[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 204 (Tuesday, October 22, 2024)] [Notices] [Pages 84333-84337] From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov] [FR Doc No: 2024-24437] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration RTID 0648-XE362 Takes of Marine Mammals Incidental to Specified Activities; Taking Marine Mammals Incidental to the Skagway Ore Terminal Redevelopment Project AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce. ACTION: Notice; request for comments on proposed renewal incidental harassment authorization. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: NMFS received a request from Municipality of Skagway (MOS) for the renewal of their currently active incidental harassment authorization (IHA) to take marine mammals incidental to the terminal redevelopment project in Skagway, Alaska. MOS's activities consist of activities that are covered by the current authorization but will not be completed prior to its expiration. Pursuant to the Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA), prior to issuing the currently active IHA, NMFS requested comments on both the proposed IHA and the potential for renewing the initial authorization if certain requirements were satisfied. The renewal requirements have been satisfied, and NMFS is now providing an additional 15-day comment period to allow for any additional comments on the proposed renewal not previously provided during the initial 30-day comment period. DATES: Comments and information must be received no later than November 6, 2024. ADDRESSES: Comments should be addressed to Jolie Harrison, Chief, Permits and Conservation Division, Office of Protected Resources, National Marine Fisheries Service, and should be submitted via email to ITP.harlacher@noaa.gov. Instructions: NMFS is not responsible for comments sent by any other method, to any other address or individual, or received after the end of the comment period. Comments, including all attachments, must not exceed a 25-megabyte file size. Attachments to comments will be accepted in Microsoft Word, Excel or Adobe PDF file formats only. All comments received are a part of the public record and will generally be posted online at https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/permit/incidental-take-authorizations-under-marine-mammal-protection-act without change. All personal identifying information (e.g., name, address) voluntarily submitted by the commenter may be publicly accessible. Do not submit confidential business information or otherwise sensitive or protected information. Electronic copies of the original application, renewal request, and supporting documents (including NMFS Federal Register notices of the original proposed and final authorizations, and the previous IHA), as well as a list of the references cited in this document, may be obtained online at: https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/permit/incidental-take-authorizations-under-marine-mammal-protection-act. In case of problems accessing these documents, please call the contact listed above. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jenna Harlacher, Office of Protected Resources (OPR), NMFS, (301) 427-8401. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background The MMPA prohibits the ``take'' of marine mammals, with certain exceptions. Sections 101(a)(5)(A) and (D) of the MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.) direct the Secretary of Commerce (as delegated to NMFS) to allow, upon request, the incidental, but not intentional, taking of small numbers of marine mammals by U.S. citizens who engage in a specified activity (other than commercial fishing) within a specified geographical region if certain findings are made and either regulations are promulgated or, if the taking is limited to harassment, an incidental harassment authorization is issued. Authorization for incidental takings shall be granted if NMFS finds that the taking will have a negligible impact on the species or stock(s) and will not have an unmitigable adverse impact on the availability of the species or stock(s) for taking for subsistence uses (where relevant). Further, NMFS must prescribe the permissible methods of taking and other ``means of effecting the least practicable adverse impact'' on the affected species or stocks and their habitat, paying particular attention to rookeries, mating grounds, and areas of similar significance, and on the availability of such species or stocks for taking for certain subsistence uses (referred to here as ``mitigation measures''). NMFS must also prescribe requirements pertaining to monitoring and reporting of such takings. The definition of key terms such as ``take,'' ``harassment,'' and ``negligible impact'' can be found in the MMPA and the NMFS's implementing regulations (see 16 U.S.C. 1362; 50 CFR 216.103). NMFS' regulations implementing the MMPA at 50 CFR 216.107(e) indicate that IHAs may be renewed for additional periods of time not to exceed 1 year for each reauthorization. In the notice of proposed IHA for the initial IHA, NMFS described the circumstances