1. The following forms are intended for illustration only. They are limited in number. No attempt is made to furnish a manual of forms. Each form assumes the action to be brought in the Southern District of New York. If the district in which an action is brought has divisions, the division should be indicated in the caption.
2. Except where otherwise indicated each pleading, motion, and other paper should have a caption similar to that of the summons, with the designation of the particular paper substituted for the word “Summons”. In the caption of the summons and in the caption of the complaint all parties must be named but in other pleadings and papers, it is sufficient to state the name of the first party on either side, with an appropriate indication of other parties. See Rules 4(b), 7(b)(2), and 10(a).
3. In Form 3 and the forms following, the words, “Allegation of jurisdiction,” are used to indicate the appropriate allegation in Form 2.
4. Each pleading, motion, and other paper is to be signed in his individual name by at least one attorney of record (Rule 11). The attorney's name is to be followed by his address as indicated in Form 3. In forms following Form 3 the signature and address are not indicated.
5. If a party is not represented by an attorney, the signature and address of the party are required in place of those of the attorney.
1 Subdivision heading supplied editorially.
A. B., Plaintiff
v.
G7
C. D., Defendant
To the above-named Defendant:
You are hereby summoned and required to serve upon ________, plaintiff's attorney, whose address is ____________, an answer to the complaint which is herewith served upon you, within 20 1 days after service of this summons upon you, exclusive of the day of service. If you fail to do so, judgment by default will be taken against you for the relief demanded in the complaint.
________________________,
Clerk of Court.
[Seal of the U.S. District Court]
Dated ________________________
(This summons is issued pursuant to Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure)
1 If the United States or an officer or agency thereof is a defendant, the time to be inserted as to it is 60 days.
(As amended Dec. 29, 1948, eff. Oct. 20, 1949.)
The change in nomenclature conforms to the official designation of a district court and of a court of appeals in Title 28, U.S.C., §§43(a), 132(a); and the more appropriate reference to “United States Court House, Foley Square, City of New York” in Form 19 replaces the outmoded reference.
TO: ______(A)______ [as ______(B)______ of ______(C)______]
A lawsuit has been commenced against you (or the entity on whose behalf you are addressed). A copy of the complaint is attached to this notice. It has been filed in the United States District Court for the ______(D)______ and has been assigned docket number ______(E)______.
This is not a formal summons or notification from the court, but rather my request that you sign and return the enclosed waiver of service in order to save the cost of serving you with a judicial summons and an additional copy of the complaint. The cost of service will be avoided if I receive a signed copy of the waiver within ____________(F)____________ days after the date designated below as the date on which this Notice and Request is sent. I enclose a stamped and addressed envelope (or other means of cost-free return) for your use. An extra copy of the waiver is also attached for your records.
If you comply with this request and return the signed waiver, it will be filed with the court and no summons will be served on you. The action will then proceed as if you had been served on the date the waiver is filed, except that you will not be obligated to answer the complaint before 60 days from the date designated below as the date on which this notice is sent (or before 90 days from that date if your address is not in any judicial district of the United States).
If you do not return the signed waiver within the time indicated, I will take appropriate steps to effect formal service in a manner authorized by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and will then, to the extent authorized by those Rules, ask the court to require you (or the party on whose behalf you are addressed) to pay the full costs of such service. In that connection, please read the statement concerning the duty of parties to waive the service of the summons, which is set forth on the reverse side (or at the foot) of the waiver form.
I affirm that this request is being sent to you on behalf of the plaintiff, this ____ day of ________, ____.
____________________________________________
Signature of Plaintiff's Attorney or
Unrepresented Plaintiff
A—Name of individual defendant (or name of officer or agent of corporate defendant)
B—Title, or other relationship of individual to corporate defendant
C—Name of corporate defendant, if any
D—District
E—Docket number of action
F—Addressee must be given at least 30 days (60 days if located in foreign country) in which to return waiver
(As added Apr. 22, 1993, eff. Dec. 1, 1993.)
Forms 1A and 1B reflect the revision of Rule 4. They replace Form 18–A.
TO: ______(name of plaintiff's attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)______
I acknowledge receipt of your request that I waive service of a summons in the action of ________(caption of action)________, which is case number ________(docket number)________ in the United States District Court for the ________(district)________. I have also received a copy of the complaint in the action, two copies of this instrument, and a means by which I can return the signed waiver to you without cost to me.
I agree to save the cost of service of a summons and an additional copy of the complaint in this lawsuit by not requiring that I (or the entity on whose behalf I am acting) be served with judicial process in the manner provided by Rule 4.
I (or the entity on whose behalf I am acting) will retain all defenses or objections to the lawsuit or to the jurisdiction or venue of the court except for objections based on a defect in the summons or in the service of the summons.
I understand that a judgment may be entered against me (or the party on whose behalf I am acting) if an answer or motion under Rule 12 is not served upon you within 60 days after ________(date request was sent)________, or within 90 days after that date if the request was sent outside the United States.
____________ XXXXXXXXXXXXX
Date Signature
Printed/typed name: ____________________________
[as ____________________________________]
[of ____________________________________]
Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain parties to cooperate in saving unnecessary costs of service of the summons and complaint. A defendant located in the United States who, after being notified of an action and asked by a plaintiff located in the United States to waive service of a summons, fails to do so will be required to bear the cost of such service unless good cause be shown for its failure to sign and return the waiver.
It is not good cause for a failure to waive service that a party believes that the complaint is unfounded, or that the action has been brought in an improper place or in a court that lacks jurisdiction over the subject matter of the action or over its person or property. A party who waives service of the summons retains all defenses and objections (except any relating to the summons or to the service of the summons), and may later object to the jurisdiction of the court or to the place where the action has been brought.
A defendant who waives service must within the time specified on the waiver form serve on the plaintiff's attorney (or unrepresented plaintiff) a response to the complaint and must also file a signed copy of the response with the court. If the answer or motion is not served within this time, a default judgment may be taken against that defendant. By waiving service, a defendant is allowed more time to answer than if the summons had been actually served when the request for waiver of service was received.
(As added Apr. 22, 1993, eff. Dec. 1, 1993.)
Forms 1A and 1B reflect the revision of Rule 4. They replace Form 18–A.
(a) Jurisdiction founded on diversity of citizenship and amount.
Plaintiff is a [citizen of the State of Connecticut] 1 [corporation incorporated under the laws of the State of Connecticut having its principal place of business in the State of Connecticut] and defendant is a corporation incorporated under the laws of the State of New York having its principal place of business in a State other than the State of Connecticut. The matter in controversy exceeds, exclusive of interest and costs, the sum specified by 28 U.S.C. §1332.
(b) Jurisdiction founded on the existence of a Federal question.
