[Federal Register Volume 68, Number 189 (Tuesday, September 30, 2003)]
[Notices]
[Pages 56478-56508]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 03-24817]
[[Page 56477]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Part X
Department of Health and Human Services
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Medicare Program; Hospice Wage Index for Fiscal Year 2004; Notice
Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 189 / Tuesday, September 30, 2003 /
Notices
[[Page 56478]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
[CMS-1233-N]
RIN 0938-AM67
Medicare Program; Hospice Wage Index for Fiscal Year 2004
AGENCY: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice announces the annual update to the hospice wage
index as required by statute. This fiscal year 2004 update is effective
from October 1, 2003 through September 30, 2004. The wage index is used
to reflect local differences in wage levels. The hospice wage index
methodology and values are based on recommendations of a negotiated
rulemaking advisory committee and were originally published in the
August 8, 1997 Federal Register.
EFFECTIVE DATE: October 1, 2003.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Terri Deutsch, (410) 786-9462.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Hospice care is an approach to treatment that recognizes that the
impending death of an individual warrants a change in the focus from
curative care to palliative care (relief of pain and other
uncomfortable symptoms). The goal of hospice care is to help terminally
ill individuals continue life with minimal disruption to normal
activities while remaining primarily in the home environment. A hospice
uses an interdisciplinary approach to deliver medical, social,
psychological, emotional, and spiritual services through use of a broad
spectrum of professional and other caregivers, with the goal of making
the individual as physically and emotionally comfortable as possible.
Counseling and inpatient respite services are available to the family
of the hospice patient. Hospice programs consider both the patient and
the family as a unit of care.
Section 1861(dd) of the Social Security Act (the Act) provides for
coverage of hospice care for terminally ill Medicare beneficiaries who
elect to receive care from a participating hospice. The statutory
authority for payment to hospices participating in the Medicare program
is contained in section 1814(i) of the Act.
Our existing regulations under 42 CFR part 418 establish
eligibility requirements and payment standards and procedures, define
covered services, and delineate the conditions a hospice must meet to
be approved for participation in the Medicare program. Subpart G of
part 418 provides for payment to hospices based on one of four
prospectively determined rates for each day in which a qualified
Medicare beneficiary is under the care of a hospice. The four rate
categories are routine home care, continuous home care, inpatient
respite care, and general inpatient care. Payment rates are established
for each category.
The regulations at Sec. 418.306(c), which require the rates to be
adjusted by a wage index, were revised in the August 8, 1997 final rule
(62 FR 42860). This rule implemented a new methodology for calculating
the hospice wage index based on the recommendations of a negotiated
rulemaking committee. The committee reached consensus on the
methodology. We included the resulting committee statement, describing
that consensus, as an appendix to the August 8, 1997 final rule (62 FR
42883). The provisions of the final hospice wage index rule are as
follows:
[sbull] The revised hospice wage index will be calculated using the
most current available hospital wage data.
[sbull] The revised hospice wage index was phased in over a 3-year
transition period. For the first year of the transition period, October
1, 1997 through September 30, 1998, a blended index was calculated by
adding two-thirds of the 1983 index value for an area to one-third of
the revised wage index value for that area. During the second year of
the transition period, October 1, 1998 through September 30, 1999, the
calculation was similar, except that the blend was one-third of the
1983 index value and two-thirds of the revised wage index value for
that area. We fully implemented the revised wage index during the third
year of the transition period, October 1, 1999 through September 30,
2000.
Payments to hospices under the revised wage index (as published in
the August 8, 1997 final hospice wage index rule) are subject to a
budget neutrality adjustment to ensure that aggregate payments are not
greater than they would have been using the original 1983 wage index.
To achieve this budget neutrality, the hospice wage index is multiplied
by a budget-neutrality factor. The budget neutrality factor is computed
and applied annually.
The hospice budget-neutrality adjustment is not applied uniformly
to all providers in calculating payments. Based on the methodology
developed and signed by the negotiated rulemaking committee and adopted
by CMS, a hospice's area wage index is adjusted using either the
budget-neutrality factor or the hospice wage index floor described
below.
Hospice wage index values of 0.8 or greater are multiplied by the
budget neutrality factor.
Hospice wage index values below 0.8 are adjusted by the greater of:
(1) the hospice budget neutrality factor; or (2) the hospice wage index
floor (a 15 percent increase, subject to a maximum wage index value of
0.8).
