[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 238 (Wednesday, December 12, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 63919-63922]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-26833]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-84737; File No. SR-NYSEArca-2018-74]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca, Inc.; Order Approving a
Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by Amendment No. 1, To Amend Rules
6.62-O and 6.37A-O To Add New Order Types and Quotation Designations
December 6, 2018.
I. Introduction
On October 5, 2018, NYSE Arca, Inc. (``Exchange'' or ``NYSE Arca'')
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'')
pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule change to
amend NYSE Arca Rules 6.62-O (Certain Types of Orders Defined) and
6.37A-O (Market Maker Quotations) to add new order types and quotation
designations. The proposed rule change was published for comment in the
Federal Register on October 24, 2018.\3\ On December 4, 2018, the
Exchange filed Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule change.\4\ The
Commission received no comment letters on the proposed rule change.
This order approves the proposed rule change, as modified by Amendment
No. 1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 84451 (October 18,
2018), 83 FR 53692 (``Notice'').
\4\ In Amendment No. 1, the Exchange made technical corrections
to cross references in the proposed rule text. Because Amendment No.
1 does not materially alter the substance of the proposed rule
change or raise unique or novel regulatory issues, it is not subject
to notice and comment. The amendment is available at: https://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-nysearca-2018-74/srnysearca201874.htm.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Description of the Proposal, as Modified by Amendment No. 1
A. Order Types
Currently, Rule 6.62-O sets forth the order types available on the
Exchange, including Liquidity Adding Orders (each an ``ALO'') and PNP
(Post No Preference) Orders, both of which provide market participants
control over how their orders interact with contra-side liquidity.
Specifically, an ALO is a
[[Page 63920]]
Limit Order that is rejected if it is marketable against the NBBO on
arrival.\5\ A PNP Order is a Limit Order that is eligible to interact
solely with interest on the Exchange, will not route, and will cancel
if it locks or crosses the NBBO.\6\ The Exchange proposes to amend Rule
6.62-O to add two order types that build on the existing ALO and PNP
Order functionality to allow for repricing (rather than cancellation or
rejection of orders) under certain circumstances.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See Rule 6.62-O(t) (providing that ``a Liquidity Adding
Order is a Limit Order which is to be accepted only if it is not
executable at the time of receipt. Orders with the liquidity adding
instruction will not be routed if marketable against the NBBO, but
will be rejected. Liquidity adding orders may only be entered as a
Day Order''). The Exchange proposes to modify paragraph (t) of this
Rule to define Liquidity Adding Orders as ``ALOs'' and make
conforming changes to the Rule. See proposed Rule 6.62-O(t). The
Exchange also proposes to modify the Rule to reflect that ``[a]n ALO
or RALO, as defined in paragraph (t)(1) of this Rule, will be
rejected if entered outside of Core Trading Hours or during a
trading halt or, if resting, will be cancelled in the event of a
trading halt.'' See id.
\6\ See Rule 6.62-O(p) (providing that a PNP Order ``is a Limit
Order to buy or sell that is to be executed in whole or in part on
the Exchange, and the portion not so executed is to be ranked in the
Consolidated Book, without routing any portion of the order to
another market center; provided, however, the Exchange shall cancel
a PNP Order that would lock or cross the NBBO''). The Exchange
proposes to capitalize the ``Market Center'' as used in paragraph
(p) of the Rule, which is a defined term in Rule 6.1A-O(6). See
proposed Rule 6.62-O(p).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Repricing ALO (``RALO'')
The Exchange proposes to provide market participants the ability to
send in ALOs designated as RALO.\7\ As proposed, a RALO will be
repriced (rather than be rejected) if it would either trade as the
liquidity taker or display at a price that locks or crosses any
interest on the Exchange or the NBBO.\8\ Specifically, an incoming RALO
to buy (sell) that would trade with any displayed or undisplayed sell
(buy) interest on the Consolidated Book will be displayed at a price
one minimum price variation (``MPV'') below (above) such sell (buy)
interest.\9\ An incoming RALO to buy (sell) that is not marketable
against interest in the Consolidated Book but that would lock or cross
the NBO (NBB) will be displayed at a price that is one MPV below
(above) the NBO (NBB).\10\ If the sell (buy) interest in the
Consolidated Book or NBO (NBB) moves up (down), the display price of
the RALO to buy (sell) and the undisplayed price at which it is
eligible to trade will be continuously adjusted, up (down) to the
RALO's limit price.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See proposed Rule 6.62-O(t)(1). The Exchange also proposes
that a RALO that is designated as a Reserve Order will be rejected.
See id.
\8\ See id.