The action arises under [the Constitution of the United States, Article __, Section __]; [the __ Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, Section __]; [the Act of __, __ Stat. __; U.S.C., Title __, §__]; [the Treaty of the United States (here describe the treaty)] 2 as hereinafter more fully appears.
(c) Jurisdiction founded on the existence of a question arising under particular statutes.
The action arises under the Act of ______, ______ Stat. ______; U.S.C., Title ______, §______, as hereinafter more fully appears.
(d) Jurisdiction founded on the admiralty or maritime character of the claim.
This is a case of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, as hereinafter more fully appears. [If the pleader wishes to invoke the distinctively maritime procedures referred to in Rule 9(h), add the following or its substantial equivalent: This is an admiralty or maritime claim within the meaning of Rule 9(h).]
1 Form for natural person.
2 Use the appropriate phrase or phrases. The general allegation of the existence of a Federal question is ineffective unless the matters constituting the claim for relief as set forth in the complaint raise a Federal question.
1. Diversity of Citizenship. U.S.C., Title 28, §1332 (Diversity of citizenship; amount in controversy; costs), as amended by P.L. 85–554, 72 Stat. 415, July 25, 1958, states in subsection (c) that “For the purposes of this section and section 1441 of this title [removable actions], a corporation shall be deemed a citizen of any State by which it has been incorporated and of the State where it has its principal place of business.” Thus if the defendant corporation in Form 2(a) had its principal place of business in Connecticut, diversity of citizenship would not exist. An allegation regarding the principal place of business of each corporate party must be made in addition to an allegation regarding its place of incorporation.
2. Jurisdictional Amount. U.S.C., Title 28, §1331 (Federal question; amount in controversy; costs) and §1332 (Diversity of citizenship; amount in controversy; costs), as amended by P.L. 85–554, 72 Stat. 415, July 25, 1958, require that the amount in controversy, exclusive of interest and costs, be in excess of $10,000. The allegation as to the amount in controversy may be omitted in any case where by law no jurisdictional amount is required. See, for example, U.S.C., Title 28, §1338 (Patents, copyrights, trade-marks, and unfair competition), §1343 (Civil rights and elective franchise).
3. Pleading Venue. Since improper venue is a matter of defense, it is not necessary for plaintiff to include allegations showing the venue to be proper. See 1 Moore's Federal Practice, par. 0.140 [1.—4] (2d ed. 1959).
(As amended Apr. 17, 1961, eff. July 19, 1961; Feb. 28, 1966, eff. July 1, 1966; Apr. 22, 1993, eff. Dec. 1, 1993; Apr. 26, 1999, eff. Dec. 1, 1999.)
Since the Civil Rules have not heretofore been applicable to proceedings in Admiralty (Rule 81(a)(1)), Form 2 naturally has not contained a provision for invoking the admiralty jurisdiction. The form has never purported to be comprehensive, as making provision for all possible grounds of jurisdiction; but a provision for invoking the admiralty jurisdiction is particularly appropriate as an incident of unification.
Certain distinctive features of the admiralty practice must be preserved in unification, just as certain distinctive characteristics of equity were preserved in the merger of law and equity in 1938. Rule 9(h) provides the device whereby, after unification, with its abolition of the distinction between civil actions and suits in admiralty, the pleader may indicate his choice of the distinctively maritime procedures, and designates those features that are preserved. This form illustrates an appropriate way in which the pleader may invoke those procedures. Use of this device is not necessary if the claim is cognizable only by virtue of the admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, nor if the claim is within the exclusive admiralty jurisdiction of the district court.
Omission of a statement such as this from the pleading indicates the pleader's choice that the action proceed as a conventional civil action, if this is jurisdictionally possible, without the distinctive maritime remedies and procedures. It should be remembered, however, that Rule 9(h) provides that a pleading may be amended to add or withdraw such an identifying statement subject to the principles stated in Rule 15.
This form is revised to reflect amendments to 28 U.S.C. §§1331 and 1332 providing jurisdiction for federal questions without regard to the amount in controversy and raising the amount required to be in controversy in diversity cases to fifty thousand dollars.
1. Allegation of jurisdiction.
2. Defendant on or about June 1, 1935, executed and delivered to plaintiff a promissory note [in the following words and figures: (here set out the note verbatim)]; [a copy of which is hereto annexed as Exhibit A]; [whereby defendant promised to pay to plaintiff or order on June 1, 1936 the sum of ______ dollars with interest thereon at the rate of six percent. per annum].
3. Defendant owes to plaintiff the amount of said note and interest.
Wherefore plaintiff demands judgment against defendant for the sum of ______ dollars, interest, and costs.
Signed: ____________________________,
Attorney for Plaintiff.
Address: __________________________
1. The pleader may use the material in one of the three sets of brackets. His choice will depend upon whether he desires to plead the document verbatim, or by exhibit, or according to its legal effect.
2. Under the rules free joinder of claims is permitted. See rules 8(e) and 18. Consequently the claims set forth in each and all of the following forms may be joined with this complaint or with each other. Ordinarily each claim should be stated in a separate division of the complaint, and the divisions should be designated as counts successively numbered. In particular the rules permit alternative and inconsistent pleading. See Form 10.
(As amended Jan. 21, 1963, eff. July 1, 1963.)
At various places, these Forms [Forms 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 18, 21] allege or refer to damages of “ten thousand dollars, interest, and costs,” or the like. The Forms were written at a time when the jurisdictional amount in ordinary “diversity” and “Federal question” cases was an amount in excess of $3,000, exclusive of interest and costs, so the illustrative amounts set out in the Forms were adequate for jurisdictional purposes. However, U.S.C. Title 28, §1331 (Federal question; amount in controversy; costs) and §1332 (Diversity of citizenship; amount in controversy; costs), as amended by Pub. Law 85–554, 72 Stat. 415, July 25, 1958, now require that the amount in controversy, exclusive of interest and costs, be in excess of $10,000. Accordingly the Forms are misleading. They are amended at appropriate places by deleting the stated dollar amount and substituting a blank, to be properly filled in by the pleader.
1. Allegation of jurisdiction.
2. Defendant owes plaintiff ______ dollars according to the account hereto annexed as Exhibit A.
Wherefore (etc. as in Form 3).
(As amended Jan. 21, 1963, eff. July 1, 1963.)
This form was amended in 1963 by deleting the stated dollar amount and substituting a blank, to be properly filled in by the pleader. See Note of Advisory Committee under Form 3.
1. Allegation of jurisdiction.
2. Defendant owes plaintiff ______ dollars for goods sold and delivered by plaintiff to defendant between June 1, 1936 and December 1, 1936.
Wherefore (etc. as in Form 3).
