate:
           With Administration on election security 
        technologies
           With Agriculture on integrity in cost-
        benefit analysis, biofuels, and climate change
           With Energy & Commerce on environmental 
        policy, including climate change, emerging trends in 
        technology that may affect American consumers, and 
        public health research priorities
           With Homeland Security on facial recognition 
        technology, advanced technology strategies for national 
        security, including cybersecurity, and for addressing 
        chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear threats
           With Natural Resources on climate change 
        science, advanced energy technologies, and geological 
        sciences
           With Oversight and Reform on ensuring the 
        effectiveness and independence of Inspectors General at 
        federal science agencies, on scientific integrity in 
        the federal response to COVID-19, cybersecurity in 
        federal agencies, the federal science workforce, and 
        other general oversight priorities
           With Transportation & Infrastructure on 
        advanced infrastructure materials and technologies, 
        strategies for reducing aircraft emissions and climate 
        resiliency of transportation infrastructure
           With the Select Committee on the Climate 
        Crisis on climate science priorities

      4.5. Committee on Science, Space, and Technology History of 
                      Appointments, 117th Congress


January 4, 2021

    Ms. Eddie Bernice Johnson (TX) named Chair (H. Res. 9)
    Mr. Lucas (OK) named Ranking Minority Member (H. Res. 10)

January 28, 2021

    Ms. Lofgren (CA), Ms. Bonamici (OR), Mr. Bera (CA), Ms. 
Stevens (MI), Ms. Sherrill (NJ), Mr. Bowman (NY), Mr. Sherman 
(CA), Mr. Perlmutter (CO), Mr. McNerney (CA), Mr. Tonko (NY), 
Mr. Foster (IL), Mr. Norcross (NJ), Mr. Beyer (VA), Mr. Crist 
(FL), Mr. Casten (IL), Mr. Lamb (PA), and Ms. Ross (NC) 
appointed.(H. Res. 62)
    Mr. Brooks (AL), Mr. Posey (FL), Mr. Weber (TX), Mr. Babin 
(TX), Mr. Gonzalez (OH), Mr. Waltz (FL), Mr. Baird (IN), Mr. 
Sessions (TX), Mr. Webster (FL), Mr. Garcia (CA), Mrs. Bice 
(OK), Mrs. Kim (CA), Mr. Feenstra (IA), Mr. LaTurner (KS), Mr. 
Gimenez (FL), Mr. Obernolte (CA),and Mr. Meijer (MI) appointed 
(H. Res 63)

February 11, 2021

    Ms. Moore (WS), Mr. Kildee (MI), Ms. Wild (PA), and Ms. 
Fletcher (TX) appointed (H. Res. 111)

February 12, 2021

    Democrat Members assigned to Subcommittees; Mr. Bowman 
named Subcommittee on Energy Chair; Ms. Bonamici named 
Subcommittee on Environment Chair; Mr. Foster named 
Subcommittee on Investigations and Oversight Chair; Ms. Stevens 
named Subcommittee on Research and Technology Chair; Mr. Beyer 
named Subcommittee on Space and Aeronautics. Ami Bera named 
Vice Chair of the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology.

February 25, 2021

    Republican Members assigned to Subcommittees; Mr. Weber 
named Subcommittee on Energy Ranking Member; Ms. Bice named 
Subcommittee on Environment Ranking Member; Mr. Obernolte named 
Subcommittee on Investigations and Oversight Ranking Member; 
Mr. Waltz named Subcommittee on Research and Technology Ranking 
Member; Mr. Babin named Subcommittee on Space and Aeronautics 
Ranking Member.

March 3, 2021

    Ms. Stevens named Vice Chair.

June 15, 2021

    Ms. Stansbury appointed (H. Res. 475) (to rank immediately 
after Mr. Bowman).

June 28, 2021

    Mr. Sessions resigned as a member of the Committee on 
Science, Space, and Technology.

August 24, 2021

    Mr. Ellzey (TX) appointed (H. Res. 602).

December 1, 2021

    Mr. Carey (OH) appointed (H. Res. 826).

February 10, 2022

    Mr. Waltz stepped down as Ranking Member of the 
Subcommittee on Research and Technology and was replaced by Mr. 
Feenstra.

