[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 196 (Tuesday, October 11, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 70029-70038]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-24381]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 82
[EPA-HQ-OAR-2003-0118; FRL-9953-72-OAR]
RIN 2060-AG12
Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Determination 32 for
Significant New Alternatives Policy Program
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Determination of acceptability.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This determination of acceptability expands the list of
acceptable substitutes pursuant to the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency's (EPA) Significant New Alternatives Policy (SNAP) program. This
action lists as acceptable additional substitutes for use in the
refrigeration and air conditioning sector and fire suppression and
explosion protection sectors.
DATES: This determination is effective on October 11, 2016.
ADDRESSES: EPA established a docket for this action under Docket ID No.
EPA-HQ-OAR-2003-0118 (continuation of Air Docket A-91-42). All
electronic documents in the docket are listed in the index at
www.regulations.gov. Although listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, i.e., Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically
at www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the EPA Air Docket (Nos. A-
91-42 and EPA-HQ-OAR-2003-0118), EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC), William J.
Clinton West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC
20460. The Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number
for the Public Reading Room is (202) 566-1744, and the telephone number
for the Air Docket is (202) 566-1742.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gerald Wozniak by telephone at (202)
343-9624, by email at [email protected], or by mail at U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Mail Code 6205T, 1200 Pennsylvania
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20460. Overnight or courier deliveries
should be sent to the office location at 1201 Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20004.
For more information on the Agency's process for administering the
SNAP program or criteria for the evaluation of substitutes, refer to
the initial SNAP rulemaking published in the Federal Register on March
18, 1994 (59 FR 13044). Notices and rulemakings under the SNAP program,
as well as other EPA publications on protection of stratospheric ozone,
are available at EPA's Ozone Layer Protection Web site at www.epa.gov/ozone-layer-protection including the SNAP portion at www.epa.gov/snap/.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Listing of New Acceptable Substitutes
A. Refrigeration and Air Conditioning
B. Fire Suppression and Explosion Protection
II. Section 612 Program
A. Statutory Requirements and Authority for the SNAP Program
B. EPA's Regulations Implementing Section 612
C. How the Regulations for the SNAP Program Work
D. Additional Information About the SNAP Program
Appendix A: Summary of Decisions for New Acceptable Substitutes
I. Listing of New Acceptable Substitutes
This action presents EPA's most recent decision to list as
acceptable several substitutes in the refrigeration and air
conditioning and fire suppression and explosion protection sectors. New
substitutes are:
R-448A in retail food refrigeration--refrigerated food
processing and dispensing equipment;
R-449A in retail food refrigeration--refrigerated food
processing and dispensing equipment;
R-449B in several refrigeration end-uses; and
trans-1-chloro-3,3,3,-trifluoroprop-1-ene in total
flooding fire suppression.
For copies of the full list of acceptable substitutes for ozone
depleting
[[Page 70030]]
substances (ODS) in all industrial sectors, visit the SNAP portion of
EPA's Ozone Layer Protection Web site at www.epa.gov/snap/substitutes-sector. Substitutes listed as unacceptable; acceptable, subject to
narrowed use limits; or acceptable, subject to use conditions are also
listed in the appendices to 40 CFR part 82, subpart G.
The sections below discuss each substitute listing in detail.
Appendix A contains tables summarizing today's listing decisions for
these new substitutes. The statements in the ``Further Information''
column in the tables provide additional information, but are not
legally binding under section 612 of the Clean Air Act (CAA). In
addition, the ``Further Information'' column may not include a
comprehensive list of other legal obligations you may need to meet when
using the substitute. Although you are not required to follow
recommendations in the ``Further Information'' column of the table to
use a substitute consistent with section 612 of the CAA, some of these
statements may refer to obligations that are enforceable or binding
under federal or state programs other than the SNAP program. In many
instances, the information simply refers to standard operating
practices in existing industry standards and/or building codes. When
using these substitutes, EPA strongly encourages you to apply the
information in this column. Many of these recommendations, if adopted,
would not require significant changes to existing operating practices.
You can find submissions to EPA for the substitutes listed in this
document, as well as other materials supporting the decisions in this
action, in Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2003-0118 at www.regulations.gov.
A. Refrigeration and Air Conditioning
1. R-448A
EPA's decision: EPA finds R-448A acceptable as a substitute for use
in:
Retail food refrigeration--refrigerated food processing and
dispensing equipment (new and retrofit equipment)
R-448A, marketed under the trade name Solstice[supreg] N-40, is a
weighted blend of 26 percent HFC-32, which is also known as
difluoromethane (CAS Reg. No. 75-10-5); 26 percent HFC-125, which is
also known as 1,1,1,2,2-pentafluoroethane (CAS Reg. No. 354-33-6); 21
percent HFC-134a, which is also known as 1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane (CAS
Reg. No. 811-97-2); 20 percent HFO-1234yf, which is also known as
2,3,3,3-tetrafluoroprop-1-ene (CAS Reg. No 754-12-1); and 7 percent
HFO-1234ze(E), which is also known as trans-1,3,3,3-tetrafluoroprop-1-
ene (CAS Reg. No. 29118-24-9).
You may find the redacted submission in Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2003-0118
at www.regulations.gov under the name, ``Solstice[supreg] N-40 (R-448A)
SNAP Information Notice.'' EPA performed assessments to examine the
health and environmental risks of this substitute. These assessments
are available in Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2003-0118 under the following name:
``Risk Screen on Substitutes in Retail Food Refrigeration
Substitute: R-448A (Solstice[supreg] N-40)''
EPA previously listed R-448A as an acceptable refrigerant in a
number of other refrigeration and air conditioning end-uses (e.g.,
July, 16, 2015, 80 FR 42053).
Environmental information: R-448A has an ODP of zero. Its
components, HFC-32, HFC-125, HFC-134a, HFO-1234yf, and HFO-1234ze(E)
have a 100-year integrated global warming potentials (100-yr GWPs) of
675; 3,500; 1,430; one to four; 1 2 and one to six; \3\
respectively. If these values are weighted by mass percentage, then R-
448A has a GWP of about 1,390. The components of R-448A are excluded
from the definition of volatile organic compound (VOC) under CAA
regulations (see 40 CFR 51.100(s)) addressing the development of State
Implementation Plans (SIPs) to attain and maintain the National Ambient
Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). Knowingly venting or releasing this
refrigerant blend is limited by the venting prohibition under section
608(c)(2) of the CAA, codified at 40 CFR 82.154(a)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Hodnebrog et al., 2013. Op. cit.
\2\ Nielsen, O. J., Javadi, M. S., Sulbaek Andersen, M. P.,
Hurley, M. D., Wallington, T. J., Singh, R. Atmospheric chemistry of
CF3CF=CH2: Kinetics and mechanisms of gas-
phase reactions with Cl atoms, OH radicals, and O3.
Chemical Physics Letters 439, 18-22, 2007.
\3\ Hodnebrog et al., 2013 and Javadi et al., 2008. Op. cit.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flammability information: R-448A, as formulated and even
considering the worst-case of fractionation for flammability, is not
flammable.
