[From the U.S. Government Printing Office, www.gpo.gov]
COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT CM 287 SH 222 S721 F6 1991 STATE OF FLORIDA COASTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM. COASTAL PELAGICS SURVEY RESEARCH CM 287 MARINE FISHERIES Commission 2540 EXECUTIVE CENTER CIRCLE, WEST SUITE 106 TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32301 JANUARY 1991 Funds for this project were provided by the Department of Environmental Regulation, Office of Coastal Management using funds made available through the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration under the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972, as amended. c .1 0 f Propworof 1 C48ow seivmu 0. Luawy TABLE OF CONTENTS I Summary of Research II fisherman and Dealer Surveys 1. Thee survey forms. a. fisherman b. Dealer 2. Read. me file 3. Disk 4. Database structure of the survey files. a. Fisherma.dbf b. Dealer.dbf 5. Coding forms for survey questions: a. Species codes - harvesting sector survey - applies to questions number 3 & 15, (also questions number 3 & 4 in Dealer.dbf) b. Gear codes - applies to questions number 12 & 16. C. List of alternative selections for question number 18: price/ quality relationships. d. List of descriptions from question number 19.defining quality. e. List of descriptions from questions number 11 & 12 (Dealer survey): defining premium product forms. III. Commercial Trip Ticket Records 1. Letter describing file. 2. Structure of variables of MACKFISH LIC89. IV. Bibiography V. NTIS Form 272 COASTAL PELAGICS SURVEY RESEARCH BACKGROUND INFORMATION The Marine Fisheries Commission enacts management plans to ensure the conservation of marine species. These management plans include background data and reports, a findings of fact document, and other documents required for agency rulemaking. The policies and standards of the Commission (Section 370.025, F.S.) establish conservation as the paramount goal. However, Commission rule making is also to provide for optimum sustained benefits and use to all the people of the state. Fishery management regulations for the coastal pelagic species, the mackerels, were first prepared by the federal councils in 1982. In retrospect the management plan did not address any of the real problems of overfishing which began to occur during the mid- seventies off the coast of Florida. During 1984 the newly created Florida Marine Fisheries Commission enacted rules regulating the taking of king mackerel. By 1986 the State had enacted substantial harvest restrictions for Spanish mackerel and succeeded in convincing the two federal councils to enact an emergency rule to stop fishing in the federal zone (exclusive economic zone) once the state quota was attained. The following year, federal plan amendment two was in place. The effect of the plan amendment was to establish federal quotas over the entire range of the various fisheries; these quotas in turn were derived from range and point estimates of acceptable biological catch (ABC) and total allowable catch (TAC) , respectively. The result was to reverse the emerging management regime which allowed Florida to regulate the pace and allocation of the fishery. The fact that Florida representatives were leaders in the call for regulation of the pelagic fishery is not salutary. In spite of their wide ranging migrations along the continental shelf, hence the sobriquet coastal pelagic, the fishery and the problems in the fishery were, at that time, largely of Florida's making. The problems of overfishing of the coastal pelagic species are not unusual. The species group includes king and Spanish mackerel, cobia, cero mackerel, Little tunny and dolphin with bluefish included in the Gulf of Mexico. The first two species have long been sought by recreational and commercial fishers. The now familiar tragedy of the commons described by G. Hardin also operates in the realm of fisheries. The technical explanation is that overexploitation of public resources occur because the factor cost to the individual firm does not equal the opportunity cost to society. Common property resources are nevertheless scarce goods to society but they are free goods, there for the taking, to individuals; this usually results in overexploitation since the usual leveling of demand and supply does not occur since one of the factors of production, i.e., natural resources such as land or fish, labor, capital and entrepreneurial skill, is without a price or that price is limited to the cost of a license or permit. Most of the management decisions made to date have been based on biological information which demonsprated growth overfishing or. recruitment overfishing of a species or species complex. This approach has emphasized conservation, but has generally ignored the issue of optimum sustained benefits and use. Instead, allocation was established based on some average of the historical distribution of landings between recreational and commercial fishermen and between the various commercial fisheries. The concept of optimum benefit is a socio-economic concept which included consideration of the distribution of fishery resources. For any given species, there are a variety of demands: reproduction and growth (maximum sustained yield) , aesthetics, food chain contribution, and commercial and recreational harvest. Man's uses can be further subdivided into nearshore versus offshore, directed versus bycatch, frozen versus fresh, tourist versus resident, etc. This distribution of the resource is referred to in fisheries management jargon as the allocation of the resource. In an economic sense, allocation to each sector (use) based on the highest marginal value would result in optimum sustained benefits and use. Unfortunately, much of the information necessary to make allocation decisions is either unavailable or dated. Therefore, the need for timely social and economic data is critical to Commission decision making. Such information is not generally available from other sources, but must be specifically collected to determine social and economic impacts, economic values placed on the resource by different groups, market demand for different product forms, and the identification of import and export channels. This project will use survey research to address, allocation questions for the coastal pelagics, specifically the mackerels: Spanish and kings. East Coast Spanish mackerel provide some examples of not only the typical recreational -commercial allocation conflict, but also a north-south geographical allocation problem. During the 1950's, Spanish mackerel were abundant during winter all along the Southeast Coast, and Dade County was the leading commercial producer. However, the fisheries leapfrogged northward to Jupiter during the 19601s, and then to Ft. Pierce in the 19701s, probably because northern-most fishermen had a locational advantage intercepting the southbound migration moving along the narrow corridor between mainland Florida and the Gulf Stream current. There has been a dearth of Spanish mackerel from Palm Beach to Dade County during the last 15 to 20 years. recent Commission regulation will try to solve that problem by controlling fishing pressure early in the season to allow some f ish to pass the intensive fisheries around Ft. Pierce. 2 Another allocation problem became apparent following the imposition of quotas three years ago, the problem being that the quotas have put the fishery in a "hurry up" mode as fishermen intensify their efforts to ensure that they get their fair share of the quota. In each of the last four years, the entire Southeast Coast quota has been taken in about two weeks of intensive fishing (Figure 1) . Fifteen years ago, the same fishery took five or six months. The two week fishery results in a glut production that strains fish house and results in most of the product going to the freezer at the expense of the traditional fresh markets. SURVEY RESULTS Florida's management plan for Gulf king mackerel is framed by the federal quota established for the Eastern Zone of the Gulf group. Federal management is based 'on a quota that allocates 68% to the recreational fishery and 32% to the commercial fishery. Those amounts are then further divided into the Eastern (Florida) and Western zones. This results in 1,270,000 pounds of commercial quota for the Eastern Zone for the 1991-92 fishing year. The commercial and recreational fisheries for king mackerel have been described in a number of sources. The trends in commercial landings of king mackerel in Florida over the past 40 years are evident as was the case in Spanish mackerel, i.e., three epochs of fishing. The first, until the late sixties, the second, pre- regulation, and finally, landings under a system of quotas. Information about landings by gear type has been estimated by NMFS for the entire period of record. However the NMFS data is not sufficient to provide price information by gear type.or season.' The East Coast fishery is predominately a hook and line fishery and was an important component of the charterboat fisheries annual income, whereas West Coast landings were dominated by gill net fisheries and are centered in Monroe County. Statistics on the origin of commercial catches indicate that the fishery is predominately in Florida, while 84% of the catch is taken in the area beyond three nautical miles from shore. Estimates of the number of watercraft in the fishery lack precision due to the multi-species nature of the pelagics fishery. Therefore, numbers and levels of effort are difficult to gauge. However, the number of hook and line vessels in the industry have shown a marked decline. The decline occurred prior to the imposition of quotas, which allows speculation of whether anticipated quotas or declining fishing conditions were the cause. Because of the aggregating behavior of the fish, hook and line fishermen have had the advantage of a longer season than gill net fisherman. When price flexibility equations were estimated, in an 3 attempt to gauge the ef f ects of regulatory catch reductions on revenues, only East Coast data was significant. The inference is that, aside from the mainstream markets that have historically shipped 60% of Florida landings to Fulton Fish Market, N.Y., N.Y. well-established markets (so-called efficient markets) do not exist. The establishment of quotas exacerbated this situation because large catches close the quota prior to the historical end of the fishery, which further attenuates the supply of an already seasonal fishery. Recently developed survey information suggests that the markets still exist, but that the market channels have shifted to imported products. Trends for comparing landings and imports indicate that imports from 1980 until 1983 were less then 500,000 pounds. it appears that imports are being used to supplement declining landings and that imports are used during the season when quotas have closed. The current management controversey is the result of two basic issues: (1) annual changes in the amount of allowable harvest that result from estimates of annual yield consistent with the long-term recovery of the fishery and (2) problems that occurred last year in monitoring the East Coast quota. The commercial fishery is largely a Florida fishery. It has been characterized both historically and contemporarily by numerous reports. The latest estimates of the stock assessment panel concluded that both stocks are still below the biomass targets