August 31, 2022

    Mr. Crist resigned as a member of the Committee on Science, 
Space, and Technology as well as from his office as the 
Representative for Florida's 13th Congressional District.
                                  4.6.



                            C O N T E N T S

                                 ------                                

                              Rules of the
              Committee on Science, Space, and Technology
                     U.S. House of Representatives
                For the One Hundred Seventeenth Congress

Rule I. General..................................................    92
    (a) Application of Rules.....................................    92
    (b) Other Procedures.........................................    92
    (c) Use of Hearing Rooms.....................................    92
Rule II. Regular, Additional, and Special Meetings...............    92
    (a) Regular Meetings.........................................    92
    (b) Bills and Subjects to be Considered......................    92
    (c) Open Meetings............................................    93
    (d) Quorums..................................................    93
    (e) Postponement of Proceedings..............................    93
    (f) Time for Statements and Debate...........................    93
    (g) Requests for Recorded Vote...............................    93
    (h) Transcripts..............................................    93
    (i) Motion to Go to Conference...............................    94
Rule III. Hearings...............................................    94
    (a) Notice of Hearings.......................................    94
    (b) Witnesses................................................    94
    (c) Questioning of Witnesses.................................    95
    (d) Claims of Privilege......................................    95
    (e) Publication of Transcripts...............................    95
    (f) Pertinence of Testimony..................................    95
Rule IV. Reports.................................................    95
Rule V. Broadcasting.............................................    96
Rule VI. Subcommittees...........................................    96
    (a) Committee Jurisdiction...................................    96
    (b) Subcommittees and Jurisdiction...........................    96
        (1) Subcommittee on Energy...............................    96
        (2) Subcommittee on Environment..........................    97
        (3) Subcommittee on Research and Technology..............    97
        (4) Subcommittee on Space and Aeronautics................    98
        (5) Subcommittee on Investigations and Oversight.........    98
    (c) Composition of Subcommittees.............................    98
    (d) Referral to Subcommittees................................    98
    (e) Subcommittee Procedures and Reports......................    98
Rule VII. Vice Chairs............................................    99
Rule VIII. Oversight and Investigations..........................    99
Rule IX. Subpoenas...............................................   100
Rule X. Deposition Authority.....................................   100
Rule XI. Committee Records.......................................   100
Rule XII. Official Committee Website.............................   100
Rule XIII. Committee Budget......................................   100
Rule XIV. Amendments to Committee Rules..........................   100
Rule I. General

    (a) Application of Rules.
          (1) The Rules of the House of Representatives 
        (``House Rules'') are the rules of the Committee on 
        Science, Space, and Technology and its Subcommittees 
        with the specific additions thereto contained in these 
        rules.
          (2) Except where the term ``Subcommittee'' is 
        specifically referred to, the following rules shall 
        apply to the Committee and its Subcommittees as well as 
        to the respective Chairs and Ranking Minority Members.
    (b) Other Procedures. The Chair of the Committee, after 
consultation with the Ranking Minority Member of the Committee, 
may establish such other procedures and take such actions as 
may be necessary to carry out these rules or to facilitate the 
effective operation of the Committee.
    (c) Use of Hearing Rooms. In consultation with the Ranking 
Minority Member, the Chair of the Committee shall establish 
guidelines for the use of Committee hearing rooms.

