[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 73 (Monday, April 19, 2021)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 20290-20294]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-07951]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA-HQ-OPP-2019-0385; FRL-10018-60]
Metaflumizone; Pesticide Tolerances
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This regulation establishes tolerances for residues of the
insecticide metaflumizone in or on multiple commodities which are
identified and discussed later in this document. BASF Corporation
requested these tolerances under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic
Act (FFDCA).
DATES: This regulation is effective April 19, 2021. Objections and
requests for hearings must be received on or before June 18, 2021, and
must be filed in accordance with the instructions provided in 40 CFR
part 178 (see also Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).
ADDRESSES: The docket for this action, identified by docket
identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2019-0385, is available at http://www.regulations.gov or at the Office of Pesticide Programs Regulatory
Public Docket (OPP Docket) in the Environmental Protection Agency
Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334,
1301 Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460-0001. The Public
Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public
Reading Room is (202) 566-1744, and the telephone number for the OPP
Docket is (703) 305-5805.
Due to the public health concerns related to COVID-19, the EPA
Docket Center (EPA/DC) and Reading Room is closed to visitors with
limited exceptions. The staff continues to provide remote customer
service via email, phone, and webform. For the latest status
information on EPA/DC services and docket access, visit https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marietta Echeverria, Acting Director,
Registration Division (7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW,
Washington, DC 20460-0001; main telephone number: (703) 305-7090; email
address: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an
agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer.
The following list of North American Industrial Classification System
(NAICS) codes is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a
guide to help readers determine whether this document applies to them.
Potentially affected entities may include:
[[Page 20291]]
Crop production (NAICS code 111).
Animal production (NAICS code 112).
Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311).
Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532).
B. How can I get electronic access to other related information?
You may access a frequently updated electronic version of EPA's
tolerance regulations at 40 CFR part 180 through the Government
Publishing Office's e-CFR site at http://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?&c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title40/40tab_02.tpl.
C. How can I file an objection or hearing request?
Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21 U.S.C. 346a(g), any person may file
an objection to any aspect of this regulation and may also request a
hearing on those objections. You must file your objection or request a
hearing on this regulation in accordance with the instructions provided
in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, you must identify
docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2019-0385 in the subject line on the first
page of your submission. All objections and requests for a hearing must
be in writing and must be received by the Hearing Clerk on or before
June 18, 2021. Addresses for mail and hand delivery of objections and
hearing requests are provided in 40 CFR 178.25(b).
In addition to filing an objection or hearing request with the
Hearing Clerk as described in 40 CFR part 178, please submit a copy of
the filing (excluding any Confidential Business Information (CBI)) for
inclusion in the public docket. Information not marked confidential
pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be disclosed publicly by EPA without
prior notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your objection or hearing
request, identified by docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2019-0385, by one of
the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit
electronically any information you consider to be CBI or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental Protection Agency Docket
Center (EPA/DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC
20460-0001.
Hand Delivery: To make special arrangements for hand
delivery or delivery of boxed information, please follow the
instructions at http://www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html.
Additional instructions on commenting or visiting the docket, along
with more information about dockets generally, is available at http://www.epa.gov/dockets.
II. Summary of Petitioned-For Tolerance
In the Federal Register of August 30, 2019 (84 FR 45702) (FRL-9998-
15), EPA issued a document pursuant to FFDCA section 408(d)(3), 21
U.S.C. 346a(d)(3), announcing the filing of a pesticide petition (PP
8E8707) by BASF Corporation, P.O. Box 13528, Research Triangle Park, NC
27709. That document stated that BASF's petition (summarized by BASF
Corporation in docket ID EPA-HQ-OPP-2019-0385) requested that 40 CFR
180.657 be amended by establishing tolerances for residues of the
insecticide metaflumizone (2-[2-(4-cyanophenyl)-1-[3-
(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]ethylidene]-N-[4-
(trifluoromethoxy)phenyl]hydrazinecarboxamide; E and Z isomers), in or
on apple at 1.0 parts per million (ppm), apple, wet pomace at 3.0 ppm,
coffee at 0.15 ppm, fruit, small, vine climbing, except fuzzy kiwi
fruit, subgroup 13-07F at 5.0 ppm, grape, raisin at 10 ppm, lemon/lime
subgroup 10-10B at 3.0 ppm, lemon/lime subgroup 10-10B, oil at 42 ppm,
melon subgroup 9A at 1.0 ppm, orange subgroup 10-10A at 3.0 ppm, orange
subgroup 10-10A, oil at 42 ppm, cattle, fat at 0.05 ppm, goat, fat at
0.05 ppm, horse, fat at 0.05 ppm, sheep, fat at 0.05 ppm, and milk, fat
at 0.1 ppm. Although the petition summary did not request a tolerance
on apple, wet pomace, the petition itself requested a tolerance on
apple, wet pomace, so EPA included that commodity in the document
published in the Federal Register. There were no substantive comments
received in response to the notice of filing for this pesticide
petition.
