[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 197 (Friday, October 15, 2021)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 57378-57385]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-22317]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 197 / Friday, October 15, 2021 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 57378]]
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
10 CFR Part 430
[EERE-2017-BT-STD-0003]
RIN 1904-AD80
Energy Conservation Program: Energy Conservation Standards for
Refrigerators, Refrigerator-Freezers, and Freezers, Webinar and
Availability of the Preliminary Technical Support Document
AGENCY: Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Department of
Energy.
ACTION: Notification of a webinar and availability of preliminary
technical support document.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Energy (``DOE'' or ``the Department'')
will hold a webinar to discuss and receive comments on the preliminary
analysis it has conducted for purposes of evaluating energy
conservation standards for refrigerators, refrigerator-freezers, and
freezers. The webinar will cover the analytical framework, models, and
tools used to evaluate potential standards for these products; the
results of preliminary analyses performed for these products; the
potential energy conservation standard levels derived from these
analyses that could be considered for these products should DOE
determine that proposed amendments are necessary; and any other issues
relevant to the evaluation of energy conservation standards for
refrigerators, refrigerator-freezers, and freezers.
DATES:
Meeting: DOE will hold a webinar on Wednesday, December 1, 2021,
from 1:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m. See section IV, ``Public Participation,''
for webinar registration information, participant instructions and
information about the capabilities available to webinar participants.
Comments: Written comments and information will be accepted on or
before, December 29, 2021.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are encouraged to submit comments using
the Federal eRulemaking Portal at www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments. Alternatively, interested persons
may submit comments, identified by docket number EERE-2017-BT-STD-0003
and/or RIN number 1904-AD80, by any of the following methods:
1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
2. Email: To [email protected]. Include
docket number EERE-2017-BT-STD-0003 in the subject line of the message.
No telefacsimiles (``faxes'') will be accepted. For detailed
instructions on submitting comments and additional information on this
process, see section IV of this document.
Although DOE has routinely accepted public comment submissions
through a variety of mechanisms, including the Federal eRulemaking
Portal, email, postal mail, or hand delivery/courier, the Department
has found it necessary to make temporary modifications to the comment
submission process in light of the ongoing corona virus 2019 (COVID-19)
pandemic. DOE is currently suspending receipt of public comments via
postal mail and hand delivery/courier. If a commenter finds that this
change poses an undue hardship, please contact Appliance Standards
Program staff at (202) 586-1445 to discuss the need for alternative
arrangements. Once the COVID-19 pandemic health emergency is resolved,
DOE anticipates resuming all of its regular options for public comment
submission, including postal mail and hand delivery/courier.
Docket: The docket for this activity, which includes Federal
Register notices, comments, public meeting transcripts, and other
supporting documents/materials, is available for review at
www.regulations.gov. All documents in the docket are listed in the
www.regulations.gov index. However, some documents listed in the index,
such as those containing information that is exempt from public
disclosure, may not be publicly available.
The docket web page can be found at www.regulations.gov/docket/EERE-2017-BT-STD-0003. The docket web page contains instructions on how
to access all documents, including public comments in the docket. See
section IV for information on how to submit comments through
www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dr. Stephanie Johnson, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy
Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Building Technologies, EE-2J, 1000
Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20585-0121. Telephone: (202)
287-1943. Email: [email protected].
Mr. Michael Kido, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of the General
Counsel, GC-33, 1000 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20585-0121.
Telephone: (202) 586-8145. Email: [email protected].
For further information on how to submit a comment, review other
public comments and the docket, or participate in the webinar, contact
the Appliance and Equipment Standards Program staff at (202) 287-1445
or by email: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Introduction
A. Authority
B. Rulemaking Process
II. Background
A. Current Standards
B. Current Process
III. Summary of the Analyses Performed by DOE
A. Engineering Analysis
B. Markups Analysis
C. Energy Use Analysis
D. Life-Cycle Cost and Payback Period Analyses
E. National Impact Analysis
IV. Public Participation
A. Participation in the Webinar
B. Procedure for Submitting Prepared General Statements for
Distribution
C. Conduct of the Webinar
D. Submission of Comments
V. Approval of the Office of the Secretary
I. Introduction
A. Authority
The Energy Policy and Conservation Act, as amended (``EPCA''),\1\
authorizes the United States Department of Energy (``DOE'') to regulate
the energy
[[Page 57379]]
efficiency of a number of consumer products and certain industrial
equipment. (42 U.S.C. 6291-6317) Title III, Part B \2\ of EPCA
established the Energy Conservation Program for Consumer Products Other
Than Automobiles. These products include refrigerators, refrigerator-
freezers, and freezers, the subject of this document. (42 U.S.C.
6292(a)(1))
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ All references to EPCA in this document refer to the statute
as amended through the Energy Act of 2020, Public Law 116-260 (Dec.
27, 2020).
\2\ For editorial reasons, upon codification in the U.S. Code,
Part B was redesignated Part A.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
EPCA prescribed energy conservation standards for these products
(42 U.S.C. 6295(b)(1)-(2)), and directed DOE to conduct three cycles of
rulemakings to determine whether to amend these standards. (42 U.S.C.