Rule II. Regular, Additional, and Special Meetings

    (a) Regular Meetings. The regular meeting day of the 
Committee for the conduct of its business shall be on the first 
Wednesday of each month, if the House is in session. If the 
House is not in session on that day, then the Committee shall 
meet on the next Wednesday of such month on which the House is 
in session, or at another practicable time as determined by the 
Chair.
          (1) A regular meeting of the Committee may be 
        dispensed with if, in the judgment of the Chair, there 
        is no need for the meeting.
          (2) The Chair may call and convene, when the Chair 
        considers it necessary and in accordance with the 
        notice requirements contained in these rules, 
        additional meetings of the Committee for the 
        consideration of any bill or resolution pending before 
        the Committee or for the conduct of other Committee 
        business.
    (b) Bills and Subjects to be Considered.
          (1) The Chair shall announce the date, place, and 
        subject matter of any Committee meeting, which may not 
        commence earlier than the third calendar day (excluding 
        Saturdays, Sundays, or legal holidays except when the 
        House is in session on such a day) on which Members 
        have notice thereof, unless the Chair, with the 
        concurrence of the Ranking Minority Member, or the 
        Committee by majority vote with a quorum present for 
        the transaction of business, determines there is good 
        cause to begin the meeting sooner, in which case the 
        Chair shall make the announcement at the earliest 
        possible date.
          (2) At least 48 hours prior to the commencement of a 
        meeting for the markup of legislation (excluding 
        Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays except when the 
        House is in session on such a day), the Chair shall 
        cause the text of such legislation to be made publicly 
        available in electronic form.
          (3) To the maximum extent practicable, amendments to 
        a measure or matter shall be submitted in writing or 
        electronically to the designee of both the Chair and 
        Ranking Minority Member at least 24 hours prior to the 
        consideration of the measure or matter, and the Chair 
        may oppose any amendment not so submitted.
    (c) Open Meetings. Meetings for the transaction of business 
and hearings of the Committee shall be open to the public or 
closed in accordance with the House Rules.
    (d) Quorums. A majority of the Committee shall form a 
quorum, except that two Members shall constitute a quorum for 
taking testimony and receiving evidence, and one third of the 
Members shall form a quorum for taking any action other than 
for which the presence of a majority of the Committee is 
otherwise required. If the Chair is not present at any meeting 
of the Committee or Subcommittee, the Vice Chair on the 
Committee who is present shall preside at the meeting, unless 
another Member of the Committee is designated by the Chair.
    (e) Postponement of Proceedings.
          (1) Pursuant to clause 2(h)(4) of House Rule XI, the 
        Chair may postpone further proceedings when a record 
        vote is ordered on the question of approving a measure 
        or matter or on adopting an amendment. The Chair may 
        resume proceedings on a postponed vote at any time 
        after reasonable notice.
          (2) When proceedings resume on a postponed question, 
        notwithstanding any intervening order for the previous 
        question, an underlying proposition shall remain 
        subject to further debate or amendment to the same 
        extent as when the question was postponed.
    (f) Time for Statements and Debate.
          (1) Insofar as is practicable, the Chair, after 
        consultation with the Ranking Minority Member, shall 
        limit the total time of opening statements by Members 
        at a Committee meeting to no more than ten minutes, the 
        time to be divided equally between the Chair and 
        Ranking Minority Member, except in the case of joint 
        Subcommittee hearings, in which case the total time of 
        opening statements by Members at such joint hearing 
        shall be no more than twenty minutes, the time to be 
        divided equally between the Chairs and Ranking Minority 
        Members. When requested, ex officio Members of any 
        Subcommittee shall also be recognized at a Subcommittee 
        hearing for five minutes each to present an opening 
        statement.
          (2) The time any one Member may address the Committee 
        on any bill, amendment, motion, or other matter under 
        consideration by the Committee will be limited to five 
        minutes, and then only when the Member has been 
        recognized by the Chair. This time limit may be waived 
        by the Chair pursuant to unanimous consent.
    (g) Requests for Recorded Vote. A record vote of the 
Committee shall be provided on any question before the 
Committee upon the request of three or more Members or, in the 
apparent absence of a quorum, by any one Member.
    (h) Transcripts. Transcripts of markups shall be recorded 
and may be published in the same manner as hearings before the 
Committee, and shall be included as part of the legislative 
report unless waived by the Chair of the Committee.
    (i) Motion to Go to Conference. Without further action of 
the Committee, the Chair is authorized to offer a motion under 
clause 1 of House Rule XXII whenever the Chair considers it 
appropriate.