Toxicity and exposure data: Potential health effects of exposure to
this substitute include drowsiness or dizziness. The substitute may
also irritate the skin or eyes or cause frostbite. At sufficiently high
concentrations, the substitute may cause irregular heartbeat. The
substitute could cause asphyxiation if air is displaced by vapors in a
confined space. These potential health effects are common to many
refrigerants.
The American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA) has established
Workplace Environmental Exposure Levels (WEELs) of 1,000 ppm as an 8-hr
time-weighted average (TWA) for HFC-32, HFC-125, and HFC-134a; 500 ppm
for HFO-1234yf; and 800 ppm for HFO-1234ze(E), the components of R-
448A. The manufacturer of R-448A recommends an acceptable exposure
limit (AEL) of 890 ppm on an 8-hour TWA for the blend. EPA anticipates
that users will be able to meet the AIHA WEELs and manufacturer's AEL,
and address potential health risks by following requirements and
recommendations in the manufacturer's safety data sheet (SDS), in the
American Society for Heating, Refrigerating, and Air-Conditioning
Engineers (ASHRAE) Standard 15, and other safety precautions common to
the refrigeration and air conditioning industry.
Comparison to other substitutes in this end-use: R-448A has an ODP
of zero, comparable \4\ to or lower than other listed substitutes in
this end-use, with ODPs ranging from zero to 0.098.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ This is in contrast to the historically used ODS CFC-12, R-
502A, and HCFC-22 with ODPs ranging from 0.055 to 1.0.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
R-448A's GWP of about 1,390 is comparable to or lower than that of
HFC-134a with a GWP of 1,430 and a number of HFC blends in this end-
use. R-448A's GWP of about 1,390 is higher than those of some other
acceptable substitutes in this end-use, including ammonia vapor
compression with a secondary loop, CO2, R-450A, R-513A, and
certain blends with GWPs ranging from zero to 920; of these
substitutes, ammonia and CO2 are not listed as acceptable
for use in retrofit equipment. We note that R-448A has a GWP toward the
higher end of the scale of acceptable alternatives in this end-use.
This end-use is a subset of retail food refrigeration and in some
instances the equipment in this end use has specialized technical
requirements that may limit or prevent use of acceptable substitutes
with lower GWPs. In this end-use, we are not aware of significant
success in the United States using alternatives with GWPs significantly
lower than that for R-448A. However, if it is demonstrated in the
future that lower GWP alternatives--either those currently listed or
new alternatives added to the list in the future--can be used in this
end-use, EPA may evaluate whether those alternatives pose lower overall
risk than R-448A and other listed substitutes with similar GWPs.
[[Page 70031]]
Flammability and toxicity risks are comparable to or lower than
flammability and toxicity risks of other available substitutes in the
same end-use. Flammability risks are low, as discussed above. Toxicity
risks can be minimized by use consistent with the AIHA WEELs, ASHRAE 15
and other industry standards, recommendations in the SDS, and other
safety precautions common in the refrigeration and air conditioning
industry.
EPA finds R-448A acceptable in the end-use listed above, because
the overall environmental and human health risk posed by R-448A is
lower than or comparable to the risks posed by other available
substitutes in the same end-use.
2. R-449A
EPA's decision: EPA finds R-449A acceptable as a substitute for use
in:
Retail food refrigeration--refrigerated food processing and
dispensing equipment (new and retrofit equipment)
R-449A, marketed under the trade name Opteon[supreg] XP 40, is a
weighted blend of 24.3 percent HFC-32, which is also known as
difluoromethane (CAS Reg. No. 75-10-5); 24.7 percent HFC-125, which is
also known as 1,1,1,2,2-pentafluoroethane (CAS Reg. No. 354-33-6); 25.7
percent HFC-134a, which is also known as 1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane (CAS
Reg. No. 811-97-2); and 25.3 percent HFO-1234yf, which is also known as
2,3,3,3-tetrafluoroprop-1-ene (CAS Reg. No. 754-12-1).
You may find the redacted submission in Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2003-0118
at www.regulations.gov under the name, ``Opteon[supreg] XP 40 (R-449A)
SNAP Information Notice.'' EPA performed assessments to examine the
health and environmental risks of this substitute. These assessments
are available in Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2003-0118 under the following name:
``Risk Screen on Substitutes in Retail Food Refrigeration
Substitute: R-449A (Opteon[supreg] XP40)''
EPA previously listed R-449A as an acceptable refrigerant in a
number of other refrigeration and air conditioning end-uses (e.g.,
July, 16, 2015, 80 FR 42053).
Environmental information: R-449A has an ODP of zero. Its
components, HFC-32, HFC-125, HFC-134a, and HFO-1234yf have GWPs of 675;
3,500; 1,430; and one to four,\5\ respectively. If these values are
weighted by mass percentage, then R-449A has a GWP of about 1,400. The
components of R-449A are excluded from the definition of VOC under CAA
regulations (see 40 CFR 51.100(s)) addressing the development of SIPs
to attain and maintain the NAAQS. Knowingly venting or releasing this
refrigerant blend is limited by the venting prohibition under section
608(c)(2) of the CAA, codified at 40 CFR 82.154(a)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ Hodnebrog et al., 2013 and Nielsen et al., 2007. Op. cit.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flammability information: R-449A, as formulated and even
considering the worst-case of fractionation for flammability, is not
flammable.
Toxicity and exposure data: Potential health effects of exposure to
this substitute include drowsiness or dizziness. The substitute may
also irritate the skin or eyes or cause frostbite. At sufficiently high
concentrations, the substitute may cause irregular heartbeat. The
substitute could cause asphyxiation if air is displaced by vapors in a
confined space. These potential health effects are common to many
refrigerants.
The AIHA has established WEELs of 1,000 ppm as an 8-hr TWA for HFC-
32, HFC-125, and HFC-134a; and 500 ppm for HFO-1234yf, the components
of R-449A. The manufacturer of R-449A recommends an AEL of 830 ppm on
an 8-hour TWA for the blend. EPA anticipates that users will be able to
meet each of the AIHA WEELs and the manufacturer's AEL and address
potential health risks by following requirements and recommendations in
the SDS, in ASHRAE 15, and other safety precautions common to the
refrigeration and air conditioning industry.
Comparison to other substitutes in these end-uses: R-449A has an
ODP of zero, comparable \6\ to or lower than the other listed
substitutes in this end-use, with ODPs ranging from zero to 0.098.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ This is in contrast to the historically used ODS CFC-12, R-
502A, and HCFC-22 with ODPs ranging from 0.055 to 1.0.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
R-449A's GWP of about 1,400 is comparable to or lower than that of
HFC-134a with a GWP of 1,430 and a number of HFC blends in this end-
use. R-449A's GWP of about 1,400 is higher than those of some other
acceptable substitutes in this end-use, including ammonia vapor
compression with a secondary loop, CO2, R-450A, R-513A, and
certain blends, with GWPs ranging from zero to 920. Ammonia and
CO2 are not listed as acceptable for use in retrofit
equipment. We note that R-449A has a GWP toward the higher end of the
scale of acceptable alternatives in this end-use. This end-use is a
subset of retail food refrigeration with equipment that in some
instances has specialized technical requirements that may limit or
prevent use of acceptable substitutes with lower GWPs. In this end-use,
we are not aware of significant success in the United States using
alternatives with GWPs significantly lower than that for R-449A.