This form may be used where the action is for an agreed price or for the reasonable value of the goods.
(As amended Jan. 21, 1963, eff. July 1, 1963.)
This form was amended in 1963 by deleting the stated dollar amount and substituting a blank, to be properly filled in by the pleader. See Note of Advisory Committee under Form 3.
1. Allegation of jurisdiction.
2. Defendant owes plaintiff ______ dollars for money lent by plaintiff to defendant on June 1, 1936.
Wherefore (etc. as in Form 3).
(As amended Jan. 21, 1963, eff. July 1, 1963.)
This form was amended in 1963 by deleting the stated dollar amount and substituting a blank, to be properly filled in by the pleader. See Note of Advisory Committee under Form 3.
1. Allegation of jurisdiction.
2. Defendant owes plaintiff ______ dollars for money paid by plaintiff to defendant by mistake on June 1, 1936, under the following circumstances: [here state the circumstances with particularity—see Rule 9(b)].
Wherefore (etc. as in Form 3).
(As amended Jan. 21, 1963, eff. July 1, 1963.)
This form was amended in 1963 by deleting the stated dollar amount and substituting a blank, to be properly filled in by the pleader. See Note of Advisory Committee under Form 3.
1. Allegation of jurisdiction.
2. Defendant owes plaintiff ______ dollars for money had and received from one G. H. on June 1, 1936, to be paid by defendant to plaintiff.
Wherefore (etc. as in Form 3).
(As amended Jan. 21, 1963, eff. July 1, 1963.)
This form was amended in 1963 by deleting the stated dollar amount and substituting a blank, to be properly filled in by the pleader. See Note of Advisory Committee under Form 3.
1. Allegation of jurisdiction.
2. On June 1, 1936, in a public highway called Boylston Street in Boston, Massachusetts, defendant negligently drove a motor vehicle against plaintiff who was then crossing said highway.
3. As a result plaintiff was thrown down and had his leg broken and was otherwise injured, was prevented from transacting his business, suffered great pain of body and mind, and incurred expenses for medical attention and hospitalization in the sum of one thousand dollars.
Wherefore plaintiff demands judgment against defendant in the sum of ______ dollars and costs.
Since contributory negligence is an affirmative defense, the complaint need contain no allegation of due care of plaintiff.
(As amended Jan. 21, 1963, eff. July 1, 1963.)
This form was amended in 1963 by deleting the stated dollar amount and substituting a blank, to be properly filled in by the pleader. See Note of Advisory Committee under Form 3.
A. B., Plaintiff
v.
C. D. and E. F.,
G7
Defendants
1. Allegation of jurisdiction.
2. On June 1, 1936, in a public highway called Boylston Street in Boston, Massachusetts, defendant C. D. or defendant E. F., or both defendants C. D. and E. F. wilfully or recklessly or negligently drove or caused to be driven a motor vehicle against plaintiff who was then crossing said highway.
3. As a result plaintiff was thrown down and had his leg broken and was otherwise injured, was prevented from transacting his business, suffered great pain of body and mind, and incurred expenses for medical attention and hospitalization in the sum of one thousand dollars.
Wherefore plaintiff demands judgment against C. D. or against E. F. or against both in the sum of ______ dollars and costs.
(As amended Jan. 21, 1963, eff. July 1, 1963.)
This form was amended in 1963 by deleting the stated dollar amount and substituting a blank, to be properly filled in by the pleader. See Note of Advisory Committee under Form 3.
1. Allegation of jurisdiction.
2. On or about December 1, 1936, defendant converted to his own use ten bonds of the ________ Company (here insert brief identification as by number and issue) of the value of ______ dollars, the property of plaintiff.
Wherefore plaintiff demands judgment against defendant in the sum of ______ dollars, interest, and costs.
(As amended Jan. 21, 1963, eff. July 1, 1963.)
This form was amended in 1963 by deleting the stated dollar amount and substituting a blank, to be properly filled in by the pleader. See Note of Advisory Committee under Form 3.
1. Allegation of jurisdiction.
2. On or about December 1, 1936, plaintiff and defendant entered into an agreement in writing a copy of which is hereto annexed as Exhibit A.
3. In accord with the provisions of said agreement plaintiff tendered to defendant the purchase price and requested a conveyance of the land, but defendant refused to accept the tender and refused to make the conveyance.
4. Plaintiff now offers to pay the purchase price.
Wherefore plaintiff demands (1) that defendant be required specifically to perform said agreement, (2) damages in the sum of one thousand dollars, and (3) that if specific performance is not granted plaintiff have judgment against defendant in the sum of ______ dollars.
Here, as in Form 3, plaintiff may set forth the contract verbatim in the complaint or plead it, as indicated, by exhibit, or plead it according to its legal effect. Furthermore, plaintiff may seek legal or equitable relief or both even though this was impossible under the system in operation before these rules.
(As amended Jan. 21, 1963, eff. July 1, 1963.)
This form was amended in 1963 by deleting the stated dollar amount and substituting a blank, to be properly filled in by the pleader. See Note of Advisory Committee under Form 3.
A. B., Plaintiff
v.
C. D. and E. F.,
G7
Defendants
1. Allegation of jurisdiction.
2. Defendant C. D. on or about ________ executed and delivered to plaintiff a promissory note [in the following words and figures: (here set out the note verbatim)]; [a copy of which is hereto annexed as Exhibit A]; [whereby defendant C. D. promised to pay to plaintiff or order on ______ the sum of five thousand dollars with interest thereon at the rate of ______ percent. per annum].
3. Defendant C. D. owes to plaintiff the amount of said note and interest.
4. Defendant C. D. on or about ______ conveyed all his property, real and personal [or specify and describe] to defendant E. F. for the purpose of defrauding plaintiff and hindering and delaying the collection of the indebtedness evidenced by the note above referred to.
Wherefore plaintiff demands:
(1) That plaintiff have judgment against defendant C. D. for ______ dollars and interest; (2) that the aforesaid conveyance to defendant E. F. be declared void and the judgment herein be declared a lien on said property; (3) that plaintiff have judgment against the defendants for costs.
(As amended Jan. 21, 1963, eff. July 1, 1963.)
This form was amended in 1963 by deleting the stated dollar amount and substituting a blank, to be properly filled in by the pleader. See Note of Advisory Committee under Form 3.
1. Allegation of jurisdiction.
2. During all the times herein mentioned defendant owned and operated in interstate commerce a railroad which passed through a tunnel located at ______ and known as Tunnel No. ______.
3. On or about June 1, 1936, defendant was repairing and enlarging the tunnel in order to protect interstate trains and passengers and freight from injury and in order to make the tunnel more conveniently usable for interstate commerce.