under which we would consider issuing a renewal for this activity, and requested public comment on a potential renewal under those circumstances. Specifically, on a case-by-case basis, NMFS may issue a one-time 1-year renewal of an IHA following notice to the public providing an additional 15 days for public comments when: (1) up to another year of identical, or nearly identical, activities as described in the Detailed Description of Specified Activities section of the initial IHA issuance notice is planned; or (2) the activities as described in the Description of the Specified Activities and Anticipated Impacts section of the initial IHA issuance notice would not be completed by the time the initial IHA expires and a renewal would allow for completion of the activities beyond that described in the DATES section of the notice of issuance of the initial IHA, provided all of the following conditions are met: 1. A request for renewal is received no later than 60 days prior to the needed renewal IHA effective date (recognizing that the renewal IHA expiration date cannot extend beyond 1 year from expiration of the initial IHA); 2. The request for renewal must include the following:An explanation that the activities to be conducted under the requested renewal IHA are identical to the activities analyzed under the initial IHA, are a subset of the activities, or include changes so minor (e.g., reduction in pile size) that the changes do not affect the previous analyses, mitigation and monitoring requirements, or take estimates (with [[Page 84334]] the exception of reducing the type or amount of take); and A preliminary monitoring report showing the results of the required monitoring to date and an explanation showing that the monitoring results do not indicate impacts of a scale or nature not previously analyzed or authorized; and 3. Upon review of the request for renewal, the status of the affected species or stocks, and any other pertinent information, NMFS determines that there are no more than minor changes in the activities, the mitigation and monitoring measures will remain the same and appropriate, and the findings in the initial IHA remain valid. An additional public comment period of 15 days (for a total of 45 days), with direct notice by email, phone, or postal service to commenters on the initial IHA, is provided to allow for any additional comments on the proposed renewal. A description of the renewal process may be found on our website at: https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/national/marine-mammal-protection/incidental-harassment-authorization-renewals. Any comments received on the potential renewal, along with relevant comments on the initial IHA, have been considered in the development of this proposed IHA renewal, and a summary of agency responses to applicable comments is included in this notice. NMFS will consider any additional public comments prior to making any final decision on the issuance of the requested renewal, and agency responses will be summarized in the final notice of our decision. National Environmental Policy Act To comply with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA; 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) and NOAA Administrative Order (NAO) 216-6A, NMFS must review our proposed action (i.e., the issuance of an IHA renewal) with respect to potential impacts on the human environment. This action is consistent with categories of activities identified in Categorical Exclusion B4 (incidental take authorizations with no anticipated serious injury or mortality) of the Companion Manual for NOAA Administrative Order 216-6A, which do not individually or cumulatively have the potential for significant impacts on the quality of the human environment and for which we have not identified any extraordinary circumstances that would preclude this categorical exclusion. Accordingly, NMFS determined that the issuance of the initial IHA qualified to be categorically excluded from further NEPA review. NMFS has preliminarily determined that the application of this categorical exclusion remains appropriate for this renewal IHA. History of Request On August 29, 2023, NMFS issued an IHA to MOS to take marine mammals incidental to the terminal redevelopment project in Skagway, Alaska (88 FR 60652, September 5, 2023), effective from October 1, 2023, through September 30, 2024. On February 5, 2024, NMFS received a request from MOS to modify the 2023 IHA; adding 2 takes by Level A harassment and 45 takes by Level B harassment for northern fur seal, and to adjust take requests based on average species densities throughout the year due to work occurring in all seasons and, consequently, increasing authorized take by Level B harassment to 270 for Steller sea lion. On May 3, 2024, NMFS issued Skagway a modification of the initial 2023 IHA (89 FR 36765). On July 22, 2024, NMFS received an application for the renewal of the initial IHA (as modified). After discussions with MOS about the proposed work to be conducted under the renewal IHA, we received a revised renewal request on September 30, 2024. As described in the application