However, if it is demonstrated in the future that lower GWP
alternatives--either those currently listed or new alternatives added
to the list in the future--can be used in this end-use, EPA may
evaluate whether those alternatives pose lower overall risk than R-449A
and other listed substitutes with similar GWPs. Flammability and
toxicity risks are comparable to or lower than flammability and
toxicity risks of other available substitutes in the same end-use.
Flammability risks are low, as discussed above. Toxicity risks can be
minimized by use consistent with the AIHA WEELs, ASHRAE 15 and other
industry standards, recommendations in the SDS, and other safety
precautions common in the refrigeration and air conditioning industry.
EPA finds R-449A acceptable in the end-use listed above, because
the overall environmental and human health risk posed by R-449A is
lower than or comparable to the risks posed by other available
substitutes in the same end-use.
3. R-449B
EPA's decision: EPA finds R-449B acceptable as a substitute for use
in:
Commercial ice machines (new and retrofit equipment)
Refrigerated transport (new and retrofit equipment)
Retail food refrigeration--refrigerated food processing and
dispensing equipment (new and retrofit equipment)
Retail food refrigeration-low-temperature stand-alone
equipment (i.e., equipment designed to maintain internal temperatures
at 32 [deg]F (0 [deg]C) or below) (new and retrofit)
Retail food refrigeration--supermarket systems and remote
condensing units (new and retrofit)
R-449B, marketed under the trade name Forane[supreg] 449B, is a
weighted blend of 25.2 percent HFC-32, which is also known as
difluoromethane (CAS Reg. No. 75-10-5); 24.3 percent HFC-125, which is
also known as 1,1,1,2,2-pentafluoroethane (CAS Reg. No. 354-33-6); 27.3
percent HFC-134a, which is also known as 1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane (CAS
Reg. No. 811-97-2); and 23.2 percent HFO-1234yf, which is also known as
2,3,3,3-tetrafluoroprop-1-ene (CAS Reg. No. 754-12-1).
You may find the redacted submission in Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-
[[Page 70032]]
2003-0118 at www.regulations.gov under the name, ``Forane[supreg] 449B
(R-449B) SNAP Information Notice.'' EPA performed assessments to
examine the health and environmental risks of this substitute. These
assessments are available in Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2003-0118 under the
following names:
Risk Screen on Substitutes in Commercial Ice Machines
Substitute: R-449B (Forane[supreg] 449B)''
``Risk Screen on Substitutes in Refrigerated Transport
Substitute: R-449B (Forane[supreg] 449B)''
``Risk Screen on Substitutes in Retail Food Refrigeration
Substitute: R-449B (Forane[supreg] 449B)''
``Risk Screen on Substitutes in Retail Food Refrigeration--
Refrigerated Food Processing and Dispensing Equipment
Substitute: R-449B (Forane[supreg] 449B)''
Environmental information: R-449B has an ODP of zero. Its
components, HFC-32, HFC-125, HFC-134a, and HFO-1234yf have GWPs of 675;
3,500; 1,430; and one to four,\7\ respectively. If these values are
weighted by mass percentage, then R-449B has a GWP of about 1,410. The
components of R-449B are excluded from the definition of VOC under CAA
regulations (see 40 CFR 51.100(s)) addressing the development of SIPs
to attain and maintain the NAAQS. Knowingly venting or releasing this
refrigerant blend is limited by the venting prohibition under section
608(c)(2) of the CAA, codified at 40 CFR 82.154(a)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ Hodnebrog et al., 2013 and Nielsen et al., 2007. Op. cit.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flammability information: R-449B, as formulated and even
considering the worst-case of fractionation for flammability, is not
flammable.
Toxicity and exposure data: Potential health effects of exposure to
this substitute include drowsiness or dizziness. The substitute may
also irritate the skin or eyes or cause frostbite. At sufficiently high
concentrations, the substitute may cause irregular heartbeat. The
substitute could cause asphyxiation if air is displaced by vapors in a
confined space. These potential health effects are common to many
refrigerants.
The AIHA has established WEELs of 1,000 ppm as an 8-hr TWA for HFC-
32, HFC-125, and HFC-134a; and 500 ppm for HFO-1234yf, the components
of R-449B. The manufacturer of R-449B recommends an AEL of 865 ppm on
an 8-hour TWA for the blend. EPA anticipates that users will be able to
meet each of the AIHA WEELs and the manufacturer's AEL and address
potential health risks by following requirements and recommendations in
the SDS, in ASHRAE 15, and other safety precautions common to the
refrigeration and air conditioning industry.
Comparison to other substitutes in these end-uses: R-449B has an
ODP of zero, comparable \8\ to or lower than the other listed
substitutes in these end-uses, with ODPs ranging from zero to 0.098.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ This is in contrast to the historically used ODS CFC-12, R-
502A, and HCFC-22 with ODPs ranging from 0.055 to 1.0.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For commercial ice machines, many substitutes listed as acceptable
have comparable or higher GWPs than R-449B's GWP of about 1,410, such
as HFC-134a, R-404A, R-448A, R-449A, and other HFC refrigerant blends,
with GWPs ranging from 1,390 to approximately 3,990; other substitutes
listed as acceptable substitutes for commercial ice machines have a
lower GWP including ammonia absorption, ammonia vapor compression,
Stirling cycle, propane,\9\ R-450A, and R-513A with GWPs ranging from
zero to about 630.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ Propane (R-290) is listed as acceptable, subject to use
conditions, in this end-use. This substitute is subject to a use
condition restricting charge sizes to 150 g or less and thus may
limit its use for equipment that requires larger charge sizes.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In refrigerated transport, many substitutes listed as acceptable
have comparable or higher GWPs than R-449B's GWP of about 1,410, such
as HFC-134a, R-404A, R-448A, R-449A, and other HFC refrigerant blends,
with GWPs ranging from 1,390 to approximately 3,990; other substitutes
listed as acceptable substitutes for refrigerated transport have a
lower GWP including R-450A, R-513A, CO2, direct nitrogen
expansion, and Stirling cycle, with GWPs ranging from zero to about
630.
R-449B's GWP of about 1,410 is comparable to or lower than that of
HFC-134a and a number of HFC and HFC/HFO blends in retail food
refrigeration--refrigerated food processing and dispensing equipment.