The wage index is to be updated annually, in the Federal Register,
based on the most current available hospital wage data. These data will
include any changes to the definitions of Metropolitan Statistical
Areas (MSAs).
Section 4441(a) of the Balanced Budget Act of 1997 (BBA) amended
section 1814(i)(1)(C)(ii) of the Act to establish updates to hospice
rates for fiscal years (FYs) 1998 through 2002. Hospice rates were to
be updated by a factor equal to the market basket index, minus 1
percentage point. However, neither the BBA nor subsequent legislation
specified the market basket adjustment to be used to compute payment
for FY 2004. Therefore, payment rates for FY 2004 will be updated
according to section 1814(i)(1)(C)(ii)(VII) of the Act, which states
that the update to the payment rates after 2002 will be the market
basket percentage for the FY. Accordingly, the FY 2004 rates will be
the full market basket percentage increase for the FY 2004. This rate
update is implemented through a separate program memorandum and is not
part of this notice. Historically the rate update has been published
through a separate program memorandum issued annually in July to
provide adequate time to implement system change requirements. For FY
2004 the hospice rates were published on July 3, 2003. The wage index
in this notice is applied to the labor portion of the rates published
in the program memorandum in order for providers to determine their
payment rates.
II. Provisions of the Notice
A. Update to the Hospice Wage Index
This annual update is effective October 1, 2003 through September
30, 2004. In accordance with the agreement we signed with other members
of the Hospice Wage Index Negotiated Rulemaking Committee, we are using
the most current hospital data available to us, including any changes
to the
[[Page 56479]]
definitions of MSAs. The FY 2003 hospital wage index was the most
current hospital wage data available when the FY 2004 wage index values
were calculated. We used the pre-reclassified and pre-floor hospital
area wage index data.
All wage index values are adjusted by a budget-neutrality factor of
1.061238 and are subject to the wage index floor adjustment, if
applicable. We have completed all of the calculations described above
and have included them in the wage index values reflected in both
Tables A and B below. A detailed description of the method used to
compute the hospice wage index is contained in both the September 4,
1996 proposed rule (61 FR 46579) and the August 8, 1997 final rule (62
FR 42860).
1. Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSA)
As explained in the September 4, 1996 hospice wage index proposed
rule, each hospice's labor market area would be established by the MSA
definitions issued by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) on
December 28, 1992 based on the 1990 census, and updated by OMB based on
the decennial census. Any changes to the MSA definitions would be
effective annually and announced in the notice updating the hospice
wage index.
2. MSA Wage Index Values Lower Than Rural Values
As explained above, any area not included in an MSA is considered
to be nonurban and receives the statewide rural rate. We are aware that
in the past, a number of MSAs have had wage index values that were
lower than their rural statewide value. This difference is due to
variations in local wage data as compared to national wage data. The
hospice wage index is computed by dividing the hourly wage rate for an
MSA or nonurban area by a national hourly wage rate. Nonurban areas
could receive a higher wage index value than urban areas in the same
State if the hourly wage rate in the nonurban area increased at a
greater rate.
B. Tables
BILLING CODE 4120-01-P
[[Page 56480]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN30SE03.010
[[Page 56481]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN30SE03.011
[[Page 56482]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN30SE03.012
[[Page 56483]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN30SE03.013
[[Page 56484]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN30SE03.014
[[Page 56485]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN30SE03.015
[[Page 56486]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN30SE03.016
[[Page 56487]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN30SE03.017
[[Page 56488]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN30SE03.018
[[Page 56489]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN30SE03.019
[[Page 56490]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN30SE03.020
[[Page 56491]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN30SE03.021
[[Page 56492]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN30SE03.022
[[Page 56493]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN30SE03.023
[[Page 56494]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN30SE03.024
[[Page 56495]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN30SE03.025
[[Page 56496]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN30SE03.026
[[Page 56497]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN30SE03.027
[[Page 56498]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN30SE03.028
[[Page 56499]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN30SE03.029
[[Page 56500]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN30SE03.030
[[Page 56501]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN30SE03.031
[[Page 56502]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN30SE03.032
[[Page 56503]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN30SE03.033
[[Page 56504]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN30SE03.034
BILLING CODE 4120-01-C
III. Waiver of Proposed Rulemaking and Waiver of 30-Day Delay in
Effective Date
We are waiving notice and comment rulemaking, as well as the 30-day
delay in the effective date, before the provisions of this notice take
effect. We may waive notice and comment rulemaking procedures if we
find good cause to do so (that is, notice and comment procedures are
impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest) and the
agency incorporates a statement of the finding and the reasons for
waiver in the notice issued.