for renewal IHA, the activities for which incidental take is requested consist of a subset of the activities that were covered by the initial authorization but which were not completed prior to its expiration. As required, the applicant also provided a final monitoring report, available online at: https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/action/incidental-take-authorization-municipality-skagways-skagway-ore-terminal-redevelopment. The report confirms that the applicant has implemented the required mitigation and monitoring, and which also shows that no impacts of a scale or nature not previously analyzed or authorized have occurred as a result of the activities conducted. Description of the Specified Activities and Anticipated Impacts MOS planned to redevelop the Skagway Ore Terminal in Skagway, Alaska, with 196 days of pile installation and removal. This project involved installation and removal of 36 temporary steel pile guides, removal of 692 piles, and installation of 244 permanent steel piles. Two different installation methods were used: vibratory pile driving and impact pile driving. Due to unexpected delays, MOS did not complete the construction during the initial 1-year period, completing removal of 385 piles and installation of 101 piles. This renewal request is to cover a subset of the activities covered in the initial IHA that was not completed during the effective IHA period and which is planned to occur during the effective period of the proposed renewal IHA. Specifically, MOS plans to install two 24-in piles and remove ten timber piles, which are necessary to stabilize a single existing fender. The remainder of the initially planned work would not be conducted under this proposed renewal IHA. The likely or possible impacts of the MOS's proposed activity on marine mammals is unchanged from the impacts described in the initial IHA. Potential non-acoustic stressors could result from the physical presence of the equipment, vessels, and personnel; however, any impacts to marine mammals are expected to primarily be acoustic in nature. Sounds resulting from pile installation, removal, and drilling may result in the incidental take of marine mammals by Level A and Level B harassment in the form of auditory injury or behavioral harassment. Detailed Description of the Activity A detailed description of the construction activities for which take is proposed here may be found in the notices of the proposed and final IHAs for the initial authorization (88 FR 23627, April 18, 2023; 88 FR 60652, September 5, 2023). As previously mentioned, this request is for a subset of the activities considered for the initial IHA that were not completed prior to its expiration and which are planned to occur under this proposed renewal IHA. The location, timing, and nature of the activities, including the types of equipment planned for use, are identical to those described in the previous notice for the initial IHA. The proposed renewal IHA would be effective from the date of issuance through September 30, 2025. The subset of activities to be completed under this proposed renewal IHA includes installation of two 24-in steel piles by vibratory and impact pile driving and vibratory removal of ten timber piles. MOS proposes that this subset of activities would take approximately 4 days, including 2 days for the pile installation and 2 days for the pile removal. Description of Marine Mammals A description of the marine mammals in the area of the activities for which [[Page 84335]] authorization of take is proposed here, including information on abundance, status, distribution, and hearing, may be found in the notice of the proposed IHA for the initial authorization and the notice of issuance of a modified incidental harassment authorization (88 FR 23627, April 18, 2023; 89 FR 36765, May 3, 2024). NMFS has reviewed the preliminary monitoring data from the initial IHA, recent draft Stock Assessment Reports, and determined that neither this nor any other new information affects which species have the potential to be affected or the pertinent information in the Description of the Marine Mammals in the Area of Specified Activities contained in the supporting documents for the initial IHA and modified IHA (88 FR 23627, April 18, 2023; 89 FR 36765, May 3, 2024). Potential Effects on Marine Mammals and Their Habitat A description of the potential effects of the specified activity on marine mammals and their habitat for the limited subset of activities for which the authorization of take is proposed here may be found in the notice of the proposed IHA for the initial authorization (88 FR 23627, April 18, 2023). NMFS has reviewed the monitoring data from the initial IHA, recent draft Stock Assessment Reports, information on relevant Unusual Mortality Events, and other scientific literature, and determined that neither this nor any other new information affects our initial analysis of impacts on marine mammals and their habitat. Estimated Take A detailed description of the methods and inputs used to estimate take for the specified activity are found in the notices of the proposed