4. In the course of thus repairing and enlarging the tunnel on said day defendant employed plaintiff as one of its workmen, and negligently put plaintiff to work in a portion of the tunnel which defendant had left unprotected and unsupported.
5. By reason of defendant's negligence in thus putting plaintiff to work in that portion of the tunnel, plaintiff was, while so working pursuant to defendant's orders, struck and crushed by a rock, which fell from the unsupported portion of the tunnel, and was (here describe plaintiff's injuries).
6. Prior to these injuries, plaintiff was a strong, able-bodied man, capable of earning and actually earning ______ dollars per day. By these injuries he has been made incapable of any gainful activity, has suffered great physical and mental pain, and has incurred expense in the amount of ______ dollars for medicine, medical attendance, and hospitalization.
Wherefore plaintiff demands judgment against defendant in the sum of ______ dollars and costs.
1. Allegation of jurisdiction. [If the pleader wishes to invoke the distinctively maritime procedures referred to in Rule 9(h), add the following or its substantial equivalent: This is an admiralty or maritime claim within the meaning of Rule 9(h).]
2. During all the times herein mentioned defendant was the owner of the steamship ______ and used it in the transportation of freight for hire by water in interstate and foreign commerce.
3. During the first part of (month and year) at ______ plaintiff entered the employ of defendant as an able seaman on said steamship under seamen's articles of customary form for a voyage from ______ ports to the Orient and return at a wage of ______ dollars per month and found, which is equal to a wage of ______ dollars per month as a shore worker.
4. On June 1, 1936, said steamship was about ______ days out of the port of ______ and was being navigated by the master and crew on the return voyage to ______ ports. (Here describe weather conditions and the condition of the ship and state as in an ordinary complaint for personal injuries the negligent conduct of defendant.)
5. By reason of defendant's negligence in thus (brief statement of defendant's negligent conduct) and the unseaworthiness of said steamship, plaintiff was (here describe plaintiff's injuries).
6. Prior to these injuries, plaintiff was a strong, able-bodied man, capable of earning and actually earning ______ dollars per day. By these injuries he has been made incapable of any gainful activity; has suffered great physical and mental pain, and has incurred expense in the amount of ______ dollars for medicine, medical attendance, and hospitalization.
Wherefore plaintiff demands judgment against defendant in the sum of ______ dollars and costs.
(As amended Feb. 28, 1966, eff. July 1, 1966.)
See Advisory Committee's Note to Form 2.
1. Allegation of jurisdiction.
2. On May 16, 1934, United States Letters Patent No. ____ were duly and legally issued to plaintiff for an invention in an electric motor; and since that date plaintiff has been and still is the owner of those Letters Patent.
3. Defendant has for a long time past been and still is infringing those Letters Patent by making, selling, and using electric motors embodying the patented invention, and will continue to do so unless enjoined by this court.
4. Plaintiff has placed the required statutory notice on all electric motors manufactured and sold by him under said Letters Patent, and has given written notice to defendant of his said infringement.
Wherefore plaintiff demands a preliminary and final injunction against continued infringement, an accounting for damages, and an assessment of interest and costs against defendant.
(As amended Jan. 21, 1963, eff. July 1, 1963.)
The prayer for relief is amended to reflect the language of the present patent statute, Title 35, U.S.C., §284 (Damages).
1. Allegation of jurisdiction.
2. Prior to March, 1936, plaintiff, who then was and ever since has been a citizen of the United States, created and wrote an original book, entitled ____________________.
3. This book contains a large amount of material wholly original with plaintiff and is copyrightable subject matter under the laws of the United States.
4. Between March 2, 1936, and March 10, 1936, plaintiff complied in all respects with the Act of (give citation) and all other laws governing copyright, and secured the exclusive rights and privileges in and to the copyright of said book, and received from the Register of Copyrights a certificate of registration, dated and identified as follows: “March 10, 1936, Class ________, No. ______.”
5. Since March 10, 1936, said book has been published by plaintiff and all copies of it made by plaintiff or under his authority or license have been printed, bound, and published in strict conformity with the provisions of the Act of ________ and all other laws governing copyright.
6. Since March 10, 1936, plaintiff has been and still is the sole proprietor of all rights, title, and interest in and to the copyright in said book.
7. After March 10, 1936, defendant infringed said copyright by publishing and placing upon the market a book entitled ________, which was copied largely from plaintiff's copyrighted book, entitled ____________________.
8. A copy of plaintiff's copyrighted book is hereto attached as “Exhibit 1”; and a copy of defendant's infringing book is hereto attached as “Exhibit 2.”
9. Plaintiff has notified defendant that defendant has infringed the copyright of plaintiff, and defendant has continued to infringe the copyright.
10. After March 10, 1936, and continuously since about ________, defendant has been publishing, selling and otherwise marketing the book entitled ____________________, and has thereby been engaging in unfair trade practices and unfair competition against plaintiff to plaintiff's irreparable damage.
Wherefore plaintiff demands:
(1) That defendant, his agents, and servants be enjoined during the pendency of this action and permanently from infringing said copyright of said plaintiff in any manner, and from publishing, selling, marketing or otherwise disposing of any copies of the book entitled ____________________.
(2) That defendant be required to pay to plaintiff such damages as plaintiff has sustained in consequence of defendant's infringement of said copyright and said unfair trade practices and unfair competition and to account for
(a) all gains, profits and advantages derived by defendant by said trade practices and unfair competition and
(b) all gains, profits, and advantages derived by defendant by his infringement of plaintiff's copyright or such damages as to the court shall appear proper within the provisions of the copyright statutes, but not less than two hundred and fifty dollars.
(3) That defendant be required to deliver up to be impounded during the pendency of this action all copies of said book entitled ____________________ in his possession or under his control and to deliver up for destruction all infringing copies and all plates, molds, and other matter for making such infringing copies.
(4) That defendant pay to plaintiff the costs of this action and reasonable attorney's fees to be allowed to the plaintiff by the court.
(5) That plaintiff have such other and further relief as is just.
(As amended Dec. 27, 1946, eff. Mar. 19, 1948.)
This form, as set out, incorporates amendments made at the same time certain rules of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure were amended. See Rule 86(b) of such rules.
1. Allegation of jurisdiction.
2. On or about June 1, 1935, plaintiff issued to G. H. a policy of life insurance whereby plaintiff promised to pay to K. L. as beneficiary the sum of ______ dollars upon the death of G. H. The policy required the payment by G. H. of a stipulated premium on June 1, 1936, and annually thereafter as a condition precedent to its continuance in force.
3. No part of the premium due June 1, 1936, was ever paid and the policy ceased to have any force or effect on July 1, 1936.