6295(b)(3)(A)(i), (b)(3)(B), and (b)(4)) DOE has completed these
rulemakings.
EPCA further provides that, not later than 6 years after the
issuance of any final rule establishing or amending a standard, DOE
must publish either a notification of determination that standards for
the product do not need to be amended, or a notice of proposed
rulemaking (``NOPR'') including new proposed energy conservation
standards (proceeding to a final rule, as appropriate). (42 U.S.C.
6295(m)(1)) Not later than three years after issuance of a final
determination not to amend standards, DOE must publish either a notice
of determination that standards for the product do not need to be
amended, or a NOPR including new proposed energy conservation standards
(proceeding to a final rule, as appropriate). (42 U.S.C. 6295(m)(3)(B))
Under EPCA, any new or amended energy conservation standard must be
designed to achieve the maximum improvement in energy efficiency that
DOE determines is technologically feasible and economically justified.
(42 U.S.C. 6295(o)(2)(A)) Furthermore, the new or amended standard must
result in a significant conservation of energy. (42 U.S.C.
6295(o)(3)(B))
DOE is publishing this Preliminary Analysis to collect data and
information to inform its decision consistent with its obligations
under EPCA.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Written comments on the subjects described in this document
are encouraged. To help inform interested parties and to facilitate
this process, an agenda, a preliminary technical support document,
and briefing materials are all available for review at:
www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/appliance_standards/standards.aspx?productid=37&action=viewlive.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Rulemaking Process
DOE must follow specific statutory criteria for prescribing new or
amended standards for covered products, including refrigerators,
refrigerators, refrigerator-freezers, and freezers. EPCA requires that
any new or amended energy conservation standard prescribed by the
Secretary of Energy (``Secretary'') be designed to achieve the maximum
improvement in energy efficiency (or water efficiency for certain
products specified by EPCA) that is technologically feasible and
economically justified. (42 U.S.C. 6295(o)(2)(A)) Furthermore, DOE may
not adopt any standard that would not result in the significant
conservation of energy. (42 U.S.C. 6295(o)(3)) The Secretary may not
prescribe an amended or new standard that will not result in
significant conservation of energy, or is not technologically feasible
or economically justified. (Id.)
On February 14, 2020, DOE published an update to its procedures,
interpretations, and policies for consideration in new or revised
energy conservation standards and test procedure, i.e., ``Procedures,
Interpretations, and Policies for Consideration of New or Revised
Energy Conservation Standards and Test Procedures for Consumer Products
and Certain Commercial/Industrial Equipment'' (see 10 CFR part 430,
subpart C, appendix A (``Process Rule,'')).\4\ 85 FR 8626. In the
current Process Rule, DOE applies a significance threshold for energy
savings under which DOE employs a two-step approach that considers both
an absolute site energy savings threshold and a percentage reduction
threshold in the energy use of the covered product (or equipment). See
Process Rule, Sec. 6(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ On January 20, 2021, the President issued Executive Order
13990, Protecting Public Health and the Environment and Restoring
Science to Tackle the Climate Crisis. Exec. Order No. 13,990, 86 FR
7037 (Jan. 25, 2021) (``E.O. 13990''). E.O. 13990 affirms the
Nation's commitment to empower our workers and communities; promote
and protect our public health and the environment; and conserve our
national treasures and monuments. To that end, the stated policies
of E.O. 13990 include: Improving public health and protecting our
environment; ensuring access to clean air and water; and reducing
greenhouse gas emissions. E.O. 13990 section 1. Section 2 of E.O.
13990 directs agencies, in part, to immediately review all existing
regulations, orders, guidance documents, policies, and any other
similar agency actions (``agency actions'') promulgated, issued, or
adopted between January 20, 2017, and January 20, 2021, that are or
may be inconsistent with, or present obstacles to, the policy set
forth in the Executive Order. E.O. 13990 section 2. In addition,
section 2(iii) of E.O. 13990 specifically directs DOE to, as
appropriate and consistent with applicable law, publishing for
notice and comment a proposed rule suspending, revising, or
rescinding the updated Process Rule. In response to this directive,
DOE has undertaken a review of the updated Process Rule at this
time. See 86 FR 18901 (April 12, 2021) (proposing revisions to the
current Process Rule). See also 86 FR 35668 (July 7, 2021)
(proposing further revisions to the Process Rule).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DOE first evaluates the projected energy savings from a potential
maximum technologically feasible (``max-tech'') standard over a 30-year
period against a site-based energy savings threshold of 0.3 quad.
Process Rule, Sec. 6(b)(2). If the 0.3 quad threshold is not met, DOE
then compares the max-tech savings to the total energy usage of the
covered product to calculate a percentage reduction in energy usage.