In addition, under the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C.
section 553 (d)), an agency may waive the 30-day delay in the effective
date if the agency finds good cause to do so (meaning, once again, that
the delay is impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest), and the agency incorporates a statement of the finding and
its reasons in the rule at the time it is issued.
We find it unnecessary to undertake notice and comment rulemaking
because the methodologies used to determine the hospice wage index have
been previously subjected to public comments, and this notice merely
reflects the application of those previously established methodologies.
In this notice, we are not changing the methodologies, but merely
performing the ministerial function of applying methodologies
previously subject to notice and public comment. Therefore, we believe
it is unnecessary to engage in notice and comment rulemaking and for
good cause, we waive notice and comment procedures.
We also believe that good cause exists to waive both notice and
comment rulemaking and the 30-day delay in the effective date, because
it is in the public interest to make this notice effective on October
1, 2003. The statute in 1814(i)(1)(C)(ii)(VII) of the Act requires
annual updates to the hospice payment rates and wage indices. In
addition, the Federal Regulations at 42 CFR 418.306(b)(2) and (c)
require annual updates to hospice wage indices and require that such
updates be effective for the FY, beginning on October 1. We do not have
sufficient time to either engage in notice and comment rulemaking or
apply a 30-day delay in the effective date prior to such date.
Moreover, if we do not make this notice effective on the implementation
date of October 1, 2003, the hospice agencies would be required to
continue to use the previous 2003 FY wage index for the 2004 payment
rates.
Finally, for the reasons stated above, at this time, we believe it
would be impracticable to both meet the requirement that updated rates
be in effect by October 1, 2003, and also engage in notice and comment
rulemaking or apply the 30-day delay in the effective date prior to
that date.
Therefore, for the reasons stated above, we find there is good
cause to waive notice and comment procedures, as well as the 30-day
delay in the effective date of the Administrative Procedure Act.
IV. Regulatory Impact Analysis
A. Overall Impact
We have examined the impacts of this notice as required by
Executive Order 12866 (September 1993, Regulatory Planning and Review),
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (September 16, 1980, Pub. L. 96-
354), section 1102(b) of the Act, the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995 (Pub. L. 104-4), and Executive Order 13132. In this notice, we
identified the impact on hospices as a result of updating the hospice
wage index. The methodology for computing the wage index for FY 2004
was determined through a negotiated rulemaking committee and
implemented in the August 8, 1997 final rule (62 FR 42860). This notice
only updates the hospice wage index in accordance with that
methodology. We
[[Page 56505]]
believe these changes to be insignificant. As Table C below indicates,
we estimate that the total hospice payments will increase from last
year by 0.6 percent, or $24,271,000.
Executive Order 12866 directs agencies to assess all costs and
benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic, environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and equity). A regulatory impact
analysis (RIA) must be prepared for major rules with economically
significant effects ($100 million or more in any 1 year). We have
determined that this notice is not an economically significant rule
under this Executive Order.
The RFA requires agencies to analyze options for regulatory relief
of small businesses. For purposes of the RFA, small entities include
small businesses, nonprofit organizations, and government agencies.
Most hospitals and most other providers and suppliers are small
entities, either by nonprofit status or by having revenues of $6
million to $29 million in any 1 year (for details, see the Small
Business Administration's regulation at 65 FR 69432. that sets forth
size standards for health care industries). For purposes of the RFA,
most hospices are small entities. Approximately 70 percent of Medicare
certified hospices are identified as voluntary, government, or other
agencies, and, therefore, are considered small entities. Because the
National Hospice and Palliative Care Organization estimates that
approximately 79 percent of hospice patients are Medicare
beneficiaries, we have not considered other sources of revenue in this
analysis.
As discussed below, rural hospices will receive a slight increase
in payment. Overall rural hospices will receive an increase of 0.9
percent and urban hospices will receive an increase of 0.6 percent.