R-449B's GWP of about 1,410 is higher than those of some other
acceptable substitutes in new retail food refrigeration--refrigerated
food processing and dispensing equipment, including ammonia vapor
compression with a secondary loop, CO2, R-450A, R-513A, and
certain blends, with GWPs ranging from zero to 920. Ammonia and
CO2 are not listed as acceptable for use in retrofit
equipment. We note that R-449B has a GWP toward the higher end of the
scale of acceptable alternatives in this end-use. This end-use is a
subset of retail food refrigeration with equipment that in some
instances has specialized technical requirements that may limit or
prevent use of acceptable substitutes with lower GWPs. In this end-use,
we are not aware of significant success in the United States using
alternatives with GWPs significantly lower than that for R-449B.
However, if it is demonstrated in the future that lower GWP
alternatives--either those currently listed or new alternatives added
to the list in the future--can be used in this end-use, EPA may
evaluate whether those alternatives pose lower overall risk than R-449B
and other listed substitutes with similar GWPs.
R-449B's GWP of about 1,410 is comparable to or lower than a number
of other substitutes listed as acceptable in retail food
refrigeration--supermarket systems and remote condensing units,
including HFC-134a, R-407A, R-448A, R-449A, and other HFC refrigerant
blends, with GWPs ranging from 1,390 to approximately 2,110. R-449B's
GWP of about 1,410 is higher than the GWP of some other acceptable
substitutes in retail food refrigeration-supermarket refrigeration
systems and remote condensing units, including CO2, R-450A,
and R-513A with GWPs ranging from zero to about 630.
R-449B's GWP of about 1,410 is comparable to the GWP of substitutes
listed as acceptable for retail food refrigeration-low-temperature
stand-alone equipment, including the HFO/HFC blends R-448A and R-449A
with GWPs of 1,390 and 1,400, HFC-134a with a GWP of 1,430, as well as
other HFC blends. R-449B's GWP of about 1,410 is higher than the GWP of
some other listed substitutes in this end-use, including
CO2, propane, isobutane, R-441A, R-450A, and R-513A, with
GWPs ranging from one to approximately 630.\10\ We note that R-449B has
a GWP toward the higher end of the scale of acceptable alternatives in
the retail food refrigeration--low temperature stand-alone equipment
end-use. This end-use is a subset of retail food refrigeration with
equipment that in some instances have specialized technical
requirements that may limit use of acceptable substitutes with lower
GWPs. In this end-use, we are not aware of significant success in the
United States using alternatives with GWPs significantly lower than
that for R-449B. However, if it is demonstrated in the future that
lower GWP alternatives--either those currently listed or new
alternatives
[[Page 70033]]
added to the list in the future--can be used in this end-use, EPA may
evaluate whether those alternatives pose lower overall risk than R-449B
and other listed substitutes with similar GWPs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ Propane (R-290), isobutane (R-600a), and R-441A are
acceptable, subject to use conditions, in this end-use. These three
substitutes are subject to a use condition restricting charge sizes
to 150 g or less and thus may limit their use for equipment that
requires larger charge sizes.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flammability and toxicity risks are comparable to or lower than
flammability and toxicity risks of other available substitutes in the
same end-use. Flammability risks are low, as discussed above. Toxicity
risks can be minimized by use consistent with the AIHA WEELs, ASHRAE 15
and other industry standards, recommendations in the SDS, and other
safety precautions common in the refrigeration and air conditioning
industry.
EPA finds R-449B acceptable in the end-uses listed above, because
the overall environmental and human health risk posed by R-449B is
lower than or comparable to the risks posed by other available
substitutes in the same end-uses.
B. Fire Suppression and Explosion Protection
1. Trans-1-chloro-3,3,3-trifluoroprop-1-ene (Solstice[supreg] FS)
EPA's decision: EPA finds trans-1-chloro-3,3,3-trifluoroprop-1-ene
acceptable as a substitute for use in:
Total flooding uses in both normally occupied and unoccupied
spaces.
Trans-1-chloro-3,3,3-trifluoroprop-1-ene ((E)-1-chloro-3,3,3-
trifluoroprop-1-ene, CAS Reg. No. 102687-65-0) is a chlorofluoroalkene
marketed under the trade name Solstice[supreg] FS for this end-use.
Solstice[supreg] FS is proposed for use in applications including data
centers, telecommunication centers, power plants, manufacturing plants,
historical buildings, warehouses, and engine nacelles and auxiliary
power units (APUs) aboard aircraft.
You may find the redacted submission in Docket item EPA-HQ-OAR-
2003-0118-0285 in Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2003-0118 at www.regulations.gov.
EPA has performed an assessment to examine the health and environmental
risks of this substitute. This assessment is available in docket EPA-
HQ-OAR-2003-0118 under the name, ``Risk Screen on Substitutes for Total
Flooding Systems in Normally Occupied and Unoccupied Spaces--
Substitute: Trans-1-Chloro-3,3,3,-trifluoroprop-1-ene (Solstice[supreg]
FS).''
We have previously listed trans-1-chloro-3,3,3-trifluoroprop-1-ene
as a refrigerant for use in new equipment in centrifugal chillers and
non-mechanical heat transfer, as a foam blowing agent, as a cleaning
solvent, as an aerosol solvent, and as a carrier solvent in adhesives
coatings, and inks (e.g., August 10, 2012, 77 FR 47768; October 21,
2014, 79 FR 62863).
Environmental information: Solstice[supreg] FS has an ODP of
0.00024-0.001512.11 12 13 The submitter indicates that
Solstice[supreg] FS has a GWP of 4.7-7 and an atmospheric lifetime of
approximately 26 days. Solstice[supreg] FS is excluded from the
definition of VOC under CAA regulations (see 40 CFR 51.100(s)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ The lower bound of the range reflects ODP values for
surface emissions. The upper bound of the range takes into account
predicted ODP values for higher altitude emissions at various
latitudes.
\12\ Wang D., Olsen S., Wuebbles D. 2011. ``Preliminary Report:
Analyses of tCFP's Potential Impact on Atmospheric Ozone.''
Department of Atmospheric Sciences. University of Illinois, Urbana,
IL. September 26, 2011.
\13\ Patten and Wuebbles, 2010. ``Atmospheric Lifetimes and
Ozone Depletion Potentials of trans-1-chloro-3,3,3-
trichloropropylene and trans-1,2-dichloroethylene in a three-
dimensional model.'' Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 10867-10874, 2010.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flammability information: Solstice[supreg] FS is not flammable.
Toxicity and exposure data: Potential health effects of this
substitute include serious eye irritation, skin irritation, and
frostbite. It may cause central nervous system effects such as
drowsiness and dizziness. The substitute could cause asphyxiation if
air is displaced by vapors in a confined space. The potential health
effects of Solstice[supreg] FS are unlikely to occur when following
good industrial hygiene practices and the personnel protective
equipment (PPE) and engineering control (e.g., ventilation)
recommendations outlined in the Safety Data Sheet (SDS) for
Solstice[supreg] FS.