Based upon review of the data supporting the referenced petition,
and in accordance with its authority under FFDCA section
408(d)(4)(A)(i), EPA has revised the tolerance levels and commodity
definitions for several of the proposed commodities, established
additional necessary tolerances, and deleted a number of established
tolerances superseded by the newly established import tolerances. The
reasons for these changes are explained in full detail in Unit IV.C.
III. Aggregate Risk Assessment and Determination of Safety
Section 408(b)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA allows EPA to establish a
tolerance (the legal limit for a pesticide chemical residue in or on a
food) only if EPA determines that the tolerance is ``safe.'' Section
408(b)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA defines ``safe'' to mean that ``there is a
reasonable certainty that no harm will result from aggregate exposure
to the pesticide chemical residue, including all anticipated dietary
exposures and all other exposures for which there is reliable
information.'' This includes exposure through drinking water and in
residential settings but does not include occupational exposure.
Section 408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA requires EPA to give special
consideration to exposure of infants and children to the pesticide
chemical residue in establishing a tolerance and to ``ensure that there
is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result to infants and
children from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue. . .
.''
Consistent with FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(D), and the factors
specified in FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(D), EPA has reviewed the available
scientific data and other relevant information in support of this
action. EPA has sufficient data to assess the hazards of and to make a
determination on aggregate exposure for metaflumizone including
exposure resulting from the tolerances established by this action. A
summary of EPA's assessment of exposures and risks associated with
metaflumizone follows.
In an effort to streamline its publications in the Federal
Register, EPA is not reprinting sections that repeat what has been
previously published for tolerance rulemakings of the same pesticide
chemical. Where scientific information concerning a particular chemical
remains unchanged, the content of those sections would not vary between
tolerance rulemakings and republishing the same sections is
unnecessary; EPA considers referral back to those sections as
sufficient to provide an explanation of the information EPA considered
in making its safety determination for the new rulemaking.
EPA has previously published a number of tolerance rulemakings for
metaflumizone, in which EPA concluded, based on the available
information, that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm would
result from aggregate exposure to metaflumizone and established
tolerances for residues of that chemical. EPA is incorporating
previously published sections from those rulemakings as described
further in this rulemaking, as they remain unchanged.
Toxicological Profile. For a discussion of the Toxicological
Profile of metaflumizone, see Unit III.A. of the
[[Page 20292]]
October 30, 2015 rulemaking (80 FR 66795) (FRL-9934-88).
Toxicological Points of Departure/Levels of Concern. For a summary
of the Toxicological Points of Departure/Levels of Concern used for the
safety assessment, see Unit III.B. of the October 30, 2015 rulemaking.
Exposure Assessment. Much of the exposure assessment remains
unchanged from the previous rulemaking, although some updates have
occurred to accommodate exposures from the petitioned-for tolerances.
The updates are discussed in this section; for a description of the
rest of the EPA approach to and assumptions for the exposure
assessment, see Unit III.C. of the October 30, 2015 rulemaking.
EPA's exposure assessments have been updated to include the
additional exposure from imported apple, coffee, melon subgroup 9A,
orange subgroup 10-10A, lemon/lime subgroup 10-10B, small vine climbing
fruit subgroup 13-07F (except fuzzy kiwifruit), milk fat, and ruminant
fat for the combined residues of metaflumizone (E-Z isomer ratio of
>9:1). The acute and chronic dietary analyses for metaflumizone for
this action assumed tolerance-level residues, 100% crop treated, and
2018 default processing factors when necessary, except for citrus
juice, which used empirical processing factor for citrus juice. The
modeled estimates of drinking water concentrations and the Agency's
assessment of residential, or non-occupational exposure remain the same
as in the October 30, 2015 rulemaking, as the residues on imported
commodities do not impact the drinking water exposures or residential
exposures. The Agency's position regarding cumulative risk also remains
the same.
Safety Factor for Infants and Children. EPA continues to retain the
Food Quality Protection Act (FQPA) safety factor of 10x for inhalation
exposure scenarios, while continuing to conclude that there is reliable
data showing that the safety of infants and children would be
adequately protected if the FQPA SF were reduced from 10x to 3x for all
oral exposure scenarios and reduced to 1x for dermal exposures. The
reasons for that decision are articulated in Unit III.D. of the October
30, 2015 rulemaking.