Process Rule, Sec. 6(b)(3). If this comparison does not yield a
reduction in site energy use of at least 10 percent over a 30-year
period, the analysis will end and DOE will propose to determine that no
significant energy savings would likely result from setting new or
amended standards. Process Rule, Sec. 6(b)(4). If either one of the
thresholds is reached, DOE will conduct analyses to ascertain whether a
standard can be prescribed that produces the maximum improvement in
energy efficiency that is both technologically feasible and
economically justified and still constitutes significant energy savings
at the level determined to be economically justified. Process Rule,
Sec. 6(b)(5). This two-step approach currently serves as the means for
enabling DOE to help ensure it avoids setting a standard that ``will
not result in significant conservation of energy.'' (42 U.S.C.
6295(o)(3)(B))
EPCA defines ``energy efficiency'' as the ratio of the useful
output of services from a consumer product to the energy use of such
product, measured according to the Federal test procedures. (42 U.S.C.
6291(5), emphasis added) EPCA defines ``energy use'' as the quantity of
energy directly consumed by a consumer product at point of use, as
measured by the Federal test procedures. (42 U.S.C. 6291(4)) Further,
EPCA uses a household energy consumption metric as a threshold for
setting standards for newly covered products. See 42 U.S.C. 6295(l)(1).
See also 42 U.S.C. 6292(b) (authorizing the Secretary to classify a
type of consumer product as a covered product provided certain criteria
are met). Given this context, DOE relies on site energy as the
appropriate metric for evaluating the significance of energy savings.
To determine whether a standard is economically justified, EPCA
requires that DOE determine whether the benefits of the standard exceed
its burdens by considering, to the greatest extent practicable, the
following seven factors:
(1) The economic impact of the standard on the manufacturers and
consumers of the products subject to the standard;
(2) The savings in operating costs throughout the estimated
average life of the covered products in the type (or class)
[[Page 57380]]
compared to any increase in the price, initial charges, or
maintenance expenses for the covered products that are likely to
result from the standard;
(3) The total projected amount of energy (or as applicable,
water) savings likely to result directly from the standard;
(4) Any lessening of the utility or the performance of the
products likely to result from the standard;
(5) The impact of any lessening of competition, as determined in
writing by the Attorney General, that is likely to result from the
standard;
(6) The need for national energy and water conservation; and
(7) Other factors the Secretary of Energy (Secretary) considers
relevant.
(42 U.S.C. 6295(o)(2)(B)(i)(I)-(VII))
DOE fulfills these and other applicable requirements by conducting
a series of analyses throughout the rulemaking process. Table I.1 shows
the individual analyses that are performed to satisfy each of the
requirements within EPCA.
Table I.1--EPCA Requirements and Corresponding DOE Analysis
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EPCA requirement Corresponding DOE analysis
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Significant Energy Savings............. Shipments Analysis.
National Impact Analysis.
Energy Use Analysis.
Technological Feasibility.............. Market and Technology Assessment.
Screening Analysis.
Engineering Analysis.
Economic Justification:
1. Economic impact on manufacturers Manufacturer Impact Analysis.
and consumers. Life-Cycle Cost and Payback Period Analysis.
Life-Cycle Cost Subgroup Analysis.
Shipments Analysis.
2. Lifetime operating cost savings Markups for Product Price Analysis.
compared to increased cost for the Energy Use Analysis.
product. Life-Cycle Cost and Payback Period Analysis.
3. Total projected energy savings.. Shipments Analysis.
National Impact Analysis.
4. Impact on utility or performance Screening Analysis.
Engineering Analysis.
5. Impact of any lessening of Manufacturer Impact Analysis.
competition.
6. Need for national energy and Shipments Analysis.
water conservation. National Impact Analysis.
7. Other factors the Secretary Employment Impact Analysis.
considers relevant. Utility Impact Analysis.
Emissions Analysis.
Monetization of Emission Reductions Benefits.
Regulatory Impact Analysis.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Further, EPCA establishes a rebuttable presumption that a standard
is economically justified if the Secretary finds that the additional
cost to the consumer of purchasing a product complying with an energy
conservation standard level will be less than three times the value of
the energy savings during the first year that the consumer will receive
as a result of the standard, as calculated under the applicable test
procedure. (42 U.S.C. 6295(o)(2)(B)(iii))
EPCA also contains what is known as an ``anti-backsliding''
provision, which prevents the Secretary from prescribing any amended
standard that either increases the maximum allowable energy use or
decreases the minimum required energy efficiency of a covered product.
(42 U.S.C. 6295(o)(1)) Also, the Secretary may not prescribe an amended
or new standard if interested persons have established by a
preponderance of the evidence that the standard is likely to result in
the unavailability in the United States in any covered product type (or
class) of performance characteristics (including reliability),
features, sizes, capacities, and volumes that are substantially the
same as those generally available in the United States. (42 U.S.C.
6295(o)(4))
Additionally, EPCA specifies requirements when promulgating an
energy conservation standard for a covered product that has two or more
subcategories. DOE must specify a different standard level for a type
or class of product that has the same function or intended use, if DOE
determines that products within such group: (A) Consume a different
kind of energy from that consumed by other covered products within such
type (or class); or (B) have a capacity or other performance-related
feature which other products within such type (or class) do not have
and such feature justifies a higher or lower standard. (42 U.S.C.