\9\ See proposed Rule 6.62-O(t)(1)(A).
\10\ See id.
\11\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A resting RALO to buy (sell) that is displayed one MPV below
(above) interest on the Consolidated Book would be eligible to trade at
its display price.\12\ A resting RALO to buy (sell) that is displayed
at a price one MPV below (above) the NBO (NBB) would be eligible to
trade at the NBO (NBB); provided, however, that if the NBO (NBB)
updates to lock or cross the RALO's display price, such RALO will trade
at its display price in time priority behind other eligible interest
already displayed at that price.\13\ Each time there is an update to
the price of the RALO, the Exchange will rank the RALO by time priority
behind other eligible interest already at that price.\14\ If multiple
RALOs simultaneously reprice to the same price at which they are
eligible to trade, the RALOs will be prioritized based on the time of
original order entry.\15\ Furthermore, an incoming RALO will be
cancelled if its limit price to buy (sell) is more than a configurable
number of MPVs above (below) the initial display price (on arrival),
after first trading with eligible interest, if any.\16\ The Exchange
will determine the configurable number of MPVs, which will be announced
by Trader Update.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ See proposed Rule 6.62-O(t)(1)(A)(i).
\13\ See proposed Rule 6.62-O(t)(1)(A)(ii).
\14\ See proposed Rule 6.62-O(t)(1)(A)(iii).
\15\ See id.
\16\ See proposed Rule 6.62-O(t)(1)(B).
\17\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Repricing PNP Order (``RPNP'')
The Exchange proposes to provide market participants the ability to
send in PNP Orders designated as RPNP.\18\ As proposed, a RPNP is a PNP
Order that will be repriced instead of cancelled after trading with
interest in the Consolidated Book, if it would lock or cross the
NBBO.\19\ Specifically, a RPNP to buy (sell) that would lock or cross
the NBO (NBB) will be displayed at a price one MPV below (above) the
NBO (NBB).\20\ If the NBO (NBB) moves up (down), the display price of
the RPNP to buy (sell) and the undisplayed price at which it is
eligible to trade will be continuously adjusted, up (down) to the limit
price of the RPNP.\21\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ See proposed Rule 6.62-O(p)(1). The Exchange proposes that
a RPNP received during pre-open or a trading halt will be treated as
a PNP Order (i.e., as a Limit Order and will not reprice) for
purposes of participating in opening auctions or re-opening
auctions. See proposed Rule 6.62-O(p). A RPNP may only be entered as
a Day Order and a RPNP that is designated as a Reserve Order will be
rejected. See proposed Rule 6.62-O(p)(1).
\19\ See id.
\20\ See proposed Rule 6.62-O (p)(1)(A).
\21\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A RPNP to buy (sell) that is displayed at a price one MPV below
(above) the NBO (NBB) will trade at the NBO (NBB); provided, however,
that if the NBO (NBB) updates to lock or cross the RPNP's display
price, such RPNP will trade at its display price in time priority
behind other eligible interest already displayed at that price.\22\
Each time there is an update to the price of the RPNP, the Exchange
will rank the RPNP by time priority behind other eligible interest
already at that price.\23\ If multiple RPNPs simultaneously reprice to
the same price at which they are eligible to trade, the RPNPs will be
prioritized based on the time of original order entry.\24\ Similar to
the proposed RALO, an incoming RPNP will be cancelled if its limit
price to buy (sell) is more than a configurable number of MPVs above
(below) the initial display price (on arrival), after first trading
with eligible interest, if any. The Exchange will determine the
configurable number of MPVs, which will be announced by Trader Update.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\22\ See proposed Rule 6.62-O(p)(1)(A)(i).
\23\ See proposed Rule 6.62-O(p)(1)(A)(ii).
