[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 63 (Thursday, April 3, 2025)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 14579-14581]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-05712]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket Number USCG-2025-0176]
RIN 1625-AA87


Security Zone; Cooper River, Charleston, SC

AGENCY: Coast Guard, Department of Homeland Security (DHS).

ACTION: Temporary final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary security zone for 
navigable waters of the Cooper River, in the vicinity of the Arthur 
Ravenel Jr. Bridge, near Charleston and Mount Pleasant, South Carolina. 
This action is necessary to provide for the security and protection of 
life of participants and spectators during the Cooper River Bridge Run. 
Entry of vessels or persons into the security zone is prohibited unless 
authorized by the Captain of the Port Charleston or a designated 
representative.

DATES: This rule is effective from 7:30 a.m. until 10:30 a.m. on April 
5, 2025.

ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being 
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2025-0176 in the search box and click ``Search.'' Next, in the Document 
Type column, select ``Supporting & Related Material.''

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this rule, 
call or email Chief Marine Science Technician Tyler M. Campbell, Sector 
Charleston, Waterways Management Division, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 
(843) 740-3184, email [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Table of Abbreviations

CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec.  Section
U.S.C. United States Code

II. Background Information and Regulatory History

    The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary rule under authority in 5 
U.S.C. 553(b)(B). This statutory provision authorizes an agency to 
issue a rule without prior notice and opportunity to comment when the 
agency for good cause finds that those procedures are ``impracticable, 
unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest.'' The Coast Guard 
finds that good cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed 
rulemaking (NPRM) with respect to this rule because it is 
impracticable. The Coast Guard did not receive the information required 
to develop and finalize plans for an official patrol of the security 
zone in ample time to allow for public comment for the Cooper River 
Bridge Run even scheduled on April 5, 2025. It would be impracticable 
to delay promulgating this rule, as it is necessary to protect the 
safety and security of participants in this event and mitigate 
potential subversive acts.

[[Page 14580]]

    Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause 
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after 
publication in the Federal Register for the same reasons as discussed 
above.

III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule

    The Coast Guard may issue this rule under authority in 46 U.S.C. 
70051 and 70124. The Captain of the Port (COTP) Charleston has 
determined that the presence of persons under the protection of the 
Coast Guard in the Sector Charleston COTP zone presents a potential 
target for terrorist attack, sabotage, or other subversive acts, 
accidents, or other causes of similar nature. The rule is needed to 
protect persons under the protection of the Coast Guard, personnel in 
and around the Cooper River Bridge Run event.

IV. Discussion of the Rule

    This rule establishes a security zone from 7:30 a.m. until 10:30 
a.m. on April 5, 2025. The security zone would cover all navigable 
waters of the Cooper River, in the vicinity of the Arthur Ravenel Jr. 
Bridge.
    Entry into this security zone is prohibited unless specifically 
authorized by the COTP or their designated representative. A designated 
representative is a commissioned, warrant, or petty officer of the 
Coast Guard assigned to units under the operational control of the 
Coast Guard Sector Charleston. Requests for entry will be considered 
and reviewed on a case-by-case basis. The COTP may be contacted by 
telephone at 843-740-3184 or can be reached by VHF-FM channel 16. 
Persons and vessels permitted to enter these security zones must 
transit at their slowest safe speed and comply with all lawful 
directions issued by the COTP or their designated representative.

V. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and 
Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses 
based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the 
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if 
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize 
net benefits. This rule has not been designated a ``significant 
regulatory action,'' under section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, as 
amended by Executive Order 14094 (Modernizing Regulatory Review). 
Accordingly, this rule has not been reviewed by the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB).
    This regulatory action determination is based on: (1) The security 
zone would only be enforced for a total of three hours; (2) although 
persons and vessels may not enter, transit through, anchor in, or 
remain within the zone without authorization from the COTP or a 
designated representative, they would be able operate in the 
surrounding areas during the enforcement period; (3) persons and 
vessels may still enter, transit through, anchor in, or remain within 
the areas during the enforcement period if authorized by the COTP or a 
designated representative; and (4) the Coast Guard will provide advance 
notification of the zone to the local maritime community by Broadcast 
Notice to Mariners, or by on-scene designated representatives.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as 
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of 
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small 
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations 
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their 
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule 
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of 
small entities.
    While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the 
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section 
V.A above, this rule will not have a significant economic impact on any 
vessel owner or operator.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small 
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule will affect your small 
business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have 
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please 
call or email the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal 
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal 
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory 
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory 
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and 
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to 
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR 
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small 
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or 
action of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This rule will not call for a new collection of information under 
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, 
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the 
relationship between the National Government and the States, or on the 
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of 
government. We have analyzed this rule under that order and have 
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism 
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order 
13132.
    Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive 
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal 
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on 
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal 
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and 
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) 
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary 
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may 
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in 
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for 
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in 
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere 
in this preamble.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security 
Directive 023-01, Rev. 1, associated implementing instructions, and 
Environmental Planning COMDTINST 5090.1 (series), which guide the Coast 
Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 
(42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined that this action is one of 
a

[[Page 14581]]

category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a 
significant effect on the human environment. This rule involves a 
security zone lasting only 3 hours that will prohibit persons and 
vessels from entering, transiting through, anchoring in, or remaining 
within a limited area surrounding the Arthur Ravenel Jr. Bridge over 
the Cooper River. It is categorically excluded from further review 
under paragraph L60(a) of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction Manual 
023-01-001-01, Rev. 1. A Record of Environmental Consideration 
supporting this determination is available in the docket. For 
instructions on locating the docket, see the ADDRESSES section of this 
preamble.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 
33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051, 70124; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 
6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 
00170.1, Revision No. 01.3.


0
2. Add Sec.  165.T07-0228 to read as follows:


Sec.  165.T07-0228  Security Zone; Cooper River Bridge Run, Charleston, 
SC.

    (a) Location. The following area is a security zone: All waters of 
the Cooper River, and Town Creek Reaches encompassed within the 
following points: beginning at 32[deg]48'32'' N, 079[deg]56'08'' W, 
thence east to 32[deg]48'20'' N, 079[deg]54'18'' W, thence south to 
32[deg]47'20'' N, 079[deg]54'29'' W, thence west to 32[deg]47'20'' N, 
079[deg]55'28'' W, thence north to origin. All coordinates are 1984 
World Geodetic System (WGS 84).
    (b) Definitions. As used in this section, designated representative 
means a Coast Guard Patrol Commander, including a Coast Guard coxswain, 
petty officer, or other officer operating a Coast Guard vessel and a 
Federal, State, and local officer designated by or assisting the 
Captain of the Port (COTP) Charleston in the enforcement of the 
security zone.
    (c) Regulations. (1) Under the general safety zone regulations in 
subpart C of this part, you may not enter the safety zone described in 
paragraph (a) of this section unless authorized by the COTP Charleson 
or designated representative.
    (2) Designated representatives may control vessel traffic 
throughout the enforcement area as determined by the prevailing 
conditions.
    (3) To seek permission to enter, contact COTP Charleston or 
representative by telephone at (843) 740-7050 or via VHF radio on 
channel 16. Those in the security zone must comply with all lawful 
orders or directions given to them by the COTP Charleston or designated 
representative.
    (d) Enforcement period. This section will be enforced from 7:30 
a.m. until 10:30 a.m. on April 5, 2025.

F.J. DelRosso,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Sector Charleston.
[FR Doc. 2025-05712 Filed 4-2-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P