deemed necessary to ensure recovery from historical recruitment overfishing. The East Coast fishery was centered in the Northeast U.S. during the latter nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, but by 1920 the fishery was concentrated in south Florida. Gill nets are the predominate gear form, while Florida landings account for over 85% of the total harvest@. The recent history of the fishery has been characterized by Williams as a leapfrogging of the industry toward Cape Canaveral from south Florida in an attempt to gain a locational advantage to first intercept the migrating fish. This has resulted from the introduction of deep water gill nets, 300 meshes deep, from vessels with a hold capacity in excess of 50,000 pounds. The introduction of such vessels during the 1970's moved the fishery further offshore, created a freezer fillet industry, and further contributed to recruitment overfishing. Management measures to reverse the declines in spawning stock biomass were first initiated in the 1986-87 fishing year. The commercial fishery was managed 'through the use of quotas which further exacerbated the pace of fishing effort as each firm 4 attempted to garner the largest possible portion of the quota. Testimony during the January workshop in Ft. Pierce As described 14 large vessels and 150 small watercraft (20-34 feet). However, an estimate of small boats based on trip tickets concluded that 58 were active on the East Coast. The West Coast of Florida landed over 95% of the Gulf of Mexico catch during the 1989-90 season. Commercial harvest was below both the state and federal quotas for the first time. In fact, in prior years, quotas were landed in the Southwest Region prior to any significant Northwest Region harvest. Lack of demand f rom Florida Keys markets were cited. However, testimony f rom some wholesalers indicated ex-vessel prices of $.75/lb. for fresh fish in whole form. Annual quota changes are based on the decisions made by the South Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico Federal Fishery Management Councils. These harvest limits are imposed to ensure stock recovery and sustained yield. Problems in the management of the East Coast fishery were identified during the 1989/90 fishing season. The Spanish mackerel Rule (46-23, F.A.C.) approved by the Commission in September 1989 attempted to reserve 10% (260,000 lbs.) of the East Coast quota (2,600,000 lbs.) to be harvested at the end of the season under 1,500 lb-. daily vessel limits. The basis of the 10% reserve was: (1) to slow down commercial harvest and allow the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) to close the fishery in an orderly manner without exceeding the quota; (2) to reserve a small amount of fish to small-scale harvesters; and (3) to reserve some fish for fresh markets. The rule did not achieve its intention of reserving the last lot, and virtually the entire quota was captured during the unlimited phase of harvest. On December 20, DNR determined that 90% of the quota had been captured following a catch of 458,000 pounds on December 19, and they then issued an order to close the fishery to unlimited harvest effective 12:01 AM on December 21, 1989. However, on December 20, as they were calculating the previous day's catch and obtaining an order to reduce harvest to 1,500 lbs. per day, the fishery produced an additional 474,000 lbs. By the morning of December 21, it was apparent that the 90% of the quota (2.34 million pounds), as well as the 2.6 million pound quota, had been reached. DNR then closed the 1,500 lb. segment at noon on December 21. Thus, the 1,500 lb. daily vessel limit applied for only 12 hours, after which time boats.became subject to the state's 500 lb. exception. The lack of a 1,500 lb. daily vessel limit season has generated considerable anger within the commercial sector. Smaller boat operators in particular claim to have suffered excessively during 5 each of the four seasons since the quota has been in place. Small boat operators' incomes depended on a smaller unit of effort applied over a longer time period, compared to the large vessels which have very high harvest capacity (up to 50,000 lbs./trip) and needed fewer fishing days to have a good income. Since the advent of the quota, the winter season has only lasted about two weeks once the mackerel migration arrives south of Cape Canaveral. In each of the last three years, the season has been closed in December, three months before the historical end of the season. There were 819 commercial permits issued for Gulf Spanish mackerel in 1988-89. The comparable number for Atlantic group was 1,242. The total watercraft in the fishery include 47 vessels and up to 237 smaller craft in all states. Of the total licenses in the fishery, 513 were active in the East Coast region, 256 in the Northwest, and 945 in Southwest Florida. During 1987/88, 374 SPLs accounted for 91% of the harvest. A detailed breakdown of landings by region, by trip size, by season for the 1989/90 fishing year. A tabulation of wholesale dealers used to derive the survey questionnaires is also attached, the chart lists the number of wholesalers categorized by the number of purchases that included king mackerel with a second for Spanish mackerel. The recreational fishery occurs on bo th coasts. Socio-economic characteristics of such fishermen were evaluated in Hiett! 1983 and have been described by others. Preliminary MRFSS data indicate catches by all modes of fishing: private boat (70%), shore (18%), party/charter (12%), in the south Atlantic and 81%, 17% and 2-00 respectively in the Gulf of Mexico. Florida catch rates show a great deal of variability. Reported catch and harvest in numbers of fish totalled 304,000 and 279,000 by East Coast anglers and 2,159,000 and 1,437,000 for Gulf Coast anglers. During the last fishing year, East Coast anglers exceeded the quota, while Gulf Coast anglers did not reach their quota limit. There are 1,100 charter and party boats in Florida in addition to the support services that are indirectly affected by management decisions. The number of anglers who target or catch mackerel range from 100,000 to 300,000 anglers taking 700,000 trips. These figures are based on a three year average. The recreational fishery was not included in the survey analysis aside from the charter/head boat portion of the questionnaire. The distribution of anglers who target and catch mackerels is such that using the recreational fishing license file to canvass anglers who result in biased results. Therefore the MFC has contracted seperately with researchers from the University of Florida in order to obtain a regionally stratified random sample of all.anglers, using the information obtained from the MRFSS telephone survey of 40,000 Florida households. During the last fishing year, the Gulf quota has not been reached. However, during the previous f ishing year, the quota was caught before the spring fishing season in southwest Florida, so the NWR did not receive an equitable allocation of the Gulf quota. The size of the benef it will be at least 56% of the NWR quota or $94,000, ex-vessel. This proposed measure would enact a landing law f or the NWR so tr ip limits could be enforced regardless of the origin of the catch, i.e., state or federal waters. This is consistent with previous Commission action in the other regions. Table 3.03 provides an extensive tabulation of landings by trip size, by region, and by season. While no single fishing year can be considered representative, the data does indicate the preponderance of smaller trip size production in that region. The benefit of the measure is considered to be twofold: (1) an enforceable,-l-i500 pound trip limit will enable quota monitoring to keep pace with landings, and (2) the trip limit will spread the quota to more fishermen for a longer time period. Harvests beyond the established quotas create regional allocation problems and extend the long-term catch reductions necessary to reach spawning stock biomass goals. Benef it/cost f igures cannot be associated with this measure because time periods f or stock recovery at various levels of ABC are not available. The cost of the measure will be to the harvesting sector, when the federal quota is open and the state landing law is 1,500 pounds. Then craft with capacity in excess of 1,500 pounds will have higher costs per return, then if they were only regulated by quotas. From 1985 to 1990, 93% of all trips and 34% of landings have been from 11500 pound or smaller trips, while the landing for the East and southwest regions were 9% and 19%, respectively. State quota numbers are derived from federal commercial quotas. Therefore, benefits or costs cannot be based on an unregulated alternative, since harvest limits are necessary to assure stock recovery and the long-term benefit of sustained yield. The estimate of MSY at recovery is 18 million pounds. Current TAC is 10.25 million pounds. The benefit of recovery would be as much as a 92% increase in commercial quotas. The ECR commercial quota is being reduced by 500,000 pounds (20%) from the previous year, while the SWR is being increased by 20,000 pounds (1%) and the NWR is being increased by 80,000 pounds (20%). The result is a net reduction of 400,000 pounds, or $140,000 ex- vessel ($.35/lb.).- ACommercial Ki n@g'. Mackerel Landings in Florida by Coast, 1952-1988 10i ------------------------ ....................................................................................... ................................ ........... .............................................. . ........ . ............................................ .......................................................................... ... ..... . ........................... ........................ ............................... ............. . 7 - ------ 7------- .......................... - ----------------------------------------------------------- ....... .. ............. ..... ............................. 6 4, . ........................................... ........ ................ .. . .... . -------------- ....... ----------- ...... .. ........... / ...... . ....... - ------------ ............ ........... --- ... ...... ..... ... .... ...... ---- ........... *--w ----- iW41L liff JILM 2 - ----- . . . .............. ... ... ............... .......................... ................. .. .... ........... ................................................................. 0 1,-@,;f>o 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1680 168,3 1 9,qO YEAR East Coast West Coast State-Wide SPLS REPORTING SALES Of KING MACKEREL BY THE NUMBER OF SALES(TRIPS) DURING THE SFY 1988 - 1989 COAST WEST COAST FREQUENCY BAR CHART MIDPOINT TRIPS FREQ CUM. PERCENT CUM. FREQ PERCENT 496 496 93.76 93.76 26 522 4.91 98.68 2 524 0.38 99.05 1 525 0.19 99.24 2 527 0.38 99.62 1 526 0.19 99.81 0 528 0.00 99.81 0 528 0.00 99.81 0 528 0.00 99.81 0 528 0.00 99.81 0 528 0.00 99.81 0 528 0.00 99.61 1 529 0.19 100.00 0 529 0.00 100.00 0 529 0.00 100.00 0 529 0.00 100.00 100 200 300 400 500 FREQUENCY SPLS REPORTING SALES OF KING MACKEREL BY THE NUMBER OF SALES(TRIPS) DURING THE S&Y 1988 - 1989 COAST = EAST COAST FREQUENCY BAR CHART MIDPOINT FREQ CUM. PERCENT CUM. FREQ PERCENT 3 219 219 77.11 77.11 9 44 263 15.49 92.61 15 13 276 4.68 97.18 21 7 283 2.46 99.65 27 1 284 0.35 100.00 33 0 284 0.00 100.00 39 0 284 0.00 100.00 45 0 284 0.00 100.00 51 0 284 0.00 100.00 57 0 284 0.00 100.00 63 0 284 0.00 100.00 69 0 284 0.00 100.00 75 0 284 0.00 100.00 81 0 284 0.00 100.00 87 0 284 0.00 100.00 93 0 284 0.00 100.00 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 FREQUENCY 'T:_ TA3LILATION OF R"PORTED COMMERCIAL TRIPS -Z' WHZEN G UT F KING MACKER-1 ARE CAUGHT, -988-89 BAT02126 KING - F--S---7RY STAT-_STICS SE-CTION ------------------------------------------------------------------------- AT - .