[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 148 (Wednesday, August 1, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 37440-37443]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-16470]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA-HQ-OPP-2018-0150; FRL-9980-39]
Titanium dioxide; Exemption From the Requirement of a Tolerance
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This regulation amends the exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance for residues of titanium dioxide (CAS Reg. No. 13463-67-7)
when used as an inert ingredient in pesticide formulations applied to
growing crops to allow for use as a carrier. SciReg. Inc., on behalf of
Bayer CropScience Biologics GmbH, submitted a petition to EPA under the
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), requesting establishment
of an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance. This regulation
eliminates the need to establish a maximum permissible level for
residues of titanium dioxide resulting from this use.
DATES: This regulation is effective August 1, 2018. Objections and
requests for hearings must be received on or before October 1, 2018,
and must be filed in accordance with the instructions provided in 40
CFR part 178 (see also Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).
ADDRESSES: The docket for this action, identified by docket
identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2018-0150, is available at http://www.regulations.gov or at the Office of Pesticide Programs Regulatory
Public Docket (OPP Docket) in the Environmental Protection Agency
Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334,
1301 Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460-0001. The Public
Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public
Reading Room is (202) 566-1744, and the telephone number for the OPP
Docket is (703) 305-5805. Please review the visitor instructions and
additional information about the docket available at http://www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Goodis, Registration Division
(7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency,
1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460-0001; main telephone
number: (703) 305-7090; email address: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an
agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer.
The following list of North American Industrial Classification System
(NAICS) codes is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a
guide to help readers determine whether this document applies to them.
Potentially affected entities may include:
Crop production (NAICS code 111).
Animal production (NAICS code 112).
Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311).
Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532).
B. How can I get electronic access to other related information?
You may access a frequently updated electronic version of 40 CFR
part 180 through the Government Printing Office's e-CFR site at http://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?&c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title40/40tab_02.tpl.
C. How can I file an objection or hearing request?
Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21 U.S.C. 346a, any person may file an
objection to any aspect of this regulation and may also request a
hearing on those objections. You must file your objection or request a
hearing on this regulation in accordance with the instructions provided
in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, you must identify
docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2018-0150 in the subject line on the first
page of your submission. All objections and requests for a hearing must
be in writing, and must be received by the Hearing Clerk on or before
October 1, 2018. Addresses for mail and hand delivery of objections and
hearing requests are provided in 40 CFR 178.25(b).
In addition to filing an objection or hearing request with the
Hearing Clerk as described in 40 CFR part 178, please submit a copy of
the filing (excluding any Confidential Business Information (CBI)) for
inclusion in the public docket. Information not marked confidential
pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be disclosed publicly by EPA without
prior notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your objection or hearing
request, identified by docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2018-0150, by one of
the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit
electronically any information you consider to be CBI or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental Protection Agency Docket
Center (EPA/DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC
20460-0001.
Hand Delivery: To make special arrangements for hand
delivery or
[[Page 37441]]
delivery of boxed information, please follow the instructions at http://www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html.
Additional instructions on commenting or visiting the docket, along
with more information about dockets generally, is available at http://www.epa.gov/dockets.
II. Petition for Exemption
In the Federal Register of May 18, 2018 (83 FR 23247) (FRL-9976-
87), EPA issued a document pursuant to FFDCA section 408, 21 U.S.C.
346a, announcing the filing of a pesticide petition (PP IN-11085) by
SciReg. Inc., on behalf of Bayer CropScience Biologics GmbH, Lukaswiese
4, 23970 Wismar, Germany. The petition requested that the 40 CFR
180.920 exemption from the requirement of a tolerance for residues of
titanium dioxide (CAS Reg. No. 13463-67-7) be amended to allow for use
as a carrier when used as an inert ingredient in pesticide formulations
applied to growing crops only. That document referenced a summary of
the petition prepared by SciReg. Inc., on behalf of Bayer CropScience
Biologics GmbH, the petitioner, which is available in the docket,
http://www.regulations.gov. There were no comments received in response
to the notice of filing.
III. Inert Ingredient Definition
Inert ingredients are all ingredients that are not active
ingredients as defined in 40 CFR 153.125 and include, but are not
limited to, the following types of ingredients (except when they have a
pesticidal efficacy of their own): Solvents such as alcohols and
hydrocarbons; surfactants such as polyoxyethylene polymers and fatty
acids; carriers such as clay and diatomaceous earth; thickeners such as
carrageenan and modified cellulose; wetting, spreading, and dispersing
agents; propellants in aerosol dispensers; microencapsulating agents;
and emulsifiers. The term ``inert'' is not intended to imply
nontoxicity; the ingredient may or may not be chemically active.