and final IHAs for the initial authorization and the notice of issuance of the modified IHA (88 FR 23627, April 18, 2023; 88 FR 60652, September 5, 2023; 89 FR 36765, May 3, 2024). Specifically, the action area and marine mammal density and occurrence data applicable to this authorization remain unchanged from the initial and modified IHA. Similarly, source levels, type of activity, methods of take, and types of take remain unchanged from the initial and modified IHA. However, there are changes to the estimated Level A harassment zones based on the revised amount of piles driven per day and the 2024 draft Technical Guidance, further discussed below. The estimated number of takes proposed for authorization is based on the subset of activities to be completed under this renewal IHA, and therefore represents a proportion of the initial authorized takes. These takes reflect the estimated remaining number of days of work and number of piles to be driven. Estimated take by Level A and Level B harassment was calculated using the same methodology as in the initial and modified IHA. On May 3, 2024, NMFS published (89 FR 36762) and solicited public comment on its draft Updated Technical Guidance, which includes updated thresholds and weighting functions to inform auditory injury estimates, and is intended to replace the 2018 Technical Guidance referenced above, once finalized. The public comment period ended on June 17, 2024, and although the Updated Technical Guidance is not final, we expect the Updated Technical Guidance to represent the best available science once it is. To best ensure we have considered an appropriate evaluation of potential effects, in consideration of the best available science, we have conducted basic comparative calculations using the draft Updated Technical Guidance for the purposes of understanding the number of takes by Level A harassment (auditory injury) that would be predicted if the draft Updated Technical Guidance were finalized with no changes. The relevant draft updated thresholds and weighting functions may be found in the executive summary of the draft Updated Technical Guidance, on pages 3 and 4. We have also considered whether modifications to mitigation zones would be appropriate in light of the draft Updated Technical Guidance. Based on the outcome of these comparisons/analyses using the draft Updated Technical Guidance and the number of piles and days of work to be conducted in this renewal, the modeled estimates of take by Level A harassment did not present substantial differences for any species. In this proposed renewal, use of the draft Updated Technical Guidance results in changes to the estimated Level A harassment zones, but there are no changes to the estimated Level B harassment zones (table 1). The updated Level A harassment zones are used to revise estimations of potential take by Level A harassment. In table 2, we have presented values based on the methodology that was included in the previous authorizations, incorporating the previously described changes (number of piles per day and the Updated Technical Guidance). Takes are a proportion of the initial authorized takes and based on the days of work included in this renewal IHA. Proposed mitigation zones, in consideration of the updated isopleths, are discussed in the Proposed Mitigation section. Table 1--Level A and Level B Harassment Isopleths (m) for Impact and Vibratory Pile Driving -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level A harassment zone (m) \1\ Level A harassment zone (m) \2\ Level B Activity ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ harassment LF MF HF Phocids Otariids LF HF VHF Phocids Otariids zone (m) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 24-in steel pile, Impact Installation 1,977.6 70.3 2,355.6 1,058.3 77.1 1,970.4 251.4 3,049.2 1,750.4 652.5 857.7 24-in steel pile,* Vibratory 4.1 0.4 6.1 2.5 0.2 5.6 2.2 4.6 7.2 2.4 3,981 Installation and Removal............ 14-in timber pile, Vibratory Removal. 2.7 0.2 4 1.7 0.1 3.7 1.4 3 4.7 1.6 3,415 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ Zones are based on the 2018 Revised Technical Guidance. This is what was used in the initial and modified IHA to calculate Level A harassment zones. \2\ Zones are based on the Draft 2024 Updated Technical Guidance, further described above. This is new information that was not available at the time of the initial and modified IHA. Species groups have also changed in the Updated Technical Guidance. * Based on the up to 30-in piles included in the initial IHA that also included pile sizes: 10.75-in, 14-in, 16-in, 20-in, 24-in, 28-in, and 30-in. Table 2--Proposed Amount of Taking, by Level A and Level B Harassment, by Species and Stock and Percent of Take by Stock -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Initial IHA Initial IHA Proposed Proposed Species Stock authorized authorized Level A Level B Percent of Level A take Level B take take take stock -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Humpback Whale................................. Hawaii.............................. 2 13 0 * 2 <1 Mexico-North Pacific................ 