4. Thereafter, on September 1, 1936, G. H. and K. L. died as the result of a collision between a locomotive and the automobile in which G. H. and K. L. were riding.
5. Defendant C. D. is the duly appointed and acting executor of the will of G. H.; defendant E. F. is the duly appointed and acting executor of the will of K. L.; defendant X. Y. claims to have been duly designated as beneficiary of said policy in place of K. L.
6. Each of defendants, C. D., E. F., and X. Y. is claiming that the above-mentioned policy was in full force and effect at the time of the death of G. H.; each of them is claiming to be the only person entitled to receive payment of the amount of the policy and has made demand for payment thereof.
7. By reason of these conflicting claims of the defendants, plaintiff is in great doubt as to which defendant is entitled to be paid the amount of the policy, if it was in force at the death of G. H.
Wherefore plaintiff demands that the court adjudge:
(1) That none of the defendants is entitled to recover from plaintiff the amount of said policy or any part thereof.
(2) That each of the defendants be restrained from instituting any action against plaintiff for the recovery of the amount of said policy or any part thereof.
(3) That, if the court shall determine that said policy was in force at the death of G. H., the defendants be required to interplead and settle between themselves their rights to the money due under said policy, and that plaintiff be discharged from all liability in the premises except to the person whom the court shall adjudge entitled to the amount of said policy.
(4) That plaintiff recover its costs.
(As amended Jan. 21, 1963, eff. July 1, 1963.)
This form was amended in 1963 by deleting the stated dollar amount and substituting a blank, to be properly filled in by the pleader. See Note of Advisory Committee under Form 3.
This form is superseded by Forms 1A and 1B in view of the revision of Rule 4.
The defendant moves the court as follows:
1. To dismiss the action because the complaint fails to state a claim against defendant upon which relief can be granted.
2. To dismiss the action or in lieu thereof to quash the return of service of summons on the grounds (a) that the defendant is a corporation organized under the laws of Delaware and was not and is not subject to service of process within the Southern District of New York, and (b) that the defendant has not been properly served with process in this action, all of which more clearly appears in the affidavits of M. N. and X. Y. hereto annexed as Exhibit A and Exhibit B respectively.
3. To dismiss the action on the ground that it is in the wrong district because (a) the jurisdiction of this court is invoked solely on the ground that the action arises under the Constitution and laws of the United States and (b) the defendant is a corporation incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware and is not licensed to do or doing business in the Southern District of New York, all of which more clearly appears in the affidavits of K. L. and V. W. hereto annexed as Exhibits C and D, respectively.
4. To dismiss the action on the ground that the court lacks jurisdiction because the amount actually in controversy is less than ten thousand dollars exclusive of interest and costs.
Signed: ____________________________
Attorney for Defendant.
Address: __________________________
Notice of Motion
To: ____________________________
Attorney for Plaintiff.
________________________________
Please take notice, that the undersigned will bring the above motion on for hearing before this Court at Room ____, United States Court House, Foley Square, City of New York, on the ______ day of________, 20__, at 10 o'clock in the forenoon of that day or as soon thereafter as counsel can be heard.
Signed: ____________________________
Attorney for Defendant.
Address: __________________________
1. The above motion and notice of motion may be combined and denominated Notice of Motion. See Rule 7(b).
2. As to paragraph 3, see U.S.C., Title 28, §1391 (Venue generally), subsections (b) and (c).
3. As to paragraph 4, see U.S.C., Title 28, §1331 (Federal question; amount in controversy; costs), as amended by P.L. 85–554, 72 Stat. 415, July 25, 1958, requiring that the amount in controversy, exclusive of interest and costs, be in excess of $10,000.
(As amended Dec. 29, 1948, eff. Oct. 20, 1949; Apr. 17, 1961, eff. July 19, 1961; Mar. 27, 2003, eff. Dec. 1, 2003.)
The change in nomenclature conforms to the official designation of a district court and of a court of appeals in Title 28, U.S.C., §§43(a), 132(a); and the more appropriate reference to “United States Court House, Foley Square, City of New York” in Form 19 replaces the outmoded reference.
The complaint fails to state a claim against defendant upon which relief can be granted.
If defendant is indebted to plaintiffs for the goods mentioned in the complaint, he is indebted to them jointly with G. H. G. H. is alive; is a citizen of the State of New York and a resident of this district, is subject to the jurisdiction of this court, as to both service of process and venue; can be made a party without depriving this court of jurisdiction of the present parties, and has not been made a party.
Defendant admits the allegation contained in paragraphs 1 and 4 of the complaint; alleges that he is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations contained in paragraph 2 of the complaint; and denies each and every other allegation contained in the complaint.
The right of action set forth in the complaint did not accrue within six years next before the commencement of this action.
(Here set forth any claim as a counterclaim in the manner in which a claim is pleaded in a complaint. No statement of the grounds on which the court's jurisdiction depends need be made unless the counterclaim requires independent grounds of jurisdiction.)
(Here set forth the claim constituting a cross-claim against defendant M. N. in the manner in which a claim is pleaded in a complaint. The statement of grounds upon which the court's jurisdiction depends need not be made unless the cross-claim requires independent grounds of jurisdiction.)
The above form contains examples of certain defenses provided for in Rule 12(b). The first defense challenges the legal sufficiency of the complaint. It is a substitute for a general demurrer or a motion to dismiss.
The second defense embodies the old plea in abatement; the decision thereon, however, may well provide under Rules 19 and 21 for the citing in of the party rather than an abatement of the action.
The third defense is an answer on the merits.
The fourth defense is one of the affirmative defenses provided for in Rule 8(c).
The answer also includes a counterclaim and a cross-claim.
The explanatory note incorporates revisions made by the Advisory Committee at the same time amendments to certain rules of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure were made. See also rule 12(b), as amended.
Defendant admits the allegations stated in paragraph 1 of the complaint; and denies the allegations stated in paragraph 2 to the extent set forth in the counterclaim herein.
1. Defendant received the sum of ______ dollars as a deposit from E. F.
2. Plaintiff has demanded the payment of such deposit to him by virtue of an assignment of it which he claims to have received from E. F.
3. E. F. has notified the defendant that he claims such deposit, that the purported assignment is not valid, and that he holds the defendant responsible for the deposit.
Wherefore defendant demands:
(1) That the court order E. F. to be made a party defendant to respond to the complaint and to this counterclaim.1
(2) That the court order the plaintiff and E. F. to interplead their respective claims.
(3) That the court adjudge whether the plaintiff or E. F. is entitled to the sum of money.
(4) That the court discharge defendant from all liability in the premises except to the person it shall adjudge entitled to the sum of money.
(5) That the court award to the defendant its costs and attorney's fees.
