[Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States: George H. W. Bush (1991, Book I)]
[May 27, 1991]
[Pages 565-568]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office www.gpo.gov]



Remarks at the Yale University Commencement Ceremony in New Haven, 
Connecticut
May 27, 1991

    Thank you very, very much. President Schmidt and members of the 
faculty, and the Yale community, fellows of the Yale Corporation, and 
especially with congratulations to my fellow honorands, it is an honor 
to be here today. Mayor Daniels, it's nice to be back in the city. And 
most importantly, to the graduating students, congratulate each and 
every one of you. May I single out Yale's band. They've cleaned up for 
today, and they've never been better under Mr. Tom Duffy. Thank you, 
sir. And thank you for the warm welcome. Si res prehensio en cano est 
non oves sic vacio. That means, if you're holding up the sign, you can't 
throw eggs. [Laughter]
    I remember my own commencement. Like so many of my classmates, I'd 
come to Yale fresh from war, ready to make up for ``lost time.'' I 
remember our impatience and our optimism. And we sensed upcoming 
adventure. I imagine it's the same today for all of you. It's almost as 
if life is about to begin, that is, if the commencement speech ever 
ends. [Laughter]
    Twenty-nine years ago, President Kennedy stood right here, and my 
dad was honored with him. And he said, ``I have the best of all worlds: 
a Yale degree and a Harvard education.'' [Laughter] He had it wrong. 
I've got the best of all worlds: a Yale education and a Yale degree.
    My day was no different. There's an excitement in the air. And 
Barbara and I spent a good part of our senior year thinking about, 
literally, becoming farmers. We talked about life on the land and rising 
early and working hard and raising a crop and a family. And we looked 
into the finances of running a farm. In the end, we decided against the 
whole idea. We realized that when it came to pigs and chickens and 
cattle or corn, we didn't know the first thing about farming.
    So, of course, there was only one alternative: I went west and 
became an oilman. [Laughter] The very day after the ceremony like this 
one, I traded the familiar surroundings of this beautiful old campus for 
the dust and grit and searing heat of the Lone Star State.
    Odessa, Texas, became my world. And yet, far beyond 37 Hillhouse 
Avenue where Barbara and I lived or the Flatlands of West Texas, change 
rocked the whole world in ways that would affect us all for more than 40 
years. On June 20th, 1948--my graduation day--the United Nations sent 
out its first peacekeeping force, 49 men from the United States and 6 
other nations, to bring the promise of peace to the Middle East. And on 
that day, the Soviet Union tried to clamp down on the free sectors of 
Berlin. The Berlin blockade had begun. And on

[[Page 566]]

that day, Congress, after an all-night session, passed a bill to help 
the nations of war-torn Europe. That package would become known, as we 
all know, as the Marshall plan.
    Today's world--your world--is every bit as astonishing. Back in my 
day, opportunity knocked. And yours, your pager beeps.
    We have seen in 2 short years the end of a long era of cold war and 
conflict. The Iron Curtain collapsed--it's gone, the wall is down--and 
with it the myth of an ideology called communism. On the barren ground 
that once separated East and West, the democratic idea sprouted anew.
    As a nation, we can take great pride in this triumph. It vindicates 
more than 40 years of American vigilance--a lesson learned on the 
battlefields of Europe and the seas of the South Pacific--that this 
nation could no longer pursue a policy of ``splendid isolation.''
    The democratic renaissance in Central and Eastern Europe, the 
blossoming of democracy here in the Americas, the emerging consensus on 
the African Continent that democracy is the road to development, none of 
this would have taken place if America had turned inward, away from the 
challenges of a new world. So today, as we seek to promote freedom and 
democracy and human rights, as we seek to strengthen stability within 
the international community, an America confident enough to engage the 
world remains our best hope for peace, security, and shared prosperity.
    Look in every corner of the globe and you will find that the 
American example has consequences. When we reach out, we offer more than 
cars or grain or MTV. We exemplify an ideal, an ideal that conquers 
circumstance and suspicion, that conquers despots and empowers people. 
Some argue that a nation as moral and just as ours should not taint 
itself by dealing with nations less moral, less just. But this counsel 
offers up self-righteousness draped in a false morality. You do not 
reform a world by ignoring it.
    East Asia is a case in point. Today, this dynamic region plays an 
important role in the world economy. As it has grown more prosperous, it 
has also grown more free. Driven forward by the engine of economic 
growth and trade, especially with the U.S., South Korea and Taiwan have 
shed their once-authoritarian rule in favor of democracy and freer 
trade.
    This same approach guides our policy towards the People's Republic 
of China, home to fully one-fifth of the world's people. China easily 
can affect the stability of the Asian-Pacific region and, therefore, 
affect the entire world's peace and prosperity. The Chinese play a 
central role in working to resolve the conflict in Cambodia and relax 
tensions on the Korean Peninsula. China has a voice now in the 
multinational organizations. And its votes in the United Nations 
Security Council against Iraq's brutal aggression helped us forge the 
broad coalition that brought us victory in the Gulf. And so, when we 
find opportunities to cooperate with China, we will explore them. When 
problems arise with China's behavior, we will take appropriate action.
    After the tragedy of Tiananmen, the United States was the first 
nation to condemn the use of violence against the peacefully 
demonstrating people of Beijing. We were the first to guarantee the 
rights of Chinese students studying on campuses across the country, 
including here at Yale. The United States was the first nation to impose 
sanctions, and we are now the last, alone among the Western democracies, 
to keep those original sanctions in place. At every high-level meeting 
with the Chinese Government, U.S. officials reiterate our position on 
human rights violations.
    Unfair trade is also high on our agenda. Just last month, we cited 
China under the trade rules of a special 301 for pirating U.S. 
copyrights and patents. And for the sake of national security, we will 
ban technologies and equipment to any Chinese company found to violate 
rules outlawing transfer of missile technologies.
    We will continue to advance our interests and ideals: for free and 
fair trade, for broader democratization, for respect for human rights 
throughout China. Let me be clear: As a member of the United Nations, 
China is bound by the U.N. Declaration of Human Rights. We will hold 
China to the obligations that it has freely accepted.
    And finally, we continue urging China to