0 1 0 0 0 [[Page 84336]] Minke Whale.................................... Alaska.............................. 2 6 0 * 1 <1 Killer Whale \1\............................... Eastern North Pacific, Northern 2 90 0 * 25 <1 Residents, Southeast Alaska + Eastern North Pacific, Alaska Residents + West Coast Transients + Gulf, Aleutian, Bering Transients. Dall's Porpoise................................ Alaska.............................. 43 193 0 4 <1 Harbor Porpoise................................ Southeast Alaska.................... 17 75 0 * 2 <1 Harbor Seal.................................... Alaska--Lynn Canal/Stephens Passage. 193 2,760 11 54 <1 Steller Sea Lion............................... Eastern U.S. + Western U.S.......... 2 270 0 10 <1 Northern Fur Seal.............................. Pribilof Islands/Eastern Pacific 2 45 0 3 <1 stock. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * Rounded up to assumed average group size based on Dahlheim et al., 2009. \1\ Dahlheim et al. (2009) observed mean group sizes of 25 (resident ecotype) and 5 (transient ecotype) for killer whales in Southeast Alaska. While MOS observed only two killer whales during the initial IHA, it is possible that a larger group could enter the area during the renewal activities. Description of Proposed Mitigation, Monitoring and Reporting Measures The proposed mitigation, monitoring, and reporting measures included as requirements in this authorization are substantially similar to those included in the FR notice announcing the issuance of the initial IHA, and the discussion of the least practicable adverse impact included in that document remains accurate (88 FR 60652, September 5, 2023). The only changes from the initial IHA are to the required shutdown zones (table 3), due to the changes in Level A harassment zone distances (table 1). As the initial IHA required shutdown zones equal to the Level A harassment zones, we retain that approach to mitigation in reflection of the new zones updated on the basis of the best scientific information available. Additionally, acoustic monitoring (as was required through the initial IHA) is not proposed here, due to the minimal pile driving planned under this proposed renewal IHA. Table 3--Shutdown and Monitoring Zones ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Minimum shutdown zone (m) ------------------------------------------------------------- Harassment Activity VHF zone (m) LF cetacean HF cetacean cetacean Phocids Otariids ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 24-in steel pile, Impact Installation. 1,975 255 3,050 1,755 655 860 24-in steel pile, Vibratory 10 10 10 10 10 3,985 Installation and Removal............. 14-in timber pile, Vibratory Removal.. 10 10 10 10 10 3,415 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The following mitigation, monitoring, and reporting measures are proposed for this renewal: The MOS must avoid direct physical interaction with marine mammals during construction activity. If a marine mammal comes within 10-m of such activity, operations must cease and vessels must reduce speed to the minimum level required to maintain steerage and safe working conditions, as necessary to avoid direct physical interaction; Conduct training between construction supervisors and crews and the marine mammal monitoring team and relevant MOS staff prior to the start of all pile driving activity and when new personnel join the work, so that responsibilities, communication procedures, monitoring protocols, and operational procedures are clearly understood; Pile driving activity must be halted upon observation of either a species for which incidental take is not authorized or a species for which incidental take has been authorized but the authorized number of takes has been met, entering or within the harassment zone; MOS will establish and implement the shutdown zones. The purpose of a shutdown zone is generally to define an area within which shutdown of the activity would occur upon sighting of a marine mammal (or in anticipation of an animal entering the defined area). Shutdown zones typically vary based on the activity type and marine mammal hearing group; Monitoring must take place from 30 minutes prior to initiation of construction activity (i.e., pre-start clearance monitoring) through 30 minutes post-completion of construction activity; Pre-start clearance monitoring must be conducted during periods of visibility sufficient for the lead Protected Species Observer (PSO) to determine the shutdown zones clear of marine mammals. Construction may commence when the determination is made; If construction is delayed or halted due to the presence of a marine mammal, the activity may not commence or resume until either the animal has voluntarily exited and been visually confirmed beyond the shutdown zone or 15 minutes have passed without re-detection of the animal; MOS must use soft start techniques when impact pile driving. Soft start requires contractors and equipment to slowly approach the work site creating a visual disturbance allowing animals in close proximity to construction activities a chance to