6295(q)(1)) In determining whether a performance-related feature
justifies a different standard for a group of products, DOE must
consider such factors as the utility to the consumer of the feature and
other factors DOE deems appropriate. Id. Any rule prescribing such a
standard must include an explanation of the basis on which such higher
or lower level was established. (42 U.S.C. 6295(q)(2))
Finally, pursuant to the amendments contained in the Energy
Independence and Security Act of 2007 (``EISA 2007''), Public Law 110-
140, any final rule for new or amended energy conservation standards
promulgated after July 1, 2010, is required to address standby mode and
off mode energy use. (42 U.S.C. 6295(gg)(3)) Specifically, when DOE
adopts a standard for a covered product after that date, it must, if
justified by the criteria for adoption of standards under EPCA (42
U.S.C. 6295(o)), incorporate standby mode and off mode energy use into
a single standard, or, if that is not feasible, adopt a separate
standard for such energy use for that product. (42 U.S.C.
6295(gg)(3)(A)-(B)) DOE's current test procedures for refrigerators,
refrigerator-freezers, and freezers measure the energy use of these
products during extended time periods that include periods when the
compressor and other key components are cycled off. All of the energy
these products use during the ``off cycles'' is already included in the
[[Page 57381]]
measurements. By measuring the energy use during ``off cycles,'' the
current test procedures already address EPCA's requirement to include
standby mode and off mode energy consumption in the overall energy
descriptor. As a result, DOE's current energy conservation standards
and any amended energy conservation standards would account for such
energy use.
Before proposing a standard, DOE seeks public input on the
analytical framework, models, and tools that DOE intends to use to
evaluate standards for the product at issue and the results of the
preliminary analyses DOE performed for the product.
DOE is examining whether to amend the current standards pursuant to
its obligations under EPCA. This document announces the availability of
the preliminary technical support document (``TSD''), which details the
preliminary analyses and summarizes the preliminary results of DOE's
analyses. In addition, DOE is announcing a public meeting to solicit
feedback from interested parties on its analytical framework, models,
and preliminary results.
II. Background
A. Current Standards
In a final rule published on September 15, 2011 (``September 2011
Final Rule''), DOE prescribed the current energy conservation standards
for refrigerators, refrigerator-freezers, and freezers manufactured on
and after September 15, 2014. 76 FR 57516. These standards are set
forth in DOE's regulations at 10 CFR part 430, section 32(a) and are
repeated in Table II.1.
Table II.1--Federal Energy Conservation Standards for Refrigerators, Refrigerator-Freezers, and Freezers
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Equations for maximum energy use (kWh/yr)
Product class ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Based on AV (ft\3\) Based on av (L)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Refrigerator-freezers and 7.99AV + 225.0 0.282av + 225.0
refrigerators other than all-
refrigerators with manual defrost.
1A. All-refrigerators--manual defrost.. 6.79AV + 193.6 0.240av + 193.6
2. Refrigerator-freezers--partial 7.99AV + 225.0 0.282av + 225.0
automatic defrost.
3. Refrigerator-freezers--automatic 8.07AV + 233.7 0.285av + 233.7
defrost with top-mounted freezer
without an automatic icemaker.
3-BI. Built-in refrigerator-freezer-- 9.15AV + 264.9 0.323av + 264.9
automatic defrost with top-mounted
freezer without an automatic icemaker.
3I. Refrigerator-freezers--automatic 8.07AV + 317.7 0.285av + 317.7
defrost with top-mounted freezer with
an automatic icemaker without through-
the-door ice service.
3I-BI. Built-in refrigerator-freezers-- 9.15AV + 348.9 0.323av + 348.9
automatic defrost with top-mounted
freezer with an automatic icemaker
without through-the-door ice service.
3A. All-refrigerators--automatic 7.07AV + 201.6 0.250av + 201.6
defrost.
3A-BI. Built-in All-refrigerators-- 8.02AV + 228.5 0.283av + 228.5
automatic defrost.
4. Refrigerator-freezers--automatic 8.51AV + 297.8 0.301av + 297.8
defrost with side-mounted freezer
without an automatic icemaker.
4-BI. Built-In Refrigerator-freezers-- 10.22AV + 357.4 0.361av + 357.4
automatic defrost with side-mounted
freezer without an automatic icemaker.
4I. Refrigerator-freezers--automatic 8.51AV + 381.8 0.301av + 381.8
defrost with side-mounted freezer with
an automatic icemaker without through-
the-door ice service.
4I-BI. Built-In Refrigerator-freezers-- 10.22AV + 441.4 0.361av + 441.4
automatic defrost with side-mounted
freezer with an automatic icemaker
without through-the-door ice service.
5. Refrigerator-freezers--automatic 8.85AV + 317.0 0.312av + 317.0
defrost with bottom-mounted freezer
without an automatic icemaker.