\24\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Quotation Designations
Currently, Rule 6.37A-O(a) defines Market Maker quotes, including
quotations designated as Market Maker--Light Only (``MMLO''), and
specifies how such quotes are processed when a series is open for
trading. The Exchange proposes to amend Rule 6.37A-O(a) to add two new
quote designations to provide Market Makers with the same functionality
for their quotations as are proposed for orders designated as RALO and
RPNP entered on the Exchange.\25\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\25\ See Notice, supra note 3, at 53695. The Exchange represents
that the proposed quotation designations would function similar to
the proposed RALO and RPNP. See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Market Maker--Add Liquidity Only Quotation (``MMALO'')
The Exchange proposes to provide Market Makers the ability to
designate quotations as MMALO.\26\ An incoming or resting MMALO will
never trade as the liquidity taker or display at a price that locks or
crosses any interest on the Exchange or the NBBO.\27\ Instead of
[[Page 63921]]
trading, an MMALO will be repriced based on contra-side interest
pursuant to proposed Rule 6.37A-O(a)(4)(A).\28\ Specifically, an
incoming MMALO to buy (sell) that would trade with any sell (buy)
interest on the Consolidated Book will be displayed at a price one MPV
below (above) such sell (buy) interest.\29\ An incoming MMALO to buy
(sell) that is not marketable against interest in the Consolidated Book
but that would lock or cross the NBO (NBB) will be displayed at a price
that is one MPV below (above) the NBO (NBB).\30\ If the sell (buy)
interest in the Consolidated Book or NBO (NBB) moves up (down), the
display price of the MMALO to buy (sell) and the undisplayed price at
which it is eligible to trade will be continuously adjusted, up (down)
to the MMALO's limit price.\31\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\26\ See proposed Rule 6.37A-O(a)(3)(B) and (a)(4)(A)(i). The
Exchange proposes to delete a reference to MMLO in paragraph (a)(4)
and proposes to separately describe the treatment of the various
quote types when a series is open for trading. See proposed Rule
6.37A-O(a)(4).
\27\ Because incoming quotations, other than an MMALO, would
immediately ``trade with contra-side interest in the Consolidated
Book at prices that do not trade through interest on another Market
Center,'' the Exchange proposes to modify the rule to carve out
incoming MMALOs. See proposed Rule 6.37A-O(a)(4)(A). The Exchange
also proposes to replace references to ``another Market Center''
with ``the NBBO'' to add clarity and consistency to the Rule. See
id. See also proposed Rule 6.37A-O(a)(4)(C)(i),(D)(i)-(ii).
\28\ See proposed Rule 6.37A-O(a)(3)(B).
\29\ See proposed Rule 6.37A-O(a)(4)(A)(i).
\30\ See id.
\31\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Similar to the proposed RALO, a resting MMALO to buy (sell) that is
displayed one MPV below (above) interest on the Consolidated Book will
trade at its display price.\32\ A resting MMALO to buy (sell) that is
displayed at a price one MPV below (above) the NBO (NBB) will trade at
the NBO (NBB); provided, however, that if the NBO (NBB) updates to lock
or cross the MMALO's display price, such MMALO will trade at its
display price in time priority behind other eligible interest already
displayed at that price.\33\ Each time there is an update to the
MMALO's price, the Exchange will rank the MMALO by time priority behind
other eligible interest already at that price.\34\ If multiple MMALOs
simultaneously reprice to the same price at which they are eligible to
trade, the MMALOs will be prioritized based on the time of original
order entry.\35\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\32\ See proposed Rule 6.37A-O(a)(4)(A)(i)(a).
\33\ See proposed Rule 6.37A-O(a)(4)(A)(i)(b).
\34\ See proposed Rule 6.37A-O(a)(4)(A)(i)(c).
\35\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
To incorporate MMALO (and MMRP discussed below) into existing rule
text, the Exchange proposes to amend Rule 6.37A-O by re-organizing and
re-numbering related rule text regarding the treatment of untraded
incoming quotations. Specifically, the Exchange proposes to provide
that ``[a]ny untraded quantity of an incoming quotation will be added
to the Consolidated Book, except in the circumstances specified below,
which result in the remaining balance being cancelled,'' \36\ including
when the incoming quotation ``is not designated as MMALO or MMRP'' and
locks or crosses the NBBO and when it is designated as MMLO and locks
or crosses undisplayed interest.\37\ Similarly, the Exchange proposes
to modify Rule 6.37A-O(a)(4) to provide that an incoming quotation that
locks or crosses the NBBO would be rejected, so long as ``it is not
designated as MMALO or MMRP'' and cannot trade with interest in the
Consolidated Book at prices that do not trade through the NBBO.\38\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\36\ See proposed Rule 6.37A-O(a)(4)(C).
\37\ See proposed Rule 6.37A-O(a)(4)(C)(i) and (ii).