To assess potential health risks from exposure to this substitute,
EPA considered both occupational and end-user exposure. We evaluated
potential risks from chronic occupational exposure, such as during
manufacture, installation, and servicing. The AIHA has established a
WEEL of 800 ppm for trans-1-chloro-3,3,3,-trifluoroprop-1-ene. The WEEL
represents the maximum 8-hour TWA at which a worker can be exposed
regularly without adverse effects. The Solstice[supreg] FS cylinder
filling process utilizes quick coupling devices to transfer the
substitute from a storage supply to the agent container, which
minimizes agent release and keeps potential exposures to levels
significantly below the 8-hour WEEL.
During installation or servicing of Solstice[supreg] FS total
flooding systems, if the proper instructions on system installation and
servicing included in manuals for the Solstice[supreg] FS systems and
relevant industry standards (i.e., latest edition of the National Fire
Protection Association (NFPA) 2001 Standard for Clean Agent Fire
Extinguishing Systems and Underwriters' Laboratories (UL) 2166) are
adhered to, exposure to the substitute is not likely. In the event of
an accidental release of the substitute from the total flooding system,
potential acute exposures may be of concern, primarily cardiac
sensitization. The manufacturer's maximum design concentration of 6.8
percent covering Class C hazards (energized electrical fires) is
significantly below the cardiotoxic NOAEL of 10 percent. Appropriate
protective measures should be taken and proper training administered
for the manufacture, clean-up and disposal of this product and for the
installation and maintenance of the total flooding systems using this
product.
NFPA 2001 provides that in the case of accidental release in
normally occupied spaces, required engineering controls as specified in
NFPA 2001 should be employed to limit personnel exposure to clean agent
discharges. Specifically, audible and visual pre-discharge alarms and a
30-60 second time delay should be employed within the protected space
to indicate the operation of the system and pending discharge to ensure
egress for all personnel prior to activation.
EPA's evaluation indicates that the use of Solstice[supreg] FS is
not expected to pose a significant toxicity risk to personnel or the
general population. In addition, the risks it may pose after exposure
are common to many total flooding agents, including those already
listed as acceptable under SNAP for this same end-use. EPA evaluated
the risks associated with potential exposures to Solstice[supreg] FS
during production operations as well as in the case of an inadvertent
discharge of the system during maintenance activities on the fire
extinguishing system. EPA's review of the human health impacts of
Solstice[supreg] FS, including the summary of available toxicity
studies, is in the docket for this action (EPA-HQ-OAR-2003-0118).\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ ICF, 2016. Significant New Alternatives Policy Program.
Fire Extinguishing and Explosion Prevention Sector. Risk Screen on
Substitutes for Total Flooding Systems in Normally Occupied and
Unoccupied Spaces--Substitute: Trans-1-Chloro-3,3,3,-trifluoroprop-
1-ene (Solstice[supreg] FS).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Protective gloves and tightly sealed goggles should be worn for
installation and servicing activities, to protect workers in any event
of potential discharge of the proposed substitute, accidental or
otherwise. Filling or servicing operations should be performed in well-
ventilated areas.
[[Page 70034]]
Toxicity risks can be minimized by use consistent with NFPA 2001
standard, recommendations in the SDS, and other safety precautions
common in the fire suppression industry. In the ``Further Information''
column of the listing for total flooding agents, EPA is providing the
following additional information for establishments manufacturing,
installing and maintaining equipment using this agent:
In the case that Solstice[supreg] FS is inhaled, person(s)
should be immediately removed and exposed to fresh air; if breathing is
difficult, person(s) should seek medical attention.
Eye wash and quick drench facilities should be available.
In case of ocular exposure, person(s) should immediately flush the
eyes, including under the eyelids, with water for 15 minutes; should
frostbite occur, affected areas should be rinsed with lukewarm water,
and medical attention should be sought if irritation develops or
persists.
In the case of dermal exposure, the SDS recommends that
person(s) should immediately wash the affected area with water and
remove all contaminated clothing to avoid irritation; should frostbite
occur, bathe (do not rub) the affected area with lukewarm, no hot,
water. If water is not available, cover the affected area with a clean
soft cloth; and medical attention should be sought if irritation
develops or persists.
Although unlikely, in case of ingestion of
Solstice[supreg] FS, the person(s) should drink a cup of water, if
fully conscious, and consult a physician immediately.
Manufacturing space should be equipped with engineering
controls, specifically an adequate exhaust ventilation system, to
effectively mitigate potential occupational exposure.
Employees responsible for chemical processing should wear
the appropriate personnel protective equipment (PPE), such as
protective gloves, tightly sealed goggles, protective work clothing,
and suitable respiratory protection in case of accidental release or
insufficient ventilation.
All spills should be cleaned up immediately in accordance
with good industrial hygiene practices.
Training for safe handling procedures should be provided
to all employees that would be likely to handle containers of the agent
or extinguishing units filled with the agent.
This agent should be used in accordance with the safety
guidelines in the latest edition of the NFPA 2001 Standard for Clean
Agent Fire Extinguishing Systems.
Safety features that are typical of total flooding systems
such as pre-discharge alarms, time delays, and system abort switches
should be provided, as directed by applicable OSHA regulations and NFPA
standards.
Comparison to other substitutes in these end-uses: Solstice[supreg]
FS has an ODP of 0.00024-0.001512 which is comparable to or lower than
the ODP of other acceptable total flooding agents with ODPs that range
from zero to 0.048. Solstice[supreg] FS's GWP of 4.7-7 is significantly
lower than that of some of the other alternatives listed as acceptable
total flooding agents- such as HFC-227ea, other HFCs, the H-Galden
hydrofluoropolyethers, and some HCFC fire suppressants, with GWPs which
range from about 1,550 to 14,800. Other acceptable substitutes in this
end-use have comparable GWPs ranging from zero to one, such as water,
C6-perfluoroketone, and inert gases. Like a number of other acceptable
substitutes in this end-use, Solstice[supreg] FS is excluded from the
definition of VOC under CAA regulations (see 40 CFR 51.100(s).
The toxicity risks due to inhalation exposure are common to many
total flooding agents, including those already listed as acceptable
under SNAP for this same end-use, such as C6-perfluoroketone.
Solstice[supreg] FS is nonflammable, as are all other available total
flooding agents.
EPA finds Solstice[supreg] FS acceptable in the end-use listed
above, because the overall environmental and human health risk posed by
Solstice[supreg] FS is lower than or comparable to the risks posed by
other available substitutes in the same end-use.
II. Section 612 Program
A. Statutory Requirements and Authority for the SNAP Program
Section 612 of the CAA requires EPA to develop a program for
evaluating alternatives to ozone-depleting substances. EPA refers to
this program as the Significant New Alternatives Policy (SNAP) program.
The major provisions of section 612 are:
1. Rulemaking
Section 612(c) requires EPA to promulgate rules making it unlawful
to replace any class I substance (CFC, halon, carbon tetrachloride,
methyl chloroform, methyl bromide, hydrobromofluorocarbon, and
chlorobromomethane) or class II substance (HCFC) with any substitute
that the Administrator determines may present adverse effects to human
health or the environment where the Administrator has identified an
alternative that (1) reduces the overall risk to human health and the
environment, and (2) is currently or potentially available.