-, 4a I ------------------------ KING YlACKZ_R_EL ------------------------------ TRIPS I TES I PCT LBS ----------------------------------------------------------------------- COAST JLB CLASS ---------------------- :7 ---------------- EAST COAST 0- 50 308@ 6613@ 0.71 ------------------- --------- ------------- 51- 100 1 1581 114791 1.24 --------------------------------------------------- 101- 150 1 1111 1-38241 1.49 --------------------------------------------------- 151- 200 1 751 128801 1. 1.39 --------------------------------------------------- 201- 250 641 142511 1.54 ------------------ ------------------------ 251- 300 491 134101 1.45 --------------------------------------------------- 301- 500 1 1871 732021 7.89 ----------------------------- ------- 501- 750 1 1251 756721 8.16 --------------------------------------------------- 751- 1000 1 591 506321 5.46 --------------------------------------------------- 1001- 5000 921 1528841 16.48 -------------------- ----------------------- ALr 1 12281 4248471 45.80 ------------------- --------------------------------------------------- WEST COAST L B C.' r. P, Sc S -------------- 0- - 50 ------ 1 7451 158511 1.71 -------------- ---------- ------------- 51- 100 1 2101 14.4161 1.55 --------------------------------------------------- 101- 150 1 611 72961 0.79 --------------------------------------------------- 151- 200 241 41oqj 0.44 --------------------------------------------------- 201- 250 , 1 171 37701 0.41 --------------------------------------------------- 251- 300 71 19151 0.21 --------------------------------------------------- 301- 500 1 191 74941 0.81 --------------------------------------------------- 501- 750 81 48091 0.52. --OF ------------------------------------------------------------------- ICONTINUED) -AmULA::ON or vr-.)r.z:rD rOMvr-)f-:A:. :R:-S W=..-rN'K:NG MACKEREL 'RE CAUGHT SHOWTNG TOTLL '@.IANDIJNG'S W:TH THE ASSOC:AT_rD K-LNG YLAICK-EF-EL :wRS ------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------ WEST COAST ------------------------------ TOT_f".Tj LANDINGS ------------------------------ IrR.1 P S I LBS I PCT rwBS --------------- ----------------------------------- ------------ = ------ K-LB-CLASS 0- --- 50 ------------- ;---------------------- 1 7451 -3236661 21.73 ----------------- -------------------- 52- iDD 1 2101 452501 3.o4 --------------------- ------------- r------- 6----------------------- loz- iso 1 611 28262-1 1.90 ----------------------------------- --------------------- 1-51- 200 1 241 457771, 0.31' - - ----------- - ------------------------ !------------- 201-- 250 1 1*71 93061 0.62 ----------------------------------------- r------- r---------------------- 251- 300 71 21071 0.14 ----------------- - - ------------------- r------------------------ 301- 500 1 191 104421 0.70 ----------------------------------------------------------- 6------------ 501- 750 1 81 54121 0.36 ---------- d----------------------------------------- r------- r------------ 75i- 1000 1 11 10251 0.07 ----------------------------------------- r------------------------------ 1001- 5000 1 91 1-55981 1.05 ---------------------------------------------------------------- 5001-10000 1 51 434761 2.92 ------------------------------------ ------------------------------ 10.001-i5ooo 61 730341- 4.90 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 15000-20000 1 31 . 553331 3.71 ------------------------------------------------ p------ ------- r------------ OT 20000-. 1 .101 2559851 37.18 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ALL 1 11251 8734731 58.63. ---------------- ------- -------------- ---------------- (CON-TINUED) THE TA-BULA'17:0N OF Z-Z.POR7-rD COMMZRZ@-ZL TR:"-zS WHEN K-;..;G YLACKER-EL -.R-r CAr-!G.=.'-!' S=..OW:NG 70:!L :,AND'-rN',-,S WITH A.SSOC-:AT-ED K:N- M.;.;rvrDrT :?S ------------------------------------------------------------------------- C, ------------------------------ -rzsT- COAS71, ------------------------------ TOTA.";j IAND*-@'NGS ------------------------------- T ES @TRTPS I I PCT LES ------------------------------------------ ------------ ------ K LB CLASS ----------------------------- 0- 50 ------ 1 3081 123941@ 8.32 -------------------------- -------- --------- 0------------ 51- 100 1 1581 1-05591 '.1. 31- ----------------------------------------- ------------------------------- 101- i5o : - . I'-. 1111 223431 - i.50 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -;- - - - -- -- - - - - - - - - - -L- - - - - -;-- - - - - - 151- 200 '15 1 1 16369. j i.10, ----------------------------------------- ------------------------- '20.1- 250 1 641 172701 1.16 ------------------------- ------------------------ A------------- i----------- 251- 300 491 46524J.. ---------------------------------------------- --------------- &---------- 301- 500 1 1871 795921 '5.34 --------------- ----------------------------------- ------------- 501- 750 1 1251 811051 5.44 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 751- 1000 1 591 521101 3.50 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- looi- 5000 1 921 1574021 10.57 ----------------------------------------- -------------------------- 50oi-10000 . 1 .1 .1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 10001-i5000 1 .1 .1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 15000-20000 1 .1 .1 ----------------------------------------- ------------------------------ GT 20000 ----------------------- d ------------------------------------------------- JALL 1 12281 6162151 41.371 ---------------------------------------- ---------------- (CONTINUED) . . =... . - - F% 0.7 =-r.PORT-rD COM.M-ERC:AL 7"%:?S WHEEN K:N" RACKED rT v -.-j ARE SHOW:NG TOTAL LAND-LNGS W=H' THE ASSOC-;x"-T-rD K:NG @LACKERZL LBS --------------------------------------------------------------- ------------ ALL ---------------------- T OTA.16i LANDT-N%GS ---------------------- @R-r-..)s 'ES PCT :RS --------------------------------- ------- 6---------------- = ------ K LB CLASS -=--= -------------------------------- 0- 5D I ID531 4476D71 30.05 --------------------------------- r-------- ------------ 51- 100 1 3681 648091 4.35 ----------------------------------------------------------- a------------- ioi- i5o 1 1721 D06051 32.40 ------------------------------------------------------I ---- 151- 200 1 991 2D946.1 1'. 41 ------------------------------------------------------------ 201- /25.0 1 sil 265761 1.79 -------------------- ----------------- p------------- 25-1- 100 1- 561 486311 3.26 --------------------------------------------------------------------- -- 301- 500 1 2061 900341 6.04 --------------------------------- 6 ------------------------------------- 501- 750 1 1331. 865171 5.8i ------------------------------------------------------ ---.r ------------ 751- 1000 1 601 531351 3.57 ------------------------------------------------------------ 6------------ iooi- 5000 1 loll 1730001 11.61 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 5001-10000 1 51 434761 2.92 ----------------------------------------- &------------------ r------------ loooi-i5ooo 1 61 730341 4.90 -R -------------------------------- ----------------------------- %-- 15000-2DOOO - 1 31 - 553331 3.71 -.; ---------------------------------------------------------------------- GT 20000 , 1 101. 2559851 17.18 ----------------------------------------------------------- 6------------ ALL 1 23531 14896881 100.00- --------------------------------------------------- SZEAFOOD DEALERS GULF K:N%-XS FROM THE F.ARV-EST.T-NG SECTOR, SFY 1988-89 %'-'OAST-=W-r-ST COAS'T .rR-rQUEN%'-'Y BAR CHART MIDPOINT PURCIHASE FREQ CUM. PERCENT CUM. -rR-rQ P -7 RC-EN T 5 68 68 68.00 68.00 10 8 76 8.00 76.00 i5 5 81 5.00 si.00 20 3 84 3.00 84.00 25 4 88 4.00 88.00 30 2 90 2.DO 90.00 35 0 90 0.00 90.00 40 1 91 1.00 91.00 45 1 92 i.00 92.00- 50 2 94 2.00 .94.00 55 1 95 1.00' 95.DD 60 1 96 1.00 96.00 65 1 97 1.00 97.00 70. 1 98 1.00 98.00 75 1 99 1.00 99.00 so 1 100 i.00 IDO.'00 --------------- ------------- 10 20 30 4D 5D 60 rREOUENCY SEASOOD DEALERS B*-':v-:NG GULF K:N%";S FROM I"t:r ;Z VESTING SECTOR, SFY 1988-89 Cop.ST--=-rAST COA.ST R-.C) , UENCY BAR CHART MT-DPOT-NT- PURCIRASE FREQ CUM. PERCENT CUM. r rn pr '-ENT 5 27 27 58.70 58.70 io 4 31 8.70 67.39 15 1 36 2 2.117 69.57 20 3 .35 6.52 76.09 25 4 39 8.70 84.78 30 0 39 D.00 84.78 35 0 39 0.00 84.78 40 0 39 0.00 84.78 45 11 40 2.17 86.96 so 0 40 0.00 86-96 55 0 40 0.00 86.96 60 0 40 0.00 86.96 65 0 40 0.00 86.96 70 1 41 2.17 89.13 75 1 42 2.17 91.30 so 4 46 8.7D IOD.DD ---------- 6 ------- 5 10 15 20 25 MEOUENCY 71BULATTON OF =7P0RTrD C0Y-.MrRr:L7 :R:pS W.H. E N %G *.J'! -6.F K'-7N%'J' YLAICK-ER-EL A.R-r 'CAUtCH'", 988-89 26 K:NG BA.T02 - rTq=rR*; STA::S7TCS St-`:ON ------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------ K@TNG YA%r-'K---R-rL ------------------------------ ..ups 'BS P c S --------------- ------------------------- ------- ----------- v-------------- COAST ILB_CArJASS ------- -------- 751- -1000 ----------- 0981 WEST COAST 11 0.11 -------------- ------------- 1001- 5000 91 152731 1.65 --------------------- ------------------------------- 5001-10000 1 51 434761 4.69 ---------------------------------------- r------------ 1.0001-15000 1 61 730341 . 7. 87' --------------------------------------------------- 15000-20000 1' 31 553---.31 5.97 ---------------------------- i------------------------ G-T 2 0 0 OD 1 .101 2549.IBI 27.48 - - --------------- - i - --------------------- .AIL j 1125j 5026921 54.20. -------------------- --- r ------------------------- ;------------------ -------- Span.-ish Macl@:erel La ri d i n g s Nov. Feb. 4 0013 36 14 to U) Pi z 5 4 "1 9:3 C-A 111@0 j Ali hu --fill p ISI.IING YEAR SAS 16:46 Wednesdav, January 8, 1992 FIGURE 3.01. FMFC - ECONOMIC IMPACT REVIEW CZM-FUNDED COST AND REVENUE SURVEY OF MACKEREL FISHERMEN AND A MARKET CHANNEL AND QUALITY STUDY OF SEAFOOD DEALERS FREQUENCY OF NUMBER OF CREW (EXCLUDING CAPTAIN) CREW MEMBERS cum cum MIDPOINT FREQ FREQ PERCENT PERCENT 2 440 440 95.65 95.65 4 16 456 3.48 99.13 6 1 457 0.22 99.35 8 0 457 0.00 99.35 10 2 459 0.43 99.78 12 1 460 0.22 100.00 14 0 460 0.00 100.00 ----------------------- 100 200 300 400 FREQUENCY -1 Al OOD 0EAl ERS BUYItJG FROM THE llfkl@Vl SI 114G SECTOR FOR SFY 1989-90 I? k A I AS Ik- 0 AI I Id QIJL tl('Y BAN cliARI m 1 11110 1 141 I S F'REQ cum. PERCEUr CUM. FREQ PERCENT ...... 57 57 66.28 66.20 10 6 63 6.911 73. 26 1') 2 65 2.33 75.50 3 68 3.49 79.07 1 69 1. 16 60. 23 30 3 72 3.49 83.72 1 73 1. 16 84.80 0 73 0,00 84.00 4 t) 0 73 0.00 84. B6 !)0 2 75 2.33 07.21 0 75 0.00 87. 2 1 0 75 0.00 07. 21 0 75 0.00 8 7 . 2 1 /0 0 75 0.00 87.21 is 1 76 1.16 86.31 ..... 10 86 11.63 100.00 10 21) 311 40 50 ,FAF00O DEACERS BUY11IG FROM THE HARVE S I 11JU SEC IOR FOR SFY 19fl4--90 Af4f.A=NORlllwFSl COAST 1 14 f 01 It: NCY HA" CHART DPO 1 141 c S FREQ CUM. PERCENT CUM. FRE() PERcfNT 5 31 31 51.67 51.67 10 4 4 4 4 5 36 B.33 60.00 15 4 40 6.67 66.67 20 3 43 5.00 7 1 . 67 1 44 1.67 73.33 30 2 46 3.33 76. 67 3'@ 6 52 10.00 86.67 41() 1 53 1 .67 88. 