\38\ See proposed Rule 6.37A-O(a)(4)(D)(i).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
An incoming quotation will be rejected, and the Exchange will
cancel the Market Maker's current quotation on the same side of the
market, if it is designated as MMALO, and has a limit price to buy
(sell) that is more than a configurable number of MPVs above (below)
the initial display price of the MMALO.\39\ The Exchange will determine
the configurable number of MPVs, which will be announced by Trader
Update.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\39\ See proposed Rule 6.37A-O(a)(4)(D)(iii). The Exchange notes
that incoming MMALOs that fail the MPV check are rejected while
similarly-priced RALOs would be accepted and then cancelled. See
Notice, supra note 3, at 53696, n.24. The Exchange also proposes to
re-locate rule text that is currently at the end of this provision
to the beginning, such that the Rules states that ``[a]n incoming
quotation will be rejected, and the Exchange will cancel the Market
Maker's current quotation on the same side of the market, if:''. See
proposed Rule 6.37A-O(a)(4)(D).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Market Maker--Repricing Quotation (``MMRP'')
The Exchange proposes to provide Market Makers the ability to
designate quotations as MMRP.\40\ An incoming or resting quotation
designated as MMRP will never display at a price that locks or crosses
the NBBO.\41\ Instead, after trading with interest in the Consolidated
Book, an incoming MMRP to buy (sell) that locks or crosses the NBO
(NBB) will be displayed at a price that is one MPV below (above) the
NBO (NBB).\42\ If the NBO (NBB) moves up (down), the display price of
the MMRP to buy (sell) and the undisplayed price at which it is
eligible to trade would be continuously adjusted, up (down) to the
MMRP's limit price.\43\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\40\ See proposed Rule 6.37A-O(a)(3)(C) and (a)(4)(B).
\41\ See proposed Rule 6.37A-O(a)(3)(C).
\42\ See proposed Rule 6.37A-O(a)(4)(B).
\43\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Similar to the proposed RPNP, an MMRP to buy (sell) that is
displayed at a price one MPV below (above) the NBO (NBB) will trade at
the NBO (NBB); provided, however, that if the NBO (NBB) updates to lock
or cross the MMRP's display price, such MMRP will trade at its display
price in time priority behind other eligible interest already displayed
at that price.\44\ Each time there is an update to the price of the
MMRP, the Exchange will rank the MMRP by time priority behind other
eligible interest already at that price.\45\ If multiple MMRPs
simultaneously reprice to the same price at which they are eligible to
trade, the MMRPs will be prioritized based on the time of original
order entry.\46\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\44\ See proposed Rule 6.37A-O(a)(4)(B)(i).
\45\ See proposed Rule 6.37A-O(a)(4)(B)(ii).
\46\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
An incoming MMRP that has a limit price more than a configurable
number of MPVs above (below) the initial display price (on arrival)
will first trade with marketable interest in the Consolidated Book up
(down) to the NBO (NBB) and any remaining balance will be
cancelled.\47\ Similarly, the Exchange will reject an incoming MMRP
that does not trade (i.e., because there is no marketable interest in
the Consolidated Book) and has a limit price to buy (sell) that is more
than a configurable number of MPVs above (below) the initial display
price (on arrival) of the MMRP.\48\ The Exchange will determine the
configurable number of MPVs, which will be announced by Trader
Update.\49\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\47\ See proposed Rule 6.37A-O(a)(4)(C)(iii).
\48\ See proposed Rule 6.37A-O(a)(4)(D). The Exchange notes that
incoming MMRPs that fail the MPV check are rejected while similarly-
priced RPNPs would be accepted and then cancelled. See Notice, supra
note 3, at 53696, n.32.
\49\ Because the MMRP is cancelled, the Exchange would also
cancel the opposite-side quote for that Market Maker. See proposed
Rule 6.37A-O(a)(4)(C) (providing, ``[w]hen such quantity of an
incoming quotation is cancelled, the Exchange will also cancel the
Market Maker's current quotation on the opposite side of the
market'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
When a series is not open for trading (i.e., during pre-open or a
trading halt), a Market Maker may submit an MMRP, which will be
eligible to participate in the opening auction and re-opening auction,
as applicable, at the limit price of the MMRP.\50\ All resting
quotations will be cancelled in the event of a trading halt.\51\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\50\ See proposed Rule 6.37A-O(a)(5).
\51\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
To reflect the proposed quotation designations in Rule 6.37A-O, the
Exchange proposes to re-organize paragraph (a) of the Rule by re-
locating rule text stating that ``a quotation will
[[Page 63922]]
not route'' from existing paragraph (a)(3)(D) to paragraph (a)(2);
adding new paragraph (a)(3) to provide that ``[a] Market Maker may
designate a quote as follows''; and re-numbering the remainder of the
paragraph to account for such changes.\52\ In addition, the Exchange
proposes to renumber the description of an MMLO as paragraph (a)(3)(A),
and amend the rule text to provide that on arrival, a quotation
designated MMLO will trade with displayed interest in the Consolidated
Book only.\53\ Once resting, the MMLO designation no longer applies and
such quotation is eligible to trade with displayed and undisplayed
interest.\54\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\52\ See proposed Rule 6.37A-O(a)(2)-(3).