5-BI. Built-In Refrigerator-freezers-- 9.40AV + 336.9 0.332av + 336.9
automatic defrost with bottom-mounted
freezer without an automatic icemaker.
5I. Refrigerator-freezers--automatic 8.85AV + 401.0 0.312av + 401.0
defrost with bottom-mounted freezer
with an automatic icemaker without
through-the-door ice service.
5I-BI. Built-In Refrigerator-freezers-- 9.40AV + 420.9 0.332av + 420.9
automatic defrost with bottom-mounted
freezer with an automatic icemaker
without through-the-door ice service.
5A. Refrigerator-freezer--automatic 9.25AV + 475.4 0.327av + 475.4
defrost with bottom-mounted freezer
with through-the-door ice service.
5A-BI. Built-in refrigerator-freezer-- 9.83AV + 499.9 0.347av + 499.9
automatic defrost with bottom-mounted
freezer with through-the-door ice
service.
6. Refrigerator-freezers--automatic 8.40AV + 385.4 0.297av + 385.4
defrost with top-mounted freezer with
through-the-door ice service.
7. Refrigerator-freezers--automatic 8.54AV + 432.8 0.302av + 432.8
defrost with side-mounted freezer with
through-the-door ice service.
7-BI. Built-In Refrigerator-freezers-- 10.25AV + 502.6 0.362av + 502.6
automatic defrost with side-mounted
freezer with through-the-door ice
service.
8. Upright freezers with manual defrost 5.57AV + 193.7 0.197av + 193.7
9. Upright freezers with automatic 8.62AV + 228.3 0.305av + 228.3
defrost without an automatic icemaker.
9I. Upright freezers with automatic 8.62AV + 312.3 0.305av + 312.3
defrost with an automatic icemaker.
9-BI. Built-In Upright freezers with 9.86AV + 260.9 0.348av + 260.9
automatic defrost without an automatic
icemaker.
9I-BI. Built-in upright freezers with 9.86AV + 344.9 0.348av + 344.9
automatic defrost with an automatic
icemaker.
10. Chest freezers and all other 7.29AV + 107.8 0.257av + 107.8
freezers except compact freezers.
10A. Chest freezers with automatic 10.24AV + 148.1 0.362av + 148.1
defrost.
11. Compact refrigerator-freezers and 9.03AV + 252.3 0.319av + 252.3
refrigerators other than all-
refrigerators with manual defrost.
11A.Compact all-refrigerators--manual 7.84AV + 219.1 0.277av + 219.1
defrost.
12. Compact refrigerator-freezers-- 5.91AV + 335.8 0.209av + 335.8
partial automatic defrost.
13. Compact refrigerator-freezers-- 11.80AV + 339.2 0.417av + 339.2
automatic defrost with top-mounted
freezer.
[[Page 57382]]
13I. Compact refrigerator-freezers-- 11.80AV + 423.2 0.417av + 423.2
automatic defrost with top-mounted
freezer with an automatic icemaker.
13A. Compact all-refrigerators-- 9.17AV + 259.3 0.324av + 259.3
automatic defrost.
14. Compact refrigerator-freezers-- 6.82AV + 456.9 0.241av + 456.9
automatic defrost with side-mounted
freezer.
14I. Compact refrigerator-freezers-- 6.82AV + 540.9 0.241av + 540.9
automatic defrost with side-mounted
freezer with an automatic icemaker.
15. Compact refrigerator-freezers-- 11.80AV + 339.2 0.417av + 339.2
automatic defrost with bottom-mounted
freezer.
15I. Compact refrigerator-freezers-- 11.80AV + 423.2 0.417av + 423.2
automatic defrost with bottom-mounted
freezer with an automatic icemaker.
16. Compact upright freezers with 8.65AV + 225.7 0.306av + 225.7
manual defrost.
17. Compact upright freezers with 10.17AV + 351.9 0.359av + 351.9
automatic defrost.
18. Compact chest freezers............. 9.25AV + 136.8 0.327av + 136.8
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AV = Total adjusted volume, expressed in ft\3\, as determined in appendices A and B of subpart B of 10 CFR pat
430.
av = Total adjusted volume, expressed in Liters.
B. Current Process
On November 15, 2019, DOE published a request for information
(``RFI'') to collect data and information to help DOE determine whether
amended standards for refrigerators, refrigerator-freezers, and
freezers would result in a significant amount of additional energy
savings and whether those standards would be technologically feasible
and economically justified. 84 FR 62470 (``November 2019 RFI'').
Comments received to date as part of the current process have
helped DOE identify and resolve issues related to the preliminary
analyses. Chapter 2 of the preliminary TSD summarizes and addresses the
comments received.
III. Summary of the Analyses Performed by DOE
For the products covered in this preliminary analysis, DOE
conducted in-depth technical analyses in the following areas: (1)
Engineering; (2) markups to determine product price; (3) energy use;
(4) life cycle cost (``LCC'') and payback period (``PBP''); and (5)
national impacts. The preliminary TSD that presents the methodology and
results of each of these analyses is available at www.regulations.gov/docket/EERE-2017-BT-STD-0003.
