[Federal Register Volume 68, Number 6 (Thursday, January 9, 2003)]
[Notices]
[Page 1213]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 03-374]
[[Page 1213]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. 50-272 and 50-311]
PSEG Nuclear, LLC, Salem Nuclear Generating Station, Unit Nos. 1
and 2; Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is considering
issuance of an exemption from Title 10 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (10 CFR) Part 55, Section 55.59(c) for Facility Operating
License Nos. DPR-70 and DPR-75, issued to PSEG Nuclear LLC (PSEG or the
licensee), for operation of the Salem Nuclear Generating Station, Unit
Nos. 1 and 2 (Salem), located in Salem County, New Jersey. Therefore,
as required by 10 CFR 51.21, the NRC is issuing this environmental
assessment and finding of no significant impact.
Environmental Assessment
Identification of the Proposed Action
The proposed action would exempt the facility licensee on a one-
time basis from the 24 month schedule requirement of 10 CFR 55.59(c)
for completing the licensed operator requalification training program
at Salem.
The proposed action is in accordance with the facility licensee's
application for exemption docketed October 28, 2002.
The Need for the Proposed Action
The proposed action would extend the date for the facility licensee
to complete the licensed operator requalification training program at
Salem. The proposed action would extend the date for completing the
training program from October 3, 2002, to January 9, 2003, therefore
extending the training program by approximately 3 months over the
schedule required by 10 CFR 55.59(c). This proposed action is needed to
allow Salem to align their requalification training program with the
training program at the Hope Creek Nuclear Generating station.
Environmental Impacts of the Proposed Action
The NRC has completed its evaluation of the proposed action and
concludes, as set forth below, that there are no significant
environmental impacts associated with the extension of the licensed
operator requalification program at Salem from October 3, 2002, to
January 9, 2003.
The proposed action will not significantly increase the probability
or consequences of accidents, no changes are being made in the types of
effluents that may be released off site, and there is no significant
increase in occupational or public radiation exposure. Therefore, there
are no significant radiological environmental impacts associated with
the proposed action.
With regard to potential non-radiological impacts, the proposed
action does not have a potential to affect any historic sites. It does
not affect non-radiological plant effluents and has no other
environmental impact. Therefore, there are no significant non-
radiological environmental impacts associated with the proposed action.
Accordingly, the NRC concludes that there are no significant
environmental impacts associated with the proposed action.
Environmental Impacts of the Alternatives to the Proposed Action
As an alternative to the proposed action, the staff considered
denial of the proposed action (i.e., the ``no-action'' alternative).
Denial of the application would result in no change in current
environmental impacts. The environmental impacts of the proposed action
and the alternative action are similar.
Alternative Use of Resources
The action does not involve the use of any different resource than
those previously considered in the Final Environmental Statement for
Salem.
Agencies and Persons Consulted
In accordance with its stated policy, the staff consulted with the
New Jersey State official, Mr. D. Zannoni, on November 14, 2002,
regarding the environmental impact of the proposed action. The State
official had no comments.
Finding of No Significant Impact
On the basis of this environmental assessment, the NRC concludes
that the proposed action will not have a significant effect on the
quality of the human environment. Accordingly, the NRC has determined
not to prepare an environmental impact statement for the proposed
action.
For further details with respect to the proposed action, see PSEG's
letter dated October 28, 2002. Documents may be examined, and/or copied
for a fee, at the NRC's Public Document Room (PDR), located at One
White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike (first floor), Rockville,
Maryland. Publicly available records will be accessible electronically
from the Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS)
Public Electronic Reading Room on the Internet at the NRC Web site,
http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. Persons who do not have
access to ADAMS or who encounter problems in accessing the documents
located in ADAMS, should contact the NRC PDR Reference staff by
telephone at 1-800-397-4209 or 301-415-4737, or by e-mail to
[email protected].
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 3rd day of January 2003.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Victor Nerses,
Acting Chief, Section 2, Project Directorate I, Division of Licensing
Project Management, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 03-374 Filed 1-8-03; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P