33 0 53 0.00 OU.33 !)o 0 53 0.00 80.33 1 54 1 .67 90. Oo 0 54 0.00 90.00 Wi 0 54 0.00 00.00 '10 1 55 1.67 91.67 1 1 - 56 1 .67 93.33 fit) 4 60 fi. 61 100.00 15 20 25 30 ',t A f I )Of I D F A I E It S BUY I Nil $-it urd i 11L I IANVf- S I I W. S I-, C 1011 FOR SFY 19(19-90 Al, I ASOiJ I I Wil S I kJ) AS I 1 1; 101117 N CY If AH I I IAII I m I (WO I tj I Ls FREU CUM. PERCEtIT cum. FRfQ PENCEIl V S 41 41 37.96 37.96 12 53 li.11 '19.07 3 56 2.78 6 1 . 85 20 9 65 8.33 60.19 4 69 3.70 63.89 4 73 3.70 6 7 . 5 9 4 77 3.70 71 .30 1 78 0.93 12. 22 3 81 2. 76 15. UL) 0 a) 0.00 75.00 3 84 2.78 77.78 60 3 87 2.18 80.56 3 Slu 2.78 83.33 0 so 0.00 83.33 2 92 1.85 85, 19 16 108 14.81 100.00 111 20 3o 40 Otifilcy S IIIJ10fli-ItIG SALES OF SPANIS14 MACKEREL ity I W liumill'.ft OF SAI ES I H I VS ) OUR I $iG 111V 51 V 19119 - 1990 FOR EACIri REGION I A 14()k 1 1 IWI S I ( 0A S I I@l 0IJi III Y HAI? ( I IAN I I I WO I It I ,.),I S FREQ CUM. PERCENT CUM. FREQ PEACUll F .3 . . . . . . . . . .44 4 0 4 4 4 4 0 4 0 208 208 131 .25 81 .25 6 ... 25 233 9. 77 91 .02 9 9 242 3.52 94.53 12 6 248 2.34 96.013 t' 4 252 1.56 911. 44 0 252 0.00 90.44 1 253 0.39 9B . 113 1 254 0.39 99.22 0 254 0.00 99. 22 0 254 0.00 9 9 @ 2 2 1.3 0 254 0.00 qq.@2 0 254 0.00 99.22 0 254 0.00 99. 22 0 254 0.00 99. 22 .15 0 254 0.00 99. 22 18 0 254 0.00 91). 22 "I a 254 0.00 99. 22 0 254 0,00 99.22 0 254 0.00 99.22 (1 2 2 5 G 0.78 100.00 J0 It 9ij 120 lt)O IBO 210 1 la()III-In Y @,Pl S RE I'M? I I NG. SAt E S OF SPAt4l Sil MACKEREL ll@ I I It' WiMBF N OF SAL E S TR I PS ) DUR I t4G hiF SFY i9HIJ 1990 U014 EACH REGION 1, 1 A 1@01) I I MI I ( ()A S I 1 0111 IICY J@A P t I iAP I t" 1 (1110 1 N I S FREQ CUM. PERCE14T Clim. FREQ IIENCE1.4f ....... 688 688 72.00 72.00 6 . . . 105 793 1 1 . 1 1 113.92 9 . . . 63 856 (i. 67 90.50 12 29 885 3.07 93.65 l!) 12 897 1.27 94.92 12 909 1 . 27 96. 19 10 919 1.06 9 1 . 25 2 921 0.21 97.46 9 930 0.95 98.41 4 934 0.42 9#1 . 04 IA 3 937 0.32 99 . 15 10 3 940 0.32 99.41 0 940 0.00 99.47 .12 0 940 0.00 .99.47 3 943 0.32 99.79 Ift 1 944 0. 11 99.89 1 945 0. 11 100.00 0 945 a.O() 1Oft,Ou 0 945 0.00 100.00 0 945 0.00 100.00 ItIO 0 0 300 400 buo 600 [REQUI W-V 0 SPLS REPORTING SALES OF SPANISH MACKEREL BY THE NUMBER OF SALES (TRIPS)DURING THE SFY 1989 - 1990 FOR EACH REGION AREA = EAST COAST FREQUENCY BAR CHART MIDPOINT SPLS FREQ CUM. PERCENT CUM. FREQ PERCENT 3 330 330 64.33 64.33 6 52 382 10.14 74.46 9 36 418 7.02 81.48 12 21 439 4.09 85.58 15 18 457 3.51 89.08 18 16 473 3.12 92.20 21 8 481 1.56 93.76 24 9 490 1.75 95.52 27 5 495 0.97 96.49 30 5 500 0.97 97.47 33 1 501 0.91 97.66 36 4 505 0.78 98.44 39 2 507 0.39 99.83 42 1 508 0.19 99.03 45 1 509 0.19 99.22 48 1 510 0.19 99.42 51 1 511 0.19 99.61 54 0 511 0.00 99.61 57 1 512 0.19 99.81 60 1 513 0.19 100.00 50 100 150 200 250 300 FREQUENCY SAS 11:50 Wednesday, january 8, 2992 CZM-FUNDED COASTAL PELAGIC COST AND REVENUE SURVEY HARVESTING CRAFT CHARACTERIZATION VARIABLES TABLE OF CRAFT-AGE BY CRAFT-LOA (CRAFT-AGE) (CRAFT-LOA) Frequency Percent Row Pct Col Pct 0 - 251 26 - 351 36 - 451 46 - 551 56 - 651 GT 65 1 Total --------------------------------------------------------------------- LE 3 YRS 49 21 3 0 0 1 74 10.65 4.57 0.65 0.00 0.00 0.22 16.09 66.22 28.38 4.05 0.00 0.00 1.35 20.16 14.29 6.25 0.00 0.00 20.00 --------------------------------------------------------------------- GT 3 - 7 YRS 54 36 12 2 0 0 104 11.74 7.83 2.61 0.43 0.00 0.00 22.61 51.92 34.62 11.54 1.92 0.00 0.00 22.22 24.49 25.00 14.29 0.00 0.00 ------------------------ 7 -------------------------------------------- 8 10 YRS 38 28 6 1 1 0 74 8.26 6.09 1.30 0.22 0.22 0.00 16.09 51.35 37.84 8.11 1.35 1.35 0.00 15.64 19.05 12.50 7.14 33.33 0.00 ------------------------------------------------------ 11 15 YRS 52 26 14 4 2 3 101 11.30 5.65 3.04 0.87 0.43 0.65 21.96 51.49 25.74 13.86 3.96 1.98 2.97 21.40 17.69 29.17 28.57 66.67 60.00 --------------------------------------------------------------------- 16 - 20 YRS 29 24 5 2 0 1 61 6.30 5.22 1.09 0.43 0.00 0.22 13.26 47.54 39.34 8.20 3.28 0.00 1.64 11.93 16.33 10.42 14.29 0.00 20.00 --------------------------------------------------------------------- 21 - 25 YRS 14 3 6 3 0 0 26 3.04 0.65 1.30 0.65 0.00 0.00 5.65 53.85 11.54 23.0s 21.54 0.00 0.00 5.76 2.04 12.50 21.43 0.00 0.00 ---------------------- ;------------------------------------------------ GT 25 YRS 7 9 2 2 0 0 20 1.52 1.96 0.43 0.43 0.00 0.00 4.35 35.00 45.00 10.00 10.00 0.00 0.00 2.88 6.12 4.17 14.29 0.00 0.00 ------------------------------------------ ---------------------------- Total 243 147 48 14 3 5 460 52.83 31.96 10.43 3.04 0.65 1.09 100.00 SAS !!:SO Wednesda%, january 6, 19'32 2 CZM-FUNDED COASTAL PELAGIC COST AND REVENUE SURVEY HARVESTING CRAFT CHARACTERIZATION VARIABLES TABLE OF CRAFT-AGE BY CRAFT-HP (CRAFT-AGE) (CRAFT-HP) Frequency Percent Row Pct Col Pct 0 - 526 11076 - 11101 - 11126 25 0 7551 0 25 50 Total ------------------ LE 3 YRS 15 6 2 7 0 7 74 3.26 1.30 0.43 1.52 0.00 1.52 16.09 20.27 8.11 2.70 9.46 0.00 9.46 37.50 37.50 11.76 25.93 0.00 14.00 --------------------------------------------------------------------- GT 3 - 7 YRS 8 4 8 7 2 9 104 1.74 0.87 1.74 1.52 0.43 1.96 22.61 7.69 3.85 7.69 6.73 1.92 8.65 20.00 25.00 47.06 25.93 11.11 18.00 - - ------------------------------------------------------------ 8 - 10 YRS 2 3 2 2 4 8 74 0.43 0.65 0.43 0.43 0..87 1.74 16.09 2.70 4.05 2.70 2.70 5.41 10.81 5.00 18.75 11.76 7.41 22.22 16.00 ------------------------------------------------------- ll---15-YRS --- 8 1 1 6 7 13 101 1.74 0.22 0.22 1.30 1.52 2.83 21.96 7.92 0.99 0.99 5.94 6.93 12.87 20.00 6.25 5.88 22.22 38.89 26.00 --------------------------------------------------------------------- 16 - 20 YRS 4 2 2 2 2 5 61 0.87 0.43 0.43 0.43 0.43 1.09 13-26 6.56 3.28 3.28 3.28 3.28 8.20 10.00 12.50 11.76 7.41 11.11 10.00 --------------------------------------------------------------------- 21 - 25 YRS 0 0 a 1 3 5 26 0.00 0.00 0.22 0.22 0.65 1.09 5.65 o.6o 0.00 3.85 3.85 11.54 19.23 0.00 0.00 5.88 3.70 16.67 20.00 --------------------------------------------------------------------- CT 25 YRS 3 0 1 2 0 3 20 0.65 0.00 0.22 0.43 0.00 0.65 4.35 15.00 0.00 5.00 10.00 0.00 15.00 7.50 0.00 5.88 7.41 0.00 6.00 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Total 40 16 17 27 is '50 460 6.70 3.48 3.70 5.87 3.91 10.87 100.00 (Continued) SAS 11:50 Wednesday, januarv 8, -1992 CZM-FUNDED COASTAL PELAGIC COST AND REVENUE SURVEY HAR-vtSTING CRAFT CHARACTERIZATION VARIABLES TABLE OF CRAFT-AGE BY CRAFT-HP (CRAFT-AGE) (CRAFT-HP) Frequency Percent Row Pct Col Pct - 176 - 201 - 226 - 251 - 216 171551 1200 1225 1250 1275 1300 1 Total ------------------ LE 3 YRS 4 8 7 8 5 3 74 0.67 1.74 1.52 1.74 1.09 0.65 16.09 5.41 10.81 9.46 10.81 6.76 4.05 22.22 11.11 13.46 22.22 33.33 17.65 --------------------------------------------------------------------- GT 3 - 7 YRS 5 19 21 11 2 2 104 1.09 4.13 2.39 2.39 0.22 0.43 22.61 4.81 18.27 10.58 10.58 0.96 1.92 27.78 26.39 21.15 30.56 6.67 11.76 ---------------------------------------------------------- ;--+ 8 - 10 YRS 4 15 5 3 5 4 74 0.87 3.26 1.09 0.65 1.09 0-87 16.09 5.41 20.27 6.76 4.05 6.76 5.41 22.22 20.83 9.62 8.33 33.33 23.53 ------------------------------------------------------- 11 15 YRS 1 16 14 9 2 4 101 0.22 3.48 3.04 1.96 0.43 0.87 21-96 0.99 15.84 13.86 8.91 1.98 3.96 5.56 22.22 26.92 25.00 13.33 23.53 --------------------------------------------------------------------- 16 - 20 YRS 3 6 12 3- 0 3 61 0.65 1-30 2.61 0.65 0.00 0.65 13.26 4.92 9.84 29.67 4.92 0.00 4.92 16.67 8.33 23.08 8.33 0.00 17.65 - --------------------------------------------------------------------- 21 - 25 YRS 0 4 1 1 2 0 26 0.00 0.87 0.22 0.22 0.43 0.00 5.65 0.00 15.38 3.85 3.85 7.69 0.00 0.00 5.56 1.92 .2.78 13.33 0.00 --------------------------------------------------------------------- OT 25 YRS 1 4 2 1 0 1 20 0.22 0.87 0.43 0.22 0.00 0.22 4.35 5.00 20.00 10.00 5.00 0.00 5.00 5.56 5.56 3.85 2.78 0.00 5.88 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Total is 72 52 36 15 17 460 3.91 15.65 11.30 77.83 3.26 3.70 100.00 (Continued) SAS 11:50 We---4nesdav, January 8, 1-992 CZM-FUNDED COASTAL PELAGIC COST AND REVENUE SURVEY HARVESTING CRAFT CHARACTERIZATION VARIABLES TABLE OF CRAFT-AGE BY CRAFT-HP (CRAFT-AGE) (CRAFT_HP) Frequency Percent Row Pct Col Pct 301 - 13326 .351 - 376 401+ 325 50 375 1400 1 T.t.1 ------------------------ ------ LE 3 YRS 0 0 0 1 1 74 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.22 0.22 16.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.35 .1.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 12-50 2.94 ------------------------------------------------- ---------- GT 3 - 7 YRS 2 4 2 2 7 104 0.43 0.87 0.43 0.43 1.52 22.61 1-92 3.85 1.92 1.92 6.73 14.29 20.00 33.33 25.00 20.59 -------- - - ---------------------------------------------- 8 - 10 YRS 3 4 2 2 6 '74 0.65 0.87 0-43 0.43 1.30 16.09 4.05 5.41 2.70 2.70 8.11 21.43 20.00 33.33 25.00 17.65 ---------------------------------------------- ll---15-YRS 5 3 2 1 8 101 1.09 0.65 0.43 0.22 1.74 21.96 4.95 2.97 1.98 0.99 7.92 35.71 15.00 33.33 12.50 23.53 ------------------------------------------------------------ 16 - 20 YRS 3 9 0 0 5 61 0.65 1.96 0.00 0.00 1.09 13.26 4.92 14.75 0.00 0.00 8.20 21.43 45.00 0.00 0.00 14.71 ------------------------------------------------------------ 21 - 25 YRS 1 0 0 1 6 26 0.22 0.00, 0.00 0.22 1.30 5.65 3.85 0.00 0.00 3.85 23.08 7.14 0.00 0.00 12.50 17.65 ------- ---------------------------------------------- GT 25 YRS 0 0 0 1 1 20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.22 0.22 4.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12.50 2.94 ------------------------------------------------------------ Total 14 20 6 8 34 460 3.04 4.35 1.30 1.@4 7.39 100.00 SAS I.C:07 Wednes--Jay, januarv 6, 1292, CZM-FUNDED COASTAL PELAGIC COST AND REVENUE SURVEY HARVESTING CRAFT CHARACTERIZATION VARIABLES Cumulative Cumulative HOMEPORT Frequency Percent Frequency Percent --------------------------------------------------------------- ALLIGATOR POINT 1 0.2 1 0.2 APALACHICOLA 2 0.4 3 0.7 ATLANTIC BEACH 1 0.2 4 0.9 BAY POINT 1 0.2 5 1.1 BIG PINE 1 0.2 6 1.3 BIG PINE KEY 20 4.5 26 5.8 BLACK POINT 1 0.2 27 6.0 BOKEELIA 10 2.2 37 8.3 BONITA SPRINGS 2 0.4 39 8.7 BOYNTON 1 0.2 40 8.9 BOYNTON BEACH 6 1.3 46 10.3 BRADENTON 1 0.2 47 10.5 CANAVERAL 1 0.2 48 10.7 CAPE CANAVERAL 3 0.7 51 .11.4 CAPE CORAL 1 0.2 52 11.6 CARRABELLE 4 0.9 56 12.5 CEDAR KEY 5 1.1 61 13.6 COCOA BEACH 2 0.4 63 14.1 CORTEZ 5 1.1 .68 15.2 CRYSTAL RIVER 2 0.4 70 15.7 CUDJOE KEY 6 1.3 76 17.0 DAYTONA 1 0.2 77 17.2 DAYTONA BEACH 9 2.0 86 19.2 DELRAY BEACH 1 0.2 87 19.5 DESTIN 2 0.4 89 19.9 DUNEDIN 1 0.2 90 20.1 EASTPOINT 1 0.2 91 20.4 ENGLEWOOD 1 0.2 92 20.6 EVERGLADES 1 0.2 93 20.8 FERNANDINA BEACH 2 0.4 95 21.3 FROGMORE, SOUTH 1 0.2 96 21.5 FT. LAUDERDALE 5 1.1 101 22.6 FT. MYERS 1 0.2 102 22.8 FT. MYERS BEACH 2 0.4 104 23.3 FT. PIERCE 3 0.7 107 23.9 FT. WALTON BEACH 2 0.4 109 24.4 GOODLAND 2 0.4 ill 24.8 GRANT 5 1.1 116 26.0 GULFBREEZE 2 0.4 118 26.4 GULFPORT 1 0.2 119 26.6 HAULOVER BEACH 1 0.2 120 26.8 HIALEAH 1 0.2 121 27.1 HIGHLAND BEACH 1 0.2 122 27.3 HOLLY HILL 1 0.2 123 27.5 HOLLYWOOD 2 0.4 125 28.0 HOMESTEAD 2 0.4 127 28.4 HOMOSASSA 1 0.2 128 28.6 HORSESHOE BEACH 4 0.9 132 29.5 INGLIS 1 0.2 133 29.8 ISLAMORADA 9 2.0 142 31.8 SAS 10:07 Wednesday, januarv 8, CZM-FUNDED COASTAL PELAGIC COST AND REVENUE SURVEY HARVESTING CRAFT CHARACTERIZATION VARIABLES Cumulative Cumulative HOMEPORT Frequency Percent Freauencv Percent -------------------------------------------------------------- JACKSONVILLE 8 1.8 150 33.6 JENSEN BEACH 1 0.2 151 33.8 JUPITER 20 4.5 171 38.3 KEY COLONY BEACH 2 