DOE also conducted, and has included in the preliminary TSD,
several other analyses that support the major analyses or are
preliminary analyses that will be expanded if DOE determines that a
NOPR is warranted to propose amended energy conservation standards.
These analyses include: (1) The market and technology assessment; (2)
the screening analysis, which contributes to the engineering analysis;
and (3) the shipments analysis, which contributes to the LCC and PBP
analysis and the national impact analysis (``NIA''). In addition to
these analyses, DOE has begun preliminary work on the manufacturer
impact analysis and has identified the methods to be used for the
consumer subgroup analysis, the emissions analysis, the employment
impact analysis, the regulatory impact analysis, and the utility impact
analysis. DOE will expand on these analyses in the NOPR should one be
issued.
A. Engineering Analysis
The purpose of the engineering analysis is to establish the
relationship between the efficiency and cost of refrigerators,
refrigerator-freezers, and freezers. There are two elements to consider
in the engineering analysis; the selection of efficiency levels to
analyze (i.e., the ``efficiency analysis'') and the determination of
product cost at each efficiency level (i.e., the ``cost analysis''). In
determining the performance of higher-efficiency products, DOE
considers technologies and design option combinations not eliminated by
the screening analysis. For each product class, DOE estimates the
baseline cost, as well as the incremental cost for the product/
equipment at efficiency levels above the baseline. The output of the
engineering analysis is a set of cost-efficiency ``curves'' that are
used in downstream analyses (i.e., the LCC and PBP analyses and the
NIA).
See Chapter 5 of the preliminary TSD for additional detail on the
engineering analysis.
B. Markups Analysis
The markups analysis develops appropriate markups (e.g., retailer
markups, distributor markups, contractor markups) in the distribution
chain and sales taxes to convert manufacturer production cost (``MPC'')
estimates derived in the engineering analysis to consumer prices, which
are then used in the LCC and PBP analysis and in the manufacturer
impact analysis. At each step in the distribution channel, companies
mark up the price of the product to cover business costs and profit
margin.
DOE developed baseline and incremental markups for each actor in
the distribution chain. Baseline markups are applied to the price of
products with baseline efficiency, while incremental markups are
applied to the difference in price between baseline and higher-
efficiency models (the incremental cost increase). The incremental
markup is typically less than the baseline markup and is designed to
maintain similar per-unit operating profit before and after new or
amended standards.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ Because the projected price of standards-compliant products
is typically higher than the price of baseline products, using the
same markup for the incremental cost and the baseline cost would
result in higher per-unit operating profit. While such an outcome is
possible, DOE maintains that in markets that are reasonably
competitive it is unlikely that standards would lead to a
sustainable increase in profitability in the long run.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chapter 6 of the preliminary TSD provides details on DOE's
development of markups for refrigerators, refrigerator-freezers, and
freezers.
C. Energy Use Analysis
The purpose of the energy use analysis is to determine the annual
energy consumption of refrigerators, refrigerator-freezers, and
freezers at different efficiencies in representative
[[Page 57383]]
U.S. single-family homes, multi-family residences, and commercial
buildings, and to assess the energy savings potential of increased
efficiencies for these products. The energy use analysis estimates the
range of energy use of refrigerators, refrigerator-freezers, and
freezers in the field (i.e., as they are actually used by consumers).
The energy use analysis provides the basis for other analyses DOE
performed, particularly assessments of the energy savings and the
savings in consumer operating costs that could result from adoption of
amended or new standards.
Chapter 7 of the preliminary TSD addresses the energy use analysis.
D. Life-Cycle Cost and Payback Period Analyses
The effect of new or amended energy conservation standards on
individual consumers usually involves a reduction in operating cost and
an increase in purchase cost. DOE used the following two metrics to
measure consumer impacts:
The LCC is the total consumer expense of an appliance or
product over the life of that product, consisting of total installed
cost (manufacturer selling price, distribution chain markups, sales
tax, and installation costs) plus operating costs (expenses for energy
use, maintenance, and repair). To compute the operating costs, DOE
discounts future operating costs to the time of purchase and sums them
over the lifetime of the product.
The PBP is the estimated amount of time (in years) it
takes consumers to recover the increased purchase cost (including
installation) of a more-efficient product through lower operating
costs. DOE calculates the PBP by dividing the change in purchase cost
at higher efficiency levels by the change in annual operating cost for
the year that amended or new standards are assumed to take effect.
Chapter 8 of the preliminary TSD addresses the LCC and PBP
analyses.