[[Page 567]]

exercise restraint in its weapons exports. Our recent experience with 
Iraq proves how dangerous the deadly trade can be. And very soon, I will 
announce significant new steps that we can take to control arms exports 
to the entire Middle East. Every nation must play a part in this effort. 
That's why we urge the Chinese Government to abide by the letter and 
spirit of international agreements on missile technology controls, and 
to do what 141 other nations have already done: sign the nuclear 
nonproliferation treaty.
    And this is one way that the United States can be a catalyst for 
positive change. This week, I will employ another by proposing formally 
that MFN trade status continue for China. This policy has generated 
considerable controversy. Some critics have said: Revoke MFN--or 
endanger it with sweeping conditions--to censure China. Cut our ties, 
and isolate it. We are told this is a principled policy, a moral thing 
to do. This advice is not new. It's not wise. It is not in the best 
interests of our country, the United States. And in the end, in spite of 
noble and best intentions, it is not moral.
    First, MFN is [not] special. It is not a favor. It is the ordinary 
basis of trade worldwide. Second, MFN is a means to bring the influence 
of the outside world to bear on China. Critics who attack MFN today act 
as if the point is to punish China, as if hurting China's economy will 
somehow help the cause of privatization and human rights.
    The real point is to pursue a policy that has the best chance of 
changing Chinese behavior. If we withdrew MFN or imposed conditions that 
would make trade impossible, we would punish South China, in particular, 
Guangdong Province, the very region where free market reform and the 
challenge to central authority are the strongest. Right now, there's an 
estimated two million Chinese who are working and proving that 
privatization can work--all in South China. Withdraw MFN, and their jobs 
would be in jeopardy. In addition, endangering MFN would deal a body 
blow to Hong Kong, the bastion of freedom and free trade in the Far 
East.
    But the most compelling reason to renew MFN and remain engaged in 
China is not economic, it's not strategic, but moral. It is right to 
export the ideals of freedom and democracy to China. It is right to 
encourage Chinese students to come to the United States and for talented 
American students to go to China. It is wrong to isolate China if we 
hope to influence China.
    For two decades after the Communists seized power in 1949, the 
Western world followed a policy of isolation toward China. This period 
proved to be among the most brutal episodes in Chinese history, a 
nightmare of anguish and death and suffering that will scar the soul of 
China for decades to come.

    So, it comes down to the strength of our belief in the power of the 
            democratic idea. If we pursue a policy that cultivates 
            contacts with the Chinese people, promotes commerce to our 
            benefit, we can help create a climate for democratic change.

    No nation on Earth has discovered a way to import the world's goods 
and services while stopping foreign ideas at the border. Just as the 
democratic idea has transformed nations on every continent, so, too, 
change will inevitably come to China.
    This nation's foreign policy has always been more than simply an 
expression of American interests; it's an extension of American ideals. 
This moral dimension of American policy requires us to remain active, 
engaged in the world. Many times, that means trying to chart a moral 
course through a world of lesser evils. That's the real world, not black 
and white. Very few moral absolutes. Enormous potential for error and 
embarrassment. But all are part of the risks that we willingly take to 
advance the American ideal.
    Many times in the past 40 years, people have encouraged us to adopt 
a policy of righteous isolationism, but we remained engaged. We cannot 
advance principles if we curl up into a defensive ball. We cannot 
transform a world if we hide from its unpleasant realities. We can 
advance our cherished ideals only by extending our hand, showing our 
best sides, sticking patiently to our values, even if we risk rejection.
    Look at the way American encouragement and the American example, the 
power of the American example, is paying

[[Page 568]]

off in Taiwan and Korea. We will have no leverage, we will not be able 
to advance our cause or resist repression, if we pull back and declare 
that China is simply too impure a place for us. We want to promote 
positive change in the world through the force of our example, not 
simply profess our purity. We want to advance the cause of freedom, not 
just snub nations that aren't yet wholly free.
    Let me close today with some modest pieces of advice. First, 
understand that you often will confront moral ambiguity. There will come 
times when you will have difficulty distinguishing between good guys and 
bad guys. When these situations arise, identify your principles and 
stick by them. Stick by them even when people jeer, when people urge you 
to find a quick and easy out. If you remain patient and true to 
yourself, you can't go wrong. Second, remember that the corner of the 
world that matters most is one right here at home, the one you share 
with friends and family. And finally, your destiny and the currents of 
history will most likely intersect more than once. You will have ample 
opportunity to make your mark. And take care to make it count.
    To all the graduates of the class of '91 who now join me as proud 
alumni of this great university, congratulations, good luck to you, and 
may God bless the United States of America.

                    Note: The President spoke at 11:55 a.m. in the Yale 
                        University Quadrangle. In his remarks he 
                        referred to Benno C. Schmidt, Jr., president of 
                        the university; John Daniels, mayor of New 
                        Haven; and Thomas C. Duffy, director of the Yale 
                        University bands.