Urban hospices in New England, Middle-Atlantic, and Puerto Rico regions
will experience a decrease of 0.4 percent, 1.1 percent, and 0.5 percent
respectively. Middle Atlantic and Puerto Rico rural regions will also
experience a decrease of 0.7 and 5.1 percent respectively. Of the urban
hospices, the Pacific region will experience the greatest increase of
2.3 percent. The remaining rural regions will experience an increase in
payment ranging from 0.2 in New England to a 2.6 increase in West South
Central. Puerto Rico will experience decreased payment in both its
urban and rural areas. Overall, Puerto Rico rural hospices will receive
the largest decrease of 5.1 percent. The Middle Atlantic rural and
urban hospices will also receive decreased payment. Most regions will
experience an increase in payment in both urban and rural regions. The
South Atlantic urban and East North Central rural hospices will
experience a slight increase of 0.1 percent respectively. Therefore,
based upon analysis of the wage index changes for FY 2004, the urban
and rural Puerto Rico and Middle Atlantic hospices will be negatively
impacted the most. The Pacific and West South Central urban regions as
well as the West South Central and South Atlantic rural regions will be
positively impacted. The payment decreases in certain areas indicate
that this notice will have an impact on a small number of small
entities. However, nationwide, hospices will receive an overall
increase in estimated payments. We estimate that total hospice payments
will increase by 0.6 percent, or $24,271,000. Rural hospices, with the
exception of Puerto Rico and Middle Atlantic regions will receive the
largest increase in payments for FY 2004. We estimate that rural
hospice payments overall will increase by $4,284,000. We believe the
anomaly of Puerto Rico rural region, with the greatest decrease overall
in payment, the West South Central rural region increase of 2.6
percent, and the Pacific urban region increase of 2.3 percent are
attributable to changes in the MSA hospital wage indices.
Under the Medicare hospice benefit, hospices can provide four
different levels of care days. The majority of the days provided by a
hospice are routine home care days. Therefore, the number of routine
home care days can be used as a proxy for the size of the hospice, that
is, the more days of care provided, the larger the hospice. Using
routine home care days as a proxy for size, our analysis indicates that
the impact of the wage index update on small hospices (those that
provide up to 1,754 days of routine home care) will experience a 1.3
percent increase. Rural Puerto Rico with 4 hospices and 28,000 routine
care days will experience a decrease of 5.1 percent while rural West
North Central with 178 hospices and 492,000 routine home care days will
have an increase of 0.8 percent. However, most small entities will
experience a slight increase in payment. Therefore, we certify that
this rule will not have a significant impact on a substantial number of
small entities, in accordance with the RFA.
Furthermore, the wage index methodology was previously determined
by consensus through a negotiated rulemaking committee that included
representatives of national hospice associations; rural, urban, large
and small hospices; multi-site hospices; and consumer groups. Based on
all of the options considered, the committee agreed on the methodology
described in the committee statement, and it was adopted into
regulation in the August 8, 1997 final rule. The committee also agreed
that this was favorable for the hospice community, as well as for
beneficiaries. In developing the process for updating the wage index in
the 1997 final rule, we fully considered the impact of this methodology
on small entities and attempted to mitigate any potential negative
effects.
In addition, section 1102(b) of the Act requires us to prepare a
regulatory impact analysis if a rule may have a significant impact on
the operations of a substantial number of small rural hospitals. This
analysis must conform to the provisions of section 604 of the RFA. For
purposes of section 1102(b) of the Act, we define a small rural
hospital as a hospital that is located outside an MSA and has fewer
than 100 beds. We have determined that this notice will not have a
significant impact on a substantial number of small rural hospices.
Section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 also
requires that agencies assess anticipated costs and benefits before
issuing any rule that may result in an expenditure in any 1 year by
State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $110 million or more. This notice has no substantial
effect on State, local or tribal governments or on the private sector.
We have determined that this notice will not have a significant impact
on the operations of a substantial number of small rural hospitals.
Executive Order 13132 establishes certain requirements that an
agency must meet when it promulgates a proposed rule (and subsequent
final rule) that imposes substantial direct requirement costs on State
and local governments, preempts State law, or otherwise has Federalism
implications. We have reviewed this notice under the threshold criteria
of Executive Order 13132, Federalism, and have determined that this
notice will not have an impact on the rights, roles, and
responsibilities of State, local, or tribal governments.
B. Anticipated Effects
We have compared estimated payments using the FY 1983 hospice wage
index to estimated payments using the FY 2004 wage index and determined
the current hospice rates to be budget
[[Page 56506]]
neutral. This impact analysis compares hospice payments using the FY
2003 hospice wage index to the estimated payments using the FY 2004
wage index. The data used in developing the quantitative analysis for
this notice were obtained from the March 2003 update of the national
claims history file of all bills submitted during FY 2002. We deleted
bills from hospices that have since closed.