0.4 38.7 KEY LARGO 5 1.1 178 39.8 KEY WEST 35 7.8 213 47.7 LAKE PARK 2 0.4 215 48.1 LAKE WORTH 2 0.4 217 48.5 LANTANA 3 0.7 220 49.2 LITTLE TORCH KEY 2 0.4 222 49.7 LONG KEY 1 0.2 223 49.9 LOWER MATECUMBE 1 0.2 224 50.1 LOXAHATCHEE 1 0.2 225 50.3 LYNN HAVEN 1 0.2 226 50.6 MADIERA BEACH 1 0.2 227 50.8 MARATHON 28 6.3 255 57.0 MARCO 1 0.2 256 57.3 MAYPORT 10 2.2 266 59.5 MELBOURNE 3 0.7 269 60.2 MERRITT ISLAND 2 0.4 271 60.6 MEXICO BEACH 2 0.4 273 61.1 MIAMI 17 3.8 290 64.9 MILTON 1 0.2 291 65.1 NAPLES 11 2.5 302 67.6 NEPTUNE BEACH 2 0.4 304 68.0 NEW SMYRNA BEACH 3 0.7 307 68.7 NORTH MIAMI 1 0.2 308 68.9 OAK HILL 1 0.2 309 69.1 OCEAN RIDGE 2 0.4 311 69.6 PALM BAY 2 0.2 312 69.8 PALM BEACH 8 1.8 320 71.6 PALM BEACH GARDE 2 0.4 322 72.0 PALMETTO 1 0.2 323 72.3 PANAMA 1 0.2 324 72.5 PANAMA CITY 14 3.1 338 75.6 PANAMA CITY BEAC 1 0.2 339 75.8 PARKER 1 0.2 340 76.1 PENSACOLA 6 1.3 346 77.4 PINE ISLAND 1 0.2 347 77.6 PLACIDA 1 0.2 348 77.9 PLANT CITY 1 0.2 349 78.1 POMPANO BEACH 1 0.2 350 78.3 PONCE INLET 5 1.1 355 79.4 PORT CANAVERAL 9 2.0 364 81.4 PORT JEFFERSON 2 0.2 365 81.7 PORT OF PALM BEA 1 0.2 366 81.9 PORT SALERNO 3 0.7 369 82.6 PORT SLAERNO 1 0.2 370 82.8 RIVIERA BEACH 13 2.9 383 85.7 ROCKLEDGE 1 0.2 384 85.9 SAS 10:07 Wednesday, january 8, 1992 CZM-FUNDED COASTAL PELAGIC COST AND REVENUE SURVEY HARVESTING CRAFT CHARACTERIZATION VARIABLES Cumulative Cumulative HOMEPORT Frequency Percent Frequency Percent -------------------------------------------------------------- SEBASTIAN 24 5.4 408 91.3 SOUTHPORT 1 0.2 409 91.5 ST. AUGUSTINE 3 0.7 412 92.2 ST. JAMES 2 0.4 414 92.6 ST. LU CIE INLET 1 0.2 415 92.8 ST. MARKS 1 0.2 416 93.1 ST. PETERSBURG 2 0.4 418 93.5 STEINHATCHEE 7 1.6 425 95.1 STUART 2 0.4 427 95.5 SUGARLOAF KEYS 1 0.2 428 95.7 SUMMERLAND KEY 2 0.4 430 96.2 SUWANEE 1 0.2 431 96.4 TA14PA 1 0.2 432 96.6 TAVERNIER 2 0.4 434 9*7.1 TEQUESTA 1 435 97.3 TIERRA VERDE 1 0.2 436 97.5 TITUSVILLE 2 0.2 437 97.8 VERO BEACH 2 0.4 439 98.2 WEST PALM BEACH 6 1.3 445 99.6 WILLISTON 1 0.2 446 99.8 YANKEETOWN 1 0.2 447 100.0 Ln L0 CYn IER CATEGORY OPEN-ENDED OlnlER CATEGORY @k H z Ln z F4 C14 0 M Ln Ln m m 9) m c4 -i Ln (N 'i H C'4 Ln H UNIMPORTANT PRODUCT Ul H M M H fn j m m Lo M 0 DEMAND EXCEEDS SUPPLY H Ln cq ;r mM M @v M 0 M Iq rn m m %r 0 H (n m SEASONAL, AVAITABI1,ITY li li -4 Ln Ln Ln ri m c,4 TIE-IN SALES j Cq I C4 j M M M j in Ln rl fn M 14 V) '-;P H Ln "LO (a Ln Ln " m @l T3 EXISTING CAPITAL INVESTMENT ri @i ri in @i m Ln c4 H Lo 'i I" rl Cq 'i H ri q cq H tn Ln m m i 11 m n H m Ln m j mrn c,4 cq Ln in m i c4 tn RELIABLE SUPPLY H rn Ln m -;r Ln in m-;r Ln Ln H -1 (9 Ln m m Ln ;;r m 0 MAW-UP MARGIN Ln Ln q c,4 q RELATIVE PRICE -4 * -i U) (n m v fq m mm N 1@r rn 1;r Nm 'I fn @r H u u') Ln A: LACK OF SUBSTITUTES li m -i Ln M H m m m H wM H @r H N ri 04 Iq 14 14 H cli 11 (n Ln cn RELATIONSHIP WIrill FISHERMEN li Ln Ln i i m m kn r4 m tn -4 ri cN Ln Ln qT H Ln Ln m SEAFOOD DEM.ER SURVEY NUMBER H o c,4 @r in %D w o ci i rA r4 --;r r- fn Lo (n "tD %D 0 cq tD oH m r- cO 'i cq CA m q -,r ;r in ko 'D w r- r- 00 a% m (n 0'1 ri 'i ri W f- OD M 0 H en -zr in kD r- co (A Cq Mt Ln %D r- ul 'i ri C4 r4 cq CA C,4 (N C,4 SAS S:02 Th,,@rsday, January 2, 1992 2 OBS DEALERID A15 B15 C15 D15 E15 F15 C15 H15 115 J15 OTH 15 38 164 5 1 1 5 5 5 5 5 1 SEASONAL 5 39 174 1 1 4 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 40 175 1 41 177 4 ETHNIC GROUPS 5 42 180 5 1 4 4 4 1 1 43 182 2 3 4 3 3 1 3 5 5 2 44 197 3 1 1 1 2 2 4 1 1 1 45 198 5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 46 199 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 1 47 200 5 1 5 5 5 5 5 3 3 3 48 203 1 1 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 49 207 5 2 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 50 210 5 5 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 3 51 212 3 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 52 214 5 53 216 1 1 4 4 4 1 1 4 4 1 LATINS 5 54 217 3 1 2 3 1 1 2 1 2 1 55 222 3 5 4 4 4 4 4 3 4 3 56 246 4 1 4 1 2 1 2 2 4 2 57 265 5 2 5 5 5 5.8 274 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 59 285 1 1 3 2 1 3 4 1 3 60 289 5 5 5 3 5 61 292 5 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 3 SAS 12:57 Tues--av 1992 FIRST RECEIVER SURVEY QUESTION: FRESH MACKEREL SUPPLY BY MONTH AND THE QUANTITY DEMANDED TABLE OF K-MONTH1 BY K-POUND1 K-MONTHI K-POUNDI Frequency Percent Row Pct Col Pct 41 - 0 291 Total 100 50 @1091 @201901 1300 ------------------ - NRG 46 0 0 0 0 47 54.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 55.29 97.87 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 80.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ------------------------------------------------------- JAN 3 1 0 2 0 9 3.53 1.18 0.00 2.35 0.00 10.59 33.33 11.11 0.00 22.22 0.00 5.26 100.00 0.00 .10.0. OD 0.00 ------------------------------------------------------- FEE 3 0 2 0 0 9 3.53 0.00 2.35 0.00 0.00 10.59 33.33 0.00 22.22 0.00 0.00 5.26 0.00 66.67 0.00 0.00 ------------------------------------------------------- MAR 2 0 0 0 -0 5 2.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.88 40.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.51 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ------------------------------------------------------- APR 0 0 0 0 0 3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.53 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ------------------------------------------------------- Total 57 1 3 2 1 85 67.06. 1.18 3.53 2.35 1.18 100.00 (Continued) SAS 12 5 7 Tuesd a v i an u a rv 92' FIRST RECEIVER SURVEY QUESTION: FRESH MACKEREL SUPPLY BY MONTH AND THE QUANTITY DEMANDED TABLE OF K-MONTH1 BY K-POUND1 K-MONTH1 K-POUNDI Frequency Percent Row Pct Col Pct 0 41 291 50 00 Total 10 110901 12191 1300 ----------------- MAY 0 0 0 0 2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.18 2.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 50.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 ------------------------------------------------------- JUN 1 0 0 0 0 2 1.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.35 50.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.75 0.00 0.0-0 0-00 0.00 ------------------------------------------------------- JUL 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.00 0.00 1.18 0.00 0.00 1.18 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 33.33 0.00 0.00 ------------------------------------------------------- OCT 0 0 0 0 0 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ------------------------------------------------------- DEC 2 0 0 0 0 6 2.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.06 33.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.51 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ------------------------------------------------------- Total 57 1 3 2 1 85 67.06 1.18 3.53 2.35 1.18 100.00 (Continued) SAS 12:57 Tuesday, january -1992 FIRST RECEIVER SURVEY QUESTION: FRESH MACKEREL SUPPLY BY MONTH AND THE QUANTITY DEMANDED TABLE OF K-MONTHl BY K-POUNDI K-MONTH1 K-POUNDI Frequency Percent Row Pct Col Pct 491 - 751 1 1,001 - 10,001 5DO 10,00 00 0 1,000 0 1 1 00 Total ------------------ ------ ---------- NRG 1 0 0 1 0 47 0.00 0.00 1.18 0.00 55.29 0.00 0.00 2.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 11.11 0.00 ---------------------------------------------- JAN 0 1 2 0 9 0.00 1.18 2.35 0.00 10.59 0.00 11.11 22.22 0.00 0.00 50.00 22.22 0.00 ---------------------------------------------- FEB 0 0 2 2 9 .0.00 0.00 2.35 2.35 10.59 0*00 0*00 22*22 22,22 0.00 0.00 22.22 28.57 -------------------------------- MAR 1 0 1 1 5 1.18 0.00 1.18 1.18 5.88 20.00 0.00 20.00 20.00 33.33 0.00 11.11 14.29 ---------------------------------------------- APR 0 0 1 2 3 0.00 0.00 1.18 2.35 3.53 0.00 0.00 33.33 66.67 0.00 0.00 11.11 28.57 ---------------------------------------------- Total 3 2 1 9 7 85 3.53 2.35 10.59 8.24 100.00 (Continued) SAS 1-):57 Tuesda%, @anuary FIRST RECEIVER SURVEY QUESTION: FRESH MACKEREL SUPPLY BY MONTH AND THE QUANTITY DEMANDED TABLE OF K-MONTH1 BY K-POUNDI K-MONTH1 K-POUND1 Frequency Percent Row Pct Col Pct 491 751 - 111,0010- 000 10,00 100,0 500. 110'00100 Total ------------------ ---- ------ ---------- MAY 1 0 0 0 2 1.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.35 50.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 33.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 ---------------------------------------------- JUN 1 0 0 0 2 1.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.35 50.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 33.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 ---------------------------------------------- JUL 0 0 0 0 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ---- ---- ---- ---- OCT 0 1 0 0 1 0.00 1.18 0.00 0.00 1.18 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 50.00 0.00 0.00 ---------------------------------------------- DEC 0 0 2 2 6 0.00 0.00 2.35 2.35 7.06 0.00 0.00 33.33 33.33 0.00 0.00 22.22 28.57 ---------------------------------------------- Total 3 2 9 7 85 3.53 2.35 10.59 8.24 100.00 The Marine Fisheries Commission is considering changes to the Spanish and king mackerel rules in order resource. Records indicate you catch king or Spanish mackerel. To help ensure that your interests are considered please complete and r 1. If you hold more then one SPIL you will receive several questionnaires. Please only complete one survey for each fishing craft you use. What is the state or Coast Guard number for this boat/vessel: amount of gear trip length 2. How many craft do you use to fish for king or Spanish mackerel: gilhet (total number of craft) trammel ne 3. Please list the fish species from which you earn at least 20% of your gross income from fishing(check all that apply Other a._Spanish, b._king, c. pompano, d._grouper, a. amberqjack, 13. Please provide an estimate of your costs for tl f. mullet, g.-seatrout, h. sheepshead, other(name) a. insurance$ 8q%q- 4. Are you the owner_, captain_ both-.(check one) b.licensefees$ %q- 5. How long have you owned_ captained_q(yrs/mos) c. business expense$ 6. Please describe your craft: (years) b. what is the length(LOA) d. loan payment$-%- a. how old is the craft:_ _q(ft) a. other costs $ C c. the displacement (tons) d. the hold capacity f. unloading costs/per Ib e. the powerplant manut.q-HP g. fuel/oil costs $ % f. what is the homeport (city) h. ice costs$ %- 7. How many trips did you take,_(1989) (1990). 8. Did you land your catch in other then your homeport during: 1. bait costs$ %q- (1989) (1990) (1991) (yes or no) J. vessel repair$ 8q%q- 9. If yes were those ports: out of state SE_FL _SW-FL k.gearrepair$ 8q% E Cen FL W_ Cen FL NE FL Big Bend_Panhandle, Lgrocery $ 10. Do you target king or Spanish mackerels or do you consider them to be an incidental bycatch (less then 15%)? Please circle correct answer. m. crew shares $ kings target bycatch n. total Spanish target bycatch 14. What was the most common number of crew 11. Please rank your recent fishing experience for mackerel on a employed during 1989/90 scale of one to ten (one = very bad, 10 = excellent): 16. Have you targeted new species, other the Spanish 1989 1990 1991 d u r i n g q u o t a c I o a u r a a . P a. -b. kings d. 12. Please describe the gears you use to target mackerel: 16. Did targeting these new species require th amount of gear trip length crew size (yes/no) DESCRIBE hook and line ------------ - 17. What time of the year (month) did you receive the best price per pound: 1969 1990 1991 CHARTERBOARTS AND HEADBOATS ONLY: month & $/lb. 20. Is the vessel s____headboat or ____charterboat (check one only) for kings 21. Did you begin catch and release fishing for king and Spanish mackerel after for Spanish quotes/bag limits went into effect?