leave the area prior to stone resetting or new stone placement. A soft start must be implemented at the start of each day's construction activity and at any time following cessation of activity for a period of 30 minutes or longer; The MOS must employ up to four PSOs to monitor the shutdown and Level B harassment zones during pile driving activities; Monitoring will be conducted 30 minutes before, during, and 30 minutes after construction activities. In addition, observers shall record all incidents of marine mammal occurrence, regardless of distance from activity, and shall document any behavioral reactions in concert with distance from construction activity; [[Page 84337]] The MOS must submit a draft report detailing all monitoring within 90 calendar days of the completion of marine mammal monitoring or 60 days prior to the issuance of any subsequent IHA for this project, whichever comes first; The MOS must prepare and submit final report within 30 days following resolution of comments on the draft report from NMFS; The MOS must submit all PSO datasheets and/or raw sighting data (in a separate file from the Final Report referenced immediately above); and The MOS must report injured or dead marine mammals. Comments and Responses As noted previously, NMFS published a notice of a proposed IHA and proposed modified IHA (88 FR 23627, April 18, 2023; 89 FR 22684, April 2, 2024) and solicited public comments on both our proposal to issue the initial IHA for Skagway Ore Terminal Redevelopment project and on the potential for a renewal IHA, should certain requirements be met. During the 30-day public comment period, NMFS received no substantive comments on either the proposal to issue the initial IHA for MOS's construction activities or on the potential for a renewal IHA. Preliminary Determinations The proposed renewal request consists of a subset of activities analyzed through the initial authorization described above. In analyzing the effects of the activities for the initial IHA, NMFS determined that MOS's activities would have a negligible impact on the affected species or stocks and that authorized take numbers of each species or stock were small relative to the relevant stocks (e.g., less than one-third the abundance of all stocks). The mitigation measures and monitoring and reporting requirements as described above are substantially similar to those required through initial IHA; hydroacoustic monitoring is excluded because it was completed under the initial IHA, and the shutdown zones have been revised to reflect the piles to be driven in the proposed subset of work.the minor changes described above do not affect the least practicable adverse impact determinations. NMFS has preliminarily concluded that there is no new information suggesting that our analysis or findings should change from those reached for the initial IHA. Based on the information and analysis contained here and in the referenced documents, NMFS has preliminarily determined the following: (1) the required mitigation measures will effect the least practicable impact on marine mammal species or stocks and their habitat; (2) the authorized takes will have a negligible impact on the affected marine mammal species or stocks; (3) the authorized takes represent small numbers of marine mammals relative to the affected stock abundances; (4) MOS's activities will not have an unmitigable adverse impact on taking for subsistence purposes as no relevant subsistence uses of marine mammals are implicated by this action; and (5) appropriate monitoring and reporting requirements are included. Endangered Species Act The NMFS Alaska Regional Office issued a Biological Opinion under section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA; 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) on the issuance of an IHA and potential renewal IHA to MOS under section 101(a)(5)(D) of the MMPA by the NMFS OPR. The Biological Opinion concluded that the action is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of ESA-listed humpback whales or Steller sea lions. Proposed Renewal IHA and Request for Public Comment As a result of these preliminary determinations, NMFS proposes to issue a renewal IHA to MOS for conducting the terminal redevelopment construction in Skagway, Alaska, from the date of issuance through September 30, 2025, provided the previously described mitigation, monitoring, and reporting requirements are incorporated. A draft of the proposed and final initial IHA and modified IHA can be found at https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/action/incidental-take-authorization-municipality-skagways-skagway-ore-terminal-redevelopment. We request comment on our analyses, the proposed renewal IHA, and any other aspect of this notice. Please include with your comments any supporting data or literature citations to help inform our final decision on the request for MMPA authorization. Dated: October 17, 2024. Kimberly Damon-Randall, Director, Office of Protected Resources, National Marine Fisheries Service. [FR Doc. 2024-24437 Filed 10-21-24; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-22-P