Aggregate Risks and Determination of Safety. EPA determines whether
acute and chronic dietary pesticide exposures are safe by comparing
aggregate exposure estimates to the acute PAD (aPAD) and chronic PAD
(cPAD). Short-, intermediate-, and chronic-term risks are evaluated by
comparing the estimated aggregate food, water, and residential exposure
to the appropriate PODs to ensure that an adequate MOE exists. For
linear cancer risks, EPA calculates the lifetime probability of
acquiring cancer given the estimated aggregate exposure.
The acute and chronic dietary estimates for metaflumizone were
found not to be of concern for the U.S. general population and all
population subgroups and are below the Agency's level of concern (LOC)
(<100% of the acute population adjusted dose (aPAD) and chronic
population adjusted dose (cPAD), respectively). An acute endpoint of
concern was not identified in the toxicological database for the
general U.S. population including infants and children. Acute dietary
risks for metaflumizone are below the Agency's LOC: 5.3% of the aPAD at
the 95th percentile for females 13-49 years of age, the population
group with the highest exposure; and chronic risks are below the
Agency's LOC: 65% of the cPAD for children 1-2 years old, the most
highly exposed population subgroup. Metaflumizone is classified as
``Not Likely to be Carcinogenic to Humans.'' Therefore, EPA does not
expect exposure to metaflumizone to pose a cancer risk.
Since metaflumizone is registered for uses that could result in
short-term residential exposure, EPA evaluated the potential for short-
term risk by aggregating chronic exposure through food and water with
short-term residential exposures to metaflumizone. Since the LOC for
the various routes of exposure differ, the aggregate risk estimates
were calculated using the Aggregate Risk Index (ARI) approach (LOC for
ARI <1). The short-term aggregate assessment combined food + drinking
water exposure with the highest potential residential post-application
exposure (high-contact activity on turf). The aggregate ARIs are
greater than 1; therefore, EPA concludes there is no short-term risk of
concern. Although only short-term residential exposure is anticipated,
the short-term assessment is protective of intermediate-term exposure
since the short- and intermediate-term PODs/LOCs are identical.
Determination of Safety. Based on the risk assessments and
information described above, EPA concludes there is a reasonable
certainty that no harm will result to the U.S. general population, or
to infants and children, from aggregate exposure to metaflumizone
residues. More detailed information on the subject action can be found
at http://www.regulations.gov in the documents entitled
``Metaflumizone: Human Health Risk Assessment in Support of Section 3
Registrations for Application of Metaflumizone to Pome Fruit (crop
group (CG) 11-10) and Stone Fruit (CG 12-12); Updating the CG
Designation for Citrus to 10-10 and Tree Nuts to 14-12; and Permitting
Aerial Application to Citrus Fruits, Grapes, Tree Nuts, and Nurseries
Containing Field-/Container-Grown Nonbearing Stone and Pome Fruit
Trees,'' dated September 29, 2015 (docket ID EPA-HQ-OPP-2014-0607), and
``Metaflumizone: Human Health Risk Assessment in Support of Tolerances
Without a U.S. Registration in/on Apple, Coffee, Melon Subgroup 9A,
Orange Subgroup 10-10A, Lemon/Lime Subgroup 10-10B, Grape, Milk Fat,
and Ruminant Fat,'' dated December 7, 2020 (docket ID EPA-HQ-OPP-2019-
0385).
IV. Other Considerations
A. Analytical Enforcement Methodology
For a discussion of the available analytical enforcement method,
see Unit IV.A. of the October 30, 2015 rulemaking.
B. International Residue Limits
In making its tolerance decisions, EPA seeks to harmonize U.S.
tolerances with international standards whenever possible, consistent
with U.S. food safety standards and agricultural practices. EPA
considers the international maximum residue limits (MRLs) established
by the Codex Alimentarius Commission (Codex), as required by FFDCA
section 408(b)(4). Codex is a joint United Nations Food and Agriculture
Organization/World Health Organization food standards program, and it
is recognized as an international food safety standards-setting
organization in trade agreements to which the United States is a party.
Although EPA may establish a tolerance that is different from a Codex
MRL, FFDCA section 408(b)(4) requires that EPA explain the reasons for
departing from the Codex level.