_____(yes or no) 18. Why do you think you got that price (check all that apply:)___do not 22. Did the requlation of king and Spanish mackerel fisheries cause you to lose know,____good quality,___ limited supply,___large demand, charters: yes/no number lost/%lost ______relationship with dealer, ____other, please describe___________ 1989/90 king ____________ __________________ _____________________________________________________________________. Spanish ____________ __________________ 19. If you answered good quality for number 18 please describe what the circumstances were that provided better quality during that 23. What is your charter rate? time of year: half day full day in season:____________________________________ off season:___________________________________ WHOLESALE/RETAIL DEALERS QUESTIONNAIRE The FMFC wants to update information about the state's mackerel resources to improve the management of the fishery. Please complete and return this form so your views will be considered. 1. What percentage of your sales come from Florida seafood 7 % 10. Please estimate the percentage of your geographical sales to: king mackerel Spanish mackerel 2. Do mackerel@ account for a significant portion of your sales: king yes no Spanish yes no core yes no southeast Florida % % 3. Of you could obtain fresh mackerels during periods when supplies are limited, Tampa Bay area % % which months would you choose and what quantities could you sell: other Florida % % king I . '-h,r--P2. Now York % % Spanish 1. other U.S % %; 4. What other species do you try to obtain when you cannot buy mackerel: Caribbean % 6A a. substitutes for king: b.substitutes other export, % for Spanish Iname or species code 11. Please estimate the percentage of your mackerel which are sold In each of the following product forms: king mackerel Spanish mackerel 4b.Are these from out of state or from Florlda7 round fresh % % 4.c. Can you substitute large Spanish for kings 7 5. What price range did you pay per pound during 1989190 7 round frozen % % high $Ab low $Ab. fillet frozen % % king mackerell"'-ft "d steaked % % Spanish 12. Are you able to receive a premium markup margin for a particular product form 7 Please Identify the product form and the percentage of the premium. 6. What percentage of the mackerel Is caught by net or hook and line 7 king mackerel Spanish mackerel king malckerel Spanish mackerel hook and fine % % gill not % % 7. Do you pay more for hook and line caught mackerel 7 13. If you identified a pternium product form, what Is the maximum monthly supply you could handle on a sustained basis (permanently)? king mackerel Spanish mackerel contsAb J-t. 0 If If-) king mackerel lbs. difference 8. What percentage of your catch Is from boats versus vessels: Spanish mackerel lbs. king mackerel Spanish mackerel boats' " 30 "t) % 14. We would like to Interview some of your wholes ale/process or vessels (30 . 1@ in I-VNI % % customers to further Investigate market demands. Please provide charter/party boats % % the mailing addreses of some customers. NAMES AND ADDRESSES: 9. Please estimate the percentage of your sales to: - king mackerel Spanish mackerel secondary wholesalers % % processors % % fish markets % % other % % IOUT VCIIH0_1J '33SSVHV-I-IVL 901 311ns iS3M 310HIO U31N30 3Aan33X3 O-VSZ NOISSINV400 S3lU3HSIJ 3NIUVIN AIB OlVd3Ud N338 SVH 39VISOd ,kUVSS303N dVIVIS 39VISOd ON ij 09176C -IJ 'H180M AAVI AVPIHOIH 31XIO HlaON TCS AUJTGI:)V (i uqof- 15. flow important were the following attributes in your deciuion to purchase Spanish mackerel. pk-aSe CirCIO the numbei corresponding to the k- vel o f importance for each a firibu le As led bcAo w. not important very important a. relationship with fishermen 1 2 3 4 5 b. lack of substitutes 1 2 3 '4 5 c. relative price 1 2 3 4 5 d. rnaik up margin 1 2 3 4 5 e. reliable supply 1 2 3 4 5 f. existing capital investment 1 2 3 4 5 0. tie-it) sales 1 2 3 4 5 h. seasonal availability 1 2 3 4 5 i. demand exce,@ds supply 1 2 3 4 5 j. unimportant product 1 2 3 4 5 k. other 1 2 3 4 5 This file describes the DBase III files that contain the responses to the commercial fishing surveys sent to harvesters and dealers who reported fishing for coastal pelagics during the 1989/90 fishing year. The accompanying disk contains a copy of this file and the following DBase III files: 1 Mackf ish. dbf - this contains I label I data. Specif ically, this file contains all names and addresses of fishermen that received the survey. 2. Mackfish.ndx - this is the matching index file. 3. Mackdeal.dbf - this file also contains 'label' data. This contains all names and addresses of dealers and wholesalers that received the survey. This also contains the 'snowball dealer' names and addresses. 4. Mackdeal.ndx - this is the matching index file. 5. Fisherma.dbf - this is part one of the main database, and consists of all data edited from the surveys received from fishermen. This file contains all questions on the survey up to and including question #15. 6. Fisherma.ndx this is the matching index file. 7. Fisher2.dbf this ispart two of the main database, and consists of the remaining data concerning surveys sent in by fishermen, and starts at question #16. 8. Fisher2.ndx this is the matching index file. 9. Dealer.dbf this is part one of the second database, and consists of all data edited from the surveys received from wholesalers, dealers, and 'snowball dealers'. This file contains all questions on the dealer survey up to and including question #14. 10. Dealer.ndx this is the matchingindex file. 11. Dealer2.dbf this is part two of the second database, and consists of all remaining data concerning surveys sent in by dealers, wholesalers, etc., and starts at question #15. 12. De.aler2.ndx this is the matching index file. 13. Tempfish.dbf this is a duplicate file that matches Mackfish.dbf, consisting of addresses and names concerning fishermen, and also containing the Ifisherid' numbers, which identify each individual record. Note that access to these records depends on the fisherid number, and not the record number. 14. Tempfish.ndx - this is the matching index file. 15. Tempdeal.dbf - this is a duplicate file that matches Mackdeal.dbf, consisting of addresses and names concerning dealers, wholesalers, and 'snowball dealers', and also containing the Idealerid' numbers, which identify each individual record. 'Note that access to these records depends on the dealerid number, and not the record number. 16. Tempdeal.ndx - this is the matching index file. 17. Marine.exe this is one of the software programs. 1 s *c s@'U r L('-'- L(CtUre f cor d at abase: D: f isherma. dbf '@!Jmber of data. reccnrds- 4 "ate -If I as t L.1 r) d a. t p 0 / I I I I e 1 Id Field Naini- T-ype W1 dth L5 f=., 1 FISHERID Numer i c - COA STGUARD Char ac t er 10 ::F:AFT NO RAFT_ t@umer I c 2. 4 2- 4 A 33 a r a c t e r 3 3 1j B33 1_-:h ar ac t er S 1--jiaracter 3 7 D 31 Char ac ter 8 E3 C'h ar ac t er 3 9 F23 Character 3 10 133 Character 3 11 H3 Character 3 12 13 Character 3 13 J3 Character 3 14 K'3 Character 3 16 OWN CAPT Char ac t er 1 1& It 17 OWN Y V_ Numeric 2 1B OWN MO Numeric 2 19 CAPT - Y R Numeric 2 20 CAPT MO Numeric 2 :.'7,1 CRAFT-AGE Numeric - 2- 1-7 2 CRAFTLENGT Numeric 23 CRAFTDISP Numeric 2 24 CRAFTHOLD Numeric E. 25 CRAFTPOWER Character 25 26 CRAFTHP Numeric /+ CRAFTHOME Character -25 T R -7 TRIPS1990 Numeric 3 -3 0 LAND1989 Character 1 3 1 LAND1990 Character I _F V 32 LAND1991 Character 1 33 FUK I 60UT Character 1 34 PORTSSEFL Character 1 35 PORTSSWFL Character 1 36 PORTSEC Character 1 37 PORTSWC Character 1 38 PORTSNEFL Character 1 39 PORTSBIG Character 1 40 PORTSPAN Character 1 41 KINGTARGET Character 1 42.. KIINGBYCATC Character 1 43 SPANTARGET Character I 44 SPANBYCATC Character 1 45 SPAN89 Char-a-cFe-r 2 .,-.46 SPAN90 Character 2 SPAN91 Character 2 48 KING89 Character 2 49 KING90 Character 2, 50 KING91 Character 2 51 HL GEAR 1 Numeric 2 52 HL GEAR 2 Numeric HL 'EAR 3 Numeric G HL-GEARNI Character 3 i @D. r T. E-., HL i 3 tli"71 C. -1 a 1-- t E--? -r- T F.-.'! P N LAM F r C7- :7 e. 7 60 OL MESH NUmer i 13L DEPTH NUmer i c Numer ic 1--j'L LENGTH 46 GL, TRI F NUmer i r E-4 Co, L R E W P'l U M P C C, 51 TR GE"'F" NUffle), i c 66 TF' MESH NUMer i C F, 77 TR DEPTH NUMel'i C F, 8 TF* LENGTH NUmer i c 69 TR-TRIP Numer i 4 70 TR C-'REW NLLmer i c 71 OT NAME Character 5 7 22 OT GEAR I NLtmer i c 7 33 OT-GEAR-2 NU(ner ic 7 4 0 T 13 E A R -31 NLImer i c 75 OT GEARNI Character 76 OT GEARN2 C:haracter 3 77 OT GEARN3 Character ID '78 OT-TRIP NUmer i c 4 79 OT-CREW Numer ic .71 80 A13DOLLAF' Numer - @@o 81 A13PERC Numeric 4 -7.1 13 62 B13DOLLAR Numeric 'el 0 2 83 B133PERC Numeric 4 -7. 84 B13LICENSE Numeric 8 5 C13DOLLAR Numeric 0'10 C: 1 3PERC Numeric 4 DI3nDOLLAR Numeric "o, I D I "'I F E R C Numer i c 4 e9 D13RATE Numeric 90 E 1'31 D 0 L L 1 Numer i c 91 E13PERCI Numer i 4 2 92 E13NAMEl Character 7.0 933 E 13 D 0 L L-2 Numeric 94 E13PERC2 Numeric 4 9 5 E13NAME2 Character 7.0 96 F13DOLL Numeric ;irlo 2 97 F13PERC Numeric 4 2 98 G13DOLL Numeric 2 99 G13PERC Numeric 4 2 100 G13GALLONS Numeric 6 101 Hl3DDLL Numeric w3r 10 2 102' H13PERC Numeric 4 2 103 H13POUNDS Numeric 6 104 I13DOLL Numeric 'o-)o 105 I13PERC Numeric 4 106 I13POUNDS. Numeric 6 107 J13DOLL Numeric erfo 108 J13PERC Numeric 4 2 109 J13HAULOUT Character I 110 K 'I 3DOLL Numeric Ill K* 1 3PERC Numeric 4 F, K13REPLACE Character I L13DOLL Numeric 4 L13PERC Numeric 4 2 115 M13DOLL Numeric 'a'10 116 M13PERC Numeric 4 21 117 N133DOLL Numeric i 2 - N 1-3 PE F, C Numer ic 0 A15 Ch ar a--- t er B 15 IC h a r ac- t E- Y 7 1 D 15 h a. r ac. t L- r 74 1-7har ac ter -------------- - otal 5 4 -17 -7e t.Drint of f eject Date --,f laSt update 10 / 11 /91 Field Field Name Type Width Dec I FISHERID Numer i c - 5 .2 DONTKNOW Ch ar ac t er I 3 GOODOUAL Character 1 4 LIMITEDSUP Character 1 5 LARGEDEMND Character I 6 RELADEALER Character 1 7 OTHER1 El- I Character 8 OTHERIS 2 Character 2 9 OTHERIB-3 Character 2 10 OTHER18 4 Character 2 11 OTHERis Character 2 -T2'--DEsl--; 1 C h a r a c 13 DES19-2 Character 2 14 DES19 3 Character 2 15 DES19 4 Character 2 16 DES19 5 Character 2 17 HEADBOA T Character 1 0 1 B CHARTERBO Character I AFTEROU DTA Character 1 K-CH-LOSE Character 1 < !21 KI-LOSE-P Numeric 5 2 S CH LOSE Character 1 0.4 L) S LOSE P Numeric 5 2 24 INRATEHLF Numeric 4 .e- INRATEFUL Numeric 4 15 -3 26 OFFRATEHLF Numeric 4 d'-:'7 OFFRATEFUL Numeric 4 28 13EAR PCH Character 1 4@- (o 29 GEAR 1 Character 3 30 GEAR 2 Character 3 31 GEAR 3 Character 3 32 GEAR 4 Character 3 3 131 GEAR 5 Character 3 34 GEAP-6 Character 3 Numeric 3 5 r.. 36 K-M90 Numeric 2 44 1 37 K-M91 Numeric 11% 38 K-PR89 Numeric 5 2 39 K PR90 Numeric 5 2 40 K PR91 Numeric 5 2 41 S M89 Numeric 2 42 @s M90 Numeric 2 43 S M91 Numeric 2 44 S PR89 Numeric 5 2 5 S_PR90 Numeric 5 2 S PR91 Numeric 5 2 otal 123 D't ructure TI-jr datan a. 5e : 1j: o&E.,..'L' e,,-- . c1b T Number of da."a. reccirds." E)a.te --If la.Stl Update I Ill./ 14 /St I d F j. e 1. d N ;,. fr, e v o E. W" d h D F-,: 1 DEALER 11) NLAfT)eY' i 4 SALE 3 t::.' 2' Character 1 2- 4 S _'2' 1--:har ac t er 1 CERD C f -la7 r t e r 1 E. i::'. MONTH1 Numer i,-- 7 [::'-POUNDI NUmer ic F, 8 MONTH2' NUMer I,-- 9 P 0 U, N D 27, Numer i c 10 S MONTH1 NUmer i 11 S POUND1 Numeric 6 12 s MONTH-2 NUmer i I: 13 S_POUND22 Numeric 6 __lq7_T_STB S T I -1--haracter 3- 15 1:'.