Table C below demonstrates the results of our analysis. In column 2
of Table C, we indicate the number of routine home care days that were
included in our analysis, although the analysis was performed on all
types of hospice care. Column 3 of Table C indicates payments that were
made using the FY 2003 wage index. Column 4 of Table C is based on FY
2003 claims (for hospices in business during that time period) and
estimates payments to be made to hospices using the FY 2004 wage index.
The final column, which compares columns 3 and 4, shows the percent
change in estimated hospice payments made based on the category of the
hospice.
Table C categorizes hospices by various geographic and provider
characteristics. The first row displays the results of the impact
analysis for all Medicare certified hospices. The second and third rows
of the table categorize hospices according to their geographic location
(urban and rural). Our analysis indicted that there are 1,314 hospices
located in urban areas and 840 hospices located in rural areas. The
next two groupings in the table indicate the number of hospices by
census region, also broken down by urban and rural hospices. The sixth
grouping shows the impact on hospices based on the size of the
hospice's program. We determined that the majority of hospice payments
are made at the routine home care rate. Therefore, we based the size of
each individual hospice's program on the number of routine home care
days provided in 2002. The next grouping shows the impact on hospices
by type of ownership. The final grouping shows the impact on hospices
defined by whether they are provider-based or freestanding.
The results of our analysis shows that the majority of hospices are
in urban areas and provide the vast majority of routine home care days.
However rural hospices will receive a larger percent increase in
payment of 0.9 percent in contrast to 0.6 percent for urban hospices.
The greatest increases in payment are for urban Mountain and rural
West Central regions with a 2.3 percent and 2.6 percent increase,
respectively. The greatest decrease in payment is for rural Puerto Rico
with a 5.1 percent decrease and the urban Middle Atlantic region with a
1.1 percent decrease. With the exception of the Middle Atlantic with a
0.7 percent decrease, the remainder of the rural areas range from 0.1
percent increase in the East North Central to an increase of 2.6
percent in the West South Central. The remainder of the urban areas
varies from a decrease of 0.5 percent in Puerto Rico to an increase of
1.8 percent in the West South Central region.
The breakdown by size indicates an increase of 1.3 percent in
payment are for hospices with routine home care day under 9,681 while
large size hospices with the greatest number of routine home care days
will increase by 0.5 percent.
Government owned hospices will have a 1.9-percent increase while
voluntary owned hospices with the largest number of routine home care
days will receive 0.2-percent increase in payment.
Home health agency based hospices will have a 1 percent payment
increase in contrast to a decrease of 0.1 percent for skilled nursing
facility based hospices with the lowest number of routine home care
days. In contrast, freestanding hospices, which represent the largest
number of hospices agencies, with the greatest number of routine home
care days will have an estimated 0.7 percent increase in payment.
BILLING CODE 4120-01-P
[[Page 56507]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN30SE03.035
BILLING CODE 4120-01-C
[[Page 56508]]
C. Conclusion
Our impact analysis compared hospice payments by using the FY 2003
wage index to the estimated payments using the FY 2004 wage index.
Through the analysis, we estimate that total hospice payments will
increase from last year by 0.6 percent or by $24,271,000. Additionally,
we compared estimated payments using the FY 1983 hospice wage index to
estimated payments using the FY 2004 wage index and determined the
current hospice wage index to be budget neutral, as required by the
negotiated rulemaking committee. We have determined that this rule is
not an economically significant rule under Executive Order 12866.
Although we believe that this rule will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities, we took any negative
effects into consideration during the negotiated rulemaking process. We
have determined that this rule will not have a significant impact on
the operations of a substantial number of small rural hospitals.
Finally, this rule will not have a consequential effect on State,
local, or tribal governments.
OMB Review
In accordance with the provisions of Executive Order 12866, the
Office of Management and Budget reviewed this notice.
Authority: Section 1814(i) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C.
1395f (i)(1)).
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.773
Medicare--Hospital Insurance Program; and No. 93.774, Medicare--
Supplementary Medical Insurance Program)
Dated: June 24, 2003.
Thomas A. Scully,
Administrator, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.
Dated: July 28, 2003.
Tommy G. Thompson,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 03-24817 Filed 9-29-03; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4120-01-P