While Codex has not yet established MRLs on the commodities
mentioned in this document, it has proposed MRLs in/on most of the
relevant commodities. EPA notes that the U.S. and Codex residue
definitions differ in that the U.S. tolerance expression includes
metaflumizone (E- and Z-isomers) and M320I04 while Codex includes only
metaflumizone (E- and Z-isomers). EPA is harmonizing its U.S.
tolerances with most of the proposed Codex MRLs for apple, coffee,
grape, melon subgroup 9A, orange subgroup 10-10A, orange oil, raisin,
milk fat, and fat (cattle, goat, horse, and sheep). EPA is not
[[Page 20293]]
harmonizing the U.S. tolerance on lemon/lime subgroup 10-10B with the
Codex MRL since the Codex MRL is less than that calculated by EPA using
the submitted residue data and the OECD tolerance calculation
procedure.
C. Revisions to Petitioned-For Tolerances
Based upon review of data and supporting materials for this
petition, EPA is establishing tolerances for the following commodities
requested using the Agency's preferred commodity terminology: Instead
of establishing a tolerance for coffee, as requested, the Agency is
establishing a tolerance for coffee, green bean. In addition, based
upon supporting data and harmonization with proposed Codex MRLs, the
Agency is establishing a tolerance level lower than requested for Apple
at 0.9 ppm, and tolerance levels higher than requested for grape,
raisin at 13 ppm; lemon/lime subgroup 10-10B, oil at 100 ppm; and
orange subgroup 10-10A, oil at 100 ppm. Further, since importation of
ruminant commodities is also a probability and based on the livestock
dietary burdens, EPA is also establishing tolerances for milk fat and
ruminant fat tolerances in or on cattle, fat at 0.15 ppm; goat, fat at
0.15 ppm; horse, fat at 0.15 ppm; sheep, fat at 0.15 ppm; and milk, fat
at 0.6 ppm.
V. Conclusion
Therefore, tolerances are established for residues of the
insecticide metaflumizone (2-[2-(4-cyanophenyl)-1-[3-
(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]ethylidene]-N-[4-
(trifluoromethoxy)phenyl]hydrazinecarboxamide; E and Z isomers), in or
on apple at 0.9 parts per million (ppm); apple, wet pomace at 3 ppm;
coffee, green bean at 0.15 ppm; grape, raisin at 13 ppm; grapefruit
subgroup 10-10C at 0.04 ppm; lemon/lime subgroup 10-10B at 3 ppm;
lemon/lime subgroup 10-10B, oil at 100 ppm; melon subgroup 9A at 1 ppm;
orange subgroup 10-10A at 3 ppm; orange subgroup 10-10A, oil at 100
ppm; cattle, fat at 0.15 ppm; goat, fat at 0.15 ppm; horse, fat at 0.15
ppm; milk, fat at 0.6 ppm; and sheep, fat at 0.15 ppm. In addition, the
existing tolerance for ``fruit, pome, group 11-10,'' is amended to
clarify that that entry now excludes apple, due to the establishment of
a separate apple tolerance in this rulemaking and the existing
tolerance for grape is amended to raise the tolerance level from 0.04
ppm to 5 ppm. Finally, EPA is removing the tolerance for ``fruit,
citrus, group 10-10'' because it is superseded by the newly established
tolerances for each of the fruit, citrus, group 10-10 subgroups.
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
This action establishes tolerances under FFDCA section 408(d) in
response to a petition submitted to the Agency. The Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted these types of actions from
review under Executive Order 12866, entitled ``Regulatory Planning and
Review'' (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993). Because this action has been
exempted from review under Executive Order 12866, this action is not
subject to Executive Order 13211, entitled ``Actions Concerning
Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or
Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001) or Executive Order 13045, entitled
``Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997) or Executive Order 13771,
entitled ``Reducing Regulations and Controlling Regulatory Costs'' (82
FR 9339, February 3, 2017). This action does not contain any
information collections subject to OMB approval under the Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), nor does it require any
special considerations under Executive Order 12898, entitled ``Federal
Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and
Low-Income Populations'' (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
Since tolerances and exemptions that are established on the basis
of a petition under FFDCA section 408(d), such as the tolerance in this
final rule, do not require the issuance of a proposed rule, the
requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.), do not apply.