-SUBST2 Char ac t er 3 1 G 1:1-SUBST3 Character 3 17 K' SUBST4 Character 18 K SUBST5 Character 3 19 S SUBSTI Character 20 S SUBST2 Character 3 S SUBST3 Character S.SUBST4 Character 3 S SUBST5 Character 3 0 ..;@4 ODT F STA Character 1 grA .7.5 OUT STZ P Numeric 4 -T-6 26 FROM FLZ Character 1 FROM FLA P Numer i c 4 B SUB s C.Tiaracter I - WIVI ric I::.- Hi D 5 '71 @@o HI LB Numeric 6 I K LO DOL Numeric 5 1@1 3 2 [.-."-LO-LB Numeric E 33 S HI DOL Numeric 5 34 S HI LB Numeric 6 35 S-LO-DOL Numeric 5 2 36 S-LO-LB Numeric 6 37 K'-HOOKL Numeric 4 38 K GILL Numeric 4 11T.9 S HOOKL Numeric 4 2 .j - 1. 40 S GILL Numeric 4 2 41 OTHER 6 Character 15 42 K OTH 6 Numeric 4 43 S OTH 6 Numeric 4 2 44 K@_C_MTM -Numeric 4 45 S-CENTS Numeric 4 2 46 K - BOAT Numer,17-- 4 2 47 K*_VESSEL Numeric 4 2 48 K-CHART Numeric 2 49 OTHER-8 Character 15 50 K OTH 8 Numeric 4 2 Qo 51 S-BOAT Numdric 4 2 52 S VESSEL- Numeric 4 2 S-CHART Numeric 4 2 4=14 S OTH 8 Numeric 4 2 W @HO _L E Numeric ---------- 4-- 56 K PROCESS Numeric 4 2 57 1(_MARKETS Numeric 4 2 58 t-WHOLE Numeric 4 59 S-PROCESS Numeric .4 2 P-1 0 S MARKETS Numer i 4 2 F, I OTHER hz-t r ar. t E, r 15 0 T H _9 NL'krner i c 4 @7, 'D S' 0 T H 'D NUMPr iC_ E 5 f::'. TAMPA Numer i!- @1 066 1:1"_11TH_FLA NUmer ic 4 .67 f:.' N Y NUMer i c 4 G 9 NUmer ic 4 6,-:): 1:-*- C-. A R I P. Numer i c 4 70 OTH 10 NUmer i c 4 71 S SE NUmer i c 4 72 S-TAMPA Numer ic 4 7.:j S-OTFI-FLA Numeric 4 74 S_NY Numer i c 4 75 S-OTH-US Numeric 4 76 S CARIB Numer i c 4 2 77 S OTH 10 Nu---,.- 4 78 K 11 1 NUmer i c 4 79 K' 11 2 Numeric 4 so K ll 3 Numeric 4 2 el K-11-4 Numeric 4 2 E32 K_ 11-5 Numeric 4 2 63 K_ 11-6 Numeric 4 84 K-11-7 Numer i c 4 a5 V*_ I 1 -8 Numeric 4 2 96 OTH 11 Character 20 E37 K 11 OTH Numeric 4 Be S-11-1 Numeric 4 2 89 S-11-2 Numer i c 4 2 90 S-11-3 Numeric 4 2 91 S-11-4 Numeric 4 2 92, S 11 5 Numeric 4 ,93 S 11 6 Numeric, 4 2 94 S-11-7 Numeric 4 2 95 S-11-8 Numeric 4 2 96 S-11-OTH Numeric 4 v.. 1:.@ i Numeric 4 .7. 98 K-12-2 Numeric 4 2 .99 K 12 3 Numeric 4 2 100 K1_ 12-4 Numeric 4 101 K 12 5 Numeric 4 2 102 K-12-6 Numeric 4 2 103 K-12-7 Numeric 4 2 104 K_ 12-8 Numeric 4 2 105' OTH-12 Character 20 106 K-12-OTH Numeric 4 2 107 S-12-1 Numeric 4 2 108 S-12-2. Numeric 4 2 109 S 12 3 Numeric 4 2 110 S 12 4 Numeric 4 2 111 S 12 5 Numeric 4 2 112 S 12 6 Numeric 4 2 113 S 12 7 Numeric 4 2 114 S 12 8 Numeric 4 .2 -115 S -.12-=H Numeric 4 2 116 K-PREM -117 S PREM --Numeric 6 8 CUSTNAME 19 CUSTADD Character 30 120 CUSTCITY Character 20 121 CUSTSTATE Character 2 1222 CUSTZIP Character 9 Ch a r a c ter a), ac. P r L)1 E 5, a., em 12-'8 F 15 Character Total 0 C Set print f f list struc Structure for database: D:dealer2:'.dbf Number of data records: I) Ij Date of last update 10/14/91 Field Field Name Type Width Dec 1 DEALERID Numeric 5 '13151--haracte 1 23 H15 Character I 4 115 Character 1 5 J15 Character I 6 OTH-15 Character 15 7 F--'15 Character I et print off SPECIES LIST Amberjack 103 Ballyhoo 105 Bait 182 Barracuda 459 Black Drum 123 Black Sea Bass 283 Blue 107 Blue Crabs 322 Bluerunners 109 Bonito (Little Tunny) ill Bottomfish 291 Butterfish 453 Catfish 115 Cero Mackerel 220 Clams 849 Cobia 113 Cod 99 Crawfish 317 Croakers 119 Dolphin 121 Eels 125 Flounder 291 Goatfish 401 Goggleeyes (Scad) 117 Grey Snapper 205 Grouper 150 Grunts 151 Haddock 98 Herring 153 Jacks, Mixed 159 King Mackerel 165 Ladyfish 167 Lane Snapper 203 Live Rock (Algae) 812 Lobster 317 Mangrove/Grey Snapper (Mango) 205 Menhaden 173 Miscellaneous Food Fish 251 Moonfish 159 Mullet 175 Mutton Snapper 207 Permit 181 Pollock 97 Pompano 183 Porgy 247 Red Snapper 209 Reeffish (Red Drum) 185 Sand Perch 187 Scad 117 Scalefish 94 Scamp 139 Scrod 93 Sea Bass 189 Seatrout 193 Shad . 197 Shark, Mixed 199 Sheepshead (Sand Bream) 201 Shinners (Bait) 182 Shrimp (Other, heads on) 344 Silver Mullet 177 Snapper, Mixed 218 Spanish Mackerel 219 Sponge (Others) 359 spot 225 Squid 347 Stone Crabs 327 Swordfish 229 Tarpon 97 Tilefish 231 Triggerfish 234 Tropicals 95 Vermillion Snapper(B-Liner/Mingos) 213 Wahoo 245 Whiting 249 Wreckfish 405 Yelloweye Snapper (Silk Snapper) 211 Yellow Fin Tuna 243 Yellowtails 215 GEAR 1. "Hook & Line": 101. Wire Line & Spoons 102. Rods & Reels 103. Paraveins 104. Bottom Fishing Gear 105. Terminal Tackle 106. Manuals 107. Electric Reel 108. Poles 109. Trolling Cigar minnows 110. Trolling 30# class tackles 111. Cable & Hooks 112. Outriggers 113. Bug Reels 114. Piano wire 115. Monofilament Handlines 116. Downriggers 117. Deep drop reels 118. Surf equipment 119. Light spinning 120. Deepwater reels & tackle 121. Live.bait wells 122. Planers 123. Bandit reels and gear 124. Jigging 125. Small jigs & reels 126. Spinning or light conventional trolling 127. Hooks & sinkers 128. Yo Yols 129. Spin cast & troll 130. Electric bottom reels 131. Jerk lines 132. Electramates 133. Tackle 134. Lures 135. Reels 136. Line and hooks 137. Snaps mono 138. Swivels 139. Hooks 140. Rods 2. "Gillnets": 201. Bigger size mesh gillnets 202. Stab gillnet 203. Spot, jack, trammel, mullet, drift, pompano, bluefish net 204. Shark net 205. New net 2106. Smaller size mesh gillnet 3. "Other": 301. Seine 302. Longline spool 303. Rakes 304. Traps 305. Sponge hooks 306. shrimp gear 307. Scuba gear 308. Dive & trap gear 309. Wing nets 310. 4 x 81 Butterfly trawls 311. Castnets 312. Wood traps 313. Long line for groupers 314. Larger nets 315. Crawfish/Lobster traps 316. Trap hauler 317. Drift line 318. Shark Line & Reel 4. "Miscellaneous": 401. Lead 402. Electronics 403. Hydraulics 404. Seabass Traps 405. Ropes 406 ' Twin 407. Dip 408. Chemicals & Nets 409. Longer Anchor Line/Anchor 410. Tanks & Pumps for Bait 411. Fish Finder 412. Trammel Lines 413. Bigger Fishboxes 414. Heavier equipment 415. Trailer 416. Nets (other than gill) 417. Crimp pliers 418. Line cablecutters 419. Cable 420. Colorscope 421. Clam boat 422. Insulated box 423. Knives 424. Net boat OPTIONS FOR #18 1. "Limited Supplyle: 10. Time of year 11. Limited supply of fish 12. Season just beginning 13. Gulf was closed/Closure of season in the Gulf 14. The nets weren't set 15. Low availability 16. Scarcity of Fish 17. Panic buying 18. Quota filled 19. Bad weather 2. "Quality": 21. Keep on ice 22. Fresh fish 23. Properly iced down 24. Ice & salt water 25. No net marks 26. Firm fish 27. Careful handling 3. "High Demand": 31. Maximum price from buyer 32. Lent/Easter 4. "Excess Demand": 41. Plenty of supply = less money 42. Commercial net boats determine price of kings 43. Poor price due to imports S. "Miscellaneous": 50. "That's all they pay" 51. Dealer sold fish from his own store 52. Large fish 53. Dealer is a crook 54. Price fixing 55. Dealer sets price 56. Dealer knew quota was going to be filled early 57. Fast off-loading 58. Going rate 59. Demise of gill nets OPTIONS FOR #19 1. "Icing Practices": 1A. Cooler water temperature 1B. Kept in ice 1C. Fish were very fresh 1D. Cool weather 1E. Brined fish 1F. Put immediately into chill box 1G. Full shade 1H. Fish still alive when iced 1I. Fish spread out 2. "Gutting Practices": 2A. Gutted properly ' 2B. Cleaned and dressed immediately 2C. Immediate removal of fish from net 3. "Non-sequitur": 3A. High demand & low supply 3B. Short season 3C. Lots of fish 3D. Price fixing 3E. Market controls price 3F. Less fish on market 3G. King mackerel quota filled 3H. Best price before gillnets set 31. Fish migrate back north 3J. Politics 3K. Plenty of feed 3L. Because you are lucky 3M. Beds of mackerel not hit as hard by big. boats/ smaller boats could catch some 3N. Hand line fish only 4. "Miscellaneous": 4A. Picky chefs 4B. Lack of worms 4C. Fat fish 4D. Good winter migration from north 4E. Large nets 4F. Short half to one day trips/Sold on same day 4G. Size/Smokers 4H. Hook and line not nets 41. Caught at night 4J. Less weight stacked on fish at the market 4K. Lack of netting 4L. Steaked for Cuban market 4M. Catch small quantities of fish at a time 4N. Caught and sold the same day 40. Limited competition from other fishermen PRODUCT FORMS 1. Round fresh 2. Round frozen 3. Fillet frozen 4. Steaked 5. Smoked 6. Fresh fillet 7. Whole fresh 8. Processed for bait 9. other, unknown COMMERCIAL TICKET RPRTT SAS 16:17 MONDAY, DECEMBER 2, 1991 CONTENTS PROCEDURE CONTENTS OF SAS MEMBER WORK.CONTENT1 CREATED BY CMS USERID RMP ON CPUID FF-4381-017482 AT 16:17 MONDAY, DECEMBER 2, 1991 BY SAS RELEASE 5.18 FILE= WORK CONTENT1 BLKSIZE=32712 LRECL=221 GENERATED BY DATA NUMBER OF OBSERVATIONS: 2109 NUMBER OF VARIABLES: 23 MEMTYPE:' DATA ---- ALPHABETIC LIST OF VARIABLES AND ATTRIBUTES ----- VARIABLE TYPE LENGTH POSITION FORMAT INFORMAT LABEL 8 ADDRESS CHAR 36 94 12 AREACODE CHAR 3 159 9 CITY CHAR 23 130 6 COUNTY NUM 2 56 19 EFFDATE NUM 4 193 20 EXPDATE NUM 4 197 17 FULLTIME CHAR 1 172 14 INDVES CHAR 1 169 23 K TRIPS NUM 8 213 22 KINGS NUM 8 205 21 LMNUM NUM 4 201 7 NAME CHAR 36 58 IS PRIMOCC CHAR 20 173 15 RESIDENT CHAR 1 170 16 RESTRSPP CHAR 1 171 3 SP TRIPS NUM 8 20 2 SPANISH NUM 8 12 1 SPL CHAR 8 4 10 STATE CHAR 2 153 13 TELEPHON CHAR 7 162 4 VESSEL CHAR 8 28 5 VESSNAME CHAR 20 36 11 ZIPCODE NUM 4 155 ------------------------------ SOURCE RECORDS ------------------------------ DATA CONTENT1; SET LIC89.MACKFISH;....- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- DE Lawton Chiles Governor Jim Smith V) FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Secretary of State Bob Butterworth L Florida Marine Research institute Attorney General Division of Marine Resources Gerald Lewis e4 Executive Director State Comptroller 100 Eighth Avenue S.E. - St. Petersburg, Florida 33701-5095 7w Gallagher Phone: (813) 896-8626 - Suncom: 523-1011 - FAX: (813) 823-0166 State Treasurer Bob Crawford Commissioner of Agriculture April 2, 1991 Betty Castor Commissioner of Education Mr. Robert Palmer, Economic Analyst Marine Fisheries Commission Koger Executive Center, 106 Douglas 3900 Commonwealth Bloulevard Tallahassee, Florida 32399 Dear Bob: Please find enclosed the mackerel mailing labels that you requested and a diskette containing the dBase IV files from which they were generated. I have also made a tape back-up of the SAS files containing the information about each dealer and fisherman. The tape is number 1781 and should be labelled: MACKEREL MAILING LABELS. I used the CMS, TAPE DUMP command to write these files to the tape. So, you should use TAPE LOAD filename, to copy the files from the tape. TAPE SCAN will show you that there are two SAS data files: MACKFISH LIC89 and MACKDEAL LIC89. MACKFISH LIC89 contains the informations about each fishermen, including their SPL. MACKDEAL LIC89 contains the dealer number and the information about each dealer. I have tried to eliminate redundant entries when possible, but I am sure that some remain. There also appear to be a number of SPL's for which there was no matching name or other information. Most are probably misrecorded numbers of fishermen already included in the file. I have removed those records from the tape file. An example record from each file is included with this letter to show the format of each. Most of the fields are self-explanatory; a few, however, are somewhat cryptic. EFFDATE is the effective starting date for the license. EXPDATE is the expiration date for the license. INDVES indicates whether the license is for an individual or vessel. K - TRIPS is the number of trips on which king mackerel were landed. KINGS is the total weight of king mackerel landed. LMNUM is simply the numeric part of the SPL. RESIDENT contains one of three