E. National Impact Analysis
The NIA estimates the national energy savings (``NES'') and the net
present value (``NPV'') of total consumer costs and savings expected to
result from amended standards at specific efficiency levels (referred
to as candidate standard levels).\6\ DOE calculates the NES and NPV for
the potential standard levels considered based on projections of annual
product shipments, along with the annual energy consumption and total
installed cost data from the energy use and LCC analyses. For the
present analysis, DOE projected the energy savings, operating cost
savings, product costs, and NPV of consumer benefits over the lifetime
of refrigerators, refrigerator-freezers, and freezers sold from 2027
through 2056.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ The NIA accounts for impacts in the 50 states and U.S.
territories.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DOE evaluates the impacts of new or amended standards by comparing
a case without such standards with standards-case projections. The no-
new-standards case characterizes energy use and consumer costs for each
product class in the absence of new or amended energy conservation
standards. For this projection, DOE considers historical trends in
efficiency and various forces that are likely to affect the mix of
efficiencies over time. DOE compares the no-new-standards case with
projections characterizing the market for each product class if DOE
adopted new or amended standards at specific energy efficiency levels
for that class. For each efficiency level, DOE considers how a given
standard would likely affect the market shares of those products with
efficiencies greater than the standard.
DOE uses a spreadsheet model to calculate the energy savings and
the national consumer costs and savings from each efficiency level.
Interested parties can review DOE's analyses by changing various input
quantities within the spreadsheet. The NIA spreadsheet model uses
typical values (as opposed to probability distributions) as inputs.
Critical inputs to this analysis include shipments projections,
estimated product lifetimes, product installed costs and operating
costs, product annual energy consumption, the base case efficiency
projection, and discount rates.
DOE estimates a combined total of 3.34 quads of site energy savings
would result at the max-tech efficiency levels for refrigerators,
refrigerator-freezers, and freezers. Combined site energy savings at
Efficiency Level 1 for all product classes are estimated to be 1.01
quads. Therefore, DOE has determined that the potential available
energy savings for refrigerators, refrigerator-freezers, and freezers
are more than the 0.3 quads of site energy threshold established by the
Process Rule and thus are considered significant under EPCA. (42 U.S.C.
6295(o)(3)(B))
Chapter 10 of the preliminary TSD addresses the NIA.
IV. Public Participation
DOE invites public participation in this process through
participation in the webinar and submission of written comments and
information. After the webinar and the closing of the comment period,
DOE will consider all timely-submitted comments and additional
information obtained from interested parties, as well as information
obtained through further analyses. Following such consideration, the
Department will publish either a determination that the standards for
refrigerators, refrigerator-freezers, and freezers need not be amended
or a NOPR proposing to amend those standards. The NOPR, should one be
issued, would include proposed energy conservation standards for the
products covered by that rulemaking, and members of the public would be
given an opportunity to submit written and oral comments on the
proposed standards.
A. Participation in the Webinar
The time and date for the webinar meeting are listed in the DATES
section at the beginning of this document. Webinar registration
information, participant instructions, and information about the
capabilities available to webinar participants will be published on
DOE's website:www.energy.gov/eere/buildings/public-meetings-and-comment-deadlines. Participants are responsible for ensuring their
systems are compatible with the webinar software.
B. Procedure for Submitting Prepared General Statements for
Distribution
Any person who has an interest in the topics addressed in this
notice, or who is representative of a group or class of persons that
has an interest in these issues, may request an opportunity to make an
oral presentation at the webinar. Such persons may submit such request
to [email protected]. Persons who wish to speak
should include with their request a computer file in WordPerfect,
Microsoft Word, PDF, or text (ASCII) file format that briefly describes
the nature of their interest in this rulemaking and the topics they
wish to discuss. Such persons should also provide a daytime telephone
number where they can be reached.
Persons requesting to speak should briefly describe the nature of
their interest in this rulemaking and provide a telephone number for
contact. DOE requests persons selected to make an oral presentation to
submit an advance copy of their statements at least two weeks before
the webinar. At its discretion, DOE may permit persons who cannot
supply an advance copy of their statement to participate, if those
persons have made advance alternative arrangements with the Building
Technologies Office. As necessary, requests to give an oral
presentation
[[Page 57384]]
should ask for such alternative arrangements.
C. Conduct of the Webinar
DOE will designate a DOE official to preside at the webinar and may
also use a professional facilitator to aid discussion. The meeting will
not be a judicial or evidentiary-type public hearing, but DOE will
conduct it in accordance with section 336 of EPCA (42 U.S.C. 6306). A
court reporter will be present to record the proceedings and prepare a
transcript. DOE reserves the right to schedule the order of
presentations and to establish the procedures governing the conduct of
the webinar. There shall not be discussion of proprietary information,
costs or prices, market share, or other commercial matters regulated by
U.S. anti-trust laws. After the webinar and until the end of the
comment period, interested parties may submit further comments on the
proceedings and any aspect of the rulemaking.
The webinar will be conducted in an informal, conference style. DOE
will present summaries of comments received before the webinar, allow
time for prepared general statements by participants, and encourage all
interested parties to share their views on issues affecting this
rulemaking. Each participant will be allowed to make a general
statement (within time limits determined by DOE), before the discussion
of specific topics. DOE will permit, as time permits, other
participants to comment briefly on any general statements.