1 Rule 13(h) provides for the court ordering parties to a counterclaim, but who are not parties to the original action, to be brought in as defendants.
(As amended Jan. 21, 1963, eff. July 1, 1963.)
This form was amended in 1963 by deleting the stated dollar amount and substituting a blank, to be properly filled in by the pleader. See Note of Advisory Committee under Form 3.
Form 22 for motion to bring in third-party defendant, setting out as an exhibit summons and third-party complaint, and for notice of motion, was eliminated Jan. 21, 1963, eff. July 1, 1963, and superseded by Forms 22–A and 22–B, setting out summons and complaint against third-party defendant, and motion to bring in third-party defendant. See Advisory Committee notes under Forms 22–A and 22–B.
To the above-named Third-Party Defendant:
You are hereby summoned and required to serve upon ________, plaintiff's attorney whose address is ________, and upon ________, who is attorney for C. D., defendant and third-party plaintiff, and whose address is ________, an answer to the third-party complaint which is herewith served upon you within 20 days after the service of this summons upon you exclusive of the day of service. If you fail to do so, judgment by default will be taken against you for the relief demanded in the third-party complaint. There is also served upon you herewith a copy of the complaint of the plaintiff which you may but are not required to answer.
________________________,
Clerk of Court.
[Seal of District Court]
Dated ________________________
1. Plaintiff A. B. has filed against defendant C. D. a complaint, a copy of which is hereto attached as “Exhibit A.”
2. (Here state the grounds upon which C. D. is entitled to recover from E. F., all or part of what A. B. may recover from C. D. The statement should be framed as in an original complaint.)
Wherefore C. D. demands judgment against third-party defendant E. F. for all sums 1 that may be adjudged against defendant C. D. in favor of plaintiff A. B.
Signed: __________________________________,
Attorney for C. D., Third-Party Plaintiff.
Address: __________________________________
1 Make appropriate change where C. D. is entitled to only partial recovery-over against E. F.
(As added Jan. 21, 1963, eff. July 1, 1963.)
Under the amendment of Rule 14(a), a defendant who files a third-party complaint not later than 10 days after serving his original answer need not obtain leave of court to bring in the third-party defendant by service under Rule 4. Form 22–A is intended for use in these cases.
The changes in the form of summons reflect an earlier amendment of Rule 14(a), effective in 1948, making it permissive, rather than mandatory, for the third-party defendant to answer the plaintiff's complaint. See Cooper v. D/S A/S Progress, 188 F.Supp. 578 (E.D.Pa. 1960); 1A Barron & Holtzoff, Federal Practice and Procedure 696 (Wright ed. 1960).
Under the amendment of Rule 5(a) requiring, with certain exceptions, that papers be served upon all the parties to the action, the third-party defendant, even if he makes no answer to the plaintiff's complaint, is obliged to serve upon the plaintiff a copy of his answer to the third-party complaint. Similarly, the defendant is obliged to serve upon the plaintiff a copy of the summons and complaint against the third-party defendant.
Defendant moves for leave, as third-party plaintiff, to cause to be served upon E. F. a summons and third-party complaint, copies of which are hereto attached as Exhibit X.
Signed: ________________________________,
Attorney for Defendant C. D.
Address: ______________________________
(Contents the same as in Form 19. The notice should be addressed to all parties to the action.)
(Contents the same as in Form 22–A.)
(As added Jan. 21, 1963, eff. July 1, 1963.)
Form 22–B is intended for use when, under amended Rule 14(a), leave of court is required to bring in a third-party defendant.
United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
A. B., plaintiff
v.
Motion to inter-
C. D., defendant
} vene as a
E. F., applicant for
defendant
intervention
E. F. moves for leave to intervene as a defendant in this action, in order to assert the defenses set forth in his proposed answer, of which a copy is hereto attached, on the ground that he is the manufacturer and vendor to the defendant, as well as to others, of the articles alleged in the complaint to be an infringement of plaintiff's patent, and as such has a defense to plaintiff's claim presenting both questions of law and of fact which are common to the main action.1
Signed: ____________________________,
Attorney for E. F., Applicant for Intervention.
Address: __________________________
1 For other grounds of intervention, either of right or in the discretion of the court, see Rule 24(a) and (b).
United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
A. B., plaintiff
v.
C. D., defendant
}Intervener's Answer
E. F., intervener
Intervener admits the allegations stated in paragraphs 1 and 4 of the complaint; denies the allegations in paragraph 3, and denies the allegations in paragraph 2 in so far as they assert the legality of the issuance of the Letters Patent to plaintiff.
Plaintiff is not the first inventor of the articles covered by the Letters Patent specified in his complaint, since articles substantially identical in character were previously patented in Letters Patent granted to intervener on January 5, 1920.
Signed: ________________________________,
Attorney for E. F., Intervener.
Address: ______________________________
(As amended Dec. 29, 1948, eff. Oct. 20, 1949.)
The change in nomenclature conforms to the official designation of a district court and of a court of appeals in Title 28, U.S.C., §§43(a), 132(a); and the more appropriate reference to “United States Court House, Foley Square, City of New York” in Form 19 replaces the outmoded reference.
Plaintiff A. B. requests defendant C. D. to respond within ______ days to the following requests:
(1) That defendant produce and permit plaintiff to inspect and to copy each of the following documents:
(Here list the documents either individually or by category and describe each of them.)
(Here state the time, place, and manner of making the inspection and performance of any related acts.)
(2) That defendant produce and permit plaintiff to inspect and to copy, test, or sample each of the following objects:
(Here list the objects either individually or by category and describe each of them.)
(Here state the time, place, and manner of making the inspection and performance of any related acts.)
(3) That defendant permit plaintiff to enter (here describe property to be entered) and to inspect and to photograph, test or sample (here describe the portion of the real property and the objects to be inspected).
(Here state the time, place, and manner of making the inspection and performance of any related acts.)
Signed: ____________________________,
Attorney for Plaintiff.
Address: __________________________
(As amended Mar. 30, 1970, eff. July 1, 1970.)
Form 24 is revised to accord with the changes made in Rule 34.
Plaintiff A. B. requests defendant C. D. within ________ days after service of this request to make the following admissions for the purpose of this action only and subject to all pertinent objections to admissibility which may be interposed at the trial:
1. That each of the following documents, exhibited with this request, is genuine.
(Here list the documents and describe each document.)
2. That each of the following statements is true.
(Here list the statements.)
Signed: ____________________________,
Attorney for Plaintiff.
Address: __________________________
(As amended Dec. 27, 1946, eff. Mar. 19, 1948.)