Rule III. Hearings

    (a) Notice of Hearings.
          (1) The Chair shall publicly announce the date, 
        place, and subject matter of any hearing to be 
        conducted by the Committee on any measure or matter at 
        least one week before the commencement of that hearing. 
        If the Chair, with the concurrence of the Ranking 
        Minority Member, determines there is good cause to 
        begin the hearing sooner, or if the Committee so 
        determines by majority vote, a quorum being present for 
        the transaction of business, the Chair shall make the 
        announcement at the earliest possible date.
          (2) The Chair shall publicly announce a list of 
        witnesses to testify at a hearing as soon as a complete 
        list of witnesses, including those to be called by the 
        minority, is compiled. When practicable, the Chair and 
        the Ranking Minority Member will seek to have a 
        complete list of witnesses compiled at, or as soon as 
        practicable after, the time that the hearing is 
        publicly announced.
      (b) Witnesses. (1) Insofar as is practicable, no later 
than 48 hours in advance of his or her appearance, each witness 
who is to appear before the Committee shall file, in printed 
copy and in electronic form, a written statement of his or her 
proposed testimony and a curriculum vitae.
          (2) Each witness shall limit his or her presentation 
        to a five minute summary, however additional time may 
        be granted by the Chair when appropriate.
          (3) The Chair, or any Member of the Committee 
        designated by the Chair, may administer oaths to 
        witnesses before the Committee.
          (4) Whenever any hearing is conducted by the 
        Committee on any measure or matter, the Minority 
        Members of the Committee shall be entitled, upon 
        request to the Chair by a majority of them before the 
        completion of the hearing, to call witnesses selected 
        by the Minority to testify with respect to the measure 
        or matter during at least one day of hearing thereon.
          (5) In the case of a witness appearing in a 
        nongovernmental capacity, a written statement of 
        proposed testimony shall include:
                  a. A curriculum vitae;
                  b. A disclosure of any Federal grants or 
                contracts, or contracts, grants, or payments 
                originating with a foreign government, received 
                during the past 36 months by the witness or by 
                an entity represented by the witness and 
                related to the subject matter of the hearing; 
                and,
                  c. A disclosure of whether the witness is a 
                fiduciary (including, but not limited to, a 
                director, officer, advisor, or resident agent) 
                of any organization or entity that has an 
                interest in the subject matter of the hearing.
                  Such statements, with appropriate redactions 
                to protect the privacy or security of the 
                witness, shall be made publicly available in 
                electronic form 24 hours before the witness 
                appears to the extent practicable, but not 
                later than one day after the witness appears.
    (c) Questioning of Witnesses.
          (1) The right to interrogate a witness before the 
        Committee shall alternate between Majority and Minority 
        Members of the Committee. Each Member shall be limited 
        to five minutes in the interrogation of witnesses. No 
        Member may be recognized for a second period of 
        interrogation until each Member present, who wishes to 
        be recognized, has been recognized at least once.
          (2) Notwithstanding clause 1, upon a motion the 
        Chair, in consultation with the Ranking Minority 
        Member, may:
                  a. Designate a specified number of Members of 
                the Committee from each party to question a 
                witness for a period of time equally divided 
                between the majority party and the minority 
                party, not to exceed one hour in the aggregate; 
                or
                  b. Designate staff from each party to 
                question a witness for a period of time equally 
                divided between the majority party and the 
                minority party, not to exceed one hour in the 
                aggregate.
          (3) Members of the Committee have two weeks from the 
        date of a hearing to submit additional questions in 
        writing for the record to be answered by witnesses who 
        have appeared before the Committee. The letters of 
        transmittal and any responses thereto shall be included 
        in the hearing record.
    (d) Claims of Privilege. Claims of common-law privileges 
made by witnesses in hearings, or by interviewees or deponents 
in investigations or inquiries, are applicable only at the 
discretion of the Chair, subject to appeal to the Committee.
    (e) Publication of Transcripts. The transcripts of those 
hearings conducted by the Committee, when it is decided they 
will be printed, shall be published in substantially verbatim 
form, with the material requested for the record inserted at 
that place requested, or at the end of the record, as 
appropriate. Individuals, including Members, whose comments are 
to be published as part of a Committee document shall be given 
the opportunity to verify the accuracy of the transcription in 
advance of publication. Any requests by those Members, staff, 
or witnesses to correct any errors other than errors in the 
transcript, or disputed errors in transcription, shall be 
appended to the record, and the appropriate place where the 
change is requested will be footnoted. Prior to approval by the 
Chair of hearings conducted jointly with another Congressional 
Committee, a memorandum of understanding shall be prepared 
which incorporates an agreement for the publication of the 
transcript.
    (f) Pertinence of Testimony. At the discretion of the 
Committee, brief and pertinent statements may be submitted in 
writing for inclusion in the record. The Committee is the sole 
judge of the pertinence of testimony and evidence adduced at 
its hearing.

