[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 136 (Friday, July 15, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 46072-46075]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-16788]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[EPA-HQ-OPP-2015-0762; FRL-9947-90]
Registration Review; Conventional, Biopesticide and Antimicrobial
Dockets Opened for Review and Comment
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
[[Page 46073]]
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: With this document, EPA is opening the public comment period
for several registration review cases. Registration review is EPA's
periodic review of pesticide registrations to ensure that each
pesticide continues to satisfy the statutory standard for registration,
that is, the pesticide can perform its intended function without
unreasonable adverse effects on human health or the environment.
Registration review dockets contain information that will assist the
public in understanding the types of information and issues that the
Agency may consider during the course of registration reviews. Through
this program, EPA is ensuring that each pesticide's registration is
based on current scientific and other knowledge, including its effects
on human health and the environment. For dicamba, EPA is seeking
comment on the preliminary work plan, the ecological problem
formulation, and the human health draft risk assessment. This document
also announces the Agency's intent not to open a registration review
docket for alachlor (case #: 0063) and propachlor (case #: 0177). These
pesticides do not currently have any actively registered pesticide
products and are not, therefore, scheduled for review under the
registration review program.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before September 13, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments identified by the docket identification
(ID) number for the specific pesticide of interest provided in the
table in Unit III.A., by one of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit
electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted
by statute.
Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental Protection Agency Docket
Center (EPA/DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC
20460-0001.
Hand Delivery: To make special arrangements for hand
delivery or delivery of boxed information, please follow the
instructions at http://www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html.
Additional instructions on commenting or visiting the docket, along
with more information about dockets generally, is available at http://www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
For pesticide specific information contact: The person identified
as a contact in the table in Unit III.A. Also include the docket ID
number listed in the table in Unit III.A. for the pesticide of
interest.
For general information contact: Richard Dumas, Pesticide Re-
Evaluation Division (7508P), Office of Pesticide Programs,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW.,
Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone number: (703) 308-8015; fax
number: (703) 308-8090; email address: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
This action is directed to the public in general, and may be of
interest to a wide range of stakeholders including environmental, human
health, farmworker, and agricultural advocates; the chemical industry;
pesticide users; and members of the public interested in the sale,
distribution, or use of pesticides. Since others also may be
interested, the Agency has not attempted to describe all the specific
entities that may be affected by this action.
B. What should I consider as I prepare my comments for EPA?
1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this information to EPA through
regulations.gov or email. Clearly mark the part or all of the
information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information in a disk or
CD-ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD-ROM as
CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD-ROM the
specific information that is claimed as CBI. In addition to one
complete version of the comment that includes information claimed as
CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain the information
claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket.
Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with
procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.
2. Tips for preparing your comments. When preparing and submitting
your comments, see the commenting tips at http://www.epa.gov/dockets/comments.html.
3. Environmental justice. EPA seeks to achieve environmental
justice, the fair treatment and meaningful involvement of any group,
including minority and/or low income populations, in the development,
implementation, and enforcement of environmental laws, regulations, and
policies. To help address potential environmental justice issues, the
Agency seeks information on any groups or segments of the population
who, as a result of their location, cultural practices, or other
factors, may have atypical or disproportionately high and adverse human
health impacts or environmental effects from exposure to the pesticides
discussed in this document, compared to the general population.
II. Authority
EPA is initiating its reviews of the pesticides identified in this
document pursuant to section 3(g) of the Federal Insecticide,
Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) (7 U.S.C. 136a(g)) and the
Procedural Regulations for Registration Review at 40 CFR part 155,
subpart C. Section 3(g) of FIFRA provides, among other things, that the
registrations of pesticides are to be reviewed every 15 years. Under
FIFRA, a pesticide product may be registered or remain registered only
if it meets the statutory standard for registration given in FIFRA
section 3(c)(5) (7 U.S.C. 136a(c)(5)). When used in accordance with
widespread and commonly recognized practice, the pesticide product must
perform its intended function without unreasonable adverse effects on
the environment; that is, without any unreasonable risk to man or the
environment, or a human dietary risk from residues that result from the
use of a pesticide in or on food.
III. Registration Reviews
A. What action is the agency taking?
As directed by FIFRA section 3(g), EPA is reviewing the pesticide
registrations identified in the table in this unit to assure that they
continue to satisfy the FIFRA standard for registration--that is, they
can still be used without unreasonable adverse effects on human health
or the environment. A pesticide's registration review begins when the
Agency establishes a docket for the pesticide's registration review
case and opens the docket for public review and comment. At present,
EPA is opening registration review dockets for the cases identified in
the following table.
[[Page 46074]]
Table 1--Registration Review Dockets Opening
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Registration review case
name and No. Docket ID No. Contact
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Acetochlor, 7230............ EPA-HQ-OPP-2016-0298 Linsey Walsh,
[email protected], (703) 347-8030.
Bromethalin, 2765........... EPA-HQ-OPP-2016-0077 Christina Motilall,
[email protected], (703) 603-
0522.