2. Listing of Unacceptable/Acceptable Substitutes
Section 612(c) requires EPA to publish a list of the substitutes
unacceptable for specific uses and to publish a corresponding list of
acceptable alternatives for specific uses. The list of ``acceptable''
substitutes is found at www.epa.gov/snap/substitutes-sector and the
lists of ``unacceptable,'' ``acceptable subject to use conditions,''
and ``acceptable subject to narrowed use limits'' substitutes are found
in the appendices to 40 CFR part 82 subpart G.
3. Petition Process
Section 612(d) grants the right to any person to petition EPA to
add a substance to, or delete a substance from, the lists published in
accordance with section 612(c). The Agency has 90 days to grant or deny
a petition. Where the Agency grants the petition, EPA must publish the
revised lists within an additional six months.
4. 90-Day Notification
Section 612(e) directs EPA to require any person who produces a
chemical substitute for a class I substance to notify the Agency not
less than 90 days before new or existing chemicals are introduced into
interstate commerce for significant new uses as substitutes for a class
I substance. The producer must also provide the Agency with the
producer's unpublished health and safety studies on such substitutes.
5. Outreach
Section 612(b)(1) states that the Administrator shall seek to
maximize the use of federal research facilities and resources to assist
users of class I and II substances in identifying and developing
alternatives to the use of such substances in key commercial
applications.
6. Clearinghouse
Section 612(b)(4) requires the Agency to set up a public
clearinghouse of alternative chemicals, product substitutes, and
alternative manufacturing processes that are available for products and
manufacturing processes which use class I and II substances.
B. EPA's Regulations Implementing Section 612
On March 18, 1994, EPA published the initial SNAP rule (59 FR
13044) which established the process for
[[Page 70035]]
administering the SNAP program and issued EPA's first lists identifying
acceptable and unacceptable substitutes in the major industrial use
sectors (subpart G of 40 CFR part 82). These sectors are the following:
Refrigeration and air conditioning; foam blowing; solvents cleaning;
fire suppression and explosion protection; sterilants; aerosols;
adhesives, coatings and inks; and tobacco expansion. These sectors
comprise the principal industrial sectors that historically consumed
the largest volumes of ODS.
Section 612 of the CAA requires EPA to list as acceptable those
substitutes that do not present a significantly greater risk to human
health and the environment as compared with other substitutes that are
currently or potentially available.
C. How the Regulations for the SNAP Program Work
Under the SNAP regulations, anyone who plans to market or produce a
substitute to replace a class I substance or class II substance in one
of the eight major industrial use sectors must provide the Agency with
notice and the required health and safety information on the substitute
at least 90 days before introducing it into interstate commerce for
significant new use as an alternative (40 CFR 82.176(a)). While this
requirement typically applies to chemical manufacturers as the entity
likely to be planning to introduce the substitute into interstate
commerce,\15\ it may also apply to importers, formulators, equipment
manufacturers, and end users \16\ when they are responsible for
introducing a substitute into commerce. The 90-day SNAP review process
begins once EPA receives the submission and determines that the
submission includes complete and adequate data (40 CFR 82.180(a)). The
CAA and the SNAP regulations, 40 CFR 82.174(a), prohibit use of a
substitute earlier than 90 days after notice has been provided to the
agency.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ As defined at 40 CFR 82.104, ``interstate commerce'' means
the distribution or transportation of any product between one state,
territory, possession or the District of Columbia, and another
state, territory, possession or the District of Columbia, or the
sale, use or manufacture of any product in more than one state,
territory, possession or District of Columbia. The entry points for
which a product is introduced into interstate commerce are the
release of a product from the facility in which the product was
manufactured, the entry into a warehouse from which the domestic
manufacturer releases the product for sale or distribution, and at
the site of United States Customs clearance.
\16\ As defined at 40 CFR 82.172, ``end-use'' means processes or
classes of specific applications within major industrial sectors
where a substitute is used to replace an ODS.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Agency has identified four possible decision categories for
substitute submissions: Acceptable; acceptable subject to use
conditions; acceptable subject to narrowed use limits; and unacceptable
(40 CFR 82.180(b)).\17\ Use conditions and narrowed use limits are both
considered ``use restrictions'' and are explained below. Substitutes
that are deemed acceptable without use conditions may be used for all
applications within the relevant end-uses within the sector and without
limits under SNAP on how they may be used. Substitutes that are
acceptable subject to use restrictions may be used only in accordance
with those restrictions. Substitutes that are found to be unacceptable
may not be used after the date specified in the rulemaking adding such
substitute to the list of unacceptable substitutes.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ The SNAP regulations also include ``pending,'' referring to
submissions for which EPA has not reached a determination, under
this provision.
\18\ As defined at 40 CFR 82.172, ``use'' means any use of a
substitute for a Class I or Class II ozone-depleting compound,
including but not limited to use in a manufacturing process or
product, in consumption by the end-user, or in intermediate uses,
such as formulation or packaging for other subsequent uses. This
definition of use encompasses manufacturing process of products both
for domestic use and for export. Substitutes manufactured within the
United States exclusively for export are subject to SNAP
requirements since the definition of use in the rule includes use in
the manufacturing process, which occurs within the United States.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
After reviewing a substitute, the Agency may make a determination
that a substitute is acceptable only if certain conditions in the way
that the substitute is used are met to minimize risks to human health
and the environment. EPA describes such substitutes as ``acceptable
subject to use conditions.'' Entities that use these substitutes
without meeting the associated use conditions are in violation of EPA's
SNAP regulations (40 CFR 82.174(c)).
For some substitutes, the Agency may permit a narrowed range of use
within an end-use or sector. For example, the Agency may limit the use
of a substitute to certain end-uses or specific applications within an
industry sector. The Agency generally requires a user of a substitute
subject to narrowed use limits to demonstrate that no other acceptable
substitutes are available for their specific application.\19\ EPA
describes these substitutes as ``acceptable subject to narrowed use
limits.'' A person using a substitute that is acceptable subject to
narrowed use limits in applications and end-uses that are not
consistent with the narrowed use limit is using the substitute in
violation of section 612 of the CAA and EPA's SNAP regulations (40 CFR
82.174(c)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ In the case of the July 20, 2015, final rule, EPA
established narrowed use limits for certain substitutes over a
limited period of time for specific MVAC and foam applications, on
the basis that other acceptable alternatives would not be available
for those specific applications within broader end-uses, but
acceptable alternatives were expected to become available over time,
e.g., after military qualification testing for foam blowing agents
in military applications or after development of improved servicing
infrastructure in a destination country for MVAC in vehicles
destined for export.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The section 612 mandate for EPA to prohibit the use of a substitute
that may present risk to human health or the environment where a lower
risk alternative is available or potentially available \20\ provides
EPA with the authority to change the listing status of a particular
substitute if such a change is justified by new information or changed
circumstance.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ In addition to acceptable commercially available
substitutes, the SNAP program may consider potentially available
substitutes. The SNAP program's definition of ``potentially
available'' is ``any alternative for which adequate health, safety,
and environmental data, as required for the SNAP notification
process, exist to make a determination of acceptability, and which
the agency reasonably believes to be technically feasible, even if
not all testing has yet been completed and the alternative is not
yet produced or sold.'' (40 CFR 82.172).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As described in this document and elsewhere, including the initial
SNAP rule published in the Federal Register at 59 FR 13044 on March 18,
1994, the SNAP program evaluates substitutes within a comparative risk
framework. The SNAP program compares new substitutes both to the ozone-
depleting substances being phased out under the Montreal Protocol on
Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer and the CAA, and to other
available or potentially available alternatives for the same end-uses.