Rule IV. Reports

    (a) Bills and resolutions approved by the Committee shall 
be reported by the Chair pursuant to clauses 2-4 of House Rule 
XIII.
    (b) A proposed investigative or oversight report shall be 
considered as read if it has been available to the Members of 
the Committee for at least 24 hours (excluding Saturdays, 
Sundays, or legal holidays except when the House is in session 
on such days).
    (c) Every investigative or oversight report shall be 
approved by a majority vote of the Committee at a meeting at 
which a quorum is present. If at the time of approval of such a 
report a Member of the Committee gives notice of intent to file 
supplemental, minority, additional, or dissenting views that 
Member shall be entitled to file such views.
    (d) Only those investigative or oversight reports approved 
by a majority vote of the Committee may be ordered printed, 
unless otherwise required by House Rules.

Rule V. Broadcasting

    (a) Whenever a meeting for the transaction of business, 
including the markup of legislation or a hearing is open to the 
public, that meeting or hearing shall be open to coverage by 
television, radio, and still photography in accordance with 
clause 4 of House Rule XI.
    (b) To the maximum extent practicable, the Committee shall 
provide audio and visual coverage of each hearing or meeting 
for the transaction of business in a manner that allows the 
public to easily listen to and view the proceedings, and 
maintain the recordings of such coverage in a manner that is 
easily accessible to the public. Operation and use of any 
Committee internet broadcast system shall be fair and 
nonpartisan, and in accordance with clauses 4 (b) and (f) of 
House Rule XI and all other applicable rules of the Committee 
and the House.