Chlorflurenol Methyl Ester, EPA-HQ-OPP-2016-0037 Wilhelmena
2095. Livingston,
[email protected], (703)
308-8025.
Cholecalciferol, 7600....... EPA-HQ-OPP-2016-0139 James Parker,
[email protected], (703) 306-0469.
Corn Glutens, 6040.......... EPA-HQ-OPP-2016-0253 Russell Jones,
[email protected], (703) 308-5071;
Judy Facey,
[email protected],
(703) 305-5450.
Dicamba, 0065............... EPA-HQ-OPP-2016-0223 Marquea D. King,
[email protected], (703) 305-7432.
Dimethenamid and EPA-HQ-OPP-2015-0803 Maria Piansay,
Dimethenamid-P, 7223. [email protected], (703) 308-8063;
Jordan Page,
[email protected]
. (703) 347-0467.
Florasulam, 7274............ EPA-HQ-OPP-2015-0548 Moana Appleyard,
[email protected], (703) 308-
8175.
Glutaraldehyde, 2315........ EPA-HQ-OPP-2015-0738 Stephen Savage,
[email protected], (703) 347-
0345.
Predator Urines: Coyote EPA-HQ-OPP-2016-0086 Menyon Adams,
Urine and Fox Urine, 6202. [email protected], (703) 347-8496;
Judy Facey,
[email protected],
(703) 305-5450.
Reynoutria sachalinensis EPA-HQ-OPP-2016-0232 Chris Pfeifer,
(Milsana), 6030. [email protected], (703) 308-0031;
Judy Facey,
[email protected],
(703) 305-5450.
Siduron, 3130............... EPA-HQ-OPP-2015-0857 Leigh Rimmer,
[email protected], (703) 347-0553.
Triforine, 2720............. EPA-HQ-OPP-2015-0853 Susan Bartow,
[email protected], (703) 603-0065.
Verticillium isolate WCS850, EPA-HQ-OPP-2016-0306 Michael Glikes,
6508. [email protected], (703) 305-
6231.
Zinc Phosphide, 0026........ EPA-HQ-OPP-2016-0140 James Parker,
[email protected], (703) 306-0469.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For dicamba (case #: 0065), EPA is seeking comment on the
preliminary work plan, the ecological problem formulation, and the
human health draft risk assessment. EPA is also announcing that it will
not be opening a docket for alachlor (case #: 0063) and propachlor
(case #: 0177) because these pesticides are not included in any
products actively registered under FIFRA section 3 or 24(c). The Agency
will take separate action to propose revocation of any affected
tolerances that are not supported for import purposes only.
B. Docket Content
1. Review dockets. The registration review dockets contain
information that the Agency may consider in the course of the
registration review. The Agency may include information from its files
including, but not limited to, the following information:
An overview of the registration review case status.
A list of current product registrations and registrants.
Federal Register notices regarding any pending
registration actions.
Federal Register notices regarding current or pending
tolerances.
Risk assessments.
Bibliographies concerning current registrations.
Summaries of incident data.
Any other pertinent data or information.
Each docket contains a document summarizing what the Agency
currently knows about the pesticide case and a preliminary work plan
for anticipated data and assessment needs. Additional documents provide
more detailed information. During this public comment period, the
Agency is asking that interested persons identify any additional
information they believe the Agency should consider during the
registration reviews of these pesticides. The Agency identifies in each
docket the areas where public comment is specifically requested, though
comment in any area is welcome.
2. Other related information. More information on these cases,
including the active ingredients for each case, may be located in the
registration review schedule on the Agency's Web site at https://www.epa.gov/pesticide-reevaluation/registration-review-schedules.
Information on the Agency's registration review program and its
implementing regulation may be seen at http://www.epa.gov/pesticide-reevaluation/registration-review-process.
3. Information submission requirements. Anyone may submit data or
information in response to this document. To be considered during a
pesticide's registration review, the submitted data or information must
meet the following requirements:
To ensure that EPA will consider data or information
submitted, interested persons must submit the data or information
during the comment period. The Agency may, at its discretion, consider
data or information submitted at a later date.
The data or information submitted must be presented in a
legible and useable form. For example, an English
[[Page 46075]]
translation must accompany any material that is not in English and a
written transcript must accompany any information submitted as an
audiographic or videographic record. Written material may be submitted
in paper or electronic form.
Submitters must clearly identify the source of any
submitted data or information.
Submitters may request the Agency to reconsider data or
information that the Agency rejected in a previous review. However,
submitters must explain why they believe the Agency should reconsider
the data or information in the pesticide's registration review.
As provided in 40 CFR 155.58, the registration review docket for
each pesticide case will remain publicly accessible through the
duration of the registration review process; that is, until all actions
required in the final decision on the registration review case have
been completed.
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 136 et seq.
Dated: July 6, 2016.
Michael Goodis,
Acting Director, Pesticide Re-evaluation Division, Office of Pesticide
Programs.
[FR Doc. 2016-16788 Filed 7-14-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P