[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 240 (Tuesday, December 15, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 77672-77673]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-31529]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. 50-275, 50-323, and 72-26; NRC-2015-0244]
Pacific Gas and Electric Company; Diablo Canyon Power Plant,
Units 1 and 2, and Diablo Canyon Independent Spent Fuel Storage
Installation
AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
ACTION: Finding of no significant impact with associated environmental
assessment; final issuance.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing an
environmental assessment (EA) and finding of no significant impact
(FONSI) related to a request to amend the Facility Operating License
Nos. DPR-80, DPR-82, and SNM-2511 issued to Pacific Gas and Electric
Company (PG&E), for operation of the Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1
and 2, including the specific-license Independent Spent Fuel Storage
Installation (hereinafter DCPP or the facility), located in San Luis
Obispo County, California. The requested amendments would permit
licensee security personnel to use certain firearms and ammunition
feeding devices not previously permitted, notwithstanding State, local,
and certain Federal firearms laws or regulations that otherwise
prohibit such actions.
ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID NRC-2015-0244 when contacting the
NRC about the availability of information regarding this document. You
may obtain publicly-available information related to this document
using any of the following methods:
Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to http://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2015-0244. Address
questions about NRC dockets to Carol Gallagher; telephone: 301-415-
3463; email: [email protected]. For technical questions, contact
the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of
this document.
NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may obtain publicly-available documents online in the
ADAMS Public Documents collection at
[[Page 77673]]
http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. To begin the search, select
``ADAMS Public Documents'' and then select ``Begin Web-based ADAMS
Search.'' For problems with ADAMS, please contact the NRC's Public
Document Room (PDR) reference staff at 1-800-397-4209, 301-415-4737, or
by email to [email protected]. The ADAMS accession number for each
document referenced (if that document is available in ADAMS) is
provided the first time that a document is referenced. The application
for amendments, dated September 24, 2013, and letter dated December 18,
2013, contain sensitive unclassified non-safeguards information (SUNSI)
and are being withheld from public disclosure. A redacted version of
the application for amendments, dated September 24, 2013, is available
in ADAMS under Accession No. ML13268A398. The supplement dated December
18, 2013, is withheld in its entirety.
NRC's PDR: You may examine and purchase copies of public
documents at the NRC's PDR, Room O1-F21, One White Flint North, 11555
Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Siva P. Lingam, Office of Nuclear
Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington DC
20555-0001; telephone: 301-415-1564, email: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Introduction
The NRC is considering a request to amend the Facility Operating
License Nos. DPR-80, DPR-82, and SNM-2511 issued to PG&E, for operation
of DCPP, located in San Luis Obispo County, California in accordance
with 10 CFR 50.90 of title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10
CFR). Consistent with 10 CFR 51.21, the NRC has reviewed the
requirements in 10 CFR 51.20(b) and 10 CFR 51.22(c) and determined that
an EA is the appropriate form of environmental review. Based on the
results of the EA, the NRC is issuing this final FONSI. The requested
amendments would permit licensee security personnel to use certain
firearms and ammunition feeding devices not previously permitted,
notwithstanding State, local, and certain Federal firearms laws, or
regulations that otherwise prohibit such actions. The NRC published a
draft EA and FONSI on the proposed action for public comment in the
Federal Register on October 28, 2015 (80 FR 66054). No comments were
received.
II. Environmental Assessment
Identification of the Proposed Action
The proposed action would permit security personnel at DCPP in the
performance of their official duties, to transfer, receive, possess,
transport, import, and use certain firearms, and large capacity
ammunition feeding devices not previously permitted to be owned or
possessed, notwithstanding State, local, and certain Federal firearms
laws, or regulations, that otherwise prohibit such actions.
The proposed action is in accordance with the PG&E's application
dated September 24, 2013 (ADAMS Accession No. ML13268A398), as
supplemented by letters dated December 18, 2013, May 15, 2014 (ADAMS
Accession No. ML14135A379), and March 26, 2015 (ADAMS Accession No.
ML15085A572).
The Need for the Proposed Action
The proposed action would allow the transfer, receipt, possession,
transportation, importation and use of those firearms and devices
needed in the performance of official duties required for the
protection of an NRC designated facility and associated special nuclear
materials, consistent with the NRC approved security plan.
Environmental Impacts of the Proposed Action
The NRC has completed its evaluation of the proposed action and
concludes that the proposed action would only allow the use of those
firearms and devices necessary to protect DCPP and associated special
nuclear material, consistent with the DCPP NRC-approved security plan.
Therefore, the proposed action would not significantly increase the
probability or consequences of accidents. In addition, the proposed
action would not change the types and the amounts of any effluents that
may be released offsite. There would also be no significant increase in
occupational or public radiation exposure. Therefore, there would be no
significant radiological environmental impacts associated with the
proposed action.
The proposed action would not impact land, air, or water resources,
including biota. In addition, the proposed action would not result in
any socioeconomic or environmental justice impacts or impacts to
historic and cultural resources. Therefore, there would also be no
significant non-radiological environmental impacts associated with the
proposed action.
Accordingly, the NRC concludes that the issuance of the requested
amendment would not result in significant environmental impacts.
Details of the NRC's evaluation will be provided in a letter to the
licensee.
Environmental Impacts of the Alternatives to the Proposed Action
As an alternative to the proposed action, the staff considered
denying the proposed action (i.e., the ``no-action'' alternative).
Denial of the license amendment request would result in no change in
current environmental conditions at the DCPP.
Alternative Use of Resources
The proposed action would not involve the use of any resources.
Agencies and Persons Consulted
The staff did not consult with any other Federal Agency or State of
California agencies regarding the environmental impact of the proposed
action.
III. Finding of No Significant Impact
The licensee has requested license amendments to permit licensee
security personnel in the performance of official duties, to transfer,
receive, possess, transport, import, and use certain firearms, and
large capacity ammunition feeding devices not previously permitted to
be owned or possessed notwithstanding State, local, and certain Federal
firearms laws, including regulations that would otherwise prohibit such
actions.
On the basis of the information presented in this environmental
assessment, the NRC concludes that the proposed action would not cause
any significant environmental impact and would not have a significant
effect on the quality of the human environment. In addition, the NRC
has determined that an environmental impact statement is not necessary
for the evaluation of this proposed action.
Other than the licensee's application dated September 24, 2013,
there are no other environmental documents associated with this review.
These documents are available for public inspection as indicated above.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 8 day of December 2015.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Robert J. Pascarelli,
Chief, Plant Licensing Branch IV-1, Division of Operating Reactor
Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 2015-31529 Filed 12-14-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P