codes; R = Florida resident, N = non- resident US citizen, and A = non-resident alien. RESTRSPP indicates restricted species status. SP-TRIPS is the number of trips on which Spanish mackerel were landed. SPAN- ISH is the total weight of Spanish mackerel landed. Administration Beaches and Shores Law Enforcement Marine Resources Recreation and Parks Resource Management State Lands Mr. Robert Palmer Page Two April 2, 1991 The dBase IV files are saved on a high density 3.5" diskette. There are three database files on the diskette, MACK89.DBF, MACKFISH.DBF, and MACKDEAL.DBF. MACKDEAL.DBF contains the dealer addresses, MACKFISH.DBF contains the fishermen addresses, and MACK89.DBF contains both. Copies of the structure of each file are enclosed. The SPL field in the MACKDEAL.DBF file actually contains the dealer number. The SPPLAB field contains the species code. REPS contains the number of duplicates of that license in the original file. DEAL-FISH contains the code for whether the record is for a fisherman (F) or a dealer (D). Other support files are also on the diskette, including the label format files. To print or view the mailing labels in zipcode order, enter the following commands from the dBase dot prompt: USE MACKFISH (or MACKDEAL, depending on the desired data) SET ORDER TO ZIPCODE MODI LABEL MACK89 You will be presented with a menu screen showing the format of the labels and allowing alterations as well as printing. You gain access to the menus at the top of the screen by pressing F10. I used nearly two full boxes of mailing labels during the printing. There are three copies each of the dealers and the fishermen list. Each label has the full name and address, and a code (xx-x) in the upper right comer describing if that record is a fisherman (F) or dealer (D), and whether they caught Spanish mackerel (S), king mackerel (K), or both (SK). Each strip of labels is separate.and sorted in zip code order. Some of the stacks are broken in the middle as well, where printing mistakes were corrected. There is also a forth large stack at the bottom of one of the boxes, which is an incomplete list of the iishermen in alphabetical order. You might find that useful for your second wave. Call me if you have any problems using or locating any of the files. Good luck with the survey. We will be interested to see the results. Sincerely, DIVISION OF MARINE RESOURCES 0. 77@ @@ James E. McKenna, Jr., Ph.D. Fisheries Biologist Fisheries Statistics Section JEMcK/jIw Enclosures FILE: C:\VIP51\JMCKENNA\PALMRMAC.LTR (COMPANION FILE, DBASE FIL E STRUCTURES: PALMRMAC.DBS) Sample record from MACKFISH LIC89: SPL: SPOO0003 SPANISH: 2 SP TRIPS: VESSEL: VESSNAME: COUNTY: 15 NAME: HILL ROLAND B ADDRESS: P 0 BOX 45 CITY: GRANT STATE: FL ZIPCODE: 32949 AREACODE: 305 TELEPHON: 7270976 INDVES: N RESIDENT: R RESTRSPP: FULLTIME: N PRIMOCC: FISH HOUSE MGR. EFFDATE: 890915 EXPDATE: 890630 LMNUM: 3 KINGS: K-TRIPS: Sample record from MACKFISH LIC89: COUNTY: 23 NUM-TRIP: 1 YEAR: 89 DEALER: RC000824 COAST: 1 SPANISH: 515 KINGS: 3953 SP-TRIPS: 5 K-TRIPS: 8 DEALNAME, J.C. DOBSON ADDRESS: 40 S.W. 31ST ROAD CITY: MIAMI STATE: FL ZIPCODE: 331292805 PHONE: 3058540507 FIRSTNAM: J.C. LASTNAME: DOBSON Database Structure: B:\MACKFISH.DBF. No. of data records: 2221. Last update: 03/28/91 FIELD FIELD NAME TYPE WIDTH DEC INDEX 1 SPL Character 8 N 2 LASTNAME Character 35 N 3 FIRSTNAME Character 11 N 4 MIDDLE Character 4 N 5 ADDRESS Character 35 N 6 CITY Character 20 N 7 COUNTY Numeric 2 N 8 STATE Character 2 N 9 ZIPCODE Character 6 Y 10 SPPLAB Character 2 N 11 REPS Numeric 3 N 12 DEAL FISH Character 1 N ** TOTAL ** 130 Database Structure: B:\MACKDEAL.DBF. No. of data records: 219. Last update: 03/28/91 FIELD FIELD NAME TYPE WIDTH DEC INDEX I SPL Character 8 N 2 LASTNAME Character 35 N 3 FIRSTNAME Character 11 N 4 MIDDLE Character 4 N 5 ADDRESS Character 35 N 6 CITY Character 20 N 7 COUNTY Numeric 2 N 8 STATE. Character 2 N 9 ZIPCODE Character 6 Y 10 SPPLAB Character 2 N 11 REPS Numeric 3 N 12 DEAL-FISH Character 1 N TOTAL 130 Database Structure: BAMACK89.DBF. No. of data records: 2440. Last update: 03/28/91 FIELD FIELD NAME TYPE WIDTH DEC INDEX I SPL Character 8 Y 2 LASTNAME Character 35 N 3 FIRSTNAME Character 11 N 4 MIDDLE Character 4 N 5 ADDRESS Character 35 N 6 CITY Character 210 N 7 COUNTY Numeric 2 N 8 STATE Character 2 N 9 ZIPCODE Character 6 Y 10 SPPLAB Character 2 N 11 REPS Numeric 3 N 12 DEAL FISH Character 1 N TOTAL 130 FILE: C:\WP51\JMCKENNA\PALMRMAC.DBS COMPANION FILE: PALMRMAC.LTR . @ IL BIBLIOGRAPHY COASTAL PELAGIC RESEARCH BIBLIOGRAPHY 1. Adams, Charles M. and Frank J. Lawlor (November 1989) Trends in the Importation of Selected Fresh and Frozen Seaf ood Products into the Southeastern United States. FSG Tech. Paper 59: Gainesville, Florida. 2. Anonymous (April 1991) 1991 Report of the Mackerel Stock Assessment Panel Meeting. NMFS; SEFC: Miami, Florida. 3. Cato, James C. (October 1978) Commercial Fishing Vessel Size in Florida. Prepared for the Small-Scale Fishermen Workshop. Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute: Woods Hole, Massachusetts. 4. Cato, James C. and R. Alan Morris and Fred J., Prochaska. (March 1978) 'Production, Costs, and Earnings By Boat Size: Florida Spanish Mackerel Fishery. FSGC: Gainesville, Florida. 5. Centaur Associates, Inc. (1984) Socio-Economic Study of the Mackerel Purse Seine Fishery. NMFS: St. Petersburg, Florida. 6. Clark, Colin W. (August 1973) 'The economics of overex- ploitation, Science. Volume 181. 7.' Eldridge, Peter (August 1985) Trends in Commercial and Recreational Fisheries for King Mackerel in the Southeastern United States. NMFS; Southeast Fisheries Center: Miami, Florida. 8. Fisheries Statistics Section (July 1990) Data file BAT02126 KINGMAC for king Mackerel trip tickets. FDNR; FMRI: St. Petersburg, Florida. 9. Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council (July 1991) Economic Allocation of Gulf Group of King Mackerel. Agenda Appendii Tab D, Number 3a. Tampa, Florida. 10. Hamer, Paul E. and Joseph M. McGurrin and Laura C. Beach and Mark C. Holliday and Linda M. Schwab. (1991) Interstate Fisheries of the Atlantic Coast. ASMFC: Washington, D.C. 11. Hardin, G. (July 1968) The tragedy of@the commons, Science. Volume 162. 12. Holland, Stephen M. and J. Walter Milon (June 1989) The Structure and Economics of the Charter and Party Boat Fishing Fleet of the Gulf Coast of Florida. University of Florida: Gainesville, Florida. 13. Kennedy, Frank S. (September 18, 1991) 1989 Annual Landings Summary (,including price information). FDNR: St. Petersburg, Florida. 14. A. T. Kearney, Inc. (July 1989) Economic Activity Associated with Fishery Products in the United States. National Fisheries Education and Research Foundation, Inc.: Washington, D. C. 15. Leeworthy, Vernon R. (1990) An Economic Allocation of Fishery Stocks Between Recreational and Commercial Fisherman: The Case of King Mackerel. Ph.D dissertation; Florida State University Department of Economics: Tallahassee, Florida. 16. Mackerel Statistics Review Panel (May 15, 1990) Review Panel Report. NMFS; SEFC: Miami, Florida. 17. McCulla, Edward F. and Roy 0. Williams (May 17, 1991) Letter to Andrew Kemmerer transmitting the Regulatory Impact Review document for annual ABC, TAC, quotas, allocations and bag limits for king and Spanish mackerel. GMFMC: Tampa, Florida. 18. Milon, J. Walter (July 1988) Estimating Recreational Angler Participation and Economic Impact in the Gulf of Mexico Mackerel Fishery. University of Florida: Gainesville, Florida. 19. Muller, R.G. (June 1990) King Mackerel Landings Summary. FMRI: St. Petersburg, Florida. 20. National Marine Fisheries Service (Fridays) Fishery Market News Report. USDOC, NMFS: New Orleans, Louisiana. 21. Poffenberger, John R. (March 1987) An Economic Assessment of the Fisheries for King and Spanish Mackerel. NMFS Southeastern Fisheries Center: Miami, Florida. 22. Poffenberger, John R. and Joseph E. Powers (April 1984) Estimated Economic Consequences of Proposed Management Measures for King Mackerel Fisheries in the Southeast United States. NMFS; Southeastern Fisheries Center: Miami, Florida. 23. Poffenberger, John R. (March 1982) An Analysis of Fishery Economic Data Relating to . Commercial Mackerel Fisheries. NMFS; Southeastern Fisheries Center: Miami, Florida. 24. Prochaska, Fred J. (July 1978) Prices, Marketing Margins and Structural Change in the King Mackerel Marketing System. Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics. 10(i). 2 25. Prochaska, Fred J. and James C. Cato. (March 16, 1978) Analysis of Florida Atlantic King Mackerel Monthly Dockside Prices. Proceedings of the Mackerel Colloquium. FSGC: Gainesville, Florida. 26. Prochaska, Fred J. and R. Alan Morris and James C. Cato (October 1977) An Economic Analysis of King Mackerel Production by Hook-and-Line on the Florida Atlantic Coast. FSGC: Gainesville, Florida. 27. Smith, Perry and Chris Reid (November 1991) 'The price of fish a case of two cities', Australian Fisheries. Volume 50 Number 11. 28. South Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Councils (May 1989) Final Amendment 4 to the Fishery Management Plan for the Coastal Migratory Pelagic Resources (including EA and RIR). GMFMC: Tampa, Florida. 29. South Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council (April 1985) Final'Amendment 1 for the Coastal Migratory Pelagic Resources. DOC; NMFS: St. Petersburg, Florida. 30. Urner Barry Publications, Inc. NMFS Fisheries Market News Reports. (Monday, Wednesday, Friday) UBP: Toms River, New Jersey. 31. United States Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. (May 1991) Current Fishery Statistics No. 9000: Fisheries of the United States, 1990. NM7S: Washington, D.C. 32. United States Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. (July 1991) NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-SEFC-292: Fishing Trends and Conditions In The Southeast Region 1990. NMFS; SEFC: Miami, Florida. 33. United States Department of Commerce, National Marine Fisheries Service. (1988) Economic Activity Associated With Marine Recreational Fishing in 1985. Volume II - State-Level and Species-Level Estimates. NMFS: Washington, D.C. 34. United States Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service. (November 1988) 1985 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife Associated Recreation. USFWS: Washington, D.C. 35. Williams, Roy 0. (March 1990) King Mackerel Problems and Options. FMFC: Tallahassee, Florida. 3 NTIS FOkM''2'72 DNR Contract No. X-0477 1/15/92 Date Completed STATE OF FLORIDA COASTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM: COASTAL PELAGICS SURVEY RESEARCH, CM-287 Jim McKenna, Dr. J. Walter Milon, Robert M. Palmer, Roy 0. Williams, Sandi A. Rohrer ON-287 Marine Fisheries Commission 2540 Executive Center Circle West Suite 106 NA90AA-H-00B09 Tallahassee, Florida 32301 U.S. Dept. of Commerce/NOAA Dept. of Env. Reg. OCRM Coastal Management Final 1825 Connectiout A. , N.W. 2600 Blair Stone Rd. Washington D.C. 20235 Tallahassee, Fl32399 This project consists of the survey research of the pelagic harvesting sector and the first receiver and seafood dealers, with an additive survey to determine marketing channels. Fishery management/resource management/cost & revenue survey/ seafood dealer survey Coastal zone management/Florida/Coastal development issues: commercial and recreational fisheries social science/economics Unclassified 67 pages Release unlimited ES CTR LIBRARY MOAA COASTAL SERVI 3 6668 14 11377 1