Generally, EPA has exempted inert ingredients from the requirement of a
tolerance based on the low toxicity of the individual inert
ingredients.
IV. Aggregate Risk Assessment and Determination of Safety
Section 408(c)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA allows EPA to establish an
exemption from the requirement for a tolerance (the legal limit for a
pesticide chemical residue in or on a food) only if EPA determines that
the tolerance is ``safe.'' Section 408(b)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA defines
``safe'' to mean that ``there is a reasonable certainty that no harm
will result from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue,
including all anticipated dietary exposures and all other exposures for
which there is reliable information.'' This includes exposure through
drinking water and in residential settings, but does not include
occupational exposure. Section 408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA requires EPA to
give special consideration to exposure of infants and children to the
pesticide chemical residue in establishing a tolerance and to ``ensure
that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result to
infants and children from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical
residue. . . .''
EPA establishes exemptions from the requirement of a tolerance only
in those cases where it can be clearly demonstrated that the risks from
aggregate exposure to pesticide chemical residues under reasonably
foreseeable circumstances will pose no appreciable risks to human
health. In order to determine the risks from aggregate exposure to
pesticide inert ingredients, the Agency considers the toxicity of the
inert in conjunction with possible exposure to residues of the inert
ingredient through food, drinking water, and through other exposures
that occur as a result of pesticide use in residential settings. If EPA
is able to determine that a finite tolerance is not necessary to ensure
that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result from
aggregate exposure to the inert ingredient, an exemption from the
requirement of a tolerance may be established.
Consistent with FFDCA section 408(c)(2)(A), and the factors
specified in FFDCA section 408(c)(2)(B), EPA has reviewed the available
scientific data and other relevant information in support of this
action. EPA has sufficient data to assess the hazards of and to make a
determination on aggregate exposure for titanium dioxide including
exposure resulting from the exemption established by this action. EPA's
assessment of exposures and risks associated with titanium dioxide
follows.
A. Toxicological Profile
EPA has evaluated the available toxicity data and considered their
validity, completeness, and reliability as well as the relationship of
the results of the studies to human risk. EPA has also considered
available information concerning the variability of the sensitivities
of major identifiable subgroups of consumers, including infants and
children.
The available toxicity studies on titanium dioxide via the oral
route of exposure clearly demonstrate a lack of toxicity. The several
studies in mice, rats, dogs, cats, rabbits and other species of varying
durations do not indicate toxicity, even at very high doses (e.g.,
50,000 ppm or 2,500 mg/kg/day dietary exposure for two years in rats).
There are no studies on the dermal toxicity of titanium dioxide and
there is no expected toxicity via the dermal route of exposure because
as an insoluble solid material, titanium dioxide is not absorbed via
the skin.
The available inhalation studies indicate that the primary toxicity
of titanium dioxide is due to deposition of the inhaled particles.
Although these studies suggest equivocal evidence of carcinogenicity
due to prolonged exposure to titanium dioxide particles, EPA has
determined that these effects are not relevant for assessing risk from
exposure to titanium dioxide when used as an inert ingredient in
pesticide formulations based on the following. First, tumors were only
observed in two of the available studies and only in one species. In
one study, those tumors were only observed in rats continually exposed
to ultrafine particles of titanium dioxide. In the second study, tumors
were only observed from exposure to fine particles of titanium dioxide
at extremely high concentrations (250 mg/m\3\), in which the animals
experienced overloading of lung clearance, with chronic inflammation
resulting in lung tumors. All but one of the tumors in the second study
were subsequently reclassified as non-neoplastic or non-cancerous in
nature. No tumors were observed in studies involving mice.
The titanium dioxide used in pesticide formulations is considered
pigmentary grade, not ultrafine or nanoscale. Consequently, the tumors
observed from exposure to ultrafine particles of titanium dioxide are
not relevant for assessing exposure to the type of titanium dioxide
used in pesticide formulations. Following the reclassification of the
tumors observed in the second inhalation study, EPA does not consider
these effects to be strong evidence of carcinogenicity from exposure to
fineparticle-sized titanium dioxide. Further, EPA does not expect any
reasonably foreseeable uses of titanium dioxide in pesticide
formulations that might result in residential exposures that would
approach the levels of exposure necessary to elicit the effects seen in
the available inhalation study. The levels at which effects were
observed in that study greatly exceed any reasonable
[[Page 37442]]
dose for toxicity testing and any likely residential exposure levels.
Moreover, when used as an inert in pesticide formulations, titanium
dioxide will be bound to other materials, with no significant
inhalation exposure to titanium dioxide particles themselves.
