[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 119 (Wednesday, June 20, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 28591-28592]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-13246]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
COUNCIL ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
40 CFR Parts 1500, 1501, 1502, 1503, 1504, 1505, 1506, 1507, and
1508
[Docket No. CEQ-2018-0001]
RIN: 0331-AA03
Update to the Regulations for Implementing the Procedural
Provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act
AGENCY: Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ).
ACTION: Advance notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) is considering
updating its implementing regulations for the procedural provisions of
the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). Over the past four
decades, CEQ has issued numerous guidance documents but has amended its
regulations substantively only once. Given the length of time since its
NEPA implementing regulations were issued, CEQ solicits public comment
on potential revisions to update the regulations and ensure a more
efficient, timely, and effective NEPA process consistent with the
national environmental policy stated in NEPA.
DATES: Comments should be submitted on or before July 20, 2018.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by docket identification
(ID) number CEQ-2018-0001 through the Federal eRulemaking portal at
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for
submitting comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Edward A. Boling, Associate Director
for the National Environmental Policy Act, Council on Environmental
Quality, 730 Jackson Place NW, Washington, DC 20503. Telephone: (202)
395-5750.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), 42 U.S.C. 4321 et
seq., was enacted in 1970. NEPA states that ``it is the continuing
policy of the Federal Government, in cooperation with State and local
governments, and other concerned public and private organizations, to
use all practicable means and measures, including financial and
technical assistance, in a manner calculated to foster and promote the
general welfare, to create and maintain conditions under which man and
nature can exist in productive harmony, and fulfill the social,
economic, and other requirements of present and future generations of
Americans.'' 42 U.S.C. 4331(a). NEPA also established CEQ as an agency
within the Executive Office of the President. 42 U.S.C. 4342.
By Executive Order (E.O.) 11514, ``Protection and Enhancement of
Environmental Quality'' (March 5, 1970), President Nixon directed CEQ
in Section 3(h) to issue ``guidelines to Federal agencies for the
preparation of detailed statements on proposals for legislation and
other Federal actions affecting the environment, as required by section
102(2)(C) of the Act.'' CEQ published these guidelines in April of 1970
and revised them in 1973.
President Carter issued E.O. 11991 (May 24, 1977), ``Relating to
Protection and Enhancement of Environmental Quality,'' which amended
Section 3(h) of E.O. 11514 to direct CEQ to issue regulations providing
uniform standards for the implementation of NEPA, and amended Section 2
of E.O. 11514 to require agency compliance with the CEQ regulations.
CEQ promulgated its ``Regulations for Implementing the Procedural
Provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act'' (CEQ's NEPA
regulations) at 40 CFR parts 1500-1508. 43 FR 55978 (November 29,
1978). Since that time, CEQ has amended its NEPA regulations
substantively only once, to eliminate the ``worst case'' analysis
requirement of 40 CFR 1502.22. 51 FR 15618 (April 25, 1986).
On August 15, 2017, President Trump issued E.O. 13807,
``Establishing Discipline and Accountability in the Environmental
Review and Permitting Process for Infrastructure Projects.'' 82 FR
40463 (August 24, 2017). Section 5(e) of E.O. 13807 directed CEQ to
develop an initial list of actions to enhance and modernize the Federal
environmental review and authorization process. In response, CEQ
published its initial list of actions pursuant to E.O. 13807 and stated
that it intends to review its existing NEPA regulations in order to
identify changes needed to update and clarify these regulations. 82 FR
43226 (September 14, 2017).
II. Request for Comment
CEQ requests comments on potential revisions to update and clarify
CEQ NEPA regulations. In particular, CEQ requests comments on the
following specific aspects of these regulations, and requests that
commenters include question numbers when providing responses. Where
possible, please provide specific recommendations on additions,
deletions, and modifications to the text of CEQ's NEPA regulations and
their justifications.
NEPA Process
1. Should CEQ's NEPA regulations be revised to ensure that
environmental reviews and authorization decisions involving multiple
agencies are conducted in a manner that is concurrent, synchronized,
timely, and efficient, and if so, how?
2. Should CEQ's NEPA regulations be revised to make the NEPA
process more efficient by better facilitating agency use of
environmental studies, analysis, and decisions conducted in earlier
Federal, State, tribal or local environmental reviews or authorization
decisions, and if so, how?