This action directly regulates growers, food processors, food
handlers, and food retailers, not States or tribes, nor does this
action alter the relationships or distribution of power and
responsibilities established by Congress in the preemption provisions
of FFDCA section 408(n)(4). As such, the Agency has determined that
this action will not have a substantial direct effect on States or
tribal governments, on the relationship between the National Government
and the States or tribal governments, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government or between
the Federal Government and Indian tribes. Thus, the Agency has
determined that Executive Order 13132, entitled ``Federalism'' (64 FR
43255, August 10, 1999) and Executive Order 13175, entitled
``Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments'' (65 FR
67249, November 9, 2000) do not apply to this action. In addition, this
action does not impose any enforceable duty or contain any unfunded
mandate as described under Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
(UMRA) (2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.).
This action does not involve any technical standards that would
require Agency consideration of voluntary consensus standards pursuant
to section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act (NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note).
VII. Congressional Review Act
Pursuant to the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.),
EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required
information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of
the rule in the Federal Register. This action is not a ``major rule''
as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: April 8, 2021.
Marietta Echeverria,
Acting Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.
Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is amended as follows:
PART 180--TOLERANCES AND EXEMPTIONS FOR PESTICIDE CHEMICAL RESIDUES
IN FOOD
0
1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
0
2. In Sec. 180.657:
0
a. Designate paragraph (a) introductory text as paragraph (a)(1) and
revise newly designated paragraph (a)(1) introductory text;
0
b. In the table in newly designated paragraph (a)(1):
0
i. Add a heading for the table;
0
ii. Add entries for ``Apple,'' ``Apple, wet pomace,'' and ``Coffee,
green bean'' in alphabetical order;
0
iii. Remove the entries for ``Fruit, citrus, group 10-10,'' ``Fruit,
pome, group 11-10,'' and ``Fruit, stone, group 12-12'';
0
iv. Add the entry ``Fruit, pome, group 11-10, except apple'' in
alphabetical order;
0
v. Revise the entry for ``Grape'';
0
vi. Add entries for ``Grape, raisin,'' ``Grapefruit subgroup 10-10C,''
``Lemon/lime subgroup 10-10B,''
[[Page 20294]]
``Lemon/lime subgroup 10-10B, oil,'' ``Melon subgroup 9A,'' ``Orange
subgroup 10-10A,'' and ``Orange subgroup 10-10A, oil'' in alphabetical
order; and
0
vii. Revise footnote 1; and
0
c. Add paragraph (a)(2).
The additions and revisions read as follows:
Sec. 180.657 Metaflumizone; tolerances for residues.
(a) General. (1) Tolerances are established for residues of the
insecticide metaflumizone, including its metabolites and degradates, in
or on the commodities listed in table 1 to this paragraph (a)(1).
Compliance with the tolerance levels specified in this paragraph (a)(1)
is to be determined by measuring only the sum of metaflumizone (E and Z
isomers; 2-[2-(4-cyanophenyl)-1-[3-(trifluoromethyl)
phenyl]ethylidene]-N-[4-(trifluoromethoxy)phenyl] hydrazinecarboxamide)
and its metabolite 4-{2-oxo-2-[3-(trifluoromethyl) phenyl]ethyl{time} -
benzonitrile, calculated as the stoichiometric equivalent of
metaflumizone, in or on the following commodities:
Table 1 to Paragraph (a)(1)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Parts per
Commodity million
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
Apple...................................................... 0.9
Apple, wet pomace.......................................... 3
Coffee, green bean 1....................................... 0.15
* * * * *
Fruit, pome, group 11-10, except apple..................... 0.04
Grape...................................................... 5
Grape, raisin.............................................. 13
Grapefruit subgroup 10-10C................................. 0.04
Lemon/lime subgroup 10-10B................................. 3
Lemon/lime subgroup 10-10B, oil............................ 100
Melon subgroup 9A 1........................................ 1
* * * * *
Orange subgroup 10-10A..................................... 3
Orange subgroup 10-10A, oil................................ 100
* * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are no U.S. registrations for this commodity as of April 19,
2021.
(2) Tolerances are established for residues of the insecticide
metaflumizone, including its metabolites and degradates, in or on the
commodities listed in table 2 to this paragraph (a)(2). Compliance with
the tolerance levels specified in this paragraph (a)(2) is to be
determined by measuring only metaflumizone (E and Z isomers; 2-[2-(4-
cyanophenyl)-1-[3-(trifluoromethyl) phenyl]ethylidene]-N-[4-
(trifluoromethoxy)phenyl] hydrazinecarboxamide) in or on the following
animal commodities:
Table 2 to Paragraph (a)(2)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Parts per
Commodity million
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cattle, fat................................................ 0.15
Goat, fat.................................................. 0.15
Horse, fat................................................. 0.15
Milk, fat.................................................. 0.6
Sheep, fat................................................. 0.15
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2021-07951 Filed 4-16-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P