This position is consistent with the National Institute of
Occupational Health and Safety's (NIOSH) recent assessment that
ultrafine but not fine titanium dioxide would be considered a
``potential occupational carcinogen.'' The NIOSH Current Intelligence
Bulletin ``Occupational Exposure to Titanium Dioxide'' concludes that
``[t]he lung tumors observed in rats after exposure to 250 mg/m\3\ of
fine TiO2 [titanium dioxide] were the basis for the original
NIOSH designation of TiO2 as a ``potential occupational
carcinogen.'' However, because this dose is considered to be
significantly higher than currently accepted inhalation toxicology
practice, NIOSH concluded that the response at such a high dose should
not be used in making its hazard identification.'' NIOSH concluded that
the data is insufficient to classify fine titanium dioxide as a
potential occupational carcinogen.
Because the predominant form of titanium dioxide used commercially,
and the form used as an inert ingredient in pesticide formulations, is
pigment grade, which is not in the ultrafine or nanoscale particle size
range but rather in the fine particle size range, EPA concludes that
carcinogenicity is not a concern from exposure to titanium dioxide
resulting from its use as an inert ingredient in pesticide
formulations.
Specific information on the studies received and the nature of the
adverse effects caused by titanium dioxide as well as the no-observed-
adverse-effect level (NOAEL) and the lowest-observed-adverse-effect
level (LOAEL) from the toxicity studies are discussed in the final rule
published in the Federal Register of July 27, 2012 (77 FR 44151) (FRL-
9354-6) and in the Agency's risk assessment which can be found at
http://www.regulations.gov in document ``Titanium Dioxide; Human Health
Risk Assessment and Ecological Effects Assessment to Support Proposed
Exemption from the Requirement of a Tolerance When used as an Inert
Ingredient in Pesticide Formulations'' in docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-
2018-0150.
B. Toxicological Points of Departure/Levels of Concern
Because the available data indicate no toxicity via the oral route
of exposure, no endpoint of concern for that route of exposure has been
identified in the available database. This conclusion is in agreement
with the conclusion of the World Health Organization (WHO) Committee on
Food Coloring Materials that no Acceptable Daily Intake (ADI) need be
set for the use of titanium dioxide based on the range of acute, sub-
acute, and chronic toxicity assays, all showing low mammalian toxicity.
Similarly, no significant toxicity of titanium dioxide is expected via
the dermal route of exposure, so no endpoint was identified.
Because the effects seen in inhalation studies occurred at doses
above the levels at which pesticide exposure is expected and for
particle sizes that are different from the size of titanium dioxide
used in pesticide formulations, the Agency has concluded that those
risks are not relevant for assessing risk from pesticide exposure and
therefore, did not identify an endpoint for assessing inhalation
exposure risk.
C. Exposure Assessment
1. Dietary exposure from food and feed uses. In evaluating dietary
exposure to titanium dioxide, EPA considered exposure under the
proposed exemption from the requirement of a tolerance and all other
existing exemptions from the requirement of a tolerance for residues of
titanium dioxide. EPA assessed dietary exposures from titanium dioxide
in food as follows:
Residues of titanium dioxide are exempt from the requirement of a
tolerance when used as an inert ingredient in many different
circumstances: When used in pesticide formulations applied to growing
crops as a pigment/coloring agent in plastic bags used to wrap growing
bananas or colorant on seeds for planting (40 CFR 180.920); when used
in pesticide formulations applied to animals (40 CFR 180.930); when
used as a UV protectant in microencapsulated formulations of the
insecticide lambda-cyhalothrin at no more than 3.0% by weight (40 CFR
180.1195); when used as a UV stabilizer in pesticide formulations of
napropamide at no more than 5% of the product formulation (40 CFR
180.1195); when used in pesticide placed at entrance to bee hives
intended to control varroa mites in hive at a maximum of 0.1% wt/wt (40
CFR 180.1195); and when used in anthraquinone pesticide formulations at
a maximum of 45% wt/wt (40 CFR 180.1195). Titanium dioxide is also
approved for use as a colorant in food (21 CFR 73.575).
Although dietary exposure may be expected from use of titanium
dioxide in pesticide formulations applied to bee hives and on other
crops (as well as from other non-pesticidal sources), a quantitative
exposure assessment for titanium dioxide was not conducted because no
endpoint of concern was identified in the database.
2. Dietary exposure from drinking water. Since a hazard endpoint of
concern was not identified for the acute and chronic dietary
assessment, a quantitative dietary exposure risk assessment for
drinking water was not conducted, although exposures from drinking
water may be expected from use on food crops.
3. From non-dietary exposure. The term ``residential exposure'' is
used in this document to refer to non-occupational, non-dietary
exposure (e.g., textiles (clothing and diapers), carpets, swimming
pools, and hard surface disinfection on walls, floors, tables).
