[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 8 (Tuesday, January 13, 1998)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 1930-1932]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-712]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 8 / Tuesday, January 13, 1998 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 1930]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. 97-NM-169-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Israel Aircraft Industries, Ltd., Model
1121, 1121A, 1121B, 1123, 1124, 1124A, 1125 Westwind Astra, and Astra
SPX Series Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document proposes the adoption of a new airworthiness
directive (AD) that is applicable to all Israel Aircraft Industries,
Ltd., Model 1121, 1121A, 1121B, 1123, 1124, 1124A, 1125 Westwind Astra,
and Astra SPX series airplanes. This proposal would require repetitive
functional tests for proper operation of hydraulic fuses installed in
the brake system and emergency hydraulic indicating system; and
replacement of any discrepant hydraulic fuse with a new, improved unit.
This proposal is prompted by the issuance of mandatory continuing
airworthiness information by a foreign civil airworthiness authority.
The actions specified by the proposed AD are intended to prevent
failure of the hydraulic fuse to operate properly, due to internal
corrosion, in the event of an external leak downstream of the fuse,
which could result in loss of hydraulic systems.
DATES: Comments must be received by February 12, 1998.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments in triplicate to the Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Transport Airplane Directorate, ANM-114,
Attention: Rules Docket No. 97-NM-169-AD, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW.,
Renton, Washington 98055-4056. Comments may be inspected at this
location between 9:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
The service information referenced in the proposed rule may be
obtained from Galaxy Aerospace Corp., One Galaxy Way, Fort Worth
Alliance Airport, Fort Worth, Texas 76177. This information may be
examined at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue,
SW., Renton, Washington.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: International Branch, ANM-116, FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98055-4056; telephone (425) 227-2110; fax (425) 227-1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
Interested persons are invited to participate in the making of the
proposed rule by submitting such written data, views, or arguments as
they may desire. Communications shall identify the Rules Docket number
and be submitted in triplicate to the address specified above. All
communications received on or before the closing date for comments,
specified above, will be considered before taking action on the
proposed rule. The proposals contained in this notice may be changed in
light of the comments received.
Comments are specifically invited on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the proposed rule. All
comments submitted will be available, both before and after the closing
date for comments, in the Rules Docket for examination by interested
persons. A report summarizing each FAA-public contact concerned with
the substance of this proposal will be filed in the Rules Docket.
Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments
submitted in response to this notice must submit a self-addressed,
stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments
to Docket Number 97-NM-169-AD.'' The postcard will be date stamped and
returned to the commenter.
Availability of NPRMs
Any person may obtain a copy of this NPRM by submitting a request
to the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, ANM-114, Attention: Rules
Docket No. 97-NM-169-AD, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington
98055-4056.
Discussion
The Civil Aviation Administration of Israel (CAAI), which is the
airworthiness authority for Israel, notified the FAA that an unsafe
condition may exist on all Israel Aircraft Industries, Ltd., Model
1121, 1121A, 1121B, 1123, 1124, 1124A, 1125 Westwind Astra, and Astra
SPX series airplanes. The CAAI advises that corrosion has occurred on
the magnesium piston in the hydraulic fuses installed in the brake
system and emergency hydraulic indicating system of these airplanes
(except 1125 Westwind Astra series airplanes), which prevented proper
operation of the fuse (i.e., closure of the fuse in the event of a
downstream leak). This condition, if not detected and corrected in a
timely manner, could result in loss of hydraulic systems.
Explanation of Relevant Service Information
The manufacturer has issued Commodore Jet Service Bulletin 1121-29-
022 (for Model 1121, 1121A, and 1121B series airplanes), Westwind
Service Bulletin 1123-29-045 (for Model 1123 series airplanes),
Westwind Service Bulletin 1124-29-132 (for Model 1124 and 1124A series
airplanes), and Astra Service Bulletin 1125-32-154 (for Model 1125
Westwind Astra and Astra SPX series airplanes); all dated September 11,
1996. These service bulletins describe procedures for repetitive
functional tests for proper operation of the hydraulic fuses installed
in the emergency hydraulic indicating system (except Model 1125
Westwind Astra and Astra SPX series airplanes) and the brake system,
and replacement of any discrepant hydraulic fuse, with a new, improved
unit. The CAAI classified these service bulletins as mandatory and
issued Israeli airworthiness directive 29-97-03-10, dated March 27,
1997, in order to assure the continued airworthiness of these airplanes
in Israel.
FAA's Conclusions
These airplane models are manufactured in Israel and are type
certificated for operation in the United States under the provisions of
section 21.29 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 21.29) and
the applicable bilateral airworthiness agreement. Pursuant to this
bilateral
[[Page 1931]]
airworthiness agreement, the CAAI has kept the FAA informed of the
situation described above. The FAA has examined the findings of the
CAAI, reviewed all available information, and determined that AD action
is necessary for products of this type design that are certificated for
operation in the United States.
Explanation of Requirements of Proposed Rule
Since an unsafe condition has been identified that is likely to
exist or develop on other airplanes of the same type design registered
in the United States, the proposed AD would require accomplishment of
the actions specified in the service bulletins described previously.
