[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 8 (Tuesday, January 14, 2025)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 3036-3037]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-00273]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Patent and Trademark Office
37 CFR Parts 1, 41, and 42
[Docket No. PTO-P-2022-0033]
RIN 0651-AD64
Setting and Adjusting Patent Fees During Fiscal Year 2025
AGENCY: United States Patent and Trademark Office, Department of
Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule; correction.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) is
correcting several minor typographical and other nonsubstantive
inadvertent errors in the preamble and amendatory instructions to a
final rule that appeared in the Federal Register on November 20, 2024.
That final rule set or adjusted patent fees as authorized by the Leahy-
Smith America Invents Act (AIA), as amended by the Study of
Underrepresented Classes Chasing Engineering and Science Success Act of
2018 (SUCCESS Act). These corrections do not result in any substantive
changes to the final rule.
DATES: The final rule correction is effective January 19, 2025.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: C. Brett Lockard, Director,
Forecasting and Analysis Division, at 571-272-0928 or
Christopher.Lockard@uspto.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On November 20, 2024, the USPTO published a
final rule setting or adjusting patent fees as authorized by the AIA,
as amended by the SUCCESS Act. See 89 FR 91898. Subsequent to the
publication of that final rule, it was discovered that the preamble
discussion and several amendatory instructions contained inadvertent
errors requiring correction. For example, in the preamble, example 10,
which provides guidance for ``Adding timely benefit claims under 35
U.S.C. 120 after filing; multiple fees due,'' contained an incorrect
internal cross-reference to the subject application. The subject
application in the example should be ``J'' and not ``I.'' Also, in
table 20, in the entry for Sec. 1.17(m)(2), for a ``Petition to excuse
applicant's failure to act within prescribed time limits in an
international design application, delay less than or equal to two
years,'' the table reflected that the final rule fee applicable to a
micro entity for this action was ``$54,'' which is incorrect. The
correct fee should be ``$452.'' In addition, in the regulatory text at
Sec. 42.15(e), the description of the fee did not reflect changes made
by an intervening final rule published on October 10, 2024, entitled
``Expanding Opportunities To Appear Before the Patent Trial and Appeal
Board'' (89 FR 82172), which revised the terminology used to reference
counsel recognized pro hac vice before the Patent Trial and Appeal
Board. This correction updates the description of the fee in paragraph
(e) to reflect the revision made by the October 10, 2024 final rule. No
changes are being made to the fee amount that was published in the
November 20, 2024, final rule. This final rule corrects these errors,
as well as other minor typographical errors in the amendatory
instructions. These changes are administrative in nature and are
intended to provide clarification to impacted entities to avoid any
potential confusion.
Rulemaking Considerations
Administrative Procedure Act
This final rule corrects typographical and format errors in a
rulemaking setting and adjusting patent fees. The changes in this final
rule involve rules of agency practice and procedure and/or interpretive
rules and do not require notice-and-comment rulemaking. See Perez v.
Mortg. Bankers Ass'n, 135 S.Ct. 1199, 1204 (2015) (explaining that
interpretive rules ``advise the public of the agency's construction of
the statutes and rules which it administers'' and do not require
notice-and-comment rulemaking when issued or amended); Cooper Techs.
Co. v. Dudas, 536 F.3d 1330, 1336-37 (Fed. Cir. 2008) (stating that 5
U.S.C. 553, and thus 35 U.S.C. 2(b)(2)(B), do not require notice-and
comment rulemaking for ``interpretative rules, general statements of
policy, or rules of agency organization, procedure, or practice''); and
JEM Broadcasting Co. v. F.C.C., 22 F.3d 320, 328 (D.C. Cir. 1994)
(explaining that rules are not legislative because they do not
``foreclose effective opportunity to make one's case on the merits'').