Titanium dioxide may be used in non-pesticide products such as
paints, printing inks, paper and plastic products around the home. It
has also been approved for use in drugs (21 CFR 73.1575) and in
cosmetics (21 CFR 73.2575 and 73.3126). Additionally, titanium dioxide
may be used as an inert ingredient in pesticides that include
residential uses; however based on the discussion in Unit IV.B., a
quantitative residential exposure assessment for titanium dioxide was
not conducted.
4. Cumulative effects from substances with a common mechanism of
toxicity. Section 408(b)(2)(D)(v) of FFDCA requires that, when
considering whether to establish, modify, or revoke a tolerance, the
Agency consider ``available information'' concerning the cumulative
effects of a particular pesticide's residues and ``other substances
that have a common mechanism of toxicity.''
Because titanium dioxide does not have a toxic mode of action or a
mechanism of toxicity, this provision does not apply.
D. Safety Factor for Infants and Children
Due to titanium dioxide's low potential hazard and the lack of a
hazard endpoint, it was determined that a quantitative risk assessment
using safety factors applied to a point of departure protective of an
identified hazard endpoint is not appropriate for titanium dioxide. For
the same reasons that a quantitative risk assessment based on a safety
factor approach is not appropriate for titanium dioxide, an FQPA SF is
not needed to protect the safety of infants and children.
[[Page 37443]]
E. Aggregate Risks and Determination of Safety
Taking into consideration all available information on titanium
dioxide, EPA has determined that there is a reasonable certainty that
no harm to any population subgroup will result from aggregate exposure
to titanium dioxide under reasonable foreseeable circumstances.
Therefore, the exemption from tolerance under 40 CFR 180.920 for
residues of titanium dioxide, when used as an inert ingredient in
pesticide formulations is safe under FFDCA section 408.
V. Analytical Enforcement Methodology
An analytical method is not required for enforcement purposes since
the Agency is establishing an exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance without any numerical limitation.
VI. Conclusions
Therefore, EPA is amending the exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance in 40 CFR 180.920 for residues of titanium dioxide (CAS Reg.
No. 13463-67-7) when used as an inert ingredient (carrier) in pesticide
formulations.
VII. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
This action establishes an exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance under FFDCA section 408(d) in response to a petition
submitted to the Agency. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has
exempted these types of actions from review under Executive Order
12866, entitled ``Regulatory Planning and Review'' (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993). Because this action has been exempted from review
under Executive Order 12866, this action is not subject to Executive
Order 13211, entitled ``Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001); Executive Order 13045, entitled ``Protection of
Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks'' (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997); or Executive Order 13771, entitled ``Reducing
Regulations and Controlling Regulatory Costs'' (82 FR 9339, February 3,
2017). This action does not contain any information collections subject
to OMB approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.), nor does it require any special considerations under
Executive Order 12898, entitled ``Federal Actions to Address
Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations'' (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
Since tolerances and exemptions that are established on the basis
of a petition under FFDCA section 408(d), such as the exemption in this
final rule, do not require the issuance of a proposed rule, the
requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.), do not apply.
This action directly regulates growers, food processors, food
handlers, and food retailers, not States or tribes, nor does this
action alter the relationships or distribution of power and
responsibilities established by Congress in the preemption provisions
of FFDCA section 408(n)(4). As such, the Agency has determined that
this action will not have a substantial direct effect on States or
tribal governments, on the relationship between the national government
and the States or tribal governments, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government or between
the Federal Government and Indian tribes. Thus, the Agency has
determined that Executive Order 13132, entitled ``Federalism'' (64 FR
43255, August 10, 1999) and Executive Order 13175, entitled
``Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments'' (65 FR
67249, November 9, 2000) do not apply to this action. In addition, this
action does not impose any enforceable duty or contain any unfunded
mandate as described under Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
(UMRA) (2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.).
This action does not involve any technical standards that would
require Agency consideration of voluntary consensus standards pursuant
to section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act (NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note).
VIII. Congressional Review Act
Pursuant to the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.),
EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required
information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of
the rule in the Federal Register. This action is not a ``major rule''
as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: July 11, 2018.
Michael L. Goodis,
Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.
Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is amended as follows:
PART 180--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
0
2. In Sec. 180.920, revise the inert ingredient ``Titanium dioxide
(CAS Reg. No. 13463-67-7)'' in the table to read as follows:
Sec. 180.920 Inert ingredients used pre-harvest; exemptions from the
requirement of a tolerance.
* * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inert ingredients Limits Uses
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
. . . . . . .
Titanium dioxide (CAS Reg. No. 13463- ......................... Pigment, colorant, carrier.
67-7).
. . . . . . .
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[FR Doc. 2018-16470 Filed 7-31-18; 8:45 a.m.]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P