Rule VI. Subcommittees

    (a) Committee Jurisdiction. The Committee shall have 
jurisdiction over such matters as determined by the Chair.
    (b) Subcommittees and Jurisdiction. There shall be five 
standing Subcommittees of the Committee on Science, Space, and 
Technology, with jurisdictions as follows:
          (1) Subcommittee on Energy. Shall have jurisdiction 
        over the following subject matters: all matters 
        relating to energy research, development, and 
        demonstration projects therefor; commercial application 
        of energy technology; Department of Energy research, 
        development, and demonstration programs; Department of 
        Energy laboratories; Department of Energy science 
        activities; Department of Energy international 
        research, development, and demonstration projects; 
        energy supply activities; nuclear, solar, and renewable 
        energy, and other advanced energy technologies; uranium 
        supply and enrichment, and Department of Energy waste 
        management; Department of Energy environmental 
        management research, development, and demonstration; 
        fossil energy research and development; clean coal 
        technology; energy conservation research and 
        development, including building performance, alternate 
        fuels, distributed power systems, and industrial 
        process improvements; pipeline research, development, 
        and demonstration projects; energy standards; other 
        appropriate matters as referred by the Chair; and 
        relevant oversight.
          (2) Subcommittee on Environment. Shall have 
        jurisdiction over the following subject matters: all 
        matters relating to environmental research; 
        Environmental Protection Agency research and 
        development; environmental standards; climate change 
        research and development; the National Oceanic and 
        Atmospheric Administration, including all activities 
        related to weather, weather services, climate, the 
        atmosphere, marine fisheries, and oceanic research; 
        risk assessment activities; scientific issues related 
        to environmental policy, including climate change; 
        other appropriate matters as referred by the Chair; and 
        relevant oversight.
          (3) Subcommittee on Research and Technology. Shall 
        have jurisdiction over the following subject matters: 
        all matters relating to science policy and science 
        education; the Office of Science and Technology Policy; 
        all scientific research, and scientific and engineering 
        resources (including human resources); all matters 
        relating to science, technology, engineering and 
        mathematics education; intergovernmental mechanisms for 
        research, development, and demonstration and cross-
        cutting programs; international scientific cooperation; 
        National Science Foundation; university research 
        policy, including infrastructure and overhead; 
        university research partnerships, including those with 
        industry; science scholarships; computing, 
        communications, networking, and information technology; 
        research and development relating to health, 
        biomedical, and nutritional programs; research, 
        development, and demonstration relating to nanoscience, 
        nanoengineering, and nanotechnology; agricultural, 
        geological, biological and life sciences research; 
        materials research, development, demonstration, and 
        policy; all matters relating to competitiveness, 
        technology, standards, and innovation; standardization 
        of weights and measures, including technical standards, 
        standardization, and conformity assessment; 
        measurement, including the metric system of 
        measurement; the Technology Administration of the 
        Department of Commerce; the National Institute of 
        Standards and Technology; the National Technical 
        Information Service; competitiveness, including small 
        business competitiveness; tax, antitrust, regulatory 
        and other legal and governmental policies related to 
        technological development and commercialization; 
        technology transfer, including civilian use of defense 
        technologies; patent and intellectual property policy; 
        international technology trade; research, development, 
        and demonstration activities of the Department of 
        Transportation; surface and water transportation 
        research, development, and demonstration programs; 
        earthquake programs and fire research programs, 
        including those related to wildfire proliferation 
        research and prevention; biotechnology policy; 
        research, development, demonstration, and standards-
        related activities of the Department of Homeland 
        Security; Small Business Innovation Research and 
        Technology Transfer; voting technologies and standards; 
        other appropriate matters as referred by the Chair; and 
        relevant oversight.
          (4) Subcommittee on Space and Aeronautics. Shall have 
        jurisdiction over the following subject matters: all 
        matters relating to astronautical and aeronautical 
        research and development; national space policy, 
        including access to space; sub-orbital access and 
        applications; National Aeronautics and Space 
        Administration and its contractor and government-
        operated labs; space commercialization, including 
        commercial space activities relating to the Department 
        of Transportation and the Department of Commerce; 
        exploration and use of outer space; international space 
        cooperation; the National Space Council; space 
        applications, space communications and related matters;
          Earth remote sensing policy; civil aviation research, 
        development, and demonstration; research, development, 
        and demonstration programs of the Federal Aviation 
        Administration; space law; other appropriate matters as 
        referred by the Chair; and relevant oversight.
          (5) Subcommittee on Investigations and Oversight. 
        Shall have general and special investigative authority 
        on all matters within the jurisdiction of the 
        Committee.
    (c) Composition of Subcommittees.
          (1) The Chair shall assign Members to the 
        Subcommittees. Minority party assignments shall be made 
        only with the concurrence of the Ranking Minority 
        Member. The Chair shall determine the ratio of Majority 
        Members to Minority Members of each Subcommittee; 
        provided that the ratio of Majority Members to Minority 
        Members on each Subcommittee (excluding any ex officio 
        Member) shall be no less favorable to the Majority 
        party than the ratio for the Committee.
          (2) The Chair and Ranking Minority Member of the 
        Committee shall be ex officio Members of each 
        Subcommittee and shall have the right to vote and be 
        counted as part of the quorum and ratios on all matters 
        before the Subcommittee.
    (d) Referral to Subcommittees. The Chair shall 
expeditiously refer all legislation and other matters referred 
to the Committee to the Subcommittee or Subcommittees of 
appropriate jurisdiction, unless the Chair deems consideration 
is to be by the Committee. Subcommittee Chairs may make 
requests for referral of specific matters to their Subcommittee 
if they believe Subcommittee jurisdictions so warrants.
    (e) Subcommittee Procedures and Reports.
          (1) Subcommittee Chairs shall set meeting dates with 
        the concurrence of the Chair and after consultation 
        with the other Subcommittee Chairs with a view toward 
        avoiding simultaneous scheduling of Subcommittee 
        meetings or hearings wherever possible. No Subcommittee 
        may meet or hold a hearing at the same time as a 
        meeting or hearing of the Committee without 
        authorization from the Chair.
          (2) Each Subcommittee is authorized to meet, hold 
        hearings, receive testimony or evidence, mark up 
        legislation, and report to the Committee on all matters 
        referred to it. For matters within its jurisdiction, 
        each Subcommittee is authorized to conduct legislative, 
        investigative, forecasting, and general oversight 
        hearings; to conduct inquiries into the future; and to 
        undertake budget impact studies.
          (3) Each Subcommittee shall provide the Committee 
        with copies of such records of votes taken in the 
        Subcommittee and such other records with respect to the 
        Subcommittee as the Chair of the Committee deems 
        necessary to ensure compliance with the House Rules.
          (4) After ordering a measure or matter reported, a 
        Subcommittee shall issue a report in such form as the 
        Chair shall specify. To the maximum extent practicable, 
        reports and recommendations of a Subcommittee shall not 
        be considered by the Committee until after the 
        intervention of 48 hours (excluding Saturdays, Sundays, 
        and legal holidays except when the House is in session 
        on such a day) from the time the report is submitted 
        and made available to the Committee. Printed hearings 
        thereon shall be made available, if feasible, to the 
        Committee, except that this Rule may be waived at the 
        discretion of the Chair after consultation with the 
        Ranking Minority Member.
          (5) Any Member of the Committee may have the 
        privilege of sitting with any Subcommittee during its 
        hearings or deliberations and may participate in such 
        hearings or deliberations, but no Member who is not a 
        Member of the Subcommittee shall vote on any matter 
        before such Subcommittee, except as provided in Rule 
        VI(c)(2).