When it is necessary, under Rule 19(c), for the pleader to set forth in his pleading the names of persons who ought to be made parties, but who are not so made, there should be an allegation such as the one set out below:
John Doe named in this complaint is not made a party to this action [because he is not subject to the jurisdiction of this court]; [because he cannot be made a party to this action without depriving this court of jurisdiction].
The form of notice of appeal is transferred to the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure as Form 1.
United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
To (here insert the names of the defendants to whom the notice is directed):
You are hereby notified that a complaint in condemnation has heretofore been filed in the office of the clerk of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, in the United States Court House in New York City, New York, for the taking (here state the interest to be acquired, as “an estate in fee simple”) for use (here state briefly the use, “as a site for a post-office building”) of the following described property in which you have or claim an interest.
(Here insert brief description of the property in which the defendants, to whom the notice is directed, have or claim an interest.)
The authority for the taking is (here state briefly, as “the Act of ______, ______ Stat. ______, U.S.C., Title ______, §______”.) 1
You are further notified that if you desire to present any objection or defense to the taking of your property you are required to serve your answer on the plaintiff's attorney at the address herein designated within twenty days after ________________.2
Your answer shall identify the property in which you claim to have an interest, state the nature and extent of the interest you claim, and state all of your objections and defenses to the taking of your property. All defenses and objections not so presented are waived. And in case of your failure so to answer the complaint, judgment of condemnation of that part of the above-described property in which you have or claim an interest will be rendered.
But without answering, you may serve on the plaintiff's attorney a notice of appearance designating the property in which you claim to be interested. Thereafter you will receive notice of all proceedings affecting it. At the trial of the issue of just compensation, whether or not you have previously appeared or answered, you may present evidence as to the amount of the compensation to be paid for your property, and you may share in the distribution of the award.
__________________________________
United States Attorney.
Address __________________________
(Here state an address within the district where the United States Attorney may be served as “United States Court House, New York, N.Y.”.)
Dated ________
1 And where appropriate add a citation to any applicable Executive Order.
2 Here insert the words “personal service of this notice upon you,” if personal service is to be made pursuant to subdivision (d)(3)(i) of this rule [Rule 71A]; or, insert the date of the last publication of notice, if service by publication is to be made pursuant to subdivision (d)(3)(ii) of this rule.
(As added May 1, 1951, eff. Aug. 1, 1951.)
United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
1. This is an action of a civil nature brought by the United States of America for the taking of property under the power of eminent domain and for the ascertainment and award of just compensation to the owners and parties in interest.1
2. The authority for the taking is (here state briefly, as “the Act of ______, ______ Stat. ______, U.S.C., Title ______, §______”) 2.
3. The use for which the property is to be taken is (here state briefly the use, “as a site for a post-office building”).
4. The interest to be acquired in the property is (here state the interest as “an estate in fee simple”).
5. The property so to be taken is (here set forth a description of the property sufficient for its identification) or (described in Exhibit A hereto attached and made a part hereof).
6. The persons known to the plaintiff to have or claim an interest in the property 3 are:
(Here set forth the names of such persons and the interests claimed.) 4
7. In addition to the persons named, there are or may be others who have or may claim some interest in the property to be taken, whose names are unknown to the plaintiff and on diligent inquiry have not been ascertained. They are made parties to the action under the designation “Unknown Owners.”
Wherefore the plaintiff demands judgment that the property be condemned and that just compensation for the taking be ascertained and awarded and for such other relief as may be lawful and proper.
__________________________________
United States Attorney.
Address __________________________
(Here state an address within the district where the United States Attorney may be served, as “United States Court House, New York, N. Y.”.)
1 If the plaintiff is not the United States, but is, for example, a corporation invoking the power of eminent domain delegated to it by the state, then this paragraph 1 of the complaint should be appropriately modified and should be preceded by a paragraph appropriately alleging federal jurisdiction for the action, such as diversity. See Form 2.
2 And where appropriate add a citation to any applicable Executive Order.
3 At the commencement of the action the plaintiff need name as defendants only the persons having or claiming an interest in the property whose names are then known, but prior to any hearing involving the compensation to be paid for a particular piece of property the plaintiff must add as defendants all persons having or claiming an interest in that property whose names can be ascertained by an appropriate search of the records and also those whose names have otherwise been learned. See Rule 71A(c)(2).
4 The plaintiff should designate, as to each separate piece of property, the defendants who have been joined as owners thereof or of some interest therein. See Rule 71A(c)(2).
(As added May 1, 1951, eff. Aug. 1, 1951.)
A. B. [describe as a party, or as executor, administrator, or other representative or successor of C. D., the deceased party] suggests upon the record, pursuant to Rule 25(a)(1), the death of C. D. [describe as party] during the pendency of this action.
(Added Jan. 21, 1963, eff. July 1, 1963.)
A. B., Plaintiff
v.
}Judgment
C. D., Defendant
This action came on for trial before the Court and a jury, Honorable John Marshall, District Judge, presiding, and the issues having been duly tried and the jury having duly rendered its verdict,
It is Ordered and Adjudged
[that the plaintiff A. B. recover of the defendant C. D. the sum of ____, with interest thereon at the rate of __ percent as provided by law, and his costs of action.]
[that the plaintiff take nothing, that the action be dismissed on the merits, and that the defendant C. D. recover of the plaintiff A. B. his costs of action.]
Dated at New York, New York, this ____ day of ______, 20__.
________________________,
Clerk of Court.
1. This Form is illustrative of the judgment to be entered upon the general verdict of a jury. It deals with the cases where there is a general jury verdict awarding the plaintiff money damages or finding for the defendant, but is adaptable to other situations of jury verdicts.
2. The clerk, unless the court otherwise orders, is required forthwith to prepare, sign, and enter the judgment upon a general jury verdict without awaiting any direction by the court. The form of the judgment upon a special verdict or a general verdict accompanied by answers to interrogatories shall be promptly approved by the court, and the clerk shall thereupon enter it. See Rule 58, as amended.
3. The Rules contemplate a simple judgment promptly entered. See Rule 54(a). Every judgment shall be set forth on a separate document. See Rule 58, as amended.
4. Attorneys are not to submit forms of judgment unless directed in exceptional cases to do so by the court. See Rule 58, as amended.
(As added Jan. 21, 1963, eff. July 1, 1963; amended Mar. 27, 2003, eff. Dec. 1, 2003.)
United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
A. B., Plaintiff
v.
}Judgment
C. D., Defendant
This action came on for [trial] [hearing] before the Court, Honorable John Marshall, District Judge, presiding, and the issues having been duly [tried] [heard] and a decision having been duly rendered,
It is Ordered and Adjudged
[that the plaintiff A. B. recover of the defendant C. D. the sum of____, with interest thereon at the rate of____ percent as provided by law, and his costs of action.]