Interim Action
This is considered to be interim action until final action is
identified, at which time the FAA may consider further rulemaking.
Cost Impact
The FAA estimates that 359 airplanes of U.S. registry would be
affected by this proposed AD. It would take approximately 2 work hours
per airplane to accomplish the proposed functional test at an average
labor rate of $60 per work hour. Based on these figures, the cost
impact of the proposed AD on U.S. operators is estimated to be a total
of $43,080, or $120 per airplane, per functional test.
The cost impact figure discussed above is based on assumptions that
no operator has yet accomplished any of the proposed requirements of
this AD action, and that no operator would accomplish those actions in
the future if this AD were not adopted.
Regulatory Impact
The regulations proposed herein would not have substantial direct
effects on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in
accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this
proposal would not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant
the preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this proposed
regulation (1) is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
and (3) if promulgated, will not have a significant economic impact,
positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under
the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. A copy of the draft
regulatory evaluation prepared for this action is contained in the
Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained by contacting the Rules
Docket at the location provided under the caption ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration proposes to amend
part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as
follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new
airworthiness directive:
Israel Aircraft Industries Ltd.: Docket 97-NM-169-AD.
Applicability: All Model 1121, 1121A, 1121B, 1123, 1124, 1124A,
1125 Westwind Astra, and Astra SPX series airplanes; certificated in
any category.
Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the
preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been
modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the
requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified,
altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of
this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an
alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (e) of
this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of
the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition
addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been
eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to
address it.
Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished
previously.
To prevent failure of the hydraulic fuse to operate properly in
the event of an external leak downstream of the fuse, which could
result in loss of hydraulic systems, accomplish the following:
(a) For Model 1121, 1121A, 1123, 1124, and 1124A series
airplanes: Perform a functional test (by measuring fluid loss) for
proper operation of the hydraulic fuses installed in the brake
system and emergency hydraulic indicating system in accordance with
Commodore Jet Service Bulletin 1121-29-022 (for Model 1121, 1121A,
and 1121B series airplanes), Westwind 1123-29-045 (for Model 1123
series airplanes), or Westwind 1124-29-132 (for Model 1124 and 1124A
series airplanes); all dated September 11, 1996, as applicable; at
the later of the times specified in paragraphs (a)(1) and (a)(2) of
this AD. Thereafter, repeat the inspections at intervals not to
exceed 1,200 flight hours or 3 years, whichever occurs first.
(1) Within 250 flight hours or 1 year after the effective date
of this AD, whichever occurs first. Or,
(2) Prior to accumulation of 1,200 total flight hours, or within
3 years since the date of manufacture, whichever occurs first.
(b) For Model 1125 Westwind Astra and Astra SPX series
airplanes: Perform a functional test (by measuring fluid loss) for
proper operation of the hydraulic fuses installed in the brake
system, in accordance with Astra Service Bulletin 1125-32-154, dated
September 11, 1996, at the later of the times specified in
paragraphs (b)(1) and (b)(2) of this AD. Thereafter, repeat the
inspections at intervals not to exceed 1,000 flight hours or 3
years, whichever occurs first.
(1) Within 250 total flight hours or 1 year after the effective
date of this AD, whichever occurs first. Or,
(2) Prior to the accumulation of 1,000 total flight hours, or
within 3 years since the date of manufacture, whichever occurs
first.
(c) If, during any inspection required by paragraph (a) or (b)
of this AD, any discrepancy is found, prior to further flight,
replace the fuse with a new, improved fuse (part number 713047 with
suffix ``A'' after the serial number), in accordance with Commodore
Jet Service Bulletin 1121-29-022 (for Model 1121, 1121A, and 1121B
series airplanes), Westwind 1123-29-045 (for Model 1123 series
airplanes), Westwind 1124-29-132 (for Model 1124 and 1124A series
airplanes), or Astra 1125-32-154 (for Model 1125 Westwind Astra and
Astra SPX series airplanes); all dated September 11, 1996; as
applicable.
Note 2: Replacement of the fuse in accordance with paragraph (c)
of this AD does not constitute terminating action for the repetitive
functional tests required by paragraphs (a) and (b) of this AD.
(d) As of the effective date of this AD, no person shall install
on any airplane a hydraulic fuse having part number 713047, unless
it has a suffix ``A'' after the serial number.
(e) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the
compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used if approved by the Manager, International Branch, ANM-116, FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate. Operators shall submit their
requests through an appropriate FAA Principal Maintenance Inspector,
who may add comments and then send it to the Manager, International
Branch, ANM-116.
Note 3: Information concerning the existence of approved
alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be
obtained from the International Branch, ANM-116.
(f) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with
sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14
CFR
[[Page 1932]]
21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where the
requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
Note 4: The subject of this AD is addressed in Israeli
airworthiness directive 29-97-03-10, dated March 27, 1997.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on January 6, 1998.
Darrell M. Pederson,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 98-712 Filed 1-12-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-U