At the end of all prepared statements on a topic, DOE will permit
participants to clarify their statements briefly. Participants should
be prepared to answer questions by DOE and by other participants
concerning these issues. DOE representatives may also ask questions of
participants concerning other matters relevant to this rulemaking. The
official conducting the webinar/public meeting will accept additional
comments or questions from those attending, as time permits. The
presiding official will announce any further procedural rules or
modification of the above procedures that may be needed for the proper
conduct of the webinar.
A transcript of the webinar will be included in the docket, which
can be viewed as described in the Docket section at the beginning of
this notice. In addition, any person may buy a copy of the transcript
from the transcribing reporter.
D. Submission of Comments
DOE invites all interested parties, regardless of whether they
participate in the public meeting, to submit in writing by December 29,
2021, comments and information on matters addressed in this
notification and on other matters relevant to DOE's consideration of
amended energy conservations standards for refrigerators, refrigerator-
freezers, and freezers. Interested parties may submit comments, data,
and other information using any of the methods described in the
ADDRESSES section at the beginning of this document.
Submitting comments via www.regulations.gov. The
www.regulations.gov web page will require you to provide your name and
contact information. Your contact information will be viewable to DOE
Building Technologies staff only. Your contact information will not be
publicly viewable except for your first and last names, organization
name (if any), and submitter representative name (if any). If your
comment is not processed properly because of technical difficulties,
DOE will use this information to contact you. If DOE cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for
clarification, DOE may not be able to consider your comment.
However, your contact information will be publicly viewable if you
include it in the comment itself or in any documents attached to your
comment. Any information that you do not want to be publicly viewable
should not be included in your comment, nor in any document attached to
your comment. If this instruction is followed, persons viewing comments
will see only first and last names, organization names, correspondence
containing comments, and any documents submitted with the comments.
Do not submit to www.regulations.gov. information for which
disclosure is restricted by statute, such as trade secrets and
commercial or financial information (hereinafter referred to as
Confidential Business Information (CBI). Comments submitted through
www.regulations.gov cannot be claimed as CBI. Comments received through
the website will waive any CBI claims for the information submitted.
For information on submitting CBI, see the Confidential Business
Information section.
DOE processes submissions made through www.regulations.gov before
posting. Normally, comments will be posted within a few days of being
submitted. However, if large volumes of comments are being processed
simultaneously, your comment may not be viewable for up to several
weeks. Please keep the comment tracking number that www.regulations.gov
provides after you have successfully uploaded your comment.
Submitting comments via email. Comments and documents submitted via
email also will be posted to www.regulations.gov. If you do not want
your personal contact information to be publicly viewable, do not
include it in your comment or any accompanying documents. Instead,
provide your contact information in a cover letter. Include your first
and last names, email address, telephone number, and optional mailing
address. The cover letter will not be publicly viewable as long as it
does not include any comments.
Include contact information each time you submit comments, data,
documents, and other information to DOE. No faxes will be accepted.
Comments, data, and other information submitted to DOE
electronically should be provided in PDF (preferred), Microsoft Word or
Excel, WordPerfect, or text (ASCII) file format. Provide documents that
are not secured, that are written in English, and that are free of any
defects or viruses. Documents should not contain special characters or
any form of encryption and, if possible, they should carry the
electronic signature of the author.
Campaign form letters. Please submit campaign form letters by the
originating organization in batches of between 50 to 500 form letters
per PDF or as one form letter with a list of supporters' names compiled
into one or more PDFs. This reduces comment processing and posting
time.
Confidential Business Information. Pursuant to 10 CFR 1004.11, any
person submitting information that he or she believes to be
confidential and exempt by law from public disclosure should submit via
email two well-marked copies: One copy of the document marked
``confidential'' including all the information believed to be
confidential, and one copy of the document marked ``non-confidential''
with the information believed to be confidential deleted. DOE will make
its own determination about the confidential status of the information
and treat it according to its determination.
It is DOE's policy that all comments may be included in the public
docket, without change and as received, including any personal
information provided in the comments (except information deemed to be
exempt from public disclosure).
[[Page 57385]]
V. Approval of the Office of the Secretary
The Secretary of Energy has approved publication of this
notification of a webinar and availability of preliminary technical
support document.
Signing Authority
This document of the Department of Energy was signed on October 7,
2021, by Kelly Speakes-Backman, Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary
and Acting Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency and Renewable
Energy, pursuant to delegated authority from the Secretary of Energy.
That document with the original signature and date is maintained by
DOE. For administrative purposes only, and in compliance with
requirements of the Office of the Federal Register, the undersigned DOE
Federal Register Liaison Officer has been authorized to sign and submit
the document in electronic format for publication, as an official
document of the Department of Energy. This administrative process in no
way alters the legal effect of this document upon publication in the
Federal Register.
Signed in Washington, DC, on October 8, 2021.
Treena V. Garrett,
Federal Register Liaison Officer, U.S. Department of Energy.
[FR Doc. 2021-22317 Filed 10-14-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P