[that the plaintiff take nothing, that the action be dismissed on the merits, and that the defendant C. D. recover of the plaintiff A. B. his costs of action.]
Dated at New York, New York, this ____ day of ______, 20__.
________________________,
Clerk of Court.
1. This Form is illustrative of the judgment to be entered upon a decision of the court. It deals with the cases of decisions by the court awarding a party only money damages or costs, but is adaptable to other decisions by the court.
2. The clerk, unless the court otherwise orders, is required forthwith, without awaiting any direction by the court, to prepare, sign, and enter the judgment upon a decision by the court that a party shall recover only a sum certain or costs or that all relief shall be denied. The form of the judgment upon a decision by the court granting other relief shall be promptly approved by the court, and the clerk shall thereupon enter it. See Rule 58, as amended.
3. See also paragraphs 3–4 of the Explanatory Note to Form 31.
(As added Jan. 21, 1963, eff. July 1, 1963; amended Mar. 27, 2003, eff. Dec. 1, 2003.)
In accordance with the provisions of Title 28, U.S.C. §636(c), you are hereby notified that a United States magistrate judge of this district court is available to exercise the court's jurisdiction and to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or nonjury trial, and entry of a final judgment. Exercise of this jurisdiction by a magistrate judge is, however, permitted only if all parties voluntarily consent.
You may, without adverse substantive consequences, withhold your consent, but this will prevent the court's jurisdiction from being exercised by a magistrate judge. If any party withholds consent, the identity of the parties consenting or withholding consent will not be communicated to any magistrate judge or to the district judge to whom the case has been assigned.
An appeal from a judgment entered by a magistrate judge may be taken directly to the United States court of appeals for this judicial circuit in the same manner as an appeal from any other judgment of a district court.
Copies of the Form for the “Consent to Jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge” are available from the clerk of the court.
(As added Apr. 28, 1983, eff. Aug. 1, 1983; amended Apr. 22, 1993, eff. Dec. 1, 1993; Apr. 11, 1997, eff. Dec. 1, 1997.)
This form, together with Form 34, is revised in light of the Judicial Improvements Act of 1990. Section 308 modified 28 U.S.C. §636(c)(2) to enhance the potential of parties consenting to trial before a magistrate judge. While the exercise of jurisdiction by a magistrate judge remains dependent on the voluntary consent of the parties, the statute provides that the parties should be advised, and may be reminded, of the availability of this option and eliminates the proscription against judicial suggestions of the potential benefits of referral provided the parties are also advised that they “are free to withhold consent without adverse substantive consequences.” The parties may be advised if the withholding of consent will result in a potential delay in trial.
Plaintiff,
vs.
G7
Defendant.
In accordance with the provisions of Title 28, U.S.C. §636(c), the undersigned party or parties to the above-captioned civil matter hereby voluntarily consent to have a United States magistrate judge conduct any and all further proceedings in the case, including trial, and order the entry of a final judgment.
____________ XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Date Signature
Note: Return this form to the Clerk of the Court if you consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge. Do not send a copy of this form to any district judge or magistrate judge.
(As added Apr. 28, 1983, eff. Aug. 1, 1983; amended Apr. 22, 1993, eff. Dec. 1, 1993; Apr. 11, 1997, eff. Dec. 1, 1997.)
Plaintiff,
vs.
G7
Defendant.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-captioned matter be referred to United States Magistrate Judge ________________ for all further proceedings and entry of judgment in accordance with Title 28, U.S.C. §636(c) and the consent of the parties.
__________________________________
U.S. District Judge
(As added Apr. 22, 1993, eff. Dec. 1, 1993.)
1. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f), a meeting was held on ______(date)______ at ______(place)______ and was attended by:
__________(name)__________ for plaintiff(s)
__________(name)__________ for defendant(s) __________(party name)__________
__________(name)__________ for defendant(s) __________(party name)__________
2. Pre-Discovery Disclosures. The parties [have exchanged] [will exchange by ______(date)______] the information required by [Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)] [local rule ____].
3. Discovery Plan. The parties jointly propose to the court the following discovery plan: [Use separate paragraphs or subparagraphs as necessary if parties disagree.]
Discovery will be needed on the following subjects: ______(brief description of subjects on which discovery will be needed)______
Disclosure or discovery of electronically stored information should be handled as follows: ______(brief description of parties’ proposals)______
The parties have agreed to an order regarding claims of privilege or of protection as trial-preparation material asserted after production, as follows: ______(brief description of provisions of proposed order)______.
All discovery commenced in time to be completed by ______(date)______. [Discovery on ______(issue for early discovery)______ to be completed by ______(date)______.]
Maximum of ____ interrogatories by each party to any other party. [Responses due ____ days after service.]
Maximum of ____ requests for admission by each party to any other party. [Responses due ____ days after service.]
Maximum of ______ depositions by plaintiff(s) and ____ by defendant(s).
Each deposition [other than of ____________] limited to maximum of ____ hours unless extended by agreement of parties.
Reports from retained experts under Rule 26(a)(2) due:
from plaintiff(s) by ____(date)____
from defendant(s) by ____(date)____
Supplementations under Rule 26(e) due ______(time(s) or interval(s))______.
4. Other Items. [Use separate paragraphs or subparagraphs as necessary if parties disagree.]
The parties [request] [do not request] a conference with the court before entry of the scheduling order.
The parties request a pretrial conference in ______(month and year)______.
Plaintiff(s) should be allowed until ______(date)______ to join additional parties and until ______(date)______ to amend the pleadings.
Defendant(s) should be allowed until ______(date)______ to join additional parties and until ______(date)______ to amend the pleadings.
All potentially dispositive motions should be filed by ______(date)______.
Settlement [is likely] [is unlikely] [cannot be evaluated prior to ______(date)______] [may be enhanced by use of the following alternative dispute resolution procedure: [________________________].
Final lists of witnesses and exhibits under Rule 26(a)(3) should be due
from plaintiff(s) by ____(date)____
from defendant(s) by ____(date)____
Parties should have ____ days after service of final lists of witnesses and exhibits to list objections under Rule 26(a)(3).
The case should be ready for trial by ______(date)______ [and at this time is expected to take approximately ______(length of time)______].
[Other matters.]
Date: ________________
(As added Apr. 22, 1993, eff. Dec. 1, 1993; amended Apr. 12, 2006, eff. Dec. 1, 2006.)
This form illustrates the type of report the parties are expected to submit to the court under revised Rule 26(f) and may be useful as a checklist of items to be discussed at the meeting.
Changes Made After Publication and Comment. The Committee recommends approval of Form 35 with modifications made from the published version, consistent with changes made to Rule 26(f). The changes are shown below. [Omitted]