The environmental and health risk factors that the SNAP program
considers include ozone depletion potential, flammability, toxicity,
occupational and consumer health and safety, as well as contributions
to global warming and other environmental factors. Environmental and
human health exposures can vary significantly depending on the
particular application of a substitute--and over time, information
applicable to a substitute can change. This approach does not imply
fundamental tradeoffs with respect to different types of risk, either
to the environment or to human health. Over the past twenty years, the
menu of substitutes has become much broader and a great deal of new
information has been developed on many substitutes. Because the overall
goal of the SNAP program is to ensure that substitutes listed as
acceptable do not pose
[[Page 70036]]
significantly greater risk to human health and the environment than
other available substitutes, the SNAP criteria should be informed by
our current overall understanding of environmental and human health
impacts and our experience with and current knowledge about available
and potentially available substitutes. Over time, the range of
substitutes reviewed by SNAP has changed, and, at the same time,
scientific approaches have evolved to more accurately assess the
potential environmental and human health impacts of these chemicals and
alternative technologies. The Agency publishes its SNAP program
decisions in the Federal Register. EPA uses notice-and-comment
rulemaking to place any alternative on the list of prohibited
substitutes, to list a substitute as acceptable only subject to use
conditions or narrowed use limits, or to remove a substitute from
either the list of prohibited or acceptable substitutes.
In contrast, EPA publishes ``notices of acceptability'' or
``determinations of acceptability,'' to notify the public of
substitutes that are deemed acceptable with no restrictions. As
described in the preamble to the rule initially implementing the SNAP
program (59 FR 13044; March 18, 1994), EPA does not believe that
rulemaking procedures are necessary to list alternatives that are
acceptable without restrictions because such listings neither impose
any sanction nor prevent anyone from using a substitute.
Many SNAP listings include ``comments'' or ``further information''
to provide additional information on substitutes. Since this additional
information is not part of the regulatory decision, these statements
are not binding for use of the substitute under the SNAP program.
However, regulatory requirements so listed are binding under other
regulatory programs (e.g., worker protection regulations promulgated by
OSHA). The ``further information'' classification does not necessarily
include all other legal obligations pertaining to the use of the
substitute. While the items listed are not legally binding under the
SNAP program, EPA encourages users of substitutes to apply all
statements in the ``further information'' column in their use of these
substitutes. In many instances, the information simply refers to sound
operating practices that have already been identified in existing
industry and/or building codes or standards. Thus many of the
statements, if adopted, would not require the affected user to make
significant changes in existing operating practices.
D. Additional Information About the SNAP Program
For copies of the comprehensive SNAP lists of substitutes or
additional information on SNAP, refer to EPA's Ozone Depletion Web site
at: www.epa.gov/snap. For more information on the agency's process for
administering the SNAP program or criteria for evaluation of
substitutes, refer to the initial SNAP rulemaking published March 18,
1994 (59 FR 13044), codified at 40 CFR part 82, subpart G. SNAP
decisions and the appropriate Federal Register citations are found at:
www.epa.gov/snap/snap-regulations.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 82
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Air pollution control, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Date: September 28, 2016.
Sarah Dunham,
Director, Office of Atmospheric Programs.
Appendix A: Summary of Decisions for New Acceptable Substitutes
Refrigeration and Air Conditioning
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
End-use Substitute Decision Further information \1\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commercial ice machines (new and R-449B Acceptable......... R-449B has a 100-year global
retrofit equipment). (Forane[supreg] warming potential (GWP) of
449B). approximately 1,410. This
substitute is a blend of HFC-32,
which is also known as
difluoromethane (CAS Reg. No. 75-
10-5); HFC-125, which is also
known as 1,1,1,2,2-
pentafluoroethane (CAS Reg. No.
354-33-6); HFC-134a, which is
also known as 1,1,1,2-
tetrafluoroethane (CAS Reg. No.
811-97-2); and HFO-1234yf, which
is also known as 2,3,3,3-
tetrafluoroprop-l-ene (CAS Reg.
No. 754-12-1).
The blend is nonflammable.
The American Industrial Hygiene
Association (AIHA) has
established workplace
environmental exposure limits
(WEELs) of 1,000 ppm (8-hr time
weighted average (TWA)) for HFC-
32, HFC-125, and HFC-134a; and
500 ppm for HFO-1234yf. The
manufacturer recommends an
acceptable exposure level (AEL)
for the workplace for R-449B of
865 ppm (8-hr TWA).
Refrigerated transport (new and R-449B Acceptable......... R-449B has a 100-year GWP of
retrofit equipment). (Forane[supreg] approximately 1,410. This
449B). substitute is a blend of HFC-32,
which is also known as
difluoromethane (CAS Reg. No. 75-
10-5); HFC-125, which is also
known as 1,1,1,2,2-
pentafluoroethane (CAS Reg. No.
354-33-6); HFC-134a, which is
also known as 1,1,1,2-
tetrafluoroethane (CAS Reg. No.
811-97-2); and HFO-1234yf, which
is also known as 2,3,3,3-
tetrafluoroprop-l-ene (CAS Reg.
No. 754-12-1).
The blend is nonflammable.
The AIHA has established WEELs of
1,000 ppm (8-hr TWA) for HFC-32,
HFC-125, and HFC-134a; and 500
ppm for HFO-1234yf. The
manufacturer recommends an AEL
for the workplace for R-449B of
865 ppm (8-hr TWA).
[[Page 70037]]
Retail food refrigeration (new R-448A Acceptable......... R-448A has a 100-yr GWP of
and retrofit refrigerated food (Solstice[supreg] N- approximately 1,390. This
processing and dispensing 40). substitute is a blend of HFC-32,
equipment). which is also known as
difluoromethane (CAS Reg. No. 75-
10-5); HFC-125, which is also
known as 1,1,1,2,2-
pentafluoroethane (CAS Reg. No.
354-33-6); HFC-134a, which is
also known as 1,1,1,2-
tetrafluoroethane (CAS Reg. No.
811-97-2); HFO-1234yf, which is
also known as 2,3,3,3-tetrafluoro-
prop-l-ene (CAS Reg. No. 754-12-
1); and HFO-1234ze(E), which is
also known as trans-1,3,3,3-
tetrafluoroprop-l-ene (CAS Reg.