Rule VII. Vice Chairs

    (a) The Chair of the Committee shall designate a Member of 
the majority party to serve as Vice Chair of the Committee, and 
shall designate a Majority Member of each Subcommittee to serve 
as Vice Chair of the Subcommittee. Vice Chairs of the Committee 
and each Subcommittee serve at the pleasure of the Chair, who 
may at any time terminate his designation of a Member as Vice 
Chair and designate a different Member of the majority party to 
serve as Vice Chair of the Committee or relevant Subcommittee.
    (b) The Chair may assign duties, privileges, and 
responsibilities to the Vice Chairs of the Committee or the 
various Subcommittees.

Rule VIII. Oversight and Investigations

    (a) The Committee shall review and study, on a continuing 
basis, the application, administration, execution, and 
effectiveness of those laws, or parts of laws, the subject 
matter of which is within its jurisdiction, including all laws, 
programs, and Government activities relating to nonmilitary 
research and development in accordance with House Rule X.
    (b) Not later than March 1st of the first session of the 
117th Congress, the Chair, after consultation with the Ranking 
Minority Member, shall submit the Committee's oversight plan to 
the Committee on Oversight and the Committee on House 
Administration in accordance with the provisions of clause 2(d) 
of House Rule X.
    (c) Any investigation undertaken in the name of the 
Committee shall be approved by the Chair. Nothing in this 
subsection shall be interpreted to infringe on a Subcommittee's 
authority to conduct general oversight of matters within its 
jurisdiction, short of undertaking an investigation.

Rule IX. Subpoenas

    The power to authorize and issue subpoenas is delegated to 
the Chair as provided for under clause 2(m)(3)(A)(i) of House 
Rule XI. The Chair shall notify the Ranking Minority Member 
prior to issuing any subpoena under such authority. To the 
extent practicable, the Chair shall consult with the Ranking 
Minority Member at least 24 hours in advance of a subpoena 
being issued under such authority.

Rule X. Deposition Authority

    The Chair may authorize the staff of the Committee to 
conduct depositions pursuant to section 3 of House Resolution 
8, 117th Congress, and subject to any regulations issued 
pursuant thereto.

Rule XI. Committee Records

    (a) The records of the Committee at the National Archives 
and Records Administration shall be made available for public 
use in accordance with House Rule VII.
    (b) The Chair shall notify the Ranking Minority Member of 
the Committee of any decision, pursuant to clauses 3(b)(3) or 
4(b) of House Rule VII, to withhold a record otherwise 
available, and the matter shall be presented to the Committee 
for a determination on the written request of any Member of the 
Committee.

Rule XII. Official Committee Website

    The Chair shall maintain an official Committee website for 
the purpose of furthering the Committee's legislative and 
oversight responsibilities, including communicating information 
about the Committee's activities to Committee Members and other 
Members of the House. The Ranking Minority Member of the 
Committee may maintain a similar website for the same purpose, 
including communicating information about the activities of the 
minority to Committee Members and other Members of the House.

Rule XIII. Committee Budget

    From the amount provided to the Committee in the primary 
expense resolution adopted by the House of Representatives in 
the 117th Congress, the Chair shall designate one-third of the 
budget, after adjustment for the salaries of the shared 
administrative functions for the Clerk, Printer and Financial 
Administrator, under the direction of the Ranking Minority 
Member for the purposes of minority staff, travel expenses of 
minority staff and Members, and all other minority office 
expenses.

Rule XIV. Amendments to Committee Rules

    The rules of the Committee may be modified, amended, or 
repealed, in the same manner and method as prescribed for the 
adoption of committee rules in clause 2 of House Rule XI, but 
only if written notice of the proposed change has been provided 
to each such Member at least 3 days before the time of the 
meeting at which the vote on the change occurs. Any such change 
in the rules of the Committee shall be published in the 
Congressional Record within 30 calendar days after their 
approval.

                                  [all]