Moreover, the Director of the USPTO, pursuant to authority at 5
U.S.C. 553(b)(B) and (d)(1), finds good cause to adopt the changes in
this final rule without prior notice and an opportunity for public
comment or a 30-day delay in effectiveness, as such procedures would be
unnecessary, impracticable, and contrary to the public interest. As
discussed above, the changes in this rulemaking involve correcting
minor typographical and other nonsubstantive errors in the final rule
published on November 20, 2024, which itself underwent notice and
comment and a delay in effective date. These changes are administrative
in nature and are intended to provide clarification to impacted
entities to avoid any potential confusion that could result if these
errors are not corrected prior to the effective date of the November
20, 2024, final rule. Therefore, good cause exists to dispense with the
requirement for prior notice and an opportunity for public comment and
a 30-day delay in effectiveness.
Correction
In FR Doc. 2024-26821 appearing on page 91898 in the Federal
Register of Wednesday, November 20, 2024, the following corrections are
made:
0
1. On page 91913, in the first column, Example 10: Adding timely
benefit claims under 35 U.S.C. 120 after filing; multiple fees due is
corrected to read as follows:
Example 10: Adding timely benefit claims under 35 U.S.C. 120 after
filing; multiple fees due. Application J is a nonprovisional
application filed on July 5, 2029. The ADS present upon J's filing
contains a benefit claim under 35 U.S.C.
[[Page 3037]]
120 to nonprovisional application O filed on February 2, 2021, which is
the only benefit claim in the application. J's EBD is February 2, 2021,
which is more than six but not more than nine years, earlier than J's
actual filing date of July 5, 2029. In this example, the Sec.
1.17(w)(1) fee of $2,700 is due upon J's filing. The applicant pays the
fee. Two months after J's filing, the applicant files a second ADS
containing the previously added benefit claim to O and a new benefit
claim under 35 U.S.C. 120 to nonprovisional application N filed on
March 2, 2020. This newly added benefit claim causes J's EBD to become
March 2, 2020, which is more than nine years earlier than J's actual
filing date of July 5, 2029, and thus prompts the fee in Sec.
1.17(w)(2). Because the fee in Sec. 1.17(w)(1) was previously paid,
the previous payment is subtracted from the amount now due under Sec.
1.17(w)(2). Accordingly, the amount due upon filing of the second ADS
is $1,300 (the current fee amount of $4,000 set forth in Sec.
1.17(w)(2) less the $2,700 previously paid under Sec. 1.17(w)(1)).
0
2. On page 91971, in table 20, in the third entry for ``1.17(m)(2)''
(fee code 3784), in the ``Final rule fee'' column, ``$54'' is corrected
to read ``$452''.
Sec. 1.17 [Corrected]
0
3. On page 92004, in the second column:
0
a. In amendatory instruction 3.f for Sec. 1.17, ``table 21 and 22'' is
corrected to read ``tables 21 and 22'';
0
b. In amendatory instruction 3.h. for Sec. 1.17, ``Redesigning tables
19 through 21'' is corrected to read ``Redesignating tables 19 through
21''.
0
4. On page 92004, in the third column, in Sec. 1.17, in paragraph (f),
in the first line in note 1 to table 10 to paragraph (f), add ``Sec.
'' before ``1.36(a)''.
0
5. On page 92005, at the top of the second column, in Sec. 1.17, in
paragraph (h), in note 3 to table 14 to paragraph (h), add ``Sec. ''
before ``1.84''.
Sec. 1.492 [Corrected]
0
6. On page 92010, in the second column, in amendatory instruction 15
for Sec. 1.492, the instruction ``Section 1.492 is amended by revising
table 1 in paragraph (a), tables 2 through 5 in paragraphs (b)(2)
through (4),'' is corrected to read ``Section 1.492 is amended by
revising table 1 in paragraph (a), tables 3 through 5 in paragraphs
(b)(2) through (4),''.
Sec. 42.15 [Corrected]
0
7. On page 92011, in the third column, in Sec. 42.15, paragraph (e) is
corrected to read as follows:
* * * * *
(e) Fee for counsel who are not registered practitioners, and who
are not seeking automatic recognition pursuant to Sec. 42.10(c)(2), to
appear pro hac vice before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board: $269.00.
* * * * *
0
8. On page 92011, in the third column, in Sec. 42.15, in paragraph
(f), ``$452'' is corrected to read ``$452.00''.
Derrick L. Brent,
Acting Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Acting
Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office.
[FR Doc. 2025-00273 Filed 1-13-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-16-P