\53\ See proposed Rule 6.37A-O(a)(3)(A).
\54\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Implementation
The Exchange states that it will announce by Trader Update the
implementation date of the proposed rule change within 90 days of the
effective date of this proposed rule change.\55\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\55\ See Notice, supra note 3, at 53697.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
III. Discussion and Commission's Findings
After careful review, the Commission finds that the proposed rule
change, as modified by Amendment No. 1, is consistent with the
requirements of the Act,\56\ and the rules and regulations thereunder
applicable to a national securities exchange.\57\ In particular, the
Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent with
Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\58\ which requires, among other things,
that the rules of a national securities exchange be designed to promote
just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and
coordination with persons engaged in regulating transactions in
securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a
free and open market and a national market system and, in general, to
protect investors and the public interest, and not be designed to
permit unfair discrimination between customers, issuers, brokers, or
dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\56\ 15 U.S.C. 78(f).
\57\ In approving this proposed rule change, the Commission has
considered the proposed rule's impact on efficiency, competition,
and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
\58\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission believes that by providing market participants with
two new order types that build on the existing ALO and PNP Order
functionality to allow for repricing instead of cancellation or
rejection of orders under certain circumstances, the proposed rule
change could give market participants greater flexibility and control
over the circumstances under which their orders interact with contra
side-interest on the Exchange. By increasing the opportunities for
execution at multiple price points and encouraging the provision of
greater displayed liquidity to the market, the proposal is reasonably
designed to facilitate the mechanism of price discovery. The Commission
also believes that ranking a repriced RALO or repriced RPNP behind
other interest already eligible to trade at a price, as well as ranking
such orders that simultaneously reprice to the same price by time of
original order entry, is reasonably designed to preserve the principles
of priority and therefore promote just and equitable principles of
trade. Finally, the Commission notes other options exchanges offer
similar order types as proposed by the Exchange.\59\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\59\ See Notice, supra note 3, at 53697, n.39 (citing Nasdaq
Options Market Chapter VI Trading Systems, Sec. 1(e)(11) and Nasdaq
PHLX LLC Rule 1080(m)(iv)(A)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission notes that the proposal to add the two new quotation
designations is designed to provide Market Makers with the same
functionality for their quotations as are proposed for orders entered
on the Exchange. The proposed quotation designations are similar to how
the proposed RALO and RPNP will function and may enable Market Makers
to exert greater control over how their quotes would interact with
contra-side liquidity, while affording additional opportunities to
provide liquidity to the market. The Commission notes that, absent the
proposed repricing functionality associated with the MMALO and MMRP, a
Market Maker quote that locks or crosses interest on the Exchange or an
away market will reject or cancel. In the case of MMALOs, the proposal
is reasonably designed to promote the display of liquidity because such
quotations would be displayed at the next-best aggressive price instead
of being cancelled. The Commission believes that the proposal will also
ensure that an MMALO will always add liquidity as maker, rather than
remove liquidity as taker, while ensuring that MMALOs priced too far
through the contra-side interest on the Exchange or the NBBO will be
rejected. As such, the proposed MMALO could assist Market Makers in
maintaining a fair and orderly market and encourage Market Makers to
provide displayed liquidity to the market, thus contributing to price
discovery. In the case of MMRPs, the proposal may afford Market Makers
more certainty when providing liquidity, while ensuring that MMRPs
priced too far through the contra-side NBBO will cancel or reject after
trading with any eligible interest on the Exchange. The Commission
believes that ranking the repriced MMALO or repriced MMRP by time
priority behind other interest already available to trade at a price
preserves principles of priority and therefore would promote just and
equitable principles of trade.
Further, the Commission believes that the proposed quotation
designations are reasonably designed to provide Market Makers with a
greater level of determinism, in terms of managing their exposure, and
thus could encourage more aggressive liquidity provision, resulting in
more trading opportunities and tighter spreads. This may help improve
the mechanism of price discovery. Moreover, the Commission notes that
other options exchanges have adopted quote types designed to strengthen
market making.\60\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\60\ See Notice, supra note 3, at 53698, n.45 (citing Miami
International Securities Exchange, LLC Rule 515(d) and BOX Options
Exchange LLC IM-8050-3).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the reasons discussed above, the Commission believes that the
proposed rule change, as modified by Amendment No. 1, is consistent
with the Act.
IV. Conclusion
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the
Act,\61\ that the proposed rule change (SR-NYSEArca-2018-74), as
modified by Amendment No. 1, be, and it hereby is, approved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\61\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\62\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\62\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-26833 Filed 12-11-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P