3. Should CEQ's NEPA regulations be revised to ensure optimal
interagency coordination of environmental reviews and authorization
decisions, and if so, how?
Scope of NEPA Review
4. Should the provisions in CEQ's NEPA regulations that relate to
the format and page length of NEPA documents and time limits for
completion be revised, and if so, how?
5. Should CEQ's NEPA regulations be revised to provide greater
clarity to ensure NEPA documents better focus on significant issues
that are relevant and useful to decisionmakers and the public, and if
so, how?
6. Should the provisions in CEQ's NEPA regulations relating to
public involvement be revised to be more inclusive and efficient, and
if so, how?
7. Should definitions of any key NEPA terms in CEQ's NEPA
regulations, such as those listed below, be revised, and if so, how?
a. Major Federal Action;
b. Effects;
c. Cumulative Impact;
d. Significantly;
e. Scope; and
f. Other NEPA terms.
8. Should any new definitions of key NEPA terms, such as those
noted below, be added, and if so, which terms?
[[Page 28592]]
a. Alternatives;
b. Purpose and Need;
c. Reasonably Foreseeable;
d. Trivial Violation; and
e. Other NEPA terms.
9. Should the provisions in CEQ's NEPA regulations relating to any
of the types of documents listed below be revised, and if so, how?
a. Notice of Intent;
b. Categorical Exclusions Documentation;
c. Environmental Assessments;
d. Findings of No Significant Impact;
e. Environmental Impact Statements;
f. Records of Decision; and
g. Supplements.
10. Should the provisions in CEQ's NEPA regulations relating to the
timing of agency action be revised, and if so, how?
11. Should the provisions in CEQ's NEPA regulations relating to
agency responsibility and the preparation of NEPA documents by
contractors and project applicants be revised, and if so, how?
12. Should the provisions in CEQ's NEPA regulations relating to
programmatic NEPA documents and tiering be revised, and if so, how?
13. Should the provisions in CEQ's NEPA regulations relating to the
appropriate range of alternatives in NEPA reviews and which
alternatives may be eliminated from detailed analysis be revised, and
if so, how?
General
14. Are any provisions of the CEQ's NEPA regulations currently
obsolete? If so, please provide specific recommendations on whether
they should be modified, rescinded, or replaced.
15. Which provisions of the CEQ's NEPA regulations can be updated
to reflect new technologies that can be used to make the process more
efficient?
16. Are there additional ways CEQ's NEPA regulations should be
revised to promote coordination of environmental review and
authorization decisions, such as combining NEPA analysis and other
decision documents, and if so, how?
17. Are there additional ways CEQ's NEPA regulations should be
revised to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the
implementation of NEPA, and if so, how?
18. Are there ways in which the role of tribal governments in the
NEPA process should be clarified in CEQ's NEPA regulations, and if so,
how?
19. Are there additional ways CEQ's NEPA regulations should be
revised to ensure that agencies apply NEPA in a manner that reduces
unnecessary burdens and delays as much as possible, and if so, how?
20. Are there additional ways CEQ's NEPA regulations related to
mitigation should be revised, and if so, how?
(Authority: 42 U.S.C. 4332, 4342, 4344 and 40 CFR parts 1500, 1501,
1502, 1503, 1505, 1506, 1507, and 1508)
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under E.O. 12866, ``Regulatory Planning and Review,'' 58 FR 51735
(October 4, 1993), this is a ``significant regulatory action.''
Accordingly, CEQ submitted this action to the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) for review under E.O. 12866 and any changes made in
response to OMB recommendations have been documented in the docket for
this action. Because this action does not propose or impose any
requirements, and instead seeks comments and suggestions for CEQ to
consider in possibly developing a subsequent proposed rule, the various
statutes and executive orders that normally apply to rulemaking do not
apply in this case. If CEQ decides in the future to pursue a
rulemaking, CEQ will address the statutes and executive orders
applicable to that rulemaking at that time.
Mary B. Neumayr,
Chief of Staff, Council on Environmental Quality.
[FR Doc. 2018-13246 Filed 6-19-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3225-F8-P