No. 29118-24-9).
The blend is nonflammable.
The AIHA has established WEELs of
1,000 ppm (8-hr TWA) for HFC-32,
HFC-125, and HFC-134a; 500 ppm
for HFO-1234yf; and 800 ppm for
HFO-1234ze(E). The manufacturer
recommends an AEL for the
workplace for R-448A of 890 ppm
(8-hr TWA).
Retail food refrigeration (new R-449A Acceptable......... R-449A has a 100-year GWP of
and retrofit refrigerated food (Opteon[supreg] XP approximately 1,400. This
processing and dispensing 40). substitute is a blend of HFC-32,
equipment). which is also known as
difluoromethane (CAS Reg. No. 75-
10-5); HFC-125, which is also
known as 1,1,1,2,2-
pentafluoroethane (CAS Reg. No.
354-33-6); HFC-134a, which is
also known as 1,1,1,2-
tetrafluoroethane (CAS Reg. No.
811-97-2); and HFO-1234yf, which
is also known as 2,3,3,3-
tetrafluoroprop-l-ene (CAS Reg.
No. 754-12-1).
The blend is nonflammable.
The AIHA has established WEELs of
1,000 ppm (8-hr TWA) for HFC-32,
HFC-125, and HFC-134a; and 500
ppm for HFO-1234yf. The
manufacturer recommends an AEL
for the workplace for R-449A of
830 ppm (8-hr TWA).
Retail food refrigeration (new R-449B Acceptable......... R-449B has a 100-year GWP of
and retrofit refrigerated food (Forane[supreg] approximately 1,410. This
processing and dispensing 449B). substitute is a blend of HFC-32,
equipment). which is also known as
difluoromethane (CAS Reg. No. 75-
10-5); HFC-125, which is also
known as 1,1,1,2,2-
pentafluoroethane (CAS Reg. No.
354-33-6); HFC-134a, which is
also known as 1,1,1,2-
tetrafluoroethane (CAS Reg. No.
811-97-2); and HFO-1234yf, which
is also known as 2,3,3,3-
tetrafluoroprop-l-ene (CAS Reg.
No. 754-12-1).
The blend is nonflammable.
The AIHA has established WEELs of
1,000 ppm (8-hr TWA) for HFC-32,
HFC-125, and HFC-134a; and 500
ppm for HFO-1234yf. The
manufacturer recommends an AEL
for the workplace for R-449B of
865 ppm (8-hr TWA).
Retail food refrigeration R-449B Acceptable......... R-449B has a 100-year GWP of
(supermarket systems, remote (Forane[supreg] approximately 1,410. This
condensing units, and low- 449B). substitute is a blend of HFC-32,
temperature \2\ stand-alone which is also known as
equipment only, new and retrofit difluoromethane (CAS Reg. No. 75-
equipment). 10-5); HFC-125, which is also
known as 1,1,1,2,2-
pentafluoroethane (CAS Reg. No.
354-33-6); HFC-134a, which is
also known as 1,1,1,2-
tetrafluoroethane (CAS Reg. No.
811-97-2); and HFO-1234yf, which
is also known as 2,3,3,3-
tetrafluoroprop-l-ene (CAS Reg.
No. 754-12-1).
The blend is nonflammable.
The AIHA has established WEELs of
1,000 ppm (8-hr TWA) for HFC-32,
HFC-125, and HFC-134a; and 500
ppm for HFO-1234yf. The
manufacturer recommends an AEL
for the workplace for R-449B of
865 ppm (8-hr TWA).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Observe recommendations in the manufacturer's SDS and guidance for all listed refrigerants.
\2\ ``Low-temperature'' refers to equipment that maintains food or beverages at temperatures at or below 32
[deg]F (0 [deg]C). See appendix U to 40 CFR part 82, subpart G.
Fire Suppression and Explosion Protection
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
End-use Substitute Decision Further information
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total flooding................... Trans-1-chloro-3,3,3- Acceptable......... Use of this agent should be in
trifluoroprop-1-ene accordance with the safety
(Solstice[supreg] guidelines in the latest edition
FS). of the National Fire Protection
Association (NFPA) 2001 Standard
on Clean Agent Fire Extinguishing
Systems. Safety features that are
typical of total flooding systems
such as pre-discharge alarms,
time delays, and system abort
switches should be provided, as
directed by applicable OSHA
regulations and NFPA standards.
For establishments manufacturing,
installing and maintaining
equipment using this agent, EPA
recommends the following:
[[Page 70038]]
In the case that
Solstice[supreg] FS is inhaled,
person(s) should be immediately
removed and exposed to fresh air;
if breathing is difficult,
person(s) should seek medical
attention;
Eye wash and quick
drench facilities should be
available. In case of ocular
exposure, person(s) should
immediately flush the eyes,
including under the eyelids, with
water for 15 minutes; should
frostbite occur, affected areas
should be rinsed with lukewarm
water, and medical attention
should be sought if irritation
develops or persists;
In the case of dermal
exposure, the SDS recommends that
person(s) should immediately wash
the affected area with water and
remove all contaminated clothing
to avoid irritation; should
frostbite occur, bathe (do not
rub) the affected area with
lukewarm, no hot, water. If water
is not available, cover the
affected area with a clean soft
cloth; and medical attention
should be sought if irritation
develops or persists.
Although unlikely, in
case of ingestion of
Solstice[supreg] FS, the person(s)
should drink a cup of water, if
fully conscious, and consult a
physician immediately;
Manufacturing space
should be equipped with
engineering controls, specifically
an adequate exhaust ventilation
system, to effectively mitigate
potential occupational exposure;
Employees responsible
for chemical processing should
wear the appropriate personal
protective equipment (PPE), such
as protective gloves, tightly
sealed goggles, protective work
clothing, and suitable respiratory
protection in case of accidental
release or insufficient
ventilation;
All spills should be
cleaned up immediately in
accordance with good industrial
hygiene practices;\
Training for safe
handling procedures should be
provided to all employees that
would be likely to handle
containers of the agent or
extinguishing units filled with
the agent;
See additional comments 1, 2, 3,
4, 5.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. The EPA recommends that users consult Section VIII of the OSHA Technical Manual for information on selecting
the appropriate types of personal protective equipment for all listed fire suppression agents. The EPA has no
intention of duplicating or displacing OSHA coverage related to the use of personal protective equipment
(e.g., respiratory protection), fire protection, hazard communication, worker training or any other
occupational safety and health standard with respect to halon substitutes.
2. Use of all listed fire suppression agents should conform to relevant OSHA requirements, including 29 CFR part
1910, subpart L, sections 1910.160 and 1910.162.
3. Per OSHA requirements, protective gear (SCBA) should be available in the event personnel should reenter the
area.
4. Discharge testing should be strictly limited to that which is essential to meet safety or performance
requirements.
5. The agent should be recovered from the fire protection system in conjunction with testing or servicing, and
recycled for later use or destroyed.
[FR Doc. 2016-24381 Filed 10-7-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P